Saturday, June 30, 2012


Mohammed Mursi gave his first speech since his inauguration today. Three foreign policy aspects of his speech are bold but confusing.

He said Egypt would respect current international treaties, but the MB want to kill all the Jews.

He also said he would work to stop the violence in Syria, yet the MB is one of the most violent factions of the Syrian rebels.

But he also said,
“I declare from here that Egypt -- the people, the nation, the government and the presidency -- stands by the Palestinian people until they get all their legitimate rights,”
[source : Mursi Vows to Support Palestinians, Respect Existing Treaties, Bloomberg,, 30/06/2012]

How these will be implemented is yet to be seen. But if Mursi does decide to reduce the participation of the MB in Syria then this could be a huge signal that he wants to unite Islam and concentrate on Palestine.

As I said; bold but confusing.

Well. He is a politician.

But a Muslim Brother politician.


This is as brief a summary of my legal argument as I can give.

But what I want to know is what official documentation or evidence can be used to support this?

1. FSMA 2000 [FSA financed by The City of London]
Section 3 Market Confidence (General rule that FSA has failed completely possibly due to corruption and/or incompetent personnel due to relatively low wages which are paid by The City of London)
Section 4 Public Awareness (FSA should be telling us not just about the distinction between differentt financial products but also how the UK financial system works, i.e. fractional reserve banking in private hands)
Section 5 Consumer Protection (FSA should protect the consumer)

2. Fraud Act 2006
Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position (Banks abused their position by deliberately inflating a credit bubble, which they could do because they can create money out of thin air, but then claim bailouts which they were given thanks to Bilderbergers, and also call for world government due to the crisis that they engineered while we suffer austerity)

3. UTCCR 1999
Section 5 (1) (states a term is unfair if it causes a significant imbalance to the detriment of the consumer, e.g. banks could inflate a credit bubble due to fractional reserve banking in private hands and then call for world government due to the engineered crisis, and that world government would exterminate at least 90% of the population).
Schedule 2 (1) (o) (an unfair term is expecting the consumer to fulfil his obligation, i.e. repay a loan, while the lender does not fulfil their obligations, i.e. get the FSA to fulfill their duties regarding education on the true functioning of the UK financial system as stated in FSMA 2000 Section 4).

4. Principle of Unjust Enrichment
According to Peter Birks in Unjust Enrichment,
"Every problem in unjust enrichment can be unlocked by asking these five questions:
1. was the defendant enriched?
2. was it at the expense of the claimant?
3. was it unjust?
4. what kind of right did the claimant acquire?
5. does the defendant have a defence?"


This is the music used in The Sting, The Entertainer by Scott Joplin.

Or should that be The Entertainers, in reference to the NWO as they attempt their already doomed sting of the human race.

Scott Joplin - The Entertainer

Friday, June 29, 2012


Upon further reading of the Financial Services Bill 2012 I found this regarding a consumer financial education body in Schedule 15.

3R The consumer financial education body
(1) The consumer financial education body continues to have the consumer financial education function.
(2) The “consumer financial education body” means the body corporate originally established by the Financial Services Authority under section 6A of this Act (as it had effect before the passing of the Financial Services Act 2012).
(3) The consumer financial education function is to enhance—
(a) the understanding and knowledge of members of the public of financial matters (including the UK financial system), and
(b) the ability of members of the public to manage their own financial affairs.
(4) The consumer financial education function includes, in particular—
(a) promoting awareness of the benefits of financial planning;
(b) promoting awareness of the financial advantages and disadvantages in relation to particular decisions relating to different kinds of goods or services;
(c) promoting awareness of the benefits and risks associated with different kinds of financial dealing (which includes informing the FCA and other bodies of those benefits and risks);
(d) the publication of educational materials or the carrying out of other educational activities;
(e) the provision of information and advice to members of the public;
(f) assisting members of the public with the management of debt;
(g) working with other organisations which provide debt services, with a view to improving—
(i) the availability to the public of those services;
(ii) the quality of the services provided;
(iii) consistency in the services available, in the way in which they are provided and in the advice given.
(5) In subsection (4) “debt services” means debt advice or assistance with the management of debt.
(6) Schedule 1A makes further provision about the consumer financial education body.”

This is interesting for several reasons, but the two main reasons are
1. there is a more detailed list of the kind of information that this consumer financial education body is supposed to gives us, but
2. that list is not exhaustive, i.e. this list could be considered to be the minimum that the consumer financial education body is expected to give us, and the "UK financial system" is EXPLICITLY listed in 3R(3)(a).

So what is the definition of "UK financial system"? In Section 5:
1I Meaning of “the UK financial system”
In this Act “the UK financial system” means the financial system
operating in the United Kingdom and includes—
(a) financial markets and exchanges,
(b) regulated activities, and
(c) other activities connected with financial markets and

NB again "includes" is not exhaustive.

And the Money Advice Centre, which is the current consumer financial education body is financed by...THE CITY OF LONDON!

Yes. That's right. The City of London has some control over what the consumer financial education body is supposed to tell us about how The City of London works because The City of London pays their wages.

The unfairness is still there, no matter how the laws are rewritten.

So what needs to be done with my argument?

Instead of referencing FSMA 2000 Section 4 I can simply reference Financial Services Bill Section 5. FSMA Section 5 can be replaced with Financial Services Bill 2012 Section 5 because that's where the consumer protection stuff is.

The Financial Services Bill is very big with information and definitions very scattered.

But it also has the appearance of a rushed and amateurish piece of legislation.


In my legal argument as to why most financial contracts are null and void I made use of the FSMA 2000 Section 4 which gives the FSA some responsibility in educating the general public about the financial system.
4 Public awareness
(1)The public awareness objective is: promoting public understanding of the financial system.
(2)It includes, in particular—
(a)promoting awareness of the benefits and risks associated with different kinds of investment or other financial dealing; and
(b)the provision of appropriate information and advice.
(3)“The financial system” has the same meaning as in section 3
[source : FSMA 2000 Section 4]

There is a very hasty attempt to replace the FSA with the Financial Conduct Authority and the relevant law change is underway in the form of the Financial Services Bill.
The government is today warned against pushing through its plans to abolish the Financial Services Authority (FSA) as it emerges that the Treasury will struggle to complete its radical overhaul of the regulatory system until 2013.

Despite the government's pledge to have three new bodies regulating the financial sector by 2012, the Guardian understands it is becoming clear that the required legislation will take longer to pass through parliament.
[source : Radical plans to replace Financial Services Authority fall behind schedule, The Guardian,, 03/02/2011]

Curiously there is no explicit reference to a Public Awareness responsibility for the new FCA in this new Financial Services Bill. Is this an attempt to anull my legal argument?

Perhaps. Perhaps. Perhaps.

However, in the Financial Services Bill there is still a "consumer protection" objective similar to the FSMA 2000.
1C The consumer protection objective
(1) The consumer protection objective is: securing an appropriate degree of protection for consumers.
(2) In considering what degree of protection for consumers may be appropriate, the FCA must have regard to—
(a) the differing degrees of risk involved in different kinds of investment or other transaction;
(b) the differing degrees of experience and expertise that different consumers may have;
(c) the needs that consumers may have for the timely provision of information and advice that is accurate and fit for purpose;
(d) the general principle that consumers should take responsibility for their decisions;
(e) the general principle that those providing regulated financial services should be expected to provide consumers with a level of care that is appropriate having regard to the degree of risk involved in relation to the investment or other transaction and the capabilities of the consumers in question;
(f) any information which the consumer financial education body has provided to the FCA in the exercise of the consumer financial education function;
(g) any information which the scheme operator of the ombudsman scheme has provided to the FCA pursuant to section 232A.
[source : Financial Services Bill 2012 Section 5]

But what does this section (f) mean?
(f) any information which the consumer financial education body has provided to the FCA in the exercise of the consumer financial education function;

The "consumer financial education body" is in reference to the Money Advice Centre, which is the Public Awareness function of the crrent FSA. So in this clause there is an implicit responsibility of the FCA for public awareness. It is not as explicit as the FSMA 2000, but it is still there. And the fact that this function has been demoted from explicit to implicit tells you something, doesn't it?


This sneaky attempt has actually strengthened my argument!

My argument still stands, and is even strengthened by this sneaky deliberate attempt to not give the FCA an explicit responsibility to educate the public on the financial system. The whole financial system is designed to unjustly enrich a cabal of fascist, satanist, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs intent on installing a global dictatorship that has yet to decide whether to exterminate 90%, 95% or 98% of us.

No amount of sneaky law changes can hide that fact.


The creep towards Eurobonds began last night. It will take years to finally implement the Eurobond, but they are going for it.

Here is what van Rompuy proposed in his report that is currently being discussed in Brussels.
In a medium term perspective, the issuance of common debt could be explored as an element of such a fiscal union and subject to progress on fiscal integration. Steps towards the introduction of joint and several sovereign liabilities could be considered as long as a robust framework for budgetary discipline and competitiveness is in place to avoid moral hazard and foster responsibility and compliance. The process towards the issuance of common debt should be criteria-based and phased, whereby progress in the pooling of decisions on budgets would be accompanied with commensurate steps towards the pooling of risks. Several options for partial common debt issuance have been proposed, such as the pooling of some short-term funding instruments on a limited and conditional basis, or the gradual roll-over into a redemption fund.
[source : TOWARDS A GENUINE ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION, Report by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy, 26/06/2012]

And I can find only one mention of this little nugget to pilot a Eurobond, with most media focusing on Spain and Italy forcing Merkel to buckle under all the pressure that is being applied to her, including from very senior Bilderbergers.
The new growth package, announced by Mr Rompuy, is made up of:

A 10bn-euro boost of capital for the European Investment Bank, expected to raise overall lending capacity by 60bn euros

Targeting 60bn euros of unused structural funds to help small enterprises and create youth employment

A pilot launch of EU project bonds worth 4.5bn euros for infrastructure improvements, focusing on energy, transport and broadband.
[source : Eurozone agrees on bank recapitalisation, BBC,, 29/06/2012]

It all seems to be going ahead, further integration and Eurobonds, but it will take a long time.


The first question on Question Time last night was on the LIBOR scandal. The question itself was, Is there any integrity left in the British banking system?

As if there was any to begin with?!

But the discussion was cleverly diverted towards a Glass Steagall-esque solution by one of the guests Terry Smith, who said the case for it was now unanswerable, and there was some support for it from the panel.

Tony Robinson suppported it. So did Terry Smith, and even Bilderberg Paddy Ashdown appeared to support it.

The show can be viewed at the link below. The general discussion on banking is the first question, but the Glass Steagall solution of separation of investment and retail banking is raised at about 13:00

Thursday, June 28, 2012


The 'postponement' of the delivery of the S300 system to Syria that was reported in Russia Today yesterday was a clear signal that Russia has given up on Assad remaining in power, leaving Assad vulnerable to any NATO attack or NFZ, and is now trying to negotiate a 'transition' to a 'unity' government, whatever that is.

And now that Russia has supported Annan's new plan for a government of national unity, which would not include certain people whose presence could undermine such a government, i.e. Assad himself, then I think we can assume that Assad is doomed and will probably find sanctuary somewhere.

But can NATO be trusted?


If Assad is replaced then Syria will be neutral when NATO attacks Iran. This will accelerate the war on Iran. The fact that Iran has not been invited to the meeting on Saturday implies the attendants have bowed to Lillary's demands and do not care for Iran either.

And that is not all that will happen. Give it 3 to 6 months and the rebels will have even more arms, implement a coup and completely overthrow the 'national unity' governmment.

And the NATO missile defence/attack system will still be aimed at Russia.

Here is General Wesley Clark revealing how he was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 what the USA was going to do; war on seven nations in five years. The dust had barely settled after WTC 1,2 and 7 had been pulled and yet a plan for war on seven nations in five years had been drafted.

Wes Clark - America's Foreign Policy

The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iran, Sudan and Somalia.

But Clark also gives us a hint as to when the plan for the inside job 9/11 began to be drafted. He reveals a conversation with Paul Wolfowitz in 1991 about the USA asserting its authority on the world before 2001 and 'cleaning up' old Soviet client regimes, specifically naming Syria, Iran and Iraq.

So here is a timeline of multiple wars.

In 1991 Wolfowitz says the USA has 10 years to assert its authority on the world, specifically naming Syria, Iran and Iraq.
In 1996 A Clean Break is written for Netanyahu, naming Iraq and Iran with Syria and Lebanon as targets.
In 1998 PNAC is formed, writing letters to Bill Clinton about taking out Saddam in Iraq.
In 2000 PNAC publishes Rebuilding America's Defenses, which is written by the same Zionists who wrote A Clean Break, which talks about "a new Pearl Harbor" to convince the American public to go on a global warmongering rampage and accept a paramilitary police state.
In 2000 George W Bush is elected President after Florida, controlled by his brother Jeb who is a founding member of PNAC, suspiciously switches from electing Gore to electing Bush. Bush brings into the White House apparatus the Zionist cabal that wrote A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.
In 2001 the film Pearl Harbor was released which graphically portrayed the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, to remind the USA of Pearl Harbor.
In September 2001 the inside job 9/11 occurs, with George W Bush calling the attack "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century".
In October/November 2001 shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark is told of this plan for war on seven nations in five years, even though no evidence was provided to convict them of complicity in 9/11.
In 2003 war on Iraq, after a bunch of lies was told about WMD and complicity in 9/11. Later investigations found the lies to be exactly that; LIES!
In 2006 war on Lebanon.
In 2008 the relatively unknown Barack Obama is elected President after being showered with billions from Wall Street for his campaign. Obama promises to end the wars.
In 2011 war on Libya, after NATO helped al Qaeda to cause a civil war there, to give NATO the excuse to invoke R2PAQ.
In 2012 Syria is very close to suffering similar NATO 'humanitarian intervention' after NATO helped Sunni terrorists to create a civil war, with widespread calls for R2PAQ and R2PWMDAQ.
In 2012 trouble is brewing in Somalia and Sudan.


Following this investigation into the manipulation of LIBOR rates by Barclays and a few other banks, are we now safe? Has the City of London been disinfected of the criminal fascist bankers and their corrupt financial wizardry which has brought engineered financial chaos to the world to be used as a pretext to reveal a long-planned world government?

Er, no.

The FSA looks good for having appeared to have protected the consumer.

The banks look bad, but we know that already.

But the real villains are still in place, and they still have their tools.

They can still create near infinite amounts of money out of nothing, which is what they did to inflate the credit bubble that was deliberately burst in 2007.

They can still sign their private gambling debts totalling megatrillions over to us via our corrupt politicians.

They have had that power for centuries.

And what have they done with that power over the centuries?

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money."
[Lord Josiah Stamp]

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
[James Paul Warburg]

“We are absolutely slaves to central banks.”
[quote from video below]

[CNBC Admits We’re All Slaves to a Global Government Run by Bankers,]

We gave a cabal of fascist, satanist, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs the power to create money out of nothing, and, like Lord Josiah Stamp warned, they bought the world and all its people, including you, your family and friends.

And now that they are openly declaring world government, what do you think they will do with you, when they are discussing whether to reduce the human population by 90%, 95% or 98%?

The corrupt wretches in the House of Commons think that because they have allowed all this to go on they will be immune from the mass culling that is coming.


They created Hitler. They created Stalin. They created Mao. They engineered WW1, WW2 and the Holocaust. They engineered 9/11 and the subsequent series of wars that have occured in Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, currently Syria and soon, the big kahuna, Iran.

All this would have been impossible if the bankers did not have the power to create money out of nothing.

Only a democratically elected government must have such power.

Only a democratically elected government can use such power for the full benefit of its electors and not for the benefit of a cabal of fascist, satanist, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling megalomaniacs.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012


The UN released its preliminary investigation into the Houla massacre today. The Guardian and BBC have covered it. And both protect the rebels.

How do they do this?

On its website as of 1306 BST, the article by The Guardian describing this report has the headline, "Assad loyalists blamed over Houla". From this headline you would think the case was closed and whodunnit was the Shabiha, as was initially alleged. But when you open the article you are suddenly confronted with this;
• Attack on pro-Assad TV channel leaves seven people dead
• Assad forces may be to blame for many Houla deaths - UN
• Violence worse than before ceasefire, says Annan's deputy
[source : Syria in a state of war, says Assad - live updates, The Guardian,, 27/06/2012]

Oh, so the conclusion is not that conclusive then? It is only a "may be to blame" now is it?

The BBC take a very similar approach.
Mr Pinheiro said the perpetrators were from one of three groups: "shabiha" or other local militia from neighbouring villages, perhaps acting with the army; anti-government armoured groups; or foreign groups.

"While the commission could not rule out the possibility of anti-government fighters being responsible for the killing, this was considered very much unlikely," he said.
[source : Gunmen 'kill seven' at Syrian pro-Assad Ikhbariya TV, BBC,, 27/06/2012]

This is a long way from what the headline on the front page said, and from what Hasty Hague said too.

But upon reading the report itself there are plenty of references to the rebels (and that includes this 'mysterious' third party who we all know is al Qaeda shipped in from and armed to the teeth by NATO, Saudi Arabia, Libya etc.)

For example take this from the Conclusions:
107. The CoI considers it has reasonable grounds to believe that anti-Government armed groups have extra-judicially executed captured members of the Government forces, Shabbiha, foreign fighters, supporters of the Government, suspected informers and/or collaborators. The Commission also found that anti-Government armed groups have tortured captured members of the Syrian security forces and/or their alleged supporters and abducted civilians and members of Government forces, usually to facilitate prisoner exchanges. The CoI is especially concerned by reports that anti-Government armed groups have been using children as medical porters, messengers and cooks, exposing them to risk of death and injury.

OK. So the UN report is here admitting that the rebels (including al Qaeda) are executing and torturing "supporters of the Government", i.e. civilians, as well as using children.

So what is Assad suppposed to do?

Well according to the same report,
57. International human rights law places the onus for protecting citizens squarely on the Government.

In other words the report says that it is Assad's responsibility to protect civilians!!

So we have the report saying that the rebels are executing and torturing civilians as well as using children, and at the same time stating that it is Assad's responsibility to protect them!


I'll leave you with this conclusion:
110. The cessation of hostilities is of paramount importance. Through hundreds of interviews, it is apparent that it is the civilian population, from various communities, who are suffering in this conflict, many losing their lives in the spiral of violence.

What the hell is Assad supposed to do when NATO is shipping in al Qaeda to execute and torture civilians and use children? Where are the rebels getting their weapons from (clue: CIA via Turkey and Mossad via Lebanon). This the report authors do not address.

Everyone, even the clueless Mark Lyall Grant, now admits the presence of this mysterious third party that seems to be causing all the major trouble. They are scared of uttering their name.

But they are not called Voldemort.




Iraq, Lebanon and Libya were on that list.

Iran is next on the list.

And the whole series of wars was enabled by the inside job 9/11.


Three nations with very large nuclear arsenals have been flexing their muscles and posturing over Syria, giving the appearance of independence from each other.

But a closer look at the official attendee list of Bilderberg could very well suggest something else.

From China came Fu Ying, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs for China. She attended last year, occupying the same position. If she attended last year at a meeting with the Bilderberg satanists and kept her job and attended this year too then she must have done a good job (what ever it was).

Why was Fu Ying invited, twice? And is she still in her job?

But the Russian attendees should give cause for deep concern.

Chinese policy towards the Syrian crisis has been words so far, suggesting that Syrians should be left to decide their government without foreign interference. Russia on the other hand appears to be taking more direct action, with reports about troops and weapons being shipped to Syria.

I have previously given Russia the benefit of the doubt. Although there have been some Russian attendees to Bilderberg, namely advisers at international institutions who can have their anti-Putin articles published in such prestigious media as The Washington Post, there has not been any direct link between these Russian traitors and the Russian government.

But this year is different.

In early 2010 Medvedev created the Russian International Affairs Council. Its President is Igor Ivanov. Ivanov was Putin's Foreign Minister and later Secretary of the Security Council. Before this he was Foreign Minister for Yeltsin, who annointed Putin. So Ivanov is obviously a trusted friend and colleague of Putin. But a member and trustee of the RIAC is Sergei Lavrov, the current Foreign Minister.

Guess who is on the official Bilderberg attendee list for 2012? Igor Ivanov.

I view this as a direct link between the current core of the Russian government and Bilderberg, and that Ivanov went to Bilderberg as Putin's representative.

For why has Ivanov not been hung, drawn and quartered as a traitor for meeting with the alleged enemy?

I can find no attendee from Russia in the years 2009 to 2011 inclusive, when Medvedev was President. I have seen Medvedev as the Golden Boy of the Lizards of London, and the evidence for this lies in the archives of the FT. Before the latest Presidential election in Russia the FT was fawning over Medvedev, pleading with Putin not to run for President to allow his protege Medvedev to continue as President unopposed. But Putin ran, and won, so the FT subsequently threatened Putin to open up Russia for the locusts of London to devour otherwise he would suffer the same fate as Gaddafi in a Russian Spring.

Several commentators on Bilderberg examined the attendance of Kasparov this year, who is head of the alleged opposition to Putin inside Russia. Tarpley attacked the attendance of Anatoly Chubais, who has attended Bilderberg before.

So why would Bilderberg invite Ivanov, who has such close and direct links to Putin and Lavrov, as well as invite Kasparov and Chubais? Have Chubais, Kasparov or Ivanov revealed their attendance to the Russian public, or what was said? And if not, then why not?

If Ivanov was pro-Putin he could nail Kasparov and Chubais as traitors in one sentence to the Russian media, and the Bilderberg meddling in Russia could be destroyed for a long time.

But silence is all we get.

So why the silence?

To answer this we can perhaps use the statements from first Lavrov and now Putin that they are not obliged to defend Assad. This statement was first made by Lavrov at the press conference in Moscow when Hasty Hague went to visit. When Lavrov made this statement he appeared to me to look down and hang his head in shame a little. Putin made the same statement very recently during his current tour of the Middle East.

But why has Russia now 'postponed' its contract to deliver S300 missiles to Syria?

Does this have anything to do with any agreement reached between Putin and any Middle East dictator (including Nutternyahu)?

If there was an agreement reached at Bilderberg that the West and/or Russia would back down a little over Syria is it being honoured?

Well, why did Turkey not invoke Article V of The Washington Treaty, but instead threatened to view the approach of Syrian military as a threat to be fired upon? This virtually extends Turkish territory into Syria, and increases the potential for establishing safe zones for NATO special forces to operate from inside Syria.

The S300 is an anti-aircraft system, considered one of if not the best around. The decision to postpone the delivery of S300 to Syria was taken from above.
The report also says that deliveries on the Syrian contract are expected to be made between 2012 and 2013. But ‘Vedomosti’ claims two separate sources, who chose to remain anonymous, have said deliveries have been put on the back-burner “after a direct order from above.”
[source : Russia halts plans to supply S-300 missile system to Syria - reports, RT,, 27/06/2012]

I have to say I am beginning to see that Assad is being left isolated, and that no direct NATO action will occur because the Syrian al Qaeda rebs have now been armed enough by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, thanks to the devilry of Kofi Annan, and advised and trained enough by the special forces of UK, USA, France, Qatar, Jordan that Bilderberg has enough confidence in them to overthrow Assad without direct NATO intervention such as bombing of civilian populations as in Libya last year.

This postponement of the S300 system does look highly suspicious.

This would explain why Russia has been making pacts with the devil, for example signing billion dollar deals with Exxon Mobil, joining the WTO, and last year signing a variety of deals with British companies, such as in nanotechnology from which Chubais would benefit from greatly.

On the other hand Ivanov is a member of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe. Was nuclear war threatened at Bilderberg?

All this just goes to show that meetings like Bilderberg must be stopped and their outcomes revealed to the global general public so that we, and not a handful of megalomaniacs, can decide our destiny.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012


The Flat Earth by Thomas Dolby (lyrics below)

The Earth can be any shape you want it
Any shape at all
Dark and cold or bright and warm
Long or thin or small
But it's home and all I ever had
And maybe why for me the Earth is flat

Friends have often asked me why
I'm sensitive about my height
I would look around and say
Hmm, I thought I was immune

All my life I have waited
to be given any word
It was screaming to be heard

Please remember...

The Earth can be any shape you want it
Any shape at all
Dark and cold or bright and warm
Long or thin or small
But it's home and all I ever had
And maybe why for me the Earth is flat

Turn the island to the storm tonight

Then when they spill the demon seed
Turn and face into the wind
All along you still believed
Believed you were immune

And if love is all you're missing
Look into your heart
Is anybody home ?

Please remember ...

The Earth can be any shape you want it
Any in the world

But don't you point that raygun at me
I might just explode

There are stars buried in your soul
And only a fool would blame the death of rock and roll, yeah

And in time you'll come to understand
This flat old Earth is in your gentle hands


Russia Today has published a very interesting and credible idea about what happened last Friday regarding the Turkish plane that Syria shot down.

The Turkish military jet's incursion into Syria may have been a botched NATO operation on counterfeiting Syrian military aircraft ID in order to fool the country’s air defense. The necessary codes could have been “borrowed” from the Syrian fighter that had been stolen by its defector pilot.

This theory, explaining why the Turkish reconnaissance plane entered Syrian airspace before being taken down, was voiced by Russian newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, which cited unnamed sources in the Syrian security forces.

Syrians believe that the Friday incident has its roots in last week’s defection of a Syrian pilot who escaped in his MiG-21 fighter jet to Jordan. Damascus branded the defector a traitor, while Jordanian authorities gave him asylum.

The defection brings memories of a similar incident that took place in February 2011, when two Libyan pilots “delivered” their military aircraft to Malta. NATO’s bombing campaign, which ended with the fall of the Muammar Gaddafi’s government, started just a month after.

Military analysts note that, curiously, the Libyan air defense systems appeared to be helpless against NATO’s air strikes. The explanation may lie in the friend-or-foe systems that the two stolen aircraft had onboard, the newspaper suggests. This system is used by the military in combat to distinguish their own aircraft.

According to the newspaper, the Syrian military believe that NATO took a similar approach again, but failed to properly decipher the codes. This is evident by the fact that the defector pilot managed to send his family to Turkey before stealing the fighter jet, which means the act was probably not done out of a sudden emotional breakdown.

Turkey may have been given the task by NATO to test how well the job was performed, and the result was disastrous, the report explains.

This is only a theory and more trivial explanations cannot be ruled out – but the intrusion is more likely to have been part of a military operation rather than the mistake Turkey claims it to be, military experts say.
[source : Turkey's downed jet: NATO action in disguise?, RT,, 26/06/2012]

I would go one step further and add that if the flight was designed to test the IFF code assumed to have been given by the Syrian defector then NATO and Turkey would have thought of the consequences if the code was wrong and the plane was shot down. I would also assume that the pilots of this Turkish plane were warned that the mission could be a virtual suicide mission, which is why the families of the pilots of the families have not been shown on NATO media crying their hearts out over their loss.


During the 1990's a Covenant of Security existed between MI5, MI6 and the Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists. This covevnant gave the terrorists safe haven in London. This is how Islamic terrorism grew to become such a threat. This is why despite great concern about mosques, particularly Finsbury Park, very little was done. This is why Reda Hassaine became so disillusioned with MI5 when he risked his life infiltrating Finsbury Park, giving MI5 top grade information which was ignored.

So should we be surprised today when Jonathan Evans, the head of MI5, warns that al Qaeda may be planning to attack the Olympic Games in London later this wet summer, also warning that some people from Britain are seeking training to attack Britain in countries that have experienced the Arab Spring?


Look at the countries named by Evans where these wanna-be terrrorists are flocking?

Though Evans did not say how many people from the UK had gone to the region, it is believed the agency has monitored more than 100 who have attempted to link up with extremists in countries such as Yemen, Egypt, Syria and Libya.
[source : MI5 warns al-Qaida regaining UK toehold after Arab spring, The Guardian,, 26/06/2012]

Repeat Yemen, Egypt, Syria and Libya.

Yemen is underneath a swarm of killer drones, blasting civilians to bits and calling them potential terrorists, the perfect recruiting sergeant.

But Egypt, Syria and Libya should raise your eyebrow because their former governments were allies in the global war on terror but have been overthrown, or in the case of Syria attempts are underway, in the Arab Spring.

But the Arab Spring is totally fake!! Read "2011 – Year of the Dupe" by Tony Cartalucci.

The Egyptian Revolutionaries were trained in the USA with finance from a variety of American sources. We then assisted al Qaeda in Libya, as even the BBC showed, and we are now doing the same in Syria.

So would these wanne-be terrorists have been able to seek such training in Libya, Egypt and Syria if we had not engineered fake revolutions to replace the governments of those nations?

Gaddafi was cooperating with MI6 and CIA, giving them names of suspected al Qaeda in Libya. Where is he now? In a coffin. Where are potential Islamic terrorists flocking, according to Evans? Libya, where the al Qaeda flag flutters high and proud in the North African breeze.

So we are perfectly within our quickly diminishing rights (which are being removed because of the threat of al Qaeda) to ask, were those governments overthrown to facilitate the growth of Islamic extremism, in a Global Covenant of Security?

I suspect so, with the eventual aim of a horrible, horrible war involving Israel.

This is why this current series of wars must stop, and stop immediately.

There must be no war on Syria. It is being covertly invaded by throat-cutting, head-chopping al Qaeda-types, admittedly assisted by us, who commit massacres like Houla and Qubair. Instead of starting war on Syria we should be helping Syria, sending our troops there, if Syria requested it, to put down the terrorism that is causing so much bloodshed, before, as Evans warns, al Qaeda grabs power like they have done in Libya (after we helped them!!), and Syria becomes the next Afghanistan, a fake breeding ground for global Islamic terrorism.

But I don't think Syria needs our assistance. All it needs is for us to stop meddling in their internal affairs by assisting al Qaeda like we did in Libya last year.

God save our gracious Queen
Long live our noble Queen
Allah U Akbar

Send her victorious
Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah U Akbar

Monday, June 25, 2012


The Foreign Minister of Syria has said today that the Turkish plane that violated Syrian airspace on Friday was shot down with a land-based machine gun and not a missile. This is absolutely crucial because the machine gun has a much shorter range than a missile and explains why the plane fell in Syrian waters, even though the Turks said it was shot in international air space.
Makdessi pointed out that the Syrian anti-aircraft defense used a land-based anti-aircraft machinegun with a maximum range of 2.5 kilometers, and that the wreckage found by the Syrian authorities and delivered to the Turkish side with an official record shows holes in the tail-end of the plane which confirm that it was shot down by a ground-based machinegun, not missiles.

"Had the aircraft been over territorial waters, we would have used missiles, not a land-based anti-aircraft machinegun with a maximum range of 2.5 kilometers... all of this confirms the falsity of the allegations that the aircraft was shot down outside Syrian territorial waters," he said.

In response to Davutoglu's statement that the aircraft wasn't alerted, Makedessi said that the Syrian anti-air defenses operate automatically in such cases, and that even if the unidentified aircraft was Syrian, it would have been shot down in the same manner, adding that that machinegun that shot down the plane isn't equipped with radar; rather it had visual confirmation of it approaching it at a distance of 1 to 2 kilometers at an altitude of 100 meters and at a speed of 800 kph.
[source : Makdessi: Turkish Military Aircraft Violated Syria's Sovereignty, Syrian Response Was Defensive Act, SANA,, 25/06/2012]

This proves beyond doubt that the Turkish plane did not just temporarily violate Syrian air space but was well inside Syrian air space.

They are trying it on again. Houla. Qubair. Now this plane.

And perhaps there were no pilots. Did the pilots bail before sending the plane into Syrian air space? At 100m they would safely land in water. Or was it remote controlled? This is so obviously a provocation and trap that something beyond the normal must have happened with the pilots.


The first moves of the MB are to review the peace treaty with Israel, and to make up with Iran.

This first move is totally expected, while the second was not, by me anyway, and could signal a ganging up against Israel rather than continuing the current Sunni v Shia bloodshed.


When the announcement came yesterday that the Muslim Brotherhood candidate had won, even though they said they would not enter a candidate, there was a huge cheer in Gaza.


Because Gaza will receive much more assistance now.

Israel knows it, and is building a fence to block smuggling from Egypt into Gaza.

Last year, as the revolution began, the FT and WP published articles that portrayed the MB as cute and cuddly reformed Muslims. The FT article was from a former member of the MB who testified to this alleged reformation of the MB. The WP article was from The Rand Corporation. The Rand Corporation was exposed by Alex Abella who was given access to their archives. Upon reading these archives Abella came to the conclusion that The Rand Corporation is corrupt, insane and intent on starting another world war.

So just how 'reformed' are the MB? Not very much. As I highlighted yesterday, the MB held a Kill The Jews rally at which a promise was made to kill all the Jews.

For decades there has been relative peace between Israel and its neighbours. But shortly after the inside job 9/11 this started to change. Saddam Hussein was taken out. Rafik Hariri was taken out. Gaddafi was taken out. Mubarak was taken out. There are attempts to take Assad out. And if Assad is taken out the Ayatollahs will be taken out (though there are reports that Nutternyahu will now attack Iran in September whatever happens).

But in order to take Mubarak, Gaddafi and Assad out, a deal with the devil has been struck. The dark forces of Sunni terrorists have been summoned, and their adventures are clear to see. Houla and Qubair are just two examples of what they are capable of.

Assume that Israel did do 9/11 to trick the USA into providing their muscle to change the lanscape of the Middle East, as demanded in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

Is it going to plan?

If Seymour Hersh's The Redirection is to be believed, then perhaps not. Hersh revealed that this Faustian pact with the Sunni terrorists had been reached to kick out Shias.

But what if the real plan was to trick Israel into doing 9/11? Israel may well have been led to believe that it would receive support from the USA and UK and NATO etc to replace the governments of Libya and Egypt and Syria and Iran with ones that could described as more amenable to Israel.

There was a plan for war on seven nations in five years. That plan faltered in the first nation on the hit list, Iraq.

But why?

Why did the plan fail in Iraq?

Iraq had been decimated by a decade of bombing with DU bombs during the 1990/s after Iraq had been tricked into invading Kuwait in 1990 and the Saddam left in power after we encouraged a revolution against him but then betrayed it leaving Saddam to slaughter the revolutionaries and leave him stronger than before, internally that is. Invading and taking over Iraq should have been, as Wolfowitz and his clan thought, a cakewalk.

But it wasn't.

So what if the plan all along was to stall the plan in Iraq, and then get Israel to agree to the Sunni terrorists taking power in Libya, in Egypt, in Syria.

Then Israel would have been tricked into replacing the relatively moderate governments of Libya, Egypt and Syria with vicious throat-cutting head chopping al Qaeda terrorists.

The Muslim Brotherhood have promised to kill all the Jews.

The Sunni terrorists in Syria have repeatedly bragged about killing supporters of Assad, saying as they slit the throats of their victims, "this is for supporting Assad, and this is for supporting Israel".

Of course Assad and their supporters do not support Israel, but want peace and for Israel to be less hostile.

Israel will soon be surrounded by Sunni terrorists, with WMDs if they kick Assad out.

With the Shias out they will not want to leave Israel in peace.


Dodgy Dave is really starting to show his true blue blood and colours.
David Cameron will on Monday launch a scathing attack on what he calls the "culture of entitlement" in the welfare system, as he warns that claimants with three or more children may start to lose access to benefits, and almost everyone aged under 25 will lose housing benefit.
[source : Cameron announces Tory plan to slash benefits, The Guardian,, 25/06/2012]

We are suffering austerity because we unnecessarily bailed out the fascist gambling banks, who used the hard earned savings of ordinary muggins British taxpayers as collateral and engaged in some very questionable business practices of lending to anyone regardless of ability to repay.

There was some reaction to this austerity last summer when riots erupted in large cities across the UK. During these riots some people took advantage and engaged in some really serious criminal activity, such as stealing a bottle of water. This is the kind of hardened, dangerous criminal who needs to be locked up for a long time for a big dollop of porridge, so that he or she can think long and hard about what he or she did to society. Stealing a bottle of water is one of the most heinous, despicable, dangerous crimes that one human being can commit against another, and offenders need to be dealt with accordingly.

Thankfully the justice system was on the case and the offender was banged up for a year...just for stealing a bottle of water.

Meanwhile, as the UK suffers years of austerity, with many innocent muggins British taxpayers losing their homes, jobs, families as a result, not one banker is even prosecuted.

And meanwhile paedos are given a slap on the wrist for having hundreds of sick photos of children.

Our banks, and by that I mean those recognised as based in the UK, some run by Knights of the Realm, were bailed out not just by the British government but by the USA too. And not just with a billion here and a billion there, but with tens if not hundreds of billions...EACH!

Needless to say the bankers got their salaries and bonuses.

And we all know where they keep their accounts, and let's just say they are 'safe', because the banker class is the only class who can afford the accountants and advisors to set up an account or scheme in a 'safe' place, safe from HMRC.

There is indeed a culture of entitlement.

But it is a culture of entitlement to satanism (at Bohemian Grove, for example), bailouts totalling trillions, tax havens to dodge as much tax as possible, and fascism to make more and more profits for the corporations while the majority of the unsuspecting muggins British taxpayers take all the blame and burden.

Sunday, June 24, 2012


This is not unexpected but still sad and dangerous news.

Dangerous for Syria.

But also for Israel.

I don't know who the Brotherhood will start war with first.

Who knows. Maybe both Syria and Israel at the same time?

The Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsi has been declared Egypt's first post-revolutionary president, bringing an end to days of feverish speculation amid increased divisions and polarisation.

Morsi won with 51% of the vote. Second-placed Ahmed Shafiq, Mubarak's final prime minister, took 48%.
[source : Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsi declared president of Egypt, The Guardian,, 24/06/2012]


For some very strange reason there has been a war on Jimmy Carr for allegedly dodging tax, but no inquiry has been established into the full extent of tax dodging by British citizens, be they residing in Birmingham or Belize.

If Dodgy Dave really felt so strongly about tax dodging then he would at least quadruple the increase HMRC are alleged to be receiving to hunt down unpaid tax, and also establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Tax Dodging, before which tax dodgers could confess their crimes in return for little or no punishment.

But we all know there is really only one class who can afford to dodge tax, and they are his fellow chaps from Eton/Oxford/Bullingdon Club/The City, as well as some donors to the Bankers Tory Party.

I would suggest that this hasty finger-pointing, acquired from Hague, is actually due to and possibly aimed at Charlie Skelton?


Just like the blatant assassination of Princess Diana fits.

Just like the bloody creation of Israel fits.

Just like the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand fits.

Just like Pearl Harbour fits.

And just like 9/11 fits.

This thesis about Obama's real biological father being a Communist pornographer? IT FITS!

It fits. It fits. It fits. All the Agenda 21 stuff. All the UN military command stuff. All the pro-abortion stuff. All the police state stuff. The potential for blackmail is immeasurable.



The dodgy thesis of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) appears to have been created by The Henry Jackson Society (HJS), which according to the LPAC/EIR group is the PNAC crowd relocated to London after the war on Iraq in 2003 provoked such a resentment against them that they were chased out of the USA and found refuge in London. This outrage forced the HJS to change their aggressive foreign policy from one based on politics to one based on 'humanitarianism'.

This false 'humanitarianism' was applied last year in Libya when what was supposed to be a No Fly Zone to protect civilians authorised by UN SCR 1973 quickly turned into a quest for Gaddafi's blood, which was eventually achieved with special forces of many NATO and Arab League states assisting the Libyan al Qaeda rebels to fight on the ground while NATO bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libyan civilians to bits (while allegedly protecting them).

So what we saw in Libya last year was not R2P but R2PAQ (Responsibility to Protect al Qaeda).

The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war on seven nations in five years included Iraq and Lebanon. These two nations have experienced war and/or invasion. But also on that list was Libya and Syria. So with Libya destroyed, attention moved to Syria.

For well over a year there has been growing violence in Syria, which since the fall of Gaddafi has escalated significantly. This is due to the transplant of the Libyan al Qaeda rebs to Syria. Even the weapons of Libyan al Qaeda rebs are being smuggled from Libya into Syria, generally via Lebanon, as the seizure of the Luftallah II shows. And now even Kofi Annan and General Mood admit that there is a presence of a violent third party distinct from the official 'peaceful' opposition. That third party is al Qaeda. This was arranged between Saudi Arabia and Israel around 2007 and revealed by Seymour Hersh.

There have been attempts to use the same trick applied on Syria as was applied on Libya, i.e. a NATO-backed NFZ to protect civilians. But this would have been a repeat of the adventure in Libya, R2PAQ all over again, with the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, with all sorts of finance and support from the same sordid sources, getting upto all sorts of nasty trouble, and I would guess with a similar result; the assassination of Assad.

But because this has not worked, in the last two weeks there has been reference to Syria's WMDs, with suggestions that these should be protected otherwise they may fall into the hands of al Qaeda. Israel made quite a noise about this possibility, and there was even a suggestion/threat that Russia may suffer if these WMDs fell into the hands of the Syrian al Qaeda rebs.

So R2P has morphed into R2PAQ which has now morphed into R2PWMDAQ (Responsibility to Protect Weapons of Mass Destruction because of al Qaeda).

But the basic trick is still the same. Encourage, support, finance and arm an uprising, cause some trouble and bloodshed, then claim the responsibility to protect, be it civilians, or al Qaeda or WMDs.


The wreckage of the Turkish aircraft shot down by Syria on Friday has been found in Syrian waters.

My understanding, and perhaps somebody like Craig Murray could clarify this, is that the territory is defined on the land and sea and this is then simply projected up normal to the surface of the earth where the territorial borders are defined thus defining air space.

If this is the case, then there are some serious questions to be asked about this flight.
1. why, at this time of heightened tensions, particularly between Turkey and Syria, was a flight path taken that risked an incursion into Syrian air space?
2. how is it possible that this aircraft entered Syrian air space (to first set off the alarm), but then enter international air space (according to Turkey) to be shot, but then end up crashing in Syrian waters?
3. were the pilots inexperienced and on a training mission themselves (therefore increasing the probability of an incursion into Syrian air space)?
4. if Turkey admits that the aircraft did indeed enter Syrian airspace then what was the precise path that it took, and how far off course did it go? In other words, was an incursion into Syrian air space planned as part of the test?

This is beginnning to look like a trap that Syria fell into. I hoped Gul had calmed it all down with his admittance that these things happen, but somebody is driving this towards war.

And we can all take a wild guess at who that is...

Saturday, June 23, 2012




Free your soul!

Golden girls - Kinetic (Frank De Wulf Remix)


I suspect at the least increased hostilities, and possibly war, with Israel.

Here is an interview from MEMRI TV in which an Egyptian commentator on the Muslim Brotherhood says that the MB do not need public support to start a war. They are obliged to start war on Israel.

And late last year the MB held a Kill The Jews rally in which the MB promised, repeat promised, to "one day kill all the Jews".
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, which expects to win at least a plurality in Monday’s legislative elections, held a “kill the Jews” rally in Cairo Friday.

Thousands of supporters attended the pre-election rally at a mosque on the Muslim Sabbath, promising to “one day kill all the Jews” and wage war against Jerusalem’s “Judaization.”
[source : Muslim Brotherhood Holds ‘Kill the Jews’ Rally on Election Eve, INN,, 27/11/2011]


You betcha!

There was some sense of victory and high morality in the Anglo-American Establishment earlier this week when a cargo ship from Russia taking helicopters to Syria was forced to return to Russia because its insurance was withdrawn at the request of the British government.

But Israel has killed a few Palestinians over the last 24 hours, one of them a six year old child. His name is Ali Alshwass.

I cannot find details of the exact military hardware and the obviously supremely accurate precision bombs that was used in this murder of an innocent six year old child, but reports state that fighter jets were involved. Israel gets its fighter jets and ammunition from the Good Ol' Murdering U S of A.

Who are these brave warriors dropping bombs on children from several thousand feet?

A six-year-old Palestinian boy has been killed and two others have been injured in a fresh Israeli aerial attack on the Tel Aviv-blockaded Gaza Strip, Palestinian medics say.

The attack took place early on Saturday when an Israeli warplane targeted the eastern part of the city of Khan Yunis in southern Gaza, the medics said, AFP reported. They named the victim as Ali Alshwass.

Israeli jets also pounded two positions in central and northern Gaza overnight, leaving two Palestinians dead and over 20 others wounded.

On Friday, a Palestinian was killed and two others were injured in an Israeli strike on the al-Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza.
[source : Palestinian boy killed in fresh Israeli aerial attack on Gaza: Medics, Press TV,, 23/06/2012]


The President of Turkey Abdullah Gul has admitted that the jet fighter shot down by Syria yesterday might have violated Syrian air space. This is exactly what Syria says happened.

There is no reason for Syria to bring down a Turkish jet fighter in any airspace other than Syrian, because it could very easily be used as an excuse by NATO to declare war. What would happen if an Iranian jet fighter violated British airpsace?

And it is equally foolish of Turkey to deliberately send a jet fighter into Syrian airspace to be shot down because Turkey would be viewed by the world as the aggressor. But because Turkey is not neutral in the warmongering in Syria I would not put this dirty trick past them, because they have been arming and training and protecting the Syrian al Qaeda rebs for well over a year now and know that NATO will back them up in any conflict with Syria.

But as Gul basically says, "Hey, these things happen."

Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul said Saturday the jet fighter shot down by Syria might have violated Syrian airspace.

“It is routine for jet fighters to sometimes fly in and out over (national) borders ... when you consider their speed over the sea,” Gul told Anatolia news agency. “These are not ill-intentioned things but happen beyond control due to the jets’ speed.”
[source : Turkey downplays ‘ill intentions,’ says downed jet may have violated Syrian airspace, al Arabiya,, 23/06/2012]

A few weeks ago several bullets fired by the Syrian Army at Syrian al Qaeda rebs, who were escaping to Turkey for protection after they had killed several Syrian soldiers inside Syria, violated Turkish airspace. Turkey threatened war but in the end did nothing explicit, but escalated the collaboration with the terrorists by allowing the likes of the CIA etc to arm the terrorists.

Friday, June 22, 2012


I have been waiting for this.

There has been another massacre in Syria.

So far this has not been reported in any NATO media at the time of writing.

ALEPPO, (SANA)- Armed terrorist groups on Friday kidnapped a number of citizens in Daret Azzeh area in the countryside of Aleppo, according to oficial sources in the province.

The sources later confirmed that the terrorist groups in Daret Azzeh committed a brutal massacre against the citizens, whom they had kidnapped earlier on the day, through shootign them dead and then mutilating their bodies.

The sources added that initial information indicates that more than 25 of the kidnapped citizens were killed in Daret Azzeh massacre, with the fate of the rest of the kidnapped people is still unknown.

H. Said
[source : 25 Citizens at Least Killed in Massacre by Terrorist Groups in Daret Azzeh in Aleppo, SANA,, 22/06/2012]

Tuesday, June 19, 2012


Further to the Daily Telegraph report about a 10 year plan to introduce Eurobonds and further integration, The Washington Post today in The Post's View also calls for Eurobonds.
In the end, a Greek slide into insolvency and an exit from the euro may still be unavoidable. That’s all the more reason why E.U. leaders must at last agree on decisive measures to shore up the rest of the currency zone, beginning with Spain and Italy. Measures under discussion for a summit meeting next week, including euro-area bank regulation, are positive but not sufficient. In the end, banks and governments must be provided with sufficient liquidity to restore confidence — something that will probably require the issuance of bonds backed by all euro-area countries, or greatly increased lending by the European Central Bank.
[source : Devising a road map to rescue the euro, The Washington Post,, 19/06/2012]


The Daily Telegraph is today reporting that top secret plans are being passed around the top echelons of the European power apparatus for discussion at the meeting of the European Council late this month.

For discussion is
1. Eurobonds
2. further European integration
3. how to implement this over the next 10 years.

The “limite” text - published exclusively by The Daily Telegraph, is secret, restricted for the "eyes only" of diplomats and officials preparing for the 28 and 29 June European Council in Brussels.

...Translated from the Brussels jargon, the PEC – president of the European Council – report will be Herman Van Rompuy’s preliminary text of the future of “Economic and Monetary Union”. This will be circulated in sealed envelopes next week.

The separate text will set out a “roadmap” to a banking union, polling debt via some kind of eurobonds and political union via EU treaty change over the next 10 years.
[source : Exclusive: Secret EU summit document shows first step to banking union, The Daily Telegraph,, 19/06/2012]

I said this was on. Too many senior Bilderbergers have been calling for this for too long. The question has been, and still is, how to convince the German people.

Or perhaps Merkel will agree to all this and sacrifice her political career in the process to achieve the euro dream.

But I think this shows just how far the NWO are behind in their plans.

This plan is to be implemented over 10 years.


How many elections will take place over that time period?

How many more things can go wrong over the next 10 years?

Monday, June 18, 2012


The Daily Star (again) has been told that the Syrian military is being spied on by satellites that are allegedly intercepting their communications, and information passed on to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs so the rebs can 'rescue' civilians and save them before an alleged massacre.

So why did this not work at Houla or Qubair, when it was instantly alleged by Hasty Hague and Lillary that there was collaboration between the Shabiha and the Syrian military over several hours before mass slaughters took place?

I mean, were any communications intercepted NOT passed on to the rebs so that them alleged slaughters could take place to make the Syrian government and their supporters look like monsters?

Or are the communications being intercepted but there are no slaughters being planned between the Shabiha and the Syrian military (and more and evidence is confirming this which is why the NATO media has lost all interest in those alleged massacres even with such respected media as FAZ confirming that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs did it), but this story makes it look like there is such bloody planning, makes this extremely hi-tec collaboration between MI6 and CIA and the Syrian al Qaeda rebs OK, and makes the self-confessed throat-cutting, head-chopping Syrian al Qaeda rebs look like angels sent from heaven above?

A SPY-IN-THE-SKY is listening in on President Assad’s ruthless killers to save the lives of ­innocent men, women and children.

The British and US ­satellites pick up their plans then pass them on to dissident leaders through MI6 and CIA ­officers who have ­infiltrated Syria.

The information has helped rebels to evacuate civilians from hospitals and other Assad targets ­before they were attacked.

The Syrian hacking ­operation is a new part of the worldwide Echelon ­system that was created to monitor the communist bloc during the Cold War.
[source : SATELLITES TARGET SYRIAN LEADER, The Daily Star,, 17/06/2012]

NB there is an admittance that Echelon exists, that it uses speech recognition.

Sunday, June 17, 2012


All I can say is, WOW!

No wonder Obama is destroying the USA space program, and is pushing for a war that could destroy Russia and China (and also stop their space programs too).

Thursday, June 14, 2012


Amnesty International has today released a report entitled Deadly Reprisals : Deliberate Killings and Other Abuses by Syria's Armed Forces, that, luckily for the warmongers, provides evidence of war crimes committed by Assad in Syria, and shows the FSA and their al Qaeda terrorist friends are in fact angels sent from heaven above, for not one instance of violence is blamed on them, even the recent massacre at Houla.

You may think, "Right. That's it. Case closed. Load the bombers and bombs away, because we can trust Amnesty International".

But can we really trust Amnesty International?

I mean, who are Amnesty International really?

Amnesty International is MI6 and CIA.

One of its former directors Dr Francis Boyle, a lawyer, has expressed his concerns about the policies of Amnesty International which coincided with US foreign policy. Why would that be? It is supported by the National Endowment for Democracy!

And here is the killer proof that Amnesty International cannot be trusted. It corroborated the evidence of Nayirah. So, who is Nayirah? She is the sicko who claimed to be a nurse in Kuwait and spoke to the US Congress that she saw Iraqi soldiers tip incubators over and left the babies occupying them to die on the floor.

As I said, Amnesty International confirmed this story was true.

But guess what? SHE WAS A LIAR! She was in fact the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the USA.

But Amnesty International confirmed that her nurse story was true!!

This lie was cited many times to drive the war on Iraq in 1990. The fact that Saddam was tricked into invading Kuwait by April Glaspie was also not mentioned.

So is it just good fortune for the warmongers that Amnesty International has managed to produce this report to convict Assad in the court of public opinion?


It is pure manufactured propaganda from the same mould as the Nayirah propaganda.

At least the report does not demand R2P (which would probably not look good for AI anyway) but it does demand that Russia and China stop their support for Assad, political and military. This coincides with a push by another intel front Avaaz to pressure Russia into stopping arms to Syria.

But for some strange reason the support for the Syrian al Qaeda rebs by Saudi Arabia and Qatar and the Friends of Syria is not questioned. Hmm. Now why would that be...


The pressure being applied to Merkel by senior Bilderbergers is definitely having an effect. Merkel has given the first overt concrete sign that she is prepared to issue common European debt with Germany taking the risk.

Officials in Berlin say privately that Chancellor Angela Merkel is willing to drop her vehement opposition to plans for a “European Redemption Pact”, a “sinking fund” that would pay down excess sovereign debt in the eurozone.

...Berlin would have veto lockhold, able to ensure discipline in a way that it cannot do with the European Central Bank where it has just two votes.

The fund would entail sacrifices for Germany. The country would no longer enjoy safe-haven borrowing costs -- curently 1.48pc for 10-year Bunds -- on a quarter of its total debt. A study by Jefferies Fixed Income concluded that it would cost Germany 0.6pc of GDP each year.

Yet the authors insist that any such costs will be outweighed by massive relief as Europe finally breaks the logjam of the last two years and offers southern Europe a chance to claw its way out of perpetual depression. Mrs Merkel is beginning to agree.
[source : Debt crisis: Germany signals shift on €2.3 trillion redemption fund for Europe, The Daily Telegraph,, 14/06/2012]

This is not quite Eurobonds.

And this may be too little too late.

And Merkel may still get all the blame if and when the Euro collapses.

A very interesting article appeared in the FT yesterday. I do not have full access to all article in the FT but Alex Tsipras wrote a piece for the FT. WSWS looked upon this as a signal to the European banking oligarchy as a bowing down before them, rather like Rand Paul to the Republican Party.
“Lest there be any doubt,” he proclaims, “my movement—SYRIZA—is committed to keeping Greece in the eurozone.”

...Rather than oppose handing further monies to the bankers, he says that recapitalising Greek banks, “with loans from the troika”, will be done “transparently”.

For years SYRIZA had a commitment to nationalise the banks as part of its programme. Now it is set on recapitalising them using money from the troika. This makes a lie of its threat not to honour the Memorandum and the savage austerity measures agreed as a precondition for the €110 billion bailout of its banks.

SYRIZA still wants the EU, ECB and IMF to fund the banks, and he who pays the piper always calls the tune. Little wonder that in Greece’s major conservative daily, Kathemerini, Tsipras adds that his party will not approach Greece’s foreign creditors “to pick a fight, but to convince them.”

...SYRIZA has no intention of making a fundamental challenge to this set up. Its numerous apologists in the fake left groups, many of which have factions in the coalition, claim that SYRIZA wants to cancel the debt. But this is a lie. Its ten point programme urges only a “moratorium on debt servicing” and “Negotiations for debt cancellation”—of only some of the debt—with “regulation of the remaining debt”.
[source : SYRIZA’s Tsipras pledges to save Greek and European capitalism, WSWS,, 14/06/2012]

So there are moves to keep the Euro together. Merkel is moving towards some kind of pooled debt solution (but will demand further integration but that's what they all want anyway so that won't be a problem), and now even Tsipras is writing in the FT of all papers that he will keep Greece in the Euro.

But as I asked a few weeks ago; for Tsipras, is Europe more important than Greece?

In other words, does Tsipras believe that Greece should suffer some kind of austerity, less than now but still some, to stay in the Euro, rather than give the banks and bankers hell and not pay a single Euro of the alleged Greek debt and leave the Euro?

Wednesday, June 13, 2012


The mandatory work activity (MWA) programme has been shown to be useless and may well have hurt participants.

The MWA is workfare by any other name.

And workfare is fascism by any other name.


That's all it is.

Fascism, plain and simple.

Tesco and a few other large corporations were caught using this scheme where benefit claimants work for free for a corporation with the carrot of a job at the end of it all.

But what has the Department for Work and Pensions own study found?
Thousands of jobseekers have been referred to a mandatory work scheme that has done nothing for their employment chances, has made them more likely to claim benefits in the long run, and may have had adverse consequences on their physical and mental health, government research has found.
[source : Mandatory work scheme does not improve job chances, research finds, The Guardian,, 13/06/2012]

And what are the government going to do in response to their own study that shows the MWA programme is useless?


Fascists, each and every one of 'em.

They do not seem to understand the simple fact that the jobs are not there.

Because nobody has any money.

Because we unnecessarily bailed out the fascist banks.

So we now have more fascism.

Didn't our fathers and grandfathers fight the Nazis in WW2 to stop this kind of thing?


After disinfecting Haffa of the Syrian al Qaeda rebs in Haffa the Syrian military found that the rebs had a massive cache of weapons, which included sniper rifles and RPG launchers.

The Syrian government also asked the UN observer mission to inspect the area and the circumstances.

We can now see why the NATO media cried foul about this particular operation by the Syrian military. They were trying to get Assad to stop it so the rebs could survive and with their huge cache of weapons intact.

But it didn't quite work out that way.

Many rebs were killed and the huge cache of weapons was found.

NATO media reported the attack by the Syrian military, portraying it as slaughter of civilians, but are so far not reporting the deaths of many rebs or the discovery of this huge cache of weapons.

Jun 13, 2012

LATTAKIA, (SANA) – Authorities have restored security and calm to al-Haffeh district after clearing it from the armed terrorist groups which terrorized citizens and sabotaged several public and private properties.

An official source in Lattakia province told SANA reporter that the authorities tracked down the armed terrorist groups in the villages surrounding al-Haffeh and clashed with them leading to the killing of many terrorists and arresting others.

The authorities also seized huge amounts of advanced weapons used by armed terrorist groups, including sniper rifles, explosive devices, RPG launchers and a large amount of ammunition.

The source added that clashes also led to the martyrdom of a number of the authorities' members and wounding others.

Foreign Ministry Calls on UN Observers to Inspect Situation in al-Haffeh

Later, an official source at the Foreign and Expatriates Ministry stated that teh Ministry has called on the UN observers to go to al-Haffe city and inspect the situation there after the armed terrorist groups in the city carried out operations of killing and terrorizing against the innocent citizens and acts of looting and vandalism against public and private properties and shops.

The Ministry said this call comes in the framework of the observers' mission to verify what is taking place on the ground and inspect the acts of these terrorist groups.

F.Allafi/ H. Said
[source : Security, Calm Restored to al-Haffeh, UN Observers Called upon to Insepct the Situation, SANA,, 13/06/2012]


This time last year we were bombing Libya.

We were told it was just to protect civilians. But within hours of UN SCR 1973 being passed there was open discussion in British media about assassinating Gaddafi. Seven months later and Gaddafi was eventually assassinated.

We were also told that BSF were not in Libya. Yes, there had been a reported clumsy attempt at establishing contact, but that was all. But in January this year the BBC revealed some of the truth about the presence and purpose of BSF in Libya. According to the BBC report BSF were at the front lines, blending in with the Libyan al Qaeda rebs, guiding, advising and training them, with weapons supplied by Qatar.

In Spetember last year Sarkozy and Cameron visited Libya for a few hours only to meet with Libyan opposition leader Jalil. There was a photo op for them, holding hands and their arms up together, celebrating the coming defeat of Gaddafi. People danced and sang in jubilation at the prospect of the freedom and safety and democracy that Sarkozy and Cameron implied to them.

Fast forward to today.

There is growing sectarian violence in Libya. Airports are being siezed. There are attacks on embassies and diplomats. Even charities are coming under attack from Islamic extremists who accuse the charities of spreading Christianity. And all the while the al Qaeda flag flutters high in the North African breeze, as extreme Islamic revolutionaries persecute and execute black Libyans.

This is Cameron, Sarkozy and Jalil.

Oh dear God. What have they done? What evil have they unleashed upon this world?

The weapons and terrorists that BSF trained in Libya are now in Syria.

Several articles in The Daily Star have revealed that BSF are in Syria and have been for a long time.

But what exactly is their purpose?

Are they planning to put al Qaeda in power in Syria too?

The Syrian rebels brag about their executions of Syrian military and Syrian civilian supporters of Assad, even though the rebs are generally Sunni and the civilians are Sunni. It doesn't matter to them. They get the knife out and hack off the head.

One source for The Daily Star is quoted thus on Syria;

"This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier."

I wonder if Cameron and Hague would walk the streets of Libya today without protection, to be thanked by the happy, happy people of Libya? Last year our screens were full of alleged Libyans allegedly cheering on the Libyan al Qaeda rebs and NATO and Sarkozy and Cameron with high fives.

But a year later, and we never hear anything about Libya. There are no photo op visits by world leaders such as Cameron and Obama, to see how great and wonderful and free and safe Libya is today.

Perhaps because it is now a living hell dominated by violent Islamic extremists.


SANA is reporting that the terrorist attacks in Haffa were on a media organisation called al-Ikhbaria. I wonder if this is related to the proposed attempted coup later this week?

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – The Ministry of Information stressed on Tuesday that the terrorist attack against al-Ikhbaria channel by armed terrorist groups is an attempt to stop national media from conveying the truth of events to the public opinion.

The Ministry added in a statement that the Syrian TV channels which are relating the reality of terrorism targeting the Syrian people with all its spectrums and components have become the target of terrorists on the ground.

The Ministry expressed best wishes for al-Ikhbaria channel's cameraman and reporter in Lattakia to recover quickly, stressing that the bullets of terrorism will only boost the determination of journalists to carry out their mission which is conveying the facts objectively and responsibly to the public opinion.

[source : Information Ministry: Terrorist Attack against al-Ikhbaria Channel in al-Haffeh Aimed at Stopping National Media from Conveying Facts to Public Opinion, SANA,, 13/06/2012]


Lillary Clinton continues the Russia-bashing, accusing Russia of sending helicopters to Syria, but has apparently forgotten that Israel has Apache helicopters from the USA and frequently uses them in Gaza, killing and injuring children in Gaza.

But there is a massive difference between Syria and Gaza.

Syria is being covertly invaded by throat-cutting, head-chopping vicious Sunni terrorists who are being assisted by the SF of USA, UK, France, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and Assad is fighting this terrorist invasion. Gaza is neither independent from Israel nor Israeli land, and Israel uses this greyness in whatever situation it wants, claiming Gaza is independent when it suits Israel and claiming Gaza is Israeli when it suits Israel.

At a discussion with Israeli President Shimon Peres at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at The Brookings Institution, Lillary said,
We have confronted the Russians about stopping their continued arms shipments to Syria. They have, from time to time, said that we shouldn’t worry; everything they’re shipping is unrelated to their actions internally. That’s patently untrue. And we are concerned about the latest information we have that there are attack helicopters on the way from Russia to Syria, which will escalate the conflict quite dramatically.
[source : Joint Discussion with Israeli President Shimon Peres Hosted by the Brookings Institution, US State Dept,, 12/06/2012]

But she also said
Certainly what happens to Syria matters greatly to the United States, but it matters drastically to Israel. And how we work through the many difficulties that are posed by this unrelenting, brutal crackdown carried out by the Assad regime and their military loyalists will have far-reaching consequences for the region and beyond.

Let me just make three quick points. First, we continue to support Kofi Annan’s efforts, and we do so because he represents both the United Nations and the Arab League.

...And the six-point plan that former Secretary General Annan laid out is a good plan. Of course, it’s not being implemented. And of course, the contempt and rejection of the first principle of that plan, namely the cessation of violence by the Assad regime, has certainly been a grave assault not only on the lives of the Syrian people but on the international effort intended to bring an end to this ongoing conflict.

Again, why is the onus being placed on Assad? Annan calls on all sides to stop the violence, not just Assad, yet here is Lillary once again putting all the responsibility on Assad.

But only a few weeks ago The Bilderberg Washington Post reported that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs were getting more and better arms with assistance from the USA!


And with that kind of information in the public domain is Assad supposed to just allow the terrorists to commit Houla after Houla after Houla?


And it is all part of a plan for war on seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11 that enabled the plan and was covered up.

At the same discussion, Peres said,
So this is the first time that I really want to express my admiration for an Arab attempt to fight for their own freedom. It’s admirable, and I wish them success.

This comical hypocrisy comes just as an unnamed Western diplomat confirms what we know already, that Qatar and Saudi Arabia have been arming the Syrian al Qaeda rebs through Turkey.
Syrian rebels are being armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, The Independent has learnt, in a development that threatens to inflame a regional power struggle provoked by the 15-month-old uprising against the Assad regime.

Rebel fighters from the Free Syrian Army (FSA) have received weapons from the two Gulf countries, which were transported into Syria via Turkey with the implicit support of the country's intelligence agency, MIT, according to a Western diplomat in Ankara.

...Yet, the diplomat voiced concerns that, in practice, the weapons have only been delivered to rebels sympathetic to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, the dominant group within the SNC. "Only Muslim Brother groups are getting weapons," he said. Activists along the border not affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood said they had not heard of the weapons being delivered until just a few days ago
[source : Exclusive: Arab states arm rebels as UN talks of Syrian civil war, The Independent,, 13/06/2012]

Tuesday, June 12, 2012


SANA is reporting the kidnapping of the passengers from two buses near Homs.

With predictions of massacres flying around, what will happen to these unlucky people? Will they be slaughtered by their kidnappers, the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, and the result filmed and posted on YouTube so Hasty Hague can accuse Assad again?

Homs was one of those locations that Victoria Nuland predicted could be the location of another massacre.

PROVINCES, (SANA)- An armed terrorist group on Tuesday kidnapped the passengers of two busses on al-Qusseir –al-Jousieh road in Homs countryside.

SANA reporter quoted a source at Homs Governorate as saying that the armed group intercepted two busses carrying citizens at al-Salehieh town crossroads and kidnapped them towards al-Jouseih town.
[source : Armed Terrorist Group Kidnaps passengers of two Busses in Homs, Authorities Pursue Remnants of Terrorists in al-Haffah, SANA,, 12/06/2012]


The United States has predicted that another Houla-style massacre will occur in Syria and has even mentioned exact locations.

US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said on Monday that the Syrian government “may be organizing another massacre, this time in the village of al-Haffa, in Latakia province, as well as in the towns Deir el-Zour, in Daraa, in Homs, in Hama, and in suburbs of Damascus.”
[source : US predicts another Houla-style massacre in Syria, PressTV,, 12/06/2012]

Ban Ki Moon also seems more concerned than usual about events in Syria, now demanding that UN observers be allowed in to Haffa.

Do he and the USA know something that we don't?

Or is this an attempt to stop the Syrian military destroying the FSA in Haffa so they can live to fight another day?

Why do I ask this? Because in the last week nearly 60 Syrian soldiers have been killed by the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, yet there is no similar plea from Ban Ki Moon to the rebels to stop their killing.

This is yet another indicator that Ban Ki Moon has taken sides and has to go.

So does Annan.

So does Hague.


The trustworthy Thierry Meyssan is reporting that a fake coup d'etat in Syria is being prepared to go operational very soon, perhaps even this week.

According to Meyssan satellite feeds will be cut and replaced with pre-filmed 'news' of alleged massacres that are immediately blamed on Assad, alleged mass protests and alleged mass resignations.

Meyssan gives examples of how similar coup's have occured in the past, including that in Venezuela which John Pilger exposes in his The War on Democracy.

I have noticed the public being prepared for this with recent reports in NATO media that the Syrian government is preparing more alleged massacres. But as of this morning 0715 GMT 12th June 2012 the UN observer mission on the ground in Syria has not formally accused Syria of committing the massacres at Houla or Qubair. It is only NATO media and politicians who accused Syria. The UNHRC in Geneva accused Syria for Houla but they took all their evidence from FSA and by phone. If anything significant has occured the position of Hasty Hague has shifted a bit. He now admits the presence of al Qaeda in Syria which he says threatens an escalation of events. What Hasty Hague fails to admit is that al Qaeda is CIA/MI6 and was injected into Syria for that very purpose!

This attempted coup comes at the same time that Russia is preparing to send a significant contingent of Russian military to Syria.
Given the worsening crisis in Syria, the Nezavisimaya Gazeta newspaper reported that the Russian army is apparently being prepared for a mission in Syria. Citing anonymous sources in the military leadership, the newspaper said that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the general staff to work out a plan for military operations outside Russia, including in Syria.

The units being prepared for an intervention are the 76th Division of airborne forces (an especially experienced unit of the Russian army), the 15th Army Division, as well as special forces from a brigade of the Black Sea fleet, which has a base in the Syrian port of Tartus.
[source : Russia prepares army for Syrian deployment, WSWS,, 12/06/2012]

NB the sources for this report are anonymous.

The dubious Debkafile reported that Obama is planning striking Syria.

Is the timing of this with the widely expected collapse of the Euro a coincidence?


NATO preparing vast disinformation campaign

by Thierry Meyssan

Member States of NATO and the GCC are preparing a coup d’état and a sectarian genocide in Syria. If you want to prevent these crimes, you should act now: circulate this article on the Internet and alert your elected officials.

In a few days, perhaps as early as Friday, June 15, at noon, the Syrians wanting to watch their national TV stations will see them replaced on their screens by TV programs created by the CIA. Studio-shot images will show massacres that are blamed on the Syrian Government, people demonstrating, ministers and generals resigning from their posts, President Al-Assad fleeing, the rebels gathering in the big city centers, and a new government installing itself in the presidential palace.

This operation of disinformation, directly managed from Washington by Ben Rhodes, the US deputy national security adviser for strategic communication, aims at demoralizing the Syrians in order to pave the way for a coup d’etat. NATO, discontent about the double veto of Russia and China, will thus succeed in conquering Syria without attacking the country illegally. Whichever judgment you might have formed on the actual events in Syria, a coup d’etat will end all hopes of democratization.

The Arab League has officially asked the satellite operators Arabsat and Nilesat to stop broadcasting Syrian media, either public or private (Syria TV, Al-Ekbariya, Ad-Dounia, Cham TV, etc.) A precedent already exists because the Arab League had managed to censure Libyan TV in order to keep the leaders of the Jamahiriya from communicating with their people. There is no Hertz network in Syria, where TV works exclusively with satellites. The cut, however, will not leave the screens black.

Actually, this public decision is only the tip of the iceberg. According to our information several international meetings were organized during the past week to coordinate the disinformation campaign. The first two were technical meetings, held in Doha (Qatar); the third was a political meeting and took place in Riyad (Saudi Arabia).

The first meeting assembled PSYOP officers, embedded in the satellite TV channels of Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, CNN, Fox, France 24, Future TV and MTV. It is known that since 1998, the officers of the US Army Psychological Operations Unit (PSYOP) have been incorporated in CNN. Since then this practice has been extended by NATO to other strategic media as well.

They fabricated false information in advance, on the basis of a “story-telling” script devised by Ben Rhodes’s team at the White House. A procedure of reciprocal validation was installed, with each media quoting the lies of the other media to render them plausible for TV spectators. The participants also decided not only to requisition the TV channels of the CIA for Syria and Lebanon (Barada, Future TV, MTV, Orient News, Syria Chaab, Syria Alghad) but also about 40 religious Wahhabi TV channels to call for confessional massacres to the cry of “Christians to Beyrouth, Alawites into the grave!.”

The second meeting was held for engineers and technicians to fabricate fictitious images, mixing one part in an outdoor studio, the other part with computer generated images. During the past weeks, studios in Saudi Arabia have been set up to build replicas of the two presidential palaces in Syria and the main squares of Damascus, Aleppo and Homs. Studios of this type already exist in Doha (Qatar), but they are not sufficient.

The third meeting was held by General James B. Smith, the US ambassador, a representative of the UK, prince Bandar Bin Sultan (whom former U.S. president George Bush named his adopted son so that the U.S. press called him “Bandar Bush”). In this meeting the media actions were coordinated with those of the Free "Syrian" Army, in which prince Bandar’s mercenaries play a decisive role.

The operation had been in the making for several months, but the U.S. National Security Council decided to accelerate the action after the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, notified the White House that he would oppose by all means, even by force, any illegal NATO military intervention in Syria.

The operation has a double intent: the first is to spread false information, the second aims at censuring all possible responses.

The hampering of TV satellites for military purposes is not new. Under pressure from Israel, the USA and the EU blocked Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Libyan and Iranian TV channels, one after the other. However, no satellite channels from other parts of the world were censured.

The broadcast of false news is also not new, but four significant steps have been taken in the art of propaganda during the last decade.
• In 1994, a pop music station named “Free Radio of the Thousand Hills” (RTML) gave the signal for genocide in Rwanda with the cry, “Kill the cockroaches!”
• In 2001, NATO used the media to impose an interpretation of the 9/11 attacks and to justify its own aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq. At that time already, it was Ben Rhodes who had been commissioned by the Bush administration to concoct the Kean/Hamilton Commission report on the attacks.
• In 2002, the CIA used five TV channels (Televen, Globovision, ValeTV and CMT) to make the public in Venezuela believe that phantom demonstrators had captured the elected president, Hugo Chávez, forcing him to resign. In reality he was the victim of a military coup d’etat.
• In 2011, France 24 served as information ministry for the Libyan CNT, according to a signed contract. During the battle of Tripoli, NATO produced fake studio films, then transmitted them via Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya, showing phantom images of Libyan rebels on the central square of the capital city, while in reality they were still far away. As a consequence, the inhabitants of Tripoli were persuaded that the war was lost and gave up all resistance.

Nowadays the media do not only support a war, they produce it themselves.

This procedure violates the principles of International Law, first of all Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights relating to the fact of receiving and imparting information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Above all, the procedure violates the United Nations General Assembly resolution, adopted after the end of World War II, to prevent further wars. Resolutions 110, 381 and 819 forbid “to set obstacles to free exchange of information and ideas” (like cutting off Syrian TV channels) and “all propaganda provoking or encouraging threats to peace, breaking peace, and all acts of aggression”. By law, war propaganda is a crime against peace, the worst of crimes, because it facilitates war crimes and genocide.

Thierry Meyssan

Translated from French by Olivia Kroth.