One of the main theses that this blog supports, and without any doubts, is that the British monarchy engineered and kicked off WW1. Edward VII engineered the war, and his son George V kicked the war off by tricking Germany into invading Belgium. The reason for this was because the USA, Germany and Russia, with France a minor partner, were implementing a new economic system different and more successful to that of the British Empire. The idea was to trash the world, and from the ruins create a world government run by the British.
This evil plan almost worked: Europe was devastated, and a world government was created, The League of Nations. But the troublesome USA voted to stay out of it. So the LoN failed.
The British and their Zionist banking allies then set out to spark a more devastating world war, with the USA joining the war from the start and suffering many more casualties.
That 2nd attempt worked, and The United Nations survives today, with global governing bodies growing in power, like the World Health Organisation which is trying to inject us all with God knows what for bogus pandemics.
But would the British monarchy really do this?
I mean, sweet Charles III talks to plants, doesn't he?
Yes, but his ancestors branded their African slaves with a crown.
It was this system, this way of thinking that WW1 was designed to preserve. As was the US Civil War, which the British also engineered and kicked off.
And Charles claims to be a descendent of Vlad the Impaler.
See : The royal crown branded on enslaved Africans: Britain’s monarchy and the slave trade
