Friday, January 31, 2014


So, we can watch the barbaric Saw IV which is on Channel 4 tonight, but we can't watch Unlawful Killing, a much more interesting and watchable documentary by Keith Allen on the very, very, very suspicious death of Diana, The People's Princess.

It's gud 'ere, innit?


It is undeniable that the ruling establishment of this Disunited Fascist Queendom engineered World War One in order to create a first attempt at world government, which took the form of The League of Nations. This involved the use of Freemasonry. While he was Grand Master of The United Grand Lodge of England, Prince Edward, later King Edward VII, engineered the alliances that would later isolate Germany in 1914. The assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand were Freemasons who received the weapons for the assassination and encouragement from foreign Freemasons, in the knowledge that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death at least a year earlier. Ferdinand was also aware of this condemnation. The assassination kicked off a chain of events leading to war, which was assisted by King George V telling Kaiser Wilhelm II that Great Britain would not involve itself in any war while Sir Edward Grey did not make it explicitly clear what Britain's position was, and Rothschild cousin Bethmann-Hollweg assisted the rush to war by giving Austria-Hungary Germany's 'blank cheque' support. As soon as Germany invaded Belgium, Grey cited the 1839 Treaty of London as the casus belli, a treaty that Great Britain was not legally bound to enforce unilaterally. Thus, the ruling establishment of this Disunited Fascist Queendom engineered World War One. It was Sir Edward Grey who as early as 1915 first used the term The League of Nations to name the resulting world government.

This is still being covered up by organisations considered to be left-wing.

The assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand occured on 28th June 1914. Thus the 28th June 2014 is the centenary of the event that kicked off World War One.

In this centenary of World War One we have a unique opportunity to expose this warmongering. The people of this Disunited Fascist Queendom showed some unity last year, and against overwhelming demands for war on Syria managed for the first time in centuries to defeat a motion in The Marsten House for war.

Below this post should be two short posts with the titles FREEMASON PROTEST YES and FREEMASON PROTEST NO. You can vote by clicking on the link to the post on the right hand side or on the relevant link below.

So the question is : Would a protest outside Freemason's Hall on 28th June this year be worthwhile? Yes or No.

If Yes then click on the link YES.

If No the click on the link NO.

Please spread this post around. This year provides a unique opportunity to enlighten the mugged off people on the nature of our ruling establishment.

I believe that the people are ready. It's just how that information can be delivered most effectively.

So the question is : Would a protest outside Freemason's Hall on 28th June this year be worthwhile? Yes or No.

If Yes then click on the link YES.

If No the click on the link NO.


If you have clicked this link then you think a protest outside Freemason's Hall on 28th June would NOT be worthwhile.


If you have clicked this link then you think a protest outside Freemason's Hall on 28th June would be worthwhile.


The Daily Mail is curiously reporting on the latest video from the bona fide Princess of the Illuminati, Rihanna, giving the video a running commentary of who touches whom and when and providing a few images to help you to imagine what is going on.

As the duo sing about their mutual addiction to a man who is no good for them, they indulge in a dance off, with a wall separating them, showing off their coordinating choreography which gets progressively raunchier.

Things heat up as they return to the cabana by the pool and caress each other with Rihanna placing her hand on Shakira's pert posterior.

It's not all about hanging out with a scantily clad Rihanna though as Shakira shows off her musical prowess, playing guitar and then the drums while wearing just a bra and lace trousers.

Both women eventually ditch their clothes altogether to share a naked embrace, while another scene features Rihanna and Shakira standing close together with their arms entwined and the Diamonds star a breath away from kissing her companion’s cheek.

[source : Skimpy outfits, an almost kiss and a naked embrace! Shakira's and Rihanna's steamy new music video revealed, The Daily Mail,, 31st January 2014]

From this description we can assume that the message from the video is that men treat women like shit,and that women do not have to have sexual, or indeed any kind of, relationships with men.

in which I expose the gay NATO agenda, which is to encourage homosexuality and its role in population control. The extremely long and apparently dull United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment is extremely long and apparently dull...until you read the section in which it is proposed that a maximum of one billion, REPEAT ONE BILLION, people should be allowed to live on this planet, and even then their standard of living should be virtually nil, so a proposed reasonable number would be a half billion.

This section is buried deep into the document where very few people will read it.

And what a coincidence that this is the number suggested on The Georgia Guidestones!




Unless you couldn't care less and/or are not looking, too busy with trying to get on in life, to get the latest rinky dinky gadget (that only allows the NSA and GCHQ to spy on you even more), or to buy the latest car (that again only allows the NSA and GCHQ to spy on you even more), etc.

You can't have children from homosexual sex. This, along with BPA, GM and pollution in general, vaccines and abortion on demand, will inevitably lead to population reduction.

Add a few large wars in there...

GET IT INTO YOUR HEAD! THEY WANT YOU DEAD! (and yes I did intend that to rhyme)

In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation - Prince Philip

[source :]

And don't forget Madonna. The name first. Second that kiss with Britney Spears (another assumed mind controlled Illuminati puppet). And Madonna is one of those ignorant, uninformed 'artists' pressuring Putin on behalf of NATO.




If you can only be bothered to look.

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Wednesday, January 29, 2014


Freemason's Hall was allegedly built to honour just the Freemasons who died in WW1! Not the ordinary muggins British man and woman from the cobbled streets of North England who blindly followed orders, believing in their rulers, who died at the Somme or Ypres or any of the other cathedrals of slaughter.

No. Not them.

Only the Freemasons.

Do they think they are special or something?
Freemasons’ Hall is the headquarters of the United Grand Lodge of England and the principal meeting place for Masonic Lodges in London. Grand Lodge has been in Great Queen Street since 1775, the present Hall being the third building on the site.

Built between 1927–1932 as a memorial to the Freemasons who died in the First World War, it is one of the finest Art Deco buildings in England, and is now Grade II* listed internally and externally. In addition to the Grand Temple (seating 1700) there are 21 Lodge Rooms, a Library and Museum, Board and Committee Rooms and administrative offices.

The building is fully open to the public.

[source : Freemason's Hall, UGLE,, Accessed 29 January 2014]

Prince Edward was Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England when he was plotting WW1.

God, I feel sick.


How about a protest outside Freemason's Hall in Great Queen Street, London, the HQ of the United Grand Lodge of England, on Saturday 28th June?

Or outside your local lodge if such a protest is banned in this free and democratic country?


This provides a great opportunity to have some kind of mass gathering, either in London, or around the country on the 100th Anniversary of the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand, the event that kicked off WW1.


The post WORLD WAR ONE WAS A CONSPIRACY available to read at

is really starting to take off. On some days half the visits to this blog are to that one post.

Google will soon be blocking access to it, or acting to place that post at the bottom of their search results.

In this centenary of World War 1 I think people are ready to hear and feel the truth about that horrific Freemasonry-engineered war. Something happened last summer when, despite the overwhelming pro-war propaganda in the NATO media following the horrific events at Ghouta, the Marsten House voted against war on Syria. For the first time in centuries a motion for war was defeated. I think that decision indicated something special.

And in this centenary of World War One I think there needs to be something even more special.

I have suggested this before, but perhaps an alternative Remembrance Sunday. But where and when? Could and should such a remembrance wait until November? What about on the 100th anniversary of the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand on 28th June?

This is a very special opportunity we have this year. There will be many more occasions that we will be exposed to the horrors of war as we are asked to remember the dead and their self-sacrifice so that we live in freedom and democracy.

Meanwhile we covertly support cutthroat Jihadis in Syria as they slit the throats of Syrian children and decapitate anything that moves in order to install a medieval tyranny in Syria and elsewhere.

Well, this is the Disunited Fascist Queendom after all.

It's gud 'ere, innit?

Tuesday, January 28, 2014


I think Vladimir Putin must be quaking in his boots!!

Ellie Goulding has now confirmed that she will not, repeat not, sing at the opening ceremony of the Sochi Winter Olympics.

So, why has Goulding taken this earth-shattering decision?

She is protesting at Russia's laws on homosexuality.

Please note that Goulding is not, repeat not, thanking Putin for supporting President Bashar al Assad as Syria fights a not-so-covert invasion of al Qaeda, who are sponsored by our glorious allies, the Diabolical Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and smuggled in by this Disunited Fascist Queendom.

Nor is she protesting at Saudi Arabia or Israel or this DFQ for executing this barbaric illegal war on Syria.

Why? Because she hasn't got a clue what is really going on!

Goulding joins a sad and long list of household celebrities who are happy to apply international pressure on Putin to acquiesce to the demands of NATO, one such celebrity being Stephen Fry, who wrote to David Cameron last year demanding that the winter olympics be moved to somewhere else other than Russia because of Russia's homosexuality laws. And like Goulding, Fry, and the rest, is saying sweet FA about our barbaric illegal war on Syria.

But is there a gay NATO agenda? And what do I mean by a gay agenda?

By a gay agenda I mean that we are being encouraged into homosexuality. I can't put a precise date on when this agenda began to manifest on our TV screens but it would be difficult to argue against the statement that homosexuality is appearing more frequently on our TVs in our living rooms. Sex in general is, like that talentless twerking idiot Miley Cyrus simulating sex in front of adoring young fans last year at the MTV Awards.

So, we have to ask why is there much more homosexuality on our TV screens while everyday the news presenters and documentary makers do not tell us the truth about world wars and what the real agenda behind the events in Syria are.

My argument would be that there has to be a pro-homosexual agenda.

The vast majority of the human race need and want to have sex. But one of the consequences of sex is children. And children grow up to become adults, who consume resources: food; cars; houses; clothes, etc.

One of the most disturbing books I have ever read is the very long United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment, which makes some very disturbing suggestions, the most disturbing of which is the suggestion that there should be a maximum of one billion human beings on the planet, and those one billion should live a very meagre existence. Other statements and suggestions the ruling elite and their supporters have made make it very clear that they think we are a cancer on the planet. Perhaps the most famous quote of our ruling elite is from our very own Prince Philip who said that he would like to be reincarnated as a deadly virus to reduce human population!

This is how our ruling elite think. To them we are cannon fodder to be blown up in times of world war that they engineer, and a cancer on the planet in times of peace. They would kill us all if they could, but then they would have to do some real work themselves, so they need some of us left alive to dig gold out of mines, and make stuff in factories, and farm.

So one way of reducing population is to encourage us all into homosexuality. This is a slow method, but it also satisfies the "anything goes" mentality of Satanism. And when our leaders attend mock human sacrifices at Bohemian Grove in a ceremony called The Cremation of Care, and engineer world wars and holocausts, and have investigations into elite paedophile rings closed down and covered up, then we can safely say that our ruling elite are indeed Satanists. Other methods of population control are gender-bending chemicals such as BPA. And vaccines. And abortion.

I will now refer you to the talk given by Dr Richard Day in 1969, most, if not all, of which he prophecised has come true, and who also used that phrase, "anything goes". See for what Day proposed: abortion; drink and drugs; education. It is all there. Day says there will be a pro-homosexual agenda.

And this gay agenda is only being pushed in NATO countries and countries allied to NATO such as Australia, which is part of the (no, don't laugh) 'Commonwealth'.

So, let's put this gay NATO agenda into perspective.

Ellie Goulding thinks she can pressure or embarrass Putin over Russia's homosexual laws by refusing to sing at the opening ceremony of the Sochi Winter Olympics.

Meanwhile, Putin is after the blood of Prince Bandar bin Sultan after Bandar made good on the threat that he, Bandar, issued to Putin last summer by bombing Volgograd.

And for the likes of Goulding and Fry and all the ignorant rest who haven't got, or don't want to have, a clue and rely on their beloved BBC for all their 'news', the threat that Prince Bandar made was this: dump Assad and Saudi Arabia would allow Russia to operate in the Middle East, and also buy billions of dollars of Russian weapons; if not then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria and Lebanon, and also unleash terrorist Jihadis onto the Sochi Winter Olympics.

Putin refused this lovely offer.

As a consequence Bandar has sent al Qaeda into Lebanon to take out Hezbollah.

He also ran the false flag attack at Ghouta.

And over the New Year he ran the bombings in Volgograd.

Bandar is now in hiding in the USA. He calls it 'sick leave', but he is really shitting his pants hiding.

So, Ellie, and Stephen, and all the rest, I think Putin has other things on his mind other than relaxing homosexual laws that advance a gay NATO trying to catch one of the planet's most dangerous criminals.

I also understand that Putin is trying to increase the population of Russia. This goes against everything that the genocidal Anglo-American Establishment want. They want death, destruction, terror, war, misery.

You should read that UN GBA. They want a maximum of 1 billion people on this planet. A half billion people for them to have any kind of living standard.


Bilderberg created the EU. Last year Bilderberg President Manuel Barosso warned that if the EU splintered then we would be fighting in the trenches again. But the fool didn't know that WW1 was engineered to create a power vacuum so that some kind of global governing institution could be plonked in the centre of Europe to take the place of the defeated Austro-Hungarian Empire. After WW1 it was The League of Nations that was plonked in Geneva (with Rockefeller money). After WW2 the world government moved to New York and was rebranded as the UN (with Rockefeller money), and the EU now runs Europe.

Now another Bilderberger has warned of the loss of trust in the EU and the dangers of the rise of nationalism in the EU.
Having a sober view not only of one's own interests, but also of one's neighbours interests, acting responsibly and thinking about consequences with a level head are vital to safeguarding peace. Avoiding the hasty adoption of positions and constantly seeking new room to compromise are two fundamental principles of diplomacy. The history of 1914 provides a vivid insight into what happens when we ignore them. Did the July crisis have to lead to catastrophe? Probably not. Yet emotive rhetoric overrode the courage to pursue a laborious balancing of interests. Can we rule out something similar happening today? The answer depends solely on us, on us being responsible and on the lessons that we take from history.

[source : Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Never again? The loss of trust in the European project holds great dangers, The Guardian,, 27th January 2014]

The source that states that Steinmeier is a Bilderberger is, which does not provide the year(s) of his attendance. And I would not be surprised if he was Bilderberg due to his employment history.

But while searching for Steinmeier's Bilderberg attendance I found that Emma Rothschild, of THE Rothschild banking family, attended in 1995. She is the one muddying the origins of World War 1 at Cambridge by running the History Centre there.

Again, the editorial board of The Guardian selected Steinmeier's rant. And it is only Steinmeier's 2nd comment in The Guardian.

And this is the newspaper that brought us Snowden and Echelon 2.0

Monday, January 27, 2014


In The Editor's Picks section of The Guardian today, the editorial team have selected a rant from Rime Allaf. Her rant propagates the pro-establishment anti-Syria policy.

So, who is Rime Allaf? She works for Chatham House.

So, what is Chatham House? According to their own history:
In 1919 British and American delegates to the Paris Peace Conference, under the leadership of Lionel Curtis, conceived the idea of an Anglo-American Institute of foreign affairs to study international problems with a view to preventing future wars. In the event, the British Institute of International Affairs was founded separately in London in July 1920 and received its Royal Charter in 1926 to become The Royal Institute of International Affairs. The American delegates developed the Council on Foreign Relations in New York as a sister institute. Both are now among the world's leading international affairs think-tanks.

[source : Chatham House History, Chatham House,, Accessed 27th January 2014]

Which seems innocent enough. But behind this apparently simple, innocent paragraph lies some evil warmongering. Readers should by now be fully aware that World War 1 was a conspiracy designed to establish a world government that Great Britain would control, and whose will would be enforced by the USA. But the USA voted out of it all, which led to World War 2. Lionel Curtis was the brains behind the Milner/Rhodes cabal who dreamed of a British empire controlling the planet. This cabal were the ultimate British Imperialists, and after the death of Edward VII they implemented World War 1 through their network including the use of Freemasonry to assassinate Arch Duke Ferdinand, and then King George V and Sir Edward Grey tricked Germany into invading Belgium, with a little help from Rothschild cousin Bethmann-Hollweg.

So this is no ordinary think tank that Allaf works for. It is THE British Imperial Establishment think tank.

And how many times has Allaf written on The Guardian? This is only her 4th comment on The Guardian.

So what does Allaf say?
Nevertheless, the diplomatic process has delivered some surprises. For one, the Syrian regime's delegation exasperated even its Russian backer with belligerent statements and a disrespectful flouting of the meeting's protocol; the abusive and obnoxious speech by the Syrian foreign minister, Walid Muallem, was in particular received very poorly. In contrast, the president of the national coalition, Ahmad Jarba, was rational and constructive, impressing even the most sceptical of watchers.

While Assad's delegation launched into absurd tirades, hysterical interviews and petty time-wasting tactics during various encounters with the media, the coalition's outreach was disciplined and open-minded.Most importantly, for the international community and Syrians of all persuasions, the meeting proved a few points. First, by agreeing to the process, the Assad regime has recognised that there is a formal, organised opposition, and that the uprising is not the global conspiracy or the terrorist invasion it has always claimed.

[source : Rime Allaf, Geneva's endless peace process plays into Bashar al-Assad's hands, The Guardian,, 27th January 2014]

But Muallem's speech was one of the greatest, most accurate and passionate speeches that I have heard or read. It was that great that Ban Ki Moon tried to shut him up! Allaf's complete ignorance, witting or unwitting, is exposed in this sentence:
First, by agreeing to the process, the Assad regime has recognised that there is a formal, organised opposition, and that the uprising is not the global conspiracy or the terrorist invasion it has always claimed.

But as this blog has continuously exposed, the violence in Syria is both a global conspiracy AND a terrorist invasion. General Wesley Clark was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 that there would be war on seven nations in five years, and that Syria was one of those seven. But by 2007 this plan was seriously behind schedule, so a Faustian agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia (and where was the DFQ while all this was being agreed?) that Saudi Arabia would unleash nasty Jihadis onto Syria, among others.

So, why is The Guardian's editorial team picking this load of shite from Allaf? It is obvious why. After I destroyed the credibility of The Guardian through an analysis of its editorials on Syria after Ghouta, The Guardian is blatantly the controlled left of NATO's media psyops against this Disunited Fascist Queendom.

Sunday, January 26, 2014


This blog will kill 2 birds with 1 stone, and as usual the birds are in The Guardian/Observer.

First, OMFG!!

Tony Blair now blames all the violence in the Middle East on extremism.
The last weeks have seen a ghastly roll call of terror attacks in the obvious places: Syria, Libya, Iraq and Lebanon, as well as Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia and Pakistan.

…The fact is that, though of course there are individual grievances or reasons for the violence in each country, there is one thing self-evidently in common: the acts of terrorism are perpetrated by people motivated by an abuse of religion. It is a perversion of faith. But there is no doubt that those who commit the violence often do so by reference to their faith and the sectarian nature of the conflict is a sectarianism based on religion. There is no doubt either that this phenomenon is growing, not abating.

[source : Tony Blair, Religious difference, not ideology, will fuel this century's epic battles, The Guardian,, 25th January 2014]

Blair talks about religion, in particular Islam, but does not mention one particular political ideology masquerading as a religion that has fuelled and is fuelling a lot of the violence in the Middle East. And that political ideology is Zionism.

It was Zionism that in 1996 produced A Clean Break, calling for war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon (Blair explicitly names 3 of these in his first sentence!).

It was Zionism that formed The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) in 1998, whose first action was to write to then President Bill Clinton demanding war on Iraq, and who in September 2000 published Rebuilding America’s Defenses in which PNAC proposed a bloody global warmongering rampage, specifically targeting Iraq and Iran, but also recognizing the need for “a new Pearl Harbor” to terrorise the American people into supporting such warmongering.

That new Pearl Harbor was (the inside Ziojob) 9/11.

Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of plan for war on seven nations in five years. Those nations were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia. Clark explicitly accused senior members of PNAC of a foreign policy coup using 9/11.

The PNAC/A Clean Break crowd told us that Iraq did 9/11 and had WMDs and knew where they were. But it was all lies, lies, lies. Result? Approaching one million dead, and a fractured Iraq unable to resist the takeover as Iraqis fought each other in a deliberately engineered sectarian war. How do we know it was deliberately engineered? Two SAS officers dressed as Iraqi locals were arrested with bombs and guns in their car, so the British organized a jailbreak and actually raided the police station where they were held and freed them, ignoring protests from the Iraqi police!

Then Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah in 2006.

Then, and this is the crucial bit so listen very, very carefully, in 2007, because the plan for war on seven nations as revealed to General Wesley Clark was moribund, with only two of the seven nations attacked, an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash extremist Jihadis to destroy some of the nations named to Clark.

But, knowing that the muggins general public wouldn’t support Islamic extremists, in order to provide cover for these extremist Jihadis so that NATO nations could give them political and military support, The Arab Spring was engineered to give any ‘revolution’ in any Arab country an air of respectability and noble purpose that should be supported by NATO. The Arab Spring was financed by The National Endowment for Democracy, and first erupted in Tunisia and Egypt (that’s two more nations that Blair names explicitly in his first sentence).

The first to suffer these Jihadis was Libya. British Special Forces assisted the Jihadis on the ground and NATO provided air cover.

After Libya the Jihadis were smuggled into Syria via Lebanon and Turkey, where they have been causing bloody mayhem, and have been joined by some very nasty and sociopathic Jihadis who decapitate anything that moves.

And for decades now London has been known as Londonistan due to the Covenant of Security that MI5 had with Islamic extremist terrorists, including during Blair’s time as PM, which allowed the terrorists to operate out of London safe from prosecution by other countries as long as the terrorists supported British foreign policy objectives. This is why the likes of Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada at Finsbury Park Mosque were allowed to preach their violence. This is why Osama bin Laden had a mansion in Wembley and trained with SAS/MI6 in Scotland. This is why the butcher of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, was allowed to openly preach Jihad against President Bashar al Assad, because as we know from former French foreign minister Roland Dumas, it was Great Britain who organized the smuggling of Jihadis into Syria BEFORE The (fake CIA/US State department sponsored) Arab Spring erupted in Syria.

And Blair protected the Saudi regime by continually blocking any investigation into the al Yamamah deal, which is suspected of financing global Islamic terrorism, in particular the very 9/11 that Blair references.

And it was a British agent called Hempher who encouraged a demented Muslim called Wahhabi to develop his twisted version of Islam, which was eventually followed by the Saud tribe who the British supported after WW1 so that the Saud tribe could takeover the Arabian Peninsula and control the vast oil wealth.

In his first sentence Blair names Syria, Libya, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia and Pakistan. The above explains the violence in 6 out of the 8 nations that Blair names explicitly. So what’s that? 75%? Not bad.

As for Pakistan, the CIA financed the ISI to create the extremists which led to the Taliban in Afghanistan. However, the Taliban went off script and decided to eradicate Afghan opium, so NATO went in to kick them out and get the opium harvest quickly back up to record levels under the pretext of hunting down an already dead Osama bin Laden who died from Marfan Syndrome in late 2001/early 2002.

And Yemen also experienced The (fake CIA/US State Department sponsored) Arab Spring during 2011.

Blair also mentions Russia, I assume regarding the terrorism in Volgograd. That was Bandar bin Sultan making good on the lovely threat he issued to Putin last summer, and it has been reported that the FSB have found evidence pointing to a Saudi involvement.

But curiously Blair fails to mention either Saudi Arabia or Israel.

Instead, Blair promotes his global faith thing, believing himself to be some kind of global spiritual guru, proposing that we all have to come together to solve this global problem of international religion-based terrorism. Yeah! The same religion based terrorism that was nurtured under The Covenant of Security! Under Blair!!

What a numpty! I give him 1 out of 10, and the single mark is only for the cheek and arrogance that he thinks he can kill approaching 1 million people based on lies and we won’t remember.

OK. So that’s Blair’s ridiculous rant destroyed.

Now onto my unfavourite, and possibly the most dangerous, UK-based NATO media organization, The Guardian/Observer, and its latest editorial on Syria.

Like Blair’s rant, this editorial names a list of nations suffering violence, which is eerily similar to that of Blair:

You will note that the first 4 nations were named to General Wesley Clark, while the last two kicked off The Arab Spring, which as stated above was designed to provide cover for cutthroat Jihadis who are now in Syria.

But again, like Blair, the editorial does not mention either Israel or Saudi Arabia.

Yet if you read The Redirection by Seymour Hersh, both Israel and Saudi Arabia are explicitly named as reaching an agreement with the USA that Saudi Arabia would unleash Jihadis onto Syria! And not only Syria, but Lebanon and Iraq too!

But here is the editorial suggesting that neither Israel or Saudi Arabia are to blame.
Syria too has become embroiled in a long and bloody civil war that has led to a massive displacement of refugees to neighbouring countries, fuelled a proxy conflict between Shia and Sunni in the region and been an exacerbating factor in the increasing violence in neighbouring Lebanon and Iraq.

…The belated recognition of the significance of sectarian division in shaping conflict by those such as former prime minister Tony Blair – whose role in government was highly divisive in this area – is to be welcomed as a step towards recognising that competitions in the region are complex. But his suggestion that religion, and in particular Islam, judging by his list of countries, is the critical determinant could be as misguided as the previous attachment to a "freedom and democracy agenda".

The reality is that the tensions in the post-Arab spring Middle East reside not only in sect, religion and ethnicity but elsewhere. Geographical rivalries in Libya between east and west and between individual cities are echoed in Egypt in the tension between the centre and outlying regions, as in parts of the Sinai, where lack of economic development and political alienation has played their part.

The relationship between established elites and a wider population has also been crucial. The lure of fundamentalist religion in some cases can be explained by other inequalities and by political exclusion.

[source : Syria's road to peace is littered with our errors, Editorial, The Observer,, 26th January 2014]

I destroyed the credibility of The Guardian/Observer by analyzing its editorials following the horrific tragedy at Ghouta on 21st August last year. The editorials:
1. immediately and consistently accused Assad of ordering the attack with chemical weapons but did not provide any reason why Assad would order this insult to logic;
2. not once considered the cutthroats as the culprits despite an abundance of evidence that they possessed chemical weapons, had tested them on live rabbits, had the means of firing a missile of a sort loaded with chemicals, had issued threats on video of using chemical weapons to get what they wanted, and were in desperate need of overt large scale military assistance because the Syrian Arab Army was annihilating them;
3. supported war under R2P;
4. was overjoyed that Assad had agreed to relinquish Syria’s chemical weapons but not once mentioned Israel’s much larger, more horrific, more threatening and more powerful arsenal of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

This editorial continues in that vein of pro-Israel, pro-Saudi sentiment by not mentioning either of them once, and it deflects from the true source of the sectarian violence in the Middle East; a US-Israel-Saudi alliance that began before 9/11 with the aim of taking out enemies and rivals of both Israel and Saudi Arabia.

So why has this blog been entitled CONFUSED?

Who cares?

Saturday, January 25, 2014


An anonymous senior Israeli intelligence official has told Associated Press that Israel is now very concerned at the alleged large numbers of al Qaeda in Syria, and that should there be peace in Syria then al Qaeda will turn their attention to Israel.
The number of al-Qaeda linked fighters active in Syria has mushroomed from 2,000 to more than 30,000 in just two years, a senior Israeli intelligence official has warned, prompting the Jewish state to re-evaluate its policy of neutrality in the conflict which now threatens to spill over the borders.

...The Israeli official said the increased jihadi presence presented the Middle East with a far more dangerous threat. He claimed that the Islamic rebel groups in Syria currently focused on toppling President Bashar al-Assad intend to turn their sites on Israel after dispatching the Syrian government.

"After Assad and after establishing or strengthening their foothold in Syria they are going to move and deflect their effort and attack Israel," he told The Associated Press.

[source : Over 30,000 al-Qaeda linked fighters' in Syria, Israeli official claims, The Daily Telegraph,, 25th January 2014]

Well, duh!!

I have warned Israel several times that they would be betrayed and that something like that is what is supposed to happen.

Israelis don’t understand the true bloody history of their nation. Yes, of course they know about the Holocaust and have been told that Palestinians are subhuman scum who are living on Jewish land and must therefore be wiped off the face of the earth. But, in general, they don’t know how the Warburgs created Hitler by opposing boycotts of Nazi Germany, sitting on the board of and being the largest investor in IG Farben, and also sitting on the board of The Reichsbank, just before they abandoned the doomed Jewish-murdering Nazi ship and fled to the USA. They also don’t know that the Zionist hierarchy collaborated with the Nazis to transfer German Jews to Palestine, a project that was sponsored by the Warburgs. And they are unaware of the several refusals of Jewish homelands other than Palestine by the Zionist hierarchy, a decision that condemned many Jews to death, as well as the refusal to pay a ransom for Jews, which astronomically wealthy Zionist bankers like the Rothschilds could very easily have afforded. And they are unaware of the statements of the Zionist hierarchy which indicate a willingness to sacrifice young, old and sick Jews to establish Eretz Israel.

And in general the world is unaware of the manipulation behind WW1, how Germany was tricked into invading Belgium through King George V telling Kaiser Wilhelm II that Great Britain would not join in any war on the continent, and how after WW1 both Nazi Germany under Hitler and Soviet Russia under Stalin were created by Wall Street, the purpose being to get them into a longer bloodier world war that the USA could join early leading to the creation of a world government. Wall Street and London gave Hitler financial, political and moral support for the Nazi eugenics progams, allowed a massive increase in the Wehrmacht beyond that stated in The Treaty of Versailles, and donated military-industrial intelligence and even factories to the Nazis to produce much needed war material and chemicals.

Yet, what did the United Nations Declaration state they were fighting against? Hitlerism!

In other words, Hitler was set up.

And who was it who said this?
We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.

James P Warburg, 17th February 1950, to the Subcommittee on Revision of the United Nations Charter.


It has taken over a century of Zionist cunning and evil to get Israel into the state it is today, threatening global stability. During WW1 they were given Palestine through the Balfour Declaration. But hardly any Jews wanted to migrate there. So there was an agreement with the Nazis that Jews could transfer to Palestine. But still Jews would not emigrate to Palestine.

But after Wall Street creation Hitler’s Holocaust...

I read 2 or 3 days ago that Israel is now considered the 10th most powerful nation in the world. Yet it was only created in 1948! Israel has a large stockpile of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that nobody dare mention.

And just last August, after the false flag of Ghouta, we were the closest to WW3 we have been since The Cuban Missile Crisis. The war in Syria is due to Israel, which in 1996 planned the series of wars since the inside Ziojob 9/11 that have killed approximately one million people.

For the dummies, The Arab Spring is a CIA/US State Department operation. Its purpose is to provide cover so that NATO countries could give political, moral and military support to cutthroat Jihadis, who were sent first into Libya and then Syria, due to an agreement between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia. This agreement was reached because by 2007 a plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11, in which seven nations would be attacked in five years, was moribund. The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria, and Libya, Sudan and Somalia. Of these the first 4 were named in 1996 in a Zionist warmongering document entitled A Clean Break.

So the very cutthroat Jihadis that Israel is now concerned about in Syria are there because of that Faustian agreement of 2007 between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia.

But we know for a fact that Israel has been supporting the rebels/cutthroats. Last year Israel attacked Damascus under the pretext that it was stopping a transfer of weapons to Hezbollah from Iran. However, several HQs of units of the Syrian Arab Army were attacked in coordination with the rebels, who were being chased out of Damascus by the SAA.

So, can we trust anything that any Israeli official says? Probably not.

But that does not mean that we should ignore the betrayal of Germany for WW1, and the betrayal of Hitler for WW2.

WW1 : Germany was betrayed, resulting in a failed world government.
WW2 : Hitler was betrayed, resulting in a world government that has survived but does not yet have total control.

There has been ample opportunity for a world government in the UN to gain total control by consent. The UN does not yet have total control. We are now entering the conquest phase, and a WW3 would provoke worldwide demand for a global tyranny.

Betrayal is in the (cold) blood and DNA of The City of London and Wall Street.

They invested in Hitler, only to betray him.

Have they invested in Israel only to betray the Jews? Well, why not? Millions were killed in the Holocaust which eventually persuaded a sceptical world Jewry that Palestine and only Palestine is the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world (created by the Rothschilds and Warburgs). We now see the result of that in Israel now destabilising the world with it’s a Clean Break policy, supported by the UK, USA, France, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar, and assisting in the empowerment of al Qaeda in nations that surround it.

And what was it that source of Seymour Hersh said about the cutthroats?
Nasr went on, “The Saudis have considerable financial means, and have deep relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis”—Sunni extremists who view Shiites as apostates. “The last time Iran was a threat, the Saudis were able to mobilize the worst kinds of Islamic radicals. Once you get them out of the box, you can’t put them back.

[source : The Redirection, The New Yorker Magazine,, 5th March 2007]

Friday, January 24, 2014


Well, guess who got zapped last night?

And not only that, guess who got zapped this morning?

Yep. Yours truly.

I wonder what it was that I said.

This is the kind of thing I have to put up with; low level, cowardly harassment. And the people who do it are just the sort to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto children.

Experiments were done on rats using electric shocks to train them to change their behaviour. That is what is happening here.

Thursday, January 23, 2014


The speech by Syrian Deputy Premier, Foreign and Expatriates Minister, Walid al-Moallem, at the Geneva II talks ranks among the great speeches of all time, along with the likes of Eisenhower's farewell address of 17th January 1961 in which he warns of the Military-Industrial Complex.

Ladies and Gentlemen,On behalf of the Syrian Arab Republic,SYRIAN – steeped in history for seven thousand years.ARAB – proud of its steadfast pan-Arab heritage despite the deliberate acts of aggression of supposed brotherly Arabs.REPUBLIC – a civil state that some, sitting in this room, have tried to return to medieval times.Never have I been in a more difficult position; my delegation and I carry the weight of three years of hardship endured by my fellow countrymen - the blood of our martyrs, the tears of our bereaved, the anguish of families waiting for news of a loved one - kidnapped or missing, the cries of our children whose tender fingers were the targets of mortar shelling into their classrooms, the hopes of an entire generation destroyed before their very eyes, the courage of mothers and fathers who have sent all their sons to defend our country, the heartbreak of families whose homes have been destroyed and are now displaced or refugees.

Al-Moallem: My delegation and I carry the hope of a nation for the years to come

My delegation and I also carry the hope of a nation for the years to come – the right of every child to safely go to school again, the right of women to leave their homes without fear of being kidnapped, killed or raped; the dream of our youth to fulfill their vast potential; the return of security so that every man can leave his family safe in the knowledge that he will return.

Finally, today, the moment of truth; the truth that many have systematically tried to bury in a series of campaigns of misinformation, deception and fabrication leading to killing and terror. A truth that refused to be buried, a truth clear for all to see – the delegation of the Syrian Arab Republic representing the Syrian people, the government, the state, the Army and the President - Bashar al-Assad.

It is regrettable that seated amongst us are representatives of countries that have the blood of Syrians on their hands

It is regrettable, Ladies and Gentlemen, that seated amongst us today in this room, are representatives of countries that have the blood of Syrians on their hands, countries that have exported terrorism along with clemency for the perpetrators, as if it was their God given right to determine who will go to heaven and who will go to hell. Countries that have prevented believers from visiting holy places of worship whilst abetting, financing and supporting terrorists. Countries that gave themselves the authority to grant and deny legitimacy to others as they saw fit, never looking at their own archaic glasshouses before throwing stones at acclaimed fortified towers. Countries that shamelessly lecture us in democracy, in development and in progress whilst drowning in their own ignorance and medieval norms. Countries that have become accustomed to being entirely owned by kings and princes who have the sole right to distribute their national wealth granting their associates whilst denying those who fall out of favor.

They lectured Syria – a distinguished, virtuous, sovereign state, they lectured her on honour whilst they themselves were immersed in the mud of enslavement, infanticide and other medieval practices. After all their efforts and subsequent failures, their masks fell from their quivering faces, to reveal their perverse ambitions. A desire to destabilize and destroy Syria by exporting their national product: terrorism. They used their petrodollars to buy weapons, recruit mercenaries and saturate airtime covering up their mindless brutality with lies under the guise of the so-called “ Syrian revolution that will fulfill the aspirations of the Syrian people.”

Ladies and Gentlemen, how is what has happened and continues to plague Syria, meeting these aspirations? How can a Chechen, Afghani, Saudi, Turkish or even French and English terrorists deliver on the aspirations of the Syrian people, and with what? An Islamic state that knows nothing of Islam except perverse Wahhabism? Who declared anyway that the Syrian people aspire to live thousands of years in the past?

In Syria, the wombs of pregnant women are butchered and their foetuses killed

In Syria, Ladies and Gentlemen, the wombs of pregnant women are butchered and their foetuses killed; women are raped, dead or alive, in practices so heinous, so vile and repulsive that they can only be attributed to their perverse doctrine. In Syria, Ladies and Gentlemen, men are slaughtered in front of their children in the name of this revolution; worse still, this is done whilst the children of these foreign perpetrators sing and dance. In Syria, how can so-called revolutionaries cannibalize a man’s heart and claim to promote freedom, democracy and a better life?

Under the pretext of the “Great Syrian Revolution,” civilians, clergymen, women and children are killed, victims are indiscriminately blown up in streets and buildings regardless of their political views or ideologies; books and libraries are burned, graves are dug up and artifacts stolen. In the name of the revolution, children are killed in their schools and students in their universities, women are extorted in the name of jihad al-nikah and other forms, mosques are shelled whilst worshipers kneel at prayer, heads are severed and hung in the streets, people are burned alive in a true holocaust that history and many countries will deny without being accused of anti-Semitism.

In the name of a revolution, “to free the oppressed Syrian people from the regime and to spread democracy,” does a father blow himself up with his wife and children to prevent foreign intruders from entering his home? Most of us in this room are fathers - I ask you then, what would compel a man to kill his own family to protect them from freedom fighting monsters. This is what happened in Adra, a place that most of you have not heard of but where the same alien monsters attacked: killing, looting, beheading, slaughtering, raping and burning people alive. You have heard nothing of this brutality for sure, yet you have heard of other places where the same heinous crimes were committed and where the same blood soaked finger was pointed at the Syrian Army and government. And when these flagrant lies were no longer credible, they stopped spinning their web of deceit.

This is what their masters ordered them to do, these countries that spearheaded the war against Syria, trying to increase their influence in the region with bribes and money, exporting human monsters fully soaked in abhorrent Wahabi ideology, all at the expense of Syrian blood. From this stage, loud and clear, you know as well as I do that they will not stop in Syria, even if some sitting in this room refuse to acknowledge or consider themselves immune.

Ladies and Gentlemen, everything you have heard would not have been possible, had our border sharing countries been good neighbours during these challenging years. Unfortunately they were far from it; with backstabbers to the North, silent bystanders to the truth in the West, a weak South accustomed to doing the bidding of others, or the tired and exhausted East still reeling from the plots to destroy it along with Syria.

Mimsery and destruction, wich has engulfed Syria, has been made possible by the decision of Erdogan’s government

Indeed, this misery and destruction, wich has engulfed Syria, has been made possible by the decision of Erdogan’s government to invite and host these criminal terrorists before they entered into Syria. Clearly, oblivious to the fact that magic eventually turns on the magician, it is now beginning to taste the sour seed it has sown. For terrorism knows no religion, and is loyal only unto itself. Erdogan’s government has recklessly morphed from a zero problems with its neighbours policy to zero foreign policy and international diplomacy altogether, crucially leaving it with zero credibility.

Nevertheless, it continued on the same atrocious path falsely believing that the dream of Sayyid Qutb and Mohammad Abdel Wahab before him was finally being realized. They wreaked havoc from Tunisia, to Libya, to Egypt and then to Syria, determined to achieve an illusion that only exists in their sick minds. Despite the fact that it has proven to be a failure, they nevertheless are still determined to pursue it. Logically speaking, this can only be described as stupidity, because if you don’t learn from history, you will lose sight of the present; and history tells us: if your neighbor's house is on fire, it is impossible for you to remain safe.

Some neighbours started fires within Syria whilst others recruited terrorists from around the globe – and here we are confronted with shockingly farcical double standards: 83 nationalities are fighting in Syria - nobody denounces this, nobody condemns it, nobody reconsiders their position - and they impertinently continue to call it a glorious SYRIAN Revolution! While when a few scores of young resistant fighters supported the Syrian Army in a few places, all hell broke loose and it suddenly became foreign intervention! Demands were made for the departure of foreign troops and the protection of Syrian sovereignty and for it not to be violated. Here I affirm, Syria - the sovereign and independent state, will continue to do whatever it takes to defend herself with whatever means it deems necessary, without paying the least bit of attention to any uproar, denunciations, statements or positions expressed by others. These have been and always will be Syria’s sovereign decisions.

They imposed sanctions on our food, our bread and our children’s milk

Despite all of this, the Syrian people remained steadfast; and the response was to impose sanctions on our food, our bread and our children’s milk. To starve the population, pushing them into sickness and death under the injustice of these sanctions. At the same time, factories were looted and burned, crippling our food and pharmaceutical industries; hospitals and healthcare centers were destroyed; our railroads and electricity lines sabotaged, and even our places of worship - Christian and Muslim – were not spared their terrorism.

When all of this failed, America threatened to strike Syria, fabricating with her allies, Western and Arab, the story about the use of chemical weapons, which failed to convince even their own public, let alone ours. Countries that celebrate democracy, freedom and human rights regrettably only choose to speak the language of blood, war, colonialism and hegemony. Democracy is imposed with fire, freedom with warplanes and human rights by human killing, because they have become accustomed to the world doing their bidding: if they want something, it will happen; if they don’t, it won’t. They have heedlessly forgotten that the perpetrators who blew themselves up in New York follow the same doctrine and come from the same source as those blowing themselves up in Syria. They have heedlessly forgotten that the terrorist that was in America yesterday is in Syria today, and who knows where he will be tomorrow. What is certain, however, is that he will not stop here. Afghanistan is an ideal lesson for anyone who wants to learn – anyone! Unfortunately, most do not want to learn; neither America nor some of the ‘civilized’ western countries that follow its lead, starting from the city of lights to the kingdom over which “the sun never set,” in the past; despite the fact that they have all felt the bitter taste of terrorism in the past.

And then suddenly they became “Friends of Syria.” Four of these ‘friends’ are autocratic, oppressive monarchies that know nothing of a civil state or democracy, whilst others are the same colonial powers which occupied, pillaged and partitioned Syria less than one hundred years ago. These so called ‘friends’ are now convening conferences to publicly declare their friendship with the Syrian people, whilst covertly facilitating their hardship and destroying their livelihoods. They openly express their outrage over the humanitarian plight of Syrians whilst deceiving the international community of their complicity. If you were truly concerned about the humanitarian situation in Syria, you would remove your strangle hold on her economy by lifting the sanctions and the embargo, and by partnering with her government in tightening security by fighting the influx of weapons and terrorists. Only then can we assure you that we will be well as we once were, without your deep concern for our wellbeing.

Some of you may be asking yourselves: Are foreigners the sole manufacturers of the happenings in Syria? No Ladies and Gentlemen, Syrians amongst us here, having been legitimized by foreign agendas, have played a contributing role as facilitators and implementers. They did this at the expense of Syrian blood and the people whose aspirations they claim to represent, whilst they themselves were divided hundreds of times and their leaders on the ground were fleeing far and wide. They sold themselves to Israel becoming her eyes on the ground, and her fingers on the trigger for Syria’s destruction; and when they failed, Israel intervened directly to reduce the capabilities of the Syrian Army and thus ensuring the continued implementation of her decades old plan for Syria.

Our people were being slaughtered while opposition figures legitimized by foreign agendas were living in five star hotels

Our people were being slaughtered while they were living in five star hotels; they opposed from abroad, met abroad betraying Syria and selling themselves to the highest foreign bidder. And yet, they still claim to speak in the name of the Syrian people! No, Ladies and Gentlemen, anyone wishing to speak on behalf of the Syrian people cannot be a traitor to their cause and an agent for their enemies. Those wishing to speak on behalf of the people of Syria should do so from within her borders: living in her destroyed houses, sending their children to her schools in the morning not knowing if they will return safe from mortar shelling, tolerating the freezing cold winters because of the shortage in heating oil and queuing for hours to buy bread for their families because sanctions have prevented us from importing wheat when we were once exporters. Anyone wanting to speak in the name of the Syrian people should first endure three years of terrorism, confronting it head on, and then come here and speak on behalf of the Syrian people.

Syrian has welcomed hundreds of international journalists and facilitated their mobility

Ladies and gentlemen,

the Syrian Arab Republic – people and state, has fulfilled its duties. It has welcomed hundreds of international journalists and facilitated their mobility, security and access; and they in turn have reflected the stark and horrific realities they witnessed to their audiences, realities that have perplexed many Western media organisations who couldn’t bear their propaganda and narrative being exposed and contradicted. The examples are too many to count. We allowed international aid and relief organizations into the country, but the clandestine agents of certain parties sitting here, obstructed them from reaching those in dire need of aid. They came under terrorist attack several times, whilst we, as a state, did our duty in protecting them and facilitating their work. We issued numerous amnesties and released thousands of prisoners, some even members of armed groups, at the anger and dismay of their victim’s families; these families though, like the rest of us, ultimately accepted that Syria’s interests come before anything else, and hence we must conceal our wounds and rise above hatred and rancor.

What have you done, you who claim to speak on behalf of the Syrian people. Where is your vision for this great country? Where are your ideas or your political manifesto? Who are your agents of change on the ground other than your armed criminal gangs? I am certain that you have nothing and this is only too apparent in the areas that your mercenaries have occupied or to use your words “liberated.”

In these areas, have you freed the population or have you hijacked their moderate culture to enforce your radical and oppressive practices? Have you implemented your development agenda by building schools and health centres? No, you have destroyed them and allowed polio to return after it had previously been eradicated in Syria. Have you protected Syria’s artifacts and museums? No, you have looted our national sites for your personal profit. Have you demonstrated your commitment to justice and human rights? No, you have enforced public executions and beheadings. In short, you have done nothing at all except muster the disgrace and shame of begging America to strike Syria. Even the opposition, over which you are the self-appointed masters and guardians, do not acknowledge you or the methods in which you manage your own affairs, let alone the affairs of a country.

A country they want to homogenize; not in the sectarian, ethnic or religious sense, but rather in a warped ideological sense. Anyone against them, whether Christian or Muslim, is an infidel; they killed Muslims of all sects and targeted Syrian Christians with severity. Even nuns and bishops were targeted, kidnapping them after they attacked Ma’loula, the last community that still speaks the language of Jesus Christ. They did all this to force Syrian Christians to flee their country. But little did they know, that in Syria we are one. When Christianity is attacked all Syrians are Christians, when mosques are targeted all Syrians are Muslims. Every Syrian is from Raqqa, Lattakia, Sweida, Homs or the bleeding Aleppo when any one of these places is targeted. Their abhorrent attempts to sow sectarian and religious sedition will never be embraced by any levelheaded Syrian. In short, Ladies and Gentlemen, your “glorious Syrian revolution” has left no mortal sin uncommitted.

There is another side to this dark gloomy picture. A light at the end of the tunnel shinning through the Syrian people’s determination and steadfastness, the Syrian Army’s courage in protecting our citizens and the Syrian state’s resilience and perseverance. During everything that has happened, there are states that have shown us true friendship, honest states that stood on the side of right against wrong, even when the wrong was clear for all to see. On behalf of the Syrian people and state, I would like to thank Russia and China for respecting Syria’s sovereignty and independence. Russia has been a true champion on the international stage strongly defending, not only with words but also with deeds, the founding principles of the United Nations of respecting the sovereignty of states. Similarly China, the BRICS countries, Iran, Iraq and other Arab and Muslim countries, in addition to African and Latin American countries, have also genuinely safeguarded the aspirations of the Syrian people and not the ambitions of other governments for Syria.

The Syrian people, like other people of the region, aspire to more freedom, justice and human rights

Yes, Ladies and Gentlemen, the Syrian people, like other people of the region, aspire to more freedom, justice and human rights; they aspire to more plurality and democracy, to a better Syria, a safe, prosperous and healthy Syria. They aspire to building strong institutions not destroying them, to safeguarding our national artifacts and heritage sites not looting and demolishing them. They aspire to a strong national army, which protects our honour, our people and our national wealth, an army that defends Syria’s borders, her sovereignty and independence. They do not, Ladies and Gentlemen, aspire to a mercenary army ‘Free’ to kidnap civilians for ransom or to use them as human shields, ‘Free’ to steal humanitarian aid, extort the poor and illegally trade in the organs of living women and children, ‘Free’ to canibalise human hearts and livers, barbequing heads, recruiting child soldiers and raping women. All of this is done with the might of arms; arms provided by countries, represented here, who claim to be championing “moderate groups”. Tell us, for God’s sake, where is the moderation in everything I have described?

Where are these vague moderate groups that you are hiding behind? Are they the same old groups that continue to be supported militarily and publicly by the West, that have undergone an even uglier face-lift in the hope of convincing us that they are fighting terrorism? We all know that no matter how hard their propaganda machine tries to polish their image under the name of moderation, their extremism and terrorism is one and the same. They know, as we all do, that under the pretext of supporting these groups, al-Qaeda and its affiliates are being armed in Syria, Iraq and other countries in the region.

This is the reality, Ladies and Gentlemen, so wake up to the undeniable reality that the West is supporting some Arab countries to supply lethal weapons to al-Qaeda. The West publically claims to be fighting terrorism, whilst in fact it is covertly nourishing it. Anyone who cannot see this truth is either ignorantly blind or willfully so in order to finish what they have begun.

Is this the Syria that you want? The loss of thousands of martyrs and our once cherished safety and national security replaced with apocalyptic devastation. Are these the aspirations of the Syrian people that you wanted to fulfill? No, Ladies and Gentlemen, Syria will not remain so, and that is why we are here. Despite all that has been done by some, we have come to save Syria: to stop the beheadings, to stop the cannibalizing and the butchering. We have come to help mothers and children return to the homes they were driven out of by terrorists. We have come to protect the civil and open-minded nature of the state, to stop the march of the Tatars and the Mongols across our region. We have come to prevent the collapse of the entire Middle East, to protect civilization, culture and diversity, and to preserve the dialogue of civilizations in the birthplace of religions. We have come to protect tolerant Islam that has been distorted, and to protect the Christians of the Levant. We are here to tell our Syrian expatriates, to return to their home country because they will always be foreigners anywhere else, and regardless of our differences we are all still brothers and sisters.

We have come to stop terrorism as other countries that have experienced its bitter taste have done, whilst affirming loudly and consistently that a dialogue between Syrians is the only solution; but as with other countries that have been struck by terrorism, we have a constitutional duty to defend our citizens and we shall continue to strike terrorism that attacks Syrians regardless of their political affiliations. We have come to hold those accountable, for as long as particular countries continue to support terrorism, this conference will bear no fruit. Political pluralism and terrorism cannot coexist in the same landscape. Politics can only prosper by fighting terrorism; it cannot grow in its shadow.

Nobody has the authority to grant or withdraw legitimacy from a president, a government, a constitution, a law or anything else in Syria except Syrians themselves

We are here as representatives of the Syrian people and the state; but let it be clear to all, – and experience is the best proof – that nobody has the authority to grant or withdraw legitimacy from a president, a government, a constitution, a law or anything else in Syria except Syrians themselves; this is their constitutional right and duty. Therefore, whatever agreement is reached here will be subject to a national referendum. We are tasked with conveying our people’s desires, not with determining their destiny; those who want to listen to the will of the Syrian people should not appoint themselves as their spokesperson. Syrians alone have the right to choose their government, their parliament and their constitution; everything else is just talk and has no significance.

Finally, to all those here and everyone watching around the world: in Syria we are fighting terrorism, terrorism which has destroyed and continues to destroy; terrorism which since the 1980’s Syria has been calling, on deaf ears, for a unified front to defeat it. Terrorism has struck in America, France, Britain, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan; the list goes on and it continues to spread. Let us all cooperate to fight it, let’s work hand in hand to stop its black, horrifying and obscurantist ideology. Then, let us as Syrians stand united to focus on Syria and start rebuilding its social fabric and material structures. As I said, dialogue is the foundation to this process, and despite our gratitude to the host country, we affirm that the real dialogue between Syrians should in fact be on Syrian soil and under Syrian skies. Exactly one year ago, the Syrian government put forward its vision for a political solution; think of how much innocent blood we would have saved had some countries resorted to reason instead of terrorism and destruction. For a whole year, we have been calling for dialogue, but terrorism continued to strike at the Syrian state, her people and institutions.

Today, in this gathering of Arab and Western powers, we are presented with a simple choice: we can choose to fight terrorism and extremism together and to start a new political process, or you can continue to support terrorism in Syria. Let us reject and isolate the black hands and the false faces, which publicly smile but covertly feed terrorist ideology, striking Syria today, but ultimately spreading to infect us all. This is the moment of truth and destiny; let us rise to the challenge.

Thank you .

Al-Moallem: We hope that Geneva Conference be a first step to start Syrian-Syrian dialogue in Syria

Later, Minister al-Moallem said, "The orchestra that we have heard from some sides today and the content of some hostile speeches from some states, to the extent that in some minutes we seemed to have heard old rhetoric with no difference except for the place of delivering them, do not deserve to be answered."

Concluding the second session of the conference, al-Moallem added, "Because we want to stop bloodshed in Syria, to protect the lives of citizens, to build Syria again and because, as a state, we play our constitutional, political, security and social role to save Syria from what is going on, we are here and we hope the Geneva conference will be a first step on the way to start Syrian-Syrian dialogue on the Syrian territories."

"I thank those who have stood by us from the friendly countries for three years so far and we say to all that we will continue hitting terrorism wherever it was with one hand and we will build Syria democratically, politically and socially with the other," al-Moallem said.

Minister al-Moallem added, "I say to those who are interfering in the Syrian affairs through any sort of interference: three years and you are still trying; have you not become desperate yet? … Enough! … Put your hands off Syria so that we can indeed achieve the people's aspirations of a secure and developed life."

[source : Geneva2 begins with paticpation of Syria's offical delegation, headed by al-Moallem, SANA,, 22nd January 2014]


The Guardian's editorial on the Geneva II peace talks ends thus:
Even by attending, each party loses face in the eyes of its cohorts. Nevertheless, talk they must. As yet, it is Syria's only hope.

[source : Geneva talks: jaw-jaw and war-war, The Guardian,, 21st January 2014]

But before this misleading statement, the editorial paints a picture of a Syria in which there is a struggle between 2 mighty enemies, each with valid points of view that cannot be reconciled.

But only one side has a valid point, and that is President Bashar al Assad, who correctly states that Syria has been covertly invaded by terrorists. We have seen their deadly handiwork at places like Adra, al Duvair, al Houla, Khan al Assal and Ghouta. When such incidents as these occur it is the NATO media that immediately accuses the Syrian Arab Army and/or Assad. Such allegations are eventually always always always proven false. Before The (fake CIA-US-State-Department-sponsored) Arab Spring in Syria, such crimes against humanity never occured in Syria. Then there is also the cannibalism, and the decapitations of civilians, prisoners and priests. None of this occured in Syria before The (fake CIA-US-State-Department-sponsored) Arab Spring.

There is only one man to thank for that: Prince Bandar bin Sultan of of that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, Saudi Arabia. Bandar is not mentioned once in the editorial, and Saudi Arabia is mentioned just once:
A crisis that began as a popular protest movement against the Assad regime has largely become a proxy war between Iran, Saudi Arabia and al-Qaida-linked Islamists, in which the main victims are Syrian civilians.
Israel is not mentioned once either. Which is very, very strange because it is due to a Faustian agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, reported by Seymour Hersh in 2007, that led to the invasion of Syria by cutthroat Jihadis...and with assistance from Great Britain!

And the last I read, 70% of Syrians supported Assad, 20% were neutral while only 10% supported the rebels/cutthroats, and many rebels were abandoning the fight and going home, realising that they were actually fighting for a foreign country, Israel, which planned all the death, destruction and mayhem in 1996, ran 9/11 to kick off the series of wars on Iraq, Hezbollah, Libya and failed at an attempt to start a war on Syria last year after the horrific false flag at Ghouta in August last year.

So what is Syria's only hope?

She doesn't have one.

And she doesn't have one because she doesn't need one.

Syria has stood up to the Takfiri terrorism that was smuggled in by Great Britain and sponsored by that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, The Diabolical Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.


Syria has defeated the following nations:
The United Kingdom
The United States of America
Saudi Arabia

But above all, Israel.

These defeated, embarrassed nations should skulk back in their dens of iniquity.

And next time their leaders want to start war they should grab themselves a rifle, helmet, uniform and a pair of boots for themselves and a one way ticket to the front line instead of unleashing cutthroats onto children.


Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice QC - prosecuted Slobodan Milosevic, but Milosevic was fighting against the Anglo-American Establishment's plans for Yugoslavia, and was winning his case, so he was murdered.

Professor David M. Crane - Once Defense Intelligence Agency, always Defense Intelligence Agency.

The Right Honourable Sir Desmond de Silva QC -
The BBC are showing enormous deference to Sir Desmond De Silva, who is introduced as a former UN war crimes prosecutor. He is indeed that, but it is not the capacity in which he is now acting. He is acting as a barrister in private practice. Before he was a UN prosecutor, he was for decades a criminal defence lawyer and has defended many murderers. He has since acted to suppress the truth being published about many celebrities, including John Terry.

If the Assad regime and not the government of Qatar had instructed him and paid him, he would now be on our screens arguing the opposite case to that he is putting. That is his job. He probably regards that as not reprehensible. What is reprehensible is that the BBC do not make it plain, but introduce him as a UN war crimes prosecutor as though he were acting in that capacity or out of concern for human rights. I can find no evidence of his having an especial love for human rights in the abstract, when he is not being paid for it. He produced an official UK government report into the murder of Pat Finucane, a murder organised by British authorities, which Pat Finucane’s widow described as a “sham”. He was also put in charge of quietly sweeping the Israeli murders on the Gaza flotilla under the carpet at the UN.

[source : Craig Murray,, 21st January 2-14]

Qatar sponsored the Carter Ruck report. Qatar is an absolute monarchy and is one of the key financiers of the Syrian rebels who are allegedly fighting for...freedom and democracy!


Well, this is planet Earth, after all.

It's gud 'ere, innit?

Wednesday, January 22, 2014


I saw the most recent party political broadcast (PPB) from The Conservative Party today. According to the Tories, we are in so much debt because of Labour's borrowing and spending.

The Tories are taking the limeade.

May I remind the British voter that around 2007/8 we bailed out The City of London to the jaw-dropping sum of approximately £1 trillion.

I'll repeat that again.

£1 trillion.

And The City of London was allowed to rack up such debts because:
1. The Tories not only supported Labour's light-touch regulation of The City of London, THEY WANTED EVEN LESS!
2. The wicked witch Margaret Thatcher empowered The City of London to expand its global casino operations which contributed to the aforementioned bailout of The City of London in 2007/8.

Which is why the UK national debt looks like this:

The Tory PPB consisted of Der Fuhrer looking rather suave telling us we've done good so far but there's still a lot more pain to come before we pay off our debts.



Yes, Labour did increase the national debt significantly, but that was because they unnecessarily bailed out the Tories best mates, The City of London, with £1 trillion!!

And the Tory PPB shows working/middle class people of many ethnicities agreeing with the Tories that we have got to live in fascist oiksterity forever and a day because of OUR debts!!




The Tories are hoping that we will have forgotten that next year when we got to the voting booth.

And sadly, they'll be right. The muggins British taxpayer will vote for more oiksterity. Please, Sir. Can we have some more austerity?

It's gud 'ere, innit?

(Psst. Don't mention the banker bailout.)


Anything that everybody's unfavourite controlled-left newspaper The Guardian trumpets should be read with extreme caution. I destroyed the credibility of The Guardian a few weeks ago with an analysis of its editorials following the horrific events at Ghouta on 21st August last year. Essentially The Guardian/Observer:
1. Immediately and consistently accused Assad;
2. Not once considered the cutthroats as the culprits, despite an abundance of evidence that they had chemical weapons, had tested them on live rabbits, had issued threats on video of using chemical weapons to get what they wanted, and were in desperate need of something spectacular to provoke an overt large scale military attack by NATO to save their necks;
3. Was overjoyed at Syria relinquishing its stockpile of chemical weapons but not once mentioned Israel's much larger, more devastating, more threatening stockpile of not just chemical weapons but also nuclear and biological weapons.

Two days ago The Guardian (who else?) published a report based on a report produced by Carter Ruck on the alleged systematic abuse, torture and murder of detainees held by the Syrian government. The report was sponsored by Qatar, and was based on a single source, a man with the pseudonym "Caesar", who claims to have photographed hundreds of corpses after they had been abused, tortured and murdered by the Syrian government. The photographs published in the Carter Ruck did look horrible and indicated some kind of abuse and torture.

But of whom?

And by whom?

Let's look at the three 'experts' who signed off the report. Geoffrey Nice QC prosecuted Slobodan Milosevic. Milosevic was fighting against the attacks on Yugoslavia by the Anglo-American Establishment, and was winning his case against Nice, so he was murdered. And what of Ian Crane QC? Apparently Crane worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Crane, a former employee of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), told the Guardian: “Now we have direct evidence of what was happening to people who had disappeared. This is the first provable, direct evidence of what has happened to at least 11,000 human beings who have been tortured and executed and apparently disposed of. This is amazing … We have the person who took those pictures. That’s beyond-reasonable-doubt-type evidence.”

In fact, the report has no evidence to back up Crane’s claims, or even to prove that the victims were killed by Assad’s forces. All the “evidence” cited by the report consists of unseen photographs allegedly located on a flash drive in the possession of an operative codenamed “Caesar,” who has been working with Syrian opposition groups since September 2011.

“Caesar” was briefly interviewed in an unnamed Middle East country by the three lawyers on January 12, 13, and 18. The lawyers and the associated forensics team preparing the report were not given access to the full contents of “Caesar’s” flash drive.

“Caesar” claimed that his flash drive contains 55,000 photographs that the Assad regime asked him to take of the remains of detainees it had tortured and murdered, while “Caesar” was working as a military policeman. There is no credible explanation of why the Assad regime, if it had tortured and murdered 11,000 people, would have asked “Caesar” to carefully document it.

The report states, “Some 5,500 images were examined in total by the forensics team … Within these 5,500 images, images of a total of 835 deceased persons were evaluated in detail. Of these, 20 percent showed evidence of inflicted trauma and 30 percent were equivocal. Forty-two percent showed emaciation.”

That is to say, the report’s authors have not seen evidence that 11,000 people were killed—a figure for which they are relying entirely on “Caesar” and whatever Middle Eastern regime is hosting him. The figure of 11,000 dead cited in the press has no evidentiary basis at all.

The report does show a dozen of these photographs, including what appear to be several horribly emaciated bodies. However, as “Caesar” and the Carter-Ruck team blurred the date stamps and location information on the photos, it is impossible to know where or by whom they were killed.

While the Assad regime is known to practice torture, having tortured suspects rendered to them by Western intelligence in the so-called “war on terror”—before US imperialism moved to back Al Qaeda against Assad—it is hardly the only possible suspect.

[source : As Geneva talks open, US advances trumped-up torture charges against Syria, WSWS,, 22nd January 2014]

So, just before talks begin to discuss and end the covert invasion of cutthroat Jihadis in Syria, a report, sponsored by yet another utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, Qatar, is trumpeted in the controlled-left NATO media, as 'proving' that the Syrian government abused, tortured and murdered 11000 detainees, when in fact no evidence to support these claims has been provided, and what evidence that has been provided shows the bodies of a handful of men. But who were they? And who killed them? And who is this source "Caesar"?

And the authors of the report are intimately linked to the Anglo-American Establishment; one prosecuted Milosevic, and another worked for the DIA.

But as I said, this is la Perfide Albion.

It's gud 'ere, innit?

Tuesday, January 21, 2014


I have today received a reply to my letter to Michael Gove sent on the 3rd January regarding WW1. Unfortunately Mr Gove has not replied personally. The reply I received was from the Ministerial and Public Communications Division of The Department for Education, and reads thus:

Thank you for your email of 3 January, containing a letter addressed to the Secretary of State, about World War One. I am sure you can appreciate that the Secretary of State receives a large amount of correspondence and is unable to answer each one personally. I have therefore been asked to reply.

It is for schools to decide how they teach and what resources they use to support the teaching of the First World War or anything else. We trust schools to use teaching materials that suit their pupils’ needs. In his article of 3 January, the Secretary of State was not criticising teachers for using Blackadder as a resource, he was referring to what he described as the myths perpetuated in that programme, and other fictional dramas, and how important it is not to rely on just one version of events.

We also expect teachers to keep their subject knowledge up to date, and to draw on a range of resources, including more recent research. We would also expect that the teaching of any issue in schools should be consistent with the principles of balance and objectivity.

More generally on the points you make about the causes of the First World War, and about differing historical arguments and interpretations, pupils are required to understand that different versions of past events may exist and why this is so. This will be a requirement in the new history curriculum at key stage 3, which will be taught from September 2014. As the Secretary of State also pointed out in his article, there is no unchallenged consensus, and it is important that we encourage an open debate on the war and its significance. Again, it is for teachers to decide how they do this.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Your correspondence has been allocated reference number XXXXXXXXXXXXX. If you need to respond to us, please visit: and quote your reference number.

As part of our commitment to improving the service we provide to our customers, we are interested in hearing your views and would welcome your comments via our website at:

Yours sincerely

Ministerial and Public Communications Division

The last major paragraph seems encouraging:
More generally on the points you make about the causes of the First World War, and about differing historical arguments and interpretations, pupils are required to understand that different versions of past events may exist and why this is so. This will be a requirement in the new history curriculum at key stage 3, which will be taught from September 2014. As the Secretary of State also pointed out in his article, there is no unchallenged consensus, and it is important that we encourage an open debate on the war and its significance. Again, it is for teachers to decide how they do this.

I wonder if this statement, is for teachers to decide how they do this.
means exclusively history teachers or teachers of other subjects?

So, how can we get this Freemasonic conspiracy into our schools during the centenary of WW1?


Is there anybody out there?


Last week it was reported that some western security officials had visited Damascus to discuss cooperation in the fight against Islamic terrorists. At first I was hopeful that this indicated a factional split, either inside intelligence or between intelligence and politicians. But I added the caveat that we are dealing with la Perfide Albion.

Former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas told French Parliamentary channel LCP last June that:
1. he was asked by British officials to help them smuggle Jihadis into Syria;
2. an Israeli PM told him that Israel would destroy all nations that did not get on with it;
3. Dumas believes the war on Syria is due to Syria's anti-Israel position.

This all would all fit perfectly with the analysis that I have consistently proposed regarding A Clean Break/PNAC/Redirection/Arab Spring. Last night I began to add a few more overlooked facts, particularly those surrounding the policy toward bona fide CIA agent Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I thought of another overlooked fact first thing this morning; Russia abstained on UN SCR 1973, but it also allowed the invasion of Iraq. So there is some potential that this whole Israel/A Clean Break/PNAC/Redirection/Arab Spring script, is just that, a script, with a much deeper and agreed plot behind the scenes.

Anyway, just before the peace talks over Syria begin we see two propaganda attempts:
1. yesterday a report sponsored by Qatar into alleged abuse, torture and murder of detainees held by the Syrian government;
2. today la Perfide Albion is now accusing Assad of being in cahoots with al Qaeda, allowing them to grow in strength and power, releasing al Qaeda prisoners, so that Assad can claim that the uprising in Syria is due to al Qaeda and that therefore western support for it must stop, and that the rise of al Qaeda in Syria is due to Assad's alleged cooperation with them!
The Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad has funded and co-operated with al-Qaeda in a complex double game even as the terrorists fight Damascus, according to new allegations by Western intelligence agencies, rebels and al-Qaeda defectors.

Jabhat al-Nusra, and the even more extreme Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS), the two al-Qaeda affiliates operating in Syria, have both been financed by selling oil and gas from wells under their control to and through the regime, intelligence sources have told The Daily Telegraph.

Rebels and defectors say the regime also deliberately released militant prisoners to strengthen jihadist ranks at the expense of moderate rebel forces. The aim was to persuade the West that the uprising was sponsored by Islamist militants including al-Qaeda as a way of stopping Western support for it.

The allegations by Western intelligence sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, are in part a public response to demands by Assad that the focus of peace talks due to begin in Switzerland tomorrow be switched from replacing his government to co-operating against al-Qaeda in the “war on terrorism”.

[source : Syria's Assad accused of boosting Al-Qaeda with secret oil deals, The Daily Telegraph,, 21st January 2014]

Yet in The Redirection by Seymour Hersh in 2007, it is clearly stated that cutthroat Jihadis would be unleashed onto particular nations. One source said that once you let them out of the box you can't put them back in!


I argue that because the plan for war on seven nations in five years, as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11, was moribund by 2007, this Faustian agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia to inject some life (or should that be death?) into the plan. My evidence for this is the two nations who have suffered these cutthroat Jihadis were both named to Clark; first Libya, then Syria.

And as stated above, former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas told French Parliamentary channel LCP last June that:
1. he was asked by British officials to help them smuggle Jihadis into Syria;
2. an Israeli PM told him that Israel would destroy all nations that did not get on with it;
3. Dumas believes the war on Syria is due to Syria's anti-Israel position.

Which is more slam dunk: that WW1 was a freemasonic conspiracy, or we are responsible for the injection and empowerment of al Qaeda in Syria?

If you ask me, and nobody is, I would say that they are equally slam dunk.

WW1 was a freemasonic conspiracy, and we are responsible for the injection and empowerment of al Qaeda in Syria.

We live in la Perfide Albion.

This is la Perfide Albion.

Perfidious. Manipulating. Treacherous. Untrustworthy.

It's gud 'ere, innit?

Monday, January 20, 2014


Everybody's favourite controlled-left newspaper The Guardian is overjoyed at a report that allegedly documents crimes against humanity committed by the Syrian government officials. The report was financed by Qatar, and one of the experts who signed off the report was the prosecutor of Slobodan Milosevic (now, isn't that so, so weird?). I demolished the credibility of The Guardian through an analysis of its editorials on Syria and its chemical weapons. According to The Guardian, Assad and only Assad could have done Ghouta because the cutthroats are angels and like nothing better than to crochet or knit, and Israel can keep its nuclear, biological and chemical weapons while Syria can't.
Syrian government officials could face war crimes charges in the light of a huge cache of evidence smuggled out of the country showing the "systematic killing" of about 11,000 detainees, according to three eminent international lawyers.

...The authors are Sir Desmond de Silva QC, former chief prosecutor of the special court for Sierra Leone, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, the former lead prosecutor of former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic, and Professor David Crane, who indicted President Charles Taylor of Liberia at the Sierra Leone court.

...The 31-page report, which was commissioned by a leading firm of London solicitors acting for Qatar, is being made available to the UN, governments and human rights groups. Its publication appears deliberately timed to coincide with this week's UN-organised Geneva II peace conference, which is designed to negotiate a way out of the Syrian crisis by creating a transitional government.

[source : Evidence of 'industrial-scale killing' by Syria spurs call for war crimes charges, The Guardian,, 20th January 2014]

Having skimmed through the report, it does look professionally produced with some harrowing photographs of torture and abuse, but it cannot be proved that Assad ordered it all.

But let us muse for a while, head on hand in deep thought, like Rodin's Thinker, and ask :

These smart arse lawyers are the sort who think it is perfectly OK to allow banks to create money out of thin air, lend it to us, charge interest on it, and then demand repayment in hard physical goods when it isn't paid back!

They just can't see, or don't want to see, the bigger picture.

So, why is there a war in Syria in the first place which drives men into allegedly committing such crimes against humanity?

It was planned decades ago, assumed by Israel in A Clean Break. They, with Saudi Arabia, did 9/11. They planned to enrage The United States of Warmerica into attacking Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

Approaching one million died during and after the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and half that before after Saddam was tricked into invading Kuwait in 1990. There was something really suspicious about all that, which has nearly been copied today in Syria. We encouraged a rebellion against Saddam. The rebels had congregated for an attack, having been led to believe that we would support them, but when the time came, we betrayed the rebels and Saddam wiped out whatever rebellion there was against him inside Iraq, leaving Saddam more powerful and untouchable inside Iraq. Now does that sound suspicious or does that sound suspicious?

Let's muse again.

Iraq : we betrayed a rebellion against Saddam in 1991, placed sanctions on Iraq that killed hundreds of thousands of children, Iraqi oil was sold on the black market (so profits couldn't be traced), then in 2003 we invaded Iraq and found someone hiding in a hole who looked like Saddam and apparently hung him. But before all this, Saddam was CIA!! Doesn't that make you go, hmmm, maybe he was CIA all along, all the way to the time they hung his double while he escaped with his millions from the sale of Iraqi oil on the black market? You don't really know with these dodgy scheming bastards. After all, we are talking about control of the world's second largest proven oil reserves...Perhaps A Clean Break is just smoke and mirrors?

War against Hezbollah in 2006 is the war that implies the wars since 9/11 are Israeli-instigated and related to A Clean Break, but it could just be a red herring.

And as for Libya? Why did Russia and China abstain on UN SCR 1973? That seems really, really dodgy to me. But to add to this, Gaddafi was allegedly our ally in the Global War on Terror, giving names of al Qaeda to CIA and MI6, torturing rendition suspects, and investing his personal fortune in The City of London with Goldman Sachs. But somehow GS managed to 'lose' millions of Gaddafi's money. And didn't Gaddafi have doubles too?

And now onto Syria. As with Gaddafi, Assad was our ally in the war on terror. Suspects were renditioned to Syria for torture. And then there is that famous photo of Kerry and Assad at dinner. What were they discussing? But as with Iraq in 1991, we encouraged a rebellion and we now seem to be betraying that too.

I'm just looking at all this from a different angle, incorporating other stuff we know. That Iraq/CIA/Saddam stuff looks very, very suspicious to me. And if what happened in Iraq was all a scam, then perhaps everything after it is too...

But back to these alleged crimes against humanity committed by Syrian government officials. Let's put them into perspective. If it is true that these crimes were committed then, yes, the perpetrators should be held accountable.

But so should the likes of William Hague, David Cameron, Tony Blair and Bandar bin Sultan for going to war on Iraq and encouraging the rebellion in Syria. But these are just the front men, the ugly faces of evil. Before March 2011 Syria was peaceful. But after British officials smuggled the rebels into Syria (as suggested by Roland Dumas)...

Who is more guilty: those who follow orders, or those who give orders?

And what if those crimes are committed in self defence?

It is the real but anonymous perpetrators who need to be brought to justice: those who ordered and/or agreed to the killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraq children through sanctions; those who ordered and/or agreed to 9/11; those who ordered and/or agreed to implement the plan for war on seven nations in five years; those who ordered and/or agreed to the killing of approaching a million Iraqis in 2003; and all the rest who order and/or acquiesce to mass genocide.

But who gives a f...?


Is there anybody out there?