Saturday, November 30, 2013


Captain Phillips is such a bizarre story to make a film out of; a tanker being hijacked by Somali pirates.

But when you understand what is going on then it's not that bizarre:
1. the director, Paul Greengrass, directed United 93, which supports the official 9/11 fairytale;
2. Somalia was named as one of seven targets for war by a Pentagon planner to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11;
3. Somalia's massive oil reserves have hardly been tapped, are estimated to be the world's seventh largest reserves of oil, and are in the same fields as those of Saudi Arabia (Somalia is expected to become the next Kuwait).
4. the Rothschilds are very interested in Somali oil.

Gravity is also a strong contender.

Earlier this year the diabolical anti-Iranian Argo won Best Picture, which proves beyond doubt that the Oscars is, if not always has been, politicised.


The attacks on The WTC and The Pentagon on 11th September 2001 formed the perfect "new Pearl Harbor" that the Zio/PNAC crowd wanted to go on their ziowarmongering rampage that they had wet dreams about in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

Just how did 19 Muslims manage to evade detection during their planning, which apparently involved being trained to fly in the USA, and armed only with box cutters manage to outwit and evade the most powerful military machine in the world for nearly 2 hours, before flying into the WTC and even The Pentagon (FFS!)?

The fact is they didn't evade detection.

The CIA knew about it in April 2001.


They knew that something was going to occur in New York City and that it would involve planes. There were also concerns about a nuke (there is evidence that a thermonuke was detonated underneath the WTC 1 and 2 which left a hot zone for weeks in the WTC foundations).

This was revealed by Susan Lindauer, who claims she was silenced during the 9/11 hearings. She also claims that in the few weeks before 9/11, strange trucks would arrive at the WTC between 3am and 5am, every morning. She deduces that the hijacked planes were cover for the controlled demolition of the WTC.

And I believe her.

It all fits, sadly too perfectly: the zios wanted the USA to do their dirty work for them, so they and the Saudis, and the DFQ (because Israel and Saudi Arabia are British), arranged for the USA to let in some stooges and agents to be sheepdipped; on the day the USAF, under the command of PNAC Dick Cheney and PNAC Donald Rumsfeld, went mysteriously AWOL; the planes (whether the original or dummies, as proposed in Northwoods) flew into the tops of the WTC; but they knew this would not be enough to bring the WTC down, so to add to the drama, body count and psychological trauma the WTC was wired for controlled demolition.



Cui bono? The Anglo-Zio-Saudi Axis of Pure Evil.


'CIA, DIA knew of 9/11 beforehand'


Seriously let down.

Let seriously down.

Let down seriously.

Take your pick.


Last night the news was dominated by it.

This morning the newspapers were dominated by it.

What am I talking about?

The video of the moment Lee Rigby was run over before he was hacked to death.

Apparently the video was shown at the trial of the butchers of Lee Rigby. The TV didn't show the whole video because of the distress it would cause.

But if you look closely you will see the director, and the microphones, and the extras, and the lights to give the event that special feeling...

No you won't. Because they weren't there. Because the death of Lee Rigby was as real and true as Jimmy Savile being a satanist paedo being protected by the police and MI5, and probably MI6.


This is the series of tweets on Stop The War's twitter:

I think that it is safe to assume that Stop The War loves and trusts Jeremy Scahill.

But at least a few of us don't. I don't. Tarpley doesn't. I suspect the Alex Jones crowd don't.

Here is one tweet in response to the Stop The War sycophancy.

Last weekend the NATO media did a great PR blitz for Scahill. He was portrayed as some kind of Media Messiah, sent from heaven above to lead us blind masses out of the wilderness of war. But they didn't mention that Scahill had torpedoed the appearance of arguably the bravest woman on the planet, Mother Agnes Mariam, at the Stop The War conference.

There is a list of speakers:
Jeremy Scahill • Tariq Ali • Tony Benn • Jonathan Steele • Owen Jones • Diane Abbott MP • Manik Mukherjee • Lindsey German • Mitra Qayoom • Explo Nani-Kofi • Sami Ramadani • Edward Horgan • Joan Humphries • Seumas Milne • Jeremy Corbyn MP • Rachel Shabi • Chris Nineham • John Rees • Andrew Murray • Kevin Ovenden • Ala'a Shehabi • Chris Cole • Jean Lambert MEP • Steve Bell

Why do these people feel that someone like Scahill has the right to threaten the conference?

Why have these people not withdrawn in protest?

Is it because they are so anti-religion that having someone like Mother Agnes Mariam steal the conference from them would damage their street cred?

Who are these people?


Will the NATO media cover this conference, report every word that Scahill says?

Friday, November 29, 2013


It's bang-your-head-against-the-wall time.

I just wrote to my MP about the Middle East, North Africa, 9/11, General Wesley Clark, bin Laden, A Clean Break, PNAC, etc. All the stuff I write about here. Their reply was:
1. al Qaeda did 9/11 all on its own;
2. that we should love Israel;
3. that we should love Saudi Arabia even more than we should love Israel;
4. that the British government is doing a fine job over Syria.

Apparently, it's all about something called 'national security'.

I believe that my MP is an utter utter moron.

How can I politely tell my MP this?

I was thinking along the lines of...
Dear ...MP

Thank you for your not so prompt reply, but I respectfully disagree with your utter utter moronic belief that:
1. al Qaeda did 9/11 all on its own;
2. that we should love Israel;
3. that we should love Saudi Arabia even more than we should love Israel;
4. that the British government is doing a fine job over Syria.

Yours Truly


Whadda yer fink?



Or just abandon this and try something else?


Oh dear (big sigh).

Tut. Tut. Tut.

I should have known this would happen.

The trial of The Butcher of Woolwich, Michael Adebalajo, began today. At the time he is alleged to have attacked and murdered Lee Rigby, many websites pushed the idea that it was all a hoax. That it was fake blood, or there was no blood at all. That It was funny how it took the armed police ages to get to the scene of the crime but cameramen were on the scene. That somehow the Masons were in on it.

I rarely, if ever, praise The Sun. But on this occasion we can thank The Sun for obtaining video footage from a phone that was filmed by a passenger on a bus which stopped just next to the attack just after it happened. One of the claims made is that there was no blood. Yet the footage obtained by The Sun clearly shows blood! Adebalajo actually walks through it and leaves a footprint!

The Sun film can be seen at

Now take a good long look at some of the websites still pushing the hoax. None of them show the full the film, just the bit where Adebalajo starts ranting.

Ask yourself, why the hell are they still pushing this bullshit?

And who is it aimed at?



Selena Gomez, like the talentless Miley Cyrus, became a star through Disney.

But whereas Cyrus twerks and gropes and sticks her tongue out and simulates sex and openly smokes cannabis, Gomez projects a softer, gentler, perhaps cuter image.

But are we being deceived?

There is a brief article today in The Daily Mail on a gig that Gomez did for the Dallas Cowboys on Thanksgiving yesterday. Thanksgiving is a celebration of genocide of native American Indians, so that's a good start. But 'cute' Gomez, in this supposed thanksgiving to God, looked like a tart. Not quite in Cyrus' league, but still a tart.

Gomez recently starred in one of the most depraved debauched films on general release, Springbreakers. The film was about four girls who go off to Florida for one of those infamous breaks that American youth take where they go wild. Gomez plays a character who goes to church but wants to go to Florida with her mates, so to fund the trip she robs a restaurant after snorting cocaine. In Florida things get really, really wild. After some time to think about her behaviour Gomez returns home, but her mates stay and slide into a full time life of crime and debauchery, who eventually drive off into the sunset in a stolen Lamborghini. So although Gomez' character reflects on her behaviour and returns to the church-going society she left behind, her mates drive off into the sunset in a Lamborghini. The film was heavily pushed over here. I remember it being praised on BBC Radio.

Was Gomez used to drag young women into watch such a film to be attracted to a lifestyle in which you get to drive off into the sunset in a Lamborghini?

Gomez and Cyrus donate generously to the Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund.

Thursday, November 28, 2013


Thank God for America.

Thank God for the settlers.

Thank God for the colonies.

Thank God for the slavery.

Thank God for Satan.

It wasn't all lutes and flutes and chase me round the maypole, as Lucky Jim says in his drunken lecture. The native American Indians were slaughtered out of existence. Then came the God-blessed slavery.

There may or may not have been a genuine revolution. The magnificent masonic ceremony to lay the cornerstone of the Capitol on 18th September 1793, the Year of Masonry 5793, betrays a plan of ages. Has there been such a ceremony before or since? And I have yet to find a satanic symbol to rival that of the inverted, incomplete, irregular pentagram in the street plan directly north of The White House.

Then came World War 1, financed by The Federal Reserve.

Then came Communism and Nazism, financed out of Wall Street.

Then came World War 2, the first and only use of atomic weapons, resulting in a world government in waiting, The United Nations, with its HQ in America.

Did America have this secret destiny?

When you strip away the romanticism of America, you find war, murder and mass genocide, slaughter, fraud, abuse, slavery, racism.

The question for America is; how do you get good people to do bad things?

Here is one example:
William Bradford, the former Governor of Plymouth and one of the chroniclers of the 1621 feast, was also on hand for the great massacre of 1637:

"Those that escaped the fire were slain with the sword; some hewed to pieces, others run through with their rapiers, so that they were quickly dispatched and very few escaped. It was conceived they thus destroyed about 400 at this time. It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the fire...horrible was the stink and scent thereof, but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully for them, thus to enclose their enemies in their hands, and give them so speedy a victory over so proud and insulting an enemy."

The rest of the white folks thought so, too. "This day forth shall be a day of celebration and thanksgiving for subduing the Pequots," read Governor John Winthrop's proclamation. The authentic Thanksgiving Day was born.

Most historians believe about 700 Pequots were slaughtered at Mystic. Many prisoners were executed, and surviving women and children sold into slavery in the West Indies. Pequot prisoners that escaped execution were parceled out to Indian tribes allied with the English. The Pequot were thought to have been extinguished as a people. According to IndyMedia [8], "The Pequot tribe numbered 8,000 when the Pilgrims arrived, but disease had brought their numbers down to 1,500 by 1637. The Pequot ‘War' killed all but a handful of remaining members of the tribe."

But there were still too many Indians around to suit the whites of New England, who bided their time while their own numbers increased to critical, murderous mass.

[source : The End of American Thanksgivings: A Cause for Universal Rejoicing, Black Agenda Report,, 26th November 2013]

Religion makes good men and women do bad things.

Was the American revolution, supposed to destroy the bad that created early America? Well, it took nearly a century for slavery to be abolished. And there were some very strange relationships between the early American republic and the British Empire, particularly that between the Bank of North America and the First Bank of The United States to the Barings and the British East India Company.

I am not wholly convinced of the sincerity of the American revolution. The actions before and after it indicate a dark agenda. One that is actually written in stone.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013


Why do I bother spending precious hours a day reading news, keeping up to date with current events and other people's views on those events?

Why do I bother reading books and articles on history, banking and politics?

Why do I bother writing blogs, reports, drafts on what I'm finding?

Why do I bother?

At the moment I haven't got the foggiest.

At the moment I feel there is something going seriously wrong. Not seriously, seriously wrong. Not yet. But definitely seriously.


Could Netanyahu be acting?

Could all the anger, the fury, the unkempt paedo hairstyle, the grim face, the "bad deal" rants; could it all be acting?

Well, why not? Israel was the instigator of 9/11 and all the wars ever since, and the assassination of Rafik Hariri, and sending IDF soldiers into lands occupied by Hezbollah to provoke the war in 2006 with Hezbollah as per A Clean Break. All this has been covered up in the media. What we see on TV, read in the newspapers and on the internet, and hear on the radio is a movie. In our heads is a movie. Well, actually it is a Ziomovie. Reality is something very different.

I love peace. I really do.

And I hate war. I really, really hate war. So when peace conquers war, or alternatively love conquers hate, then I'm happy. Which is why I support the P5+1 deal with Iran that was agreed last weekend. It gives peace a chance. God knows it needs a chance with Jihadi lunatics like Bandar bin Sultan on the loose.

But in the back of my mind there has always been a niggling doubt about it all, similar to one I had about Eustace Mullins and his support for the bona fide traitor Andrew Jackson.

That niggle was, why were Hague and Kerry, who pushed for war on Syria so much during the summer, pushing for peace with Iran? Even to the point of making Netanyahu look foolish?

As I explained over the weekend, PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses stated that Iran was a bigger threat to US national security than Iraq. Iran is the ultimate target of all the wars in the Middle East. Iran is why there was a war in Syria and on Hezbollah in the last few years; to either take them out or neutralise them in preparation for a war with Iran.

And I also highlighted Which Path to Persia? to show just how much Iran means to the Zios. There is no Which Path to Damascus? Or Which Path to Beirut? Or Which Path to Tripoli?

Tony Cartalucci has answered that doubt I had about this P5+1 deal.
"...any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal."

-Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which Path to Persia?" report, page 52.

[source : Nuclear Deal With Iran Prelude to War, Not "Breakthrough", Land Destroyer,, 26th November 2013]

Yes. We should celebrate peace. Live it. Love it.

But when I see Hague at the dispatch box in The Marsten House telling Netanyahu to calm down dear, when throughout the summer Hague sported his al Qaeda bandana with pride as he pushed for war, war and more war on Syria, when Syria and Iran were named to General Wesley Clark after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11, then I am suspicious.

Can we believe that the USA would hold secret talks with Iran behind Netanyahu's back?

There are so many questions that this raises that one blog will not cover them all.

One question I have is: Why was The Bilderberg Washington Post so keen for peace with Iran through this deal when throughout the summer it was attacking both Obama and Kerry for not bombing Syria?

Monday, November 25, 2013


Is Russia Today becoming, or was it always, Rothschild Today?

That Zac Goldsmith MP, newly married into THE Rothshild banking family, was on the most recent Going Underground (which is now not so much in an underground car park but indoors)?

Goldsmith was first on The Keiser Report.

Now he is on Going Underground.

Pushing the same thing; recall. Not exactly earth-shattering revolution. Goldsmith even considers himself "a troublemaker".

What sort of troublemaker votes for war on Syria after a blatant false flag?

Take a look at Goldsmiths voting record since he was elected in 2010. Loyal. Loyal. Loyal. Yes, a few rebellions here and there, but in the vast majority, and by vast I mean at least 92% of the votes, Goldsmith has been loyal.

So what is so special about:
1. Goldsmith?
2. his current raison d'etre/ cause celebre?

Goldsmith recently married into THE Rothschild banking family. So maybe he is on a bit of a crusade to impress for a later challenge for the leadership?

But what about his cause? It could permit stronger public campaigns against MPs who are real rebels, unlike Goldsmith. But it could also encourage stronger public campaigns against MPs whose constituents consider a bit of an arse. The cause is not something to get out onto the streets for, like removing the royal prerogative, or making fractional reserve banking in privately owned banks illegal.

Goldmsith was not asked by Rattansi about the outrageous decision to sell student loans through the Rothschilds.

Watch Goldsmith get off very, very lightly at:

I wonder which RT program Goldsmith will be on next?


Yesterday The Independent worshipped the ground that Jeremy Scahill walked on.

Today, it is the turn of everybody's favourite controlled left media outlet, The Guardian.

And in The Guardian's fawning article we see who Scahill really is.

Jeremy Scahill, whose provocative documentary Dirty Wars is released in the UK this week, has been described as a "progressive journalist" and an activist in the same mould as Glenn Greenwald. Is "progressive" a word he is comfortable with? "It's not a term I would reject in terms of my personal politics," he says, "but I see myself as an independent journalist and my mission is to try to tell stories about real people."

[source : Jeremy Scahill: the man exposing the US Dirty War, The Guardian,, 24th November 2013]

But Mother Agnes Mariam is real.

She has a story to tell.

But Scahill doesn't want her to tell her story because it would expose the false flag of Ghouta.

Kicking someone out of a Stop The War conference goes a bit further than simply being "an independent journalist" wanting to "tell stories about real people".

The Guardian, which projects this image of anti war (why else would they publish such an arse-licking article on Scahill?) pushed for war on Syria in August after Ghouta, citing R2P. It allows warmongers like Nick Cohen to push for war, but deletes my comments. Not once in the piece on Scahill is the scandalous move that Scahill took to kick Mother Agnes Mariam out of the Stop The War conference addressed. Neither did The Independent yesterday.

This article exposes both The Guardian and Scahill as, as Tarpley suggests, left gatekeepers.

And Scahill is teaming up with...Glenn Greenwald, the man who brought us Ed Snowden, just after the Syrian Arab Army had recaptured al Qusair and Obama was stalling on direct military intervention in Syria. That stalling on direct military intervention in Syria by Obama has continued with diplomacy with Iran.

Sunday, November 24, 2013


That loser, Netanyahu, is furious!

And I like it!

First, Obama didn't bomb Syria, despite many false flags attributed to Assad, the latest at Ghouta.

Second, Obama pushed for diplomacy with Iran instead of bombing Iran.

Third, it is being reported that the USA and Iran have been in secret negotiations for a year.

And fourth, it is now being reported that Obama wants Iran to attend peace talks over Syria.

Having overseen an interim deal with Iran on its nuclear program, the Obama administration now intends to try to involve Iran in wider Middle East diplomacy, including an attempt to find a solution to the Syrian civil war, Israeli television reported Sunday night.

The report was one of a series of dramatic revelations and assessments in the Hebrew media on Sunday night, hours after the US and other world powers signed an interim agreement with Iran in Geneva.

Both of Israel’s main TV news channels also carried reports flatly stating that Israel’s military option is “off the table” for the foreseeable future. This claim was apparently based on assessments from inside Israel’s military establishment. Israel’s Channel 10 news reported that “the White House is briefing American journalists” with the same message: Israel cannot intervene militarily in Iran now that the interim deal has been signed.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly vowed Sunday to ensure Iran not attain nuclear weapons, but privately the prime minister was said to have acknowledged that the Geneva deal has essentially sanctioned Iran as a nuclear threshold state.

Netanyahu is “extremely angry” over the terms of the deal, under which Iran will be allowed to continue low-level enrichment of uranium for at least the next six months, a Channel 2 report said. It quoted an unnamed senior official in Jerusalem, who stated: “In Geneva, [US President] Obama established Iran as a nuclear threshold state, and Israel, the prime minister has made clear, cannot live with Iran as a nuclear threshold state.” Israel, the report continued, regards the Geneva deal as “a profound failure” by the Obama administration.

The Israel TV news reports Sunday night also claimed that the Obama administration was still misleading Israel over its newly acknowledged secret back-channel negotiations with Iran in recent months. The administration “hid the fact of the secret channel from Israel,” Channel 2 reported, even after it knew that Israeli intelligence had exposed it. Obama only reportedly told Netanyahu about the back channel less than two months ago, when they met at the White House.

Aspects of that secret channel were still being hidden, Channel 10 said.

[source : ‘US intends to seek Iran’s help in solving Syrian civil war’, Times of Israel,, 24th November 2013]

Now JINSA John, John Bolton, has posted on Kristol's Weekly Standard. Bolton states that the only response is for Israel to attack Iran.

...Instead, those opposing Obama’s “Munich moment” in Geneva (to borrow a Kerry phrase from the Syrian crisis), should focus on the larger and more permanent strategic problem: A terrorist, nuclear Iran still threatens American interests and allies, and almost certainly means widespread nuclear proliferation across the Middle East. A nuclear Iran would also be essentially invulnerable, providing a refuge that al Qaeda leaders hiding in Afghan and Pakistani caves could only dream of.

So in truth, an Israeli military strike is the only way to avoid Tehran’s otherwise inevitable march to nuclear weapons, and the proliferation that will surely follow. Making the case for Israel’s exercise of its legitimate right of self-defense has therefore never been more politically important. Whether they are celebrating in Tehran or in Jerusalem a year from now may well depend on how the opponents of the deal in Washington conduct themselves.

[source : Abject Surrender by the United States ; What does Israel do now?, Weekly Standard,, 24th November 2013]

It is people like Netanyahu, Kristol and Bolton who will henceforth in their nightmares see the American people coming for them with pitchforks and a long rope.

Expect the anti-Obama rhetoric to escalate in not just the mainstream but also the alternative media. Ziodollars go a long, long way.









You know who engineered all this senseless slaughter.

Good Luck Everyone - Blackadder - BBC



In 1996 a sad bunch of Zionutters proposed a clean break with peace in their warmongering document A Clean Break. Bless their little warmongering hearts, they proposed war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon.

Their Ziofriends created The Project for a New American Century. They wrote that they wanted "a new Pearl Harbor" to start a series of wars on...Iraq and Iran. After the new Pearl Harbor 9/11 they planned a series of wars on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon. And bless their little false flag mongering hearts, they decided to have a go at Libya, Sudan and Somalia too.

Since 9/11 there has been a series of wars:
In 2003 we invaded Iraq.
In 2006 Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah, but somehow lost.
In 2011 we bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libya, and BSF helped al Qaeda into Tripoli.
In 2011 the 'civil' war in Syria began, and there have been calls to attack Syria ever since, particularly after some false flags blamed on Assad.

But the big one is Iran. They said so in Rebuilding America's Defenses, in which they stated that Iran was more of a threat to US, i.e. Israeli, security than Iraq. And they falsely accused Iraq of running 9/11! Another clue to just how important Iran is to them is that one of their think tanks The Saban Center for Middle East Studies, financed by Zionist billionaire Haim Saban, wrote Which Path To Persia? which explored the many ways the USA could be used to get to Tehran for the Zios. According to Wikipedia, Saban's self-confessed mission in life is to protect Israel.

Israel wants Iran wiped off the map. And it wants the USA to do it for them.

That's why they did 9/11.

That's why they are really pissed off about Obama not bombing Syria, and for not bombing Iran.

Yes, Syria is in rubble. The plan was to trick Obama into attacking Syria. But by 2009 it was clear it wasn't going to happen. So true to the Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh, the Saudis provided some cutthroat Jihadis, and the British asked former French foreign minister Roland Dumas to help their wild child Saudi Arabia to get them into Syria. But even then the cutthroats couldn't quite do the job of ousting Assad, so there have been a few false flag events; al Houla, Khan al Assal, and the pièce de résistance, the horrific event at Ghouta. All false flags. All blamed on Assad by the NATO media and politicians, but actually committed by Prince Bandar bin Sultan via his proxies, the cutthroat Jihadis.

Unfortunately for the Zios, they, Bilderberg and Wall Street picked the wrong man in Mitt Romney to win in 2012. Romney blew his chance after their man at Langley, General David Petraeus, arranged a false flag at Benghazi to blame on Obama.

Obama is not going to play war.

Yes, indeed folks. Iran is the big one. Israel wants Iran wiped off the map. And it wants the USA to do it for them.

But Obama wants to be friends with Iran instead. Wary friends, but still friends.

Better wary friends than world war 3.

Nice one on this one, O!


Alan Power claims his life is in danger and that he is being harassed for writing a book which accuses MI6 and SAS of murdering Diana, the People's Princess.
Writer Alan Power spotted one of his pursuers walking up the long, private driveway of his remote home on the Isle of Man.

He confronted the man who said he was looking for a pet store. Then the stranger walked off to meet two other men in a car.

He believes the men were ­harassing him because of his ­sensational claims in his book, The Princess Diana Conspiracy, The Evidence Of Murder.

...“I noticed people tailing me when I took the ferry to the mainland to get my car looked at in July. One sat next to me and the other sat behind me during the crossing. They made it pretty obvious they were tailing me.

“The same thing happened on the way back with other men making it clear they were keeping a close eye on me. One kept flexing his muscles.

...“I have had death threats before and after publishing the book but I didn’t take them too seriously. This was different. I am pretty sure some security services ­people came over to the island just to make a point, to let me know they are monitoring me.”

[source : Princess Diana conspiracy expert, Alan Power, is 'in danger', The Sunday Express,, 24th November 2013]

He could be making it up to increase sales.

Or they really could be harassing him.

We have to ask:
1. why are we allowed to watch all kinds of warporn, tortureporn and porn, yet we can't watch Keith Allen's film on the death of Diana, Unlwaful Killing?
2. why did it take 10 years to establish an inquiry into the death of the mother of the future King of England?
3. why is there so much occult symbolism in her death?

Readers will know that I believe that Diana was murdered, and that she was murdered because she was about to marry and have children with a Muslim just a few years before 9/11. I ask, would there have been such a rush to war after 9/11 had Diana (a) had children with a Muslim, (b) exerted her influence over Bush like she had with Clinton?

Diana was a danger to the agenda. She was preparing to go public on the royal family, and to create a massive bridge between the west and Islam just before 9/11.


An agreement was reached with Iran early this morning over its nuclear program. Iran will suspend further enrichment in return for less sanctions.

A deal was torpedoed last week by France, to the obvious wild joy of Israel.

Since then we have seen a declaration of war by the Zios on Obama; The Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI) released a video attacking Obama's competence over the roll out of Obamacare, linking this to the very wise decision not to bomb Syria.

Obama has now taken that wisdom and applied it to Iran. The response from the ZioPNAC crowd has been predictable: fury; anger; outrage; and even more fury.

Very modern history, and by that I mean the last 15 years or so, has been dominated by the Zionists and their bloodthirsty monster The Project for a New American Century (PNAC). PNAC was sadly foisted upon this world by William Kristol in 1998, who later sadly foisted upon this world the ECI. With this latter move Kristol unwittingly proved that 9/11 was an inside Ziojob. The very first thing that PNAC did was to write to then President Bill Clinton demanding war on Iraq. A year before 9/11 PNAC published their prophetic Rebuilding America's Defenses, which called for "a new Pearl Harbor" to launch a series of wars across the globe to assert US hegemony. Although there was a list of nations named explicitly, the two nations that stood out for special treatment were Iraq and Iran, with Iran alleged to be more of a threat to the USA than Iraq.

PNAC was dominated by Israel-firsters, whose allegiance to the USA came second to their allegiance to Israel. The fact that Kristol later formed the ECI with other PNACers says it all. The policies pursued by the USA after the inside Ziojob 9/11 were suggested by a crowd of Zionutters who had written another bloodthirsty document called A Clean Break, which proposed a clean break with peace and to 'engage', i.e. start war on, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria.

So, which nations have been attacked since 9/11? SURPRISE! Iraq. Then Lebanon. Syria was supposed to have been attacked last year after the false flag of al Houla. But despite tons of diplomatic pressure, and a few Ziolies, Obama wisely refused to bomb Syria following a false flag at Ghouta.

And now there is peace with Iran. For now.

The reaction from the ECI/PNACers is clear.
Statement by Noah Pollak, Executive Director of the Emergency Committee for Israel, on the agreement with Iran just concluded in Geneva:

"The Geneva Agreement is a defeat for the United States and the West. It fails to uphold even the minimum demand of repeated U.N. Security Council resolutions that Iran must stop enriching uranium. For the next six months, the centrifuges will not be dismantled and will continue to spin, uranium will be enriched, the 20 percent enriched uranium will stay in Iran, and a reactor designed to produce bomb-ready plutonium will remain just months away from completion. Iran will continue its march to nuclear weapons, with perhaps a brief pause in some parts of the program -- but it will be a pause that refreshes, since Iran will be rewarded right away with significant sanctions relief, with the additional likelihood that the rest of the sanctions regime will begin to crumble.

"Congress should make clear that it does not support this deal. Congress should make clear that just because the Obama administration seems to have taken all our options off the table, our allies need not follow us down this futile path of accommodating the Iranian regime's nuclear ambitions. In particular, Congress should make clear the United States will support Israel if Israel decides she must act to prevent a regime dedicated to her destruction from acquiring the means to do so."

[source : ECI Statement on the Geneva Agreement, ECI,, 24th November 2013]

Kristol simply compares Iran to Nazi Germany, by quoting verbatim the speech that Winston Churchill gave to The Marsten House after the Munich Agreement:
In light of the Geneva Agreement, I went back to read Winston Churchill's October 5, 1938, speech in the House of Commons on the Munich Agreement. Here are a few highlights:

"I will begin by saying what everybody would like to ignore or forget but which must nevertheless be stated, namely, that we have sustained a total and unmitigated defeat. ..."

[source : 75 Years Ago, Weekly Standard,, 24th November 2013]

Iran is pursuing a peaceful civilian nuclear power program. No proof has been provided to the contrary. All we get from Israel are paranoid rants, the paranoia caused by the Holocaust that their very own Rothschild and Warburg families engineered because world Jewry well understood what would happen if Jews colonised Palestine, so they didn't want to go, despite financial inducements from the Warburgs. So the Rothschilds and Warburgs created Hitler to scare world Jewry into going to Palestine. The Nazis didn't kill six million Jews, but they definitely killed a lot, a million, two at the most, but it was all with the nod from the Rothschilds and Warburgs. The result was world Jewry terrorising and murdering Palestinians into the world's largest refugee camps in Gaza and the West Bank, and wars and and global terror ever since that are now being used to implement universal surveillance, and if the USA and/or Israel attack Syria and/or Iran, then the resulting WW3 would lead to a total world government, which is what I think Israel was created to provoke.

Israel is screaming "bad deal":
Top Israeli ministers harshly criticized the nuclear deal between Iran and six world powers early Sunday, with Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman saying the agreement had shifted the status quo in the Middle East.

“This brings us to a new reality in the whole Middle East, including the Saudis. This isn’t just our worry,” he told Israel Radio. “We’ve found ourselves in a completely new situation.”

When asked if this would lead to an Israeli military strike on Iran, Liberman said Israel “would need to make different decisions.”

[source : Israeli ministers lambaste ‘delusional’ Iran nuclear deal, Times of Israel,, 24th November 2013]

And lest we forget; Israel has a massive stockpile of nuclear, chemical and biological WMDs which nobody talks about, and Israel is not a signatory to any treaty regarding these.

If the ZioPNAC/ECI/Israelis are furious then this is good news.

Perhaps there really is something in the Truth Serum Report of the Year 2012:
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.

[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV,, 21st September 2012]

Saturday, November 23, 2013


Morrissey -- Irish Blood, English Heart

Irish blood, English heart
This I'm made of
There is no one on earth I'm afraid of
And no regime can buy or sell me

I've been dreaming of a time when
to be English is not to be baneful
to be standing by the flag, not feeling shameful
racist or partial

Irish blood, English heart
this I'm made of
There is no one on earth I'm afraid of
And I will die with both of my hands untied

I've been dreaming of a time when
the English are sick to death
of Labour, and Tories
and spit upon the name Oliver Cromwell
and denounce this royal line that still salutes him
and will salute him


Just two weeks ago we remembered.

We remembered all those who fought and died in the many wars this nation has fought in, but mainly World Wars 1 and 2. Out of those two engineered wars came declarations of rights, mainly the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Oh, our ancestors who fought and died in those wars must be turning in their graves. Were their deaths in vain?

Yesterday it was reported that, despite its gross violations of human rights, The Foreign Affairs Committee thinks that we should continue to sell weapons to Saudi Arabia.

There are accusations that the al Yamamah deal financed 9/11 and other terrorist attacks, which would explain why all attempts to investigate that dodgy deal have been torpedoed.

Saudi Arabia is also financing and arming the cutthroat Jihadis as they decapitate their bloody grisly way through Syria, which at the moment looks like a one way ticket to an early death at the hands of the Syrian Arab Army.

It really is all a complete farce, a sham, a load of bollocks. Almost as funny as Carry On Screaming.

The message from The Marsten House to the cutthroat Jihadis is, Carry On Decapitating, because the British government is going to do fuck all about the terrorism coming out of Saudi Arabia. Do nothing, say nothing and pretend to know nothing.

As long as Saudi Arabia is helping to cut the throats of Syrian children, that's OK, is it?

The report recognises that Saudi Arabia’s role as a key buyer for the UK defence industry is controversial. But it finds that, with other competitors in the market, there is little to suggest that ending defence sales from the UK would have any positive effect, and might actually reduce the UK’s leverage and its ability to provide training programmes.

[source : UK must better explain its approach to relations with Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, The Marsten House,, 22nd November 2013]


One of the major news channels early this morning ran a piece on the JFK assassination. It showed the Zapruder film, well most of it. The bit when the head shot occurs was edited out. Instead a few seconds long black and white film of a policeman looking up at the book depository was edited in, so the film you actually got to see was:
1. JFK being shot from behind in his back, and lurching forward
2. this short B/W film of a policeman looking up at the depository
3. JFK with his head in bits being rushed off.

My message is: no matter how you spin it, his head still went back and to the left.

Back and to the left.

Back and to the left.

Back and to the left.

Back and to the left.

Back and to the left.

Back and to the left.

Here is Bill Hicks taking the limeade out of the official fairytale of the JFK assassination, in particular the head shot.


Here are excerpts from the trial of the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand. These excerpts reveal that:
1. freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death;
2. freemasonry was looking for someone to assassinate Ferdinand;
3. freemasonry found their willing assassins in Princip, Casimirovic, Ciganovic and Cabrinovic;
4. freemasonry provided the assassins with a revolver and bullets;
5. freemasonry provided the assassins with encouragement;
6. the assassins were freemasons themselves.

In the rush to war these statements were completely ignored.

Kaiser Wilhelm II was later informed by a distinguished freemason that freemasonry had planned World War 1 to create a power vacuum. That vacuum was initially filled by Hitler for WW2 (he was allowed to violate The Treaty of Versailles and to annex neighbours for resources and to bring him closer to another dupe, Stalin), and now the EU.

Cabrinovic. - He (Casimirovic) is a freemason, even in some degree one of their chiefs. He travelled abroad immediately (after the men had offered themselves to carry out the assassination). He went to Russia, France and Buda-Pesth. Every time when I asked Ciganovic how far our projects had advanced, he replied that I should know when Casimirovic should return. About this time Ciganovic also told me that the freemasons had already condemned to death the heir to the throne two years ago, but that they had not found men to carry out their judgment. Later when he gave me the automatic revolver and the cartridges, he said : That man came back last evening from Buda-Pesth. I knew that he had made the journey in connection with our undertaking and that he had conferred abroad with certain circles.
The President. — Are you not simply spinning a yarn ?
Cabrinovic. — It is the pure truth and a hundred times truer than your Narodna Odbrana documents.


Premusic: - Have you read the books of Rosic?
Cabrinovic. — I have read his treatise on freemasonry.
Premusic. — Were these books distributed in Belgrade?
Cabrinovic. — I set them in type as a printer.
Premusic. — Tell me, do you believe in God or anything?
Cabrinovic. — No.
Premusic. — Are you a mason?
Cabrinovic. — (Confused, after a moment's silence and speaking loudly) Why do you ask me that? I cannot answer you on that subject.
Premusic. — Is Tankosic a mason?
Cabrinovic. — (Again after a silence). Yes, and Ciganovic also.
The President. — From which it follows that you also are a mason, for a freemason never admits to anyone but another mason that he belongs to that society.
Cabrinovic. — Please do not ask me about that subject for I shall not reply.


The President. — Tell me something more about the motives. Did you know before deciding to attempt the assassination that Tankosic and Ciganovic were freemasons? Had the fact of you and they being freemasons an influence on your resolve?
Cabrinovic. — Yes.
Tm: President. — Did you receive from them the mission to carry out the assassination?
Cabrinovic. — I received from no one the mission to carry out the assassination, Freemasonry had to do with it because it strengthened me in my intention. In freemasonry it is permitted to kill. Ciganovic told me that the freemasons had condemned to death the Archduke Franz Ferdinand more than a year before.
The president. - Did he tell you that from the very beginning or only after you spoke to him of your wish to carry out the assassination?
Cabrinovic. — We had already spoken about freemasonry but he said nothing to me of the condemnation to death before we had quite decided to carry out the assassination.


The President. — Did you speak about freemasonry with Ciganovic?
Princip (insolently). — Why ask me that ?!
The President. — I ask because I must know. Did you speak to him about it or not?
Princip. - - Yes, Ciganovic told me that he was a freemason.
The President. — When did he tell vou that?
Princip. -- he told me when I was asking about the means of carrying out the assassination. He added that he would speak with a certain person and that he would receive the necessary means. On another occasion, he told me that the heir to the throne had been condemned to death in a masonic lodge.
The President. — And are you also a freemason?
Princip. — Why that question? I shall not reply. (After a short silence) : No.
The President. — Is Cabrinovic a mason?
Princip. — I do not know. Perhaps he is. He told me once that he was going to join a lodge.


We have been lost in a deep, dark forest of lies, war, fraud, kiddie-fiddling, mass genocide and megalomania for far too long.

It's time to come home.

Peters & Lee - Welcome Home

I'm so alone, my love without you
You're part of everything I do
When you come back, and you're beside me
These are the words I'll say to you

Welcome home, welcome
Come on in, and close the door
You've been gone, too long
Welcome, you're home once more

I thought of all the things I'd say to you
When you come back to me someday
When you are here and we're together
With all my heart you'll hear me say

Welcome home, welcome
Come on in, and close the door
You've been gone, too long
Welcome, you're home once more

There are so many lonely people
Why must they ever be apart
I hope someday you'll be together
Singing these words with all your heart

Welcome home, welcome
Come on in, and close the door
You've been gone, too long
Welcome, you're home once more
(Welcome home)


Jim Reeves - Welcome To My World

Welcome to my world.
Welcome to my world
Won't you come on in
Miracles I guess
Still happen now and then
Step into my heart
Leave your cares behind
Welcome to my world
Built with you in mind
Knock and the door will open
Seek and you will find
Ask and you will be given
The key to this world of mine
I'll be waiting here
With my arms unfurled
Waiting just for you
Welcome to my world


Friday, November 22, 2013


Have we tolerated being mugged off so much for so long because we have been genetically engineered that way?


Ignore Jack Nicholson. You can handle the truth...but it'll take time, so be patient.

You can handle the truth about the assassination of JFK, who was becoming too big for his boots, splintering the CIA, winding down the Cold War, withdrawing from Vietnam and standing up to Wall Street and The Empire by seeking global cooperative development.

You can handle the truth about the inside Ziojob 9/11 and the subsequent plan for war on seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark which roughly follows an Israeli plan called A Clean Break for war on its enemies.

You can handle the truth about Bilderberg vetting our politicians before they enter high office, as well as creating the European Union.

You can handle the truth about how World War 1 was planned and executed by The Brutish Empire and its secret terrorist organisations in a desperate bid to create a world government, the ultimate in empire.

You can handle the truth about how World War 2 was engineered because the USA voted out of The League of Nations because the USA had only fought in World War 1 for the final year and had not suffered the same number of casualties as Great Britain and France.

You can handle the truth about The Russian Revolutions, which was revenge for Tsar Alexander II assisting Abraham Lincoln and threatening war on the British Empire during the US Civil War.

You can handle the truth about the horrific creation of Israel, the betrayal of the Jews by the Zionists who wanted Palestine populated by Jews but the Jews didn't want to go, so the Zionists conjured up Hitler to scare world Jewry into wanting to go to Palestine (and it had to be Palestine and nowhere but Palestine), and Israel's bloody purpose and destiny in fomenting global war and terror.

You can handle the truth about the Wall Street and City of London manufactured Hitler unwittingly serving 2 purposes: to drag Europe into a long global war that would embroil the USA so that it would suffer many more casualties and be more likely to join a resulting world government; to scare world Jewry into moving to Palestine.

You can handle the truth about MI6 creating al Qaeda, and the Covenant of Security that MI5 had with the Islamic terrorists, then them having the balls to tell The Marsten House that they need universal surveillance and to shut Ed Snowden up because he is assisting al Qaeda while we support cutthroat Jihadis in Syria by allowing preachers to preach to young Muslims on the streets of London to go to Syria to slit the throats of Syrian children, the same Jihadis that Roland Dumas was asked by British officials to smuggle into Syria in 2009,and the same Jihadis that MI5 are now expressing concern for over what those Jihadis will do when they return to the UK.

You can handle the truth about the banking and financial system, how the banks create trillions out of thin air while we work our arses off just to survive and how the banking system is really just a casino in which we pay for the gambling debts of the banks instead of the banks creating and financing a stable growing economy for the benefit of the people.

You can handle the truth about yourself, that you have been mugged off all these years, led to believe that your government loves you, would never ever lie to you and would treat you with total respect.

You can handle the truth that you can change all the next day.

You can handle the truth that you have the power to stop the warmongering, the paedophilia, the human trafficking, the frauds, the mass genocide, the lies.

You can handle the truth.


1. Santa Claus.
2. Elvis.
3. The Anglo-American Establishment through their military/CIA/mob network, who were pissed off with JFK for looking for cooperative global development and destruction of empire, rapprochement and detente with the USSR and a cooling of the Cold War, withdrawal from Vietnam, and perceived betrayal at The Bay of Pigs resulting in JFK beginning a full frontal bureaucratic assault on the CIA. They also had the power to cover it up by appointing people like Allen Dulles and John J McCloy to control The Warren Commission.
4. KGB.
5. Israel because JFK wanted to curb Israel's nuclear weapons program.
6. Colonel Mustard, with the cumbersome, ridiculously inaccurate and slow Mannlicher-Carcano, in the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository.
7. Any combination of the above.















Thursday, November 21, 2013


In 2003 and 2004 I wrote to the Intelligence and Security Committee 3 THREE times setting out in some detail my research into covert electromagnetic weapons and remote mind control. I demanded an immediate public inquiry into such weapons. They did nothing.

How can you tell if someone is intercepting your emails?

How can you tell if someone is remotely reading your mind? Or writing your mind?

Which is more sinister and intrusive?

We knew about Echelon years ago. That mass surveillance system was bound to have been modernised. I doubt whether all the latest technology since then could have been introduced into the public domain without the nod from particular spying agencies. Those agencies may have even developed the new technologies, then introduced them into the public sphere via a corporation.

The technology that the elite have is decades in advance of what is in the public domain. Many NWO/conspiracy researchers should know that. To me, the Snowden revelations are boring, and due to the conduit of his revelations, The Guardian, and its recent alliances I believe he is at the least being used in a psyop against Obama, particularly when previous NSA whistleblowers have been completely ignored. To add to this doubt about the sincerity of Team Snowden, Glen Greenwald is teaming up with Jeremy Scahill. Tarpley has accused Scahill of being funded by foundations, like Ford. But what cannot be denied is that Scahill recently torpedoed the appearance of Mother Agnes Miriam at a Stop The War conference in London later this month. Scahill has also professed his belief in the official 9/11 fairytale.

Forget Snowden and focus on the much darker, more sinister, more intrusive technology of remote mind control and EM weapons being used on the general public.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013


In the last two lessons I have given to a class, one kid has cracked a joke each time:
1. Sir, why was the number 10 scared? Because 7 8 9.
2. Sir, why did he call it a polygon? Because he had a parrot and it flew away.


You cannot make this stuff up #483511392

The United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Committee has approved a resolution from, wait for it...SAUDI ARABIA...which demands that Syria allow access into Syria to provide aid.

Even the spider in my bathroom knows that it is Saudi Arabia who is sponsoring all the slaughter in Syria. So why do the Saudis want Syria to allow in aid?

In the last week I have read nothing but great news coming out of Syria, as the brave and competent Syrian Arab Army chases the Saudi-backed cutthroat terrorists out of Damascus and Aleppo. This was always on the cards following the liberation of al Qusair in June, which prompted the Snowden revelations to pressure Obama into bombing Syria. Obama declined, and the false flag attack on Ghouta occured on 21st August 2013 which was designed to force Russia into dumping Assad and to trick Obama into bombing Syria. Al Qusair was a very important logistics hub for the cutthroats. So with their supply lines cut they are now suffering defeat after defeat,and are now attacking and decapitating each other! Hence this Saudi resolution to force Syria to allow in 'aid'.

What kind of aid?

Aid to whom?

Who will check the deliveries and the recipients?

And regarding the latest bombing in Beirut, claimed by the al Qaeda affiliate Abdullah Azzam Brigade, I refer you to the current favourite to win the much coveted award, The Truth Serum Report of the Year 2013, which I understood to predict the horror we now see in not only Syria but also Lebanon:
PARIS-- Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia told Vladimir Putin and the other Russian officials he met with in Russia a couple of weeks ago that Saudi Arabia is taking the lead in the Middle East following the demise of Qatar. This was reported by Lebanese journalist Scarlett Haddad in an August 8th article in L'Orient le Jour, the major French-language daily in Lebanon

...Because of the failure of his "diplomatic" offensive, the "BRICS" diplomat says that Bandar will now launch an offensive against Syria, aimed at finally removing Bashar al-Assad from power. Bandar apparently announced that results would be visible on the ground in the coming months and has decided to create a new balance of power in Syria in favor of the opposition that would compel Russia and its allies to give up Assad in the context of international negotiations. At the same time, Bandar intends to create great difficulty for Iraq and the Hezbollah, which are in the process of aiding Assad. In Lebanon, Bandar instructed thus his allies — Hariri, Jumblatt, Geagea — to block any possibility for the Hezbollah and Aoun's party, the March 8th Coalition, to come to power again, and for them to gain once again a blocking minority.

Sources in Lebanon close to General Aoun fully confirmed this black scenario, that Bandar will try a full onslaught to eliminate Bashar al-Assad, in the course of September and October. "Times ahead will be terrible," he said, "the West has opted for a strategy of chaos and destruction of the entire area." He also noted the hideous massacres which occurred in the last days in the Latakia governorate — Abu Makka and Obin — where gangs of jihadists executed whole families and in the case of Obin exterminated a whole village.

[source : Bandar Planning New "Blair Up" in Syria and Lebanon , LPAC,, 13th August 2013]

The false flag of Ghouta was that attempt to force or embarrass Russia into dumping Assad. It failed spectacularly. Just days before Ghouta was an attack on the Hezbollah HQ in Beirut. Now with talks with Iran about to recommence, this is a provocation by the Israeli-Saudi Axis of Evil that I believe was given its stamp, or should that be cloven hoof, of approval.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013


A young girl I was teaching yesterday had something written on her left hand. I looked closer and saw that she had drawn a triangle with the all seeing eye inside, and underneath she had written 666. I asked where she had seen that, and she told me, "Disney". She seemed quite happy and proud of what she had drawn and done, which was to effectively tattoo herself with the logo of Satanists.

I know this girl. She is very friendly, nice, sweet and very intelligent. She was on a sponsored silence last Friday for Children in Need, so we had a laugh as I tried to teach her.

So what makes a young girl like that tattoo herself like that? And appear quite proud of it?

This is yet more evidence that Disney is an Illuminati brainwashing operation. Its latest product is the talentless traitor Miley Cyrus, who rose to fame and became the darling of millions upon millions of families across the world through the Disney character Hannah Montana, only for her to 'rebel' and produce musical drivel while she wears next to nothing like the bona fide princess of The Illuminati, Rihanna,, twerks like an idiot, sticks her tongue out like a moron, gropes latex-clad dwarves like a sexual degenerate, bends over and simulates sex like a whore, and styles her hair so it resembles two horns like a devil, and all in front of millions upon millions of families. Thankfully there is some rejection of Cyrus, but sadly not enough.

How can we get this out, and keep it out, of our schools?!

Monday, November 18, 2013


There is all sorts of crap in a vaccine, and some if not all are known to be useless.

With the advent of nanotechnology, guess what they'll be covertly injecting soon.

But this report is very, very scary. DARPA are now investigating genetically engineering us by giving us a 47th chromosone via a vaccine. Bill and Melinda Gates are in there.


Aww, this is getting beyond the joke now.
Among the host of conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy are variations that point the finger at agencies of the U.S. government, all the way up to the vice president.

Others connect the dots and find the Soviet Union at the center of the plot, highlighting Lee Harvey Oswald’s mysterious defection to the communist nation and return to the U.S. with a Russian wife.

But a former Soviet-bloc spy chief who was active at the time of the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination says Moscow’s fingerprints are on both scenarios.

Lt. Gen. Mihai Pacepa, in his book “Disinformation”, presents evidence that Oswald was recruited by the KGB to kill Kennedy when he was a U.S. Marine stationed at the Atsugi Air Station in Japan, the home of the U-2 spy plane.

[source : WND EXCLUSIVE : Moscow 'programmed Oswald to kill JFK', WND,, 17th November 2013]

These 'revelations' come from a Mihai Pacepa who defected from Romania to the USA in 1978.

After Arafat was recently found to have been murdered by Israel with Polonium 210, WND indirectly accused the KGB by printing Pacepa's 'exclusive' that the KGB did it.

And now, as we approach the 50th Anniversary of JFKs assassination, WND again indirectly accuses the KGB by printing yet another Pacepa 'exclusive'.

Add to this 'reports' from Aaron Klein who claims to have a direct pipeline into the heart of Middle Eastern intelligence agency (which usually supplies him with disinfo on Israel's enemies so we can take an educated guess as to which one), and in WND we have a very sour lemon.

Sunday, November 17, 2013


The Brothers Johnson - Stomp!


Oh dear. I was hoping for a Brand-free weekend. But an allegation was made against Russell Brand in The Sun today. He denies the allegation. The allegation was that he had something going with a woman while he was seeing Gemima Khan nee Goldsmith now Rothschild sister-in-law.

The Sun is the gutter press. As Brand states, The Sun blamed the victims of Hillsborough themselves, and it has been so pro-Israel, so pro-war and switched its allegiance to Labour war criminal and Satan's minion Tony Blair.

I believe Brand.

It may just be a young girl looking to make some quick cash. But there may well be something a bit more sinister to it...


The cornerstone of The Capitol was laid in a grand Masonic ceremony on 18th September 1793, with Masons parading through Washington DC in their full Masonic regalia. With the cornerstone was also laid a silver plate engraved with the following:
This South East corner Stone, of the Capitol of the United States of America in the City of Washington, was laid on the 18th day of September 1793, in the thirteenth year of American Independence, in the first year of the second term of the Presidency of George Washington, whose virtues in the civil administration of his country have been as conspicuous and beneficial, as his Military valor and prudence have been useful in establishing her liberties, and in the year of Masonry 5793, by the Grand Lodge of Maryland, several Lodges under its jurisdiction, and Lodge No. 22, from Alexandria, Virginia.

The year of Masonry 5793 was 1793, making Masonry approximately 4000 years old.

Yet you try finding that history of Masonry anywhere! Most sites imply that Masonry began in the 18th Century, or at the earliest with stone masons in the middle ages.

And in 1782 something very bad is alleged to have occured; The Bavarian Illuminati took control of Masonry at The Congress of Wilhelmsbad.


After some heavy duty blogging this weekend I need to chillax' with some music.

Humble Pie - Natural born boogie 1969

Dustin O'Halloran - Opus 17

D Train - You're The One For Me


Whoever works for, or supports, World Net Daily and is not a Zionist should hang their heads in shame. Because the day following the news that significant and unusual levels of Polonium 210 had been found in the corpse of Arafat, WND pushed the idea that the KGB had assassinated Arafat.

But hang on a second: Israeli President Shimon Peres has recently admitted that Israel assassinated Arafat!

After years of denials from Israeli spokespersons, Israeli President Shimon Peres has admitted the truth. In an interview given to the New York Times some months ago, which was published only last week, Peres said Arafat should not have been assassinated and asserted that he had opposed the policy of murdering him. Peres stated he had “protected Arafat from several plots against his life.”

[source : The assassination of Yasser Arafat, World Socialist Website,, 16th November 2013]

So it wasn't Santa Claus. It wasn't Elvis. It wasn't the KGB. And it wasn't Colonel Mustard.


Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel. Israel.

This definitely puts the radioactive death of Alexander Litvinenko in a completely different light, and explains why, despite having the perfect opportunity to expose Russia as a mafia state and force Russia to drop its support for Assad, and despite claiming to have the evidence to do so, there has been no public inquiry into the radioactive death of Alexander Litvinenko.


Who killed Kennedy?

Well, we could start by clarifying, which one?

You may have thought that US Ambassador to The Court of St James Joseph Kennedy waiving the diplomatic immunity, and thus allowing the arrest and trial, of Tyler Kent by the British would have endeared the Kennedy family to the Anglo-American Establishment. Kent had been keeping records of the secret communications between President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, who at the time was only First Lord of The Admiralty. The two were developing a very friendly relationship through these communications, and were talking of ruling the world if the two nations, UK and USA, would join together. Kent was arrested after he gave copies of the communications to Archibald Ramsay MP, hoping that Ramsay would contact American politicians to warn them that FDR and Churchill were plotting a war against Germany. Ramsay and hundreds of others, including Oswald Mosley, were interned for the duration of World War 2 under Regulation 18b.

Was Kent correct? On 7th December 1941...

Hitler was created. He did not come out of nowhere. World War 1 had failed to produce the world government that the British ruling class longed for. World government is the ultimate in empire. But the USA voted out of it. So that island of British financial control in the USA, Wall Street, created not just Hitler and Nazi Germany but also his arch nemesis Stalin and Communist Russia. With such ideological extremes armed and in such close proximity a world war was bound to occur. Hitler was allowed to invade Europe piece by piece to give him resources, and to bring him geographically closer to Communist Russia, and when the time was right we declared war. But for well over 8 months there was no world war, only a battle here and there. It was only after Hitler invaded France that things took off, but even then there are hints that Hitler did not want war with Great Britain. Were British troops allowed to escape during 'the miracle of Dunkirk'? Did Hitler seek peace and an anti-Communist alliance with Great Britain through the visit of Rudolf Hess? Hess was captured, detained in isolation, and 'looked after' by John Rawlings Rees. And then Hitler really kicked off WW2 by invading Russia. He then obliged the warmongers, FDR included, in the USA by declaring war on the USA after Pearl Harbour. And after 4 years of slaughter The United Nations was born, has survived (unlike The (aborted) League of Nations) and has gradually assumed more and more power and control, as have other global government institutions such as the EU and IMF. All this may have been impossible had Joseph Kennedy not allowed the arrest and imprisonment of Tyler Kent.

But back to Kennedy.

Next weekend is the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F Kennedy. The fairytale is that a Communist sympathiser called Lee Harvey Oswald shot Kennedy three times from a 6th floor window with a crap gun. Oswald had defected to Russia, for a while, but then came back to the USA, was not prosecuted, and was openly supporting Castro and Communism on the streets of New Orleans while he hung out with anti Communist Russians! The more you read, the more you understand that it was impossible for Oswald to have shot not just Kennedy but also Officer J D Tippit, and that Oswald was some kind of government agent/informer/spy. Oswald had no obvious motive for killing Kennedy, did not provide one, instead claiming live on TV, "I'm just a patsy!". And to stop Oswald's story being revealed he was shot by mobster Jack Ruby live on TV. Ruby predicted that he would be killed too, and he was.

As we approach this anniversary the pro- and anti-JFK camps are out in force.

LPAC and Tarpley claim that JFK had a FDR-esque vision of a world free of the British empire (see JFK versus the Empire). This gave the British the motive to whack JFK.

Then there are others. One surprising other is Justin Raimondo of Anti-War, who claims that JFK was more of a warmonger than George W Bush and David Petraeus! Raimondo accuses JFK of escalating the Cold War in Vietnam and of trying to kill Castro. Yet Raimondo does not accuse anyone of JFKs assassination.

Other sites and newspapers also attempt to smear JFK as a speed freak, hooked on the chemical cocktails provided by a Dr Max Jacobson, who allegedly supplied injections to a mix of politicians, crooks (generally the same thing) and celebrities.

Another new allegation/theory that has recently been presented this week on British TV is that Oswald was doing the shooting all on his own from the 6th floor window, just like the Warren Commission say, but a Secret Service agent in the car behind Kennedy had a rifle on his lap, unlocked the safety, and as he turned to take at aim at Oswald he accidentally fired at Kennedy and blew up JFKs head! But if you watch the Zapruder film you can see the obvious change in momentum in JFKs head as the bullet fired from the grassy knoll hit him; JFKs head goes back and to the left, indicating a close shot from the grassy knoll.

JFK may well have initially hotted up the Cold War, but he was cooling it down, pulling out of Vietnam, and increasing detente with Russia. In 1961 the CIA invaded Cuba using Cuban exiles at The Bay of Pigs. The exiles were slaughtered. JFK refused to provide support. The Cuban Missile Crisis occured the following year, in which JFK, in the eyes of the extreme right in the USA, 'went soft' on Communism. But to give you an idea of just how much the US military felt threatened by Cuba and Communism at that time, we need look no further than Operation Northwoods, written in 1962, which detailed precisely what the US Joint Chiefs of Staff were prepared to do to get Castro and Communism out of Cuba: blowing up American passenger planes to be blamed on Castro; shooting American citizens to be blamed on Castro. All their suggestions were designed to provoke war on Cuba by the USA. Unsurprisingly JFK rejected the obviously clinically insane Northwoods. To add to this 'going soft on Communism', JFK had also decided to break up the CIA. So JFK was not making any friends with the top brass at The Pentagon or the CIA, who had all supported the Bay of Pigs invasion that they thought JFK had betrayed.

And for years Cuba had been a cash cow and a playground for the mob...until Castro took over.

Whether this anti-Castro anti-Cuba anti-Communism was used by the British empire to eliminate JFK and his alleged FDR-esque vision is up for debate.

But there is no doubt that at the least there was a coming together of minds in the military, the CIA and the mob that JFK had to go.

It is possible that the British whacked Kennedy: they killed Lincoln after he had created his own money which provided the Union with the resources to beat the Confederacy; and Aaron Burr shot Alexander Hamilton under ungentlemanly circumstances in a duel after Hamilton had publicised Burr's treason for the British. And this rapprochement between the USA and Russia was destroying the Cold War that begun within hours of the alleged murder of FDR by the British using poison. FDR's post-war policy was to help the whole world, USSR included, to modernise. The theory is that this would have led to the USA and USSR becoming the first and second powers in the world, with Great Britain demoted well down the league. This was a reminder of the American-Russian alliance during the US civil war. So Harriman drove a huge wedge between the USA and the USSR and we got the Cold War and the threat of nuclear war instead of peace and development.

After the assassination of JFK there was no invasion of Cuba, even though Russia had removed its missiles the previous year. However, one of the first things that Johnson did as President was reverse Kennedy's decision to pull out of Vietnam. The following year the Gulf of Tonkin incident occured (or not as history has proved), and there followed over 10 years of slaughter, killing millions, costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

Now that something like that is worth killing a President of the USA for...

50 years on the assassination of JFK is still a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma, but not for much longer.

Saturday, November 16, 2013


In yet another post to expose his true allegiance, Joseph Farah has written a very bizarre and disturbing article on just how great and wonderful and glorious and heavenly Israel is.
And, most remarkable of all, perhaps, is Isaiah’s prophecy that this nation [Israel] would be reborn in one day. (Isaiah 66:8)

All coincidence?

Self-fulfilling prophecies?

What kind of a grand conspiracy could account for such accuracy over 19 centuries?

Who could mastermind such a plot?

God could.

And God did.

Now you know why they are His chosen people – and the purpose for which they were chosen.

[source : Why Israel Proves God is Real, WND,, 16th November 2013]

Farah's love for Israel has made him truly blind.

The problem with Farah's article is that behind this Biblespeak is some very deliberate genocidal sociopathic betrayal of the Jews by some fantastically wealthy Jews who are Hofjuden for the British monarchy. These Jews are the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Schiffs. They were, and presumably still are, along with the Rockefellers, the power behind that cruelest hoax upon mankind, The Federal Reserve.

Max Warburg called himself The King of The Jews. Yet during 1930s Nazi Germany, Max sat on the board of The Reichsbank and I G Farben, while his brother Paul (who was the brains behind The Federal Reserve) sat on the board of I G Farben's American subsidiary. I G Farben was "the state within a state", financing Hitler and guiding his policies. The Warburgs were the largest stockholders in I G Farben. The Warburgs also opposed any international boycott of Hitler and the Nazis. But at the same time, the Warburgs were running the Haavara, the Transfer Agreement, in which the Nazis, the Zionists and the British government (who at the time administered Palestine) agreed that German Jews would be trained in Germany for life in Palestine and then emigrate there. One analysis of these facts, and one to which I subscribe, is that the Warburgs were building up Hitler to scare Jews into populating Palestine, the Rothschilds having financed the first series of Jewish colonies in Palestine, and bequeathing their fortunes for the future Jewish colonisation of Palestine. The Balfour Declaration was essentially a note from a Rothschild employee and friend to a senior Rothschild. But the problem for the Rothschilds, Warburgs and their Zionist ilk was that the Jews in general are, or at the time were, smart. The vast majority of Jews understood that colonisation of Palestine by Jews would lead to terrible consequences. Riots and mass murders had occured in Palestine since 1918. The Jewish people generally understood what was waiting for them in Palestine; trouble. But little did they know what the Warburgs and their Project Hitler were preparing for them, to terrorise them into colonising Palestine...

The Holocaust caused so much trauma in world Jewry that after WW2 they couldn't wait to colonise Palestine. They sailed there in their boat loads, and once there terrorised the Palestinians off their lands and farms into the world's largest refugee camps of Gaza and The West Bank. And ever since 1948 there has been inevitable war and terror, just like the Jews in general before WW2 foresaw. But after the Zionist Warburg Hitler Project...

I would argue that all this was planned.

Not only was Hitler created to terrorise Jews into colonising Palestine, he was created to create the United Nations, as the United Nations Declaration of 1st January 1942 stated, in which the USA, USSR, Great Britain and China and a host of other nations all came together, called themselves The United Nations, and that they had all united to defeat Hitlerism, not Stalinism. Because while the Warburgs and the Rockefellers and Wall Street were busy creating Hitler, Wall Street was at the same time also busy creating his total enemy, Stalin and Communism. My question is, did either Hitler or Stalin know they were being set up? And if so, did they tell the other? Why was there an agreement that the USSR would provide Nazi Germany with oil and other resources?

And it is undeniable that Israel did 9/11 (but not on its own) and has risked provoking World War 3 with its A Clean Break policy of war against Syrian and Iran.

This is not anti-Semitism. It is the truth. The truth about some very evil and fantastically wealthy Hofjuden Jewish Zionist banking families and their betrayal of good, understanding Jews who well understood what a Jewish state forced on Palestine would lead to.

And Joseph Farah of World Net Daily loves it!

Friday, November 15, 2013


With just weeks to go before this emotional roller coaster of a year 2013 is over, the main contender for the much coveted prize The Truth Serum Report of the Year 2013 is Bandar Planning New "Blair Up" in Syria and Lebanon by LPAC published 13th August 2013 at I knew then that that report would be very significant, and it prompted me to write that we can stop the coming slaughter by writing to our MPs to prepare for what was being planned. Less than 2 weeks later, the sick and horrific tragedy of Ghouta occured. If you did write to your MP either before or after Ghouta then good on you. It may just have had some influence on one of those MPs who should have voted for WW3 but who in the end didn't.


The ad from The Emergency Committee for Israel is an open declaration of war by the Zios on President Obama in response to Obama not attacking Syria (after he had forced them to expose themselves at Ghouta) and seeking peace with Iran.

Any of these two possible wars, on either Syria or Iran, would I believe lead to a serious, serious war with Russia and/or China.

Obama was not President on 9/11 He did not invade Iraq, or provide aid to Israel on its war on Hezbollah, but he did reluctantly lead from behind on the war on Libya in 2011.

Bilderberg and Wall Street selected pro-Israel, pro-fascism, pro-war Romney in 2012. They tried to Carterize Obama at Benghazi, when one of their own, David Petraeus, was in charge of the CIA. Petraeus failed, resigned in a scandal, and was recently given a cushy job with KKR who are ever present at Bilderberg.

The fallout from Benghazi was significant. Several top brass resigned or were transferred. There was a Congressional investigation.

But among all the scandals and accusations, one report stood out to me. It won The Truth Serum Report of the Year 2012. In that report, Obama, Dempsey and other powerful Americans were considering going public on 9/11.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.

[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV,, 21st September 2012]

If Obama was truly under their control he would have bombed Syria. But he didn't.

If Obama was truly under their control he would not be seeking diplomacy with Iran. But just as a deal was about to be reached, Israel torpedoed it.

The Zios have now publicly and openly declared war on Obama. That is undeniable.

Obama, Dempsey and the other powerful Americans must go public on 9/11...NOW!


The Emergency Committee for Israel has released a one minute advert which really shows Obama as an incompetent leader who doesn't fulfill his promises.

I have never seen anything like it!

The board of the ECI consists of:
William Kristol - founder of PNAC (but curiously his ECI bio does not state this)
Gary Bauer - signed The Statement of Principles of PNAC

Rachel Abrams is still listed as on the board even though she died this summer. Abrams was the wife of Elliot Abrams. With Elliot we enter the inner sanctum of Israeli infiltration into American politics. As with Bauer, Elliot signed the Statement of Principles of PNAC, but he also works or has worked at Heritage Foundation, Centre for Security Policy and American Jewish Committee.

This video is a declaration of war by the Zios on President Obama.

And the fact that it uses the debacle over the rollout of Obamacare surely raises questions about how did it go all wrong.

Was it sabotage?

Or mere incompetence?

To answer this, we have to go all the way back to September 11th 2001. On that murdered September day we were told that 19 Muslims with boxcutters hijacked 4 passenger planes and outwitted the greatest military machine on the planet for nearly 2 hours, pulling off some pretty impressive flight manoeuvres considering they had only had training in small planes, to eventually fly those hijacked passenger planes into not only the WTC but also EVEN THE PENTAGON! General Wesley Clark was shortly after informed by a Pentagon planner that the USA was going to go to war on seven nations in five years; Iraq; Iran; Lebanon; Syria; Libya; Sudan; Somalia. The first 4 on the list were named in A Clean Break. The other three (I think) will soon be connected by a pipeline running from Somalia to Libya where Somali oil will then be transported to Europe by pipeline, Somalia recently estimated to have the world's 7th largest oil reserves, which form part of the reserve that Saudi Arabia sits on.

The USA invaded Iraq, but under George W Bush.

There was a war on Lebanon, but that was just by Israel on Hezbollah.

Obama reluctantly bombed Libya.

And this summer, after Saudi Arabia ran this year's largest false flag attack at Ghouta, Obama did not take the bait and instead wisely resisted all calls for war on Syria.

9/11 was years in the planning; Saudi Arabia providing the patsies; pro-Israeli agents in charge of the US military and media apparatus to make the military and American people go to sleep.

Before Ghouta Obama was under pressure due to the revelations of Ed Snowden, whose information was relayed to imply that Obama personally read all our emails, texts, tweets, blogs and entries on Facebook. But before Snowden there were plenty of other NSA whistleblowers who were ignored. Snowden's info was reported by The Guardian. But The Guardian has made some very curious alliances in the past: pushing green fascism at Copenhagen in 2009; supporting Rothschild-loving Mikhail Khordokovsky; and supporting an attack on Syria after Ghouta. So why did The Guardian suddenly find Snowden's information so explosive?

Ever since Bilderberg and Wall Street selected Romney last year, Obama has been The Fart in the Spacesuit. They didn't want him in The White House in 2013 because the plan for war on seven nations in five years is way behind schedule, moribund. Obama may love his peace prize, but to the warmongers it is a sharp wooden stake to their cold hearts. Romney would have bombed Syria and Iran by now. Instead Obama forced them to run a false flag and expose themselves at Ghouta...AND HE STILL REFUSED TO START WAR ON SYRIA! And now just as a deal was to be reached between the P5+1 over Iran's nuclear program, Netanyahu screams "bad deal!" and the deal is off.

I was 50/50 on Tarpley's suggestion that the Obamacare roll out had been sabotaged; it was possible, and particular Ziogroups definitely had the motive. But now that this ad has been commissioned by the Zios using Obamacare and referencing Syria, sabotage is to me the more likely.

Obama has infuriated particular people by not attacking Syria, and seeking diplomacy with Iran. This ad has exposed the sabotage of Obamacare.


That depends on how you define cost.

If you are talking about the cost in terms of human life, then the tens of thousands of innocent civilians by indiscriminate and targeted NATO bombing is a start. But we can also add to that the Libyan military, the Jihadis and the hundreds of black Libyans killed by the Jihadis, simply for being black.

In financial terms we can safely assume it cost us, the muggins British taxpayer, over £1 billion.

£1 billion.

In a time of oiksterity.

Why did we do it?

At the time, Gaddafi was cooperating in the global war on terror, giving MI6 and CIA the names of Jihadis in Libya. He had also renounced his WMDs, and had embraced Tony Blair in a new spirit of friendship, which led to Jihadis being renditioned to Libya for torture.

So, again, why did we do it?

Because shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan to start wars on seven nations in five years.

Libya was one of those lucky seven nations.

The other nations were:
Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006)
Syria (2011-)

Yet to be attacked are:

Of these, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria were named in warmongering Zionist document called A Clean Break. Iraq and Iran were explicitly named in Zionist PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses.

Did we spend £1 billion of our precious tax money for Israel?

Think about that today.

Thursday, November 14, 2013


And that is to expose 9/11 as an inside Ziojob.


Why, after 33 years of Children in Need, are there still children in need; when just one cruise missile, similar to what the cowardly warmongers in The Marsten House were foaming at the mouth to wantonly fire at Syria from thousands of miles away, costs approximately one million dollars?


Friday 15th November 2013 is:
1. Bankers in Need Day (still)?
2. Children in Need Day (again)?
3. Cutthroat Jihadis in Need Day (still)?