Tuesday, October 31, 2006


There is no doubt about that!!

It seems now that every week there is a "new" scheme for tracking people being revealed for whatever ridiculous purpose. These schemes are designed to condition us to being 'chipped. First it was your pets, and to show how useful 'chipping can be dognapping was increased, or the reporting of dognapping was increased. Then when the Soham murders occured and the two girls couldn't be found for weeks, the BBC reported that parents and their children were prepared for the kid to be 'chipped. Just today The Sun is reporting that convicted paedophiles, either being released early or after ridiculously short sentences, are released without having to give a specific address for the authorties to check on them. And it was reported yesterday that the banks, yes THE BANKS, the same banks who will soon be calling for the 'chip to protect customer IDs, are throwing customer details into the streets!! Is this on purpose? YES. All this adds to the climate of fear. Your kids could be lifted off the streets by some grubby little peado, your details could be stolen and used for fraud, some young hooligan who has taken off his tag could break into your home and kill you etc, etc etc.


So what's "the solution"?

Mmmmm. I wonder what they'll propose?

From http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23372564-details/Britons%2B%27could%2Bbe%2Bmicrochipped%2Blike%2Bdogs%2Bin%2Ba%2Bdecade%27/article.do

Britons 'could be microchipped like dogs in a decade'
Add your view

Experts predict that humans could soon have ID chips implanted under the skin
Human beings may be forced to be 'microchipped' like pet dogs, a shocking official report into the rise of the Big Brother state has warned.

The microchips - which are implanted under the skin - allow the wearer's movements to be tracked and store personal information about them.

They could be used by companies who want to keep tabs on an employee's movements or by Governments who want a foolproof way of identifying their citizens - and storing information about them.

The prospect of 'chip-citizens' - with its terrifying echoes of George Orwell's 'Big Brother' police state in the book 1984 - was raised in an official report for Britain's Information Commissioner Richard Thomas into the spread of surveillance technology.

The report, drawn up by a team of respected academics, claims that Britain is a world-leader in the use of surveillance technology and its citizens the most spied-upon in the free world.

It paints a frightening picture of what Britain might be like in ten years time unless steps are taken to regulate the use of CCTV and other spy technologies.

The reports editors Dr David Murakami Wood, managing editor of the journal Surveillance and Society and Dr Kirstie Ball, an Open University lecturer in Organisation Studies, claim that by 2016 our almost every movement, purchase and communication could be monitored by a complex network of interlinking surveillance technologies.

The most contentious prediction is the spread in the use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology.

The RFID chips - which can be detected and read by radio waves - are already used in new UK passports and are also used the Oyster card system to access the London Transport network.

For the past six years European countries have been using RFID chips to identify pet animals.

Already used in America

However, its use in humans has already been trialled in America, where the chips were implanted in 70 mentally-ill elderly people in order to track their movements.

And earlier this year a security company in Ohio chipped two of its employees to allow them to enter a secure area. The glass-encased chips were planted in the recipients' upper right arms and 'read' by a device similar to a credit card reader.

In their Report on the Surveillance Society, the authors now warn: "The call for everyone to be implanted is now being seriously debated."

The authors also highlight the Government's huge enthusiasm for CCTV, pointing out that during the 1990s the Home Office spent 78 per cent of its crime prevention budget - a total of £500 million - on installing the cameras.

There are now 4.2 million CCTV cameras in Britain and the average Briton is caught on camera an astonishing 300 times every day.

This huge enthusiasm comes despite official Home Office statistics showing that CCTV cameras have 'little effect on crime levels'.

They write: "The surveillance society has come about us without us realising", adding: "Some of it is essential for providing the services we need: health, benefits, education. Some of it is more questionable. Some of it may be unjustified, intrusive and oppressive."

Yesterday Information Commissioner Richard Thomas, whose office is investigating the Post Office, HSBC, NatWest and the Royal Bank of Scotland over claims they dumped sensitive customer details in the street, said: "Many of these schemes are public sector driven, and the individual has no choice over whether or not to take part."

"People are being scrutinised and having their lives tracked, and are not even aware of it."

He has also voiced his concern about the consequences of companies, or Government agencies, building up too much personal information about someone.

He said: "It can stigmatise people. I have worries about technology being used to identify classes of people who present some kind of risk to society. And I think there are real anxieties about that."

Yesterday a spokesman for civil liberties campaigners Liberty said: "We have got nothing about these surveillance technologies in themselves, but it is their potential uses about which there are legitimate fears. Unless their uses are regulated properly, people really could find themselves living in a surveillance society.

"There is a rather scary underlying feeling that people may worry that these microchips are less about being a human being than becoming a barcoded product.

Friday, October 27, 2006


The Independent front page today focuses on "martyrs of the web", people arrested for what their respective governments deem "subversive behaviour on the internet".

The countries highlighted are "the usual suspects"; China, Tunisia, Vietnam and surprise, surpise (where is Cilla?), Iran.

In contrast what is our government and the government of our greatest ally-in-crime, the USA doing regarding "subversive behaviour on the internet"?

Well it looks like, despite fighting multiple simultaneous wars to spread freedom and democracy across the globe, we are speeding Richard-Hammond-like into the same police states The Independent is highlighting.

Arrest of "terrorist recruiters" i.e. bloggers, and rendition to special torture camps?! Not here?

But where in The Independent is there news of the following kind brought to you by Paul Joseph Watson?

What will the UK be like in 5 years time?

From http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/october2006/261006targetsbloggers.htm

Now Europe Targets Bloggers As Terrorists
UK, EU crackdown on "spreading propaganda," mirrors U.S. assault on Internet freedom

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 26 2006

Bush administration efforts to infiltrate, misdirect, regulate and pollute the Internet with Neo-Con propaganda, as well as their openly stated agenda to target American bloggers as terrorists, is now being aped by the British government across the pond as well as other major European countries.

Home Secretary John Reid met with ministers from the six largest European Union countries and, according to a BBC report, "agreed to work together to make the internet a "more hostile" place for terrorists."

How will they accomplish this? By initiating a crackdown on people who use the Internet to "spread propaganda." The very website you are now reading would be considered propaganda by these neo-fascists- no matter the fact that the criminal syndicates Bush and Blair front for are the most deceitful progenitors of lurid propaganda since the third reich.

The purge also aims to use the Internet and other media to target young audiences with state approved indoctrination PR spin on how the war on terror is really not about imperial hegemony and crushing liberties at home.

Reid himself is no stranger to the strong arm tactics of despots, a former hardcore Stalinist, member of the Scottish Communist Party and an alcoholic bully with a penchant for thumping people in the face - he could also become the next Prime Minister.

The British government's paranoid fear of anyone "spreading propaganda" that could compete with their own is perhaps one of the reasons why they outlawed the right to protest under the 2005 Serious and Organized Crimes Act. Now Brits are only allowed to protest against the government with the government's permission - in other countries they would call that a police state and in others besides - like Zimbabwe or China - it's the de rigueur of tyranny.

Similarly, the Glorification of Terror legislation is so broadly defined that disagreeing with the government's "official explanation" of a terrorist event could be seen as enemy propaganda.

The only remaining outlet for the groundswell of dissent in opposition to the Neo-Fascist takeover of the west is the Internet, and it keeps these jack-booted bastards awake at night to think you can sit in front of your computer and broadcast your outrage to the four corners of the earth on a whim.

The fact that the U.S. government demanded access to the Google search queries of around 150 million Internet active Americans under the umbrella of the NSA eavesdropping program (recall the surveillance trucks in V For Vendetta that tuned into home conversations) proves that the elite are deliriously nervous about the last remaining outpost of freedom and its potential to influence change.

In addition, the European Union has moved to completely regulate Internet freedom. The first step is the introduction of licensing laws where you would be required to register, pay tax and only receive permission to operate a website if your material didn't violate the broad ranging "hate speech" laws legislated by the EU - win hich criticizing the EU itself is deemed "hate speech."

The development of "Internet 2" is also designed to create an online caste system whereby the old Internet hubs would be allowed to break down and die, forcing people to use the new taxable, censored and regulated world wide web. If you're struggling to comprehend exactly what the Internet will look like in five years unless we resist this, just look at China and their latest efforts to completely eliminate dissent and anonymity on the web.

Last week we highlighted similar efforts in the U.S. to mobilize resources in the war on terror to target bloggers as terrorist sympathizers and propagandists.

The White House has made it perfectly clear that it will target American citizens for propagating information harmful to the interests of the U.S. government and classify them as enemy combatants. This is codified in sub-section 27 of section 950v. of the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

Bush's own strategy document for "winning the war on terror" identifies "conspiracy theorists," meaning anyone who exposes government corruption and its lies about major domestic and world events, as "terrorists recruiters," and vows to eliminate their influence in society.

In a speech given last Monday, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills."

Chertoff has pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.

A program on behalf of CENTCOM is also underway to infiltrate blogs and message boards to ensure people, "have the opportunity to read positive stories,"presumably about how Iraq is a wonderful liberated democracy and the war on terror really is about protecting Americans from Al-CIAda.

Saturday, October 14, 2006


This is an excellent intro into the way in which the USA has been taken over by the Money Masters. There are some statements I disagree with but generally I think this is one of the best documentaries ever made.

Definitely spread this around!


Friday, October 13, 2006


This is getting ridiculous!

There is a project to develop a tagging system for airports, which will track the movements of all passengers at airports while they wait for their flights.

As with the tagging of prisoners, this will offer some potential but won't work. And if it does, some smartarse will want more functionality which the tag can't provide e.g. people taking the tags off as with offenders, which will end with suggestions for another 'solution' to the 'problem'.

The ultimate aim is to microchip us all.

Scheme such as these are designed to condition us to the idea of compulsory microchipping.

And look who's funding it. The EU. The same people who recently tried to force a European Constituion down our throats, which was defeated by a true ballot but which is being ignored and the constitution is coming back in a few years, probably with an electronic voting system. Ask Bilderberg Mandelson.

But questions of enforcement exist; what happens if a passenger refuses to be tagged, or takes it off? Will the tag be voluntary? Will a new EU-wide law be required to enforce it with penalties of fine and/or imprisonment if violated?

From http://travel.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1921420,00.html

Air travellers could soon be electronically tagged inside airports in a bid to improve security. The technology would use wrist bands or boarding passes embedded with computer chips and allow authorities to track passenger movement around terminal buildings.

Paul Brennan, an electronic engineer at University College London who is leading work on the EU-funded Optag system, said it would combine high resolution panoramic video imaging with radio frequency identification (RFID) tags to enhance airport security, safety and efficiency. "It would work if each passenger were issued with a tag, which could allow location to about one metre accuracy," he said. "The video and tag data can be merged to give a very powerful surveillance capability."

RFID tags work by emitting a short radio message when interrogated by an electronic tag reader. Dr Brennan said that Optag RFID chips would not store any personal details.

Wednesday, October 11, 2006


From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/10/AR2006101001442.html

A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 more people have died in Iraq since coalition forces arrived in March 2003 than would have died if the invasion had not occurred.

The estimate, produced by interviewing residents during a random sampling of households throughout the country, is far higher than ones produced by other groups, including Iraq's government.

...Of the total 655,000 estimated "excess deaths," 601,000 resulted from violence and the rest from disease and other causes, according to the study. This is about 500 unexpected violent deaths per day throughout the country.

The survey was done by Iraqi physicians and overseen by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health. The findings are being published online today by the British medical journal the Lancet.

The same group in 2004 published an estimate of roughly 100,000 deaths in the first 18 months after the invasion. That figure was much higher than expected, and was controversial. The new study estimates that about 500,000 more Iraqis, both civilian and military, have died since then -- a finding likely to be equally controversial

Tuesday, October 10, 2006


John Bolton thinks that North Korea may now supply its nuclear know-how to terrorists, a suggestion which is straight out of the film Team America : World Police.

But how did this tiny, isolated, backward and poverty-struck nation become a member of the most powerful club on Earth; the Nooklear Klub?

Abdul Qadeer Khan gave North Korea the centrifuges and their design necessary for the enrichment of uranium to the purity required for a bomb. Kahn was under surveillance by more than one intelligence agency as early as 1975, when the Dutch wanted to prosecute and imprison Kahn for stealing secrets from Urenco but at the request of none other than the CIA did not do so. Similarly in 1986.

Although the centrifuges enrich the uranium a bomb still needs a trigger, a delivery system, and the design of the bomb itself.

George H W Bush became Director of the CIA in November 1975, and was Vice-President in 1986, and as I understand as ex-DCI receives briefings and access to intelligence.

Kahn was not arrested because the CIA wanted to know what Kahn was upto.

Donald Rumsfeld was on the board of ABB who in 2000 sold North Korea the design and key components for two light-water reactors in return for North Korea ending its nuclear weapons program. It is possible but difficult to extract weapons grade material from a light-water reactor.

So has North Korea been allowed to continue its nuclear ambitions so that one day it becomes a threat which can only result in war? Or has it been allowed to manufacture a bomb (not known to be deliverable as yet) which could be sold to terrorists or plant the idea in our heads that it could as Bolton has done for a false-flag op?

One things for sure, I don't trust Bush or Rumsfeld or Cheney or any of that ilk.

Slippery, squirmy creatures of the night.


Chips with everything.

I've heard that 'clever' title to an article on the implantable microchip before.

It's time for The Times to push the idea of the implantable microchip, and today we are in for a treat! Two-articles-for-the-price-one!

First there's the report based on the Institute for Grocery Distribution who are looking at different methods of payment at checkouts, and luckily for us the implantable microchip is one of them. We even get to hear about scantily-dressed people at a beach club in Barcelona where a trial chip was used in customers. The manufacturer of that chip is named, VeriChip Corporation. What the article fails to mention is that Verichip is controlled by IBM who ran the prisoner processing system of the Nazis which gave the Nazis the most efficient system for state-sanctioned murder we have known, and that the backers of the Nazis reside in Wall Street and the City of London.

For details on the scary IBM/Nazi/Verchip link see the video "IBM, Verichip, and the Fouth Reich" at

This lazy article is then backed up with the "Chips With Everything" nonsense which focuses even more on the Baja Beach Club experiment. Why use the little glass chip in your arm just for purchasing soul-destroying alcohol? Why not use it to get loads of crumpet too?

Sadly we will have to put up with bollocks like this for a while as "they" try to advertise Satan-as-our-saviour with all sorts of spin. But underneath all that sheen and glimmer and plastic smile lies pure evil.

Once that chip is inside you you are cattle; THEIR CATTLE.

And with all the history we are NOT told how can we trust "them" that we are being told everything the chip can REALLY do, besides all the financial-transaction and movement-tracking applications? What will the chip REALLY be used for?

clue: watch the video "IBM, Verichip, and the Fouth Reich" at

Surely one thing you left school knowing is you can't trust Satan?

Monday, October 09, 2006


What a bargain!!

And I'm absolutely, supremely confident the project will be on time and on budget and 100% accurate...

I am reminded of a quote from possibly the only honourable banker ever, Lord Josiah Stamp.

"The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money."

It's that last bit I wish to point out, the bit about paying the cost of your own slavery. Because despite having the power to create billions and billions of paper and virtual electronic money you don't expect the bankers to fork out of their own pockets for the system to keep us enslaved, do you? Sod that! Let the serfs pay for their own slavery!

Tax the thick, ignorant f*%kers!!


To spy on whom?

For what purpose?

And have they made similar approaches before to other people I know, say from my previous term of employment?

I know the answers to these questions.


Get used to saying this.


Duck and cover.
Duck and cover.
Duck and cover.

Two very good videos are available to watch for free on Google Video.

Alex Jones' Terror Storm

Aaron Russo's America : From Freedom to Fascism

Both are in the top 100 Google Video.

Go to http://video.google.com/videoranking and check 'em out now!!

Terror Storm has been there for weeks but Google kept resetting the counter whenever it was about to break into the top 100 to stop it being more available and known to the public.

I say to practice to duck and cover because now these videos are out there and being watched the USA is going to go berserk; either the public lynching their leaders or another false-flag act of terror or war to divert attention and criticism.

Just you watch.


Marvin Gaye released an album entitled What's going on? in 1971, when the USA was questioning what it was doing in Vietnam. The lyrics for the title track are;

Mother, mother
There's too many of you crying
Brother, brother, brother
There's far too many of you dying
You know we've got to find a way
To bring some lovin' here today - Ya

Father, father
We don't need to escalate
You see, war is not the answer
For only love can conquer hate
You know we've got to find a way
To bring some lovin' here today

Picket lines and picket signs
Don't punish me with brutality
Talk to me, so you can see
Oh, what's going on
What's going on
Ya, what's going on
Ah, what's going on

In the mean time
Right on, baby
Right on
Right on

Father, father, everybody thinks we're wrong
Oh, but who are they to judge us
Simply because our hair is long
Oh, you know we've got to find a way
To bring some understanding here today

Picket lines and picket signs
Don't punish me with brutality
Talk to me
So you can see
What's going on
Ya, what's going on
Tell me what's going on
I'll tell you what's going on - Uh
Right on baby
Right on baby

A similar song is required now.

So what do I think is going on?

1. Zionism was funded in the late 19th Century to establish a homeland for Jews in Palestine. This was part of a plan for three world wars set out by Albert Pike in 1871.
2. Since then the Zionists have been supported by the Rothschilds in order to get Israel created with the full knowledge and intention that it was bound to create anger and hatred between Zionism and Islam.
3. the USA has sustained Israel with paper dollars simply for the purpose of creating friction between Zionism and Islam. For what do the Islamic Fundamentalists cite as their no.1 grievance? Israel. What we should also recognise is that the 'money' the USA gives to sustain Israel was created out of nothing and simply exists as virtual money. It is not backed by anything physical e.g. gold, it is simply paper or electronic number money.
4. The time is now right for the Zionists in the USA to come to power and to be led to believe that they have the power to crush their neighbours in the Middle East, and the USA has been led to believe that it has the right to do whatever it wants. This is why the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen to get the Israel-firsters in.
5. the false-flag act of terror we call 9/11 was the excuse for the USA to steam into the Middle East and cause havoc, and with the Zionists in control of the USA giving the impression that this was all under the control of Israel. This in turn angers the world of Islam even further.
6. the 'leak' of photos of torture at Abu Ghraib etc drives the world of Islam further into anger. Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad are released purposefully to incite Islam into a frenzy.


The plan for three world wars set out in 1871 by Albert Pike proposed the third and final world war would occur by manipulating the friction between Zionism and Islam in the Middle East.

So who apparently controls the USA? the Zionists.
So where is the USA fighting multiple simultaneous wars? the Middle East.
Are frictions between Islam and Zionism being manipulated. Oh yes!

It looks like these wars are for Israel, but they aren't. It can be useful to argue that the wars are for Israel to get people to at least question the official stories. But ultimately these wars are for something much more sinister.

The Zionists believe they have the ultimate power when they are actually mere pawns. What they fail to understand is that the opposing side is also being manipulated into war. We now know, thanks to Nafeez Ahmed at The Cutting Edge blog, that there has been a covenant of security between Islamic terrorists and British Intelligence, leading to the nickname "Londonistan". This covenant allowed the terrorists to live in security in the UK as long as they didn't attack British interests.

When Albert Pike proposed his plan for three world wars he said so in a letter addressed to Giuseppe Mazzini. Mazzini was British Intelligence, and had created a network of revolutionary terrorists called Young Europe.

Albert Pike was the top Freemason of his generation, possibly of all time.
Mazzini was also a Freemason.

Albert Pike proposed that WW1 should occur by manipulating the friction between Germany and Great Britain. The event which sparked WW1 was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria. His assassins were members of Mazzini's Young Europe and were encouraged in their plot by Freemasonry who had condemned Ferdinand to death in 1912 and Ferdinand knew it. It was Bethmann-Hollweg who encouraged Austria to find a military rather than diplomatic solution to the ensuing crisis. Bethmann-Hollweg was a Freemason and cousin of the Zionist-sponsoring Rothschilds. Pike also proposed that communism should overthrow the Russian monarchy during WW1. The Bolshevik Revolution was led by Lenin, who was sent into Russia on a sealed train by Rothschild agents Bethmann-Hollweg and Max Warburg without the knowledge of the Kaiser and whose Pravda was financed by German Intelligence, and Trotsky, who was funded by Germany and assisted by British Intelligence in his release when he was detained at Halifax, Nova Scotia by Canadian Police. The Bolshevik Revolution stinks to high heaven of Rothschild/British Intelligence manipulation.

Pike also propsed that World War 2 would occur between communism and fascism, which it did, and that communism should beat fascism and rival christendom for power. This was achieved by Russia being given Eastern Europe at Yalta. We went to war to free Poland from tyrrany but Freemason FDR and Freemason Churchill eventually gave it to Freemason Stalin! Pike also proposed that WW2 should result in the creation of the state of Israel, whose purpose is purely to enrage the world of Islam in preparation for Pike's World War 3.

So WW1 and WW2 went exactly according to Pike's plan.

The plan of Albert Pike would not have suceeded without the Rothschilds, British Intelligence and Freemasonry. All of these have been provably instrumental in events which clearly follow Pike's plan.

Now here we are with frictions between Islam and Zionism being manipulated. British Intelligence protected the Islamic terrorists in "Londonistan", allowed them to grow in confidence, strength and number. The USA, controlled by the megalomaniac Zionists, is invading Middle East countries citing the highly suspicious 9/11 as its excuse and inciting much anger and hatred in the Islamic world.

The stage is set of the end game in Albert Pike's plan for three world wars.

Here is what Pike proposed.

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

This is what's going on. It's not Israeli expansion. It's not oil. It's not Pax Americana. It's about a terrible world war 3 to destroy any sense of humanity and turning us into degenerate beasts, openly worshipping Lucifer.

How any one can ignore this I don't know.