The Dutch government has refused to reveal details of a secret pact between members of the Joint Investigation Team examining the downed Flight MH17. If the participants, including Ukraine, don’t want information to be released, it will be kept secret.
The respected Dutch publication Elsevier made a request to the Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice under the Freedom of Information Act to disclose the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) agreement, along with 16 other documents. The JIT consists of four countries - the Netherlands, Belgium, Australia and Ukraine - who are carrying out an investigation into the MH17 disaster, but not Malaysia. Malaysian Airlines, who operated the flight, has been criticized for flying through a war zone.
[source : Dutch government refuses to reveal ‘secret deal’ into MH17 crash probe, RT, http://rt.com/news/207243-netherlands-mh17-investigation-documents/, 20th November 2014]
And look at this retweet from the vain Brown Moses who apparently does not find it rather strange when a shot dead boy gets up, or that NATO, with its vast intelligence gathering and data analysis network, is relying on him and his team of amateurs to produce a report that is then proclaimed as the gospel truth on MH17 when it is nothing of the sort.
#MH17 Summing up the evidence. Great article by Amy Knight. http://t.co/WTx7KGHwgW
— Janke Schinkel (@jankeschinkel) November 20, 2014So let's go to the article by Amy Knight and read what she says about the Belling Cat report.
But a growing number of unofficial investigations —including a deeply researched new report issued last week by the independent journalist group Bellingcat—show unambiguously that a Russian missile system was used to down the passenger jet, killing all 298 people on board.
...Although several countries, including Ukraine, have BUK missile systems, the thirty-five-page Bellingcat report also demonstrates clearly that the BUK used to shoot down Flight MH17 was supplied by Russia. The separatists are known to have short-range missiles, but none that could hit an airliner at 33,000 feet. And, although they had posted images on the Internet of BUKs they had allegedly seized from the Ukrainian arsenal, the images were outdated and showed non-operational missiles. By using videos from Russian social media sites, the Bellingcat team was able to track the movements of a Russian military convoy that left a military base near Kursk, Russia in late June and travelled to the border with Ukraine. Unique identifying markings on the vehicles and sideskirt damage above the vehicle tracks show that the same BUK missile launcher that was later filmed by Paris Match in rebel-held territory on the day that flight MH17 was shot down. This BUK missile launcher was transported from the city of Donetsk to the city of Snizhne and unloaded three hours before the attack on MH17. The launcher was later filmed, minus one missile, being driven through rebel-controlled Luhansk. From this evidence, the Bellingcat team concludes that the BUK missile launcher photographed on July 17 had been brought from Russia and was then used to shoot down the Malaysian aircraft.
Note that Knight is convinced of Russia's guilt, with the use of words such as 'unambiguously' and 'demonstrates clearly'.
But what exactly does this Belling Cat report state in the final conclusion?
However, it is clear that at least one Buk missile launcher (3x2) from the June 23rd convoy was inside separatist-controlled territory on July 17th, and 3 days later a video was uploaded showing that the Buk system loader unit was very close to the Ukrainian border. Considering the established time frames, logical routes, and photographic evidence, it is possible that this Buk missile launcher was part of the same June 23rd convoy as “Buk 3x2” and supported it. However, it has not been possible to establish that relationship between the two vehicles.
Say what? "it has not been possible to establish that relationship between the two vehicles."?
Earlier in the report the Belling Cat team try to link that particular BUK to shooting down MH17 but fail.
Yet Brown Moses is allowing people like Knight and even NATO politicians to use his report to provoke international incidents and diplomatic fall outs when he acknowledges himself that the report proves no link!!!
And I would also add that I question the use of this phrase 'logical routes'. Assuming that the BUK seen on 17th July in Sizhne did shoot down MH17, and assuming that that BUK was the one allegedly seen in Luhansk at the crack of dawn on 18th July, my questions are:
1. how the fuck did it get to Luhansk?
2. why the fuck did it go to Luhansk?
LUHANSK WAS A WAR ZONE INFESTED WITH KIEV NAZIS!!
What is logical about transporting a smoking gun BUK to Luhansk to reveal a missing missile to the Kiev Nazis when it would be much more logical to transport it to Krasnodon well away from the Kiev Nazis?
THERE IS NOTHING LOGICAL TO THAT ROUTE. IT IS, AS SPOCK WOULD SAY, "HIGHLY ILLOGICAL".
But I must stress that this is all assumption.
NATO and their gofer Brown Moses have proven nothing to link Russia to MH17. Nothing. Suggested something but proven nothing. A few coloured squiggly lines drawn on by the authors, a BUK with no number to identify itself, and a video whose time of filming is open to question prove nothing. Not the certainties that Amy Knight suggests anyway.
AND THE REPORT EVEN EXPLICITLY STATES THAT!!
Do you know what a real investigative reporting team would do? Here is a hint : even Amy Knight, despite her bias, acknowledges that the Kiev Nazis have BUKs.
And they would hold a thorough open and transparent investigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment