WHAT IF THE PURPOSE OF USING SUCH AN OBVIOUS FAKE WAS TO RIDICULE NATO?

No slam dunk evidence has yet been provided by NATO to prove that the separatists shot down MH17 despite NATO telling us that they have the data from 'sensors', etc. Instead NATO appears to be relying on an amateur weapons expert to very slowly prove it for them by using Youtube, when they have the world's greatest military and intelligence network, including computers, to gather and analyse data and do in one day what Brown Moses has done in four months (which at the most is to suggest, and not with slam dunk evidence either, that a BUK seen in Torez and Sizhne on 17th July came from Russia).

On the other hand, Russia has stated that it has radar evidence to show that a fighter was close to MH17 when it came down, and released that data within days of MH17 coming down.

The investigation into MH17 has been rigged: one of several nations can veto any evidence shown to the investigation team and what they publish. And Kiev has taken full advantage of this by immediately grabbing the communications between ATC and MH17 and keeping them secret.

If Russia had satellite images then they would have been released by now.

So why did Russia report on a fake satellite image at this time?

I proposed it was to reduce criticism of Putin at the G20. But we know Putin. The Guardian has called him 'strongman'. Other NATO media and politicians call him a bully. He is apparently risking WW3 by allegedly invading Ukraine, sending submarines into narrow channels near Stockholm, and flying planes over Paris. He doesn't need to be helped by a fake satellite image of MH17.

So perhaps it was reported as a prank, to take the piss out of NATO?

A wild thought perhaps, but you have to start thinking outside of the box.

At stake is Ukraine, the source of Russia's influence over Europe and thus a major source of income for Russia. And Ukraine borders Russia. If NATO can grab control of Ukraine, by for example running a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup, then NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles right on Russia's doorstep which could hit Moscow in minutes. This is why the USA has spent billions and billions of dollars on fomenting revolution in Ukraine for the last 20 years.

I think, if I remember correctly, that we fought the Nazis in World War 2. My grandfathers landed on Normandy beaches in June 1944 and came back psychologically broken men. Perhaps you have similar stories in your family.

I would therefore expect nobody in the UK to be supporting the neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine in any way whatsoever.

But it appears that some do...