LPAC are reporting that their high level intelligence sources are telling them that the madmen David Numbnuts Cameron, the naughty boy Obama and Nutternyahu have agreed war on Iran, and it will occur before not after the US Presidential election later this year.
And not only that, the attack will be "immediate"!
It has been hinted lately that such an attack would occur after the elections.
These madmen must be arrested for conspiracy to murder. There is no evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapon or is indeed trying to build one. But an attack on Iran by Israel, with the backing of the UK and USA, would very likely escalate into a much wider regional war and probable global nuclear war, after which a world government dictatorship, controlled by the very same people who engineered the conflict, will be implemented and the surviving human population herded into large urban areas and their population levels vastly reduced to around one billion, but probably half that.
We can argue later if it was all planned centuries ago, or has been made up as we go along.
This conlict must be stopped.
=====================================
From http://larouchepac.com/node/22033
Obama, Cameron, Netanyahu's Lies Accelerate World War Drive
March 16, 2012 • 2:30PM
Highly-placed American and Israeli intelligence sources have confirmed and elaborated on the recent Aluf Benn report that, contrary to all major media accounts, U.S. President Barack Obama, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and British Prime Minister David Cameron are all in synch on plans for an immediate military strike against Iran, ultimately targeted against Russia and China. In effect, the troika are all lying through their teeth to create the conditions for a thermonuclear world war unless Moscow and Beijing capitulate to the full and immediate bailout of the bankrupt imperial financial system and the abandonment of any defense of true national sovereignty.
According to one senior U.S. intelligence official, during their White House meeting in early March, President Obama "gave Netanyahu the kitchen sink," promising critical military hardware to enhance Israel's strike capability against Iran. Among the equipment now being rushed to Israel are two additional airborne tankers for mid-air refueling, updated bunker-buster bombs, and jamming equipment to penetrate Iranian air defenses. The U.S. and Israeli governments are also negotiating on how to deploy SAR (search and rescue) teams in adjacent countries to Iran, in expectation that some Israeli fighters will be shot down or will crash, requiring rescuing of crew members who survive. According to both U.S. and Israeli accounts, plans are to pre-position SAR teams in the Kurdish region of Iraq and in the bordering areas of Azerbaijan. What remains to be determined is whether those SAR teams will be Israeli or American Special Forces, according to the Israeli source.
Furthermore, the U.S. and Israel are already running a "seamless warroom" engaged in cyber attacks against Iran's critical infrastructure. The most well-known incident of such cyberwarfare is the stuxnet computer virus that attacked the control systems for the centrifuge cascades at the Natanz and Fordo facilities in Iran. According to one Israeli source, Defense Minister Ehud Barak has ordered his cyberwar team to give him "ten hours of quiet," meaning the shutdown of the Iranian electical power grid, covering the period required for the raids.
Reportedly, the only actual point of dispute between Netanyahu and Obama during their three-hour Oval Office session on March 5 was over the continuation of targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists during the period of the P5+1 negotiations, set to resume in Turkey in the next few weeks. According to an Israeli source, Netanyahu was adament that the killings would not be halted.
A very senior retired U.S. military intelligence official confirmed that he is absolutely certain that there has been no roll-back in the time frame for the launching of general war, starting with an attack on Iran. He cautioned that, while Defense Secretary Leon Panetta remains in full agreement with General Martin Dempsey and the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that war must be prevented at all costs, if the U.S. military is ordered by President Obama to launch attacks, there is no guarantee that the military command will refuse.
Thus, as Lyndon LaRouche has repeatedly demanded since before the assassination of Muammar Qaddafi, the only durable war avoidance action is the immediate removal of President Obama from office, by impeachment or by the invoking of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment. The collective lies of Obama, Cameron and Netanyahu are all aimed at lulling war opponents into the belief that the launch date for a possible World War III has been rolled back to some time past the November U.S. elections. Nothing could be further from the truth!
Saturday, March 17, 2012
THE DISINFORMATION WAR ON SYRIA GETS TACKY AS SYRIAN AL QAEDA REBS BOMB DAMASCUS
The disinformation war on Syria continues and grows and is getting tacky and ridiculous.
Press TV is reporting that one of the people who was alleged to be in email contact with Bashar al Assad, as implied by the bunch of fake emails that the Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving The Guardian published this week, has denied being in contact with Bashar al Assad and denies that CNN have contacted him over the story[1].
So there is now the possiblity (and I would say 100% probability) that the vast majority of those emails are fraudulent and made up to smear the Syrian leader and his wife in a modern day Diamond Necklace Affair.
But it gets much worse and tackier than that.
The Daily Telegraph is reporting that among the emails was a picture of an anonymous scantily clad woman sent by someone with messages such as "I love you"[2]. What does this remind you of? A few years ago allegations were made that Putin had secretly divorced his wife and married an ex-gymnast. That allegation was untrue, but several newspapers and bloggers carried the allegation as far as they could in an attempt to damage Putin. That didn't work. Neither will this.
But again, let us assume that the email and photo are true. The Guardian told us the accounts have been hacked for a long time now. So it is entirely possible that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs passed on the email address to one of those adult websites and a member or employee of that site sent the photo. It may even have have been the Syrian al Qaeda rebs themselves! Or even a Western intelligence agency we all know and love.
Meanwhile, two intelligence compounds in Damascus have been attacked by the Syrian al Qaeda rebs. The media here is again hinting that maybe Assad did it. Curiously two reports contain the exact same paragraph verbatim.
NB "terrorists".
You can bet that if someone attacked an intelligenc building in the UK the media would not be using "terrorists".
The media here can only hint that the terrorist bombings in Syria are an inside job because if they investigated them in any detail then they would have to address the mother of all inside jobs, 9/11. Without 9/11 we would not have had all the wars and terror and police state laws implemented. Indeed, it was shortly after 9/11 that The Pentagon were ordered to draw up plans for war on seven nations in five years, all of whom had nothing to do with 9/11. Those plans have been executed, with the ultimate goal of war on Iran.
Once a particular number of people realise that 9/11 was an inside job then the scam is over. That number has nearly been reached. And is why the madmen in Washington DC, London and Tel Aviv are under orders to start a war on Iran that will probably lead to a major war in the region, if not global nuclear war. And after that the New World Order will demand a world government dictatorship that they would control.
[1] Press TV chief in Syria denies e-mail correspondence with Assad, Press TV, 16/03/2012
[2] Syria: Bashar al-Assad email reveals mystery near-naked woman, The Daily Telegraph, 16/03/2012
[3] Two blasts hit Syria capital, The Independent, 17/03/2012
[4] Deadly explosions rock Damascus, says Syrian TV, The Guardian, 17/03/2012
Press TV is reporting that one of the people who was alleged to be in email contact with Bashar al Assad, as implied by the bunch of fake emails that the Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving The Guardian published this week, has denied being in contact with Bashar al Assad and denies that CNN have contacted him over the story[1].
Accusing Western media of fabricating news, Hussein Mortada, who runs local offices of Press TV and al-Alam news channels in the Syrian capital, Damascus, said the Western media claims about his e-mails to Assad were false.
He also emphasized that recent CNN claims about Mortada failing to respond to its contacts about the authenticity of e-mails attributed to him were baseless as he has never been contacted by CNN.
So there is now the possiblity (and I would say 100% probability) that the vast majority of those emails are fraudulent and made up to smear the Syrian leader and his wife in a modern day Diamond Necklace Affair.
But it gets much worse and tackier than that.
The Daily Telegraph is reporting that among the emails was a picture of an anonymous scantily clad woman sent by someone with messages such as "I love you"[2]. What does this remind you of? A few years ago allegations were made that Putin had secretly divorced his wife and married an ex-gymnast. That allegation was untrue, but several newspapers and bloggers carried the allegation as far as they could in an attempt to damage Putin. That didn't work. Neither will this.
But again, let us assume that the email and photo are true. The Guardian told us the accounts have been hacked for a long time now. So it is entirely possible that the Syrian al Qaeda rebs passed on the email address to one of those adult websites and a member or employee of that site sent the photo. It may even have have been the Syrian al Qaeda rebs themselves! Or even a Western intelligence agency we all know and love.
Meanwhile, two intelligence compounds in Damascus have been attacked by the Syrian al Qaeda rebs. The media here is again hinting that maybe Assad did it. Curiously two reports contain the exact same paragraph verbatim.
The regime has touted the attacks as proof that it is being targeted by "terrorists." The opposition accuses forces loyal to the government of being behind the bombings to tarnish the uprising.[3][4]
NB "terrorists".
You can bet that if someone attacked an intelligenc building in the UK the media would not be using "terrorists".
The media here can only hint that the terrorist bombings in Syria are an inside job because if they investigated them in any detail then they would have to address the mother of all inside jobs, 9/11. Without 9/11 we would not have had all the wars and terror and police state laws implemented. Indeed, it was shortly after 9/11 that The Pentagon were ordered to draw up plans for war on seven nations in five years, all of whom had nothing to do with 9/11. Those plans have been executed, with the ultimate goal of war on Iran.
Once a particular number of people realise that 9/11 was an inside job then the scam is over. That number has nearly been reached. And is why the madmen in Washington DC, London and Tel Aviv are under orders to start a war on Iran that will probably lead to a major war in the region, if not global nuclear war. And after that the New World Order will demand a world government dictatorship that they would control.
[1] Press TV chief in Syria denies e-mail correspondence with Assad, Press TV, 16/03/2012
[2] Syria: Bashar al-Assad email reveals mystery near-naked woman, The Daily Telegraph, 16/03/2012
[3] Two blasts hit Syria capital, The Independent, 17/03/2012
[4] Deadly explosions rock Damascus, says Syrian TV, The Guardian, 17/03/2012
Thursday, March 15, 2012
THE DIAMOND NECKLACE AFFAIR OF SYRIA
Our good Khodorkovsky-and-green-geonocide-loving friends at The Guardian have somehow managed to obtain a pile of emails from the Syrian al Qaeda rebs. Just as Bashar al-Assad has routed the Syrian al Qaeda rebs in Homs and Idlib the Syrian al Qaeda rebs give a list of emails to the British media.
Not the French media.
Not the American media.
But the British media.
And not just any British media, but the Khodorkovsky-and-green-genocide-loving The Guardian.
Everyone trusts The Guardian, you see. It's portrayed as one of those intellectual, beyond-question sources of media. That's why it was saved from financial ruin by ?. That's why it was rebuilt and is now the most popular source of news on the internet. And that's why it was chosen to push massive green genocide and back-to-the-stone-age economic policies at Copenhagen 2009.
But back to these emails.
The one true fact we can agree with stated by The Guardian is that not all the alleged emails can be verified. The Guardian claim that some have been verified, but upon further reading it is less than a handful, which leaves open the implication that any one of them could be true.
Apparently someone from the al Assad inner cricle leaked two email accounts and passwords (though how they knew the passwords is a question) to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs and the messages from that account have been intercepted for a while. So why only now have they been leaked? Because some other messages allegedly also contained matters relating to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, such as Homs. This made the accounts a source of intelligence for the Syrian al Qaeda rebs which would no doubt have been stopped if the contents of the email account had been divulged earlier.
As soon as I started to read these emails I was immediately reminded of the Diamond Necklace Affair that helped to speed up the downfall of the French Monarchy in 1792. The Diamond Necklace Affair helped to portray Marie Antoinette as a fraudster living a life of luxury as the ordinary French man and woman was suffering. The Illuminati at that time was very small in number yet one of their own Caglisotro was arrested and held for 9 months, but was released due to lack of hard evidence. The fraudsters found sanctuary in London, the source of intrigue concerning The French Revolution, and wrote their memoirs implicating Marie Antoinette.
Most of these emails do not look real; poems, iTunes? Why would these accounts be used for such diverse activities as personal love messages between a head of state and his wife, and seeking public affairs advice?
But let us assume that they are all true. So what? Bashar al Assad held a referendum a few weeks ago and there was a massive turn out and massive support for his reforms. And as for the amount of money being talked about, the bankers who have just screwed us left, right and centre by corrupting our politicians to unnecessarily sign their multi-trillion debts onto us so we suffer brutal austerity can blow ten times that amount in one night on champagne, cocaine, hookers and strippers.
Let's get this all into perspective.
This is a modern day Diamond Necklace Affair for Syria.
The Guardian could not wait to publish comments from Danny Abdul Dayem, but for whatever reason has not covered his expose as a complete fraud, probably a MI6 disinformation agent.
And their support for the traitor Khordokovsky is now ridiculous. Khordokovsky wanted to sign Russia's massive fossil fuel wealth over to the New World Order. He gave all his shares in Yukos to...Lord Jacob Rothschild. He organised The Open Russia Foundation with Kissinger and Rothschild.
COME ON!
The dude is a traitor, not only to Russia but to the whole human race for what he tried to do!
And The Guardian loves him!
WHY?
I think another good indicator that this story is a smear, and possible disinformation plot, against al Assad, because he has just routed the NATO/Arab League-sponsored Syrian al Qaeda rebs leaving them with no foothold in Syria, is that nearly every online British media is covering it. It's the Cameron-Soetoro love-in, and the Assad emails.
The main thrust of the story is that while ordinary Syria suffers the leaders live an enchanted life of chandeliers and Harry Potter. That sounds like this Disunited Fascist Kingdom and the United States of Aggression to me (where we have some of the greatest wealth gaps in the world).
But why is Syria suffering?
Who asks that question now.
Why is Syria suffering?
I repeat again; before we sob and weep and cry for the civilians of Syria and then send over our boys and girls to Syria in their death machines to kill those very same civilians of Syria as collateral damage, William Hague and Phil Hammond must make a statement in the House ofCommons Corrupt Wretches on the presence and purpose of British Special Forces in and around Syria since 1st January 2011.
Remember that quote in The Daily Star from an unnamed British security official regarding the role of British Special Forces in Syria.
The BBC recently exposed how BSF were in Libya advising, guiding and training the Libyan al Qaeda rebs from the very start (and I suspect well before too).
And remember the seven nations that former NATO chief General Wesley Clark was told were to be attacked after the false flag attack 9/11, and that it is not coincidence that those seven nations have since suffered and are suffering international intrigue of one form or another.
Iraq.
Lebanon.
Sudan.
Libya.
Each of these has seen war.
Somalia recently welcomed air strikes on al Qaeda in Somalia after deals were agreed to give Somali oil to BP.
But al Qaeda is today being used in Syria, like in Libya, to overthrow the government of Syria.
And Iran? Well, Iran has been the focus of our special kind of love for decades, notably Operation Ajax, in which MI6 and CIA overthrew the most popular modern day Iranian, Mossadegh, and the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 to install another British puppet Ayatollah Khomeini. Iran was named as a member of the Axis of Evil, and also in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.
The question I have, besides the question about BSF that Hague and Hammond must answer, is this; Have we been signed up to a decade of war and revolution in The Middle East, Syria included, after the false flag attack 9/11, not been told about it, fed lies and bullshit to coerce us into supporting that plan, and also paid for it as thousands and thousands of unsuspecting British taxpayers lose their jobs and homes through no fault of their own after dictatorial banks corrupted our politicians to sign their multi-trillion debts over to us?
I would answer, YES!
So hows about it Hague and Hammond? Tell us everything that British Special Forces, including MI6 and their disinfo agents, have been doing in and around Syria since 1st January 2011.
Not the French media.
Not the American media.
But the British media.
And not just any British media, but the Khodorkovsky-and-green-genocide-loving The Guardian.
Everyone trusts The Guardian, you see. It's portrayed as one of those intellectual, beyond-question sources of media. That's why it was saved from financial ruin by ?. That's why it was rebuilt and is now the most popular source of news on the internet. And that's why it was chosen to push massive green genocide and back-to-the-stone-age economic policies at Copenhagen 2009.
But back to these emails.
The one true fact we can agree with stated by The Guardian is that not all the alleged emails can be verified. The Guardian claim that some have been verified, but upon further reading it is less than a handful, which leaves open the implication that any one of them could be true.
Apparently someone from the al Assad inner cricle leaked two email accounts and passwords (though how they knew the passwords is a question) to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs and the messages from that account have been intercepted for a while. So why only now have they been leaked? Because some other messages allegedly also contained matters relating to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, such as Homs. This made the accounts a source of intelligence for the Syrian al Qaeda rebs which would no doubt have been stopped if the contents of the email account had been divulged earlier.
As soon as I started to read these emails I was immediately reminded of the Diamond Necklace Affair that helped to speed up the downfall of the French Monarchy in 1792. The Diamond Necklace Affair helped to portray Marie Antoinette as a fraudster living a life of luxury as the ordinary French man and woman was suffering. The Illuminati at that time was very small in number yet one of their own Caglisotro was arrested and held for 9 months, but was released due to lack of hard evidence. The fraudsters found sanctuary in London, the source of intrigue concerning The French Revolution, and wrote their memoirs implicating Marie Antoinette.
Most of these emails do not look real; poems, iTunes? Why would these accounts be used for such diverse activities as personal love messages between a head of state and his wife, and seeking public affairs advice?
But let us assume that they are all true. So what? Bashar al Assad held a referendum a few weeks ago and there was a massive turn out and massive support for his reforms. And as for the amount of money being talked about, the bankers who have just screwed us left, right and centre by corrupting our politicians to unnecessarily sign their multi-trillion debts onto us so we suffer brutal austerity can blow ten times that amount in one night on champagne, cocaine, hookers and strippers.
Let's get this all into perspective.
This is a modern day Diamond Necklace Affair for Syria.
The Guardian could not wait to publish comments from Danny Abdul Dayem, but for whatever reason has not covered his expose as a complete fraud, probably a MI6 disinformation agent.
And their support for the traitor Khordokovsky is now ridiculous. Khordokovsky wanted to sign Russia's massive fossil fuel wealth over to the New World Order. He gave all his shares in Yukos to...Lord Jacob Rothschild. He organised The Open Russia Foundation with Kissinger and Rothschild.
COME ON!
The dude is a traitor, not only to Russia but to the whole human race for what he tried to do!
And The Guardian loves him!
WHY?
I think another good indicator that this story is a smear, and possible disinformation plot, against al Assad, because he has just routed the NATO/Arab League-sponsored Syrian al Qaeda rebs leaving them with no foothold in Syria, is that nearly every online British media is covering it. It's the Cameron-Soetoro love-in, and the Assad emails.
The main thrust of the story is that while ordinary Syria suffers the leaders live an enchanted life of chandeliers and Harry Potter. That sounds like this Disunited Fascist Kingdom and the United States of Aggression to me (where we have some of the greatest wealth gaps in the world).
But why is Syria suffering?
Who asks that question now.
Why is Syria suffering?
I repeat again; before we sob and weep and cry for the civilians of Syria and then send over our boys and girls to Syria in their death machines to kill those very same civilians of Syria as collateral damage, William Hague and Phil Hammond must make a statement in the House of
Remember that quote in The Daily Star from an unnamed British security official regarding the role of British Special Forces in Syria.
"This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier."
The BBC recently exposed how BSF were in Libya advising, guiding and training the Libyan al Qaeda rebs from the very start (and I suspect well before too).
And remember the seven nations that former NATO chief General Wesley Clark was told were to be attacked after the false flag attack 9/11, and that it is not coincidence that those seven nations have since suffered and are suffering international intrigue of one form or another.
Iraq.
Lebanon.
Sudan.
Libya.
Each of these has seen war.
Somalia recently welcomed air strikes on al Qaeda in Somalia after deals were agreed to give Somali oil to BP.
But al Qaeda is today being used in Syria, like in Libya, to overthrow the government of Syria.
And Iran? Well, Iran has been the focus of our special kind of love for decades, notably Operation Ajax, in which MI6 and CIA overthrew the most popular modern day Iranian, Mossadegh, and the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 to install another British puppet Ayatollah Khomeini. Iran was named as a member of the Axis of Evil, and also in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.
The question I have, besides the question about BSF that Hague and Hammond must answer, is this; Have we been signed up to a decade of war and revolution in The Middle East, Syria included, after the false flag attack 9/11, not been told about it, fed lies and bullshit to coerce us into supporting that plan, and also paid for it as thousands and thousands of unsuspecting British taxpayers lose their jobs and homes through no fault of their own after dictatorial banks corrupted our politicians to sign their multi-trillion debts over to us?
I would answer, YES!
So hows about it Hague and Hammond? Tell us everything that British Special Forces, including MI6 and their disinfo agents, have been doing in and around Syria since 1st January 2011.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
WELL I NEVER SAW THIS COMING
Who'd a thought this would happen? That Egypt would now consider Israel as the number one enemy, expel the Israeli Ambassador to Egypt and stop the gas flow to Egypt.
Yet we hear of Mossad in Syria helping out the al Qaeda rebs.
Is it possible that Great Britain has pulled a similar trick on Israel that it did on Germany to start WW1? In that trick King George told Kaiser Wilhelm that Great Britain would not involve itself in a war on the continent. The Kaiser saw this as a green light for war and invaded Belgium in the Schlieffen Plan to qickly take out Paris. But as soon as Germany invaded Belgium Britain cited an obscure treaty to defend Belgium, that was not binding and did not need to be enforced, and sent the British Expeditionary Force to stop Germany. Thus WW1 and war in the bloody trenches were guaranteed. Bush pulled a similar trick on Saddam Hussein in 1990, telling Saddam that the USA would not involve itself if Saddam invaded Kuwait to stop alleged Kuwaiti slant drilling into Iraq. When Saddam invaded Kuwait we got all the war propaganda, such as the babies-in-incubators story that was tried a few weeks ago in Syria by the al Qaeda rebs.
I wonder what will happen if Israel does make an unprovoked "pre-emptive" strike on Iran.
============================
From http://www.presstv.ir/detail/231376.html
Israel is Egypt’s no. 1 enemy, MPs declare
The lower house of the Egyptian parliament has unanimously approved a text declaring that Israel is the number one enemy of Egypt and calling for the expulsion of the Israeli ambassador and a halt to gas exports to Israel.
On Monday, Egyptian MPs voted by a show of hands on the text of a report, which was compiled by the Arab Affairs Committee of the People's Assembly (lower house of parliament).
"Revolutionary Egypt will never be a friend, partner or ally of the Zionist entity, which we consider to be the number one enemy of Egypt and the Arab nation," the report declared, adding, "It will deal with that entity as an enemy, and the Egyptian government is hereby called upon to review all its relations and accords with that enemy."
Yet we hear of Mossad in Syria helping out the al Qaeda rebs.
Is it possible that Great Britain has pulled a similar trick on Israel that it did on Germany to start WW1? In that trick King George told Kaiser Wilhelm that Great Britain would not involve itself in a war on the continent. The Kaiser saw this as a green light for war and invaded Belgium in the Schlieffen Plan to qickly take out Paris. But as soon as Germany invaded Belgium Britain cited an obscure treaty to defend Belgium, that was not binding and did not need to be enforced, and sent the British Expeditionary Force to stop Germany. Thus WW1 and war in the bloody trenches were guaranteed. Bush pulled a similar trick on Saddam Hussein in 1990, telling Saddam that the USA would not involve itself if Saddam invaded Kuwait to stop alleged Kuwaiti slant drilling into Iraq. When Saddam invaded Kuwait we got all the war propaganda, such as the babies-in-incubators story that was tried a few weeks ago in Syria by the al Qaeda rebs.
I wonder what will happen if Israel does make an unprovoked "pre-emptive" strike on Iran.
============================
From http://www.presstv.ir/detail/231376.html
Israel is Egypt’s no. 1 enemy, MPs declare
The lower house of the Egyptian parliament has unanimously approved a text declaring that Israel is the number one enemy of Egypt and calling for the expulsion of the Israeli ambassador and a halt to gas exports to Israel.
On Monday, Egyptian MPs voted by a show of hands on the text of a report, which was compiled by the Arab Affairs Committee of the People's Assembly (lower house of parliament).
"Revolutionary Egypt will never be a friend, partner or ally of the Zionist entity, which we consider to be the number one enemy of Egypt and the Arab nation," the report declared, adding, "It will deal with that entity as an enemy, and the Egyptian government is hereby called upon to review all its relations and accords with that enemy."
WHAT IS THE PENTAGON SAYING?
Last week SecDef Panetta, with the US CJCS Dempsey, said that the US military could go to war without the consent of Congress if there was some kind of international basis, e.g. if UN and/or NATO wished it.
Is that what they said?
What exactly did they say?
Did they mean that if the UN wanted the US military to go to war then they could even if both the POTUS and Congress didn't want it?
Or did they mean that if the POTUS wanted war and the POTUS had UN/NATO "authority" then the US military could go to war without Congressional consent (as happened over Libya last year)?
Or did they mean that if the US military wanted to go to war and neither the POTUS and Congress wanted it then the US military could go to war but only if the UN and/or NATO gave their consent?
Or did they mean if the US military, Congress and POTUS wanted to go to war but the UN and/or NATO did not give them "authority" then they could not go to war?
And is there a difference between "could" and "would"?
On Sunday The New York Times reported that the Pentagon is apparently very sceptical of war on Syria, for several reasons[1]. Currently, with Russia against any intervention from the international community, starting war on Syria could lead to a nuclear war with Russia. Ditto with China. But if Russia did change its position and support, or at least not oppose, intervention then that would also have its own risks. These include Syria's sophisticated air defences in concentrated civilian areas, risking high civilian casualties, and Syria's large well-equipped military.
But there is the usual, "yes, we can" but this time with the caveat that it would be tricky.
So even though LPAC is spinning these statements in the NYT article as anti-war[2] I am not so sure. And I am not sure about under what precise circumstances the Pentagon would go to war without Congressional approval. Is it possible that the US Congress gave them the nod but the US military did not want to go to war? Upon further watching Panetta's statements[3] do appear to state that the US military could go to war without the approval of the US Congress if an agreement could be reached with international partners.
We could do with a table of six columns, at least, with the first five labelled "US Military", "Congress", "POTUS", "UN", "NATO" and the sixth labelled "War". With these five variables given the binary values 0 or 1 (0 for does not want war, and 1 for does want war) then this gives that table 32 possible combinations/entries/rows of who wants and does not want war. The column "War" would be 0 or 1 for when the US military could go to war. There is probably a sixth variable, labelled "General Coalition excluding UN and NATO", leading to 64 entries. Maybe Panetta could clarify the situation that way? As I understand it it should be the US Congress and the US Congress alone with the power to send the US military to war, but Obama's actions over Libya last year and Panetta's statements last week have cloudied the law somewhat.
But can Dempsey always claim that he is only "following orders" but communicate his apparent scepticism for any particular military action via the media, such as the NYT?
Meanwhile NATO investigated itself over its actions in Libya last year and found itself innocent of all charges of crimes against humanity. But here is Lizzie Phelan speaking to Press TV about Libya, and also Syria[4]. She was there in Libya and has been in Syria recently.
[1] Military Points to Risks of a Syrian Intervention, NYT, 11/03/2012
[2] Pentagon Correspondent: Joint Chiefs Warn Syria Intervention Is a Proxy War for Confrontation with Russia, LPAC, 12/03/2012
[3] Panetta:’International Permission’ Trumps Congressional Permission For Military Actions, InfoWars, 08/03/2012
[4] War Crimes: NATO Obviously Killed Civilians in Libya, GRTV, 12/03/2012
Is that what they said?
What exactly did they say?
Did they mean that if the UN wanted the US military to go to war then they could even if both the POTUS and Congress didn't want it?
Or did they mean that if the POTUS wanted war and the POTUS had UN/NATO "authority" then the US military could go to war without Congressional consent (as happened over Libya last year)?
Or did they mean that if the US military wanted to go to war and neither the POTUS and Congress wanted it then the US military could go to war but only if the UN and/or NATO gave their consent?
Or did they mean if the US military, Congress and POTUS wanted to go to war but the UN and/or NATO did not give them "authority" then they could not go to war?
And is there a difference between "could" and "would"?
On Sunday The New York Times reported that the Pentagon is apparently very sceptical of war on Syria, for several reasons[1]. Currently, with Russia against any intervention from the international community, starting war on Syria could lead to a nuclear war with Russia. Ditto with China. But if Russia did change its position and support, or at least not oppose, intervention then that would also have its own risks. These include Syria's sophisticated air defences in concentrated civilian areas, risking high civilian casualties, and Syria's large well-equipped military.
But there is the usual, "yes, we can" but this time with the caveat that it would be tricky.
So even though LPAC is spinning these statements in the NYT article as anti-war[2] I am not so sure. And I am not sure about under what precise circumstances the Pentagon would go to war without Congressional approval. Is it possible that the US Congress gave them the nod but the US military did not want to go to war? Upon further watching Panetta's statements[3] do appear to state that the US military could go to war without the approval of the US Congress if an agreement could be reached with international partners.
We could do with a table of six columns, at least, with the first five labelled "US Military", "Congress", "POTUS", "UN", "NATO" and the sixth labelled "War". With these five variables given the binary values 0 or 1 (0 for does not want war, and 1 for does want war) then this gives that table 32 possible combinations/entries/rows of who wants and does not want war. The column "War" would be 0 or 1 for when the US military could go to war. There is probably a sixth variable, labelled "General Coalition excluding UN and NATO", leading to 64 entries. Maybe Panetta could clarify the situation that way? As I understand it it should be the US Congress and the US Congress alone with the power to send the US military to war, but Obama's actions over Libya last year and Panetta's statements last week have cloudied the law somewhat.
But can Dempsey always claim that he is only "following orders" but communicate his apparent scepticism for any particular military action via the media, such as the NYT?
Meanwhile NATO investigated itself over its actions in Libya last year and found itself innocent of all charges of crimes against humanity. But here is Lizzie Phelan speaking to Press TV about Libya, and also Syria[4]. She was there in Libya and has been in Syria recently.
[1] Military Points to Risks of a Syrian Intervention, NYT, 11/03/2012
[2] Pentagon Correspondent: Joint Chiefs Warn Syria Intervention Is a Proxy War for Confrontation with Russia, LPAC, 12/03/2012
[3] Panetta:’International Permission’ Trumps Congressional Permission For Military Actions, InfoWars, 08/03/2012
[4] War Crimes: NATO Obviously Killed Civilians in Libya, GRTV, 12/03/2012
Monday, March 12, 2012
AL JAZEERA EXODUS
There is a reported exodus of journalists at Al Jazeera[1], due to the bias Al Jazeera is showing against the Syrian government. The resignation of one journalist is described thus.
So why would Al Jazeera be so biased?
Al Jazeera is just the old BBC Arabic, i.e. the MI6 media outlet for the Muslim world. BBC Arabic was shut down in April 1996 by Saudi Arabia, and Al Jazeera was launched just six months later in November 1996 in Qatar, and its employees were from...ooopsadaisy! BBC Arabic. The sordid story of the creation of Al Jazeera can be found in a recent expose by EIR[2].
[1] Al Jazeera exodus: Channel losing staff over ‘bias’, Russia Today, 12/03/2012
[2] Al-Jazeera Demystified, Executive Intelligence Review, 27/02/2012
"You can check the emails he sent to his colleague, Rula Ibrahim, to know his position which changed after the station refused to show photos he had taken of armed fighters clashing with the Syrian Army in Wadi Khaled. Instead [Al Jazeera] lambasted him as a shabeeh [implying a regime loyalist],” the source said.
So why would Al Jazeera be so biased?
Al Jazeera is just the old BBC Arabic, i.e. the MI6 media outlet for the Muslim world. BBC Arabic was shut down in April 1996 by Saudi Arabia, and Al Jazeera was launched just six months later in November 1996 in Qatar, and its employees were from...ooopsadaisy! BBC Arabic. The sordid story of the creation of Al Jazeera can be found in a recent expose by EIR[2].
[1] Al Jazeera exodus: Channel losing staff over ‘bias’, Russia Today, 12/03/2012
[2] Al-Jazeera Demystified, Executive Intelligence Review, 27/02/2012
Sunday, March 11, 2012
ANOTHER BLOCKBUSTER SHOW FROM WEBSTER TARPLEY
Webster Tarpley's World Crisis Radio Show from this weekend 9th/10th March is another blockbuster. He addresses
1. Ron Paul's poor performance in the Republican nomination contest, and Paul's apparent inaction on the Walter Jones House Res 107 to impeach Obama
2. Hamas' quasi-treason in moving from Damascus to Qatar
3. the rise and rise of fascism in the USA
4. issuing points of action for Putin
5. Kony 2012 and Africa
http://tarpley.net/world-crisis-radio/
1. Ron Paul's poor performance in the Republican nomination contest, and Paul's apparent inaction on the Walter Jones House Res 107 to impeach Obama
2. Hamas' quasi-treason in moving from Damascus to Qatar
3. the rise and rise of fascism in the USA
4. issuing points of action for Putin
5. Kony 2012 and Africa
http://tarpley.net/world-crisis-radio/
Thursday, March 08, 2012
IT'S THAT NAUGHTY BOY TRAITOR OBAMA YOU WANT NOT DEMPSEY
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey has been speaking out against an attack on Iran. Panetta is supportive of this position too, publicly anyway...for now. It is due to them that we have not yet attacked Iran, and have yet to attack Syria.
It is Obama that needs to be arrested and impeached.
There is furore being created following the statements of Dempsey and Panetta yesterday. But they were not statements of arrogance, as some have portrayed it. They were stating the facts!
And the facts are due to Obama, not Dempsey or Panetta.
There must be no attempt whatsoever to spin these statements into dragging Dempsey into disgrace so he is sacked and replaced by a more compliant and obedient Chairman.
Read Dempsey's statements. They are categorically against war.
Panetta's are similar but not as solid.
There is a danger that these statements by Dempsey and Panetta will be used and twisted and spun to drag them down and out. They have been placed in their uncomfortable positions by the traitor Obama. Their statements should be seen as patriotic rather than arrogant or brazen.
Is it just coincidence that Congressman Walter Jones starts inpeachment proceedings the day after Dempsey and Panetta make these statements?
Is there some law that states that military and congress cannot communicate under any circumstances?
It's Obama.
O
B
A
M
A
He, not Dempsey, ordered the military into action against Libya, and then casually informed Congress he doesn't need their authority.
Perhaps the statements of Dempsey and Panetta are a way of exposing exactly what is going on? To bring attention to the treason.
It's the naughty boy traitor Obama, not Dempsey and Panetta, you want.
It is Obama that needs to be arrested and impeached.
There is furore being created following the statements of Dempsey and Panetta yesterday. But they were not statements of arrogance, as some have portrayed it. They were stating the facts!
And the facts are due to Obama, not Dempsey or Panetta.
There must be no attempt whatsoever to spin these statements into dragging Dempsey into disgrace so he is sacked and replaced by a more compliant and obedient Chairman.
Read Dempsey's statements. They are categorically against war.
Panetta's are similar but not as solid.
There is a danger that these statements by Dempsey and Panetta will be used and twisted and spun to drag them down and out. They have been placed in their uncomfortable positions by the traitor Obama. Their statements should be seen as patriotic rather than arrogant or brazen.
Is it just coincidence that Congressman Walter Jones starts inpeachment proceedings the day after Dempsey and Panetta make these statements?
Is there some law that states that military and congress cannot communicate under any circumstances?
It's Obama.
O
B
A
M
A
He, not Dempsey, ordered the military into action against Libya, and then casually informed Congress he doesn't need their authority.
Perhaps the statements of Dempsey and Panetta are a way of exposing exactly what is going on? To bring attention to the treason.
It's the naughty boy traitor Obama, not Dempsey and Panetta, you want.
Wednesday, March 07, 2012
THE DIRTY TRUTH ABOUT ISRAEL IS NOWHERE DIRTY ENOUGH
This video is on David Icke's website today.
The Dirty Truth About Israel
It shows alot of truth about Israel; Palestinians did live there before WW1, and the Zionists terrorised them off their lands into Gaza and the West Bank.
But it is nowhere dirty enough.
I listened to Icke on Alex Jones last night and the video follows much of what Icke said. But the question of the Holocaust was not raised.
Let us work backwards in history.
What is currently causing the greatest threat to humanity? A Zionist attack on Iran.
Why does Israel want to attack Iran? Because Israel has nukes and doesn't want anyone else in the region to have them, and Iran has a nuclear power program but Israel is being led to believe that there is a military purpose to it.
Why is that dangerous? Because Iran has Russia and China supporting Iran and threatening a nuclear military response.
Why is Israel so scared about anyone else in the region having a nuclear weapon? Because it fears reprisals after its barbaric brutal treatment of the Palestinians.
How did Iran get its nuclear power program? It was given it in the Atoms For Peace program.
Why was Israel created? A bunch of Jews and non-Jews believed that there should be a homeland for Jews in Palestine and nowhere else.
Was this desire reflected in the global Jewish people? NO! Most Jews believed that going to Palestine en masse would cause a lot of trouble (how right were they?).
Why did so many Jews after WW2 move to Israel? Because during WW2 the Nazis persecuted the Jews of Europe in The Holocaust because they didn't like Jews and wanted Jews out of Europe, but couldn't send them to Palestine because Palestine was at the time controlled by the British and Nazi Germany and Great Britain were at war.
Did the Nazis try to get Jews out of Germany before WW2? YES! The Nazis and Great Britain had what was known as The Transfer Agreement to encourage German Jews to move to Palestine basically free of charge. The Nazis actually gave the German Jews training on how to survive in Palestine, such as farming.
So how many Jews took up this offer? Only about 10% of German Jews. This accounts for the jump in Jewish immigration into Palestine during the 1930s. But if Israel was to survive and grow then a lot more Jews were needed.
And this is when it gets really really dirty.
How do you convince a sceptical Jewish population to move to Palestine? YOU SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF THEM, OF COURSE!
Hence, The Holocaust occured.
Yes, there was a Holocaust. It is just the scale of it that should be questioned. Even if it was just one hundred Jews, it is one hundred too many. But do not forget that others were persecuted too.
I believe the plan for approximately 150 years, probably longer, has been to create a Jewish state in a predominantly Islamic part of the world, and get that Jewish state to create so much feeling of anger and fear and war and terrorism in the Islamic world that a major global war will occur.
I am not sure that the Holocaust was initially part of that plan, not at first. The first attempt to populate Palestine with Jews, through the Transfer Agreement, did have some success, but not much. About 10% of German Jews moved to Palestine, even after all the anti-Jew rhetoric from the Nazis and all the anti-Jew laws and all the Nazi terrorism such as Kristallnacht.
10%! That's all.
I think that if The Transfer Agreement had worked, and the majority of German Jews had moved to Palestine, then the Holocaust may not have occured. WW2 would still have happened. The purpose of WW2 was to empower Communism and create a world government after The League of Nations had failed.
The Holocaust served several purposes.
1. It certainly convinced a sceptical world Jewish population that Palestine and nowhere but Palestine could be the only safe haven for the Jewish people from a cruel and harsh world
2. It terrorised the Jewish people into terrorising the Palestinians off their lands and into Gaza and The West Bank, which has served to create the anger and resentment necessary for a global Zionism v Islam conflict.
3. It has made the Jews so paranoid that they cannot see the difference between a military nuclear weapons program and a civil nuclear power program.
And who controls Zionism? The Rothschilds. Without them the initial settlements would not have survived. They virtually wrote the Balfour Declaration as a letter to themselves. Their privately-owned Federal Reserve and privately-owned US Senate and Congress support Israel in everything it does, from building illegal walls and settlements to using phosphorous bombs on the children of Gaza.
Was the Holocaust planned from the start? That is a very good question. One for further research. But sadly I believe it was done to terrify a sceptical world Jewish population into believing that Palestine and nowhere but Palestine was the only place on Earth they could live in peace and safety.
There were attempts to move German Jews out of Germany to other British colonies, but these were refused by the Zionist hierarchy.
Guess who controlled the Zionist hierarchy?
Guess who could have bought the safety of the German Jews after Hitler offered to ransom them?
Sadly the German Jews were murdered in the Holocaust.
If The Transfer Agreement had been more successful, what would have been the outcome after WW2? More Jews in Palestine, obviously, but what kind of mentality would they have had? Would they have been in such a state of paranoia and fear that they would have terrorised the Palestinians into Gaza and The West Bank? Possibly. Possibly not. Or would there have been a war of independence, similar but perhaps not as bloody as in 1947? Possibly. Possibly not.
We will never know.
But we are where we are.
The Holocaust was engineered to scare a sceptical world Jewry to populate Palestine and create a barbaric, brutal and bullying Israel. As a result, and with hundreds of billions in aid and military hardware and unquestioning political support from a bought-and-paid-for-and-blackmailed US Congress and Senate, we now have Israel threatening a "pre-emptive" attack on Iran which will likely drag in the USA on the one side and Russia and China, probably Pakistan too, on Iran's side.
The Dirty Truth About Israel
It shows alot of truth about Israel; Palestinians did live there before WW1, and the Zionists terrorised them off their lands into Gaza and the West Bank.
But it is nowhere dirty enough.
I listened to Icke on Alex Jones last night and the video follows much of what Icke said. But the question of the Holocaust was not raised.
Let us work backwards in history.
What is currently causing the greatest threat to humanity? A Zionist attack on Iran.
Why does Israel want to attack Iran? Because Israel has nukes and doesn't want anyone else in the region to have them, and Iran has a nuclear power program but Israel is being led to believe that there is a military purpose to it.
Why is that dangerous? Because Iran has Russia and China supporting Iran and threatening a nuclear military response.
Why is Israel so scared about anyone else in the region having a nuclear weapon? Because it fears reprisals after its barbaric brutal treatment of the Palestinians.
How did Iran get its nuclear power program? It was given it in the Atoms For Peace program.
Why was Israel created? A bunch of Jews and non-Jews believed that there should be a homeland for Jews in Palestine and nowhere else.
Was this desire reflected in the global Jewish people? NO! Most Jews believed that going to Palestine en masse would cause a lot of trouble (how right were they?).
Why did so many Jews after WW2 move to Israel? Because during WW2 the Nazis persecuted the Jews of Europe in The Holocaust because they didn't like Jews and wanted Jews out of Europe, but couldn't send them to Palestine because Palestine was at the time controlled by the British and Nazi Germany and Great Britain were at war.
Did the Nazis try to get Jews out of Germany before WW2? YES! The Nazis and Great Britain had what was known as The Transfer Agreement to encourage German Jews to move to Palestine basically free of charge. The Nazis actually gave the German Jews training on how to survive in Palestine, such as farming.
So how many Jews took up this offer? Only about 10% of German Jews. This accounts for the jump in Jewish immigration into Palestine during the 1930s. But if Israel was to survive and grow then a lot more Jews were needed.
And this is when it gets really really dirty.
How do you convince a sceptical Jewish population to move to Palestine? YOU SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF THEM, OF COURSE!
Hence, The Holocaust occured.
Yes, there was a Holocaust. It is just the scale of it that should be questioned. Even if it was just one hundred Jews, it is one hundred too many. But do not forget that others were persecuted too.
I believe the plan for approximately 150 years, probably longer, has been to create a Jewish state in a predominantly Islamic part of the world, and get that Jewish state to create so much feeling of anger and fear and war and terrorism in the Islamic world that a major global war will occur.
I am not sure that the Holocaust was initially part of that plan, not at first. The first attempt to populate Palestine with Jews, through the Transfer Agreement, did have some success, but not much. About 10% of German Jews moved to Palestine, even after all the anti-Jew rhetoric from the Nazis and all the anti-Jew laws and all the Nazi terrorism such as Kristallnacht.
10%! That's all.
I think that if The Transfer Agreement had worked, and the majority of German Jews had moved to Palestine, then the Holocaust may not have occured. WW2 would still have happened. The purpose of WW2 was to empower Communism and create a world government after The League of Nations had failed.
The Holocaust served several purposes.
1. It certainly convinced a sceptical world Jewish population that Palestine and nowhere but Palestine could be the only safe haven for the Jewish people from a cruel and harsh world
2. It terrorised the Jewish people into terrorising the Palestinians off their lands and into Gaza and The West Bank, which has served to create the anger and resentment necessary for a global Zionism v Islam conflict.
3. It has made the Jews so paranoid that they cannot see the difference between a military nuclear weapons program and a civil nuclear power program.
And who controls Zionism? The Rothschilds. Without them the initial settlements would not have survived. They virtually wrote the Balfour Declaration as a letter to themselves. Their privately-owned Federal Reserve and privately-owned US Senate and Congress support Israel in everything it does, from building illegal walls and settlements to using phosphorous bombs on the children of Gaza.
Was the Holocaust planned from the start? That is a very good question. One for further research. But sadly I believe it was done to terrify a sceptical world Jewish population into believing that Palestine and nowhere but Palestine was the only place on Earth they could live in peace and safety.
There were attempts to move German Jews out of Germany to other British colonies, but these were refused by the Zionist hierarchy.
Guess who controlled the Zionist hierarchy?
Guess who could have bought the safety of the German Jews after Hitler offered to ransom them?
Sadly the German Jews were murdered in the Holocaust.
If The Transfer Agreement had been more successful, what would have been the outcome after WW2? More Jews in Palestine, obviously, but what kind of mentality would they have had? Would they have been in such a state of paranoia and fear that they would have terrorised the Palestinians into Gaza and The West Bank? Possibly. Possibly not. Or would there have been a war of independence, similar but perhaps not as bloody as in 1947? Possibly. Possibly not.
We will never know.
But we are where we are.
The Holocaust was engineered to scare a sceptical world Jewry to populate Palestine and create a barbaric, brutal and bullying Israel. As a result, and with hundreds of billions in aid and military hardware and unquestioning political support from a bought-and-paid-for-and-blackmailed US Congress and Senate, we now have Israel threatening a "pre-emptive" attack on Iran which will likely drag in the USA on the one side and Russia and China, probably Pakistan too, on Iran's side.
MOSSAD, CIA AND BLACKWATER OPERATIONS IN SYRIA
Russia Today is reporting the actions of Mossad, CIA and Blackwater in Syria following the liberation of the lawless Islamic Emirate of Baba Amr by the Syrian military. Quoting an alleged expert on Syrian strategic affairs (though I can't find anything about who he or she is), Salim Harba, the report states
Let us recall the reports in The Daily Star in January, in which a British security official states that British Special Forces are in and around Syria assisting the Syrian al Qaeda rebs with advice, ammo and logistical support. The official is quoted as saying
And let us recall the most recent report from the Arab League observation team, which was buried in NATO media, stating that armed gangs and terrorists are active in Syria and reports of attacks and atrocities attributed to the Syrian military are often made up.
And let us recall the media darling, Danny Abdul Dayem, preparing for an interview with CNN by asking his colleagues, when there is nothing but music in the background, to get the sound effects ready to give the impression that he was under constant siege by a brutal Syrian military[4].
This is not to say that The Syrian military has been involved in actions in Homs.
The questions we have to ask are why, and who was the action against?
Thierry Meyssan reports from Homs that there was something very suspicious about the actions and roles of Marie Colvin and Paul Conroy[5]. Colvin was killed in an attack, assumed to be by the Syrian military. But Meyssan has found a video of Colvin alegedly in battle dress at the time of her death. In the run up to the invasion of Iraq, after the inside job of 9/11, Colvin's interview of an Iraqi defector claiming that Saddam had nukes was cited as evidence in the very influential Duelfer Report. Of course, no such program or nukes existed. But if they did you can bet we assisted in some way. Meyssan also questions the role of Paul Conroy. Conroy was with Libyan al Qaeda rebel commander Belhaj in Libya. He was also in Baba Amr, and managed to get out of there when most people couldn't. Meyssan now accuses Conroy of being an MI6 agent[6]. This suspicion of Conroy is reinforced by Tony Cartalucci[7].
In a devilish article, this time comparing Homs to Srebrenica, Robert Fisk states that
Warsaw. Hama. Now Srebrenica. Where next? Waco? Sirte last year, when the Libyan al Qaeda rebs cut off Sirte while NATO indiscriminately bombed it? Fallujah?
But again, Fisk does not address the presence and purpose of Special Forces from Israel, NATO and the Arab League assisting the Free Syria Army as they cut the throats of their opponents. I ask, why? It is good that someone of Fisk's stature is rising above the sewer-level mainstream media and reporting that the Free Syria Army and their ilk are not the pristine, as-pure-as-the-driven-snow "freedom fighters" they are made out to be. But there is much much more to these "freedom fighters". And that much much more is coming from us, the ordinary taxpayer of this Disunited Fascist Kingdom, The United States of Aggression, etc as we fund our Special Forces (unless they are funded through a black op which receives its money from drugs etc).
The recently leaked email of Reva Bhalla the Director of Analysis for Stratfor shows just how far we and our glorious allies are prepared to go to start big big trouble in Syria so we can claim R2P and effect regime change in Syria. After a meeting at The Pentagon with American, British and French officials Bhalla wrote
Guerrilla attacks? Assassination campaigns? Sounds an awfully lot like terrorism to me.
And is exactly what we are seeing in Syria.
AND WE ARE BEHIND IT ALL!
This should come as no surprise because London is known as Londonistan, because we had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists that gave them protection while they lived in London and did their terrorism all over the planet. And now even Clintonella de Vil admits al Qaeda is in Syria and we are assisting them!
This madness, insanity and criminality has to stop before we have a global nuclear war over non-existent nuclear weapons in Iran.
[1] Mossad, CIA and Blackwater operate in Syria - report, Russia Today, 07/03/2012
[2] The Daily Star, SYRIA WILL BE BLOODIEST YET, The Daily Star, 1/1/2012
[3] SYRIA. TEXT OF LEAKED ARAB LEAGUE MISSION REPORT Report Reveals Media Lies Regarding Syria, The Centre for Research on Globalization, 01/02/2012
[4] 'Syria Danny' Caught Staging CNN War Propaganda Stunt, PropagandaMatrix, 06/03/2012
[5] The journalist-combatants of Baba Amr, Voltaire Network, http://www.voltairenet.org/The-journalist-combatants-of-Baba
[6] "Journalist" Paul Conroy is MI6 operative, Voltaire Network, http://www.voltairenet.org/Journalist-Paul-Conroy-is-MI6
[7] Brit Propagandist in Syria: The Good Guys?, http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/03/brit-propagandist-in-syria-good-guys.html
[8] Robert Fisk: Is Homs an echo of what happened in Srebrenica?, The Independent, 07/03/2012
[9] http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/1671459_insight-military-intervention-in-syria-post-withdrawal.html
Around 700 gunmen were recently arrested in the former rebel stronghold of Babar Amr.
“The captured gunmen held Arab nationalities, including Gulf, Iraqi, and Lebanese. Among them were also Qatari intelligence agents and non-Arab fighters from Afghanistan, Turkey, and some European countries like France,” the agency quotes Syrian expert in strategic affairs Salim Harba as saying.
Harba also confirmed to the agency that “a coordination office was established in Qatar under American-Gulf sponsorship. The office includes American, French, and Gulf – specifically from Qatar and Saudi Arabia – intelligence agents, as well as CIA, Mossad, and Blackwater agents and members of the Syrian Transitional Council.”
The Syrian expert also added the security forces have also seized Israeli-, European- and American-made weapons.
“The Syrian army also uncovered tunnels and equipments there,” he told to the agency, “advanced Israeli, European, and American arms that have not yet been tested in the countries of manufacture, in addition to Israeli grenades, night binoculars, and communication systems were confiscated by the security forces.”[1]
Let us recall the reports in The Daily Star in January, in which a British security official states that British Special Forces are in and around Syria assisting the Syrian al Qaeda rebs with advice, ammo and logistical support. The official is quoted as saying
“This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier."[2]
And let us recall the most recent report from the Arab League observation team, which was buried in NATO media, stating that armed gangs and terrorists are active in Syria and reports of attacks and atrocities attributed to the Syrian military are often made up.
26. In Homs and Dera‘a, the Mission observed armed groups committing acts of violence against Government forces, resulting in death and injury among their ranks. In certain situations, Government forces responded to attacks against their personnel with force. The observers noted that some of the armed groups were using flares and armour-piercing projectiles.
27. In Homs, Idlib and Hama, the Observer Mission witnessed acts of violence being committed against Government forces and civilians that resulted in several deaths and injuries. Examples of those acts include the bombing of a civilian bus, killing eight persons and injuring others, including women and children, and the bombing of a train carrying diesel oil. In another incident in Homs, a police bus was blown up, killing two police officers. A fuel pipeline and some small bridges were also bombed.
28. The Mission noted that many parties falsely reported that explosions or violence had occurred in several locations. When the observers went to those locations, they found that those reports were unfounded.
29. The Mission also noted that, according to its teams in the field, the media exaggerated the nature of the incidents and the number of persons killed in incidents and protests in certain towns.[3]
And let us recall the media darling, Danny Abdul Dayem, preparing for an interview with CNN by asking his colleagues, when there is nothing but music in the background, to get the sound effects ready to give the impression that he was under constant siege by a brutal Syrian military[4].
This is not to say that The Syrian military has been involved in actions in Homs.
The questions we have to ask are why, and who was the action against?
Thierry Meyssan reports from Homs that there was something very suspicious about the actions and roles of Marie Colvin and Paul Conroy[5]. Colvin was killed in an attack, assumed to be by the Syrian military. But Meyssan has found a video of Colvin alegedly in battle dress at the time of her death. In the run up to the invasion of Iraq, after the inside job of 9/11, Colvin's interview of an Iraqi defector claiming that Saddam had nukes was cited as evidence in the very influential Duelfer Report. Of course, no such program or nukes existed. But if they did you can bet we assisted in some way. Meyssan also questions the role of Paul Conroy. Conroy was with Libyan al Qaeda rebel commander Belhaj in Libya. He was also in Baba Amr, and managed to get out of there when most people couldn't. Meyssan now accuses Conroy of being an MI6 agent[6]. This suspicion of Conroy is reinforced by Tony Cartalucci[7].
In a devilish article, this time comparing Homs to Srebrenica, Robert Fisk states that
In Homs, the armed defenders had indulged in sectarian killings of their own. NGOs retreated from Baba Amr during the siege with terrible stories of "Free Syria Army" soldiers boasting of cutting their opponents' throats. In Srebrenica, Serbs claimed they were fighting "Islamist terrorists" – a favourite claim of Messrs Karadzic and Mladic – and this is exactly whom the Syrian Baathists claimed to be fighting in Homs.[8]
Warsaw. Hama. Now Srebrenica. Where next? Waco? Sirte last year, when the Libyan al Qaeda rebs cut off Sirte while NATO indiscriminately bombed it? Fallujah?
But again, Fisk does not address the presence and purpose of Special Forces from Israel, NATO and the Arab League assisting the Free Syria Army as they cut the throats of their opponents. I ask, why? It is good that someone of Fisk's stature is rising above the sewer-level mainstream media and reporting that the Free Syria Army and their ilk are not the pristine, as-pure-as-the-driven-snow "freedom fighters" they are made out to be. But there is much much more to these "freedom fighters". And that much much more is coming from us, the ordinary taxpayer of this Disunited Fascist Kingdom, The United States of Aggression, etc as we fund our Special Forces (unless they are funded through a black op which receives its money from drugs etc).
The recently leaked email of Reva Bhalla the Director of Analysis for Stratfor shows just how far we and our glorious allies are prepared to go to start big big trouble in Syria so we can claim R2P and effect regime change in Syria. After a meeting at The Pentagon with American, British and French officials Bhalla wrote
I kept pressing on the question of what these SOF teams would be working toward, and whether this would lead to an eventual air camapign to give a Syrian rebel group cover. They pretty quickly distanced themselves from that idea, saying that the idea 'hypothetically' is to commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within.[9]
Guerrilla attacks? Assassination campaigns? Sounds an awfully lot like terrorism to me.
And is exactly what we are seeing in Syria.
AND WE ARE BEHIND IT ALL!
This should come as no surprise because London is known as Londonistan, because we had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists that gave them protection while they lived in London and did their terrorism all over the planet. And now even Clintonella de Vil admits al Qaeda is in Syria and we are assisting them!
This madness, insanity and criminality has to stop before we have a global nuclear war over non-existent nuclear weapons in Iran.
[1] Mossad, CIA and Blackwater operate in Syria - report, Russia Today, 07/03/2012
[2] The Daily Star, SYRIA WILL BE BLOODIEST YET, The Daily Star, 1/1/2012
[3] SYRIA. TEXT OF LEAKED ARAB LEAGUE MISSION REPORT Report Reveals Media Lies Regarding Syria, The Centre for Research on Globalization, 01/02/2012
[4] 'Syria Danny' Caught Staging CNN War Propaganda Stunt, PropagandaMatrix, 06/03/2012
[5] The journalist-combatants of Baba Amr, Voltaire Network, http://www.voltairenet.org/The-journalist-combatants-of-Baba
[6] "Journalist" Paul Conroy is MI6 operative, Voltaire Network, http://www.voltairenet.org/Journalist-Paul-Conroy-is-MI6
[7] Brit Propagandist in Syria: The Good Guys?, http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/03/brit-propagandist-in-syria-good-guys.html
[8] Robert Fisk: Is Homs an echo of what happened in Srebrenica?, The Independent, 07/03/2012
[9] http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/1671459_insight-military-intervention-in-syria-post-withdrawal.html
HAVEN'T WE HEARD THIS KIND OF THING BEFORE?
David Cameron implied to The House of Commons Liaison Committee yesterday that Iran is building a nuclear missile that could hit London[1]. This was stated just hours after a top secret meeting of cabinet ministers at which the attendees were told to not take their mobile phones into the meeting room[2] because, in case you didn't know before, your mobile phone can be hacked and used as a listening device by intelligence agencies (this facility was actually included in the device design BY LAW).
This is an uncorrected transcript of what Cameron said to the committee.
The two points I question in this statement are
1. Iran was talking about removing the Zionist regime, not wiping Israel off the map
2. did this reference to an intercontinental missile come from the top secret meeting just hours before? The Daily Mail article on this meeting states
We have heard all this before, and it is getting boring.
Why don't they just say to us, "Look, you silly dumbed-down human race, we have had this plan to start WW3 over Israel for centuries and we will kill and cheat and lie our arses off to execute it. We caused so much bloodshed in WW1 and WW2, first to get Palestine under our control and then flood Palestine with terrified paranoid Jews after we engineered the Holocaust. We then gave Israel nukes and hundreds of billions in aid and military hardware to give it the confidence to bully and persecute the Palestinians, which has obvioulsy led to the hatred of Israel, and not just in the Islamic world. Meanwhile we gave Iran a nuclear program, to make Israel even more paranoid, and also created and protected all these Islamic terrorist organisations whose stated purpose is to destroy Israel, making Israel even more paranoid. This is why Israel is driving all the trouble in the Middle East. It was created specifically for that purpose. Now get back to your drudgery and be thankful for it."
[1] Iran trying to build nuclear missiles capable of hitting London, Cameron warns MPs, The Daily Mail, 07/03/2012
[2] MI6 chief briefs Cabinet on Iranian nuclear threat, The Daily Telegraph, 07/03/2102
[3] UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 608-v, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmliaisn/uc608-v/uc60801.htm
This is an uncorrected transcript of what Cameron said to the committee.
We have to do the right thing for our own national security, and in a way, that is what this comes back to. To take Richard’s question: I do not believe that an Iranian nuclear weapon is just a threat to Israel. It clearly is, because the Iranian regime have said that they want to be part of efforts wipe that country off the map, but it is also clearly very dangerous for the region, because it would trigger a nuclear arms race, and it is a danger more broadly, not least because there are signs that the Iranians want to have some sort of intercontinental missile capability. We have to be clear that this is potentially a threat much more widely, if I can put it that way, than just Israel and the region.[3]
The two points I question in this statement are
1. Iran was talking about removing the Zionist regime, not wiping Israel off the map
2. did this reference to an intercontinental missile come from the top secret meeting just hours before? The Daily Mail article on this meeting states
Mr Cameron’s warning is the first time a British minister has suggested Iran might be able to launch a direct attack on the UK mainland.
He gave no indication of how close British intelligence believes Tehran is to developing the technology.[3]
We have heard all this before, and it is getting boring.
Why don't they just say to us, "Look, you silly dumbed-down human race, we have had this plan to start WW3 over Israel for centuries and we will kill and cheat and lie our arses off to execute it. We caused so much bloodshed in WW1 and WW2, first to get Palestine under our control and then flood Palestine with terrified paranoid Jews after we engineered the Holocaust. We then gave Israel nukes and hundreds of billions in aid and military hardware to give it the confidence to bully and persecute the Palestinians, which has obvioulsy led to the hatred of Israel, and not just in the Islamic world. Meanwhile we gave Iran a nuclear program, to make Israel even more paranoid, and also created and protected all these Islamic terrorist organisations whose stated purpose is to destroy Israel, making Israel even more paranoid. This is why Israel is driving all the trouble in the Middle East. It was created specifically for that purpose. Now get back to your drudgery and be thankful for it."
[1] Iran trying to build nuclear missiles capable of hitting London, Cameron warns MPs, The Daily Mail, 07/03/2012
[2] MI6 chief briefs Cabinet on Iranian nuclear threat, The Daily Telegraph, 07/03/2102
[3] UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 608-v, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmliaisn/uc608-v/uc60801.htm
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
OBAMA IS NOT THE MESSIAH. HE'S A VERY NAUGHTY BOY.
About this time last year, nearly everyone was crying out for Obama to produce his long form birth certificate. A pdf document was eventually released but it was quickly shown to be potentially a fraud. A few days later and Osama bin Laden was raised from the grave, having been dead for years after dying from Marfan Syndrome, and killed again in a story that beggars belief because they still can't get their facts straight, have not produced any survivors such as the daughters, and cannot produce a corpse because...Oopsadaisy! It was allegedly quickly buried at sea. The birth certificate issue was buried in the euphoria (supposedly along with Osama bin Laden's corpse).
Now, after nearly a year to really research the document that was alleged to be Obama's long form birth certificate, some researchers, after 2200 hours of taking the document apart, have concluded that the document that was released in late April last year is, as many suspected, a fake.
This does not automatically mean that Obama is a fake (though we know he is). But we do have to question, if he had a real long form birth certificate why was that not produced instead of the forgery?
Obama was portrayed as the Messiah, sent from heaven to banish the evil bankers to hell and save America.
From The Life of Brian
Now, after nearly a year to really research the document that was alleged to be Obama's long form birth certificate, some researchers, after 2200 hours of taking the document apart, have concluded that the document that was released in late April last year is, as many suspected, a fake.
This does not automatically mean that Obama is a fake (though we know he is). But we do have to question, if he had a real long form birth certificate why was that not produced instead of the forgery?
Obama was portrayed as the Messiah, sent from heaven to banish the evil bankers to hell and save America.
From The Life of Brian
He's NOT the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy.
BANKERS WE LOVE YOU
Can you imagine a choir of junior school children singing this?
And it becoming Top of the Pops?
No. Instead we get Military Wives and their Goebbels-esque propaganda "Wherever You Are".
=============================
(To the tune of Grandma, We Love You by St Winifred's School Choir from 1980)
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
There’s no one quite like the bankers
who think they own the world.
Without them we would not have seen
The Nazi flag unfurled.
They sent in Lenin and Trotsky,
But Stalin stole the lead.
The bankers made good friends with him.
All three made Russia bleed.
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
The Nazis and the Communists
Were joined by the USA.
FDR allowed the Japanese
To blow Pearl Harbor away.
The bankers got their dream world.
We call it World War Two.
And from that engineered conflict
A world government grew.
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
So now the United Nations,
The banker government,
Wants to start green genocide.
On this they are hell bent.
The bankers want eugenics.
The bankers want us dead.
Let’s put this madness behind us.
Set freedom free instead.
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
And it becoming Top of the Pops?
No. Instead we get Military Wives and their Goebbels-esque propaganda "Wherever You Are".
=============================
(To the tune of Grandma, We Love You by St Winifred's School Choir from 1980)
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
There’s no one quite like the bankers
who think they own the world.
Without them we would not have seen
The Nazi flag unfurled.
They sent in Lenin and Trotsky,
But Stalin stole the lead.
The bankers made good friends with him.
All three made Russia bleed.
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
The Nazis and the Communists
Were joined by the USA.
FDR allowed the Japanese
To blow Pearl Harbor away.
The bankers got their dream world.
We call it World War Two.
And from that engineered conflict
A world government grew.
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
So now the United Nations,
The banker government,
Wants to start green genocide.
On this they are hell bent.
The bankers want eugenics.
The bankers want us dead.
Let’s put this madness behind us.
Set freedom free instead.
Bankers, we love you.
Bankers, we do.
Though you think that we’re all scum
We still love you.
Monday, March 05, 2012
WHAT'S RUSSIAN FOR FISHY?
There is something very fishy about this review of the case against Khordokovsky, with it being announced, as most of Russia was celebrating, immediately after Putin was formally announced the President elect.
Very fishy indeed.
Has a deal of some sort been struck? Is so, then between whom?
I also think WW3 is more likely with Putin if we do not stop our own warmongering leaders. He is more likely to stand up against NATO warmongering while Medvedev would roll over on his back and let NATO tickle his tummy-wummy. But if Putin begins to create a strong anti-NWO alliance then that may convince the NWO the game is up.
When something isn't right it's wrong. And it's not right. Not yet anyway.
There is something fishy.
Look what they went through to get Iraq, the world's second largest proven oil reserves, so coveted by oil men like Dick Cheney. They placed their agent Saddam in there in the 1960s. He became leader in a coup. He then bought WMD off us. He used them during the war with Iran. Then we tricked him into invading Kuwait, and just before kicking him out in Desert Storm we betrayed a revolution that we encouraged against him which he put down brutally and he became stronger internally. We then imposed sanctions against Iraq and bombed it with DU for a decade. We then accused Iraq of doing 9/11 and of having WMD (which we sold to him). We then invaded Iraq (again), which was severely weakened after a decade long war with Iran and a second decade of sanctions and DU bombs. We then hung what could or could not have been Saddam. And we now control Iraqi oil.
Now that is deep deep cover.
We need to know what was discussed between Putin and Kissinger in 2007 after the radioactive and photogenic death of the traitor (as his own father now calls him) Alexander Litvinenko.
Very fishy indeed.
Has a deal of some sort been struck? Is so, then between whom?
I also think WW3 is more likely with Putin if we do not stop our own warmongering leaders. He is more likely to stand up against NATO warmongering while Medvedev would roll over on his back and let NATO tickle his tummy-wummy. But if Putin begins to create a strong anti-NWO alliance then that may convince the NWO the game is up.
When something isn't right it's wrong. And it's not right. Not yet anyway.
There is something fishy.
Look what they went through to get Iraq, the world's second largest proven oil reserves, so coveted by oil men like Dick Cheney. They placed their agent Saddam in there in the 1960s. He became leader in a coup. He then bought WMD off us. He used them during the war with Iran. Then we tricked him into invading Kuwait, and just before kicking him out in Desert Storm we betrayed a revolution that we encouraged against him which he put down brutally and he became stronger internally. We then imposed sanctions against Iraq and bombed it with DU for a decade. We then accused Iraq of doing 9/11 and of having WMD (which we sold to him). We then invaded Iraq (again), which was severely weakened after a decade long war with Iran and a second decade of sanctions and DU bombs. We then hung what could or could not have been Saddam. And we now control Iraqi oil.
Now that is deep deep cover.
We need to know what was discussed between Putin and Kissinger in 2007 after the radioactive and photogenic death of the traitor (as his own father now calls him) Alexander Litvinenko.
OUR INGLORIOUS DEMOCRACY
There is definitely a fear of Putin, or the appearance of one, in our media.
No sooner had the polls closed and allegations of vote fraud were coming in, despite the international observers, many from London, saying the voting procedure in Russia was the best in the world! And I watched them say it live on Russia Today last night.
But should our media be criticising Russian democracy when our own is not that perfect?
For example, take electronic voting machines. They can be easily remotely hacked and told to produce a certain result. But if that is too sophisticated for you then you can always "disappear" a few truck loads of votes like happened in Iowa and declare the winner you want after counting the votes you do have at a secret location.
And as for Bilderberg and the CFR. Barely mentioned in our media but you usuallly have to be a member of at least one 'em to become a Prime Minister or President.
Oh, our inglorious democracy. Our fathers and grandfathers who fought and died in WW2 must be so proud of us.
No sooner had the polls closed and allegations of vote fraud were coming in, despite the international observers, many from London, saying the voting procedure in Russia was the best in the world! And I watched them say it live on Russia Today last night.
But should our media be criticising Russian democracy when our own is not that perfect?
For example, take electronic voting machines. They can be easily remotely hacked and told to produce a certain result. But if that is too sophisticated for you then you can always "disappear" a few truck loads of votes like happened in Iowa and declare the winner you want after counting the votes you do have at a secret location.
And as for Bilderberg and the CFR. Barely mentioned in our media but you usuallly have to be a member of at least one 'em to become a Prime Minister or President.
Oh, our inglorious democracy. Our fathers and grandfathers who fought and died in WW2 must be so proud of us.
Sunday, March 04, 2012
GOVERNMENTS IN LEAGUE WITH MADMEN WANT YOU DEAD
You have to watch this latest video from Alex Jones about the eugenics and mass genocide that is being performed on us by our own governments in league with a cabal of demented madmen playing God.
THE REAL SYRIA
Robert Fisk in The Independent today has tried to impress us with some brief but detailed history of Syria. Under the article title Fisk writes,
Fisk then goes on to detail some of the internal political dynamics of Syria.
I usually have some respect for Fisk. His knowledge of the Middle East is extensive, he is apparently a pacifist, is against Western interference in the Middle East, and has some questions about 9/11, but for some reason he appears to be ignoring one crucial element; the presence in Syria and purpose of Special Forces from non-Arab League countries, e.g. UK, France and USA.
A few days ago he wrote an emotive article which implied a comparison of Homs and the Warsaw Ghetto[2]. He is usually quick to remind us of the massacre of Hama in 1982 by Bashar's father Hafez, which he sneakily links to Bashar with this sentence.
That uprising in Hama was organised and executed by The Muslim Brotherhood, which was created by MI6. The Muslim Brotherhood have now been put into power in Egypt after the Arab Uprising there last year. Are you beginning to see a pattern?
Fisk also appears to have changed his mind about the fate of Bashar al Assad. In an interview with al Jazeera in November last year, after The Arab League suspended Syria, he said that Bashar al Assad did not have long left, saying "Time is running out for Bashar very fast indeed"[3]. But in another interview with al Jazeera last month at the "Enemies of Syria" meeting in Tunis Fisk said he now thought Bashar al Assad now has a long time left (and this was before the Syrian military recently chased the NATO-backed terrorists out of Homs)[4]. In this latter interview Fisk states that there are beheadings of government supporters in Homs, thus supporting the thesis that the rebels are armed terrorist gangs armed from outside Syria.
By the way, if you haven't worked it out yet, al Jazeera is an MI6/CIA/DGSE/NATO etc etc etc operation. Have you ever wondered why tiny Qatar is home to al Jazeera and why Qatar, yet another utopia of democracy in which, much like the absolute monarchy of Saudi Arabia, the King and his family have all the wealth and power, has usually been at the front of the interference of other nations during the Arab Spring spreading freedom and democracy? Take Libya. Guess who, along with British Special Forces, worked with the Libyan al Qaeda rebs? Yep. Qatar. The same in Syria today.
Fisk seems to be dodging the question of the presence in Syria and purpose of Special Forces from non-Arab League countries.
So what is going on in Syria?
Well, a suicide bomber killed himself and several others in Daraa yesterday. The most recent Arab League report on Syria, which was buried over here, stated that armed gangs supported from outside Syria were committing terrorist attacks and there was either exaggeration or just plain making stuff up about Syrian military attacks.
The residents of Homs are grateful for being rid of the NATO-backed terrorists and Special Forces from France and Qatar who have been arrested there with sophisticated weapons.
The Red Crescent with ambulances were blocked from entering and leaving Baba Amr by the Free Syrian Army.
So why was this evacuation blocked by the terrorist FSA? Because the FSA were using the journalists etc as human shields!
NB The Wikipedia page on Syria has been subtly altered recently. In the section reserved for facts and statistics on the right hand side, the bit for President has been amended to include the word "disputable".
So, this is what is really happening in Syria. We are being fed lies by our inglorious media. We are assisting terrorists. We are fomenting a civil war there, just like we did in Libya, so we can either claim R2P or invade Syria. Overthrowing Bashar al Assad will leave a road wide open all the way for NATO to move forward into Tehran.
And that is when the real trouble will really start. And Fisk can help stop this by reporting the clear links between the armed terrorists and NATO.
[1] Robert Fisk: The fearful realities keeping the Assad regime in power, The Independent, 04/03/2012
[2] Robert Fisk: The regime calls it 'cleaning', but the dirty truth is plain to see, The Independent, 01/03/2012
[3] Robert Fisk on Al Jazeera, 16/11/2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtiZOEZAEyU
[4] Robert Fisk on Al Jazeera, 28/02/2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0TXiDtsgwU
[5] Residents of Baba Amr say they feel safe after armed groups arrested, PressTV, 04/03/2012
[6] Red Cross blocked in Homs amid atrocity crossfire, Russia Today, 03/03/2012
[7] For the release of our compatriots and colleagues held captive in Baba Amr, Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire.net, 26/02/2012
Nevermind the claims of armchair interventionists and the hypocrisy of Western leaders, this is what is really happening in Syria[1]
Fisk then goes on to detail some of the internal political dynamics of Syria.
I usually have some respect for Fisk. His knowledge of the Middle East is extensive, he is apparently a pacifist, is against Western interference in the Middle East, and has some questions about 9/11, but for some reason he appears to be ignoring one crucial element; the presence in Syria and purpose of Special Forces from non-Arab League countries, e.g. UK, France and USA.
A few days ago he wrote an emotive article which implied a comparison of Homs and the Warsaw Ghetto[2]. He is usually quick to remind us of the massacre of Hama in 1982 by Bashar's father Hafez, which he sneakily links to Bashar with this sentence.
To the north, 30 years ago, Hafez Assad created more than 10,000 "martyrs" in Hama; last week, Homs became a little Hama, the city's martyrdom predicted by its past.[1]
That uprising in Hama was organised and executed by The Muslim Brotherhood, which was created by MI6. The Muslim Brotherhood have now been put into power in Egypt after the Arab Uprising there last year. Are you beginning to see a pattern?
Fisk also appears to have changed his mind about the fate of Bashar al Assad. In an interview with al Jazeera in November last year, after The Arab League suspended Syria, he said that Bashar al Assad did not have long left, saying "Time is running out for Bashar very fast indeed"[3]. But in another interview with al Jazeera last month at the "Enemies of Syria" meeting in Tunis Fisk said he now thought Bashar al Assad now has a long time left (and this was before the Syrian military recently chased the NATO-backed terrorists out of Homs)[4]. In this latter interview Fisk states that there are beheadings of government supporters in Homs, thus supporting the thesis that the rebels are armed terrorist gangs armed from outside Syria.
By the way, if you haven't worked it out yet, al Jazeera is an MI6/CIA/DGSE/NATO etc etc etc operation. Have you ever wondered why tiny Qatar is home to al Jazeera and why Qatar, yet another utopia of democracy in which, much like the absolute monarchy of Saudi Arabia, the King and his family have all the wealth and power, has usually been at the front of the interference of other nations during the Arab Spring spreading freedom and democracy? Take Libya. Guess who, along with British Special Forces, worked with the Libyan al Qaeda rebs? Yep. Qatar. The same in Syria today.
Fisk seems to be dodging the question of the presence in Syria and purpose of Special Forces from non-Arab League countries.
So what is going on in Syria?
Well, a suicide bomber killed himself and several others in Daraa yesterday. The most recent Arab League report on Syria, which was buried over here, stated that armed gangs supported from outside Syria were committing terrorist attacks and there was either exaggeration or just plain making stuff up about Syrian military attacks.
The residents of Homs are grateful for being rid of the NATO-backed terrorists and Special Forces from France and Qatar who have been arrested there with sophisticated weapons.
The residents of the Baba Amr neighborhood in the Syrian city of Homs say they are relieved following the arrest of foreign armed gangs by Syrian security forces in the region, Press TV reports.
“We thank the Syrian Army for putting an end to armed terrorist groups that had made it impossible for us to walk safely in the streets and live a normal life,” a Baba Amr resident said.
...Many of those detained were Arab nationals, among them Qatari intelligence agents; others were reportedly from Afghanistan, Turkey and a number of European countries, including France.[5]
The Red Crescent with ambulances were blocked from entering and leaving Baba Amr by the Free Syrian Army.
Aisling Byrne, of the Conflicts Forum in Beirut, told RT the Red Crescent twice sent ambulances to Baba Amr, but both times they were blocked by the FSA.
The humanitarian mission “did get ambulances through to take injured journalists out of Homs, and it was actually the Free Syrian Army who refused to let them leave,” she said, adding that the FSA also obstructed the evacuation of injured civilians.[6]
So why was this evacuation blocked by the terrorist FSA? Because the FSA were using the journalists etc as human shields!
On Saturday 25th, the International Red Cross and the Syrian Red Crescent asked the Free "Syrian" Army for permission to re-enter the area. Being on the spot, I offered my services to the authorities to facilitate the removal of my compatriots and colleagues. The negotiations lasted over four hours. Several states, including France, were kept abreast of these events.
After several twists and turns, the officers of the Free "Syrian" Army received the instruction via satellite to decline. Their encrypted communications with their superiors either ended up in Beirut or were relayed via Beirut. De facto the journalists are being used as human shields even more effectively than civilians, the rebels fearing a final assault by Syrian forces.[7]
NB The Wikipedia page on Syria has been subtly altered recently. In the section reserved for facts and statistics on the right hand side, the bit for President has been amended to include the word "disputable".
So, this is what is really happening in Syria. We are being fed lies by our inglorious media. We are assisting terrorists. We are fomenting a civil war there, just like we did in Libya, so we can either claim R2P or invade Syria. Overthrowing Bashar al Assad will leave a road wide open all the way for NATO to move forward into Tehran.
And that is when the real trouble will really start. And Fisk can help stop this by reporting the clear links between the armed terrorists and NATO.
[1] Robert Fisk: The fearful realities keeping the Assad regime in power, The Independent, 04/03/2012
[2] Robert Fisk: The regime calls it 'cleaning', but the dirty truth is plain to see, The Independent, 01/03/2012
[3] Robert Fisk on Al Jazeera, 16/11/2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtiZOEZAEyU
[4] Robert Fisk on Al Jazeera, 28/02/2012, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0TXiDtsgwU
[5] Residents of Baba Amr say they feel safe after armed groups arrested, PressTV, 04/03/2012
[6] Red Cross blocked in Homs amid atrocity crossfire, Russia Today, 03/03/2012
[7] For the release of our compatriots and colleagues held captive in Baba Amr, Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire.net, 26/02/2012
Saturday, March 03, 2012
IT IS A GUERRILLA WAR
Aisling Byrne from Conflicts Forum talks to RT about Syria. She says it is a guerrilla war to establish a Sunni Islamic regime. Al Qaeda is Sunni. Iran is Shia.
The Syrian rebels are revealing their true heritage. A suicide car bomber just killed himself and a few others in Daraa.
I ask again, are British Special Forces assisting this bunch of terrorists or not? If so, how long have they been doing so, how much has it cost the British taxpayer, and who is responsible?
The Syrian rebels are revealing their true heritage. A suicide car bomber just killed himself and a few others in Daraa.
I ask again, are British Special Forces assisting this bunch of terrorists or not? If so, how long have they been doing so, how much has it cost the British taxpayer, and who is responsible?
Friday, March 02, 2012
SOUNDTRACK
Since my prayer to the Great Spirit I have started to feel more relaxed and happier, planning for when the NWO are toast. This is not to say there won't be further trouble in the Middle East, but now that the trouble in Syria is dying down, and cooler stronger heads everywhere are prevailing and having a positive effect, there is only one thing that they can do, and that is a preemptive unilateral strike on Iran by Israel, which will expose them for what they truly are.
One project that has been in my plans for years is a film expose of the rave scene c. early 1990's. Yes, I know Human Traffic attempted to do something like that, but not from my experience and point of view, particularly now we know that governments in league with the corrupt banks are at the top of the chain. I intend to dive deep.
Films have soundtracks. Here are some I am considering using, besides others I've posted.
King Bee - Back By Dope Demand
tramps - say no two dope
Outlander - Vamp [this is f*%kin' mental!]
Don Carlos - Alone
Reese Project - Direct Me
Ruffcut - Talk About
Mozart & Master Freez - Let the Music Move Me
One project that has been in my plans for years is a film expose of the rave scene c. early 1990's. Yes, I know Human Traffic attempted to do something like that, but not from my experience and point of view, particularly now we know that governments in league with the corrupt banks are at the top of the chain. I intend to dive deep.
Films have soundtracks. Here are some I am considering using, besides others I've posted.
King Bee - Back By Dope Demand
tramps - say no two dope
Outlander - Vamp [this is f*%kin' mental!]
Don Carlos - Alone
Reese Project - Direct Me
Ruffcut - Talk About
Mozart & Master Freez - Let the Music Move Me
THE RESULT OF BRITISH SPECIAL FORCES IN LIBYA
This video allegedly shows black Libyans in a cage, treated like animals, bound and being forced to eat the old Libyan flag, while the real animals are shouting the third line of our new national anthem; Allah U Akbar!
From http://rt.com/news/libya-rebels-torture-africans-679/
Is this the result of the work of British Special Forces in Libya last year?
This is why it is imperative that William Hague and/or Phil Hammond make a statement immediately in the House ofcorrupt wretches Commons about the presence and purpose of British Special Forces in Syria since 1st January 2011.
If this is true, I hope numbnuts and the rest of the corrupt wretches are proud of their work.
Watch out, Syria!
Let us honour our glorious allies al Qaeda (before they chop our heads off) by singing our new national anthem.
p.s. wasn't Great Britain the greatest slave trading nation on Earth?
From http://rt.com/news/libya-rebels-torture-africans-679/
Is this the result of the work of British Special Forces in Libya last year?
This is why it is imperative that William Hague and/or Phil Hammond make a statement immediately in the House of
If this is true, I hope numbnuts and the rest of the corrupt wretches are proud of their work.
Watch out, Syria!
Let us honour our glorious allies al Qaeda (before they chop our heads off) by singing our new national anthem.
God save our gracious Queen
Long live our noble Queen
Allah U Akbar
Send her victorious
Happy and glorious
Long to reign over us
Allah U Akbar
p.s. wasn't Great Britain the greatest slave trading nation on Earth?
THE INFORMATION WAR
Two stories being reported in the media this morning highlight the information war you are engaged in, whether you want it or not.
1) The first story is a report on Sky News about possible vote rigging in Russia this weekend.
[source : Russian Election: Workers 'Paid To Vote Putin', Sky News, 02/03/2012]
Two elements of this story need addressing so that we can assess its truth and bias.
First, the election monitor Golos is mentioned as 'independent'. But it is not independent. It is financed by The National Endowment for Democracy, and was caught last year whoring itself to the NED, by claiming voting irregularities in return for financial rewards.
Second, a woman named as Lilia Shevtsova is interviewed. She says,
So who is Shevtsova? She works for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. This organisation is one of the major globalist think tanks, i.e. propaganda units. Its current President is a member of Bilderberg, CFR and Trilateral Commission, and high up in the Rockefeller apparatus. Shevtsova is the Russian citizen who has attended Bilderberg the most, and frequently writes in TheBilderberg Washington Post against Putin.
Putin is quoted in the Sky News report as predicting such vote rigging and attributing it to the NED-sponsored opposition.
2) The second story is about Baba Amr in Homs reported on Russia Today. An "eyewitness" called Galina, so perhaps not a resident, is interviewed claiming that the rebels have destroyed water and energy supplies, are sniping at anyone, and are robbing and chopping civilians up into bits.
[source : Self-appointed revolutionaries shooting people in the streets – Homs eyewitness, RT, 02/03/2012]
A question we have to ask about Homs is that only Baba Amr appears to have been under "siege", as Western media have reported it. But Homs consists of several suburbs, one of which is Baba Amr. So what about the other suburbs? Have there been rebellions in those suburbs also? I can find no reports of similar rebellions elsewhere in Homs. But is that because the residents of Homs in general support the current Syrian government? If they supported the rebellion they would have rushed to Baba Amr and joined the rebellion there, wouldn't they, throwing Molotov Cocktails and stones at the Syrian military? Apparently they did not. So perhaps there is some truth to what Gallina says about Homs, that "people in Homs support the Assad government.".
So who do you believe?
This is just one small part of the information war today. The information war occured yesterday, the day before yesterday, and the day before that. And it will go on tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that. It is a vast planet-wide war requiring discernment. At stake is your life. The protagonists of the current warmongering want the population of the world vastly reduced, down to somewhere between a half and one billion. Those deemed worthy of life will be microchipped, will have no freedom and will be policed by a brutal paramilitary force with the powers to arrest, detain, torture and kill without evidence. The NDAA forms the basis for this.
Good luck!
1) The first story is a report on Sky News about possible vote rigging in Russia this weekend.
A Sky News investigation has revealed claims that thousands of government workers are being promised payment to fraudulently cast multiple votes for Vladimir Putin in Russia's presidential election.
[source : Russian Election: Workers 'Paid To Vote Putin', Sky News, 02/03/2012]
Two elements of this story need addressing so that we can assess its truth and bias.
First, the election monitor Golos is mentioned as 'independent'. But it is not independent. It is financed by The National Endowment for Democracy, and was caught last year whoring itself to the NED, by claiming voting irregularities in return for financial rewards.
Second, a woman named as Lilia Shevtsova is interviewed. She says,
"Everybody says among the civic centres, pollsters, among the analysts that this election will be much more rigged than the previous one," said political analyst Lilia Shevtsova.
"This election means the destiny, the future for Putin so they will do everything - they will use all the gimmicks, all the tricks, all the pressure - all the administrative resource, bribery and corruption in order to get through the first round."
So who is Shevtsova? She works for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. This organisation is one of the major globalist think tanks, i.e. propaganda units. Its current President is a member of Bilderberg, CFR and Trilateral Commission, and high up in the Rockefeller apparatus. Shevtsova is the Russian citizen who has attended Bilderberg the most, and frequently writes in The
Putin is quoted in the Sky News report as predicting such vote rigging and attributing it to the NED-sponsored opposition.
"Our opponents are getting ready to use certain mechanisms that would prove that the election has been falsified. They will stuff the ballot boxes themselves, observe this and then report on it."
2) The second story is about Baba Amr in Homs reported on Russia Today. An "eyewitness" called Galina, so perhaps not a resident, is interviewed claiming that the rebels have destroyed water and energy supplies, are sniping at anyone, and are robbing and chopping civilians up into bits.
Galina says people in Homs support the Assad government and want “the revolution” to be over.
[source : Self-appointed revolutionaries shooting people in the streets – Homs eyewitness, RT, 02/03/2012]
A question we have to ask about Homs is that only Baba Amr appears to have been under "siege", as Western media have reported it. But Homs consists of several suburbs, one of which is Baba Amr. So what about the other suburbs? Have there been rebellions in those suburbs also? I can find no reports of similar rebellions elsewhere in Homs. But is that because the residents of Homs in general support the current Syrian government? If they supported the rebellion they would have rushed to Baba Amr and joined the rebellion there, wouldn't they, throwing Molotov Cocktails and stones at the Syrian military? Apparently they did not. So perhaps there is some truth to what Gallina says about Homs, that "people in Homs support the Assad government.".
So who do you believe?
This is just one small part of the information war today. The information war occured yesterday, the day before yesterday, and the day before that. And it will go on tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that. It is a vast planet-wide war requiring discernment. At stake is your life. The protagonists of the current warmongering want the population of the world vastly reduced, down to somewhere between a half and one billion. Those deemed worthy of life will be microchipped, will have no freedom and will be policed by a brutal paramilitary force with the powers to arrest, detain, torture and kill without evidence. The NDAA forms the basis for this.
Good luck!
Thursday, March 01, 2012
SUBTLE DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING IRAN
Press TV is reporting two subtle developments regarding Iran.
1) the bar for war on Iran has been lowered from possession of a nuclear weapon to "having nuclear weapons capability".
[source : US makes abrupt volte face on Iran, PressTV, 01/03/2012]
2) MeK/MKO could be taken off the US list of foreign terrorist organizations if they relocate to Liberty Camp outside Baghdad, Iraq, and the USA will help them to move!
[source : US hints at way for MKO to get off terrorism list, PressTV, 01/03/2012]
LPAC are claiming that if were not for The Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff General Martin Dempsey and the support he has had from inside the US military we would have been at war with Iran by now and a nuclear war may well have occured.
[source : International Day of Action: Stop World War III, LPAC, 01/03/2012]
Dempsey and his like-minded officers, not just in the USA but everywhere in the world, need to avoid an Israeli strike on Iran, whether it is supported or not, overtly or covertly.
Dempsey's efforts have had an effect on them. Gaddafi held them up too. Such efforts are bringing to the attention of the sleepwalking public the contradiction that the powers of the West are working with the very terrorists that we are being told to be terrified of so we give up all our rights.
Clintonella de Vil is forced to state on BBC that the USA is working with al Qaeda in Syria!
It is working.
Now the MeK/MKO are being assisted by the USA to move to Iraq so that the USA can take them off their terrorist list, so that I assume much more overt assistance can be given to the "new freedom fighters" to provoke Iran into war.
1) the bar for war on Iran has been lowered from possession of a nuclear weapon to "having nuclear weapons capability".
[source : US makes abrupt volte face on Iran, PressTV, 01/03/2012]
2) MeK/MKO could be taken off the US list of foreign terrorist organizations if they relocate to Liberty Camp outside Baghdad, Iraq, and the USA will help them to move!
[source : US hints at way for MKO to get off terrorism list, PressTV, 01/03/2012]
LPAC are claiming that if were not for The Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff General Martin Dempsey and the support he has had from inside the US military we would have been at war with Iran by now and a nuclear war may well have occured.
All of our lives are hanging, literally, by a silken thread. If the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and a series of other American military officers had not argued vehemently against a military attack on Iran, the greater part of humanity would have been lost, already now, in a global thermonuclear war.
The reason for this threat of war does not lie in the alleged atomic weapons program of Iran, about which all the national intelligence services in the U.S. National Intelligence Directorate agreed, in their official National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), has not existed since 2003. The fundamental reason lies much more in the fact that the financial system of the entire trans-Atlantic world is hopelessly bankrupt. This British Empire — the so-called system of globalization — is currently carrying out a drive to the very edge of the nuclear abyss, in order to force Russia and China to their knees, to make them abandon their sovereignty and their high technology-oriented economic policies.
[source : International Day of Action: Stop World War III, LPAC, 01/03/2012]
Dempsey and his like-minded officers, not just in the USA but everywhere in the world, need to avoid an Israeli strike on Iran, whether it is supported or not, overtly or covertly.
Dempsey's efforts have had an effect on them. Gaddafi held them up too. Such efforts are bringing to the attention of the sleepwalking public the contradiction that the powers of the West are working with the very terrorists that we are being told to be terrified of so we give up all our rights.
Clintonella de Vil is forced to state on BBC that the USA is working with al Qaeda in Syria!
It is working.
Now the MeK/MKO are being assisted by the USA to move to Iraq so that the USA can take them off their terrorist list, so that I assume much more overt assistance can be given to the "new freedom fighters" to provoke Iran into war.
SATURDAY MORNINGS WITH THE MONKEES
As a young kid some of my Saturday mornings consisted of watching The Monkees on TV, along with The Double Deckers and The Jackson Five cartoon.
Decades later and I can now ask the question, were The Monkees part of the same operation as The Beatles but aimed at children?
I am not casting aspersions over The Monkees. Their fun-loving antics were very cheezy at times. But they also produced some very memorable songs.
When I first went to university a small group of us jokingly discussed creating a Monkees appreciation society. In the end we didn't, but when Last Train to Clarksville or I'm A Believer was played at the many clubs we went to we sang along and boogied (drunk, of course).
The death of Davy Jones is very sad, and curious. Apparently he was vegetarian and kept himself fit. But how many aged and young children will die today because of hunger and/or dehydration due to the sick global economy sucking the life out of us all in a global eugenics program?
Another curiosity is that I have been thinking about The Monkees over the last few days for no apparent reason.
Here is my favourite song by The Monkees, Pleasant Valley Sunday, about "status symbol land...where the kids don't understand". Sound familiar? I know The Monkees didn't write it but their version is very catchy.
Pleasant Valley Sunday (by Goffin & King)
Decades later and I can now ask the question, were The Monkees part of the same operation as The Beatles but aimed at children?
I am not casting aspersions over The Monkees. Their fun-loving antics were very cheezy at times. But they also produced some very memorable songs.
When I first went to university a small group of us jokingly discussed creating a Monkees appreciation society. In the end we didn't, but when Last Train to Clarksville or I'm A Believer was played at the many clubs we went to we sang along and boogied (drunk, of course).
The death of Davy Jones is very sad, and curious. Apparently he was vegetarian and kept himself fit. But how many aged and young children will die today because of hunger and/or dehydration due to the sick global economy sucking the life out of us all in a global eugenics program?
Another curiosity is that I have been thinking about The Monkees over the last few days for no apparent reason.
Here is my favourite song by The Monkees, Pleasant Valley Sunday, about "status symbol land...where the kids don't understand". Sound familiar? I know The Monkees didn't write it but their version is very catchy.
Pleasant Valley Sunday (by Goffin & King)
The local rock group down the street
Is trying hard to learn their song
Seranade the weekend squire, who just came out to mow his lawn
Another pleasant valley sunday
Charcoal burning everywhere
Rows of houses that are all the same
And no one seems to care
See mrs. gray she's proud today because her roses are in bloom
Mr. green he's so serene, he's got a t.v. in every room
Another pleasant valley sunday
Here in status symbol land
Mothers complain about how hard life is
And the kids just don't understand
Creature comfort goals
They only numb my soul and make it hard for me to see
My thoughts all seem to stray, to places far away
I need a change of scenery
Ta ta ta...
Another pleasant valley sunday
Charcoal burning everywhere
Another pleasant valley sunday
Here in status symbol land
Another pleasant valley sunday...
PLASTIC OUTRAGE OVER HOMS
Imagine if Russia had financed a gaggle of internet warriors to post revolutionary tweets to encourage an uprising against The Queen, and then sent its Special Forces to Manchester to arm and advise a violent uprising not only in Manchester but also in Bristol and Leeds.
What would be the reaction here?
How would the Army be used to put down such an uprising?
First, such an uprising would not occur. Russia does not harbour such brazen, arrogant imperialism. A strong defence of its interests, yes. But it would not dream up never mind implement such a plan.
But somebody has.
It was dreamed up in Vauxhall and Langley, and has been implemented across the Arab world.
There is outrage in the British media that the Syrian military is about to take control of Baba Amr in Homs, which has been the focus of the uprising. They have even got Robert Fisk using the emotive word 'cleansing'[1]. There have been widely reported allegations of massacres of children but little if any evidence has been provided to support such claims[2].
But how much outrage would there be if we learned that British Special Forces have been in Syria for months arming and advising the Syrian rebels?
How much outrage would there be if British Special Forces were in Homs and were arrested and imprisoned?
How much outrage would there be if we learned that British Special Forces had been in Homs arming and advising the Syrian rebels, but have now done a runner, leaving the Syrian rebels in Homs up shit creek without a paddle?
How can I ask such questions? Because we were in Libya, fomenting a rebellion, advising that rebellion, arming that rebellion, eventually spending billions bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing to death the very Libyan civilians we were supposedly protecting. And not only that, the Libyan rebels were from al Qaeda! Now al Qaeda flags flutter over Libya in the North African breeze, while al Qaeda tortures and rapes and executes black Libyans.
And reports published in The Daily Star in January quote unnamed British security officials confirming the presence of British Special Forces in Syria, with the chilling quote
So before we all cry and sob and weep and compare Baba Amr to the Warsaw Ghetto, we should be absolutely sure and 100% confident that the blood of innocent Syrian children is not on our hands because our British Special Forces are not in Syria stirring up a humanitarian crisis so we can subsequently claim Responsbility to Protect and either invade or bomb Syria.
Are they?
Or aren't they?
Yes or no.
That is why it is essential that William Hague and/or Phil Hammond make a statement in the House ofcorrupt wretches Commons about the presence and purpose of British Special Forces in and around Syria.
[1] The Independent, Robert Fisk: The regime calls it 'cleaning', but the dirty truth is plain to see, 01/03/2012
[2] The Truth Serum, SYRIA, DEAD BABIES AND INCUBATORS, 09/02/2012
[3] The Daily Star, SYRIA WILL BE BLOODIEST YET, The Daily Star, 1/1/2012
What would be the reaction here?
How would the Army be used to put down such an uprising?
First, such an uprising would not occur. Russia does not harbour such brazen, arrogant imperialism. A strong defence of its interests, yes. But it would not dream up never mind implement such a plan.
But somebody has.
It was dreamed up in Vauxhall and Langley, and has been implemented across the Arab world.
There is outrage in the British media that the Syrian military is about to take control of Baba Amr in Homs, which has been the focus of the uprising. They have even got Robert Fisk using the emotive word 'cleansing'[1]. There have been widely reported allegations of massacres of children but little if any evidence has been provided to support such claims[2].
But how much outrage would there be if we learned that British Special Forces have been in Syria for months arming and advising the Syrian rebels?
How much outrage would there be if British Special Forces were in Homs and were arrested and imprisoned?
How much outrage would there be if we learned that British Special Forces had been in Homs arming and advising the Syrian rebels, but have now done a runner, leaving the Syrian rebels in Homs up shit creek without a paddle?
How can I ask such questions? Because we were in Libya, fomenting a rebellion, advising that rebellion, arming that rebellion, eventually spending billions bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing and bombing to death the very Libyan civilians we were supposedly protecting. And not only that, the Libyan rebels were from al Qaeda! Now al Qaeda flags flutter over Libya in the North African breeze, while al Qaeda tortures and rapes and executes black Libyans.
And reports published in The Daily Star in January quote unnamed British security officials confirming the presence of British Special Forces in Syria, with the chilling quote
“This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier."[3]
So before we all cry and sob and weep and compare Baba Amr to the Warsaw Ghetto, we should be absolutely sure and 100% confident that the blood of innocent Syrian children is not on our hands because our British Special Forces are not in Syria stirring up a humanitarian crisis so we can subsequently claim Responsbility to Protect and either invade or bomb Syria.
Are they?
Or aren't they?
Yes or no.
That is why it is essential that William Hague and/or Phil Hammond make a statement in the House of
[1] The Independent, Robert Fisk: The regime calls it 'cleaning', but the dirty truth is plain to see, 01/03/2012
[2] The Truth Serum, SYRIA, DEAD BABIES AND INCUBATORS, 09/02/2012
[3] The Daily Star, SYRIA WILL BE BLOODIEST YET, The Daily Star, 1/1/2012
Monday, February 27, 2012
PUTIN IS NOT DEAD
Russian media is reporting that an asassination attempt on Putin has been foiled. The suspects claim that Doku Umarov is behind the plot. Umarov has claimed responsibility for terrorist attacks on Domodedovo International Airport and Moscow Metro. He is also accused of bombing a train in 2009, and survivors of the Beslan siege have identified Umarov as one of those present.
The desire of the West to apparently get Putin, one way or the other, is plain to see.
He has been accused of involvement of the Beslan siege.
He was immediately accused of murdering Litvenenko.
In 2007 the scoundrel Berezovsky told The Guardian that he was advocating and working for a violent revolution in Russia to get rid of Putin.
The National Endowment for Democracy is financing The White Revolution against Putin's election next week.
Last month Foreign Policy magazine, which is owned by theBilderberg Washington Post, published an article curiously entitled "Putin is Already Dead".
And right on cue, The Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving Guardian has today published another letter from Khordokovsky in which Khordokovsky argues that the evolution not revolution (which has shades of Alan Partridge) has begun so Putin is already finished.
Umarov has been linked to al Qaeda by the UN.
It could all be a farce though.
Russia is now a member of the WTO and G8, organisations considered to be integral to the NWO, for whatever reason Russia abstained on UN SCR 1973 and thus has the blood of many thousands of Libyan civilians on its hands, and has recently signed over some of its valuable natural resources over to the NWO.
On the other hand, if you watch this video by LPAC on Russia's development while we have been bailing out our Nazi lords of satanism, warmongering and derivatives, there is an argument that Russia now threatens the NWO.
Russia's Resistance http://larouchepac.com/node/21737
The desire of the West to apparently get Putin, one way or the other, is plain to see.
He has been accused of involvement of the Beslan siege.
He was immediately accused of murdering Litvenenko.
In 2007 the scoundrel Berezovsky told The Guardian that he was advocating and working for a violent revolution in Russia to get rid of Putin.
The National Endowment for Democracy is financing The White Revolution against Putin's election next week.
Last month Foreign Policy magazine, which is owned by the
And right on cue, The Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving Guardian has today published another letter from Khordokovsky in which Khordokovsky argues that the evolution not revolution (which has shades of Alan Partridge) has begun so Putin is already finished.
Umarov has been linked to al Qaeda by the UN.
It could all be a farce though.
Russia is now a member of the WTO and G8, organisations considered to be integral to the NWO, for whatever reason Russia abstained on UN SCR 1973 and thus has the blood of many thousands of Libyan civilians on its hands, and has recently signed over some of its valuable natural resources over to the NWO.
On the other hand, if you watch this video by LPAC on Russia's development while we have been bailing out our Nazi lords of satanism, warmongering and derivatives, there is an argument that Russia now threatens the NWO.
Russia's Resistance http://larouchepac.com/node/21737
WORKFARE OR FASCISM?
Large employers are withdrawing from the Workfare scheme proposed by the current government. Several politicians, businessmen and media organisations have praised the idea. Indeed, The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail are at the front of the demands for Workfare.
Today The DailyWorkfare Mail has an article in which former Marks & Spencer boss Sir Stuart Rose supports Workfare. The article mentions that Rose started at M&S stacking shelves, but information that is buried in the article states that he first joined M&S as a management trainee, so had a guaranteed job and guaranteed promotion up the career ladder after his presumably short stint stacking shelves (can't have the management associating with the shopfloor staff). Rose says,
[source : Show some backbone! Ex-M&S chief tells firms to defy militants on work experience scheme, The Daily Mail, 27/02/2012]
What is wrong with this? Well, if you go to the Right to Work webiste you will find a report entitled "A comparative review of workfare programmes in the United States, Canada and Australia", financed by the DWP themselves, that looked at Workfare in the USA, Canada and Australia. The report concludes that Workfare did very little if anything to help people find work (this when jobs were more available), and Workfare may in fact be harming chances of finding employment because while those on the scheme were 'working' and travelling to and from their location of 'work' they were unable to look for real full time employment with real prospects.
What a farce!
But why is the government proposing Workfare in the first place? Because we are broke. Now Captain Oik admits it, but despite being Chancellor for nearly two years blames it all on Labour (which is half right, the other half is his fault). During his time as Chancellor he has been promising a land of milk and honey and rivers made of chocolate if only we, i.e. the working and middle classes, suffer austerity to pay for the reckless gambling of his good friends the Zionazi warmongering Rothschilds and their ilk, the banker classs. Oik said,
[source : George Osborne: UK has run out of money, The Daily Telegraph, 26/02/2012]
So now we see why the implementation of Workfare is so crucial to the government. They want and need a source of free labour, just like in war they want and need a source of free cannon fodder.
So what is Workfare? It's when you do some 'work' in return for experience and your benefits. The company 'employing' you while you 'work' does not pay you a bean. All the money comes from the government. The result is that the government pays you to work for a company, the company gets the result of your 'work' and you may or may not get a job after it. But please read the aforementioned DWP report about USA, Canada and Autralia; WORKFARE DOESN'T WORK! AND THE DWP KNOWS IT!
Workfare is fascism, plain and simple.
The DWP knows it.
McDonalds knows it.
Grayling knows it.
Osborne knows it.
Under normal economic conditions Workfare would not even be discussed because jobs would be much more abundant and easily obtained. However, as Sir Stuart Rose himself acknowledges our economic condition is far from normal. Unemployment is increasing, particularly among the youth, and is forecast to get much worse before it gets better.
But why are economic conditions far from normal? That's right. Because of the bankers. And it's not just all bankers, it's those at the very, very top, who are reaping all the power and the wealth from the chaos that their gambling caused. And it is the working and middle classes who are being asked, or ordered, to work for free.
If a few of these bankers were hung, drawn and quartered to teach the rest of the banker class to respect the God-like power to create money out of thin air that they have been entrusted with by our corrupt wretches in the Houses of Parliament, then at least we would see that maybe, just maybe, we are indeed "all in this together", to quote Cap'n Oik. Perhaps then Workfare could possibly be seen as a solution by more of society.
But I don't see any gallows.
I see a disunited fascist kingdom.
And it's becoming more disunited and more fascist by the day.
Today The Daily
‘It’s about getting people into the routine of working, making sure they are up in the morning, making sure they’re presentable, make sure they arrive on time, make sure they know what it’s like to have a properly constructed work programme, and shelf stacking is just a part of it.
‘When I started off in my retail career as a management trainee in Marks & Spencer’s 40 years ago, I was put to shelf stacking and indeed to sweeping out the warehouse for a day.
‘If you are drawing unemployment benefit and you are looking to get into the workplace and somebody says to you, “We’ll give you some experience” and you have got a week apparently to withdraw from it if it doesn’t suit you, why would you not do it?
‘If I was the parent of one of these people I’d say, “Go on to it, lad, get in there, get stuck in”.
‘So I find it quite baffling and I think it’s very, very sad, with I think it’s 20-odd per cent of unemployment around the age of 18, that kids are being led to believe that big business is exploiting them, which is nonsense.’ Sir Stuart said firms were apparently being ‘intimidated’ by the campaign against the scheme, adding: ‘One or two have shown a little less than backbone, if I might say so.
‘I think you have got to stick with it. If there are one or two issues of administration in the process that need sorting out, then let’s sort it out, but it seems to me quite straightforward.
‘You can come in, you can get work experience and if you like it you can stay here and possibly get offered a job; if you don’t like it after the first week you can go away. I don’t get it, what’s the problem?’
[source : Show some backbone! Ex-M&S chief tells firms to defy militants on work experience scheme, The Daily Mail, 27/02/2012]
What is wrong with this? Well, if you go to the Right to Work webiste you will find a report entitled "A comparative review of workfare programmes in the United States, Canada and Australia", financed by the DWP themselves, that looked at Workfare in the USA, Canada and Australia. The report concludes that Workfare did very little if anything to help people find work (this when jobs were more available), and Workfare may in fact be harming chances of finding employment because while those on the scheme were 'working' and travelling to and from their location of 'work' they were unable to look for real full time employment with real prospects.
What a farce!
But why is the government proposing Workfare in the first place? Because we are broke. Now Captain Oik admits it, but despite being Chancellor for nearly two years blames it all on Labour (which is half right, the other half is his fault). During his time as Chancellor he has been promising a land of milk and honey and rivers made of chocolate if only we, i.e. the working and middle classes, suffer austerity to pay for the reckless gambling of his good friends the Zionazi warmongering Rothschilds and their ilk, the banker classs. Oik said,
“The British Government has run out of money because all the money was spent in the good years,” the Chancellor said. “The money and the investment and the jobs need to come from the private sector.”
[source : George Osborne: UK has run out of money, The Daily Telegraph, 26/02/2012]
So now we see why the implementation of Workfare is so crucial to the government. They want and need a source of free labour, just like in war they want and need a source of free cannon fodder.
So what is Workfare? It's when you do some 'work' in return for experience and your benefits. The company 'employing' you while you 'work' does not pay you a bean. All the money comes from the government. The result is that the government pays you to work for a company, the company gets the result of your 'work' and you may or may not get a job after it. But please read the aforementioned DWP report about USA, Canada and Autralia; WORKFARE DOESN'T WORK! AND THE DWP KNOWS IT!
Workfare is fascism, plain and simple.
The DWP knows it.
McDonalds knows it.
Grayling knows it.
Osborne knows it.
Under normal economic conditions Workfare would not even be discussed because jobs would be much more abundant and easily obtained. However, as Sir Stuart Rose himself acknowledges our economic condition is far from normal. Unemployment is increasing, particularly among the youth, and is forecast to get much worse before it gets better.
But why are economic conditions far from normal? That's right. Because of the bankers. And it's not just all bankers, it's those at the very, very top, who are reaping all the power and the wealth from the chaos that their gambling caused. And it is the working and middle classes who are being asked, or ordered, to work for free.
If a few of these bankers were hung, drawn and quartered to teach the rest of the banker class to respect the God-like power to create money out of thin air that they have been entrusted with by our corrupt wretches in the Houses of Parliament, then at least we would see that maybe, just maybe, we are indeed "all in this together", to quote Cap'n Oik. Perhaps then Workfare could possibly be seen as a solution by more of society.
But I don't see any gallows.
I see a disunited fascist kingdom.
And it's becoming more disunited and more fascist by the day.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
SOMALIA'S OIL
Following the London conference on Somalia last week we can now have full confidence that the reason why Great Britain is so interested in Somalia is oil.
[source : Britain leads dash to explore for oil in war-torn Somalia, The Observer, 26/02/2012]
But the same report begins with the use of British taxpayer money to help the likes of BP to get in there.
Is this fascism?
The humanitarian aid will come from taxpayer money. The security assistance will also come from taxpayer money.
So just how much is BP offering?
The article perhaps acknowledges this fascism, and attempts to put lipstick on the fascist pig with this paragraph.
Remember that this is a report from The Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving Guardian News and Media Limited.
Just how will this be "a boon for the UK economy"?
And the warmongering over Iran is due to a bunch of Zionutters who have been made paranoid of the rest of the world by their own Zionazi leadership from the Rothschilds after they and their close friends the Warburgs engineered Nazi Germany and the Holocaust to convince a sceptical world Jewry that the only safe place for Jews was Palestine and nowhere else but Palestine.
And the al Qaeda threat is manufactured too. Al Qaeda is a MI6/CIA operation. There is a possibility that al Qaeda have been getting into Somalia through al Shabab so that Great Britain can say, "look, Somalia. If you don't give us your lovely lovely oil we'll get our al Qaeda guys in Somalia to put a bullet in your head, just like they did with Gadaffi. And you wouldn't want that now. Would you?"
Face it, Britons. We are run by fascist gangstaz.
Yet it is the extent of oil deposits beneath the Indian Ocean that is most exciting Somali officials. One said the potential was comparable to that of Kuwait, which has more than 100bn barrels of proven oil reserves. If true, the deposits would eclipse Nigeria's reserves – 37.2bn barrels – and make Somalia the seventh largest oil-rich nation.
[source : Britain leads dash to explore for oil in war-torn Somalia, The Observer, 26/02/2012]
But the same report begins with the use of British taxpayer money to help the likes of BP to get in there.
Britain is involved in a secret high-stakes dash for oil in Somalia, with the government offering humanitarian aid and security assistance in the hope of a stake in the beleaguered country's future energy industry.
Is this fascism?
The humanitarian aid will come from taxpayer money. The security assistance will also come from taxpayer money.
So just how much is BP offering?
The article perhaps acknowledges this fascism, and attempts to put lipstick on the fascist pig with this paragraph.
British involvement in the future Somali oil industry would be a boon for the UK economy and comes at a time when the world is increasingly concerned about the actions of Iran, the second-biggest oil producer in Opec.
Remember that this is a report from The Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving Guardian News and Media Limited.
Just how will this be "a boon for the UK economy"?
And the warmongering over Iran is due to a bunch of Zionutters who have been made paranoid of the rest of the world by their own Zionazi leadership from the Rothschilds after they and their close friends the Warburgs engineered Nazi Germany and the Holocaust to convince a sceptical world Jewry that the only safe place for Jews was Palestine and nowhere else but Palestine.
And the al Qaeda threat is manufactured too. Al Qaeda is a MI6/CIA operation. There is a possibility that al Qaeda have been getting into Somalia through al Shabab so that Great Britain can say, "look, Somalia. If you don't give us your lovely lovely oil we'll get our al Qaeda guys in Somalia to put a bullet in your head, just like they did with Gadaffi. And you wouldn't want that now. Would you?"
Face it, Britons. We are run by fascist gangstaz.
Saturday, February 25, 2012
THE UTOPIAN DEMOCRACY OF SAUDI ARABIA
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy. The king has the majority if not all of the power, and his family occupies most of the sham ministerial positions. Women cannot vote. The kingdom was formed after the Sauds helped the British to stab the Palestinians in the back after the Palestinians were promised independence from the Ottomans if they allied with Great Britain during WW1 to kick the Ottomans out. In return the Palestinians were betrayed and instead got mass Jewish immigration, leading to the creation of Israel and all the squalor, death, bloodshed and barbarity that has resulted since; largest refugee camps in the world in Gaza and West Bank, occupation, wars, terrorism and 9/11 (which the Saudis were involved in).
Uprisings in Saudi Arabia are being brutally put down, with British weapons and assistance. In fact, Saudi Arabia likes to brutally put down uprisings so much it even assists its neighbour Bahrain, another utopia of democracy, in putting down theirs!
Yet the Saudis stormed out of the Enemies of Syria (and everywhere else on the planet) conference on Syria because the attendees could not agree on assisting the Syrian uprising!
Honestly. You could not make this stuff up!
And the Saudis have now publicly stated that they will arm the Syrian al Qaeda rebs.
Is that legal?
Maybe Craig Murray could answer that question on international law. Just how far can one country assist a revolution/uprising/rebellion in another country?
Uprisings in Saudi Arabia are being brutally put down, with British weapons and assistance. In fact, Saudi Arabia likes to brutally put down uprisings so much it even assists its neighbour Bahrain, another utopia of democracy, in putting down theirs!
Yet the Saudis stormed out of the Enemies of Syria (and everywhere else on the planet) conference on Syria because the attendees could not agree on assisting the Syrian uprising!
Honestly. You could not make this stuff up!
And the Saudis have now publicly stated that they will arm the Syrian al Qaeda rebs.
Is that legal?
Maybe Craig Murray could answer that question on international law. Just how far can one country assist a revolution/uprising/rebellion in another country?
DOUBLE STANDARDS TAKES A TRIP TO TUNIS
At the Enemies of Syria (and everywhere else on the planet) conference in Tunis, Foreign Minister William Hague said that Britain was collecting evidence of war crimes in Syria.
[source : 'Whose side are they on?' Hillary Clinton blasts Russia and China as 'despicable' for opposing UN action on Syria, The Daily Mail, 25/02/2012]
But what about our glorious allies al Qaeda in Libya, Mr Hague?
They are torturing, exectuing, and raping.
And NATO (Neo Al Qaeda Terrorist Organisation) bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libya and Libyan civilians.
This takes double standards to a completely new level of incredibility.
And as for Clintonella de Vil. She said
[source : 'Whose side are they on?' Hillary Clinton blasts Russia and China as 'despicable' for opposing UN action on Syria, The Daily Mail, 25/02/2012]
How many Pakistani and Afghan women and children have been murderded and how many houses have been destroyed by unmanned drones while she has been Secretary of State?
And the USA has used its veto to defend Israel which as we all know is mudering women and children (take Operation Cast Lead) and destroying homes to make way for illegal settlements and an illegal wall.
Honestly. You couldn't make this stuff up!
Mr Hague said Britain was documenting the evidence of crimes against humanity in the country with a view to possible prosecutions in the International Criminal Court.
'Those responsible for the murder of entire families, the shelling of homes, the execution of detainees, the cleansing of political opponents and the torture and rape of women and children must be held to account,' he said.
[source : 'Whose side are they on?' Hillary Clinton blasts Russia and China as 'despicable' for opposing UN action on Syria, The Daily Mail, 25/02/2012]
But what about our glorious allies al Qaeda in Libya, Mr Hague?
They are torturing, exectuing, and raping.
And NATO (Neo Al Qaeda Terrorist Organisation) bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libya and Libyan civilians.
This takes double standards to a completely new level of incredibility.
And as for Clintonella de Vil. She said
'It's quite distressing to see two permanent members of the Security Council using their veto while people are being murdered - women, children, brave young men - houses are being destroyed.
[source : 'Whose side are they on?' Hillary Clinton blasts Russia and China as 'despicable' for opposing UN action on Syria, The Daily Mail, 25/02/2012]
How many Pakistani and Afghan women and children have been murderded and how many houses have been destroyed by unmanned drones while she has been Secretary of State?
And the USA has used its veto to defend Israel which as we all know is mudering women and children (take Operation Cast Lead) and destroying homes to make way for illegal settlements and an illegal wall.
Honestly. You couldn't make this stuff up!
Friday, February 24, 2012
SYRIAN REBELS GET THEIR ARMS FROM THE WEST
Are we supplying weapons to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs as well as advising them and providing logistical support?!
[source : Syrian rebels get arms from abroad: source, Reuters, 24/02/2012]
Foreign powers are turning a blind eye to weapons purchases by Syrian exiles who are already smuggling light arms, communications equipment and night vision goggles to rebels inside Syria, a Syrian opposition source said on Friday.
"We are bringing in defensive and offensive weapons... It is coming from everywhere, including Western countries and it is not difficult to get anything through the borders," the source told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.
[source : Syrian rebels get arms from abroad: source, Reuters, 24/02/2012]
MY LETTER TO MY MP ABOUT THE USE OF BRITISH SPECIAL FORCES IN THE DRIVE TO WW3
I have just sent the following letter to my MP about the use of British Special Forces in the drive to WW3.
I request that if you want to know what is going on that you use this letter verbatim or amend it to your hearts desire and ask your MP too.
This insanity must stop immediately.
==============================================
I write to you as my MP to express my grave concerns that British Special Forces (BSF) are once again being used to foment a civil war. Last year allegations that BSF were involved with the Libyan rebels were laughed off as conspiracy theory. But only a few weeks ago the BBC showed that BSF were in there right from the start, guiding and advising the Libyan rebel army. UN SCR 1973 gave NATO the power to implement a No Fly Zone and protect civilians, but within days of UN SCR 1973 being adopted the assassination of Gaddafi was openly proposed in British media. Libyan civilians were instead bombed to death by NATO, and Gaddafi was eventually assassinated. But by whom? With it now publicly admitted that BSF were working with the hierarchy of the Libyan rebel army, is it possible that BSF assassinated Gaddafi? And why were we openly assisting the Libyan rebel army when they had clear links to al Qaeda?
I'll tell you why. Because what we are now seeing in North Africa and the Middle East is a Pentagon plan to go to war on seven nations in five years. We know about this plan because former NATO chief General Wesley Clark has told us. In his book entitled Winning Modern Wars, and in speeches at The Commonwealth Club of California and at the University of Alabama Clark related his experiences at The Pentagon shortly after 11th September 2001. Clark met a Pentagon planner who told him that first just Iraq was being targeted, and the rank and file at The Pentagon could not understand why (this when there was no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11). A week or so later six more nations were targets; Sudan, Somalia, Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Libya. So why were Iraq and Iran on the list? Both Iraq and Iran were named as targets in PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses published in 2000. Syria and Lebanon were also named in A Clean Break. It is more than curious that on 9/11 founding members of PNAC were in very, very, very influential positions, such as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (who had quietly been given the sole power to stand down the US military). PNAC had written in Rebuilding America's Defenses that they wanted "a new Pearl Harbor" to go on a global warmongering rampage to impose US hegemony. They got their “new Pearl Harbor”, perhaps with their inaction, on 9/11.
It is painfully obvious that the list of countries that General Clark named have seen some form of intrigue. Let’s look at Iraq and Lebanon.
We invaded Iraq because we were told Iraq had WMD and was involved in 9/11. Neither allegation was true.
In Lebanon Rafik Hariri was assassinated in 2005. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon accused Syria. Syria subsequently withdrew from Lebanon. But the STL now accuses Hezbollah. Hezbollah accuses Israel, after Hezbollah intercepted images from Israeli drones flying over Beirut closely following Hariri's movements shortly before his assassination. Israel bombed Lebanon back to the stone age in a war in 2006.
And last year the United Nations adopted UN SCR 1973 to stop Gaddafi killing his own citizens. We now know that NATO bombed many civilians to death and has installed a puppet government which is more ruthless than Gaddafi and has a distinct brand of Islamic extremism, torturing and killing whoever it wants, usually black Libyan civilians, without any criticism from us, but occasionally former Libyan government officials too.
The warmongering on Syria and Iran has been accelerating in the last year, and now Somalia is being linked with military intervention from the West following the London Conference on Somalia on 23rd February 2012.
The civil war that UN SCR 1973 was designed to stop was fomented with the assistance of BSF. That is now beyond question.
Reports in The Daily Star in January 2012 quote unnamed British security officials stating that BSF are now in Syria assisting the Syrian rebel army, and that in Syria "it is going to be like Libya, only bloodier".
Is this because of BSF?
Should BSF be used to help the Pentagon implement the PNAC plan of eventual war on Iran, a war that could very easily escalate into World War 3?
There have been recent reports of babies and children dying in Homs, and elsewhere in Syria. Is this the result of BSF stirring up trouble in Syria as part of this plan?
At a time of harsh austerity, caused by the reckless gambling of the banks, which the ordinary British taxpayer is suffering from through no fault of their own, should British taxpayer money be used to start civil wars in countries so that we can claim responsibility to protect (R2P) but then overthrow governments, and in the case of Libya hand them over to al Qaeda?
And should we ally with al Qaeda? Al Qaeda was at the vanguard of the Libyan rebels. Belhaj, the Libyan rebel commander and founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, was renditioned to Libya and is suing the British government. More recently Zawahiri requested that all Muslims should assist the overthrow of the Syrian government. This amid US intelligence reports that al Qaeda in Iraq is getting in on the action in Syria, committing terrorist atrocities against Syrian military and civilians alike, notably the car bomb attack in Aleppo.
The report published by the most recent observation team from the Arab League in Syria contained some startling revelations. They observed armed gangs who were supported from abroad committing terrorist attacks against a bus carrying civilians. Needless to say, this report was buried by the media because it raised the possibility of BSF in Syria helping al Qaeda to commit terrorist acts.
The current Arab uprisings, as well as that currently being attempted in Russia, were planned and implemented through various NGOs in the West, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, which receives its money from the US State Department. As a consequence of the Arab Uprising we have put Islamic extremists into power; Salafists, The Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. Not bad going, eh?
We have a track record of allying with al Qaeda; Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya. There are now credible reports that we are now allying with al Qaeda in Syria. But at the same time as allying with al Qaeda in Libya and Syria, the government of Somalia is asking us to bomb al Shabab, a.k.a. al Qaeda in Somalia!
What is going on?
William Hague and Phil Hammond must be made to make a statement in The House of Commons about the past and present use of BSF in the seven nations named by General Wesley Clark since 11th September 2001, and they must do so as soon as possible. A war over Syria will be completely different to the one over Libya, and could easily result in a world war with Russia. BSF must not be used to foment civil wars for The Pentagon and their masters, the international financial oligarchy of Wall Street and The City of London, who have just screwed us all into fascist austerity with their derivatives gambling. The removal of the current Syrian government would remove Iran’s only major ally in the region. A war with Iran will be even more horrific, and the overthrow of Assad in Syria will without question lead to war with Iran. It was demanded in Rebuilding America’s Defenses and in A Clean Break.
I request that if you want to know what is going on that you use this letter verbatim or amend it to your hearts desire and ask your MP too.
This insanity must stop immediately.
==============================================
I write to you as my MP to express my grave concerns that British Special Forces (BSF) are once again being used to foment a civil war. Last year allegations that BSF were involved with the Libyan rebels were laughed off as conspiracy theory. But only a few weeks ago the BBC showed that BSF were in there right from the start, guiding and advising the Libyan rebel army. UN SCR 1973 gave NATO the power to implement a No Fly Zone and protect civilians, but within days of UN SCR 1973 being adopted the assassination of Gaddafi was openly proposed in British media. Libyan civilians were instead bombed to death by NATO, and Gaddafi was eventually assassinated. But by whom? With it now publicly admitted that BSF were working with the hierarchy of the Libyan rebel army, is it possible that BSF assassinated Gaddafi? And why were we openly assisting the Libyan rebel army when they had clear links to al Qaeda?
I'll tell you why. Because what we are now seeing in North Africa and the Middle East is a Pentagon plan to go to war on seven nations in five years. We know about this plan because former NATO chief General Wesley Clark has told us. In his book entitled Winning Modern Wars, and in speeches at The Commonwealth Club of California and at the University of Alabama Clark related his experiences at The Pentagon shortly after 11th September 2001. Clark met a Pentagon planner who told him that first just Iraq was being targeted, and the rank and file at The Pentagon could not understand why (this when there was no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11). A week or so later six more nations were targets; Sudan, Somalia, Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Libya. So why were Iraq and Iran on the list? Both Iraq and Iran were named as targets in PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses published in 2000. Syria and Lebanon were also named in A Clean Break. It is more than curious that on 9/11 founding members of PNAC were in very, very, very influential positions, such as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (who had quietly been given the sole power to stand down the US military). PNAC had written in Rebuilding America's Defenses that they wanted "a new Pearl Harbor" to go on a global warmongering rampage to impose US hegemony. They got their “new Pearl Harbor”, perhaps with their inaction, on 9/11.
It is painfully obvious that the list of countries that General Clark named have seen some form of intrigue. Let’s look at Iraq and Lebanon.
We invaded Iraq because we were told Iraq had WMD and was involved in 9/11. Neither allegation was true.
In Lebanon Rafik Hariri was assassinated in 2005. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon accused Syria. Syria subsequently withdrew from Lebanon. But the STL now accuses Hezbollah. Hezbollah accuses Israel, after Hezbollah intercepted images from Israeli drones flying over Beirut closely following Hariri's movements shortly before his assassination. Israel bombed Lebanon back to the stone age in a war in 2006.
And last year the United Nations adopted UN SCR 1973 to stop Gaddafi killing his own citizens. We now know that NATO bombed many civilians to death and has installed a puppet government which is more ruthless than Gaddafi and has a distinct brand of Islamic extremism, torturing and killing whoever it wants, usually black Libyan civilians, without any criticism from us, but occasionally former Libyan government officials too.
The warmongering on Syria and Iran has been accelerating in the last year, and now Somalia is being linked with military intervention from the West following the London Conference on Somalia on 23rd February 2012.
The civil war that UN SCR 1973 was designed to stop was fomented with the assistance of BSF. That is now beyond question.
Reports in The Daily Star in January 2012 quote unnamed British security officials stating that BSF are now in Syria assisting the Syrian rebel army, and that in Syria "it is going to be like Libya, only bloodier".
Is this because of BSF?
Should BSF be used to help the Pentagon implement the PNAC plan of eventual war on Iran, a war that could very easily escalate into World War 3?
There have been recent reports of babies and children dying in Homs, and elsewhere in Syria. Is this the result of BSF stirring up trouble in Syria as part of this plan?
At a time of harsh austerity, caused by the reckless gambling of the banks, which the ordinary British taxpayer is suffering from through no fault of their own, should British taxpayer money be used to start civil wars in countries so that we can claim responsibility to protect (R2P) but then overthrow governments, and in the case of Libya hand them over to al Qaeda?
And should we ally with al Qaeda? Al Qaeda was at the vanguard of the Libyan rebels. Belhaj, the Libyan rebel commander and founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, was renditioned to Libya and is suing the British government. More recently Zawahiri requested that all Muslims should assist the overthrow of the Syrian government. This amid US intelligence reports that al Qaeda in Iraq is getting in on the action in Syria, committing terrorist atrocities against Syrian military and civilians alike, notably the car bomb attack in Aleppo.
The report published by the most recent observation team from the Arab League in Syria contained some startling revelations. They observed armed gangs who were supported from abroad committing terrorist attacks against a bus carrying civilians. Needless to say, this report was buried by the media because it raised the possibility of BSF in Syria helping al Qaeda to commit terrorist acts.
The current Arab uprisings, as well as that currently being attempted in Russia, were planned and implemented through various NGOs in the West, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, which receives its money from the US State Department. As a consequence of the Arab Uprising we have put Islamic extremists into power; Salafists, The Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. Not bad going, eh?
We have a track record of allying with al Qaeda; Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya. There are now credible reports that we are now allying with al Qaeda in Syria. But at the same time as allying with al Qaeda in Libya and Syria, the government of Somalia is asking us to bomb al Shabab, a.k.a. al Qaeda in Somalia!
What is going on?
William Hague and Phil Hammond must be made to make a statement in The House of Commons about the past and present use of BSF in the seven nations named by General Wesley Clark since 11th September 2001, and they must do so as soon as possible. A war over Syria will be completely different to the one over Libya, and could easily result in a world war with Russia. BSF must not be used to foment civil wars for The Pentagon and their masters, the international financial oligarchy of Wall Street and The City of London, who have just screwed us all into fascist austerity with their derivatives gambling. The removal of the current Syrian government would remove Iran’s only major ally in the region. A war with Iran will be even more horrific, and the overthrow of Assad in Syria will without question lead to war with Iran. It was demanded in Rebuilding America’s Defenses and in A Clean Break.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)