Wednesday, November 30, 2011


This is an artists impression of the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the event that triggered World War 1.

Like all false flag events the blame was not placed on the real culprits. In this case the real culprit was Freemasonry.

As a consequnce of this assassination, and some manipulation and deliberately created confusion, a series of treaties carefully engineered by Grand Master of The United Grand Lodge of England Prince Edward fell into place. Germany was tricked into invading Belgium on its way to Paris, and Great Britain, having indicated it would stay out of a war on the continent, promptly intervened citing an obscure treaty to defend Belgium.

This then led to a long war and slaughter in the trenches, which also involved Russia. Lenin was sent into Russia by Germany (the Warburgs and Rothschilds to be more precise), Trotsky was sent into Russia by Wall Street (Rothschilds etc), and Communism eventually took over Russia. Palestine was stolen by Great Britain and given to the Zionists in The Balfour Declaration. The first attempt at world government was made with The League of Nations. It failed.

Communism was further empowered by Wall Street, and the Lend-Lease program of FDR which became a large overt program after the flase flag attack on Pearl Harbor, which allowed the USA to relieve the USSR from the attack by the Nazis. Communism was further empowered after WW2 by being given China and Eastern Europe. Following the Holocaust world Jewry drove Palestinians from their homes and declared Eretz Israel, treating the Palestinians like shit ever since, and thus provoking Islamic fundamentalist terrorism, later nurtured in Londonistan with a Covenant of Security.

The second attempt was made at world government with The United Nations. It still exists but does not have absolute power over sovereign nations.

There was then a huge war by the USA in South East Asia to restrain Communism and hold it in check. NATO was created to restrain Communism and keep it in check in Europe.

Then in 1989 The Berlin Wall was pulled down. This allowed the formation of a United Germany and thus a United Europe. It also opened up Russia and the former Soviet Union for economic rape. Similarly for China.

Now both have taken the side of Islam in a Zionism v Islam conflict that has deepened since yet another false flag attack on 9/11.

A nuclear war, the final cataclysm, coupled with global financial chaos will provoke many calls for the imposition an all powerful world government with absolute power over sovereign nations, and an exhausted and confused human race will be unable to resist.

Purleaze don't tell me this all happened by accident.


Bilderberger and Foreign Secretary William Hague is in the House of Commons this afternoon talking about the storming of The British Embassy in Tehran yesterday.

I have been trying to get through to all that Iran has been the target of British and American intrigue for decades. We assisted Operation Ajax in overthrowing the very popular and democratically elected Mossadegh because he had the cheek to want to use Iranian oil for Iranians. For similar reasons Pahlavi was kicked out in the Iranian Revolution.

The latest reason for targetting Iran is because of an alleged nuclear weapons program. The forces behind war on Iran are the USA, Israel and the UK. There is no smoking gun evidence of this program, only hearsay, supposition and allegations from...the USA, Israel and the UK. The USA gave Iran nuclear technology in the first place. Meanwhile Israel has nukes.

The PNAC document Rebuilding America's Defenses lists Iraq and Iran as threats to American national security. Despite having no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11 and no evidence that Iraq had WMD the USA invaded Iraq.

The list of countries named by Israel in A Clean Break as threats to Israeli national security was expanded to include Libya, which has just been attacked after an engineered NATOlution.

Syria was also on that list.

But what takes war on Iran and Syria to a totally different level (the two are close allies and have stated they will defend the other) is that Russia and China are getting involved.

For whatever reason Russia and China abstained on UNSCR 1973, allowing war on Libya.

But for whatever reason they are drawing a line in the sand over Syria and Iran.

If either Syria or Iran is attacked, the other will join in. That will bring in Hezbollah and Hamas. All these will attack Israel from all sides. Perhaps the grand idea of installing Islamists in Libya and Egypt is for them to turn on Israel when this war kicks off. Israel will use its nukes. Pakistan may then use their nukes. Russia and China on one side. The USA on the other.

This is no time to talk about "serious consequences" for an embassy being invaded. Nobody died, unlike in Operation Ajax and unlike what will happen if we do go to war. Some documents were stolen (I wonder what they reveal?). That's all.

Perhaps if our insane and morally bankrupt leaders stopped committing false flag terror attacks and killing their own people so they can start threatening other nations with war and bloody revolutions then their embassies might not get invaded.

Hague has to go immediately so his ignorant belligerence is removed from the international scene to avoid a World War 3 planned 150 years ago.


It's getting dark now. We're going to have to switch the lights on soon. Those lights are going to be switched on tonight anyway. We need the light.

But who invented the cheap and abundant electric light bulb to bring us that light? Who thinks of that intelligent hard working member of the human race?

He was Thomas Edison. He patented other everyday inventions besides the light bulb.

But he wrote in the New York Times on 6th December 1921 about money.

We as a nation borrow money. That's what Cap'n Oik was talking about yesterday when he announced even more savage Bilderberg fascist austerity. Many more British families will lose their income and possibly accommodation because, they say, "we have to pay our debts".

But why do we borrow when just like the bankers we can create or invent our own money?

Edison wrote:
If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20 per cent, whereas the currency pays nobody but those who directly contribute to Muscle Shoals in some useful way.

...It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay; but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people. If the currency issued by the Government were no good, then the bonds issued would be no good either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to increase the national wealth, must go into debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious values of gold.

Look at it another way. If the Government issues bonds, the brokers will sell them. The bonds will be negotiable; they will be considered as gilt edged paper. Why? Because the government is behind them, but who is behind the Government? The people. Therefore it is the people who constitute the basis of Government credit. Why then cannot the people have the benefit of their own gilt-edged credit by receiving non-interest bearing currency on Muscle Shoals, instead of the bankers receiving the benefit of the people’s credit in interest-bearing bonds?

This is just plain common sense, isn't it?

European nations are currently under attack by the banks, driving bond rates up and up, buying and selling bonds, speculating, leading to elected leaders being replaced by unelected leaders, who are coincidentally very good friends of the banks. And of course, to add to this insanity are the most insane facts of all; the money does not exist and the banks create the money out of thin air!

The banks simply create money out of thin air and we then borrow it and at interest!

Absolutely freakin' insane!

Why do we borrow when we can create?

There is no magical alchemy involved. Numbers are simply typed into a computer, or a computer program simply creates them.

There is no magical alchemy involved in creating money out of thin air. It's perhaps the most simplest easiest thing to do in the world.

Why do we allow our lives to be dictated by warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniac bankers who want the human population level reduced to between 1/2 and 1 billion, most being virtual slaves with no rights to be policed by a brutal paramilitary force with powers to detain, torture and kill without evidence that a crime has been committed?



The Daily Mirror has today portrayed multiple Bilderberg attendee George Osborne as a naval captain driving HMS Britain onto the rocks.

I pictured Cap'n Oik dressed in a blue oilskin and Sou'wester, with a large pipe in his mouth steering a large wheel being battered by wind and rain, shouting into the storm, "There is no Plan B! Only Plan Bilderberg!".

The current financial crisis was engineered by Bilderberg and their banks, such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase.

They are taking over Europe. Merkel is theirs. Von Rumpoy and Barosso too. Also Dragi at the ECB. Now unelected Monti in Italy.

They are taking over the global economy via the IMF. Strauss-Kahn was theirs, until he reportedly rebelled, like Thatcher. Lagarde is.

Why is Bilderberg Cap'n Oik pushing such savage Bilderberg fascist austerity here?

What precisely is Plan Bilderberg? Savage fascist austerity everywhere?


I should have posted this yesterday. They don't make 'em like this anymore.

Mary House - Channel (Halleluja Remix)

Tuesday, November 29, 2011


This afternoon the corrupt wretches were shouting and pointing at each other about which island of savage Bilderberg fascist austerity HMS Titanoik should set sail for.

Growth forecasts down.

Jobless forecasts up.

Borrowing forecasts up (but from whom do we borrow, and why?).

Work harder for longer and for less.

But never mind. We're all in this together.

We're all on this ship of fools together, sailing from one island of savage Bilderberg fascist austerity to another but slightly different island of savage Bilderberg fascist austerity. No accurate and truthful explanations are given as to why we are taking this journey.



Lock up the Bilderberg bankers, their cheerleaders and supporters with Josef Fritzl (he'll sort 'em out).

Create our own new money for a new infrastructure; housing, road, rail, and hospitals and schools with nurses and teachers to fill them.

Abolish tax havens and hunt down tax avoiders and evaders.


They may not make tunes like they did anymore, but they sure as hell still make false flag attacks like they did.

In 1941 FDR wanted the USA to join in World War 2, as did Winston Churchill, but the rest of the USA didn't. On 25th November 1941 FDR met with Stimson, Hull, Knox, Marshall and Stark to discuss how to maneuver the Japanese into firing the first shot to give FDR the reason to join the war. Luckily for FDR the huge Japanese Navy managed to sail all the way across the Pacific allegedly and apparently unnoticed to attack Pearl Harbor. As a result the USA joined the war, fought for nearly four years, suffered many, many more casualties than it did in World War 1, and now accommodates a world government of sorts, The United Nations, having destroyed the first attempt at world government The League of Nations because it had not suffered many casualties in World War 1 and saw no need for a world government.

This is the USS Arizona sinking at Pearl Harbor.

Aah. That Pearl Harbor moment, when you can take your country into world war.

Nearly 60 years later and a bunch of warmongering Zionists called The Project for a New American Cemtury (PNAC) published a document called Rebuilding America's Defenses, in which they proposed war on Iraq and Iran but recognised that persuading the American public to support this would require
some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

Luckily for PNAC some planes were allegedly hijacked by some Muslims and were flown into not only the WTC but even The Pentagon! Yes, somehow the most powerful military on the planet went AWOL on the very day that allegedly some Muslims hijacked a few planes and killed nearly 3000 people, giving the reason to go to war. And even more lucky for the hijackers was the fact that the Secretary of Defense at the time Donald Rumsfeld was a member of PNAC and had quietly been given the sole power to issue a Stand Down order. The USA blamed Iraq for that attack and having WMD, and then invaded and bombed Iraq killing approximately a million Iraqi civilians.

This is UA175 about to fly unimpeded into WTC2. Where was the USAF? Ask PNAC member Donald Rumsfeld.

Since 9/11 the US military and intelligence has since been implementing and expanding upon a plan to attack a list of countries deemed threats to Israel. That list of seven countries consists of
and...Iran and Syria.


They don't make tunes like this anymore.

1991. When wars were small.

I remember 1991 well. I remember attending a meeting on the impending war on Iraq at Manchester Town Hall. It was when I first began to really question the motives for war, and everything else. It was the first time I marched in protest at anything. I got home to find pictures on my TV of bombs falling on Baghdad, and I wept. I knew something was seriously wrong and felt there was a lot more to everything I had learned at school and later from books and discussions on politics and history with friends, but didn't know what it was or where to find it.

Twenty years later, and many historical books and zaps later, and I am convinced, 100% convinced, that modern history has been following a plan proposed nearly 150 years ago for three world wars. And that this plan has been implemented by a cabal of warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs who we have very, very foolishly given the power to create money out of thin air.

In 1991 the war on Iraq was a huge topic. But for some reason, despite being portrayed as Satan incarnate, we left Saddam Hussein in power. And not only that we made him more powerful internally by betraying a revolution we encouraged against him. He brutally put down that uprising with barely a protest from us.

Today we are sleepwalking into a trap; World War 3.

So I'm going to be a bit nostalgic for more innocent times, when I didn't know what I know now.

I wonder what the people who heard these tunes in 1991 know now, and what they think of the state of current affairs.


Sonic Attack - Give Yourself To Me


The Cover Girls - Funk Boutique

Monday, November 28, 2011


How do they expect to get away with it?

With the frauds?

With the swindles?

With the looting?

Answer : world freakin' war!


The Occupy London movement camped at St Pauls and elsewhere across London has issued its demands.

And I'm absolutely 100% sure that 99% of the population will agree with them. The remaining 1% will be squirming in their gentlemen's clubs (or is it strip clubs today?), Mediterranean yachts, Ferraris etc.

The demands are
Globally, corporations deprive the public purse of hundreds of billions of pounds each year, leaving insufficient funds to provide people with fair living standards. We must abolish tax havens and complex tax avoidance schemes, and ensure corporations pay tax that accurately reflects their real profits.

Corporate lobbying subverts our democracy. Last year corporations spent £2 billion influencing the British government. We believe exploitative corporate lobbying has no place in a democratic society. Legislation to ensure full and public transparency of all corporate lobbying activities must be put in place. This should be overseen by a credible and independent body, directly accountable to the people.

The existing system of corporate sanctions allows executives and board members to avoid individual responsibility for the consequences of their actions and inactions. Those directly involved in the decision-making process must be held personally liable for their role in the misdeeds of their corporations and duly charged for all criminal behaviour.

[source : Occupy London calls for an end to tax havens, for lobbying transparency and personal accountability for executives,]


To add to our new national anthem, in which we honour our new bloodthirsty allies al Qaeda with the words Allah U Akbar, the new national flag has been unveiled. It accurately shows how wealth is distributed.

[image from False Economy,]

So to show how we are all in this together, me, you, al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood, The Syrian National Council, MeK in Iran, in fact any Islamic terrorist organistion, every morning this new flag should be raised over The Houses of Parliament, all Royal residences etc, to the tune of the new national anthem. So please be upstanding and salute!

God Save our gracious Queen
Long live our noble Queen
Allah U Akbar
Send her victorious
Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah U Akbar

Saturday, November 26, 2011


Cool heads are required for what is about to be unleashed on the generally unsuspecting human race.

Very cool heads.

Very, very cool heads.

It's not just for blatant provocations such as this latest needless killing of over 20 Pakistan troops on the Afghan border.

It's also the current financial collapse.

A significant minority know it is all engineered, to bring about a new world order.

Order from financial chaos.

Order from military chaos.

But that's all it is. A significant minority. But some of that significant minority are in very influential positions.

So it's not lost.

But neither is it game over for the detested warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs.

Just take a few deep breaths...

Aaaaand relax.


Remember Libya?

We just bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed it back to the stone age. The purpose was to save civilians, but oopsadaisy, we executed Gaddafi instead.

Since Gaddafi's very public execution there has been little media coverage of Libya. Yes, there was the obligatory victory salutes to Cameron and Sarkozy who flew there for the day in a blaze of glory and camera lights, and then got the hell outta there pretty sharpish. But media attention has moved swiftly on to the next victims of NATO's liberating love, Syria and Iran.

So what is happening in Libya today? Right now. This very second.

Besides the al Qaeda flags fluttering in the North African breeze, what is happening?

Apparently the Islamic terrorists are in charge, and the alleged new government is actually in virtual exile already seeking safety in Malta and Turkey!


Perhaps in response to Webster Tarpley's tour of Syria the week before last the BBC has sent its reporter Paul Wood to Homs in Syria. The BBC proudly boasts it is the first to send reporters to the area. You may have heard of Homs, and you should because it where the rebellion against the Syrian government is allegedly the strongest and the bloodiest.

But when I watched the reports filed by Wood I thought they supported the claims of the Syrian government.

The reports show
1. rebels smuggling weapons into Syria via Lebanon
2. rebels sniping at soldiers of the Syrian military

Also shown is a small protest (and it does looks small too) in Homs against the Syrian government. The Syrian Army is nowhere to be seen and so does not drown the protestors in a sea of bullets, as we have been led to believe happens, which is strange considering the protest is in the alleged centre of the rebellion in Homs where hundreds have allegedly been killed. Wood claims the protestors want military intervention but does not show any member of the public or Free Syrian Army saying this and it being translated.

Wood has so far filed three reports. The latest report can be watched at

Friday, November 25, 2011


Craig Murray is doing a very good job of trying to get to the bottom of the scandal surrounding Adam Werritty, Liam Fox and Matthew Gould. His Freedom of Information requests regarding Gould have been denied because, he was told almost immediately and very late at night, it would cost too much!

In his latest blog about this FoI denial Murray quotes statements from the House of Commons Public Administration Committee questioning of Sir Gus O'Donnell. Paul Flynn MP appears to be concerned about the cover up, and asks O'Donnell a few incisive questions, but is continually interrupted by another MP called Robert Halfon. The reason for this is given by Murray.
It is shocking but true that Robert Halfon MP, who disrupted Flynn with repeated points of order, receives funding from precisely the same Israeli sources as Werritty, and in particular from Mr Poju Zabludowicz. He also formerly had a full time paid job as Political Director of the Conservative Friends of Israel.

...It is now proven without doubt that O’Donnell lied blatantly about the number of Gould-Fox-Werritty meetings, and that Mossad was involved. And yet every single British mainstream media outlet still refuses to mention it.

I know from a mole that the plot involves a plan to attack Iran. For the cover-up to be so blatant and yet so comprehensively maintained, the secret at the heart of this conspiracy must be great, and those complicit must include a very large swathe of the British political and media establishment.

UPDATE: access to this blog is now blocked from FCO and Cabinet Office terminals. Very wise – truth can be contagious.

[source : Gould-Werritty: A Real Conspiracy, Not a Theory, ]

This drive for war on Iran is consistent with the theory that since 1996 a Zionist faction has been lusting for war on its neighbours. The warmongering document A Clean Break was written in 1996 for none other than Nuclear Netanyahu, and named Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria as the threats that should be addressed "to secure the realm".

But we must also note that the group containing the authors of A Clean Break later wrote Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000 as The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the so-called Neocons, and named Iraq and Iran as the major threats to American security, along with North Korea. That document recognised the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to convince the American public to go to war. 9/11 gave the Neocons that "new Pearl Harbor", and they have not wasted the opportunity, have they?

On 9/11 members of PNAC were in very influential positions. Both Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, founding members of PNAC, were in Washington DC on 9/11 while President George Bush was in Florida, and so they were effectively in charge. Just a few months before 9/11 the power to stand down the USAF was quietly transferred from the Pentagon and officers in the field to only the Secretary of Defense, ie PNAC founder Donald Rumsfeld.

But it goes much deeper than this.

Even before the WTC had collapsed there was a demand for proof that Iraq was behind the attacks of 9/11. Osama bin Marfan Laden was accused, rightly or wrongly, and a token invasion of a defenceless Afghanistan was made. But the real target was Iraq, named in both A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. One reason given for going after Iraq was WMD. But who had previously negotiated a sale of WMD to Iraq? Donald Rumsfeld. And who sold North Korea nuclear technology while on the board of ABB? Donald Rumsfeld.

So Donald Rumsfeld was a founding member of a pro-Israeli organisation which had written a document recognising the need for "a new Pearl Harbor" to go to war on threats to Israel, and on 9/11, when the United States Air Force was mysteriously AWOL, Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense with the sole power to issue a Stand Down order, and after 9/11 one of those threats to Israel, Iraq, was attacked because it had WMD which Rumsfeld sold to them. Iraq was invaded in 2003 and the USA is building its biggest ever embassy there. Coincidentally, Iraq has the 2nd largest proven reserves of oil.

Yes, this does stink a bit, doesn't it.

But there's more.

In February 2005 Rafik Hariri was assassinated in Beirut, Lebanon. Syria was initially accused and The Cedar Revolution, another of the CIA color revolutions, drove Syrian troops out of Lebanon. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) was created and has been accused of being a tool of the USA and Israel. The STL tried to prove Syria was responsible for Hariri's assassination but couldn't, and has since totally discredited itself now claiming that Hezbollah did it, a claim that has yet to be proven. Hezbollah has responded by showing intercepted communications from Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon showing that Israel was at the time following Hariri's movements very closely. Israel was at war on Lebanon and its innocent children in a contrived war in 2006.

So that's Iraq and Lebanon taken care of.

In 2004 the list containing Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon was amended to include Libya, Somalia and Sudan as the Greater Middle East Project, extending from North Africa to Pakistan. Libya was recently bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed by NATO, and there have been less high profile wars in Sudan and Somalia.

Now back to this war drive on Iran. Iran and Syria have publicly vowed to defend each other. If one is attacked the other will rain their missiles onto Israel. So starting a war on Syria will drag in Iran.

But it will also drag in Russia.

But is there much more to this drive for war on Iran from elements within the British political establishment?

As I point out on my website, the British establishment does "have form" when it comes to engineering world wars.

Germany was tricked into starting World War 1 by Great Britain. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was a Freemason plot run out of London. King George then told Kaiser Wilhelm that Britain would not join in a war on the Continent, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the BEF was sent into Northern France to stop Germany's advance to Paris. Wilhelm later wrote in his memoirs that a high ranking German Freemason told him that Freemasonry had engineered the war to destroy and then recreate Central Europe. The first attempt at world government was subsequently made as The League of Nations (LoN). The LoN failed because the USA voted out despite Woodrow Wilson touring the USA and almost killing himself in the process in a desperate attempt to convince America to join the LoN. Wilson had earlier created the abomination we know as The Federal Reserve.

The USA voted out of the LoN because although it had sent troops to France they only fought for less than a year and suffered few casualties. To convince the USA a world government was required the USA had to be embroiled in a much longer and bloodier war. So Hitler was brought forth by elements of Wall Street allied to the British ruling class. These same elements using the power given to them by The Federal Reserve also created the USSR to oppose Hitler. Hitler served two purposes. The first was to start another war on the European mainland and beyond to drag in the USA. The second was to scare Jews to Palestine, which he did eventually. Despite being apparent enemies FDR conspired with Churchill to get the USA involved in WW2. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was provoked and allowed to happen, and the USA then fought for nearly four years all over the world. Unsurprisingly, a world government of sorts The United Nations was created after WW2 and its HQ is in the USA. The UN has some global power but not absolute dictatorial global power. Not yet, anyway.

After WW2 the Holocaust convinced a sceptical world Jewry that creating Eretz Israel in Palestine was the only way to save Judaism, so they brutally drove the Palestinians off their land into the largest refugee camps in the world, Gaza and The West Bank. This and subsequent Zionist behaviour has provoked many Arabs and Muslims into terrorism, which has been nurtured and guided by the CIA and MI6, particularly in London, also known as Londonistan.

All this follows the diabolical plan for three world wars to create a tyrannical world government proposed by Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike in 1871.

9/11 was the trigger for the final world war to be between Zionism and Islam, with the the rest of the world being dragged in having been divided by the issue of Palestine for decades. The USA is now in a confident war mood, following recent success in Iraq and Libya, and is now threatening Syria and Iran and also Pakistan. Syria is backed by Russia. Pakistan is backed by China.

Senator Mike Gravel recently suggested a sequence of events if Iran or Syria is attacked, and I would agree with them; Syria or Iran is attacked. Both with Hezbollah and Hamas lob missiles at Israel. Israel eventually defends itself with nukes. Pakistan nukes Israel. Russia and China on one side and the USA and its allies on the other will not stand on the side lines. Maybe the UK will use its nukes.

We do have to ask, why is there such a drive for war on Iran inside the British political establishment with these possible consequences when it has the aforementioned track record of engineering world wars?

And not just ask, but be very very concerned.

As Murray concedes,
the secret at the heart of this conspiracy must be great

There can be no greater conspiracy than to create a tyrannical world government.

I doubt that people such as Werritty or Gould are fully aware and/or complicit. As Foreign Secretary William Hague could be. He is Bilderberg which voted for war on Iran last year and must have frequent contact with Gould.

But we cannot ignore this or recent statements from British agents Henry Kissinger and George Soros.

Speaking on Bloomberg earlier this year Kissinger said that events in Egypt were "only the first Scene of the first act of a drama that is to be played out.". A few months later he demanded war on Iran for Israel. Soros vowed that the Iranian government would be removed in the "bloodiest of the revolutions". Soros has a history of funding colour revolutions.

So at the very least, war on Iran would be the culmination of a series of wars stemming from the 1996 Israeli document A Clean Break.

But I fear much more.

I may be wrong. But I am trying to fit current affairs into a grander scheme that explains not just very recent history since 1996, but modern history, accounting for the previous world wars and the drive to create that all-powerful tyrannical world government which would implement policies to drastically reduce human population down to about one billion, probably less.

What I see stands out like a black cockroach on a white rug.

If we fall for this one then we probably deserve everything they want.

Thursday, November 24, 2011


The main character in the Farrelly Brothers film Kingpin is Roy Munson. A talented Ten Pin Bowler, he sets off in his car to tour the country and seek his honest fortune playing in bowling tournaments. He comes across and teams up with another bowler Ernie 'Big Ern' McCracken, a seedy sleazy character prepared to cheat and manipulate. To earn some extra income Big Ern persuades Munson to pretend to be an average player who loves to bet that his bowling is the best. They sucker a bunch of club players into betting a large amount of money that Roy cannot make a difficult shot, which Roy does. Roy and Big Ern try to make a quick getaway in Big Ern's car but the club players they've just conned catch up with them. Roy, being a good guy at heart, gets out of the car, expecting Big Ern to do the same, to apologise. But Big Ern drives off leaving Roy to face the wrath and revenge. This betrayal is later used by various characters in the film, including an Amish bowler(!), to say that anyone left up shit creek without a paddle is being 'Munsoned'.

Big Ern has left the human race up shit creek without a paddle.

In 1871 Albert Pike, the 33rd Degree Freemasonic sicko, is alleged to have written the following about World War 3:
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.

Since 9/11 we have seen this war develop. Initially A Clean Break, naming Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon as threats to Israel, was written in 1996 for Netanyahu. The group who wrote that then wrote Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000 naming Iraq and Iran as threats to the USA, and on 9/11 they and their fellow Zionutters occupied very influential positions, such as Vice President and Secretary of Defense. After 9/11 the USA with its allies went into Afghanistan, but the real prize was Iraq. The list of targets named in A Clean Break was expanded into The Greater Middle East Project to include Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Pakistan. Russia and China allowed the USA to invade Iraq. They also allowed NATO to use their airspace for operations in Afghanistan.

More recently both Russia and China curiously abstained on a vote on a NFZ over Libya. Almost immediately UNSCR 1973 morphed from humanitarian intervention into regime change and, as we saw a month ago, assassination.

Today we see Russia siding with Syria by sending warships to the area, and China siding with Pakistan by donating the latest Chinese fighter aircraft. NATO has betrayed Russia through the missile defence system, the war on Afghan opium and Serbia. Syria and Iran have vowed to start war on Israel if attacked. Israel has nukes, and the Zionutters in charge to use them.

The Illuminazi Illuminati families have led the human race to this point of being Munsoned. At the core of current affairs is this Zionism v Islam conflict, and on its periphery are the smaller conflicts such as the missile system, Pakistan and drugs.

When this WW3 kicks off it could get very very horrible very very quickly. Our leaders could try to get out of the car like Roy Munson to change course, but Big Ern will drive off into the underground bunkers safe from the nuclear, biological and chemical weapons used.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011


Two news reports today support THE BLATANT FACT that we do indeed live in a Disunited Fascist Kingdom.

Let me first address the Disunited aspect. A report by the Office for National Statistics indicates that the lowest earners are suffering the most while the bosses and top earners are doing rather well, thankyou very much.
Overall earnings growth was even lower, with the average UK salary increasing just 0.5% on 2010 levels once part-time workers are included.

This was driven by a shift to part-time work as a result of high unemployment and low economic growth: the indicative figures for 2011 included 380,000 fewer full-time workers than a year before, with 72,000 more part-time employees.

...The headline figures also masked sizeable falls in pay for some of the UK's lowest-earning professions – and sizeable salary boosts for senior managers and directors.

[source : UK incomes fall 3.5% in real terms, ONS reveals, The Guardian, 23/11/2011]

Now the Fascist aspect. Our Prime Minister David Cameron, with the assistance of Business Secretary Vince Cable, two of the COCCs, is going to make it easier for workers to be sacked.
The Government is to curb workplace rights in an attempt to cut red tape for business and boost Britain's anaemic economic growth levels.

...And David Cameron is backing a controversial proposal to allow firms to sack poorly performing staff without an explanation. The idea, proposed in a review for Downing Street by Adrian Beecroft, a venture capitalist and Conservative Party donor, has run into strong opposition from the Liberal Democrats and caused a rift at the top of the Coalition.

[source : Cameron's war on employment rights, The Independent, 23/11/2011]

No extra jobs will be created from this. Workers will be more fearful of losing their jobs, despite claims to the contrary, so their spending will decrease as they put more away for that rainy day when they are sacked. Workers will also work harder and longer to keep their poorly paid jobs (see ONS report above). Working harder and longer will drive them to an early grave, so they don't claim their pensions, and will drive an even larger wedge between them and their families as they spend more time at work, making the nation even more disunited.

Note that there is no Cameron's war on banks and bankers. Oh no. That wouldn't do, would it. That would mean bankers being locked up for wrecking the economy (or possibly executed for treason?). That would mean creating money for jobs instead of bailing out banks. That would mean a happier, healthier, more confident population with a roof over their heads and time on their hands to discuss among themselves how the hell we got into this situation.

Every day in every way we're becoming more and more fascist.

Every day in every way we're becoming more and more fascist.

Every day in every way we're becoming more and more fascist.

Every day in every way we're becoming more and more fascist.

Every day in every way we're becoming more and more fascist.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011


Ex-Senator Mike Gravel was recently interviewed by Russia Today, and that interview was shown this morning. The interview does not yet seem to be up on the RT website yet (1130 GMT). In the interview Gravel laid out the dominoes of war, in which one nation being attacked will lead to another coming into defend the attacked, so another country joins in, and eventually nukes are used en masse.

This sounds eerily similar to how WW1 started, and is how I envision WW3 starting.

In WW1, as I set out on my website, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was wanted, predicted and executed by Freemasons with Freemasonic help. Upon the assassination a series of treaties that had been engineered by King Edward VII before he became King fell into place, and before you could say "mass unnecessary slaughter in the trenches, anyone?" Great Britain, who had promised Germany that it would never join in a war on the European mainland, declared war on Germany and sent the BEF onto the European mainland to halt Germany's advance and secure mass unnecessary slaughter in the trenches. Thus a Freemasonic element within the ruling class of Great Britain (King Edward was Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, as was his brother after him) had tricked Germany into starting a war, which was later used to impose the very harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which led to Hitler etc. This trickery was deliberate because it set humanity on a course for three world wars as laid out by Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike.

I am beginning to hear and see WW3 being mentioned more and more often. Yet commentators do not address how we got to this crossroads in history. It's as if WW1 and WW2 just happened, accidents of history that nobody could foresee or prevent.

At the heart of events in the Middle East is Israel. It was forced onto the human race by a series of events.
1. the land controlled by the Ottomans was placed under British, ie Freemasonic, mandate after WW1, after the Arabs were stabbed in the back by the British.
2. there then followed a period of Jewish immigration and the inevitable Arab riots. The British and the Nazis tried to entice German Jews to that land but most wanted to stay at home in Germany. Most Jews believed that immigration into Palestine would only cause trouble. When WW2 broke out there were offers for Jews to be transferred to a Jewish homeland other than Palestine. The Zionist hierarchy refused such offers, because for whatever reason it had to be Palestine and nowhere else. Thus the Zionist hierarchy condemned millions of Jews to death at the bloody hands of the Nazis. Hitler had been financed and managed into power by elements in Wall Street loyal to this Freemasonic element within the ruling class of Great Britain.
3. after WW2 the Jews of the world were led to believe that Palestine was the only safe haven from a cruel world, and after the Holocaust Jewish ears were hearing this message loud and clear. The Jews, angered at what the world had allowed Hitler to do to them, literally drove the Palestinians off their lands into the largest refugee camps in the world and declared Eretz Israel. The Rothschilds, who had financed the first Jewish settlements in Palestine, then gave the Israelis nuclear technology, and through the US Federal Reserve and a bought-and-paid-for US Congress also the financial and moral support to persecute the Palestinians. Not in exactly the same way the Nazis persecuted the Jews, but enough to drive many into extreme Islamic terrorism against Israel its allies.
4. that terrorism has since been managed and nurtured, including in Londonistan, to eventually lead to 9/11, which allowed a project to be set in motion in which Israeli/US interests would be expanded as laid in two documents entitled A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, both written by the same bunch of Zionutters.

So that is briefly how we got here. Not many Jews wanted to emigrate to Palestine because they knew it would cause trouble. So rabid anti-Semite Hitler was brought to power to scare Jews to Palestine. Once in Palestine the Jews, enraged by their treatment, behaved cruelly and harshly which led to the terrorism of 9/11 and the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Israel has nukes and is terrified of a neighbour obtaining a nuke.

It is very easy to get bogged down in detail, but the main events of history have generally followed the plan laid out by Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike. As today is 22nd November it is very easy to get bogged down in the details of the assassination of JFK; who dunnit? was it a guy in the drain? was JFK abolishing the Federal Reserve? The fact remains that JFK was killed and his policy of no US war against Communism in South East Asia was almost immediately reversed by LBJ (LBJ was not assassinated and there is credible evidence that LBJ at least knew of the killing beforehand).

The dominoes have been carefully set. Perhaps some cannot see them for detail. Perhaps others see only imperialist wars for greed without consequence. Perhaps others cannot see them full stop.

I'll tell you what I see. I see a trap. Nuclear Netanyahu cannot or refuses to see it. Bomber Obama cannot or refuses to see it.

The dominoes are
1. if Iran and/or Syria are attacked both will attack Israel, by missiles, which will also drag in Hezbollah and Hamas.
2. eventually Israel will try to assert its authority with nukes.
3. Pakistan nuking Israel.

This is what ex-Senator Mike Gravel proposed, but went no further. But I would add

4. a subsequent rush to implement a global fascist tyranny, one world government, one world currency, global police state with microchip implants and mass depopulation (if the war has not resulted in the use of anti-human biological weapons).

This is why Iran was given nuclear technology in the Atoms for Peace program. This is why Israel, populated by alienated persecuted terrified Jews, was given nukes. This is why the Zionutters were allowed to write A Clean Break and Rebuilding America' Defenses and become so influential in the political apparatus of the USA on 9/11, to put the USA and Israel on a path to war.

After WW1 there was the first attempt at world government in the form of The League of Nations. That failed because the USA voted out of it.

So WW2 was engineered, but this time the USA experienced much much more bloodshed, and as a consequence the USA now houses the current form of world government, The United Nations. The UN has some but not complete power over sovereign nations.

WW3 is designed to finally create that all-powerful world government to be controlled from behind the scenes by the same families who engineered both WW1 and WW2, and the current financial crises, and push the depopulation and anti-human green movement.

Ordo ab chao.

Order out of chaos.


The High Pay Commission report, entitled Cheques With Balances: why tackling high pay is in the national interest, supports the fact that we do indeed live in a Disunited Fascist Kingdom. The report proves that we are not all in this together.

The table provided in the Executive Summary lists the increase in pay in BP, and two banks Barclays and Lloyds. Both BP and Barclays are Bilderberg. Barclays was bailed out with billions not from the British government but from the US Federal Reserve. Also mentioned is Lloyds, which is part of the Rothschild empire. Also mentioned is Reed Elsevier. The Chairman of Reed Elsevier for the period 2009-2011 was Jan Hommen, who attended Bilderberg 2007 and 2010, and this was during the smear campaign against Dr Andrew Wakefield who tried to expose the link between autism and vaccines.


To back up his World Crisis Radio report of 19th November on his trip to Syria, Webster Tarpley was interviewed by Russia Today and reports the same things as he highlighted in his radio report.

There is no armed insurrection against Assad.

There is no civil war.

There are hooded terrorists sniping and terrorising the civilian population.

These sniping terrorists are being brought in by NATO intelligence circles.

The civilian population want the Syrian Army to take out these sniping terrorists (well, wouldn't you?).

This sounds similar but different to the tactic used in Libya. In Libya it was probably easier to instigate a civil war due to the tribes and factions, ie al Qaeda, there. But Tarpley says Syria is a much more coherent society. This will make it much harder to start a civil war there.

Monday, November 21, 2011


9/11 allowed a project to be implemented. That project was for the USA and its allies to start multiple wars across the globe. Afghanistan was first, but only because bin Laden had stayed there.

The main target after 9/11 was Iraq. Iraq was named in two documents written by the same group of people, who on 9/11 were in very influential positions. The two documents were A Clean Break, and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

A Clean Break also names Lebanon and Syria, and indirectly Iran.

Rebuilding America's Defenses names Iran as more of a threat than Iraq.



15 Years Later, `A Clean Break' Is Still the Policy
November 21, 2011 • 10:07AM

Fifteen years ago, a gang of U.S. neocons, led by Richard Perle, Doug Feith, and David Wurmser presented incoming Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu with a strategy paper called ``A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.'' In addition to calling for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, the plan focussed on Syria and the need to also destabilize and overthrow the Assad regime there. Here is a relevant quote from that report, which bears remarkable similarity to events now playing out on the ground. ``Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq--an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right--as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions... It is understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting diplomatically, militarily and operationally Turkey's and Jordan's actions against Syria, such as securing tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross into Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite.'' Elsewhere the document called for ``striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.'' And ``given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan `comprehensive peace' and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction program, and rejecting `land for peace' deals on the Golan Heights.''


We're all in this together, they said.

We're all in this what? This race to the bottom together?

It certainly looks like it.

And it's only just begun.


Poor see biggest drop in household finances

Markit Household Finance Index for November pointed to the sharpest deterioration in three months with low income groups and public sector workers reporting the worst falls

Phillip Inman, economics correspondent, Monday 21 November 2011 10.24 GMT

Household finances have plummeted at the sharpest pace since August, according to a monthly survey that underlines the worsening economic situation in the UK.

The survey also revealed that the downturn in household finances was unevenly distributed and had increased the gap between the highest and lowest income groups.

Low income groups and public sector workers reported the sharpest falls in income while those on higher incomes reported only a limited fall.


There are some who truly believe in America, its apparent values and its alleged history.

And there are some who don't.

I fall into the latter camp.

America was built on the back of African slaves and the persecution of the true Americans, the native American Indians, in the name of God and Gold.

What America has become, its destiny from before Christopher Columbus set sail, is an illusion. An illusion of freedom and democracy, fighting across the globe for both, thinking it has both but in reality having neither and delivering nothing but fraud and fascism.

America spends more on its military than the rest of the world combined. It has exotic weapons it has not used yet. It is the only country on the planet that has used nuclear weapons, and that was done unnecessarily. It loves war.

What is the force behind all this military aggression?

If there is one image that can explain yesterday, today and the future it is this; the street plan of Washington DC in 1791 before it was built.

That inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram, the most satanic image, is pointing down into the White House. The message is clear; satan rules the White House.

Since then an image of Moloch the owl, the deity worshipped at Bohemian Grove where mock and real human sacrifice occurs at the Cremation of Care, has been added. That owl sits on top of a 13 layer pyramid without a capstone, and the Capitol lies inside the belly of Moloch.

This satanic imagery cannot have been put there by accident, in the street plan of the capital of the most militaristic nation on earth, delivering nothing but fraud and fascism.

As David Icke carefully explains in the video report below, the America we are asked to believe in is an illusion.

Sunday, November 20, 2011


Before our military is once again used to advance the Bilderberg fascism our grandfathers fought against on the beaches of Normandy by blowing up innocent Syrian children, they and Cameron and Hague and all our other bloodthirsty leaders should all listen to Webster Tarpley's World Crisis Radio show from Friday 19th November.

Tarpley has actually been in Syria this last week, trying to cut through the bullshit we see and hear on our Mockingbird media.

There is no military dictatorship.

There are no mass protests against Assad being mowed down by a bloodthirsty Syrian Army.

But there are hooded snipers terrorising the population from the rooftops.

There are armed hooded terrorists shouting Allah U Akbar.

There are protests, but protests in support of Assad and demanding heating oil.

There are deaths, but the vast majority are those of Syrian Army soldiers at the hands of the terrorists, probably the same group who recently fired RPGs at a Ba'ath party building in Damascus. And probably the same terrorists who have been armed by the smugglers who have been captured on the Lebanon-Syria border smuggling Israeli weapons into Syria.

When I listened to Tarpley's report from 19th November I recalled all those dodgy mobile phone shots shown on BBC, always with the caveat that they cannot be verified.

Hmm. I wonder why they cannot be verified. Perhaps because they are not occuring, not in Syria anyway? Perhaps they are occuring, but in Hollywood or Langley or somewhere else with large studios? We saw similar fakery during the war on Libya.

A war on Syria would drag in not only Hezbollah on Israel, but Iran and Hamas, and also Russia.

We have already seen al Qaeda flags over Libya (good job with that, by the way). The Muslim Brotherhood, who want war on Israel, are about to take control of Egypt.

It would all fit perfickly into a plan for a dark tyranny to descend over this planet.

But when you can kill little old granny for a few quid to bailout the Nazi banks, we shouldn't be surprised anymore.

Friday, November 18, 2011


Come on people of the world!

It's Bankers Children Bankers Children in Need Day?

I'm sorry. I'm confused.

I can't work out if it's Children in Need Day or still Bankers in Need Day.

I'm confused because the BBC Breakfast programme this morning has a few token articles on events across this Disunited Fascist Kingdom on how children are raising money for other children in need and how the money being raised will help other children in need. One report ended with the presenters bidding £10 for a triple icing cup cake made by one child. Cute, eh?

Yet we are this very day, as on all days, bailing out the Nazi banks and bankers with trillions.



We are even killing our old and sick through the Liverpool Care Pathway and other sneaky murderous schemes highlighted on this blog because dead old granny doesn't need a pension and dead old granny doesn't need expensive health treatment so that the money saved from not having to pay these out can bail out the Nazi banks.

There is something fundamentally wrong if we can donate £30 million year after year and expect to save the children of the world when we are bailing out Nazis with trillions.

And they are Nazis. They put Hitler into power, gave him financial, commercial and material support, even for his T4 program, and now they demand severe austerity and even the murder of our old and sick to bail them out and give them more power.

What's the point in saving the children of the world if all they will experience is more and more fascist austerity? And lies for more imperialist wars? And fluoride in the water and toothpaste to dumb them down? And state-sponsored terrorism to implement the police state? And increasing satanism and sexualisation of children?

And all the other components of the New World Order program, such as genetically modified food that makes them sterile or gives them cancer.

Save the children for what? To become mindless virtual slaves under a global fascist kiddie-fiddling tyranny?

We have to do more, much more, than donate £30 million year after year after year...

But that instinct to donate is still there, isn't it?

Why is that instinct to want to save children there?

It is there, isn't it?

Or does saving the Nazi bankers take priority?

Sadly I would say that it's Bankers Children Bankers Children still Bankers in Need Day.

Thursday, November 17, 2011


As I suspected it would, HMS Titanoik is going down.

We were promised growth. Even the OBR, the new quango alleged to be independent, said Captain Oik's numbers were good.

So how come all forecasts were wrong, and forecasts are being revised down and down and down? And not just here, but all over Europe, and the world?

Who are these offices and agenies who always promise a land of milk and honey tomorrow if only we suffer severe austerity today?

It's all a sham.

One great big global fascist scam.

We don't need to tweak a few numbers here and there to change course from one global fascist scam just to sail into another but slightly different global fascist scam.

We need to abandon ship!

Life boats at the ready!


Arrest the Nazi bankers who are driving the global economy down and who are also on a global war drive. Prosecute them. Lock up those guilty of the slightest misdemeanour for a very very long time (though I think we all know of at least one commentator who would like to bring forth the guillotine).

But above all, we have got to start creating our own money for we the people. At the moment we are creating money to bailout Nazi banks and bankers. That money would be put to much better use in projects for construction and education and health, to name just a few examples.

We need housing. House prices are unsustainable and unpayable for many. Many houses lie empty and simply need repair. New housing stock could be built too. Builders want to build and repair homes. People need homes to live in. IT'S DEAD EASY!

We need schools. pupil:teacher ratios in private education are much lower than in state education. And we wonder why privately educated pupils always go to the top universities? It's not DNA. It's generally your bank account that makes that decision. Teachers want to teach. Mums and dads acrosss the country want a good education for their children. IT'S DEAD EASY!

We need hospitals. Our society is ageing. The Nazi bankers want us to kill our old and sick, just like the Nazis they funded did in their T4 programs, so we can bail the bankers out by using the pensions and national insurance contributions of the murdered. Our grandfathers fought this fascism on the beaches of Normandy. Respect our old. Save the sick. Old and sick people want and need care. Nurses want to give that care, and proper care at that. IT'S DEAD EASY!

If we can bail out Nazi bankers with trillions then we can save our country from a global fascist tyranny by locking up the Nazi bankers and creating trillions for we the people, so we can build a country we can be proud of.

I'm sure the Russians and the Chinese and the Americans and the Indians and the Brazilians and everyone else who has been and still is under the jackboot of this global fascist tyranny and wants freedom would gladly meet to eagerly discuss how to cancel all debt and start again with a clean slate for all nations and all peoples.

Abandon HMS Titanoik and its one way trip to Bilderberg fascism.

Set sail instead on the good ship Freedom Is Safety.


At last!

It's here!




Donate generously, just like Gerald Celente.

Except Gerald didn't donate, did he?



Robbed blind by the MFs.

Just like every single one of us is being.

Their money is their money, and our money is their money.

Obviously having the power to create money out of thin air is not enough. If they see money that has already been created why bother wasting time and energy in creating more. Why not just steal it? Why not just loot people's accounts?

Lord Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England, is credited with saying this little nugget of truth.
The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.

It is through this power of creating money "with the flick of the pen" that the bankers were able finance and support Hitler, and all the other components of their diabolical plan for three world wars.

The bankers do indeed want it all. And we are seeing that ugly greed manifest itself more and more each day. What happened to Gerald Celente is simply the naked greed of the top 1%. The top 1% were informed of trouble and got their money out. The 99% were burned and their money ended up in the vaults of arguably the most evil bank in the world (so naturally the employer of Tony Blair); JP Morgan Chase. The CEO of MF Global Jon Corzine is the former CEO of Goldman Sachs and a Bilderberger. JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are the main two Bilderberg banks who have benefitted enormously from the current financial crisis.

Tomorrow is Children in Need day, on which we hope to save the children of the world by donating just £30 million. A worthy cause, you may think. And it is. But we have Children in Need Day every year. £30 million is nowhere near enough, is it?

Today, the undeserving Bilderberg bankers and financiers and brokers and their minions are being bailed out with trillions and trillions, while we suffer severe austerity, killing our old and sick by the Liverpool Care Pathway and other sneaky murderous schemes highlighted on this blog.

The behaviour of MF Global indicates that it is not enough.

They want it all.

So donate generously to Bankers in Need.

Coz let's face it; YOU DON'T HAVE A CHOICE!!

The Nazi Bankers in Need are being bailed out by our Bilderberg leaders and we the people are not being given the choice.


Wednesday, November 16, 2011


I want my freedom.

I want freedom for my family.

I want freedom for my friends.

I want freedom for most of humanity.

I don't want freedom for the Nazi bankers. Lock them up with Josef Fritzl!

I want freedom from this fascism and state-sponsored terror being rammed down our throats.

S Bam - I Want My Freedom (really gets going at 3:45)



This is the fascism that my grandfathers fought against in WW2.

Young jobless men and women are being forced into working for free or they lose their benefit. They get their JSA for thirty hours a week of work. So what's that? £53/30 = £1.76 per hour. Much less than the minimum wage.

Yes, that is more than the Jews in Nazi concentration camps got. And yes, they are not being sent to the ovens.

But the fascist apparatus is there. That is what fascism is; the corporate state. The state using its muscle to enrich the corporations.

And it is only going to get worse as the global economy sinks deeper and deeper into depression because the Nazi bankers have sucked all the money out of the global economy, begging for bailouts from their gambling, and our Bilderberg leaders are bailing them out.

Why do I call them Nazi bankers? Because the top bankers who created all the derivatives sinking the global economy financed Hitler and also gave him material support for IG Farben to become THE most powerful corporation in the fascist Nazi Germany. They also financed the Nazi racial hygiene programs. I speak primarily of the Rockefeller family who control JP Morgan Chase, the first bank to introduce derivatives and the bank at the top of the derivatives exposure list.

One company named in the below report participating in this fascism is Tesco, who made nearly £4 billion profit last year.

We do indeed live (or just about survive) in a Disunited Fascist Kingdom.

And it is only going to get worse. Much much worse.


Young jobseekers told to work without pay or lose unemployment benefits

People taking up work experience places – providing up to 30 hours a week of unpaid labour – face losing benefits if they quit

Shiv Malik, Wednesday 16 November 2011 13.00 GMT

Britain's young unemployed are being sent to work for supermarkets and budget stores for up to two months for no pay and no guarantee of a job, the Guardian can reveal.

Under the government's work experience programme young jobseekers are exempted from national minimum wage laws for up to eight weeks and are being offered placements in Tesco, Poundland, Argos, Sainsbury's and a multitude of other big name businesses.

The Department for Work and Pensions says that if jobseekers "express an interest" in an offer of work experience they must continue to work without pay, after a one-week cooling-off period, or face having their benefits docked.

Young people have told the Guardian that they are doing up to 30 hours a week of unpaid labour and have to be available from 9am to 10pm.

In three such cases jobseekers also claim they were not told about the week's cooling-off period, and that once they showed a willingness to take part in the scheme they were told by their case manager they would be stripped of their £53 a week jobseekers allowance (JSA) if they backed out.


Webster Tarpley is in Syria this week. Syrians are telling him they are being terrorised by snipers from the roof tops and that the Syrian government is not doing enough against these snipers.

Listen to the interview by Alex Jones yesterday.

Monday, November 14, 2011


Former UK Ambassador Craig Murray has blown the lid off the UK government plot to start war on Iran.

Murray has tried to get get his report published in UK newspapers, and has not previously had an article refused.

But guess what? NOBODY WILL PUBLISH IT!!

We have to ask why.

And when you read Murray's blog it makes sense; there appears to be a war drive at the heart of the UK government that is very depressingly similar to that before our folly into Iraq in 2003.

There is a cover up. And it involves Israel.

Murray adds 2 + 2 and gets war on Iran.

(It is best to read Murray's blog because he links to other articles via text).


Matthew Gould and the Plot to Attack Iran

by craig on November 14, 2011 12:03 pm in Uncategorized

This is Matthew Gould, second from right, British Ambassador to Israel, who was pictured speaking at a meeting of the Leeds Zionist Federation that was also the opening of the Leeds Hasbarah Centre. The Leeds Zionist Federation is part of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland, motto “Speaking Up for Israel.” A collection was made at the meeting to send packages to members of the Israeli Defence Force.

On 29 May 2011 The Jerusalem Post reported: “British Ambassador Matthew Gould declared his commitment to Israel and the principles of Zionism on Thursday”.

Remember this background, it is unusual behaviour for a diplomat, and it is important.

The six meetings between British Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould and Minister of Defence Liam Fox and Adam Werritty together – only two of which were revealed by Cabinet Secretary Gus O’Donnell in his “investigation” into Werritty’s unauthorised role in the Ministry of Defence – raise vital concerns about a secret agenda for war at the core of government, comparable to Blair’s determination to drive through a war on Iraq..

This is a detective story. It begins a few weeks ago, when the Fox-Werritty scandal was first breaking in the media. I had a contact from an old friend from my Foreign Office days. This friend had access to the Gus O’Donnell investigation. He had given a message for me to a trusted third party.

Whistleblowing in the surveillance state is a difficult activity. I left through a neighbour’s garden, not carrying a mobile phone, puffed and panted by bicycle to an unmonitored but busy stretch of road, hitched a lift much of the way, then ordered a minicab on a payphone from a country pub to my final destination, a farm far from CCTV. There the intermediary gave me the message: what really was worrying senior civil servants in the Cabinet Office was that the Fox-Werritty link related to plans involving Mossad and the British Ambassador to Israel, Matthew Gould.

Since I became a notorious whistleblower, several of my ex-friends and contacts have used me to get out information they wanted to leak, via my blog. A good recent example was a senior friend at the UN who tipped me off in advance on the deal by which the US agreed to the Saudi attack on pro-democracy demonstrators in Bahrain, in return for Arab League support for the NATO attack on Libya. But this was rather different, not least in the apparent implication that our Ambassador to Israel, Matthew Gould, was engaged in something with Werritty which went beyond official FCO policy.

I was particularly concerned by this because I knew slightly and liked Matthew Gould, from the time he wrote speeches for Robin Cook. I hoped there was nothing much in it. But then Gould’s name started to come up as professional journalists dug into the story, and reported Werritty’s funding by pro-Israeli lobby groups.

I decided that the best approach was for me to write to Matthew Gould. I did so, asking him when he had first met Werritty, how many times he had met him, and how many communications of every kind there had been between them. I received the reply that these questions would be answered in Gus O’Donnell’s report.

But Gus O’Donnell’s report in fact answered none of these questions. It only mentioned two meetings at which Fox, Gould and Werritty were all three present. It did not mention Gould-Werritty bilateral meetings and contacts at all. To an ex-Ambassador like me, there was also something very fishy about the two trilateral meetings O’Donnell did mention and his characterisation of them.

This led me to dig further, and I was shocked to find that O’Donnell was, at the most charitable interpretation, economical with the truth. In fact there were at least six Fox-Werritty-Gould meetings, not the two given by O’Donnell. Why did GOD lie? I now had no doubt that my informant had pointed me towards something very real and very important indeed.

Matthew Gould was the only British Ambassador who Fox and Werrity met together. They met him six times. Why?

The first meeting to which O’Donnell admits, took place in September 2010. O’Donnell says this was

“a general discussion of international defence and security matters to enable Mr Gould better to understand MOD’s perspective.”

O’Donnell says Werritty should not have been present. An FCO spokesman told me on 21 October that

“Mr Gould’s meeting with the Defence Secretary was arranged by his office as part of his pre-posting briefing calls.”

All Ambassadors make pre-posting briefing calls around Whitehall before taking up their job, as you would expect. But even for our most senior Ambassadors, outside the Foreign Office those calls are not at Secretary of State level. Senior officials are quite capable of explaining policy to outgoing Ambassadors; Secretaries of State have many other things to do.

For this meeting to happen at all was not routine, and Werritty’s presence made it still more strange. Why was this meeting happening? I dug further, and learnt from a senior MOD source that there were two more very strange things about this meeting, neither noted by O’Donnell. There was no private secretary or MOD official present to take note of action points, and the meeting took place not in Fox’s office, but in the MOD dining room.

O’Donnell may have been able to fox the media, but to a former Ambassador this whole meeting stunk. I bombarded the FCO with more questions, and discovered an amazing fact left out by O’Donnell. The FCO spokesman replied to me on 21 October 2011 that:

“Mr Werritty was also present at an earlier meeting Mr Gould had with Dr Fox in the latter’s capacity as shadow Defence Secretary.”

So Gould, Fox and Werritty had got together before Gould was Ambassador, while Fox was still in opposition and while Werritty was – what, exactly? This opened far more questions than it answered. I put them to the FCO. When, where and why had this meeting happened? We only knew it was before May 2010, when Fox took office. What was discussed? There are very strict protocols for senior officials briefing opposition front bench spokesman. Had they been followed?

The FCO refused point blank to answer any further questions. I turned to an independent-minded MP, Jeremy Corbyn, who put down a parliamentary question to William Hague. The reply quite deliberately ignored almost all of Corbyn’s question, but it did throw up an extraordinary bit of information – yet another meeting between Fox, Werritty and Gould, which had not been previously admitted.

Hague replied to Corbyn that:

“Our ambassador to Israel was also invited by the former Defence Secretary to a private social engagement in summer 2010 at which Adam Werritty was present.”

Getting to the truth was like drawing teeth, but the picture was building. O’Donnell had completely mischaracterised the “Briefing meeting” between Fox, Werritty and O’Donnell by hiding the fact that the three had met up at least twice before – once for a meeting when Fox was in opposition, and once for “a social engagement.” The FCO did not answer Corbyn’s question as to who else was present at this “social engagement”.

This was also key because Gould’s other meetings with Fox and Werritty were being characterised – albeit falsely – as simply routine, something Gould had to do in the course of his ambassadorial duties. But this attendance at “a private social engagement” was a voluntary act by Gould, indubitable proof that, at the least, the three were happy in each other’s company, but given that all three were very active in zionist causes, it was a definite indication of something more than that.

That furtive meeting between Fox, Werritty and Gould in the MOD dining room, deliberately held away from Fox’s office where it should have taken place, and away from the MOD officials who should have been there, now looks less like briefing and more like plotting.

My existing doubts about the second and only other meeting to which O’Donnell does admit make plain why that question is very important.

O’Donnell had said that Gould, Fox and Werritty had met on 6 February 2011:

“in Tel Aviv. This was a general discussion of international affairs over a private dinner with senior Israelis. The UK Ambassador was present.”

There was something very wrong here. Any ex-Ambassador knows that any dinner with senior figures from your host country, at which the British Ambassador to that country and a British Secretary of State are both present, and at which international affairs are discussed, can never be “private”. You are always representing the UK government in that circumstance. The only explanation I could think of for O’Donnell’s astonishing description of this as a “private” dinner was that the discussion was far from being official UK policy.

I therefore asked the FCO who was at this dinner, what was discussed, and who was paying for it? I viewed the last as my trump card – if either Gould or Fox was receiving hospitality, they are obliged to declare it. To my astonishment the FCO refused to say who was present or who paid. Corbyn’s parliamentary question also covered the issue of who was at this dinner, to which he received no reply.

Plainly something was very wrong. I therefore again asked how often Gould had met or communicated with Werritty without Fox being present. Again the FCO refused to reply. But one piece of information that had been found by other journalists was that, prior to the Tel Aviv dinner, Fox, Gould and Werritty had together attended the Herzilya conference in Israel. The programme of this is freely available. It is an unabashedly staunch zionist annual conference on “Israel’s security”, which makes no pretence at a balanced approach to Palestinian questions and attracts a strong US neo-conservative following. Fox, Gould and Werritty sat together at this event.

Yet again, the liar O’Donnell does not mention it.

I then learnt of yet another, a sixth meeting between Fox, Gould and Werritty. This time my infomrant was another old friend, a jewish diplomat for another country, based at an Embassy in London. They had met Gould, Fox and Werritty together at the “We believe in Israel” conference in London in May 2011. Here is a photo of Gould and Fox together at that conference.

I had no doubt about the direction this information was leading, but I now needed to go back to my original source. Sometimes the best way to hide something is to put it right under the noses of those looking for it, and on Wednesday I picked up the information in a tent at the Occupy London camp outside St Paul’s cathedral.

This is the story I was given.

Matthew Gould was Deputy Head of Mission at the British Embassy in Iran, a country which Werritty frequently visited, and where Werritty claimed to have British government support for plots against Ahmadinejad. Gould worked at the British Embassy in Washington; the Fox-Werritty Atlantic Bridge fake charity was active in building links between British and American neo-conservatives and particularly ultra-zionists. Gould’s responsibilities at the Embassy included co-ordination on US policy towards Iran. The first meeting of all three, which the FCO refuses to date, probably stems from this period.

According to my source, there is a long history of contact between Gould and Werritty. The FCO refuse to give any information on Gould-Werritty meetings or communications except those meetings where Fox was present – and those have only been admitted gradually, one by one. We may not have them all even yet.

My source says that co-ordinating with Israel and the US on diplomatic preparation for an attack on Iran was the subject of all these meetings. That absolutely fits with the jobs Gould held at the relevant times. The FCO refuses to say what was discussed. My source says that, most crucially, Iran was discussed at the Tel Aviv dinner, and the others present represented Mossad. The FCO again refuses to say who was present or what was discussed.

On Wednesday 2 November it was revealed in the press that under Fox the MOD had prepared secret and detailed contingency plans for British participation in an attack on Iran.

There are very important questions here. Was Gould really discussing neo-con plans for attacking Iran with Werritty and eventually with Fox before the Conservatives were even in government? Why did O’Donnell’s report so carefully mislead on the Fox-Gould-Werritty axis? How far was the FCO aware of MOD preparations for attacking Iran? Is there a neo-con cell of senior ministers and officials, co-ordinating with Israel and the United States, and keeping their designs hidden from the Conservative’s coalition partners?

The government could clear up these matters if it answered some of the questions it refuses to answer, even when asked formally by a member of parliament. The media have largely moved on from the Fox-Werritty affair, but have barely skimmed the surface of the key questions it raises. They relate to secrecy, democratic accountabilty and preparations to launch a war, preparations which bypass the safeguards of good government. The refusal to give straight answers to simple questions by a member of perliament strikes at the very root of our democracy.

Is this not precisely the situation we were in with Blair and Iraq? Have no lessons been learnt?

There is a further question which arises. Ever since the creation of the state of Israel, the UK had a policy of not appointing a jewish Briton as Ambassador, for fear of conflict of interest. As a similar policy of not appointing a catholic Ambassador to the Vatican. New Labour overturned both longstanding policies as discriminatory. Matthew Gould is therefore the first jewish British Ambassador to Israel.

Matthew Gould does not see his race or religion as irrelevant. He has chosen to give numerous interviews to both British and Israeli media on the subject of being a jewish ambassador, and has been at pains to be photographed by the Israeli media participating in jewish religious festivals. Israeli newspaper Haaretz described him as “Not just an ambassador who is jewish, but a jewish ambassador”. That rather peculiar phrase appears directly to indicate that the potential conflict of interest for a British ambassador in Israel has indeed arisen.

It is thus most unfortunate that it is Gould who is the only British Ambassador to have met Fox and Werritty together, who met them six times, and who now stands suspected of long term participation with them in a scheme to forward war with Iran, in cooperation with Israel. This makes it even more imperative that the FCO answers now the numerous outstanding questions about the Gould/Werritty relationship and the purpose of all those meetings with Fox.

There is no doubt that the O’Donnell report’s deceitful non-reporting of so many Fox-Gould-Werritty meetings, the FCO’s blunt refusal to list Gould-Werritty, meetings and contacts without Fox, and the refusal to say who else was present at any of these occasions, amounts to irrefutable evidence that something very important is being hidden right at the heart of government. I have no doubt that my informant is telling the truth, and the secret is the plan to attack Iran. It fits all the above facts. What else does?

Please feel free to re-use and republish this article anywhere, commercially or otherwise. It has been blocked by the mainstream media. I write regularly for the mainstream media and this is the first article of mine I have ever been unable to publish. People have risked a huge amount by leaking me information in an effort to stop the government machinery from ramping up a war with Iran. There are many good people in government who do not want to see another Iraq. Please do all you can to publish and redistribute this information.

UPDATE A commenter has already pointed me to this bit of invaluable evidence:

“My government absolutely agrees with your conception of the Iranian threat and the importance of your determination to battle it.” Dealing with the Iranian threat will be a large part of my work here.” Gould said.

From Israel National News. It also says that he will be trying to promote a positive atmosphere between Israel and the Palestinian National Authority, but the shallowest or the deepest search shows the same picture; an entirely biased indeed fanatical zionist who must give no confidence at all to the Palestinian Authority. He must be recalled.


Now that the sham salutes and services of our Bilderberg leaders on Remembrance Sunday have been televised all over this Disunited Fascist Kingdom, can we please get back to engineering more unnecessary imperialist wars?

On Syria.

On Iran.

On Pakistan.

Basically in the whole Middle East and Caspian region, that fossil-fuel rich region, which we invaded after the state-sponsored terror attack on 9/11, that murdered September day on which the United States military was so mysteriously AWOL which gave PNAC the 'new Pearl Harbor' it wanted and needed to trick the American people into supporting waging multiple simultaneous wars across the globe for the USA impose its hegemony as the only global superpower.

Saturday, November 12, 2011


al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) is claiming to have the Libyan Surface-to-Air Missiles[1] that appear to have disappeared after NATO assisted al Qaeda to power in Libya by bombing innocent Libyan children to bits.

This is supported by a report that The Muslim Brotherhood somehow smuggled Grad rockets from Libya into Gaza[2].

As pointed out by Nick Harding in The Independent[3] today, there are many many conspiracy theories, including the one that Gaddafi was removed because he no longer wanted to trade oil in US dollars but a new gold-backed currency. One conspiracy theory Harding does not address is the three world war plan of Albert Pike, which is no surprise because it is conspiracy fact. Other facts are that al Qaeda flags are now flying over Libya. al Qaeda wish to destroy Israel. The Muslim Brotherhood are widely expected to take control of Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood want war with Israel. These people need weapons for their wars.

It looks like NATO quietly supplied them with Libya's.

[1] AQIM: We’re ‘Main Beneficiaries’ of Libya Weapons, AntiWar,, 11/11/2011

[2] Libyan mercenaries arrive in Gaza with Grad multiple rocket launchers, DEBKAfile,, 11/11/2011

[3] Truth and lies: Conspiracy theories are running rampant thanks to modern technology, The Independent, 12/11/2011



"Super Mario" Monti of the EU, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Goldman Sachs and the extreme pro-Federal Europe Spinelli Group is being suggested as the new leader of Italy, assuming Berlusconi does indeed resign.

Friday, November 11, 2011


Today is Armistice Day, but the big day is Remembrance Sunday.

Our warmongering leaders and politicians will put on their grim masks and lay wreathes while the real heroes march by The Cenotaph in Whitehall.

But are they heroes? Or are they "dumb, stupid animals to be used", as Henry Kissinger referred to them?

Kissinger controls Bilderberg where our leaders meet for a jolly jaunt once a year to discuss what wars to start and how to rob us blind. Kissinger also brought Nazis to the USA after WW2 in Operation Paperclip.

One outcome of WW2 was the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Article 10 states
Article 10 – Freedom of expression

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

I honour the Glorious Dead by exercising this right to freedom of expression. If the Glorious Dead had not died on the beaches of Normandy, a sacrifice so horrifically portrayed in Steven Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan, I may not be writing this today. I do not wear a poppy. To me it is associated with glorifying war. How many of our leaders will be wearing poppies on Remembrance Sunday having just bombed untold numbers of innocent Libyan children to bits, and wondering how they can trick even more "dumb, stupid animals to be used" in imperialist wars in Syria and Iran and everywhere across the globe to expand the very fascism that The Glorious Dead fought against in WW2?

Perhaps secondary services should be held at war memorials across the countries of this Disunited Fascist Kingdom, where we who know how and why wars are engineered and fought can meet and remember in our own way those who were lied into wars they need not have fought and died in.

Leave our Bilderberg leaders to their sham salutes and services.

We can honour The Glorious Dead better by informing our countrymen about our real history, and by not engineering or fighting in any more wars for the benefit of a cabal of warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs hell bent on the total enslavement and reduction of the human population of this beautiful planet.


On this sombre day remember the outcome of war; DESTRUCTION.

When FDR and Churchill received the offer from the German Resistance to hand Hitler over to them they refused. Why? Because they wanted the "utter destruction" of Germany. The outcome of this was the destruction of Europe and millions of dead Jews which lead to the creation of Israel and the state of the world today.

A report on Russia Today this morning looked at the result of the removal of Gaddafi in Libya. Remember Gaddafi had cooperated with us in the bogus Global War on Terror by giving MI6 and CIA names of al Qaeda in Libya, and participated in the rendition program. He also invested billions in the City of London. The RT report suggested that Britain spent less than a half billion dollars to remove, ie execute, Gaddafi, but the estimate of the cost of reconstructing Libya, after NATO killed untold numbers of innocent children, is about 300 billion dollars. And of course, having spent a half billion dollars to remove, ie execute, Gadaffi, Britain wants a large slice of that reconstruction pie. Ove Arup and Mott Macdonald were mentioned as getting in there.

So with the Army going through a huge change, why not simply reflect what the Army is. Instead of naming regiments after counties, name them after companies or corporations. For example, the Yorkshire Regiment could be renamed The BP Regiment. BP could then sponsor and subsidise that regiment by placing their logo on the uniform. Everyone's a winner! (except the dead and maimed infantry).

I'll leave you with this testimony by one of the greatest patriots who has ever lived, U.S. Marine Major General Smedley D. Butler.

"War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes."