Tuesday, September 30, 2014


Last week Webster Tarpley brought to our attention that the Syrian government was warning that a false flag chemical weapons attack was being prepared by the Syrian rebels. An article in The Daily Telegraph reported that doctors were gathering on the Syria-Turkey border to be trained how to respond to a chemical weapons attack.

And now it is being reported that British Special Forces have been ordered to carry gas protection suits because it is feared that Islamic State has got its hands on some chemical weapons.
Britain's elite troops operating in Iraq are carrying gas protection suits because Islamic State fighters are feared to have taken control of Syrian chemical weapons.

Special Forces units have carried out reconnaissance in the region to provide up-to-date information on the jihadists for RAF airstrikes, and are also training Kurdish fighters battling the regime.

But despite international efforts to destroy President Assad's chemical weapon stockpile, it is thought that some may have fallen into the hands of ISIS after the militants seized vast swathes of Iraq and Syria - and they could be used on troops in retaliation for the UK joining the U.S.-led air campaign.

[source : British special forces in Iraq 'ordered to carry chemical suits as ISIS are feared to be planning gas attacks', The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2774878/British-special-forces-Iraq-ordered-carry-chemical-suits-ISIS-feared-planning-gas-attacks.html, 30th September 2014]

First, the OPCW confirmed that Syria had given up its chemical weapons.

Second, Iraq was invaded 11 years ago and any chemical weapons would surely have been found by now (if indeed that is why we went in).

A much more probable explanation for the source of these chemical weapons is the Saudi-Turkey Axis of Evil that was responsible for Ghouta.

They are going to pull a fast one again.

And this time BSF are going to be involved so nobody fucks this one up like Ghouta.

And if you're scratching your head, asking yourself, "would our boys do such a thing?", then I would answer, "Of course they fucking would! They were running the al Qaeda rebels in Libya throughout 2011!"


I made a jolly jest yesterday about Saudi Arabia not chopping off my head.

Early this morning I was awoken by what sounded like someone shaking my back door very violently. It lasted for a few seconds, and I wasn't sure it was that, until later this morning when I switched on my mobile phone to find that a very, very curious text was sent to me at precisely the same time that I was awoken (I switch my mobile off at night). The text reads:
Following your accident please use the following link to complete the fast track application for your pending £ 3000 compensation. claim-uk.co.uk

The sending number was +447977 283852

I have not had a text like this phishing for business following an accident for years.


Or is anyone else getting them?


George Osborne has attended the secretive Bilderberg meetings several times in the last 10 years, and every year for the last few years. Bilderberg has a nasty Nazi heritage.

Yesterday Osborne announced a new policy of freezing benefits which he estimates would save £ 3 billion.



Meanwhile, how many corporations and rich fuckers are avoiding and evading tax? I recall reading that over £ 200 billion is not being paid by the fascists.

We bailed out the banks with over £ 1 trillion. The Tories try to blame Labour but the voting records will show that the Tories supported near enough every move that Labour made to liberalise The City of London with light touch regulation. And I say near enough every move because many Tories thought that Labour didn't go far enough and that there should have been no regulation of The City of London at all!!

The Tories tried to save money for their precious fascist banker mates through The Bedroom Tax. This was supposed to force tenants to move to smaller, cheaper accommodation if their current residence was deemed larger than they required, or the tenant should pay more for each room it was deemed they did not need. This might sound reasonable to a fascist pig, but what made this policy pure evil was that there was not the smaller cheaper housing stock for tenants to move to thus forcing tenants to pay up...AND THEY KNEW IT!! Some people have even killed themselves over that tax.

The Tories just pick on the poor and defenceless to save their fascist banker mates.

And Labour are not that much better.

Pure fascist pigs. Baling out fascist greedy reckless gambling banks with the hard earned tax of hard working British taxpayers and implementing pure fascism like workfare and the bedroom tax to 'cut the deficit'.

Monday, September 29, 2014


Love stinks.

It must.

So many people claim to be 'in love', 'head over heels', etc.

Take David Cameron.

Claims to be in love With Sam Cam. He may well refer to his deep love for her in his speech at the Tory Party Conference this week. Yet a few weeks ago he stated in The Marsten House that Great Britain would not pay any ransom for any British hostage held by Islamic State because, he says, it funds terrorism. Yet for decades now MI5 has had a Covenant of Security with Islamic terrorists, and under his watch MI5 was allowing demented preachers like Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against President Assad of Syria, a policy that has no doubt led to a number of British muslims heeding Adebalajo's call for Jihad and travelling to Syria to be trained and fight alongside al Qaeda and its affiliates in Syria, and some probably joining Islamic State. But Cameron's policy of not paying a ransom, when other nations have, led to David Haines having his head sawn off, which Callous Cameron then cited as a casus belli for war on Islamic State in Iraq. The cost of any such war will cost several orders of magnitude greater than any ransom that could have saved Haines' life. But the war itself is camouflage for the British foreign policy of ousting President Assad of Syria. He knows it. We know it. Hopefully tens or even hundreds of thousands will be shouting it loud in London on Saturday.

Can a man who claims to be truly in love do this?

The same can be said of any member of The Marsten House who voted for war last Friday.

Or indeed anyone who does nothing to find out why the world is so shit and then once aware doing something about it.

So this one is for all those 'in love'. Your love stinks. It must stink if you can allow all the horror and abuse in the world, not lifting a finger to even find out who is behind it all and then once knowing, not doing anything about it!!

From The Wedding Singer - Love Stinks


Please don't chop my head off.

I need it.


Last week members of The Marsten House were tricked into voting for war on Islamic State in Iraq. This motion was proposed by Callous Cameron, who had allowed David Haines to have his head sawn off to provide a casus belli. Haines was implicitly referred to in the text of the motion.

But Islamic State is being portrayed as a threat to the world. Even members of the Marsten House last Friday stated this time and time again.

But here is what BBC Radio 4 is reporting this morning:
1. a fierce battle between Islamic State and Iraqi forces is taking place just 5 miles outside of Baghdad;
2. RAF Tornadoes, loaded with bombs, were flying on 'reconnaissance' missions at the time but for whatever reason were not ordered to fly over that battle and drop their bombs on IS.

Make of that what you will.

Sunday, September 28, 2014


The text refers to James Foley but should also mention that the FBI threatened not only James Foley's mother but also Steven Sotloff's parents with prosecution if they tried to negotiate a ransom to save their son's lives.

And in the UK, Callous Cameron stated in The Marsten House that he would not pay any ransom to save any British hostage, because, he says it funds terrorism, when he used the beheading of a British hostage as a casus belli, the cost of any war is going to be several orders of magnitude greater than any ransom that could have saved his life ($4 billion over 3 years by some reports), but for decades MI5 has been allowing Islamic extremist terrorists to openly operate out of London in a Covenant of Security!!


(To the tune of Old Macdonald Had A Farm)

Saudi Arabia had a sword
Ee aye ee aye oh.
And on that sword was someone's head
Ee aye ee aye oh.
With a chop-chop here
And a chop-chop there.
Here a chop, there a chop.
Everywhere a chop-chop.
Saudi Arabia had a sword
Ee aye ee aye oh.


What makes that special someone?


See Qatar-Turkey pipeline

Then read Obama’s “Secret Backdoor Deal With Saudi Arabia” which Preceeded the US Airstrikes against Syria.

9/11 was done for all this. Israel ran it while Saudi Arabia supplied the patsies. Events since have not been purely religious. Natural resources are involved. Israel is reducing The Gaza Strip into an uninhabitable pile of rubble because of natural resources in the East Mediterranean Sea. Why else would Tony Blair be involved?

But Zionists wrote A Clean Break in 1996 demanding war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon. Since 9/11 there has been war on Iraq and Lebanon, and The Redirection agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran, but for whatever reason they were first unleashed onto Libya.

And the war on Libya indicates that the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 is being implemented: war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, but also Libya, Sudan and Somalia. Here is Clark stating that plan:

But brave Syria has resisted and resisted and resisted. Syria chased the cutthroat Jihadis out of Syria and into Iraq, but the Iraqi Army was told to stand down and allow the cutthroat Jihadis escaping from Syria to take control of their portion of Iraq. Hence we now have this entity Islamic State which is nothing more than a ragtag bunch of cutthroat bandits hiding behind Islam. But their threat is being inflated by a willing NATO media in order to create a war mentality here to eventually oust Assad. Our MPs have just been terrified by visions of a British aid worker having his head sawn off (when any ransom to save his life would cost far, far less than any subsequent war in his name).

The Members of The Marsten House voted for an open-ended, apparently aimless war on Friday.

But now that the bombing in Syria has started, anything can happen.

They said World War One would be over by Christmas...


This is the flag that I saw being flown in York yesterday (in St Helen's Square I think it was).

Behind this flag lies 9/11, the wars in North Africa and The Middle East since, and now Islamic State who have been used to trick our elected Members of Parliament into yet another war.

This flag should not be allowed to be flown anywhere in the United Kingdom, or if it is then only if splashes of red blood are dripping from the sword and a decapitated head stuck on the end of the sword.


Nothing special.




Saturday, September 27, 2014


Last week it was reported that an agreement had been reached between the USA and Syria about coordination between the two to degrade and destroy Islamic State in Syria. The USA started to bomb IS positions in Syria early this week. There was some protestation from Syria, but it could have been stronger. And in fact the USA has been attacking IS in Syria every day of this last week, and again with some but muted protest from Syria.

Now The Daily Mirror is reporting that MI6 have been in talks with the Syrian government about attacking IS in Syria.

This suggests to me that some kind of agreement has been reached between Syria and the coalition, and that so far that agreement is being adhered to.

But this is Perfide Albion.

We engineered WW1 by giving Germany the impression that we would stay out of any war, even after we through Freemasonry assassinated Ferdinand to create the crisis.

We engineered WW2 by giving Hitler the impression that we were his friend, King Edward VIII being a Nazi, we allowed Hitler to build the Wehrmacht way beyond The Treaty of Versailles, and financed his eugenics programs.

We assassinated Gaddafi even though he had stopped research into WMD and been giving names of al Qaeda to CIA and MI6.

We unleashed cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children.

We remained silent last summer as Israel murdered over 500 Palestinian children.

This is what we do: betrayal.

We are Perfide Albion.



Getta load of this!!
A former Saudi army officer has announced the formation of a movement aimed at unseating the Al Saud dynasty in Saudi Arabia.

In a video message, Dakheel al-Qahtani declared “the establishment of the Arabian Peninsula liberation movement,” noting that it “aims to begin a revolution in the Arabian Peninsula in order to topple the government of Al Saud…[and] to uproot their rule.”

He also called on the people in the kingdom to begin a popular uprising against the regime “for the sake of a nation destroyed by Al Saud corruption.”

Qahtani further denounced the Saudi regime’s “dirty” foreign policies which “are working against the interests of the nation.”

The ex-officer took to task the Saudi regime for its support of the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the finance of extremist Takfiri groups in Syria, noting that the Al Saud family supported the 2013 military-backed coup in Egypt which ousted former president, Mohamed Morsi.

“Al Saud does not represent the people of the Arabian Peninsula; they are the invaders and occupiers of our land,” he said.

The top posts in Saudi Arabia are in the hands of the first generation of the sons of Abdul Aziz Al Saud, the founder of the kingdom.

Saudis have no say in the appointment of the kingdom's leadership, which has led to increased social and political discontent in the oil-rich country in recent years.

When Abdul Aziz rose to power in Saudi Arabia with help from the British monarchy in 1932, he named the country after the Al Saud family. He also entrusted the power to rule the country to his 31 children.

The ruling family has distributed all the key posts in the country among the deceased king's brothers and their sons.

The country has been the scene of numerous anti-regime protests during the past several years, mainly in the Eastern Province, which have been crushed by security forces.


[source : Saudi ex-officer forms liberation movement for Arabian Peninsula, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/09/27/380239/saudi-exofficer-set-to-topple-al-saud/, 27th September 2014]


The very curious consortium of Rosneft and Exxonmobil has struck oil in a well at The Universitetskaya-1 well in the Kara Sea in Russia's Arctic. Rosneft is planning on investing $400 billion over the next 15 years in the Arctic which they think can hold reserves comparable to those of head-chopping Saudi Arabia.

Those oil fields could be a bunsen burner (nice little earner) for someone...

And obviously it's not supposed to be the Russian people.


I went to the fair city of York today.

I was stunned to see a stall in one of the main squares occupied by a delegation from The (head-chopping) Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Their poster, for whatever reason, didn't mention the head-chopping or its support for the cutthroat Jihadis in Syria who have been slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children. A few children dressed up in Saudi dress were playing. A few men were trying to advertise The (head-chopping) Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as a destination for tourism. There were a few women totally covered from head to toe. And their flag is very threatening, with that sword, particularly when we all know that The (head-chopping) Kingdom of Saudi Arabia chops heads and hands off in public with such swords every Friday.

But York was also invaded by gang after gang after gang of middle aged Geordie women, wearing 6 inch platforms and very, very short tight dresses, even when they weighed 40 stone! You've gotta' love em. It's what life's for.

But here is where some people I know should put their hands over their ears and make really daft sounds: when you know just how evil this nation is then you have a duty to do something about it.

You've all had your fun. The really serious bit starts now.

ps I also walked a few metres in front of a couple from darn sarf. Posh fuckers they were, referring to the good people of York as 'the natives' who apparently have an attitude problem, according to these Surrey multi-millionaires who think they have some class.

You know the sort, who think they are special and that we are here to serve them.


No, it wasn't all a bad dream.

Members of The Marsten House really did vote overwhelmingly for war on a ragtag bunch of cutthroat bandits hiding among civilians. We really are going to see mission creep, from initially just flying just 6 bombers, to firing Tomahawk missiles from Royal navy submarines, to boots of combat troops on the ground, to No Fly Zones over Syria, to ousting Assad, with probably yet another false flag attack of some kind, a chemical or bioweapon attack, or massacre, to be blamed on Assad.

And it really will cost several orders of magnitude than any ransom that could have been paid so that David Haines didn't have his head sawn off in order to provide a casus belli.

But one consolation is that in the next General Election quite a few useless weak-minded MPs are going to lose their seats to be replaced by better MPs.

Friday, September 26, 2014


In an interview with CBS news Prince Turki al-Faisal of head-chopping Saudi Arabia confessed that he would like to see the coalition bomb a path all the way to Damascus.

While al-Faisal said he has "no idea" what the U.S. promised the kingdom in return for their help, he said he would imagine Saudi Arabia would eventually want to see the removal of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

He said he hopes the airstrikes are the first step in doing that because "you can't simply deal with ISIS and not deal with Assad," he told "CBS This Morning" co-host Norah O'Donnell.

[source : Saudi prince on helping U.S. fight ISIS, CBS, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/saudi-arabia-prince-turki-al-faisal-on-syria-airstrikes/, 25th September 2014]

The same head-chopping dude also admitted to CBS that there are no moderate opposition groups in Syria!

But this contrasts with George Galloway's proposal that Saudi Arabia and Turkey should bomb IS, for Galloway has stated that it is Syria and Iran who assist the resistance in Palestine.


To think, the likes of Callous Cameron, Clegg and Bad Breath Ed will be standing at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday, with faces solemn and grim. But what they have done today is propagate terrorism, supporting the true terrorists in Tel Aviv, Riyadh, Washington DC and London who planned and executed the inside job 9/11.

As Callous Cameron has suggested today, he is prepared to ignore the text of the motion that he proposed to take the war into Syria without consulting Parliament. And as I have been pointing out ad nauseum, any war on Syria would be fulfilling the reason for 9/11; war and regime change in seven nations in five years, those seven nations being Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.


The following MPs today voted against military action on Islamic State in Iraq:

(From The Guardian)
Labour (24 votes against, plus 1 teller)

The Labour MPs who voted against were: Diane Abbott, Graham Allen, Anne Begg, Ronnie Campbell, Martin Caton, Katy Clark, Ian Davidson, Paul Flynn, Stephen Hepburn, Kate Hoey, Kelvin Hopkins, Sian James, Mark Lazraowicz, John McDonnell, Iain McKenzie, Austin Mitchell, Grahame Morris, George Mudie, Linda Riordan, Barry Sheerman, Dennis Skinner, Graham Stringer, and Mike Wood.

There was also one Labour teller, Jeremy Corbyn, and one Labour MP who voted against, but also voted in favour (ie, actively abstained), Rushanara Ali.

Conservatives (6 votes against)

The Conservatives who voted against were: Richard Bacon, John Baron, Gordon Henderson, Adam Holloway, Nigel Mills and Mark Reckless

Lib Dems (1 vote against)

Julian Huppert

SDLP (3 votes against)

The SDLP MPs who voted against were: Mark Durkan, Alasdair McDonnell and Margaret Ritchie.

Plaid Cymru (2 votes against)

The Plaid MPs who voted against were: Jonathan Edwards and Hywel Williams

Respect (1 vote against)

George Gallway

SNP (5 votes against, plus 1 teller)

The SNP MPs who voted against were: Stewart Hosie, Angus Roberton, Mike Weir, Eilidh Whiteford and Angus Brendan McNeill.

The teller was Mike Wishart.

Greens (1 vote against)

Caroline Lucas

They have today been inducted into TTS Hall of Fame.


Yesterday Anjem Choudary was arrested with several other Islamic extremists on suspicion of terrorism related offences. This fitted perfectly with all the other events related to the vote today, such as an audio tape of Alan Henning pleading for this life.

Sky News is now reporting that Choudary has been released without charge. In other words, the arrest of Choudary was, as I suggested, politically motivated.

I must make it explicitly clear that I do not support Choudary in any way whatsoever. But politically motivated arrests to create a terrified state of mind in our elected MPs on the eve of a vote for another unnecessary war is not what my grandfathers invaded France in 1944 for. Did yours?

Particularly when our Prime Minister, Callous Cameron, allows a British aid worker to have his head sawn off as a casus belli.


Sorry Ed.

You and your false corrupt Labour party made a very, very bad decision today. You are now complicit in aiding and abetting the terrorists in Tel Aviv, Riyadh, Washington DC and London who planned and executed 9/11 to provoke the series of wars on seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.

Get some kip, Ed.

You looked like death warmed up, some might say fucked.


Just like that tool of British imperialism Lawrence of Arabia stabbed the Palestinians in the back after rousing them to rebel against the Ottomans with a promise of independence, Callous Cameron has today stabbed the British people in the back.

The text of the motion debated in The Marsten House today stated this:
Notes that this motion does not endorse UK air strikes in Syria as part of this campaign, and any proposal to do so would be subject to a separate vote in parliament.

Yet what did John McDonnell state as a point of order as soon as the result was accepted?

Callous Cameron stated that he would not hesitate to take the fight into Syria without consulting Parliament!!

Callous Cameron allowed David Haines to have his head sawn off to get this war. So lying to Parliament is a piece of cake.

There are a lot of MPs with good intentions in The Marsten House who have been lied to and deliberately misled today about military action in Iraq.

A significant minority expressed concern that no endgame, no strategy or success criteria was given in the text of the motion. And none was given when asked.

And now Cameron states that he will go into Syria without consulting MPs, even though it is explicitly stated in the text that he would!!


But what do you expect from someone who allows someone to be beheaded in order to use that beheading as a casus belli for war?

This is the Disunited Fascist Queendom today.

This is what our fathers and grandfathers fought for in WW1 and WW2.

C'est magnifique, innit?


Bomb Syria.

That's basically it.

Bomb Syria. Forget Islamic State. Bomb Syria. Bomb. Bomb. Bomb.

I have not hear every speaker, but a few voices of sanity are:
George Galloway
Jeremy Corbyn
Angus Robertson

So there is some sanity, but at the moment it looks like:
1. we will start bombing Iraq this weekend;
2. we will be debating bombing Syria very, very soon.


George Galloway pointed out that nearly every MP who has spoken so far is talking more about bombing Syria than bombing Iraq. This betrays what this war is all about: Syria.

But what Galloway failed to point out is that nobody has suggested what happens next in Iraq, let alone Syria.

We have in The Marsten House a coven of ill-informed trigger-happy armchair generals who get drunk on their own war potions.


Galloway quite rightly pointed out that IS do not have bases. They live among the population. There are at most 30000 of them in a territory the size of Great Britain (though that 30000 suddenly appeared a few weeks ago without much evidence).

In addition, missiles are not precise.

And Galloway also pointed out that IS can only be in power over such a large area and large number of people because those people are generally sympathetic in one way or another. Indeed, sympathetic officers in the Iraqi Army ordered their units to stand down to allow the rebels escaping from Syria to seize that land and territory and eventually declare the Islamic State.

1. an enemy hiding among civilians;
2. missiles that are not 100% accurate;
3. a probably sympathetic civilian population.

This is a recipe for disaster.

I think a number of MPs are going to lose their seats in the next general election because of this war.


This is the standard of knowledge of MPs on show in the debate today:

One MP shouted out, "What's the link between 9/11 and Iraq?". A second shouted out in reply, "None!"


Every MP who has spoken so far is eager for war on Syria.

This is why Islamic State was created, you fucking morons!!


Callous Cameron, the fake human who allowed David Haines to have his head sawn off to provide a casus belli, is citing threats to British people on British streets as the reason why we should go to war.

Callous Cameron has already stated that IS/ISIS/ISIL is plotting an attack in great Britain. Is it? The threat level was raised a few weeks ago but no specific threat was cited then and no specific threat has been stated since.

David Haines had his head sawn off because Callous Cameron allowed it. Callous Cameron could have easily paid any ransom for David Haines, but Callus Cameron would rather prosecute a war over several years, killing many civilians, and costing much, much more than any ransom.

And for decades there has been a Covenant of Security between MI5 and Islamic extremists that the 'Islamists' could operate out of London in safety as long as their interests coincided with British foreign policy. This is why the butcher of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, was allowed to preach Jihad against President Assad of Syria because ousting Assad has been British foreign policy for years. That is why we and our head-chopping allies Saudi Arabia have been aiding and financing the rebels in Syria. That is why Roland Dumas was asked in 2009 to smuggle Jihadis into Syria. This is why the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia unleashed Jihadis onto Syria.

And he, and a few members asking for intervention, are also discussing ousting Assad. This betrays the real purpose of this military action.

Zac Rothschild Goldmsith just intervened suggesting that we should 'pressure' Saudi Arabia and Qatar to clamp down on Islamic extremists, but he did not state that the event that kicked off all the wars in North Africa in The Middle East since it occured, 9/11, was run by his in-laws.




What nonsense.

We could take out IS in a week if we wanted.

This betrays the real reason for war.

It is not to degrade and destroy IS but to stall the war until head-chopping Saudi Arabia has trained the latest batch of brainwashed morons to be unleashed on Syria.


There has been a Covenant of Security between Great Britain and Islamic extremist terrorists for decades. Preachers have been allowed to preach Jihad in the mosques and on the streets of Great Britain. Islamic terrorist organisations have been able to base their HQs in London and openly recruit Jihadis.

One case I would like to draw to your attention is that of Michael Adebalajo. He butchered a British soldier Lee Rigby on the streets of Woolwich. Yet MI5 had been trying to recruit him as a spy, a role he apparently refused, and which he resented so much that he lost the plot and butchered Rigby. But while MI5 were trying to recruit him, Adebalajo was preaching Jihad against President Assad of Syria. This is because in 2007 it was agreed between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. The former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked in 2009 by Great Britain to plan smuggling Jihadis into Syria. This plan was agreed because by 2007 a plan for war on seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11 was moribund.

So one wonders how many British Jihadis Adebalajo inspired to go to Syria for Jihad against Assad, and how many are now members of Islamic State or any other terrorist organisation, and how many will return to this rotten, corrupt, warmongering, sex-obsessed Disunited Fascist Kingdom to commit terrorism and help to advance the police state.

These Jihadis were first unleashed in Libya where British Special Forces trained, advised and guided them as they butchered their way into Tripoli.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been instrumental in financing the Jihadis.

Turkey has been instrumental in allowing Jihadis to flow easily in and out of Syria over the Turley-Syria border, at times firing shells into Syria to give the Jihadis cover as they invaded Syria from Turkey!!

It is all a load of bollocks!!

We create our own monsters who we claim must be slayed.

But The Islamic State is just a bunch of cutthroat bandits with a few tanks and bank accounts hiding behind Islam. Their threat is being inflated by a willing NATO media in an attempt to fulfill the plan for ousting Assad in Syria.



The war editorial in The ZioGuardian today supports war.
We cannot prosper while a great civilisation goes down next to us like a sinking ship. If we can help avert that, we should do so, but with the strong reservation that we will stop if we see we are making things worse, and very much in the hope that this will be the last chapter in the vexed history of our interventions in that region.

[source : The Guardian view on the choice before the Commons as it debates air action in Iraq, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/25/guardian-view-choice-commons-debates-air-action-iraq, 26th September 2014]

And not surprisingly The ZioGuardian blames Iran!!

Our argument should be that our military and diplomatic help is conditional on local progress, local compromise and local effort. That means that the states which have been feeding this conflict from a distance, notably Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, have to arrive at some kind of truce, while the damaged states at its centre have to remake themselves, difficult though that is.

It is all typical Guardianspeak: apparent compassion but not telling the truth.

The wars in North Africa and The Middle East since 9/11 are all a plan for war on seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark.

And they are generally benefiting Israel. In case yo haven't noticed all the wars are on or have been in nations hostile to Israel: Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Syria. All reduced to rubble and civil wars while Israel rises to dominate economically and militarily.

Yet The ZioGuardian does not mention Israel. Not once.

Last year The ZioGuardian was ecstatic that Syria had agreed to relinquish its chemical weapons after Prince Bandar failed to trick British MPs into war by running a false flag at Ghouta. Several editorials were published expressing their joy. But just on the other side of The Golan Heights lies Israel which has a much more powerful and destructive arsenal of not just chemical but also biological and even nuclear weapons. But did The ZioGuardian demand or even suggest that Israel be stripped of its WMDs? Absolutely not!! Total silence on that.

As Israel was murdering over 500 Palestinian children in yet another war on The Gaza Strip engineered by Israel, The ZioGuardian said sweet FA about the barbarity of Israel.

And the ZioGuardian published an advert financed by Zionists accusing Hamas of using those children as human shields!!


In addition to the blatant fact that they will be aiding and abetting mass murder in acquiescing to use British military forces in a plan for war on seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark after the inside job 9/11, as he states in the video below:

and the 10 very good reasons suggested by Stop The War:

the reasons for war as given in the actual text of the motion can be dismissed.

Here is the text of the motion:
This House:

• Condemns the barbaric acts of Isil against the peoples of Iraq including the Sunni, Shia, Kurds, Christians and Yazidi and the humanitarian crisis this is causing

• Recognises the clear threat Isil pose to the territorial integrity of Iraq and the request from the government of Iraq for military support from the international community and the specific request to the UK government for such support

• Further recognises the threat Isil poses to wider international security and the UK directly through its sponsorship of terrorist attacks and its murder of a British hostage

• Acknowledges the broad coalition contributing to military support of the government of Iraq, including countries throughout the Middle East

• Further acknowledges the request of the government of Iraq for international support to defend itself against the threat Isil poses to Iraq and its citizens, and the clear legal basis that this provides for action in Iraq

• Notes that this motion does not endorse UK air strikes in Syria as part of this campaign, and any proposal to do so would be subject to a separate vote in parliament

• Accordingly supports her majesty’s government, working with allies, in supporting the government of Iraq in protecting civilians and restoring its territorial integrity, including the use of UK air strikes to support Iraqi, including Kurdish, security forces’ efforts against Isil in Iraq

• Notes that her majesty’s government will not deploy UK troops in ground combat operations

• Offers its wholehearted support to the men and women of her majesty’s armed forces.

I cannot argue with the legality of any action. If Iraq is asking for assistance then any action that the UK takes with Iraq's permission is legal. So I shall accept that.

However, the reasons as given in the text of the motion are:
• Further recognises the threat Isil poses to wider international security and the UK directly through its sponsorship of terrorist attacks and its murder of a British hostage

As far as I am aware, there has been no terrorist attack on British territory sponsored by IS, nor is there any imminent threat. Yes, the threat level was raised a few weeks ago but with the caveat that there was no immediate or credible threat of a terrorist attack from anyone let alone IS.

And Sky News has been reporting all last night that US authorities have not seen any credible evidence for the allegations from the new Iraqi PM that IS is about to launch attacks on American and French subways. And when asked for further details the Iraqi PM mumbled and stumbled and fluffed it. In other words it is probably all bollocks and is propaganda for war!!

And the murder of one British hostage, as barbaric as it was, is no excuse to go to war and murder many, many more civilians, and at an eventual financial cost many orders of magnitude more than the ransom that could have saved the life of David Haines. That is the way of the butchering Zionists who recently murdered over 500 Palestinian children in an engineered conflict that provoked much more outrage than Israel usually does by such heartless action.

But also, the beheading of David Haines was engineered by Callous Cameron, who stood up in The House of Commons and said we will not pay any ransom because it funds terrorism. But who was the first to shed fake tears on the news that David Haines had had his head sawn off? Yeah, that's right.


Callous Cameron allowed David Haines to have his head sawn off!!!

Even Haines' friends and family accused Callous Cameron of this.

And as stated by Joe Tywman of YouGov ob Sky News last night, it was the beheading of Haines that swung British public opinion in favour of war.

The Americans have also been provoking calls for war by threatening the families of hostages with prosecution if they attempted to raise ransoms for their sons, Steven Sotloff and James Foley.

You have to ask, why are the USA and UK not paying ransoms but other G8 nations are, but then the USA and UK use the barbaric beheadings of those hostages as a casus belli?!

But as with the admissions by the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand at their trial that they were Freemasons, had received the weapons and encouragement for the assassination from Freemasonry, and knew that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death years earlier but had not found willing assassins, this crucial information is being ignored in a rush to war. And look what happened!!!


But there is also no mention in the text of this war motion about what constitutes a mission success, or what will happen afterwards, or any timetable for cessation of military action if things aren't going well.

This is an amateurish hastily put together motion for a long war with plenty of opportunity for abuse, mission creep, such as bombing Syria and in particular the Syrian military inline with the aforementioned plan, but more importantly, eventual military conflict with Russia.

The point of this war is to oust Assad.

The British Government allied with head-chopping Saudi Arabia last year to try to trick all MPs into attacking Syria by running a false flag at Ghouta. This war is just their next trick.


Just say NO!!

Because once the bombing starts anything can happen.

Thursday, September 25, 2014


I just listened to Joe Twyman of YouGov on Sky News state that the British public are now 2 to 1 in favour of bombing IS in Iraq, which is a significant swing from evenly split a few weeks ago.

So what changed the British public's mind?


That beheading was due to Cameron's cruel, brutal, heartless policy of not paying ransoms as agreed at the G8 meeting last year. In contrast, other G8 nations ignored that treaty and paid ransoms, and as a result former hostages are back with their families and friends. But not David Haines. In fact, Haines' family accused Cameron of allowing Haines to die!

And in addition to Cameron's policy, the FBI threatened the families of James Foley and Steven Sotloff with prosecution if they paid any ransom.

James, Steven and David had their heads sawn off in videos somehow obtained by a Mossad front SITE.

And as a result Dodgy Dave will probably get his war, and a war that will cost several orders of magnitude more than any ransom that would have saved David Haines' life.

But as with all cowardly warmongers, Dodgy Dave will be safe and sound miles away from all the action.


I do not support Choudary in any whatsoever, but it's all a bit too coincidental.

On the eve of UK MPs voting for war in Iraq (yet again):
1. The wife of Alan Henning receives an audio recording of him pleading for his life (why not video as is the case for John Cantlie);
2. The Iraqi PM suggests that IS is planning to attack subways in France and the USA;
3. Anjem Choudary is arrested on suspicion of terrorism;
4. The FBI claim to have identified Jihadi John but ridiculously refuse to name him!!!


Air strikes on Islamic State have so far not been devastating. If IS was such a threat to the universe, as Obama and Cameron suggest, then there would be American boots on the ground, lots of them, and air strikes would be much more devastating and much more frequent.

But I suspect that any war on IS in Iraq will drive IS into Syria.

And once there?

Well, look at Section 8 of UN SCR 2178 that was adopted last night:
8. Decides that, without prejudice to entry or transit necessary in the furtherance of a judicial process, including in furtherance of such a process related to arrest or detention of a foreign terrorist fighter, Member States shall prevent the entry into or transit through their territories of any individual about whom that State has credible information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is seeking entry into or transit through their territory for the purpose of participating in the acts described in paragraph 6, including any acts or activities indicating that an individual, group, undertaking or entity is associated with Al-Qaida, as set out in paragraph 2 of resolution 2161 (2014), provided that nothing in this paragraph shall oblige any State to deny entry or require the departure from its territories of its own nationals or permanent residents;

Much is being made that this resolution is designed to stop potential Jihadis from Europe and the USA.

But what about IS escaping from Iraq into Syria?

Or IS in Syria entering Iraq as reinforcements?


The last few times I have heard Sam Kiley on Sky News discuss The Islamic State he has suggested that the US military will eventually attack the Syrian military.

This morning Kiley asked a very good question:

if The Islamic State is such a huge threat to the world then why are the USA, UK, France, and the Gulf states taking their time about degrading and destroying The Islamic State?

My answer to this very good question is:

Sam, it is because the aim of this operation is not to degrade and destroy The Islamic State, but to degrade and destroy the Syrian state by using IS in what ever way works: stalling the process until head-chopping Saudi Arabia has trained a fresh batch of brainwashed fodder; driving IS into Syria then attacking IS in Syria, and then claim that Syria attacked a US fighter jet; use UN SCR 2178 to accuse Syria of aiding terrorism by allowing IS in Syria to move to Iraq, or for IS in Iraq to escape into Syria (which is what the war on IS in Iraq is supposed to do!!).

Wednesday, September 24, 2014


The Islamic State was created to directly or indirectly oust Assad.

I will bet any MP that IS will be used to eventually oust Assad.


Israel. Saudi Arabia. But above these, the (just about) United Kingdom.

The latter engineered WW1 to eventually create the other two.


The Islamic State did not appear out of nowhere, like a ghost or a phantom in an episode of Sccoby Doo, But precisely as in an episode of Scooby Doo, there is something spooky about this entity, and also something very criminal.

Spooky, in that NATO intelligence knew IS was coming. After the tragic debacle of Ghouta last year, the brave and competent Syrian Arab Army began to annihilate the NATO-Saudi sponsored cutthroat Jihadis, who decided to escape to Iraq. The Kurds knew about this and told NATO intelligence, but NATO did nothing to stop the escape. On the contrary, the Iraqi Army was ordered to stand down to allow the escaping cutthroat Jihadis to steal weapons, bank accounts and territory. They eventually hooked up with al Qaeda in Iraq and formed The Islamic State, a ragtag bunch of megalomaniac cutthroat bandits hiding behind Islam, possessing nothing more than a few tanks and hiluxes, putting down any resistance with summary executions. That is all they are. Or is it. Is there something more? Of course. NATO and its Gulf allies, and all their media and intelligence apparatus, inflating the threat through Mossad sites likes SITE.

Criminal, in that all they do is steal bank accounts, extort, and behead and crucify.

The Islamic State is nothing more than a ragtag cabal of criminals and murderers engineered into existence by NATO and their Gulf allies and given a veneer of Islamism.


But the UK contributed to the Islamic State by allowing demented preachers such as Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Assad;

And before that we began to plan smuggling cutthroat Jihadis into Syria in 2009, as revealed by Roland Dumas.

But most recently, David Haines was allowed to be beheaded to provoke outrage.


Any war on Islamic State in Iraq will drive Islamic State into Syria. The purpose of this is so that the brave and competent Syrian military and people will have not just Israel, Islamic State and all the other NATO proxy degenerate Jihadis to control but also the Saudi trained rebels who will be unleashed onto Syria just in time for Easter next year.

And once in Syria these Jihadis will be a law unto themselves (and their NATO-Gulf paymasters who in turn take their orders from The British Monarchy).

They did 9/11 not for fun but for a reason. That reason is to re-order The Middle East, and if it provokes WW3 then so be it.

Assad and the Syrian people have stood, and after nearly 4 years of Saudi-sponsored medieval barbarism still stand, in their way.

Just say No! to war on Islamic State.

Support Syria!

Support Iran.

Support Palestine.

You saw what the murdering bastards did in The Gaza Strip over summer. Over 500 Palestinian children murdered by Israel, and not a peep from the likes of Dodgy Dave. And it took weeks for Bad Breath Ed Miliband to criticise Israel, as meek as it was.

Islamic State relies on oil for its revenues. It cannot last long. Surely if NATO spying is so pervasive and intrusive as Ed Snowden suggests then NATO knows how IS oil is smuggled, who buys it sand their bank accounts. And if this involves British banks then if it so important for war then banking rules can be waived in favour of publicity.

Assad and Syria have blocked the plans of the terrorist warmongers. Stop the oil smuggling of IS. Do not bomb Iraq (again).


So Dodgy Dave has recalled Parliament to discuss bombing The Islamic State.

In 2001/2/3 Saddam Hussein was portrayed as pure evil, the devil incarnate who flew planes into the WTC and Pentagon killing 3000 civilians, and had a WMD program to blow the world to smithereens ten times over. Of course, none of it was true, but we went in anyway, killing at least a half million civilians, but more likely closer to a million. We were supposed to bring freedom and democracy and stability and prosperity to Iraq. But here we are, 10 years after allegedly hanging Saddam, about to drop bombs, many bombs, over a very long time (as the US military admits) on Iraq.

What was it all for in 2003?

What did it accomplish?

The same question can be asked about Libya: once the jewel of Africa, with the highest UN HDI of any nation on that continent cursed by the transatlantic slave trade and the white man's greed. But it is now a lawless Jihadi bandit country, and exporting its crimninality and degenerate Jihad all over North Africa.

9/11 was an inside job. Head-chopping Saudi Arabia supplied the patsies, and the Zionists ran the operation, from issuing a stand down, to directing the military response. Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told that the USA was going to be involved in war and regime change in seven nations in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

We invaded Iraq in 2003. We were supposed to bring freedom and democracy, peace and harmony. Instead we gave them The Islamic State.

Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah in 2006, but lost. Lebanon was bombed but is not in the same state as Libya or Syria.

We invaded Libya in 2011. Yes, we did invade Libya in 2011. BSF were there, guiding Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb as they butchered their way into Tripoli. Again, we were supposed to bring freedom and democracy, peace and harmony. Instead we gave them degenerate lawless Jihadi bandits squabbling over who owns what bit of rubble created by super duper accurate NATO love bombs.

After killing Gaddafi the Jihadis ventured into Syria and have been there ever since, cutting the throats of defenceless Syrian children and eating the hearts of their prisoners, helping to also turn Syria into a pile of rubble.

Why are Members of The Marsten House being asked to support yet another war in Iraq? Because brave Syria is standing up to the culprits of 9/11, who have created The Islamic State to take out Assad in what ever way works.

Just say no to war on Islamic State in Iraq. And in Syria.

The Islamic State can be defeated in other ways to killing yet more civilians. IS are hiding in civilian populations. Their oil revenues can be defeated. Their sponsors exposed, sanctions imposed and brought to justice ( and stripped of The World Cup).

Because The Islamic State was engineered by NATO and its Gulf allies to kick out Assad. Once war on IS starts in Iraq, then as admitted by the US military, the long campaign against IS will provoke mission creep. And before you know it the UK will be bombing the Syrian military...just as the false flag at Ghouta was supposed to do last year!!!

Perfide Albion!!

We engineered World War 1 to create the first world government, The League of Nations.

We allowed Hitler to expand way beyond The Treaty of Versailles in preparation for World War 2, which we also engineered through anglophile Wall Street in order to create The United Nations because The League of Nations failed.

This is what the British establishment does. They engineer world wars. They are not altruistic. They love chaos and death and destruction and then rebuilding the world as they want. In their plan Assad should have gone years ago. But he is still there. The Syrian people are still there. Resisting the invasion of cutthroat Jihadis that we unleashed on to them.

Just say no to war on Islamic State. They are just a bunch of criminals with a few tanks hiding behind Islam. Saying Yes will be aiding abetting the pure criminals who engineered and ran 9/11 and are guilty of all the bloodshed in the engineered wars in North Africa and Middle East ever since.

ps Dodgy Dave allowed David Haines to be beheaded to provoke outrage. The Sotloff and Foley families were harassed by the FBI to stop arranging ransoms for their sons. Result? Severed heads in videos provided by a Mossad outfit!!


Last weekend there was quite a significant protest by Kurds charging Great Britain and other nations such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia with aiding The Islamic State and the rebels in Syria. The protesting Kurds also accused other nations of similar actions. The BBC has not covered this protest.

However, yesterday I listened to BBC Radio 4 One O Clock News. A Kurdish woman was interviewed expressing her enormous thanks for the action taken by the USA. And today a video report of Kurdish refugees expressing their gratitude for the US action IS is available on the BBC website, at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-29337266 .

But no BBC video of the Kurds protesting last weekend. RT covered this at http://rt.com/uk/189656-britain-isis-protest-london/ .

But more importantly, still no video of General Wesley Clark exposing the plan for war and regime in seven countries in five years, Syria being one of those nations.

But who cares? Ed didn't mention the deficit!! A scandal for which Eammon Holmes ridiculed Ed, suggesting that Ed had bad breath after Ed's wife ducked out of a kiss from Ed!!


Respect national sovereignty and protect civilians.

Get Russia and Iran involved.

In other words, Syria is not happy.


So the day before MPs are to be recalled to discuss attacking The Islamic State, the wife of Alan Henning is sent an audio of him pleading for his life.


Just enough to persuade a few more MPs who were either against or neutral on bombing IS.


I am getting really, really sick of saying this, because the corrupt morons in The Marsten House just do not want to see how evil the DFQ really is, but events in Syria are due to 9/11. The attacks on 9/11 were an inside job. Saudi Arabia supplied the patsies while Zionists planned and ran the operation, and guided the response of the American public and military to the attacks. The Zionists had previously written two documents demanding war on their enemies: in 1996 a document called A Clean Break demanding war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon/Hezbollah; and in 2000 The Project for a New American Century called Rebuilding America's Defenses calling for war on primarily Iraq and Iran but recognising the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to provoke outrage. Members of PNAC, on 9/11, were in very powerful positions: Vice President; Secretary of Defense; Deputy Secretary of Defense. They also commanded powerful positions in the media to influence the American public.

Shortly after this inside job 9/11 the former Commander of NATO in Europe General Wesley Clark was told by an unnamed Pentagon officer that the Secretary of Defense had told him that the USA was going to be involved in war and regime change in seven countries in five years. The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. You will note that the first four were named in A Clean Break, and that Iraq and Iran were named in PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses. This was at a time when there was no evidence whatsoever that any of these seven nations was involved in 9/11.

If you wondered why we went into Iraq in 2003 only to find out that, contrary what we were told, Iraq was not involved in 9/11 and did not have WMDs, then this is why.

If you wondered why Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah in 2006, then this is why.

If you wondered why UN SCR 1973 was totally abused in 2011 to eventually kill Colonel Gaddafi, then this is why.

However, the war on Libya was different to the previous wars. By 2007 there had only been two of the seven wars, and Israel had lost to Hezbollah. So a Plan B was hatched between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. But it appears that Libya was selected. Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb were portrayed as 'freedom fighters' in The Arab Spring who we had to protect. But this was the precise reason why Washington engineered The Arab Spring. So NATO abused UN SCR 1973 and quickly went from protecting civilians to bombing Libya military positions, assassinating Gaddafi's family relations (children included), BSF were on the ground assisting and advising the Jihadis, to eventually kill Gaddafi. Libya, once the jewel of Africa, with the highest UN HDI in Africa, is now a complete mess; lawless Jihadi organisations fighting in the streets, with spillover in to neighboring nations.

After Libya the Jihadis and weapons looted from the Libyan arsenal were smuggled into Syria where they have been committing atrocity after atrocity. But the Syrian military has recovered from early losses and the Jihadis face defeat. Prince Bandar, sponsor of the Jihadis, was sent to Moscow to threaten Putin that if Russia didn't dump Assad then there would be hell on earth in Syria. Putin rejected. So on 21st August 2013 something happened in Ghouta. This was designed to provoke a large scale military intervention by NATO on behalf of the cutthroat Jihadis. But it failed. The Syrian military then began to chase the Jihadis, who escaped to Iraq. The Kurds told NATO about this escape months in advance, but NATO did nothing. Instead the Iraqi Army was ordered to stand down to allow the escaping Jihadis to capture weapons, bank accounts, natural resources and territory. The Jihadis, drunk with power, declared themselves The Islamic State and have been putting down any resistance with medieval brutality, much like in the mother country, their sponsors, Saudi Arabia!

Syria was supposed to have fallen years ago, but has resisted and resisted. The event in Ghouta last year was supposed to provoke bombing of Syrian military positions, but it failed. The Islamic State has beheaded journalists from the USA and the UK The Islamic State has provoked bombing of Syria but not of Syrian military positions. At least, not yet. President Obomber has stated that any attack on US military by Syria will be seen as an act of war. A report last week suggested that the USA and Syria were going to cooperate to avoid mistakes, but despite the USA saying it told Syria that IS was going to be attacked, Syria denies cooperating and giving permission.

They will not give up. They did 9/11 to kick out leaders like Assad. Saddam and Gaddafi have gone. Nasrallah and Assad are still there. Iran has not been attacked. So do not be fooled that this action against IS is not aimed in some way against Assad.

Here are 4 reasons why military action against the Islamic State is a very, very bad idea:

1. The US military is stating that this action will not be quick. Suggestions are already being made in the NATO media that Syrian military will also be attacked. It is going to take at least 6 months for Saudi Arabia to train further rebels. So what is supposed to happen between now and then? If IS is degraded and destroyed too quickly then the SAA will destroy the remaining rebels leaving the fresh Saudi-trained rebels totally exposed to the much more experienced SAA. So this is why it is going to take a long time to degrade and destroy IS; a stalemate, at the least, must be preserved so that in 6 months time the fresh Saudi-trained rebels can have some effect. So what are the consequences? As in all wars civilians will pay the price. The IS will blend into the civilian population. Contrary to The Gaza Strip, the IS can establish positions in the territories they hold. Gaza has a massive population density that makes it very difficult to not fight from civilian areas. American missiles do not have 100% accuracy. So civilian deaths will result, and be used by the IS, to recruit and raise funds.

2. There is the potential that the Syrian military erroneously attacks a US fighter jet, or is provoked into doing so, or the US claims that Syria attacked a US fighter jet, resulting in the USA declaring war on Syria. And in that case, Russia and/or China will step in.

3. There is also the potential for terrorist attacks at home in retaliation.

4. There are no boots en masse on the ground as yet, but there is always the potential for this, particularly when the militaries are stating at such an early stage that any action will take a long time.

In the 6 months before the Saudi-trained rebels will be ready the finances of the Islamic State can be degraded and destroyed, their sponsors sanctioned, Qatar stripped of The World Cup, etc.

But primarily this action in Syria is aimed at kicking out Assad as part of the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.

And as with 9/11 we find in this action on Syria the hands of Israel and Saudi Arabia.

This is a very, very, very bad idea.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014


By all accounts air strikes in Iraq on The (un)Islamic State have done bugger all to degrade and destroy them.

So far Obama had been wise not to bomb Syria. He had stalled on bombing Syria last year: scandal after scandal; pleas from leaders such as Hollande and Erdogan; tricks by the UK and Israel blaming the SAA for chemical weapons attacks, ending with Ghouta; twice-weekly editorials in The Washington Post demanding war on Syria.

McCain, of #arrestMcCain4ISIS fame, blurted out that Obama did not want to arm ISIS when everyone else did.

But within a few days of an agreement being reached between the USA and Syria to coordinate attacks on ISIS in Syria, after several years of no intruders in The White House two come along, one armed to the teeth!

Hmmm. A bit of a coincidence?

Did those intruders destabilise Obama? In addition to the news about this obscure IS splinter that was allegedly planning to attack the US homeland?

Now the USA has decided to bomb IS and this splinter. The USA claims it told Syria, which Syria does not deny, but Syria is denying coordination or permission, and will be stating the procedure from last night at the UN SC tomorrow.

In other words, a very unwise Obama just broke international law and attacked Syria.

No, the USA didn't attack any Syrian military position. But that event is not far off.

Neither is the day when elements in the US military claim that Syria attacked a US fighter jet.

This is going to be a long drawn out war on Syria. The forces that Saudi Arabia will be training to fight Assad will be ready in a minimum of 6 months, but it will be more like 8 to 12 months. If the IS is destroyed quickly then the SAA can focus on the rabble of rebels that now left in Syria, and within 6 months the 'civil' war will be over and the Saudi-trained forces will be food and drink to the SAA.

So in the meantime, before these Saudi-trained rebels are ready:
1. the US will continue to bomb IS, not to degrade and destroy the IS but to preserve some kind stalemate;
2. provoke the Syrian military into shooting at a coalition fighter jet, or provoke or claim some kind of Gulf of Tonkin event.


Do you want your MP to know about this woman Jasmine Tridevil who claims to have three breasts?

Or that all the wars since the inside job 9/11 in North Africa and The Middle East were foretold to General Wesley Clark?

Here's Clark:

Saturday, September 20, 2014


Check out these tweets from Webster Tarpley.

All last year Obama was under increasing pressure to attack Syria: twice-weekly editorials in The Washington Post demanding war on Syria; face-to-face meetings with Hollande, Netanyahu, Cameron, Erdogan; many attempts at false flags blaming the SAA, culminating in the incident at Ghouta. And even after Ghouta Obama managed to avoid war on Syria, agreeing to Syria destroying its chemical weapons (wile Israel's much more horrific arsenal remains in tact).

A report on Consortium News suggests that agreement on coordinated attacks on The Islamic State has been reached between the USA and Syria. This should reduce the probability of an incident such as a US fighter jet being shot at by the Syrian air defence systems, which the warmongers could obviously use as a Gulf of Tonkin. But they might ignore this agreement anyway and claim without evidence that a US fighter was shot at.
The Obama administration, working through the Russian government, has secured an agreement from the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad to permit U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State targets in parts of Syria, according to a source briefed on the secret arrangements.

The reported agreement would clear away one of the chief obstacles to President Barack Obama’s plan to authorize U.S. warplanes to cross into Syria to attack Islamic State forces – the concern that entering Syrian territory might prompt anti-aircraft fire from the Syrian government’s missile batteries.

...Yet, this secret collaboration may go even further and include Syrian government assistance in the targeting of the U.S. attacks, according to the source who spoke on condition of anonymity. That is another feature of U.S. military protocol in conducting air strikes – to have some on-the-ground help in pinpointing the attacks.

[source : Robert Parry, Reported US-Syrian Accord on Air Strike, Consortium News, http://consortiumnews.com/2014/09/17/reported-us-syrian-accord-on-air-strikes/, 17th September 2014]

The whole point of The Islamic State is to create conditions for war on Syria. The warmongers would have loved to have gone into Syria shooting at anything that moves, provoking retaliatory fire from the Syrian military, and then declaring war on Syria. This agreement has significantly reduced the probability of any confusion between Syria and the USA on where and when US fighter jets are attacking.

But as I said, the warmongers could conjure up a Gulf of Tonkin type event that never occured...

But here is what Tarpley has tweeted regarding an 'intruder' in The White House:

This is not to condone what Obama has done regarding weapons and training for the rebels in Syria.

Friday, September 19, 2014


The campaign calling itself Better Together won the vote last night. "We're better off together", was their mantra. Dodgy Dave said this multiple times. Yet this morning he was far more concerned about more autonomy and more devolution.

Better together?

Or better apart?

Members of The Marsten House should be getting a pay rise. But for what? Doing less? Because more powers will have been devolved to respective assemblies or parliaments?

Will The Marsten House soon be obsolete and become a museum, the resulting power structure being local assemblies deciding how many dogs a citizen can keep while all the major powers, such as going to war, given to Brussels? Why not? We already have a EU military. You might not be aware of it but it has been operating off the coast of Somalia. This is why European militaries are having their budgets cut as we unite to create a European Superstate.

And all resistance to it is to be eliminated.


A Yes vote yesterday would have caused financial and administrative chaos.

But have you noticed something this morning? The talk from Dodgy Dave is about more ENGLISH autonomy!!

There is a Welsh Assembly, a Scottish Parliament, and a Northern Irish Parliament, but no English Parliament. But curiously thanks to this Scottish Independence referendum more ENGLISH autonomy is coming...AND WE DIDN'T EVEN ASK FOR IT!!
Speaking outside Downing Street he [TTS : Dodgy Dave] said it was 'crucial' to give England the same powers over tax, spending and welfare as Scotland, following his last minute pledge for further devolution to Holyrood during the campaign.

Mr Cameron said: 'I've long believed that a crucial part missing from this national discussion is England. We've heard the voice of Scotland, but now the millions of voices of England must also be heard.

'The question of English votes for English laws, the so-called West Lothian question, requires a decisive answer.

'So just as Scotland will vote separately in the Scottish Parliament on their issues of tax, spending and welfare so too England as well as Wales and Northern Ireland should be able to vote on these issue - and all this must take place in tandem with and at the same pace the settlement for Scotland.'

[source : 'Now the millions of voices of England must be heard': Cameron hails Scottish referendum result but says it is now time for 'English votes for English laws', The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2761766/David-Cameron-make-televised-address-reacting-Scotland-referendum-promising-powers-English-MPs-bid-head-Tory-revolt.html, 19th September 2014]

We are seeing and allowing the dissolution of The United Kingdom by stealth to create mini states powerless to resist the EU.

A Yes vote would have caused financial and administrative chaos. But very curiously a No vote, which was the campaign of a group calling itself Better Together, has actually led to more autonomy not only for Scotland, but also for England...AND WE DIDN'T EVEN ASK FOR IT!!

And I would not be surprised if Alex Salmond is in on this. By refusing to state what currency an independent Scotland would have used he caused just enough doubt about the result of a Yes vote.

Thursday, September 18, 2014


If Scotland was going to be truly independent following the referendum today, creating its own money, deciding its own laws, then I would migrate there today. But I am unpersuaded by Alex Salmond and the empty arguments for independence.

"Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes the laws." - a quotation attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild. I have been unable to verify this, but if Rothschild did not say or write this then whoever did is bang on the money, so to speak.

You can only be truly independent when you issue and control your own money. I have not heard any suggestion from Salmond or any other pro-independent about Scotland creating its own money. I did hear just the one caller into a radio debate suggest this, but that is it.

If Scotland uses the Pound then Scotland is beholden to The Bank of England and thus to the British Monarchy.

If Scotland uses the Euro then Scotland is beholden to the European Central Bank and thus to Bilderberg and thus to the British Monarchy.

The United Kingdom is being Balkanized to create a set of mini states powerless to resist the European Union and corporations. We already have a Welsh Assembly, a Parliament in Northern Ireland, a Scottish Parliament, but so far no English Parliament. In case you haven't noticed there is a Parliament of some kind in Brussels. That Parliament already has so much power that The Marsten House is becoming insignificant. Two World Wars were engineered to create that Parliament, the EU and the Euro. All resistance to this new political set up is to be eliminated.

However, I am detecting a definite sense of desperation from the establishment to keep the union. It is possible that Balkanizing the whole of Europe except the United Kingdom is the plan, to eventually make the UK the most powerful state of all the states in Europe, but all beholden to Brussels.

If Scotland votes Yes today then we will see:
1. an English Parliament;
2. relentless Conservative governments in England;
3. financial and administrative chaos which only the establishment will not suffer;
4. a fairer, more equal Scotland, but only because everyone will be poorer.

I would love to see and live in a truly independent Scotland. But if the result of a Yes from today's referendum means financial and administrative chaos and Scotland keeping the Pound or adopting the Euro then I will not be moving to Scotland any time soon. If I was voting today I would need much more detail before voting Yes.

Scotland should probably play safe and vote naw.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014


Today I have experienced a massive, massive let down. Someone who I thought could help me bring down this rotten, corrupt, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling system has decided not to help. I know that they read TTS because I have told that person that I wrote TTS. I have written to that person many times, stating the position. But to no avail.

For whatever reason or reasons, their help is not forthcoming.

But what that person has failed to realise is that it is not just me being let down but the whole of the human race, including their family and friends!!

I truly believe that that someone was supposed to help me, that we were supposed to meet and work together to bring down the system. I am in position, have a very good knowledge of how things work, but also believe that this someone could provide the last piece of the puzzle.

Henceforth I will not be initiating any contact with that person. However I must keep the channel open in case they change their mind. But I am sick of their attitude. They are not King or Queen.

I now expect them, their family and friends to do the honourable thing and stop reading TTS. I cannot bear writing TTS while I know that there are people out there reading TTS who I personally know, who have a much better understanding of what is going on but are doing bugger all about it, expecting people like myself to risk everything and take the flak!

Tuesday, September 16, 2014


Similar to Jihadi Hague, the Foreign Secretary Phil Hammond sure is taking his time to reply to my letter MY LETTER TO THE ETREMELY NAIVE FOREIGN SECRETARY PHIL HAMMOND, but he does have the time for a nice trip to Paris to discuss how to start war on Syria.

Monday, September 15, 2014


CC Music Factory - Things That Make You Go Hmmmm

A few other things that should make you go hmmmmm....:

The assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand admitted to being Freemasons, admitted to receiving the material and encouragement for the assassination from Freemasonry, and admitted to knowing that Freemasonry had condemnded Ferdinand to death years earlier but they had until then failed to find willing assassins;

General Wesley Clark being told by a Pentagon officer shortly after 9/11 that there would be war and regime change in seven nations in five years, those seven nations having nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11, and most of those nations being previously named as targets of Israeli warmongering or not being friendly to Israel, and every war the USA has been involved in since then, except Afghanistan, has been on those nations named to Clark: Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and very soon Syria.


Why don't they just get down, groove, dance, and enjoy and celebrate life instead of making everyone else's life fucking hell?

funky disco and nu groove - get down people


If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;
If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

Rudyard Kipling


It is becoming abundantly clear to me that The Islamic State was deliberately created by NATO and its Gulf allies to create the conditions for war on Syria. Once bombing in Syria starts anything can happen. The USA need only claim that Syria shot at one of their planes and that will be that: war on Syria.

I have just heard Sam Kiley on Sky News suggest that the coalition will bomb not only IS in Syria but also the Syrian military. And Sophie Ridge on Sky News has just stated that the momentum is in favour of military action in Syria, even from those sceptical of war in Syria last year.

So from being just a bunch of cutthroat bandits with a few pick up trucks, The Islamic State has now been inflated by the NATO media into this huge threat to the world that a coalition of tens of nations are agreeing how to 'degrade and destroy' not only The Islamic State but also the Syrian military with the aim of regime in Syria as per the plan for war and regime change revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.

Russia and China and all their allies such as Iran must start making their positions known to the madmen and madwomen in the centres of power in Washington DC, London, Paris, Berlin and Tel Aviv.

Sunday, September 14, 2014


While the sociopath Dodgy Dave Cameron holds a press conference to tell us that Islamic State is "the embodiment of evil", and expressing his sympathies, last week the friends of David Haines told The Daily Mail that the British Government was allowing Haines to die.
Friends of the British hostage facing brutal murder by Islamic State fanatics last night said the British Government was 'letting an innocent man die' by refusing to pay a ransom for his release.

While his wife told the Mail she is defiantly refusing to give up hope that David Haines will be rescued, close friends of the couple said his fate has been sealed by the UK's refusal to negotiate with terrorists.

...But she [Haines'2nd wife Dragana] criticised the British government for‎ not paying off Islamic State terrorists to save him, as other European countries have done.

...'We know Dragana can't tell us what is happening. She is so strong. She will not give up hope that David will be rescued,' the friend said.

'‎She is in shock. She can't understand what is happening to him. I watched the video and I can't believe the UK does nothing to save him from those animals.

'If he was from Italy or France they would pay and he would be back with his beautiful wife and their child.

'The UK and America won't pay ransoms so they are letting an innocent man die‎. Dragana is so in love, I don't know how she copes. Her daughter will grow up with no father.

'It is the worst thing. I watched the video and he is so thin. I can't think about what they are doing to him. What Dragana is going through is the worst thing in the world. He should never have gone there. He is always trying to do good things for work but it is too risky. It is not worth the risk.

'I know people say paying terrorists is bad. But that is politics. This is a real man. How can the UK see this and they do nothing?'

[source : 'You're letting an innocent man die': Anger of British hostage's friends at UK government for not paying a ransom to save his life, The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2745654/Pictured-wedding-day-British-hostage-David-Haines-wife-reveals-I-cry-I-helpless.html, 5th September 2014]

So, how can the UK see this and they do nothing?

Well, I could ask this exact same question of some people I know, some of whom have children.

The UK and USA are not paying ransoms and allowing British and American hostages to be beheaded to provoke calls for war on Syria. President Assad should have been ousted years ago in The Arab Spring. This 'revolution' was a Plan B for an initial Plan A in which there would be war and regime change on seven nations in five years. And because Assad was still in power in the summer of 2013, NATO and its allies ran a false flag in Ghouta that was designed to provoke calls for intervention in Syria on behalf of the rebels, who at the time faced total annihilation. But it failed and no war ensued. So the rebels escaped to Iraq, an escape that was allowed to happen, and once in Iraq sympathetic officers in the Iraqi Army ordered their units to stand down. The rebels, then armed with weapons and bank accounts, declared The Islamic State and have been putting down any resistance or protest by summary execution, often beheading. But although IS has no air force, one Scud missile and a few pick up trucks with guns, IS is now, we are told, a threat to the world. However, several leaders have expressed their position that they will not work with Assad. But we saw what happened in Libya : given a UN SCR NATO abused that resolution to eventually kill Gaddafi. Both Syria and Libya are on that list of seven nations.

So by provoking and allowing beheadings of their citizens, the British and American governments are generating thsoe calls for war on Syria that were absent last year after Ghouta.


A few weeks ago Der Fuhrer Dodgy Dave Cameron stood up in The Marsten House and said we will not pay ransoms because it funds terrorism. This was just after videos allegedly showing the beheadings of James Foley and Steven Sotloff had been released and Haines was being threatened as the next to lose his head. Harumph, harumph, harumph, muttered The Marsten House, for Haines was expendable.

Before last night nobody in the NATO media cared about Haines. The Daily Mail last week printed something about his family attacking Cameron for not wanting to pay his ransom when other hostages were back safe and well with their families because their governments had allowed ransoms to be paid, violating a treaty agreed between G8 nations last year. Basically that is all we knew about David Haines before last night; his name.

But now that Haines has no head, virtually every NATO media newspaper had some kind of heart-wrenching bio of Haines: former RAF; he was happiest when working; he married and had children with his childhood sweetheart. All that kind of stuff.

Now I ask, if this same kind of media coverage of Haines had been made BEFORE he lost his head then the whole of the DFQ would have been banging down the doors of Number 10 Downing Street demanding that Cameron pay Hanies' ransom.

Sky News has been wall-to-wall Haines since the first reports of his beheading. And Sky News is quoting Colonel Richard Kemp who suggests that we should basically bomb, bomb, bomb then send in the ground troops. But who is Kemp? During the most recent shooting-fish-in-a-barrel Isrseli war on The Gaza Strip Kemp said that the IDF is the most moral army the world has ever known!!

Before last night we knew very little about Haines. But now he was everyone's son, beheaded by The Islamic State who we must now bomb, bomb, bomb before sending in the ground troops, an action that would cost several orders of magnitude greater than Haines' ransom, both financially and in deaths.

I proposed that the British and American governments were very suspiciously honouring this obscure treaty between G8 nations on ransoms because it is producing exactly the outcries of Bomb Syria that were lacking last year after the event of 21st August last year at Ghouta. Other members of the G8 have ignored this treaty and paid ransoms, and as a result the former hostages are alive and back with their families. But in the USA the Foleys and Sotloffs were threatened with prosecution if they tried to raise the ransom. And in the DFQ Dodgy Dave stood up in The Marsten House and said that we will not pay ransoms, but now that Haines has no head Cameron will sickeningly use Haines' beheading as a casus belli.

Apparently Haines said:
My name is David Cawthorne Haines. I would like to declare that I hold you David Cameron entirely responsible for my execution.

Haines is undeniably correct. If Cameron is so shocked and sickened and horrified by Haines' beheading then he should resign immediately, and at the very least not use Haines' death as a casus belli, a death that Cameron has deliberately provoked and engineered, supported by a pathetic, cowardly NATO media who are using Haines' engineered beheading for war.

Cameron has the blood of David Cawthorne Haines on his already bloodsoaked hands. He should resign immediately and be prosecuted for murder.

Saturday, September 13, 2014


To some I know : put your hands over your ears and make really daft sounds.

First the mother of James Foley claimed that she was threatened with prosecution for trying to raise the ransom for her son who was later allegedly beheaded by an executioner for The Islamic State. Now the parents of Steven Sotloff have claimed the same thing happened to them. Steven was also allegedly beheaded by an executioner for The Islamic State. Both executions have been used to provoke support for war in Iraq and Syria on The Islamic State.

And yet The Islamic State has held hostages from nations other than the USA and released them. Why? Because their home nations were willing to allow the ransoms to be paid. There is a treaty between G8 nations agreed last year that no member of the G8 would pay a ransom. But some members of the G8 have broken that treaty...several times! Indeed you could describe that treaty as moribund. Yet for some reason, the USA and the DFQ are steadfast in their resolve to honour this particular treaty, despite all the international laws, codified and moral, that they wantonly break on a daily basis.

And oh how convenient it is that the result of honouring this treaty results in beheadings that can be used to provoke cries for war.

If you were sceptical about Mrs Foley then the same claim from the Sotloffs, and an inhumane reticence from Der Fuhrer Dodgy Dave Cameron that the DFQ should pay any ransoms, should be enough proof that our governments are willing, indeed desperately wanting, to sacrifice civilians being beheaded to provoke calls for war in Syria.

The parents of murdered journalist Steven Sotloff were told by a White House counterterrorism official at a meeting last May that they could face criminal prosecution if they paid ransom to try to free their son, a spokesman for the family told Yahoo News Friday night.

"The family felt completely and utterly helpless when they heard this," said Barak Barfi, a friend of Sotloff who is serving as a spokesman for his family. "The Sotloffs felt there was nothing they could do to get Steve out."

[source : Sotloff's parents told they could be prosecuted for paying ransom to IS, Yahoo News, http://news.yahoo.com/sotloff-s-parents-were-told-they-could-be-prosecuted-for-paying-ransom-to-is-234329991.html, 13th September 2014]

Friday, September 12, 2014



In Syria splitters would be beheaded.


The good stuff is the fun and easy bit. Aaaaanyone can do that. Because aaaaaanyone will. It's dead easy that bit. There's nowt difficult or clever about that.

But the bad stuff?

And the bad stuff is:
1. finding out, through private research or being told, just how really, really evil this world is; and
2. wanting to do something about it; then
3. actually doing something about it.

With children comes an enormous responsibility. If you bring children in to this world then you cannot expect others to risk their livelihood and even life for your children while you enjoy life.

Sadly the vast majority of parents don't even get halfway to point 1. above, and of those that do they can't be bothered or ostracise you for telling them. Indeed such persons should really walk around with their hands over their ears making really daft sounds.


The good stuff.

The good stuff is good, innit? Sometimes really good.

And sometimes it produces the miracle of life, some say the greatest gift; a child.

Making love is supposed to do just that; make love.

But look around you today. How much love do you see?

A bit here and a bit there...maybe. A couple holding hands. Parents singing to their child in a buggy.

But tonight, how much 'love' will be made? And tomorrow night? And the night after that? Etc.

And will it stop all the death and war and destruction and poverty?

Indeed, will more people seek out the truth?

The answer to both of these is, NO!!

What we are encouraged to be is reckless, uncaring. And if a pregnancy is the result? Well, just have an abortion.

Take a look at this photo (from The Daily Mirror) of a baby born premature at 24 weeks, the maximum legal age for an abortion.

It is currently legal in the UK to kill a human being this size, this developed. A few years ago people began suggesting killing children several years old!

But once a baby has been born, are the parents inspired by love to seek out the truth? Very seldom. Children could actually be described as a weapon against their parents. The parents are expected to bring the children up, work, work, work, to feed and clothe and shelter the child, but the State can tell you what to do with that child and even take the child off you if you are deemed unfit by the State. But the parents are so focused on bringing up their children that they have little time, if any, to find out why there is so much death and war and destruction and poverty.

And it is going to get worse. Much worse. As Dr Richard Day stated; anything goes!