A POSSIBLE WARNING FROM MI5

Following yesterday's post MI5'S WET DREAM, in which I (again) demolish the hoax that the spying agency chiefs are pulling over Snowden/al Qeada/British Jihadis in Syria, it would not be surprising, given the tone and the title of that post, to have provoked a reaction from MI5. Indeed, perhaps subconciously that was what I was doing.

I made an error in that post. I called the head of MI5 Sir Andrew Parker, but he has not yet received that title. He will one day, and as head of MI5 he already owes his allegiance to the Crown and not to the muggins Great British public. This error was perhaps pointed out to me by someone visiting NICE MAN GETS KNIGHTHOOD.

But it's what came after that is extremely curious.

You may recall that on the first Monday after I suggested starting up The Citizens Pecora Commission this blog was visited by 2 major Wall Street banks, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America, who were very interested in a post in which I had written a version of the Spiderman tune which referred to banks being bailed out due to their ties.

So the day after I post MI5'S WET DREAM, there is this sequence of visits, which I think has something sinister about it.

1. RAOUL MOAT : IT'S ALL STARTING TO COME OUT

2. A NOT SO PRIVATE PROSECUTION OF DAVID ROCKEFELLER

3. YET ANOTHER GUN RELATED INCIDENT IN THE UK

4. The Truth Serum Front Page

In the first and third posts I discuss how two highly reported shootings in 2010 occured in close proximity, in time and space, to each other. The most suspicious of these was the incident involving Raoul Moat, who was portrayed in the media as a total psychotic sociopathic maniac who went on an unpredictable rampage and who was not tasered, when in fact he had been requesting psychiatric help (which was denied), he was released despite warnings that he would turn violent, and he was tasered...with an experimental taser (and the clue to the events is 'experimental').

But I write:

I do not condone or support Moat's attacks on his ex, her boyfriend and the cop he attacked, but when someone in prison, particularly an informant, starts asking for help, which is then denied, and he is then released with warnings that he was going to go on a bloody rampage, warnings which are ignored, and then he shoots some people declaring war on the cops, and he is then hunted down with vehicles being shipped over from Northern Ireland and a RAF Tornado deployed, only for the man to die live on TV, shooting himself after being tasered and the cops then immediately say tasers weren't used and the media blindly report it so, then you've gotta ask yourself; WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!

Like with any shocking media event such as this, it looks like it was engineered by some psycho psychiatrist on the payroll of the CIA or MI5 with the aim of telling the people; look, we are in total control of you, this is what we can do in broad daylight in front of the world media and the people will support us.

That Raoul Moat incident led to tasers becoming more acceptable to the general public.

And I have been been thinking of the private prosecution of David Rockefeller recently (this blog proposes that Snowden's revelations are boring because we know or suspect what he says, and that we should instead focus on exposing the insidious technology of electronic remote mind reading and writing).

Maybe this is all just coincidence, that the day after writing a provocative post about MI5 this blog gets this sequence of visits, which talks about guns and shootings being allowed to occur to show how MI5 are in control (of the media at least), and in the sequence is also a post discussing something I had recently thought about.

It may be nothing, just a coincidence.

Or maybe not.