Tuesday, June 27, 2006


In an experiment two mobile phones were placed close to and on opposite sides of an uncooked egg. The phones were switched on and a satellite connection was made between them and the connection left on as if the phones were being used in a conversation by two people i.e. the phones were in normal operating mode, and emitting radiation.

So what happened to the egg?

After 65 minutes of continual use the egg was totally cooked by the phone radiation, with the yolk and the albumen solidified!!

This is just one aim of the mobile phone. Microwaves are extremely dangerous to the human body. But the phones can also be used to track your movements.

From http://www.rense.com/general72/cellcook.htm

...In the experiment, researchers placed one egg in a porcelain cup (because it is easy to conduct heat), and put one cell phone on one side and another cell phone on the other. The researchers then called from one cell phone to another and kept the cell phones on after connecting.

During the first 15 minutes, nothing changed. After 25 minutes, however, the egg shell started to become hot and at 40 minutes, the surface of the egg became hard and bristled. Researchers found the protein in the egg had become solid although the egg yolk was still in liquid form. After 65 minutes, the whole egg was well cooked.

The study shows how scary cell phone radiation is. People should try to avoid use of cell phones. Although so far no one has proved the radiation from cell phones can cause something clinically significant. By the same token, there has been no one who can disprove the existence of such a risk.

Children should be forbidden from cell phone use because they still grow their brains and are particularly vulnerable to radiation.

Monday, June 26, 2006


In the last month there appears to have been an internationally coordinated effort to give the impression that al-Qaeda and/or Islamic terrorists are very busy planning terrorist attacks.

London - two brothers are arrested on suspicion of being involved in the preparation of a terrorist act, following intelligence that a bomb vest had been seen in their house. The intelligence was later found to have come from an intellectually impaired jail bird (thus raising the possibility that the source could have been told he would be released if he provided the 'intelligence').

Canada - 17 Muslim males are arrested on suspicion of wanting to attack the Canadian Parliament and behead the Canadian PM (these arrests occured just days before this year's Bilderberg meeting held in the same geographical area of Ottawa, Canada). This too looks highly suspcious. There is a military connection with the leader of the group being a soldier. Their behaviour was also odd. They wore camouflage clothes, brought a lot of attention to themselves, including shooting guns in public, and bought a single shipment of 3 tonne of ammonium nitrate in a sting/entrapment operation.

Miami, USA - 7 men are arrested suspected of planning to blow up the Sears Tower, Chicago. It is now known that the 'ringleader' was mentally unstable due to a recent bereavment, and the suggestion for the attack actually came from a plant/informant. The group had no plans, no bombs etc. i.e. they were set up/entrapped.

To add to these arrests there was also a report on the alleged hijacked plane attack on Canary Wharf as if it was real, but which has now been totally debunked.

I suspect that the media were led to believe that all these terrorist plots were real and active and in the late stages of preparation. I am wondering if there is going to be a very big, horrible synthetic terror attack which will again be blamed on al-Qaeda, and due to these recent arrests everyone will believe it to be so. There is definitely some sort of psychological warfare operation going down.

Sunday, June 25, 2006


Over this weekend there has been the reporting of two absolutely astonishing pieces of news regarding the London 7/7 bombs of last year.

They are;
1. Martin Gilbertson claims he sent incriminating material on Kahn to West Yorkshire Special Branch in late 2003.
2. a bug was found in Kahn's car, after it had been taken away for inspection after 7/7.

Regarding the bug, in January of this year David Leppard of The Sunday Times published an article that stated Kahn had been bugged and taped in early 2004 talking of raising funds for and fighting in Jihad. On this blog, after reading that article, I asked what happened to the surveillance devices used on Kahn after the surveillance was supposedly called off? I suggested that 'someone' was still using the devices, to secretly track and listen in on Kahn and his friends. I still stand by that suggestion today.

Do such bugs have a lifetime, and use up their energy source after a certain time? Are they then replaced with a new battery or is the whole device replaced with a new one?

And what does happen to surveillance devices once a surveillance target has been deemed harmless and the surveillance called off?

If there is an intelligence operative reading this with experience in covert surveillance, and particularly with experience of surveillance operations that have been called off/cancelled/stopped because the target was thought harmless, then perhaps you could enlighten us? Are they removed? Do they self-destruct? Or are they just left for others, possibly the target, to find?

Does the FACT that the bug was still in Kahn's car at the time of the bombings suggest or indeed prove that Kahn was under surveillance at the time of the bombings?

Now, Martin Gilbertson claims he sent incriminating material to West Yorkshire Special Branch in late 2003. Then in early 2004 Kahn was bugged and taped talking of raising funds for and fighting in Jihad. So was the bugging op of Kahn instigated by or related to the Gilberston material? Or was it due to another piece of information? For if there is more than one set of information pointing to Kahn then this goes beyond incompetence. Way beyond.

I cannot believe the information Gilbertson sent (by normal mail) never reached its intended destination because it was stolen by one of the criminals working in Royal Mail who steal credit cards etc. There is a difference between a credit card and a parcel addressed to The Special Branch. I could well believe that such a parcel would receive extra special attention and would not go through the normal channels of sorting.

Apparently Kahn returned from a terrorist training camp in the summer of 2003,
(see http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2003915_1,00.html) and it was believed that he was by then "fully versed in how to make bombs".

So you are Special Branch. You get this parcel with DVDs and names and all sorts of stuff indicating that a particular bunch of people are up to something. You type in Kahn's name and up comes the bombmaking intelligence on Kahn. What do you do? You bug him.

So Kahn was bugged (and so far we only know of just the one bug, for if there were more then where are they? and are they still active?). You know he's attended terrorist training camps in Pakistan. You know he is "fully versed in how to make bombs". You know he is involved in the production of inciteful material. You tape him talking of fighting in Jihad.

Waddya do?

This was early 2004.

Do you know how many "terrorist" suspects, the vast majority of whom are Muslim/Asian, have been arrested under terrorism laws and then released without charge? The vast majority!


Early 2004 saw the phantom terrorist attack on Old Trafford football ground. Do you remember that? News of the arrests was plastered all over the papers, TV etc. "It was our tireless police and security service who foiled a terrorist plot to blow up" Old Trafford, screamed The Sun. But then all ten suspects were quietly released without charge.

The difference in approach is sickening. Kahn, bugged, under surveillance and a known bombmaker is taped talking of joining Jihad. Nothing is done. Instead 10 innocent men are arrested with absolutely no connection to terrorism whatsoever!!

This is not incompetence.

This is complicity by LIHOP.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006


The BBC aired live the press conference held at around midday today by 'The Forest Gate Two'. I listened to most of what was aired, and was struck by several things the brothers and their solicitors said. I'll go into them later.

The BBC also has a report about this press conference on its website, at
Raid brother tells of death fears

The things that struck me are not in the BBC report!

1. it appears that after shooting Mohammed Abdul Kahar the police then assaulted him with lots of kicking.
2. Mohammed Abdul Kahar made eye contact with the officer who shot him, who then shot him without a word. Due to shock Mohammed Abdul Kahar at first remained silent then began to tell the police he couldn't breathe due to the bullet wound and assault, and was told several times to "shut the fuck up".
3. their solicitors again stressed that the two brothers do not, repeat not, have a criminal record.
4. Mohammed Abdul Kahar had actually recently applied to become, and had been accepted as, a Community Police Officer. (is this how they came to the attention of the 'dark forces' within our intelligence community?)
5. during questioning there was no mention of why the police had raided their home and they did not seem interested in finding out if a bomb was or ever had been on the premises, and it seemed the police were fishing, asking the two questions like, "Are you a member of the Ku Klux Klan?" (no, really!)
6. they have still not received any apology.

None of this is in the BBC report.

Sunday, June 11, 2006


I connected to my broadband provider, Orange, today and the headline reads

Triple Suicide Hits Camp

At first reading this could be read to imply that a camp had been hit by three suicide bombers. But on further reading the article refers to three detainees at Guantanamo Bay who had committed suicide. The english language can be a wonderful thing for spinning. I think it's called Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP).

But what's worse is the reaction of the camp commander Navy Rear Adm. Harry Harris, who called the suicides "acts of asymmetrical warfare". No, really! Now killing yourself and nobody else is an act of asymmetrical warfare. How fucked up, twisted and paranoid do you have to be to think like that?!

The Orange report quotes camp commander Navy Rear Adm. Harry Harris as telling reporters,

"They are smart. They are creative, they are committed. They have no regard for life, neither ours nor their own. I believe this was not an act of desperation, but an act of asymmetrical warfare waged against us,".

Yeah, it was an act of desperation all right. No rights, no trial to defend yourself, torture, and caged like animals for years with no end in sight.

Lock Harris up in shackles in a cage for years without trial and let's see what he tells reporters then.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006


Watching Newsnight last night 5th June Julian Young, the solicitor for Koyair, denied his client had a criminal record.

This contradicts the leaks dripped to David Leppard of The Sunday Times who wrote last Sunday
Government officials said both suspects had “extensive criminal records”. According to a well placed source, Kahar has previous convictions for theft, robbery, burglary and possession of a prohibited weapon involving a “noxious, liquid gas”, said to be CS spray.

Koyair was said to have convictions for burglary, two thefts and possession of a Stanley knife. Both men had spent time in youth offender institutes

Is this some kind of operation to see how much can be gotten away with?


There have been very few prisons built in the last decade or so, and our prisons are seriously overcrowded. So what's the answer? RELEASE THEM!

Welease Woger. Welease Wodewick.

This the proposal of the Commons Public Accounts Committee. Release them and tag them.

But there is one small problem here. TAGGING DOESN'T WORK!!

There have been numerous reports about how tagged offenders have removed their tags and committed more crime.

The PAC are being led down the microchipped path. Their advice is seriously flawed and doomed to end with the final suggestion; IMPLANTABLE MICROCHIPS.

This suggestion is already being suggested in the USA for immigrants, and possibly tourists.

From http://society.guardian.co.uk/crimeandpunishment/story/0,,1791119,00.html

Thousands of remand prisoners, inmates with mental health problems and children should urgently be released from prisons to relieve the growing overcrowding crisis in England and Wales, according to a damning report by MPs published today.
The Commons public accounts committee says the unprecedentedly high prison population of 77,000 is due to rise even higher and will lead to higher suicide rates and a fertile environment for unrest among prisoners.

The PAC chairman, Edward Leigh, says it is time for the new home secretary, John Reid, to think "long and hard" about practical alternatives to jail, including electronic tagging, for three specific groups of prisoners. They are:

· The 3,900 remand prisoners who are currently in jail but who, when convicted, are not given a custodial sentence - about one third of all remand prisoners.

· The rapidly rising number of children held in prison service accommodation, which has now reached 2,300 compared with only 1,600 a decade ago.

· The 5,000 profoundly mentally ill people held in prison. MPs say that overcrowding limits the ability of prison to provide care for them and only 700 a year are transferred to hospital

Introducing such an intrusive and megalomaniac phenomena as the implantable microchip requires a high degree of spin. The chip has to be seen to be 'good', 'useful' and above all 'works'. What could be better than to track criminals on our streets? Of course in order to have criminals on our streets to track they have to be identified. Well, that's easy, they are in prison. Ah, but how do you then get them on the streets so they can be tracked? Release them early. But how can convicted criminals be released early without causing an uproar? Stop building prisons and let the prison population rise and rise and rise until the prison system is overflowing. And then get some dimwit MPs to suggest tagging, which is designed to fail, so that the only solution left is...(drum roll)

da daaa!


Watch out for more socially useful adverts for such controls.

Saturday, June 03, 2006


Would I be cynical to suggest that the 'intelligence' leading to the shooting of a young man was fabricated?

The 'intelligence' came from an alleged informant. A chemical bomb had been seen at an address. Over 200 cops raid the address at 4am. Doors were smashed down. Again an unarmed man is shot, and his mother collapses. No guns were found at the address. No explosives or bombs were found either.

But right now, London is in panic mode, for the alleged chemical bomb vest cannot be found!!

The words of the Morrissey/The Smiths song "Panic" come to mind.

Panic on the streets of London.
Panic on the streets of Birmingham.
I wonder to myself...

Now every one will be taking a second look at a Muslim, or even possibly any non-White, just to see if there is a hint of a bulge underneath their clothing. Is that just a little bit of a paunch, or could it be a chemical vest bomb?!

The compartmental structure of the security services can encourage the use of fabricated intelligence, for very few people will know, or have access to finding out, where that intelligence actually came from, if it came from an informant at all.

I am deeply skeptical of this operation, and believe it to be a publicity stunt to deflect from the limp-wristed criticisms from the ISC report into 7/7.

Of course, this may be just a trick to shmoke out the cynics so that when a bomb is later exploded in an attack on, as is suggested, a crowded bar screening a World Cup match, the cynics are humbled. Though I'm not sure they have the balls to do such a thing so soon after 7/7. They almost screwed that up, but just about got away with it.