Thursday, September 30, 2010


We are told that Pakistanis support the CIA drone attacks inside Pakistan against alleged terrorist training camps.

So why was there such a mass protest and strike against them today?

Apparently shops, markets and bazaars shut down as part of a mass strike as a protest against the CIA unmanned drone attacks.

One of the main organisers of the strike told AFP,
“They are attacking civilians, they are killing women, children and old-age people,”

And we scratch our heads and wonder why there is an endless supply of Jihadis wanting to come over here and blow us up!

What would you do if Pakistan was sending unmanned drones attacking alleged training camps in rural Hertfordshire and blowing up farms and cottages?


Pakistani tribesmen protest against US drone strikes

MIRANSHAH: Tribesmen in Pakistan's most notorious militant stronghold observed a shut-down Thursday to protest against a major surge in US drone attacks, witnesses and elders said.

“We are protesting against the drone attacks. Americans are killing innocent civilians but the government has completely failed to protect us,”Malik Jalal, a tribal elder and one of the strike organisers told AFP.

Shops, markets and bazaars closed in the four main towns of North Waziristan on Thursday, including the district capital Miranshah, an AFP reporter said.

Pakistani officials have reported that at least 21 US drone attacks have killed around 120 people in September, the highest monthly tally of attacks.

The overwhelming majority of the attacks have been carried out in North Waziristan, considered Pakistan's most notorious bastion of Al-Qaeda-linked and Taliban commanders opposed to the US-led war in Afghanistan.

Most of the strikes have targeted the Haqqani network, one of the strongest US foes in Afghanistan whose leadership is based in North Waziristan.

But local tribesmen claimed the US missiles were killing civilians.

“They are attacking civilians, they are killing women, children and old-age people,” Jalal told AFP.

“The government should take immediate steps to stop drone attacks otherwise it should resign,” said former lawmaker Maulana Mohammad Deendar.

Washington has classified Pakistan's tribal belt on the Afghan border as a global headquarters of Al-Qaeda and the most dangerous place on Earth.

A covert US drone war in Pakistan has killed around 1,140 people in about 140 strikes since August 2008, including a number of senior militants, but the attacks fuel anti-American sentiment in the conservative Muslim country.

Under US pressure to crack down on Islamist havens, Pakistan has stepped up military operations against largely homegrown militants in the area.

But commanders have so far avoided a major offensive in North Waziristan, arguing that gains elsewhere need to be consolidated to prevent their troops from being stretched too thin.

©2010 DAWN Media Group. All rights reserved.


Why is so much information being leaked by unauthorised persons about this alleged plot to blow up Europe?

Today in Pakistan yet another unauthorised person speaking under anonimity has told us something of the alleged terrorist plot and the team assigned to monitor it[1].

Eight Germans and two British brothers are at the heart of an al-Qaida-linked terror plot against European cities, but the plan is still in its early stages, with the suspects calling acquaintances in Europe to plan logistics, a Pakistani intelligence official said Thursday. One of the Britons died in a recent CIA missile strike, he said.

...Pakistan, Britain and Germany are tracking the suspects and intercepting their phone calls, the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information to the media.

The official is part of an intelligence team that has been tracking the two British brothers of Pakistani origin for nearly a year and the Germans for more than six months.

Although he characterized the plot as immature, the Pakistani official warned against underestimating the suspects, whom he said have backing from al-Qaida, the Pakistani Taliban and the Afghan Taliban, all groups that are separate yet interconnected.

...The U.S. has dramatically stepped up its missile attacks in North Waziristan, and is believed to have launched at least 21 this month. The official said a Sept. 8 strike killed one of the Britons, whom he identified as Abdul Jabbar, originally from Pakistan's Jhelum district. Jabbar was believed to be less than 30 years old.

So who is this Abdul Jabbar?

And why is this particular intelligence operation being compromised so much?

And why now?

[1] Official: Germans, Brits behind Europe terror plot,;_ylt=AvGAp7mnqhS9byp_Bqbs7MPuOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTMyYmtiYWc3BGFzc2V0Ay9zL2FwL2V1cm9wZV90ZXJyb3JfdGhyZWF0BGNjb2RlA21wX2VjXzhfMTAEY3BvcwM2BHBvcwM2BHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDb2ZmaWNpYWxnZXJt

Wednesday, September 29, 2010


Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are in China to meet the wealthy Chinese elite to persuade them to donate more of their fortunes to 'philanthropy', which translates from Bilderbergese into 'population control and genocide'.


US billionaires host banquet for China's wealthiest
By Michael Bristow BBC News, Beijing

US billionaires Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are to host a dinner in Beijing for some of China's richest people.

The pair say they are in China to learn about philanthropy in the country. Many suspect they want to persuade their guests to give more to charity.

The two men have already convinced a number of extremely wealthy Americans to give away half their fortunes.


I was waiting for some trouble yesterday. It never appeared. Instead I was told by every single media outlet I read and saw (which is very important) that Israel had peacefully boarded the Irene, bound for Gaza with aid and toys, and the passengers had bowed down before their new Gods, the Israeli Defence Force.

But look here.


I suppose we should be grateful that nobody was executed gangland-style with a cheeky bullet to the head at point blank range.

Just how and why does Israel seem to get its message across so quickly and with such synchronicity?

And what a use of resources. Ten warships tracked and boarded a small unarmed boat carrying toys for Gaza. Way to go, guys!


'Israel's Gaza boat takeover violent'

Passengers onboard a Jewish aid boat, which was intercepted by Israeli warships en route to the Gaza Strip, refute Israel's claims of non-violent takeover.

On Tuesday, around 10 Israeli warships surrounded the aid vessel Irene nearly 20 miles (32 kilometers) off the Gaza coast, forcefully diverting it to the Israeli port of Ashdod.

Following the incident, Israeli army officials insisted that the takeover was carried out without any use of force, but the civilian activists onboard the vessel begged to differ.

"There are no words to describe what we went through," Israel's Ynet news website quoted passenger Yonatan Shapira as saying.

Shapira was one of the five Israelis aboard the Gaza-bound boat, who was interrogated by the Ashdod police before being released a day later.

A former Israel Air Force pilot, Shapira, said Israeli soldiers had resorted to violence while taking over the boat.

The Israeli army spokesperson "is trying to paint a picture as though the takeover was not violent, but the soldiers' actions were violent and disgusting," protested Shapira, charging he had been tasered by a soldier.

The 82-year-old Holocaust survivor Reuven Moskowitz, who was also aboard the vessel, backed Shapira's claim.

"We are people who came with a message of peace and we did not anticipate a burst of violence against us, but the officers acted violently," he said.


© Copyright 2010 Press TV. All rights reserved.


The Washington Post[1] is reporting that the plot to blow up Europe is
"credible but not specific" enough to allow authorities to anticipate precisely where or when a strike might occur.

But The Daily Telegraph[2] is reporting that the plot
was in the final stages of its preparations for co-ordinated attacks, thought to be on the capital cities of Britain, France and Germany.

And The Daily Mail[3] is reporting that
Intelligence sources said the plot was in the ‘advanced but not in the imminent stages’ and the plotters had been tracked by spy agencies for some time.

And again, in all media reports now emerging, this alleged plot is being used to explain the massive increase in drone attacks inside sovereign Pakistan, which have tripled under Soetoro. Such drone attacks are being called "pre-emptive". Photos of drones are provided. The reader is left with the message that unmanned drone strikes on Pakistan civilians are good for you.

And again, no mention of CIA agent David Headley.

And again, the threat level is not being raised.

And again, no arrests are apparently now possible.

And again, that's handy.

Ask yourself this, why would such an intelligence operation be blown wide open and leaked to the media so that no arrests can be made?

Remember, the alleged perps have not been arrested and are still out there, allegedly plotting and conspiring to blow you up.

The result of this story is that
1. you have been terrified about threats to be killed by Islamic terrorists,
2. the intelligence agencies (who created the terrorists in the first place decades ago) have saved the day,
3. and they've done that by invading sovereign Pakistani airspace and blowing up unnamed "suspected militants", ie Pakistani civilians, in "pre-emptive" strikes.

Or am I being too cynical and untrusting (after they engineered 9/11 and subsequently invaded Iraq telling us they knew where the WMD were)?

When they make arrests of the alleged perps instead of shooting up "suspected militants" then I'll believe them.

Until then I'll assume they are deliberately killing Pakistan and Afghan civilians to create a steady source of vengeful civilians to fuel the Jihad. After all, they need a reason to stay there to protect the opium trade, even helping to protect the Taliban's opium crop for them, calling it "toleration"! Before 9/11 the Afghan opium crop was virtually nil. Now the US military is actually protecting record opium harvests! Do the maths!

[1] CIA steps up drone attacks in Pakistan amid fear of al-Qaeda terror in Europe,

[2] Terror plot against Britain thwarted by drone strike,

[3] 'Mumbai-style' Al Qaeda terror attacks planned on UK, France and Germany are uncovered,


In July this year Wikileaks released tens of thousands of alleged documents relating to the war in Afghanistan, which implied that Pakistan and Iran have been supporting the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, and that Osama bin Laden is alive and well. This leak was made with three major establishment media organisations, The New York Times, The Guardian and Der Spiegel, and with the nod from The White House. Osama bin Laden had been absent from our media for years, but the 'leaks' gave the Mockingbird media the reason to publish his photo on their front pages. These leaks also came at an opportune time for the Pentagoons, who were struggling to get tens of billions of dollars from Congress to continue the war in Afghanistan. Within days of the leaks The Pentagoons got $40 billion to continue invading sovereign Pakistan and shooting up Pakistani civilians, or "suspected militants" as The Pentagoons call them, which acts as a recruiting sergeant thus driving many more Pakistanis to join the Jihad against the infidel invaders, and thus continuing the war over there and creating more terror threats over here so we give up our freedoms.

Now there have been several resignations from Wikileaks due to the procedure that its founder Julian Assange has taken to release even more documents on 18th October, this time related to Iraq. The reason being given for the resignations is that not enough time is being given to redact the names of US collaborators and informants in Iraq. The proposed leaks next month are being released this time in collaboration with TV stations, and the production of documentaries.

One of the allegations made against Wikileaks in July by The White House and The Pentagon and others was that the release of the documents relating to Afghanistan risked national security. This raised the fears that access to the internet was going to be restricted.

The Afghan documents numbered approximately 70000.

The Iraqi documents number 500000!

And they are being released in collaboration with TV stations and many more newspaper media.

This rush to 'leak' these documents on such a lrage scale with the names of so many collaborators and informers for all to see will give The White House and The Pentagon even more ammo to clamp down on the internet, citing "national security".

Wikileaks should leak the documents, but on its own, without the aid of Mockingbird media who can use the data for their own purpose as they did in July, and with the names of all collaborators and informers redacted. If this means a delay then so what. They don't have to be leaked all at once. They can easily be released in batches, causing very little or no threat to security.

ps Assange appears to be on a power trip. He told one former employee who accused Assange of being an "emperor",
I am the heart and soul of this organization, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original coder, organizer, financier and all the rest, if you have a problem with me, piss off.



Unpublished Iraq War Logs Trigger Internal WikiLeaks Revolt

A domino chain of resignations at the secret-spilling site WikiLeaks followed a unilateral decision by autocratic founder Julian Assange to schedule an October release of 392,000 classified U.S. documents from the war in Iraq, according to former WikiLeaks staffers.

Key members of WikiLeaks were angered to learn last month that Assange had secretly provided media outlets with embargoed access to the vast database, under an arrangement similar to the one WikiLeaks made with three newspapers that released documents from the Afghanistan war in July. WikiLeaks is set to release the Iraq trove on Oct. 18, according to ex-staffers — far too early, in the view of some of them, to properly redact the names of U.S. collaborators and informants in Iraq.

Read More


Mainstream news media is today reporting that a new terror plot to blow up Europe has been thwarted. However, very little detail is provided.

Reports in The Guardian[1] and The Independent[2] refer to the attack on Mumbai in 2008, and we are told that plots to execute similar attacks on targets in Great Britain, France and Germany have been foiled. Allegedly many people would have been held hostage and killed. The terror threat has not been raised.

However, The Guardian and The Independent do not report that the Mumbai attack was coordinated by the CIA agent David Headley!

The BBC's Security Correspondent Frank Gardner was on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning and he said the security agencies would probably have been following the plots until they could catch the perps red-handed. But for whatever reason the plots have been leaked to the US media and now there is no evidence to prosecute anyone relating to these alleged plots. Well, that's handy!

But what the reports such as those in The Guardian and The Independent refer to are US drone attacks in Pakistan, implying that such raids are good.

So, forgive my cynicism but, because the drone attacks are killing many Pakistan civilians, who NATO call "suspected militants"[3], this story has been either conjured up and does not exist, or has been leaked to the press with positive spin, to support yet more NATO drone and gunship attacks inside the sovereign borders of Pakistan to kill many more "suspected militants".

But what if there is an operation to kill Pakistan civilians, but label the civilians as "suspected militants" in the NATO/Mockingbird press, so that many more Pakistanis are driven into the arms of Islamic terrorism, thus fuelling the war leading to the Pentagoons being given many more billions for total relentless death?

Why are the US military helping the Taliban with their opium?

[1]'Mumbai-style' terror attack on UK, France and Germany foiled,

[2]'Mumbai-style terror plot' against UK uncovered,

[3]Pakistan under Attack: Now NATO gunships,

Tuesday, September 28, 2010


As was suspected a United Nations fact-finding mission has found that Furkan Dogan, the US citizen who died during the Israeli raid on the Mavi Marmara, was killed at point blank range in a way that could be described as an "extra-legal, arbitrary and summary execution".

Dogan had been shot in the leg and was lying on his back when he was executed, shot point blank in the head.

The IDF are warmongering psychowarriors.

Dogan was a toymonger, taking toys to Gaza.

Dogan was a US citizen.

Dogan is expendable to Soetoro in his lust to please and gratify Nutternyahu.

What will Soetoro do now, after Nutternyahu gave him the finger over restarting building settlements, a gesture likely to bring an end to peace talks?

Imagine if the Iranian Revolutionary Guard had executed Dogan?


UN Fact-Finding Mission Says Israelis "Executed" US Citizen Furkan Dogan

Monday 27 September 2010

by: Gareth Porter, t r u t h o u t | Report

Furkan Dogan, a 19-year-old US citizen of Turkish descent, was aboard the Mavi Marmara when he was killed by Israeli commandos.

The report of the fact-finding mission of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on the Israeli attack on the Gaza flotilla released last week shows conclusively, for the first time, that US citizen Furkan Dogan and five Turkish citizens were murdered execution-style by Israeli commandos.


Does Nutternyahu know for a fact that he can do anything to Obama?

Remember that video of Nutternyahu from 2001 bragging about controlling the USA? What was it he said?
America is a thing that can be easily moved, moved in the right direction. They will not bother us.

Just after the 11th September attacks Nutternyahu went live on TV and said about the attacks,
It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.

Several years later and Netanyahu was very happy about the events following 9/11. He said the following at Bar Ilan university,
We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq

He also added that the attacks "swung American public opinion in our favour".

This is exactly what the Zionazis who wrote the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses dreamed of, a "new Pearl Harbor", so they could go on the rampage in the Middle East with strong support from the ZioUSA.

Israel would not survive without the financial and military assistance it gets from the USA. So how can Nutternyahu continue building settlements when
1. the USA asked Nutternyahu to stop them
2. the PA has threatened to leave the peace talks if the building of settlements continues

He even tried to blackmail Soetoro asking for the release of Jonathan Pollard!

Nutternyahu asked the settlers to keep a low profile. Instead Israeli media is celebrating that the building has restarted, showing pictures of concrete being poured into new foundations. And more Palestinians are being kicked out of their homes and off their land to make way for yet more settlements.

So, who controls whom?

Does this finger explain why the dancing Israelis were so jubilant as they recorded the event on September 11th 2001?

Does this finger explain why most of the United Nations remained seated and even applauded Ahmedinejad last week, while the USA and others walked out?

Indeed it does.

Israel didn't do 9/11 on its own, but it was involved. Not everyone in Israel knew, but some did. Some right at the very top. That's why they sent the dancing Israelis to record the event.


Over the last few years, as the UK-USA-Israel Axis-of-Evil have tried to implement their A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda after they engineered the "new Pearl Harbor" of 9/11 that they so desperately wanted and needed, there have been several provocations of Iran. I think the main one was in 2007 when the UK sent Marines into disputed waters to spy on Iran. Iran captured the spies and held them for weeks, threatening trial and imprisonment, but then released them as a gesture of goodwill at Easter. Iran won that one.

But this latest provocation really takes the limeade.

Iran has been humiliated by the Stuxnet assault, and it comes just after Iran used its opportunity at the United Nations to raise the huge question of who was really behind September 11th 2001.

But what worries me is that this year in particular members of the Iranian government and military have been boasting of the response from Iran if it was attacked, going so far as to show the mass graves being dug for the potential invaders.

Well, Iran has been attacked. Not militarily, but still attacked.

Iran may retaliate. It may not.

The retaliation, false-flag or not, may be military, asymmetric or cyber, any of which will please The Pentagoons.

But we may well soon see the first false-flag cyber attack, to be blamed on Iran, to clamp down on the internet, if not shut down the internet altogether.


Could Iran retaliate for apparent cyber attack?

Security experts believe Tehran will be reeling from effects of Stuxnet computer worm for a while, but warn it may try to strike back and 'set in motion a deadly game that catalyses a nuclear program'

Published: 09.27.10, 22:08 / Israel News

Iran has limited capacity to retaliate in kind to an apparent cyber attack that infected computers at its sole nuclear power plant, analysts say, but some worry it could seek to hit back by other means.

Security experts say they believe the release of the Stuxnet computer worm may have been a state-backed attack on Iran's nuclear program, most likely originating in the United States or Israel. But they say the truth may never be known.

Cyber Attack

Tehran officials say Stuxnet computer virus infected 30,000 computers in Islamic Republic. Computer experts estimate worm originates from US, Israel, UK France or Germany

Little information is available on how much damage, if any, Iran's nuclear and wider infrastructure has suffered from Stuxnet -- and Tehran will probably never share the full details. Officials said on Sunday the worm had hit staff computers at the Bushehr nuclear power plant but had not affected major systems there.

Some analysts believe Iran may be suffering wider sabotage aimed at slowing down its nuclear ambitions, and point to unexplained technical problems that have cut the number of working centrifuges in its uranium enrichment program.

In the short term, intelligence experts believe Tehran's priority will be trying to identify the source of the attack and examining how the worm was uploaded onto its systems. "The Iranian internal security and counterintelligence departments will need to nail down the culprits first, then work out how to turn the tables," said Fred Burton, a former US counterintelligence expert who is now vice president of political risk consultancy Stratfor.

Deniable response

But finding reliable evidence identifying which country or group was responsible might well prove impossible, increasing the probability of a more unofficial and deniable reaction.

Some analysts suggest Iran might like to retaliate with a cyber attack against Israel or the West – although there are question marks over its capability to do so.

"I don't think we can expect much in the way of retaliatory cyber attacks," said regional analyst Jessica Ashooh. "The Iranians simply don't have the technical capacity to do anything similar to properly protected systems – as evidenced by the very hard time they are having controlling and quarantining this attack."

Nevertheless, experts say Iran has made improving its cyber espionage capability a priority – and will probably aim to grow these resources further in the years to come.

The risk, some worry, is that Iran might be tempted to either intensify its own nuclear program or target the West's own nuclear installations in return.

"How prepared are we all for this and could this set in motion a deadly game that catalyses a nuclear program no one intended to engage in?" said Mark Fitt, managing director of N49 Intelligence, a firm that advises businesses in the Middle East.

In terms of a more conventional response, Iran could potentially act through proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, as well as insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"They can... use networks in Afghanistan and the Gulf to strike back using unconventional `stealth tactics' and asymmetric methods," said Fitt.

Whatever happens, analysts say the Stuxnet attack is an early insight into the form state conflict may take in the 21st century.

"It's by no means a one-off – I think we'll see much more of this," said Ian Bremmer, president of political risk consultancy Eurasia Group.

Copyright © Yedioth Internet. All rights reserved.

Monday, September 27, 2010


The Cairngorms were under snow today.

And two Scottish weather stations recorded record lows: Tulloch Bridge recorded a temperature of -4.2°C, and Tyndrum -4.4°C – the coldest temperatures recorded since the two stations opened in 1982 and 1990 respectively.

Read more:

Remember last winter when we were under snow and ice for months, an amazing meteorological event that was not predicted by the super scientists with their vast supercomputers at the corrupt Meteorological Office? The experts casually and arrogantly brushed off the troublesome ice and snow and said that global warming would mean global cooling.

Well, it looks like they were right!

War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
Global warming is global cooling.
etc etc etc ad nauseum.


The current financial crisis has forced the Chancellor of the Exchequer to create a commission, called the Independent Commission on Banking. It has been asked to "consider structural and related non-structural reforms to the UK banking sector to promote financial stability and competition".

Hmm. OK.

But who are the 'independent' members of this commission?

Well, first of all, the Chancellor of the Exchequer who ordered the commission is George Osborne, acquaintance of the Rothschilds, Oxford/Bullingdon Boy, and fast becoming a regular at Bilderberg.

The members of the committee are
Sir John Vickers
Clare Spottiswoode
Martin Taylor
Bill Winters
Martin Wolf

Taylor was a regular at Bilderberg while at Barclays.
Wolf represents the FT at Bilderberg if his stooge Rachman doesn't go.
Winters was instrumental at JP Morgan for driving the derivative boom. I am reading about Winters in Gillian Tett's Fool's Gold. If we are to blame just one person for the current crisis then Winters is a strong candidate.

I am currently not that concerned about Vickers or Spottiswoode, but with the above three amigos, Taylor, Winters and Wolf, the Independent Commission on Banking is not that independent.

But what the hell! I'm writing to them anyway!

Sunday, September 26, 2010


"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws."

This (or something very very similar) was said by the Rothschild who helped to create the Illuminati. It sums up the greed of the banker class. It oozes evil, displaying complete contempt for the ordinary law-abiding man and woman.

This power to create money out of nothing should not be in private hands. We have seen how it can be abused in the last few years. A massive credit bubble was inflated, money created out of nothing was loaned to jobless no-hopers, those inevitably unpayable debts were then fraudulently classed as AAA, mixed up with other "good" debts and sold on in bundles. But nobody knew who owed what to whom, so when the debts were not repaid one of "their" banks and a big name on Wall Street, Lehman Bros, was allowed to go under and bought up by another of "their" banks, Barclays. The panic caused by Lehman Bros caused the crisis. Banks stopped lending. But "they" were alright Jack because "they" had "their" men in charge of the bailouts. "They" got hundreds of billions and gobbled up struggling competitors, or merged with some of "their" other banks (Santander bought retail RBS, JP Morgan bought investment RBS). All this was agreed at Bilderberg, behind closed doors at an exclusive 5 star hotel.

This power to create money out of nothing should not be in private hands.

Make that the hot topic for the Independent Commission on Banking.


The Independent Commission on Banking does not want the most important issue to be raised. That issue is control over the money supply. The issues report the ICB released briefly describes how banks create money out of nothing, in Annex 1 Paragraph 6. But what it does not provide are quotes from the Rothschilds about control of the money supply. And what it also omits is how the Rothschilds have been able to gang up with other ruthless greedy bankers and screw the British public through the Inter Alpha Group and Bilderberg.

If you want these people to keep that power and not care who makes the laws and takeover the world to implement their human population reduction, eugenics and microchip agenda then just sit on your arse and do nothing.

But if you want your children and grandchildren to grow up in a much fairer world then you must put this most important issue of money supply up for debate. The ICB must realise just how placing the money supply in the hands of people who attend and cheer mock human sacrifices at Bohemian Grove will affect not just them but their children and grandchildren.

For example, Tables 1 and 2 in the IBC issues report shows the top ten investment banks. How did they get to be so powerful? Bilderberg.

Saturday, September 25, 2010


You can change the world for good.


Write to the Independent Commission on Banking, as they request in their issues paper they released on Thursday. Issues they need to investigate include, but are not restricted to, are
1. the role of the Inter Alpha Group of banks and how they use your money for their benefit,
2. the role of Bilderberg, members of Bilderberg and the role of their banks and how they use your money for their benefit.

These parasites must be exposed and stopped as soon as possible.

The issues paper is available at

Friday, September 24, 2010


The Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has caused some controversy at the UN General Assembly by speaking a lot of truth about 9/11. From what I can gather he did not spout outrageous ridiculous anti-semitic conspiracy theories, but addressed some of our key concerns about 9/11, eg pristine passports in rubble, and used the phrase "powerful and complex terrorist group" to describe the perps of 9/11. He also suggested that "The majority of the American people as well as most nations and politicians around the world agree with this view,".

The US, UK and other delegations, such as the usual suspects like major Commonwealth nations under orders from the UK, walked out.

But who stayed?

Who did not walk out?

Watch this video from CNN of the speech and the walk out. The vast majority stayed. Does this prove Ahmadinejad's statement that "most nations and politicians around the world agree with this view," that a "powerful and complex terrorist group" embedded within the top layers of US politics and military conspired to commit the terrible and murderous crimes of 9/11 for Israel and oil?

How was a man hiding in a cave and requiring kidney dialysis able to attack the most powerful military nation on earth, and even hit the most protected building on the planet, the Pentagon?

How could the most powerful military nation on earth, which spends more on its military than the rest of the world combined, not detect and intercept the hijacked planes, sending fighters from far away bases over the Atlantic instead of scrambling fighters from Andrews Air Force Baase just a few miles from the Pentagon?

How could the most powerful military nation on earth, with its vast intelligence and espionage network and infrastructure, get it so wrong on Iraq?

Why is it that what has transpired since 9/11 was more or less foretold in two controversial documents written by the same bunch of Zionazis who on 9/11 were in very influential positions, such as Vice President, Secretary of Defense etc?

Wednesday, September 22, 2010


Vince Cable used this phrase in his inglorious speech to the LibDem conference today. The spivs and gamblers he refers to are what we call bankers.

The bank was originally the place to deposit your savings. If you were paid a cheque you paid that into your account having been given it by your employer, and if you were paid cash you paid out for whatever you had or wanted to and then deposited the remainder into your bank account if you wanted to ( you may have kept it under your bed instead). You had a choice. But today your wages are paid directly into your bank account as e-money, i.e. your bank gets direct control of your money before you see a penny. And there are now proposals that before you get your e-money your employer sends all your wages to the taxman who will then deduct what they think you owe the government, and the remainder will then be sent to your bank account where the bank will deduct whatever it thinks you owe them. All this before you see a penny. And if they get it wrong? Tough. The banks and government are never wrong, they'll say. Take us to court, they'll suggest. And of course you can't take them to court, because you've got no money, because first the taxman took most of it, and then the bank took the rest. So starve to death, you worthless fool! Arbeit macht frei, they'll laugh.

But banks have also grown into casinos. Your wages are paid directly to the banks. You have no say about that, even though it is your money. You earned it. It's yours. But the banks get their grubby hands on it before you do! They used and still use your wages and savings as collateral for bets. When this gambling with your wages and savings goes right, they pay themselves massive wages and bonuses. But when this gambling with your wages and savings goes inevitably wrong, as we've seen in the last few years, they still pay themselves massive wages and bonuses, but you've had to bail them out!

So the phrase "spivs and gamblers" is very accurate.

This system we call "freedom" has to change. Cable sounds like he may be prepared to do something about it, but I'm not holding my breath. He can call the bankers spivs and gamblers as much as he wants. But unless he uses his god-given plain common sense they, the spivs and gamblers, will still be using our money for their benefit expecting us to bail them out if it goes wrong, they'll still be creating money out of nothing and using the astronomical profits to their benefit, they'll still be laughing at us for giving them such power and allowing them to do whatever they want, they'll still be selecting our political leaders under the banner of "democracy" and deciding on policies behind closed doors, and of course, still attending and cheering mock human sacrifices as they dream up more and more genocidal policies to drastically reduce human population.

We must not be dependent on mass murderers and fraudsters.

We must create our own money.

This is not revolutionary.

It is plain common sense.


Imagine, if you can after consuming your daily dose of mercury, flouride, manganese and God knows what else they put into the food and water supply to dumb you down, a system which we call "freedom".

In this system called "freedom" we are led to believe that we are free, that we have certain rights and that our government is honest and truthful and always sides with the people in the name of fairness and transparency to defend those rights.

But ask yourself this very, very, perhaps the most important, question : why did you go to work today?

Do you love your job so much that you would leave your wife and kids for ten hours or more, or would you rather take them for a nice day out in the countryside to enjoy the fresh air and autumnal colours, or to the seaside, or to a shopping mall to buy them some clothes and educational toys and books?

Most of you went to work today for money.

Most of us work for money because we have to.

But there are a handful of people who can simply create money out of nothing. They feed off your hopes and dreams. They cannot simply create money out of nothing because they want some money for a Dominos Large New Yorker Pizza. No. That would be a bit too obvious. But what they do is create a demand for more money from you, and then they provide it. But they don't have it. They never did. They simply create it out of nothing, lend it to you and you pay it back and with interest. It's that simple.

You may want a loan for a mortgage to put a roof over the heads of you and your family. You may want a loan to improve your business, to buy a larger van, to expand and improve your offices or your warehouse or your IT systems. These are just a few examples of how you can be encouraged to request a loan.

It is such a tremendous privilege, to create money for the economy.

But it has been abused. Seriously abused with tragic consequences. Health treaments and pensions are to be slashed to pay for the bank bailouts, resulting in many more deaths. But it's much worse than this, as will be detailed later.

We can create a time series of how banks have become so powerful.

At T0 Bank A has £100, but can lend out 10x so loans out £1000 at 7% so if all is repaid it has £1070. NB the borrower is led to believe that the bank has £100.
At T1 Bank A now has £1070, but can lend out 10x so loans out £10700 at 7% so if all is repaid it has £11449.

You can see how without lifting a finger (except to type the numbers for the loan into the spreadsheet in order to create the money for the loan) the bank has magically transformed £100 into over £11000 off the sweat and blood of its customers.

And of course, while its customers are toiling and concentrating on working 10 hours a day (just like you) the bank's owners and directors can just sit back, relax, have a laugh at your expense, and think about how to control you further, such as engineering world wars and terror attacks and conjuring up myths such as manmade global warming. And of course, at the end of 10 hours hard graft you are too exhausted and trusting to question what you are told and you follow their suggestions. And the banks owners, through the astronomical profits, can finance virtually anything they want. They can finance semi-secret meetings where the business men and women, the military top brass, the bankers, the royalty and the politicians can meet behind closed doors and agree to implement policies for their benefit, eg war, trillion dollar bank bailouts.

But not only that, they get to decide who gets money. They get to decide who can buy a house, who can save or improve their business, but also who is made bankrupt, jobless and homeless.

So you see, when Vince Cable, as intelligent and suspicious as he is, is extremely naive. His children are growing up in a society run by people who attend and cheer mock human cremations. His children are growing up in a society run by people who worship Mao Tse Tung who killed tens of millions of Chinese, and other genocidal dictatorships such as the Bolsheviks. His children are growing up in a society run by people who deliberately created Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, and after WW2 then recruited certain Nazis for their espionage, propaganda and scientific expertise. His children are growing up in a society run by people who want his children dead, all in the name of reducing carbon dioxide and carbon footprints!

And they can do all this because they have the power to create money out of nothing.

That power has been abused.

That power has to be taken from them, and returned to the people, who would use that power to finance vast improvements in infrastructure and social housing, and other jobs.

The banks are bankrupt. Without our bailouts they'd be bankrupt. Who needs them? We don't. They need us to bail them out. We can create our own money. We've done it before. We can do it agin.

This is not revolutionary.

It's plain common sense.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010


Picture this : one fine morning the Bohemian Grove Moloch monstrosity is found in rubble. Can you imagine any grover going on TV to express their anger at the destruction of the Bohemian Grove Moloch monstrosity?

A hypothetical interview could go something like this:
[interviewer] I have with me Mr Grover, who says he knew well and loved the statue of an owl that was so shockingly vandalised and destroyed last night and nows lies as a pile of rubble behind me. Mr Grover, how would you describe the vandals who destroyed that statue?
[Grover] There's only one word for them; Bastards! And it was more than a statue. It was a God! A God we worshipped with a mock cremation of a human. We've had many a grand night watching the flames rise up before that beautiful owl, cheering as screams of pain are played over the PA. Some of us have actually cried with joy, but also with frustration, as we imagined what a real execution would be like. I'd like to get my hands around their necks and ...
[interviewer] I'm sorry. Could you repeat that about cremations and executions?
[Grover] Sure. We have this ceremony called The Cremation of Care every summer. We would burn an effigy of a human before that great owl. It's the best!
[interviewer] You burn an effigy of a human?
[Grover] Oh yeah! You should see it, hear it, feel it. Feel the power of Satan flow into you as you wish it was a real human burning before you, for example a supermarket scumbag from Des Moines who nobody cares about. That's the whole point of it, so that we powerful men, we CEOs of global corporations, we international financiers and Presidents and Prime Ministers and military top brass, we are led to believe that we have unquestioned power, so we send you into unnecessary engineered wars for our gain while you morons just sit and take it, and actually beg for more! We love it. It's the only thing we do love, death. We hate our children, our families. All we love is death. That's why we support the environmental movement. We pretend to love the planet, but we only want death. I guess we'll have to really push that as the next religion, now that our beloved Moloch is no more. WE WANT DEATH!
[interviewer] Er, hmm, er, is that, is that how you really feel about us?
[Grover] Hell yeah! You are all excess population in peacetime, and cannon fodder in wartime. That's all you are to us. Scum. Our property. We own you. We can do whatever we want with you. Moloch led us to believe that. But now I'm not so sure. Now alot of you are breaking free.
[interviewer] Oh my God! I had some sympathy for you, thinking that some mindless vandals had destroyed a statue of an owl. But you're just sickos! I wish I'd knocked that monstrosity down myself with my bare hands. You fucking weirdos! You total psychos! I'm calling 911. You lot need to be locked up immediately!
[Grover] I don't think so. (Grover then drags the interviewer into the woods, knocks him out and sets him on fire. Grover is found a few hours later with blood dripping from his mouth as he tries to bite the head off a live red squirrel.)

Monday, September 20, 2010


Just as Bilderberg met earlier this year and gave a green light for an attack on Iran, the Israeli news source Debkafile reported that Osama bin Laden was alive and well and living it up in Iran. Of course, that allegation has sunk like a lead fish.

But now that there appears to be an open and gathering coalition in Lebanon, gaining in strength against Israel, involving the Lebanese PM Hariri, Hezbollah, Syria and Iran (and you could probably throw Russia in there too after its sale of Russian cruise missiles to Syria which has significantly annoyed Israel), Debkafile is now reporting that last weekend Iran and Syria agreed to mount a coup against the Hariri government.

It's so pathetic.



Debkafile: Ahmadinejad, Assad Agreed to Back Hizbullah 'Coup'

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his Syrian counterpart Bashar Assad have agreed to back Hizbullah's alleged coup against the Hariri government, Israel's debkafile reported.

It said the two leaders struck the deal during Ahmadinejad's brief stopover in Damascus on Saturday on his way to New York.

Ahmadinejad and Assad also agreed that Israel would not intervene "to save Beirut from Hizbullah domination," debkafile said.

Saturday, September 18, 2010


That monstrosity of an owl at Bohemian Grove needs working on, knocking down, perhaps blowing up in the dead of night while nobody is around.

Begone, detested Moloch!


Now that Bilderberg has been busted, perhaps attention now needs to focus on that Moloch monstrosity. Exposing Bilderberg for the globalist manipulators they are is all well and good. But they need exposing as quasi-Satanists too. For when the people realise that they are led by satanists which explains all the paedophilia and voilence in the world then I'm very sure that that will be The End.

The globalists are now in full panic mode telling us that we need a world government and that they are the chosen ones to run the world. World government may well be acceptable to some, just enough to weaken the resistance enough. They need to be exposed for the satanists they really are!

A world government run by satanists? Now that is and would be unaccpetable to almost everyone.

Begone, detested Moloch!


Friday, September 17, 2010


You may think that the small country of Lebanon north of Israel has little to do with you over here in the UK or in the USA or in Europe. If you do then you are so wrong. A war between elements within Lebanon and Israel would be a backdoor to war with Iran.

Lebanon was seriously destabilised in 2005 with the assassination of Rafik Hariri, leading to a corrupt investigation called The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL). The STL accused several pro-Syrian Lebanese military officers and had them detained for several years without charge. Nevertheless this accusation of Syria's involvement led to Syria withdrawing from Lebanon without too much public protest and violence. This withdrawal of Syria is part of the strategy laid out in black and white in the section Securing the Northern Border of the A Clean Break document written for Benjamin Netanyhau in 1996. The same group of Zionazis were influential in the USA, particularly on and after 9/11. Indeed, on 9/11 Netanyahu,live on TV, said the attacks on the Twin Towers would be good for Israel.

But now the same STL is about to accuse Hezbollah of killing Hariri. Hezbollah denies the allegation, which prompted Hezbollah to hold a press conference last month to implicate Israel, showing video secretly captured from Israel's spy planes and drones as they flew over Lebanon, and detailed the presence of Israeli Air Force planes over Beirut on the day of Hariri's assassination. Since that conference Hariri's son, the current PM of Lebanon, has publicly stated that he now believes that Syria is innocent of all charges of its involvement in his father's assassination, and that if Hezbollah is accused by the STL then it was not Hezbollah itself but rogue agents within Hezbollah, possibly working for Israel. This is a diplomatic and roundabout way of accusing Israel, for if it was not Syria or Hezbollah, and with the known history of Israeli operations in Lebanon (as detailed by Hezbollah in the aformentioned press conference), then who else could it be?

But the allegation that Hezbollah killed Hariri is potentially more dangerous, in that it could drive the Lebanese public to turn on Hezbollah, who in turn could begin to attack Israel for making false allegations. Even if Lebanon does not turn Hezbollah, Hezbollah could be provoked into some form retaliation over the accusations from the corrupt STL. And if Hezbollah fires the first shot then Israel has the moral high ground and will probably use it to more devastating effect than in 2006, which in turn will probably drag Iran into the violence. And if Iran is overtly involved then the USA will rub its hands with glee and get stuck in.

If the Lebanese do turn on Hezbollah and expels them then Lebanon would be free of both Syria and Hezbollah.

The section entitled Securing the Northern Border of A Clean Break reads,
Securing the Northern Border

Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which America can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by:

* striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan.

* paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.

* striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.

Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly breaks its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has betrayed the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a "Brotherhood Agreement" in 1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun colonizing Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in 1983 in Hama.

Under Syrian tutelage, the Lebanese drug trade, for which local Syrian military officers receive protection payments, flourishes. Syria’s regime supports the terrorist groups operationally and financially in Lebanon and on its soil. Indeed, the Syrian-controlled Bekaa Valley in Lebanon has become for terror what the Silicon Valley has become for computers. The Bekaa Valley has become one of the main distribution sources, if not production points, of the "supernote" — counterfeit US currency so well done that it is impossible to detect.


Negotiations with repressive regimes like Syria’s require cautious realism. One cannot sensibly assume the other side’s good faith. It is dangerous for Israel to deal naively with a regime murderous of its own people, openly aggressive toward its neighbors, criminally involved with international drug traffickers and counterfeiters, and supportive of the most deadly terrorist organizations.

Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan "comprehensive peace" and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction program, and rejecting "land for peace" deals on the Golan Heights.

What has been suggested here has not been fully implemented, but there was a war between Hezbollah and Israel in 2006, and during the conquest of Iraq (as proposed in a different section of A Clean Break) it was suggested in particular elements of the media that Syria had hidden Iraq's alleged WMD. Israel also bombed an alleged secret nuclear site in Syria in Operation Orchard, claiming the site was being used by Syria to develop nuclear weapons.

A Clean Break shows that there was a definite desire to cleanse Lebanon of Syrian and Hezbollah/Iranian influence, even suggesting a large scale military conflict, an engagement with the enemy, to achieve that goal. Maybe the war in 2006 was supposed to achieve that goal, but if so then it failed.

And so Hezbollah now faces being accused by a corrupt UN body, The Special Tribunal for Lebanon, of assassinating Rafik Hariri. This could lead to civil war in Lebanon with all its implications, or war between Hezbollah and Israel dragging in Iran and then the USA.

Hezbollah has thus used its influence in the Lebanese parliament to block Lebanese funding to the STL.


March 14 MPs Withdraw from Budget Meeting after Hizbullah Refused to Approve Funding for Hariri Tribunal

March 14 MPs on Thursday walked out of a budget meeting after Hizbullah MPs and their allies refused to approve funding for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon.

MP Jamal Jarrah, whose Mustaqbal Movement holds the majority in Parliament, said Hizbullah-backed March 8 lawmakers refused a financial provision for the STL in the national budget.

"We were on the point of discussing a clause on the financing of the court, when Hizbullah deputies said that from now on they would not deal with or finance the court," Jarrah said.

Head of the Finance and Budget Committee Ibrahim Kanaan said the clause was not approved.

The STL is reportedly set to implicate Hizbullah in the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and 22 others in Beirut. Hizbullah has repeatedly warned against any such implication.

Future News TV reported that March 8 MPs were pursuing the session "despite its loss of quorum" following the withdrawal of March 14 MPs.

Kanaan said, however, that the withdrawal of the majority deputies did not strip the session of its quorum.

He said the Committee had three choices: postponing discussions over the issue until the committee's upcoming session on September 27, voting on the article or leaving it to the Parliament's general assembly to vote on the article.

Kanaan was praised for his stance, particularly because he refrained from voting after the withdrawal of March 14 MPs even though quorum was not affected by the lawmakers' exit.

The STL funding and budget of the Council for Development and Reconstruction were on the meeting's agenda.

Mustaqbal Movement and Hizbullah MPs traded accusations following the session over failure to reach an agreement over the clause.

Jarrah said March 14 MPs walked out of the meeting to protest against Hizbullah's condemnation which described the STL as an Israeli and U.S. scheme.

Hizbullah MP Hasan Fadlallah was quoted by Mustaqbal Movement MP Ammar Houri as saying that the STL "is an Israeli and American tribunal; and we reject it."

"After September, we cannot wait or be patient," Fadlallah was quoted as saying. "We have entered a dangerous phase."

But An-Nahar newspaper on Friday said Fadlallah was quick to deny the remarks.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010


Iraq oil will be transported to the Mediterranean via Syria, not Israel.

Shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the coalition of the Zionazis as part of the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda following the engineered new Pearl Harbor of 9/11, Israel proposed that a pipeline be reconstructed through its territory to transport Iraqi oil directly from Iraq via Jordan to Haifa, and Israel would simply siphon off some to solve its energy problems. The USA supported this proposal. But now Iraq has agreed to transport its oil via Syria!

And now that Lebanon has awakened to the A Clean Break agenda by no longer accusing Syria for the assassination Rafik Hariri in February 2005, and the Arab nations are demanding that Israel sign upto the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, what next?


Iraq to transfer oil & gas to EU through Syria
Monday, 13 September 2010 10:27

Syria welcomes the signature of the Minutes of meeting between the Syrian and Iraqi Ministries of Oil which took place in Damascus on shipping the Iraqi crude oil and gas to the Mediterranean coast through the Syrian territories, State-run Syrian news agency reports according to an official source.

The minutes also includes taking the advantage of the capabilities available in the system of transferring oil, and the system of transporting and treating gas currently existing in Syria as well.

" This important step would contribute in developing the relations between the two countries and further activate the joint economic cooperation between them in the interest of the two brotherly peoples," the sources said.

The technical committees' meetings will be held in Damascus during the next few days.

Global Arab Network



Israel seeks pipeline for Iraqi oil

US discusses plan to pump fuel to its regional ally and solve energy headache at a stroke

* Reddit
* Buzz up
* Share on facebook (26)
* Tweet this (1)

* Ed Vuillamy in Washington
* The Observer, Sunday 20 April 2003 04.09 BST
* Article history

Plans to build a pipeline to siphon oil from newly conquered Iraq to Israel are being discussed between Washington, Tel Aviv and potential future government figures in Baghdad.

The plan envisages the reconstruction of an old pipeline, inactive since the end of the British mandate in Palestine in 1948, when the flow from Iraq's northern oilfields to Palestine was re-directed to Syria.

Now, its resurrection would transform economic power in the region, bringing revenue to the new US-dominated Iraq, cutting out Syria and solving Israel's energy crisis at a stroke.

It would also create an end less and easily accessible source of cheap Iraqi oil for the US guaranteed by reliable allies other than Saudi Arabia - a keystone of US foreign policy for decades and especially since 11 September 2001.

Until 1948, the pipeline ran from the Kurdish-controlled city of Mosul to the Israeli port of Haifa, on its northern Mediterranean coast.

The revival of the pipeline was first discussed openly by the Israeli Minister for National Infrastructures, Joseph Paritzky, according to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz .

The paper quotes Paritzky as saying that the pipeline would cut Israel's energy bill drastically - probably by more than 25 per cent - since the country is currently largely dependent on expensive imports from Russia.

US intelligence sources confirmed to The Observer that the project has been discussed. One former senior CIA official said: 'It has long been a dream of a powerful section of the people now driving this administration [of President George W. Bush] and the war in Iraq to safeguard Israel's energy supply as well as that of the United States.

'The Haifa pipeline was something that existed, was resurrected as a dream and is now a viable project - albeit with a lot of building to do.'

The editor-in-chief of the Middle East Economic Review , Walid Khadduri, says in the current issue of Jane's Foreign Report that 'there's not a metre of it left, at least in Arab territory'.

To resurrect the pipeline would need the backing of whatever government the US is to put in place in Iraq, and has been discussed - according to Western diplomatic sources - with the US-sponsored Iraqi National Congress and its leader Ahmed Chalabi, the former banker favoured by the Pentagon for a powerful role in the war's aftermath.

Sources at the State Department said that concluding a peace treaty with Israel is to be 'top of the agenda' for a new Iraqi government, and Chalabi is known to have discussed Iraq's recognition of the state of Israel.

The pipeline would also require permission from Jordan. Paritzky's Ministry is believed to have approached officials in Amman on 9 April this year. Sources told Ha'aretz that the talks left Israel 'optimistic'.

James Akins, a former US ambassador to the region and one of America's leading Arabists, said: 'There would be a fee for transit rights through Jordan, just as there would be fees for Israel from those using what would be the Haifa terminal.

'After all, this is a new world order now. This is what things look like particularly if we wipe out Syria. It just goes to show that it is all about oil, for the United States and its ally.'

Akins was ambassador to Saudi Arabia before he was fired after a series of conflicts with then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, father of the vision to pipe oil west from Iraq. In 1975, Kissinger signed what forms the basis for the Haifa project: a Memorandum of Understanding whereby the US would guarantee Israel's oil reserves and energy supply in times of crisis.

Kissinger was also master of the American plan in the mid-Eighties - when Saddam Hussein was a key US ally - to run an oil pipeline from Iraq to Aqaba in Jordan, opposite the Israeli port of Eilat.

The plan was promoted by the now Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and the pipeline was to be built by the Bechtel company, which the Bush administration last week awarded a multi-billion dollar contract for the reconstruction of Iraq.

The memorandum has been quietly renewed every five years, with special legislation attached whereby the US stocks a strategic oil reserve for Israel even if it entailed domestic shortages - at a cost of $3 billion (£1.9bn) in 2002 to US taxpayers.

This bill would be slashed by a new pipeline, which would have the added advantage of giving the US reliable access to Gulf oil other than from Saudi Arabia.

Monday, September 13, 2010


In the street plan of Washington DC there is an irregular, inverted and incomplete pentagram directly north of the White House (see below). It is the most satanic symbol. Besides that satanic symbol there is an an owl with the Capitol in its stomach sitting on top of an incomplete pyramid. Nowhere on this potentially beautiful Planet Earth is there so much satanic symbolism than the capital city of what is considered the most powerful nation, The United States of America.

So where else would you find adverts on the subway for death machines?

Only the subway of Washington DC could allow adverts for death machines. Any normal subway would allow adverts for fizzy drinks containing delicious yummy slowkill aspartame. But DC? No! For DC that's for whimps. For DC it has to ads be for total relentless death.



Weapons ads on Washington subway-just part of the scenery
permalinke-mail story to a friendprint version

Published 13 September, 2010, 07:27

Edited 13 September, 2010, 11:48

Over $US 600 billion a year is how much the most powerful military machine on Earth spends on defense, and it is fueled by nothing other than US taxpayer's money.

Still, some Americans do not mind being in bed with the beast of war.

No where else in the world are multi-million dollar war machines being marketed like soft drinks and cell phones as on the Washington D.C. subway. There are ads for military helicopters alongside those for a gambling spot.

You would think somebody would notice, but passengers consider it a normal fact of life and just stop paying attention to it.

Drones, combat ships, fighter jets, with claims about ‘defining the future’ and nobody seems to care, nobody but a very few.

These ads are targeted at a handful of people who decide on multibillion contracts, though the subway’s regular commuters have nothing to do with this, as they are not going to run and buy a fighter jet. But maybe it does have a certain effect on them, after all.

Read more

Passengers on the subway told RT that these ads make them think the country is strong, that it needs those sophisticated weapons and that “taxes are going somewhere”.

A really big chunk of taxes, around one-third of American taxpayers’ money, go to the military and to contractors who gear up the military.

They promise dominance and talk about efficiency in killing and complete dominance strategies.

None of the military suppliers who advertise on the metro that RT contacted were willing to talk, therefore none would answer the simple question of why bother buying adverts for commuters to see?

Probably the government agencies which spend the money want people to see that and think that is the norm. Antiwar activists say the money spent on this kind of PR does not go wasted.

“It reinforces the war profiteers’ position and puts it in a positive light when in actuality it’s something that is destroying the American economy,” Dennis Lane from Veterans for Peace pointed out.

For Capitol Hill observers, the expensive ads are a signal to future decision-makers in Congress.

“We pay a lot of money for this ad. We think our programs are important. We know you are watching us – understand also that we are watching you. And if you help us out – we’ll help you out. And that helps also to contributions in general,” Winslow Wheeler, Center for Defense Information, said.

But for most, those signals pass under the radar. Nobody deeply questions the ads and, as with the situation with Washington commuters, it doesn’t take long before what is advertised becomes normal.

© Autonomous Nonprofit Organization "TV-Novosti" 2005-2010. All rights reserved.

Sunday, September 12, 2010


He took us into Afghanistan and Iraq on a pack of lies, and at the Chilcot Inquiry he pushed the same pack of lies to take us into Iran, as part of the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda.

And now it appears that he did very little as Peace Envoy to the Middle East, but he tried very hard to get a big deal done for one of his clients, the bloodthirsty JP Morgan empire. Blair's son also works for JP Morgan.

JP Morgan loaned hundreds of millions of dollars to Qtel which owned Wataniya, a mobile phone network operator that had built a network in the West Bank. Israel was refusing to allow Wataniya to operate on the frequencies it wanted, so Blair lobbied Netanyahu very very hard to get Wataniya its licence. As a result Wataniya has been allowed to start operating and will be given its frequencies once it reaches a stated threshold of customers. The advertising campaign for Wataniya is being run by the son of Mahmoud Abbas.

In the meantime, when Israel was bombing innocent children to bits in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, Blair was unsurprisingly on holiday and silent.

Blair claims ignorance of the link to JP Morgan.

It stinks!


Special investigation: How Blair rescued Palestine deal worth $200m to his £2m-a-year paymasters

By David Rose
Last updated at 12:42 AM on 12th September 2010

Tony Blair mounted an intense political lobbying campaign to rescue a struggling mobile-phone business owned by a client of the bank that pays him a £2 million annual salary.

The firm, Wataniya, had already built a brand-new network in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian West Bank.

But it almost collapsed before launching its service, jeopardising a £450 million investment, because Israel’s government was refusing to let it use the frequencies it needed to operate.

Acting in his capacity as the international Middle East peace envoy, Mr Blair helped to save the company by spending months putting pressure on Israel’s prime minister and his colleagues in a bid to change their minds.

An investigation by The Mail on Sunday has revealed:

* Mr Blair spoke of the need to get Wataniya up and running in order to boost the Palestinian economy. However JP Morgan, the American investment bank that employs him as a consultant, has a financial stake in Wataniya through Wataniya’s owner, the Qatari firm Qtel, which is an important client of JP Morgan.

* Financial documents show that back in 2007, JP Morgan had been one of four ‘mandated lead arrangers’ of a $2 billion loan with which Qtel bought Wataniya from its original Kuwaiti owners. Last year, the bank joined a syndicate that lent Qtel a further $500 million, and became a ‘lead arranger’ for a Qtel bond issue which raised yet another $1.5 billion.

In these deals, JP Morgan would have been paid many millions of pounds in fees, and if the loans had gone bad, could have been exposed to substantial losses. ‘Its original exposure was probably around $200 million,’ one Wall Street expert said yesterday.

Last night a bank spokesman refused to comment, or to disclose any further details. He did not deny that Qtel was a significant JP Morgan client.

A spokesman for Mr Blair said he had no knowledge of any connection between JP Morgan and Qtel.

Mr Blair’s lobbying campaign also helped to enrich the family of the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas – a central figure in the search for Middle East peace. A firm run by his son Tarek has secured a lucrative contract to provide advertising for Wataniya.

Mr Blair’s envoy role – for which, as he has often boasted, he is not paid
a salary – has now been enhanced.

Earlier this month, Mr Abbas, Mr Blair and the most important man he lobbied, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, sat down together in Washington with President Obama to begin new direct peace talks.

Last night Mr Blair faced calls to publish full details of the myriad business interests that have netted him a personal fortune estimated to be at least £15 million since he left office.

He is paid not only by JP Morgan but also by the insurance giant Zurich, and his own private consulting firm, Tony Blair Associates, counts among its clients the royal families of Abu Dhabi and Kuwait.

A frequent visitor to Libya, he has used his personal friendship with the dictator Colonel Gaddafi to explore business opportunities there on behalf of JP Morgan.

David Davis, the senior backbench Tory MP, said: ‘There are now clear questions about how he has used his powers as a peace envoy and whether that has benefited his commercial sponsors.

‘He must now put all his financial affairs into the public domain. Only then can we be sure he has behaved in an appropriate manner.’

Mr Blair was appointed an envoy on leaving Downing Street in June 2007. He represents the ‘Quartet’ – the United Nations, the US, the EU and Russia.
His special area of responsibility is the Palestinian economy.

With ten rooms permanently booked at Jerusalem’s most expensive hotel, the American Colony, at an annual cost of £1.1 million, he spends a few days there each month.

As The Mail on Sunday reported last year, many Palestinian businessmen say his achievements have been limited. Projects he has loudly supported – such as an international business park near the holy city of Hebron – have come to nothing.

‘But Wataniya is the great exception,’ one leading West Bank entrepeneur said yesterday. ‘Indeed, until he finally managed to sort it out at the end of last year, it was difficult to get him to engage with anything else.’
Keeping himself busy: Tony Blair has been active since leaving office as prime minister - releasing his memoirs most recently

Keeping himself busy: Tony Blair has been active since leaving office as prime minister - releasing his memoirs most recently

When Mr Blair arrived in the Middle East in 2007, there was only one mobile firm, Jawwal, operating in the Palestinian Occupied Territories, Gaza and the West Bank. But Wataniya had already purchased licences for £313 million from Mr Abbas’s Palestinian Authority to provide a competing service.

In July 2008, Mr Blair brokered what Wataniya thought was a cast-iron deal with Israel to make the frequencies it needed available. In order to provide a modern 3G service to include mobile internet, Wataniya had been seeking a bandwidth of 4.8 megahertz.

On the strength of this agreement, it continued to build mobile-phone masts, switching centres and other installations it needed to operate, spending a further £100 million.

It was set to launch in June last year. Meanwhile, amid fierce local controversy, Wataniya managed to secure special additional loans from a US government programme that had been set up to help Palestinian farmers and small businesses – despite the backing it had from Qtel and, indirectly, banks such as JP Morgan.

Launching this programme in 2007, the State Department said it was aimed at ‘an olive grower who wants to expand operations, a young person with a small information technology company, or someone who wants to hire neighbours to produce and export Palestinian embroidery’ – not a £450 million mobile network.

The US loans to Wataniya, though worth a relatively modest £11 million, deprived other enterprises of them.

Critics pointed to the fact that involved with Wataniya were leading members of the Palestinian elite around Mr Abbas. Its Palestine chairman is Mohammad Mustafa – his financial adviser and closest associate, who accompanies him on virtually every foreign trip.
'In the meetings he had with the Prime Minister, he brought it up time and time again, and kept pushing, pushing.'

In the late spring of 2009, Mr Blair’s frequency deal unravelled. Claiming that the Palestinian Authority had failed to fulfil unspecified commitments, Israel refused to release the necessary bandwidth. Wataniya teetered on the brink of collapse as first the June and then a second October launch date, came and went, with the network still inoperative.

Alan Richardson, a Scottish engineer who had already set up a mobile network in Iraq, was Wataniya’s Palestine chief executive until June this year.

‘We invested according to a business plan that was based on false promises,’ he told me last October. ‘We cannot meet our subscriber targets with the frequencies they are offering.’

However, Mr Blair was furiously trying to rescue the company. ‘From day one of this problem, he’s been very proactive through his role as Quartet representative,’ Mr Richardson said.

A senior Israeli official said last week: ‘In the meetings he had with the Prime Minister, he brought it up time and time again, and kept pushing, pushing.’

One reason the Israelis advanced for not releasing the bandwidth was security – claiming it needed the frequencies for military communications. Another Israeli source confirmed that Mr Blair repeatedly raised the matter in meetings with Israel’s defence minister, Ehud Barak.

Mr Blair made several public statements about the Wataniya frequency dispute, and did not mention JP Morgan at all.

‘If we cannot get the proper frequency and it cannot go forward then we don’t have proper competition on mobile telephony and we don’t get the investment and jobs,’ he said after the first launch was cancelled in June 2009.

‘It may seem a small thing in one sense but it’s very important for the Palestinian economy.’

Finally, after Qtel threatened legal action, Mr Blair got his way. Although Israel agreed to release only 3.8 megahertz at first, local sources say it has promised to expand this to 4.8 megahertz once Wataniya has 350,000 customers.

Wataniya launched on November 10, with Mr Blair at the opening ceremony. He said it proved that ‘Palestine is open for business’.

Earlier this year, Mr Blair singled out the affair in a report he wrote on his envoy work to the Commons’ Foreign Affairs Committee.

‘Wataniya’s launch is overdue, but extremely welcome,’ he wrote, ‘[it] means the completion of a key milestone in the economic reform and state building agenda …Wataniya is an example of a flagship project, which has a significant impact on people’s perceptions and hopes for what a lasting peace might bring.’

Yesterday The Mail on Sunday asked Mr Blair’s spokesman Matthew Doyle whether he had declared the bank’s interest in his meetings with the Israelis.

He replied in an email, saying only: ‘Tony Blair raised Wataniya at the request of the Palestinian Authority in his role as Quartet Representative. He has no knowledge of any connection between QTel and JP Morgan and has never discussed the issue with JP Morgan nor have they ever raised it with him. Any suggestion that he raised it for any reason other than the one stated to help the Palestinians or that in some way he has benefited from Wataniya is untrue and defamatory.’


Critics of the Wataniya mobile- phone project backed so strongly by Tony Blair claim it is marred by a longstanding feature of the Palestinian scene – cronyism, in which close associates of the ruling Fatah party leadership somehow manage to derive lucrative benefits.

In the case of Wataniya, the link could hardly be closer – for one big beneficiary of the firm’s investments is none other than Tarek Abbas, the son of the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas.

American-educated Tarek runs Sky, the West Bank’s biggest advertising agency. Last year, it was awarded a contract to be Wataniya’s lead advertising agent, with both a monthly retainer and further payments for individual campaigns.

Palestinian business sources say that its work for Wataniya has been worth approximately £700,000 in the past 12 months – almost certainly, the biggest advertising ‘spend’ in Palestine.

Meanwhile, businessman Firas Nasruddin, a friend of both Tarek and his father, owns Hemaya, a security company staffed by men in sunglasses and black uniforms, some of whom are former fighters against Israel in groups such as the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades. Others are former Palestinian Authority police.

Hemaya has a contract to provide security for Wataniya personnel and installations.

It also serves several other firms that are supported by the Palestine Investment Fund, a large pot of money that is meant to be used to benefit the Palestinian people.

The fund has a 43 per cent stake in Wataniya. President Abbas’s chief adviser Mohammad Mustafa is chairman and CEO of the fund, and chairman of Wataniya.

Wataniya’s spokesman, Mohammad Nassar said last night he could not answer any questions about how the Sky and Hemaya contracts were awarded until next week, while Tarek Abbas’s lawyer – who usually speaks on his behalf – could not be reached.

In an interview last year, Wataniya’s former Palestine chief, Scot Alan Richardson, said there had been ‘a straightforward contract process that went through all the normal procedures’, adding that Sky and Hemaya had been given their deals because they represented ‘best price, best quality’.

Wataniya, he said, operated in a ‘fair and transparent manner’.

Nevertheless, the outcome means that as Tony Blair takes part in the renewed search for a peace deal, both sides will know that his support for Wataniya has produced sizeable benefits for President Abbas’s family and friends.

Published by Associated Newspapers Ltd
Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday & Metro Media Group

© Associated Newspapers Ltd

Saturday, September 11, 2010


The Bilderberg Washington Post today, on the anniversary of that murdered September day nine years ago today, makes me want to puke.

It has published an article written by Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Secretary General of NATO, and it basically says "everything is OK, rock on, in Afghanistan". He uses the term Domino Effect, suggesting that if we pulled out of Afghanistan then its neighbours will fall to al-Qaeda. Now where have I heard that before...

No mention that al-Qaeda is CIA.

No mention that the Taliban were financed by the ISI who were financed by CIA, and the US military is actually helping to protect their opium crop!

No mention that they were airlifted to safety by the US military.

No mention of the carpet of gold or carpet of bombs.

The internet edition is accompanied by a photo of Osama bin Laden with an AK47.

They said Osama bin Laden did it.

They said they would produce a dossier to prove it.

They never did.

They didn't even want Osama bin Laden for 9/11!

Instead we got a fake fat bin Laden look-a-like on a grainy video claiming responsibility.

All they wanted was war. And 9/11 gave them that war.

On 9/11 it was The Bilderberg Washington Post that within hours of the attack published an OpEd by Robert Kagan, entitled We Must Fight This War, in which Kagan calls for blood, blood and more blood, citing Pearl Harbor and demanding a rapid strengthening of the US military, which was what PNAC wanted. Kagan was intimately involved with PNAC and their lust for "a new Pearl Harbor". He could barely contain his glee that now he and his fellow PNAC murderers had their Pearl Harbor.

So instead of carrying out a thorough investigation, they blamed Osama bin Laden AND Saddam Hussein as the patsies, and went to war. Nine years later, thousands of US and UK soldiers dead, hundreds of billions of dollars spent, and approximately a million civilian deaths providing the recruiting sargeant for the next generation of "insurgents", and The Bilderberg Washington Post wants more.

It's time to bring the troops home. It's all a farce. Use the money to thoroughly investigate 9/11 instead, and deal with the guilty traitors as required. Some of the saved money could also go to investigating the Wikileaks documents on Pakistan and Afghanistan that were recently leaked with the complicity of The White House in The New York Times (Bilderberg), The Guardian (supporters of mass genocide at Copenhagen), and Der Spiegel (Operations Gladio and Mockingbird) that resulted in The Pentagon receiving $40 billion dollars to continue fighting in Afghanistan.


Remembering the lessons of 9/11 in Afghanistan

By Anders Fogh Rasmussen
Saturday, September 11, 2010

...It is important, particularly on anniversaries like today's, to remember those lessons, even as we mourn the victims. It is especially important when raised voices, in the United States and other countries, call for an end to the mission in Afghanistan; to bring the troops home now, regardless of conditions on the ground; essentially to let the Afghans deal with the Taliban and al-Qaeda on their own.

Following this route would be a mistake of historic proportions. Were we to do that, there would be a clear domino effect: The Afghan government would not long be able to resist the insurgency. Civil war in Afghanistan would be inevitable. The Taliban fighters and extremists like them would be emboldened across that region -- including in nuclear-armed Pakistan -- and much wider afield. And al-Qaeda would once again enjoy a haven from which to plan terrorism attacks on a global scale.



If you're happy and you know it clap your hands.
[total silence]
If you're happy and you know it clap your hands.
[total silence]
If you're happy and you know it,
and you really want to show it,
if you're happy and you know it clap your hands.
[total silence]

If you hate the New World Order make a noise
[3 minutes of verbal abuse, "hang the bastards!", "cut their balls off!", "booooo!"]
If you hate the New World Order make a noise
[3 more minutes of verbal abuse, "string the bastards up by their balls!", "throw 'em to Josef Fritzl!", "shark bait!"]
If you hate the New World Order and their 911 slaughter,
If you hate the New World Order then let them know.


Last night was allegedly the last night of the tedious, boring Big Brother. Even the inglorious BBC got in on the act! Now why would they spend so much time on the programme of a competitor? Because there is much more to Big Brother.

Big Brother conditioned you to the surveillance society, in which you are constantly watched while the banks rip you off and we invade sovereign nations on lies.

When you go shopping today count how many cameras watch you.

As Kevin Turvey said, "Look up. Look down. Look all around".

While you watched and voted people out of the BB House, the real controllers have been watching you and deciding who they don't like, and then implementing policies to eliminate you off the real BB House called Planet Earth. Be a good citizen by not asking awkward questions, believing their lies and sending your sons and daughters off to fight and die in wars based on lies. and gradually accept Satanism and they might, just might let you stay. But if you raise your hand and ask questions like, why is it that only a handful banks have gained in the financial crisis, or why did we invade Iraq and now possibly Iran when neither had nothing to do with 911, then watch out.

And when they get that microchip implant in you...

It's only just begun.

Thursday, September 09, 2010



Goldman Sachs is being fined £20 million by the FSA!

To me and you, the ordinary people of this world, this sounds like alot of money.

But Goldman Sachs received ten billion in TARP bailouts.

And has increased its market share due to the Great Bilderberg Derivative Bailout swindle.

And will further increase its market share and control of the US banking system under the new financial regulation and banking reform.

So bend over while Goldman Sachs and the rest of the Bilderberg bankstaz pull their trousers down.


Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs fined £20m by UK's FSA
Financial professional stands in the Goldman Sachs booth at the New York Stock Exchange Goldmans Sachs was fined $550m in the US to settle fraud charges

Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs has been fined £20m ($31m) by the UK City regulator, the Financial Services Authority, the BBC has learned.

The fine is for failing to tell the FSA it was under investigation for fraud by the US financial watchdog this summer.

In July, Goldman settled the fraud charge with the Securities and Exchange Commission by paying $550m (£356m).

The £20m is one of the heaviest fines ever imposed by the FSA, said the BBC's business editor Robert Peston.

Both the FSA and Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the fine.

Goldman agreed to pay the US fine to settle civil fraud charges of misleading investors.

The charges concerned the bank's marketing of complex mortgage investments, just as the US housing market faltered.

The FSA said Goldman also did not tell them that Fabrice Tourre, the trader who helped to create these mortgage derivatives, was under investigation.

This it said was particularly relevant as Mr Tourre moved from the US to London, and therefore came under the auspices of the UK regulator.

Goldman has admitted that it made a mistake, our correspondent added.
Heavy losses

In April, the SEC charged Goldman with failing to disclose "vital information" that one of its clients, Paulson & Co, helped to choose which securities were packaged into a mortgage portfolio that was then sold to investors in 2007.

It claimed Goldman did not disclose that Paulson, one of the world's largest hedge funds, had bet that the value of the securities would fall.

The SEC alleged that investors in the mortgage securities, packaged into a vehicle called Abacus, lost more than $1bn (£646m) in the US housing market collapse.

In paying the SEC fine, Goldman did not admit legal wrongdoing but acknowledged that its marketing material for Abacus contained "incomplete information".

Many commentators felt at the time that the bank got off lightly.

The bank made a profit of $3.5bn in the first three months of this year, but saw its profits slump to $613m between April and June.

This was due to a drop in trading revenues, the $550m fine and a $600m hit from the bonus tax in the UK.

Despite the fall in profits and the fraud charges, Goldman Sachs is still considered by many to be world's preeminent investment bank.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010


There is much fuss about mind-reading today. Apparently some people in Utah stuck some electrodes into someone's brain and managed to convert some electronic brain signals into sounds. Forgive my lack of enthusiasm and excitement but "they" can read your mind remotely already, this second, as you read this. These scientists reported in the media are yesterdays zeroes compared to the military.

Think about it. David Icke met with a patched scientist in 1998 who begged that we do not allow the implantation of the microchip. These secret centres researching extravagant exotic tomorrows world technology do exist, and the scientists are forced into the research or they suffer a very painful death. But who are their experimental human subjects? The "disappeared"?

Anyway, in 1973 when the height of technology in the average house was one colour television, the military were using microwaves to beam thoughts into people's brains sat in a different room to the microwave device. They were reading thoughts too with the same microwave technology. Decades later we now have microwave ovens and the mobile phone network that can correctly detect and translate the tiniest electronic current in your phone that has a cover on it while you hold it in your hand and you are moving, possibly at high speed in a car.

Just compare. In 1973 it was the one colour TV in the house while the military was remotely beaming thoughts into peoples heads and reading their thoughts, albeit just a few metres away but in a different room. Today, nearly 40 years later, we have a mobile phone network based on the same microwave technology that the military used in 1973 to read thoughts with microwaves, while the military today does what? Plays Monopoly? Goes down the local Wetherspoons for a Beer and a Burger? No. The military, or rather the secret military, is decades ahead of the public. And that advanced technology is kept secret, for control.

"They" can read your mind already. Get over it. Move on. They daren't tell you about it though, because then you'll realise just how manipulated you all are. Just think if they could have remotely read Osama bin Laden's mind before 9/11? Or even Dick Cheney's mind before 9/11?

It's a fantastic basis for a novel. Patched scientists forced into creating super secret technology to enslave the world.

But novels are fiction. Maybe it should be faction.