OOPSADAISY! THE GUARDIAN AND BBC PROTECT THE SYRIAN REBELS

The UN released its preliminary investigation into the Houla massacre today. The Guardian and BBC have covered it. And both protect the rebels.

How do they do this?

On its website as of 1306 BST, the article by The Guardian describing this report has the headline, "Assad loyalists blamed over Houla". From this headline you would think the case was closed and whodunnit was the Shabiha, as was initially alleged. But when you open the article you are suddenly confronted with this;

• Attack on pro-Assad TV channel leaves seven people dead
• Assad forces may be to blame for many Houla deaths - UN
• Violence worse than before ceasefire, says Annan's deputy

[source : Syria in a state of war, says Assad - live updates, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2012/jun/27/syria-at-war-assad-live, 27/06/2012]

Oh, so the conclusion is not that conclusive then? It is only a "may be to blame" now is it?

The BBC take a very similar approach.

Mr Pinheiro said the perpetrators were from one of three groups: "shabiha" or other local militia from neighbouring villages, perhaps acting with the army; anti-government armoured groups; or foreign groups.

"While the commission could not rule out the possibility of anti-government fighters being responsible for the killing, this was considered very much unlikely," he said.

[source : Gunmen 'kill seven' at Syrian pro-Assad Ikhbariya TV, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18606341, 27/06/2012]

This is a long way from what the headline on the front page said, and from what Hasty Hague said too.

But upon reading the report itself there are plenty of references to the rebels (and that includes this 'mysterious' third party who we all know is al Qaeda shipped in from and armed to the teeth by NATO, Saudi Arabia, Libya etc.)

For example take this from the Conclusions:

107. The CoI considers it has reasonable grounds to believe that anti-Government armed groups have extra-judicially executed captured members of the Government forces, Shabbiha, foreign fighters, supporters of the Government, suspected informers and/or collaborators. The Commission also found that anti-Government armed groups have tortured captured members of the Syrian security forces and/or their alleged supporters and abducted civilians and members of Government forces, usually to facilitate prisoner exchanges. The CoI is especially concerned by reports that anti-Government armed groups have been using children as medical porters, messengers and cooks, exposing them to risk of death and injury.

OK. So the UN report is here admitting that the rebels (including al Qaeda) are executing and torturing "supporters of the Government", i.e. civilians, as well as using children.

So what is Assad suppposed to do?

Well according to the same report,

57. International human rights law places the onus for protecting citizens squarely on the Government.

In other words the report says that it is Assad's responsibility to protect civilians!!

So we have the report saying that the rebels are executing and torturing civilians as well as using children, and at the same time stating that it is Assad's responsibility to protect them!

YET LILLARY AND HASTY HAGUE AND ALL THE REST OF THAT LOT WANT ASSAD TO STOP AND LET AL QAEDA (WHO THEY INSERTED INTO SYRIA) TO TAKE OVER!!

I'll leave you with this conclusion:

110. The cessation of hostilities is of paramount importance. Through hundreds of interviews, it is apparent that it is the civilian population, from various communities, who are suffering in this conflict, many losing their lives in the spiral of violence.

What the hell is Assad supposed to do when NATO is shipping in al Qaeda to execute and torture civilians and use children? Where are the rebels getting their weapons from (clue: CIA via Turkey and Mossad via Lebanon). This the report authors do not address.

Everyone, even the clueless Mark Lyall Grant, now admits the presence of this mysterious third party that seems to be causing all the major trouble. They are scared of uttering their name.

But they are not called Voldemort.

THEY ARE AL QAEDA.

THE WHOLE SCHEME IN SYRIA WAS PLANNED YEARS AGO BETWEEN THE USA, ISRAEL AND SAUDI ARABIA.

AND SYRIA IS JUST ONE OF SEVEN NATIONS TARGETED FOR WAR.

Iraq, Lebanon and Libya were on that list.

Iran is next on the list.

And the whole series of wars was enabled by the inside job 9/11.