Hawking goes straight for the R2P argument, which indicates, like with Jan Egeland, an ignorance and/or naivete of the facts on the violence in Syria.
He does not mention once either Saudi Arabia or Israel, but at the same time only hints at blaming Assad for all the violence.
Today in Syria we see modern technology in the form of bombs, chemicals and other weapons being used to further so-called intelligent political ends.
But it does not feel intelligent to watch as more than 100,000 people are killed or while children are targeted. It feels downright stupid, and worse, to prevent humanitarian supplies from reaching clinics where, as Save the Children will document in a forthcoming report, children are having limbs amputated for lack of basic facilities and newborn babies are dying in incubators for lack of power.
What’s happening in Syria is an abomination, one that the world is watching coldly from a distance. Where is our emotional intelligence, our sense of collective justice?
[source : Stephen Hawking, Syria’s war must end, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/stephen-hawking-syrias-war-must-end/2014/02/14/a71dea72-94f0-11e3-83b9-1f024193bb84_story.html, 14th February 2014]
Hawking has addressed some of the most challenging scientific problems using mathematics to solve equations. But there is one equation that appears to have stumped him, because as yet Hawking has not found a solution to The Bandar Equation, which was derived by Prince Bandar bin Sultan of that diabolical medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to model the violence in Syria.
The Bandar Equation can be written
The coward Bandar bin Sultan + cutthroat Jihadis + Israel + DFQ = an illegal war on Syria resulting in the slit throats of defenceless Syrian children.
Remove Bandar from this equation and we remove the cutthroat Jihadis, and thus the source of the violence.
Before Bandar's Jihadis were smuggled into Syria by Great Britain there was no violence in Syria; no priests being decapitated, no nuns and children being kidnapped, no massacres of families.
But the solution to The Bandar Equation is not unique. Removing Bandar is one solution. Another solution would be to assist the Syrian Arab Army in annihilating the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum as soon as possible, which will unfortunately add to the violence in Syria, but any deaths would be the very welcome deaths of cutthroat terrorists. As one source commented to Seymour Hersh in The Redirection, in reference to the cutthroat Jihadis:
Nasr went on, “The Saudis have considerable financial means, and have deep relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis”—Sunni extremists who view Shiites as apostates. “The last time Iran was a threat, the Saudis were able to mobilize the worst kinds of Islamic radicals. Once you get them out of the box, you can’t put them back.”
[source : The Redirection, The New Yorker Magazine, http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/03/05/070305fa_fact_hersh?currentPage=all, 5th March 2007]
No comments:
Post a Comment