Friday, June 12, 2015

THE ONE MASSIVE QUESTION ABOUT THE LATEST BELLING CAT REPORT ON MH17

Belling Cat have today released a report based on satellite imagery allegedly taken on 17th July 2104. The claim of the report is that at a press conference on 21st July 2014, the Russian Ministry of Defence used images from June 2014 claiming they were taken in July 2014.

The one massive question I have about this is: why are NATO leaving all this to Belling Cat?

If what the Digital Globe images show is true then why haven't NATO held a press conference months ago to show this?

Why are they leaving all this to a former bank clerk from Leicester, Ingerland?

The USA says it has data from 'sensors' which they say shows a missile being launched from south of Shnizhne. But do we get to see that data? NO! Instead we are given an image compiled from photos taken from several different satellites at different times with an arc and a straight line intercepting somewhere west of Donetsk and ordered, "Trust us." This from the same people who are launching a series of illegal wars in North Africa and the Middle East, which has led to the rise of Jihadism and Islamic State. Convinced? No. Me neither.

Remember the Cuban Missile Crisis? An analyst spotted potential missiles in photographs taken of Cuba. This was in 1962. The President was immediately notified. Some time later Adlai Stevenson gave his "I'm prepared to wait until hell freezes over" presentation at the United Nations, which included imagery. Has such a presentation been given by Samantha Power? No!

We really do have to wonder why NATO are leaving all this to Belling Cat?

Why is NATO, with all its satellites and high performance computing power and offices full of intelligent eagle-eyed analysts, leaving the proof that Russia shot down MH17, the proof that could oust Putin if it was true, all to Belling Cat?

Analysing satellite images is the bread and butter of intelligence agencies across the world.

Something smells very fishy about all this.

If NATO has the evidence then show it instead of releasing schoolkid images, and seducing a former bank clerk with wining and dining, who then tries to bamboozle the world with satellite images the CIA has had its hands on for months, who is then promoted in media that keeps silent on that aforementioned illegal series of wars that has led to the rise of Islamic State.

No comments: