Saturday, January 31, 2015


Belling Cat recently published another analysis of the photographs that were claimed to have been taken about one minute after MH17 was hit by whatever brought it down.

Examining the MH17 Launch Smoke Photographs

I have pointed out that there are currently three proposed launch sites for a BUK that allegedly brought down MH17:
1. Chernukino;
2. 5 Km south of Shnizhne;
3. 3 Km north of Shnizhne.

This is some spread in locations. They are not just at opposite ends of a street. They are miles away from each other.

But we can use geometry and meteorology to help to prove or disprove the authenticity of the photographs.

At the time that MH17 was hit the wind speed in the Torez/Shnizhne area was about 12 Km per hour from the east. And we know the distance and direction from the location of the photographer to the proposed launch site 5 Km south of Shnizhne is 8 Km. I have produced this simple triangle to roughly illustrate the scenario.

The photographer is at A, the proposed launch site 5 Km south of Shnizhne is at B and the plume of white smoke is at C having been blown by the wind for the one minute or whatever time it was between the alleged launch and the photographer allegedly taking the photo0graph. The wind speed is a minimum of 12 Km per hour but not much more due to vertical wind shear. The wind speed of 12 Km per hour suggests quite calm conditions.

Regarding angles, the angle B is 45 degrees (assuming the photographer is looking south east and the wind was from the east). The angle A can be measured approximately from the photograph and maps, but looks like it could be around 7 degrees.

So could the wind blow the plume to the location C (wherever it is) in the time between the alleged launch and the photograph being taken? What wind speed would blow the plume to where it is? And is that a reasonable speed? And in what time?

This is where mathematics and geopolitics meet.

But we must remember the situation: a large passenger plane had just been blown out of the sky. People would be looking up and around in the sky looking for something, anything. Some people did and saw fighter jets. Surely they would have noticed this large plume of smoke too?

And one contradiction could be removed if the mine was the Lutugina mine east of Torez because then the field identified by the 'eyewitnesses' of Collectiv would definitely be in the line of sight suggested by the photographs.


Allegedly formed to counter the threats of Islamic State (who we created) and Russia (who we are provoking in Syria and Ukraine), the British Army has formed an electronic army to join and control the narrative in the information war. The USA and Israel have had such units for years, so we can safely assume that it is they who trained the 77th Brigade.

"77 brigade will be made up of warriors who don't just carry weapons, but who are also skilled in using social media such as Twitter and Facebook, and the dark arts of psyops - psychological operations.

"They will try to influence local populations and change behaviour through what the Army calls traditional and unconventional means.

[source : Army sets up new brigade 'for information age', BBC,, 31st January 2015]

Do you want Israeli-trained information warriors controlling what you read? No. Neither do I.

I don't like the sound of this: "control the narrative" through "the dark arts of psyops". It suggests that they are prepared to lie through their teeth rather than tell the truth. And we're paying for it!!

But this kind of thing has been going on for decades. The media, traditional and social, is riddled with intelligence agents.


It all makes perfect sense when you know:
1. Israel did 9/11 with factions within the UK, Saudi Arabia and the USA;
2. that 9/11 was designed to kick off a series of wars on seven nations in the Middle East and North Africa, many of whom are enemies of Israel;
3. but because that series of wars had stalled by 2007, Israel, the USA and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran.

This is why:

This is why Netanyahu was able to hijack the Unity March in Paris a few weeks ago, projecting himself as a man of peace and reason after killing over 500 Palestinian children last summer with barely a whisper of condemnation.

And this is why I wouldn't shed a tear if that ungrateful, whining Maureen Lipman decided to leave this Jewnited Kingdom. We went to war to save her 'race'. Many British soldiers died liberating her 'race' from the alleged Holocaust (that we are not allowed to question). Jewish terrorists showed their appreciation by blowing us up at the King David Hotel, and attacking and killing many other British soldiers, as well as driving 800,000 Palestinians off their lands into the world's largest refugee camps to be treated little better than in a WW2 Polish ghetto.

Before she opens her mouth again she had better research how the Warburgs were instrumental in creating and protecting Hitler and the Nazis.

Here is Lipman whining about Ed "I am a Zionist" Miliband surprisingly supporting a motion to recognise Palestine as an independent sovereign nation.
Maureen Lipman, the actress, has announced she is ending five decades of support for the Labour Party, as she furiously denounced Ed Miliband’s stance on Israel.

Mrs Lipman said she will vote for “almost any other party” until Labour is “once more led by mensches” – the Yiddish word for a person of integrity.

In a deeply personal attack on Mr Miliband, Mrs Lipman said his support for a motion recognising the state of Palestine “sucks” at a time of rising anti-Semitism in Europe.

[source : Maureen Lipman abandons Ed Miliband over Israel, The Daily Telegraph,, 29th October 2014]

Who do these people think they are? God's chosen people or something?

Thank God there are some Jews with some sense of reason.

Friday, January 30, 2015


1. who attended the TechCamp event held in US Embassy in Kiev in March 2013? Who has attended subsequent events there and elsewhere? And are any of those attendees now associated with Belling Cat?

2. Did the photographer, who photographed the plume of smoke proclaimed by Belling Cat and RTL Nieuws to come from the missile that shot down MH17, also take photographs of the sky of the aftermath of the explosion of MH17 being hit? It seems like he was almost right underneath MH17 when it was shot down and would surely be able to get good images of the aftermath of MH17 in pieces falling out of the sky through black smoke but for whatever reason he found a plume of smoke from a field 15 Kms away much more interesting.


Throughout this conflict every once in a while Ukrainian government officials have come clean about the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

To the chagrin of the Obama Administration and NATO Russia has not invaded. This latest admission came twice today. Once by inference and the other a direct admission from Ukrainian Armed Forces Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Victor Muzhenko.

During a briefing with General Muzenko he announced that

“To date, we have only the involvement of some members of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and Russian citizens [volunteers] that are part of illegal armed groups [Donbass militia] involved in the fighting. We are not fighting with the regular Russian Army. We have enough forces and means in order to inflict a final defeat even with illegal armed formation present. “-

If that wasn’t embarrassing enough for the Poroshenko regime which has consistently stated Russia had invaded and that Ukraine is fighting the Russian Army, it was Petro Poroshenko’s own TV station Channel 5 news that broke the story!

[source : Kiev Regime Confirms that Russian Invasion of Ukraine is a Hoax!, CRG,, 29th Januarry 2015]

They've been crying invasion for months!!!!!

And these people tell us MH17 was shot down by a Russian BUK while they divert attention from their own BUKs and refuse to open up their log books of military flights on 17th July, and the USA refuses to release its data from sensors that it says it has instead releasing a very unconvincing picture of a line and an arc intercepting over Shnizhne?


Having read the analyses of WSWS of the recent Greek elections I was a bit sceptical of Syriza, particularly after the Independent Greeks were given the defence ministry. My concern was that the military could be used by them in some way in opposition to or detrimental to the interests of a free Greece. And Syriza were not voted in with a massive vote of confidence from the Greeks themselves, were they? Less than 40% of a small turn out? In times of such cruel and brutal austerity?

But after listening to Webster Tarpley on INN I think that Russia should assist Syriza as suggested by Tarpley, if not more, and that Syriza should be given a chance to show what they can do.

There is a danger of a NATO coup in Greece. But the appointment of Kammenos is of some concern. It makes sense that an anti-German party could be a good ally against the EU and in particular against Germany. But why the military?

But still, Russia should get in there and forge very strong alliances and partnerships with Greece asap.


Women, who were previously men before their sex change, can now steam clean their designer vaginas.

Meanwhile Israel kills over 500 Palestinian children with barely a whisper of condemnation, and millions of children across the world suffer and die from starvation and thirst.

Have we got our sense of progress all wrong or what?

Thursday, January 29, 2015


Very interesting!

Why did Theresa May appoint Tam and Emmerson?

So of the two QCs in the Litvinenko Inquiry:
1. Tam is close enough to MI5 that he represents them in a case against one of the best journalists in the world (imho);
2. Emmerson is counsel for the historic child abuse inquiry which is going nowhere that fast that the abused have appointed Michael Mansfield QC to run their own inquiry.

Emmerson's speciality seems to be representing people with strange sexual practices (The Bolton 7?).

And as Dejevsky questions: if the Litvinenko case was such a threat to this nation, and such a dastardly deed that justice must be done for poor Marina, then why has it taken 8 years to get an inquiry into his death, with the British government going to court to stop or postpone or block information from current and previous investigations into his death?


Even these pigeons know!!


Ukraine will join NATO.

That's what the 3rd April 2008 statement from the NATO summit in Bucharest said.

23. NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO. Both nations have made valuable contributions to Alliance operations. We welcome the democratic reforms in Ukraine and Georgia and look forward to free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in May. MAP is the next step for Ukraine and Georgia on their direct way to membership. Today we make clear that we support these countries’ applications for MAP. Therefore we will now begin a period of intensive engagement with both at a high political level to address the questions still outstanding pertaining to their MAP applications. We have asked Foreign Ministers to make a first assessment of progress at their December 2008 meeting. Foreign Ministers have the authority to decide on the MAP applications of Ukraine and Georgia.

[source : Bucharest NATO Summit Declaration, NATO,, 3rd April 2008]

But how do you get Ukraine into NATO?

Watch this video of a member of the Rada exposing the coming coup in Ukraine in November 2013!!

TechCamp run by the US State Dept is referenced. I wonder how many of the attendees to the March 2013 TechCamp are now associated with Belling Cat?

Belling Cat recently published another investigation into the launch site of the missile that allegedly shot down MH17. They believe that MH17 was shot down by a BUK provided by Russia which was launched from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne.

The latest report begins with this paragraph:
In a previous investigation related to the 17 July 2014 downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) in eastern Ukraine, the Bellingcat investigation team provided the origin and movements of a Buk M1 missile launcher filmed and photographed that same day that travelled from Donetsk past Zuhres, through Torez and Snizhne. Before reaching Snizhne, the Buk M1 missile launcher was transported on a red low-loader hauled by a white Volvo truck featuring a telephone number and unique blue stripes. In Snizhne, however, the Buk was unloaded off the hauler and driven south out of Snizhne under its own power. In the early hours of 18 July 2014 the missile launcher was spotted in Luhansk, where it was again being hauled by the same white Volvo truck, but this time it was missing one missile.

Now, what is the massive problem with this paragraph?

It is this:
In the early hours of 18 July 2014 the missile launcher was spotted in Luhansk

This bold statement that implies that the BUK seen south of Shnizhne fired a missile, because one was missing, cannot be proven. That BUK is assumed to be the same BUK that was filmed south of Shnizhne on 17th July only because of the loader and truck. But the source of that video must be questioned. The source is the Ukraine Security Service.

But hold on. Didn't the Ukraine Security Service release tapes of alleged intercepted phone conversations implicating Cossacks based at Chernukino as the culprits? Er, yes they did.

So my question is: if Belling Cat believe so strongly that MH17 was shot down from 5 Km south of Shnizhne then they must surely believe that the Ukraine Security Service is lying!! And if they believe that the Ukraine Security Service is lying then how can they trust that same Ukraine Security Service when they say that the video was filmed at dawn on 18th July?

The answer is that they cannot.

But it gets worse for the credibility of Belling Cat.

A month or so ago two parallel reports were published by Collectiv and Der Spiegel. Very flashy and professional multimedia reports they were too. Those reports proposed a third launch site, a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne.

So we now have three proposed launch sites:
1. Chernukino, proposed by the Ukraine Security Service based on intercepted phone calls;
2. a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne, proposed by Belling Cat and RTL Nieuws based on social media and analysis of a photograph of a plume of smoke;
3. a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne, proposed by Collectiv and Der Spiegel based on 'eyewitness' statements (who were not prepared to go on camera).

RTL Nieuws analysed a photograph of a plume of smoke and found that a field visited by Roland Oliphant shortly after MH17 came down was a strong candidate because it lay on the line of sight from the photographer to the plume of smoke.

But the problem for Belling Cat is that that field and the field which the 'eyewitnesses' of Collectiv and Der Spiegel stated was the launch site (because they saw it!) do not lie on that line of sight.

So at least one of these proposed sites is wrong. And I say at least because it possible that both are wrong.

But which one? One is based on geolocation, the other based on 'eyewitnesses' who say they saw the missile (but who would not go on camera).

But Belling Cat are credited by Der Spiegel as co-authors of those parallel reports (see Impressum section here)!!

And to add to the sloppiness of Belling Cat, it was they who identified the precise location in Luhansk where the smoking gun BUK was filmed, a crossroads in a suburb a few Kms west of Luhansk, but the Collectiv/Der Spiegel reports state it was filmed on the N21 which passes straight through the centre of Luhansk and goes nowhere near that crossroads!!

So you tell me WTF is going on!?

First we have the Ukraine Security Service providing evidence that they say proves 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks shot down MH17 from Chernukino. But Belling Cat and RTL Nieuws say no, that's bullshit, because MH17 was shot down from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne. But then Collectiv and Der Spiegel, with the help of Belling Cat, say no that is wrong because 'eyewitnesses' say they saw the missile being launched from a field 3 Km NORTH of Shnizhne!!!


It would be a comedy of errors if the consequences were not so serious. Because if Ukraine joins NATO then there could be a very big war. And just before Christmas, when nobody was watching, the Rada voted to repeal the law that forbid them to join NATO, no doubt influenced by all the contradictory social media reports implicating Russia in the shootdown of MH17.

But to add to this plan to get Ukraine into NATO we have the case of Yatseniuk.

In November 2013 he was a leader of a minor party in the Rada.

So how did he become Prime Minister of Ukraine?

Well, it helps if you have the following as friends financing your personal foundation:
US Embassy in Kiev
National Endowment for Democracy
George Soros' Renaissance Foundation

And in a phone call Victoria Kagan-Nuland handpicked 'Yats' to become Prime Minister, after telling an audience that the US had spent over $5 billion in Ukraine to make it 'democratic', i.e. open to joining NATO and selling its soul to the American Devil.

So that is what is happening in Ukraine.

Ain't no doubt about that. No sirree.

It's all about dragging Ukraine into NATO as agreed at Bucharest in 2008.

And Belling Cat is a witting partner in the media war.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015


D3 is the witness who will give an anonymous statement that he was asked by Kovtun if he knew of a cook in London because he Kovtun wanted some poison sprinkling on some food to be consumed by a traitor to Russia. C2 is the cook D3 mentioned to Kovtun, and he will also give an anonymous statement.

Keyword: anonymous.

But get this: although Russia produces virtually all known Polonium 210, guess who buys it? THE USA!!!! The Polonium 210 found in Litvinenko was pure, so it is impossible to identify its source. But if so then why did Emmerson say this:
The only producer of polonium in Russia is the federal atomic agency, Rosatom. We know that polonium 210 is produced at Avangard, a nuclear laboratory that is owned by Rosatom. And we know that Avangard is the only facility in Russia that produces polonium-210.

If Emmerson knows the source cannot be traced because the Polonium 210 was pure then why is he mentioning Avangard?

And did Emmerson also mention who buys most of the Polonium 210?

So far we have:
1. anonymous sources:
2. deliberate ommission of facts to implicate Russia when the USA buys virtually all Polonium 210.

Perhaps something else to be concerned about: Emmerson is counsel for the child abuse inquiry.


I thought that Belling Cat would do the honourable thing and address the other claims for the location of the launch site for the missile that allegedly shot down MH17.

But it appears not.

Not yet anyway.

In their latest report they have only reinforced their claim that MH17 was shot down from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne.

But the following allegations have also been made:
1. The Ukraine Security Service claim that intercepted phone conversations prove 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks shot down MH17 from Chernukino;
2. Correctiv and Der Spiegel claim that actual eyewitnesses saw and heard the missile being launched from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne.

With so many contradictory claims and so much evidence somebody has to be lying through their teeth.

Now. I wonder who it can be...

The Ukraine Security Service?

Belling Cat?

Correctiv and Der Spiegel?

All three?

We can also ask the following valid questions:

Why have the USA not released their data and instead issued an image showing a white line and yellow arc intercepting?

Why have the Ukraine Air Force refused to open their log books of the 17th July for inspection, instead telling us that no flights occured that day, which contradicts claims of eyewitnesses who have gone on film to say they saw fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down?

Why does NATO rely on social media to prove their allegations when they have some of the world's most powerful computers, spying technology and intelligence analysts at their disposal?

Just asking.


Alexander Litvinenko worked for MI6.

Do you know what his job was?

To write propaganda against Putin.

Litvinenko made the wildest claims against Putin, so wild that he had in fact discredited himself, and was thus expendable.

Litvinenko claimed that Russia under Putin was behind 9/11 and all of global terrorism!!!

Yeah. That's right. According to Litvinenko, Russia is running all those international cutthroat Jihadis sawing the head off anyone who opposes them. But the war in Syria is to create a pipeline that would threaten Russia's business with Europe!!

Litvinenko did not write about The Covenant of Security between MI5 and Islamic terrorists that led to London being named Londonistan. Nor, as far as we are aware, did he disclose the origin of those three objects of dense matter that were up his arse as he lay dying from radiation poisoning.

But he did claim that Putin was responsible for his demise.

So there you have it, straight from the MI6 propagandist's mouth: silent on actual facts like The Covenant of Security; a blabbermouth making up the most ridiculous allegations against the leader of a nation with one of the most powerful militaries in the world!!

The (expendable) dickhesd!!

Tuesday, January 27, 2015


Have they released the post mortem? No. Not even when demanding the extradition of Lugovoy.

Have they released the source of the Polonium 210? No. It is possible to calculate the time and source of manufacture.

Have they figured who was contaminated where and when? No. It is not that straightforward.

Is this public inquiry into his death actually public? No. Most of it will be heard in secret, some from anonymous sources.

Rest assured good ol' (Freemasonic) British Justice will save the day!!!

So I'll leave you with this report which mentions three dense objects up Litvinenko's arse when he was dying.
The poison used to attack the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko remained unknown last night as doctors searching for a radioactive toxin focused their efforts on pieces of "dense matter" found in his intestines.

The team treating Mr Litvinenko at University College Hospital in central London believe the defector must have knowingly swallowed the three pieces of material which have become lodged in his colon.

X-rays have shown that two of the items are of a similar size to a 2p coin and the other is the shape of a figure "8", according to a hospital source. But it is not yet known whether the three items are linked to Mr Litvinenko's illness, which has left him without a functioning immune system, due to the failure of his bone marrow, and liver damage. Tests are being carried out to identify the pieces of material.

[source : Doctors treating poisoned Russian focus on objects in his colon , The Independent,, 23rd November 2006]

Sleep tight...


NATO unleashed their neo-Nazis onto Ukraine once Yanukovich decided to ally and strike a deal with Russia instead of with the EU and IMF. The neo-Nazi junta was led by NATO-sponosred Yatseniuk, who was handpicked to become the new PM in the junta by Victoria Kagan-Nuland. Yats is also sponsored by George Soros and the National Endowment for Fascism Democracy. The neo-Nazis burned anti-Nazi protestors alive in Odessa in May last year, and have been indiscriminately shelling and killing thousands of civilians in East Ukraine for nearly a year now, as those civilians recognise and protest the Nazi heritage of the coup in Kiev. And in an emergency session just before Christmas, when nobody was watching, the Rada voted to take one step closer to joining NATO. And Natalie Jaresko, the new Finance Minister, is a possible CIA agent straight from the US Embassy in Kiev!!

It has indeed been a violent NATO-sponosred neo-Nazi coup.


Today is Holocaust Memorial Day. We are supposed to remember the six million Jews who were allegedly murdered by the Nazis. Or was it six million people, when we actually find out that many others besides Jews were murdered by the Nazis. And was it six million, or less?

Jonathan Sacks, former Chief Rabbi, writes in The Daily Telegraph today:
To be free, you have to let go of hate. There is no other way.

[source : Jonathan Sacks, Why we all need Holocaust Memorial Day, The Daily Telegraph,, 27th January 2015]

Oh yeah? Well tell that to the over 500 children murdered by Israel last year!!

That final sentence I have quoted from Sacks' rant is typical of how the Holocaust is used by Zionists so we feel sorry for them as they murder hundreds of Palestinian children.

Sacks proposes four 'myths' of the Holocaust:
Four different myths have been created about the Holocaust. The Iranian version is that it didn’t happen: it was invented by Jews to further the aims of Zionism. Another is that it half-happened, and the pity is that Hitler did not finish the job. The third is that it happened and the Jews deserved it. The fourth is that it happened but now Jews are the new Nazis and Palestinians the new Jews.

Well, I now propose a fifth alternative, which is actually much closer to the truth:
A cabal of wealthy Zionist bankers helped to create the Nazis to scare a sceptical world Jewry into populating Palestine for them, and the Holocaust did happen but it was engineered for this purpose.

Sacks references the rise of the Nazis:
Nazi anti-Semitism started after Germany’s defeat in the First World War and the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles.

For now we'll ignore the fact that the British monarchy engineered WW1 to destroy Germany in the first place. But at the heart of German finance were the Warburgs, formerly known as the Del Bancos from Venice they changed their name after fleeing Venice after the League of Cambrai almost destroyed that cesspit of financial manipulation known as Venice. The Warburgs had their own bank, MM Warburg, which did massive business with successive German governments. The Holocaust is remembered for the gas chambers. Zyklon B was the chemical allegedly used in the gas chambers. Zyklon B was manufactured by IG Farben. The Warburgs were the largest stockholders in IG Farben, and also sat on the the main German board of directors AND the American subsidiary of IG Farben. IG Farben was known as 'the state within a state' and was the main economic driving force behind the Nazis. And not only that, Max Warburg sat on the board of the Reichsbank under Hjalmar Schacht, a close personal friend of the Governor of the Bank of England Montagu Norman. The Nazis were that terrible that international boycotts of Nazi Germany were being discussed and arranged. Guess who organised opposition to these boycotts? Yep. The Warburgs.

And so back to the Holocaust. This is what Israel points to whenever it does anything. Before the Holocaust world Jewry did not want to populate Palestine. The Warburgs ran the Haavara, a plan between the Zionists and the Nazis that would train German Jews for a life in Palestine. This was a logical: Zionists such as the Warburgs wanted Jews in Palestine, and the Nazis wanted Jews out of Germany. But despite all the anti-Semitism of the Nazis and the assistance given by the Haavara, only 10% of German Jews migrated to Palestine under the Haavara.

So let's put all this together:
1. Initial Jewish settlements in Palestine were financed by the Rothschilds;
2. the Rothschilds and Warburgs are good family friends and business partners;
3. the Warburgs directed and were the main stockholders of IG Farben, which was a significant financier of Hitler and Nazis, and the main economic force in Nazi Germany, and also directed the Reichsbank under Schacht;
4. the Warburgs allied with the Rothschilds and created a scheme to help German Jews migrate to Palestine while at the same time directing IG Farben;
5. the Warburgs organised successful opposition to international boycotts of Nazi Germany.

Now all this puts the Holocaust and the subsequent creation of Israel in a different light.

People like Sacks get the violin out and cry, "Never again!", and write stuff like, "To be free, you have to let go of hate. There is no other way." while cheering on the murder of hundreds of Palestinian children and leaving destitute and traumatised thousands more.

Yes, never forget that six (or five or four) million died in the Holocaust.

But also never forget that behind the rise of the Nazis lie the Warburgs who had a motive in creating and protecting the Nazis to create a monster to scare world Jewry into populating Palestine, a dream that their good family friends and business partners the Rothschilds had been trying to realise for decades.

Of course, it may all just be all a huge coincidence...

Monday, January 26, 2015


Eurozone finance ministers will on Monday threaten an end to negotiations on debt relief for Greece unless its new radical Left government promises to honour all existing austerity agreements.

Eurozone officials are convinced that the EU holds all the trump cards in the coming clash with Greece's leader-in-waiting, Alexis Tsipras, including the nuclear option of letting Greek banks collapse. They believe Mr Tsipras knows his weakness.

The hardline approach will be sugared with offers of flexibility on the detail of austerity measures, and a move to allow Greece more time to meet an end of February deadline for renewal of key EU loans that are keeping the country’s economy afloat.

[source : Greece must bow to austerity or go bust, says EU, The Daily Telegraph,, 26th January 2015]

From this it looks like the EU is prepared to be more flexible but still demand some austerity. But as Syriza is pro-EU then this is likely to happen. It may have been agreed already...


Syriza won the Greek election. But what of their policies? If you have only briefly heard of them then this maybe because they are not that huge a threat. Russell Brand has received far more negative coverage and been attacked much more by the NATO media than Syriza.

...The electoral repudiation of the Greek capitalist class’s traditional parties of rule, PASOK and ND, reflects mass outrage with austerity dictated by the banks. However, Syriza is a bourgeois party that is committed to the EU, the euro and the defense of capitalism. While it has made a few vague promises about improving Greek life, it has been engaged in intense discussion behind the scenes aimed at reaching an accommodation with the European banks.

In a victory speech delivered at Athens University, Syriza leader Alexis Tsipras said he would find a “new viable solution” for Greece and Europe. “The troika, that is the past,” Tsipras said, referring to the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which together arranged austerity policies with governments in Athens.

However, Tsipras promptly promised to work with Greece’s lenders, the most important of which are the agencies making up the “troika.” He said that the Greek government would be “ready to negotiate with our lenders a mutually acceptable solution” and would “prove all Cassandras wrong. There will be no conflict with partners.”

These comments echoed previous pledges that a Syriza government would “maintain a balanced budget, and will commit to quantitative targets.”

Tsipras’s main aim is to make some sort of deal with the banks of Europe, including a revision of the terms of the repayment of Greek debt. Indeed, there are sections of the ruling class in the United States and Europe that are concerned that such a revision is necessary in order to ensure that Greek bonds can be repaid.

...All discussions over the course of policy are taking place within the framework of defending capitalism in Greece and throughout Europe. At most, Tsipras is hoping for some concession that he can hail as a victory in order to bide time and prepare a further attack on the working class.

...In the run-up to the elections, Syriza officials were busy behind the scenes reassuring journalists, economists and politicians that an election victory posed no danger to the banks. European news site EurActiv wrote: “Key to Syriza’s ascent, party officials say privately, is a calculated effort to moderate the radical leftist rhetoric that prompted Der Spiegel to name Tsipras among the most dangerous men in Europe in 2012.”

Former Syriza leader Alekos Alavanos stressed that the party would pose no threat to the banks in an interview with the Financial Times of London two days ago. “Even Mr Tsipras’ predecessor as Syriza chief, Alekos Alavanos, questions whether the party’s rhetoric matches its intentions,” the FT concluded, citing Alavanos’s remark that Syriza “now is a moderate party.”

Economist Jean-Marc Daniel reassured France’s 20 Minutes that Syriza would do no long-term harm to the stock portfolios of the affluent and the super-rich. “The stock market does not usually like the beginning of ‘left’ governments, but it picks up gradually as they abandon their program. What is most striking about Alexis Tsipras, is that he is already diluting his program,” Daniel said.

If representatives of finance capital state so openly and with such confidence that Syriza is no threat to them, this is because Syriza has been thoroughly vetted by the banks and intelligence agencies. Since Syriza emerged as a major electoral force in Greece in 2012, Tsipras has met publicly with the Greek army and repeatedly traveled to the major capitals of the euro zone and to Washington—after declaring himself an admirer of President Barack Obama’s economic policies.

[source : Syriza wins Greek elections, WSWS,, 26th January 2015]

Sunday, January 25, 2015


Watching this classic on police corruption and paedophilia for about the 20th time.

One perp calls it a "private weakness".

But in real life there's a lot more to it than a shopping mall: control of politicians; control over the political process.

If you can't believe that it would and could never happen in the Queen's United Kingdom...

Red Riding is powerful stuff, but compared to real life is a fairytale!!


How long have you had them now?

And what have you done with them besides idle gossip?

On 28th June last year I stood alone outside Freemasons Hall to protest 100 years after Freemasons assassinated Arch Duke Ferdinand in an event that was designed to kick off the horrors of WW1. To say I was pissed off is an understatement.

My thinking is that if, after reading those reports, you are not absolutely fucking furious that our monarchy could engineer WW1 and then WW2 then you do not deserve those reports.


If they are nothing more to you than intelligent or idle gossip then you do not deserve those reports.

So if you have not done so already, destroy reports, and those who did as I requested can have updated copies directly from me. I'll think of a way to get them to you.


C'mon. I don't believe you all destroyed them. Not for one second. Even though you know there is basically zero probability of me being able to find out and/prove that you hadn't.

It was just a test of trust.

And if you had then it would mean that you might actually have to do some research of your own then. That is if you actually cared.

But I have the utmost respect for and trust in those who did destroy them, and if you want replacements then I will gladly send you them. You can get my email address from the origin of your copies.

I fucking hate this planet.

Nobody gives a fuck!!!




This brilliant live performance of another Chopin prelude also expresses how I feel at the moment: frustrated, sad, angry.

Matei Varga - Chopin Prelude op. 28, no. 24

I wish I could feel like this instead (like I did 2 years ago).

Claudio Arrau Chopin Prelude Op 28 No 17 In A Flat (1950)

Saturday, January 24, 2015


I used to be able to play this, but that was decades ago.

But it expresses how I'm feeling at the moment (though I would play the first four bars slightly faster and with a bit more aggression, and play that last chord with a bit more anger and volume and sustain it for longer).

Chopin: Prelude Op.28 No.20 in C Minor, Largo (Pogorelich)


In the last 24 hours some parts of the NATO media are buzzing with the story that there is proof that Russia killed Litvinenko. This 'proof' consists of alleged intercepts, recorded by the NSA, of communications between the suspects in London and their handlers in Moscow.

But apparently this 'proof' is inadmissible in court!!!

A source familiar with the investigation confirmed the existence of American “intelligence material”. They said it would have been “inadmissible” in court, but that the British authorities were “confident that this was a state execution”.

[source : Litvinenko inquiry: the proof Russia was involved in dissident's murder, The Daily Telegraph,, 23rd January 2015]

And this 'proof' is that solid that we won't be able to hear it, because even though the inquiry into Litvinenko's death is supposed to be public, most of it is going to be heard in secret!! And it is at one of those many secret sessions that this tape may, repeat may, be played.

So let's recap:
1. secret tapes allegedly exist that prove that Moscow killed Litvinenko;
2. but they cannot be trusted enough to be used as evidence in a court of law;
3. but they may be played in a closed session to an inquiry which is supposed to be public but is for all intents and purposes secret.

But haven't we heard of this kind of thing before?

Oh yeah. That's it. The USA says it has data from 'sensors' which it says shows MH17 was shot down from somewhere around Shnizhne but will not release that data, instead issuing a simple image of a white line and a yellow arc meeting somewhere over Shnizhne. And this contradicts evidence presented by the Ukraine Security Service which they say proves 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks at Chernukino!!

Stop arsing about.

Release these NSA/Litvinenko tapes.

Release the MH17 data.



In the case of the King of that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, the terrorist-financing, head-chopping, child-raping Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, just a few hours.

In the case of Diana, tireless campaigner for charity and mother to the future king of England, a whole week, even when the nation was demanding it!!

So you do the maths.

Have they learned how to lower the flag just that little bit quicker?

Or does this show what they care about?

Friday, January 23, 2015


Watch it!

"I am sick to death of the poor", one of the 'spoiled brats' shouts, just before he...

Watch it!

It starts off slow but makes up for it in the end.


I rejoiced at the great news of the death of Abdullah bin Abd Al Aziz Al Saud. The man has brought terror, death, destruction and homelessness to millions in North Africa and the Middle East, by first continuing to cover up Saudi Arabia's role in 9/11, and then, because the initial plan for 9/11 becoming moribund, agreeing to the Redirection in which the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia would unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya, Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

But here is what Callous Cameron said upon hearing the great news:
He will be remembered for his long years of service to the Kingdom, for his commitment to peace and for strengthening understanding between faiths.

Abdullah apparently has 4 wives, 7 sons and 15 daughters, and a personal fortune of over $17 billion.

If I had that there is no way I would be unleashing cannibal cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children. I would be the happiest man alive, sponsoring research and conferences into nuclear fusion and the true causes of wars.

But that's what Abdullah did: he unleashed the cutthroats!

Commitment to peace, my arse!

He obeyed Liz.


Regular attendee at Bilderberg, Mario Draghi, announced over €1 Trillion of warm fresh money.

Now why would a regular Bilderberger do that?

Out of the kindness of his heart?

Because he cares for the little people?


A month or so ago the US Congress was conned into bailing out the Wall Street banks because of the (engineered) slump in oil prices by Saudi Arabia.

This over €1 Trillion is to tide European banks over this oil price crisis.

It may well also be to bribe Greece in some as yet unknown way.


Someone like Draghi does not create over €1 Trillion for the little people.

Thursday, January 22, 2015


Bill Hicks on how we create our own monsters as a foreign policy.


Nearly 2 years ago, Boris Berezovsky was about to blow the lid off the Litvinenko case. But despite not showing any signs of wanting to, he allegedly committed suicide by hanging himself in his bathroom.

And now, just as the Whitehall paedo scandal is about to blow, Leon Brittan dies.

Just sayin'.


Educating Yorkshire became a national treasure when one of the pupils, Musharraf, overcame his speech impediment with the aid of some of the teachers at the school to gain his grade C in English.

But Educating Yorkshire will now be known for something completely different: one of the star teachers having multiple inappropriate relationships with girls from a previous school.

Is it just me or is this becoming a national scandal? Everyday there is something being reported that teachers have abused their position of trust and exploited relationships with younger students for their sexual gratification.

Again, is home-schooling the solution to this?

My experience of the education system in the UK is that:
1. it brainwashes teachers and students into accepting themselves as members of a global village, i.e. servants to a world government, at the expense of subjects like mathematics, leading students with a grade B in GCSE mathematics unable to calculate 25% of 50;
2. no in depth study of the true causes of war is made, and I was horrified to find that genuinely nice students at a 'nice' school in a 'nice' English town had been forced by their 'nice' teachers to write and draw pro-war propaganda that could be used to encourage people to fight in wars, particularly WW1.

And as I have stated here multiple times, when I tried to tell one female teacher with children what is really going on I was and still am ostracised, even though she may be able to help me to stop all this shit to make this world a safer place for her children.


Never trust a teacher, not in a state secondary school anyway. They know best how to produce the next generation of under-educated robots for the system to use and abuse.

A secondary school teacher who starred in Channel 4 series Educating Yorkshire has been banned from the classroom for life after having sex with two former pupils.

Neil Giffin, 35, was barred after he admitted having relationships with two girls aged over 18 from 2007 to 2008, and sending 'inappropriate' messages to three more from 2012 until last year.

In the messages he described his sexual fantasies, including having a girl sitting on top of him in school uniform smoking a cigarette, cross-dressing, and his obsession with tights.

Both of the relationships took place while he was teaching history at Bishop Heber High School, in Cheshire, from 2003 to 2012 after he contacted girls who had recently graduated via social media.

[source : Teacher who starred in TV show Educating Yorkshire is banned from the classroom for life after having sex with two former pupils, The Daily Mail,, 22nd January 2015]


For centuries there has been, and if current gatekeepers get their way, always will be an establishment. This establishment discusses wars decades in advance, then engineers those wars years in advance, then executes those wars through politicians of the day, then escapes prosecution because all anger is directed at those politicians.

This is now occuring with Blair and Bush.

Do you honestly think that W would plan a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East, then engineer and execute 9/11 to kick off that series of wars, and then after leaving office still have the power to continue that series of wars?

Don't be such a silly billy!!!

The gatekeepers are directing anger away from the establishment onto the public faces of Blair and Bush for just one war: the war on Iraq in 2003.

But General Wesley Clark told us the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

The first four nations were named in A Clean Break in 1996.

And of these seven nations:
Iraq was invaded in 2003;
Lebanon was attacked by Israel in 2006;
Libya was attacked in 2011;
Since 2011 Syria has been invaded and attacked by international cutthroat Jihadis sponsored and supported by multiple nations such as the USA, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom.

Iran is always being accused of developing nuclear weapons with the threat of war. Israel has attacked Sudan several times since 2001 and Sudan experienced a civil war which is still not resolved despite the country breaking into two. And Somalia has been named the largest terrorist threat to the UK and operations there are continuing to grow.

Could Blair and Bush plan all this years in advance (as early as 1996?), and then still have the power to implement it years after being removed from office?

I seriously doubt it.

It is the establishment, you silly billy.

Get the establishment, not just Blair and Bush.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015


Ruffcut ‎-- Talk About (Extended Mix)


WAR - Why Can't We Be Friends

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I seen you around for a long long time, ya
I really remembered you when you drink my wine

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I seen you walkin' down in Chinatown
I called you but you could not look around

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I bring my money to the welfare line
I see you standing in it every time

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

The color of your skin don't matter to me
As long as we can live in harmony

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I'd kinda like to be the President
So I can show you how your money's spent

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

Sometimes I don't speak right
But yet I know what I'm talking about

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends

I know you're workin' for the CIA
They wouldn't have you in the Ma-fi-a

Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends...


If you aren't going to help then destroy all copies of those reports.

I need people who are prepared to protest in front of Freemasons Hall, not gossipmongers using those reports trying to make themselves look concerned and intellectual.

So destroy those reports...IMMEDIATELY!!

You know who you are.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015


Never trust a teacher, not even a female teacher.

The male is made out to be the caveman, the predator, with base lusts and instincts, bashing a woman on the head with a club and then dragging her off by her hair to his cave, muttering "ugga bugga" to himself.

But check this out.

Two Californian teachers have been arrested after allegedly being caught have sex with their students while away on an unsanctioned field trip, police said.

South Hills High School teacher Melody Lippert, 38, met up with a group of male students at a beach in San Clemente in December of last year.

Cops say she gave the group alcohol and then engaged in a sexual act with one of the students, according to deputies.

Afterwards, she allegedly made plans to meet up with the students a second time at the same spot, bringing along another teacher 30-year-old Michelle Ghirelli.

[source : Two teachers arrested after they were 'caught having sex with students on beach', The Daily Star,, 19th January 2015]

This is just another sordid tale to add to the very worrying trend of teachers abusing their position of trust. It was usually male teachers exploiting boys, but now women are catching up pretty fast.

Is this a symptom of women's liberation?

Is this a reason to ditch public schooling in favour of home schooling?

Or can we even trust private tutors to teach children in their own homes?

All I'll say is this: no teacher taught me what I know about how this world really works, and when I tried to tell one who I expected would be desperate to help I was and still am ostracised.

So you do the maths.

Monday, January 19, 2015


So what is this tweet about?

Well, check out this report in The Daily Telegraph.
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant fighters in Syria, massed close to the Lebanese border, are threatening to launch attacks across it, the Telegraph has witnessed.

The group has been training new recruits and defectors from smaller rebel factions in Qalamoun, a militarily strategically important province in the south-west of Syria that borders Lebanon.

Several of those smaller rebel groupings, some aligned with the more moderate "Free Syrian Army", have capitulated to the jihadists in recent months with many of their fighters joining Isil.

The growth of the group in the area means Sunni Isil fighters in Syria are now at the edge of the Lebanese heartland of its Shia arch enemy Hizbollah, whose men are fighting alongside the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

[source : Islamic State fighters mass on Lebanon border and threaten to launch attacks across it, The Daily Telegraph,, 18th January 2015]

So what we have here is a report in a British paper that Islamic State is about to launch raids into Lebanon against Hezbollah, Israel's nemesis and eternal enemy.

So what does Israel do?

Does Israel attack Islamic State?

Er, nope.

Israel attacks a car carrying senior Hezbollah and Iranian RG and kills them, thus weakening Hezbollah in an area and at a time that is going to help Islamic State!!

But this fits perfectly with the report of Seymour Hersh entitled The Redirection that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia would unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. This was agreed because their Plan A of war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia within five years of 11th September 2001 was by 2007 moribund. The Redirection was Plan B.

But we've seen this kind of assistance to the international cutthroat Jihadis from Israel before. Several times Israel has bombed Syrian Arab Army positions, including a coordinated attack between the Israeli Air Force and the Jihadis on a series of checkpoints around Damascus in 2013. That attack failed, but Israel succeeded in bombing to death some chickens. Way to go, Zioguys!!

The point is this: Israel was a partner in crime in 9/11, along with Saudi Arabia, a Zionist element in the USA, and DFQ, which was designed to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East. Iraq was taken out in 2003. Israel somehow lost against Lebanon in 2006. So by 2007 the plan was well behind schedule, so they decided to unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran instead.

What we see today is this diabolical Plan B.

And to think that Netanyahu hijacked and marched at the head of the Unity March in Paris!!

What a scumbag.


Racist Eric Pickles has sent a letter to individual Muslim leaders in the UK asking them to expose "preachers of hate", etc.

He should also do the same to Jewish leaders.

And also write to (not Sir) Andrew Parker, the head of MI5, who has been allowing "preachers of hate", such as Michael Adebalajo, to preach Jihad against President Assad of Syria in order to provide fresh meat for the Jihad in Syria as part of the redirection exposed by Seymour Hersh in 2007, in which the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia would unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. This was done because by 2007 the plan for war on seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark was moribund.

I would like to bring to the attention of Pickles, and all the other racists, that on 22nd July 1946 Zionist terrorists blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. This was an attack on the British HQ in Palestine, i.e. an attack on Great Britain itself by Zionists.

But another attack had occured earlier on the British Army camp at Sarafand in which British soldiers were killed, weapons stolen and the camp blown up. Two Zionist terrorists were later captured and sentenced to death. The Zionist terrorists then went out and kidnapped two British soldiers, killed them, and hung the corpses from orange trees. But the terrorists went that one demented step further and had booby-trapped the corpses, so that when the corpses were cut down they exploded! One more British soldier was seriously injured. This is The Sergeant's Affair. Sick, eh?

From the mid-1930s Palestine was a battleground between Zionists terrorists and the British who had somehow been granted the mandate for Palestine, partly because of the Balfour Declaration and Sykes-Picot.

Basically, every Prime Minister of Israel has been a serious high-ranking Zionist terrorist, or had or has links to Zionist terrorism. For example, Nutter Netanyahu's daddy was secretary to Jabotinsky, the brains behind Irgun, who incidentally bombed the King David Hotel.

They couldn't give a fuck (like a few others I know personally).

Before WW2 the Nazis and the Zionists collaborated to get German Jews out of Germany and into Palestine. But German Jews preferred to stay in Nazi Germany rather than emigrate to Palestine. The Jewish Warburgs were organising opposition to boycotts of their pet project, the Nazis, as they sat on the boards of IG Farben and the Reichsbank creating and guiding Nazi Germany for world war.

Before the Holocaust Jews in general did not want to populate Palestine because they knew the hatred it would cause. But after the Holocaust (which we are not allowed question!!) world Jewry was bombing and murdering and terrorising Palestinians off their lands and driving them into the world's largest refugee camps, the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

And all because the Rothschilds, followers of the sick pervert Jacob Frank who the Rothschilds financed while on his death bed at Offenbach, wanted to populate Palestine with Jews.

It is this demented drive that the Zionists must live in Palestine and nowhere but Palestine that has led to Israel, and horrors such as Israel murdering over 500 Palestinian children last year in yet another engineered war on the Occupied Territories with barely a whisper of condemnation from world leaders, except from Russia and Iran.

Did Eric Pickles write to 1000 Jewish leaders in Great Britain last summer asking that they root out Jewish preachers of hate? Er, no.

Pickles is a racist, uneducated bigot. A typical Tory, sucking up to money.

So by all means, write to Muslim leaders to ask that they root out preachers of hate. But also write Jewish leaders and MI5.

Sunday, January 18, 2015


There was a set of Jewish bankers, the Hofjuden, who served the British Royal family. They were the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Schiffs, among others.

The Rothschilds created Israel.

The Warburgs were instrumental in bringing forth and protecting the Nazis to persuade sceptical Jews into populating Palestine, through the Haavara, and then later Israel after the Holocaust by Warburgs Nazis.

The Schiffs boasted of financing revolutions in Russia. This desire to control Russia was later shown through Lord Jacob Rothschild and his association with Mikhail Khordokovsky and his Open Russia Foundation.

They sent their sons to be trained in each others banking houses.

Do not be fooled by them. They kill Palestinian babies at will. Over five hundred of 'em last year. Dead. Buried..what was left of them, anyway.

Four dead Jews and the world's police and military are patrolling the streets.

Over 500 dead Palestinian children and they get the champagne out.

This is how the world really works.

Do not be fooled by them.

Before the Holocaust they wrote that the young and the old and the sick and the frail Jews would have to suffer for Israel to be born. Economic dust these Jews condemned by Jews were called.

This is how the world really works.

Do not be fooled by them.

Je suis Zakaria Baker.


Home Secretary Theresa May is reported to have said today:
“The attack on a Jewish supermarket, where four people were killed, is a chilling reminder of antisemitism, not just in France but the recent antisemitic prejudice that we sadly have seen in this country.

“I know that many Jewish people in this country are feeling vulnerable and fearful and you’re saying that you’re anxious for your families, for your children and yourselves.”

“I never thought I would see the day when members of the Jewish community in the United Kingdom would say they were fearful of remaining here in the United Kingdom.

“And that means we must all redouble our efforts to wipe out antisemitism here in the United Kingdom.”

[source : Theresa May pledges extra police patrols to counter antisemitism threat, The Guardian,, 18th January 2015]

The really really simple way to "wipe out antisemitism here in the United Kingdom" is for Israel to stop killing 500 Palestinian children in engineered wars.

Honestly. It really is that simple.

Stop killing malnourished, impoverished, traumatised, terrified Palestinian children for no other reason than to drive Palestinians off The Gaza Strip so that Israel can claim the natural resources off the coast, and that will go some way to wipe out antisemitism here in the Disunited Fascist Queendom.

May goes on about the four deaths in a Jewish supermarket. But what about the four deaths of the Baker brothers who died for committing the most horrific crime against humanity of playing football on a beach on The Gaza Strip?

The answer is dead simple: Stop killing Palestinian babies!!


Je suis Zakaria Baker.


If you are wondering why Ukraine refuses to open up their log books of military flights for 17th July then watch the following documentary that has been shown on Russia Today over the weekend. The documentary shows yet more eyewitnesses who claim that they saw fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down. And in contrast to the 'eyewitnesses' for the Collectiv and Der Spiegel reports, which produce yet more contradictions to the previous reports and claims proclaimed by NATO media and their go-to wannabes Belling Cat, these eyewitnesses went on tape, their faces can be seen. And these are in addition to the eyewitnesses interviewed by the BBC in a report which the BBC subsequently pulled.

The documentary also shows a Su-25 flying at over 10000 metres. This fighter is not recommended to fly at that height not because it cannot but because the cockpit is not sealed so there is added danger for the pilot at that height, but shown in the documentary is that if the pilot feels comfortable and able then he/she can fly at over 10000 metres altitude.

So, we all need to ask: why does the Ukraine military refuse access to their log books of military flights for 17th July 2014?

Reflections on MH17

And at last, Belling Cat are looking into the contradictions in the proposed launch sites, that I have been uniquely highlighting since last weekend upon the publication of the reports from Collectiv and Der Spiegel. So far the three proposed sites are:
1. Chernukino, proposed by the Ukraine Security Service based on evidence gained from intercepted phone calls;
2. 5 Km south of Shnizhne, claimed by Belling Cat and RTL Nieuws based on geolcation and a photograph of a plume of smoke;
3. 3 Km north of Shnizhne, claimed by Collectiv and Der Spiegel based on 'eyewitness' statements, but also proclaimed by Belling Cat even though they contradict the previous two.

Readers must understand that it is not necessarily the case that one of these proposed launch sites must be true. All three could be false, which would explain the number of contradictions and wide variance in geographical location.

Readers must also question why the USA, which says it has data from 'sensors' which shows the launch site as somewhere around Shnizhne, does not release that evidence, as well as satellite images, but instead refuses to release that data and the images and allows the war and sanctions to go on and conspiracy theories to grow?

Readers must also understand that as yet nobody has proved that MH17 was shot down by a BUK. There is now even more serious doubt about the origin of the main piece of evidence that was used to convict Russia. That is a video of a BUK with a missing missile. The Ukraine Security Service at first said it was filmed in Krasnodon, but this was changed to Luhansk. The time was given as dawn on 18th July. But the precise location was found to be a suburb a few Kms west of the centre of Luhansk. I questioned, so far without answer, how such a BUK could travel through a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis between Shnizhne and Luhansk. But the time and location of this video have changed again. Because according to the reports of Collectiv and Der Spiegel, proclaimed by Belling Cat as the gospel truth, the video was filmed on the N21 somewhere in Luhansk, even though Belling Cat had traced that location to a few Kms west of Luhansk and the N21 goes nowhere near west Luhansk!! And the new time is either late afternoon or evening of 17th July (they haven't made their minds up yet).

So that is the state of play. This is now when Belling Cat earn their NATO points: how will they explain the contradictions in proposed launch sites and the consequences?

This could be an interesting week.

Friday, January 16, 2015


Eliot Higgins has retweeted this:

Perhaps Belling Cat should apply their Checkdesk to the Collectiv and Der Spiegel reports before proclaiming them as the gospel truth instead of blindly accepting them without any apparent scrutiny?

I have pointed out several very important contradictions in those reports, some of which have massive consequence for Belling Cat themselves.

This is why I think that he and Belling Cat are the most dangerous people in the world at the moment. The USA claims to have data from 'sensors' which they shows that MH17 was shot down from Shnizhne. Yet they refuse to release that data, and other satellite images. Instead they rely on Belling Cat to 'prove' their case. And whenever Belling Cat give their stamp of approval it is pushed in the NATO media. Subsequently this is used by NATO and the Kiev Nazis to drive Ukraine towards NATO, which Russia will obviously resist, with full lethal force if necessary.

But Higgins and Belling Cat are not the professionals and experts that they or the NATO public think they are.

If Belling Cat were true investigative journalists they would see and highlight the following contradictions:
1. there are three proposed launch sites: Chernukino, 5 Km south of Shnizhne, and 3 Km north of Shnizhne;
2. the time and location of the video of the BUK in Luhansk has somehow changed: the time has changed from dawn of 18th July to either late afternoon or evening of 17th July; the location has somehow changed from a suburb a few Kms west of Luhansk to some as yet unidentified location on the N21 which does NOT repeat not travel through the west of Luhansk ut runs through the centre of Luhansk.

Why has this happened?

And does it matter to Belling Cat?

And why are the following not of any apparent concern to BellingCat:
1. that the USA says it has data from 'sensors' and satellite images to show that MH17 was shot down from separatists areas but refuses to release that data, and also has the NSA and CIA with all their rinky dinky super duper computers and teams of analysts, yet NATO is relying on Belling Cat to either 'prove' that Russia shot down MH17 or give their stamp of approval to any other report or evidence that 'proves' Russia shot down MH17, even if it contradicts everything that was 'proved' or approved before;
2. that the Ukraine military refuses to open their log books of military flights for 17th July saying that no flights took place w on 17th July, when several eyewitnesses have gone on record (in contrast to the Collectiv report) stating that military planes were close to MH17 when it was shot down;
3. that even though MH17 is believed to have been shot down by a BUK, Ukraine's BUKs are curiously being ignored.

Belling Cat are NATO propagandists not investigative journalists.

Well, what do you expect when one of their team works for George Soros?


I did a quick search on MH17 on Twitter this morning.

Up popped this from NATO's favourite propagandist:

Higgins is quoted as saying to the Nazi Post:
"The new investigation confirms Bellingcat's earlier work on the movements of the Buk on July 17, and that it originated from the 53rd brigade in Russia. At this point it's undeniable the Russian military provided the Buk, and there's more and more information that links it to the downing of MH17,” says Eliot Higgins, founder of Bellingcat.

Er, really?

Belling Cat's report from November showed a BUK in the Shnizhne region but that BUK was filmed in the afternoon, and south and moving further south of Shnizhne. A month or so later RTL Nieuws published a report into a photograph of a plume of smoke. A NATO missile expert said the plume was from a missile. Using geolocation a possible launch site was identified 5 Km south of Shnizhne. Now, all Belling Cat's work before Christmas indicated that MH17 was shot down from south of Shnizhne. This is why Belling Cat were ecstatic with the RTL Nieuws report which they 'proved' that MH17 was shot down from south of Shnizhne.

Yet here is Higgins proclaiming the Corrctiv report even though it says, using 'eyewitness' statements (from unidentified persons), that MH17 was shot down from a field 3 KM north of Shnizhne, not 5 Km south of Shnizhne!!

So how could BUK identified by Belling Cat as south and moving further south of Shnizhne and assumed to have shot down MH17 from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne get to a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne in broad daylight and nobody photographed it?

And it gets worse, because the two proposed fields do not lie on the line of sight in the photograph analysed by RTL Nieuws!!

So at least one of the reports, RTL Nieuws or Colectiv/Der Spiegel, is false.

But how could geolocation expert Higgins miss this?

Well, as I proved the other day, Higgins 'analysed' a video overlaying Russian radar data for MH17 and the flight path of MH17 as provided by the Dutch, i.e. NATO, investigation team. After intense analysis of that video Higgins said the Russian radar data was wrong. But the problem is the Russians were right!!!!! The Dutch, i.e. NATO, investigation team report of September contained text of the communications between MH17 and ATC which proved that the Russian radar data was right, that MH17 took a left and then right turn. But for whatever reason whoever produced the image of the flight path for the Dutch, i.e. NATO, investigation team report did not include the left and right turn that the report and the Russian radar data include.

But all this has escaped NATO's favourite propagandist and go-to weapons expert, Higgins.

But another tweet that popped up was this from the Ukraine Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

You've gotta laugh at Ukraine otherwise you'd cry.

You may recall that shortly after MH17 was shot down the Ukraine Security Service released tapes of alleged intercepted phone calls which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks shot down MH17 from Chernukino, not Shnizhne.

Yet here is the Ukraine MFA pushing the Collectiv/Der Spiegel reports which suggest a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne.

First there is a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup to kick out Yanukovich and drag Ukraine into the NATO/EU/IMF sphere of influence. The neo-Nazis then burn people alive in Odessa, reminiscent of Nazi Germany. Then MH17 is shot down and the following happens:
1. The Ukraine Security Service release tapes which they say proves 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17;
2. they also release a video of a BUK in Luhansk, but the actual location was traced to a suburb several Kms west of Luhansk centre, and they say the video was shot at dawn on 18th July;
3. Belling Cat release a report in November which they say proves that MH17 was shot down south of Shnizhne by a BUK from Russia;
4. RTL Nieuws then publish a report of analysis into a photograph of a plume of smoke, and using Belling Cat's tool of geolocation identify a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne as the launch site, which is proclaimed as the gospel truth by Belling Cat and everyone else on the NATO side;
5. but then Collectiv and Der Spiegel publish parallel reports which identify a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne as the launch site which is also proclaimed the gospel truth. But these latest reports contain several contradictions to previous reports and other evidence:
(a) the BUK filmed in Luhansk was initially said by the Ukraine Security Service to have been filmed at dawn on 18th July. But I questioned why a BUK from Shnizhne would be in a west suburb of Luhansk. Collectiv have got around this by saying the BUK was actually filmed on the N21. But the N21 does not run through west Luhansk!! Another contradiction is the time the video was shot. The Ukraine Security Service said that all BUKs were back in Russia by 0400 on 18th July. I questioned that the light in the video suggests the video was shot at about 0500, which would contradict the Ukraine Security Service statement that all BUKs were back in Russia by 0400. But the Collectiv and Der Spiegel reports have got around this by at first saying that the video was filmed in the evening of 17th July, and then a few days later saying the late afternoon of 17th July.
(b) the RTL Nieuws report 'proved' that MH17 was shot down from 5 Km south of Shnizhne. This was 'proved' by geolocation showing that a field with a curious burnt patch and a mysterious piece of plastic found by Roland Oliphant lay on the line of sight of the plume in the photograph. But both the two fields identified by RTL Nieuws and Collectiv/Der Spiegel do not, repeat, not lie on that line of sight!!

All this and more has escaped Belling Cat.

So who is right?
1. the Ukraine Security Service who say 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks shot down MH17 from Chernukino;
2. RTL Nieuws who say 5 Km south of Shnizhne (which Belling Cat agreed with because it backed up their November report);
3. Collectiv and Der Speigel who through anonymous 'eyewitness' statements say a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne (which somehow Belling Cat also agree with even though it contradicts their November report through location of launch site and several other aspects);
4. none of the above.

But the above tweet from the Ukraine MFA suggests that not even the Ukraine MFA trusts its own Ukraine Security Service!

So why should we?

Now forgive me for asking, but is a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne the same as a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne? The bleedin' obvious answer is no. So with so many contradictions and unless that BUK identified by Belling Cat somehow travelled from south Shnizhne to north Shnizhne then how can anyone, Belling Cat included, say with their hands on their hearts that they firmly believe that a BUK provided by Russia shot down MH17?

It appears that as long as a report blames Russia it doesn't matter. It can be a glossy well-produced multi-media show, or a simple PDF using coloured squiggly lines drawn on by the authors. It doesn't matter. As long as it blames Russia and ignores Ukraine's BUKs and ignores Ukraine's military aircraft then proclaim it as the gospel truth on MH17, even though it contradicts everything that was previously proclaimed as the gospel truth and ignores other evidence such as the presence of military aircraft close to MH17.

But all these conflicting conspiracy theories could be destroyed if the USA released their data from 'sensors' which they say the have and which they say proves that MH17 was shot down from Shnizhne, and the Ukraine military could open up its log books for scrutiny of all military flights on 17th July.

But for whatever reason they have not.

The plain and simple truth about Ukraine is this:
NATO has wanted Ukraine as a member for decades, so NATO runs a coup using violent neo-Nazis. Miraculously a plane is shot down over East Ukraine that gives the Netherlands (a founding member of NATO) control over the investigation. Immediately Russia and/or separatists are accused of shooting down MH17 with a BUK. However, even though Ukraine has BUKs and is also a member of the investigation team and stands to benefit from accusing Russia and the separatists, Ukraine's BUKs are not investigated. And when any report is published that blames Russia is published it is proclaimed as the gospel truth, even if it contradicts everything that was said before. As long as it looks and sounds good and blames Russia then it is 'good'. Never mind the bias and the contradictions.

The USA has not released its secret data. Ukraine has not opened its log books of military flights on 17th July. And any report blaming Russia is proclaimed the truth even though they all contradict themselves and ignores other evidence, e.g. eyewitnesses seeing military jets close to MH17 when it was shot down.

And now the Ukraine Ministry of Foreign Affairs doesn't trust the Ukraine Security Service which is handling evidence from MH17!!

The fix is in.

The team investigating MH17 is being led by a founding member of NATO which has coveted Ukraine as a member for decades so they are not going to let this chance go to waste. And one of the possible suspects, Ukraine, who stands to benefit from accusing Russia and the separatists, has BUks but they are not being investigated, and has fighter jets which were seen by eyewitnesses who say so on tape (in contrast to Collectiv's 'witnesses') and the Ukraine military is not being investigated either.

I also question the probability that of all the planes that flew over Ukraine that day that the one that was shot down would lead to such a biased investigation essentially controlled by NATO and their wannabe Ukraine?

I repeat: the fix is in.

Thursday, January 15, 2015


I believe so.

Higgins made a name for himself as Brown Moses, an unemployed man from Leicester, who somehow became a weapons expert from analysing photographs and videos. For NATO media he became the go-to man because using photographs he could beguile and dazzle a sleepwalking public into believing that President Assad of Syria would kill hundreds if not thousands of his own people at Ghouta and thus give NATO and their allies the perfect casus belli to bomb the shit out of Syria and oust him as per the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years revealed to General Wesley Clark.

Last July 2014 MH17 was shot down over East Ukraine. Immediately NATO media accused Ukraine separatists, some elements going so far as to accuse Russia and even Putin himself. Higgins is part of the latter camp. The USA says that it has data from 'sensors' that shows that a BUK was fired from the Shnzihne area. But did they release the data? Er, no. Instead they released a picture of a plane flying over Donetsk being hit by a missile fired from the Shnizhne area.

Well, I'm convinced. Aren't you?! They say they have the data but won't release it, but instead release a picture!!


But there is the small matter of the Ukraine Security Service releasing tapes of alleged intercepted phone calls that they say proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino.

So who is lying? Perhaps both?

Why don't the USA release their data from 'sensors' that they have instead of allowing conspiracy theories to grow and grow and the war to rumble on and on?

Is it perhaps because they don't have it?

In November last year a project that Higgins put together, Belling Cat, published a report that they said 'proved' that MH17 was shot down by a BUK located south of Shnizhne which was provided by Russia. Using coloured squiggly lines drawn on by the authors themselves, Belling Cat attempted to link Russia with a video of a BUK with a missing missile travelling through Luhansk. I won't say when that video was filmed because we now have THREE different proposed times which Belling Cat have somehow overlooked in their quest to blame Russia: dawn of 18th July; evening of 17th July; late afternoon of 17th July. The Belling Cat report explicitly stated that they cannot verify the time that the video was filmed. However, members of the Belling Cat team, Higgins himself and Aric Toler, have stated elsewhere that the BUK that shot down MH17 was the BUK in that video.

But there are massive problems with all this.

In December 2014 RTL Nieuws published a report into a photograph of a plume of smoke that was allegedly taken immediately after MH17 was shot down. Using Higgins' beloved geolocation, a field 5 KM south of Shnizhne was located as the probable launch site. A NATO weapons expert stated that the smoke came from a missile. A day or two after 17th July Roland Oliphant had been to that field and found a piece of plastic. Upon the publication of the RTL Nieuws report, Belling Cat were ecstatic and gloating that their report of November 2014 had been verified. An investigation into Oliphant's piece of plastic was launched, perhaps with the intent of discovering if it belonged to a BUK system. But it looks like it doesn't, and that investigation has fizzled out. The RTL Nieuws report was used to further bash Russia and Putin.

But a week ago two parallel reports were published, by Correctiv and Der Spiegel, which they claim proved that MH17 was shot down by a BUK from 3 Km north, not 5 Km south, of Shnizhne. Now, this massive contradiction to the previous claims made by the Ukraine Security Service and Belling Cat was somehow overlooked as Belling Cat proclaimed these two parallel reports as 'proof'. Contradictions in times and locations were also missed by Belling Cat as they proclaimed these two reports as 'proof'.

And to add to all this, a few days Higgins suddenly showed some interest in Ukraine's BUKs and other aspects of the investigation into MH17 that Belling Cat had previously steered well clear of. One aspect of this was the Russian MoD press conference on 21st July in which Russia released radar data. I covered what Higgins did regarding this in BELLING CAT AND DUTCH MH17 INVESTIGATION TEAM ARE IN BIG TROUBLE. Higgins looked at a video which overlayed the paths of MH17 provided by the official Dutch MH17 investigation report of September 2014 and the Russian radar data. The Russian radar data showed that MH17 took a left and then right turn, while the Dutch investigation report showed a straight line. But Higgins believed the Dutch investigation report image and said the Russians were wrong. However, buried within the Dutch investigation report is some of the alleged communication between MH17 and ATC, which states that MH17 took a left and then right turn so that it was approximately 20 Nautical Miles north of its previous flight path. According to the report MH17 requested this change in path (but if the Ukraine Security Service have their hands on it for months can we trust that MH17 requested this or is it legitimate to ask if MH17 was ordered to change course?). But Higgins said the Russian radar data is wrong. BUT IT ISN'T!!

A few days ago yet another article fawning over Higgins contained an interview of Higgins himself, in which he stated :
One new tool we’ve started using recently is Meedan’s Checkdesk, which allows us to collaboratively and transparently verify content, and that’s something I’m hoping to encourage the use of among my contributors and my audience. The hope is that my audience will see the process of verification and investigation, learn from that, and participate, so they learn how verification works and become skilled investigators themselves.

[source : Watch out for Bellingcat, Columbia Journal Review,, 12th January 2015]

But what I have presented here is a total lack of journalistic integrity that approaches Orwellian propaganda.
1. not once has the integrity of the Ukraine Security Service been questioned, despite the blatant contradiction in what Belling Cat suggest and the Ukraine Security Service suggest;
2. not once has the bias of the investigation into MH17 been addressed: the Netherlands is a founding member of NATO who have wanted Ukraine as a member of NATO for decades so they are not going to waste this chance; MH17 is believed to have been shot down by a BUK yet Ukraine has BUKs; Dutch families of victims have called the investigation "completely botched"; Malaysia, to whom MH17 belonged, was not allowed to participate in the investigation, and when after public pressure it was allowed, but only as a junior member, yet anther Malaysian plane drops out of the sky.
3. when RTL Nieuws publish a report into a photograph into a plume of smoke allegedly taken immediately after MH17 was shot down, which places the launch site of that missile as a field 5 KM south of Shnizhne, Belling Cat gloat and gloat that their case is proven;
4. yet when Correctiv and Der Spiegel publish parallel reports citing 'eyewitness' testimony which places the launch site as 3 Km north of Shnizhne, and in a field that does not lie on the line of sight provided by the photograph in the RTL Niews report, Belling Cat proclaim these two parallel reports as the truth also!! And in these Correctiv and Der Spiegel reports lie several other contradictions, such as the time and location that the video of a BUK with a missing missile was filmed. The Ukraine Security Service said it was filmed at dawn on 18th July in Luhansk. The actual location was traced to a suburb several Kms west of Luhansk centre. But Correctiv and Der Spiegel state that the video was filmed at either late afternoon or evening of 17th July, and on the N21 which does not run through west Luhansk but travels straight through the centre of Luhansk and continues north!

The Russian radar data is crucial. The communications between MH17 and ATC were confiscated by the Ukraine Security Service so they could have done anything to those communications. But the Russian radar data, despite what Higgins states, agrees with what was published in the Dutch investigation report. The Russian radar data showed fighter jets close to MH17 when it was shot down. The Ukraine military says no flights were made on 17th July. But this question of the presence of Ukraine military aircraft close to MH17 when it was shot down can be answered by the Ukraine military opening its log books of all military flights on 17th July for inspection. So far it has not done so. However, several eyewitnesses state on camera that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it was shot down. Such statement worried the BBC so much that they pulled a report containing such statements! But I showed that on the question of Russian radar data, it can be trusted, yet Higgins says that it cannot.

1. why doesn't the USA release its data from 'sensors' to show where the missile was launched?
2. why doesn't the Ukraine military open its log books of flights on 17th July for inspection:
3. why does NATO instead rely on an untrustworthy Belling Cat team to push the Russia-shot-down-MH17 meme?

With his unchecked and biased allegations, as I have pointed out above, Higgins is providing NATO with the kind of information that can be used to convince a sleepwalking public to support NATO's expansion into Ukraine, thus driving us all closer to WW3.