Monday, October 27, 2014

THE ARTICLE OF THE DAY PROVOKES A HUGE QUESTION

One of the better investigative reporters, F William Engdahl, has put more flesh on the bones of what I believe is happening over Syria.

The details are emerging of a new secret and quite stupid Saudi-US deal on Syria and the so-called IS. It involves oil and gas control of the entire region and the weakening of Russia and Iran by Saudi Arabian flooding the world market with cheap oil. Details were concluded in the September meeting by US Secretary of State John Kerry and the Saudi King. The unintended consequence will be to push Russia even faster to turn east to China and Eurasia.

[source : The Secret Stupid Saudi-US Deal on Syria, Boiling Frogs, http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2014/10/24/the-secret-stupid-saudi-us-deal-on-syria/, 24th October 2014]

The article sets out the argument that the war in Syria is to kick out Assad to allow Qatar and Saudi Arabia to transport gas from Pars to Turkey and onto the EU to cut off Russian supplies to the EU, which would please NATO very, very much, which is the reason why NATO has been supporting Saudi Arabia's international cutthroat Jihadis.

Engdahl also proposes that this war on Russia has another front with Saudi Arabia decreasing global oil prices. Petrol pioces have been falling in the UK, but could and should they be falling further and faster?

No doubt Saudi Arabia either told Liz or was told by Liz that this was going to happen. So are petrol prices artificially high?

So, the huge question is: Should Liz be referred to the Competition and Markets Authority?



No comments: