Wednesday, March 31, 2010


The organisation thought to be responsible for the Moscow bombs has denied its involvement. The Caucasus Emirate did however admit its intention to attack economic targets inside Russia, but not to target civilians.



Islamist group says not behind Moscow bombs
Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:33pm BST

ISTANBUL, March 31 (Reuters) - A militant Islamist separatist group led by a prominent Chechen rebel denied responsibility on Wednesday for bombings that killed 39 people in two Moscow metro stations.

"We did not carry out the attack in Moscow, and we don't know who did it," Shemsettin Batukaev, a spokesman for the Caucasus Emirate organisation, told Reuters by telephone in Turkey.

The spokesman said the group planned attacks on economic targets inside Russia, but not against civilians. Its leader, Doku Umarov, vowed last month to spread a Caucasian insurgency to Russian cities.

The Caucusus Emirate aims to create a pan-Caucasus, sharia-based state separate from Russia. Security analysts have named it as a potential suspect in Monday's attacks, which Russian authorities have blamed on female suicide bombers with connections to the volatile North Caucasus region.

No one has yet claimed responsibility for Moscow's worst bomb attack in six years.

"Of course we plan on attacking Russian economic targets, but our plans do not include attacks on people," said Batukaev, who lives in Istanbul and acts as the group's foreign representative.

He said that he did not know who was behind two bombings in Dagestan that killed 12 people on Wednesday, but did not deny the possibility that his organisation was involved. (Reporting by Thomas Grove, editing by Mark Trevelyan)

© Thomson Reuters 2010 All rights reserved.


This is the standard mantra used when we are told to give up all our privacy and data, and lately even our DNA!

Yet this is curiously not applicable to our governments, and now to climate scientists.

The Commons Science and Technology Committee has released its report on the Climategate story, and is actually quite damning and critical of the CRU, despite the spin given to the report by the mainstream media that Professor Jones has been exonerated.


He has been seriously criticised for withholding and possibly deleting data that should by law have been released due to FOIA requests.

It doesn't matter if the requests were from climate change sceptics; the requests were made and data should have been released.

The committee tries to sympathise with Jones in saying that witholding data is standard practice in climate science!!

And the committee also expresses its confidence in the 'independence' of the Oxburgh Inquiry into Climategate, even though Lord Oxburgh is chairman of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association and the wind energy company Falck Renewables which stand to make a fortune from the green economy that would arise if the green Nazi policies are implemented.

It's all such a farce!

I quote from the report executive summary.

The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in November 2009 had the potential to damage the reputation of the climate science and the scientists involved.

We believe that the focus on CRU and Professor Phil Jones, Director of CRU, in particular, has largely been misplaced. Whilst we are concerned that the disclosed e-mails suggest a blunt refusal to share scientific data and methodologies with others, we can sympathise with Professor Jones, who must have found it frustrating to handle requests for data that he knew—or perceived—were motivated by a desire simply to undermine his work.

In the context of the sharing of data and methodologies, we consider that Professor Jones’s actions were in line with common practice in the climate science community. It is not standard practice in climate science to publish the raw data and the computer code in academic papers. However, climate science is a matter of great importance and the quality of the science should be irreproachable. We therefore consider that climate scientists should take steps to make available all the data that support their work (including raw data) and full methodological workings (including the computer codes). Had both been available, many of the problems at UEA could have been avoided.

We are content that the phrases such as “trick” or “hiding the decline” were colloquial terms used in private e-mails and the balance of evidence is that they were not part of a systematic attempt to mislead. Likewise the evidence that we have seen does not suggest that Professor Jones was trying to subvert the peer review process. Academics should not be criticised for making informal comments on academic papers. In the context of Freedom of Information (FOIA), much of the responsibility should lie with UEA. The disclosed e-mails appear to show a culture of non-disclosure at CRU and instances where information may have been deleted, to avoid disclosure. We found prima facie evidence to suggest that the UEA found ways to support the culture at CRU of resisting disclosure of information to climate change sceptics. The failure of UEA to grasp fully the potential damage to CRU and UEA by the non-disclosure of FOIA requests was regrettable. UEA needs to review its policy towards FOIA and re-assess how it can support academics whose expertise in this area is limited.

The Deputy Information Commissioner has given a clear indication that a breach of the
Freedom of Information Act 2000 may have occurred but that a prosecution was timebarred; however no investigation has been carried out. In our view it is unsatisfactory to leave the matter unresolved. We conclude that the matter needs to be resolved conclusively—either by the Independent Climate Change Email Review or by the Information Commissioner.

We accept the independence of the Climate Change E-mail Review and recommend that
the Review be open and transparent, taking oral evidence and conducting interviews in
public wherever possible.

On 22 March UEA announced the Scientific Appraisal Panel to be chaired by Lord
Oxburgh. This Panel should determine whether the work of CRU has been soundly built
and it would be premature for us to pre-judge its work.


They engineered the establishment of the United States of Israel America.

They engineered the US Civil War.

They engineered WW1 and WW2 for their world-governing apparatus to be established.

And now they've faked a photo of their own bretheren to implicate David Icke as a Freemason.

See how it was done at


So what, you ask?

Sheikh Ahmed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the boss of ADIA, took Citi to court over "fraudulent misrepresentations" by Citi after ADIA invested over $7 billion dollars in Citi in 2007, just as the shit was hitting the fan. The case has yet to be decided.

Citi later received tens and tens of billions of dollars in bailouts, so its financial health was probably not as good as people thought...

Citi is a Bilderberg bank.

So a trained pilot who was taking on a Bilderberg bank is killed in a glider crash in which the second pilot survived?



Webster Tarpley on Alex Jones' Prison Planet stated that there is a foreign anti-Russian cabal intent on driving a wedge between not only Russia and China, but Putin and Medvedev.

Apparently Putin recently met with Xi, the heir apparent to China, to forge a relationship.

And Russia recently proposed a 100% destruction of the opium crop of Afghanistan, which was not surprisingly rejected by NATO.

There is only one force that would suggest that a wedge is being or should be driven between Putin and Medvedev, and that is same force that was involved in the American Civil War that led to significant cooperation between the USA and Russia.

It is imperative that an alliance be forged between the USA, Russia and China immediately, an alliance for peace, prosperity and manufacture, and not for revenge.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010


Darling, Cable and Osborne are the three blind mice.

Variations on a theme of genocidal exploitation.

1. Oik Osborne is just a rich banker's mate, independent of his Bulingdon Club heritage
2. Cable, as knowledgable as he is about how the crisis evolved, still does not get who is actually behind it all and therefore oblivious to the true reason behind it all. To Cable it was all an accident, but really it is about mass genocide in the form of vastly reduced health services, but more importantly, world war (i'll explain later)
3. Darling has been Chancellor since Brown appointed him in June 2007. This absolves him of most blame for encouraging the crisis but this does not absolove him of any blame for finding the true solution to our problem.

Mouse Osborne is simply a gimp of the Rothschilds and their allies since his Oxford days. He may not have been as racist and sexist as the Nat but you don't get to be a Bullingdon Bullying Bastard without some reason.

Mouse Cable should by now realise who the Rothschilds are and how they manipulated the world wars of the last century, and above all the precise reason as to how they have been able to exercise such power; the Rothschilds and their ilk create vast sums of money out of nothing while you and I must work our arses off just survive. And through the astronomical profits from such a system have been able to produce tyrants and world wars to their hearts desire.

Mouse Darling, ditto.

So the three blind mice were shown in glorious TV technicolour, floundering for vision as to what to do but at the same time trying to save their sad sorry arses, the sorry due to their blatant sell out to the Rothschilds and their ilk, the bastard, I-don't-give-fuck-about-you-stupid-electorate-non-upperclass-mongs, I'll-get-a-cushy-pension bankers.

We need to take back the power to create our own money...NOW!

It is blatantly obvious that those we have ridiculously entrusted that power to so far have used it for their own selfish gains.

Good night, and good luck.


In 2008 Georgia started a war in South Ossetia by shelling citizens in their beds while they slept at night. Russia quickly stopped this naked aggression by invading Georgia. Subsequent investigations have concluded that the Tie-muncher of Tblisi started it all. At the time of the war the likes of Richard Holbrooke and our very own boy David Miliband were foaming at the mouth for war with Russia.

The Tie-muncher of Tblisi was installed during the Rose Revolution which was financed by George Soros.

Since that war there has been a steady movement of US military and intelligence equipment and personnel into Georgia, probably by design after the Tie-muncher of Tblisi was egged on or ordered to begin the unnecessary assault on South Ossetia.

The man being blamed for the latest bombing of Moscow is Doku Umarov, the President of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria.

Ichkeria borders Georgia.

RT is now stating that Islamic extremists have admitted to the bombs.
Islamic extremists from the North Caucasus have claimed responsibility for the bombings. The statement was posted on a website which has contacts with them. This information has now been confirmed by Russia’s top security official.

[source : Authorities say Chechen warlord Umarov top suspect in Moscow bombings, RT 30/03/2010]

Umarov stated last month that he would be bringing the war in the Caucasus to towns and cities in Russia.

The US Senate recently decided that Georgia should be overtly re-armed by the US/NATO/EU by plenty of arms sales after the 2008 war had significantly depleted the Georgian military.

The Tie-muncher of Tblisi recently appointed a NWO PR firm and just a few weeks ago terrorised his own people by running a media simulation of an invasion of Georgia by Russia, which would no doubt convince a few more Georgians that plenty of money should be spent on military equipment.

Monday, March 29, 2010


For the past year or so Russia Today has gone for it on 9/11. It is the only media outlet in the world to focus on 9/11 in any shape or form or detail that we would expect our very own media to do so were it free and fair.

So who is Russia Today?

Why is it focusing on 9/11 so much?

But back to today's bombings in Moscow.

Imagine Russia's 9/11 or 7/7. Is today's bombing more like 7/7? If so, why not a Russian 9/11? Is that because Russian military and intelligence would never get caught out like the USA did on 9/11?

7/7 to us in the UK was an inside job; the alleged perps were not clean skins but had been under surveillance for months, the laughable report from the official investigation was quickly shown to be false, MI5 have since been shown to be liars with due to torturegate, and there has still not been an official post mortem on the dead, which is similar to Princess Diana when it took al Fayed 10 years to get one. The alleged perps of 7/7 gave the illegal and corrupt invasion of Iraq as their reason.

Now in Russia there is nothing like this situation.

But Russia
1. is trying to give mass media coverage of 9/11 via Russia Today, giving frequent appearances to the likes of Alex Jones and Webster Tarpley
2. is opposing the Nazi green agenda, and is suspected to be a possible source of the climategate emails
3. is being encouraged to kick out the London agents and their financial houses so that the London parasites have no prey to feast upon (Larouche has named a few of these; Chubais and the Inter-Alpha banks).

We know who runs the Islamic terrorists, everywhere; CIA and MI6 with the help of the Saudis and Israel. These people would benefit greatly from Russia being accused of a false flag op of their own so that Russia Today stops or decreases its exposure of the real 9/11 and other western operations.

What would Russia gain from these bombings? Perhaps more police state laws, and a war in the North Caucasus?
Would Russia benefit from a war in the North Caucasus, which could draw in Georgia?
And if Georgia could be drawn into that war then so could NATO.

And who would benefit from a war between Russia and NATO? Georgia recently ran that bogus Russian invasion simulation after employing a NWO PR firm.

Saturday, March 27, 2010


If you are not a paedo or a supporter, then you have nothing to fear.

Otherwise, oh dear...expect a few 'suicides' or 'unexplained deaths'...

Friday, March 26, 2010


I give those who know two weeks to sort out the peadophile ring in the Hampshire area, bring those guilty to justice, either to trial or some other trial, or else those who do nothing or protect the ring will be held personally repsonsible when this horror comes to be public knowledge.

The time of judgement is rapidly approaching.

It's your choice.

We know the story; powerful locals seduced by a local paedophile ring, controlled by MI5 to control local and national and international paedophile rings.

It's known; vote for this or else this photo with little johnnie will be released.

If you are MI5, then think of your children; as yet unchipped, but if those you serve come to power then your children will be prime targets as much as those you find for the process.

The final agenda is total control through the microchip. Once that's in you then forget it. Children, ALL children, will not be protected from paedophiles.


I do not believe that David Icke is a member of the Ryde Lodge.

I believe the photo to be manipulated.

But why would somebody do this?

David thinks it is due to his new book.

But I think it may go deeper and uglier than that.

David has worked very hard to expose the Hollie Greig story recently. At first threats and arrests (but not of the deserving perps) were made. But now as the story has grown and grown, the focus of discrediting has shifted from the principal investigator Robert Green onto Icke.

You may remember the child abuse case at Haut de la Garenne on Jersey a few years ago. When that story broke several people came forward to claim they were abused at a childrens home in Portsmouth, just across the water from The Isle of Wight. 21 people now say they were abused in childrens homes in Portsmouth. The former Mayor of Portsmouth Fred Emery-Wallis was jailed in 2001 for child molesting.

There seems to be a paedophile link between Portsmouth and Jersey, and lately Guernsey too.

The Ryde Lodge comes under the jurisdiction of the Hampshire Lodge, and Portsmouth is in Hampshire.

Is this all just a coincidence?

If the photo of The Worshipful Brother David Icke has been altered then either
1. six people knowingly posed for the photo knowing that one of them would be edited
2. the photo is genuine but one of them has been edited without being told

So, who are the other five, and who is the sixth?

By the way, David should be praised for his tireless work to expose the sick paedos, and is a brother of the whole of the human race for doing so.

Don't you think so?

Thursday, March 25, 2010


First, Israel uses cloned British passports to assassinate a Hamas official in Dubai, risking the inevitable consequences of a retaliation from Hamas, which undoubtedly will be used a pretext by Israel to invade and kill somewhere or other to satisfy some geopolitical proposal.

But secondly, after receiving billions and billions and billions and billions and billions and billions and billions etc in aid from the USA, Israel is about to give the USA the one fingered salute and build just a few hundred homes for Israelis on very controversial and highly disputed ground.

Lest we forget,
1. A Clean Break was written for Netanyahu
2. on 9/11 Netanyahu said that 9/11 would be very good for Israel

Who is the most powerful nation in the world?

Not Great Britain.

Not the USA.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010


Why did Bildermorgue Brown sell off tons of gold at rock bottom prices?

This has apparently been a source of great intrigue.

But if you have followed Reginald Howe's argument at The Golden Sextant you know the answer already; central banks sold off tons of gold at the correct time to suppress the price of gold as part of a conspiracy to manipulate gold prices. And the culprits are the usual suspects that have been at the heart of the derivatives market that caused the current financial crisis.


Explain why you sold Britain's gold, Gordon Brown told
Gordon Brown has been ordered to release information before the general election about his controversial decision to sell Britain's gold reserves.

By Holly Watt and Robert Winnett
Published: 11:55AM GMT 24 Mar 2010

Gordon Brown (L) and gold in the Bank of England - Explain why you sold Britain's gold, Gordon Brown told

The decision to sell the gold – taken by Mr Brown when he was Chancellor – is regarded as one of the Treasury's worst financial mistakes and has cost taxpayers almost £7 billion.

Mr Brown and the Treasury have repeatedly refused to disclose information about the gold sale amid allegations that warnings were ignored.

Following a series of freedom of information requests from The Daily Telegraph over the past four years, the Information Commissioner has ordered the Treasury to release some details. The Treasury must publish the information demanded within 35 calendar days – by the end of April.

The sale is expected to be become a major election issue, casting light on Mr Brown's decisions while at the Treasury.

Last night, George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, demanded that the information was published immediately. "Gordon Brown's decision to sell off our gold reserves at the bottom of the market cost the British taxpayer billions of pounds," he said. "It was one of the worst economic judgements ever made by a chancellor.

"The British public have a right to know what happened and why so much of their money was lost. The documents should be published immediately."

Between 1999 and 2002, Mr Brown ordered the sale of almost 400 tons of the gold reserves when the price was at a 20-year low. Since then, the price has more than quadrupled, meaning the decision cost taxpayers an estimated £7 billion, according to Mike Warburton of the accountants Grant Thornton.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010


Following the expulsion of the top Mossad agent in the UK for its use of cloned British passports in the ziomurder of a Hamas official, I fully expect all members of Labour Friends of Israel to tear their membership of LFI up in front of the Israeli Embassy.

And not just Labour, but All Friends of Israel, otherwise we know where your loyalties lie...


A tiny step in the right direction will be taken by the UK in expelling an Israeli diplomat in repsonse to the finding that Israel did indeed use cloned British passports in its obvious assassination of a Hamas leader in Dubai in January this year.

But in reality this is nothing.

Israel is erasing Gaza from the map, and imprisoning the remaining Palestinians behind a concrete wall while receiving billions and billions in financial and political support from the Ziocongress and Zioparliament, both British and EU.

Look. It's dead simple.

1. We are told that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda are the source of all global terror.
2. Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda have forever and a day named Israel as the major reason for their terror.
3. The terror that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda have allegedly committed, and will continue to allegedly commit, is being used by our Ziocongress and Zioparliaments to implement a global police state
4. So it is in the interest of our Ziocongress and Zioparliaments to be seen to show concern for Israel's actions while actually rubbing their hands with glee that they will soon be able implant an all-controlling microchip into us to eventually end our human freedom that has troubled them over the millenia forever.
5. So in order to ease this process it is absolutely essential that al-Qaeda and its affiliates be protected, hence we protected them in Londonistan and gave them a covenant of security, and the works of Webster Tarpley and Nafeez Ahmed clearly show that al-Qaeda and its affiliates are gimps of the CIA and MI6.



Report: Britain to expel Israeli diplomat over Dubai hit passports
By Danna Harman, Haaretz Correspondent, and Reuters
Tags: Israel news

Britain will expel an Israeli diplomat over the use of forged British passports in the assassination of Hamas chief Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai, Sky News television reported on Tuesday, without disclosing its sources.

Mabhouh was killed January in what Dubai police have said they are near certain was a hit by Israel's Mossad spy agency. Police said the killers traveled to the Gulf Arab emirate using forged passports from the U.K., Ireland, France, Germany and Australia.

Dubai authorities have named 27 alleged members of the team that tracked and killed the Palestinian, and said they used fraudulent British, Irish, French, German and Australian passports to enter and depart from Dubai.

The British Foreign Office declined to comment but said Foreign Secretary David Miliband would make a statement on the matter at 5:30 P.M. (1530 GMT).

Sky News said it did not know the level of seniority of the diplomat who faced expulsion.

The Foreign Ministry said it had no immediate comment on the report. Spokesman Yigal Palmor said he was checking the details of the report.

Israel has neither confirmed nor denied a role in the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a military commander from the Palestinian organisation Hamas, in a Dubai hotel room in January.

Britain is expected to formally link Israel to the killing of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, who was found dead in a Dubai hotel room in January, according to a report Tuesday by the British Daily Telegraph.

Israeli Ambassador to London, Ron Prosor, was summoned to the Foreign Office in London on Monday to be told that results of an inquiry into the murder of Mabhouh have determined for certain that British passports were forged as part of the operation, according to the report.

According to the newspaper, there was growing speculation that a diplomat would be expelled as "a mark of the 'anger' within the government that British passport holders had been put at risk as a result of the operation."

Prosor was also reportedly told that a ministerial statement will be made to Parliament in the coming days formally naming the Israeli security services as responsible for the cloning of up to 15 British passports as part of the Dubai operation.

The statement will not state definitively whether the Mossad was involved and will instead mention both them and the Military Intelligence Directorate.

But the Foreign Office made it clear to Prosor that the probe had determined for certain that the passports were cloned when British citizens passed through airports on their way into Israel, with officials taking them away for 'checks' which lasted around 20 minutes.

There was no immediate response from the embassy


If you didn't think that Google was CIA, then why has it got the balls to take on China?

Search engines are possibly the best source of information on what people are thinking, so would obviously be of supreme interest to intelligence agencies.

So we have legitimate questions to ask about the meteoric rise of Google to become the most popular search engine by a long way.

And now Google is challenging China.

Monday, March 22, 2010


Is it funny that the Iranian and Pakistan nuclear power programs were started under the Atoms for Peace program of Eisenhower of the 1950's?

And now here we are, in 2010 and Israel, the only nation in the Middle East known to have nuclear weapons, is threatening war with Iran over a nuclear power program that
1. was proposed by an American President,
2. developed by an American company
3. when Israel would not survive without America

I also wonder if Operation Ajax had anything to do with this.

It is all such a farce, and indicates just how much planning and manipulation has gone into creating the conditions in the Middle East we see today.

Sunday, March 21, 2010


It's dead easy...honest!

I hereby declare peace.


There is an interview of a child of Gaza about five minutes into this documentary of the result on the contrived Zionazi bombing of Gaza beginning late December 2008.

The child says he used to love everybody. After the bombing he now loves nobody.

This is Israel deliberately creating the next generation of terror to help implement the global police state in which everyone will be implanted with a microchip, which will not only be used for financial transactions but will also control you as an individual.


Yet more wartalk appears in The Sunday Times.

Apparently two unnamed Taliban commanders have told The Sunday Times where they train!

If you want to destroy your organisation then you tell people where you train, don't you?

Who are these commanders? Are they bona fide?
Have they been captured? If so, what deals have been struck for this 'information'?
Have they been tortured? If so, the 'information' cannot be trusted.
Have they been paid?

As The Chilcot Inquiry may have finally realised, there has been a 15 year agenda for the Zionazis to capture the vast oil and gas reserves of the Middle East and Caspian. But they can't state that explicitly, so they come up with some bollocks about defence and freedom, and then produce documents entitled A Clean Break, and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

Both documents were written by the same bunch of Zionutters.
Both named Iraq as a prime target of military aggression.

Both also named Iran.


Iranians train Taliban to use roadside bombs

TALIBAN commanders have revealed that hundreds of insurgents have been trained in Iran to kill Nato forces in Afghanistan.

The commanders said they had learnt to mount complex ambushes and lay improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which have been responsible for most of the deaths of British troops in Helmand province.

The accounts of two commanders, in interviews with The Sunday Times, are the first descriptions of training of the Taliban in Iran.

According to the commanders, Iranian officials paid them to attend three-month courses during the winter.


It is being reported that the Chilcot Inquiry has asked to question several members of the USA government under George W Bush, including W himself. But get this! Others requested for questioning include
Dick Cheney
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Rumsfeld
Stephen Hadley

This is a very significant development, but I'm not confident of the Clean Break/PNAC agenda being exposed because these potential witnesses do not have to answer any questions from the inquiry.

But is this due to anyone writing to inquiry about the Clean Break/PNAC agenda?



Iraq Inquiry asks to question George Bush's senior officials

The Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War could take an explosive new twist after it emerged that leading figures in George Bush's administration have been asked to give evidence to it. By Patrick Hennessy, Political Editor
Published: 9:00PM GMT 20 Mar 2010

Requests are understood to have been made to Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld and Stephen Hadley. Sources in Washington said the inquiry sent out emails "about three weeks ago" to senior officials in Mr Bush's government including, it is believed, the former president himself. Other requests are understood to have been made to Dick Cheney, Mr Bush's vice-president, Condoleezza Rice, the former secretary of state, Donald Rumsfeld, the former US defence secretary, and Stephen Hadley, an ex-national security adviser – as well as to their deputies and senior assistants.

Members of Sir John Chilcot's panel are believed to be willing to travel to the US to take evidence – almost certainly in private – on the administration's policies between the 2003 invasion of Iraq and 2009.

Saturday, March 20, 2010


I am concerned about the recent reports regarding an interview with Dr. Alan Sabrosky.

The two non-US states we know for a fact that that are involved in 9/11 are not only Israel, but more importantly Saudi Arabia.

The alleged pilots were not Israelis...they were Saudis, by the majority.

Both Israel and Saudi Arabia are British entities, so 9/11 is more a British than an Israeli, operation.

There are undoubtedly Israeli fingerprints over 9/11, e.g. the dancing Israelis who later admitted they were close to the WTC on 9/11 to film the event, but they were not alone.

The Israeli factor regarding 9/11 was to drive the USA into a large scale war in the Middle East and Caspian, as requested by A Clean Break and PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses, lately recognised by Dr Sabrosky.

The Saudi faction, having been granted their power by the British during WW1, would not deny their benefactors any request,

So we have Rothschild, i.e.British, Israel, and a Saudi, i.e. British, Arabia.

The two came together on 9/11 to give terrorism to the USA on a massive scale
And the USA responded on a massive scale too!

Who is this Sabrosky anyway?

Surely it cannot have taken his alleged expertise nearly ten years to finally conclude, and incorrectly, that the Jews alone did 9/11?!

People, including alleged military historians, must realise that
1., Israel is a creation of the Rothschilds, who are gimps of the British monarchy
2. Saudi Arabia was created after Versailles as a puppet monarchy of the British
3. this makes total sense when it is understood that "the USA" has never been independent of the UK but merely the next phase in the plan which required a large amount of energy, hence the 'fond' relationship between British created Saudi Arabia and the British created USA

ps you MUST also understand that by British I mean Illuminati, and by Illuminati I mean that organisation created by Adam Weishaupt which amalgamated with Freemasonry, itself started 6000 years ago, at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad in 1782.

Friday, March 19, 2010


Blair has apparently been on a bunsen burner with South Korean oil field development company UI Energy.

The website of UI Energy provides some very revealing information.

Stephen Solarz and Keneth Adelman are named as current members of the board of advisors. Both were members of PNAC, and
in particular Adelman had an interest in the Middle East, Solarz in the Balkans.

But the UI page on the company goes even further, naming as advisors Frank Carlucci and John Abizaid, former Commander of CentCom
which covered the Middle East.


The corporation is making progress in various overseas energy development projects in the North America, where many potential energy developments are, and the Middle East, such as Iraq and Africa, where Korea companies have difficulty to enter into due to geopolitical and other political issues, through entering a partnerships with domestic, foreign and other global oil exploration companies with the highest qualifications.

... UI Energy Corporation is undertaking oil development business in Iraq through strategic business development where Korean companies had trouble in the past. When the global consortium for oil development of North Kurdistan region, Iraq, is established as Iraqi oil law is approved, the participation of UI Energy Corporation is determined and only the final finishing touch is remained.
So UI is paying these people for advice and to lobby so that a South Korean oil company can get into Iraq.

And Blair is on their payroll.

And Blair illegally invaded Iraq based on a pack of lies.

Very very interesting (and corrupt) indeed.

Thursday, March 18, 2010


I use Riemann solvers in my research in CFD. They are very useful and improve accuracy significantly. They can add significant computation to arrive at that improved solution, but they get the job done, depending on which solver you use.

Now, after WW1 the ptb, primarily Great Britain and France, tried to establish a world government at Versailles in the form of the League of Nations (LoN), the American branch of a British institution aimed at promoting world government. They didn't get it because the USA voted out of it. Wilson then toured the USA trying to convince the USA to sign up to the LoN. They didn't. So the ptb created the Council on Foreign Relations, a branch of a British organisation aimed at promoting world government and financed by British-allied Wall Street bankers who then owned The Federal Reserve. When this failed to drag the USA into the LoN a trap was set, although this had been recognised as necessary by Albert Pike for his 3 world war plan. That trap was to somehow drag the USA into another world war.

By 1921 Europe had already been divided by the advent of Communism in 1917. By 1929, after the Great Crash, Europe was even more divided. The instigators of that 1929 crash got out early and escaped prosecution under following Presidencies.

FDR was elected in 1932 and in 1933 gave his "the money changers have fled the temple" speech. It sounded great to a public savaged by severe economic depression. They wanted change. Great change. FDR offered it in vast quantities.

But The Federal Reserve and the criminals who owned it and engineered the 1929 crash were still, and would remain, at large under FDR., free to engineer events elsewhere with their vast profits.

Sure, there was an 'investigation', and several minor scapegoats were jailed; but the major criminals remained free and the Federal Reserve infrastructure remained virtually unscathed, despite FDRs prophecy.

So how do you solve a problem called world government?

Following WW1 the major obstacle to a world government was the USA.

So, again, how do you solve a problem called world government? You drag the USA into another world war, more bloody and violent and horrific than WW1, and get the USA to fight in it much longer than the 15 months it fought in WW1, so that the USA would vote for a world government, one that promoted itself as the only solution to man's global inhumanity to man!

Indeed, that is what happened!

FDR engineered Pearl Harbour, with the connivance of his alleged arch-enemy Winston Churchill, and not only slaughtered approximately 3000 US military at Pearl Harbour in order to feign surprise and disgust in Congress at the attack, and subsequently drag the USA into WW2 with mass support from the ordinary American public, but all the many millions who eventually died in WW2! And when he had the chance to stop all the killing, with several offers from Admiral Canaris, he refused! And he gave the USSR virtually anything it wanted, including the bomb!

So that is how you solve a problem called world goverment; you get a FDR Solver, approximate or exact. It doesn't matter. It gets the job done.

Now we have several global governing institutions interfering in our lives, those lives they deem worthy of living.

And if anyone has an alternative explanation of Pearl Harbour, other than "it just happened", I and many others would be very very happy to hear it.


I knew it!

A Bildermorguer never changes his spots.

I knew Brown was lying to Chilcot, and so it has been proven.

Brown will 'correct' evidence he gave to Chilcot regarding funding for the MoD. Brown said to Chilcot the budget for the MoD had increased when in fact it had decreased.

How Brown could get this wrong after ten years as Chancellor and months to prepare his evidence.

I based my assumption that Brown had lied to Chilcot purely on the fact that he betrayed us by signing the Treaty of Lisbon, the wet dream of Bildermorgue, without giving us the referendum he promised.

What else is he lying about?



Defence blunder forces Gordon Brown to beat retreat
Deborah Haynes, Defence Editor and Roland Watson, Political Editor

A former defence chief turned on Gordon Brown last night after the Prime Minister admitted giving inaccurate information to the Iraq inquiry about Britain’s wartime spending.

General Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank said that Mr Brown’s admission that he cut military spending in real terms — rather than increased it, as he told the inquiry — demonstrated his antipathy towards the Armed Forces.

The admission vindicated former commanders, whose claims that the cuts had cost lives were branded by Mr Brown as “disingenous” and “wrong”.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010


Our freedom is their problem.

Our freedom to think.

Our freedom to say what we think.

Our freedom to do something about what we think.

All that, our freedom, is their problem.

So how do they solve a problem called freedom?


When I was growing up the IRA were causing all sorts of terror in the UK. As a result laws were introduced to deal with this threat of terror. These laws led to persecution of people of Irish descent, and led to the imprisonment of the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six, released years later after conviction when it was believed that the convictions were unsafe.

This Irish terrorist activity on mainland Britain was due to the centuries old conflict of Britain invading Ireland by Oliver Cromwell, held up by many as the father of Parliament when he in fact was a traitor, colluding with a faction based in Amsterdam, killing the king.

During the 20th Century the Jews took control of Palestine. This was a desire expressed by that same faction who financed Cromwell. Most Jews believed, quite correctly as has been shown by recent events, that Jews returning en masse to Palestine would cause great anger in the Islamic world. The Ottomans recognised this and rebuffed any overture made to them by the Jews.

But WW1 changed all that.

At Versailles Palestine was handed to Britain, largely associated with the Rothschilds and their mates such as Schiff and Warburg, also based in the USA and Germany. There then followed some encouragement of mass immigration of Jews into Palestine. As a result the Palestinians rioted. This should have rung some alarm bells; Jews had believed this would occur. But still the immigration was encouraged. The Jews even collaborated with the Nazis to assist Jewish immigration into Palestine. But despite the terrible abusive atmosphere created by the Nazis the vast majority of German Jews did not take up the opportunity to take advantage of the favourable conditions provided between Nazi Germany and Britain, who then controlled Palestine, to escape Nazi persecution to Palestine.

But WW2 changed all that.

The Nazis persecuted others than Jews, but we cannot deny that the Nazis did persecute Jews. We can argue whether 2 million, 3 million or even 6 million Jews were executed. But something terrible did happen to the Jews during WW2.

So after the inevitable defeat of the Nazis the Jews who before WW1 were reluctant to move to Palestine decided that perhaps Palestine was their Jewish homeland, a haven from persecution from an anti-Semitic world.

But they were not told that
1. the Nazis had been financed and controlled by Jews, notably the Warburgs
2. the Jewish leadership had refused transfer to safety from Nazi persecution many German and Polish Jews because their proposed destination was not Palestine

The alleged Holocaust of WW2 had changed the minds of many Jews, and some were driven into overt violence against the Palestinians. Approximately 700,000 Palestinians were driven into ghettos called The West Bank and The Gaza Strip, living in camps with the rats. Maps of the growth of Jewish Palestine since 1945 show just how quickly it grew after WW2.

Israel was formally created in 1948.

Then it was given great financial and military assistance from the USA, the privately-owned The Federal Reserve being owned by such families as Rothschild, Warburg and Schiff.

With this force behind them Israel believed it could do whatever it wanted...and it did, treating Palestinians and Israel's neighbours such as Lebanon and Syria like shit.

As a result organisations such as Hamas, Hizbullah and PLO were created.

What was initially a local conflict quickly became global. Israeli athletes were slaughtered at the Munich Olympics. An Air France flight was hijacked and flown to Uganda.

This global terrorism was something the IRA conflict did not produce...and global terror meant more deaths and more spectacular terror, to get the message across.

About this time a young Wahabbi called Osama bin Laden began working for the CIA in Afghanistan to drive the Russians out of that country. During that conflict a database known as al-Qaeda of all of bin Laden's supporters was created. Over a decade, as you would think, bin Laden created a cohesive and directed organisation.

After the Russians left Afghanistan bin Laden began issuing messages against Israel.

Then on 9/11 he allegedly masterminded the successful flight of four hijacked planes over the most protected air space in the world for over an hour before they flew into the WTC and the Pentagon, of all places!

It was called blowback by 'experts' in the intel community.

It was unexpected, they cried.

But it is now known the FBI assisted a previous attack on the WTC in 1993, and Operation Bojinka discovered in the mid-1990s required the hijacking of tens of planes which were to be flown into high profile targets in the USA.

And 9/11 satisfied the precondition, as expressed so precisely in the PNAC document Rebuilding America's Defenses, for the USA and its allies, the UK and Israel, to go on the rampage in the Middle East and the Caspian to acquire control over the worlds largest known fossil fuel reserves. The same cabal of Zionazis who produced Rebuilding America's Defenses also wrote A Clean Break for then Israeli PM Netanyahu.

But 9/11 also led to massive increases in powers of surveillance, arrest and detention of the citizen by the state.

As set out in Rebuilding America's Defenses and A Clean Break, and despite the severe lack of credible evidence (we went to war on the word of a cabbie!), Iraq was invaded by the coalition of the killing, which led to the London bombings of 7/7, the largest terrorist attack on mainland Britain, far far greater than anything the IRA were ever able to execute.

So you now see that the Irish conflict led to local terror and a local police state, albeit relatively weak.

But Islamic terror, provoked by the barbarity of the Zionist State of Israel and with its HQ in Londonistan and its covenant of security, has led to global terror, a global police state and what has been a 8 year war so far, and still counting.

WW1 lasted just over 4 years.

WW2 lasted just under 6 years.

What I would call WW3, which has so far lasted 8 years, has not finished yet. Its ultimate purpose is to provoke a global war between Russia/China and the USA, which has so far not occured.

There have been provocations; Litvinenko's death, Georgia's slaughter in South Ossetia, etc.

But Iran, named as target in both A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, is still sovereign...but only just, having survived overtly externally-financed revolutions and allegations of WMD development and an encroachment into sovereign Iranian waters by the British Navy leading to the arrest of a number of British Military personnel in 2007.

So that is how our freedom is being eroded.

And we are paying for it all!

That's the 'beauty' of the plan.

They want to enslave us in a prison planet but they
1. don't want to pay for it
2. don't want to do any work themselves

So they trick us all into doing their nasty work for them and get us to pay them for the privilege.

It's very clever...but evil.

There is only one force that could conceive of this, and it controls the White House.

Monday, March 15, 2010


In response to Jesse Ventura's statement that he will never commit suicide, I am going on the record too; I will never commit suicide.

As stated at New Year, sometime this year, probably after, not before, the 2010 GE and the elected party has proposed its budget to cope with the result of the gambling of the banks encouraged by Bildermorguers Brown and Balls, I will begin my legal efforts to anull most of the financial contracts between private citizens and any bank registered under the FSA.

We need real hard numbers for that, not just hearsay and speculation.

There is one subargument which could be applied beforehand, but with real hard numbers provided by none other than HM Government, there is definitely no counter-argument; WE HAVE BEEN DELIBERATLEY SCREWED BY A BUNCH OF MURDERING SCUMBAG FUCKERS, and their recent form in WW1 and WW2 will provide the proof that the rip off of the ages was no random event.

And of course, the Bilderbergers of all Bilderbergers will be in court, singing like a bird, and under oath.


I want to see these fuckers behind bars, sharing a cell with Josef Fritzl, AT LEAST...

Sunday, March 14, 2010


In January this year the murdering Tie-muncher of Tblisi, Mikhail Saakashvili, signed a contract with PR firm Podesta Group.

Podesta's clients are straight from the NWO;
Bank of America
Credit Suisse
General Dynamics
General Motors
Lockheed Martin
Wells Fargo

Now, just two months after the PR contract was signed the Georgian government, without warning, simluates a mock invasion of Georgia by Russia, terrorising the Georgian population.


Anyway, the simulation appears to have backfired because there is much anger.


The Advertising Standards Authority has banned two of the terrorising ads produced with taxpayer money designed to scare us all shitless about the bogus theory of manmade global warming. The ads have been banned because the science behind the ads is unproven. A short film based on the same load of bollocks has been referred to Ofcom.

These crooks should be done for terror and fraud, and also mass murder because the ultimate aim of these ads is to implement green Nazi policies of mass genocide because the ptb believe there are too many of us on the planet; but they don't want to kill themselves, they want to kill you instead, so they come up with this load of bollocks.

The mysterious Georgia Guidestones state a maximum of 500 million people.

The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment 1996 states a maximum of 1 billion people.



Ed Miliband's adverts banned for overstating climate change
Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor

The Advertising Standards Asociation has banned Ed Miliband's Environment department from running misleading nursery rhyme advertisements on climate change.

The adverts' claims 'were not supported by science'

TWO government advertisements that use nursery rhymes to warn people of the dangers of climate change have been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for exaggerating the potential harm.

The adverts, commissioned by Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, used the rhymes to suggest that Britain faces an inevitable increase in storms, floods and heat waves unless greenhouse gas emissions are brought under control.

The ASA has ruled that the claims made in the newspaper adverts were not supported by solid science and has told the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that they should not be published again.

It has also referred a television commercial to the broadcast regulator, Ofcom, for potentially breaching a prohibition on political advertising.

Saturday, March 13, 2010


There is one very simple and obvious way for the Russian government to express it's alleged 'distress' about drugs; expose the Hollie Greig paedophile ring scandal...NOW!

It taps directly into Number 10 Downing Street, the heart of NATO!

NATO waging undeclared war on Russia: Moscow

Look, everyone knows that the British are at the heart of NATO and drug dealing. They have been for centuries.

Drug dealing is one thing.

But if there is one thing to get the blood of the British man and woman to say NO!, it's paedophilia. You can send us into war in the trenches for years, but paedophilia?

Over here paedophilia is THE worst thing that anyone can be accused of.

Defraud the government of £1 trillion pounds? Here you go mate, a ten billion bailout you see you through.

Kill some OAPs on the LCP and it's here's our knighthood.

But kids?

Asking for trouble.

So when a blatant case of paedophilia rises to offer opportunity of exposing the paedophile scum that links into the heart of the British establishment I fully expect all to expose that story as full and as detailed as possible!!



WMDs in Iraq? Yeah, tell all the lies you want.

WMDs in Iran? Yeah, tell all the lies you want.

But if a massive story that could topple the British government arises that involves paedophiles? FORGET IT!

NOBODY, nobody internationally exposes it!



The international paedo ring that drives and corrupts current affairs is supported by ALL international intelligence, i.e. peado, agencies.

George HW Bush is named by some as present at paedo parties; he is also named as key to paving the way for the NWO with his many refs to the NWO.

Expose Hollie Greig or damn your children to a life of slavery, possibly sex slavery if he or she is given that task by the very people you now allegedly oppose.

Friday, March 12, 2010


My favourite word, when I speak of the bastards who have done what they've done to us and plan for us, begins with F.

Can you guess what it is yet?

What's that? Friend?!

Friend, he says. I don't think so, my friend. Exactly the opposite.

What's that you say? Foe?

Foe, she says. It's in the same ball park love, but nowhere near suggestive as the word I'm thinking.

Come on now people. A word that begins with F, a word that we use though we know we shouldn't (which implies we all have doubts about that Babylonian religion that evolved in Christianity), a word we use if we hit our thumbs with a hammer, or find out our daughter is about to have a child from one of the Rothschilds.




Anybody brave enough to say it.

We all know it.

We all use it.

C'mon now.

It's not friend, or foe, that's established.

Foreigner! Who said that? Foreigner?

Again, not quite right, but you're on the right track, mate, coz these peoples don't care about nationality, only how to destroy it.



C'mon now peoples.

OK, I'll give you a clue. If someone ripped you off as a nation for over £10 trillion so that you and your children and grandchildren would be paying off the national debt for decades, what word beginning with F would you use?


Fazakerley! At Long last! Hallelujah!

Cheesuz, you lot are hard work.


I grew up listening to Thomas Dolby. He wrote I Scare Myself. It is supposed to be about a man realising the depth of his love for his lover.

In this age of engineered terror, the song is very apt for today in which the general population is engineered to love its protector, even though the protector engineered the terror for that very reason.

So many people are so readily able to scare themselves.


It is that with a sorry heart that I fear something catastrophic may happen between either now or the time that Bildermorgue Gordon Brown announces the date of the 2010 GE, and the anticipated election in early May occurs.

I get this feeling that something very bad may occur because
1. it is absolutely crystal clear that current events and general emotions are really beginning to spook the ptb in a very big way; not just annoyance but explicit outrage!
2. the bank bailout, not just by USA but also by the EU, has become unacceptable to the general population
3. the plan for easy and total domination of the Caspian and Middle East has not worked out, and is becoming apparent to more and more that 9/11 was a murderous hoax by elements within our governments.

I proposed that 2. and 3. were in fact designed to provoke the world, due to the omnipresent and boring and tragically engineered dispute between Islam and Judaism, into a catastrophic world war 3 that after WW1 (which had at least implanted into the the world the idea of a world government), and WW2 (which had at least created a world-government-apparatus-in-wating) would lead to the rapid and easy formation of a world government for the ultrarich, by the ultrarich of the eternally poor.

Russia Today at least appears to be supporting our plight, but after its lack of coverage of Hollie Greig I can now only sympathise with the idea that ALL governments (and probably due to paedophilia) are complicit in the agenda for world government by the kiddie-fiddlers for the kiddie-fiddlers of the fcukt-up.


Since the first second I was born it has been drilled into me; love thy servitude.

Love thy servitude?

Love thy quasi-slavery? (The two are not EXACTLY the same)

Anyhoo, the fact remains; we are treated as inhuman by the oligarchy.

Having just rewatched Endgame by Alex Jones, I am stunned by the amount of correct information is in his documentaries. I believe Endgame has stopped the then very rapid formation of the NAU. As I have repeatedly stated, the EU, the NAU, the African Union, the Asia-Pacific Union were, repeat were, supposed to all almagmate seamlessly and effortlessly into one big happy sing-a-long tyrannical fascist World Government after the next big world war, which Albert Pike proposed should be between the Jews and the Muslims, and WW1 and WW2 have followed that diabolical plan.

But Endgame also reports how Aldous Huxley explains that his book entitled Brave New World was then a secret plan of the NWO, and not fiction. Aldous was brother of Julian, President of the Eugenics Society and founder of the WWF, the organisation which tried to "save the planet" at Copenhagen last December with apocalyptic forecasts of weather from the Meteorological Office (then run by a former head of the WWF-UK). Other founders of the WWF were Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands whose mummy is Queen B, a permanent fixture at Bilderberg, and our very own (put your hands together for) Prince Phillip, President of The Racist and Sexist Gaffe Society.

The Nazi dream is over.


We know.

They know we know.

And now you know we know.

Das Neu Welt Oder ist kapput!

And it stinks!

With the PNAC/A Clean Break agenda blatantly trying to satisfy this precondition for WW3 but failing spectacularly, it would appear that the three world war agenda is spectacularly failing.

So my advice to potential 2010 Bildermorgue attendees, including Bailout Brown is; FORGET IT!

When you take time out and look at things in perspective you can only come to one conclusion; I AM MAD!

I am mad for letting such a group of genocidal psychopaths for not only controlling the world now, but controlling the future of my children!

They 'use' paedophiles to control votes in Congress, UK Parliament, the EU, and elsewhere. Drugs, and children.

So God help your children if these fuckers get their way and implant a microchip into your kids and grandkids.

I've alerted you.

Now save your children!

Vote No! to fascist tyranny and war, and Yes! to freedom and education.

Sunday, March 07, 2010


Having just again watched Alex Jones' incredible taping of the Cremation of Care at Bohemian Grove in June 2000 I wonder if the NSA has been able to tape it from NSA space in much more detail than Alex was able to, either then or more likely since?

For those who are still unaware of Bohemian Grove, every year several hundred sick fuckers are invited to attend The Cremation of Care in which an effigy of a human being is burned in front of a 40 foot stone owl called Moloch to whom children were sacrificed in the ancient times.

When Jones filmed this ceremony of artificial human sacrifice not one attendee can be heard booing. In fact they cheer!

They cry, Begone detested Care! Begone dull Care!

Can you imagine why our political leaders would attend such a sick meeting, cheer it on, and they say fuck all to us!?

There can be only one explantion : they don't care about us.

Care is the name of the effigy, i.e. you are not supposed to care about Care, i.e. have no sympathy for anything or anyone.

The implication is; "Care" is detestable. "Care" is dull.

That's what the Nazi deathcare is all about, what the Liverpool Care Pathway is all about, what all the coming death is all about to pay for the bailout of the Bilderberg Nazi banks.

These visions of detested and dull care are thoughts and emotions that attendees are supposed to leave Bohemian Grove with, to eventually make decisions on the world political stage, such as should we go to war, or on the industrial/commercial stage, such as should we rip the 3rd world off by employing 7 year old kids at 1 cent an hour for 16 hours a day.

I shall repeat here now and shall repeat for evermore;





We hate you!

We know exactly what you are upto.

We do not agree with your globalist Nazi agenda.

You can shove it up your arse and then eat it and feed it to your known detested kids.


There are two listings for DNAputer.

1. DNAputer Research Inc listed in Hollister, California as a medical research company for which Bedell was the only employee and receiving $58000 annual income, though the source of this income is as yet unknown
2. DNAputer Consulting listed in Richardson, Texas describing itself as
We specialize in intranet development for small to medium-size businesses. We also provide network design and implementation services.

There is a link provided that is inactive.

Saturday, March 06, 2010


He applied for a grant from The Pentagon under the DARPA Broad Agency Announcement 04-12. His research proposal is entitled Aluminum Anodization for DNA Integrated Circuits. It looks bona fide, i.e. not just a random rant linking some research together, with real references.

I cannot find this particular announcement DARPA BAA 04-12, either open or closed, but there is a DARPA BAA 03-12 which is entitled Applications of Molecular Electronics Technology (MoleApps) which would cover Bedell's application.

Did BAA 04-12 actually exist?

If so then why can I not find it when plenty other DARPA BAAs can be found on the DARPA website?

If not, maybe Bedell made it up.

And DNAputer Research Inc. lists Bedell as the only employee, and is listed as a medical research company receiving $58000 annual income. From what?

Why did Bedell not enroll at university this year?

And for whatever reason DNAputer Research Inc is listed as related to United Defense, once controlled by Carlyle and now owned by BAE. Apparently there is a small testing lab belonging to United Defense in Hollister, and for whatever reason DNAputer seems to be connected to it, but I cannot find the connection, so maybe this is nothing and may simply be that the two are listed in Hollister.

DNAputer is also listed in Richardson, Texas.

In 2000 Bedell posted a blog on Advogato that he said he knew how to create a DNA computer, and I believe this then grew into the DARPA proposal.

Manic depressives should never be left alone for long periods of time.


Personally, the military.

Brown promised us a referendum on The Treaty of Lisbon but reneged and signed us over with a knowing smile.

The questioning of Brown yesterday at The Chilcot Inquiry was tedious, boring and light-touch, just like the regulation by the FSA of The City as requested by Brown so that The City could then go on its reckless lending and gambling spree.

And is it just coincidence that throughout the noughties when the UK and USA were invading the Middle East and Caspian due to the engineered 9/11 that the government was able to raise finance for those military adventures through taxation of The City and its then massive profits?


It is now being reported that Pentagon shooter John Patrick Bedell was reported missing from 4th January to 18th January this year.

[source :]

He then returned to his parents telling them not to ask any questions, and promptly left again to travel to Washington DC to try to shoot up the Pentagon with a pair of 9mm pistols.

THIS IS BIZARRE, and reminds me of Sirhan Sirhan.

This means that Bedell's location was rarely known for nearly two months, except for an arrest in Reno on the 1st February for possession of cannabis.

When and where were the internet posts attributed to him made?

It is also very curious and suspicious that a drill occured just a few days ago that resembled the shooting.

Neighbours are shocked and surprised that Bedell would attempt the shooting.

He was intelligent, described as a very talented circuit designer, and had applied for a grant from the Pentagon to fund research into a very cutting edge branch of computer science.

Something is not right with this.

Friday, March 05, 2010


Many many people have tried to explain America.

America represents freedom, is one explanation.

The Promised Land, is another.

But how has the current America evolved from the state of 1300 into the state of 2010?

First, let's define America. By America I mean the USA except Hawaii.

In 1300 it was the home of many people, now classified as American Indians. They were very loosely connected, and had a profound respect for their interaction between themselves and the natural world they lived in.

But gradually their lives were disrupted by the white man.

First in the Caribbean under Columbus and his fellow European financiers, who kidnapped some of the native South Americans and sailed them back to Europe, for amusement, investigation and eventual enslavement.

But then those same forces that explored the New World began to transfer kidnapped Africans to work on plantations in South America, after killing and enslaving the natives, of course.

It was found that one plant, tobacco, could thrive in what we now know as the South East of the USA, so slaves were brought from Africa to be sold to the colonists of that region of America, many of whom professed great respect for the Bible and observed religion, only due to its support for slavery. Obviously this religion was Catholicism, but not so curiously this slavery was also supported and indeed encouraged by the anti-Catholic English, who after Henry VIII had rebelled against Catholicism in the name of freedom.


The point was this; if you were white and religious you stood a chance, particularly if you owned and abused slaves. If you were an African slave then forget it.

But this was just the beginning.

The British Monarchy became the greatest profiteer in this despicable act upon humanity. Other European nations engaged; Spain, the Netherlands, France, etc.

It was capitalism at its sickest.


But the central and West Coast of America had to be colonised and controlled too!

But before that the white man had to consolidate; they had a foothold in the East of America but had opposing points of view. The South supported slavery, the north hated it (despite profiting from such slavery).

In order to have some credence it was decided that anti-slavery should prevail, thus giving the 'pioneers' some sort of moral support as they began to colonise the central and western areas of America and destroyed the native American Indians, their ancient societal structure and their hunting grounds. This all ended at Wounded Knee.

After Wounded Knee it all changed...BIG TIME!

In the late 19th Century the native American had been reduced to a circus freak.

In 1913 the greatest hoax ever foisted upon mankind was created; The Federal Reserve.

Since then we've experienced two brutal world wars (both financed by The US Federal Reserve in one way or another), the implementation of a world governmnent apparatus (controlled by the same family structure that engineeered all the previous global chaos), and a mega-trillion bailout of the banks all owned and controlled by the same cabal that is beyond comprehension.

There is only one symbol to represent this global manipulation and murder;

If anyone has a view that explains the colonisation and expansion of the USA into the soul-destroying bastard nation we suffer now then I would be interested to know of it.

ps if you don't know the symbol highlighted it is an inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram, perhaps the most Satanic symbol ever, and it is pointing directly into the White House.

Explain that, President Obummer!!!


The first and major point of record is that he was reported missing.

When and for how long Bedell was missing is still a mystery.

There has as yet been no report on his recent employment, only that he was interested in computer programming.

I have seen reports that he is listed as the principal investigator into some software development program as a director of DNAputer Research Inc, which would concur with his interests. Apparently Bedell had a great interest in DNA computing, which as I understand is a relatively new concept in computer science, but with fantastic implications and rewards. DNA computing attempts to fuse current computing with natural computation in the human body via DNA. Quantum computing is a related area of research. The point of this research is to fuse the now recognised powerful natural computing power of DNA with conventional computation.

I would say that Bedell, if it is him, was on the edge of what we could call the Military-Industrial-Complex with this cutting edge research, and would thus expose him and his beliefs to certain factions within the US government.

It appears he was also not against the herb, and felt quite passionately about that, but he was also sure that JFK was assassinated by an international cabal of gangsters who control the international drug trade.



His parents recently filed a missing persons report with authorities. His parents warned authorities their son was upset and might have a gun, a source told the Associated Press.


First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for the 9/11 sceptics, and I did not speak out—because I was not a 9/11 sceptic;
Then they came for the man-made global warming sceptics, and I did not speak out—because I was not a man-made global warming sceptic;
Then they came for the tyrannical world government sceptics, and I did not speak out—because I was not a tyrannical world government sceptic;
But then they kicked my front door down and implanted a microchip into me. And now? I can't think straight, and I get a strange strong pain in my chest if I try to think about things, or try to show any emotion towards my immediate family or best friends. My neighbours complain the same.
Man, I wish I had spoken up then, when I was warned and had some degree of freedom, and demanded inquiries into what the hell was going on.


Let's get things into perspective.

On 11th September 2001 four planes were hijacked over North East USA and managed to fly around the most protected airspace in the world unhindered for over an hour before flying into the WTC, and more amazing, into the Pentagon! No fighters were scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base, just a few miles from the Pentagon.

Osama bin Laden was blamed immediately, and we were promised a vast detailed dossier on the attack that would prove ObL was the perp. That dossier never materialised.

However, the attack provided the 'new Pearl Harbor' that the likes of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and their Zionazi buddies at PNAC needed to convince the American people to go on the rampage in the Caspian Basin and Middle East, as laid out in their document Rebuilding America's Defenses.

As a result the coalition of the killing first invaded Afghanistan, and after 8 years is still blowing away scores of innocent Afghan civilians in NATO-led bombing raids.

But the main target was always Iraq.

We were told Iraq had WMD that could kill many in a split second, and that we knew where they were.

We were told that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attack itself.

We were told that after Saddam's removal that Iraqi oil revenues would go to Iraqis.

So we invaded Iraq.

In the process nearly one million innocent Iraqi civilians were blown away!!


It is being reported today that a man John Patrick Bedell calmly walked upto guards at the Pentagon and shot at them, and that he was then fatally shot by the guards. The man apparently had suspicions about the collapse of the WTC towers, and is being classified as a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. The man had other concerns, such as the suspicious death of a US Marine Colonel who was investigating drug smuggling in the US military, and was also interested in the Bush family, particularly the drug smuggling allegations made against the Bush family.


But let's look at this again.

The people who scripted the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, and those who believed it and supported war due to it, are responsible for the deaths of one million innocent Iraqi and Afghan civilians.

The lone man who questioned one aspect of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, and was apparently not a member of any truth group, is labelled a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, thus branding all 9/11 conspiracy theorists as mad violent shooters.

It is not good for anyone when something like this shooting occurs; for the policemen who have been wounded, for us who inevitably get branded as nutters, and for the dead man himself.

But I didn't pull the trigger.

And I definitely didn't kill one million innocent Iraqi and Afghan civilians because of my belief in the official 9/11 conspiracy theory that has not been fully investigated and fits perfectly into a plan spelled out in black and white that was written by a cabal of warmongers typified by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Perle who all occupied powerful positions in the US government on that murdered September day.

Thursday, March 04, 2010


The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.

This was allegedly proposed by Albert Pike, senior member of the hierarchy of the Illuminati which indisputably allied with Freemasonry in 1782 at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad and after its banishment by the Kingdom of Bavaria indisputably found sanctuary in the House of Saxe-Gotha which later came to control the British monarchy.

I'll tell you what; I am physically, morally and spiritually exhausted by that boring argument between the Jews and the Arabs. Aren't you?

But how did this situation come to be?


And what are its consequences?

To tell you the truth,
1. the Saudis were put in place by the British, ie Illumiati, to control massive oil wealth to fund a corrupt version of Islam to the benefit of the British, ie Illuminati
2. the Saudis follow a corrupt version of Islam called Wahhabism which was encouraged by a British agent called Hempher
3. the barbaric treatment of Palestinians by the Zionists has driven many into anger, and some, inevitably, into terrorism
4. that anger has been directed by the British-Saudi-Wahhabi faction into terrorism, to empower Israel, but ultimately into events such as 9/11
5. since 9/11 the USA, the UK and Israel have been feasting on public opinion and invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and eventually Iran, as BLATANTLY laid out in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses

Iran, however, seems to be the line in the sand.

Russia appears to have backed Iran much more than it did Iraq.

Russia appears to be arming Iran in a big MF way.


We have already seen attempts by some factions in Bilderberg to confront Russia, in Georgia in 2008.

That was stopped dead in its tracks.

But A Clean Break was written 1996! 14 years ago!

Israel itself was created just over 60 years ago.

The conflict between Jew (ie Zionist) and Arab has exhausted not only the innocent people involved (and by that I mean most Jews of Isreal who have not a clue of the engineered horror that created their nation, and which will use them again), but the whole world, just as Pike planned.

The plan is sick.

The plan is evil.

The plan is diabolical.

But it is real.

How else can you explain saint FDR engineering Pearl Harbour?

How else can you explain the creation, then expansion but then subsequent containment of Commusnism by the very same families who created Nazism?

Maybe the current Russian hierarchy is not that independent.

This is why I question the reporting of the Hollie Greig abuse scandal, or lack thereof.

The BBC has undeniably been BANNED from reporting on this sick sordid story that undeniably connects directly into No. 10 Downing Street.

RT seems keen on reporting on 9/11 and engineered financial crises, but paedophilia is what really controls the people who control us.

An MP or Congressman or Senator or whoever who has been filmed abusing a kidnapped or otherwise kid, whether that man or woman is a bona fide kiddie-fiddler or not, can be ordered to say or vote for whatever.

And here we have a scandal that leads directly into No. 10 Downing Street...

There is obviously a tiny faction within the UK who have been directing events since 1694 and The Bank of England, which later allied with the house of Saxe-Gotha to create the green nazi monster that is the House of Windsor, and with it comes all the blackmail of paedophiles across the world, filmed in compromising situations, placed in powerful positions, to control us.

The info is there for all to see, but read by only a small % of people.



Pearl Harbour just happened, didn't it?

The Japanese travelled thousands and thousands of miles over the Pacific, without detection or warning, to attack Pearl Harbour, didn't they?

That's what some people want you to believe.

There are many versions of Pearl Harbour, some more patriotic than others, some more truthful but less acceptable and digestible, than others.

There are other versions that do not put that attack into a true and full historical concept.

Version 1 - the Japanese decided to attack Pearl Harbour without provocation. This is the one we are all taught, and can view in full glorious technicolor in Tora! Tora! Tora!, and the curioulsy entitled Pearl Harbor, released in 2001 starring Ben Affleck, winning Oscars, just in time for 9/11. You naughty Japs!

Version 2 - the Japanese were deliberately provoked into attacking Pearl Harbour, to drag the USA into another world war. more bloody and violent, eventually leading to the successful formation of a world-government-apparatus-in-waiting, an outcome not secured by WW1. This is nowhere near addressed and popular as version 1, and is thus not so accepted but is still a controversial theory, despite the overwhelming evidence that some still fail to recognise and address.

Version 3 -

I leave version 3 to the readers imagination.

Pearl Harbour was provoked or was not provoked.

If it was provoked then why, and to whose benefit?

If it was not provoked then why is there overwhelming evidence, suppressed evidence, to support such a controversial thesis?

Well done Kesha!


I've just sent the google video of the Alex Jones interview of Aaron Russo to the Chilcot Inquiry, pointing out that Russo states that in late 2000 the Rockefellers told him that there would soon be an event that would result in Afghanistan and Iraq being invaded.

I would advise that you do the same.

I have already written to the inquiry about the A Clean Break/PNAC agenda that was laid out before 9/11, that Blair was going to take us into war no matter what, that Blair would have met David Rockefeller several times at Bilderberg, and has been rewarded for his lies by employment for himself and his son in the Morgan-Rockefeller banking empire.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010


Michael Foot has died.

So what?

Not The Nine O' Clock News got it dead right in their comedy sketch in which during a heated 'debate' on TV one of the debaters has a heart attack and dies. The surviving politician/debater suddenly changes his oratory from one of virulent attack to one of sycophantic sympathy.

That fictional debate was not about who controls the issuance of our currency...just as today.

Just as it ever was.

Just as it ever will be...

The point of political 'debate' has rarely covered the most important point of who controls our currency.

"Permit me to control and issue a nations currency and I care not who makes its laws", stated the original Zionazi Rothschild, Mayer Amschel.

We can argue and argue and argue over how much should be spent on education, health/death, transport etc. until hell freezes over.

But if we can issue our own currency then why don't we?

If we can issue our own currency then why do we borrow under terms and conditions from banks that engineer wars and financial crises?


If you take out a loan for a few grand there are terms and conditions.

It's the same for a loan of a few billion to the UK government, and Stafford Hospital implies what the terms and conditions are for those kind of loans; MEGA-DEATH!

Yet we are supposed to entrust the government of our nation to fucked-up Oxbridge graduates who have blindly accepted everything they've been brainwashed with and cannot or do not question why or how we are in, or got ourselves into, the historical position we are in now, simply because they've been to Oxbridge and must therefore be right!

Well, Bildermorguer Gideon Rachman got a 1st in History from (Rothschild) Cambridge and has got it wrong 100% of the time!!!

He didn't call the crash.

His Middle East/Iranian history is completely fucked up!

He's called for a world government!

He writes for the FT.


I asked this question a few weeks ago.


Why are we, the world as a whole, in the position we are in now?

Has our current position been engineered, and if so how have the perps been able to do so?

Not just themselves, those selfish unquestioning brainwashed Oxbdridge idiots like Gideon Rachman and David Cameron, but the nation and the world as a whole?

Do they ask themselves this question at night, or are they willingly serving an agenda they cannot or dare not understand?

Do Rachman and Cameron etc. want their kids and grandkids microchipped, 'chipped like slaves were branded, servants to warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs? If not, is it OK with them that your kids and grandkids are?

Where is this question, and who issues our currency?

If these sycophants really do care about the death of Foot, and he asked that question, then why do they not honour him and ask it again and again and again...

If he did not then is his death worth the media coverage it is receiving?

My sympathy does go out to the Foot family, but let's get a grip, eh?

If he didn't identify the money supply problem then why should we be so concerned?

If he did, then why are living sycophants not championing his wishes?

But why am I so pissed off about this?

Because I have recently rewatched the interview of Aaron Russo by Alex Jones.

In that interview Russo, producer of one of my longtime fave films Trading Places, states that as a friend to one of the Rockefeller family he was told in 2000 by a senior DNA member of that life-sucking family that an event would soon occur that would lead to invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and Iran, and that it would all be a complete farce!!!!

This agrees with the A Clean Break/Rebuilding Americas Defenses agenda of the Zionazis since 9/11 dominating the Caspian/Middle East fossil fuel resources that will be essential to heat European and North American homes when we enter the new ice age, as predicted by respected climatologists and not predicted by the green Nazi WWF-Met Office and its ilk.

But how did the Rockefellers, financiers of the two attempts at world government The League of Nations and The United Nations, become so powerful? Because we insanely gave them and their ilk the power to create our money!!

This blog has drifted a bit, but it is essential to understand why the media fawns over some and not others.

Some families, like the Rockefellers, over the centuries have been able to create money, lots and lots and lots of money, out of nothing, and demand interest, while the rest of us, the 99.9% of hard working families, must work our arses off, just to survive.

If Foot realised this then please point out where and when, and when the fawning sycophants have raised this most important issue in the media.


Russia Today appears to have its teeth dug deeply into the New World Order's nuts, and is apparently tugging on them quite hard indeed.

RT addresses the grave concerns we have over our governments intentions and recent actions, particularly 9/11. Ouch!! That's gotta hurt!

But what about Hollie Greig, the young woman who was abused by a paedophile ring in Scotland which is now being protected by the British government.

The BBC have been banned from reporting on this. Most of the mainstream media are not reporting on this either. Only a small number of small independent media are reporting on this.