THE FARCE OVER MH17 NEEDS CLEARNG UP

Following the recent debacle of the BND not actually blaming separatists but reported as saying so, and the known penetration of German media by the CIA, the farce around MH17 needs clearing up.

NATO seems very reluctant to provide any convincing evidence that Russia and/or pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17, instead relying very heavily on 'social media'. Let's repeat that but in a different way. NATO, with all its super duper rinky dinky spy machinery, cannot provide any convincing evidence that Russia and/or pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17, instead relying on an amateur weapons 'expert' based in Leicester. Germany is a member of NATO. Its intelligence chief is alleged to have claimed that pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17 with a BUK that the pro-Russia separatists acquired from a Ukraine military base. But that claim is now being denied.

So what are the BND actually claiming? And with what evidence?

Have they heard of Brown Moses? Assessed his work and conclusions? Given him credit?

And still Brown Moses in Leicester is convinced that pro-Russia separatists shot down MH17 with a BUK that Russia gave them and then took back after MH17 was shot down.

Brown Moses claims to have the timeline that this BUK took mapped, i.e. locations, times and dates all on video/photograph, with all identifying numbers matching, and in one particular video the covers have been partly-removed to expose that at least one of the four missiles is missing, thus implying that that was the BUK used to shoot down MH17.

However, there is one serious problem with this particular video: it was provided by the neo Nazis who kicked out the legitimate government of Ukraine in a violent NATO-sponsored coup. So we have to ask, as that video is the only one that I have seen that suggests that it was the BUK that may have shot down MH17:
1. do all identifying numbers match with all the other images used in the timeline?
2. has the location, time and date been verified?
3. is that the only video/image showing the cover partly-removed? If so, then why is that?

What we are dealing with in Ukraine is the creeping up onto the borders of Russia by NATO. From Checkpoint Charlie to Kiev. Billions of dollars was spent by the USA alone on anti-Russia organisations in Ukraine over 20 or so years. Earlier this year bona fide violent neo Nazis kicked out the legitimate government of Ukraine and declared themselves the new government. They proudly and unashamedly paraded their Nazi symbols, emblems and regalia in front of the world's media, but only the Russian media pointed it out. Their leader runs a foundation financed by NATO and has intimate links to Wall Street. Previous coups in Ukraine were financed by George Soros and Boris Berezovsky.

Ukraine is a prize possession for NATO, bordering Russia and a key transit for Russian energy to Europe. Billions of dollars have been spent over 20 years.

I have stated that I believe that the rebels had a BUK. A former commander Khodakovsky claims they had one, and there are photos and video of a BUK in rebel held territory.

But as stated above, they all seem to show four missiles, and all covered, while the one video that conveniently shows the missiles uncovered and at least one missile missing was provided by the neo Nazis in Kiev.

So those three questions above need answering:
1. do all identifying numbers match with all the other images used in the timeline?
2. has the location, time and date been verified?
3. is that the only video/image showing the cover partly-removed and missiles missing? If so, then why is that?