IT IS REALLY REALLY EASY TO GET TO SEPARATIST KRASNODON FROM SIZHNE SO WHY GO TO THE DEAD END WAR ZONE OF LUHANSK?

The allegation is that a BUK seen in Sizhne on 17th July shot down MH17 and was then very fortuitously videoed by Ukraine security personnel in Luhansk at the crack of dawn on 18th July with its covers removed to reveal missing missiles.

I explained yesterday that assuming that that BUK seen in Sizhne shot down MH17 then it was absolute lunacy, and as Spock would say "highly illogical", to drive it all the way to Luhansk because by doing so risked being seen and/or stopped by units of Kiev Nazis who were creating a corridor south and east of Luhansk to Luhansk Airport.

But one other little fact that is being overlooked is that the Ukraine Interior Minister stated that the BUK was filmed in Krasnodon. Now, keeping that BUK deep inside separatist territory and driving it to Krasnodon from Sizhne would make much more sense rather than drive it uncovered through a war zone where there were many units of Kiev Nazis all desperate to find that BUK. I mean, why didn't the rebels just drove that BUK to Kiev and place large flashing neon lights pointing at the BUK saying, "This is the BUK you are looking for"?

But on 14th July, just a few days before MH17 was shot down by whatever means, a Ukraine Air Force An 26 was shot down as it approached Luhansk Airport, and the separatists admitted that they shot it down with a BUK. And on 14th July Luhansk was essentially controlled by the separatists.

So we know that:
1. on 14th July a BUK could have been in the Luhansk area in order to shoot down the An 26, and Luhansk was under separatist control and by that time they had the red loader and white cabin;
2. on 18th July the direct routes to Luhansk from Sizhne were controlled by Kiev Nazis and that whole area south and west of Luhansk was infested with Kiev Nazis and was a war zone as the Kiev Nazis fought the separatists to create a corridor to Luhansk Airport and for control of Luhansk itself.

I am now beginning to suspect that that BUK filmed in Luhansk allegedly at the crack of dawn on 18th July was indeed filmed in Luhansk but not on 18th July. I think it was filmed a few days earlier and could be the BUK that shot down the An 26.

This would explain why the BUK was in Luhansk in the first place, because Luhansk was controlled by the separatists on 14th July, and they felt confident that they could drive a BUK uncovered through Luhansk at that time.

I still cannot think of any logical reason why allegedly having shot down MH17 with a BUK near Snizhne you would then drive the smoking gun BUK all the way to Sizhne through territory controlled and infested with Kiev Nazis to get it to Luhansk, when Luhansk was a war zone and possibly a dead end, because north of Luhansk was also controlled by the Kiev Nazis and getting to Russia going east from Luhansk does not provide any suitable roads.

It would make much more sense to keep the BUK away from the Kiev Nazis, deep inside separatist territory and drive it straight to Krasnodon over night, avoiding Luhansk in daytime, on wide roads, which is possible (as shown by the route below calculated by http://distancecalculator.globefeed.com/Ukraine_Distance_Calculator.asp).



And from Krasnodon it is much easier to get it to Russia.

But this is all assuming that that BUK seen in Sizhne on 17th July is the BUK that could have shot MH17 down, and that it came from Russia.

The explanation above explains:
1. why Ukraine Interior Minister stated the video was shot in Krasnodon when it was filmed in Luhansk;
2. why an uncovered BUK with missing missiles would be travelling through Luhansk on the red trailer and pulled by that white cabin.

The Belling Cat report provided no evidence at all that the BUK allegedly filmed on 18th July in Luhansk was part of the convoy from Russia, the only evidence that suggested this was the red trailer and white cabin, and that evidence was weak at best...but still needed explaining.

This blog has explained how it could be possible that an uncovered BUK missing a few missiles could be travelling through Luhansk. It could have been filmed shortly after the An 26 was shot down when Luhansk was much more controlled by the separatists (or it was filmed at an earlier time), and not on 18th July, because to get it there from Sizhne would mean driving it through a war zone and through territory controlled by Kiev Nazis (who were no doubt desperate to find that BUK), and Luhansk was possibly a dead end for it anyway, with the area north of Luhansk also controlled by Kiev Nazis and east of Luhansk offering no easy route to Russia for a large heavy wide loader carrying a BUK.

Either that, or the Ukraine Interior Minister was right after all and the BUK was filmed in Krasnodon, because it makes much more sense to take the BUK from Sizhne directly to Krasnodon avoiding the war zone of Luhansk and away from the eyes of Kiev Nazis desperate to find it.

But again, I must stress that this is all assuming, repeat assuming, that the BUK seen in Sizhne on 17th July did indeed shoot down MH17. It is an assumption. No evidence has yet been provided to prove this. The only 'evidence' so far is that video of the BUK with missing missiles on the red trailer. I have now provided an alternative and more credible argument to explain that video.