Thursday, October 31, 2013


The bona fide total fascist credentials of the British Government have now been proven in court, thanks to a very brave young woman called Cait Reilly.

When she was unemployed, Reilly was placed on a diabolical scheme called Workfare by the Department for Work and Pensions, which involved her working full time unpaid for her benefits, which at the time were £54 per week. This is the same amount that privileged fascist Iain Duncan Smith was challenged to live on earlier this year, a challenge that Smith, who lives rent free in a mansion with a tennis court and a swimming pool, unsurprisingly refused. Smith's dreaded Bedroom Tax has not only driven several people into committing suicide, but also lots of people, innocent victims of the financial crisis caused by bailed out fascist banks, into total despair.

So we have total fascism causing total despair.

What is fascism?

Well, first you may not know what fascism is but you may have heard of it.


We fought to rid the world of the scurge, the evil, the horror of fascism in World War 2. Fascism is synonymous with Hitler and Mussolini. YET WE CREATED BOTH OF THEM! We gave Hitler all the technology he needed to create another German military, then allowed him to build it up way beyond that allowed by The Treaty of Versailles, and then encouraged and financed his eugenics policies! And as for Mussolini, similar to Hitler, he was given $100 million dollars by JP Morgan and Wall Street, after he wrote pro-war propaganda for British intelligence during World War 1 to keep Italy on the side of the allies! YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP! However, after creating these monsters we slayed them, and The United Nations, that bastard world-government-in-waiting, was born, reinforced by continental governments like the EU.

Fascism is essentially the corporations using the government to enforce their will; the corporations v. the people.

The government is supposed to work FOR the people, not the corporations.

In the case of Reilly, she worked for Poundland but Poundland did not pay her any wage directly. So Poundland received all the benefits of her work, but the government paid her 'wage', i.e. her benefit of £54 per week. So what is that per hour? Poundland got the benefit of all her work.

Now, is that fascism or is that fascism?

But to me, the whole point of Reilly's case is that the HM Government was in such a rush to implement total fascism that it broke the law!!

Readers should also note that Iain Duncan Smith is not in such a rush to take up the challenge of living off £54 per week.

The government's "back to work" schemes, which were challenged by a graduate who was made to work for free at Poundland and an HGV driver made to clean furniture, were legally flawed, the UK's highest court has ruled.

The supreme court ruled against the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP), which was attempting to overturn an earlier verdict by the court of appeal.

The supreme court stopped short of ruling that the regulations constituted forced or compulsory labour, but said the 2011 regulations creating the programme were invalid as they did not contain a sufficiently detailed "prescribed description" of the schemes.

[source : Poundland case: government defeated again over back-to-work schemes, The Guardian, 30th October 2013]

Just think; a week on Sunday is Remembrance Sunday, when our leaders put on their grim faces and lay wreathes at The Cenotaph. Yet they break the law to implement the very political system that our fathers and grandfathers fought in World War 2.

I shake my head in utter despair.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013


This was the question for Bill O'Reilly's Talking Point on Fox News.

Fox News is well known for its warmongering, particularly after 9/11 to implement the war on seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.

"Things are getting very bad for the Obama Administration", suggests O'Reilly.

Hmm. I wonder why.

Ever since the election last year things have been getting worse and worse and worse. Even before the election there was the incident at Benghazi, Libya, which was designed to Carterize Obama, to make him look weak and to give the candidate for Israel, Bilderberg and Wall Street, Mitt Romney, the opportunity to appear presidential. But Romney blew it. Romney also blew all that Wall Street money, which was ten times the amount that Wall Street gave to Obama. And the engineer of Benghazi, the then Director of the CIA David Petraeus, left in a scandal but as been given a cushy job with KKR, who are ever present at Bilderberg.

Israel, Bilderberg and Wall Street wanted Romney in the White House because Romney would have attacked Syria and Iran by now, and he would have implemented fascism.

So to express their discontent, Israel, Bilderberg and Wall Street have been dredging up scandal after scandal, culminatiing in the Snowden revelations. Obama resisted war on Syria, despite face to face meetings with all the relevant warmongers, and claims from Israel and the UK that Assad had used chemical weapons, and that Assad had exploded car bombs in Turkey. Snowden changed all that, but there was no war on Syria.

And so on 21st August, Saudi Arabia unleashed a chemical attack on the Damascus suburb of Ghouta. Initial reports claimed nearly 2000 civilians died. Assad was immediately blamed. Cameron rushed to war but was humiliated by Ed Miliband. Miliband, like Obama, has since been paying a heavy price in the media. Miliband's father was slurred and his policy on a price freeze on energy provoked fury in the right wing press.

And now Obama has been isolated. Nobody wants to be Obama's friend. He has been made the fart in the spacesuit with allegations and implications that Obama is personally reading not only our emails, texts, tweets and blogs but also those of national leaders and statesmen!

And to top it all off, Obama is pursuing a policy of diplomacy with Iran, to the consternation and anger of Israel.

So Obama is pissing off the following:
1. DFQ
2. Israel
3. Saudi Arabia
4. France
5. Almost every other nation on Earth, leaders and 'ordinary' members of the public alike.

It is all unravelling for President Obama.

This particular blog explains why.

This does not mean I support Obama's other truly dreadful policies: drones; weapons for cutthroat Jihadis; abortion; Agenda 21. The list is long, too long.

But, for now, wars on Syria and Iran, that I believe could have led and were designed to lead to WW3, have been averted.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013


It has to be the world's cruellest joke: that that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, is financing, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, an army of cutthroat Jihadis in Syria in the name of freedom, democracy and human rights.

Liberation, they call it.

The only liberation they want is the liberation of heads from torsos, preferably done with a blunt breadknife to inflict maximum pain, torture and terror.


The latest nod to sharia has been a £200 million bond, consistent with Sharia law, sold by our government and reported in several newspapers today.

We are already in the process of adopting a new national anthem, honouring our new cutthroat allies:
God save our gracious Queen
Long live our noble Queen
Allah U Akbar
Send her victorious

Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah U Akbar

Do not be surprised to hear soon, England fans across the nation singing the following on the terraces of Wembley, or Stamford Bridge, or The Stadium of Light, indeed anywhere where football is played:
Al Qaeda
Al Qaeda
We'll support you ever more
We'll support you ever more

And by "we" I really mean MI6.

After all, Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad on the streets of Woolwich right under the noses of MI5, pleading with Muslims to go to Syria to join the Jihad in Syria against Assad and cut the throats of Syrian children, before butchering Drummer Lee Rigby.


Now that Obama is the fart in the spacesuit, following allegations and implications that he was personally listening into the phone calls and personally reading the texts, tweets and blogs of world leaders as well as millions of unsuspecting citizens around the world, Der Fuhrer David Cameron is making veiled threats to the media that he will issue D notices if further leaks are printed.

So what has happened is that just enough information has been leaked with implications to direct everyone's anger at Obama, but when the leaks actually threaten the security state then...BANG! It's D notice time.

What has Obama done to deserve this? He has steadfastly refused to bomb Syria, and is pursuing diplomacy with Iran.

Why did Cameron not immediately slap D notices on The Guardian in June when these allegations began?

We do have to ask if a D Notice has been slapped on the claims by the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas that in 2009 he was asked to help the British to infiltrate into Syria the cutthroat Jihadis we now see decapitating everything that moves in Syria.

Sunday, October 27, 2013


The interview of Russell Brand by Jeremy Paxman this week has inevitably led to the ritual media slaughter of Russell Brand. For when anyone with any following says something revolutionary then the media attack dogs are unleashed onto him/her to be savaged and slaughtered. It is a ritual we have seen many times before, and will see again.

And for that Brand can be right proud of himself, because some of his executioners are some of the lowest warmongering scumbags in the mainstream media.

Take Nick Cohen. Cohen supported the invasion of Iraq. He supports war on Syria. And I assume from his hatred of Iran that he would also support war on Iran. But as with all warmongers, we must ask what would Cohen do if he was given a uniform, a rifle, a helmet, a pair of boots and a free flight to Baghdad, or Damascus, or Tehran?

Cohen was one of the original signatories to The Euston Manifesto, which tried to make the left pro-war just as the plan for war on seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11, was being strongly opposed by the left.

So it is no surprise that Cohen writes for everybody's favourite controlled-left newspaper...The Guardian.

In his hit-piece Cohen immediately tries to liken Brand to Benito Mussolini.
Here are two quotes. The first is from the Fascist Decalogue, written by Benito Mussolini in 1938. The second is from an article,"We no longer have the luxury of tradition", written by Russell Brand in 2013.

"Service can be rendered at all times, in all places, and by every means. It can be paid with toil and also with blood," said the one.

"Revolt in whatever way we want, with the spontaneity of the London rioters, with the certainty and willingness to die of religious fundamentalists or with the twinkling mischief of the trickster," said the other.

Only the contemporary references to suicidal murderers and rioting Londoners reveal that the second call to violence came from the comedian/actor and the first from the dictator.

[source : Wild emotions are all very well, Russell Brand, but then what?, The Guardian,, 26th October 2013]

But hang on. Isn’t this the same Nick Cohen who supported war on Iraq, supports war on Syria, and presumably war on Iran too? Cohen’s love for violence led to the deaths of over a half million Iraqis during Shock and Awe, as well as all the deformities due to the illegal use of depleted uranium. Did Cohen also support the sanctions that led to Madeleine Albright saying that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children was a price worth paying?

Cohen constantly refers to the 1920's and 1930's. What happened during this period? Well, according to Cohen, people were thinking and saying exactly the same thing that Brand said to Paxman. But the hint is there : don't think or talk like Brand or we might get another Mussolini, or Mosley, or even Hitler. Hitler was a vegetarian, but Brand is a vegan! Cohen then ends with a nod to his late pal Norman Geras, who Cohen states was a Marxist philosopher, and who also a driving force behind The Euston Manifesto. Cohen, citing Geras, now sees it as his job to “take on and beat” Brand.

Well, good luck with that, Nick!

Brand must be saying something right to get a warmonger like Cohen riled. It is a badge of honour to be attacked by a warmonger like Cohen, so Brand can wear this badge with great pride.

Saturday, October 26, 2013


Paul Weller singing live The Whole Point of No Return

The lords and ladies pass a ruling
That sons and girls go hand in land
From good stock and the best breeding
Paid for by the servile class
Who have been told all lie in state
To bow down forth and face their fate
It's so easy.
So, so easy

All righteousness did build thy arrow
To shoot it straight into their lies
Who would expect the mighty sparrow
Could rid our world of all their kind?

Rising up and taking back
The property of every man
Oh it's easy.
So, so easy

Rising up to break this thing
From family trees the dukes do swing
Just one blow to scratch the itch
The law's made for and by the rich
It would be easy.
So, so easy.


The Send-off by Wilfred Owen
Down the close, darkening lanes they sang their way
To the siding-shed,
And lined the train with faces grimly gay.

Their breasts were stuck all white with wreath and spray
As men's are, dead.

Dull porters watched them, and a casual tramp
Stood staring hard,
Sorry to miss them from the upland camp.
Then, unmoved, signals nodded, and a lamp
Winked to the guard.

So secretly, like wrongs hushed-up, they went.
They were not ours:
We never heard to which front these were sent.

Nor there if they yet mock what women meant
Who gave them flowers.

Shall they return to beatings of great bells
In wild trainloads?
A few, a few, too few for drums and yells,
May creep back, silent, to still village wells
Up half-known roads.

Wilfred Owen was our greatest war poet. During my first year as a postgraduate, I should have been solving nonlinear partial differential equations, but instead I was reading and memorising the poetry of Wilfred Owen.

A decade later I find out that our royal family engineered World War 1 in a genocidal bid to create a world government. But that failed so a second world war was engineered. That succeeded, and ever since the United Nations, and continental governments, have been usurping and centralising global power.

But they aren't there yet. So Israel is being used to provoke a third world war that in theory would provoke calls from the survivors for a totalitarian world stop war forever more.

Wilfred Owen, like 99.99% of those who fought in World War 1, was no doubt unaware of this scheming, this plotting, this treason against the human race. He recorded his brutal experiences of war.

But we never learned...

Which is why exposing the satanist paedophile element to the conspiracy is the key.

Then we can send them off to prison instead of sending our loved ones off to die on the front lines of engineered wars.


You could not fail to have seen or heard about Rihanna's latest photo shoot. She is 99% naked (guess where the covered 1% is), and is playing with snakes.

Snakes are reptiles.

She has tweeted about being Illuminati.

Here is her tweet on her official twitter account:

Rihanna is the Princess of the Illuminati. Their other minions are Lady Gaga and Miley Cyrus. There have been others in the past (Madonna being the most obvious, with that name).

For analysis on Rihanna's Illuminati status see The page contains snapshots from Rihanna's videos in which it is clearly stated that she is indeed The Princess of The Illuminati.

In this latest shoot she looks like The Anti-Christ or the Whore of Babylon in The Omen.

Mothers and fathers really do have to wake up very quickly to how not just the music business, but the media in general, is controlled. They only let you see and hear what they want you to see and hear. Which is why I am so suspicious about the Greenwald/Snowden/Guardian circus, particularly with the track record of The Guardian showing its true colours at crucial times (supporting mass genocide at Copenhagen, supporting Rothschild-loving Mikhail Khordokovsky, and supporting the engineered attack on Syria in August this year).

Maybe Snowden and Greenwald are genuine enough, and that whoever really runs The Guardian saw in them an opportunity to damage and control Obama at a time when he was extremely reluctant to save the cutthroat Jihadis through an overt large scale attack on Syria. Within days of Snowden's allegations (which implicated Obama directly) being made public by The Guardian, Obama made a U-turn and declared that a few months earlier Assad had crossed Obama's 'red line' and had used chemical weapons, even though Obama's own intelligence agencies said there was no chain of custody when analysing the samples and that the results could not therefore be trusted.


I have reported, and am convinced, that some of my emails and texts are not being delivered, and if they are then their delivery is being delayed. The latest example of this was just a few a weeks ago when I was supposed to be meeting a group of people over lunch but we hadn't agreed where. The venue was to be texted to me, so I had my phone switched on. But no text arrived. So I went to where I suspected the group would be, and they were there. I didn't say anything about not receiving a text from them because I knew what had happened. I switched my phone off during the afternoon. I switched it back on again when I got home. Within seconds of my phone being switched on, guess what arrived? Yep. A text from the group, sent well before lunch, when my phone was switched on, telling me where they were meeting. But at least I received that text. I have sent emails to people which have not been received. And I know because I have phoned them, they have denied receiving the emails, and I have no reason not to believe them. So it is perfectly possible that some emails and texts sent to me were never delivered to me.

This is ideal for manipulating relationships!!

Today The Guardian is reporting on concerns of GCHQ that they may be prosecuted for their mass surveillance. But one word in the report leapt out at me. And that word was "deletion".
Referring to the decision to publish the report on intercept as evidence without classification, it noted: "Our main concern is that references to agency practices (ie the scale of interception and deletion) could lead to damaging public debate which might lead to legal challenges against the current regime." A later update, from May 2012, set out further perceived "risks" of making intercepts admissible, including "the damage to partner relationships if sensitive information were accidentally released in open court". It also noted that the "scale of interception and retention required would be fairly likely to be challenged on Article 8 (Right to Privacy) grounds".

[source : Leaked memos reveal GCHQ efforts to keep mass surveillance secret, The Guardian,, 26th October 2013]

But I am not 100% sure in what context this deletion is occuring.

This reference to deletion could mean that due to the huge scale of data interception and retention that not all the data can be stored, so after some analysis most of it is deleted.

But, it could also refer to real-time deletion and/or delay.

Maybe, and I suspect, both


Remember Russell Tice? No. I didn't at first. But after reading about him I do now recall something about him. Tice blew the whistle on the scale of NSA snooping a few years ago, even accusing them of spying on American politicians such as Obama as well as spying on US Military. But not much happened. His claims were buried very quickly. Even The Guardian appears not to have reported his allegations (I could not find a mention of his name in their internet archives from before this year). So why was Tice ignored and his claims buried then, while Snowden makes Obama, the unwanted fart in the spacesuit in the White House, an international pariah just as Obama cancels wars on Syria and Iran?



Obama was not supposed to win the election last year. Romney and his pro-Israel pro-war pro-fascist pro-Wall Street policies were. Bilderberg 2012 annointed Romney which led to Wall Street giving ten times as much money to Romney than to Obama. And to give Romney his 'power hour', the incident at Benghazi was engineered, by then CIA Director David Petraeus, to Carterize Obama, make Obama look weak and Romney strong. Petraeus was sussed and left in a scandal, but for his services to Bilderberg/Wall Street he was given a very cushy job at KKR who are ever present at Bilderberg.

And now there is the whisper, the rumour that Obama is the new Nixon.

Obama: from Carterized to Nixonized.
A group of entertainment celebrities are fed up with the Obama administration’s willingness to spy on American citizens through the National Security Agency, or NSA – even comparing his actions to those exposed by Nixon’s Watergate scandal.

Actors John Cusack, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Will Wheaton join director Oliver Stone, former talk host Phil Donahue and several others appearing in a new video called “Stop Watching Us.”

The video begins with Daniel Ellsberg, the leaker of the “Pentagon Papers” – which revealed bald-faced deception of the American public during Lyndon Johnson’s administration – declaring, “Revelations that have emerged in the past few months from whistleblower Edward Snowden and others [continuing from the mouth of Donahue] have painted a disturbing picture of widespread, suspicionless surveillance of American citizens.”

“Every American is at risk of getting caught up in the NSA dragnet,” Stone warns.

[source : Echoes of impeachment in NSA scandal, WND,, 26th October 2013]

Obama is not supposed to be in the White House!

Don't you get it?

He just averted World War 3!

There are lots of British, Wall Street, Saudi and Israeli ruling class sociopaths who are now furious with Obama. He was not supposed to win the election, and he has denied them, for now, their wars on Syria and Iran.

Yes, Obama has implemented and is implementing some truly dreadful policies. But he does not read all our emails, texts, tweets and blogs. It is that law unto itself...the NSA!

And who does the NSA work for?

Who do you think gets all the juicy intel on business and trade deals?

Maybe, just maybe, there is something in that report in Press TV last year in which it was reported that Obama, Dempsey and other powerful Americans are considering going public on 9/11.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.

[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV,, 21st September 2012]

Friday, October 25, 2013


The gypsies have always been easy targets.

Is it just coincidence that just as there is renewed optimism and momentum in finding Madeleine McCann there are several raids on gypsy camps across Europe 'rescuing' blond-haired blue-eyed girls?

Who put the word out to do this?


Was the intention to distract or divert the search for Madeleine into gypsy camps knowing that Madeleine would never be found in such a camp?

Or was it just to label gypsies as child-kidnappers?

Too much of a coincidence for me...


Obama was not supposed to win the election last year. Romney and his pro-Israel pro-fascist policies were. Romney was picked at Bilderberg 2012, and subsequently received ten times as much money from Wall Street than Obama did. With this knowledge we should look at Benghazi in a different light, particularly now that the man in charge of the CIA at the time, David Petraeus, has just been awarded a cushy job with KKR who are ever present at Bilderberg. Was it to Carterize Obama, to make him look weak and Romney strong? I believe so.

The plan for war on seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of inside Saudijobs, 9/11, is seriously, seriously, seriously behind schedule. Obama reluctantly bombed Libya, and has just dodged World War 3 over Syria. There is also a real possibility of a deal with Iran.

What has been the result of this recent diplomacy? Hardly any cheers. Instead, Saudi Arabia and Israel, both bloodsoaked 'jewels' in the British crown, are furious! Absolutely livid! So much so that Saudi Arabia is making veiled threats against the USA, implementing its own warmongering policies, while Israel is once again prepared to go it alone and attack Iran itself.

The second Obama presidency began in controversy, over Benghazi.

But that was merely an Hors d'oeuvre.

There began a series of scandals, all implicating Obama directly. This, I believe, was to pressure Obama into attacking Syria. No such pressure would be needed to influence Romney. Then began the allegations that Assad was behind atrocity after atrocity, using chemical weapons against Syrian civilians, and driving car bombs over the border into Turkey. There were face to face meetings with Netanyahu, Erdogan and Cameron. They all pleaded with Obama to attack Syria, because the cutthroat Jihadis were being annihilated.

But still Obama resisted.

And then...the Pièce de résistance.

Ed Snowden arrived on the scene just days after the Syrian Arab Army captured the important hub of al Qusair. Snowden's claims all implicated Obama in invading our privacy, personally reading all our emails, texts, tweets, blogs, etc. Most of the alternative media crowd were shocked. SHOCKED! Yet this crowd were surely aware of the Echelon system exposed years earlier, and should have expected that such a system would have evolved with the rise of social media?

But the public outrage caused Obama to U-turn and declare that Assad had crossed Obama's red line and used chemical weapons. However, Russia showed the UN that, in fact, the rebels had used them. So the rebels went in and slaughtered every living thing, including soldiers of the Syrian Arab Army, so there was no one left alive to testify to the UN who had used chemical weapons. Obama announced an increase in the quantity of weapons for the rebels.

But still no attack on Syria.

And so, on 21st August it was reported that Assad had used chemical weapons to kill over a thousand Syrian civilians. The usual suspects immediately blamed Assad, and demanded that the USA attack Syria. The logic that Assad would use chemical weapons was hardly addressed. That Israeli source of total bullshit, Debkafile, tried to pin it on Assad's brother, Maher, but did not provide any proof.

But Ed Miliband pressed the pause button which gave Obama the time to think and agree a diplomatic solution without any investigation into who really had used chemical weapons.

The UK, Saudi Arabia, Israel and France are furious with Obama.

Obama has shown some strength in resisting the Anglo-American-Saudi-Israeli Axis of Evil and their desire for total war. They have a motive in isolating Obama, to make him look ridiculous and incapable of governing.

Billy Connolly came up with 'the fart in the space suit' analogy. This last week has seen Obama look isolated over the NSA spying revelations, and incapable of governing following the Obamacare roll out.

All I am saying is that there are lots of very powerful people who are furious with Obama for not attacking Syria. I do not trust Snowden: his background is dodgy and he has lied about his qualifications; his information is not that explosive; he supports Ron Paul; he came into the public arena at a perfect time to embarrass Obama into attacking Syria; and the conduit for his claims, The Guardian, has made some very dubious alliances, in supporting Rothschild-loving Mikhail Khordokovsky and in supporting mass genocide at Copenhagen in 2009.

Thursday, October 24, 2013


I have come to the conclusion that US President Andrew Jackson was a traitor to the United States of America. I first came across Jackson in Eustace Mullins' Secrets of the Federal Reserve, and G Edward Griffin's The Creature From Jekyll Island. Both authors portrayed Jackson as an angel sent from heaven above to do battle with the Rothschilds and save America.


Jackson had already betrayed the USA before he destroyed The Second Bank of the United States (BUS2). Jackson was used to destroy BUS2 because it was rapidly creating a huge economic and political rival to the British Empire. Jackson was on the edge of a British espionage ring in the USA. His controller was Martin van Buren who was tutored in treason by Aaron Burr, who had plotted with Jackson to grab Louisiana and hand it over to the British. Jackson defended Burr at Burr's trial.

The BUS2 was creating a United States of America that threatened the British Empire. It placed high tariffs on imports and financed public works that would aid economic growth, such as canals. It also had regional banks in the states.

I proposed earlier this year that we could and should replace our banking system (and God knows it needs replacing) with a banking system similar to the BUS2: a central bank to finance great public works, such as national infrastructure projects like road and rail: state banks in each nation of the United Kingdom that understand the national economies in great detail; and smaller banks in each region in each nation, such as North East England, that know the local economy inside out. High tariffs on imports would nurture local industry and agriculture.

Authors such as Mullins and Griffin have tried to ridicule and condemn the idea of creating money out of thin air. At first I was horrified that this was how our banking system worked. Currently such power is in the hands of privately controlled banks. But this power to create money out of thin air, if in good hands, can be used for good. And I believe that in the BUS2 that power to create money out of thin air was in good hands and was being used for the common good, not for the benefit of a privileged few. There is still the issue of what the hell Barings, at the heart of the British establishment, was doing as bankers to the USA before Jackson destroyed the BUS2 and handed what was left to the Rothschilds. I'm wondering if there was either a turf war between Barings and Rothschilds, or, if the USA had a destiny, Barings were helping to build the USA a bit too quickly.

But today the Archbishop of Canterbury has called for...regional banks!
The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has called for a revival of regional banks, in a week when the Co-op, one of the "challenger banks" seen as a potential rival to the high-street giants, has fallen under the control of US hedge funds leaving the future of its ethical stance in question.

Speaking on Thursday at A Blueprint for Better Business?, an ethical business conference in London, Welby said the financial services system needed to be redesigned to focus on startups and small businesses outside London.

He said this was desperately needed "if there is going to be regeneration of the economy and a serious attack on the appalling poverty that is now three-generational in some parts of our country".

[source : Justin Welby calls for more regional banks to break dominance of London, The Guardian,, 24th October 2013]

Meanwhile, Russell Brand's interview by Jeremy Paxman was at first, to me, classic Brand: cocky; jokey; flamboyant; not sure if he is serious or not.

But during the last minute or so Brand spoke with a force and clarity and passion that obviously stunned and unnerved Paxman, but also quite a lot of other people, myself included.

There is something fomenting. People are pissed off. But I am not sure there will be a revolution due to economics or politics. Everyone knows and feels the world is unfair and thinks that life is life: get your head down, work for a few decades and do your best for those you love. It has been like that for centuries, nay millenia.

But what has happened in the last decade or so is that the ruling classes are being exposed as Satanist paedophiles and blackmail other paedophiles into doing their work while our intelligence agencies protect them all. I think this is the Achilles Heel of the ruling classes...and they know it. And if this can also be exposed with the fact that they engineered and financed world wars...then it will be curtains.

The latest financial crisis occured 5 years ago. The banks were bailed out with trillions. There has been some outrage followed by some austerity, dumped onto the lower and middle classes. Their response? Oi! Don't do that to us! But then the ruling classes come out with stuff like, "But it's for Britain and the Queen." And thus the masses are pacified, and in some cases condemning those who protest for much more fairness.

The people are fluoridated. The people are zombified by long hours at work. The people are entertained by moronic TV and films.

But show 'em we are ruled by Satanist world warmongering paedophiles...

This is why we should all support David Icke. He may not be right on the button but he is bloody close.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013


At the moment the Syrian rebels are only being urged to attend peace talks in Geneva.

Only urged?

Yes. Urged.

Mr Hague's US counterpart John Kerry said he believed and hoped the meeting would go ahead as planned but that Western countries could not control whether all parties would attend.

[source : Syria opposition urged to join 'Geneva II' talks, BBC,, 22nd October 2013]

There is, of course, a blindingly obvious way that Western countries could force the Syrian rebels to attend Geneva II; threaten to cut off all aid if they do not go!

As yet, I am unaware of any such a threat.

I therefore conclude that these peace talks are being torpedoed...AGAIN! Particularly when The Morally Bankrupt Friends of Syria, sponsors of the rebels, whatever their shade of Jihad, agree that Assad has to go.

...Mr Hague reaffirmed the view of the Friends of Syria group - Britain, Egypt, France, Germany, Jordan, Italy, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and the United States - that Geneva II must be about a political transition in Syria away from the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

Any transitional government could only be agreed with the consent of the SNC, and therefore Mr Assad would play no role in it, Mr Hague added.

Peace talks over Syria were torpedoed by William Jihadi Hague earlier this year when the EU embargo on arms to Syria expired and Jihadi demanded that it not be re-implemented, even though everyone else in the EU believed that it should be! This led to the rebels expecting lorry load after lorry load of weapons and equipment which they believed would lead to their victory. However, it hasn't turned out that way. Instead the rebels face total annihilation. They are fighting amongst themselves while the Syrian Arab Army wins victory after victory.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013


I have just donated a pony to The People's Voice.

Not literally a pony. Where would he keep it?

I mean £25.

Why have I done that?

Because I hate/detest/abhor/execrate the genocidal warmongering fraudulent paedophile scum who have been running this planet for far too long, and I think David Icke can rid us of this scum.

But he needs our help. And by the looks of it quite urgently. Otherwise The People's Voice will just be a hoarse whisper instead of the ear-busting roar that it should and needs to be.

So don't delay, donate today.


Monday, October 21, 2013


This time four years ago what were you doing?

Four years ago some were looking forward to conning the world into mass genocide in the name of saving the planet from economic development and overpopulation. The venue for this anticipated slaughter was Copenhagen. Self-appointed dignitaries arrived in spectacular and inappropriate fashion, considering they were expecting to draw up the death warrants of billions. At the time I called them Climate Change Daleks, who were repeating ad nauseum, "Exterminate! Exterminate!"

They failed.

But not for want of trying.

They even enrolled the services of The Guardian, who published a little handbook in a vain attempt to con us into not just supporting but demanding that Agenda 21 be implemented much faster than it was already.

Fast forward 4 years and The Guardian is at the centre of a 'scandal'. For months it has been telling us how our emails, texts, blogs, tweets, etc. have all been intercepted and read. This 'scandal' occured just as the Syrian cutthroat rebels had lost the crucial hub of al Qusair. During the previous months Israel, UK and Turkey had tried to trick President Obama into attacking Syria. But Obama wisely resisted. A series of mini-scandals were directly blamed on Obama. Obama was not supposed to win the election in 2012. Romney and his pro-Israel fascist policies were supposed to win. So then came Snowden and his 'bombshell'. Obama suddenly decided that Assad had crossed Obama's 'red line' a few months earlier, but this was strangely announced by Ben Rhodes, not Obama. But still no overt large scale attack on Syria. And so, on 21st August, hundreds of Syrian civilians were allegedly killed by chemical weapons. Assad was blamed. Allegations were made based on alleged intercepted communications, and the fuzzy biased logic that only Assad had chemicals in the required quantities. Der Fuhrer David Cameron couldn't wait for the UN inspectors to land in Syria before demanding bloody revenge. He demanded authorisation for war.

But Cameron was humiliated by a defeat in The Marsten House on a motion for world war. Red Ed saved the day by pressing the pause button, having at first acquiesced to world war. Ed has been under attack ever since, particularly for his energy price freeze policy, a policy that the coalition, so isolated from the British public, is now looking to imitate. Yes, Red Ed managed The Climate Change Act 2008 which has placed a charge on energy bills to support green energy, but it required very little negotiation, was passed almost unanimously and the Tories thought it didn't go far enough!

At the front of this pseudo-humanitarian "we must bomb Syrians to save them" movement was...The Guardian.

The genocidal Guardian.

The R2P Guardian.

The same genocidal R2P Guardian who four years earlier tried to con us into demanding our own deindustrialisation and subsequent slow death at Copenhagen.

On the Sunday before Cameron was humiliated in The Marsten House, the sister of The Guardian, The Observer, published the most blatant R2P editorial demanding war on Syria, even though no evidence had been provided to prove beyond doubt that Assad and the Syrian military had used chemical weapons at Ghouta. All the blame was laid on Assad and the rebels were angels sent from above.

What is it with The Guardian/Observer?

Why does it support Mikhail Khordokovsky yet demands we bomb Syria and implement genocidal Agenda 21 policies?

Why has it not published the allegations made by the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas that he was asked by British officials to help the to plan the insertion of cutthroat Jihadis into Syria?

If The Guardian really did care for us then it would publish the Dumas allegations.

This is why I do not trust the Greenwald/Snowden circus.

Sunday, October 20, 2013


Maybe I missed it but now only two of the four men arrested last weekend in spectacular style have been charged. One was reported released yesterday. I must have missed the other release.

Two men arrested arrested last week in London have been charged under the Terrorism Act, Scotland Yard says.

The men, both aged 25, were arrested on 13 October and will appear before Westminster magistrates on Monday.

One has been charged with engaging in acts with the intention of committing or assisting in acts of terrorism.

Both were charged with collecting or recording information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.

One of the men was also charged with a further offence contrary to the Identity Documents Act 2010.

Searches completed

They were were arrested in a car in Mansell Street, Whitechapel, east London, after police fired "Hatton rounds" - ammunition designed to burst tyres and blow open doors.

At the time of their arrest, police said one was a British national of Turkish origin and the second was a British national of Algerian origin.

Two other men arrested during the same operation were released earlier this week.

One was a 28-year-old British national of Azerbaijani origin who was arrested outside the premises of Planet Organic in Westbourne Grove, Bayswater, west London.

The other was a 29-year-old British national of Pakistani origin who was arrested in Peckham Hill Street, Peckham, south-east London.

A spokesman said officers had completed searches at six addresses in London and also on two vehicles as part of their investigation.

[source : Pair charged with terror offences, BBC,, 20th October 2013]

Many reports of the arrests stated:
1. the men had all been under surveillance for some time;
2. there were fears that the men had weapons;
3. so a large number of armed officers were used to arrest the men, in a London street, in broad daylight, in front of shoppers and diners;
4. one of the men was arrested at his home which had been 'staked out';
5. the fear was that the men were planning a Mumbai or Nairobi-style attack inside the UK;
6. the head of MI5 had warned that Islamists saw Brits as legitimate targets;
7. six houses were being searched, presumably for the weapons for the suspected attacks.

So, after all this, two of the men arrested have been released...WITHOUT CHARGE, one of whom was arrested in his own home which had been 'staked out'.

You will also note that there is no mention in the BBC report above of any weapons being found at any of the six addresses that were searched.

However, the BBC report has just been followed by a slightly more detailed report from The Guardian, which states:
Two men arrested in a dramatic counter-terrorism operation a week ago have been charged.

Scotland Yard said a 25-year-old British national of Turkish origin had been charged with offences contrary to Section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006 and Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

A British national of Algerian origin, also 25, has been charged under Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 and with a further offence contrary to the Identity Documents Act 2010.

[source : Two men charged with terrorism offences, The Guardian,, 20th October 2013]

Section 58 of The Terrorism Act 2006 states:
58 Collection of information.

(1)A person commits an offence if—

(a)he collects or makes a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, or

(b)he possesses a document or record containing information of that kind.

(2)In this section “record” includes a photographic or electronic record.

(3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that he had a reasonable excuse for his action or possession.

(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—

(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years, to a fine or to both, or

(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to both.

Section 5 of The Terrorism Act 2006 states:
5 Preparation of terrorist acts
(1) A person commits an offence if, with the intention of—
(a) committing acts of terrorism, or
(b) assisting another to commit such acts,
he engages in any conduct in preparation for giving effect to his intention.
(2) It is irrelevant for the purposes of subsection (1) whether the intention and
preparations relate to one or more particular acts of terrorism, acts of terrorism
of a particular description or acts of terrorism generally.
(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on conviction
on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

Very vague. No mention of weapons being found or planned to be used. There is reference to documents and information being collected, which could refer to checking out manuals on the internet.

I'm just wondering why, after the suspects had been under surveillance for 'some time' and they were arrested using a large number of armed officers in front of many members of the public, two of them have been released without charge after being detained for a week, no weapons have been reported to have been found, and the charges against them are vague and imply they were collecting information yet the media last weekend were pushing the idea the men were about to launch a spectacular terrorist attack on a shopping centre somewhere in the DFQ.

And that statistic still stands: only 14% of those charged with offences under terrorism acts are convicted.

At the moment this is looking more and more like a knee-jerk arrest to reinforce the fearmongering by the head of MI5 a few days earlier who said that GCHQ should get more power to spy on us because thousands of Islamists are itching to kill us all.


The Independent is not independent.

An editorial in The Independent today, entitled Hell Beyond Hell, exonerates Saudi Arabia and lays the blame for the current state of Syria squarely on President Assad.

The latest allegation against Syria is that the Syrian Arab Army is sniping at pregnant women!!

Yesterday brought the testimony of David Nott, the "Indiana Jones of surgery" who has led a group of international doctors in Syria. He says snipers, assumed to be hired by the Assad regime, have been using pregnant women for target practice, aiming at unborn children for sport.

[source : Editorial: 'Hell beyond hell': The situation in Syria is actually getting worse, The Independent, 20th October 2013]

Such barbarity is in the same league as using chemical weapons on civilians. After the international outrage (most of it fake) due to the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian Arab Army at Ghouta on 21st August this year, leading to Syria relinquishing its chemical weapons to either halt or postpone an attack by the USA, would it make perfect sense that the same Syrian Arab Army would provoke yet even more international outrage by sniping at pregnant women?!

Such allegations are beyond ludicrous!!

And I am highly suspicious of the tone of the editorial because it suggests that Putin can be embarrassed further to put more pressure on Assad.
The Russian government is the Assad regime's main external sponsor – and its second international ally, Iran, is also looking for an improved relationship with the US and Europe. Vladimir Putin has shown that he can be embarrassed into forcing his client to abide by international law. Let us hope that the outrage over Mr Nott's revelations could be put to similar use.

Before the horrific events in Ghouta, Bandar bin Sultan, the intelligence chief of that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and according to some reports told Putin that he, Bandar, was going to create Hell on Earth in Syria to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad. A few weeks later Ghouta occured. Subsequently evidence points to Saudi Arabia as the guilty perps of Ghouta; statements to journalists; chemicals and protective gear from Saudi Arabia found in rebel tunnels.

I smell in this editorial words written by British/Saudi/Israeli intelligence.

All the barbarity against civilians in Syria has been and is being committed by the cutthroat Jihadis that Seymour Hersh reported in his 2007 article The Redirection would be unleashed by Saudi Arabia with the acquiescence of Israel and the USA. They were inserted into Syria by this Disunited Fascist Queendom according to former French foreign minister Roland Dumas. The cutthroats have been committing massacre after massacre, and beheading by breadknife after beheading by breadknife. These are usually attributed by the NATO media to the Syrian Arab Army. In reality, any massacres committed by the Syrian Arab Army are of the cutthroat Jihadis, but in the NATO media the cutthroat Jihadis are called 'people', thus implying they were innocent civilians. The cutthroat Jihadis were unleashed because by 2007 a plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shorty after 9/11 for war on the seven nations in five years on Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia was moribund. Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria were named in a document called A Clean Break written by rabid Zionists who on 9/11 were in control of the mysteriously AWOL US military. The same cabal of rabid Zionists also wrote Rebuilding America's Defenses which named Iran more of a threat than Iraq.


In the spring of 1975, Muhammad Ali was invited to give the commencement address at Harvard University. Toward the end of his speech, an audience member hollered out, “Give us a poem!” Ali's response was all of two words: “Me, We.”

[source : Me, We, Forsaken Circus,, Accessed 20th October 2013]


A retired child protection officer has revealed how officers from Special Branch held a gun to his head and told him to stop investigating paedophiles. Similar threats were made to his colleagues. This was done to stop the investigation into Elm House where a suspected VIP paedo ring operated.

A FORMER child protection officer claimed last night a Special Branch detective held a gun to his head to stop him investigating a VIP paedophile ring.

...“At one point they had me up against a wall by my throat with a gun at my head telling me in no uncertain terms that I was to back away if I knew what was good for me.

“A colleague of mine had the same treatment, as did a number of the volunteers. Victims who were actually abused at Elm House were also physically stopped from coming to speak to us at the NAYPIC office in north London.

“I witnessed Special Branch officers manhandling them and turning them away with a warning to keep their mouths shut. It was blatant, it was open, they were acting like gangsters.

“In the end we had to meet victims at a local community centre without the knowledge of the police to hear what they had to say.” NAYPIC was given the identities of senior politicians who formed part of an alleged paedophile ring at the heart of government.

However, Mr Fay said: “I was told by the police implicitly, ‘We do not want you to come to us with big names’.”

In a sinister twist, he said his kitchen window was shot at, leaving three bullet holes in the glass, although he never found out who was responsible.

[source : 'Police gunman told me to ignore paedophiles’, says ex-child protection officer, Sunday Express, 20th October 2013]

Saturday, October 19, 2013


Shalamar - Make That Move (Original 12'' Version)


Bocca Juniors Substance (Boys Own 1991)


One of the four men arrested in a very public and high profile series of arrests last weekend involving armed officers has been released without charge. Most if not all reports of the arrests stated that the men had been under surveillance for some time. Armed officers were used in the arrests because it was believed the men were armed, and their intelligence led them to believe that the terrorist plot would use those arms.

So if one of the men has been released without charge, after being questioned for a week, after all that surveillance...

London terror arrests: one suspect released

One of four British men arrested over an alleged terror plot has been released, Scotland Yard has said.

The men were arrested in a series of raids in London on 13 October on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.

The 29-year-old was released earlier and has not been charged with any offence.

The other three suspects remain in police custody, a force spokesman said.

Two men, both aged 25, were arrested in a car in Mansell Street, Whitechapel, east London, after police fired "Hatton rounds" - ammunition designed to burst tyres and blow open doors.

One was a British national of Turkish origin and the second was a British national of Algerian origin, police said.

A 28-year-old British national of Azerbaijani origin was arrested outside the premises of Planet Organic in Westbourne Grove, Bayswater, west London.

The 29-year-old who was been released, a British national of Pakistani origin, was arrested in Peckham Hill Street, Peckham, south-east London.

The men were taken to a south London police station.

Whitehall officials said the alleged jihadist plot was "serious" and included plans to use firearms in the UK.

But they said it did not appear to be on anything like the scale of earlier major plots, such as the airline liquid bomb plot or the Birmingham rucksack bomb plot, which resulted in convictions.

[source : London terror arrests: one suspect released, BBC,, 19th October 2013]

Wednesday, October 16, 2013


Not content with disarming Syria of its chemical weapons, the Anglo-American Establishment is now going after Syria's bioweapons. In their report published yesterday the Henry Jackson Society (HJS) warned that Assad has less control of Syria's bioweapons, even though they are more dangerous than chemical weapons, and that al Qaeda has shown interest in acquiring bioweapons in Syria.

The point being made is that maybe Syria should be forced to give up its bioweapons too.

However, the HJS do not mention:
1. that Israel has the largest and most dangerous stockpile of WMDs in the region;
2. that Israel agreed to, assisted and has helped to implement The Redirection of inserting cutthroat Jihadis in Syria with the assistance of the USA and Saudi Arabia, and the Disunited Fascist Queendom and no doubt France too.

The issue of al-Qaeda (AQ) acquiring biological weapons has so far been a remote
preoccupation of Western intelligence services. However, with the Syrian crisis and the
potential acquisition of biological weapons by AQ, the issue is now a clear and present

1. While the world has been focusing on the destruction of Syria's chemical weapon
stockpiles, President Bashar al Assad’s biological weapons program is in fact a far graver
danger that has not been tackled.

...Should AQ acquire sections of Assad's BW program, it has the competence and expertise to
weaponize and deploy agents. Acquisition of this capability poses a threat because many
biological agents in Assad’s arsenal would not necessarily need to be weaponized in order to
achieve a significant kill ratio.

[source : AL-QAEDA’S BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PROGRAM, Henry Jackson Society, October 2013]

So who are The Henry Jackson Society?
On July 14, as Israeli bombers began their 5,000 sorties against Lebanon, including the devastation of Beirut, the mass murder of civilians in the town of Qana, and repeated assaults on other civilian population centers, a would-be Nuremberg Rally occurred on a small scale in an undisclosed location in Britain, where some 200 afficionados of the Henry ("Scoop") Jackson Society cheered the United Kingdom's support for the American-backed Israeli actions, and declared that this was "The British Moment."

...A few days later, on July 23 and July 26, the HJS filed a series of followup articles on its website, hailing the Israeli invasion and bombardment of Lebanon to supposedly "disarm Hezbollah" as an example to the United States and Britain as to what these two nuclear superstates should be doing. To the Baby Boomer/Tweener-aged imperialists, Lebanon does not deserve full sovereignty, so it needs "those 'sticks' of the military domain."

...The Henry Jackson Society is right now in its larval stage, set up in March 2005 by a combination of the scions of the "Golden Age" of British synarchy—the infamous Round Table—and the American neo-conservatives of the imperial/fascist Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), who needed a new base of operations and moved to London, as the American population turned bitterly against the Bush-Cheney regime in 2005. As EIR reported in June 2004, the CPD was reincarnated by the neo-cons for a third time, because support for the Iraq War "was in jeopardy." The first CPD of 1950-51 was a project of the Harry Truman Administration's Psychological Strategy Board, used to propagandize for preventive nuclear war against North Korea. The second CPD incarnation was in 1976, around the Presidential campaign of Sen. Scoop Jackson, who wanted direct confrontation with the Soviet Union. The men who ran Jackson's policy in the 1970s, and then founded the CPD, were the leading warmongers of the Bush-Cheney "first strike" preventive war doctrine, including Paul Wolfowitz, Bush's former Deputy Secretary of Defense, now at the World Bank; and Richard Perle, former chairman of Defense Policy Board. These two, along with Douglas Feith, Bush's former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, set up the rogue intelligence network in the Pentagon that reported directly to Cheney's office.

[source : The Henry Jackson Society: Would-Be Fascist World Rule, EIR,, 18th August 2006]

The Israeli attack on Lebanon was one of seven planned wars, to occur in the short space of five years, that were revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. The other six were to be on: Iraq; Syria; Iran; Libya; Sudan; Somalia. However, by 2007 that plan for war on seven nations in five years was moribund so an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya, Syria and Iran. This led to:
1. NATO becoming al Qaeda's air force in a war against Libya;
2. Syria becoming a pile of rubble as the Syrian Arab Army and the Saudi-backed rebels fight each other in the streets of Syria, and Syria relinquishing its chemical weapons in a deal to avert the USA bombing Syria following a false flag attack in Ghouta on 21st August run by Bandar bin Sultan, designed to be blamed on Assad and to force Putin to abandon his support for Syria as the Saudi-backed rebels face total annihilation.


Why has George "Oiksterity" Osborne relaxed banking rules for China to encourage them to set up in The City of London?

And what will happen when things go wrong, as they inevitably do in casino banking?
“A great nation like China should have a global currency,” said UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, during his official five day visit to China. And the UK is gladly willing to contribute “through the international center of finance: London”.

Under the agreed pilot program, China sanctioned London-based investors to buy up to 80 billion yuan ($13.1 billion) of stocks, bonds and money market instruments directly, avoiding Hong Kong transactions, Reuters reports.

Meanwhile, Britain will let Chinese banks set up wholesale branches in London, easing regulations the country had imposed after the financial crisis broke out. Since 2008, Britain has insisted that most foreign lenders should set up their UK operations as "subsidiaries" rather than branches, which provides greater protection for depositors and taxpayers. Less regulation will be welcomed by Chinese lenders who have always complained the rules made it hard to operate in Britain, prompting them to move much of their business to Luxembourg.

On top of that, London and Beijing will trade the yuan against the dollar directly, avoiding the dollar.

"The Chinese currency, the renminbi, is not terribly well known in Britain at the moment. But over my lifetime I think it's going to become almost as familiar as the dollar, and I want British businesses involved in trading it, investing in it," Osborne told BBC television in China.

[source : London to become Chinese offshore banking centre, RT,, 15th October 2013]

The surprise move has angered bankers and lawyers across the Atlantic.

US bankers and UK lawyers attacked the new light-touch regulatory regime proposed for Chinese banks in the City on Tuesday, accusing George Osborne of political interference in ­regulation.

As the chancellor confirmed details of his mission to boost the UK’s status as an offshore Chinese financial centre, including a plan for Chinese banks to operate via branches rather than full-blown subsidiaries, senior US bank executives were stunned.

“It is extraordinary to treat Chinese banks differently,” said one bank chief. “It’s very inconsistent. This is just a crazy lovefest.”

Legal experts said the move sent an odd signal on the independence of the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority to set and enforce rules for banks.

[source : US bankers attack London and China’s ‘lovefest’, FT,, 15th October 2013]

At the time of writing there is still no solution from the USA about their debt ceiling.

That statement from an anonymous White House about killing the dollar now looks very, very prophetic.
In 2011, economist Kyle Bass interviewed a senior member of the Obama administration about its planned solutions for fixing the US economy and trade deficit, but the question itself was not nearly as important as the response he received from this senior administration official. In fact, this single, seven word response clarifies everything, explains everything, and leaves little else to discuss: “We’re just going to kill the dollar.”

[source : “We’ll Kill the Dollar!”, Veterans Today,, 25th September 2013]

A total planned collapse of the USA explains why there has been a rush to disarm the American people and arm the state to the teeth.

Obama did a very good thing by not bombing Syria.

But this planned collapse and provoked civil war in the USA is just as evil if not more so than bombing Syria!

Tuesday, October 15, 2013


Over the weekend there was a much reported arrest of suspected Islamists plotting a Nairobi-style attack in Great Britain. This was just a few days after the head of MI5 had tried to mug us all off by warning us that thousands of Islamic extremists were itching to kill us all and were receiving their dastardly training in Syria. However, in the same warning we were not told that:
1. MI5 had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic extremists which allowed them to live in and operate from Great Britain as long as they did not damage British interests,
2. the killer of Drummer Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, was under MI5 surveillance while he preached on the streets of Woolwich begging and pleading with Muslims to go to Syria to cut the throats of Syrian children in a Jihad against President Assad.

Reports of the arrest stated that the men arrested had been under surveillance for some time.

So what is the likelihood that these arrests will result in a successful conviction for terrorism?

Between 11 September 2001 and 31 March 2013, 330 individuals have been convicted of terrorism-related offences, including murder, illegal possession of firearms and explosives offences. 2,419 people have been arrested under the Terrorism Act during this period. As of 31 March 2013, 121 prisoners both, convicted and awaiting trial, were classified as terrorists or domestic extremists. For more statistical information on the operation of police powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 and subsequent legislation, see the GOV.UK website:

[source : Arrests and Convictions, MI5,, Accessed 15th October 2013]

So in well over 11 years, 2419 arrests have been made under the Terrorism Act resulting in just 330 convictions, some of which are not directly linked to the Terrorism Act. At best this is a 14% conviction rate.

I hope that this was not a knee-jerk arrest and that we do see full convictions. However, the media used the tell-tale the-plot-as-such-was-not-advanced-and-was-in-its-early-stages.

So take from that what you want and will.

Monday, October 14, 2013


After Red Ed stopped us going to war for Israel against Syria 2 months ago, I think he needs to clarify his policy on Israel.

For Ed's education, 9/11 was an inside Ziojob run by rogue elements of the intelligence agencies of this Disunited Fascist Queendom, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the USA. The aim of 9/11 was drag the USA into a war with Russia and/or China that could go nuclear, leading to massive calls for a totalitarian world government. It nearly worked over Syria. Red Ed pressed the pause button, and has been under media attack ever since.

So does Ed still support Israel?

The Zionist beliefs of Ed Miliband, the Leader of the Opposition, are mired in confusion after the Labour Party leader — who is Jewish — said at a public meeting that he was a Zionist, only for his office then to deny he had said any such thing.

During a question-and-answer session at a Board of Deputies event last Thursday, an audience member asked Mr Miliband: “David Cameron has described himself as a Zionist. Would you describe yourself as a Zionist?”

Mr Miliband replied: “The answer to that is yes, because I consider myself a supporter of Israel.

“I think it’s very, very important that as somebody who supports not only Israel’s right to exist but has huge respect for what Israel does that I count myself in that category.”

He added: “But it doesn’t mean that I’m not critical of the government of Israel, and I think there’s a distinction, and I think it’s very, very important that we are able to make that distinction.”

Mr Miliband’s remarks were met with immediate angry responses from anti-Zionist Labour supporters. Critics took to social networking sites to claim it was “disgraceful” for the party leader to support an “extreme and nasty ideology”.

The following day his office issued a supposed clarification in an attempt to distance him from his own comments. The Labour leader’s team said he had “not used the word Zionist to describe himself”, but said he had “made absolutely clear that he is a strong supporter of Israel”.

There was no response to requests for a further, straightforward explanation of whether Mr Miliband does, or does not, consider himself a Zionist.

[source : Concern over Ed Miliband's Zionist credentials, Jewish Chronicle,, 14th Mach 2013]

Sunday, October 13, 2013


Now then.

This puts the death of the radioactive traitor Alexander Litvinenko in a new radioactive light.

For years the British government had denied that Litvinenko was a British agent. Last year they finally confirmed that he was.

For years the British government has refused to provide any convincing evidence that Andrei Lugovoi had murdered Litvinenko, instead making baseless accusation after baseless accusation.

For years the British government has refused to hold a public inquiry into the death of the British agent Litvinenko, and when the perfect opportunity arises to show Russia as the evil criminal state that it is made out to be, to force Russia to abandon its support of President Assad of Syria, by revealing all the evidence that it has against Russia at a public inquiry, that opportunity is not taken.

And now Lancet has published an article which further supports the claim made last year that Arafat was poisoned by Polonium 210, the same poison that allegedly killed Litvinenko.


The Mail on Sunday continues its crusade against evil Red Ed Miliband, this time blaming him for the Climate Change Act 2008 that has put a levy on everyone's energy bills so that we can slash carbon emissions by 80% by subsidising green energy policies.

The MoS article lays the blame at Red Ed's feet.
...Put another way, in 2020 consumers will be paying £270 a year to fund green initiatives, some imposed by ambitious targets set by the 2008 Climate Change Act, which was piloted through the Commons by Ed Miliband when he was Energy Secretary.

Last week a political storm was triggered by energy firm SSE’s announcement of an 8.2 per cent price rise. Other companies are expected to follow suit shortly.

Yesterday Energy Minister Greg Barker said: ‘The higher energy bills falling on to people’s doormats have Ed Miliband’s smudgy fingerprints all over them.’

[source : Red Ed's great green obsession... and the real reason YOUR bill has gone through the roof: The hidden subsidies each household pays every year thanks to Miliband's laws, Mail on Sunday,, 13th October 2013]

Note the language: Miliband's Laws, piloted; smudgy fingerprints.

But who opposed the bill in 2008?


It was almost unanimously passed.

And the Tories and Lib Dems wanted to take it further!

So far from being Miliband's law with his smudgy fingerprints all over it which he devilishly piloted through Parliament, I would say that a penguin could have managed the passage of that act. Why? Because back then the nation was gripped by eco-fear, that the lands would melt and the seas would boil if we didn't immediately halt and then reverse human progress by limiting economic growth, killing billions of people.

But that was 5 years ago. After over a decade of predictions of gloom and doom from an institution, The Meteorological Office, that consistently cannot accurately predict the weather just a few days in advance I read yesterday that starting next month we face one of the coldest winters on record! And this after they admitted that temperatures have stayed constant for the last 15 years (and that is using temperatures taken at dodgy places where the air would be just that little bit warmer...)

The truth is that the climate changes all the time, the sun drives our climate, we produce insignificant amounts of carbon dioxide compared to natural emissions, we need carbon dioxide for plants to grow for our food chain, and the moon plays a massive part in medium term weather/climate (as shown by Piers Corbyn at

Sadly, the environment is just being used to:
1. tax us all to death;
2. bring about more world government;
3. introduce a carbon trading system from which only a self-elected evil megalomaniac few will profit financially.

I also note that there is very little if any desire to repeal The Climate Change Act 2008 in any party represented in Parliament...BUT IT SHOULD BE! Before many more of our old age pensioners die from lack of food and/or lack of heating to pay for the bogus scam of global warming.

So Red Ed is right to cap energy prices.

But the whole bloody Climate Change Act 2008 should be binned.


Support the Tax Wall Street Party on 5th November 2013.

Vote Credico.

The rest are nowhere but in the pockets of Wall Street.

ps Does anyone fancy starting a similar Tax The City of London Party here in this Disunited Fascist Queendom?

Saturday, October 12, 2013


A Scotland Yard officer is to be disciplined for racially discriminating against Stephen Lawrence’s younger brother.

The police watchdog has ordered the Met to bring misconduct proceedings against the officer, who followed and stopped teacher Stuart Lawrence as he drove home in his car last November.

The Met’s professional standards unit had previously cleared the officer of any wrongdoing.

But after Mr Lawrence appealed, the Independent Police Complaints Commission has ruled that his allegation against the officer was ‘well founded’ and he should face a misconduct hearing.

[source : Stephen Lawrence's brother WAS picked on by the Met: Officer to be disciplined for stopping teacher for no reason, The Daily Mail,, 12th October 2013]

Not The Nine O Clock News - Constable Savage


Don't you stop it
Don't you stop
Don't stop the truthin'

Yarbrough & Peoples - Don't stop the music


Mr Lothero - Rotation

PUMP THE 1-2-0

Zanzaman - Pump The 1-2-0


external. group gravity


The feud between Ed Miliband and Paul Dacre is such a farce. But in these times of Bilderberg fascist oiksterity we need a laugh, a giggle, a chuckle, don't we?

So why is the feud so farcical?

Well, it all began after Ed Miliband at first supported an attack on Syria, but then wisely pressed the pause button. He did so because there was no evidence to prove that Assad had used chemical weapons at Ghouta on 21st August 2013. Cameron, on the other hand, couldn't even wait for the UN inspectors to arrive in Syria, never mind issue a report on their limited findings.

But then 'Red Ed' gave a rousing speech at The Labour Party conference, promising to cap energy prices. This was a huge public vote winner. This week's nearly 10% price hike from SSE drove more people towards Labour.

In response, The Daily Mail, published an attack on Ed's late father Ralph. Ralph was something of a Marxist, and had fought in the British military against the Nazis. Quotes from Marxist Ralph's works were published, to show Ralph's hatred of Great Britain.

Ed was allowed to publish a reply to and in The Daily Mail, but still the feud rumbles on. Today the editor of the The Daily Mail, Paul Dacre, has published an article on the feud, proclaiming that The Daily Mail stands up for Great Britain and Britons, and stands against Europe and Marxists.

But what The Daily Mail, and many others, do not understand, is that Great Britain created Marxism!


I know!

It sounds more bizarre than MI5 allowing Islamic extremists to preach on the streets of this Disunited Fascist Queendom in order to persuade Muslims to go to Syria and cut the throats of Syrian children in a Jihad against President Assad of Syria.


So how and why did Great Britain create Marxism?

I would very, very strongly urge readers to purchase and/or read Treason in America by Anton Chaitkin.

America and Germany were becoming a threat to the British ruling class, as they implemented the ideas of The American System of Economics. Marx was paid to write critiques of The American System. His works were then taken up by revolutionaries to eventually overthrow the Russian monarchy after decades of British intrigue against Russia after Tsar Alexander II had all but declared war on Great Britain during the British-engineered American Civil War by sending the Russian Navy to assist Abraham Lincoln in a blockade of The Confederacy.

And that is the farce. That The Daily Mail claims to be against pornography yet its internet edition is constantly full of pictures of scantily clad celebrities, usually female, and attacks Marxism which was created by the very establishment it claims to support, the same establishment that had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic extremists that The Daily Mail so detests!

You could not make this stuff up!

Friday, October 11, 2013


Mantronix, got to have your love


A bargain!



JFK vs. Empire, Interview with Anton Chaitkin

Chaitkin's written article John F. Kennedy Vs. the Empire is available at

It was a fascination with the death of JFK that has led me to where I stand now.

Thursday, October 10, 2013


United States Africa Command, (U.S. AFRICOM) is one of six of the U.S. Defense Department's geographic combatant commands and is responsible to the Secretary of Defense for military relations with African nations, the African Union, and African regional security organizations. A full-spectrum combatant command, U.S. AFRICOM is responsible for all U.S. Department of Defense operations, exercises, and security cooperation on the African continent, its island nations, and surrounding waters. AFRICOM began initial operations on Oct. 1, 2007, and officially became an independent command on Oct. 1, 2008.

...United States Africa Command, in concert with interagency and international partners, builds defense capabilities, responds to crisis, and deters and defeats transnational threats in order to advance U.S. national interests and promote regional security, stability, and prosperity.

[source : ABOUT THE COMMAND, United States Africa Command,, Accessed 10th October 2013]

Libya. Once the jewel of Africa. Now in ruins. Bombed to smithereens. By Africom.

Libya was one of three African nations named to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11. The other two were Sudan and Somalia.

Somalia. Home to the world's seventh largest oil reserves, which are currently untapped.

USA for Africa - We Are The World (w/M.Jackson)

There comes a time when we hear a certain call
When the world must come together as one
There are people dying
And it's time to lend a hand to life
The greatest gift of all

We can't go on pretending day by day
That someone, somehow will soon make a change
We are all a part of God's great big family
And the truth, you know,
Love is all we need

We are the world, we are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day
So let's start giving
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
Its true we'll make a better day
Just you and me

Send them your heart so they'll know that someone cares
And their lives will be stronger and free
As God has shown us by turning stones to bread
So we all must lend a helping hand


When you're down and out, there seems no hope at all
But if you just believe there's no way we can fall well well well well
Let us realize that a change can only come
When we stand together as one


L U P O - Keep It Up


Two days ago the new head of MI5 tried to mug us all off by citing Jihadis returning from Syria wanting to blow us all up as the reason for mass surveillance of the muggins British taxpayer, when it is MI5 who is knowingly allowing Islamic extremists to preach on the streets of this Disunited Fascist Queendom and call for Muslims to cut the throats of Syrian children and join the Jihad in Syria against President Assad.

But last week the head of the NSA admitted to fabricating terror plots to justify mass surveillance.

NSA director admits to misleading public on terror plots

The administration has been amping up stats about foiled plots to bolster support for mass surveillance

By Natasha Lennard

In so many words, NSA director Keith Alexander admitted Wednesday that the Obama administration had issued misleading information about terror plots and their foiling to bolster support for the government’s vast surveillance apparatus.

During Wednesday’s hearing, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy pushed Alexander to admit that plot numbers had been fudged in a revealing interchange:

“There is no evidence that [bulk] phone records collection helped to thwart dozens or even several terrorist plots,” said Leahy. The Vermont Democrat then asked the NSA chief to admit that only 13 out of a previously cited 54 cases of foiled plots were genuinely the fruits of the government’s vast dragnet surveillance systems:

“These weren’t all plots, and they weren’t all foiled,” Leahy said, asking Alexander, “Would you agree with that, yes or no?”

“Yes,” replied Alexander.

Proof positive of what many of us have long posited: that under the flimsy guise of a targeted War on Terror, the surveillance state has established itself with little regard for an honest relationship with the American public.

[Natasha Lennard is an assistant news editor at Salon, covering non-electoral politics, general news and rabble-rousing. Follow her on Twitter @natashalennard, email]


At this year's Oscar awards, a film about the Iran hostage crisis called Argo won Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay. However, the film was also criticised for its woeful historical inaccuracies.

Iran has been the target of Israeli propaganda for decades over an alleged nuclear weapons program. Last year at the UN GA, the Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu gave us all a giggle when he produced a picture of a classic cartoon bomb with a lit fuse, supposed to represent Iran's alleged progress to producing a nuclear bomb. Meanwhile Israel sits on the largest stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Middle East, and nobody dare whisper anything about it.

So which film will take next year's Oscars by storm?

Well, I think we have a potential winner in Captain Phillips.

Captain Phillips is an adaptation (like Argo) of an account of piracy of the Maersk Alabama by fishermen from (drum roll...........) SOMALIA!!!

Initial screenings have been well received by the critics (like Argo).

But the film is also criticised for its historical inaccuracies (like Argo).

But what it is more curious is that the film is directed by Paul Greengrass, who directed two of the highly successful Bourne films, and also United 93, which supports the official version of 9/11.

So why would a successful director of the Bourne films, who also creates films that support the official version of 9/11, direct a film about Somali piracy, at this particular time, and for it to be so well received by the same film critic industry that praised Argo so much?

I am not a gambling man but I might just put a fiver on Captain Phillips to win at least one major award at next year's Oscars.

Wednesday, October 09, 2013


In the first public defence of GCHQ by a senior intelligence official, Parker said the agency had played a vital role in stopping many of the terrorist plots MI5 and the police had tackled in the past decade.

"We are facing an international threat and GCHQ provides many of the intelligence leads upon which we rely. It causes enormous damage to make public the reach and limits of GCHQ techniques. Such information hands the advantage to the terrorists.

"It is the gift they need to evade us and strike at will. Unfashionable as it might seem, that is why we must keep secrets secret, and why not doing so causes such harm."

In the speech, Parker also estimated there were "several thousand Islamist extremists [in the UK] who see the British people as a legitimate target". He said he thought the terrorism threat had not increased but was "more diffuse, more complicated, more unpredictable".

Parker said it would be impossible for MI5 to stop every plot, or prevent every attack. He argued that the agencies should have the capabilities they need and that scrutiny of their work was strong enough.

...MI5 has previously indicated Syria is "the destination of choice" for Britons seeking jihad. It is thought several hundred Britons have travelled to Syria over the past two years to fight with the forces seeking to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad.

"A growing proportion of our casework now has some link to Syria, mostly concerning individuals from the UK who have travelled to fight there or who aspire to do so," Parker said.

[source : GCHQ surveillance plays vital role in fight against terrorism, says MI5 chief, The Guardian,, 8th October 2013]

Here, the new chief of MI5 Sir Andrew Parker warns us that
1. "several thousand" Jihadis see the muggins British taxpayer as a legitimate target
2. that Syria is being used as a training ground by these Jihadis
3. GCHQ is tyring its hardest to stop their plots but needs more power and rinky dinky stuff

But perhaps all three are linked.

In May this year Drummer Lee Rigby was horrifically attacked on the streets of London by two men with machetes. They hacked at Rigby, causing fatal injuries, and then proudly talked at length on camera about their motives for the attack before charging at armed police and being shot.

And in the media that is where the story ended.

But it turns out that one of the attackers, Michael Adebalajo, was
1. under MI5 surveillance
2. had been asked to spy for them on Jihadis but refused to cooperate
3. allowed to preach Jihad on the streets of Woolwich begging Muslims to join the Jihad in Syria against Assad.

This at first sounds cray-zee, that MI5 would allow a Muslim to preach Jihad on the streets of London begging Muslims to go to Syria to cut the throats of Syrian children, but in MI5-land it makes perfect sense. This is because MI5 had a Covenant of Security with Islamic terrorists which allowed them to base their HQs in London and preach Jihad in order to provide cannon fodder for the holy wars that benefit the British Empire. This is the source of that Abu Qatada/Finsbury Park Mosque scandal. The former French foreign minister Roland Dumas has stated that he was asked by British officials in 2009 to help them to prepare the Jihad in Syria against Assad, that war being one of seven revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.

So we have to ask why are people like Adebalajo allowed to preach Jihad and beg for Muslims to join the Jihad against Syria on the streets of London, only for the new head of MI5 to preach to us, the muggins British taxpayer, that Syria is now a focus of Jihadis who are training over there to come back here and blow us up, so therefore we must give up all our freedoms?!

1. Sir Andrew Parker is a total plonker, or
2. is trying to take us all for mugs.

Either way Parker has to go.

No doubt there are some Jihadis who were not manufactured on this British Jihadi factory conveyor belt who need watching.

But we know the vast majority of them are being manufactured to scare the shit out of us so we cede our rights and privacy.

And it is not working anymore!

Tuesday, October 08, 2013


The Bilderberg Washington Post is trying it on over Somalia.

Proclaiming the recent raids in Libya and Somalia as reasonably successful and "legal and justified", despite violating national sovereignty, The Post praises these raids as the correct use of the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), the operations led by the US military not the CIA, while also suggesting that these operations would not have occured had the US not remained on a "war footing". In a speech earlier this year President Obama had begun to doubt the use of this.

But The Post wants more. And guess where?


And against who?

AL QAEDA!!!!!!!

As tempting as it may be to declare “the end of a decade of war,” Mr. Obama would be wiser to recognize — as he did in approving these operations — that the war against al-Qaeda continues. What’s needed is not the repeal of the legal justification for fighting it but an update that provides more explicit authority for operations in places such as Libya and Somalia.

[source : Stopping al-Qaeda — with the right authority, Washington Post,, 8th October 2013]

But as al Shabaab have warned, there will be reprisals against Western action in Somalia. Innocent unsuspecting civilians, in Somalia, the UK and USA, will probably die so that Anglo-American oil companies can get their hands on Somali oil.

These people do not care. It is this kind of action that will provoke the likes of al Shabaab to execute terrorist acts in places like London. They will no doubt be allowed to commit such acts, so that our politicians can act horrified and outraged, and demand war, war, war.

They didn't do 9/11 for fun.

Monday, October 07, 2013



Far beneath the surface of the tragic drama of Somalia, four major U.S. oil companies are quietly sitting on a prospective fortune in exclusive concessions to explore and exploit tens of millions of acres of the Somali countryside.

That land, in the opinion of geologists and industry sources, could yield significant amounts of oil and natural gas if the U.S.-led military mission can restore peace to the impoverished East African nation.

According to documents obtained by The Times, nearly two-thirds of Somalia was allocated to the American oil giants Conoco, Amoco, Chevron and Phillips in the final years before Somalia's pro-U.S. President Mohamed Siad Barre was overthrown and the nation plunged into chaos in January, 1991. Industry sources said the companies holding the rights to the most promising concessions are hoping that the Bush Administration's decision to send U.S. troops to safeguard aid shipments to Somalia will also help protect their multimillion-dollar investments there.

[source : The Oil Factor in Somalia, LA Times, 18th January 1993]


Because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"

[source : General Wesley Clark,


Yet it is the extent of oil deposits beneath the Indian Ocean that is most exciting Somali officials. One said the potential was comparable to that of Kuwait, which has more than 100bn barrels of proven oil reserves. If true, the deposits would eclipse Nigeria's reserves – 37.2bn barrels – and make Somalia the seventh largest oil-rich nation.

...Britain is involved in a secret high-stakes dash for oil in Somalia, with the government offering humanitarian aid and security assistance in the hope of a stake in the beleaguered country's future energy industry.

[source : Britain leads dash to explore for oil in war-torn Somalia, The Observer, 26/02/2012]


Britain's national security policy in the Middle East is moving away from Pakistan and Afghanistan, Britain's national security advisor has said.

Sir Kim Darroch told the joint committee on national security strategy that recent developments are shifting national security policy towards Yemen and Somalia.

Responding to a question about whether Afghanistan and Pakistan are still priorities given increased stability, Sir Kim told the committee: "The terrorist threat from Afghanistan is diminished. We don't want to tempt fate but it isn't what it once was".

He continued: "Al-Qaida's power in Pakistan has diminished, and the threats from instability in Yemen and Somalia are growing."

Sir Kim said that the weakness of governments in Yemen and Somalia and their inability to contain Islamist militants tied to al-Qaida means that they are considered more of a threat to British national security than Afghanistan.

[source : UK security focus shifting to Yemen and Somalia,,, 27/03/2012]


Moreover, Somalia is an easy target for the Western war machines, as the country does not have huge military infrastructure or any alliance to deter foreign intervention, and that the country has already been hit by civil wars, famine and natural disasters.

Somalia also has immense oil and gas reserves and some other natural resources like Uranium, iron and zinc. According to World Bank Somalia is the second African country with vast unexploited oil reserves. Puntland Province alone is able to produce between 5 and 10 billion barrels of oil.

[source : UK to impose Libya-style war on Somalia, PressTV, 22/02/2012]


Mogadishu (AFP) - Somalia said Sunday it was "not a secret" it is working with foreign governments to fight terror and described the country's Al-Qaeda-linked Shebab militants as a threat to the world.

Prime Minister Abdi Farah Shirdon was commenting after US commandos launched a raid against Shebab militants in Somalia, in tandem with a strike against a wanted Al-Qaeda leader in Libya.

"Our cooperation with international partners on fighting against the terrorism is not a secret," Farah Shirdon said. "Understand me, that fighting is not a secret. And our interest is to get a peaceful Somalia and free from terrorism and problems."

[source : Somalia says working with foreign partners on terror 'no secret', Yahoo News,, 6th October 2013]


Islamist fighters in Somalia last night warned of deadly reprisals on Britain's streets if the West mounted military action in the war-torn east African state.

...Last night the spokesman for the Islamist group, Sheikh Ali Dhere, warned it could launch terror attacks in the West if countries such as Britain and the US intervened in Somalia. "Your peace depends upon us being left alone," he told Channel 4 News. "If you do not let us live in peace, you will not enjoy peace either."

[source : Somali terrorists warn of reprisals on British streets, The Independent, 24/02/2012]

There was a Covenant of Security between the Islamic terrorists and MI5 in which the terrorists could live in London in safety but their operations had to fit in with the policies of Great Britain. Osama bin Laden had a mansion in London, and trained with MI6 in Scotland. Al Qaeda was created by MI6 and CIA for operations in Afghanistan.

Kenyan Intelligence Services knew about the attack on the Nairobi shopping mall. High level officials were warned not to go there that day.

After 9/11 we went into Afghanistan hunting the leader of al Qaeda. We invaded Iraq being told that Iraq was in bed with al Qaeda. That Israeli source of pure bullshit Debkafile has continually tried to link a dead Osama bin Laden with Iran.

And now, after yet another terrorist attack that was allowed to happen, operations in and against Somalia are increasing.

That wasteland on the Horn of Africa is going to become very interesting in the next year or two.

It's the same old story: create terrorists; let them commit terrorism; act horrified and go to war on them; grab natural resources.