PRISONER EXCHANGE, OR WORLD WAR

The current violence surrounding Israel is due to three Israeli soldiers being kidnapped.

Has Israel been involved in prisoner exchanges before, either with Hamas or Hezbullah?

Samar Assad has listed the prisoner exchanges in which Israel has taken part.

From http://www.counterpunch.com/assad07142006.html

Israeli-Hizballah Prisoner Exchanges

To date, there have been three prisoner exchange deals between Israel and Hizballah, the details of which follow.

In July 1996, Hizballah released the remains of two Israeli soldiers, Joseph Fink and Rahamim Alsheich, in exchange for the remains of 123 Lebanese soldiers. On the same day, Hizballah released 25 members of the South Lebanon Army (SLA), an army loyal to Israel. In exchange the SLA released 25 Lebanese prisoners from the Khima Prison in south Lebanon.

In June 1998, Hizballah returned the remains of Sergeant First Class Itamar Ilya in exchange for the remains of 40 Hizballah soldiers, among them the body of Hizballah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah's son who was killed in 1997. The deal also included the release of Lebanese prisoners. The bodies of the Hizballah soldiers were transported by a French aircraft.

In January 2004, in the largest prisoner exchange, Israel released a total of 436 prisoners including 400 Palestinians; 23 Lebanese; two Syrians; three Moroccans; three Sudanese; a Libyan; and a German Muslim. Israel also returned the remains of 59 Lebanese soldiers. Israel received the remains of three Israel soldiers and the release of Elhanan Tennenbaum who Hizballah claimed was an Israeli intelligence officer. Sheikh Abdel Kareem Obaid, who Israel kidnapped from Lebanese territory in 1989, and Sheikh Mustafa Dirani, kidnapped in 1994, were among those released by Israel in exchange for its three soldiers and intelligence officer.

An Israeli soldier was kidnapped in 1994. Israel decided on a military option, which ended with the soldier being killed.

Israel and Hamas

About twelve years before Hamas' 25 June 2006 capture of Israeli Corporal Gilad Shalit in Gaza, Israeli soldier Nachshon Wachsman was taken prisoner in October 1994. Like today, Israel said it would not negotiate a release with Hamas. Then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin decided on a military option to free the Israeli soldier. The Israeli commando raid on a house in Bir Nabala near Jerusalem not only left the Hamas captors dead but with them Wachsman.

Hamas has demanded the release of all female and minor Palestinian prisoners held by Israel in exchange for Shalit.

Meanwhile Israel continues to ignore international law and hold several hundred Palestinian women and children in custody without trial in addition to the nearly 10,000 Palestinian men under similar conditions. Quoting from the same article,

According to a recent poll by the Jerusalem Media and Communication Center (JMCC), 69 percent of Palestinians insist on an exchange for Shalit's release. The high support for a prisoner exchange stems from the sensitivity of the prisoner issue within Palestinian society. The vast majority of Palestinians have been directly or indirectly affected by Israel's policy of arbitrary or blanket arrests and hold deep resentment for political violations of their leaders' authority and autonomy.

Israel's imprisonment and detention of Palestinians is an example of its failure to abide by international law and the Fourth Geneva Convention. Administrative detentions, imprisonment without due process and imprisonment inside Israel are both illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Furthermore, Palestinian prisoners are routinely tortured by Israel and held in detention centers and prisons that do not meet the minimum international standards and are routinely denied visitation rights by their legal representation and family members. The vast majority of Palestinian prisoners are held without trial. According to Amnesty International, the trials that do take place often fall short of international fair trial standards.

Israel's failure to release Palestinian political prisoners and its continued arbitrary arrest of Palestinian civilians serves only to highlight Israel's belief that it is above the law and that the Palestinians are beneath it.

The two Israeli soldiers kidnapped by Hezbullah were captured on Lebanese soil as part of an Israeli raid into Lebanon and not, as the BBC and other media are reporting, as part of a Hezbullah raid into Israel. In fact, shortly before Israel violated Lebanese sovereignty in this way Israel had prepared its response following such a kidnap.

From http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2006/3329isr_palestine_war.html

According to a report in the July 13 Israeli daily Ha'aretz, the Israel military had approved a plan for a major exercise along the Israeli-Lebanese border, based on a scenario of a Hezbollah capture of Israeli solders, after which Israel would respond with a heavy air and land assault into southern Lebanon to destroy Hezbollah. It is this plan which is now being carried out. As of this writing, Israel has begun to mobilize its reserves, including a full division, to be deployed on the already heavily fortified northern border.

This would explain how Israel has been able to put into effect so quickly such a slick operation, with ships blockading ports, the military logistics required etc. I would say from the evidence that Israel planned this months ago. They sent that patrol over the border on purpose, and I would not be surprised to learn that Israel had virtually telegraphed to Hezbullah the time and location the patrol would cross into Lebanon, or that Israel sent the patrol into an area of Lebanon where Hezbullah was known to be strong, for reports I have read mention that that patrol was not even 100 metres into Lebanon before it was attacked.

What I am trying to get at here is that there is a history of prisoner exchanges between Israel and its neighbours, although a significant proportion of the prisoners were already dead. It would appear that Israel foresaw the potential for some of their soldiers to be kidnapped by Hezbullah. Israel continues to detain and torture thousands of Palestinian men, women and children without trial, ignoring international law, and yet refuses a prisoner exchange and instead decides to bomb Lebanon back into 1975, killing innocent women and children while doing so!

WHY?

And they wonder why they are hated so much?!

In 1948 the terrorists who founded the Zionists State of Israel forced hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into refugee camps, stole their land, and continue to keep those Palestinians in dire poverty and under virtual martial law/police state rule, while at the same time being subsidized by the USA to the tune of billions of US dollars every year. Why?

Why does the USA sustain Israel so?

If you understand how the Federal Reserve works then you understand that that system cannot go on forever. It has a built-in self-destruction button. It is doomed to collapse, and that time is approaching fast. In order to create a world war more terrible than WW1 and WW2 put together a source of friction has to be manipulated. That source was chosen centuries ago; Zionism. That is why Israel has been financed, to give it an awesome death machine, but more importantly, a nuclear arsenal.

If Israel continues this action in Lebanon I can see Syria and Iran getting involved, as PNAC want, attacking or invading Israel, and in retaliation Israel will unleash its nuclear missiles. When I wrote about "The Sum of All Fears" I said that the governments and military have been infiltrated and were being manipulated by a coordinated group of megalomaniacs. The US govt has been infiltrated by the Zionists in the form of PNAC, AEI, AIPAC etc. It is their job to sustain and encourage Israel into a war in the Middle East, which could very easily escalate into a much wider conflict. The point of this war would be the same as WW1 and WW2; the creation of a world government, which would be controlled by the same people controlling PNAC etc. This world government would be accepted by the world because WW3 will be millions of times worse than WW2. It took 6 years and 2 atomic bombs for the world to accept the existence of the UN. It will take something alot worse than WW2 for us to cede total sovereignty to the UN. This must be done before those who control the USA through the Federal Reserve lose their control with the collapse of the current monetary system. Hence the rush to create the clash of civilizations between Zionism and Islam.

The choice is simple; prisoner exchange, or world war.

WILLIAM KRISTOL WANTS WAR ON IRAN

William Kristol, in his The Weekly Standard, puts forth his suggestion that the USA shoud attack Iran.

No big surprises there. Kristol signed the 20th September 2001 letter from PNAC to Bush, suggesting using Hezbullah to get to Iran.

From http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/433fwbvs.asp?pg=1

It's Our War
Bush should go to Jerusalem--and the U.S. should confront Iran.
by William Kristol
07/24/2006, Volume 011, Issue 42

...Thus, our focus should be less on Hamas and Hezbollah, and more on their paymasters and real commanders--Syria and Iran...For while Syria and Iran are enemies of Israel, they are also enemies of the United States. We have done a poor job of standing up to them and weakening them. They are now testing us more boldly than one would have thought possible a few years ago. Weakness is provocative. We have been too weak, and have allowed ourselves to be perceived as weak.

The right response is renewed strength--in supporting the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, in standing with Israel, and in pursuing regime change in Syria and Iran. For that matter, we might consider countering this act of Iranian aggression with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Why wait?

WHY NO RUSH TO EVACUATE BRITONS AND AMERICANS IN LEBANON?

It appears there is no rush to evacuate British or American citizens currently in Lebanon. Why?

You would think that British and American citizens were probably in most danger, as Great Britain and the USA are strongly supportive of Israel. So why no rush to evacuate them?

A couple of reasons, cynical ones, come to mind.
1. some are taken hostage and killed and Hizbullah is blamed (though it may or not have been Hizbullah).
2. some are shot during evacuation and the killing blamed on Hizbullah (though it may or not have been Hizbullah).

There is some dark motive to this reticence to evacuate. Any military action on British or American citizens would be a perfect excuse to blame and go after Hizbullah, and thus Iran and Syria, as set out in "A Clean Break" and in the 20th September 2001 PNAC to Bush.

SURGICAL STRIKES BY ISRAEL KILL MANY CIVILIAN CHILDREN FLEEING ISRAELI TERROR

Way to go, you brave Israeli air force dudes!!

From http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1821706,00.html

Children die in convoy attack as Israel widens Lebanon assault

Inigo Gilmore in Nahariyah, Patrick Wintour in St Petersburg and Tracy McVeigh
Sunday July 16, 2006
The Observer


Israel steeply escalated its military campaign against Hizbollah in Lebanon yesterday with a series of air strikes that left more than 35 civilians dead, including a single strike on a convoy of families fleeing the fighting in a village near Tyre in the south of the country that killed more than 20 people, most of them children.

The intensification of the conflict, in which Hizbollah fired missiles deep intoIsrael, came as international leaders appeared to be deeply split over how to respond to a crisis that threatens to spill over into a full-scale war involving Syria and Iran as well as Israel, Palestine and Lebanon. Last night the Lebanese Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora, declared the country in a 'state of catastrophe'.

THE NEOCONS, LEBANON AND HIZBULLAH

Lebanon gained its 'independence' from France in 1926, who had been given control of the land after WW1 through The Treaty of Sevres and the San Remo Conference. Many dispossessed Palestinians had moved into South Lebanon, to create a state within a state. The PLO, banned from Syria, Jordan and Egypt, moved to Lebanon and began fighting Israel from Lebanon. There then followed the beginning of the civil war because there were too many Palestinians in South Lebanon resented by local Shia for bringing military conflict with Israel with them. The Shia moved to Beirut to escape the conflict. Israel thus invaded South Lebanon, and was initially welcomed, but then imposed a tyrrany, and moved into Beirut. Hizbullah was formed from Shias in Lebanon to repel Israel. Israel withdrew in 2000.

So Israel was humiliated. Its awesome US-sponsored death machine had been driven out of Lebanon by a bunch of 'ragheads'.

But then something 'totally unexpected' happens : 11th September 2001.

Shortly after this on the 20th September 2001 the Project for a New American Century wrote to President George W Bush, the text of which is available at http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm , and which mentions Hezbullah as a target for action, which could also be used to threaten Iran and Syria.

The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President,

We write to endorse your admirable commitment to “lead the world to victory” in the war against terrorism. We fully support your call for “a broad and sustained campaign” against the “terrorist organizations and those who harbor and support them.” We agree with Secretary of State Powell that the United States must find and punish the perpetrators of the horrific attack of September 11, and we must, as he said, “go after terrorism wherever we find it in the world” and “get it by its branch and root.” We agree with the Secretary of State that U.S. policy must aim not only at finding the people responsible for this incident, but must also target those “other groups out there that mean us no good” and “that have conducted attacks previously against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and our allies.”

In order to carry out this “first war of the 21st century” successfully, and in order, as you have said, to do future “generations a favor by coming together and whipping terrorism,” we believe the following steps are necessary parts of a comprehensive strategy.

Osama bin Laden

We agree that a key goal, but by no means the only goal, of the current war on terrorism should be to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, and to destroy his network of associates. To this end, we support the necessary military action in Afghanistan and the provision of substantial financial and military assistance to the anti-Taliban forces in that country.

Iraq

We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein “is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….” It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the United States. But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The United States must therefore provide full military and financial support to the Iraqi opposition. American military force should be used to provide a “safe zone” in Iraq from which the opposition can operate. And American forces must be prepared to back up our commitment to the Iraqi opposition by all necessary means.

Hezbollah

Hezbollah is one of the leading terrorist organizations in the world. It is suspected of having been involved in the 1998 bombings of the American embassies in Africa, and implicated in the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983. Hezbollah clearly falls in the category cited by Secretary Powell of groups “that mean us no good” and “that have conducted attacks previously against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and our allies.” Therefore, any war against terrorism must target Hezbollah. We believe the administration should demand that Iran and Syria immediately cease all military, financial, and political support for Hezbollah and its operations. Should Iran and Syria refuse to comply, the administration should consider appropriate measures of retaliation against these known state sponsors of terrorism.

Israel and the Palestinian Authority

Israel has been and remains America’s staunchest ally against international terrorism, especially in the Middle East. The United States should fully support our fellow democracy in its fight against terrorism. We should insist that the Palestinian Authority put a stop to terrorism emanating from territories under its control and imprison those planning terrorist attacks against Israel. Until the Palestinian Authority moves against terror, the United States should provide it no further assistance.

U.S. Defense Budget

A serious and victorious war on terrorism will require a large increase in defense spending. Fighting this war may well require the United States to engage a well-armed foe, and will also require that we remain capable of defending our interests elsewhere in the world. We urge that there be no hesitation in requesting whatever funds for defense are needed to allow us to win this war.

There is, of course, much more that will have to be done. Diplomatic efforts will be required to enlist other nations’ aid in this war on terrorism. Economic and financial tools at our disposal will have to be used. There are other actions of a military nature that may well be needed. However, in our judgement the steps outlined above constitute the minimum necessary if this war is to be fought effectively and brought to a successful conclusion. Our purpose in writing is to assure you of our support as you do what must be done to lead the nation to victory in this fight.


Sincerely,

William Kristol

Richard V. Allen Gary Bauer Jeffrey Bell William J. Bennett

Rudy Boshwitz Jeffrey Bergner Eliot Cohen Seth Cropsey

Midge Decter Thomas Donnelly Nicholas Eberstadt Hillel Fradkin

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Jeffrey Gedmin

Reuel Marc Gerecht Charles Hill Bruce P. Jackson Eli S. Jacobs

Michael Joyce Donald Kagan Robert Kagan Jeane Kirkpatrick

Charles Krauthammer John Lehman Clifford May Martin Peretz

Richard Perle Norman Podhoretz Stephen P. Rosen Randy Scheunemann

Gary Schmitt William Schneider, Jr. Richard H. Shultz Henry Sokolski

Stephen J. Solarz Vin Weber Leon Wieseltier Marshall Wittmann

So will the USA join in the bloodbath, and get at Iran this way, because the nuclear option is fading fast, and the PTB need to get their skates on?

THE SUM OF ALL FEARS

For all the gimps out there who have no clue what is going down watch the film "The Sum Of All Fears". Although that film deals with the potential for a nuclear war between Russia and the USA the principle is the same. There is a coordinated group of people who have infiltrated the high levels of government and military who are hell bent on manipulating a global war between Zionism and Islam. They may work for a national government, but actually wish to destroy it.

One small interesting point in "The Sum Of All Fears" is that the man in the USA who is tasked with importing a dirty nuclear bomb into the USA and transporting it to its target is "Brother Mason".

GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO WORLD WAR 3.

Israel. Oh Israel. What hast thou become?

G*d's chosen ones are blowing little Palestinian kids to bits with new poisonous weapons, and all after they allowed a soldier of theirs to be kidnapped which could be used as an excuse for a bloodlust.

Last year when Israel pulled out of Gaza I knew something like this was going to happen, and I told the Intelligence and Security Committee so in a letter which focused on certain aspects of 7/7, whch still remain unresolved. It was obvious why Jewish settlers were pulled out Gaza. The Israeli death machine was going to blow those Palestinian kids to smithereens. "The Clean Break" document for Benjamin Netanyahu basically called for World War 3 with a massive expansion of Israel into Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria. This is bound to 'upset' certain terrorist organizations who will no doubt begin blowing up more kids to smithereens. And in retaliation more kids will get blown to smithereens. And in retaliation for that more kids will get blown to smithereens. And on and on and on...

Who are the 'real' children? The children, or the adults?

This is the point of Israel. It is not a land for G*d's chosen ones to live their lives in peace and harmony. It is instead a way of kicking off a long, bloody war involving death, terror, and WMD. The way in which Israel came into existence reeks of death and blood and terror, and can only have one purpose.

This naked Israeli aggression must be stopped immediately.

IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR

We are told this as the Police State takes over our lives. They want our DNA, our biometrics, even our farts!

Despite promises that this government would be more open, Saint John Reid is now preparing to toughen laws to stop whistleblowers from telling what we really ought to know about the machinations of government.

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1811134,00.html

Reid to toughen secrecy laws

Richard Norton-Taylor
Monday July 3, 2006
The Guardian


Plans for tougher official secrecy laws to prevent whistleblowers from revealing information about government policy have been drawn up by the home secretary, John Reid.
He wants to stop members of the security and intelligence agencies, as well as other Whitehall officials with access to sensitive information, from claiming they acted in the public interest and were exposing wrongdoing or unlawful acts by the government.

Ministers have been embarrassed by a spate of leaks revealing their private concerns about the legality of the US-led invasion of Iraq, including concerns allegedly expressed by Tony Blair about American tactics in the country.

THE SOMME. WHAT A WASTE.

Six days of shelling.

Two massive mines.

And then they sent the men over the top as if on parade expecting the Germans to have either been killed or scared off.

Instead over 4 months of fighting, approximately 1 million German, French and British men lost their lives.

So how did it all start?

See my page on World War 1 at http://www.theconspiracyexplained.com/WorldWar1.html

In my opinion, if your family lost a loved one at the Somme or Ypres or any other of the slaughterhouses of World War 1 then thank British Intelligence and Freemasonry (who are basically one and the same thing, set up to screw us all with a smile on their face), as well as the banks of Rothschild, Morgan (Rothschild agent) and Rockefeller for financing it all and creating an aborted world government, The League of Nations.

This is Delville Wood, taken from the World War 1 website, http://www.worldwar1.com/pharc001.htm

ISRAEL IS ON THE LOOSE IN GAZA DURING THE WORLD CUP

Israel is on the loose in Gaza, hunting down the captors of Corporal Gilad Shalit.

But is this just an excuse?

From http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jun2006/isra-j30.shtml

There is already substantial evidence that Israel allowed the Palestinian commando raid at Kerem Shalom to take place in order to provide a pretext for such a pre-planned offensive. Olmert has still failed to respond to statements by the security service Shin Bet that it had warned the government and the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) that such a Palestinian commando raid was planned. Instead, he authorized an “inquiry” to effectively bury the issue while military hostilities proceed.

Israel’s ability to marshal 3,000 troops and 100 tanks in a couple of days indicates forward planning. The same is true of the West Bank raids by the IDF. These resulted in the arrest and imprisonment of 64 Hamas ministers and parliamentarians and 23 military operatives, including Deputy Prime Minister Nasser a-Shaer, Finance Minister Omar Abdel Razek, Labor Minister Mohammed Barghouti, Minister Samir Abu Aysha and Jerusalem Affairs Ministers Naef Rajoub, the brother of senior Fatah official Jibril Rajoub.

...Reporting on the raids, the Israeli daily Haaretz noted, almost in passing, “The arrests were planned several weeks ago and received approval from Attorney General Menachem Mazuz on Wednesday.”

So again, it looks like a terrorist action was
1. known of in advance
2. allowed to happen
3. taken advantage of

Does this sound like 7/7?

I mean, come on, a long tunnel is dug underneath an Israeli barracks and a soldier is kidnapped?!

Israel has bombed the infrastructure of Gaza, what little there was of it, so that there is the potential for a humanitarian crisis, as if there wasn't one already. Clean water, electricity, sanitation, all gone. This is why George Galloway went on Big Brother and also why he was and still is ridiculed for it.

But who cares when 22 men are kicking a football about?

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!

BEWARE! MOBILE PHONES COOK EGGS (AND YOUR BRAIN?)

In an experiment two mobile phones were placed close to and on opposite sides of an uncooked egg. The phones were switched on and a satellite connection was made between them and the connection left on as if the phones were being used in a conversation by two people i.e. the phones were in normal operating mode, and emitting radiation.

So what happened to the egg?

After 65 minutes of continual use the egg was totally cooked by the phone radiation, with the yolk and the albumen solidified!!

This is just one aim of the mobile phone. Microwaves are extremely dangerous to the human body. But the phones can also be used to track your movements.

From http://www.rense.com/general72/cellcook.htm

...In the experiment, researchers placed one egg in a porcelain cup (because it is easy to conduct heat), and put one cell phone on one side and another cell phone on the other. The researchers then called from one cell phone to another and kept the cell phones on after connecting.

During the first 15 minutes, nothing changed. After 25 minutes, however, the egg shell started to become hot and at 40 minutes, the surface of the egg became hard and bristled. Researchers found the protein in the egg had become solid although the egg yolk was still in liquid form. After 65 minutes, the whole egg was well cooked.

The study shows how scary cell phone radiation is. People should try to avoid use of cell phones. Although so far no one has proved the radiation from cell phones can cause something clinically significant. By the same token, there has been no one who can disprove the existence of such a risk.

Children should be forbidden from cell phone use because they still grow their brains and are particularly vulnerable to radiation.

PREPARING US FOR THE NEXT ATTACK?

In the last month there appears to have been an internationally coordinated effort to give the impression that al-Qaeda and/or Islamic terrorists are very busy planning terrorist attacks.

London - two brothers are arrested on suspicion of being involved in the preparation of a terrorist act, following intelligence that a bomb vest had been seen in their house. The intelligence was later found to have come from an intellectually impaired jail bird (thus raising the possibility that the source could have been told he would be released if he provided the 'intelligence').

Canada - 17 Muslim males are arrested on suspicion of wanting to attack the Canadian Parliament and behead the Canadian PM (these arrests occured just days before this year's Bilderberg meeting held in the same geographical area of Ottawa, Canada). This too looks highly suspcious. There is a military connection with the leader of the group being a soldier. Their behaviour was also odd. They wore camouflage clothes, brought a lot of attention to themselves, including shooting guns in public, and bought a single shipment of 3 tonne of ammonium nitrate in a sting/entrapment operation.

Miami, USA - 7 men are arrested suspected of planning to blow up the Sears Tower, Chicago. It is now known that the 'ringleader' was mentally unstable due to a recent bereavment, and the suggestion for the attack actually came from a plant/informant. The group had no plans, no bombs etc. i.e. they were set up/entrapped.

To add to these arrests there was also a report on the alleged hijacked plane attack on Canary Wharf as if it was real, but which has now been totally debunked.

I suspect that the media were led to believe that all these terrorist plots were real and active and in the late stages of preparation. I am wondering if there is going to be a very big, horrible synthetic terror attack which will again be blamed on al-Qaeda, and due to these recent arrests everyone will believe it to be so. There is definitely some sort of psychological warfare operation going down.

WAY BEYOND

Over this weekend there has been the reporting of two absolutely astonishing pieces of news regarding the London 7/7 bombs of last year.

They are;
1. Martin Gilbertson claims he sent incriminating material on Kahn to West Yorkshire Special Branch in late 2003.
2. a bug was found in Kahn's car, after it had been taken away for inspection after 7/7.

Regarding the bug, in January of this year David Leppard of The Sunday Times published an article that stated Kahn had been bugged and taped in early 2004 talking of raising funds for and fighting in Jihad. On this blog, after reading that article, I asked what happened to the surveillance devices used on Kahn after the surveillance was supposedly called off? I suggested that 'someone' was still using the devices, to secretly track and listen in on Kahn and his friends. I still stand by that suggestion today.

Do such bugs have a lifetime, and use up their energy source after a certain time? Are they then replaced with a new battery or is the whole device replaced with a new one?

And what does happen to surveillance devices once a surveillance target has been deemed harmless and the surveillance called off?

If there is an intelligence operative reading this with experience in covert surveillance, and particularly with experience of surveillance operations that have been called off/cancelled/stopped because the target was thought harmless, then perhaps you could enlighten us? Are they removed? Do they self-destruct? Or are they just left for others, possibly the target, to find?

Does the FACT that the bug was still in Kahn's car at the time of the bombings suggest or indeed prove that Kahn was under surveillance at the time of the bombings?

Now, Martin Gilbertson claims he sent incriminating material to West Yorkshire Special Branch in late 2003. Then in early 2004 Kahn was bugged and taped talking of raising funds for and fighting in Jihad. So was the bugging op of Kahn instigated by or related to the Gilberston material? Or was it due to another piece of information? For if there is more than one set of information pointing to Kahn then this goes beyond incompetence. Way beyond.

I cannot believe the information Gilbertson sent (by normal mail) never reached its intended destination because it was stolen by one of the criminals working in Royal Mail who steal credit cards etc. There is a difference between a credit card and a parcel addressed to The Special Branch. I could well believe that such a parcel would receive extra special attention and would not go through the normal channels of sorting.

Apparently Kahn returned from a terrorist training camp in the summer of 2003,
(see http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2003915_1,00.html) and it was believed that he was by then "fully versed in how to make bombs".

So you are Special Branch. You get this parcel with DVDs and names and all sorts of stuff indicating that a particular bunch of people are up to something. You type in Kahn's name and up comes the bombmaking intelligence on Kahn. What do you do? You bug him.

So Kahn was bugged (and so far we only know of just the one bug, for if there were more then where are they? and are they still active?). You know he's attended terrorist training camps in Pakistan. You know he is "fully versed in how to make bombs". You know he is involved in the production of inciteful material. You tape him talking of fighting in Jihad.

Waddya do?

This was early 2004.

Do you know how many "terrorist" suspects, the vast majority of whom are Muslim/Asian, have been arrested under terrorism laws and then released without charge? The vast majority!

SO WHY WAS KAHN NOT PICKED UP AND ASKED A FEW QUESTIONS DOWN AT THE LOCAL NICK ?

Early 2004 saw the phantom terrorist attack on Old Trafford football ground. Do you remember that? News of the arrests was plastered all over the papers, TV etc. "It was our tireless police and security service who foiled a terrorist plot to blow up" Old Trafford, screamed The Sun. But then all ten suspects were quietly released without charge.

The difference in approach is sickening. Kahn, bugged, under surveillance and a known bombmaker is taped talking of joining Jihad. Nothing is done. Instead 10 innocent men are arrested with absolutely no connection to terrorism whatsoever!!

This is not incompetence.

This is complicity by LIHOP.

'THE FOREST GATE TWO' PRESS CONFERENCE

The BBC aired live the press conference held at around midday today by 'The Forest Gate Two'. I listened to most of what was aired, and was struck by several things the brothers and their solicitors said. I'll go into them later.

The BBC also has a report about this press conference on its website, at
Raid brother tells of death fears

The things that struck me are not in the BBC report!

1. it appears that after shooting Mohammed Abdul Kahar the police then assaulted him with lots of kicking.
2. Mohammed Abdul Kahar made eye contact with the officer who shot him, who then shot him without a word. Due to shock Mohammed Abdul Kahar at first remained silent then began to tell the police he couldn't breathe due to the bullet wound and assault, and was told several times to "shut the fuck up".
3. their solicitors again stressed that the two brothers do not, repeat not, have a criminal record.
4. Mohammed Abdul Kahar had actually recently applied to become, and had been accepted as, a Community Police Officer. (is this how they came to the attention of the 'dark forces' within our intelligence community?)
5. during questioning there was no mention of why the police had raided their home and they did not seem interested in finding out if a bomb was or ever had been on the premises, and it seemed the police were fishing, asking the two questions like, "Are you a member of the Ku Klux Klan?" (no, really!)
6. they have still not received any apology.

None of this is in the BBC report.

THREE GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEES COMMIT SUICIDE

I connected to my broadband provider, Orange, today and the headline reads

Triple Suicide Hits Camp

At first reading this could be read to imply that a camp had been hit by three suicide bombers. But on further reading the article refers to three detainees at Guantanamo Bay who had committed suicide. The english language can be a wonderful thing for spinning. I think it's called Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP).

But what's worse is the reaction of the camp commander Navy Rear Adm. Harry Harris, who called the suicides "acts of asymmetrical warfare". No, really! Now killing yourself and nobody else is an act of asymmetrical warfare. How fucked up, twisted and paranoid do you have to be to think like that?!

The Orange report quotes camp commander Navy Rear Adm. Harry Harris as telling reporters,

"They are smart. They are creative, they are committed. They have no regard for life, neither ours nor their own. I believe this was not an act of desperation, but an act of asymmetrical warfare waged against us,".

Yeah, it was an act of desperation all right. No rights, no trial to defend yourself, torture, and caged like animals for years with no end in sight.

Lock Harris up in shackles in a cage for years without trial and let's see what he tells reporters then.

DO 'THE FOREST GATE TWO' HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS?

Watching Newsnight last night 5th June Julian Young, the solicitor for Koyair, denied his client had a criminal record.

This contradicts the leaks dripped to David Leppard of The Sunday Times who wrote last Sunday

Government officials said both suspects had “extensive criminal records”. According to a well placed source, Kahar has previous convictions for theft, robbery, burglary and possession of a prohibited weapon involving a “noxious, liquid gas”, said to be CS spray.

Koyair was said to have convictions for burglary, two thefts and possession of a Stanley knife. Both men had spent time in youth offender institutes.

Is this some kind of operation to see how much can be gotten away with?

A HA! JUST AS I THOUGHT! RELEASE PRISONERS AND TAG THEM.

There have been very few prisons built in the last decade or so, and our prisons are seriously overcrowded. So what's the answer? RELEASE THEM!

Welease Woger. Welease Wodewick.

This the proposal of the Commons Public Accounts Committee. Release them and tag them.

But there is one small problem here. TAGGING DOESN'T WORK!!

There have been numerous reports about how tagged offenders have removed their tags and committed more crime.

The PAC are being led down the microchipped path. Their advice is seriously flawed and doomed to end with the final suggestion; IMPLANTABLE MICROCHIPS.

This suggestion is already being suggested in the USA for immigrants, and possibly tourists.

From http://society.guardian.co.uk/crimeandpunishment/story/0,,1791119,00.html

Thousands of remand prisoners, inmates with mental health problems and children should urgently be released from prisons to relieve the growing overcrowding crisis in England and Wales, according to a damning report by MPs published today.
The Commons public accounts committee says the unprecedentedly high prison population of 77,000 is due to rise even higher and will lead to higher suicide rates and a fertile environment for unrest among prisoners.

The PAC chairman, Edward Leigh, says it is time for the new home secretary, John Reid, to think "long and hard" about practical alternatives to jail, including electronic tagging, for three specific groups of prisoners. They are:

· The 3,900 remand prisoners who are currently in jail but who, when convicted, are not given a custodial sentence - about one third of all remand prisoners.

· The rapidly rising number of children held in prison service accommodation, which has now reached 2,300 compared with only 1,600 a decade ago.

· The 5,000 profoundly mentally ill people held in prison. MPs say that overcrowding limits the ability of prison to provide care for them and only 700 a year are transferred to hospital.

Introducing such an intrusive and megalomaniac phenomena as the implantable microchip requires a high degree of spin. The chip has to be seen to be 'good', 'useful' and above all 'works'. What could be better than to track criminals on our streets? Of course in order to have criminals on our streets to track they have to be identified. Well, that's easy, they are in prison. Ah, but how do you then get them on the streets so they can be tracked? Release them early. But how can convicted criminals be released early without causing an uproar? Stop building prisons and let the prison population rise and rise and rise until the prison system is overflowing. And then get some dimwit MPs to suggest tagging, which is designed to fail, so that the only solution left is...(drum roll)

da daaa!

THE IMPLANTABLE MICROCHIP!!

Watch out for more socially useful adverts for such controls.

SO A MAN WAS SHOT, AND NO GUNS, EXPLOSIVES OR BOMBS WERE FOUND. HMMM.

Would I be cynical to suggest that the 'intelligence' leading to the shooting of a young man was fabricated?

The 'intelligence' came from an alleged informant. A chemical bomb had been seen at an address. Over 200 cops raid the address at 4am. Doors were smashed down. Again an unarmed man is shot, and his mother collapses. No guns were found at the address. No explosives or bombs were found either.

But right now, London is in panic mode, for the alleged chemical bomb vest cannot be found!!

The words of the Morrissey/The Smiths song "Panic" come to mind.

Panic on the streets of London.
Panic on the streets of Birmingham.
I wonder to myself...

Now every one will be taking a second look at a Muslim, or even possibly any non-White, just to see if there is a hint of a bulge underneath their clothing. Is that just a little bit of a paunch, or could it be a chemical vest bomb?!

The compartmental structure of the security services can encourage the use of fabricated intelligence, for very few people will know, or have access to finding out, where that intelligence actually came from, if it came from an informant at all.

I am deeply skeptical of this operation, and believe it to be a publicity stunt to deflect from the limp-wristed criticisms from the ISC report into 7/7.

Of course, this may be just a trick to shmoke out the cynics so that when a bomb is later exploded in an attack on, as is suggested, a crowded bar screening a World Cup match, the cynics are humbled. Though I'm not sure they have the balls to do such a thing so soon after 7/7. They almost screwed that up, but just about got away with it.

COINCIDENCE OR PERFECT TIMING?

So when Tony Blair is giving a speech at Georgetown University about reforming world governing organizations, and after W and he spoke of their regret at the way Iraq has gone and requesting more support, shots are reported to be heard at a building next to the Capitol leading to the Capitol, the home of US government, being closed and evacuated, TWICE! Both reports turned out to be false.

When the G8 was in Scotland last year and Benjamin Netanyahu and Australian PM John Howard were in London, there was a bomb attack on London Underground.

Are these just more concidences, like Dick Cheney supervising simulations of terrorist attacks on the US Eastern air space, simulation she organised and which were very similar to the attacks that actually occured in real life on 9/11?

Coincidences, or perfect timing?

A WORLD OF VOYEURS

Big Brother 7 starts this Thursday (whooppee!). This is the TV programme I despise the most. Why?
1. it is conditioning us to total surveillance
2. it is encouraging voyeurism, leading to more pornography

As The Sun reports today

BIG Brother bosses have put THREE double beds in the house to encourage sex romps.

And they have hidden a secret camera in a 5ft-high rabbit-shaped hedge to keep a close eye on housemates.

There were just two double beds in 2005’s Big Brother, but this year show chiefs are going all out for action between the sheets.

The bathroom also features a tub big enough for a THREESOME.

The housemates are set to include blonde Lea Walker, 35, a divorced mum of one who sold her house to pay for plastic surgery and starred in a porn flick.

In the last year or so Channel 4 has run two weeks examining the sex industry. I have yet to see a single one hour documentary on the fraudulent fractional reserve banking system which allows a handful of self-appointed money masters to control the world. No, instead of looking at that Channel 4 wants to turn us into a world of voyeurs, in which the intimacy between two people leading to human love is not allowed. All sexual contact will be visible to millions, splashed across newspapers, turning man from loving being to lustful beast. I believe this kind of behaviour can only lead to a growth in the watching of pornography and from there, who knows?

There is only one force which would want that.

AWAITING THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ INCIDENT

The Vietnam War was kicked off by false reports of an attack on the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tunkin.

The 'War on (T)error' was kicked off by 'a New Pearl Harbour', 9/11.

With Cheney foaming at the mouth in trying to find an acceptable excuse to attack Iran and a significant part of the international community opposing Cheney's megalomania another 'incident' is required to persuade enough of the right people that war on Iran is required and/or justified.

A few weeks ago I suspected that another terrorist incident would occur soon after reading of the reception Charlie Sheen received when he suggested to Alex Jones that the Twin Towers were brought down in a controlled demolition. Over 80% of respondents in a CNN poll supported Sheen! That must have really put the shits up them because Sheen was literally slaughtered in the press, even by our very own Marina Hyde, with nobody addressing the fundamental issues Sheen was raising. 9/11 was PNAC's/Cheney's 'a New Pearl Harbour', giving them reason enough to invade the Middle East and Caspian. But it is also their growing, bleeding, festering sore that is threatening to burst wide open, leading to charges of treason and 1st degree murder against most members of the Bush Administration.

Thus Cheney et al need something, and quick. The 9/11 Truth Movement, and now the 7/7 Truth Movement, are making their cases to larger audiences. People are listening and considering the evidence, and not instantly dismissing it. Cheney can't hang about, thus the proposed Chapter VII resolution which would authorize military action this year, even though it is thought Iran is years from a bomb.

Now Will Thomas reports on what his sources in the US Military have told him about the plans for a US-led attack on Iran. Apparently one of Thomas' sources told him,

“It will be another Gulf of Tonkin,” my source reported. “They want it. They’ll have it. Even if they have to make it.”

Thomas' report is entitled, "US Troops Prepared To Attack Iran. Bush Said To Be Seeking “Persian Gulf Incident”

SO EVIDENCE WAS WITHHELD FROM THE ISC! SHOCK! HORROR! :-()

The Sunday Times is reporting that evidence indicating that Mohammed Sidique Kahn was more of a potential threat than was previously thought has been withheld from the Intelligence and Security Committee during their inquiry into 7/7. This should come as no surprise. The list of witnesses in Annex A of the ISC report reads like a who's who of the gimps who lied to us about Iraq and took us in there on a false pretext.

There is a follow-up article by David Leppard which goes into the withheld evidence in more detail, and it is very damaging. According to the Leppard article

THE CLUES THAT MI5 MISSED AND THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS


Mohammad Sidique Khan led the 7/7 bombers. His phone number was logged by MI5 in 2003 after he was contacted by a known terror suspect already being monitored by the security services. The two men talked about arranging meetings but this was never followed up. Why?

The following year Khan and Shehzad Tanweer, another 7/7 bomber, were bugged over a number of months by MI5 talking about a separate alleged plot to blow up targets in the UK. One of the bugs was placed in a car Khan was driving, yet MI5 says it did not have the “resources” to identify either man. Is this credible? [TTM: er, did it not have a number plate? And if the car was bugged I would guess it was being tracked too.]

Khan and Tanweer visited terror training camps in Pakistan in 2003 and 2004. Their trips were not monitored, say the security services, despite the war on terror being in full flow. Why did MI6, which has substantial resources in Islamabad, fail to pick them up? Why were they not clocked at British ports? [TTM: I would guess they were but were allowed to go on with their terrorist business.]


In the months before the bombings MI5 took a greater interest in Khan for reasons not properly explained. It admits it showed surveillance photos of him to foreign intelligence services and terrorist prisoners in detention centres around the world. Why was MI5 suddenly so interested in Khan? [TTM: to get an idea as to how well known Kahn was before he was allowed to bomb London so that many people wouldn't say, "oh yeah, everybody knew Kahn was a terrorist".]


The telephone number of a third bomber, Germaine Lindsay, was also on MI5 files long before the attacks. This had previously been denied. Lindsay’s Fiat car was linked to a burglary in May 2005, in which a handgun was involved. Lindsay was shown on the police computer as the registered owner, but police inquiries at the time failed to track the car. Why? [TTM: Again, to allow the plot to evolve and happen]


The security services had been monitoring a suspected Islamic fundamentalist in the Beeston area of Leeds that the bombers came from only a year or so before the attacks. He worked in the same extremist bookshop the bombers frequented and he knew them. Why was this not mentioned in the Home Office account last week? [TTM : because this, along with the other evidence, would indicate not incompetence but complicity]



The flat where the bombs were made was sublet to the bombers just a few weeks before the attack. The man who gave them the keys is an Egyptian with a PhD in biochemistry. He left for Cairo eight days before the bombings. Last week he said he was entirely innocent of any involvement. He also confirmed the British authorities have never sought to interview him. Why? [TTM: perhaps he is not innocent and British authorities know this]

As explained a few days ago, the point is to create terror. Synthetic terror to control us. But the terror that does occur needs to be of the correct size; too big/much and there is absolutely no way a public inquiry can be avoided and light shone into the shadows, while too small/little then the effect of the terror/trauma is not worth the risk. I would say about 50 dead and hundreds more injured is in the 'possibly too big but just about acceptable' scale. 7/7 was the biggest terrorist attack on mainland Britain.

But again, look at how 7/7 was used. The politicians and security services were crying out for torture and 90 day detention!

I cannot see how MI5 can be this incompetent. They claim 'lack of resources' but they've had extra millions and millions thrown at them, as reported in the ISC's annual reports, besides the usual budget (which was not completely used up). But what Leppard shows is that Kahn and Tanweer were bugged talking of a bomb plot! Kahn and Tanweer were under surveillance for months and extensively photographed. You don't spend months putting someone under surveillance unless they are a serious threat, particularly as MI5 claim 'lack of resources' and the manpower for a such surveillance is substantial, as stated in the ISC report. But what other modes of surveillance were used? Were all emails and phones logged? Were bugs/cameras placed in their places of residence? Were these still active in the period before 7/7? But more importantly, who were the case officers?

Personally I don't believe the official story. The government 'has form'. 7/7 was a LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose) for one reason; Police State.

THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2004-2005

Each year the ISC compiles a report on the Intelligence community. The 2004-2005 report contains very interesting bits of information.

From The ISC Report 2004-5 we can read

29. In last year’s Annual Report,6 we expressed concern about the reduction of effort allocated to counter-espionage work, and both the Director General and the Home Secretary acknowledged that the UK was “carrying some risk here”. We were told that the planned 2004–05 allocation would be 10% of the Net Resource Allocation. In the event, because of a £*** underspend on counter-terrorism that reduced the Service’s total Net Resource Requirement in 2004–05, the actual allocation to counter-espionage was 11%. However, we are concerned that current planning provides for a reduction in the allocation to counter-espionage from the previous year, down to 9% of the Net Resource Requirement, which, despite the increase in funding available to the Service, is actually a real terms reduction. We repeat the concerns we expressed last year that, because of the necessary focus on counter-terrorism, significant risks are being taken in the area of counter-espionage.

The emphasis is not added by me!! The emphasis is in the report!!

So the "lack of resources" excuse does not compute. The ISC were expressing concern that counter-terrorism resources were being cut and had been cut for a number of years!!

The reason as to why they were being cut is not given. I have my suspicions.

But there's more!

From the report

21. In previous years we have reported that the Agencies did not spend their full allocation and they have consequently rolled the funding over as end-year flexibility. To manage this underspend, a block adjustment of £*** has been made to reflect an assumption that it will be possible to identify £*** in each of the years 2004–05 to 2007–08 that can be reallocated within the SIA. This has allowed the bids presented by the Agencies to PSX (the Cabinet Committee on Public Services and Public Expenditure) to be funded. There is a risk that these underspends may not occur, but the Chief Secretary to the Treasury has agreed to look again at the funding should the underlying assumption prove incorrect. In the current year, £*** has been drawn down from the end-year flexibility reserve for the Agencies.[emphasis added]

So the intelligence agencies have not been spending their full budgets for years now and the accumulated surplus has been carried through to this year!! Christ, their rolling in it. They've got more money than the fractional reserve bankers and Harry Enfield's character Loadsamoney put together!

Lack of resources? Bollocks!

WHO COMPILED 'THE NARRATIVE'?

I can't find a name or any signature or any text or similar to identify who compiled 'the narrative of events of 7/7' published yesterday. Who was it? And what sources did he/she use? The ISC Report is signed by the members of the ISC. The narrative gives no such indicator as to the identity of the person or persons who compiled the report. Is this legal? Standard procedure?

CON COUGHLIN HAS WRITTEN A GOOD ARTICLE TODAY

Con Coughlin has written a good article today for The Daily Telegraph.

In MI5 must pay for a scandalous error he says

The picture of MI5 that emerges from a careful reading of the ISC report is of an organisation that feels at ease with its own complacency.

This, after all, is the same organisation that, in the 1990s, allowed London to become a world-renowned centre for Islamic extremists, earning the capital the unwelcome soubriquet "Londonistan". It was here that the Paris Metro bombings in 1995 were masterminded, and most of the key figures responsible for planning the 9/11 attacks had strong ties with the British capital.

I believe there is much more than complacency going down here.

There is something sick within British Intelligence. If it's not shooting up Northern Irish citizens, it's fitting up known innocent businessmen for torture in Afghanistan. And if it's not that it's arranging with the FBI for infrared bomb technology to be placed into the hands of the IRA and allowing it to be used in Northern Ireland. Yes, some good is done by them. It's as some MPs said a few years ago after the break-in at Castlereagh; rogue elements. The state security apparatus is used for private motive, profit and gain.

The whole point is to create terror. With terror a population is much more easily controlled. The population want protection and flock to the government to protect them with a Police State, or even war. I will still argue that 7/7 was a 'Goldilocks' event; it was just right. With the IRA terror threat now gone a new terror threat was required, but too much terror and cries of incompetence are made, while too little terror and we go about our lives with freedom and without fear and with our minds free to think about our lives and the shitty state of the world instead of being drowned in celebrity this, that and the other.

What happened after 7/7 though? Or rather how was 7/7 used by The Security Services and politicians? More police state laws. There has even been a letter from Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller requesting that evidence gained from torture be used as evidence!! And yet as Con Coughlin in the above article states

More than £1.5 billion is spent on funding MI5, MI6, and the high-tech GCHQ base at Cheltenham, and billions more are spent on the nation's police forces, which include Special Branch and the Anti-Terrorism Branch.

But all this money - and all the "resources" that it buys - counts for nothing if our security chiefs can't be bothered to carry out even the most rudimentary identity checks on potential terror suspects, the kind of checks the police are only too ready to conduct for the most inconsequential traffic infringements.

So quite happy to use torture. But check someone's identity? Sod that!

I heard a relative of a survivor of 7/7 on the radio yesterday. He was very angry and suspicious. Why? Because the excuse for 7/7 is 'lack of resources'. He asked what complaints were made by MI5 about lack of resources? What were the results of these complaints, if indeed there were any? These are questions he was asking, not me. But I'm asking them now because I think this is an achilles heel. Can a FOIA be made to learn what requests were made, when, and by whom to whom, and the results of any such requests?

FIRST IMPRESSION OF 'THE 7/7 NARRATIVE"

Absolute b*ll@cks!!

After a quick skim through the 7/7 'narrative of events'. The preface contains this;

This narrative summarises what the police, intelligence and security
agencies have so far discovered about the bombers and how and why they
came to do what they did.

A few points to make for starters.
1. Annex A point 4 says

The key event in the founding of Al Qaida was the Soviet invasion and
occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s.

As well as Annex C, which says

1979 Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan and subsequent occupation.

Zbigniew Bzrezinski has stated that al-Qaeda was created by the Americans before the invasion of the Soviets.

2. No mention of the Israelis receiving the advance warning.

3. Regarding 'Londonistan', Annex A point 9 says

As Al Qaida developed in the 1990s, a number of extremists in the UK,
both British and foreign nationals – many of the latter having fled from
conflict elsewhere or repressive regimes – began to work in support of its
agenda, in particular, radicalising and encouraging young men to support
jihad overseas. These included Abu Hamza and Abdallah al Faisal (both
now serving prison sentences), Abu Qatada (currently detained pending
possible deportation) and Omar Bakri Mohammed (now outside the UK and
excluded from returning here). During the 1990s, it is now known that there
was a flow of young Muslims, from the UK and elsewhere, travelling to
Pakistan and Afghanistan for indoctrination or jihad..

There is plenty more to be said about this e.g. MI5 mole Reda Hassaine inside Finsbury Park Mosque having his observations of Abu Hamza totally ignored by his handler.

4. No mention of previous surveillance of suspects, or information received from other intelligence agencies e.g. Saudi Arabia regarding bomb plots on the London Underground.

5. The suspects apparently still caught the 0740 from Luton, which I thought didn't run that day. I'll have to check up on that one.


This appears at first reading to be a total whitewash and a total waste of time, paper and memory.

PLEASE DON'T CRITICIZE MI5 :-)

The Independent is preparing us for the release tomorrow of two reports into the 7/7 bombings of last year. The headline of the article I refer to is

Security services identify 700 potential al-Qa'ida terrorists at large in Britain

To me this says, "don't criticize MI5 tomorrow because they've got to defend us from 700 terrorists". The article does not mention that for years London has been known as Londonistan because MI5 and MI6 have been allowing Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists to live, recruit, and publish newsletters etc inciting suicide bombings, in London and the UK in general.

I look forward to these publications tomorrow. It will be interesting how the Israeli foreknowledge is handled, if at all.

THE PANAM103 AND 9/11 CONNECTION

This is a very interesting piece of research. Apparently the man who investigated the PanAm103 crash at Lockerbie and the man who controlled all the evidence from the 9/11 attacks is the same man; Robert Mueller. It was recently revealed in a swron statement by an ex-Chief Police officer that evidence implicating Libya was planted into the wreckage of PanAm 103 by the CIA. Mueller was the guy who investigated the crash for the US Justice Dept. He also investigated the collapse of the Bank of Crooks and Criminals Incorporated, or BCCI. So it would appear that Mueller could be relied upon to cover things up!

Mueller was then appointed head of the FBI just 7 days before 9/11. He took control of virtually every aspect of the investigation of 9/11.

From http://www.rense.com/general71/panam.htm

Pan Am 103 & 9/11 Connection
by Russell Pickering
russellpickering@bresnan.net
5-7-6

In the recent Rense-linked article Police Chief - Lockerbie Evidence was Faked, there is a huge clue as to what may have happened to 9/11 evidence as well (1). The key lies in the fact that the exact same person "handled" both investigations. In fact, the person who led the Pan Am 103 investigation for Bush Sr.'s "Justice" department just happened to be appointed the director of the FBI by Bush Jr. just seven days prior to 9/11.

"Robert Mueller was nominated by President George W. Bush and became the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on September 4, 2001". (2)

"After spending 1988 and 1989 in private practice, he joined the staff of Attorney-General Richard Thornburgh, and his star rose at the Justice Department as the head of the criminal division under President George Bush's father from 1990 to 1993.

And he led the investigations of the 1991 collapse of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International banking and the 1988 bombing of Pan Am 103." (3)

CONTROLLING ALL SIDES

Is this what is going on within The Labour Party?

Are Bilderbergers Brown and Blair controlling the left and the right within The Labour Party, with Brown acting the disgruntled leader-in-waiting, but at the same time very happy with his IMF position and the changes Blair is making?

Hmm. I'm beginning to think so. What did/do they talk about when alone together? In his monthly press conference today Blair said that what is said between the two of them remains secret. Is Brown doing all he can to remove Blair? Or is he just making all these noises and references for "renewal" to take some of the heat out of the situation so Blair can stay in power and implement the policies they both agreed upon?

EVIDENCE IN LOCKERBIE TRIAL WAS PLANTED BY THE CIA

Another stitch-up!

The CIA planted a fragment of a circuit board in the wreckage of the PanAm 103 which crashed outside Lockerbie in December 1988. So says an anonymous ex-Police Chief in a sworn statement to the lwayers representing the man convicted of bombing PanAm 103.

From The Scotsman

Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked
MARCELLO MEGA

A FORMER Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.

The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people.

The police chief, whose identity has not yet been revealed, gave the statement to lawyers representing Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, currently serving a life sentence in Greenock Prison.

The evidence will form a crucial part of Megrahi's attempt to have a retrial ordered by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC). The claims pose a potentially devastating threat to the reputation of the entire Scottish legal system.

GORDON BROWN SHOULD NOT BE LABOUR PARTY LEADER

If Blair is pressured into publicly stating a date for his stepping down, or if there is even a leadership challenge, the one who should not be leader is Gordon Brown.

As stated a few days ago in 1991 Gordon Brown was the first member of the Parliamentary Labour Party to be invited to the Bilderberg meetings in the 1990's.

Why?

What was so special about Gordon Brown that the banking elite would invite Brown six years before he became Chancellor of the Exchequer?

And why would Blair be invited 2 years later, in 1993?

Does this explain the relationship the two had/have? Do they know something we don't?

And why do these two occupy the two most powerful positions in government, and have had without too much scandal to remove them?

Brown is currently Chairman of the IMF International Monetary and Financial Committee, and has been for a number of years. Could he really be 'a man of the people' if he has been able/permitted to hold this position and be Chancellor of the Exchequer?

I don't think so.

But Brown has shown his true colours by selling our nation's gold on the market at times his money masters wanted and at cheap prices and thus not achieving the best market price.

This is what has been happening. For year the banks and central banks (all controlled by the same banking elite who run Bilderberg) have been running an unbelievable scam. The central banks have been loaning the private banks the gold at very low rates of interest e.g. 1% pa. The private banks then sell the gold and use the proceeds in businesses with a much higher return e.g. 40%. But in order for the private banks to make a profit when the gold is due to be returned to the central banks, and the private banks need to buy back the gold they sold, the price of gold needs to be approximately the same price it was when it was loaned to the private banks, preferably lower but not to have risen too much. So when the gold is due back another central bank would flood the gold market with physical gold, which lowers the price of gold, enabling the private banks to buy back the gold they sold at lower prices, which helps the private banks to make huge profits!

As if having the fractional reserve banking system wasn't enough?! This is just pure greed. They just can't help themselves. What force would do this?



This was a highly coordinated scheme and has been run for about a decade. It appears to have been rumbled now because the price of gold is rising rapidly and fast approaching the price it should be. A man called Reginald H Howe followed and documented this scam and filed a complaint on 7th December 2000 alleging gold price fixing and named Alan Greenspan, the Bank for International Settlements, JP Morgan, CitiGroup (Rockefeller) among the codefendants. You know, the usual suspects. The Golden Sextant website has been following this. It's most recent news bulletin states that the BIS has indeed admitted that it was involved in helping to fix the price of gold.

In February 2006, the Bank for International Settlements published the proceedings of its fourth annual conference held in Basel on June 27-29, 2005, as BIS Paper No. 27, Past and Future of Central Bank Cooperation. In his opening remarks to the conference and based on his eleven years of service at the Bank, Mr. White stated in part:

Before turning briefly to an assessment of past efforts and likely future challenges, it is perhaps worth spending a minute on what is meant by central bank cooperation (emphasis in original). I think that the terminology developed for domestic monetary policy might have some uses here; namely, the ultimate objectives, the intermediate objectives and the operational instruments. The ultimate objectives have always been monetary and financial stability, though clearly the focus of attention has often shifted over the years. The intermediate objectives of central bank cooperation are more varied. First, better joint decisions, in the relatively rare circumstances where such coordinated action is called for. Second, a clear understanding of the policy issues as they affect central banks. Hopefully, this would reflect common beliefs, but even a clear understanding of differences of views can sometimes be useful. Third, the development of robust and effective networks of contacts. Fourth, the efficient international dissemination of both ideas and information that can improve national policymaking. And last, the provision of international credits and joint efforts to influence asset prices (especially gold and foreign exchange) in circumstances where this might be thought useful. [Emphasis supplied.]

Do you remember Gordon Brown selling a substantial quantity of our gold reserves a few years ago, allegedly to raise cash for Africa, amid allegations that Brown had not made that much money, had squandered a national asset and should have sold at a different time? Well, that was part of this conspiracy to help the private bankers make massive fortunes by suppressing the price of gold at critical times.

So Brown should not be Leader of the Labour Party, or Prime Minister. He is just another stooge.

I would like to see somebody like Bob Marshall-Andrews as leader and PM. He seems to have his head screwed on. Get Marshall-Andrews and 'the rebels' in Whitehall.

WHAT DID AHMADINEJAD REALLY SAY ABOUT ISRAEL?

Did Iran's President Ahmadinejad really call for Israel to be "wiped off the map"?

Maybe not.

From http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12949.htm

It was October last year when we
came home, flicked on the radio and listened aghast to the news
that the Iranian president denied the Holocaust had happened and
said the state of Israel should be wiped off the map. ‘Christ,’
we thought, ‘this nut job’s playing into their hands with this
kind of rhetoric.’ Since then “the Cuban missile crisis in slow
motion” as one US academic has described the Iran/US imbroglio
has ratcheted up to high alert with Seymour Hersch of the New
Yorker

reporting that the White House is all prepared for nuclear
strikes. It would take just 12 hours to deploy nuclear
weapons for a bunker busting strike that would kill a million
Iranians according to conservative estimates commissioned by the
Pentagon. Nuclear armed planes are now on constant alert and
public opinion has been framed around those mad, mad statements
on Israel by Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.



But what if the pronouncements by Ahmadinejad that cast him as
this season’s baddie incarnate had been a) mistranslated and b)
taken out of context?



When

properly translated the Iranian president actually calls for
the removal of the regimes that are in power in Israel and in
the USA as a goal for the future. Nowhere does he demand the
elimination or annihilation of Israel. He called for greater
governance for Palestine. The word map does not even feature.
And the president makes plain that the Holocaust happened, but,
he argues western powers have exploited the memory of the
Holocaust for their own imperialistic purposes. What the
mainstream ran with is complete deception.



The deception has been aided by the fact that much of the media
use an ‘independent’ company called

Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri) for translating
Middle Eastern languages.

Memri just happens to be owned by two right-wing neo-con
Israelis:

Meyrav Wurmser, the wife of one of Dick Cheney’s aides (and
ex-special assistant to ‘Strap-on’ John Bolton),

David Wurmser and former(?) Israeli Military Intelligence
officer, Colonel

Yigal Carmon. Indeed a look at Wikipedia’ s incomplete staff
list seems to suggest a heavy Israeli bias in staffing and at
least two more ex-Israeli Military Intelligence people. Still
the little red email is sure
that’s just a coincidence, as is the fact that the Israeli army
(presumably military intelligence) has

also used this mistranslation tactic in the past.



And once Ahmadinejad had been brushed with the wacko Jew
destroyer tag, it was a short hop, skip and ein Sprung before he
was alongside Adolf Hitler in the pantheon of baddies. Like
Milosevic and Hussein before him, Ahmadinejad’s Hitler
comparison is as sure a sign war is imminent.



Unlike Hitler though Ahmadinejad doesn’t rule Iran, nor does he
control its foreign or military policy. The man in charge of all
that is Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.



Iran is a theocracy, and Khamenei is the theocrat-in-chief. To
give you an idea of where Ahmadinejad lies in Iran’s political
hierarchy, note that no one can even run for the presidency in
the first place without the approval of Khamenei and the
Guardian Council, a group of six clerics and six conservative
jurists that are selected by Khamenei.



Ahmadinejad serves the purpose of being a believable bogeyman.
He’ll find his Ph.D. in civil engineering and being a founding
member of the Iran Tunnel Society useful if Seymour Hersch’s
bunker-busting nuke allegations come true

.

SO CLARKE'S GONE. WILL THE AGENDA CHANGE?

No!

The banks will still be creating infinite amounts of money to enslave the world, including you, and their chosen ones such as Blair implement their agenda; war and the Global Police State.

But who's bothered about all that when Big Brother's going Bikini-n-BBQ!!! Human's are so, so simple. The Money Masters laugh at you the way you may laugh at a dog pointlessly chasing a ball.

THE RESHUFFLE

As soon as I heard Blair was reshuffling his cabinet earlier this morning I knew Clarke would go and Reid would take his place. 'Reefer' Reid is just the beastman to push through the ID card/database state Blair's Bilderberg masters want. And another Bilderberg position has appeared; I have been expecting a special Secretary of State for Europe cabinet position to be created soon to push forward the Fortress Europe idea for it is moving far too slowly for the money masters, and we now have one, to be occupied by the servile and creepy former Defence Minister during the time of the Iraq War and the death/murder/suicide of Dr David Kelly (and the man who also recently called for compulsory voting), Geoff Hoon.

Blair kept Clarke at the Home Office, not as Blair suggested to sort out the foreign prisoner scandal, but as the fall guy for the local election results. I actually feel some sympathy for Clarke, but this shows Blair's ruthlessness and blindness; Clarke was too busy pushing through the Bilderberg ID Card/Database State and Blair can't see that it is Blair himself who is the liability.

Speaking of the local election results the Conservative Party should not be that confident in their apparent rise in popularity. They made massive gains in London where the strategic voter scheme was being run. Yes, it sent a message to Blair, but I would guess that a significant proportion of people in London voted according to the suggestion made by the strategic voter scheme rather than with their true political thinking.

And as for the BNP, the reason for immigration is to break down barriers in race and nationality, to show to us that we are all just one people who need a one world government to stop artificially-created wars (and not forgetting cheap labour). The BNP are a barrier to this, and are thus demonized in BBC documentaries leading to unsuccessful prosecution for inciting racial hatred. It is my belief that if the Atlantic Foreign Policy was not what it has been, turning most of the world into a shithole, installing dictators and raping the world, stealing natural resources, then most immigrants would not want to leave their families for a better standard of living. Wouldn't you? Yes, some would want to leave, but nowhere near the levels now. The world today is as a result of British and American Foreign Policies in the 19th and 20th Centuries, probably designed to do what is happening right now. These money masters plan centuries ahead, and the plan is passed down from generation to generation, much like Class A shares in the biggest hoax ever foisted upon mankind, The Federal Reserve.

FLIGHT 93

Universal Pictures recently released a propaganda film in the USA, "Flight 93". It allegedly shows the world what really happened to United Airlines Flight 93 on the morning of September 11th 2001. We are told, by the Bush Administration, the Kean-Zelikow Commission, and every other New World Order arse-licker, that the passengers on UA 93 rushed the terrorist hijackers but could not regain control of the plane and the plane crashed into the ground in Pennslyvania killing all on board.

OK. Explain this!

From http://web.archive.org/web/20021109040132/http:/wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html

Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard


Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.

White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.

United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.

United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.

On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.

"United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.

So on the morning of September 11th 2001 United Airlines admitted that Flight 93 actually landed safely in Cleveland, Ohio!

The growing 9/11 Truth/Sceptics Movement has bombarded the Universal website discussion board for their propaganda film Flight 93, and Universal has decided to shut the board down due to the contradictory evidence posted by the 9/11 Truth Movement.

From http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/may2006/040506admitsdefeat.htm

Universal Admits Defeat, Removes Flight 93 Forum
Crescendo of dissent on official fairy tail leads to wiping of website


Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | May 4 2006

Universal Studios has admitted defeat in its efforts to re-package the official 9/11 fraud and has completely deleted its own forum after the website was hijacked by individuals posting truthful information about what really happened to Flight 93.

We previously reported that Universal's forum moderators were deleting entire threads in real time deeming them, "inappropriate."

The website had been turned into a battle ground for countering the Flight 93 government apologist propaganda being regurgitated in an impetuous lunge to give credibility to a tale about as reality-based as Humpty Dumpty.

Now a visit to the website only returns the text, "There are no message boards currently available."

The fact that Universal took the decision to remove the entire forum suggests they were concerned that people voicing alternative explanations behind 9/11 and attacking the government version of events was harmful to the reputation of the film, proving again that Flight 93 was produced, in addition to making hundreds of millions of dollars, to negatively reinforce the official 9/11 orthodoxy.

Polls on the website returned results of 80% believing a government cover-up behind 9/11.

IRAN WILL ATTACK ISRAEL IF ATTACKED

Early last month I posted a very brief summary of events planned for the Middle East, in THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS (a brief intro to British Foreign Policy in the Middle East). These events were planned centuries ago, and have involved creating a very nasty brand of Islam via British agent Hempher influencing ayoung and angry Wahhabi, and the skullduggery involved with creating and sustaining Israel. Both of these are products of British Foreign Policy of the 19th and early 20th Centuries.

The sequence events I listed is as follows;
1. create and control a nasty, terrorist strain of Islam through an agent called Hempher
2. create and sustain a colony within Islamic territory for Jews (Israel), leading to anger within Muslim community and young, angry men and women joining this nasty strain of Islam
3. arm that colony (Israel) with nukes
4. have your terrorists make a number of attacks on this colony over the years so they get a name for themselves
5. then run a false-flag op on your soil, have your terrorists blamed for the terrorism, and invade the region
6. create a furore over a country seeking a peaceful nuclear power process (Iran)
7. invade said country (Iran) to stop it from producing nukes
8. said country (Iran) then attacks the colony (Israel)
9. the colony (Israel) then nukes said country (Iran)
10. RUN A LONG, GLOBAL WAR INVOLVING NUKES, BIO'S, CHEM'S and TERROR
11. when war ends form a totalitarian world government to stop wars that you created

NB Israel has been given nukes by the British and the USA. Iran has very recently stated that it will attack Israel, so I have highlighted event 8. From http://www.rense.com/general70/evil.htm

Iran Threatens Israel
If US Does 'Evil'
By Edmund Blair
5-2-6

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran threatened on Tuesday to attack Israel in response to any "evil" act by the United States and said it had enriched uranium to a level close to the maximum compatible with civilian use in power stations.

The defiant statements were issued shortly before world powers meet in Paris to discuss the next steps after Tehran rejected a U.N. call to halt uranium enrichment.

Senior officials from the U.N. Security Council's permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany were to discuss how to curb an Iranian program that Western nations say conceals a drive for atomic warheads.

Iran denies the charge and refuses to back down from what it calls its right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

What do you think Israel will do if Iran attacks it?

On Iran being reported by the IAEA to the UNSC John Bolton and Nicholas Burns went straight for a Chapter 7 Resolution, which authorizes the use of force. They didn't get it. But as we have seen with Iraq the USA will probably go right on ahead and attack Iran anyway. There is a very nasty energy controlling The White House.

BERNARD LEWIS : A PILLAR OF WISDOM?

Today The Times has published a comment piece by Dean Godson of Policy Exchange, a think tank. The Policy Exchange website states that Godson was "Chief Leader Writer of the Daily Telegraph", but does not say what he does now for full-time employment, only that he occasionally writes comments for The Times, The Sunday Times and The Wall Street Journal.

Godson's comment is on Bernard Lewis, the academic British Agent guiding American Foreign Policy. Apparently Dick Cheney flew to a party being held for Lewis's 90th birthday where Cheney gave a speech (and I'll try to find a transcript of that). Lewis is currently Cleveland E Dodge Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton. Cleveland E Dodge was the son of Cleveland H Dodge, who was the biggest donator to Woodrow Wilson's Presidential campaigns in 1912 and 1916. Wilson subsequently created the biggest fraud on mankind, The Federal Reserve, and despite promises to stay out of WW1 sent troops to Europe. Cleveland H Dodge was also a Director of National City Bank, which was owned by the Rockefellers. So with this history behind the chair what sort of man would occupy it?

Godson reveals that Lewis worked for MI6 during WW2. Godson also reveals that Lewis was

"Born in 1916 to a Jewish immigrant father and an Anglo-Jewish mother, he grew up in Notting Hill, Stoke Newington and Willesden and first became interested in oriental languages when learning Hebrew for his bar mitzvah. He subsequently studied under Sir Hamilton Gibb at the School of Oriental and African Studies".

So, is he still Jewish? If so, does this affect his views? Probably. I saw Lewis in a documentary about Islamic Fundamentalism and 9/11 about a year ago. Lewis still believes that 9/11 was a government-free op! And from what Godson has wrote it appears Lewis is unaware of the British infiltration of Islam through Hempher in creating Wahhabism to destroy the Ottoman Empire from within.

Anyway, the comment piece by Godson shows the respect that people like Cheney and Wolfowitz have for Lewis, and how Lewis is guiding American Foreign Policy regarding the Middle East.

From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2160473,00.html

A pillar of wisdom in the great Islamic debate
Dean Godson

For years the US Government has listened to and learnt from the 90-year-old Professor Bernard Lewis


CONSIDER AMERICA the paradoxical. It is the most forward-looking country on earth, where one of the cruellest put-downs is “you’re history”. It is a youthful country, where the elderly are regularly dismissed as “old timers”. And its public discourse can be spectacularly anti-academic, with populist politicians railing against “pointy-headed professors”.
But yesterday, Dick Cheney — arguably the most powerful Vice-President in American history — commandeered Air Force 2 and flew to Philadelphia to speak at a luncheon in honour of a 90-year-old history professor. The event, hosted by the World Affairs Council, was none other than the birthday celebration of Bernard Lewis, Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton and the last of the great Orientalists.

In the postwar era, perhaps only John Kenneth Galbraith among the economists, and Edward Teller and Albert Wohlstetter among the nuclear theologians, have enjoyed comparable influence. Cheney’s tribute is all the more noteworthy considering that Lewis never served in the US Government; his only stint in officialdom was wartime service in MI6.

CLARKE, PREZZA AND MONEY

So the righteous Prezza allegedly had sex in his office while the door was open, and Clarke erroneously allowed several hundred foreign criminals to avoid deportation, some of whom have committed crimes again.

SCANDALOUS!!

Well, no. Lets' get all this into perspective.

During the 1990's while the Tories were in power and before Labour came to office only two member's of the Parliamentary Labour Party were invited to Bilderberg meetings; current Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown in 1991, and current Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1993. The positions these two men hold are arguably the two most powerful positions in government. Is it just 'a coincidence' that Brown and Blair were invited, and nobody else, and that they now hold these two positions? Or is it, as Bilderberg Chairman Etienne Davignon claims, that Bilderberg are just "excellent talent spotters"?

[By the way, Blair has lied to Parliament about the attendance of himself and Brown to these Bilderberg meetings.]

So what is Bilderberg? If you ask the likes of Jon Ronson he'll say it's a meeting of 'Jewish Lizards'. In reality if you look at the attendance list you will find it is a meeting run by the most powerful fractional reserve bankers (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Warburg) to interview potential candidates for political office so that the chosen ppoliticians continue the agenda of the fractional reserve bankers. The Steering Committee decides who is invited, approximately 100 of 'the great and the good' from Europe and the USA. It is widely believed that one, if not the main, objective of Bilderberg is to create One Europe Government as a stepping stone towards One World Government. In support of this thesis John Monks was the only other person from the UK 'left', besides Blair and Brown, to be invited, in 1996, before the 1997 Labour victory. Then Monks was the General Secretary of the TUC. Now Monks is the General Secretary of the European TUC, a member of the Councils of the European Policy Centre, Brussels and the Center for European Studies, London. But he is also a Trustee of The Friends of Europe. But who is the President of The Friends of Europe? It is currently Etienne Davignon who is also currently the Honorary Chairman of Bilderberg! There are quite a few regular Bilderbergers who are also Trustees of The Friends of Europe e.g. Uffe Ellemann-Jensen, and Carl Bildt. So Monks is a big Europe man, and there is no way he would have been invited in the first place and also be where he is today if the bankers didn't like what he said.

If you get invited to Bilderberg, you have a chance to make it. But if you say the right things you will make it. For example Bill Clinton at Bilderberg 1991, made President of USA 1992. Brown and Blair at Bilderberg early 1990's, now Chancellor and Prime Minister of Great Britain for over two terms in office.

Why? What is so special about the people who control Bilderberg?

Along with the bankers who control it, or their representatives, there are always, always, always members of the press e.g. The Economist, The Times, The Financial Times, The Daily Telegraph. But if there are always members of the press in attendance then why do you read about, for example, Prezza and Clarke, and not hear anything about Bilderberg, or for that matter, fractional reserve banking?

Well, I'll ask again; Who has the power to create as much money as they want to buy, or even create new, media outlets? Who owns Reuters? Rupert Murdoch is a Bilderberger. Conrad Black, former owner of The Daily Telegraph is also a Bilderberger.

These people control what you read, hear and see with regards to the news, and thus what you think. They can make or break politicians. They can also create diversions, to take your mind off potentially damaging news.

So why do you not read about who has the power to create money while you eat your cornflakes, but you can read about Prezza getting a blow job from his sexretary who was hiding under the desk?

Or what would you rather read while you eat your cornflakes?

So what if Clarke goes?

So what if Prezza goes?

If one goes another clone will take their place and the merry-go-round/musical chairs continues.

As Josiah Stamp stated, as long as we allow the bankers to create money at will they will always use that power to buy and/or control media to influence your vote to put people like their chosen one Blair in place so that people like Blair can put people like Clarke in place to bring in ID Cards/database.

Let's get this straight. The ID Card/database is not Clarke's idea. Clarke is a stooge for it. The ID Card/database idea was thought up years ago, before Clarke was born. IBM helped the Nazis to create an ID Card/database state. I would guess that it is the furore over ID Cards that diverted Clarke from sorting out the foreign prisoner scandal. But as Labour have suggested it is Labour who were the first to introduce the system, so who knows how many have avoided deportation under previous governments, Tory or Labour?

So, what's more important? Clarke fired to be replaced by another clone selected by Bilderberg's chosen one Blair to continue the rush towards a Police State? Or to take the money-creating power from the bankers so they stop selecting people like Brown and Blair to be our leaders years before they enter office and then use their influence over the media to get their chosen ones into office to continue the banker's agenda (oh, and not forgetting putting everyone and everything into eternal debt slavery)?

It's upto you.

BUSH INCREASES CONTROL OVER THE USA

When I say Bush I mean the people for whom he is a simple front.

I posted a few weeks ago about the comparisons between Nazi Germany and current British and American politics. Carl Schmitt was the Nazi theoretician of law and came up with the idea of Fuhrerprinzip, that the head of state was the law. The "Kill Parliament Bill" , although slightly amended now, had a strong whiff of Fuhrerprinzip . But across the pond Bush is taking that principle to another level.

From http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=355

If you need evidence the Straussian neocon controlled Bush administration is a dictatorship, consider the “decider” in the White House, according to the Boston Globe, “has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution,” or rather his trashing of the Constitution. No doubt Bush has never read the Constitution, not that it matters—he is president in name only and the executive branch is controlled by a cabal of Straussians who believe in Machiavellian dictatorship, not a constitutionally limited republic. “Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems, ‘whistle-blower’ protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research.”

Once upon a time, Congress had the power to write laws and to the president a duty ‘’to take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” but in Bushzarro world this tradition is turned on its head. In effect, there is no reason for Congress to convene because the Straussian fascists have declared Ausnahmezustand (state of emergency under the pretense of a bogus war on terrorism) and now the executive is free to break laws of all sort, both national and international.

Bush, not Saddam Hussein or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Iran, is the “new Hitler” and the Patriot Act and subsequent legislation and executive orders serve as the neocon Reichstag Fire Decree (in essence, a continual state of emergency). Bush’s Straussians have put into practice the political philosophy of Carl Schmitt, who wrote Die Diktatur (On Dictatorship) and believed the office of the Reichspräsident should rule supreme and transform the juridical system into a deadly juggernaut.

The article to which Nimmo refers is
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/

Bush challenges hundreds of laws
President cites powers of his office
By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | April 30, 2006

WASHINGTON -- President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.

Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems, ''whistle-blower" protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research.

Legal scholars say the scope and aggression of Bush's assertions that he can bypass laws represent a concerted effort to expand his power at the expense of Congress, upsetting the balance between the branches of government. The Constitution is clear in assigning to Congress the power to write the laws and to the president a duty ''to take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Bush, however, has repeatedly declared that he does not need to ''execute" a law he believes is unconstitutional.

Former administration officials contend that just because Bush reserves the right to disobey a law does not mean he is not enforcing it: In many cases, he is simply asserting his belief that a certain requirement encroaches on presidential power.

Now if that ain't Fuhrerprinzip what is?

AL-ZARQAWI (the psyop) WAS ALLOWED TO LIVE

Former CIA agent Mike Scheuer says that the psyop Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was allowed to avoid being killed by the USA a number of times during 2002. Scheuer says that al-Zarqawi was living at a terrorist training camp in Iraqi Kurdistan and detailed intelligence on al-Zarqawi including overhead imagery was passed daily to the Bush Administration. But al-Zarqawi was allowed to live so that a link could be made between Saddam Hussein and terrorism, which would no doubt reinforce the lie that Cheney & Co were pushing that Iraq was involved in 9/11.

Since then al-Zarqawi has been transformed into this Goliath terrorist by the good folks in the psyop dept at US Military HQ.

From http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/us-allowed-zarqawi-to-escape/2006/04/30/1146335608444.html

The United States deliberately passed up repeated opportunities to kill the head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Jordanian-born terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, before the March 2003 US-led invasion of that country.

The claim, by former US spy Mike Scheuer, was made in an interview to be shown on ABC TV's Four Corners tonight.

Zarqawi is often described as a lieutenant of Osama bin Laden, whose supporters masterminded the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington

...During the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, Zarqawi's presence in the north of the country was used by US officials to link Saddam Hussein to terrorism.

.

And who says terrorists aren't used by governments?