Conclusion 1 states:
Based on the available information, it appears clear to the Bellingcat MH17 investigation team that separatists transported a Buk missile system through their territory on July 17, and used the same low-loader truck used to transport the Buk missile system on July 17 on at least two occasions in August. The Buk missile system was unloaded in Snizhne and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.
The first sentence is a valid conclusion. We know from the separatists that they had a BUK: Commander Khodakovsky stated this; the separatists claimed to have shot down a Ukraine Air Force Antonov An 26 with a BUK on 14th July.
But the second sentence cannot be supported by any evidence presented in the first section, or indeed later sections.
The second sentence states:
The Buk missile system was unloaded in Snizhne and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.
The first part, "The Buk missile system was unloaded in Snizhne" is probably true. But the remainder is pure assumption.
The remainder of that sentence states:
and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.
NO!
NO!
NO!
No evidence is provided in the report to support this 'conclusion'. On 18th July Luhansk was a war zone. The Kiev Nazis had virtually surrounded Luhansk in an attempt to create a corridor to Luhansk Airport. Even Porky stated this was the plan in a tweet on 13th July. But in creating this corridor the Kiev Nazis gained control of all the major routes between Shizne and Luhansk to the south and west of Luhansk. In addition, north of Luhansk was controlled by Kiev Nazis, and east of Luhansk offered no easy route to Russia, if that is where it was going.
So my questions are:
1. How could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis without it being stopped when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon? ?
2. Why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon?
How?
Why?
And there is some doubt about when that video of the BUK showing missing missiles was shot. This is recognised by the Belling Cat report itself in this statement:
While it is not possible to discern the exact time this video was filmed
The Ukraine Interior Minister stated it was shot on 18th July. But the Kiev Nazi counterintelligence chief said the BUK was in Russia on 18th July!!
SO WHO IS LYING?
BOTH?
So if that video was not filmed on 18th July then when could it have been filmed?
Well, there is a clue in that the separatists claimed to have shot down a Ukraine Air Force Antonov An 26 on 14th July with a BUK. Where was this plane shot down? Luhansk.
So we now have an explanation of why a BUK would be in Luhansk. That video was probably filmed before 18th July, possibly 15th July.
Belling Cat need to offer support for the following statement as soon as possible:
and was then transported on the same low-loader truck to separatist-controlled Luhansk, now missing at least one missile.
What route did it take?
How could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis without it being stopped when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon? ?
Why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Shizne to Luhansk when Luhansk was a dead end war zone infested with Kiev Nazis when it was much easier and safer to transport it to Krasnodon?
How?
Why?
Answers please.
Was it by teleportation? Jedi mind control? Magic carpet?
You can't make statements like that without evidence when the report is driving us to war.
If they cannot support it with any evidence then it must be removed.. and with apologies.
No comments:
Post a Comment