The FT article actually covers A Clean Break and PNAC, but does not go into too much depth into the links between the two, that PNAC wanted a lot more than just war on Iraq and that 9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had proposed in their warmongering document Rebuilding America's Defenses, which occured when senior and founding members of PNAC were in control of the USA and its military on 9/11.
But according to the FT article, there is no conspiracy in Syria!!!
All that violence, hatred, war and headchopping in Syria? To the FT it is just "happenstance", i.e. it just happened!!
THIS IS TOTAL BOLLOCKS!!
For a timeline of the war in Syria see here.
The war in Syria is just one of seven that was planned decades ago and revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. But because by 2007 there had been only 2 wars, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran (this is The Redirection), and the US State Dept engineered The Arab Spring to provide these Jihadis with cover as 'freedom fighters'. And because those Jihadis failed to oust Assad, a US DIA plan proposed in 2012 for a Salafist entity to be facilitated in Syria to isolate Assad has been implemented, that entity is Islamic State.
It really is that simple.
Read this shameful attempt at a cover up by the FT:
How the #MiddleEast became a breeding ground for conspiracy theories (free to read)
https://t.co/5p48zORYxc pic.twitter.com/Tao04oTmrC
— Financial Times (@FT) January 16, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment