FDR

Towards the end of his World Crisis Radio report from 3rd December 2011, Webster Tarpley announced that he will very soon be publishing another book, this time on FDR and Pearl Harbor, the publication delayed due to events in Libya and now Syria.

Tarpley claims that FDR did not provoke Japan (Japan was already on the rampage in South East Asia), and that it was the heirarchy of the US Navy that withheld vital information about the location of the Japanese navy, not FDR. Other claims he makes are that the politics of particular naval officers got in the way of their judgement, and that Churchill also withheld information from FDR about the Japanese navy.

Tarpley also adds that FDR wanted the dismantling of the British Empire after the war.

OK. This may well be the case. This latter claim would certainly support FDR's decision to instigate the Pecora Commission and Glass-Steagal act as a shot across the bows of the Anglophile Wall Street bankers (though why nobody high up went to prison and why the Federal Reserve was not abolished puzzles me).

But there is no doubt that FDR wanted to join the war when most of America didn't, and according to the diary of Henry Stimson, FDRs Secretary of War, FDR held a discussion on 25th November 1941 with Stimson, Hull, Knox, Marshall and Stark to discuss how to maneuver the Japanese into firing the first shot to give FDR the reason to join the war.

This particular piece of evidence does not look good for FDR, particularly if it can be verified.

So was he, or wasn't he? Was FDR in on it, or not?

What FDR did do, according to Albert Pike's plan that has guided modern history for the last 150 years or so, was to empower Communism and defeat Nazism. But perhaps he had no choice? What would you or I have done?

FDR was allegedly poisoned before the war ended. Was FDR against using "the bomb" while Truman wasn't? Was he against the creation of Israel while Truman wasn't? Was he for dismantling the British Empire in favour of cooperating independent sovereign nation states while Truman wasn't?

If they can kill JFK when he went against the plan then they can kill FDR, can't they, particularly after he had served the plan, wittingly or unwittingly?

I look forward to this latest book from Webster Tarpley with great anticipation. Perhaps it will answer the question, was FDR in on the plan, or just used like most US presidents are to some degree or another?