That's what the 3rd April 2008 statement from the NATO summit in Bucharest said.
23. NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO. Both nations have made valuable contributions to Alliance operations. We welcome the democratic reforms in Ukraine and Georgia and look forward to free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in May. MAP is the next step for Ukraine and Georgia on their direct way to membership. Today we make clear that we support these countries’ applications for MAP. Therefore we will now begin a period of intensive engagement with both at a high political level to address the questions still outstanding pertaining to their MAP applications. We have asked Foreign Ministers to make a first assessment of progress at their December 2008 meeting. Foreign Ministers have the authority to decide on the MAP applications of Ukraine and Georgia.
[source : Bucharest NATO Summit Declaration, NATO, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8443.htm, 3rd April 2008]
But how do you get Ukraine into NATO?
Watch this video of a member of the Rada exposing the coming coup in Ukraine in November 2013!!
TechCamp run by the US State Dept is referenced. I wonder how many of the attendees to the March 2013 TechCamp are now associated with Belling Cat?
Belling Cat recently published another investigation into the launch site of the missile that allegedly shot down MH17. They believe that MH17 was shot down by a BUK provided by Russia which was launched from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne.
The latest report begins with this paragraph:
In a previous investigation related to the 17 July 2014 downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) in eastern Ukraine, the Bellingcat investigation team provided the origin and movements of a Buk M1 missile launcher filmed and photographed that same day that travelled from Donetsk past Zuhres, through Torez and Snizhne. Before reaching Snizhne, the Buk M1 missile launcher was transported on a red low-loader hauled by a white Volvo truck featuring a telephone number and unique blue stripes. In Snizhne, however, the Buk was unloaded off the hauler and driven south out of Snizhne under its own power. In the early hours of 18 July 2014 the missile launcher was spotted in Luhansk, where it was again being hauled by the same white Volvo truck, but this time it was missing one missile.
Now, what is the massive problem with this paragraph?
It is this:
In the early hours of 18 July 2014 the missile launcher was spotted in Luhansk
This bold statement that implies that the BUK seen south of Shnizhne fired a missile, because one was missing, cannot be proven. That BUK is assumed to be the same BUK that was filmed south of Shnizhne on 17th July only because of the loader and truck. But the source of that video must be questioned. The source is the Ukraine Security Service.
But hold on. Didn't the Ukraine Security Service release tapes of alleged intercepted phone conversations implicating Cossacks based at Chernukino as the culprits? Er, yes they did.
So my question is: if Belling Cat believe so strongly that MH17 was shot down from 5 Km south of Shnizhne then they must surely believe that the Ukraine Security Service is lying!! And if they believe that the Ukraine Security Service is lying then how can they trust that same Ukraine Security Service when they say that the video was filmed at dawn on 18th July?
The answer is that they cannot.
But it gets worse for the credibility of Belling Cat.
A month or so ago two parallel reports were published by Collectiv and Der Spiegel. Very flashy and professional multimedia reports they were too. Those reports proposed a third launch site, a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne.
So we now have three proposed launch sites:
1. Chernukino, proposed by the Ukraine Security Service based on intercepted phone calls;
2. a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne, proposed by Belling Cat and RTL Nieuws based on social media and analysis of a photograph of a plume of smoke;
3. a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, proposed by Collectiv and Der Spiegel based on 'eyewitness' statements (who were not prepared to go on camera).
RTL Nieuws analysed a photograph of a plume of smoke and found that a field visited by Roland Oliphant shortly after MH17 came down was a strong candidate because it lay on the line of sight from the photographer to the plume of smoke.
But the problem for Belling Cat is that that field and the field which the 'eyewitnesses' of Collectiv and Der Spiegel stated was the launch site (because they saw it!) do not lie on that line of sight.
So at least one of these proposed sites is wrong. And I say at least because it possible that both are wrong.
But which one? One is based on geolocation, the other based on 'eyewitnesses' who say they saw the missile (but who would not go on camera).
But Belling Cat are credited by Der Spiegel as co-authors of those parallel reports (see Impressum section here)!!
And to add to the sloppiness of Belling Cat, it was they who identified the precise location in Luhansk where the smoking gun BUK was filmed, a crossroads in a suburb a few Kms west of Luhansk, but the Collectiv/Der Spiegel reports state it was filmed on the N21 which passes straight through the centre of Luhansk and goes nowhere near that crossroads!!
So you tell me WTF is going on!?
First we have the Ukraine Security Service providing evidence that they say proves 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks shot down MH17 from Chernukino. But Belling Cat and RTL Nieuws say no, that's bullshit, because MH17 was shot down from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne. But then Collectiv and Der Spiegel, with the help of Belling Cat, say no that is wrong because 'eyewitnesses' say they saw the missile being launched from a field 3 Km NORTH of Shnizhne!!!
WHAT A FUCKING FARCE!!
It would be a comedy of errors if the consequences were not so serious. Because if Ukraine joins NATO then there could be a very big war. And just before Christmas, when nobody was watching, the Rada voted to repeal the law that forbid them to join NATO, no doubt influenced by all the contradictory social media reports implicating Russia in the shootdown of MH17.
But to add to this plan to get Ukraine into NATO we have the case of Yatseniuk.
In November 2013 he was a leader of a minor party in the Rada.
So how did he become Prime Minister of Ukraine?
Well, it helps if you have the following as friends financing your personal foundation:
NATO
US Embassy in Kiev
National Endowment for Democracy
George Soros' Renaissance Foundation
And in a phone call Victoria Kagan-Nuland handpicked 'Yats' to become Prime Minister, after telling an audience that the US had spent over $5 billion in Ukraine to make it 'democratic', i.e. open to joining NATO and selling its soul to the American Devil.
So that is what is happening in Ukraine.
Ain't no doubt about that. No sirree.
It's all about dragging Ukraine into NATO as agreed at Bucharest in 2008.
And Belling Cat is a witting partner in the media war.
No comments:
Post a Comment