So what did Huntsman do to be awarded the position of The Atlantic Council?
Did he know about the aborted Jasmine Revolution in China while he was US Ambassador to China but not tell the Chinese government? Huntsman was filmed right outside the Mcdonalds in Beijing where mass protests against the Chinese government were to take place. Huntsman said he was just 'passing by'.
Yeah, right!
Huntsman is the dude wearing shades wearing the leather jacket with the stars and stripes.
I've gone through the creators of The Atlantic Council: an assortment of Freemasons, wife-beaters, and created NATO.
I've gone through the list of Directors of The Atlantic Council before: they are the military-industrial-banking complex that has been driving the wars in North Africa and the Middle East since 9/11. They are all there at the end of their report Hiding in Plain Sight: NATO Aggression released today in association with Faustus Eliot Higgins, who has been seduced by the bright lights of Washington DC.
Honorary Directors of The Atlantic Council are:
David C. Acheson
Madeleine K. Albright
James A. Baker, III
Harold Brown
Frank C. Carlucci, III
Robert M. Gates
Michael G. Mullen
Leon E. Panetta
William J. Perry
Colin L. Powell
Condoleezza Rice
Edward L. Rowny
George P. Shultz
John W. Warner
William H. Webster
A list of more megalomaniac spies you could not compile.
What does this title mean? According to Wikipedia:
An honorary title or title of honor is a title bestowed upon individuals or organizations as an award in recognition of their merits.
What merits has any of these?
It's a sick joke!!
Some of the sources for that report are good. But others can be seriously questioned, such as using a report in NYT which cites Poroshenko stating that 4000 Russian soldiers were at the time in Ukraine. But how many times has he made such claims which were subsequently ridiculed and found to be false?
The report also accuses Russia of shooting down MH17, but by accident.
Moscow responded to the Ukrainian counteroffensive by sending in ever more sophisticated artillery, tanks, and anti-aircraft missiles, including the Buk surface-to-air missile system that was used from Russian- controlled territory in Ukraine to shoot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) by mistake on July 17, 2014. Numerous independent investigations corroborate Russia’s role in this tragedy.8
Really?
Has the MH17 JIT concluded this yet? Er, nope.
So what is this reference 8?
Would you Adam and Steve it! It's Belling Cat's own investigation, not the MH17 JIT, which still has not published its final conclusions 10 months after the tragedy.
And here is where the report calls for revolution against Putin:
Putin’s hold on power in Russia is dependent on continued high levels of popular support. The way to end Putin’s aggression toward Ukraine and further intervention in Europe’s East is not through economic sanctions alone; Putin can blame economic pain on the West and avoid the real issue. The West needs to reveal the lies that Putin is telling his own people. Putin’s popular support is the base of his house of cards: once that card falls, the whole house will crumble.
Is the US government, indeed any NATO government telling its people that in 2012 the US DIA proposed the facilitation of the rise of a Salafist entity in Syria to isolate President Assad, that entity we know as Islamic State? ANd the reason for this is that Syria was named in a list of seven countries that were targeted for war and regime change by the USA, even though Syria had sweet FA to do with 9/11? And that after several years of resisting Saudi-funded international cutthroat Jihadis, Assad was still in power and showed no sign of leaving any time soon?
There is nothing special about this report. It glosses over the true cause of the war in Ukraine with a single short sentence. The true cause of this war in Ukraine is that:
1. Yanukovich had decided to not sign a deal with the EU and IMF in favour of a deal with Russia;
2. neo-Nazis who favoured the EU then provoked riots by shooting protestors and police from The Conservatory;
3. during the provoked riots the neo-Nazis then stormed government buildings and Yanukovich fled for his life;
4. the neo-Nazis were painted whiter than white by NATO media and their gimps, even as they burned people alive in Odessa;
5. recognising the Nazism of the junta, East Ukraine rebelled, which has led to a war in which over 7000 civilians of East Ukraine have been killed by the Kiev Nazis.
The crucial act that destabilised Ukraine was the shootings from The Conservatory by the neo-Nazis that provoked the riots that the neo-Nazis then used to overthrow the legitimately elected government. To their shame, the NATO media whitewashed, and has continued to whitewash, this Nazism and the neo-Nazi destabilisation. For if this Nazism was exposed the people of NATO-land would understand why the people of East Ukraine declared independence.
During WW2 the Nazis invaded Russia seeking 'lebensraum'. Russia drove the Nazis back all the way to Berlin but paid a huge price: about 27 million Russians died. Now, what are the Russian-allied civilians of East Ukraine going to do if a cabal of murdering Nazis overthrow their legitimately elected government?
But didn't we fight against the Nazis too?
Didn't our fathers and grandfathers fight in Europe to destroy Nazism?
And yet here is NATO in alliance with neo-Nazis as they burn people alive and murder 7000 civilians?
No comments:
Post a Comment