Thursday, July 29, 2010


The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment states the optimum human population is 1 billion.

The Georgia Guidestones state the optimum human population is 0.5 billion.

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinbugh, wants to be reincarnated as a major virus to kill reduce human population.

The world population is nearly 7 billion.

If we take the UN optimum, if you do nothing and let the world-government-in-waiting the UN take control then the odds of your survival are 7/1.

If we take the Georgia Guidestones optimum the odds are halved to 14/1.

7/1 is generally considered an outside chance.

14/1? You'd only back a 14/1 horse for a laugh or if you were pissed or if you had inside info.

ENJOY (the death of your family)!

Wednesday, July 28, 2010


Osama bin Laden has been off the front pages for months. But then just before a vote to finance the Afghanistan war the Gladio/Mockingbird Media are given the opportunity to put him back on the front page, big photo and all, and to blame Pakistan and Iran for everything. Then a Congress that was not expected to vote to continue financing the Afghan war beats expectations and votes to continue the war.

Just another one of them things that makes you go hmmmm.

I was at the crib, sittin' by the fireplace
Drinkin' cocoa on the bear skin rug
The door bell rang. Who could it be?
Thought to myself then started to shrug
Got to the door. Ding Dong. Who is it?
My girl's best friend had payed me a visit.
Sly as can be, tight dress and all
She knew that I was faithful. I really didn't have the gall.
I tried to chilll. She made the move.
Now I know my girlfriend wouldn't approve.
I didn't realize my girl was settin' me up
Yo, my girl didn't trust me. No!
Yeah, but she lost control I wouln't take the bait.
I said chill baby baby chill baby baby wait
My girl bust in, Caught us creating a boom
She said "Girlfriend"?

Things that make you go hmm
Things that make you go hmm
Things that make you go hmm
Things that make you go hmm, hmm, hmm
Things that make you go hmm

Here's how it started
Just an example of how another brother can trample
Ruin your life, sleep with your wife
Watch your behind
There was a friend of mine named Jay
Would come over late at night and say hey
I watched the fight. I thought is was alright.
'Cause me and Jay were really really tight
So damned close we had the same blood type.
Months went by and my wife got big
We were havin' a child and I got another gig
So I let Jay move into the crib and chill
He had his own room and helped pay the bills
The time had come (for the baby down to the scene)
It looked like Jay and I couldn't believe
Before my eyes in the delivery room.

The things that make you go hmm
Things that make you go hmm
The things that make you go hmm, hmm, hmm
The things that make you go hmm
Things that make you go hmm
The things that make you go hmm.

Robbie Rob - break it down!

Give it to me Give it to me Give it to me Give it to me (x7)
Give it to me Give it to me

Seventeen and I was havin' a ball
Eleventh grade and "Joe" I knew it all
I fell in love for the very first time
With this girl she really blew my mind
Inner sense and whole lotta class
Style that could give you whiplash
We said hello and my heart beat stopped
She was the world and I was on top
Time went by, She filled my universe
We made love, She said I was the first
My boy kept tellin' me. Yo, I don't know
I think your girl's been playing tic tac toe
I'll ask my girl I know she only loves me
Wasn't I the one who took your viginity?
The look on her face read sorrow and gloom
She said "Yeah, Why do you guys always ask that?"

Things that make you go hmm
Things that make you go hmm
It's the things that make you go hmm

(Repeat Chorus)

Hey ladies
Have you ever had a man
Go away for business, come back with a tan
Comes home late at night from work
You cooked him dinner now you feel like a jerk
Sayin' he didn't have time to eat
And he's not even hungry, he wants to RETREAT
To the bedroom he said his head hurts
You're only makin' love in radical spurts
Mysterious calls and the phone goes click
You say to yourself "I'm gonna hit him with a brick"
Ain't no way he could be cheatin' on me
I wonder who bought him those BVD's
Dressed to a T to hang with the fellas
Over the guys and I'm getting jealous
Comin' home late smellin' like perfume (fume)

(Repeat Chorus x7)

Things that make you go hmm


We were told that the Wikileaks op told the truth about the true Afghanistan war, that we were killing civilians en masse, etc.

So why has a Congress that was publicly scepticalof the Afghan war just approved yet more money for Obummer to continue the job?

Maybe the sentences extracted from the following report will explain;
The Pentagon had been complaining about the delays in the funding and warned that it was running out of cash to continue the [Afghan] war...A secondary vote calling for US troops to withdraw from Pakistan was voted down 38-372...The vote was a surprisingly major win for the Obama Administration, following evidence that a large number of Congressmen were already bristling at the expense of the war,

So just when the Pentagon was to run out of money to fund the Afghanistan war and withdraw troops from Pakistan, some 'leaks' are leaked, the 'free press' gets really angry to pretend the leaks are true, and then the 'free press' says the 92000 documents prove conclusively that bin Laden is still alive, and that Pakistan and Iran are running the Taliban.

Hence the 'surprise' approval for more money for more war in Afghanistan and the troops in Pakistan are staying there too! Withdrawing from Afghanistan and Pakistan would have slowed down if not completely stopped the rush to war on Iran.


House Approves More Afghan War Funding
Congressmen Embrace Escalation as Evidence of War's Folly Grows
by Jason Ditz, July 27, 2010
Email This | Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum

Though one would have expected that the massive release of some 92,000 classified documents Sunday underscoring just how poorly the war is going would have changed some minds, the Obama Administration has gotten its way once again, with the House of Representatives approving the $59 billion emergency funding bill to keep the war going by a 308-114 vote.

There was, at the very least, some vigorous debate in the House today, with Reps. Dennis Kucinich (D – OH) and Ron Paul (R – TX) at the center of the opposition to continuing the war. At the end of the day, however, all the new evidence about the disastrous war was ignored in favor of pumping tens of billions of dollars into the conflict.

The 308-114 vote was saw a majority from both parties supporting the war, with only 12 Republican and 102 Democrats opposing the conflict. A secondary vote calling for US troops to withdraw from Pakistan was voted down 38-372.

The House was forced into the direct vote last week after the Senate rejected a number of domestic spending amendments attached to the bill in a procedural effort by the House early in the month.

The Pentagon had been complaining about the delays in the funding and warned that it was running out of cash to continue the war. The “emergency” funds were intended to pay for the Obama Administration’s December escalation of the conflict.

The vote was a surprisingly major win for the Obama Administration, following evidence that a large number of Congressmen were already bristling at the expense of the war, and the dramatic release of the WikiLeaks War Logs just two days before the vote.

But pro-war Congressmen were quick to disregard the logs, insisting that the 92,000 documents detailing the war’s enormous shortcomings and massive civilian toll were “outdated” because they were from late 2009 and before. Though all of the evidence is that the situation has only worsened in the last seven months, it seems officials were able to shrug off the embarrassment with relatively little effort, and secure the funds to continue their ill-conceived conflict.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010


Their financial crimes have been busted. Maybe they thought they could get away with it, but we now know what they did, how they did it and more importantly, who did it.

Their three world war plan has been busted. Maybe they thought they could take their time, thinking that we were so dumbed down by flouride and Z-list celebrities that we wouldn't look up from our TVs.

Their prime political conspiracy, Bilderberg, has been busted. Even their own are turning on them, and they are all over the news, being exposed in the EU Parliament, and now police are complaining of their use to protect Bilderberg.

Their latest gimp, Obummer, has been busted. His messianic aura has been stripped from his fake birth certificate and his ratings are collapsing faster than WTC7 on 9/11.

They are so busted that we can see every move they make, sometimes weeks or months beforehand...because we know.

So when they use a website based on leaks to try to put some positive spin on pro-war propaganda bullshit, and even that is busted almost as soon as it is published, then what can we deduce?






The Daily Telegraph was one of the greatest warmongers of this last decade. It has published its analysis of the latest Wikileaks, and its principal findings are:


Pakistan has armed, trained and coordinated Taliban and al-Qaeda attacks in Afghanistan, according to the military reports.

The leaked documents show the exponential growth in the use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) in the last six years, from just 308 were recorded in 2004 to 7,155 in 2009.

Iran is waging a secret campaign to arm, train and fund the Taliban-led insurgency against Nato forces in Afghanistan, according to American military reports from 2005 and 2006

The secret work of Task Force 373, the American military unit tasked with the "kill or capture" of senior Taliban and al-Qaeda insurgents is laid bare.

The documents show multiple intelligence reports on the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden.

A notorious Afghan criminal was recruited to spy for Iran before returning to Afghanistan to become a police chief.


The most important to me are paragraphs 3,5 and 6, linking Iran and ObL. They imply that ObL is alive and well, until 2009 at the latest, and that Iran is actively involved with the Taliban, and with paragraph 2 is actively killing NATO soldiers through IEDs. The IED angle was worked to death (no pun intended) mid-decade, and it didn't stick, because it wasn't true.

Anyway, in this latest Wikileak approximately 92000 documents have been 'leaked'. Who is going to read nearly 92000 documents? Not many, so who are most people going to trust? Their favourite newspaper. And what are ALL newspapers saying?

1. ObL is alive
2. Iran is involved with the Taliban.

And NWO papers such as The Guardian, NYT and Der Gladio Spiegel have been verifying all this!?

Is my name David Rockefeller!?



Have you read this report on the 'leaks' in The Guardian today?

ObL seems to be one of those evil pantomime characters who appears from a cloud of smoke, conjurs up some evil, and then disappears into the mist with an evil laugh, stroking his beard. All the kids shout, "he's behind you", and boo their unwitting hearts out...all except an awkward few who shout, "Get off! You're already dead several times, and anyway, the good guys helped you to escape! Get off! This is bullshit!"

In the following 'report' ObL is
1. alive
2. in Pakistan and Afghanistan
3. consorting with Iran and North Korea, both named as members of the Axis of Evil, along with Iraq.

This is great 'intelligence'. It really is. Just a few years too late!!!

Just make it up now, lads. It's getting boring. We could all do with a good laugh. Make one of those films again, with an actor portraying ObL with a dodgy nose and the nose starts to slip and fall off so the actor has to push it back it into place. Yeah! That'd be great! Nominations for Oscars in Best Director, Best Screenplay, Best Make-Up, and the new category of Best Bullshit!

These leaks are implying the following;
1. ObL is still alive
2. ObL is working with Iran and North Korea
3. Pakistan is assisting the Taliban
4. the 'infidels' have committed many many war crimes and covered them up

However, we know,
1. ObL is dead, or very very ill, requiring regular dialysis
2. he cannot therefore be working with Iran, and it would be suicide for Iran to do so anyway
3. Pakistan did create the Taliban, but with CIA money
4. NATO kills civilians, kids too, and covers it up, but revealing these war crimes will fuel the Jihad further, driving more to join the Jihad, particularly while Israel continues to play its part and blockade Gaza and commit other crimes en masse.

Regarding point 4, the war crimes have had to be covered up otherwise we'd be out of Dodge by now. There is increasing desperation with Afghanistan. Soldiers are dying in numbers out there, and the public are questioning their presence there. It's been nearly 9 years since 9/11. But a significant military presence in Afghanistan is required for an attack on Iran. Iraq is on Iran's Western border and Afghanistan is on Iran's Eastern border. There are US forces in Turkmenistan, and large numbers in Saudi Arabia of course. Pakistan does not have that many US military, so may be that's why the US is keen to get into Pakistan, because then Iran would be completely surrounded and isolated.

Or maybe by invading Pakistan a nuclear war could be started...

Anyway, it appears these 'leaks' are more than just leaks, and are serving an agenda. Whether it is to restrict the internet, or to throw more mud at Iran and ObL, we'll just have to wait and see.


Afghanistan war logs reveal hand of Osama bin Laden

Many threat reports between 2004 and 2009 link elusive al-Qaida chief to full range of insurgent activities

The shadow of Osama bin Laden, mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, hangs heavily over the US-led coalition's campaign in Afghanistan. Again and again, the secret watchers of American military intelligence, whose furtive and often confused attempts at information gathering are collated in the 2004-2009 war logs, glimpse the hidden hand of the al-Qaida chief or catch a tantalising whiff of his whereabouts, only for the trail to turn cold and peter out.

Speaking last month, Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, said the last time US officials were in possession of precise information about Bin Laden's location was in the "early 2000s". Since then, there had been no firm leads. "He is, as is obvious, in very deep hiding," Panetta said. "He's in an area of the tribal areas of Pakistan that is very difficult … All I can tell you is it's in the tribal areas. We know that he's located in that vicinity."

Yet despite the CIA's self-confessed cluelessness, raw intelligence reports contained in the leaked war logs show that, every now and then, US forces believe they can see the mist surrounding Bin Laden briefly lift. One such moment came in August 2006, when a "threat report" generated by International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) regional command (north) zeroed in on suicide bombers recruited by al-Qaida.

"Reportedly a high-level meeting was held in Quetta, Pakistan, where six suicide bombers were given orders for an operation in northern Afghanistan. Two persons have been given targets in Kunduz, two in Mazar-e-Sharif and the last two are said to come to Faryab," the report claimed.

It went on: "These meetings take place once every month, and there are usually about 20 people present. The place for the meeting alternates between Quetta and villages (NFDG) [no further details given] on the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

"The top four people in these meetings are Mullah Omar [the Taliban leader], Osama bin Laden, Mullah Dadullah and Mullah [Baradar]. "The six foreigners who have been given the assignment have each been given $50,000 [£32,000] to conduct the attacks, and they have been promised that their families will be taken care of."

The report went on to detail the insurgents' discussions about where and how the suicide attacks would be carried out, and whether vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs) or suicide vests would be used.

Pakistan-based Ahmad Murghabi, described as a close associate of Baradar and a former provincial military commander in Ghor province, is alleged to be the lead instructor in a self-governing al-Qaida/Taliban academy for murder. "Murghabi is the one who is responsible for the teaching of suicide bombers and also IEDs and guerrilla warfare. He has 12 students now."

This intelligence report may have had significant practical impact down the line. Dadullah, a former mujahideen leader and close associate of Omar, was cornered and killed the following May in a raid by US and British special operations forces. Baradar was captured by Pakistani security forces in Karachi earlier this year.

The war logs make clear that suicide bombing, normally carried out by non-Afghan, foreign fighters, is a growth business in this period – and claim that they are being carefully nurtured by Bin Laden.

A threat report generated as early as September 2004 stated that "three well-trained terrorists (NFI) [no further information] have been assigned by Osama bin Laden to conduct a suicidal attack against [Hamid] Karzai [the pro-western Afghan president].

"According to the source [unidentified], the three terrorists will pass Afghanistan border in 10 days with counterfeit journalist passports obtained from an Arab country, potentially Pakistan [sic]. They are planning to conduct the attack during a press conference or a meeting held by Karzai."

Another report, in September 2008, speaks of highly co-ordinated, multinational al-Qaida attack planning: "Seven Arabs and four Iranians have been seen in Siahvashan village, Gozareh district, Herat province five days ago. They have joined Gholam Yahya Akbary (GYA) group. The seven Arabs are tied with [US-born Abu] Mansour, one of the Osama bin Laden deputies.

"The Arabs are only charge[d] to carry out suicide attacks against US and Italian troops or, secondarily, whatever foreigners personnel [sic]. The four Iranians belong to 'intelligence' unit of Sepah-e-Pasdaran [Iranian Revolutionary Guards] and they are supporting GYA in the anti-Isaf/Afghan government actions through intelligence and as well co-ordinating the GYA group activities."

More suicide bombings, if the intelligence set out in the logs is accurate, are planned with al-Qaida's Afghan allies, such as the Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin (HIG) militia led by the notorious warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.

Some raw intelligence pertaining to Bin Laden is downright sensational – and largely impossible to verify. In December 2005, under the banal title Threat to Aircraft in Helmand Province, Isaf headquarters in Kabul generated the following startling report based on information received from regional command (south):

"On 19 November 2005, Hezb-e-Islami party leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Dr Amin (NLN) [no last name], Osama bin Laden's financial adviser, both flew to North Korea, departing from an [sic] Iran. They returned to Helmand on approximately 3 December 2005. While in North Korea, the two confirmed a deal with the North Korean government for remote controlled rockets for use against American and coalition aircraft.

"The deal was closed for an undetermined amount of money. The shipment of said weapons is expected shortly after the new year. Upon return from North Korea, Dr Amin stayed in Helmand and Hekmatyar went to Konar, Nuristan province."

Direct co-operation including weapons sales between al-Qaida, North Korea's regime, and the Afghan insurgents, apparently with a helping hand from Iran, could amount to Washington's worst security nightmare. But whether it happened, or is still happening, is a matter of speculation. The report of the North Korea visit was not followed up, at least not at the war-logs level of military intelligence, and no further information was forthcoming.

But while Hekmatyar is still very much at large, "Dr Amin" – his full name is Amin al-Haq or ul-Haq – was reportedly picked up by Pakistani security forces in Lahore in 2008.

According to the Long War Journal, Amin has a long pedigree as a Taliban, al-Qaida and HIG operative. Most often described as the security co-ordinator of Bin Laden's Black Guard (bodyguards), he was with the al-Qaida chief at the battle of Tora Bora in 2001. Said to be "under interrogation at an undisclosed location" after his arrest in January 2008, Amin has since disappeared from view.

Numerous threat reports link Bin Laden and al-Qaida to the full range of conventional insurgent activities, including rocket smuggling in Kandahar province. But in another, particularly alarming report, al-Qaida is also claimed to be mixed up in a plan to manufacture chemical weapons payloads for rocket-propelled grenades that are "intended to spread a poisonous gas on impact".

Dr Mohammad Hamzah Ahmadzai, identified in the logs as the scientist behind the plan, is said by the source to be interested in acquiring uranium for unspecified explosive purposes. Uranium was available from an unidentified factory in Lahore at a cost of approximately $538 for 10g, but Hamzah found the price too high, the source claimed. "Hamzah was thus seeking alternative means of creating a large explosion."

The overall impression gained from the war logs through 2009 is that Bin Laden's influence is pervasive and possibly growing.

Intelligence circulated in May 2008, for example, claimed a plot was afoot to poison coalition forces. A Taliban commander called Nasim in Nuristan province had, it was alleged, developed a powder that was to be added to food and drink consumed by coalition soldiers as their patrols passed through villages. According to the source, "the poison is called Osama Kapa in honour of Osama".

And a report in July 2007 suggests Bin Laden is willing and able to exercise the patronage of a great chief. Thus, in Kunduz province, it is reported that an insurgent called Abdullah won distinction and favour for his skill in making remote-controlled IEDs. His reward: an Arab wife presented to him by Bin Laden.

Despite his invisibility, Osama's message representing resistance, jihad and the inevitable triumph of the faithful seems ubiquitous. One intelligence report, filed in April 2004 and headlined Propaganda, describes how coalition forces found two lone white flags flying on a hillside along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

"On the flags was written, 'Long Live Taliban' … 'Long Live Omar', and 'Sheikh Osma' [Osama]," it said. And under the flags were five handwritten letters. In a chilling promise that echoes hauntingly across Afghanistan six years later, the letters said: "We are looking for coalition forces. If God is willing, we will get rid of them … Kill them wherever you find them."

Monday, July 26, 2010


The latest Wikileaks on Afghanistan could well drive many more pissed off Muslims to join the Jihad in Afghanistan, or indeed anywhere. This plays into the hands of the NATO madmen intent on remaining in Afghanistan and the area for whatever purpose. In the last month there has been talk of withdrawal within a few years. A report published a month or so ago that Afghanistan had $1 trillion of natural resources was an attempt to persuade the coalition of the killing to remain there, to grab a piece of the action.

But if more Jihad results from these and previous leaks, then I can see Senators and MPs demanding more war, war, war,...

On the other hand, if these leaks result in us getting the hell out of Dodge, then great!


Two years ago, the inglorious NWO tried a sneak attack on Russia via Georgia. It didn't work.

Last year there was an attempt to instigate civil war in Iran via The Green Revolution, another CIA/MI6 colour revolution. That didn't work either.

In the last month or so talk of war on Iran has escalated. A very good analysis of this has been made by Webster Tarpley at

Now Wikileaks has released thousands of classified documents, and surprise, surprise, these documents detail the fears of NATO commanders that Pakistan and Iran are backing the Taliban, who have suddenly increased their attacks on NATO.

This 'leak' is thus a very very convenient way of blaming Iran for the Taliban and the deaths of NATO soldiers, because if it is leaked on Wikileaks then it MUST be true, right?

We know for a fact that the CIA and the ISI created the Taliban.

We know for a fact that the CIA created al-Qaeda.

We know for a fact that Iran has been in NATO crosshairs after being named in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

I am not stating that Wikileaks is part of an information warfare operation, but I do question why this latest set of 'leaks' tells us something we know already (the ISI/Taliban link) but also supports the continuing build up for war on Iran as part of the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda by blaming Iran for supporting the Taliban, which if you were Iran would be virtual suicide.

And let's look at the newspapers leaking the 'leaks'.

The Guardian was promoting mass genocide last December in blatantly supporting the Copenhagen Conference. It also deleted my comment about The Club of Rome and its Nazi heritage. It is also publishing propaganda for the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda, frequently demonising Iran.

The New York Times, the premier paper in New York, is owned by the Ochs-Sulzbergers, who are either CFR and/or Bilderberg.

Der Spiegel was formally called Diese Woche, a British/American propaganda media, but it was quickly handed over to Rudolf Augstein. Augstein appointed known former members of the Nazi propaganda and security departments as senior personnel, and defended the Nazi propaganda lie that Marinus van der Lubbe set the Reichstag on fire (as part of Gladio?). It also took a pro-Georgia position during the 2008 Russia-Georgia war, and is accused by Hezbollah leader Nasrallah of being part of the Zionist propaganda machine. Such a magazine, with one of the largest circulations in Europe, smells like it is part of the CIA Mockingbird Media apparatus, but at the moment the evidence is not solid.

Sunday, July 25, 2010


The word of the day is extermination.

1. ex KGB agent says he was told by ex MI5 agent that Dr David Kelly had been 'exterminated'.

Kelly was murdered. He was a major obstacle to the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda because he was highly sceptical of the major claim that Iraq had WMD, and was voicing his scpeticism. It is now crystal clear that Kelly was correct; Iraq did not have WMD, and those minor weapons that Iraq did have were bought from us. The second main claim against Iraq, that it was behind 9/11, has also been busted and MI5 head Manningham-Buller wrote memos stating that Iraq was not behind 9/11. Nevertheless, Iraq was invaded as per the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda. And now Bilderberg has given a green light to attack Iran.

2. despite promises, the NHS budget is to be axed.

We were told that the NHS would be safe from cuts, but now secret plans have been drawn up to restrict even the most basic treatments. This is one of the aims of the engineered financial crisis, to kill people and make their lives a misery. The main aim is to create some sort of new global financial architecture, but because of the Nazi heritage of our inglorious bankers, the resulting economic depression will kill off the sick and the weak, just like Hitler did with his T4 extermination program.


So the word of the day is extermination.

Dr David Kelly was exterminated.

Many hard-working British taxpayers will be exterminated.

Saturday, July 24, 2010


We are ruled by Nazis. The City of London and Wall Street created the Nazis. The Nazi ideaology did not die in 1945. It lives on, in London, Washington DC, Langley, Whitehall, and all centres of political and military-industrial power. To them you are just a worthless animal, to be worked to death and experimented on, and sent to fight and die in engineered wars, all with the aimof making them money and centralising power to form a tyrannical fascist world government.


your soul don't burn
you dark the sun
you rain the fire on everyone
scabs, police, government thieves
venal psychic amputees
parasitic you're syphilitic
parasitic you're syphilitic

swastika eyes
you got
swastika eyes
you got
swastika eyes, swastika eyes, swastika eyes

I'll vent my spleen I'll keep my dreams
my flesh, my bones, my soul I own
my mind's a weapon immune from infection
parasitic you're syphilitic
parasitic you're syphilitic

swastika eyes
you got
swastika eyes
you got
swastika eyes, swastika eyes, swastika eyes

I see your autosuggestion psychology
elimination policy
a military industrial
illusion of democracy

swastika eyes
you got
swastika eyes
you got
swastika eyes, swastika eyes, swastika eyes

Wednesday, July 21, 2010


Cui Bono?

It's the first question to ask when a crime has been committed.

Cui bono?

Who benefits?

Well, our inglorious leaders are calling for world government, in many avenues of our lives; world financial governmnent, world environment government, world police and army.

The first attempts at world government were
1. The League of Nations, financed by Rockefeller, which failed because the USA didn't support it, so Rockefeller and Wall Street created the CFR to persuade the USA that a world government was required
2. The United Nations, financed by Rockefeller, which survived because the USA had fought in WW2 for much longer than it had in WW1 and was persuaded that some form of world government was needed (but they weren't told that FDR and the CFR had dragged the USA into WW2 with the connivance of Winston Churchill and the provocation of Pearl Harbor).

This shows the Rockefeller desire for world government, but David also declares the aim in his memoirs.

After the UN was created organisations like Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission and The Club of Rome were created by Rockefeller to drive the agenda for world government.

One good thing FDR did was to get The Glass-Steagall Act implemented. But in the 1990's several Bilderbergers, like Larry Summers who is currently ranting on the FT website, decided to repeal that act so that Rockefeller and his Bilderberg ilk could go gambling with your money. A credit bubble was inflated. You could get a large mortgage even if you didn't provide evidence of your income. Mortgages and debts were mixed up and sold on as AAA when they were really ZZZ, and before anyone could really get a fix on who owed what to whom, a member of "the family", Lehman Brothers, was allowed to go bust, sending the finanical system into panic. But Rockefeller and their Bilderberg ilk were safe because they had arranged for their own to be in the prime positions to control the flow of any bailouts, because the banks they owned had become Too Big Too Fail. So the likes of Geithner, Paulson, Bernanke, Summers etc, all members of Bilderberg, gave Bilderberg banks tens of billions each so that those Bilderberg banks, such as JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, could ride the storm and literally make a killing, buying up and/or stealing competition for a fraction of the true market price.

And now they propose even more world government financial architecture to save us from further economic collapse!

Cui bono?


This blew my mind when it was first released in 1993. Cheesuz, it's now 2010...and it's happening.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010


There is great excitement about a series of reports in The Washington Post called Top Secret America.

The WP has been the Bilderberg Post for decades, annually invited to Bilderberg meetings and respecting the Chatham House rules of not reporting what was said.

But hang on. Why would the Bilderberg Post report in some detail on Top Secret America?

Why does the WP not report on the pseudo-Satanism and The Cremation of Care at Bohemian Grove?

And why not use their front row status at Bilderberg to report on the traitors at Bilderberg?

I suggest that the New World Order is so shit scared of our rapid awakening and rebellion that they are using their Number One publication (though the Financial Times is also a rival to that coveted position) to persuade their minions that they still have substantial control; that the CIA is Google and vice versa, that their reach extends into the boards of this and that corporation, that they are in total control.

Well, have I got news for you.

It ain't gonna happen.


A few weeks ago shortly after the Hamburger summit the USA announced the discovery of a network of Russian spies. The members of that spy ring were swapped for four spies Russia had convicted of espionage.

Now a Russian civilian pilot has been arrested and taken to the USA on charges of cocaine smuggling. The arrest could be described as a kidnap or rendition because the USA did not inform Russia of the arrest. The Russian pilot denies all allegations.



US “kidnaps” Russian pilot over alleged drug trafficking

Published 20 July, 2010, 10:40

Edited 20 July, 2010, 19:58

The Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry has sent an official note of protest to the US State Department after American agents detained a Russian citizen in Liberia and secretly transported him to the United States.

The Russian pilot, Konstantin Yaroshenko, is suspected in the US of attempting to bribe Liberian officials and smuggle cocaine. On May 28, the 41-year-old was detained by American Special Forces in a hotel in the Liberian capital of Monrovia and later transferred to the US where he is currently kept in a prison in Manhattan, New York.

The Russian Foreign Ministry “pointed out that it was unacceptable that the Russian side had not received proper notification on the arrest of our fellow citizen as is prescribed by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the bilateral consular convention,” said the Russian Consul General in New York, Andrey Yushmanov, cites Interfax agency.


In her evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry the former head of MI5 Baroness Manningham-Buller said the evidence on Iraq's WMD was poor and that terrorism had increased due to the invasion of Iraq. Chilcot has released a memo written by Baroness Manningham-Buller in 2002 in which she assesses the potential threats of terrorism if Iraq was invaded. The memo is available at, and in paragraph 2 she writes,
There is no credible intelligence that demonstrates that Iraq was implicated in planning the 11 September attacks.

When asked about providing input into dossiers on Iraq, Manningham-Buller told Chilcot,
"We were asked to put in some low-grade, small intelligence to it and we refused because we didn't think it was reliable,"

She also told Chilcot,
"By focusing on Iraq we reduced the focus on the al Qaida threat in Afghanistan. I think that was a long-term major and strategic problem."

Well of course it was. That was the point. Grab Iraqi oil, oust Saddam as part of the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses agenda, and keep global terrorism alive so that a global police state could be implemented.

But Iran still stands. Iran was named in A Clean Break, and in Rebuilding America's Defenses is named as more of a threat than Iraq. We now need to see what assessments have been made regarding Iran, because it is crystal clear that policy makers have been cherry-picking intelligence, and in some cases simply making it up, to drive an agenda that I think they don't fully understand.

Monday, July 19, 2010


After the CIA Google censored Alex Jones' The Obama Deception over the weekend, a censoring that provoked outrage and which has seriously and comically backfired, The Obama Deception has now been restored.

I now link to it and Jones' interview of Aaron Russo in a pane on the right of this blog.


In the great Bilderberg Austerity versus Stimulus debate at the FT someone called Bill de Berg has challenged Bilderbergers to come clean on how the financial crisis was engineered. The challenge has not been deleted yet.

But will the challenge be taken up by one of the Bilderberg commentators?

Here is what Bill de Berg has said;
The current crisis was engineered at Bilderberg. Bilderberg banks such as JP Morgan Chase have profited in buying up competitors and increasing their market share. Bilderbergers such as Summers, Trichet, Wolf and Ferguson should come clean now and tell us what was said at Bilderberg meetings about the crisis. Bilderberg was busted this year. Bilderberg ist kapput.


Bilderberg minions of the fraudsters who engineered the current financial crisis are arguing in the FT over what to do now with the global economy; more stimulus or more austerity.

Contributors include Martin Wolf, Larry Summers, Jean-Claude Trichet, Niall Ferguson.



The great austerity debate

Published: July 18 2010 19:56 | Last updated: July 18 2010 19:56

Over the next week some of the world’s leading policymakers and economists will be addressing in the FT the all-consuming contemporary economic debate: austerity versus stimulus. The writers, including Larry Summers, Jean-Claude Trichet and the FT’s Martin Wolf will argue whether cutting now risks suffocating the fragile recovery of the global economy.

This page allows you to see the highlights from each contribution and join the discussion in the comment box at the end of this page. You can also click through to read each piece as a whole and comment on that specific contribution.

Friday, July 16, 2010




Jundullah have claimed responsibility for the attack on a mosque in Zahedan, Iran, in retaliation for the execution of their former leader Abdolmalek Rigi. The CIA created Jundullah to destabilize Iran, and Rigi confirmed current and ongoing CIA support for Jundullah.

Use the CIA intelligence gathering and information censoring tool called Google to read for yourself how the alleged warriors for freedom create terrorist organisations and blow people up for fun. Search on the term "CIA Jundullah"...but hurry before the CIA deletes all relevant information.



Iran mosque hit by bomb blasts

At least 20 killed and more than 100 wounded in two suicide bombings outside a mosque in south-eastern Iran

David Batty and agencies, Friday 16 July 2010 07.53 BST

At least 20 people have been killed and more than 100 wounded in two suicide bombings outside a mosque in south-eastern Iran.

Members of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards were among those who died when the blast struck outside the main mosque in Zahedan, the capital of Sistan-Baluchistan province, the IRNA state news agency reported.

"The first explosion took place behind a checkpoint, and a number of Revolutionary Guard members were killed and injured because of it," Ali Abdollahi, the deputy interior minister, told the Fars news agency.

The head of the province's medical emergency department, Fariborz Rashedi, said: "In the two explosions in Zahedan more than 20 people were killed and over 100 were injured."

Local prosecutor Mohammad Marzieh told IRNA that 21 people had died.

The Sunni rebel group Jundullah, or Soldiers of God, claimed responsibility, according to al-Arabiya Television. The attack was in retaliation for the execution of the group's leader, Abdolmalek Rigi, last month.

Jundullah is accused by Tehran of mounting terrorist attacks with the support of the US, Britain and Pakistan. The government also claims it is linked to al-Qaida.

"Confessions of Abdolmalek Rigi prove that America, Israel and some European countries are directly involved in the attacks," said Guards official Yadollah Javadi in remarks carried by Fars.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010


When I first heard the news that Raoul Moat was dead it was on BBC Radio 5 Live, and the initial reports were that tasers had not, repeat not, been used.

But since his death it has come out that
1. Durham Prison had warned that Moat was ready to go on a bloody rampage
2. Moat was a police informer
3. experimental tasers had been used on Moat...TWICE!
4. while in prison Moat was complaining the police were always on his back, and he was constantly requesting psychiatric help (which was obviously denied).

I do not condone or support Moat's attacks on his ex, her boyfriend and the cop he attacked, but when someone in prison, particularly an informant, starts asking for help, which is then denied, and he is then released with warnings that he was going to go on a bloody rampage, warnings which are ignored, and then he shoots some people declaring war on the cops, and he is then hunted down with vehicles being shipped over from Northern Ireland and a RAF Tornado deployed, only for the man to die live on TV, shooting himself after being tasered and the cops then immediately say tasers weren't used and the media blindly report it so, then you've gotta ask yourself; WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!

Like with any shocking media event such as this, it looks like it was engineered by some psycho psychiatrist on the payroll of the CIA or MI5 with the aim of telling the people; look, we are in total control of you, this is what we can do in broad daylight in front of the world media and the people will support us.



'I've got problems with the police, they're always on my back': Secret audio diary reveals how killer Moat asked for psychiatric help

By Paul Sims

Secret tapes: Raoul Moat recorded up to 50 hours of conversations with care workers and police from July last year

An extraordinary audio diary recorded by Raoul Moat up to a year before his gun rampage reveals how the killer had previously asked for psychiatric help.

The recordings - said to be up to 50 hours long - were covertly made by the father of three as he met with social workers, police and family between July 2009 and April 2010.

In them he claims he is being harassed by police, and carries 'the stress of the world' on his shoulders.

The tapes were passed to ITV News by a friend of Moat's after his death.

In a recording made by Moat during a meeting in August 2009 - attended by a social worker - he says: 'I would like to have a psychiatrist, psychologist, have a word with me regularly, on a regular basis, to see if there's somewhere underlying where I have a problem that I haven't seen.

'It's easy for me to say I don't do anything wrong but I would like a professional, you know, not a DIY thing. A professional thing for someone to come along and say, "Look there's area for improvement here. This is a problem".'

Letting his mind wander to the next thought without properly finishing sentences, Moat displays a genuine desire to get help in a bid to keep his family together.

He says: 'This is one of the things I'm suggesting... to me that would be the most, you know, spend some money on trying to get this family back together instead of splitting it up.

'If I'm at fault myself in any way I'm open to all kinds of suggestions but I refuse to spend the rest of my time fighting with social services.'

In another recording he says: 'I'm quite emotionally unstable, I get myself over-the-top happy sometimes you know. And I have my bad days. I've done it all my life, that when things [are] going on that you don't like you block things out.

Read more:


PIMCO has come out stating its desire to buy British gilts. They think we should be jumping up and down with glee. I think we, the British taxpayer, is going to get totally screwed by Bilderberg Osborne's budget.

PIMCO appointed Neel Kashkari, the dude who implemented the Bilderberg TARP under Hank Paulson, as its Managing Director. Before helping Paulson defraud the USA of hundreds of billions, Kashkari was a VP of...GOLDMAN SACHS!

Bill Gross, PIMCO's founder and manager of its Total Return fund, made billions from the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac via the TARP.

So when people like this want to buy our bonds, I think we're gonna get done...BIG TIME. And their position on our bonds has changed since Bilderberg Osborne proposed a severe austerity budget, much more severe than Labour would have proposed.

But then again, Labour dragged us into the financial crisis with their light-touch regulation of the City.

So who can we trust?



Pimco turns bullish about UK gilts in light of budget cuts and euro debt woes

World's biggest bond investor seems unfazed by possible downgrade of UK's AAA credit rating

Pimco's Bill Gross Pimco, the world's largest asset manager, is now optimistic about investing in UK bonds, despite talk of a possible downgrade in British debt – but then its co-founder Bill Gross, above, has been fiercely critical of ratings agencies.

Pimco, the world's biggest bond investor, has turned bullish about Britain, reversing its position in January, when it warned that government gilts were resting "on a bed of nitroglycerin".

The California-based asset manager is more optimistic about investing in Britain following the drastic budget cuts announced by the government while, at the same time, Europe's debt woes make other sovereign bonds relatively less attractive, the Guardian has learned.

The asset manager's sheer size – it has $1tn (£659bn) of assets under management – makes its views widely followed in the market.

Pimco's move comes despite Standard & Poor's credit rating agency warning earlier this week about a possible downgrade of British debt. The UK could lose its top AAA rating if the government fails to deliver its planned austerity budget, S&P said.

Thursday, July 08, 2010


In the classic The Firm, Gary Oldman's character at a meeting of England's three top 'firms' warns the leaders of the other two gangs present that he comes in peace but leaves you in pieces.

In 1996 several Zionazis wrote a document for then PM of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu which called for military aggression against Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Iran.

On 11th September 2001 Nutternyahu went on US TV and stated that the mass murder of nearly 3000 people in the WTC was good for Israel, but quickly corrected himself.

After 11th September 2001
1. Iraq has been invaded and taken over
2. Israel has bombed Lebanon into the stone age
3. Israel has accused Syria of assassinating several anti-Syria Lebanese politicians and of hiding Saddam's invisible WMD

and now, despite having the only known nuclear arsenal in the region and not signing up to the NPT, Israel is now demanding war on Iran because of Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program!

So when Nutternyahu comes to you in peace, he plans to leave you in pieces. He is a gangster, a vandal, a hooligan, unwittingly working for the wicked hands of the NWO. As Matthew Hopkins in The Witchfinder General would say, "He has the mark of Satan upon him". This is not to cast all Jews as Satanists. Only the extreme hierarchy are, and they know it, the Rothchilds being the prime example. Look at
1. the poverty in the world, even the alleged destitution of Jewish children in Israel as advertised in Haaretz
2. the sickening wealth of the Rothschilds

The Rothschilds and their ilk got their extreme wealth by the transparent fraud of private fractional reserve banking in which they can create trillions out of nothing and demand the whole world as repayment.

Anyway, Nutternyahu is a nutter, perhaps possessed.

So when Barry Soetero President Obama Obummer, Chicago hoodlum, CIA agent, descendent of the NWO thinktank apparatus and beneficiary of massive Wall Street finance, says that Netanyahu is a man of peace, watch out!!



Obama endorses Netanyahu as “man of peace”
By Chris Marsden
8 July 2010

President Barack Obama on Tuesday praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a man who “wants peace” and is “willing to take risks for peace.”

He did so following a White House meeting five weeks after the May 31 raid on the Mavi Marmara Gaza aid convoy, in which Israeli forces murdered eight Turkish activists and a dual Turkish-US national. The White House meeting was also on the eve of another round of Israeli settlement expansion on the West Bank.

On the day of the meeting, a report by the human rights group B’Tselem said that Jewish settlements with 300,000 people now control more than 42 percent of all land in the West Bank, including 21 percent of all privately owned Palestinian land.

In March, Obama had made a point of refusing to hold a press conference with Netanyahu after Israel announced the building of 1,600 more Jewish homes while Vice President Joseph Biden was visiting Jerusalem. A “partial freeze” on further building runs out in September, and Israel has made clear it intends further construction.

Netanyahu has also refused to extend an apology to Turkey for the Mavi Marmara raid, and has rejected any international inquiry. With Washington’s support, Israel is holding its own inquiry, headed by a retired Israeli Supreme Court justice. The Israeli investigative committee does not even rise to the level of a state commission of inquiry.

Despite tensions that led to a temporary souring of US-Israel relations, Obama has again made clear the essential continuity of Middle East policy with the Republican Bush administration and underscored the bi-partisan character of US support for Israel. Obama described the relationship between the US and Israel as “unbreakable” and enduring. “It encompasses our national security interests, our strategic interests,” he said, and has “grown closer and closer as time goes on.”

Obama went to extraordinary lengths in his efforts to rehabilitate Netanyahu and Israel in the face of popular anger internationally over its blockade of the Gaza Strip and the suffering this inflicts on the Palestinians. He said nothing about the continued construction of Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem and did not urge an extension to the partial freeze.

Instead, he hailed the partial lifting of the Gaza blockade to allow in a limited number of consumer goods in the aftermath of Mavi Marmara as an example of how Israel has “shown restraint over the last several months that I think has been conducive to the prospects of us getting into direct talks.”

He rebutted press questions over his previous snub of Netanyahu. “The premise to your question was wrong, and I entirely disagree with it,” Haaretz reported Obama as saying. “If you look at every public statement that I’ve made over the last year-and-a-half, it has been a constant reaffirmation of the special relationship between the United States and Israel; that our commitment to Israel’s security has been unwavering. In fact, there aren’t any concrete policies that you could point to that would contradict that.”

He added, “I trusted Prime Minister Netanyahu since I met him before I was elected president. He is dealing with a very complex situation in a very tough neighborhood.”

The Israeli press noted in particular the significance of Obama’s defense of Israel’s nuclear deterrent. Obama rejected any singling out of Israel over its undeclared nuclear program as a threat to the 2012 Middle East regional nuclear conference.

A White House statement explained, “The president emphasized that the conference will only take place if all countries feel confident that they can attend, and that any efforts to single out Israel will make the prospects of convening such a conference unlikely.”

In an extraordinary Freudian slip, Obama also told reporters, “We strongly believe that, given its size, its history, the region that it’s in, and the threats that are leveled against us—against it, that Israel has unique security requirements. It’s got to be able to respond to threats or any combination of threats in the region. And that’s why we remain unwavering in our commitment to Israel’s security.” [Emphasis added]

YNet reported, “Israeli officials said no other American president has ever made such a clear statement regarding Israel’s nuclear ambiguity,” while Haaretz correspondent Natasha Mozgovaya called his statement, “The real treat” for Israel.

Obama’s glowing tribute to Netanyahu and fence-mending with Israel are motivated in the first instance by his desire to ensure Israeli collaboration against Iran, with both leaders stating they had discussed efforts to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear intentions following the imposition of additional sanctions by the United Nations Security Council.

Just hours ahead of Obama’s meeting with Netanyahu, during a visit to Finland, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman warned that “if Iranians gain nuclear capability, we will see a crazy nuclear arms race in the whole Middle East with consequences I don’t even want to think about.” This, he said, “is the biggest threat to the Gulf countries, it’s the biggest threat to the Middle East.”

Obama can accommodate so openly to Israel only because of the backing of the Arab regimes, as well as Turkey. The US has been concerned that Israel’s provocative actions and brutal treatment of the Palestinians might make it impossible for the Arab states to collaborate with its plans to secure Middle East domination. But the Arab bourgeois governments have shown a remarkable willingness to do so.

The Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is offering unprecedented concessions to Tel Aviv in order to secure the continued sponsorship by Washington of his stooge regime. The London-based Arab-language newspaper Al Ahram reported that Abbas submitted written proposals to US Special Envoy George Mitchell on core issues, including the borders of a Palestinian state and Jerusalem. The report states that Abbas’s Fatah will consider a land swap that would allow Israel to retain the major Jewish settlements in return for Palestinian control of East Jerusalem, with the exception of the Jewish quarter of the Old City and the Wailing Wall.

Should this be rejected, as it will be, his sole alternative is to ask the Arab League countries to re-endorse the Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, and to plead with the UN Security Council to recognize a Palestinian state based on the pre-1967 War borders.

Behind their usual empty words of support for the Palestinians, the Arab League states are working ever more closely with Washington and Tel Aviv. On the eve of Obama’s meeting with Netanyahu, his administration approved £500 million in military sales to three Arab League states—Egypt, Oman and Tunisia—including an air defense upgrade, aircraft and naval ship support and helicopters. Washington is also considering a request from Saudi Arabia for the sale of 75 F-15 fighter jets and the modernization of other aircraft worth $10 billion. The request was reportedly approved during the visit to Washington by Saudi King Abdullah last month.

Last year, the US approved almost $13 billion in arms requests from the Arab states. Such military and commercial arrangements, coupled with a shared desire to curb Iranian power, are what really determine the Arab League’s attitude towards Israel and the Palestinians.

The US deputy national security advisor, Ben Rhodes, stressed that such deals do not cut across enhanced military and security cooperation with Israel and the maintenance of its “qualitative military edge…through programs such as the Iron Dome [missile defense program] and through a very close contact through our national security teams.”

“We believe that there are many cases in which the Iranian threat commits us to strengthen the ability of states in the region to defend themselves,” he added.

The US has also agreed nearly $10 billion in arms deals with Turkey.

Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad has called upon Turkey to exercise restraint regarding its posturing over Mavi Marmara. He warned on an official visit to Spain Monday, “If the relationship between Turkey and Israel is not renewed it will be very difficult for Turkey to play a role in negotiations” over the Middle East peace process, which would “affect the stability in the region.”

Ankara has been forced by domestic anger to make protests against its traditional ally, Israel, in the aftermath of the killing of its citizens, including freezing at least 16 arms deals worth $56 billion, recalling its ambassador, and closing its airspace to Israeli military aircraft.

Last weekend, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu was reported to have told a small group of journalists traveling with him to Kyrgyzstan that Turkey would cut off ties with Israel if it did not receive an apology over Mavi Marmara. But Turkish officials quickly claimed the minister had been misrepresented, telling Reuters that he had said only that relations would not improve unless Ankara’s demand was met.

Trade between Turkey and Israel reached a high of $3.3 billion in 2008, up from $1.4 billion in 2002 when the Justice and Development Party first came to power in Turkey. Last year, Israel and Turkey, despite the recession, did over $2.5 billion in trade.

Senior Israeli officials told the Jerusalem Post they believed it was unlikely Ankara would sever ties with Israel because, “This is not something the US feels is in the interest of Middle East stability.”

“If they went ahead with this, they would feel US anger,” the officials said. In addition, the European Union would oppose such a move, which would “bury” Turkey’s chances of EU membership.

Copyright © 1998-2010 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved


Daniel Estulin has been interviewed by RT, and he claims that thirteen secret US military bases are being built in Afghanistan for an attack on Russia. Estulin claims the one of his sources for this claim is the Russian government itself.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010


The report has been released from the Russell Whitewash Inquiry into Climategate.
The "rigour and honesty" of the scientists at the centre of a row over climate research, sparked when hundreds of emails were stolen from a world-renowned research centre, is not in doubt, an independent review said today.

[source : Climategate scientists' honesty not in doubt, says review, The Independent 7/7/2010]
NB "an independent review"?!

Sir Muir Russell was asked to investigate the UEA CRU by the UEA itself...and the UEA is financing the inquiry!! So how can it be declared as "independent"? Duh, gee, I dunno, boss.

Anyway, hardly a surprise, but the inquiry run by Russell into the UEA CRU which was financed by the UEA has concluded that the UEA CRU is full of saints but they should have been a bit more open.

Tuesday, July 06, 2010


Just one month ago Derrick Bird went on the rampage in Cumbria. There are suggestions that the cops let it happen once he started.

Now Raoul Moat has tried to murder his ex-girlfriend and killed her boyfriend, and has declared war on the cops, shooting one cop! And this after the Northumbria Constabulary was warned by the Durham Prison Service that Moat was on the warpath!

Two media intensive gun-related incidents in one month, one definitely allowed to happen, the other highly probably allowed to play out?

Remember, Dr David Kelly was found dead just hours after Operation Mason became active, a close friend says he could not have killed himself because he could barely hold a knife to eat his meals, suicide was against his religion and hardly any blood was found near his corpse.


The United States of America of today was predicted in 1791.

Just a few days ago the USA 'celebrated' its alleged freedom from tyranny.

But that was from a tyranny the Americans of yesteryear could see, touch and smell; the British Establishment.

In 1791 the design of the capital of this new nation of freedom was drawn up.

What did it contain?

An inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram, the most satanic symbol, pointing down into The White House.

This was followed by a significant Freemasonic ceremony of laying the cornerstone of The White House in which a plaque was laid indicating Freemasonry is over 6000 years old.

But before this in 1782 The Illuminati and Freemasonry allied at the Congress of Wilhemsbad with a plan to control the world.

And before and after this the European invaders drove the American Native Indians into reservations of ever decreasing number and size.

Flouride in the water, GM food, chemtrails in the air, microsecond surveillance, the list goes on and on...

Who would want all this? Not Jesus. Not God.

Only one entity wants this.

Saturday, July 03, 2010


This is one way to go.

UK laws allow the private prosecution of a foreign citizen. Perhaps they didn't think of that in their arrogance.

And one benefit of this path is that for a small fee you can get a High Court judge to only 'assess' the merits of your private prosecution. You don't have to take the criminals to court. You can simply submit your case to a High Court judge, who will then, if he is convinced of your case, issue an arrest warrant. This is what happened to the Israeli General Doron Almog who flew to London but then did not get off the plane and instead flew back to Israel because of an arrest warrant issued through a private prosecution.

However if a private prosecution does reach court then it can be commandeered and shut down by the Crown Prosecution Service at any time, even if there is a significant public interest, such as Rockefeller and Bilderberg and their ilk defrauding us via their unnecessary banks, sending us into unneccesary wars, and denying us our human rights through the engineered and unnecessary global war on terror.

But does it really need to go that far? Perhaps just getting arrest warrants issued is a victory.

A full private prosecution requires a lot of money, but the standard of proof is lower. But just getting the arrest warrant issued for David Rockefeller et al does not need that much money and would be a sign of intention and would require them to submit a defence in writing to dismiss the arrest warrant.

But while the warrant is active their travel plans would be hindered.

And that would be a significant psychological victory.

But if you can think of another way then don't wait for me...

Friday, July 02, 2010


Next time you meet somebody try a freemason handshake and see what happens.

It may be a complete stranger introduced to you at a party, or a business meeting.

Or it could be an old school chum or acquaintance you haven't seen for years.

But check out those good ol' mason handshakes and try 'em out.

Who knows where it could lead.

Actually, it sounds like a cracking plot for a novel...


There are a few Russian Bilderbergers. See my posts on Russia and Bilderberg. Russian Bilderbergers should be arrested for Treason. If not then think-tanks like Carnegie Moscow Centre should be shut down...unless Carnegie does indeed control Russia!


George Robot regularly posts his pro-MMGW BS in The Guardian. Today's post is entitled "The IPCC messed up over 'Amazongate' – the threat to the Amazon is far worse" and is available at

I posted a comment on his blog about The Club of Rome, who and what is behind it, what their goal is, including world government, more taxes and mass genocide.

Guess what? Yep.

This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.

This on the day the peace camp protesting against the ridiculous GWOT was to be removed from outside Parliament because it is considered by some to be an embarrassment.

On 6th June 1944 Allied Forces landed on the beaches of Normandy. They invaded France en masse to drive the Nazis back to Berlin for their final defeat. It was all planned anyway, so that Communism could take Eastern Europe, and Israel could be created, but the very brave Allied soldiers didn't know that. They were told the Nazis were evil tyrants and were killing many many people and creating a police state. They, the Allied soldiers, must restore Freedom! So they landed on the beaches and many got blown up, shot, maimed...

For what?

So that my posts on the Club of Rome could be deleted?

There were no obscenities in my post, no incitement to violence, no racism, no sexism, no threats, no pointless ranting etc. My post basically suggested that they check out The Club of Rome.

And guess what? The newspaper considered to be the most liberal in the UK deletes my post and replaces it with the following bland text
This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.

What has this country become?