Monday, July 30, 2007


Gordon Brown has a piece in The Washington Post. In it Brown looks at the relationship between the UK and the USA. The Brown article is full of quotes and references such as;

"the joint inheritance"

"shared destiny"

"Atlantic partnership"

"freedom and the rights of man" (except when state-sponsored terror is on the rampage)

And then there is this paragraph;
"Since Sept. 11, al-Qaeda has killed thousands of people in 19 countries, irrespective of faith. In Britain there have been 15 attempts at terrorist outrages. Last week, I reported to Parliament that our security services are tracking around 30 potential plots, including potential suicide bombers, involving up to 2,000 people."

Of course, there is no mention of the mangled, maimed carcasses of the hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, including those from the 1990s underneath the no-fly-zone, and all those deformed children from the DU.

But still the "shared destiny" of "the Atlantic Partnership" must be achieved at all costs!!

The final paragraph is;
"Separated -- yes -- by an ocean, we are still united by the streams of history and the strengths of our ideals. Standing together on this foundation we will prevail in the greatest struggles of our times."

Again, no mention of the British control through the Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, Freemasonry, etc

And what are these ideals? That a violent, evil sick bunch of individuals have control over the money supply and can create virtually unlimited quantities of it for wars and tyrants and genocidal dictators?

It ends with:
The writer is prime minister of Britain. [TTS: what happened to the "Great"?]

TTS: not quite the bloodthirsty rant that Blair had published in the Foreign Affairs a few months ago, but too close to it for my liking.

Friday, July 20, 2007


What can we deduce?

Bush invited Putin to Kennebunkport. Neither Kissinger or Cheney were there.

Kissinger then flies to Moscow with some other Bilderbergers, and returns unhappy after some "frank" discussion with Putin.

A few days later Britain expels four Russian diplomats, a Russian plot to assassinate Berezovsky is alleged and news reports also allege Russian bombers on their way to London were turned around by a pair of scrambled RAF fighters.

Today papers are reporting that Bilderberger Bernard Kouchner is fully supportive of Britain's demand that Russia tear up its constitution (like Cheney has in the USA) and extradite a Russian citizen for trial when no evidence has been provided, while Britain refuses the extradition of a handful of Russian rogues and scoundrels to Russia.



It is believed Prince William broke up with Kate Middleton because his father told him she did not have the right DNA. Their relationship is now back on.

A few weeks ago he and his (half?) brother organised an all-day musical tribute to their mother at Wembley that was screened live across the world. Guess who wasn't there?

Now William is inviting the daughters of Mohammed al-Fayed to a memorial next month to mark the tenth anniversary of the death of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed.

William appears to me to be more independent than some would like.



Wills asks Fayeds to Di service

July 20, 2007

PRINCE William has invited Mohammed Fayed’s daughters to Princess Diana’s memorial service next month.

Wills and brother Harry have written to Camilla Fayed, 21, and sister Jasmine, 25, asking them to attend the tenth anniversary event in London on August 31.

It comes despite years of attacks on the royals by the girls’ father — who once claimed Prince Philip “grew up with the Nazis” and said he and Charles “ordered terrorists” to kill Fayed’s son Dodi and Diana in Paris in 1997.

The princes’ private secretary Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton invited the pair to the service at the Guard’s Chapel in Wellington Barracks, close to Buckingham Palace.

Thursday, July 19, 2007


The Times has yet another traumatising photo of the steam in New York.


Here are some photos from American news outlets of the steam explosion that killed one person, repeat one person.

At the top is a photo from CNN.

At the bottom is a photo from The Washington Post.

They remind me of 9/11. But then I remember that was in the photo is steam and not very fine dust from the WTC that had been pulverised by a controlled demolition.


I awoke to images (actually the same image shown ad nauseum) of New York streets in smoke.

Had there been yet another (false-flag) 9/11?


A steam pipe had ruptured, killing one.

This is headline news all over.


Because the whole world can be traumatised again with images of New York streets in smoke and dust and injured people looking terrified with flashing police lights and sirens etc etc.

We're being prepared for something.

The image below is from the BBC.


Yesterday, along with the alleged foiled Berezovsky assassination, The Times reported that Russian bombers were headed towards London, but were turned around by scrambled RAF fighters.

Not so.



Something's Rotten in the State of England...
Increase Decrease

July 18, 2007 (LPAC)--Russian Air Force Commander Col. Gen. Alexander Zelin said that British press reports of Russian bomber flights headed toward London were untrue, and that any alleged connection between ongoing Russian bomber flights and the current diplomatic tensions are "rubbish," the Russian news service Ria Novosti reported today.

Lyndon LaRouche said today that the comments by Colonel-General Zelin are extremely significant, and should be circulated widely, as against the Times of London propaganda aimed at building a phony Cold War climate against Russia.

"Reports that Russian bombers were flying towards British airspace are untrue," Air Force command aide Col. Alexander Drobyshevsky quoted Colonel-General Zelin. "The long-range aircraft were on a scheduled mission over international waters. Bomber flights in international airspace are planned at least six months ahead, and we inform all countries concerned about them in advance."

Zelin was responding to an astonishing report on The Times of London website today, claiming that Royal Air Force fighter jets had to scramble to intercept two Russian strategic bombers allegedly "heading for British airspace" yesterday. This report was written by The Times Diplomatic Editor, Richard Beeston, who claimed tht "the spirit of the Cold War returned to the North Atlantic once again

Responding to the provocation, Voice of Russia commentator Victor Yennikeyev wrote. "Something is rotten in the United Kingdom."

"It is surprising that the British diplomacy, famous for its subtle and refined methods, is resorting to clumsy cold war-era tricks," Yennikeyev wrote.


I would say the desperation to get that Albert Pike WW3 restarted is causing panic and mistakes in certain circles.


Great Britain has this week expelled four Russian diplomats as a signal of its frustration at the refusal of Russia to extradite for trial who it believes is the murderer of Alexander Litvinenko.

Yesterday it was claimed by Boris Berezovsky that MI5 and Scotland Yard foiled a plot to kill him. The plot allegedly involved a man visiting London with his child. That man would attempt to lure Berezovsky to a hotel and shoot him, claiming the murder was business-related and not a political assassination. The man was arrested, held for questioning for 3 days, then handed over to Immigration and deported.

Can these two opposite approaches to potential murderers be reconciled? I can't see how.

Great Britain has been on and on and on to Russia about handing Luguvoi over. Yet when the opportunity arose to catch a Russian assassin red-handed about to murder Berezovsky (a) there are no reports in the media at the time, (b) no name or photograph are released of the alleged assassin, and more bizarrely (c) there is no trial for conspiracy to murder, a crime which ranks among rape and terrorism for which the sentence is life imprisonment! Such a trial of a Russian assassin caught red-handed would have exposed Russia and Putin for the bully and thug they are portrayed.

But we haven't seen that, have we?

Instead, the alleged assassin was quietly sent on his way. Then on the day certain people were expecting Russia to react to the expulsion of four Russian diplomats, this bizarre Berezovsky/assassination story is circulated, one month after the alleged assassin was allegedly arrested.

I cannot understand this. Can you?

Unless it's all bollox.

Somehow 7/7 happened.

Somehow 21/7 happened.

Somehow Litvinenko was murdered with a radioactive poison.

Somehow 30/6 in London and Glasgow happened.

But when a Russian assassin is caught red-handed about to murder Berezovsky he is released without charge.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007


The Times and The Sun, the two biggest warmongering papers besides The Telegraph, are reporting that a plot has been foiled to assassinate the scoundrel Boris Berezovsky by shooting him in the street from a hotel window with a child by the assassin's side.

The Sun also mentions the similarity to the use of family in the Litvinenko murder, a reference to the photograph released by Luguvoi which showed him with his family just hours after he allegedly handled radioactive Polomiun-210 and dropped some into the tea of Litvinenko.

The Times states this;
"Scotland Yard said last night that it was not prepared to discuss the matter."

No name or photograph of the failed assassin is supplied in either newspaper, which is a big suprise. Hmm.

The Sun does however point out to us how Berezovsky is such a saint and stalwart of British society.

I look forward to discovering the identity of this mystery assassin and hope that if the proper evidence is put forward that he or she will be sent to prison for conspiracy to murder, a charge that could and should be laid against quite a few people in The City of London.


Reading an article in The Guardian on the recent expulsion of four Russian diplomats I came across a reference to the European Council on Foreign Relations.

Say what?


Yep. The ECFR.

In fact it is so new that they don't yet have a fully operational website.

Even the web address is European! .eu

From the only availabe page we read;


This is a temporary site. The official ECFR website will be launched in late 2007.

The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is a new pan-European initiative for policy development, advocacy and communications which will be formally launched in the autumn of 2007. The mission of this new endeavour - backed by the Soros Foundations Network, the Sigrid Rausing Trust, FRIDE and the Communitas Foundation - is to promote open societies through a more integrated European foreign policy. The ECFR will have the following characteristics:

* A pan-European presence - with offices in Berlin, Paris, London, Madrid, Rome and Warsaw as well as a presence in Brussels and the new member states. It will be directed by Mark Leonard and presided over by a Council of prominent European figures drawn from the EU 27.

* A high-profile in-house policy team - working on strengthening European approaches to democracy and human rights, energy and the environment, proliferation and the international rule of law. ECFR will run research programs on the institutions of European power; Russia and the Eastern Neighbourhood; the Middle East and Southern Neighbourhood; and Asia.

* A strong focus on advocacy and communications - in order to help translate proposals into reality ECFR will use the latest technologies and new media tools to build a pan-European community of debate and activism in support of its agenda.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007


Very little.

Miliband has only been in the job a couple of weeks. He has a lot to learn. Perhaps Putin should instead invite Miliband across to Moscow for a dicussion on the details of the terrorism that London allowed to grow and continues to grow.

Miliband does not know what he is getting himself into, who his advisers really are and where they get their advice from. In fact I would go so far as to label Miliband an idiot, and this is more of an embarrasment than the debacle of the sailors captured by Iran earlier this year and the resulting farce over media access to them. If he wants Luguvoi, then show Russia ALL the evidence against Luguvoi and hand over the scoundrel Berezovsky.

So Putin should not expel anyone purely in retaliation to this reaction, unless they are involved in undermining the Russian democratic process. Let this one go with a laugh. Let the boy grow up and see what an arse he is being and keep this "new cold war" as cold as possible.

Sunday, July 15, 2007


This may just be nothing more than harassment (NB the guy was found guilty of fraud but later acquitted) or fearmongering, but it sure is weird.



From The Sunday Times
July 15, 2007
Fixer for 21/7 plot free in London
David Leppard

A SUSPECTED Al-Qaeda operative who is believed by MI5 to have played a key role in the events leading up to the July 21 failed bombings is at liberty and living in east London.

Mohammed al-Ghabra, a 27-year-old Syrian who has been given British citizenship, is said by security sources to have arranged for the leader of the failed 21/7 London suicide attacks to travel to Pakistan for terrorist training.

The sources said al-Ghabra instructed a second terrorist suspect to facilitate a four-month trip to Pakistan by Muktar Said Ibrahim, the leader of the July 21 gang.

Ibrahim learnt how to make bombs while in Pakistan. Four months later, he deployed his training in a bid to kill dozens of people on three London Tube trains and a bus.
The Brits that plotted to wreak death and carnage

Al-Ghabra – who last year was accused by the British and American financial authorities of association with terrorism – lives with his mother and sister in a maisonette in a cul-de-sac in Forest Gate, east London. He is unemployed and regularly attends the local mosque on Romford Road.

Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP and security expert, said: “It is extraordinary that a man who is alleged to be central to a mass murder plot is still at liberty. How can this be?”

Last week Ibrahim and three other bombers were convicted of conspiracy to murder at Woolwich crown court. The judge, Mr Justice Fulford QC, sentenced the gang to life imprisonment with a minimum of 40 years each. He said they would have murdered at least 50 people and injured hundreds more if their plot had succeeded.

After the court case, it emerged that in December 2004 Ibrahim was followed to Heathrow airport by 10 MI5 undercover agents. The MI5 team was tailing the man driving him, Rauf Mohammed, an Iraqi taxi driver who was suspected of working with al-Ghabra in helping radical British Muslims travel to Iraq to fight against British and American troops.

Ibrahim and two other passengers were in the car. A well-placed source said: “MI5 judged they were going to take part in holy war activities in Pakistan. It was thought this might include going to terrorist training camps.”

The source added: “We knew the journey was arranged by Rauf Mohammed, acting on the instructions of Mohammed al-Ghabra.”

The connection with Rauf Mohammed (who was later charged and acquitted of terrorism offences) led Ibrahim and his travelling companions to be questioned by Special Branch before they boarded their flight.

They were found to be carrying thousands of pounds in cash, a military first-aid kit and a ballistics manual. Nonetheless, MI5 allowed Ibrahim to travel to Pakistan. There he was trained by Al-Qaeda to make explosives and groomed to become a suicide bomber.

Despite his known links to Rauf Mohammed, Ibrahim was not stopped, searched or questioned by police when he returned to Heathrow on March 8, 2005.

The lack of surveillance made it possible for Ibrahim to recruit three other would-be suicide bombers to make unobserved bulk purchases of hydrogen peroxide, used to manufacture the bombs.

Security sources have confirmed that they were alerted to Ibrahim’s return to the country. But they said he was not then classified by MI5 as a priority target.

One source said: “He was regarded as a low-key follower. He wasn’t forgotten. But the intelligence on him was not as worrying as it was on a whole host of others who were being watched at full tilt.”

The decision, according to sources, was based on an assessment by the Pakistanis – who had been asked to track Ibrahim – that he did not pose a terrorist threat.

David Davis, the shadow home secretary, said yesterday: “It is simply extraordinary that the security service did not either prevent Ibrahim travelling abroad or put him under close surveillance when he returned. This is the third occasion in which the security services have failed to identify terrorists before they carried out their attacks.”

Speaking of al-Ghabra’s alleged role, Davis added: “It is also extraordinary, if true, that a prime facilitator of terrorist activity has neither been arrested or charged and is still at large.”

Al-Ghabra said last week: “I am not going to say anything. I say no comment.

My battle is through the courts and I refuse to be tried by the media.”

He was referring to allegations made against him last December when the British Treasury wrote to him saying it had “reasonable grounds for suspecting that you are, or may be, a person who facilitates the commission of acts of terrorism”.

In a statement issued at the time, it said: “Al-Ghabra has organised travel to Pakistan for individuals seeking to meet with senior Al-Qaeda individuals and to undertake jihad training. Several of these individuals have returned to the UK to engage in covert activity on behalf of Al-Qaeda.

“Additionally, al-Ghabra has provided material support and facilitated the travel

of UK-based individuals to Iraq to support the insurgents’ fight against coalition forces.”

The Treasury claimed it had information showing he had undertaken jihadi training at a terrorist camp in Kashmir.

The US Treasury froze his bank accounts, saying it was “designating” al-Ghabra as someone “who provides material and logistical support to Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organisations”.

Al-Ghabra said when these allegations were made: “If I am a money-maker and this is why they have decided to put the sanctions against me, how could I have so many financial problems myself?”

He denied that he played any role in the so-called pipeline of young Muslim men that were travelling to fight with the insurgents in Iraq.

He said MI5 had repeatedly accused him in interviews with his friends of being a terrorist money man.

“I don’t have the capability of supporting anyone financially, barely myself. If anyone has the evidence, please show it to me. I am not the banker.”

Four years ago, al-Ghabra was charged with fraud and possession of a document or record that could be useful to terrorism. He spent nine months on remand before being acquitted in July 2004.

Additional reporting: Robert Booth

Wednesday, July 11, 2007


Having the power to create money out of thin air and "loan" it out to governments and the general public AND at interest is not enough for them. No, they want it all.

Recent news reports indicate that terror is desired, and is allowed if not encouraged to happen.



"Between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public’s going to have a very different view of this war, and it will be because, I think, of some unfortunate events, that like we’re seeing unfold in the UK. But I think the American public’s going to have a very different view," said the former senator [Rick Santorum] from Pennsylvania.

Last month, the new chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.

"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]," Milligan told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, "And the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country," he concluded.



According to secret and long-hidden documents obtained for Body of Secrets, the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. In the name of antiCommunism, they proposed launching a secret and bloody war of terrorism against their own country in order to trick the American public into supporting an ill-conceived war they intended to launch against Cuba.

Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.


A ten-man MI5 team followed the ringleader of the 21/7 bombers on the night he left Britain for terrorist training in Pakistan, The Times has learnt.

The Security Service was also alerted when Muktar Said Ibrahim returned to Britain three months later, but allowed him to enter the country unhindered.

Ibrahim, who tried to blow up a No 26 bus on July 21, 2005, will be sentenced with his three accomplices – Yassin Omar, Hussein Osman and Ramzi Mohammed – at Woolwich Crown Court today for conspiracy to murder.

...As new details emerge of apparent security failures that left Ibrahim free to carry out the attacks, there are growing demands for an explanation from the authorities.

Counter-terrorist sources have told The Times that Ibrahim was driven to Heathrow on December 11, 2004, by an Iraqi man who was a high-priority terrorist suspect. Their car was being followed.

The man, Rauf Mohammed, has been named in Home Office documents as being “actively engaged” in providing support to the insurgency in Iraq.



According to The Guardian: ( 21/7 bombers: ringleader slipped through police net )

· The court heard that in May 2004, Ibrahim encouraged his three friends to join him at a jihadi training camp in the Lake District which was subject to surveillance by anti-terrorist police. The men were captured in the surveillance photographs but there was no follow-up investigation.

· In August 2004, Ibrahim was captured on surveillance photographs taken outside Finsbury Park mosque in London.

· In October 2004 Ibrahim was arrested in Oxford Street after scuffling with a policeman who intervened as he was handing out extremist literature. He was charged with a public order offence and was due in court in December 2004. When he failed to turn up, an arrest warrant was issued which was outstanding in February 2005, five months before the July attacks.

· In December 2004 Special Branch officers stopped him at Heathrow and questioned him for three hours before allowing him to board a plane to Islamabad. He and two associates were carrying thousands of pounds in cash, a military first aid kit and a manual on ballistics. The other two men are missing believed dead fighting jihad.

According to prosecutors, at the time he should have been in court Ibrahim was at a training camp in Pakistan learning the skills to carry out a suicide bomb attack in Britain.

· In February 2005, police were seeking Ibrahim on an arrest warrant outstanding for the October public order offence and sent a letter to his London address saying: "Call us, before we call you."



Osama bin Laden's deputy warned Gordon Brown yesterday that Britain would be hit with "a very precise response" in retaliation for the knighthood given to the novelist Salman Rushdie.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, the number two in al-Qaida, made the threat in an audio tape produced by the organisation's media wing, as-Sahhab, and distributed to jihadi websites yesterday.

[TTS: who recommended the author who resides in the USA(!) for a Knighthood?]


Yesterday MPs were unmoved by the recent terror and voted to keep 28 days maximum detention, and not the desired 90 days.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007


WTF is going on?

7/7 : at first it was claimed the alleged bombers were "clean skins" but we now know they were on the fringe of the biggest plot to attack Britain, and that warnings were received about an attack on London transport after someone in Belmarsh heard the Crevice plotters discussing the plan, and that the alleged ringleader of 7/7 had been recorded expressing his desire for Jihad.

30/6/07 : again it was first claimed the attack had come out of the blue, but we now know some of the attackers were on a terrorist watch list and that a warning had been issued on al-Hesbah, a suspected intelligence front, about the day of the attack.

And now with 21/7, it appears some the failed bombers were known and on a terrorist list, had been followed to the Lake District where they trained, and one of them was even on bail after being arrested on suspicion of extremism.

What you have to contrast this "incompetence" with is the non-existent Ricin Plot, the non-existent Old Trafford Plot, the non-existent Exploding Chemical Vest Plot, and a long, long list of trumped up bollocks. 1000+ arrested. 40 charged.

Yet when anything happens we open the newspapers, turn on the radio and TV, and all we get is "90 day detention", "15 year war against terrorism", "snitch on your family, friends and neighbours", "we mustn't let them chage our way of life" etc.

Fearmongering. It's Stalinist Russia. It's Hitler's Germany. It's Pinochet's Chile.

Fear. Fear. Fear.



Police let the July 21 bombers slip the net

By Duncan Gardham

Police missed a string of opportunities to intercept four terrorists months before the botched suicide bomb attacks on July 21, it became clear last night.

Police let the July 21 bombers slip the net: Muktar Said Ibrahim, Yassin Hassan Omar, Ramzi Mohammed, and Hussain Osman
Guilty: Muktar Said Ibrahim, Yassin Hassan Omar, Ramzi Mohammed, and Hussain Osman [left to right]

Four men who were given sanctuary in Britain after leaving their war-torn countries were yesterday found guilty of a plot that would have killed hundreds of people on the London transport system two years ago.

Muktar Ibrahim, 29, the leader of the suicide gang, was seen by officers on at least four occasions before the bombings, Woolwich Crown Court had heard and was on bail after being arrested on suspicion of extremism.

London was saved only by Ibrahim's lack of basic arithmetic. A scribbled note found at the bomb factory showed that Ibrahim, who had failed maths GCSE, had wrongly calculated the ratio of ingredients, rendering the bombs harmless.

Despite having a criminal record, he was given British citizenship even as he plotted the potentially murderous attacks.

Ibrahim had been in Pakistan at the same time as the leaders of the July 7 plot - Mohammed Siddique Khan and Shezhad Tanweer - and the devices his team employed were remarkably similar to those that killed 52 travellers and four bombers in the first attacks.

The later bombs were designed to cause an atrocity "bigger and better" and failed only because the devices had been put together wrongly.

Yesterday, as Ibrahim was found guilty of conspiracy to murder, alongside Yassin Omar, 26, Ramzi Mohammed, 25, and Hussain Osman, 28, questions were asked how he had been permitted to travel abroad.

David Davis, the shadow home secretary, said: "This trial has revealed that the ringleader in the 21/7 plot was allowed to leave the country to train at a camp in Pakistan and return to plan and attempt the attack.

"This was despite the fact that he was facing criminal charges for extremism."


Yesterday it was claimed by Interpol that the UK wasn't checking the Interpol list of terrorist suspects anywhere near as frequently as other countries, despite this constant media terrorist attack on us that we are all targets of dastardly Islamic terrorist plots.

Meanwhile, hundreds of civilians have been killed in Afghanistan by NATO from their brave carpet and surgical bombing.


The Queen has been spared questioning at the inquest of Princess Diana. The lawyer for al Fayed Michael Mansfield asked that she be questioned about her remark to Paul Burrell referring to "powers at work within the state" and other mysterious references. The coroner has denied the request, "at this stage", leaving open the possibility that she may yet appear on the stand to expose the New World Order in the UK.



The Queen and Prince Philip will not have to answer questions from Mohamed Fayed about Diana, Princess of Wales, "at this stage", a coroner decided yesterday.

Lord Justice Scott Baker, who will be holding the inquests later this year into the deaths of the princess and her companion Dodi Fayed, was responding to a request from a lawyer representing the Harrods owner.

Michael Mansfield, QC, for Mr Fayed, wanted the Queen to be asked about a conversation she allegedly had with the former royal butler Paul Burrell, in which she was said to have mentioned "other forces, powers at work within the state".

Mr Mansfield told the coroner: "At this stage we ask that Her Majesty be approached as a witness or potential witness to see if this material is right."

Sunday, July 08, 2007


The Mail on Sunday has published a report based on the infiltration by a BBC reporter of the company tasked with tracking suspected terrorists with tags.

Guess what? THEY DON'T WORK!

Well, they do, but they aren't reliable enough.

Dear, dear. What shall we do?

We could try them in a court of justice before 12 men and women good and true.

Or I suppose we could microchip 'em.

Tags were always going to be a stepping stone to the 'chip. To condition society to accepting something as way out as the implantable microchip will need examples of certain types of people e.g. paedophiles, terrorist suspects, whom society demands that their location and status be known every millisecond. Once these are chipped it will be violent offenders, the aged, and kids at birth, and then within a generation everyone is chipped.



Tag fiasco: Failures in monitoring terror suspects

• Tracking system does not work when mobile network down
• Nor does it work when offender is in bath
• Tags can be removed with a cigarette lighter

Alarming failures in the way that terror suspects are kept under surveillance by electronic tagging have been revealed.

Staff working for the company responsible for maintaining a round-the-clock watch on individuals linked to terrorism have no idea who they are monitoring.

And the system itself frequently crashes - sometimes, it is claimed for as long as eight hours at a time.


I thought I detected an increase in talk of war between Israel and Syria in certain reports last week, in Haaretz, The Jerusalem Post. I think one of them read that Syria believed that Israel's practice training near Golan was more than practice training.

If you read this warning you see the point is to create a much larger scale war in the Middle East, with Lebanon, Syria and Iran, which as you may, or should, know by now are the three targets of Israeli aggression named in "A Clean Break", published 11 years ago, yet to receive the benevolence of "The Jewish State".

However, I believe the "A Clean Break" policy is not the ultimate aim of this Middle East madness. I believe that this Israeli aggression supported by the Zionist-controlled USA is designed as the final extension of the Zionist aggression to complete the Albert Pike plan for three world wars, resulting in some sort of apocalyptic confrontation between the USA on one side and China/Russia on the other, with a Pakistan v India nuclear sideshow. The current financial system cannot go on much longer. It was never designed to be eternal, but sustained long enough to give the sickos running the show enough time and money to get certain things done and certain people in the right places at the right times.



Warning: Cheney Pushing New Lebanon War This Summer

July 7, 2007 (LPAC)--Israeli and Arab sources are telling Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) that there is a very strong likelihood that Israel will launch new military operations into southern Lebanon before the end of the summer, and that pressure for such attacks is coming from the circles of Vice President Dick Cheney. According to one source, a new Israeli assault against Hezbollah positions in southern Lebanon would be based on the 1982 Israeli invasion plan of then-Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, and that the attack could include operations launched from the Golan Heights, in an effort to draw Syria into the conflict.

An Israeli source acknowledged that there is strong opposition in some Israeli political circles to such a pre-emptive attack, and that Syria has already been warned that part of the war scheme involves the effort to draw Syria into the war. One U.S. intelligence specialist acknowledged the war danger, but cautioned that Hezbollah has also revised its military plans, in anticipation of such an Israeli action, and that they are prepared to carry out much more damaging asymmetric retaliatory attacks on Israel. In short, any move by the Israeli Defense Forces would generate a larger regional conflict with the potential to spread beyond Israel and Lebanon.

All of the sources who spoke to EIR acknowledged that the biggest driver for the Israeli action is Dick Cheney and the Cheney apparatus in the Bush Administration and the neocon camp in Washington. Such an Israeli hit on Hezbollah is seen by Cheney and company as a vital part of their war plans against Iran, which call for a "carpet bombing" campaign against an estimated 20 military and infrastructure targets inside Iran, before the end of this year, several sources asserted. The only certain way to stop these planned military actions is for Cheney to be forced out of office in the immediate weeks ahead. That, several sources said, would tilt the political balance inside Israel, allowing the anti-war forces to prevail, and greatly weakening Cheney's key ally, former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Wednesday, July 04, 2007


Who issued that chilling warning?

To whom was this warning passed on?

Who cures us?

Who was on a list of terrorist suspects?

Who is suspected of running al-Hesbah, the website on which was posted the warning that London was to be attacked on a specific day?

And yet it all happened, at a very predictable time known of well in advance, during an exchange of power from Bilderberger Blair to Bilderberger Brown.

Something is seriously, seriously wrong.

Isn't the new head of MI5 an alleged expert on al-Qaeda in the UK?

I suppose he and others won't shed a tear if more police state powers are brought in by a fresh government eager to prove it is not soft on terrorism.



From The Times
July 4, 2007
‘Those who cure you will kill you’

Deborah Haynes in Baghdad, Michael Evans and Adam Fresco

An al-Qaeda leader in Iraq boasted before last week’s failed bombings in London and Glasgow that his group was planning to attack British targets and that “those who cure you will kill you”, The Times has learnt.

The warning was delivered to Canon Andrew White, a senior British cleric working in Baghdad, and could be highly significant as the eight Muslims arrested in the wake of the failed plot are all members of the medical profession.

Canon White told The Times that he had passed the general warning, but not the specific words, to a senior official at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) in mid-April. A Foreign Office spokesman said last night that it was forwarding the actual words to the Metropolitan Police.

Sunday, July 01, 2007



Blair launches stinging attack on 'absurd' British Islamists

Nicholas Watt, political editor
Sunday July 1, 2007
The Observer

Tony Blair has launched a powerful attack on 'absurd' British Islamists who have nurtured a false 'sense of grievance' that they are being oppressed by Britain and the United States.

In his most outspoken remarks on Islamists, the former Prime Minister warns that Britain is in danger of losing the battle against terrorists unless mainstream society confronts the threat.


I was rather hoping that after a few days away from the stress of being PM Blair may have calmed down a bit and could begin to talk some sense.

Not so.

Does he not know that it is we, "Great" Britain with the USA, who have been in the Middle East for a century, redrawing borders and countries, imposing puppet kings and overthrowing troublesome leaders, using gas and then DU and then carpet bombing Iraq? And it is "Great" Britain who allowed mass immigration of Jews into Palestine, despite the rioting and threats of war, after stabbing the Palestinians in the back at Versailles and San Remo.

The guy is a total idiot and this kind of talk exemplifies why he has been chosen as the Middle East envoy. The people there cannot trust a little imperialist like him.

And we do want to confront the threat of terrorism, but peacefully. We want a full and independent inquiry to understand how and why some guys from Leeds blew themselves and over fifty others up in London two years ago. We want to know all about "The Covenant of Security". Blair apparently wants confrontation rather than comprehension, which can only exacerbate the situation further (which certain people desperately want).

What was it he said? "We must not let the terrorists change our way of life".

Go watch "Taking Liberties", Tony Baloney!


Al-Hesbah is the internet chat forum on which a message proclaiming an attack on London was posted just hours before the cars in the centre of London were found.

So what is "the beef" on Al-Hesbah?

It is a popular Jihadist website, and messages from al-Qaeda are posted on it. So this site should be monitored every second of every day. So to say there was no warning or intelligence on the plot is not true.

But get this: it is actually accused of being a front for Western Intelligence agencies!



Often the virtual battle is among various terrorist websites, representing different groups affiliated with the same movement. The Al-Tajdeed site (, operated by the Saudi Islamist opposition in London, launched such a struggle against, a leading Islamist site that often posts messages from Al Qaeda. Al-Tajdeed accused Al-Hesbah of serving Arab and Western intelligence agencies, as well as exposing the founders of the famous Al-Ansar website (, including the operator known as "Irhabi 007" and other members of the Global Islamic Media Front. On March 5, 2006, Al-Tajdeed published an article signed by "Omar bin Hanif," titled "A Series of Exposures of Spies - [Who Is] the Traitor who Sold Irhabi 007?"

After Al-Hesbah went offline, Al-Tajdeed attempted to attract Jihadists who had used Al-Hesbah by promoting alternative websites such as Al-Akhbar and Al-Alamiyya. However, on April 4, 2006, Al Qaeda posted a communiqué on several forums rejecting the accusations against Al-Hesbah for the arrest of Al Qaeda members and Irhabi 007: “we stress that these allegations are false. Everything we know about our brothers in Al-Hesbah is good – and even if we assume, for the sake of argument, that [the website] had been infiltrated, [we assure you that] … the fall of the brothers had nothing to do with the Internet.” Al-Tajeed responded immediately, arguing that the communiqué was fake, an attempt by Arab-Zionist intelligence apparatuses to maintain “the Al-Hesbah espionage site.” The site reappeared April 14, 2006, with a statement blaming the attacks for the website’s month-long absence and noting that precautions had since been taken.


Whether this allegation is true or not, Al-Hesbah appears to be an important channel of communication for al-Qaeda.

Now assuming that (a) al-Qaeda is real, and (b) our governments really, really, really want to stop terrorist attacks so that (c) MI5 are constantly monitoring al-Qaeda chat forums, when MI5 see a message on a trusted al-Qaeda mouthpiece that London is going to be bombed today what should have happened? Were the correct and agreed procedures followed? For example, were analysts awakened from their sleep to help analyse traffic and CCTV footage? Was there a squad of Special Branch immediately sent around to the address of the poster?

Wouldn't it be absolutely ubelievable if, as is alleged, al-Hesbah is a front for Western Intelligence?

To add to this hint of LIHOP, it is also being reported that the USA received warnings of an attack on Glasgow airport two weeks ago. The warnings were taken seriously enough to place marshalls on flights into and out of Glasgow Airport. However, the warnings were apparently not passed on "for operational reasons"!



U.S. law enforcement officials received intelligence reports two weeks ago warning of a possible terror attack in Glasgow against "airport infrastructure or aircraft," a senior US law enforcement official tells the Blotter on

The intelligence reports also warned that airports and aircraft in the Czech Republic could be the targets of al Qaeda-connected terrorists.

The warnings were kept secret for operational reasons, according to officials. In public, the White House and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff have continued to maintain they know of no specific or credible threats involving the United States, even though the intelligence reports specify US aircraft as possible targets.

A US official told that the intelligence reports led to the assignment of Federal Air Marshals to flights into and out of both Glasgow and Prague.


So when two cars laden with fuel and nails almost exploded in London on the first full day of a brand new British cabinet, was this and other credible intelligence then passed on?

There is something very fishy about all this.