BACK TO SYRIA

Now that the conference on Somalia is over, Syria is back on the agenda.

Webster Tarpley has issued a false flag warning that he has received intelligence from reliable sources that an attempt will be made to blame the Syrian government of using snipers to kill 17 children.

A reliable Russian source in Syria warns that al Jazeera is about to launch within hours a major false flag provocation. Al Jazeera will allege that 17 children have been killed by Assad’s forces. These children are already dead, and have been killed by NATO death squads. The goal is to create an atmosphere of hysteria at the Tunis “Friends of Syria” conference today Friday, which otherwise threatens to be a fiasco due to the boycott by Russia, China, and Lebanon, and due to the fragmented nature of the Syria opposition.

Please spread this story as fast as you can as a highest priority False Flag Alert.

–Webster Tarpley

[source : FALSE FLAG ALERT – Syrian Sources Warn: Al Jazeera to Claim 17 Children Killed by Assad Forces; Kids are Already Dead, Slain by Nato Death Squads to Induce Hysteria at Friday’s “Friends Of Syria” Conference in Tunisia, Tarpley.net, 23/02/2012]

The headline of The Guardian today may be related to this.

The UN has accused the Syrian regime of "crimes against humanity" – including the use of snipers against small children – and has drawn up a list of senior officials who should face investigation, reportedly including President Bashar al-Assad.

[source : Syrian regime accused of crimes against humanity by UN, The Guardian, 24/02/2012]

There is a conference of "Friends of Syria" on Syria in Tunisia today.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she wanted to see progress on three fronts - providing humanitarian relief, increasing pressure on the regime and preparing for a democratic transition of power.

[source : Syria faces ultimatum from international conference, BBC, 24/02/2012]

Now that does not sound neutral to me. It is open statement that Clintonella de Vil wants Assad out.

And this feeling is reinforced in an Opinion piece in the FT. Written by Emile Nakhleh, an ex-CIA analyst, it proposes a half-baked scheme to lull Assad into a war.

It is time for the west to help the Syrian opposition remove Bashar al-Assad’s regime and save the Syrian people from further slaughter. If the west fails to support Syria’s opposition immediately, the city of Homs – and its population of more than 1m people – will face the fate of its sister city Hama, which was destroyed by Mr Assad’s father Hafez 30 years ago.

...So what should be done? The assistance should begin with establishing a haven for the opposition and the military personnel who defect from the regime, as in northern Iraq in 1991. Food, water, clothes, medical supplies and technical equipment should be dropped into the safety zone. Ankara would have to play a critical role in planning, and ultimately in maintaining and supplying the zone, as it would almost certainly have to be contiguous to Turkey.

If Syrian forces violate the sanctuary, the west should arm the opposition and work with military defectors to organise more effective resistance. If that fails to deter the regime’s brutality and more deaths occur, the west should consider putting a limited number of “boots on the ground”, beginning with the “liberated” zone.

[source : Syria intervention is only a matter of time, FT, 24/02/2012]

To quote The Graduate,

Me : Emile Nakhleh, this whole idea sounds pretty half baked.
Emile Nakhleh: No, it's not. It's completely baked.

Nakhleh uses the example of Iraq in 1991. What happened during Desert Storm? We encouraged an uprising against Saddam, then betrayed it, allowing Saddam to easily identify all his opposition, who he then slaughtered.

If you read the piece it is very one-sided because it does not address anywhere the widely known facts that NATO Special Forces are in Syria assisting the Syrian al Qaeda rebels, and have been for a while. They are using the same trick they used in Libya; foment a civil war, call for humanitarian assistance, then bomb the hell out of the country and hand it over to al Qaeda.

DOUBLE STANDARDS

The violence in Syria, which can be attributable to both sides, could be very quickly stopped if Great Britain, France and the USA stopped their assistance of the Syrian rebels and called on the Syrian rebels to ceasefire. No such attempt has been made. Hence Russia and China have consistently opposed any (overt) intervention in Syria because all attempts that have originated from Great Britain, France and the USA are one sided, calling for Assad to step down and demanding that Assad's military stop their actions while the Syrian rebels can continue their actions (such as the terrorist bombing in Aleppo). Just last week the alleged leader of al Qaeda called on all Muslims to overthrow Assad. There is open talk of openly arming the Syrian rebels (as if it wasn't going on already).

Yesterday a conference was held in London on Somalia. Before the conference the leader of Somalia told Reuters that he would welcome targeted air strikes on al Shabab, now al Qaeda in Somalia. The point of the conference was allegedly to find a peaceful resolution to the civil war. However, al Shabab was not invited.

Al Shabaab was not invited to yesterday's conference, but Mr Cameron insisted its fighters could be brought into the tentative political process if they laid down their weapons and genuinely renounced violence.

[source : Somali terrorists warn of reprisals on British streets, The Independent, 24/02/2012]

So it is OK for the Syrian rebels, now in an open alliance with al Qaeda, to continue their killing, with many people like Senator McCain suggesting that they now be armed, yet al Shabab can only be invited for peace talks if they lay down their weapons?

Why is Cameron not demanding the same of the Syrian rebels?

The government of Somalia has now called for military intervention.

As a conference on Somalia's future closed in London, the country's President appealed for bombing raids on the positions of al-Shabaab, which recently merged with al-Qa'ida. Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed said he would welcome air strikes against the "menace" of the insurgents, warning: "This isn't a Somali problem, it has to be addressed globally."

[source : Somali terrorists warn of reprisals on British streets, The Independent, 24/02/2012]

Al Shabab, now al Qaeda in Somalia, has subsequently warned of reprisals on the streets of Great Britain if they are attacked.

Islamist fighters in Somalia last night warned of deadly reprisals on Britain's streets if the West mounted military action in the war-torn east African state.

...Last night the spokesman for the Islamist group, Sheikh Ali Dhere, warned it could launch terror attacks in the West if countries such as Britain and the US intervened in Somalia. "Your peace depends upon us being left alone," he told Channel 4 News. "If you do not let us live in peace, you will not enjoy peace either."

[source : Somali terrorists warn of reprisals on British streets, The Independent, 24/02/2012]

So because of Cameron's double standards there is now the grave possibility that we will attack Somalia, innocent Somali children could die, and in response a possible terrorist attack on Britain's street by Islamic extremists (may be false flag like 7/7) could kill innocent children over here.

If this happens, can we prosecute Cameron for manslaughter? Or to be more accurate, childslaughter?

And we are fully aware of Cameron's double standards. Not one banker has been prosecuted for wrecking the economy and they can still gamble in the hundreds of trillions in fraudulent derivatives, while a man who stole a bottle of water gets a year in prison.

THE SOMALIA QUICKENING

Sky News says that it has been informed by intelligence sources that some of the weapons that went missing from Libya (after NATO helped their on-off lovers al Qaeda by bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing Libyan civilians to death so that al Qaeda could torture and kill black Africans and former government officials) have found their way into the hands of...oopsadaisy! al Qaeda in Somalia, al Shabab!

Somalia's hard line Islamist rebels are reported to have taken delivery of up to 30 surface-to-air missiles smuggled to them from Libya since the fall of Muammar Gaddafi.

...They could be used against commercial airliners in revenge for recent advances by African Union (AU) forces from Uganda and Burundi who have driven the Shabab out of the Somali capital, Mogadishu.

...The former Libyan leader had stockpiles of hundreds of surface-to-air missiles - very few of which were accounted for after the chaos of the revolution which deposed him.

[source : Somali Rebels 'Get Hold Of Gaddafi Missiles', Sky News, 23/02/2012]

Isn't that handy for al Qaeda?

And isn't that handy for NATO?

Those missiles could be anywhere!

It is becoming painfully obvious, more and more, day by day, that the plan mentioned to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 is being implemented.

Seven nations in five years was the plan.

Iraq (2003).
Lebanon (2005).
Sudan (2005).
Libya (2011).

That's four down.

Only three remain; Syria, Iran and Somalia.

The warmongering with Iran and Syria is painfully obvious.

During the last week the demonisation of Somalia has quickened at a disturbing rate.

Now there is open talk of invading Somalia because it is run by al Qaeda who now have Gaddafi's weapons.

But didn't we just help al Qaeda into power in Libya?

Aren't we just about to assist al Qaeda into power in Syria?

Yet we are supposed to invade Somalia because al Qaeda is in power?!

Perhaps we are not supposed to question this contradiction. Perhaps we are supposed to simply mong out in front of the TV watching moronic Z list celebrities writhing in agony in a tank of worms and scary-looking insects?

I hope it is crystal clear to you all now.

They at the least allowed 9/11, the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC and their warmongering warmongers wanted, to go on a global rampage, hoping to attack Iraq and Iran (as proposed in Rebuilding America's Defenses and A Clean Break), and adding the above named extra states, which were added for whatever reason, probably natural resources and/or to empower the IMF.

But I still believe that they are trying to start WW3 through Israel in whatever capacity they can get to work to spark it all off; Israeli attack on Iran, false flag terror attack blamed on Iran, etc.

ps Webster Tarpley recently told us about "bigwigs" being warned against air travel in March. Now al Qaeda in Somalia are reported to have Gaddafi's SAMs just when they want to invade Somalia. Hmmm.

IT'S SOMALIA TIME

Continuing the refocus of attention onto Somalia, the FT editorial today appeals to the conference on Somalia being held in London today to agree on military action on "al-Shabaab, the jihadist militia that controls large swaths of territory".

An express recognition is needed from neighbours, donors and the UN that this has been a failure and that Somalia needs something better.

This must set the stage for greater international consensus on a better approach – between other African countries, the west and interested powers such as Turkey. This requires mutual understanding on military issues including the intentions of the invading forces or the conditions under which the west launches air attacks against al-Shabaab.

[source : Solving Somalia, FT, 23/02/2012]

"military issues"?

"invading forces"?

"the west launches air attacks"?

Sound familiar?

SOMALIA COMING INTO THE CROSSHAIRS

Last week Cameron named Somalia in the same category as Syria and Iran; apparently they are of vital interest to the empires of Great Britain and France.

Lord Malloch Brown, Soros' handler, has today written in the FT that Somalia can be compared to Afghanistan.

Afghanistan!

Malloch Brown even tries to scare us with this statement.

One think tank claims there are currently around 50 British nationals undergoing terrorist training in Somalia. It took far fewer than that to bring down the World Trade Center Towers and a wing of the Pentagon.

[source : Somalia’s parallels with Afghanistan mean the world must act, FT, 22/02/2012]

Malloch Brown suggests that the R2P means we should get into Somalia and sort the current government out.

So why is Somalia placed in the same category as Syria and Iran?

All three are named on a list given to General Wesley Clark and they have yet to see their governments overthrown or replaced.

But why Somalia?

Perhaps this is the answer.

Moreover, Somalia is an easy target for the Western war machines, as the country does not have huge military infrastructure or any alliance to deter foreign intervention, and that the country has already been hit by civil wars, famine and natural disasters.

Somalia also has immense oil and gas reserves and some other natural resources like Uranium, iron and zinc. According to World Bank Somalia is the second African country with vast unexploited oil reserves. Puntland Province alone is able to produce between 5 and 10 billion barrels of oil.

[source : UK to impose Libya-style war on Somalia, PressTV, 22/02/2012]

Hmmm. I wonder if MB will be citing the R2P as Greece sinks ever deeper into Bilderberg fascist austerity, and people are dying on the streets through lack of food and/or shelter. I doubt it. The R2P is only to be used when NATO foments a civil war, such as in Libya and now Syria, and I would say with the media beginning to focus much more on it, Somalia too could soon be receiving deliveries of love bombs from Santa NATO (or NATO Claus, which ever one you think works best).

HANG A BANKER A WEEK

In response to Ken Livingston's suggestion that we "hang a banker a week until the others improve"[1], here is an amended version of Hang The DJ by The Smiths.

Riots on the streets of London
Riots on the streets of Birmingham
I wonder to myself

Could life ever be sane again?
The Leeds side-streets that you slip down
I wonder to myself

Hopes may rise on the Grasmere
But honey pie, you're not safe here
So you run down
To the safety of the town

But there's riots on the streets of Carlisle
Dublin, Dundee, Humberside
I wonder to myself

Burn down the City
Hang the bastard bankers
To stop the frauds that they constantly play
Everything they do screws up my life
Hang the bastard bankers
To stop the frauds that they constantly play

On the Leeds side-streets that you slip down
The provincial towns you jog 'round
Hang the bankers, Hang the bankers, Hang the bankers
Hang the bankers, Hang the bankers, Hang the bankers
Hang the bankers, Hang the bankers, Hang the bankers
Hang the bankers,
Hang the bankers,
Hang the bankers,
Hang the bankers,
Hang the bankers,
Hang the bankers,
Hang the bankers,

[1] Ken Livingstone sparks anger with 'hang bankers' speech, The Guardian, 17/02/2012

A FALSE FLAG TERROR WARNING FROM TARPLEY

During his World Crisis Radio of 18th February Webster Tarpley issued a warning for the first few weeks of March. Apparently "bigwigs" are being warned not to fly during that time period.

Readers of this blog should be aware that I think the blockbuster movie Pearl Harbor was made not only to remind America in a very graphic and very emotional way of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941 in preparation for the "new Pearl Harbor" on 9/11, but also to rub it in our faces. This film is now being shown frequently on Freeview. It may be nothing, but the timing of this and Tarpley's warning is curious.

Another 9/11-style attack would almost certainly provide the warmongers with the perfect excuse to attack Iran. Remember that it took them 18 months from 9/11 to the war on Iraq. And warnings are beginning to come more frequently, now even from Navy Seals. And the FBI recently saved us all from total catastophe when they arrested their own patsy who they had been grooming for months and in a blaze of publicity stopped him from attacking the Capitol with a dud vest.

A FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION 2012

And the funny thing has happened to Ron Paul.

Paul is so obviously being cut out of media coverage on the Republican nomination for 2012.

So compare these apparently contrasting events regarding Ron Paul.

1. Webster Tarpley has been questioning Paul's allegiance to the US constitution, referencing a speech that Paul gave many years ago about not having anything to fear from globalisation and a global currency, and also suggesting that Paul and Romney are converging. In his World Crisis Radio show of 18th February Tarpley reminded us that a member of the Bilderberg Steering Committee Peter Thiel recently donated a substanial amount of cash to the superpac called Endorse Liberty that is supporting Ron Paul. According to OpenSecrets Thiel is registered as donating $900,000, but other reports suggest that this was on behalf of PayPal rather than a personal donation.

2. the BBC has barely reported on anything that Ron Paul has had to say in any debate or indeed in any press conference of whatever kind. But for whatever reason, in a recent Panorama programme on the state of the welfare safety net, homelessness and healthcare in the USA, Paul (the doctor) was shown in a debate blaming those who were sick and close to death as bringing it upon themselves and they should not be helped, thus portraying Paul (the doctor) as cruel and heartless. The aim of the programme was to question how Obama has implemented the promises he made upon becoming President, but towards the end of the programme a member of the Democratic Party is shown defending Obama, suggesting that Obama just had too much to do in so little time and could not get everything done (but he managed to find time to bail out Wall Street with trillions).

If the $900,000 donation to Endorse Liberty was on behalf of PayPal then the fact that Thiel is on the Bilderberg Steering Committee may not be that significant. But if it was a personal donation then this implies to me three possibilities.
1. they are trying to paint Paul with the Bilderberg brush,
2. they are trying to buy Paul
3. they are trying to force a Romney/Paul ticket to get the anti-war votes for Romney but if elected ignore the anti-war movement and plough on with endless bloody imperial fascist wars.

We are where we are.

The perfect candidate for all will never exist.

Tarpley raises some very valid questions, but if Paul is our only hope of stopping the US warmongering that could very well lead to WW3 then he is the man.

Stop the wars first.

Then argue about economic policies in a peaceful environment.

HAS NUMBNUTS UNWITTINGLY CONFIRMED WESLEY CLARK'S ALLEGATION?

We should all by now be fully aware that after the inside job on 9/11 The Pentagon was ordered to draw up plans to overthrow the governments of seven countries in five years.

The countries that were listed by General Wesley Clark were

Iraq
Iran
Lebanon
Syria
Sudan
Somalia
Libya

Iraq was invaded in 2003 on the false pretext that it was involved in 9/11 and had WMDs that could strike your backyard barbecue in 45 minutes. Both allegations were false, and even if Iraq had WMD they got them from us.

In 2005 the Prime Minister of Lebanon Rafik Hariri was assassinated. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon initially blamed Syria, who promptly withdrew its military from Lebanon in the Cedar Revolution. Those initial allegations were proven false, and the STL has since blamed Hezbollah. But Hezbollah accuses Israel after Hezbollah intercepted communications from an Israeli drone that was illegally flying over Beirut following Hariri's movements very closely shortly before Hariri was assassinated.

Sudan has seen a civil war and has been partitioned into two, North and South Sudan.

Last year NATO was given the responsibility by the UN in UN SCR 1973 to protect Libyan civilians from Gaddafi, after NATO Special Forces allied with al Qaeda had fomented a civil war. Instead of protecting civilians NATO bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libya, particularly Tripoli, so that lawless, racist, torturing, genocidal al Qaeda militia could rape and murder black Libyan africans, and then...oopsadaisy, Gaddafi was assassinated.

So that's four out of the seven.

The three left are Iran, Syria and Somalia.

The warmongering on Syria and Iran is painfully obvious.

The one country that has always troubled me is Somalia. It has seen some sort of trouble, but nowhere near the level of Iraq or Libya.

But is this because Somalia, not Iran, is the last name on the list?

David Cameron was recently in France to meet with his sidekick Sarkozy. Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Cameron said this

"I don't think that there has been closer French-British co-operation at any time since the Second World War, not just in Libya but also on the vital issues of Syria, Iran, Somalia, and defense cooperation."

[source : Sarkozy and Cameron Draft War Plans, LPAC, 18/02/2012]

Why is Somalia a "vital issue"?

Little old Somalia, with a small pirate problem, is such a "vital issue" to the two empires of France and Great Britain?

This is perhaps a confirmation (as if we needed one) that the plan given to General Wesley Clark is being oh so slowly but oh so horribly, for those affected, implemented.

So it is absolutely crystal clear that Russia Today should report on this plan immediately.

THE SENTENCING OF THE BLAZING UNDERPANTS BOMBER

The Blazing Underpants Bomber, aka Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was yesterday sentenced to jail fo rlife without parole.

Abdulmutallab was at first going to contest, and named a lawyer called Kurt Haskell as a witness. Haskell was prepared to testify that he saw a man in a tan suit get Abdulmutallab onto the plane without any documentation.

Here is a snapshot of what our media said about this sentencing.

Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was on a suicide mission for al Qaeda when he attempted to detonate a bomb in his underpants as the plane, en route from Amsterdam, approached Detroit.

[source : 'Unrepentant would-be mass murderer': Underwear bomber jailed for life without parole for failed Christmas Day plane attack, The Daily Mail, 17/02/2012]

A US federal judge has ordered life in prison for a Nigerian man who turned away from a privileged life and tried to blow up an international airplane with nearly 300 people during a suicide mission for al-Qaida.

...Earlier, four passengers and a crew member aboard Flight 253 told US district judge Nancy Edmunds that the event forever changed their lives.

[source : 'Underwear bomber' Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab handed life sentence, The Guardian, 16/02/2012]

Handing down multiple life sentences, US District Judge Nancy Edmunds criticised the Nigerian al-Qaeda sympathiser for failing to show remorse, adding: "This is a just punishment."

Earlier, passengers and crew on Fight 253 from Amsterdam gave dramatic testimony about the moment Abdulmutallab attempted to set light to explosives smuggled in his underwear minutes before landing in Detroit on Christmas Day 2009.

...At an earlier hearing, he admitted being an al-Qaeda operative, and that he had carried out the plot to blow up the plane minutes before it landed at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on behalf of the terror group.

[source : God is great, says underpants bomber as he is jailed for life, The Daily Telegraph, 16/02/2012]

A Nigerian who tried to blow up an international flight near Detroit on behalf of al-Qa'ida started a life sentence without parole today.

...Federal Judge Nancy Edmunds announced the sentence in a crowded courtroom which included some passengers from Northwest Airlines Flight 253.

Earlier, four passengers and a crew member told Judge Edmunds that the event changed their lives forever.

[source : Underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab begins life term, The Independent, 17/02/2012]

Before sentencing in Michigan victims of a crime can speak for upto 5 minutes about the impact the crime had on their lives. This is referenced in the above quotes from our media.

But one victim is not mentioned. And he is the most important because he was going to testify on behalf of Abdulmutallab.

So what does Haskell have to say that is so important but is ignored by our media?

He saw Abdulmutallab be assisted onto the plane by a man in a tan suit!

Here is what Haskell said before sentencing. NB no British media reported on Haskell's statement. When you read it you will understand why.

I wish to thank the Court for allowing me these 5 minutes to make my statement. My references to the government in this statement refer to the Federal Government excluding this Court and the prosecution. On Christmas Day 2009, my wife and I were returning from an African safari and had a connecting flight through Amsterdam. As we waited for our flight, we sat on the floor next to the boarding gate. What I witnessed while sitting there and subsequent events have changed my life forever. While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed in jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man in a tan suit who spoke perfect American English and who aided Umar in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially refused Umar boarding until the man in the tan suit intervened. The event meant nothing to me at the time. Little did I know that Umar would try to kill me a few hours later as our flight approached Detroit. The final 10 minutes of our flight after the attack were the worst minutes of my life. During those 10 minutes I sat paralyzed in fear. Unfortunately, what happened next has had an even greater impact on my life and has saddened me further.

When we landed, I was shocked that our plane taxied up to the gate. I was further shocked that we were forced to sit on the plane for 20 minutes with powder from the so called bomb all over the cabin. The officers that boarded the plane did nothing to ensure our safety and did not check for accomplices or other explosive devices. Several passengers trampled through parts of the bomb as they exited the plane. We were then taken into the terminal with our unchecked carry on bags. Again, there was no concern for our safety even though Umar told the officers that there was another bomb on board as he exited the plane. I wondered why nobody was concerned about our safety, accomplices or other bombs and the lack of concern worried me greatly. I immediately told the FBI my story in order to help catch the accomplice I had seen in Amsterdam. It soon became obvious that the FBI wasn’t interested in what I had to say, which upset me further. For one month the government refused to admit the existence of the man in the tan suit before changing course and admitting his existence in an ABC News article on January 22, 2010. That was the last time the government talked about this man. The video that would prove the truth of my account has never been released. I continue to be emotionally upset that the video has not been released. The Dutch police, meanwhile, in this article (show article), also confirmed that Umar did not show his passport in Amsterdam which also meant that he didn’t go through security as both are in the same line in Amsterdam. It upsets me that the government refuses to admit this fact.

I became further saddened from this case, when Patrick Kennedy of the State Department during Congressional hearings, admitted that Umar was a known terrorist, was being followed, and the U.S. allowed him into the U.S. so that it could catch Umar’s accomplices. I was once again shocked and saddened when Michael Leiter of the National Counter terrorism Center admitted during these same hearings that intentionally letting terrorists into the U.S. was a frequent practice of the U.S. Government. I cannot fully explain my sadness, disappointment and fear when I realized that my government allowed an attack on me intentionally.

During this time, I questioned if my country intentionally put a known terrorist onto my flight with a live bomb. I had many sleepless nights over this issue. My answer came shortly thereafter. In late 2010, the FBI admitted to giving out intentionally defective bombs to the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber,the Wrigley Field Bomber and several others. Further, Mr. Chambers was quoted in the Free Press on January 11, 2011 when he indicated that the government’s own explosives experts had indicated that Umar’s bomb was impossibly defective. I wondered how that could be. Certainly, I thought, Al Qaeda wouldn’t go through all of the trouble to plan such an attack only to provide the terrorist with an impossibly defective bomb.

I attended nearly all of the pretrial hearings. At the hearing on January 28, 2011, I was greatly disappointed by the prosecution’s request to block evidence from Mr. Chambers “as it could then be able to be obtained by third parties, who could use it in a civil suit against the government”. It really bothered me that the government apparently was admitting to wrongdoing of some kind as it admitted that it was concerned it would be sued. It further upset me to know that the government was putting its own interests ahead of those of the passengers.

When I attended the jury selection hearings, I questioned why versions of the same two questions kept coming up, those being:

1. Do you think you’ll be able to tell whether something is actually a bomb? and
 2. Do you realize that sometimes the media doesn’t always tell the truth?

I continued to be greatly saddened at this point as I felt the truth continued to be hidden.

When Umar listed me as his only witness, I was happy to testify, not on his behalf, but on behalf of the truth. I never expected to testify, as my eyewitness account would have been too damaging to the myth that the government and media are putting forward. A mere 5 days after I was announced as a witness, there was an inexplicable guilty plea which exasperated me as I no longer would be testifying.

In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am convinced that Umar was given an intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist attack to be used to implement various government policies.

The effect this matter has had on my life has been astounding and due to this case, I will never trust the government in any matter, ever.

In regards to sentencing, nothing I’ve said excuses the fact that Umar tried to kill me. He has waived his valid claim to the entrapment defense. Umar, you are not a great Muslim martyr, you are merely a “Patsy”. I ask the court to impose the mandatory sentence.

[source : BREAKING: Kurt Haskell Exposes Government False Flag Operation During Underwear Bomber Sentencing, PrisonPlanet.com, 16/02/2012]

So al Qaeda bomber Abdulmutallab was helped onto the plane by US government agents to detonate a bomb to cause false terror so that unpopular US government policies could be implemented, particularly the TSA gropers and death ray scanners.

If you are still sceptical, or sitting on the fence, about the NATO and al Qaeda love-ins in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria, just think about Haskell's statement.

PENSIONS AND INSURANCE

I have noticed recently a surge in adverts for easy insurance. Michael Parkinson and other celebrities talk to us in adverts about this insurance plan or that insurance plan, but all have one thing in common; YOU ARE GUARANTEED TO BE ACCEPTED!

There are also an increasing number of similar schemes for pets.

And also private pensions, in which if you pay some into a private pension then so does not only your employer but the government does too.

All this money goes to private pension or insurance provider, i.e. a City of London financial institution.

Before this you had to go through loads of medical and fitness tests before you could be accepted onto a life insurance plan. Not any more.

Does this make sense?

It looks to me like they are keen to get your money now because they know they won't have to pay out later.

And they won't have to pay out later because at the top they know there is going to be a big terrible war.

They just want your money now to keep the system going until the war is over, many of us are dead and the satanic world government takes over.

OBAMA'S ALLIANCE WITH AL QAEDA

I agree with this short video from LPAC, but have the following question; did they deliberately destroy the global financial system by allowing Lehman and others to go under, or was it all accidental?

The military campaign in the Middle East appears to be following the Rebuilding America's Defenses plan, with a few stops on the way such as Libya and Syria, as stated by General Wesley Clark. So why would they stop in Libya and Syria along the way to Iran, waste time, and allow more and more to understand and react to their criminality, and now in Syria openly ally themselves with public enemy number one, al Qaeda?

I would say that they are getting more and more desperate by the day, if not by the hour.

And I shall question this in another blog later today.

Anyway, here is LPACs Obama's Alliance with al Qaeda

ONWARDS, LIARS OF SYRIA

Ayman al-Zawahiri, the alleged leader of al Qaeda, recently encouraged the overthrow of the Assad government in Syria, saying

"Onwards, lions of Syria,"

Today The Daily Telegraph has regurgitated the allegation that Iran and al Qaeda are ganging up to bomb The Olympics.

The Islamic regime, which was accused of attempting to assassinate Israeli diplomats in three countries this week, is seeking to expand the network of Western enemies it assists, officials believe.

As a result, Tehran has loosened restrictions on high level al–Qaeda operatives under its controls as well as offering financing and training to the terrorist group's senior planners.

Security experts said that recent intelligence suggested Iran and al–Qaeda could attempt to find a common project in Europe, possibly targeting the London Olympics, which opens in July.

[source : Iran strengthening ties with al–Qaeda, say intelligence chiefs, The Daily Telegraph, 16/02/2012]

I addressed the absurdity of this allegation yesterday. What we are being asked to believe is that
1. al Qaeda helps to overthrow Assad in Syria, leaving Iran totally isolated, then
2. Iran helps al Qaeda to bomb the Olympics giving NATO the perfect excuse to start war on an isolated Iran.

Maybe it is just me, but this is beyond ridiculous.

It is much more plausible that
1. al Qaeda has been ordered into Syria to bring down Assad to leave Iran isolated,
2. then there is a false flag attack, possibly on The Olympics, to be blamed on Iran so that NATO can start war on Iran.

al Qaeda and NATO have worked together in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia and Libya. We are told that the events of 9/11 were "blow back", but given that 9/11 provided "the new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC and others wanted to go on a world warmongering rampage, and given that there is plenty of evidence that the alleged hijackers were working for NATO intelligence in some way, then the suggestion that 9/11 was "blow back" is as ludicrous as this suggestion that Iran and al Qaeda are new partners-in-terrorism.

9/11 was an inside job. No ifs. No buts.

9/11 was an inside job.

That's why NATO and al Qaeda in Libya worked together so well last year.

Al Qaeda and NATO are one and the same, a branch of the global criminal network that runs drugs, guns, terror and slavery, and interlocks with the money-laundering, fraudulent and bankrupt network of banks in Wall Street and The City of London.

They want Syria out of the way to get at Iran, and they want it done asap.

And if that means bringing the al Qaeda/NATO love-in into public view then they are getting desperate. They are behind schedule. Gaddafi held them up for much longer than they wanted.

But are we being prepared for a false flag attack on The Olympics?

BLAMING IRAN

We all know Iran is the eventual target of the ongoing warmongering and NED-sponsored revolutions backed up with NATO weaponry.

Iran has been named as a target
1. in PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses
2. in Israel's A Clean Break
3. on a list of seven nations to be invaded in five years given to General Wesley Clark
4. by Henry Kissinger and George Soros

Iran is under intense scrutiny and is walking on eggshells.

So what are we being asked to believe is occuring now? That Iran is on a rampage of global terror, just at the time when Israel and the USA are trying to provoke Iran into making the first overt move to give them the excuse to start war.

So is it possible that someone is trying to frame Iran?

=======================================
From http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29307

ANOTHER PRETEXT TO WAGE WAR? The Fingerprints of False Flags Against Iran. The Thailand, India, Georgia Terrorist Bomb Blasts

by Finian Cunningham


Global Research, February 15, 2012

Have American and Israeli efforts to pin international terrorism on Iran just gone global? A series of bomb attacks apparently on Israeli diplomats in India and Georgia are now being linked with blasts in the Thai capital, Bangkok, for which it is reported that three Iranian men have been arrested.

Israel is claiming that the explosive devices recovered in Thailand are the same “sticky bombs” that were used in the attacks in New Delhi and Tbilisi, and that is proof that an Iranian terror network is conducting an assassination campaign against its foreign diplomats.

“The attempted terrorist attack in Bangkok proves once again that Iran and its proxies continue to perpetrate terror,” said Ehud Barak, Israel’s defence minister.

Thai police have named one of the men injured in the blasts on Tuesday in Bangkok as an Iranian national. It is reported that two other men arrested, one in the Thai capital and another detained after he flew to Malaysia, are also Iranian.

The Thai authorities have so far declined to comment on claims that the group is part of an international terror network. The assailants in the Indian and Georgian attacks are unknown. However, Israel has claimed that those apparent assassination attempts against its diplomats on Monday in New Delhi and Tbilisi were the work of Iranian-linked Hezbollah, operating out of Lebanon.

Israeli claims echo long-standing assertions by Washington and Tel Aviv that Iran is a sponsor of international terrorism. At the end of last year, the US government claimed that it had uncovered an Iranian plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in Washington. The latter alleged plot has been widely scoffed at for its outlandish circumstances involving an Iranian used car salesman in cahoots with a Mexican drug cartel to carry out the murder bid at a restaurant in the US capital.

Nevertheless, the latest incidents this week will doubtless fuel repeated assertions by Western governments that Iran is a “rogue state” presenting a threat to international security, in particular with regard to harbouring sinister “nuclear weapons ambitions”. Taken together, it purports to justify the US/NATO/Israeli war plans towards Iran. It is believed that Washington has given Israeli a tacit green light to launch pre-emptive military strikes against the Islamic Republic. In this context, the latest claims emanating from Tel Aviv that its foreign diplomats are being targeted for assassination by Iran could provide a fatal trigger for long-held war plans.

But a closer look at the latest blast incidents raises serious questions about the credibility of such claims, and indeed could suggest that they are part of a false flag campaign to set Iran up for imminent attack.

For a start the explosive devices apparently used in Thailand, India and Georgia were so-called sticky bombs, devices that can be magnetically attached to vehicles for targeted assassination of individuals. In the New Delhi attack, a motorcyclist rode up to the Israeli diplomat’s car and attached the bomb. In the Tbilisi incident, the device was apparently stuck underneath the vehicle’s chassis. None of the diplomats alleged targeted were seriously injured in the attacks.

But this method of assassination has been used previously with devastating effect in the murder of four Iranian nuclear scientists in separate attacks. The latest Iranian victim of assassination was 32-year-old Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan who was killed when motorcycle assailants planted a sticky bomb on his car in Tehran last month. The Iranian government has claimed with credible reasoning that the assassination campaign against its scientists is the work of American and Israeli intelligence. The American and Israeli use of Iranian nationals as proxy agents to execute such a campaign is a proven modus operandi.

Iran has strongly denied any involvement in the latest terror incidents in India, Georgia and Thailand, as well as the alleged bomb plot against the Saudi diplomat in Washington. There is plausible credibility in Iran’s denials. What would Iran gain from such action, only grief and trouble?

This is especially true with regard to India and Thailand. Both Asian countries have become major trading partners with Tehran in recent years. India, along with China, is Iran’s biggest customer for its vital oil industry.

Thailand is of growing importance as a trading partner with Iran for oil, mining, heavy industry, services, technology and agriculture especially after both countries set up a joint business council five years ago.

For Iran to carry out such attacks, as is being claimed, would be like shooting itself in the foot, particularly because both Asian countries have refused to join in the US-led campaign to isolate Iran economically and diplomatically.

Put the other way round, it is much more in the interest of Washington and Israel to destabilize relations between Iran and its Asian partners. The repercussions from the blasts in India would appear to be having that desired effect.

Take this Reuters reports: Up to now India has not gone along with new financial sanctions imposed by the United States and European Union to punish Iran over its disputed nuclear programme. Instead, New Delhi has come up with elaborate trade and barter arrangements to pay for oil supplies. However, the president of the All India Rice Exporters’ Association said Monday’s attack on the wife of an Israeli diplomat in the Indian capital will damage trade with Iran and may complicate efforts to resolve an impasse over Iranian defaults on payments for rice imports worth around $150 million. “The attack and its political fallout have clearly vitiated the atmosphere. Traders who were already losing money due to payment defaults will be extremely wary of continuing their trade with buyers in Iran,” Vijay Setia told Reuters.

So add it up. Bomb teams with proven US/Israeli assassination expertise and methodology; target countries that are major Iranian partners; desired effect of further isolating Iran internationally; and, to cap it all, a long sought-after pretext for Israel to attack Iran with America’s blessing.

When logic and facts coincide like this, it’s usually more prudent to engage in reason than to indulge in lurid claims.

Finian Cunningham is Global Research’s Middle East and East Africa Correspondent

cunninghamfinian@gmail.com

PUTIN 2.0

In its editorial today the FT has urged Vladimir Putin to "modernise".

So what does "modernise" mean?

According to the FT,

Modernisation requires far more than overhauling Russia’s creaking, resource-dominated economy. It means, above all else, replacing the arbitrary and often corrupt rule of the Kremlin and local bureaucracies with the rule of law, reinforced by the checks and balances of a modern democracy. Russia faces numerous handicaps in making that transition – in its history, its culture, its mind-boggling vastness. But with nominal output per capita topping $13,000 last year, it is at the level where many other countries have achieved it.

Steering the country to this point is, for all the repellent aspects of his system, Mr Putin’s undoubted achievement. “Putin 2.0” must move to the next stage. Russia needs an independent, well-trained judiciary; a functioning, competitive parliament; and free media. These, in turn, could boost protection of property rights and begin to combat corruption. That could encourage foreign investment and help small businesses, outside the extractive industries, to start to flourish. In economic policy, Mr Putin would be well advised to adopt the detailed “Strategy 2020” plan drawn up at his request by experts last year.

[source : Time for Putin 2.0, FT, 15/02/2012]

Medvedev, the FT's Golden Boy, appears to have disappeared. He was enchanted by the Lizards of London, and received cuddles and glowing praise from them.

But there does seem to be a distrust and fear of Putin. Russia's economy is significantly dependent on the exploitation of its natural resources (which NWO corporations such as BP and ExxonMobil eventually got their grubby hands on last year). But the economies of the UK and USA are significantly dependent on the exploitation of bailouts. We produce very little, except for weapons, which make us the biggest exporters and users of weaponry in the world. It is therefore a bit rich for the FT to plead with Putin to "modernise" by opening up Russia to foreign investment. All the FT and their ilk want is to destroy Russia like a plague of locusts, leaving Russia decimated.

It is upto Russians, not satanist, corrupt and bankrupt bankers in Wall Street and The City of London, to use Russian natural resources how they want. And if Russians want to "modernise" then they should do it their own way, not the Wall Street and City of London way.

I mean, look at us now. Bankrupt, austerity everywhere and a growing police state, which in the USA is looking very very evil.

We are told that NATO is assisting/driving the Arab Spring so that people can exercise their right to self-determination. In fact, the Arab Spring is a NED/NATO operation to, at the least, overthrow governments and install new dictators.

The NED has recently tried to block Putin's reelection. It appears that the FT has conceded that they failed and that Putin will be elected.

LUDICROUS INCREDIBLE ALLEGATION BY ANONYMOUS INTELLIGENCE SOURCES THAT IRAN IS USING AL QAEDA

A ludicrous and incredible allegation has been made by anonymous intelligence sources to Sky News that al Qaeda is being used by Iran to attack targets in the West, including possibly the Olympic Games in London this year.

Al Zawahiri is believed to be planning a 'classic' al Qaeda attack, simultaneously on multiple locations, which would confirm the mantle he has assumed as the leader of the global jihad.

A source said: "Iran is the main route through which funding for the organisations is made, the main route for operatives to travel to Pakistan for training, and it is the only real way by which al Zawahiri can control and order a major attack."

The sources have no specific intelligence on what the al Qaeda target is, nor when it might be launched.

"We do know that an operation is under way. We assess that the most likely target is to be European. And the most obvious target in Europe for an attack that would attract a lot of attention would be the Olympic Games," a source said - stressing that this was only an 'assessment' and not based on any specific intelligence.

[source : Fears Iran Is Helping Al Qaeda Plot Atrocity, Sky News, 15/02/2012]

Perhaps al Qaeda are whoring themselves out to anyone, Langley and Vauxhall included.

These allegations come just days after al Zawahiri called for all muslims to overthrow Assad, Iran's major ally in the region, and amidst reports that al Qaeda in Iraq is now moving to Syria to overthrow Assad.

So why would al Qaeda help to overthrow Assad, Iran's major ally in the region, for NATO, and then be helped by Iran to attack the Olympic Games? The answer is not immediately clear to me. Perhaps there isn't one. Perhaps because it is all bollocks?

Can you see the problem I have with this?

What we are being asked to believe is this; al Qaeda overthrows Assad in Syria to leave Iran totally isolated, then Iran helps/uses al Qaeda to attack the West giving NATO the perfect excuse to attack Iran.

It is totally ludicrous and incredible!

So, with the undoubted fully documented relationship of love and friendship between al Qaeda and NATO intelligence I think it is much much more likely that the attempt to link Iran and al Qaeda is total bollocks. There have been many attempts to link Iran and al Qaeda, usually reports that the (already dead for several years) Osama bin Laden was living it up in Tehran.

But I am concerned that the Olympic Games are being mentioned as a possible target for al Qaeda. If war on Iran, perhaps Syria, has not started by the time the Games begin then a state-sponsored attack, another 7/7-style perhaps, on the Olympics would serve the purpose of getting the general public behind the drive to WW3.

ISRAEL TRAINS MOTORCYCLISTS TO STICK BOMBS TO CARS

Jeff Steinberg at LPAC wrote last week about a member of MeK in Iran who confessed he was trained by Mossad for a month in Israel to be trained how to stick bombs on cars while on a motorcycle.

NBC News has broken the story that the Israeli Mossad has been recruiting and training members of the terrorist Mujahideen e-Khalq (MEK) to carry out assassinations and bombings inside Iran. The report was corroborated by several Obama Administration officials, and was based on an interview with Mohamad Javad Larijani, the brother of Speaker of the Majlis Ali Larijani and a close personal friend of the Supreme Leader Khamenei. Larijani was interviewed by NBC’s Brian Williams, and he reported that Iranian officials had caught an MEK member, attempting to assassinate an Iranian physicist. Under interrogation, the would-be assassin confessed that he had been recruited by the Mossad in Ankara, Turkey and had been sent to Israel for one month of training, to prepare him for the targeted assassination. According to Larijani, the Israelis specifically trained the MEK recruit on how to plant a “sticky bomb” onto a car, while passing on a motorcycle—the modus operandi for several recent assassinations of Iranian scientists involved with their nuclear program.

[source : Mossad Caught Running MEK Assassinations of Iranian Scientists, LPAC, 09/02/2012]

Yesterday a car was set ablaze in New Delhi, India after several eye witnesses reported a motorcyclist sticking a device to the car. The occupant of the car was the wife of Israel's defence attache in India. Israel accused Iran.

India is still investigating the terrorist act, and has so far not blamed anyone but has said the act was perpertrated by a "very well-trained person".

Indian Home Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram said Tuesday that the attack against an Israeli diplomatic car in New Delhi was carried out by a "very well-trained person."

[source : India: 'Well-trained person' behind terror attack at Israeli embassy, Haaretz, 14/02/2012]

However, it is possible that this particular act of terrorism was perpertrated by someone wanting to provoke Israel into accusing Iran, or to make it look like Israel did it.

IF YOU'RE BREAKING FREE FROM THE ILLUMINATI MURDER MATRIX THEN THIS ONE IS FOR YOU

Get ready for the best time in your life...DO IT!

S.L.D. - Gettin' Out (Justin Robertson's Most Excellent Mix)

NATO ADMITS IT MURDERS CHILDREN

NATO has admitted it murdered 8 children in the North East Afghanistan provice of Karisa.

It's not the first time.

And it won't be the last.

================================
From http://www.presstv.ir/detail/226480.html

The US-led NATO forces in Afghanistan have admitted that Afghan children have been killed in last week's bombing raid in the northeast province of Kapisa.


Spokesman for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Brigadier General Carsten Jacobson said on Monday that an assessment showed there were “young Afghans of varying ages” among the victims of the attacks.

Following the February 8 airstrikes, Afghan President Hamid Karzai ordered an investigation.

Mohammad Tahir Safi, a member of parliament for Kapisa and part of the investigation team dispatched by Karzai, explained that children gathered to start a fire when "all of a sudden a plane dropped one bomb in first round and another bomb later."

"There were eight people and all innocent children and you can see their pictures," he said, showing pictures of bloodied children in shrouds.

The dead were aged between six and 14, with "another guy aged about 18 to 20" who was mentally ill, Safi said.

The Afghan president has regularly condemned the US-led foreign forces for civilian deaths in the US-led decade-long invasion of Afghanistan.

AGB/HGH

WHY DOES RUSSIA TODAY NOT SHOW THE VIDEOS OF GENERAL WESLEY CLARK SPILLING THE BEANS ABOUT SEVEN NATIONS IN FIVE YEARS?

RT has not yet reported on the case of Robert Green, which is very disappointing.

It could redeem itself and stop the current warmongering by reporting on what General Wesley Clark has said and written.

SNIPERS OF SYRIA

It looks like NATO media has dropped the use of children in trying to get us to support an invasion of Syria, and has now adopted the use of snipers.

Sky is now reporting that Syria is under constant fire from Syrian government snipers.

How do they know the snipers are Syrian government?

Snipers in Syria were reported by Webster Tarpley when he was in Syria last year. But they weren't government snipers. They were masked snipers dressed in black. The pictures Sky showed were of a man in uniform without a mask. Tarpley said the Syrians he spoke to wanted the Syrian military on the roofs to stop the snipers. The use of anonymous sniping is documented in John Pilger's The War on Democracy. In a coup against Chavez in Venezuela a few years ago the (privately owned) media showed civilians under fire from snipers and alleged the snipers were from the Venezuelan military. It was later shown the snipers were from the Venezuelan military but were part of the coup, i.e. defectors, deserters, traitors. So is that same tactic being used in Syria now? Hell, yes!

I would thoroughly recommend watching Pilger's The War on Democracy. It shows how the USA was involved in the revolutions in Latin America, from Venezuela to Chile.

All I can say is they are demented sick torturing murdering fascists. And they want the same for Syria; torture, executions, economic shock therapy, poverty, fascism.

And Russia Today has today questioned the use of the aerial photographs of heavy military equipment we were shown last week. We were told it showed the Syrian military preparing to invade Homs and slaughter the civilians there. It was also alleged that gas masks were being distributed in preparation for the use of chemical warfare agents. As yet no such invasion and slaughter has been reported.

On the other hand it has been reported that a Syrian General was assassinated outside his house in Damascus, that al Qaeda in Iraq has joined the fight with the Syrian rebs and that the alleged leader of al Qaeda Ayman al-Zawahiri has issued a call to overthrow the Syrian government.

It's a jungle out there. Whether you like it or not, you are engaged in an information war. What appears to be one thing is usually something completely different.

NATO AND AL QAEDA WILL BE TOGETHER FOREVER ALWAYS

I can't work out if it is al Qaeda singing to NATO, or t'other way round.

The Wannadies - You and Me

OLD FRIENDS BACK TOGETHER AGAIN

Old Friends - Simon & Garfunkel


Back Together Again - Roberta Flack


Old friends are getting back together again. The old friends are al Qaeda and NATO.

Afghanistan. Yugoslavia. 9/11. Libya. Now Syria.

Is it a will-they-won't-they love story like the BBC sitcom Just Good Friends?

Or is it a Last of the Summer Wine-type sitcom?

Whatever. It is a comedy, and the worst and most corrupt comedy at that.

Can you imagine them years from today, sat on a park bench quietly? Or will they be causing civil war, terrorism and bloody mayhem to the benefit of NATO and The New World Order?

A HINT TO POTUS

Resign, dude.

Just resign.

It's dead easy.

No embarrasing impeachment.

No one will bother.

So you resigned. So what?

You (allegedly) protected and defended America and the Constitution, but you want to spend more time with your family, write a few articles.

And you didn't send America into WW3!

PITCHFORKS-R-US

Does anyone want to join in my proposed business called Pitchforks-R-Us?

We would do anything pitchfork, from toddler-size, so your 6 month baby could symbolically shake a pitchfork, to inflatable pitchforks, to real life bona fide actual tried-and-tested pitchforks with very, very sharp and thirsty forks.

I'm thinking that in the coming months and years there are going to be real actual genuine, not NED-sponsored, revolutions.

[this joke blog was brought to you by etc etc etc]

BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW OF LYNDON LAROUCHE

I have just listened to the interview of Lyndon LaRouche last night by Alex Jones.

It was a very good interview, I thought.

AND WHAT A BOMBSHELL LAROUCHE DROPPED!

I don't know whether it was noticed or ignored, but at 22:30 into the interview below LaRouche begins to drop the bombshell. He eventually admits that FDR allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour!!

From http://larouchepac.com/node/21527


WTF!!

LaRouche said FDR allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbour; first to mobilise the United States into war, and second because the US military at Pearl Harbour and elsewhere were not going to do anything to stop it anyway!

At the moment I am stunned.

The implications of this statement are at the moment massive. For example I think it was Webster Tarpley(?) who said it was British-allied Wall Street bankers, such as Train, who immediately accused FDR of allowing Pearl Harbour. I shall have to confirm that.

BUT THIS IS MASSIVE.

And I have just had a brainwave about the alleged Albert Pike three-world-war plan, that I am slowly clarifying in my head.

DO THE INTERNATIONAL MEGA FASCISTS (IMF) WANT THEIR GRUBBY HANDS ON THE SYRIAN STATE?

Stephen Gowans has written a thought-provoking article about the current intrigue in Syria. Gowans argues that Syria is not opening up its state to the US corporations, and is also an ally of Hezbollah which threatens the Zionist State of Israel, and that this is enough for the US and Israel to replace the government of Syria with one that is more "interconnected".

Apart from Syria’s irritating Washington by allying with Iran, backing Hezbollah, and providing material assistance to Palestinian national liberation movements, the country exhibits a tendency shared by all US regime change targets: a predilection for independent, self-directed, economic development. This is expressed in state-ownership of important industries, subsidies to domestic firms, controls on foreign investment, and subsidization of basic commodities. These measures restrict the profit-making opportunities of US corporations, banks and investors, and since it is their principals who hold sway in Washington, US foreign policy is accordingly shaped to serve their interests.

The US State Department complains that Syria has “failed to join an increasingly interconnected global economy,” which is to say, has failed to turn over its state-owned enterprises to private investors, among them Wall Street financial interests. The State Department is aggrieved that “ideological reasons” continue to prevent the Assad government from liberalizing Syria’s economy. As a result of the Ba’athists’ ideological fixation on socialism, “privatization of government enterprises is still not widespread.” The economy “remains highly controlled by the government.”

[source : Syria’s Uprising in Context, http://gowans.wordpress.com/, 10/2/2012]

A few years ago the IMF stated that it was preparing for the day in the not too distant future when it would run the global economy. The crisis in Europe has led the IMF to intervene and be given much more power. The IMF is now looking like it will get its grubby hands on Egypt. If Assad falls we can expect the IMF to get in there and carve up the Syrian state and open it up for the international mega fascists.

USING MY BOOKMARKS TO MAKE THREATS?

I just went to write another blog and could not find this page in My Bookmarks. I have created two other blogs, but do not currently write on them. I had all three blogs grouped together. The other two are still there, but The Truth Serum was not. But between the other two blogs was the page for The National Death Service, which writes about the NHS.

Take from that what you will.

Is that a threat? I was in a NHS hospital last summer for a week seriously ill.

Or is it just my computer playing up?

If it is a threat then it was probably my last blog, Terrorism in Aleppo, that angered someone. Remote access to my computer is possible.

TERRORISM IN ALEPPO

Nearly thirty people died and nearly two hundred were injured when what were apparently car bombs went off in Aleppo yesterday. It appears that at first the Free Syria Army (FSA) claimed responsibility, but an hour or so later accused the Syria government. The Syria government accused armed terrorist gangs, meaning probably the FSA.

So, as with all news reports coming out of Syria, who can we believe?

The BBC has added some more details in a report by Jim Muir.

The rebel Free Syrian Army said it was operating in the area at the time, but was not responsible for the blasts.

Col Malik al-Kurdi, the FSA's deputy leader, told BBC Arabic that it had been monitoring the activity of security forces personnel and members of the pro-government Shabiha militia inside a Military Intelligence compound and a riot police base in Aleppo on Friday morning.

"When they were gathering in a square to go to the mosques and repress demonstrations, two groups from the FSA targeted the two buildings with small arms and rocket-propelled grenade fire," he said.

"After violent clashes, there was an explosion inside the Military Intelligence building. At first we didn't know what it was, but we think it was the regime trying to stop the operation of the FSA," he added.

[source : Syria unrest: Aleppo bomb attacks 'kill 28', BBC, 10/2/2012]

So here al-Kurdi is at least admitting that the FSA did start an attack on the Syria Military with small arms and RPGs, then there were violent clashes, but he then alleges that the Syria Military then blew up its own buildings from inside.

Is this credible?

How many FSA were involved?

And is there any evidence, such as eye witness reports, of these "violent clashes" that al-Kurdi alleges took place?

Curiously, in his spoken interview, Muir does not mention that the FSA started an attack with RPGs but does say that activists said there were "suspicious movements by the security people shortly before the blasts leading them to believe something was going to happen". Muir is then asked how is it possible that cars could drive up to those locations, to which Muir replies "that is a question". But one of the locations affected yesterday was a public garden in which children were playing, and subsequently died.

So it is possible that the FSA started the attack with RPGs, then violent clashes took place, then Syria 'security people' placed car bombs (but drawing so much attention to themselves amidst the mayhem that the activists noticed it), then the car bombs went off, but the 'security people' then also blew up their own buildings.

Credible?

I cannot find evidence that "violent clashes" occured between FSA and the Syrian military just before the bombs went off. I think that if such clashes had occured and if the Syrian military had indeed blown up their own buildings then eye witness accounts of those attacks would have been reported by Syria state TV to make the accusations against the FSA much stronger because the FSA would have been shown as violent.

But what else do we know?

Through the last decade, whenever a car bomb went off, say in Iraq, a so-called terrorism expert would come on the news and tell us that car bombs are the trademark of al Qaeda.

So is there evidence that al Qaeda is in Syria? It is perhaps not insignificant that Aleppo is close to the border with Turkey. The al Qaeda dude, Belhaj, who ran the Libyan rebel army (with assistance from British Special Forces and NATO) was airlifted to Turkey with some of his gang to assist if not command the Free Syria Army, and many reports have confirmed his presence on the Syria/Turkey border.

And the presence of armed terrorist gangs was reported in the most recent report from the Arab League, which has been suppressed and barely reported in the British media. These armed terrorist gangs were reported to have blown up a bus killing women and children. The same report also accused the media of exaggerating if not making up reports of attacks by the Syrian military on civilians.

I am not saying the Syrian military are angels. But faced with armed gangs the British military would implement similar policies and tactics. Take Northern Ireland for example, a situation not too dissimilar to Syria; torture, murder, a biased judicial system. It all sounds depressingly too familiar.

Taking all of the above into account I would say that the FSA has no credibility on this one, and that the terrorism in Aleppo is probably the responsibility of the Syrian rebels.

Curiously our own media is not investigating the possibility of Aleppo being state sponsored terrorism too deeply, merely reporting the accusation of the FSA. Perhaps because such an investigation would inevitably lead all the way back to Langley and Vauxhall and expose the mother of all modern state sponsored terrorism, 9/11.

THE DEAD CHILDREN OF PAKISTAN AND GAZA

That Danny Abdel Dayem geezer has been shown on Sky News every half hour today reporting from Homs, shouting at the camera, "where is the frickin UN? where is the USA?", and showing some living breathing children who looked as though they may have been injured. I don't trust the guy. You cannot argue with some of the reports of established Sky and BBC reporters in Homs that there is some military action going on there, but not everything we are told happened did indeed happen.

Yesterday we were bombarded in the info war with reports that 18 babies had died in their incubators due to deliberate power cuts. Curiously, or perhaps not, the BBC and Sky seemed more concerned about the resignation of Fabio Capello and his possible replacement.

And still no pictures of the 18 dead babies.

But plenty of evidence that the report is just one more example of black propaganda. Both manifestations of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights cannot be trusted.

What cannot be denied is that NATO is killing children in Pakistan and Afghanistan as a result of unmanned drone attacks, and that during Operation Cast Lead in 2008/9 Israel killed approximately 1500 civilians in Gaza, many of whom were children.

Unfortunately there is not now, and there was not then, the desire to show similar pleas from Pakistan and Gaza to the UN and USA for intervention. And even if there were you can bet your last Euro that the USA would veto any criticism or call for cessation of hostilities.

As in all wars it is usually the civilians who suffer the most casualties, and in particular children.

So if it is found that British Special Forces are indeed involved with the Syrian rebs, in what ever capacity, how much responsibility should they take? Or is it all down to Hague, who signed off the use of BSF in Libya?

It is essential and imperative that Hague and/or Hammond be forced to make a statement in The House of Commons about the presence and activities of BSF in Syria.

Do we want our taxpayer money, at a time of brutal Bilderberg austerity, being used to foment a civil war in which innocent children are allegedly dying?

PROVOKING IRAN WITH CLAIMS ISRAEL TRAINED IRANIAN TERRORISTS

An apparently incredible but oh so believable allegation has been made that Israel is "training Iranian dissident activists to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists", according to Haaretz.

Mossad officials are training Iranian dissident activists to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists, a NBC News report citing U.S. officials said on Thursday. The report noted, however, that Washington was not directly involvement in the alleged attacks.

[source : Israel's Mossad trained assassins of Iran nuclear scientists, report says, Haaretz, 9/2/2012]

dissident activists?

Don't they mean terrorists?

Or is it because it is Israel it is not terrorism but dissent?

This is just another provocation to provoke Iran into firing the first (overt, public) shot.

SYRIA, DEAD BABIES AND INCUBATORS

There are reports today in The Daily Express[1] and The Independent[2] that 18 babies in incubators died in Homs yesterday.

Babies? Incubators?

Haven't we heard this before?

As I reminded you all a few days ago, the most blatant and brazen piece of black propaganda was created in 1990 when a 15 year old girl pretending to be a nurse from Kuwait spoke before the US Congress(!) and said she watched invading Iraqi soldiers toss ill babies out of their incubators and left them to die. The girl was lying. She was the daughter of the Kuwait Ambassador to the USA. And Iraq had been tricked into invading Kuwait following statements from US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie that the USA would not intervene if Iraq invaded Kuwait, who Iraq accused of slant drilling and stealing Iraqi oil.

It appears there are two manifestations of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). Russia Today has addressed this oddity today[3], claiming that the SOHR run by Mousab Azzawi (syriahr.org) is less trustworthy than the SOHR run by Rami Abdul Rahman (syriahr.com) because the latter includes deaths of Syrian military at the hands of the armed terrorist gangs, as observed by the Arab League, therefore Rahman's SOHR gives a more balanced account of deaths.

But can we even trust Rahman's organisation?

This dead-babies-in-incubators story led me to find an investigation[4] from last year into a report of...guess what? Dead babies in incubators in Syria, and its shows the farce that is reporting from Syria.

Rahman's SOHR reported AS FACT that babies had died in their incubators because of power cuts. The source was CNN Arabic. But the CNN Arabic report was lifted verbatim from an earlier UNVERIFIED report from...Rahman's SOHR!

Reports of dead babies and incubators certainly get the blood boiling.

That's why we have to be very, very careful about believing not only what you see, but also what you hear and also read.

Regarding these latest reports of dead babies, there are no photographs.

As NATO Supremo General Wesley Clark has told us, within days of 9/11 The Pentagon was ordered to draw up plans to wage war on seven countries in five years. Five have seen intrigue of one form or another. Syria was on that list. We now see threats of intervention from NATO.

And the warmongering on Iran is live but covert, with assassinations of scientists, releases of internet viruses, large explosions at military bases etc.

What you are seeing, hearing and reading is the result of years of image engineering.

Meanwhile, it looks like earlier reports and suspicions about the presence of British Special Forces in Syria assisting the Syrian rebs, particularly in Homs, are true, with BSF providing advice, communications and logistical support[5].

[1] 18 BABIES DIE IN HOSPITAL AFTER SYRIAN ARMY ATTACK, The Daily Express, 9/2/2012

[2] Assad's slaughter of the innocents, The Independent, 9/2/2012

[3] Deaths in Syria: Counting them (politically) correctly, Russia Today, 9/2/2012

[4] How CNN helped spread a hoax about Syrian babies dying in incubators, electronicIntifada.net, 8/8/2011

[5] DEBKAfile, First foreign troops in Syria back Homs rebels. Damascus and Moscow at oddshttp://www.debka.com/article/21718/, 8/8/2012

UK PLANNED WAR AND FAKE REVOLUTION IN SYRIA IN 1957

Documents found in 2003 show a conspiracy being planned against Syria in 1957. A fake revolution was to be instigated leading to intervention and invasion by the UK and USA. Sound familiar? It is the same plan used in Libya last year. And is the same plan being used now in Syria.

Whether this is precisely the same plan that is being implemented is up for debate. The plan was to be implemented in 1957. It is now 2012 and things have changed.

But there are definite similarities. Arming political factions with paramilitary capabilities is definitely one of them. The most recent Arab League report on Syria clearly stated that there were anti-government terrorist "armed gangs" within Syria, blowing up buses killing women and children, and both Lavrov and Churkin have made reference to these, asking anyone who has influence over them, i.e. the UK and USA, to bring them to the table for negotiations.

==============================
From http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29126

SYRIA: CIA-MI6 Intel Ops and Sabotage

by Felicity Arbuthnot


Global Research, February 7, 2012

“In order to facilitate the action of liberative (sic) forces, ...a special effort should be made to eliminate certain key individuals. ...[to] be accomplished early in the course of the uprising and intervention, ...

Once a political decision has been reached to proceed with internal disturbances in Syria, CIA is prepared, and SIS (MI6) will attempt to mount minor sabotage and coup de main (sic) incidents within Syria, working through contacts with individuals. ...Incidents should not be concentrated in Damascus …

Further : a “necessary degree of fear .. frontier incidents and (staged) border clashes”, would “provide a pretext for intervention... the CIA and SIS [MI6 should use … capabilitites in both psychological and action fields to augment tension.” (Joint US-UK leaked Intelligence Document, London and Washington, 1957)


“'The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history." (George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair, 1903-1950.)

For anyone in two minds about what is really going on in Syria, and whether President Assad, hailed a decade ago as “A Modern Day Attaturk”, has become the latest megalomaniacal despot, to whose people a US-led posse of nations, must deliver “freedom”, with weapons of mass, home, people, nation and livelihood destruction, here is a salutary tale from modern history.

Have the more recent sabre rattlings against Syria* been based on US-UK government papers, only discovered in 2003 - and since air brushed (or erroneously omitted) from even BBC timelines, on that country?(i)

In late 2003, the year of the Iraq invasion, Matthew Jones, a Reader in International History, at London’s Royal Holloway College, discovered “frighteningly frank” documents:1957 plans between then UK Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, and then President, Dwight Eisenhower, endorsing: “a CIA-MI6 plan to stage fake border incidents as an excuse for an invasion (of Syria) by Syria’s pro-western neighbours.” (ii)

THIS IS THE KIND OF SICK THING THEY ARE PREPARED TO DO

This is 'Nurse Nayirah' testifying before US Congress in 1990. She said she was a nurse in Kuwait who saw Iraqi soldiers take sick babies out of incubators and leave them to die. But guess what?

Oopsadaisy! SHE LIED!

She was actually the 15 year old daughter of the Kuwait Ambassador to the USA!

This is the kind of sick propaganda they are prepared to concoct, before US Congress, in order to start war.

If they can do this then with all this new technology and a complicit media they can make it look like Homs is under constant bombardment.

In case you didn't know, they don't make films in order of viewing. They shoot scenes out of sequence. They add sound and visual effects later. What you see is the end product of years of image engineering.

WHY IS BROAD CAST ALLEGEDLY OF BABR AMR FROM LUXEMBOURG?

And why no smoke?

And why no other image but the same skyline, even though broadcasts have been running for hours and days?

The broadcaster on Bambuser is called baba-omer and is reporting he or she is broadcasting images of Baba Amr but from Luxembourg.

WTF?!

Just seen the BBC use the images from this broadcaster.

All you see is the same skyline, no smoke, no civilians running about dodging shells, nothing. And all you hear is what sounds like shelling and gunfire, no civilians screaming, but you don't see anything except the same boring skyline.

This is very very odd. Surely the camera would be panning around to show the results of the shelling and mortars, if indeed Baba Amr was being shelled.

And why broadcast from Luxembourg?

BAMBUSER NEVER LIES (OR DOES IT?)

Yesterday I was intrigued by the use by the BBC and Sky News of images allegedly of Homs under siege taken from Bambuser. I could not find the images being used except one set which looks like it was taken in Saudi Arabia.

I now think I know why.

If you go to Bambuser there are three options; broadcasts, users and events. Click on broadcasts. There is a set of tabs, one of which is map. Click on map and a map of the world is shown. Zoom in on Syria. To the left hand side of the map there is a list of time periods; live, less than 24 hours, less than 2 days, etc. Select the option you want. I was interested in less than two days which would show all those broadcasts shown in the last two days.

Guess what?

Oopsadaisy! NONE FROM HOMS!

There is one in Homs less than 7 days, which does show perhaps something going on; lots of armed civilians roaming the streets shouting, guess what, Allah U Akbar.

So where were those images that were shown on the BBC and Sky taken, and when?

Go to http://bambuser.com/ and check it out yourself.

There is something very tricky going down here. Bambuser was shut down by Egypt during the revolution last year. The BBC showed images claimed to be from Libya that were quickly shown to be from elsewhere (was it India?).

BEWARE INFORMATION CLAIMED TO BE FROM SYRIA

The website bambuser.com has been referenced by both the BBC and Sky today. Images both showed were allegedly of attacks on Homs today, this very day, 6th February 2012.

I have already questioned one source of images, used by the BBC taken by Homs7 from Saudi Arabia.

I have also tried to find other images of Homs on bambuser that the BBC and Sky have used today to show Homs today under mortar fire and cannot find the images they used.

This does not mean they do not exist, but the images used may be from a different day, or from somewhere else, maybe both, but the BBC and Sky have, wittingly or unwittingly stated they are
1. of Homs, and
2. from today 6th February 2012.

And who is this guy Danny Abdul Dayem? He appears to be the go-to man for British media regarding events in Syria, particularly Homs. He was on Newsnight last year claiming to have been shot by Syrian Security forces, but the shooters could equally have been CIA terrorist squads. Dayem has a blog on MI6's al Jazeera. He was interviewed today on both the BBC and Sky claiming to be in Homs and under fire from mortars, 300 already (he got his times wrong too, on an interview on al Jazeera he said the bombing started at 5am but on BBC said it started at 8am, or vice versa). Who is he? And why does the British media trust him so much?

We have to be very very careful here about what to believe is coming out of Syria. We know the Arab Spring is a New World Order production with the stated aim of war on Iran, the trigger for WW3. Stopping events in Syria will probably stop the war on Iran. But then maybe not. They may just go straight for Iran anyway.

SHAMELESS BBC WARMONGERING

BBC News is showing a broadcast from a mobile phone via bambuser.com which apparently shows Homs under fresh bombardment.

I have just been to bambuser to watch the broadcast and guess what! There is no bombardment!

You can actually hear children playing in the background!

You can hear the occasional dull thump, but that could be someone banging a cushion or something like that to give the impression of being under bombardment.

There are no bombs.

There are no missiles.

There are no mortars.

There are no guns being fired.

Nothing but children playing in the background and a motorcycle.

Oh, and some geezer repeating ad nauseum Allah U Akbar, Allah U Akbar.

But the shots the BBC show have the kids playing the background edited out, and all you hear is the geezer repeating Allah U Akbar with those dull thuds amplified.

Your money is paying for this warmongering propaganda.

And the source of the broadcast is Homs7 from Saudi Arabia.

Oh, and at the same time Sky was reporting that fighter jets could be heard flying over Homs.

There were no fighter jets flying over when I watched.

THERE ARE NONE SO BLIND AS THOSE WHO DO NOT WANT TO SEE

Here is General Wesley Clark speaking in 2007 at The Commonwealth Club of California. He reveals that Paul Wolfowitz said to him in 1991 that America had 10 years to assert its authority over the world.


Here is Clark again, this time at the University of Alabama in 2006.


And here is what Clark writes in his book Winning Modern Wars.

As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan." Clark adds, "I left the Pentagon that afternoon deeply concerned.

Seven countries.
Iraq
Syria
Lebanon
Libya
Iran
Somalia
Sudan

Of these Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon were named in A Clean Break.

And of these Iraq and Iran were named in Rebuilding America's Defenses.

In Lebanon Rafik Hariri was assassinated. Syria was immediately blamed and Syria withdrew its troops in the Cedar Revolution. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon was established and blamed Syria. That allegation has been proven to be false. But that hasn't stopped the STL, who now accuse Hezbollah, an allegation Hezbollah denies claiming that Israel was following Hariri's movements closely with illegal drones flying over Beirut.

Somalia has been involved in intrigue regarding pirates and invasions by US backed military.

Sudan has seen a civil war.

And as for Libya? NATO was given permission to implement a No Fly Zone over Libya after Russia and China mysteriously abstained, but the NFZ quickly turned into regime change, ending with the ugly and clumsy assassination of Gaddafi.

Both of the two documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, were written by the same bunch of Zionist nutters who congregated around PNAC, JINSA and AIPAC.

The two men Clark names are Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld. On 9/11 Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defence and just before 9/11 he had been quietly given the sole power to stand down the US military. Wolfowitz was Deputy Secretary of Defence. Both Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were signatories to the PNAC Statement of Principles. And both were signatories to a letter to then President of the USA Bill Clinton demanding military action on Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein, explicitly mentioning weapons of mass of destruction.

On 9/11 the US military was mysteriously and suspiciously AWOL.

Clark states in the two videos above that just ten days after 9/11 Iraq was being lined up for war, and the Pentagon ranks did not know why.

Now we do.

Iraq was invaded because, we were told, Iraq was involved in 9/11 and Iraq had WMD that could strike our back yard barbecues within 45 minutes. Both these accusations have now been shown to be completely false.

But what do we now hear about Iran? It was involved in 9/11 and has WMD.

C'mon people!

Can't you see?

Do you want to see?

You don't need eyes to see.

Use your brain! PLEASE!

The Arab Spring is run out of the US State Department via the National Endowment for Democracy. The Russian Spring is too.

It's all bollocks! Can't you see?

All this warmongering would not be possible if it was not for 9/11.

And who was in charge of the US military on 9/11?

OOPSADAISY! Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz!

EUROPEAN BANKS ALONE WILL NEED 5 TRILLION EUROS THIS YEAR

Financial chaos + military chaos = ?

Well, the answer to this apparently very simple addition is up to us.

We could set both variables to zero very easily, to give zero + zero = zero.

This could be achieved by the following;
1. ban all derivatives and anull all current derivatives contracts.
2. stop the warmongering over Syria and Iran.

If just one is non zero then we could have some trouble but come through.

But if both are non zero then the result is probably a global fascist dicatatorship and mass genocide to bring human population down to around a half billion.

A report from LPAC indicates the problem that Europe alone faces. Apparently European banks will need 5 trillion Euros this year. But where will that come from? Should it be given? Was this allowed and/or engineered to happen?

And why is the current financial chaos occuring at precisely the same time that a nuclear WW3 is looking more and more likely?

Some of us know the answer to this latter question. It is not coincidence. It was planned decades if not centuries ago. The plan is to have so much chaos, caused by a global financial collapse and global nuclear, biological and chemical warfare, that we, or more precisely the severely traumatised and wrecked survivors, submit willingly to a world government proposed as the only solution to the chaos.

What will not be told is that such chaos was engineered by the same people who will run the proposed world government from behind the scenes.

But by then the true horror will have only just begun.

==============================
From http://larouchepac.com/node/21436

Why the British Monarchy Must Have World War Now
February 4, 2012 • 12:40PM

A senior U.S. intelligence official has warned that the Inter Alpha Group-centered European private banking system is going to need an estimated 5 trillion euro in zero-interest loans this year, to avert a total crash. The source commented on Friday on the fact that European banks have already told the European Central Bank that they will need one trillion euro in discount borrowing before the end of February. In effect, with illegal secret backing from the U.S. Fed, the ECB is running a European carry trade, issuing near zero-interest loans to banks so they can turn around and buy up European sovereign debt, at 5-7 percent yields or more. The "profits" are booked by the banks to cover for the fact that they are hopelessly bankrupt. The source further explained that much of the sovereign debt that the banks are buying cannot be paid. Portugal, Spain, Italy and Ireland are in the same boat as Greece. It is estimated that Portugese debt will ultimately be redeemed at most at 30 percent value, Spanish debt at 40 percent value. Italian debt is totally unpredictable.

The source emphasized that the one billion euro being demanded this month is but a fraction of what the banks will need over the coming months, and that we have reached a point of "hyperinflationary explosion" that cannot be postponed for much longer. The threshold for an explosion was reached a year ago, the source concluded, and it is only a matter of weeks or months, at the most, before the whole system detonates. Despite Angela Merkel's claim that Greece is a "unique case," and that the haircut being negotiated between the Greek government and private bondholders will not be repeated elsewhere in euroland, the fact is that the Greek deal—if it is ever finalized—will set the framework for Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy.

Commenting on this report on Friday evening, Lyndon LaRouche emphasized that this is why the British Monarchy cannot delay any longer the plans for a thermonuclear war, involving the United States, Russia and China. Already, he noted, their timetable has been thrown way off, due to war-avoidance efforts led by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Russia, China and others. Now, the European and trans-Atlantic financial system is at a break point, and the British Monarchy has so far been unable to yet trigger the global thermonuclear conflagration that they desperately seek, to save their dying Fourth Roman Empire system.

VETOES BY THE USA AND HOW A CABAL HAS BENEFITTED

Just over 3 years ago Israel engineered yet another attack on Gaza, this one called Operation Cast Lead. On 8th January 2009 UN SC 1860 was adopted which called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel ignored it. To the Israeli Defence Force it was like shooting fish in a barrel. Estimates of the dead vary but well over a thousand civilians were slaughtered, some with banned weapons.

UN SC 1860 was adopted with a 14-0 vote, the abstention came from the USA.

Yes, this was an abstention and not a veto. But there was so much outrage at the barbarity and over reaction by Israel that the USA had no other option; it was embarrased by Israel.

But UN SC 1860 is just the tip of the iceberg on the protection of Israel at the UN. The USA has wielded its veto over Israel at the UN SC over 40 times.

But curiously this has benefitted the satanic cabal that runs not only the USA but the UK.

How?

By letting Israel get away with its barbaric treatment of the Palestinians a violent reaction was being provoked and nurtured within the Arab and Islamic community. This was used for 9/11. Before 9/11 the pro-Israel PNAC and supporting authors had earlier written two documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. In the latter it was recognised that "a new Pearl Harbor" was needed to convince the American public to give up their freedom, arm itself to the teeth and go on a global rampage. 9/11 was that New Pearl Harbor. 9/11 was blamed on al Qaeda who cited the Israeli treatment of Palestinians and Israel's support from the USA as its raison d'etre.

So the vetoes the USA used to protect Israel during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s led to 3000 deaths on 9/11, and the subsequent deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq.

We saw how NATO abused the authority it was given in Libya after UN SC 1973.

We now see warmongering on Syria and also Iran as part of the A Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses/NATO project to target seven nations, as admitted by NATO supremo General Wesley Clark.

This warmongering must stop, before we end up in a terrible WW3 that was planned centuries ago.

And British and American people must demand an investigation as to how their taxpayer money is being used to instigate wars and revolutions.

It is no coincidence that just after the banks have robbed us blind with multi trillions in unwarranted bailouts that a large war is being engineered in the Middle East/Caspian.

WHAT CAN WE BELIEVE ABOUT SYRIA?

Today we are being bombarded by reports of a slaughter in Homs, Syria. Allegedly the Syrian Army is shelling Homs indiscriminately, resulting in hundreds of deaths of civilians, men, women and children.

It is more than curious that just as the United Nations Security Council was about to vote on a Russian-engineered resolution criticising not only the Assad government but also the rebs and calling for peace talks that the Syrian Army would allegedly decide to kill hundreds of civilians.

So what do we know about Syria, and what have we learned from the adventure into Libya?

1. former NATO supremo General Wesley Clark has told us in writing and verbally that Syria is named on a list of seven nations that were targets for NATO countries. All the other nations on that list except Syria and Iran have experienced intrigue of one kind or another, most recently Libya. And the warmongering regarding Iran is plain to see.

2. regarding Libya, we were told that the Libyan rebs did it all on their own, except towards the end, and that British assistance was minimal. But just a few days ago none other than the BBC boasted that British Special Forces were in there guiding and advising the Libyan rebs from start to finish, and there are very strong suspicions that Gaddafi was assassinated if not by British Special Forces then with their advice.

3. regarding British Special Forces, several interviews in the Daily Star last month with security ofiicials clearly indicate that BSF are in Syria at the least looking at how the Syrian rebs could be assisted, but knowing what we now know about Libya this cannot be trusted and we can safely assume that BSF are in there targetting and arming and training the Syrian rebs.

4. as the assault on Libya gained momentum we were told that the Libyan army had raped civilians under the influence of Viagra, that they had slaughtered civilians and used helicopter gunships against defenceless civilians. Now the war is over none of these allegations has been proven, and in fact it has been proven that it was the British Special Forces-assisted Libyan rebs who slaughtered and raped civilians, particularly black Libyans. And they are now torturing and killing captives, including the former Libyan Ambassador to France (who no doubt knew a few compromising facts about the relationship between France and Gaddafi).

5. but much more disturbing is the fact that the man who ran the Libyan reb army is bona fide al Qaeda. And not only that he is now running the Syrian reb army!

6. the source of the number of deaths in Syria is The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, who get their numbers from The Strategic Resource and Communications Center. Both of these are based in Londonistan, HQ to the Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorists who had a Covenant of Security with MI5.

Others can add much more detail to this, and this should be enough for those who had no idea what to think following the disturbing news about Homs, if indeed it is true.

I am just expressing my deep concern that events in Syria are not a spontaneous uprising but are fabricated, exaggerated and part of a long term plan engineered by NATO to start wars and revolutions in the Middle East and Caspian.

What the eventual aim of the plan is up for debate, be it simply control of the region, or to start world war 3, etc.

What is beyond doubt is that British tax payer money is being used to foment bloody uprisings, slaughter of civilians, war and regime change.

BRRRRRRR. IT'S A BIT NIPPY (AND FASCIST).

They said the land would melt and the seas would boil because of manmade global warming and we should therefore kill billions with backward economic policies. But last week data was (very, very, very quietly) released, by the same authorities who had banged the MMGW drum following enormous research grants, that the earth had not warmed since 1997.

So when you next watch the weather forecast don't be surprised to hear something like this.

A Fascist front is gathering over North West Scotland and is slowly moving South East, leaving Scotland covered in a thick blanket of Fascism. We also have another Fascist front moving in from the South Atlantic bringing with it storms of violent Fascism. This will move quickly across Cornwall and Devon, to join with a Fascist front currently over Wales. These two Fascist fronts will form one giant storm of Fascism and move North East, leaving behind it devastation consisting of broken families, broken homes and broken hearts. We are expecting deaths and the emergency services will be needed. This giant storm will meet and join with the Fascist front moving South East from Scotland to envelope the whole of the West of this Disunited Fasicst Kingdom in a mega storm of Fascism. At first this mega storm of Fascism will cause just a few spits and spots of Fascism, particularly on the hills, but as this eventually sorts itself out it will quickly move East so that by the end of the day the whole of the DFK will be underneath and smothered by a mega storm of cold, dark, violent, corrupt Fascism.

Now some viewers have already contacted us about this, expressing their concern, and have found it a bit confusing, because our fathers and grandfathers fought and died against Fascism in World War 2. Well, that's just the way it goes I'm afraid. You get told a pile of stinking bullshit to send you into war to empower a cabal of megalomaniac satanic fascist kiddlie fiddling scum, and you fools always, without fail, fall for it.

Brrrrrr. It's a bit Fascist.

Now back to Pete and Jenny in the warm studio.

OBAMA INELIGIBILITY JUST ABOUT GUARANTEES WORLD WAR 3 OVER IRAN

Obama's eligibility as President of the USA is being challenged in a court in Georgia. He failed to show up for the case.

In April last year a very very very dodgy birth certificate was produced by Obama but was quickly shown to be a fake. A few days later...the zombie Osama bin Marfan Laden was allegedly killed in a raid in Pakistan and his body allegedly quickly buried at sea. Everyone quickly forgot the certificate issue.

The Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, has now stated that he believes that Iran is now more of a threat than al Qaeda and that Iran is more prepared to strike the USA on US soil. This nicely sets up another 9/11-style attack, this time to be blamed on Iran.

Proving Obama is a total fraud and a product of the CIA would smash the NWO into a thousand pieces. I thought they had used up their final get-out-of-jail-free card with the raid on Obbotobad. A war over Iran would bury the birther issue, possibly forever; how dare you accuse our POTUS of being a total CIA fraud when he is busy provoking World War 3.

NOW STRIP SUTHERLAND

Fred Goodwin is a minnow, a scapegoat for all that occured in The City of London following the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act in the USA.

Yes, he should have been stripped of his knighthood.

But so should Sir Peter Sutherland.

In fact, not only should Sutherland be stripped of his knighthood he should be locked up in stocks to be paraded in the towns, cities and villages of this Disunited Fascist Kingdom and bombarded with rotten tomatoes and cabbages (and that's just for starters).

Sutherland was not only on the board of RBS while Goodwin was allegedly running RBS, he was also running Goldman Sachs and BP, while also being in the top echelons of Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission.

Sutherland is much more of a danger to the human race than Goodwin.