What was I sayin' just t'other day?
Ukrainians were on high alert on Saturday after a series of explosions occurred in the south and west of the country, killing two people.
...The motive behind the attacks remains unclear. However, a top Ukrainian security official told Mashable by phone on Saturday that he believes "pro-Russians" or Russian agents" carried out the attacks to destabilize the country, and “incite fear” among the population.
However, since the alleged attackers have not yet been identified or captured, he said he “could not say with 100% certainty” that this was the case. "But evidence so far points to this," he added.
[source : Two dead after Ukraine rocked by series of blasts, Mashable, http://mashable.com/2014/12/27/ukraine-blasts/, 27th December 2014]
The dickheads! The motive behind the attacks remains unclear? Can't they see it's obviously Russia trying to provoke Ukraine into joining NATO?
Just like Osama bin Laden provoked NATO into bombing Afghanistan and Iraq just like they wanted but they needed a pretext.
What a transparent farce!!
I am expecting something bigger in the next month or two. These are merely horses doovres (hors d'œuvre).
Remember. This is the same Ukraine Security Service that released to the whole world a tape of alleged intercepts implicating Cossacks shooting down MH17 from Chernukhino, yet somehow the latest trend is to say that MH17 was shot down from Shizhne because of a plume of smoke.
So which was it: Chernukhino or Shizhne?
Eliot Higgins, according to a recent interview with RFE/RL, seemed very pleased with the location being Shizhne. If so then what does he have to say about the diabolical hoax that the Ukraine Security Service have pulled on the world with the fraudulent tapes implicating Cossacks at Chernukhino? And how did a BUK in a field south of Shizhne in the afternoon of 17th July get to Luhansk at sunrise (approximately 0500) on 18th July? Or is that not now the BUK that allegedly shot down MH17?
Higgins now has two major pieces of evidence to confirm: those alleged intercept tapes, and the video of the BUK in Luhansk (which is used in the Belling Cat report).
How could a BUK with missing missiles get through a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis? Magic Carpet?
And according to the Ukraine Security Service (who said MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukhino) all BUKs were back in Russia by 0400 on 18th July yet the light in the video in Luhansk suggests that that video was filmed at approximately 0500, and the BUK still had another 30 to 45 minutes to reach the border.
So which was it: Chernukhino or Shizhne?
And if Shizhne then what does that suggest about the tapes of the alleged intercepts implicating Cossacks at Chernukhino? And if that evidence cannot be relied then can we rely on other evidence provided by or even handled by the Ukraine Security Service?
And also remember this: Higgins has been pointing to a video of a presentation of his in which he says, ""And here we have the BUK that shot down MH17", or words to that effect. Oh really? How did a BUK in a field south of Shizhne in the afternoon of 17th July get to a western suburb, repeat western suburb, of Luhansk for 0500 on the 18th July, when to be in that suburb is nuts, and to get it there it had to go through a war zone, and that suburb is more a natural route for a BUK from Chernukhino?
So which is it: Chernukhino or Shizhne?
The reliability and trustworthiness of the Ukraine Security Service (who are in control of the evidence for the "completely botched" NATO-led investigation in to MH17) rests on his answers.
And we know he reads this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment