Saturday, December 31, 2011


Whilst approaching death this summer in hospital I was introduced to the Harry Potter series of films by my nephew. I was intrigued by the phenomenon. My friend loved it, so I wanted to see what all the fuss was about, particularly as the film series has no doubt influenced a generation.

So what is it all about? All the wand-pointing, and the goblins, and the creating stuff out of thin air whenever you need it?

It is basically a tale of good versus evil, right? Harry Potter, after first sacrificing and then resurrecting himself (sound familiar?), and his young friends eventually defeat the bad guy and save the world. A ha, you think. That's it. To save the world from evil you may have to sacrifice yourself.

But I noticed a twist.

Harry Potter ends up with this special knobbly wand, which essentially makes him invincible. So why does he snap it into two pieces, thus destroying its power, and throw it away? If he kept it and used it for good then he and his wand-waving friends could banish evil forever. Instead, Harry Potter breaks it and throws it away.


This one curious act implies to me that power, in the hands of either good or evil, is bad so should be given away.

But given away to whom?

Fully aware that there is a plan to implement or impose a tryannical world government the Harry Potter film series (I have not read the books) could well disarm a generation into thinking that they should not have power.

I hope this is not the case, and that sacrifice-yourself-to-defeat-evil is the whole point of it all.

Harry Potter? You can keep him.

Give me Antony C Sutton and his non-fiction anyday.


The Zionists, be it just the USA or with Israel and with backing from the UK, will attempt to start a war with Iran.

That is the prediction.

I am not predicting how this attempt will manifest, or when.

But they killed nearly 3000 people when they executed 9/11. They had announced their intentions exactly one year before when they published Rebuilding America's Defenses, in which they named Iraq and Iran as major threats to US hegemony. Four years before this the same group of Zionists had published A Clean Break naming Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria as threats to Israeli hegemony in the Middle East.

General Wesley Clark has since confirmed that a Pentagon plan to start war on seven countries has been ongoing. Syria and Iran are both on that list. The other five, including Libya, have seen either war or interference from the USA.

William Engdahl has also claimed there is a plan for a Greater Middle East, stretching from North Africa all the way to Pakistan.

Both Kissinger and Soros have also publicly stated that Iran will suffer during the Arab Spring.

Wherever you look, you find plans to include Iran as a target.

And when you look at a map, Iran is now surrounded by countries with a large US military presence.

But I am a firm believer in the Albert Pike three-world-war plan, and therefore believe that war on Iran is not, repeat not, the end goal of all these military adventures. The war planners at the Pentagon are unaware of this plan. They take orders to plan for war to save the homeland, save their families, etc. As do the "dumb stupid animals", as Henry Kissinger calls them, on the front line. Only those at the top are aware, and even they may be only suspicious of something more, being kept out of the loop themselves.

A war with Iran will not be like Iraq, or Libya. There is great potential for such a war to escalate to easily drag in Israel, Pakistan, Russia and China, all of whom, with the USA, are nuclear powers. Who knows. Even India could somehow be dragged in.

So if the plan is to have a third world war, as proposed by Albert Pike, the conditions could not be better. The USA with NATO on one side. Russia and China on the other. The issue dividing them is whether a nation in the Middle East other than Israel could be a nuclear power. Chaos from nuclear, chemical and biological warfare reinforced with global financial chaos from sovereign defaults and currency collapse will destroy the global infrastructure that puts food on the table, keeps the lights on, and supplies electricity, gas and water to the majority of the global population. Faced with such chaos, anyone surviving will beg for a world government to stop all the chaos and restore order, but at the least they will be so weak and therefore unable to resist the imposition of a world government.

But the true horror will then have only just begun.

Human population will be reduced to between a half and one billion, and the survivors will be microchipped virtual slaves in a global fascist state and policed by a paramilitary force with absolute powers to arrest, detain, torture and kill without evidence.

Modern history has followed the plan of Albert Pike. I show this on my website The Conspiracy Explained. It explains the creation and rise of Nazism and Communism. It explains the creation, rise and support of Zionism. It explains the folly of the Vietnam War. It explains the collapse of tbe Berlin Wall and the resurgence of Russia. It explains the assassinations of not only JFK, RFK and MLK, but also that of Diana, the People's Princess.

There is no proof that Iran has a nuke or is developing one. There are only rumours and whispers, all coming from the Zionists who told us Iraq had WMD and was involoved in 9/11. Both these allegations were competeley false.

A war with Iran may not lead to a tyrannical world government described above. But with modern history following a plan laid out 150 years ago, many documents and even constructions laying out the plan for mass depopulation, and unquestionable evidence that our elite are satanic paedophile eugenicists who care little for us, can we take the risk?

Thursday, December 29, 2011


Hugo Chavez has suggested that the USA is behind the series of cancers to affect South American leaders[1]. Suggested methods of deliverance are by ingestion or injection.

I suggest this could also be done by satellites creating an electromagnetic field strong enough to create the cancer. I believe the illness that affected me this year is indirectly related to the EM harrassment I suffered for several years from 1999 - 2005.

But I can guarantee that their minds are being read by satellite technology anyway.

[1] U.S. is giving South American leaders cancer, claims Chavez as Argentine president de Kirchner becomes FIFTH to contract disease, The Daily Mail, 29/12/2011


Are wondering why the family is under attack?

Are you wondering why so many people are dying from cancer?

Are you wondering why homosexuality is being encouraged and promoted so much?

Alex Jones exposes how the food chain and water supply are being used to implement a silent war against you, your family and your friends. This two part video only touches upon this huge subject, which Alex is convinced is THE topic the New World Order are scared of you realising what they are doing to all of us, and have been doing for decades.

A more detailed expose is expected to be published today.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011


As Litvinenko lay dying three objects of "dense matter" were reported in Litvinenko's colon or small bowel.

Medical staff have not been able to ascertain what they are, but an additional x-ray ordered yesterday afternoon revealed one was the size of a 2 pence piece, the other was shaped like a figure 8, and the third larger still.

[source : Russian dissident was not poisoned by thallium, says doctor, The Independent, 22/11/2006]


The highly controversial and photogenic death of Alexander Litvinenko was raised on RT just before Christmas. The Spotlight programme interviewed Andrey Lugovoy shortly after his reelection to the Duma.

Lugovoy was accused as the murderer. He has denied the allegations.

Lugovoy claims that British Intelligence had tried to recruit him, to dig up some dirt on Putin, but he refused. Lugovoy also claimed that Litvinenko was a British agent. This was denied at the time of Litvinenko's death but has since been confirmed.

Litvinenko was allegedly poisoned with Polonium-210. Lugovoy had been in the KGB but was not a skilled assassin trained in the use of deadly radioactive materials. After meeting with Litvinenko he was photographed with his family, so if he had indeed delivered a deadly dose of radioactive poison to Litvinenko he was also risking the lives of his children.

The post mortem records have still not been released, not even to the coroners inquest. At about 20 minutes into the interview Lugovoy explains what occured at the inquest regarding the post mortem records. Scotland Yard said they needed two more weeks to submit the records to the inquest. Two months later and the records have still not been submitted. The post mortem occured five years ago. So why the delay? This is beginning to look a lot like the death of Diana, the People's Princess. It took 10 years before an inquest took place into her death, and even then the prime suspects were not questioned.

Someone is hiding something.

Monday, December 26, 2011


This year we heard everyday x number of people have died today in Syria, y people have died in Syria this week so far, and N have died in Syria in total this year.

But where does the mainstream media get these numbers from?

These numbers come from The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

And where do they get their numbers from?

They get their numbers from The Strategic Resource and Communications Center[1].

Both of these are based in Londonistan, HQ to the Islamic fundamentalist terrorists, who had a Covenant of Security with MI5. The Islamic fundamentalist terrorists have since gone on to provide excuses to invade the Middle East and Caspian regions after 9/11 (if you believe they could outwit the most powerful military on the planet), and have recently worked with MI6 and CIA in Libya and now Syria.

[1] British-Controlled Monajed is the Source of All of the Press Accounts of How Many Syrians Assad Has Supposedly Killed, LPAC, 26/12/2011


Now that we have celebrated another fascist christmas can we get back to war. Real war. Not playing war we used to do as kids, with toy guns and toy uniforms, but real guns, real laser-guided missiles, real microwave weapons that can melt your brain from miles away.

As I said, Military Wives is Top of the Pops. If the Nazis had a Top of the Pops something similar would have been arranged by propaganda minister Goebbels (who murdered his own children). This is such a coup for the war propagandists, thousands of miles away from where the bombs and bullets are flying.

David Icke has written about this. The wives have been used by the war propagandists. Everything is being militarised for total war in 2012,even christmas, when currencies and society collapse and we descend into war. We are to be set at each others throats while they sit comfortably away in their bunkers loaded with the finest foods and wines.



Some may not like what I say here, but I don't care. It needs saying. I am so sick of the bullshit.

Wherever you are my love will keep you safe
My heart will build a bridge of love across both time and space
Wherever you are our hearts still beat as one
I hold you in my dreams each night until your task is done
Light after darkness my wondrous star
Our hopes and dreams, my heart and yours, forever shining far
Light up the darkness my prince of peace
May the stars shine all around you
May your courage never cease

I understand that these women miss their partners and are concerned for their safety. I understand why they have been programmed to believe that their pawns in uniform are making a difference to the world. But what are their partners actually doing? Killing, maiming and enslaving innocent people and fighting fake enemies without question just because a 'superior' or coward in a dark suit thousands of miles away tells them that they must.

This is the reality of what those you sing about are doing or supporting. Do you think that the parents and partners of the innocent killed by your loved ones, and what they represent, might miss their loved ones who will never return because people like those you sing about have killed them? Is that 'light after the darkness, my wondrous star'? Is that 'lighting up the darkness, my Prince of Peace' with a gun in his hand?

If you really love those you sing about then ask them what the friggin' hell they are doing in uniform doing this. What are they thinking of serving with such grotesque violence a force that doesn't give a shit about them, or you?; a force that is intent on enslaving you, your children and grandchildren, and everyone else.

So sing your song of self-delusion, but you have so desperately lost the plot. The lives of all human beings deserve equal respect. Yes, your partners in uniform, but also - EQUALLY - those that they slaughter.

Cue emotional manipulation that totally misses the point ...

'Princes of Peace' and 'Wondrous Stars' - viewer discretion advised

Sunday, December 25, 2011


Tony Cartalucci has given us all the best christmas prezzie ever; a breakdown of what has been driving global events this year.

Just like christmas is fake, the Arab Spring is fake.

The Russian Spring now being provoked by Gorbachev is also fake.


2011 – Year of the Dupe

Print The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

A timeline & history: One year into the engineered “Arab Spring,” one step closer to global hegemony

Tony Cartalucci
Saturday, December 24, 2011

dupe (d2011 Year of the Dupe oomacrp, dy2011 Year of the Dupe oomacrp)

1. An easily deceived person.
2. A person who functions as the tool of another person or power.

tr.v. duped, dup·ing, dupes To deceive (an unwary person).

December 24, 2011 - In January of 2011, we were told that “spontaneous,” “indigenous”uprising had begun sweeping North Africa and the Middle East in what was hailed as the “Arab Spring.” It would be almost four months before the corporate-media would admit that the US had been behind the uprisings and that they were anything but “spontaneous,” or “indigenous.” In an April 2011 article published by the New York Times titled, “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” it was stated:

“A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region, including the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and grass-roots activists like Entsar Qadhi, a youth leader in Yemen, received training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, a nonprofit human rights organization based in Washington.”

The article would also add, regarding the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED):

“The Republican and Democratic institutes are loosely affiliated with the Republican and Democratic Parties. They were created by Congress and are financed through the National Endowment for Democracy, which was set up in 1983 to channel grants for promoting democracy in developing nations. The National Endowment receives about $100 million annually from Congress. Freedom House also gets the bulk of its money from the American government, mainly from the State Department. “

It is hardly a speculative theory then, that the uprisings were part of an immense geopolitical campaign conceived in the West and carried out through its proxies with the assistance of disingenuous foundations, organizations, and the stable of NGOs they maintain throughout the world. As we will see, preparations for the “Arab Spring” and the global campaign that is now encroaching on both Russia and China, as predicted in February 2011′s “The Middle East & then the World,” began not as unrest had already begun, but years before the first “fist” was raised, and within seminar rooms in D.C. and New York, US-funded training facilities in Serbia, and camps held in neighboring countries, not within the Arab World itself.

Thursday, December 22, 2011




I know we've got it already.

But I want more.

More inequality.

More fascism.

More tyranny.

More. More. More.


Oopsadasiy. At 1000%, we've also got that already! [1]

Damn it!

Surely there is something I want that we haven't got already.

There's gotta be something...


Think, like John McClane in Die Hard,...

There's gotta be someth...

A Ha! Got it!

[1] Britain has the highest total debt to GDP ratio (1,000%) of any G20 nation so it makes sense it also has the worst wealth and income gaps (by design), Max Keiser, 5/12/2011,


Raise a glass to the men and women who throughout the ages have fought tyranny everywhere, and risked their lives for the freedom of every man, woman and child.

Coz very soon we're gonna need 'em.


Freedom from The City of London.

Freedom from Wall Street.

Freedom from the EU.

Freedom from the UN.


We don't need no fascist Christmas
We don't need no thought control
No New World Order starting world wars
Colonel leave those bombs alone

Hey! Sergeant! Leave those guns alone!

All in all you're just a "dumb stupid animal".

All in all you're just another pawn in the war.


Have yourself a merry fascist Christmas,
Let your heart be light
From now on our troubles will come into sight.

Have yourself a merry fascist Christmas,
Make the Yule-tide gay,
From now on our troubles won’t be miles away.

Here we are, as in olden days,
Happy golden days of yore.
The New World Order has planned for us
Yet another world war.

Through the years we all will be together,
If the Fates allow.
We can stop this coming world war three somehow.
So have yourself a merry fascist Christmas now.


The City of London has everything; fascism, fractional reserve banking, infinite rehypothecation.

What more can The City of London want for Christmas that it doesn't yet have?

Well, what about a tyrannical world government that it would control?

And a world army, the only army in the world with everyone else defenceless?

And, ooh, a world bank, the only bank in the world to create money out of nothing while the rest of us struggle in a global fascist state?

And a brutal paramilitary police force with the powers to arrest, detain, torture and kill without evidence?

Can Santa get all that in his sack? I doubt it.

So this Christmas, as you put out a glass of sherry and a mince pie for Santa on Christmas Eve, spare a thought for the poor City of London, that evil greedy entity of Venetian origin, masquerading as a British bulldog but working for the total enslavement of all Britons.


Oopsadasiy. We've already got that too.


Oopsadaisy. We've got that already.

Ah, well. That's one less thing for Santa to worry about.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011


Yes. Even the Nazis celebrated Christmas.

With Father Christmas, the Nazi hierarchy handing out presents to the public, dinner underneath a decorative Christmas tree and...

praise for the troops.

Yes, the troops.

The troops. Some call them heroes. Some call them zeroes. Some, like Henry Kissinger, call them "dumb stupid animals". Before expressing his opinion of the military thus Kissinger had helped many Nazis escape Nuremberg to work in the USA as part of Operation Paperclip.

Nazi Propaganda Minister Goebbels' address to the troops on the Eastern Front on Christmas Eve 1941 is full of reference to defending the homeland.

Goebbels would later kill his own children.

The Eastern Front for British troops this year is Afghanistan. We invaded Afghanistan because our ally the USA was defending its own homeland after a false flag terror attack on September 11th 2001 blamed on Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists. Nazi Germany invaded Poland after a false flag event at Gleiwicz.

Perhaps another Eastern Front for our troops is Syria. No doubt the SAS are sniffing around for things for their idle hands to do after helping bring al Qaeda to power in Libya.

Since invading Afghanistan opium production, which had been nearly eradicated by the Taliban, is up to record levels. The British hierarchy has been running opium and heroin for centuries. And it has been reported that NATO troops, American and British included, are not only protecting Afghan opium production but helping distribution!

I make these comparisons to Nazi Germany because the Military Wives will be Top of the Pops this year.

And a recent award ceremony for "the troops", The Sun Military Awards, was reported all over our media. But little mention was made that it was media such as The Sun that sent "the troops" into Iraq based on a stinking pile of bullshit comprising lies about WMD and involvement in 9/11.

While waging imperialist fascist wars of aggression and greed we are killing our old and sick and even our newly born in our dirty hospitals, in order to help pay for bailouts for a banking system that helped to create Hitler in the first place!

Merry Fascist Christmas everybody!

Tuesday, December 20, 2011


Peace? Yes.

Goodwill? They wish ill will on us, so...,er,..., no.


These allegations of a cosy relationship between the big corporations and HMRC are just another symptom of this Disunited Fascist Kingdom.

If you're a big bank or corporation being bailed out by the muggins taxpayer, even though you have the God-like power to create money out of thin air, then you can avoid tax, evade tax or just not pay tax after paying for a tasty slap-up all-you-can-stuff-your-corrupt-face-with dinner with the head of HMRC.

But if you're a muggins taxpayer, honestly paying your taxes, obeying the laws, fighting in unnecessary engineered wars either directly personally or indirectly via a family member, and believing in and perhaps even loving your limeade-taking government, then you go to jail, go directly to jail, do not pass go, CLINK!.


It looks unsurprisingly like the same formula/system that was used on Libya is about to be used on Syria.

A civil war is being insitigated, or at least played up, with allegations of massive abuse of human rights, NATO special forces are on the Syrian borders, and no doubt actually in there with boots on the ground, and now even the same faces are being used.

Webster Tarpley is now twittering that the head of the Free Syrian Army is the same al Qaeda dude who led the Libyan rebels, Abdel Hakim Belhadj.

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Monday, December 19, 2011


This was posted a few weeks ago, but it is so so important it needs reposting again and again and again...

This is David Icke talking about the plan for three world wars, the plan that I am 100% convinced (I was only 90% convinced) is being followed, and that what is occuring now in the Middle East and Caspian regions between NATO against Russia and China via several states in those regions is to satisfy that diabolical plan.

And it is diabolical.

Because that war, in parallel with engineered financial chaos, will drive many to beg for one world government, one world army and one world bank to stop similar future chaos.

And then that world government will start to kill the survivors, so that only a half to one billion people eventually survive. And those survivors will be virtual slaves living in a global fascist state policed by a brutal paramilitary force with powers to arrest, detain, torture and kill without evidence.

Sunday, December 18, 2011



What does it stand for?

This question is the most popular search term to bring people to this blog.

What does NATO stand for?

Initially it was North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.

But with the vast quantity of drugs it grows and smuggles it could also stand for NArco Terrorist Organisation.

And with the recent war on Libya it could also stand for North Africa Takeover Organisation.

But now with the very recent provocations of two nuclear states, Russia (during the elections) and Pakistan (shooting up border troops), it could also stand for Naked Aggression Treaty Organisation.

It is the naked agression of NATO, not the defensive reactions of Russia, Pakistan, China, Syria and Iran, that is pushing us to the brink of World War 3.

And that naked aggression is due to 9/11.

And 9/11 was a false flag terror attack.


Iran accused of involvement in 9/11[1]. We've heard this one before. They were dead wrong then, over Iraq. They are dead wrong now.

US Special Forces sent to Jordan to start trouble in Syria[2]. We've also heard this one before. NATO special forces were sent into Libya to instigate a civil war there, which ended with NATO bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing Libyan civilians in order to save them from Gaddafi, who NATO publicly executed against international law.

With Soros declaring Iran would suffer the bloodiest of revolutions, and Russia and China stating they will defend not only Iran, but Syria and Pakistan, and major global events following a 150 year old plan for three world wars to implement a tyrannical world government, with the third world war between Islam and Zionism with the rest of the world being dragged in having been divided over the issue of Palestine...

It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas World War 3.

But can you blame Russia, or China, or Syria, or Iran or Pakistan?

Who is doing the pushing? As far as I can tell, none of the above.

[1] 9/11 verdict is 'US propaganda for waging war on Iran', Russia Today, 16/12/2011,

[2] Have U.S. Special Forces Been Deployed to Jordan Against Syria?, LPAC, 17/12/2011,

Thursday, December 15, 2011


Putin is holding a televised press conference in Russia today in which he answers questions from the public. Sky News is covering this from an office in Russia, with three anti-Putin acitivists and one pro-Putin commentator. The pro-Putin commentator correctly identified outside influences in Russia wanting Putin out. The three anti-Putin activists slagged Putin off relentlessly.


Is this in our national interest, numbnuts?

Infinite rehypothecation?

This is when a bank lends money to a borrower and the borrower puts up some collateral for that money. But then that bank can use that collateral in an infinite number of transcations which allows that bank to borrow money from other banks or sources.

So having the power to create money out of thin air is not enough for them. The money for the initial loan, so the bank gets its grubby hands on the collateral, is created out of thin air. But then if that bank goes to another bank using that collateral asking for money in an infinite number of transactions then the other banks creating the loans accepting the collateral create the money out of thin air.

Thin air on top of thin air on top of thin air etc...

And who owns the collateral?

And who bails them out if it goes wrong?

And who keeps the profits if it goes right?

Wednesday, December 14, 2011


The perfect tune to end the night, and for the current state of global affairs.

Maydie Myles - Keep On Luvin


It's nearly Christmas. Goodwill to all men and all that.

We don't need hooded CIA/al Qaeda snipers shooting children dead in Syria.

We don't need brutal Bilderberg fascist austerity to pay for gambling debts we the people don't owe.

We don't need engineered world wars following a 150 year old plan of a Freemasonic sicko to create a tyrannical world government that will reduce human population down to about one billion.

Dream Team - Love Is What We Need


The Daily Telegraph and The Financial Times appear to be doing their best to stick their knives into the back of the Euro.

Multiple Bilderberger and Associate Editor of the FT Martin Wolf has entitled his hit piece A disastrous failure at the summit[1], and argues that
The eurozone has no credible plan to fix the flaws of the eurozone, apart from greater fiscal austerity: there is to be no fiscal, financial or political union; and there is to be no balanced mechanism for economic adjustment on both sides of the creditor-debtor divide. The decision is, instead, to try still harder with a stability and growth pact whose failures have been both predictable and persistent. Yes, Mr Cameron made a blunder last week. But that of the eurozone looks far bigger.

Assistant Editor of The Daily Telegraph Jeremy Warner has entitled his hit piece Another eurozone crisis is only weeks away[2], and states
There was no fiscal compact of any significance agreed last weekend. Nor was there any progress made in providing a credible backstop. Even with the extra funds which European leaders are laughably promising via the IMF “back door” (as if they cannot trust themselves with their own money), the financial firewall remains dwarfed by the ever-growing size of the problem. Italy’s funding needs would gobble up the entire bail-out money within two years. In any case, the IMF back-door support is already in trouble. There’s no clarity on where the extra 200 billion euros are going to come from, with the Bundesbank refusing to cough up unless underwritten by the German parliament and confusion over whether non-euro countries are expected to contribute.

The DT is also dancing with joy at the foreign exchange rates[3], reporting that the Euro has recently fallen significantly against both the Dollar and the Pound.

The FT headline is EU treaty hopes come under strain[4], which is very pessimistic about the future of the Euro.

At the moment it looks like the Euro is being stabbed in the back. After years of building it up, encouraging Europe to come together to build a monetary and political union through its Bilderberg agents while standing many miles behind the battle, The City of London may well have now decided the time is right to stab it in the back.

This is all very curious because George Soros wrote several times this summer in the FT about his plans to save the Euro, proposing Eurobonds. And late last year similar suggestions were being made for much more European integration, which has not come.

Late last year Van Rompuy stated that the nation state was dead, while Soros and Strauss-Kahn suggested that only further European integration would save Europe and the Euro.

[1] A disastrous failure at the summit, FT, 13/12/2011

[2] Another eurozone crisis is only weeks away, The Daily Telegraph, 13/12/2011

[3] Markets fall as unity on EU treaty changes starts to splinter, The Daily Telegraph, 14/12/2011

[4] EU treaty hopes come under strain, FT, 14/12/2011

Tuesday, December 13, 2011


I recently read (I think in a Peter Oborne article but I may be wrong) that George Osborne is virtually our Prime Minister in all but name. He spends most of his time at No. 10 guiding and advising Cameron.

Osborne has been to Bilderberg almost every year for the last few years, including this year, so I suspect that Osborne advised Cameron to walk out of the Euro meeting last week. We know that Bilderbergers are told to advance Plan Bilderberg as much as possible within their sphere of influence. Advising, and possibly controlling, the Prime Minister is I would say within Osborne's sphere of influence. Osborne has supported Cameron's walk out very publicly since last Friday.

So assuming that Osborne advised Cameron to walk out and that Osborne did this as his duty to Bilderberg, besides brutal fascist austerity for everyone but themselves, what exactly is Plan Bilderberg?

There has been little if any protest from the Financial Times.

There has been little if any protest from Gollum van Rompuy (who attended Bilderberg this year with Osborne), who seems quite relaxed about the whole affair saying that at some point all 27 will be at the same table and an agreement could be reached then (but when that will be is not stated).

There has been little if any protest from Henry Kissinger, or indeed David Rockefeller.

If Cameron really had sunk the Euro by walking out last week then I would expect a lot more protest from the likes of van Rompuy, Kissinger and Rockefeller. We had been led to believe that the Euro was the wet dream of the New World Order. I would have expected Kissinger to have flown over personally to London with a few 'friends' to enquire politely of Cameron WTF he thought he was doing by wrecking their Euro dream. Editorials and comments demanding Cameron's head would have filled the newspapers.

So either the walk out and subsequent (very mild) protest is fake, to perhaps strengthen Cameron within a Euro-sceptic Tory party demanding a referendum, and the walk out, as dramatic as it has been portrayed, will actually have no effect.

Or Cameron really has sunk the Euro and it was part of Plan Bilderberg and the unaware pro- and anti-Euro politicians can point and wag their fingers at each other until the flames of hell rise up around them when Europe descends into anarchy.

Sunday, December 11, 2011


When you are out on the lash on New Year's Eve in a few weeks time, do not utter the three usual words for the occasion; Happy New Year!

It would be wiser and more considerate to tell them these three most important words for next year; ordo ab chao.

Order out of chaos.

Next year will not be happy for 99.99% of the global population.

Global financial chaos with simultaneous chaos from at least regional nuclear war involving Israel are the New World Order's christmas present for us. Santa couldn't get them all in his sack in one go so he has been busy putting the pieces together for us for over more than a century.

Saturday, December 10, 2011


Now that The City of London has played its hand via its gimp David Cameron, what can we as ordinary British citizens and Europeans do?

And how long do we have?

I propose

a) in the short term:

An immediate vote of No Confidence in the House of Commons in David Cameron, William Hague and George Osborne.

An immediate ban on all derivatives.

An immediate international conference attended by all major nations just to agree that NO world war will occur, followed by agreement to meet very soon after to agree anullment of debts to give all nations a clean slate to start again, free from the New World Order. Some debts will have to be paid, but most will not.

b) in the longer term:

A lot of interest-free credit created by a new national bank to get the economy moving again.

Arrests of particular employers and employees in The City of London with subsequent trials.


I estimate that it will take about 3 to 6 months for the Euro to disintegrate and cause not just European financial chaos but global financial chaos.

I also estimate that, assuming Pastor Williams' source is correct, events in the Middle East involving Syria will escalate after Christmas and New Year. Give it a few months to get a force together to attack Syria then we are into March/April. With Iran publicly stating it will defend Syria then Iran could be enticed into firing the first shot by May/June.

This is a reasonable timescale for events to evolve and work in parallel to cause something big in August.

Aah, the guns of August.

August 2012.

Then proper war starting in September 2012.

By then total financial chaos and war with Iran escalating into not just regional but world war.

Then US elections.

Commencing countdown...


Rule Britannia.
Britannia rules the waves.
Britons never never never shall be slaves.

So goes the big, big pile of stinking bullshit song.

It was not true then. It is not true now.

Britons are slaves and they will never, never, never be free while The City of London runs their government.

A brief history of The City of London. Once upon a time Venice ruled the waves and Europe through finance and banking. But then the League of Cambrai attacked Venice in an attempt to destroy their evil. Venice bribed the Pope and survived. Venice then started to look around for another place to rule from. One of the very few allies of Venice was England. Venetian agents helped Henry VIII split from Rome. Venetians then began to arrive in London. Once firmly settled in London they engineered the English Civil War to bring the English Monarchy under control. Once under control the English Monarchy allied with the Venetians and created the Bank of England. Despite its name The Bank of England was privately owned, with the Monarchy owning a lot of stock in it. The bank was very profitable because it created money out of nothing. Through this power the British Empire was financed. They sent agents to the USA and eventually got the Federal Reserve created to control not only the USA but the world.

This practice of creating money out of nothing continues today, but on a much bigger scale, in trillions not millions as then.

With so much power to create so much money out of nothing, while you and I work our arses off just to put stale bread on the table, they can finance all sorts of political organisations; communism, nazism, environmentalism etc. What do these movements have in common? Mass genocide.

With this cabal in control Britons never never never shall be free.

The City of London must be exposed for what it is; warmongering, genocidal and not British.


I can't quite understand what Webster Tarpley is getting at in this interview on Press TV.

I can understand the following;
1. that because Wall Street was bailed out with so many dollars the USA elite with the City of London have engineered a panic in Euroland to make the Euro look unattractive so that deposits in Euros are moved to what appear to be safer deposits in dollars in sterling, perhaps yen.
2. Cameron acted as a trojan horse, as predicted by de Gaulle, to cause that panic
3. Cameron made this out to be in the British national interest, but as I pointed out yesterday the British national interest is not the same as the interest of The City of London. The City of London is an independent entity that wants savage and brutal fascist austerity, mass depopulation and the survivors enslaved and policed by a brutal paramilitary police force. Besides they are not even British. They are Venetian!!

But Tarpley added that causing a crisis in Euroloand will cause a global economic crash, including in the USA and a crash of the dollar.

So how can it be in the interest of saving the dollar to cause a crisis in the Euro if it is going to cause a crash of the dollar?

Or have I missed something?

I can understand if the idea of causing a crisis in the Euro is to cause a global crisis. It is what I have been predicting would occur, and was backed up by Pastor Williams the other day on Alex Jones Show, that such massive global chaos would be caused by
1. world nuclear war in the Middle East/Caspian, in parallel with
2. global financial chaos
that we, potential slaves of the New World Order, would be begging for a our New World Order tyrannical world government.

How long will it take for the Euro to crash and cause global financial chaos?
How long will it take them to provoke Iran into firing the first shot and then launching a large war on Iran?

And another thing I don't quite understand. If the point of postponing war with Iran is to save Obama then why wait? I mean, can they not engineer a crisis, a national emergency, so that elections can be suspended, maybe suspended indefinitely?

Friday, December 09, 2011


Our Dave is boasting that he protected national interests in Brussels by blocking a tax on financial transactions.

National interests?


We are in this shithole precisely because of the City of London. They may well be 10% of the national economy, but so what? We don't need them. They need us!

The City of London has no national interest other than screwing us for every penny it can, and then killing us, either through schemes like the Liverpool Care Pathway or savage austerity or state sponsored terrorism or war or measures to protect us from made up fantasy global warming or whatever we fall for.

Ask yourself why it is called The City of London. It is because it considers itself separate from the UK. It is an independent entity.


Well, it looks like apocalypse has been postponed.

Pastor Lindsay Williams was on The Alex Jones Show last night, and from what I could gather
1. war with Iran has been postponed until the US presidential elections next year. Apparently the NWO are happy with Obama and want him reelected. They think that a war with Iran would give Obama the ratings boost with the electorate necessary to reelect him. And they will try to provoke Iran into firing the first shot. However the source said he believed (a personal opinion only) war with Iran could trigger WW3. Oh and Saudi Arabia will experience an Arab Spring too.

2. the dollar and euro have not collapsed yet, despite Williams' earlier prophecy, because the NWO want us all in so much fear and desperation caused by world war and global economic depression that we will be begging for our loving caring tyrannical world government to save us, to restore order from the chaos (the chaos that the bankstaz engineered for that very purpose).


What is the USA (the United States of Aggression) playing at?

Two reports today indicate it is playing with fire.

The first report focuses on emails between the US State Dept and the alleged independent organisation monitoring elections in Russia[1]. These emails imply that there is a significant link between the US State Dept and the protestors on the streets of Russia protesting against the outcome of the recent Russian elections.

The second report links the rebels in Syria to the USA (the United States of Aggression)[2]. Former FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds says she has been told that the USA (the United States of Aggression) is arming the rebels directly from the NATO base at Incirlik, Turkey.

With fleets from both Russia and the USA building up in the Middle East and threats and warnings escalating, at this time of goodwill to all men, what is the driving force behind all this?

There can be only one. It's the same force that transported millions of African slaves to the Americas, that ethnically cleansed American Indians in the name of God and Gold and then financed two world wars via its central bank, the Federal Reserve.

[1] Russian election watchdog in cahoots with US to discredit Duma poll, Russia Today, 9/12/2011,

[2] 'US training Syrian rebels in Turkey', PressTV, 9/12/2011,

Tuesday, December 06, 2011


New World Order Productions proudly presents...

Twas the Night Before World War 3

Twas the night before World War 3. The fresh crisp snow lay virgin on the ground, untouched, except for the footprints of a fox scurrying from wheelie bin to wheelie bin scavenging for scraps of leftovers. The multicoloured decorative lights from the houses danced merrily at the advent of world war, creating a silent circus of festive light celebrating death. The unsuspecting good citizens sleeping in their warm beds were unaware of the manipulation that had brought them to this eventful time. They worked. They paid their taxes. They raised a glass and toasted the good times on the necessary occasions. They trusted their government, heart and soul, even after being robbed blind by the MF Nazi bankers. They never believed, not for one millisecond, that elements within their own government would engineer a world war, another and final world war, to implement a tyrannical world government.

That night, as the hours crept coldly by, events in the Middle East and Caspian region reached a flashpoint.

(To be continued)


The Occupy London organisation has been pathetically tarred with the terrorist brush, being referred to in a section on terrorism in an advisory notice issued by City of London Police for local business.
Police have angered Occupy London activists after listing the movement among terrorist groups in an advisory notice sent to the business community in the City.

The document issued by City of London police, headed "Terrorism/extremism update for the City of London business community", included a detailed account of recent and upcoming Occupy London activities and was sent to "trusted partners" in the area.

The document, dated 2 December, which was passed on to Occupy London's Finsbury square encampment over the weekend by a local business owner, gave an update on foreign terrorist activities including that of Farc in Columbia, al-Qaida in Pakistan and the outcome of a trial into the Minsk bombing in Belarus.

[source : Occupy London's anger over police 'terrorism' document, The Guardian, 5/12/2011]

Listing the activities of Occupy London along with al Qaeda is very, very low, and shows the increasing desperation that Occupy London is causing. They are still there, gaining support annd issuing demands that are very popular.

At least Occupy London does not have a Covenant of Security with MI5, unlike many Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorist organisations, who formed their own occupy movement called Occupy Londonistan to run their global terrorist activities without fear of prosecution or extradition.

Don't be surprised to soon read that members of Occupy London have been extradited to the USA and 'disappeared' in the US Unjustice system.

Monday, December 05, 2011


Towards the end of his World Crisis Radio report from 3rd December 2011, Webster Tarpley announced that he will very soon be publishing another book, this time on FDR and Pearl Harbor, the publication delayed due to events in Libya and now Syria.

Tarpley claims that FDR did not provoke Japan (Japan was already on the rampage in South East Asia), and that it was the heirarchy of the US Navy that withheld vital information about the location of the Japanese navy, not FDR. Other claims he makes are that the politics of particular naval officers got in the way of their judgement, and that Churchill also withheld information from FDR about the Japanese navy.

Tarpley also adds that FDR wanted the dismantling of the British Empire after the war.

OK. This may well be the case. This latter claim would certainly support FDR's decision to instigate the Pecora Commission and Glass-Steagal act as a shot across the bows of the Anglophile Wall Street bankers (though why nobody high up went to prison and why the Federal Reserve was not abolished puzzles me).

But there is no doubt that FDR wanted to join the war when most of America didn't, and according to the diary of Henry Stimson, FDRs Secretary of War, FDR held a discussion on 25th November 1941 with Stimson, Hull, Knox, Marshall and Stark to discuss how to maneuver the Japanese into firing the first shot to give FDR the reason to join the war.

This particular piece of evidence does not look good for FDR, particularly if it can be verified.

So was he, or wasn't he? Was FDR in on it, or not?

What FDR did do, according to Albert Pike's plan that has guided modern history for the last 150 years or so, was to empower Communism and defeat Nazism. But perhaps he had no choice? What would you or I have done?

FDR was allegedly poisoned before the war ended. Was FDR against using "the bomb" while Truman wasn't? Was he against the creation of Israel while Truman wasn't? Was he for dismantling the British Empire in favour of cooperating independent sovereign nation states while Truman wasn't?

If they can kill JFK when he went against the plan then they can kill FDR, can't they, particularly after he had served the plan, wittingly or unwittingly?

I look forward to this latest book from Webster Tarpley with great anticipation. Perhaps it will answer the question, was FDR in on the plan, or just used like most US presidents are to some degree or another?

Sunday, December 04, 2011


Libya = al Qaeda (armed and installed)
Egypt = Muslim Brotherhood + Salafists (voted in)

Hmm. Good work, chaps.

I wonder what these governments will do when Israel starts war on Gaza, as will no doubt happen if Syria and/or Iran are attacked and Hezbollah and Hamas join in.

Friday, December 02, 2011


For those who still do not understand how modern history has been manipulated and engineered to bring us to this critical time, here is the plan of Albert Pike proposed nearly 150 years ago.

It explains not only why World Wars 1 and 2 happened, but also events such as
1) the Holocaust - to persuade a sceptical world Jewry that Palestine and only Palestine would provide the safe haven from a cruel and harsh anti Semitic world.
2) the assassination of JFK and his brother Robert - both would have dragged the USA out of a war against Communism in South East Asia.
3) the assassination of Princess Diana - she was about to marry a Muslim, which would have built a huge bridge between the West and Islam just at a time when the plan required the exact opposite.

The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the 'agentur' (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.

We shall unleash the Nihilists and the Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute Atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.


The headline story in The Daily Telegraph today is about euthanasia. It does not explicitly state that but it is[1].

The report addresses the Liverpool Care Pathway, a procedure this blog has accused of killing old and sick people to save money; dead old granny doesn't need a pension, and dead old granny doesn't need expensive health treatment.

According to the report tens of thousands(!!!) of patients are put on the LCP without their families being told.

The first line of the report needs to be seriously questioned. It reads
Tens of thousands of patients with terminal illnesses are being placed on a “death pathway”, almost double the number just two years ago, a study published today shows.

So what needs questioning? The reference to "terminal illness".

Why? Because at the end of the report The Daily Telegraph boasts
Concerns about the pathway were raised first in The Daily Telegraph in 2009 when experts warned that in some cases patients have been put on the pathway only to recover when their families intervened, leading to questions over how people are judged to be in their “last hours and days”.

Why the rush to kill the old and sick, and without consultation with the family?

Why was this pathway permitted to be used in hospitals, when it was designed for use in hospices where people deliberately go to die and die with some dignity?

When you understand the Nazi heritage of our ruling class, their love for eugencis, their moral and financial support for Hitler, their desire to kill "useless eaters" to reduce human population down to between 1/2 and 1 billion, then the LCP is logic.

No, the LCP will not quickly reduce human population levels, but it is merely a logical manifestation of their genocidal psyche. They engineer world wars. They abuse, torture and then kill children in satanic rituals. Killing anyone who looks like they could be on their way out and is alone and vulnerable in a hospital under pressure to save money (while we bail out the Nazi bankers with trillions) is pure logic to them.

[1] Loved ones not always told their relative is on controversial 'death pathway', The Daily Telegraph, 2/12/2011


This is David Icke talking in 2009 about World War 3 being engineered between the USA v Russia and China with the trigger in the Middle East involving Israel.

He has suggested this many times and for many years.

And it looks oh so prophetic, doesn't it?

Except it is not prophetic. It is read from a script, or a letter to be more precise, a letter or series of letters written nearly 150 years ago in which a plan was laid out for three world wars to implement a tyrannical world government.

This blog is, as far as I know, the only blog to continually suggest and propagate this fact. My website is one of less than a handful to address the three world war theory.

That plan required the creation of Israel, the creation of Communism, the creation of Fascsim. All three of these can be traced back to the same cabal of bankers based in Wall Street and The City of London. How can they finance such a plan? Because like total dickheads the corrupt wretches in The Houses of Parliament and Congress have given this cabal the power to create money, now multi trillions, out of thin air.

In the snippet Icke mentions a traffic warden who was told by a senior policeman that there will soon be a major war that will cause massive civil unrest, and people like traffic wardens are being given powers that police currently have in anticipation of this coming war.

If we fall for this one it's goodbye freedom, my old friend.

Thursday, December 01, 2011


No. The Korean War was close. The Vietnam War was not far behind.

But since then it's been relatively quiet.

Until now.

Just as the Euro is about to collapse and cause global financial chaos.

Just as Israel is about to be surrounded by Islamic nations thanks to NATO.

But which came first; the financial chaos, or the world war?

Many state that the current financial chaos can be traced to 1971. The Vietnam War was starting to wind down then.

So has WW3 been delayed because someone somewhere saw an opportunity to make trillions through derivatives and the bailouts from the money printing machine at The Federal Reserve?

Would they postpone WW3 for financial greed?

If so, was that wise?

Wednesday, November 30, 2011


This is an artists impression of the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the event that triggered World War 1.

Like all false flag events the blame was not placed on the real culprits. In this case the real culprit was Freemasonry.

As a consequnce of this assassination, and some manipulation and deliberately created confusion, a series of treaties carefully engineered by Grand Master of The United Grand Lodge of England Prince Edward fell into place. Germany was tricked into invading Belgium on its way to Paris, and Great Britain, having indicated it would stay out of a war on the continent, promptly intervened citing an obscure treaty to defend Belgium.

This then led to a long war and slaughter in the trenches, which also involved Russia. Lenin was sent into Russia by Germany (the Warburgs and Rothschilds to be more precise), Trotsky was sent into Russia by Wall Street (Rothschilds etc), and Communism eventually took over Russia. Palestine was stolen by Great Britain and given to the Zionists in The Balfour Declaration. The first attempt at world government was made with The League of Nations. It failed.

Communism was further empowered by Wall Street, and the Lend-Lease program of FDR which became a large overt program after the flase flag attack on Pearl Harbor, which allowed the USA to relieve the USSR from the attack by the Nazis. Communism was further empowered after WW2 by being given China and Eastern Europe. Following the Holocaust world Jewry drove Palestinians from their homes and declared Eretz Israel, treating the Palestinians like shit ever since, and thus provoking Islamic fundamentalist terrorism, later nurtured in Londonistan with a Covenant of Security.

The second attempt was made at world government with The United Nations. It still exists but does not have absolute power over sovereign nations.

There was then a huge war by the USA in South East Asia to restrain Communism and hold it in check. NATO was created to restrain Communism and keep it in check in Europe.

Then in 1989 The Berlin Wall was pulled down. This allowed the formation of a United Germany and thus a United Europe. It also opened up Russia and the former Soviet Union for economic rape. Similarly for China.

Now both have taken the side of Islam in a Zionism v Islam conflict that has deepened since yet another false flag attack on 9/11.

A nuclear war, the final cataclysm, coupled with global financial chaos will provoke many calls for the imposition an all powerful world government with absolute power over sovereign nations, and an exhausted and confused human race will be unable to resist.

Purleaze don't tell me this all happened by accident.


Bilderberger and Foreign Secretary William Hague is in the House of Commons this afternoon talking about the storming of The British Embassy in Tehran yesterday.

I have been trying to get through to all that Iran has been the target of British and American intrigue for decades. We assisted Operation Ajax in overthrowing the very popular and democratically elected Mossadegh because he had the cheek to want to use Iranian oil for Iranians. For similar reasons Pahlavi was kicked out in the Iranian Revolution.

The latest reason for targetting Iran is because of an alleged nuclear weapons program. The forces behind war on Iran are the USA, Israel and the UK. There is no smoking gun evidence of this program, only hearsay, supposition and allegations from...the USA, Israel and the UK. The USA gave Iran nuclear technology in the first place. Meanwhile Israel has nukes.

The PNAC document Rebuilding America's Defenses lists Iraq and Iran as threats to American national security. Despite having no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11 and no evidence that Iraq had WMD the USA invaded Iraq.

The list of countries named by Israel in A Clean Break as threats to Israeli national security was expanded to include Libya, which has just been attacked after an engineered NATOlution.

Syria was also on that list.

But what takes war on Iran and Syria to a totally different level (the two are close allies and have stated they will defend the other) is that Russia and China are getting involved.

For whatever reason Russia and China abstained on UNSCR 1973, allowing war on Libya.

But for whatever reason they are drawing a line in the sand over Syria and Iran.

If either Syria or Iran is attacked, the other will join in. That will bring in Hezbollah and Hamas. All these will attack Israel from all sides. Perhaps the grand idea of installing Islamists in Libya and Egypt is for them to turn on Israel when this war kicks off. Israel will use its nukes. Pakistan may then use their nukes. Russia and China on one side. The USA on the other.

This is no time to talk about "serious consequences" for an embassy being invaded. Nobody died, unlike in Operation Ajax and unlike what will happen if we do go to war. Some documents were stolen (I wonder what they reveal?). That's all.

Perhaps if our insane and morally bankrupt leaders stopped committing false flag terror attacks and killing their own people so they can start threatening other nations with war and bloody revolutions then their embassies might not get invaded.

Hague has to go immediately so his ignorant belligerence is removed from the international scene to avoid a World War 3 planned 150 years ago.


It's getting dark now. We're going to have to switch the lights on soon. Those lights are going to be switched on tonight anyway. We need the light.

But who invented the cheap and abundant electric light bulb to bring us that light? Who thinks of that intelligent hard working member of the human race?

He was Thomas Edison. He patented other everyday inventions besides the light bulb.

But he wrote in the New York Times on 6th December 1921 about money.

We as a nation borrow money. That's what Cap'n Oik was talking about yesterday when he announced even more savage Bilderberg fascist austerity. Many more British families will lose their income and possibly accommodation because, they say, "we have to pay our debts".

But why do we borrow when just like the bankers we can create or invent our own money?

Edison wrote:
If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20 per cent, whereas the currency pays nobody but those who directly contribute to Muscle Shoals in some useful way.

...It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay; but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people. If the currency issued by the Government were no good, then the bonds issued would be no good either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to increase the national wealth, must go into debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious values of gold.

Look at it another way. If the Government issues bonds, the brokers will sell them. The bonds will be negotiable; they will be considered as gilt edged paper. Why? Because the government is behind them, but who is behind the Government? The people. Therefore it is the people who constitute the basis of Government credit. Why then cannot the people have the benefit of their own gilt-edged credit by receiving non-interest bearing currency on Muscle Shoals, instead of the bankers receiving the benefit of the people’s credit in interest-bearing bonds?

This is just plain common sense, isn't it?

European nations are currently under attack by the banks, driving bond rates up and up, buying and selling bonds, speculating, leading to elected leaders being replaced by unelected leaders, who are coincidentally very good friends of the banks. And of course, to add to this insanity are the most insane facts of all; the money does not exist and the banks create the money out of thin air!

The banks simply create money out of thin air and we then borrow it and at interest!

Absolutely freakin' insane!

Why do we borrow when we can create?

There is no magical alchemy involved. Numbers are simply typed into a computer, or a computer program simply creates them.

There is no magical alchemy involved in creating money out of thin air. It's perhaps the most simplest easiest thing to do in the world.

Why do we allow our lives to be dictated by warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniac bankers who want the human population level reduced to between 1/2 and 1 billion, most being virtual slaves with no rights to be policed by a brutal paramilitary force with powers to detain, torture and kill without evidence that a crime has been committed?



The Daily Mirror has today portrayed multiple Bilderberg attendee George Osborne as a naval captain driving HMS Britain onto the rocks.

I pictured Cap'n Oik dressed in a blue oilskin and Sou'wester, with a large pipe in his mouth steering a large wheel being battered by wind and rain, shouting into the storm, "There is no Plan B! Only Plan Bilderberg!".

The current financial crisis was engineered by Bilderberg and their banks, such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase.

They are taking over Europe. Merkel is theirs. Von Rumpoy and Barosso too. Also Dragi at the ECB. Now unelected Monti in Italy.

They are taking over the global economy via the IMF. Strauss-Kahn was theirs, until he reportedly rebelled, like Thatcher. Lagarde is.

Why is Bilderberg Cap'n Oik pushing such savage Bilderberg fascist austerity here?

What precisely is Plan Bilderberg? Savage fascist austerity everywhere?


I should have posted this yesterday. They don't make 'em like this anymore.

Mary House - Channel (Halleluja Remix)

Tuesday, November 29, 2011


This afternoon the corrupt wretches were shouting and pointing at each other about which island of savage Bilderberg fascist austerity HMS Titanoik should set sail for.

Growth forecasts down.

Jobless forecasts up.

Borrowing forecasts up (but from whom do we borrow, and why?).

Work harder for longer and for less.

But never mind. We're all in this together.

We're all on this ship of fools together, sailing from one island of savage Bilderberg fascist austerity to another but slightly different island of savage Bilderberg fascist austerity. No accurate and truthful explanations are given as to why we are taking this journey.



Lock up the Bilderberg bankers, their cheerleaders and supporters with Josef Fritzl (he'll sort 'em out).

Create our own new money for a new infrastructure; housing, road, rail, and hospitals and schools with nurses and teachers to fill them.

Abolish tax havens and hunt down tax avoiders and evaders.


They may not make tunes like they did anymore, but they sure as hell still make false flag attacks like they did.

In 1941 FDR wanted the USA to join in World War 2, as did Winston Churchill, but the rest of the USA didn't. On 25th November 1941 FDR met with Stimson, Hull, Knox, Marshall and Stark to discuss how to maneuver the Japanese into firing the first shot to give FDR the reason to join the war. Luckily for FDR the huge Japanese Navy managed to sail all the way across the Pacific allegedly and apparently unnoticed to attack Pearl Harbor. As a result the USA joined the war, fought for nearly four years, suffered many, many more casualties than it did in World War 1, and now accommodates a world government of sorts, The United Nations, having destroyed the first attempt at world government The League of Nations because it had not suffered many casualties in World War 1 and saw no need for a world government.

This is the USS Arizona sinking at Pearl Harbor.

Aah. That Pearl Harbor moment, when you can take your country into world war.

Nearly 60 years later and a bunch of warmongering Zionists called The Project for a New American Cemtury (PNAC) published a document called Rebuilding America's Defenses, in which they proposed war on Iraq and Iran but recognised that persuading the American public to support this would require
some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

Luckily for PNAC some planes were allegedly hijacked by some Muslims and were flown into not only the WTC but even The Pentagon! Yes, somehow the most powerful military on the planet went AWOL on the very day that allegedly some Muslims hijacked a few planes and killed nearly 3000 people, giving the reason to go to war. And even more lucky for the hijackers was the fact that the Secretary of Defense at the time Donald Rumsfeld was a member of PNAC and had quietly been given the sole power to issue a Stand Down order. The USA blamed Iraq for that attack and having WMD, and then invaded and bombed Iraq killing approximately a million Iraqi civilians.

This is UA175 about to fly unimpeded into WTC2. Where was the USAF? Ask PNAC member Donald Rumsfeld.

Since 9/11 the US military and intelligence has since been implementing and expanding upon a plan to attack a list of countries deemed threats to Israel. That list of seven countries consists of
and...Iran and Syria.


They don't make tunes like this anymore.

1991. When wars were small.

I remember 1991 well. I remember attending a meeting on the impending war on Iraq at Manchester Town Hall. It was when I first began to really question the motives for war, and everything else. It was the first time I marched in protest at anything. I got home to find pictures on my TV of bombs falling on Baghdad, and I wept. I knew something was seriously wrong and felt there was a lot more to everything I had learned at school and later from books and discussions on politics and history with friends, but didn't know what it was or where to find it.

Twenty years later, and many historical books and zaps later, and I am convinced, 100% convinced, that modern history has been following a plan proposed nearly 150 years ago for three world wars. And that this plan has been implemented by a cabal of warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs who we have very, very foolishly given the power to create money out of thin air.

In 1991 the war on Iraq was a huge topic. But for some reason, despite being portrayed as Satan incarnate, we left Saddam Hussein in power. And not only that we made him more powerful internally by betraying a revolution we encouraged against him. He brutally put down that uprising with barely a protest from us.

Today we are sleepwalking into a trap; World War 3.

So I'm going to be a bit nostalgic for more innocent times, when I didn't know what I know now.

I wonder what the people who heard these tunes in 1991 know now, and what they think of the state of current affairs.


Sonic Attack - Give Yourself To Me


The Cover Girls - Funk Boutique

Monday, November 28, 2011


How do they expect to get away with it?

With the frauds?

With the swindles?

With the looting?

Answer : world freakin' war!


The Occupy London movement camped at St Pauls and elsewhere across London has issued its demands.

And I'm absolutely 100% sure that 99% of the population will agree with them. The remaining 1% will be squirming in their gentlemen's clubs (or is it strip clubs today?), Mediterranean yachts, Ferraris etc.

The demands are
Globally, corporations deprive the public purse of hundreds of billions of pounds each year, leaving insufficient funds to provide people with fair living standards. We must abolish tax havens and complex tax avoidance schemes, and ensure corporations pay tax that accurately reflects their real profits.

Corporate lobbying subverts our democracy. Last year corporations spent £2 billion influencing the British government. We believe exploitative corporate lobbying has no place in a democratic society. Legislation to ensure full and public transparency of all corporate lobbying activities must be put in place. This should be overseen by a credible and independent body, directly accountable to the people.

The existing system of corporate sanctions allows executives and board members to avoid individual responsibility for the consequences of their actions and inactions. Those directly involved in the decision-making process must be held personally liable for their role in the misdeeds of their corporations and duly charged for all criminal behaviour.

[source : Occupy London calls for an end to tax havens, for lobbying transparency and personal accountability for executives,]


To add to our new national anthem, in which we honour our new bloodthirsty allies al Qaeda with the words Allah U Akbar, the new national flag has been unveiled. It accurately shows how wealth is distributed.

[image from False Economy,]

So to show how we are all in this together, me, you, al Qaeda, The Muslim Brotherhood, The Syrian National Council, MeK in Iran, in fact any Islamic terrorist organistion, every morning this new flag should be raised over The Houses of Parliament, all Royal residences etc, to the tune of the new national anthem. So please be upstanding and salute!

God Save our gracious Queen
Long live our noble Queen
Allah U Akbar
Send her victorious
Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah U Akbar

Saturday, November 26, 2011


Cool heads are required for what is about to be unleashed on the generally unsuspecting human race.

Very cool heads.

Very, very cool heads.

It's not just for blatant provocations such as this latest needless killing of over 20 Pakistan troops on the Afghan border.

It's also the current financial collapse.

A significant minority know it is all engineered, to bring about a new world order.

Order from financial chaos.

Order from military chaos.

But that's all it is. A significant minority. But some of that significant minority are in very influential positions.

So it's not lost.

But neither is it game over for the detested warmongering kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs.

Just take a few deep breaths...

Aaaaand relax.


Remember Libya?

We just bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed it back to the stone age. The purpose was to save civilians, but oopsadaisy, we executed Gaddafi instead.

Since Gaddafi's very public execution there has been little media coverage of Libya. Yes, there was the obligatory victory salutes to Cameron and Sarkozy who flew there for the day in a blaze of glory and camera lights, and then got the hell outta there pretty sharpish. But media attention has moved swiftly on to the next victims of NATO's liberating love, Syria and Iran.

So what is happening in Libya today? Right now. This very second.

Besides the al Qaeda flags fluttering in the North African breeze, what is happening?

Apparently the Islamic terrorists are in charge, and the alleged new government is actually in virtual exile already seeking safety in Malta and Turkey!


Perhaps in response to Webster Tarpley's tour of Syria the week before last the BBC has sent its reporter Paul Wood to Homs in Syria. The BBC proudly boasts it is the first to send reporters to the area. You may have heard of Homs, and you should because it where the rebellion against the Syrian government is allegedly the strongest and the bloodiest.

But when I watched the reports filed by Wood I thought they supported the claims of the Syrian government.

The reports show
1. rebels smuggling weapons into Syria via Lebanon
2. rebels sniping at soldiers of the Syrian military

Also shown is a small protest (and it does looks small too) in Homs against the Syrian government. The Syrian Army is nowhere to be seen and so does not drown the protestors in a sea of bullets, as we have been led to believe happens, which is strange considering the protest is in the alleged centre of the rebellion in Homs where hundreds have allegedly been killed. Wood claims the protestors want military intervention but does not show any member of the public or Free Syrian Army saying this and it being translated.

Wood has so far filed three reports. The latest report can be watched at

Friday, November 25, 2011


Craig Murray is doing a very good job of trying to get to the bottom of the scandal surrounding Adam Werritty, Liam Fox and Matthew Gould. His Freedom of Information requests regarding Gould have been denied because, he was told almost immediately and very late at night, it would cost too much!

In his latest blog about this FoI denial Murray quotes statements from the House of Commons Public Administration Committee questioning of Sir Gus O'Donnell. Paul Flynn MP appears to be concerned about the cover up, and asks O'Donnell a few incisive questions, but is continually interrupted by another MP called Robert Halfon. The reason for this is given by Murray.
It is shocking but true that Robert Halfon MP, who disrupted Flynn with repeated points of order, receives funding from precisely the same Israeli sources as Werritty, and in particular from Mr Poju Zabludowicz. He also formerly had a full time paid job as Political Director of the Conservative Friends of Israel.

...It is now proven without doubt that O’Donnell lied blatantly about the number of Gould-Fox-Werritty meetings, and that Mossad was involved. And yet every single British mainstream media outlet still refuses to mention it.

I know from a mole that the plot involves a plan to attack Iran. For the cover-up to be so blatant and yet so comprehensively maintained, the secret at the heart of this conspiracy must be great, and those complicit must include a very large swathe of the British political and media establishment.

UPDATE: access to this blog is now blocked from FCO and Cabinet Office terminals. Very wise – truth can be contagious.

[source : Gould-Werritty: A Real Conspiracy, Not a Theory, ]

This drive for war on Iran is consistent with the theory that since 1996 a Zionist faction has been lusting for war on its neighbours. The warmongering document A Clean Break was written in 1996 for none other than Nuclear Netanyahu, and named Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria as the threats that should be addressed "to secure the realm".

But we must also note that the group containing the authors of A Clean Break later wrote Rebuilding America's Defenses in 2000 as The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the so-called Neocons, and named Iraq and Iran as the major threats to American security, along with North Korea. That document recognised the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to convince the American public to go to war. 9/11 gave the Neocons that "new Pearl Harbor", and they have not wasted the opportunity, have they?

On 9/11 members of PNAC were in very influential positions. Both Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, founding members of PNAC, were in Washington DC on 9/11 while President George Bush was in Florida, and so they were effectively in charge. Just a few months before 9/11 the power to stand down the USAF was quietly transferred from the Pentagon and officers in the field to only the Secretary of Defense, ie PNAC founder Donald Rumsfeld.

But it goes much deeper than this.

Even before the WTC had collapsed there was a demand for proof that Iraq was behind the attacks of 9/11. Osama bin Marfan Laden was accused, rightly or wrongly, and a token invasion of a defenceless Afghanistan was made. But the real target was Iraq, named in both A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. One reason given for going after Iraq was WMD. But who had previously negotiated a sale of WMD to Iraq? Donald Rumsfeld. And who sold North Korea nuclear technology while on the board of ABB? Donald Rumsfeld.

So Donald Rumsfeld was a founding member of a pro-Israeli organisation which had written a document recognising the need for "a new Pearl Harbor" to go to war on threats to Israel, and on 9/11, when the United States Air Force was mysteriously AWOL, Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense with the sole power to issue a Stand Down order, and after 9/11 one of those threats to Israel, Iraq, was attacked because it had WMD which Rumsfeld sold to them. Iraq was invaded in 2003 and the USA is building its biggest ever embassy there. Coincidentally, Iraq has the 2nd largest proven reserves of oil.

Yes, this does stink a bit, doesn't it.

But there's more.

In February 2005 Rafik Hariri was assassinated in Beirut, Lebanon. Syria was initially accused and The Cedar Revolution, another of the CIA color revolutions, drove Syrian troops out of Lebanon. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) was created and has been accused of being a tool of the USA and Israel. The STL tried to prove Syria was responsible for Hariri's assassination but couldn't, and has since totally discredited itself now claiming that Hezbollah did it, a claim that has yet to be proven. Hezbollah has responded by showing intercepted communications from Israeli aircraft flying over Lebanon showing that Israel was at the time following Hariri's movements very closely. Israel was at war on Lebanon and its innocent children in a contrived war in 2006.

So that's Iraq and Lebanon taken care of.

In 2004 the list containing Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon was amended to include Libya, Somalia and Sudan as the Greater Middle East Project, extending from North Africa to Pakistan. Libya was recently bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed by NATO, and there have been less high profile wars in Sudan and Somalia.

Now back to this war drive on Iran. Iran and Syria have publicly vowed to defend each other. If one is attacked the other will rain their missiles onto Israel. So starting a war on Syria will drag in Iran.

But it will also drag in Russia.

But is there much more to this drive for war on Iran from elements within the British political establishment?

As I point out on my website, the British establishment does "have form" when it comes to engineering world wars.

Germany was tricked into starting World War 1 by Great Britain. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was a Freemason plot run out of London. King George then told Kaiser Wilhelm that Britain would not join in a war on the Continent, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the BEF was sent into Northern France to stop Germany's advance to Paris. Wilhelm later wrote in his memoirs that a high ranking German Freemason told him that Freemasonry had engineered the war to destroy and then recreate Central Europe. The first attempt at world government was subsequently made as The League of Nations (LoN). The LoN failed because the USA voted out despite Woodrow Wilson touring the USA and almost killing himself in the process in a desperate attempt to convince America to join the LoN. Wilson had earlier created the abomination we know as The Federal Reserve.

The USA voted out of the LoN because although it had sent troops to France they only fought for less than a year and suffered few casualties. To convince the USA a world government was required the USA had to be embroiled in a much longer and bloodier war. So Hitler was brought forth by elements of Wall Street allied to the British ruling class. These same elements using the power given to them by The Federal Reserve also created the USSR to oppose Hitler. Hitler served two purposes. The first was to start another war on the European mainland and beyond to drag in the USA. The second was to scare Jews to Palestine, which he did eventually. Despite being apparent enemies FDR conspired with Churchill to get the USA involved in WW2. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was provoked and allowed to happen, and the USA then fought for nearly four years all over the world. Unsurprisingly, a world government of sorts The United Nations was created after WW2 and its HQ is in the USA. The UN has some global power but not absolute dictatorial global power. Not yet, anyway.

After WW2 the Holocaust convinced a sceptical world Jewry that creating Eretz Israel in Palestine was the only way to save Judaism, so they brutally drove the Palestinians off their land into the largest refugee camps in the world, Gaza and The West Bank. This and subsequent Zionist behaviour has provoked many Arabs and Muslims into terrorism, which has been nurtured and guided by the CIA and MI6, particularly in London, also known as Londonistan.

All this follows the diabolical plan for three world wars to create a tyrannical world government proposed by Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike in 1871.

9/11 was the trigger for the final world war to be between Zionism and Islam, with the the rest of the world being dragged in having been divided by the issue of Palestine for decades. The USA is now in a confident war mood, following recent success in Iraq and Libya, and is now threatening Syria and Iran and also Pakistan. Syria is backed by Russia. Pakistan is backed by China.

Senator Mike Gravel recently suggested a sequence of events if Iran or Syria is attacked, and I would agree with them; Syria or Iran is attacked. Both with Hezbollah and Hamas lob missiles at Israel. Israel eventually defends itself with nukes. Pakistan nukes Israel. Russia and China on one side and the USA and its allies on the other will not stand on the side lines. Maybe the UK will use its nukes.

We do have to ask, why is there such a drive for war on Iran inside the British political establishment with these possible consequences when it has the aforementioned track record of engineering world wars?

And not just ask, but be very very concerned.

As Murray concedes,
the secret at the heart of this conspiracy must be great

There can be no greater conspiracy than to create a tyrannical world government.

I doubt that people such as Werritty or Gould are fully aware and/or complicit. As Foreign Secretary William Hague could be. He is Bilderberg which voted for war on Iran last year and must have frequent contact with Gould.

But we cannot ignore this or recent statements from British agents Henry Kissinger and George Soros.

Speaking on Bloomberg earlier this year Kissinger said that events in Egypt were "only the first Scene of the first act of a drama that is to be played out.". A few months later he demanded war on Iran for Israel. Soros vowed that the Iranian government would be removed in the "bloodiest of the revolutions". Soros has a history of funding colour revolutions.

So at the very least, war on Iran would be the culmination of a series of wars stemming from the 1996 Israeli document A Clean Break.

But I fear much more.

I may be wrong. But I am trying to fit current affairs into a grander scheme that explains not just very recent history since 1996, but modern history, accounting for the previous world wars and the drive to create that all-powerful tyrannical world government which would implement policies to drastically reduce human population down to about one billion, probably less.

What I see stands out like a black cockroach on a white rug.

If we fall for this one then we probably deserve everything they want.