Sunday, July 31, 2011


Adding to the mystery surrounding Anders Breivik, his unknown sources of money, and his links to and protection by the Norwegian military/police (or sections thereof), Webster Tarpley details the SIMAS network which has burrowed itself into that very same Norwegian military/police network that was so incompetent on 22/7/2011, as incompetent as the USAF was on 9/11.

The weekly radio shows by Tarpley should be listened to by all politicians around the world, particularly the brief interviews with Phil Berg who runs and is proving that Obama is ineligible, but this weeks show dives into the SIMAS network and the events of 22/07/2011. Listen to this weeks show at The section on Norway starts at 1:01:45 into the show.


All the children in the world should be
Loving each other wholeheartedly
Yes, it's all right
Take my message to your brother
And tell him twice

Take the news to the marching men
Who are killing their brothers
When death won't do, ooh
Yes, we're all the same
Yes, the blood inside of me is inside of you

Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?

If you look around
The whole world is comin' together now, baby
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?

Feel it in the air
The wind is taking it everywhere, yeah
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?

All the colors of the world should be
Lovin' each other wholeheartedly
Yes, it's all right
Take my message to your brother
And tell him twice

Spread the word and try to teach the man
Who's hating his brother
When hate won't do, ooh
'Cause we're all the same, yes
The blood inside of me is inside of you

Now, tell me
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?

Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Yeah, yeah, oh

Every breath you take
Is someone's death in another place
(Another place, another place, another place)
Every healthy smile
Is hunger and strife to another child
(Another child, another child)

But the stars do shine
In promising salvation, is near this time
(Near this time)
Can you feel it now?
So brothers and sisters show me know how

Now, tell me
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Yeah yeah oh

Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?

All the children in the world should be
Loving each other wholeheartedly
Yes, it's all right
Take my message to your brother
And tell him twice

Take the news to the marching men
Who are killing their brothers
When death won't do, ooh
Yes, we're all the same
Yes, the blood inside of me is inside of you

Now, tell me
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?

Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?
Can you feel it?


With some time on my hands while I gradually recover from the triple whammy of illnesses that knocked me for six a few months ago, I did some channel surfing on freeview yesterday and came across TOTP2, and in the show I watched was St Etienne with their cover of Who Do You Think You Are from May 1993.

How apt the song is today.

Though written by a band called Jigsaw, about a woman taking advantage of a fool in love with her, it can easily be a song that we as individuals could sing to the Null World Order, as they lie to us and take advantage of us. Most of us are or have been fools to the Null World Order, loving their lies, loving their abuse, loving their wars, their frauds and their corruption. But enough is enough.

We are at the crossroads : it's either freedom or global fascism.

Who the F do they think they are?

They can't even beat a 69 year old man in Libya with all that military hardware and media apparatus to spread their lies at their disposal!

PS this is a far better version than the original, particularly with the beautifully stunning (and stunningly beautiful) Sarah Cracknell singing.

Who am I?
I'm just a girl who only wants
to try to do what's right;
I'll never make you cry,
but you're no good for me, and
who do you think you are?
You tried to push me a bit too far,
and every day sees another scar.
Oh tell me, who do you think you are?
If you want me there, you gotta care!
Oh tell me,

who do you think you are
taking advantage of me this way?
Tell me, who do you think you are,
hurting me more with the things you say?
It's not fair, you don't care.
Who do you really think that you are?

Where are we?
We're at the cross roads and
I just can't see
which way to take to keep you
here with me.
The lights are changing, baby,
who do you think you are?
You tried to push me a bit too far,
and every day sees another scar.
Oh tell me, who do you think you are?
If you want me there, you gotta care!
Oh tell me,

who do you think you are
taking advantage of me this way?
Tell me, who do you think you are,
hurting me more with the things you say?
It's not fair, you don't care.
Who do you really think that you are?

If you want me there, you gotta care!
Oh tell me,

who do you think you are
taking advantage of me this way?
Tell me, who do you think you are,
hurting me more with the things you say?
It's not fair, you don't care.
Who do you really think that you are?

Who do you think you are
taking advantage of me this way?
Tell me, who do you think you are,
hurting me more with the things you say?
It's not fair, you don't care.

[Who the F do you really think that you are? - added by TTS]


A poll run by Press TV, which I assume was answered by a predominantly Islamic readership, has possibly cast doubt on the claim that the fall of Rupert Murdoch is possibly in-fighting in the ranks of the Null World Order[1].

However the responses to the poll indicate a deep mistrust of British media, a mistrust which I believe is very, very well grounded, particularly as Blair is going to get pounded by Chilcot[2], and the British media rarely questioned anything he and the government said during the months before the folly into Iraq in 2003.
About 53% of the respondents said the outrage over phone hacking and bribery “is just the tip of the iceberg of the corruption in British media.”

Other results from the poll were
1) 27% said that the overshadowing corruption in the British system of governance was what allowed Murdoch to further his own interests.
2) 16 % said the recent revelations show “how the free media reflects the views of a select few.”
3) 4% held that the scandal was a means to force Murdoch to loosen his grip on the media outlets.

It is this last opinion that brings into question the hypothesis that Murdoch is being dumped by the Null World Order. But then being an atheist myself and assuming the respondents are religious to varying degrees perhaps the hypothesis that Murdoch is being dumped is true. Is it of significance that BSkyB managed to buy into Formula One very recently, when Murdoch expressed such an interest in doing so a few months ago, Murdoch launched his bid for BSkyB, then the hacking scandal really took off? I dunno. But Murdoch is being savaged, in the UK and the USA.

Press TV reporters stated
Murdoch, the Chairman and CEO of the sprawling News Corporation media conglomerate, was listed three times as one of the 100 most influential people in the world.

He has exploited his vast media empire to push war in Iraq, elect George W. Bush, spread resentment of Muslims and immigrants, and block global action on climate change.

[1] Poll: Murdoch scandal tip of iceberg, Press TV, 30/7/2011

[2] The damning of Tony Blair: Former PM to be held to account on Iraq in Chilcot report on war, The Daily Mail, 31/7/2011

Friday, July 29, 2011


Anders Breivik was once in the Army, he received mysterious amounts of money without having obvious employment, and before allegedly slaughtering approximately one hundred of his fellow white Norwegians (not Muslims) he lived alone(?) on a remote farm close to Norwegian military training grounds, he was reported to local police by two of his neighbours for suspicious activity, and built bombs using chemicals that brought him to the attention of the Norwegian terrorist cops, who subsequently put him on their watch list but apparently did not go to have a nice friendly little chat with him.

Oh, and not forgetting that someone changed his Facebook page after he had been arrested.

And not forgetting that chap who was shot dead at his home by two military types after reports from survivors of Breivik's alleged massacre suggested there was more than one gun man.


Anders Behring Breivik, Mystery Man, AntiWar, 29/07/2011
Police ignored neighbors’ concerns over Breivik, Russia Today, 28/07/2011
NORWAY TERROR LINKS TO GANGSTERS?, aangirfan blog, 27/07/2011


That is the amount of 'money' that The Non-Federal Reserve conjured up out of thin air and gave to banks, both foreign and domestic.



There are sixteen trillion questions you could ask about this cheeky daylight robbery, but the main question for me is,
How do you get away with robbing sixteen trillion dollars?

How do you steal sixteen trillion dollars and avoid being lynched, or going to prison for a very, very, very long time?

It is becoming clearer to me day by day that whoever organised this sixteen trillion dollar robbery is also organising, manipulating and instigating all the military conflicts in the Eurasian region.

By engineering a global financial crisis and global military crises we are being provoked into demanding a world government to solve all the world's problems.

But guess who engineered all the problems?

And guess who would ultimately control the resulting world government?

By cntrolling any world government the banksters would be beyond the law, free from prosecution and living it up in one of their many 100 bedroom mansions or castles located in the most desirable areas of the world. Meanwhile the rest of us, the scum, can fester in squalor and come to love our servitude and drudgery.


The Looting Of America: The Federal Reserve Made $16 Trillion In Secret Loans To Their Bankster Friends And The Media Is Ignoring The Eye-Popping Corruption That Has Been Uncovered

A one-time limited GAO audit of the Federal Reserve that was mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has uncovered some eye-popping corruption at the Fed and the mainstream media is barely even covering it. It turns out that the Federal Reserve made $16.1 trillion in secret loans to their bankster friends during the financial crisis. You can read a copy of the GAO investigation for yourself right here. These loans only went to the "too big to fail" banks and to foreign financial institutions. Not a penny of these loans went to small banks or to ordinary Americans. Not only did the banksters get trillions in nearly interest-free loans, but the Fed actually paid them over 600 million dollars to help run the emergency lending program. The GAO investigation revealed some absolutely stunning conflicts of interest, and yet the mainstream media does not even seem interested. Solid evidence of the looting of America has been put right in front of us, and yet hardly anyone wants to talk about it.

Thursday, July 28, 2011


Apparently not.

Apparently the British government, along with the French and the American governments, decide who will govern Libya and who the legitimate government of Libya is.

And there is now a power struggle within the rebels, with Younes being killed. NATO media tried to imply that Gaddafi killed him. But it is a power struggle. Who can make most money out of us. Who can murder the most. Who is more corruptible.

Add this to the racist murders and torture.

Are these the alleged democratic freedom-loving thugs we want running Libya?

While we put these thugs in power in Libya our NHS is being accused of delaying operations hoping that patients die in order to save money to help bail out the gambling Nazi bankster financiers of Cameron. So far the cost of putting the Libyan al-Qaeda thugs into power in Libya has cost us £260 million.

But not only that. It has cost us what little respect we had around the world. We told the whole world that military action in Libya was about protecting civilians. Within days of it beginning it was clear the military action was about regime change. Gaddafi had to step down and leave or risk being assassinated. Over three months and lots of grandchildren bombed and maimed by NATO later, and NATO is collapsing. Norway is pulling out, which is possibly the reason why the massacre attributed to Breivik occured last week. Netherlands is pulling out. Italy is almost pulling out.

And now the Libyan al-Qaeda rebels are fighting among themselves and killing each other in a secondary civil war, one that the SAS did not provoke (or did they?) instead of fighting as one against Gaddafi.

Meanwhile the 69 year old Gaddafi remains in power. He has been robbed by Goldman Sachs, like the rest of us. The Not Accurate Targeting Organisation (NATO) murdered three of his grandchildren. But he remains.

The Null World Order cannot remove him.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011


It now appears that Breivik went to live on a remote farm for a few weeks before the shooting last week.
It also emerged on Monday that Breivik made contact with EDL supporters for the last time as recently as March, just before he holed up on a remote farm to begin his final preparations for an Friday's attack.[1]

Who knows what went on at that farm, who visited him, etc.

And just before the shooting he took drugs.
Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik took drugs to make him 'strong and efficient' during the bombing and shooting spree which killed at least 76 people.[2]

Add this to being known to the Norwegian terrorist cops and being on their watchlist and not receiving a visit from them despite having a Facebook page on which he wrote of his plans, having no income but suddenly having an income whose origin is unknown, being a freemason and involved with secret societies with the aim of starting a holy war between christians and zionists against muslims, and suspicions that he did not act alone (how would he know if he was out of his skull on drugs?).

It all sounds depressingly familiar.

[1] Scotland Yard called in over Breivik's claims he met 'mentor' in UK, The Guardian, 26/7/2011
[2] Norwegian mass killer took drugs to make him 'strong and efficient' before launching bloody rampage, lawyer reveals, The Daily Mail, 26/07/2011


Several men who have recently gone on what are apparent random shooting rampages went missing during the few weeks before they went on their shooting sprees.

John Patrick Bedell went missing for two week in January 2010 before he decided he could shoot up the Pentagon armed only with a pistol. He was of course shot dead. Bedell apparently had some business links with the Pentagon after he said he had designed a DNA computer, hence the name of his company DNAputer Inc.

Jared Loughner went missing for a week before he went on his shooting adventure in which he almost killed Gabrielle Giffords. The cross-dressing skull-worshpping Loughner bragged he was mind controlled. Since his arrest in January this year Loughner has been and still is being pumped full of potent anti-psychotic drugs, despite his lawyers claiming it is against his constitutional rights.



Seven more wasted by the Not Accurate Targeting Organisation (NATO).

Sunday, July 17, 2011


In an editorial today the Bilderberg Washington Post defends Murdoch and his media empire, making several claims to support their defence[1]. These claims are
1. that the hacking of the phones and computers of politicians by media organisations is hardly new
2. Rebekah Brooks has already resigned
3. that Murdoch's decision to withdraw his bid to control BSkyB will benefit British media, of which Murdoch already controls 40% of newspaper circulation according to the editorial
4. that British law is strong enough to prosecute any wrong-doing so no investigation of Murdoch and his media empire by the USA is required
5. that the self-regulatory British Press Complaints Commission is strong enough to handle the fallout from the News of the World hacking scandal etc so an official regulatory body is not required
6. that British media laws do not give the media enough freedom which drives them to hack phones of politicians, celebrities etc

In particular I love this sentence.
Britain’s biggest media problem is not too much freedom but too little: Onerous libel laws deter critical reporting about public figures and arguably drive journalists to measures such as phone hacking to obtain lawsuit-proof stories.

As with Martin Wolf in the FT recently calling for a new media in Great Britain, there is nothing stopping reporters from the WaPo or FT or any other media "critically reporting" on Bilderberg or the Council on Foreign Relations or BeHomo Bohemian Grove, but they rarely print anything of any substance and when they do they portray these treasonous scheming satanic organisations as a simple gathering of like-minded folk to play or to talk. The fact that they hold mock human sacrifices and discuss engineering wars and mass genocide goes unreported.

But why would the Post defend Murdoch?

Is it defending Murdoch, or the right of the media to snoop into anybody's life and use the intelligence to politically assassinate and/or blackmail people?

We know that Echelon has been listening into all our phone calls, emails, texts, faxes etc for decades. There are probably much more sophisticated intelligence gathering systems now (and here I suggest remote mind reading from many miles away), but intelligence gathered in such ways cannot be released into the public domain because it will expose how such systems work.

It is possible however, knowing that the media is infiltrated by MI5/CIA/Mossad etc via Operation Mockingbird, that intelligence gathered by old and/or modern systems is being passed down to the Mockingbird, dressed up as rogue reporting and used to control/blackmail politicians, celebrities, etc, and that if an inquiry begins to look into this link between intelligence and the media it might uncover a few facts that certain people would prefer to remain secret. This could explain why the Washington Post, arguably the mouthpiece of the Null World Order, is concerned that the outrage caused by the News of the World has gone too far already.

[1] Don’t let the response to News of the World go too far, WP, 17/07/2011

Saturday, July 16, 2011


Reports from Libya imply that there is a mass uprising against a tyrant but it is being brutally put down by drug-crazed thugs. The following gives a completely different picture of events in Libya, and provokes the question, would Cameron/Obama/Sarkozy give out millions of Kalashnikovs to citizens of the UK/USA/France? I seriously doubt it because there would be a genuine revolution against them.

And that is the difference. The violence in Libya is neither a genuine revolution nor a civil war. It is an act of military aggression as a naked manifestation of imperialism. British, American and French Special Forces were in Libya months before it all kicked off over there, liaising with and training members of al-Qaeda. The nature of the movement against Gaddafi does not fit the pattern of the rest of Arab Spring, which involves mass protests. Libya is under a covert military invasion disguised as humanitarian intervention and civil war, but the civil war was engineered and provoked leading to the love bombs of NATOs alleged humanitarian intervention killing hundreds of civilians.

Is it just coincidence that Libya has the largest oil deposits in Africa?

Is it just coincidence that Libya is the most advanced nation in Africa?

I think not.

We are in Afghanistan for oil and gas.

We are in Iraq for oil.

We are in Libya for oil.

And we will soon be in Iran for oil and gas.

But by we I mean the ordinary British/American/NATO man and woman in the street is killing the ordinary Afghan/Iraqi/Libyan/Iranian man and woman in the street so that the likes of Nazi David Rockefeller and his Bilderberg ilk can grab control of more this beautiful and bountiful planet's resources that do not belong to them.

And it is all down to the inside job of 11th September 2001.

Oh, what have you got us into Mr Cameron, and the rest of the corrupt imperialist wretches in the House of Commons, wasting our money on killing Libyan children when we should be saving our sick elderly in our cash-starved hospitals?


NATO will be Defeated in Libya
The Libyan Resistance Movement. A Defining Moment for Africa

by Gerald A. Perreira

Global Research, July 14, 2011

The argument in Libya has been won by the Al Fateh revolution. There is now a glaring truth confronting the North Atlantic Terrorist Organization (NATO) – Muammar Qaddafi has handed out over one million kalashnikovs to the Libyan people. If he was the brutal dictator that NATO would have us believe him to be, then the armed population could have turned their guns on him and the revolutionary armed forces by now, especially as they would have NATO’s full backing if they did so.

Instead, on July 1st, more than a million Libyans, were in Green Square and the surrounding streets, to hear Muammar Qaddafi speak and to rally against NATO.

Chinese media put the number at 1.7 million and Intifada – Voice of Palestine website called it ‘the largest demonstration ever in world history’. The crowd chanted over and over again ‘We want Qaddafi’ while unveiling a green flag 6 kilometers long.

The Al Fateh revolution has given the Libyan people a taste of the dignity that comes with true independence and real sovereignty.

Unlike so many ‘Third World’ nation-states, Libya, under the leadership of Muammar Qaddafi, has been a surrogate of neither the East nor the West. The first thing that hits you when you step off the plane at Tripoli International Airport is that Libyans are firmly in control of their country. Libya is a power unto herself and Libyans are not taking kindly to NATO’s attempts at re-colonization.

What has developed in Libya is a conundrum for NATO. They may have imagined that with such vicious ongoing bombing raids, Qaddafi’s forces would have crumbled.

Instead, they have witnessed the opposite. In the face of this all out aggression, over 10,000 bombing raids and into its fifth month, the Libyan patriotic and revolutionary armed forces and the vast majority of Libyans have remained steadfast and loyal, defending their revolution and its leader.

There are even pro-Qaddafi rallies in Benghazi, and constant gun battles between pro-Qaddafi forces and the rebels in Benghazi and Misurata. In villages and towns, reportedly under rebel control, the green flag of the Al Fateh revolution can be seen flying from homes and public buildings. One thing is clear, if Qaddafi did not have mass support he could not be resisting this barbaric onslaught so effectively.

Every day the rebels reveal themselves to be mere surrogates of an imperialist plot to overthrow the Libyan revolution. They cannot call for health-care, housing, free education, subsidized food and a share in the oil wealth because they have all of that.

Residents in areas where the NATO backed rebels are in control, have reported that the rebels are looting stores and removing goods and food at gunpoint. There are also numerous reports of torture, rape and execution of captured pro-Qaddafi soldiers, Black Libyans and migrant workers from neighboring African countries.

The nature of the Benghazi rebels is best illustrated by events that occurred after rebels took control of the mountain village of Qawalish in Western Libya. Many of the villagers were forced to evacuate the area since, according to a report carried on July 10th, in the New York Times:

“All of the shops in the town had been ransacked, several homes were burned, and the town’s gas station, in fine condition when Qawalish fell, had been vandalized to the point of being dismantled. In building after building furniture was flipped over, dishes and mirrors shattered, and everything torn apart. Except for a few rebels roaming the streets in cars and trucks, the town was deserted – a shattered, emptied ghost town decorated with broken glass.”

There is no doubt that ‘the Coalition of Demons’, as Minister Louis Farrakhan has called them, has realized their grave mistake – if not out in the open, certainly behind closed doors. Having finally understood that the Benghazi rebels are not now, nor would they ever be in a position to take power in Libya, the ‘Coalition of Demons’ is crumbling, with major differences surfacing amongst members on how to proceed with this ill-fated mission impossible.

After spending billions of dollars at a time when their economies are in deep crisis and reeling from the cost of years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Europe and the US are now scrambling for a solution which will allow them to save face.

The French, who were the driving force behind the invasion of Libya, are now pressing for dialogue with Tripoli. On July 11th, in a report carried in Flash News Today, French Defense Minister, Gerard Longuet stated: “We’ll stop the bombing when the Libyans talk to each other and the military forces on all sides return to their barracks. They can talk to each other because we provide the proof that there is no solution by force”.

I wonder sometimes if these people actually hear themselves. No matter what disdainful spin Gerard Longuet tries to put on the situation, he can never convince us that the purpose of this mission was an exercise to prove that this conflict could not be resolved by force.

The truth is that the French, British and Americans, in their arrogance and ignorance, believed that toppling Qaddafi and rolling back the Libyan revolution would be a push over and now they are trying everything to avoid admitting an all out defeat.

In addition to the death and destruction caused by this French, British and US barbaric adventurism, an estimated 150,000 people have been forced to flee Libya, many of them African migrant workers. These refugees, who were working in Libya and supporting their families in other parts of Africa, now find themselves sleeping in parks in Italy and France.

With an estimated 23 million men and women unemployed in Europe, a figure that is expected to increase in the coming months as the capitalist crisis deepens, the situation for these refugees is disastrous.

NATO picked on a country that has experienced a profound political and social revolution for the past 40 plus years. The majority of Libyans only know life in the Jamahiriya and have lived in its dignity, comfort and calm all their lives, causing many of them to perhaps become complacent, taking much of what they had for granted.

However, there is no doubt that their revolutionary spirit has been reignited by NATO’s bombs and they are standing behind the Al Fateh revolution. As one female student from Al Fateh University put it, “Libya is our mother and Qaddafi is our father.”

NATO – North Atlantic Terrorist Organization

NATO is a terrorist organization. Originally created to check the spread of Soviet Communism into Western Europe, this European organization has now reinvented itself as an enforcer and defender of White supremacy. On a global crusade, NATO brutally enforces neo-colonialism worldwide under the guise of ‘spreading democracy’ and ‘humanitarian intervention’.

Since the onset of colonialism, hundreds of years ago, West Europeans have carried out a policy of genocide and plunder throughout the world. NATO comprises these same old tribes of Europe organized under a modern day umbrella.

The number of Iraqis slaughtered in the ongoing US war and occupation of Iraq – now in its ninth year, is estimated at 1,455,590, let alone the numbers murdered in Afghanistan, Somalia, Cote d’Ivoire and conflicts all over the world – set in motion either covertly or overtly by these terrorists. No people in the entire history of humanity have made war on all peoples and murdered more people than these North Atlantic Tribes. This is an historical fact.

Qaddafi – African Hero

Only leaders who are determined to live for their people are prepared to die for their people. Young Libyans from the Student Revolutionary Committees in the streets of Tripoli chant ‘Allah, Qaddafi, Libya’. The overwhelming majority of Libyans – young and old – love him. And then there is the massive outpouring of love and support that has come from every corner of the globe, where people, organizations and liberation movements, all of whom have received assistance from him at one time or other, have raised their voices against NATO’s unprovoked aggression.

But nowhere is Qaddafi loved more than in Africa. His genuine commitment to our liberation is known to all Africans. African youth support his vision. Rappers have called him ‘African Hero’.

Tuaregs and freedom fighters from all over the continent have joined with the Libyan people to defend Tripoli. The Pan-African movement has been re-energized. It is no accident that it took an attack on the man who said ‘The Black race shall prevail throughout the world’, to galvanize the movement which is capable of bringing about the dream of Garvey and Nkrumah, a dream which Muammar Qaddafi has pursued at his own peril.

Tingba Muhammad, in an excellent article in The Final Call, made the following indisputable points:

“Since he came to leadership in that oil-rich nation in 1969, Col. Qaddafi has amassed a record of accomplishment for Black Africa unmatched in modern history. Using his nation’s oil revenues, he has set the exploited former Italian colony firmly on the road to true independence… those who take the time to look past the litany of white lies about Qaddafi will be introduced to a man whose progressive record of accomplishments very well may be unmatched by ANYONE who has ever led a nation in modern times. And this is not hyperbole! We will take it further: If this man—Muammar Qaddafi—ever ran for president of America with a résumé like his, we dare say EVERY American would not only vote for him, but would angrily trash the 22nd amendment to the Constitution to allow him to serve forever!”

‘Wathint Abafazi Wathint Imbokotho’ – ‘You Strike a Woman, You Strike a Rock’

The women of Libya are taking a leading role in defending the gains of the revolution. Under the leadership of Muammar Qaddafi they have been able to realize their own emancipation, which is uniquely Libyan and not based on the Eurocentric notions of Western feminism.

They are amongst the most highly educated female population in Africa and the Arab world. They are free to dress with or without the headscarf, because Qaddafi understands that Islam cannot be enforced by a ‘moral police force’, harassing and beating people in the streets for not dressing in hijab and not praying on time.

Adhering to the edict articulated by Prophet Muhammad, stating that ‘there can be no compulsion in religion’, Qaddafi knows that the only way forward is to raise the consciousness of the people.

What protects the Islamic tradition and way of life in Libya is that their very liberation is derived from the true emancipatory spirit of Islam. They have been able to hold onto their traditions, while shedding the reactionary pre-Islamic residue that permeates so much of the Muslim world. No one is clearer than the women of Libya about what to expect from the backward, al-Qaeda inspired Benghazi counter-revolutionaries, and they are having none of it.

Sarkozy – the Wicked Pied Piper

NATO is arming and fighting alongside al Qaeda in Libya after telling the world for years that al Qaeda is the single largest threat to their national security.

At the same time, they continue to claim that they are fighting al Qaeda in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and Somalia. This might seem like a contradictory and confused foreign policy however, it is classical Machiavellian policy at play and nobody plays Machiavellian politics better than Europeans.

War criminal, Henry Kissinger, summed it up many years ago when he said: “We do not have permanent friends or permanent enemies – we only have permanent interests.”

Obama, Cameron, Berlusconi and other European leaders were led on a merry dance by French president and white supremacist, Sarkozy.

His real reason for France’s frantic move against Libya was his government’s embarrassing failure to save their minion, Zinedine Ben Ali in Tunisia, in an election year. We know this man Sarkozy by his actions and his words. He is on record as saying, in true Hegelian spirit, that:

“The tragedy of Africa is that the African man has never really entered history. The African peasant has known only the eternal renewal of time via the endless repetition of the same actions and the same words. In this mentality, where everything always starts over again, there is no place for human adventure or for any idea of progress.” He added: “Africa’s problem is that its present is permeated with nostalgia for the paradise of its lost childhood….”

They call it Democracy – we know it as Hypocrisy

Muammar Qaddafi has handed out kalashnikovs to an entire people. Libya is one of maybe only two countries in the world – the other being Cuba – that could arm their people under these circumstances. Why?

Could Sarkozy, Cameron, Obama, or for that matter the Sheikdoms in the Arab world who have lined up against Qaddafi, hand out kalashnikovs like pancakes to their populace under the same circumstances? I think not.

In fact, in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia was called on to invade and brutally suppress the rebellion. The Bahraini ruling family is certainly not arming the people.

When the Saudis brutally suppressed the uprising in Bahrain, not a word was uttered from the ‘international community’ – international community being a euphemism for the US and Western Europe. And if a few words were uttered by Hillary Clinton, it was done for the sake of protocol and meant nothing.

Kwame Ture Speaks

The great Pan-African revolutionary, Kwame Ture, was a frequent visitor to Libya. He was a member of the World Mathaba based in Tripoli and a vocal supporter of the Al Fateh revolution. He led a worldwide campaign to break the unjust sanctions placed on Libya in the 90s and worked tirelessly to promote Nkrumah and Qaddafi’s vision of a united and truly independent Africa.

He made an interesting point about the double standards that the West applied when dealing with Africa, which is particularly relevant to what is happening in Libya today.

He observed that when sections of society in Europe or the United States disagree, even violently disagree, it is called pluralism and this is said to be a vital ingredient of their democracy.

It is never said that the US is undemocratic because they disagree–on the contrary it is, according to them, what makes it democratic. Our people on the other hand are not allowed to have differences or disagreements. When we do, it is called disunity and dissent, never pluralism.

When revolutionary leaders defend their revolutions against counter-revolutionary uprisings they are called brutal dictators. The contradiction is that throughout the history of the United States, any uprising against America’s injustice has always been suppressed violently, and Kwame would remind us that he was one that knew this from personal experience.

The Libyan rebels make up an estimated 2 percent of the entire Libyan population. What is the percentage of people who disagreed with George W. Bush or who now disagree with Barak Obama? In fact, Bush only received 50.7 percent of the US citizens’ vote and Obama only 52.9 percent. There is a great deal of dissent there.

In the Green Book, Muammar Qaddafi has this to say:

“Political struggle which culminates in the victory of a candidate obtaining 51 percent of the total votes of the electorate, establishes a dictatorship in the seat of power garbed in the guise of democracy. It is in fact, a dictatorship because 49 percent of the electorate would then be governed by an instrument of government they did not vote for, and which has been imposed upon them. This is the essence of dictatorship…under such systems the people are the victims whose votes are vied for by exploitative competing factions, who dupe the people into political circuses that are outwardly noisy and frantic, but inwardly powerless and irrelevant.”

Western Fallacies

Let us put one fallacy to rest forever – Europeans do not have a monopoly on the theory and practice of democracy. It is not my intention here to enter into what is a huge discussion of what constitutes democracy. Suffice to say, that Western Europe and the US, which continue to this day to brutally enforce their undemocratic systems of colonialism, neo-colonialism and capitalism worldwide, are not in either a moral or historical position to lecture the world on what is or is not democratic.

Those who promote democracy, European and US style, must be aware that the Fathers of the American revolution excluded the indigenous peoples and the captured Africans from their ‘democratic’ project. Same with the French revolutionaries, who in 1789 were proclaiming ‘liberty, equality and fraternity’, but were not prepared to extend these principles to the captured Africans working their plantations in the Caribbean.

However fallacious the Western notion of democracy may be, the only thing that matters from an African perspective is that the West is prevented from continuing to impose this fallacious notion on us. They can, as far as we are concerned, have whatever political system they choose. The point is, so can we as Africans. This is what we are fighting for – our inalienable right to self-determination – to freely decide our own destiny.

That is what it means to finally throw off the yoke of colonialism and imperialism, and that is what Libya dared to do under the leadership of Muammar Qaddafi. And Qaddafi dared to extend this vision to the entire African continent.

In the words of the Afrocentric intellectual warrior, Dr Molefi Kete Asante:

“The work of the Brother Leader, as he is sometimes called, has been to raise African consciousness to the point that some of the nations on the continent of Africa begin to reject the loyalty they hold for their colonial masters…Qaddafi has proposed that Africa do away with travel restrictions, create a common currency and ease trade tariffs and barriers. This African solidarity is not only a threat to the West – some who identify as Arabs have a difficult time accepting the Africanity promoted by Qaddafi.”

The battle for African self-determination did not start in Libya or with Qaddafi – it is a very long battle stretching back to the earliest incursions into Africa. And it is not the first time that Africans have faced such a sophisticated and deadly European attack – we can look way back at the battle of Isandlwana in 1879, where the arrogant British army, one of the most technologically advanced in the world at that time, was humbled by the Zulu fighters under the leadership of the great African king, Cetshwayo.

What this ‘Coalition of Demons’ currently attacking Libya, armed with the most sophisticated weaponry known to humankind, is slowly coming to realize, is that they could well be defeated by the will of the Libyan people armed with their faith, revolutionary consciousness and kalashnikovs.

Fear of a Black Planet

‘Up you mighty race, you can accomplish what you will’ – Marcus Garvey

‘The Black race shall prevail throughout the world’ – Muammar Qaddafi

This is a defining moment for Africa and Africans all over the world. It is a moment in history that we must seize.

Africans on the continent and throughout the Diaspora were recently given a tiny glimpse of the kind of power that Africa can possess, when Jean Ping, speaking on behalf of the African Union, directed all member states to ignore the ICC’s (International Colonial Court) call for Qaddafi’s arrest. Jean Ping stated that “the ICC is discriminatory because it only pursues Africans. The Hague-based court ignores crimes committed by Western powers in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan”. Thank you, Jean Ping.

However, it is the African youth on the continent and in the Diaspora that are leading and inspiring us towards true independence. Tendai Wenyika, Deputy General Secretary of the Pan-African Youth Union, addressing the recent AU Heads of State summit in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea called on African leaders to:

“demand the arrest of the likes of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy, who through their unprovoked war have violated the supreme tenets of the Nuremburg Principles and committed the crime of all crimes…We call for the suspension of all engagements with NATO, and Africa must begin to strengthen its internal ties, security and trade mechanisms in order for us to prosper.”

As I have stated in previous articles, there is nothing that White Power fears more than a united Africa. They know that a united Africa would completely alter the balance of power globally. The well-documented fact is that if Africa stopped the flow of all resources and raw materials to the Western nations for just one week, the United States and Europe would grind to a halt.

In 2007, in Conakry Guinea, Qaddafi made a simple observation to a cheering crowd of thousands:

“Whenever I ask people about Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola people immediately say it’s an American or European drink. This is not true. The kola is African. They have taken the cheap raw material from us, they’ve made it into a drink, and they sell it back to us for a high price. We should be producing it ourselves and selling it to them.”

If only Africa could realize its immense power. Realizing this power is primarily a psychological transition, since the material facts are overwhelmingly clear. Almost every known natural resource needed to run the contemporary industrial economies—such as uranium, gold, copper, cobalt, coltan (for cell phones, video games, laptops), platinum, diamonds, bauxite, and especially large reserves of oil are located in Africa. Azania (South Africa) alone contains half the world’s gold reserves. Democratic Republic of Congo contains half of the world’s cobalt and 80 percent of the world’s known coltan reserves. One quarter of the world’s aluminum ore is found in the coastal belt of West Africa and the continent is awash in petroleum reserves.

Time for ‘us’ to put sanctions on ‘them’

It is time to stop the flow of these strategic resources to the Western capitals until they meet our demands. Yes, it is time for us to sanction the Western capitals. The Global Pan-African Movement and the African masses are crying out for it – the time is now. Africans everywhere must exert maximum pressure on their leaders to realize this power, as Muammar Qaddafi dared to, or move aside.

But how would we survive if we were to sanction these Western capitals? I can hear the detractors cry. Answer: there are huge emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil who will be only too happy to pick up the slack.

Already this is the West’s greatest fear: In an article titled, ‘Wen calls for more Access for Africa’, which appeared in 2007 in the Financial Times, W. Wallis and G. Dyer, wrote:

“Western powers real concern is that African States will opt for Chinese deals to free themselves from the punitive conditions of IMF/ World Bank loans and other forms of financial dependence on Europe and the Unites States. As the second largest source of oil in Africa, Angola is now in such a strong position that it is rejecting IMF loans completely. As one consultant put it, with all their oil revenue, they don’t need the IMF or the World Bank. They can play the Chinese off the Americans.”

In another article, ‘China and the USA in a new cold war over Africa’s oil riches: Darfur? It’s the oil, stupid…’ William Engdahl points out:

“Today China draws an estimated 30% of its crude oil from Africa. That explains an extraordinary series of diplomatic initiatives which have left Washington furious. China is using no-strings-attached dollar credits to gain access to Africa’s vast raw material wealth, leaving Washington’s typical control game via the World Bank and IMF out in the cold. Who needs the painful medicine of the IMF when China gives easy terms and builds roads and schools to boot?”

What does all this mean for Africa? Quite simply it means that we now have a choice in trading partners, and although all trading partners drive a hard bargain – some are giving better deals than others.

Black Power – African Power!

This is the moment to put all our efforts into the realization of Nkrumah and Qaddafi’s grand plan for a United States of Africa. A strong and truly independent Africa, with one government, one defense force and one currency based on our African gold standard as Qaddafi has proposed. Only when we can achieve this level of unity and power, will we be able to take our rightful place in the world. Only then can we say that the time is finally over when Africa must run from one power broker to another to do our bidding. At last we will be able to do our own bidding on our own terms. Backed by a population of 1 billion people, Africa will then be able to make demands that cannot be ignored.

In 2009, at a meeting of the AU in Addis Ababa, Qaddafi, commenting on European and US attitudes to Africa, had this to say: ‘If they do not want to live with us fairly, then they should know it is our planet and they can go to another planet.’

Fair and just is all we are seeking – only the unfair and unjust have anything to fear from a Black planet.

Gerald A. Perreira is a founding member of the Guyanese organizations, Joint Initiative for Human Advancement and Dignity and Black Consciousness Movement Guyana (BCMG). He lived in Libya for many years, served in the Green March, an international battalion for the defense of the Libyan revolution and was an executive member of the World Mathaba based in Tripoli.

Copyright © Gerald A. Perreira, Libya 360, 2011

Friday, July 15, 2011


JP Morgan is king of the derivatives. It created the first derivative. It started the business. It is consistently at the top of the list for exposure. And has benefitted enormously from the crisis that derivatives has caused.

So how did that benefit arise?

JP Morgan was one of a handful of banks intimately linked to Bilderberg, such as Goldman Sachs, who during the recent financial crisis rose like a phoenix from the ashes while others burned to a cinder. Their market share grew as they stole customers from their failing competitors.

But they also received billions and billions and billions in bailouts while others in equal dire straits did not. The bailouts were administered selectively so that the Bilderberg banks survived and grew stronger while their competitors were allowed to go under. This occured because Bilderberg had carefully placed its men in key positions; Bernanke at The (Very Well) Fed, and Geithner at The Treasury.

And it was this kind of corruption that arranged for JP Morgan to buy up Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns at near bargain basement prices following some well placed rumours of insolvency etc.

But how does JP Morgan evaluate its vast multitude of derivatives?

I am aware of at least one attempt by JP Morgan to use the high performance computing (HPC) facilities at Edinburgh University for derivative evaluation when those HPC facilities are supposed to be used for scientific research by the UK scientific community. How this was allowed to occur I don't know.

But the following article reports that JP Morgan has taken a great interest in HPC. The aforementioned experiment at Edinburgh used a cluster of CPUs. JP Morgan subsequently bought a few such clusters. They then looked at Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), which I am using for my research in CFD, and found them to be 15x faster than the CPU clusters. But JP Morgan have now invested heavily in Field Programmable Gate Arrays, finding that they can provide over 200x speed up over the CPU clusters. They have subsequently bought a 20% stake in the company who implemented the FPGA solution, to obviously control who gets this technology.

It remains to be seen if the underlying mathematical theory of derivatives is at fault to cause such a financial crisis, or as JP Morgan believe it was the speed at which variables can be calculated, hence the investment in FPGAs, that was at fault, or if there is just some plain old simple corruption and swindling going on, maybe all three, for JP Morgan and their Bilderberg bretheren to grow stronger. But for someone like me who is interested in the Null World Order and who also has an interest in how HPC can accelerate research and applications, this report is very interesting indeed.


July 13, 2011

JP Morgan Buys Into FPGA Supercomputing

Michael Feldman

One of the largest financial institutions in the world is using FPGA-based supercomputing for analyzing some of its largest and most complex credit derivative portfolios. JP Morgan, along with Maxeler Technologies, has built and deployed a state-of-the art HPC system capable of number-crunching the company's collateralized debt obligation (CDO) portfolio in near real-time.

CDOs are instruments in which the credit assets are divided into different bundles or tranches, according to their relative risk of default. During the credit crisis of 2007-2008, CDO valuation tanked as the value of the underlying assets, mostly mortgages, fell off a cliff. Part of the problem was that many of the computer models didn't assess the risk parameters of the various mortgages correctly. The less obvious aspect was that these instruments were so complex that it was difficult for the models using traditional computer technology to analyze these portfolios effectively.

With the credit crisis in full swing in 2008, Stephen Weston joined JP Morgan's London office, heading up a team devoted to making the company's financial algorithms and models run more effectively. In what started out as a blue-sky technology project almost three years ago, Weston's group has implemented a production-ready solution that speeds up the company's CDO risk models by a factor of more than 130. "This, to us, is a step change," said Weston, talking about the project during a presentation at Stanford University in May.

Execution time was the critical factor. Prior to the FPGA solution, JP Morgan's main risk model for analyzing their CDO portfolio took 8 to 12 hours to complete -- an overnight run requiring a cluster of thousands of x86 cores. If the model failed to execute correctly, there was no time to resubmit the application for that day. Worse yet, the credit risks and valuation are in constant flux. That snapshot of the previous day may no longer be useful. "It was a bit like driving your car on the freeway at 90 miles per hour by looking in the rear view mirror," said Weston. "It could be fun, but there's a high probability it could be a destructive activity."

With the speedup, the same risk model took four minutes, with the FPGA processing eating up just 12 seconds of that. It's not just that they could run the models faster though. The better performance allowed them to run multiple trading/risk scenarios throughout the day. So traders can evaluate more scenarios using different combinations of default criteria. In a nutshell, the time compression allowed JP Morgan to get a better handle on the risk profile of their CDO assets.

In general, porting legacy applications like these financial risk models to FPGAs is no small task. Programming them with low-level VHDL, the traditional programming language of FPGAs, is time-consuming, tedious, and generally unsuited for application developers. Weston knew that it would be a tough sell to convince the quants and management types at the company that this could be a viable solution for a production environment.

In fact, initially JP Morgan looked at GPUs for acceleration. They ported one of their models to the graphics architecture and were able to get a 14- to 15-fold performance boost. But they thought they could do even better with FPGAs. The problem was that it was going to take about 6 months for an initial port. That's when they went to Maxeler and initiated a proof-of-concept engagement with them.

Maxeler is a London-based technology vendor specializing in FPGA acceleration for high performance computing applications. Unlike most FPGA vendors though, Maxeler offers a vertically integrated solution: hardware, high-level compilers (Java), runtime support, development tools, and FPGA porting expertise. As such, the company is able to meet application programmers on their own turf and help them navigate the eccentricities of FPGA software development. At least, that's Maxeler's pitch.

With JP Morgan, it all seemed to work. With Maxeler's help, Weston's group was able to port the time-critical, compute-intensive pieces of their C++ risk model (the Copula and Convoluter kernels, in particular) to the FPGA platform in about 3 months. The end result was something Weston felt was sustainable for their production environment.

Part of the effort to port to risk model involved redesigning the original C++ code, which was chock full of templates and objects. Those languages structures are great for application abstraction, said Weston, but they effectively kill parallelism, and thus performance. So the first phase of the code migrations was to remove all uses of classes, templates, and other C++ abstractions that got in the way of parallelization.

With the lower level code exposed, it became much simpler to tease out the parallelism that could be exploited by the FPGAs. In this case, the flattened C++ source was ported to Java, which the Maxeler compiler is able to convert to VHDL.

Hardware-wise, the final target system is a 40-node hybrid HPC cluster from Maxeler. Each node houses eight Xeon cores hooked up to two Xilinx Virtex-5 (SX240T) FPGAs via PCIe links. Memory is split between the CPU (24GB) and the two FPGAs (12 GB each). Two terabytes of hard disk storage are hung off an Ethernet connection.

The advantage of the FPGA is that it is built for parallelism and allow the application to be intimately mapped onto the hardware. The devices are especially suited to applications that can exploit fine-grained parallelism and very deep pipelines. Unlike linear computations on fast CPUs (~2.6 GHz), parallel computation on slower FPGAs (~200 MHz) can yield many more calculations per watt. As Weston put it, "We went from computing in time to computing in space."

Right now the company is in the final stages of the project to integrate it with the rest of their production infrastructure. They are also looking to move the technology into other areas of their business like FX trading and high frequency trading, and in some cases are seeing even better performance improvements. Their Monte Carlo model, for example, was able to realize a 260- to 280-fold speedup using FPGA acceleration.

Apparently JP Morgan feels bullish enough about the technology to warrant a direct investment. In March, they acquired a 20 percent stake in Maxeler for an undisclosed amount. Although the investment is probably just a rounding error for the financial giant, it signals company's interest in making sure Maxeler's intellectual assets are intact.

There is certainly plenty of room to expand the Maxeler footprint at JP Morgan. To run all aspects of their financial business, the company currently has 14 thousand applications running on 50 thousand servers spread across more than 42 datacenters worldwide. Only a fraction of those applications will be amenable to acceleration, but each one has the potential to raise the company's bottom line.

"If we can compress the space, the time and the energy required to do these calculations, then it has hard business value for us," noted Weston. "It gives us, ultimately, a competitive edge."

Copyright © 1994-2011 Tabor Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


There is even more wrong-doing of the powerful now being plotted and schemed this very moment at BeHomo Bohemian Grove.

Men will be served and serviced by young men.

They will attend a mock human sacrifice in front of a large owl called Moloch and cheer it on.

They will make deals and reach agreements that will affect the whole world.

And we don't have any input whatsoever.

Yet more wrong-doing of the powerful that is not being reported.


"The wrong-doing of the powerful" is a phrase used today by multiple Bilderberger Martin Wolf, the associate editor of the Financial Times. Wolf has written in the FT that we should seize the chance that has now arisen due to the current outrage caused by the News of the World and restructure the media in this sceptred isle.

My preliminary views are that: the privacy of the powerless needs more protection and the wrong-doing of the powerful far less; redress against malicious coverage needs to be tougher, while preserving freedom of expression; rules on cross-ownership of media should be far tighter, with the mooted position of News International in both newspapers and television ruled out, a priori; the country should continue to support the BBC through stable funding, because it defines the notion of a public weal; and we should consider whether the public good of high-quality news gathering and analysis deserves public support.

[source : Seize the chance for media reform, FT, 14/07/2011]

This apparent call by Wolf for a new kind of media in Great Britain is astonishing, and quite hypocritical.

Wolf has attended the globalist elite meeting of all globalist elite meetings, Bilderberg, as has his FT colleague Gideon Rachman, on several occasions, and neither have written of "the wrong-doing of the powerful", of the plotting and scheming for global enslavement, war, mass genocide and fascist world government that Bilderberg dreams of.

We do indeed need a new media in Great Britain, and we could start by making it illegal for reporters to attend Bilderberg without reporting what wrong-doing the powerful are plotting and scheming against the ordinary law-abiding taxpaying muggins British man and woman in the street. This crime would be punishable with ten years in the same cell as Josef Fritzl.

Thursday, July 14, 2011


A few days ago the undead George Soros wrote in the FT that Europe needs a Plan B. In his article Soros brazenly states that the Europe of today was planned immediately after WW2 and that the planners of then knew that the Europe of today would have to be created by stealth.

The European Union was brought into existence by what Karl Popper called “piecemeal social engineering”. A group of far-sighted statesmen, inspired by the vision of a United States of Europe, recognised that this ideal could be approached only gradually, by setting limited objectives, mobilising the political will needed to achieve them and concluding treaties that required states to surrender only as much sovereignty as they could bear politically. That is how the postwar Coal and Steel Community was transformed into the EU – one step at a time, understanding that each step was incomplete and would require further steps in due course.

The EU’s architects generated the necessary political will by drawing on the memory of the second world war, the threat posed by the Soviet Union and the economic benefits of greater integration.

Soros then begins to express his concern for the disintegration of Europe, and that Europe's leaders are defending the status quo instead of forging ahead with building the Bilderberg European Project (or should that be nightmare?)

If this seemingly inexorable process [of disintegration] is to be arrested and reversed, both Greece and the eurozone must urgently adopt a plan B. A Greek default may be inevitable, but it need not be disorderly. And, while some contagion will be unavoidable – whatever happens to Greece is likely to spread to Portugal, and Ireland’s financial position, too, could become unsustainable – the rest of the eurozone needs to be ringfenced. That means strengthening the eurozone, which would probably require wider use of Eurobonds and a eurozone-wide deposit-insurance scheme of some kind.

Soros ends his pro-European nightmare rant with this rallying cry to "True Europeans" to be as bold and as forward looking as Karl Popper and his ilk, and seek a "European solution" instead of national solutions.

Generating the political will would require a plan B for the EU itself. The European elite needs to revert to the principles that guided the union’s creation, recognising that our understanding of reality is inherently imperfect, and that perceptions are bound to be biased and institutions flawed. An open society does not treat prevailing arrangements as sacrosanct; it allows for alternatives when those arrangements fail.

It should be possible to mobilise a pro-European silent majority behind the idea that when the status quo becomes untenable, we should look for a European solution rather than national ones. “True Europeans” ought to outnumber true Finns and other anti-Europeans in Germany and elsewhere.

So what is a "True European"?

To me a "True European" is a sneaky, manipulating, lying traitor. Soros openly states in the first paragraph of his pro-European nightmare rant that the original architects of the EU nightmare knew their end goal was a United States of Europe but knew that such a union would not be accepted by the general European public so the union had to be created by stealth, by "piecemeal social engineering", i.e. manipulation and lies.

When Europeans, in an open society, have been given the opportunity and asked in a referendum if they wanted to join the EU/Euro they have clearly told the sneaky, manipulating, lying traitors to f off. But the sneaky, manipulating, lying traitors cannot take no for an answer so held another referendum and offered fake promises of riches and prosperity and streets paved with gold, and eventually got their yes.

Now look at Europe; a total complete fucked up continent in a twilight zone, neither a United States of Europe nor a set of independent but cooperating sovereign states, drowning in trillions of unpayable debt.

The Bilderberg European dream is the ordinary European's nightmare.

Anything the undead Soros supports cannot be good for the ordinary taxpaying law-abiding European man and woman in the street. It is time to dump the idea of a united Europe with a single currency in the bin.

[source : True Europeans now need a ‘plan B’, FT, 11/07/2011]


I hereby declare The New World Order to be null.

The Null World Order has been at war through the NArco Terrorist North Africa Takeover Organisation with a 69 year old man in Libya for months. He is still in power. They said it would take days. But the days turned into weeks. The weeks turned into months. And he is still there. They pretended the war was to save civilians. Instead they have killed hundreds of innocent civilian men, women and children, including his grandchildren, and eventually declared the real aim of the war is regime change.

But the 69 year old man is still there.

We know their plans.

We know their modus operandi.

The Null World Order is indeed null.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011


George Soros did us Brits in a massive swindle in 1992, for which he was given permission to do so otherwise he would have been got decades ago. But instead of being got Soros, with the loot he swindled, has been helping to drive the agenda to enslave us all, just like Soros helped the Nazis.

Soros finances euthanasia and drug legalisation. The euthanasia is part of the eugenics agenda to exterminate the useless eaters. The drug legalisation is designed to dumb us down even more as world government is implemented.

If Murdoch can be got, so can Soros.


Release it.

Let it fly.

Unchain the anger.

Unleash that outrage at what has been done to our fathers, grandfathers, greatgrandfathers who fought in engineered world wars, and for what?


This engineered financial crisis that is robbing us all blind?

All these taxes to finance world government "save the planet"?

All these laws to obstruct worthy legitimate protest?

All these semi-secret elitist societies plotting and scheming?

All these cover ups of high level paedophiles?

All these chemicals and GM being purposely placed into the food chain to dumb us down?

All these false flag terror attacks for war and police state laws?

Let them know that you know 9/11 was an inside job.

Let them know that you know of their financial frauds.

Let them know you want your children to grow up healthy, educated and free of oppression and mind control.

If it's in you let it out...before it's too late.


It has been a month since my last post. I have been quite ill, and am still not fully recovered but on the mend, and am now strong enough to resume blogging. Hence, a slight return.

I listened to Alex Jones last night for the first time in weeks. What an inspiration he is! I wish he would set aside at least 10 minutes per show to go off on a rant. We need passionate, accurate, inspiring rants. I wish I could speak like he does. Perhaps I could because I have yet to try. I certainly feel like he does, and have thought about starting a political party which would require the same deeply emotional oratory.

The current batch of corrupt wretches in the House of Commons need to understand the situation and have a reality check as soon as possible.

Note to MPs : You don't give warmongering genocidal satanist megalomaniacs the power to create money out of nothing so they can lend it out, and at interest!!

Not only is just plain stupid. It is suicidal.

At least they are now giving Murdoch a good kicking. Next on the list should be Soros, who may, as has been proposed by Alex, in a fit of panic be driving the attack on Murdoch to eliminate a rival. It is a good sign when they start to fight among themsleves, and even better when it is so public.

Dennis Skinner, one of my favourite MPs, proposed in the debate in the Commons a few days ago that the Energy Secretary should drive Murdoch to the airport and put him on the first plane to Australia.

But to my great disappointment we are still involved in stirring up regional wars, still being robbed blind and still apparently loving it.

Not me!

It has to stop, or the majority of us are doomed. It won't happen immediately. It won't happen next week. But it will start soon. Read their documents and writings. They want about a billion at most, perhaps half that, concentrated in megacities so we are much easier to control. At the moment we are dispersed, awakening and rebelling, and it is scaring the brown stuff out of them.

I still think Iran is the target, whether by direct attack, by proxy via Syria, or by a revolution. Kissinger and Soros have publicly stated this. At the moment they cannot be ignored. But perhaps their time has come and gone. Perhaps we can now ignore their arrogance. Perhaps we can write to them, phone them, protest their presence, start poking our fingers into their abdomen and face and tell them to f off before they walk the plank.

Yes. Perhaps it is now our time.