HERE IS WHY MPS MUST VOTE DOWN THE WAR MOTION TODAY

In addition to the blatant fact that they will be aiding and abetting mass murder in acquiescing to use British military forces in a plan for war on seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark after the inside job 9/11, as he states in the video below:



and the 10 very good reasons suggested by Stop The War:

10 reasons why tomorrow in parliament MPs should vote against Britain bombing Iraq: http://t.co/QFzTLoPWa8 pic.twitter.com/URx3w9nWwK

— Stop the War (@STWuk) September 25, 2014

the reasons for war as given in the actual text of the motion can be dismissed.

Here is the text of the motion:

This House:

• Condemns the barbaric acts of Isil against the peoples of Iraq including the Sunni, Shia, Kurds, Christians and Yazidi and the humanitarian crisis this is causing

• Recognises the clear threat Isil pose to the territorial integrity of Iraq and the request from the government of Iraq for military support from the international community and the specific request to the UK government for such support

• Further recognises the threat Isil poses to wider international security and the UK directly through its sponsorship of terrorist attacks and its murder of a British hostage

• Acknowledges the broad coalition contributing to military support of the government of Iraq, including countries throughout the Middle East

• Further acknowledges the request of the government of Iraq for international support to defend itself against the threat Isil poses to Iraq and its citizens, and the clear legal basis that this provides for action in Iraq

• Notes that this motion does not endorse UK air strikes in Syria as part of this campaign, and any proposal to do so would be subject to a separate vote in parliament

• Accordingly supports her majesty’s government, working with allies, in supporting the government of Iraq in protecting civilians and restoring its territorial integrity, including the use of UK air strikes to support Iraqi, including Kurdish, security forces’ efforts against Isil in Iraq

• Notes that her majesty’s government will not deploy UK troops in ground combat operations

• Offers its wholehearted support to the men and women of her majesty’s armed forces.

I cannot argue with the legality of any action. If Iraq is asking for assistance then any action that the UK takes with Iraq's permission is legal. So I shall accept that.

However, the reasons as given in the text of the motion are:

• Further recognises the threat Isil poses to wider international security and the UK directly through its sponsorship of terrorist attacks and its murder of a British hostage

As far as I am aware, there has been no terrorist attack on British territory sponsored by IS, nor is there any imminent threat. Yes, the threat level was raised a few weeks ago but with the caveat that there was no immediate or credible threat of a terrorist attack from anyone let alone IS.

And Sky News has been reporting all last night that US authorities have not seen any credible evidence for the allegations from the new Iraqi PM that IS is about to launch attacks on American and French subways. And when asked for further details the Iraqi PM mumbled and stumbled and fluffed it. In other words it is probably all bollocks and is propaganda for war!!

And the murder of one British hostage, as barbaric as it was, is no excuse to go to war and murder many, many more civilians, and at an eventual financial cost many orders of magnitude more than the ransom that could have saved the life of David Haines. That is the way of the butchering Zionists who recently murdered over 500 Palestinian children in an engineered conflict that provoked much more outrage than Israel usually does by such heartless action.

But also, the beheading of David Haines was engineered by Callous Cameron, who stood up in The House of Commons and said we will not pay any ransom because it funds terrorism. But who was the first to shed fake tears on the news that David Haines had had his head sawn off? Yeah, that's right.

CALLOUS CAMERON!!!

Callous Cameron allowed David Haines to have his head sawn off!!!

Even Haines' friends and family accused Callous Cameron of this.

And as stated by Joe Tywman of YouGov ob Sky News last night, it was the beheading of Haines that swung British public opinion in favour of war.

The Americans have also been provoking calls for war by threatening the families of hostages with prosecution if they attempted to raise ransoms for their sons, Steven Sotloff and James Foley.

You have to ask, why are the USA and UK not paying ransoms but other G8 nations are, but then the USA and UK use the barbaric beheadings of those hostages as a casus belli?!

But as with the admissions by the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand at their trial that they were Freemasons, had received the weapons and encouragement for the assassination from Freemasonry, and knew that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death years earlier but had not found willing assassins, this crucial information is being ignored in a rush to war. And look what happened!!!

TOTAL DEVASTATION!!!

But there is also no mention in the text of this war motion about what constitutes a mission success, or what will happen afterwards, or any timetable for cessation of military action if things aren't going well.

This is an amateurish hastily put together motion for a long war with plenty of opportunity for abuse, mission creep, such as bombing Syria and in particular the Syrian military inline with the aforementioned plan, but more importantly, eventual military conflict with Russia.

The point of this war is to oust Assad.

The British Government allied with head-chopping Saudi Arabia last year to try to trick all MPs into attacking Syria by running a false flag at Ghouta. This war is just their next trick.

DO NOT BE FOOLED.

Just say NO!!

Because once the bombing starts anything can happen.