BILDERBERG POST CALLS FOR WAR ON SYRIA

The Bilderberg Post has said that Kofi Annan has been double crossed and has been made to look foolish by Bashar al Assad, and the only solution is for Obama to intervene militarily and start war.

Mr. Annan is merely the latest of a series of envoys made to look foolish by the Syrian dictator, including not a few Americans.

The question now facing the administration and the Security Council is also familiar: how to respond to Mr. Assad’s double-cross.

...That is why the shortest way to the end of the Syrian crisis is the one Mr. Obama is resisting: military support for the opposition and, if necessary, intervention by NATO.

...The best immediate step would be the creation of a protected zone on Syrian territory where civilian refugees could gather, and the Free Syrian Army could be organized and trained.

[source : The U.N.’s failed plan for Syrian peace, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-uns-failed-plan-for-syrian-peace/2012/04/09/gIQAJa3e6S_story.html, 09/04/2012]
Double cross?

Yes. Annan has been double crossed. By the Friends of Syrian Terrorists, not Assad.

The Syrian government agreed to the peace plan in the final week of March, and has been in constant written contact with Annan since then, explaining to him what Syria is doing to implement the plan.

But on the first weekend in April the Friends of Syrian Terrorists decided to support the Syrian al Qaeda rebs with $100 million, with the British government even giving them £500,000 of nonlethal equipment (and when I see nonlethal I read lethal-but-not-directly).

Annan has not given up on the peace plan. The only quotes we get from him are that he is "disappointed". Russia and China have not deserted Syria, because they know the situation in Syria is not being fully reported, as revealed by the Al Jazeera employess who have resigned in disgust at the biased and unprofessional journalism there.

A press conference held by the Foreign Ministers of Russia and Syria was held yesterday. Sky News showed some of it. The Sky News Foreign Affairs editor commented on the statements, and was in some ways reporting the true situation, commenting that when the Syrian government withdrew their troops from cities for the Arab League monitors earlier this year the Syrian al Qaeda rebs took those areas again, so the Syrian government does not want something similar to happen again. But very little if anything has been reported of this press conference in the NATO media.

Walid al-Moallem the Syrian Foreign Minister suggested that Turkey also agree to the Annan peace plan. Al-Moallem had some strong words to say about Turkey.

He [al-Moallem] pointed out that Turkey doesn't just host those who were forced to flee their homes by terrorists, but it also hosts armed groups and establishes camps for them and allows these groups to smuggle weapons into Syria and to infiltrate the Syrian borders in violation of Annan's mission which calls for halting the use of violence by all sides.

"Annan told me in our last phone call that the halting of violence will be followed directly by disarming the armed groups… If this is the case, how could this happen while the operations of smuggling weapons and gunmen from Turkey are underway?"

[source : Al-Moallem: Terrorism Escalated Despite Withdrawal of Army Units from Some Provinces, SANA, http://www.sana.sy/eng/22/2012/04/11/411656.htm, 11/04/2012]

At the same conference the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that he had asked Annan to work towards getting the Syrian al Qaeda rebs and their supporters, i.e. NATO, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, etc. , to give a guarantee of a ceasefire, and that Annan had praised Russia's efforts in finding a peaceful resolution.

Later, Lavrov stressed to Annan the need for the Syrian opposition and the sides supporting them to make urgent arrangement to guarantee a firm cessation of violence, calling on Annan to work actively with them in this regard.

In a statement, the Russian Foreign Ministry said that Lavrov briefed Annan during a phone call on the results of the talks he held with Minister al-Moallem on means for solving the crisis in Syria, underlining the Syrian leadership's readiness to continue implementing the plan approved by the Security Council and cooperate actively with Annan's mission.

Lavrov also reiterated his country's support for Annan's efforts and the need for unconditional implementation of his plan's articles by all sides , adding that the deployment of UN observers effectively will be an important step in guaranteeing the accurate implementation of Annan's plan.

The statement noted that Annan also valued highly the Russian side's efforts to ensure the success of his mission.

I think no such guarantee, written or spoken, will come from the Syrian al Qaeda rebs. The plan, as revealed by General Wesley Clark, is for seven nations in five years. They are well behind in their plans. But nothing will stop these devils. Not even nuclear war. Nobody must be allowed to stand up to them and survive. Why? Because they have committed so much crime, the financial fraud causing the current crisis and the mass murder of 9/11 for starters, that if they fail then the ordinary people who have been mugged off for centuries will see them for what they truly are.

IS NATO MEMBER TURKEY A WILLING ACCOMPLICE IN AGGRESSION AGAINST SYRIA?

Yesterday there was a reported incident at a refugee camp near Kilis on the Syria-Turkey border. Most NATO media I read simply reported that Syrian soldiers had shot at protestors in the camp, thus implying that the Syrian soldiers were possessed by evil demons on a bloodlust so Syria must be invaded.

But The Independent revealed some more details of the incident. Members of the Syrian opposition attacked a checkpoint on the Syrian side of the border, killed 6 Syrian personnel and then fled to Turkey, finding refuge in the camp. According to the report the killers were wounded.

Russia Today backs up the suggestion that Turkey, wittingly or unwittingly, is being used as a base from which the terrorists can operate, by sneaking into Syria, committing terrorist acts and then sneaking back into Turkey.


[source : Syrian rebels ‘using Turkish refugee camps as base’, Russia Today, http://rt.com/news/rebels-refugee-camp-attack-665/, 10/04/2012]

The danger regarding this is that Turkey is a member of NATO, and if Syria can be trapped or enticed into an attack on Turkey then military action on Syria by NATO could be launched under Article Five of The Washington Treaty.

EXPLAINING WHY SYRIA WOULD SHOOT INTO REFUGEE CAMP IN TURKEY

The NATO media is baying for bloody revenge because Syria is reported to have attacked a camp in Turkey for Syrian refugees. Details are scarce in most reports.

But The Independent has provided much more clarification, and it actually implicates Turkey into possibly trying to provoke an international incident. According to this report Syrian al Qaeda rebs attacked a checkpoint inside Syria, killing six Syrian Army personnel, before escaping to seek protection inside Turkey at the refugee camp.

The incident began at about before dawn on Monday when rebel fighters attacked Syrian soldiers manning a checkpoint near the Turkish border, said Rami Abdul-Rahman, a spokesman for the [Syrian Observatory for Human Rights].

Six soldiers were killed in the ambush, Abdul-Rahman said. The troops then kept firing as eight wounded rebels escaped to the camp that is just over the border in Turkey, sending bullets whizzing across the frontier into the camp, he said.

According to the Observatory, the shooting wounded five people in the camp, which is near the town of Kilis in the southern province of Gaziantep. The Observatory reported that two people later died of their injuries, but that could not be immediately confirmed.

[source : The Independent, Gunfire from Syria hits refugee camp in Turkey, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/gunfire-from-syria-hits-refugee-camp-in-turkey-7627800.html, 09/04/2012]

With these details the news reports with headlines that Syria attacked a refugee camp inside Turkey and killed protestors are blown out of all proportion, and back up what the Arab League monitors concluded earlier this year in their report, that was buried in the NATO media, that news items regarding the Syrian military in the NATO media are exaggerated or simply made up. Perhaps it was a little clumsy of the Syrian military to shoot towards the refugee camp, but what are they supposed to do when Syrian al Qaeda rebs kill six of their colleagues and then find sanctuary in Turkey?

A war on Syria via Turkey is perhaps more likely too. Russia and China appear to be resolute in their support of Syria against the NATO and Arab League sponsored Syrian al Qaeda rebs. Perhaps if Syria could be enticed and/or trapped into attacking and/or killing Turkish troops on Turkish soil, and today's incident could have been such a trap, then NATO could invoke Article Five of The Washington Treaty and declare war on Syria without UN authorisation.

So let's get things straight before we all end up as radioactive dust, eh?

BAN KI MOON'S BOLLOCKS

OK. Hands up. Who has got their hands on Ban Ki Moon's bollocks?

If you want a much clearer and unbiased assessment of the situation in Syria then you must watch the press conference held by the Syrian Rep to the UN shortly after the disgraceful abuse of the United Nations by the MI6 outpost Qatar.

During that press conference more details were given about the precise circumstances surrounding the UN GA meeting on 5th April, which was organised by the President of the UN General Assembly, Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser. Which MI6 outpost does he represent? QATAR (of course)! Before the meeting Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser provided an invitation to the media to attend an open meeting about the situation in Syria. Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser did not inform the Syrian rep of the meeting beforehand. However, the Syrian rep found out about the meeting and attended. The Saudi Arabian rep spoke. Ban Ki Moon spoke. But just as the Syrian rep was about to speak and requested a minutes silence for ALL the victims of the fake NATO-Arab League sponsored uprising, the live feed showing the meeting was cut. Even the attendee from Russia was denied the right to speak! The meeting was later declared as closed, even though formal invitations had been given to the media beforehand.

But all this was done with Ban Ki Moon's agreement!

Besides these details, the request from Syria for a written agreement from the Syrian al Qaeda rebs to stop the violence has been made for a while now, and not just from yesterday as our beloved media would have you believe. Why do Syria request this? First, Syria has communicated everything in writing to Kofi Annan. Second, when the Arab League monitors were in Syria earlier this year the Syrian Army withdrew from certain areas, but the Syrian al Qaeda rebs regrouped and retook the territory that the Syrian Army had vacated, so Syria wants written confirmation that this will not happen again. With a $100 million war chest the Syrian al Qaeda rebs see no reason to stop, particularly as they are now effectively paid mercenaries of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, taking home salaries.

There are plenty of other small details revealed in the press conference, but the main ones are
1. the President of the UN GA, who is from QATAR, the home of the ridiculously biased Al Jazeera and sponsor of the Syrian al Qaedas rebs, abused his position while Ban Ki Moon was standing right next to him in the same room and has so far not been reprimanded, not publicly anyway.
2. the Syrian government has been open with Kofi Annan, providing communications in writing to minimize any possible confusion and has provided Annan with daily reports on the actions taken by the Syrian government to comply with the "six" point peace plan, and Annan has even praised the Syrian government on this.
3. Syria has been requesting FOR A WHILE NOW written confirmation from the Syrian al Qaeda rebs that they will stop the fighting, and has not suddenly made this request to scupper the peace deal, as suggested by our beloved NATO media.

Now try finding all that in our media.

The press conference can be seen at
http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/swfs/player.swf?file=pressconference/2012/pc120405pm3.flv&image=http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/04/full/Snap63.jpg&autostart=false&controlbar=over&start=0&duration=3693&dock=true&stretching=uniform&streamer=rtmp://webcast-flash.un.org/ondemand/

SYRIA EXPLAINS RECENT CLAMPDOWN BEFORE CEASEFIRE AND CALLS FOR CESSATION OF FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL SUPPORT FOR AL QAEDA

Syria is again under media attack for defending itself from the al Qaeda terrorists sponsored by NATO and The Arab League. The Syrian government has agreed to a ceasefire and withdrawal of troops and heavy weapons by 10th April. But reports in NATO media would suggest that evil dastardly Bashar al-Assad is on one last final bloodlust blowing up innocent men, women and children before the ceasefire comes into effect.

For example, the US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford has posted images of Idlib on the US Embassy Facebook website, complete with little red tanks on it suggesting the presence of tanks on the streets. This comes at the same time that a large rise in Syrian refugees are reported to be arriving in Turkey, prompting Turkey to tell the UN that it cannot take this situation for much longer. In response to all this the UN Sec Gen Ban Ki Moon has condemned the Syrian government for not honouring the peace plan that Syria agreed to.

But hang on a sec. Didn't the Syrian al Qaeda rebs just get $100 million from Arab League members, such as Qatar and Suadi Arabia, both with obvious links to the Anglo-American Empire? And without any condemnation from this very same UN Sec Gen, even though al Qaeda themselves have admitted to committing the atrocities in Syria after al Zawahiri called on the "lions of Syria" to chop the heads off the Syrian infidels?

To show the bias that the UN is showing against Syria here is a brief report of what occured at the UN yesterday. Before speaking at a UN GA meeting, Dr. Bashar Al Jaafari, the Syrian Representative to the UN, requested a minutes silence in respect for ALL the victims of the Syrian rebellion. Qatar objected and demanded that the media present should leave the room, which they promptly did. The meeting was called to listen to a video report from Kofi Annan on the progress that has been made regardng his "six" point peace plan. The meeting was being aired on UN TV. Ban Ki Moon spoke. So too did the Qatari representative. But just as Jaafari was about to speak the live feed was cut.

Asked to explain this media bias later Ban Ki Moon's representative said that it was a closed meeting. So why were the speeches of the Qatari rep and Ban Ki Moon shown and not that of the Syrian rep? No answer to this perfectly legitimate question was given.

And asked if Ban Ki Moon observed the minute's silence, his representative replied that Ban Ki Moon has spoken about the dead of Syria already.

I take that as a "no".

This report comes from the TRUE Friends of Syria, at http://friendsofsyria.wordpress.com/, and not the Friends of Syrian Terrorists headed by William Hague and Clintonella deVil.

So why is there an apparent escalation of violence in Syria as the ceasefire approaches?

Well, there are two sides to this violence.

From the NATO media you could be very easily fooled into believing that there is only one perpetrator of the violence, the Syrian government, and only one victim, the Syrian people.

But this is not true, and has never been true.

The Syrian government has written to both the UN Sec Gen Ban Ki Moon and the President of the UN Security Council to explain this latest clampdown.

Fresh with the commitment of $100 million from the likes of MI6 outposts Qatar and Saudi Arabia, and with assistance from NATO and Arab League Special Forces, the Syrian al Qaeda rebs are escalating the violence, basically causing trouble because they know that if Assad can be seen to be violating the Annan "six" point peace plan then NATO and The Arab League will openly side with them as they did with the Libyan al Qaeda rebs.

I shall now post verbatim a report from the Syrian Arab News Agency on these letters sent by Syria to the United Nations, not only explaining the clampdown but also calling for ALL nations to stop the finance and support of all kinds to the self-admitted Syrian al Qaeda terrorists.

From http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2012/04/07/410987.htm

Syria: International Community and UNSC Should Take Necessary Measures to Prevent Funding Terrorist Acts against Syria

Apr 07, 2012

DAMASCUS, (SANA) – Syria on Friday addressed two identical letters to the President of the UN Security Council and the UN Secretary General on the terrorist acts perpetrated by armed groups which are backed by Arab and Western countries.

"The terrorist acts committed by the armed terrorist groups in Syria have increased during the last few days, particularly after reaching an understanding on Kofi Annan's plan," the letters stated.

The letters added "In addition to the bombings whose preliminary evidence revealed the involvement of al-Qaeda members and the crimes committed by the other armed terrorist groups, instigation was escalated by some sides who claim care for Syria and making the UN Special Envoy's mission a success, while at the same time acting contrary to Annan's plan and the return of security and stability to Syria.

"The outcome of some meetings recently held indicated that the main goal of their participants was to shed more Syrian blood to the extent that some of them announced establishing funds to finance and arm these groups which we have already provided you with proofs in previous letters of their acts of killing, violence and terrorism, the letters said.

The letters added that those who follow up the developments of the crisis in Syria note that the sides which stroked the crisis through unprecedented media instigation and providing arms and support to the terrorist groups did not admit the presence of gunmen until after the Arab monitors' mission proved their presence and their killing and sabotage acts.

"Therefore, the sides which denied this idea withdrew the Arab monitors, ended the work of the mission and rejected its report as it doesn’t serve Syria's enemies inside and outside the Arab League," they added.

The two letters said that Syria provided the Arab monitors' mission and the UN with documents that prove the crimes perpetrated by the armed terrorist groups against civilians and law-enforcement forces in Syria and their countless attacks on private and public properties and infrastructures which have left negative impact on the life of the Syrian citizens.

The letters documented the number of civilian martyrs who fell in the terrorist attacks, in addition to the number of Army and law-enforcement martyrs which reached 2088 and more than 478 martyrs from the police.

The two letters documented the number of women and children martyred, in addition to those who were abducted or threatened with death for ransom from civilians and army and police members, in addition to the number of stolen vehicles.

The letters expressed surprise over the feigned concern of media and officials in certain countries for the Syrian people while they said no word regarding these crimes, not to mention decisions issued by international and regional institutions with the aim of distorting Syria's image, threatening its stability, independence and sovereignty and undermining its regional and international role.

The letters indicated that representatives of some UN member states rushed to mobilize international institutions against Syria to undermine Annan's efforts to which Syria stressed support and cooperation to make his mission a success.

The letters added that Syria called upon all states to work together with it to prevent terrorist acts, including the implementation of the international conventions related to terrorism.

"Syria calls upon the international community and the US Security Council in particular to take necessary measures to prevent funding or preparing any terrorist acts against it using the territories of other countries," it added.

In its two letters, Syria warned the countries which announced that supporting and arming the terrorists against Syria is a duty of the consequences of their statement as the world won't forget their role in funding terrorist groups in other countries which had catastrophic consequences on regional and international levels.

Syria called upon the countries concerned not to provide haven for those who plan, support or commit terrorist attacks as the international community is no longer able to tolerate these terrorists and their supporters.

The letters indicated to the close connection between the international terrorism and the organized crime, illicit drugs trafficking, money laundering and illegal arms trade and what is taking place in Syria, calling upon concerned parties to stop and condemn them in order to coordinate efforts on national, regional and international levels in the face of serious challenges and threats to the international security.

"Syria, as a founding member of the UN, look forwards to the cooperation of the countries of the world to end terrorism and protect independent and sovereign states from its catastrophes, the two letters added.

R. Raslan/ M. Ismael

I repeat my call to the Friend of Syrian Terrorists William Hague to explain the presence and purpose of British Special Forces in and around Syria since 1st January 2011.

What was it that source of The Daily Star said, while admitting the presence of BSF in and around Syria?

"This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier."

ARE U.S. CARRIERS GOING TO THE EASTERN MED?

It looks like the war on Iran has been postponed, for now.

The latest Stratfor Naval Update map suggests that reports speculating a potential Israeli attack on Iran has been delayed until next year are accurate. With the U.S. having positioned numerous aircraft carriers and other warships in the Persian Gulf, it now appears at least some of them are departing.

[source : U.S. Aircraft Carriers Departing Persian Gulf?, InfoWars, http://www.infowars.com/u-s-aircraft-carriers-departing-persian-gulf/, 06/04/2012]

Reports suggest it is because Nutternyahu now wants to wait until next year to play the big war leader during the 2013 election process, and that his recent "attack Iran" rhetoric was designed to manipulate the USA into providing Israel with more money and weapons, which if the case worked (though if any other country tried that...).

I would suggest this possible postponement of war on Iran is due to Syria not yet submitting to the Friends of Syrian Terrorists and holding up the seven-nations-in-five-years plan revealed to and by General Wesley Clark (which itself was an extension of the plans proposed in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses).

Despite EIR/LPAC sources saying that Israel had been given the green light by Obama and Cameron to attack Iran after meetings in Washington DC a few weeks ago, that war has not materialised. Maybe the three stooges thought that by now Syria would have fallen, leaving a wide-open unobstructed path to Persia.

Instead, Syria stands proud and sovereign.

But now EIR/LPAC sources are saying that after the recent meeting of The Friends of Syrian Terrorists in Istanbul, Turkey has been conned into starting a war on Syria by creating a humanitarian corridor on the Syrian side of the border between the two neighbours. This would require an invasion of Syria by NATO-member Turkey.

The British are trying to make their "Friends of Syria" gathering April 1 in Istanbul, another "coalition of the willing," into an illegal substitute for the UNSC, to fake the "legality" for war which only the Security Council could provide. The source report in yesterday's briefing, that a Turkish "humanitarian invasion" of Syria is being prepared under the screen of Tony Blair's doctrine of the "responsiblity to protect," R2P, was echoed by an article in the April 4 Wall Street Journal. It reports that the Turkish military is preparing plans for "refugee safe havens" on both sides of the border — whose feigned establishment would in reality only be a pretext for launching immediate war.

[source : London Prepares Option of Turkish "Humanitarian Invasion" of Syria, LPAC, http://larouchepac.com/node/22277, 06/04/2012]

So, as Gaddafi held them up for nearly a year, Assad has held them up for well over a year.

If Turkey is insane enough to fall into this trap, and Syria resists, then Syria will be accused of violating the humanitarian assistance point in the Kofi Annan "six" point peace plan. Then NATO can invoke Article 5 of its treaty, that when one member is attacked then the other members are obliged to join in to defend.

Whatever. It does not matter. Annan's plan was doomed to fail. Syria, nor anyone else, will be allowed to stand up to these devils and survive. They have planned world domination, resulting in a global fascist dictatorship and drastic human population reduction and eugenics.

More tea, Vicar? Custard cream?

THESE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE TIGER FEET

It has been confirmed to me by confidential sources that the following people do not have tiger feet.

The Friends of Syria.
The Syrian al Qaeda rebs, and the NATO and Arab League Special Forces who are assisting them.
The Libyan al Qaeda rebs, and the NATO and Arab League Special Forces who assisted them.
William Hague.
Clintonella deVil.
David Rockefeller.
Henry Kissinger.
Dodgy Dave Cameron.
Lord Jacob Rothschild.
The whole Federal Reserve hierarchy.
The Zionist hierarchy.
The NATO hierarchy.
The Bilderberg hierarchy.
The King and most of the ruling family of Saudi Arabia.
The King of Bahrain.
The engineers and executioners of the mother of all inside jobs, 9/11, that provided the 'new Pearl Harbor' to terrorise the American public into supporting starting world war 3.
Most of the British Monarchy.

These people do not, repeat not, have tiger feet. They are corrupt, and are terrorists and/or are hell bent on starting a nuclear world war 3 with Russia and/or China hoping to destroy most of the world's population in one way or another, because they think that most of us are scum, and believe that we, including their own children, should be virtual slaves and should be physically and/or psychologically and/or sexually abused and then sacrificed to their dark lord Satan to save Planet Earth.

And that, my friends, is the sad, soulless opposite of having tiger feet.

DOES THE EMIR OF QATAR HAVE TIGER FEET?

A former producer at Al Jazeera, who resigned earlier this year in protest at the bias shown by that MI6 media outlet, has stated that Al Jazeera makes stuff up about Syria, withholds a lot of facts about Syria and bigs the Syrian al Qaeda rebs up.

"The facts are totally different with the reports in the media (Al Jazeera), extremely different," Reuters quoted Moussa Ahmed, a former producer for Al-Jazeera's Beirut Bureau, as saying on Wednesday.

Ahmed said the channel concealed many facts, with editors' opinions becoming the so-called facts, adding, “I'm so sorry that we concealed facts for so long a time.”

Ahmed is one of the five Al-Jazeera employees in Lebanon who resigned from the TV station over the channel's biased stand on Syria in the middle of March.

Al-Jazeera is also accused of blowing the opposition movement in Syria out of proportion and covering up the truth in the country.

It is widely believed that the Emir of Qatar has a direct influence on the nature of programs broadcast in Al-Jazeera.

[source : Al-Jazzeera fabricates stories on Syria: former producer, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/234799.html, 06/04/2012]

I wonder, does the Emir of Qatar have tiger feet?

That's neat.
That's neat.
That's neat.
That's neat.
I really love your tiger feet.

THE BEST REASON TO SAVE THE HUMAN RACE

The hair. The dance. The nonsensical lyrics. It's what life should be all about; FUN!

Mud - Tiger Feet

TRAITORS TO THE HUMAN RACE RUN THE GOVERNMENT

The Daily Telegraph is reporting that traitors to the human race run the government.

Not only is Mr Osborne in charge of economic policy – the Coalition’s existential purpose –he also effectively runs the Conservatives’ political strategy, and much else besides, often chairing the twice-daily No 10 meetings that effectively run the Coaltion’s day-to-day operations.

[source : Analysis: Tories fret over George Osborne's driving role, The Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/9179559/Analysis-Tories-fret-over-George-Osbornes-driving-role.html, 01/04/2012]

I saw this fact in an article by Peter Oborne, I think, a few months ago.

It is not David Cameron who runs the government. It is in fact George Osborne.

It has been reported that David Cameron attended a Bilderberg meeting in 2008, but maybe that is to yet to be confirmed. But what is not beyond doubt is that he defended Bilderberg saying that it had no sinister agenda and that if it had then he would want to be there.

What is also beyond doubt is that George Osborne has attended Bilderberg several times. You do not get invited to Bilderberg meetings several times unless the steering commmittee is convinced of your allegiance to them and their sinister agenda and not the nation you were elected to serve (if you are an elected politician like Osborne).

So there you have it.

Osborne (attendee to multiple Bilderberg meetings) runs the government that Cameron (probable Bilderberg attendee but definite supporter of Bilderberg) allegedly runs with a warmongering Foreign Secretary (confirmed Bilderberg attendee) trying to overthrow multiple governments in the Middle East and risking a nuclear World War 3 in the process.

THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AL QAEDA (R2PAQ)

The whole point of UN SCR 1973 was the "Responsibility to Protect" civilians.

Instead, NATO bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libyan civilians to death to pave a clear and unobstructed path for the Libyan al Qaeda rebs leading directly into the heart of Tripoli resulting in the assassination of Gaddafi by "someone" in Sirte.

So why did NATO not save 72 refugees drifting in boat fleeing the war that NATO deliberately created?

I guess the R2P applies to al Qaeda only, or R2PAQ.

Migrants left to die after catalogue of failures, says report into boat tragedy

Council of Europe investigator says deaths of migrants adrift in Mediterranean exposes double standards in valuing human life

A catalogue of failures by Nato warships and European coastguards led to the deaths of dozens of migrants left adrift at sea, according to a damning official report into the fate of a refugee boat in the Mediterranean whose distress calls went unanswered for days.

A nine-month investigation by the Council of Europe – the continent's 47-nation human rights watchdog, which oversees the European court of human rights – has unearthed human and institutional failings that condemned the boat's occupants to their fate.

[source : Migrants left to die after catalogue of failures, says report into boat tragedy, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/28/left-to-die-migrants-boat-inquiry, 28/03/2012]

JUST WHAT KIND OF DEVILRY IS THIS?

The United Disunited Fascist Kingdom is to give £500,000 to the Syrian opposition, allegedly for non-lethal purposes.

Foreign Secretary William Hague will announce that he has agreed to provide half a million pounds of British support to Syria's political opposition.

This support includes agreement in principle for practical non-lethal support to them inside Syria.

...UK support is intended to help Syrian political oppositionists to:
*develop themselves as a credible alternative to Assad and his regime
*keep themselves safe against regime repression and violence by communicating effectively;
*get improved access to humanitarian assistance;
*develop the necessary capability to realise an orderly transition to a more democratic Syria;

[source : Foreign Secretary to announce support for Syrian political opposition, FCO, http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/news/latest-news/?view=News&id=747957482, 29/03/2012]

We already know that British Special Forces have been in and around Syria for months, if not for a year, trying to make Syria like Libya only bloodier.

Just what kind of devilry is this?

The definition of non-lethal certainly needs to be stated because tasers were classed as non-lethal but are killing an increasing number of people every year.

UN SCR 1973 was supposed to keep Libyan civilians "safe". Instead NATO bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libyan civilians to death paving a path for the Libyan al Qaeda rebs all the way into central Tripoli.

Russia Today asks other questions that need answering.

But questions are being raised over who exactly will receive the money, as the opposition within Syria is fractured. How this money will be used and who is to control the way it is spent also remains somewhat murky.

President Assad has been repeatedly telling other countries to stop sponsoring the opposition. Failing to respect this principle could therefore put the implementation of the six-point plan put forward by Kofi Annan at risk.

[source : UK to help Syrian opposition unite against Assad with £500,000, RT, http://rt.com/news/uk-assisstance-syria-opposition-806/, 30/03/2012]

So just as the Syrian government is asked to stop all fighting and withdraw its troops and weapons from places like the Independent Islamic Beheading Emirate of Homs, there are NATO and Arab League Special Forces on the ground in Syria, the opposition are being given lots of money allegedly for "non-lethal" purposes, and there are even discussions in the US Senate about openly arming and intervening on behalf of the Syrian opposition.

Senator John McCain introduced a new resolution on Syria Wednesday that calls for arming the Syrian rebels to fight the regime of Bashar al-Assad and establishing safe zones inside Syria.

The non-binding resolution stops short of calling for U.S. military intervention in Syria, which McCain and his co-sponsors support. The resolution is meant to build congressional support for some kind of direct intervention on behalf of the Syrian opposition.

[source : McCain Resolution Calls for Arming Syrian Opposition, Safe Zones, AntiWar, http://news.antiwar.com/2012/03/28/mccain-resolution-calls-for-arming-syrian-opposition-safe-zones/, 28/03/2012]

The whole point of this "six" point peace plan is that the six points apply to the Syrian government alone and none apply to the Syrian al Qaeda rebs. This will then give the Enemies of Syria lots of opportunities to claim that Assad violated the peace and then intervene more openly, perhaps even invading Syria.

I wish we knew the name of that plan revealed by General Wesley Clark. That plan named Iraq, Sudan, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Iran. The first four have been sorted out. Syria is currently being sorted out. Somalia has recently come into the crosshairs. After the current Syrian government has been replaced then the real fireworks will begin over Iran.

So, just what kind of devilry is this?

HAS WORLD WAR THREE BEEN POSTPONED?

Haaretz is reporting that Ehud Barak has been forced to postpone any attack on Iran until next year at the earliest because he was told that a war games simulation of the result of an attack on Iran resulted in the deaths of 200 Americans, and such an attack without the support of the USA would mean that Israel would be responsible for those deaths.

So why postpone and not cancel?

Does this have anything to do with Syria kicking al Qaeda butt? Now even the MI6 colony a.k.a. Qatar is apparently against an attack on Iran, for now.

Damning U.S. war simulation forces Ehud Barak to reconsider attack plans; Americans pledge more money for Iron Dome antimissile system.

...According to a war simulation conducted by the U.S. Central Command, the Iranians could kill 200 Americans with a single missile response to an Israeli attack. An investigative committee would not spare any admiral or general, minister or president. The meaning of this U.S. scenario is that the blood of these 200 would be on Israel's head.

...For all intents and purposes, it was an announcement that this war was being postponed until at least the spring of 2013.

[source : Israel's plan to attack Iran put on hold until next year at the earliest, Haaretz, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-s-plan-to-attack-iran-put-on-hold-until-next-year-at-the-earliest-1.421348, 29/3/2012]

GREECE HEALTH SERVICES DECIMATED TO PAY FOR BAILOUTS

Accounts with the Bank of Greece for most of the country's hospitals were looted of about 70% of their total to pay for the bailouts that Greece does not and should not need to pay.

What this will do to the health of the nation is obvious; genocide.

And it will not stop at Greece.

The illegally denied default of Greece entered a dramatic new phase this afternoon with the revelation by mainstream Greek public health website Health News that, shortly before midnight on March 8th – the eve of Greece’s psi completion on Friday March 9th – on average 70% of public utility funds in various large, interest-bearing accounts at the Bank of Greece were raided. These included most of the State’s regional hospital budgets, various universities and (it is alleged) at least one utility company.

The shortfalls came to light late last week and this morning as various hospital purchasing cheques in particular began to bounce. The monies – estimated by one source to total some 1.4 billion euros – appear to have been used to pay off the tiny minority of private sovereign creditors who, under the original terms of their bond purchase, were entitled come what may to full payment of the bond’s yield entitlement.

Setting aside the amoral audacity of this act, it does yet again raise the issue of a Greece so utterly lacking in any real funds in the real world, that to pay off a minute proportion of the bondholders it had to resort to such a desperate measure.

[source : Greek Government Robbed Public Institutions to Complete the Bond Swap, Global Research, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29996, 27/03/2012]

KOFI ANNAN SIX POINT PLAN IS A TRAP

The "six" point plan that Syria has apparently agreed to is a trap. It asks way too much of Syria, no time scales are given, and does not explicitly recognise that the opposition are terrorist thugs armed from outside Syria. The Syrian opposition is splintered so at the moment it will be very very difficult for Annan to seek from the opposition what he asked of Bashar al-Assad. In the first two points Annan has basically asked al-Assad to stop fighting against the opposition, and withdraw troops and heavy weapons from places like Homs.

These first two points are followed by the statement that Annan would seek similar from the opposition.

Similar commitments would be sought by the Envoy from the opposition and all relevant elements to stop the fighting and work with him to bring about a sustained cessation of armed violence in all its forms by all parties with an effective United Nations supervision mechanism

But who defines what are "relevant elements"? Clintonella de Vil?

The "six" point plan then expands to many many more points and asks the Syrian government and the Syrian government alone to

(3) ensure timely provision of humanitarian assistance to all areas affected by the fighting, and to this end, as immediate steps, to accept and implement a daily two hour humanitarian pause and to coordinate exact time and modalities of the daily pause through an efficient mechanism, including at local level;
(4) intensify the pace and scale of release of arbitrarily detained persons, including especially vulnerable categories of persons, and persons involved in peaceful political activities, provide without delay through appropriate channels a list of all places in which such persons are being detained, immediately begin organizing access to such locations and through appropriate channels respond promptly to all written requests for information, access or release regarding such persons;
(5) ensure freedom of movement throughout the country for journalists and a non-discriminatory visa policy for them;
(6) respect freedom of association and the right to demonstrate peacefully as legally guaranteed.

[source : Annan's six-point plan for Syria, CNN, http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/27/world/meast/syria-annan-plan/, 27/03/2012]

These four points apply to the Syrian government and the Syrian government alone.

And as stated above, the first two points apply to both, but no time scales are given. What if Assad does his bit, but the opposition drags their feet, or cannot organise to comply?

This is in effect a two point plan with four more points exclusively for the Syrian government.

So I a smell a rat.

For example, in the context of this "six" point plan, what exactly is meant by "humanitarian assistance"? (see Point 3). The war on Libya was supposed to be "humanitarian assistance" but turned into a one-sided bloodbath ending with the assassination of Gaddafi and the installment of al Qaeda. The "journalists" that will enter the country will be intelligence agents, as they are now, e.g. Danny Dayem, Paul Conroy, but will be given much more freedom to spew their fabrications and lies.

Neither Annan nor al-Assad do not seem to understand the kind of devils that are driving these uprisings. Al-Assad has recognised that the rebels are terrorists armed from outside Syria, but may not be fully aware of just how far they are prepared to go. Syria is just one stepping stone on the way to the final destination, war on Iran.

And that's when the real fireworks will begin.

I foresee that, as well intentioned as this plan may appear to be, it will be used to entrap Syria in some way. Syria will be accused of violating the agreement, and war, or open support from the West of the Syrian al Qaeda rebs, will follow. It could be that the opposition does not form as one group. How will al-Assad deal with that, if most opposition groups conform but one does not, perhaps the rebel group reported in Press TV that is beheading captured Syrian soldiers?

Syrian rebels have formed their own laws, courts and death squads in Baba Amr neighborhood in the restive city of Homs and beheaded the captured army soldiers, a report has revealed.

The report, published by Spiegel Online on Monday, discloses violent measures by the anti-government armed groups, laying bare the other side of the unrest in the Middle Eastern country.

Hussein, one of the rebels fighting the government of President Bashar al-Assad, is quoted in the report as saying that he himself decapitated four army soldiers who had been detained by gunmen.

[source : Syria rebels form death squad, behead army soldiers: Report, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/233454.html, 27/03/2012]

I repeat my demand to Hague and/or Hammod to explain the purpose and presence of British Special Forces in and around Syria since 1st January 2011 to the present date.

MERAH THE INFORMANT WOULD MAKE A LOT OF SENSE

Reports are suggesting that Merah, the alleged killer of Toulouse, was an informant for French intelligence[1]. This is a possibility I considered because it is something that happened to the alleged killer of JFK, Lee Harvey Oswald.

If Merah was indeed an informant for the DGSE then it would explain
1. his lifestyle (although unemployed he lived in his own flat, had cars and apparently built a cache of weapons)
2. his ability to avoid arrest after kidnapping youths and forcing them to watch al Qaeda DVDs of beheadings and executions, and walking around with sword shouting "Al Qaeda! Al Qaeda!"
3. the blatant plan to kill him in his flat so that he could not tell his side of the story

It is possible that he had infiltrated a cell that did the killings while he was merely a member helping out rather then doing the killings. It is also possible that he did none of the shootings. Witnesses said the killer at Montauban was fat/stocky with a facial tattoo. Merah was lean and did not have a tattoo, though it is possible that he wore extra clothes and a tattoo could have been painted on and then washed off afterwards.

A look at all of Merah's bank accounts would be useful, to the say the least.

[1] Massacre nut ‘spied on terrorists for France’, The Sun, http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4223564/GUNMAN-whose-7-victims-included-3-children-was-spy-for-the-country-it-is-claimed.html, 28/03/2012]

A SIGN OF THE TIMES

Spanish prostitutes are going on strike until the Spanish bankers, who make up most of their clientele, start lending to the Spanish people again!

Spain's high-class escorts are refusing to have sex with the nation's bankers - until they open up credit lines to cash-strapped families and firms.

Madrid's top-end prostitutes say their indefinite strike will continue until bank employees 'fulfil their responsibility to society' and start offering bigger loans for struggling Spaniards, it has been claimed.

[source : A national sex strike! Spain's 'high-class hookers refuse to sleep with bankers until they open up credit lines to cash-strapped families', The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2120984/Spains-high-class-hookers-ban-sex-bankers-provide-credit-cash-strapped-economy.html, 27/03/2012]

The prostitutes say only bankers can afford their prices. Why is that? Because bankers can create money out of nothing, lend it out at interest, get us to do all the work for them, and then pay back the loans...with interest!

And if they are gambling bankers then they create trillions in fraudulent derivatives, and if they win they win and buy another Carribean island, but if they lose then they get our corrupt political leaders, like Dodgy Dave, to sign their gambling debts over to us so we suffer austerity and they still get massive bonuses.

This happens all over the world. Not just in Spain. It happens in France, Italy, Great Britain, Germany, Australia, Canada, USA. EVERYWHERE.

What was it Lord Josiah Stamp said?

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money."

That's why the bankers can afford high class prostitutes.

That's why the bankers now run Europe.

That's why they created both Nazi Germany and Communist USSR and dragged the USA into a bloody global conflict from which grew their world government the United Nations which is now being used to implement their global eugenics and mass depopulation program.

The bankers own the earth...because we gave them the power to create money out of thin air so they could buy it from under our noses.

Ever get the feeling you've been mugged off?

GREAT BRITAIN SWITCHING FOCUS OF NATIONAL SECURITY ONTO SOMALIA

It all fits very nicely into the plan as revealed by General Wesley Clark that was to be implemented after the mother of all inside jobs, 9/11.

Iraq. Sudan. Lebanon. Libya. Currently Syria. Soon Somalia. After that Iran (unless Mad Dog Nutternyahu attacks first).

And who is the boogeyman? Al Qaeda. Yes, the same al Qaeda we assisted in Libya and are now supporting in Syria.

I'm sure it has nothing to do with all that top grade oil off the coast of Somalia.

Ever get the feeling you're being mugged off?

Britain's national security policy in the Middle East is moving away from Pakistan and Afghanistan, Britain's national security advisor has said.

Sir Kim Darroch told the joint committee on national security strategy that recent developments are shifting national security policy towards Yemen and Somalia.

Responding to a question about whether Afghanistan and Pakistan are still priorities given increased stability, Sir Kim told the committee: "The terrorist threat from Afghanistan is diminished. We don't want to tempt fate but it isn't what it once was".

He continued: "Al-Qaida's power in Pakistan has diminished, and the threats from instability in Yemen and Somalia are growing."

Sir Kim said that the weakness of governments in Yemen and Somalia and their inability to contain Islamist militants tied to al-Qaida means that they are considered more of a threat to British national security than Afghanistan.

[source : UK security focus shifting to Yemen and Somalia, Politics.co.uk, http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2012/03/27/uk-security-focus-shifting-to-yemen-and-somalia, 27/03/2012]

WHY IS DODGY DAVE SO DODGY?

Last year was dominated by Libya. What was said would take just several days eventually took several months, ending with the assassination of Gaddafi on 20th October.

It all began well before it officially began. Gaddafi was portrayed as the Devil Incarnate. He was accused of the Lockerbie bombing, despite the overwhelming evidence that it was an operation to stop an investigation into drug smuggling by certain intelligence agencies. And with Libyan oil money had built Libya into the envy of the African continent. But then Tony Blair gave Gaddafi a hug when he renounced his WMDs and started sending his billions to Goldman Sachs in London. Gaddafi had been sucked into a spider’s web.

Officially the war on Libya was not a war but “humanitarian intervention”. Officially United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 adopted on 17th March gave the likes of NATO the authority to enforce a No Fly Zone over Libya to protect civilians. But within days the British media was laced with articles suggesting if not demanding the assassination of Gaddafi.

Over the Spring and Summer of 2011 tales of brutality poured out of Libya, implicating Gaddafi’s troops in mass executions, mass rapes while off their heads on Viagra, shooting up civilian housing with helicopter gunships, etc. It all turned out false.

But kept well out of the media was the very disturbing news that the Syrian rebs were actually al Qaeda! It was not until the end of the humanitarian intervention regime change that this filtered through to the front pages when the Syrian al Qaeda rebel military commander accused our intelligence services of sending him to Gaddafi to be tortured!

Meanwhile the question of Libya’s top grade oil was barely mentioned. It was all about killing the civilians to save them. But it leaked out that a special operation had been run out of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to manipulate the oil market to supply fuel to the Libyan al Qaeda rebs and block Gaddafi trading his oil on the market. This was run by Alan Duncan MP.

So Alan Duncan ran the Libya Oil Cell out of the FCO. Duncan is a member of the very secretive Le Cercle, which is perhaps even more conspiratorial than Bilderberg. Duncan had worked for and was good friends with Ian Taylor of Vitol. Vitol took the lead and was instrumental in supplying the Libyan al Qaeda rebs with refined oil products such as diesel while blocking the sale of Gaddafi’s oil, which led to Gaddafi’s fuel running out while the Libyan al Qaeda rebs had barrels of it. Duncan’s father worked for NATO. NATO bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed Libyan civilians to pave a path for the Libyan al Qaeda rebs which led all the way into Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli.

On 20th October Gaddafi was assassinated.

On 2nd November Ian Taylor dined with Dodgy Dave.

When was the invite sent?

And I wonder if they raised a glass of champagne and toasted the assassin of Gaddafi?

Since that dinner Vitol has been awarded lucrative contracts with the Libyan government. I wonder who was thanking whom.

Now the Libyan al Qaeda rebs are raping, torturing and executing black Libyans, treating them like animals in cages while shouting “Allah U Akbar!” and demanding Sharia Law while their flags flutter in the North African breeze.

And we now know that, despite consistent official denials, British Special Forces were in Libya before it all began and they were at the front of the military campaign guiding, training and advising and God knows what else, the Libyan al Qaeda rebs.

Ever get the feeling you’ve been mugged off?

DODGY DAVE GOT £19 MILLION FROM DINNER PARTY DONORS

Dodgy Dave has been forced by Rupert Murdoch to reveal information about his dinner parties. I am not surprised by anything this guy does anymore. He serves the banks, not the British people.

Here is the list of Dodgy Dave's Dinner Donors who gave more than £50k (donations in brackets).

July 14, 2010: A “thank-you dinner” inside Number 10 itself, while flat was being refurbished.

Anthony and Carole Bamford (£101,249) (and a further £2,425,066 from their JCB Ltd)
Michael and Dorothy Hintze (£1,453,280, and a further £2,500,000 in loans)
Murdoch and Elsa Maclennan (£33,925) (for Telegraph Media Group)
Lord John and Lady Sainsbury (£910,000)
Andrew Feldman (£84,270 through company Jayroma)
Jill and Paul Ruddock (£20,000)
Mike and Jenny Farmer (£2,641,046)
Michael and Clara Freeman (£325,400)

February 28, 2011: Downing Street flat

David Rowland and his wife. (£4,420,515.52)
Andrew Feldman also attended (as above)

November 2, 2011: Downing Street flat. Described as a “social dinner for strong and long term supporters of the party, with whom the PM has a strong relationship”.

Henry and Dorothy Angest (£9,950) (and £110,093 from Arbuthnot Banking Group plc)
Michael Farmer and wife (£2,641,046, as above)
Ian Taylor and wife (£50,000)

February 27, 2012: Downing Street flat. Said to have been a “social dinner”.

Michael Spencer and partner (£304,989.59) (and a further £3,637,642 from their IPGL Ltd)

[source : DOWNING STREET DINING CAMERON'S DONORS GACE £19 MILLION TO TORIES, Political Scrapbook, http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/03/david-cameron-downing-street-donors/?utm_source=politicalscrapbook.net&utm_medium=psbook_featt&utm_campaign=psbook_featt4, 26/03/2012]

This is an astonishing amount to get from a very small number of people. The Tories cry that Labour gets a shed load from the Unions. Yes, they do. But the Tories get more, and the donations are from Unions, i.e. basically lots of very small donations from hundreds of thousands of hard working British taxpayers who are sick of being mugged off, not very large donations from a small number of individuals.

And they got to dine with Dodgy Dave.

THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT

This is a news report on the publication of The Transfer Agreement on, obviously, the transfer agreement between the Nazis and the Zionists. Unfortunately it does not state how mamy Jews took up the offer to move to Palestine, but it was about 10% of German Jews. This was also at a time that Palestine was still under British control, so the whole scheme was a collaboration between the British, the Nazis and the Zionists.

If more Jews had took up the offer to transfer to Palestine it is possible that the Holocaust may not have happened. But when you read some of the writings of the leading Zionists at the time they were perfectly happy for the old and the sick to die so that Israel could rise from their ashes.

Anyway, Israel did rise from their ashes, after many Jews were at first sceptical of the transfer fearing the anger it would cause but after the Holocaust global Jewry had been persuaded that a Jewish homeland in Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world.

This has since led to all the war and terror in and originating from the Middle East.

And of course, the mother of all inside jobs, 9/11.

MERAH'S MONEY

The media is protecting Sarkozy. They are questioning in some detail how Merah could have afforded his lifestyle and become so radicalised without being either arrested beforehand or become number one suspect from the start, but they are not questioning the 'coincidence' that this series of shootings has benefitted Sarkozy enormously and they are also ignoring the downfall of DSK last year in which Sarkozy and his agents are heavily implicated.

Anyway, Merah was living well beyond his means.

The revelations will raise questions about how Merah succeeded in amassing such an arsenal of weapons – and while unemployed and on benefits – without raising the suspicions of the intelligence services who were supposed to have him under surveillance. The investigation will focus on how an unemployed petty thief could afford a €500 (£418) a month flat, as well as a rented garage and two hire cars.

[source : Toulouse shooting: failure to find first target led assassin to Jewish school, The Khordokovsky-and-green-genocide-loving Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/24/toulouse-shootings-assassin-jewish-school, 24/03/2012]

Police are trying to determine whether Merah had any help in carrying out the murders. Key questions include how Merah, described by the French intelligence boss Ange Mancini as "a little failure from the suburbs", was able to amass an arsenal of weapons – including an Uzi submachine gun – and rent a car, despite having no clear source of income. Mr Mancini told the French broadcaster BFM TV that Merah told police during the siege that he bought the weapons for €20,000 using money he acquired through break-ins and hold-ups.

[source : Girlfriend to marry soldier shot dead by scooter killer, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/girlfriend-to-marry-soldier-shot-dead-by-scooter-killer-7584489.html, The Independent, 25/03/2012]

THE GHOST OF LITVINENKO IS RISEN

I awoke this morning to news that a Russian banker has been shot in London. I fully expected the anti-Russia propaganda to kick in...and it has.

Two articles in the online papers this morning have mentioned Litvinenko, one even with that famous photograph of the dying radioactive traitor (as recognised even by his own father) Litvinenko on his death bed, implying that the two are linked.

Note that I have not described the death of Litvinenko as murder. I will explain why shortly.

First. The UK media.

The attempted assassination will prompt comparisons with the murder of Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko in London in November 2006.

British prosecutors have named his fellow ex-KGB agent Andrei Lugovoy as the main suspect in his poisoning with radioactive polonium-210.

[source : Exiled Russian banker left in coma after submachine gun 'assassination bid' near Canary Wharf had testified in murder case, The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2119384/Canary-Wharf-shooting-Russian-banker-German-Gorbuntsov-gunned-assassination-attempt.html, 24/03/2012]

Comes complete with the widely published photograph of the radioactive Litvinenko on his death bed.

The last high-profile attack on a Russian citizen in the UK brought relations between the two countries to breaking point.

The murder of Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned in 2006, was treated as a state supported assassination.

Litvinenko's death from poisoning by radioactive polonium-210 sparked a diplomatic battle between the UK and Russia. Moscow has refused to extradite one of its intelligence agents, Andrei Lugovoi, whom the UK suspects of a role in the poisoning.

At this stage, it is understood there is nothing to suggest that the attack on Gorbuntsov was in the same category as the Litvinenko case.

[source : Russian banker in coma after London shooting, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/23/russian-banker-coma-london-shooting, 24/03/2012]

Comes with a film about Mikhail Khordokovsky (all together ; 1,2,3,...aaawwww).

But in both of these articles it is clearly stated that German Gorbuntsov had recently given evidence in the case of the attempted murder of another banker Antonov. Three Chechens were convicted for that failed hit, but who ordered the hit is still unknown. The fresh evidence from Gorbuntsov has led to the case being reopened. Friends of Gorbuntsov think the attempt to kill him is related to this recent testimony. This makes total sense.

So back to Litvinenko. The inquest into Litvinenko's death was supposed to have been given his post mortem records last October 2011. The police requested two more weeks. It is now March, nearly April 2012. And still no post mortem records.

WHY?

I suspect it may have something to do with whatever was up Litvinenko's arse when he fell ill. It was reported there were three solid objects up there, but that news was quickly buried.

The poison used to attack the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko remained unknown last night as doctors searching for a radioactive toxin focused their efforts on pieces of "dense matter" found in his intestines.

The team treating Mr Litvinenko at University College Hospital in central London believe the defector must have knowingly swallowed the three pieces of material which have become lodged in his colon.

X-rays have shown that two of the items are of a similar size to a 2p coin and the other is the shape of a figure "8", according to a hospital source. But it is not yet known whether the three items are linked to Mr Litvinenko's illness, which has left him without a functioning immune system, due to the failure of his bone marrow, and liver damage. Tests are being carried out to identify the pieces of material.

[source : Doctors treating poisoned Russian focus on objects in his colon, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/doctors-treating-poisoned-russian-focus-on-objects-in-his-colon-425435.html, 23/06/2012]

Surely after OVER FIVE YEARS those objects would now have been identified.

Why have the post mortem records not been released?

Since October the coroner has demanded that both MI5 and MI6 release all information they have relating to Litvinenko, this probably due to the now absolute fact that Litvinenko (the traitor as recognised now by even his own father) was paid tens of thousands of pounds by British Intelligence for his services.

Though what his services were to the realm are as yet to be revealed.

And I strongly suspect NEVER to be revealed.

Shortly after issuing his demands to MI5 and MI6 the coroner was involved in a scandal involving his wife, and was hospitalised for nearly a week with what was classed as appendicitis.

But still no post mortem records.

WAR BEGINS ON SOMALIA MAINLAND

Another opportunity for me to step back in amazement and wonder to say, "Quelle surprise!"

What did General Wesley Clark say would happen after the mother of all inside jobs 9/11?

Iraq.
Lebanon.
Sudan.
Libya.

Currently Syria.

Iran and Somalia next.

And the war on the Somalia mainland has now officially begun.

This decision to attack sites on the Somalia mainland has the potential to get boots on the ground.

We could ask of our leaders, "So, what first attracted you and BP to the near-desert and famine-riddled Somalia that has the seventh largest oil reserves in the world?".

A month ago to the day there was a special conference on Somalia in London, during which I posted THE SOMALIA QUICKENING and IT'S SOMALIA TIME stating they were plotting war in Somalia.

The European Union has agreed to expand its mission against Somali pirates, by allowing military forces to attack land targets as well as those at sea.

In a two-year extension of its mission, EU defence ministers agreed warships could target boats and fuel dumps.

The BBC's security correspondent Frank Gardner says the move is a significant step-up in operations, but one that also risks escalation.

...The transitional government only controls the capital Mogadishu, while al-Shabab militants, who recently joined with al-Qaeda, hold large swathes of territory.

[source : Somalia pirates: EU approves attacks on land bases, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-17487767, 23/03/2012]

THE MYTH OF MERAH

Two conflicting views of Merah are emerging.

The first is the violent Islamic extremist, training in al Qaeda camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan, on the US no-fly list, kidnapping kids and showing them al Qaeda videos of executions and beheadings, and walking around brandishing a sword shouting "al Qaeda! al Qaeda!"

The second is the fun-loving petty criminal into cars and girls.

So which is the truth?

Can these views be reconciled?

But there are also conflicting reports of who actually did the shootings.

One witness in Montauban said the visor on the gunman’s helmet briefly flipped up, revealing an extensive tattoo and a scar on his left cheek. She described him as being solidly built and of medium height.
[source : Gunman kills four at Jewish school in Toulouse, France,WSWS,20/03/2012]

Their description matches an eyewitness report of a facial tattoo... The same scooter, a Yamaha T-Max, was used by the shooter in both cases. Its license plate was recorded on video surveillance tapes from the town of Montauban. The same .45 caliber gun was also used on both days... A witness in Toulouse said the gunman had a facial tattoo.
[source : Le Point: Police Believe Disgraced Neo-Nazi Soldier Committed Murders, Jewish Press, 20/03/2012]

One witness, who described the killer as "of average height and quite fat", told French broadcaster RTL his helmet visor had been raised and she had seen his eyes and a tattoo or scar on his face.
[source : Shootings in Toulouse and Montauban: What we know, BBC, 22/03/2012]

Quite fat?

Facial scar or tattoo?

Is that Merah?

This is a still from a video of Merah allegedly joyriding.


Not fat.

No facial scar or tattoo.

Note that the licence plate of the scooter was also recorded.

It is entirely possible that Merah did the other shootings, but not the Montauban shooting.

QUELLE SURPRISE. MERAH SHOT DEAD.

Merah shot dead in a raid on his appartment. Sleep deprivation. 300 rounds. Jumping through windows. Body bag.

It's all a bit...convenient.

Like Gaddafi's asassination.

He won't be able to tell us his contacts, his sources.

But one very intriguing piece of information.

Another series of blasts came shortly after 11am local time.

It came as police in Paris said the convicted Jihadist may have been in touch with a woman in Paris while he was carrying out his crimes.

The mystery woman is said to have been spotted talking to Merah from a train at the Gare de l’Est on Monday – just before he carried out an attack on a Jewish school.

Intrigued by the conversation – which was about the killing of three soldiers - another passenger is said to have asked the mystery woman ‘Were you talking to the Toulouse killer?’

Investigators are taking the lead ‘very seriously’, according to police sources, because it fits in Merah’s telephone records, which have since been compiled by the police.

It also came as the French authorities faced questions as to how the convicted Jihadist had been allowed to live freely after being caught planting bombs for the Taliban in Afghanistan.

[source : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2118052/Toulouse-shooting-First-picture-Al-Qaeda-fanatic-Mohammed-Merah-suspected-killing-7.html, 22/03/2012]

And from the same page

SUSPECT 'KIDNAPPED MAN' AND THEN 'WALKED AROUND CITY WITH SWORD IN HIS HAND'

Suspected serial killer Mohammad Mera, who broke out of an Afghanistan jail in 2008 as part of a mass Taliban escape, once kidnapped another man, it has been reported.

A close family friend of the 24-year-old suspect told Le Parisien she knew him well while in the city's Izards housing estate.

The woman, Laela, said: 'He was well known to the police. Around two years ago he kidnapped a young person on the estate.

'I remember that the mother of the boy in question was wandering around the estate trying to find him.

'Finally, her son was freed. And I’m convinced then a complaint was lodged, and Mohammad was heard by investigating officers.'

Following the kidnapping, for which he was never charged, he is said to have 'crossed the estate in combat gear, with a sword in his hand shouting 'Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda!'.

Describing his family as 'charming people', Laela said: 'His mother finally left after divorcing her husband.'

This family split, she said, may have contributed to his slip into anti-social behaviour. But the main reason was Islamic fundamentalism.

She said: 'He was a normal kid who was radicalised. He had exchanges with people on the internet, but also frequently met other Islamists in the region.

'On the estate, he wanted to indoctrinate younger children. One day, for example, he grabbed my little nephew, and took him to a car where he showed him some horrible videos.

'There were scenes of decapitation, things going on in Afghanistan, or images showing the horror of the war.'

So Merah was under surveillance but able to walk around brandishing a sword shouting "al Qaeda!al Qaeda!", and kidnapping boys to indoctrinate into Jihadism by showing them al Qaeda videos of executions and beheadings?!

And he wasn't arrested?!

Who is nuttier? Merah? Or the French security apparatus?

This is beyond insanity.

MERAH FORCED BOY TO WATCH AL QAEDA VIDEOS OF BEHEADINGS

OH...

MY...

GOD!

A woman living in the same suburb of Toulouse as Merah complained to the Police in the summer of 2010 that Merah had forced her son to watch al Qaeda videos of executions and beheadings. But nothing happened to Merah. This was when he was reported to be under surveillance but not arrested because he was allegedly not planning anything.

Contrast this report with the initial reports from yesterday suggesting that Merah had a violent past but which today mysteriously imply that he was only a petty criminal. Hmm.

=====================================
From http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/report-woman-warned-french-police-over-toulouse-shooter-years-before-killings-1.420147

Published 10:01 22.03.12
Latest update 10:01 22.03.12

Report: Woman warned French police over Toulouse shooter years before killings
Woman claimed she had filed two complaints against Mohamed Merah after he forced her son to watch gruesome videos of Al-Qaida shooting women and beheading hostages in Afghanistan.

A local French newspaper published on Thursday an in-depth testimony of a woman claiming that she had warned authorities multiple times that the suspect in the Toulouse killings, Mohamed Merah, was a danger to the public.

The woman, who did not provide her real name, told Le Télégramme that upon discovering the suspect’s identity, she felt as though her “legs were cut off.” According to her, the fact that it was necessary for the deaths to occur in order to finally arrest Merah was a “huge misstep.” She further claimed that she had filed two complaints against the suspect, and returned and warned authorities several times to no avail.

The woman, who lives in the same neighborhood as Merah in Toulouse, told Le Télégramme that in the summer of 2010, the suspect attempted to recruit her son to jihad. The son, who at the time was 15 years old, was taken to the suspect’s car where he listened to disc of preaching for holy war. He then drove her son to his apartment, where he presented him with a Koran and a large sword, and forced him to watch gruesome Al-Qaida videos in which women were shot and hostages in Afghanistan were beheaded.

“My son called me and we were finally able to get him out of there. He was there from 5 P.M. until midnight,” the woman said.

The mother filed a complaint with the police, which according to her caused Merah to become upset. “He came to the front of our home, threatened me and hit me. He said that I was an atheist and that I must pay like all the rest of France’s citizens,” she said. She further stated that Merah claimed he would “wipe out all those who kills Muslims.” She stated that two days after the incident, Merah struck her son and daughter in the presence of eyewitnesses. However, no one intervened. The mother still has a copy of the complaint that was filed, as well as her daughter’s medical documents.

The woman also stated that the “true mind” behind the suspect was his brother Abdelkader, who is currently in police custody. “It is he who brainwashed [Merah] and often flew out of France,” she said.

THE MANIPULATION OF MERAH

It would now appear that the French police had Merah as a suspect in the shootings of three soldiers and three children from the start, but didn't put him at the top of the suspect list until Tuesday morning when the Yamaha dealership Merah contacted passed on his name, but Merah had contacted the same dealership last week about deactivating the GPS system and casually mentioned the repaint from black to white.

But some other information has now come to light.

Not only Mohammed but also his brother were under surveillance, because both were members of an extremist group that Merah's brother ran.

But here is the killer clue as to what is going on.

Merah claimed that he was acting under "general orders" from al-Qai'da to "bring France to its knees" in retaliation for the French military presence in Afghanistan.

[source : Serial killer reveals why he struck at Toulouse school, The Independent, 22/03/2012]

Claude Guéant, the interior minister, said Merah told police he had "received instructions from al-Qaeda during a trip to Pakistan".

"They proposed he commit a suicide bomb attack. He refused, but accepted a general mission to commit a terrorist attack in France," he said.

[source : I am on an al-Qaeda mission, taunts besieged gunman who shot children, The Daily Telegraph, 22/03/2012]

This is the killer clue because al Qaeda does not appear to be executing similar operations to bring other nations in Afghanistan to their knees. So we have to ask, why Merah? Why France? And why now?

One cynical answer is
1. Sarkozy is expected to lose the Presidential election next month to a Socialist who is not controlled (as far as we know) by the Anglo-American Empire
2. Sarkozy has shown his allegiance to the Anglo-American Empire and his neocon connections are widely known
3. the Anglo-American Empire created and controls al Qaeda
4. so the Anglo-American Empire ordered al Qaeda to order one of their criminal and possibly unhinged operatives in France to bring France to its knees
5. so that Sarkozy can snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by saving the nation.

Hooray! Vive Sarkozy! Vive La France! Vive l'Anglo-American Empire!

So not only was Merah manipulated by the Anglo-American Empire via al Qaeda, who apparently gave Merah his orders to bring France to its knees, but now Sarkozy is manipulating for political purposes the terrorism and current siege that Merah created.

I would be interested in knowing how French media is covering this. Has the media given Sarkozy the most coverage? Have they portrayed Sarkozy, in editorials for example, as the saviour of the nation? How have Hollande and le Pen been reported?

The other thing that is fishy about this is that nobody has seen or spoken to Merah since the siege began. Everything he has reportedly said since the siege began has come through the police. It is now reported that he wants to die with guns in his hands.

He sounds like a complete nutter...and the perfect patsy.

And I am also beginning to suspect that Merah may have botched the operation by shooting the children. He as allegedly said he shot the children because he couln't find a soldier to kill. The shooting of the children may have been too much for the authorities who may have been quite happy to allow him to shoot soldiers for a week or two more before giving Sarkozy the photo opportunity of catching the man who terrorised France. The election is five weeks away. As they say, a week is a long time in politics. This may all be forgotten in five weeks time.

But if the capture of Merah had occured just a week or two before the election...

WHERE IS THE CONDEMNATION?

The Syrian Al Qaeda rebs have finally owned up to what we all knew anyway, that they were responsible for the car bombs in Damascus last weekend.

Our NATO media and leaders naturally assumed it was that evil, dastardly Bashar al-Assad because NATO and al Qaeda are in love and in NATO's eyes al Qaeda can do no wrong, including raping, torturing and executing not only black Libyans but now Syrians are experiencing that special NATO/al Qaeda love. So our NATO media and leaders accused that evil, dastardly Bashar al-Assad of committing state sponsored terrorism, but only quietly accused him. Because if they loudly accused al Assad then people here just might start thinking, "Well, hang on. If al Assad can do it over there, then maybe it's possible that all those people we have been told are crazy conspiracy theorists might just be right about 9/11".

Well.

We were right it was the Syrian al Qaeda rebs terrorising Damascus and Aleppo with car bombs.

And we are right about 9/11 being the mother of all inside jobs.

So where is the condemnation of the Syrian al Qaeda rebs?

=============================
From http://www.infowars.com/syrian-al-qaeda-takes-credit-for-deadly-bombings/

Syrian al-Qaeda Takes Credit for Deadly Bombings

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 21, 2012

Homs-based al-Nusra Front to Protect the Levant claimed responsibility for bombings in Syria over the weekend. Three suicide bombings in Damascus killed 27 people on Saturday and an explosion went off near a Syrian government security building in the northern city of Aleppo on Sunday.

In February, U.S. intelligence boss James Clapper said earlier attacks “had all the earmarks of an al-Qaeda-like attack” and added that “we believe al-Qaeda in Iraq is extending its reach into Syria.” Ayman al-Zawahiri, the titular leader of al-Qaeda following the unsubstantiated hit on Osama bin Laden in May of 2011, has announced his support for al-Nusra Front to Protect the Levant.

On February 26, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, al-Nusra Front to Protect the Levant posted a video on the al-Qaeda linked Shumukh al-Islam forum. The video includes a martyrdom statement by suicide bomber Abu al-Bara’a al- Shami. The al-Nusra Front to Protect the Levant announced the creation of the “Free Ones of the Levant Brigades” in a YouTube video posted on January 23. The group claimed an attack on security headquarters in Idlib in the statement.

HOW WILL RECENT SHOOTINGS IN FRANCE AFFECT FRENCH ELECTION?

The expected winner, as of yesterday, of the French Presidential election next month is the Socialist Francois Hollande. But if enough voters could be persuaded to not vote for him, either by abstaining or by voting for another candidate, then Sarkozy stands a chance of winning. Another possibility is that Sarkozy steals the anti-immigrant vote from Marine le Pen of FN.

Sarkozy has served the Anglo-American Empire well, and I can see that certain persons would be interested in having him re-elected.

The man who is now surrounded in a suburb of Toulouse has been named as Mohammed Merah and it is very clear that he should have come to the attention of the French investigators for these killings earlier.

He was arrested in Kandahar, Afghanistan in 2010. There are additional reports that he took the black scooter he used into a Yamaha dealership to have the GPS tracker disabled, and/or to have it repainted.

The man had also sought out a garage in Toulouse to have his Yamaha scooter repainted after the first two attacks.

[source : Raid on Toulouse shooting suspect, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17446999, 21/03/2102]

You would think it would be standard police procedure that if a particular vehicle, for example a black scooter, had been used in a series of seriously violent crimes then owners of such vehicles in the area would have been investigated.

But it gets much worse.

Merah was a known violent criminal, with a record of violent crimes.

He is a known criminal in Toulouse where some of his crimes were violent, according to French newspaper Le Figaro.

[source : Raid on Toulouse shooting suspect, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17456541, 21/03/2102]

And he was under surveillance by France's Secret Service DCRI for several years!

The French interior minister has revealed that the suspect "was followed for several years" by the DCRI, France's secret service. But he says there was no indication that he was preparing any criminal activity.

[source : Toulouse shootings: police arrest man and corner suspect in early swoop - live updates, The Guardian, 21/03/2102]

Sky News was also reporting this morning with its relentless coverage of the siege that the immigration and security questions are now beginning to dominate the election debate, in the media and in the public in general.

Just how this will affect the voting intentions of the French public is yet to be seen. But I am highly suspicious of the following;

1. Merah was a known violent criminal with a black scooter
2. he had already been under surveillance by the DCRI for several years (though what for is unclear, but to be under surveillance for that long implies to me that it was for something serious).
3. the Presidential election is just one month away and Sarkozy is, or was, expected to lose.
4. Merah claims to a member of al Qaeda, and we all know who controls them.

I am not stating that Sarkozy demanded that an al Qaeda stooge be ordered or persuaded to go on a bloody rampage, but somebody else may have to give Sarkozy the opportunity in the final weeks of the Presidential election to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.

So I will end as I began.

The expected winner, as of yesterday, of the French Presidential election next month is the Socialist Francois Hollande.

As of yesterday...

SERGEI LAVROV NOW DENIES RUSSIAN TROOPS IN SYRIA

Someone is mischiefmongering, I suspect.

Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov denied reports on Tuesday that Russian warships had arrived off the Syrian coast to deploy soldiers.

"Reports that Russian warships are in Tartus are complete fairy tales," Lavrov said.

A Syrian Defense Ministry official also denied the same reports, the SANA news agency said.

“This information is false and is part of the anti-Syria campaign waged by some countries…. seeking military interference into Syria’s domestic affairs,” the official said.

...The Defense Ministry confirmed the tanker Iman’s arrival off the Syrian coast, but said it was for technical reasons and its crew was all civilians accompanied by security guards.

The ministry said the tanker was carrying fuel and food supplies for the Russian Black Sea and Northern fleets, which are engaged in anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden.

[source : Lavrov Denies Russian Warships Off Syria, RIA Novosti, 20/03/2012]

RUSSIA DENIES SENDING TROOPS TO SYRIA

It certainly would be "a bomb" if Russia had sent troops to Syria.

But why would they? al Assad has just kicked al Qaeda butt in Homs and Idlib. There is really no need for Russia to send troops to Syria.

But such a story would help the Anglo-American Empire in their struggle to get boots on the ground in some capacity, even if it just "humanitarian" at first.

===============================
From http://www.sana.sy/eng/337/2012/03/20/407220.htm

Military Source denies reports about the arrival of Russian Warships in Syrian shores

Mar 20, 2012


DAMASCUS, (SANA)-A military source on Monday denied reports by some media about the arrival of Russian warships carrying military staffs to combat terrorism in the Syrian shores, describing those reports as categorically baseless and untrue.

"Those news come in the framework of the lie campaigns against Syria by some opposition sides and the countries that support them in order to cover the calls for the foreign intervention in the Syrian affairs," the source told SANA in a statement.

Russian Defense Ministry denies news on Russian Presence of Warships near Syrian shores

MOSCOW, (SANA)- Russian Defense Ministry on Monday denied reports by some media about the arrival of Russian warships in the Syrian shores.

The Russian news agencies quoted a source at the Ministry's Media Department as saying that it was astonished at the reports circulated by some media about the presence of Russian warships near the Syrian coasts.

The source added that there is not any warships for the Russian navy near the Syrian shores.

Mazen

IS SARKOZY PLAYING A VERY VERY VERY DANGEROUS GAME?

Is it just me or is there something highly suspicious about these apparently random shootings in France?

For no apparent reason, first members of the military, now Jewish schoolchildren?

Purleaze don't say Sarkozy (or someone hoping to assist him) is using a Gladio-type operation to terrorise France only for Sarkozy, the Father, the Saviour, the Messiah to save the nation? Hurray!

Can it be that cheesy?

Possibly.

Because it is being reported that the same gun was used in both apparently unconnected attacks.

The gun used in a school massacre that has rocked France was the same used in the murders of three soldiers last week, a police source has said.

...The French presidential campaign has effectively been suspended with Mr Sarkozy's main rival, socialist Francois Hollande, also travelling to Toulouse.

[source : Toulouse shooting: Same gun used in Jewish and soldier attacks, The Daily Telegraph, 19/03/2012]

My question is, just how unconnected are these attacks while Sarkozy, the man who just assisted al Qaeda into power in Libya and is now assisting them in Syria, thus serving the Anglo-American Empire, is predicted to lose the coming French election?

Who will people look to for safety?

Sarkozy is currently significantly behind Francoise Hollande in the opinion polls.

The election is just over a month away, but as the quote above shows the campaign has been suspended, perhaps giving Team Sarkozy more time to engineer a new campaign, or for a character assassination of Hollande similar to the one pulled on DSK last year. Can Sarkozy implement stronger laws to protect the public in such a short space of time? Probably not. But we will see how much coverage Sarkozy gets denouncing this terrorism while Hollande is hardly reported, just like Ron Paul.

ARE THEY DITCHING BRZEZINSKI?

Brzezinski has been on the media demanding that Israel not attack Iran, particularly since the New Year.

But LPAC/EIR are saying that their high level intelligence sources have told them that Israel will attack Iran very soon.

So which will it be?

And why?

FALLING FOR A CORNY OLD GAG

Watch this cartoon featuring Screwy Squirrel. He sends this dumb dog hunting him over a fence to fall a long long way, with Screwy Squirrel waiting for him holding newspapers shouting "Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Dumb dog falls for corny old gag!". Upon landing Screwy Squirrel hands the dumb dog a newspaper with the headline "SUCKER!!" with a photo of the dumb dog jumping over the fence.

This occurs between 2:00 and 2:30, but you should watch the whole cartoon, from start to finish.

The New World Order are trying to get us to jump over a fence and fall for a corny old gag with this war on Iran. And this gag ain't funny.

We've had two world wars already.

Enough! Enough! Enough!

We are not dumb dogs!

http://youtu.be/yTttAkELFZc

OUR UNHUMAN SOCIOPATHIC LEADERS ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY ISOLATED

The New York Times is reporting there is little disagreement between CIA and Mossad that Iran is not building a nuclear bomb, despite them throwing everything they have at spying on Iran.

Today, as suspicions about Iran’s nuclear ambitions have provoked tough sanctions and threats of military confrontation, top administration officials have said that Iran still has not decided to pursue a weapon, reflecting the intelligence community’s secret analysis.

...The extent of the evidence the spy agencies have collected is unclear because most of their findings are classified, but intelligence officials say they have been throwing everything they have at the Iranian program.

[source : U.S. Faces a Tricky Task in Assessment of Data on Iran, NYT, 18/03/2012]

But try telling that to Nutternyahu. As soon as anyone farts in Gaza Nutternyahu is on the TV demanding war on Iran and citing the Holocaust.

It is becoming increasingly clear that our unhuman sociopathic leaders are dancing to a different tune to the rest of us and are becoming increasingly isolated from us. Yet it is we who will suffer the potentially genocidal consequences of their corrupt decisions. That is the very definition of a sociopath.

But when it comes to Israel all common sense goes out of the window. For it was created in blood for blood. I have hammered the history of Israel on this blog for years. How the Palestinians were betrayed by the British and the Sauds, who then used the wealth from oil to promote the violent extremist Wahhabi version of Islam. How the European Jews were encouraged to transfer to Palestine, but refused because of their scepticism. How the European Jews could have been saved from the Nazis and the Holocaust by the Zionist leadership but were left to die so their deaths could be used to persuade a sceptical world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world. How the Holocaust so psychologically traumatised the Jews that they terrorised the Palestinians into Gaza and The West Bank. How Israel was then given financial, military and political support, including nuclear weapons, to bully and persecute the Palestinians to provoke global anger in the Islamic world, which is now controlled through al-CIAda and channeled through Saudi Arabia, so that we now have a clash of civilizations scenario threatening to drag nation after nation into a global nuclear conflict at the same time that a global financial crisis is occuring.

This is not a case of "shit happens".

This is a satanic conspiracy to trick us into demanding our own slavery and genocide by demanding a global fascist dictatorship run by the same bankers who engineered the crises in the first place and who want human population levels down to between a half and one billion.

THE DESTINY OF HUMANITY WILL BE DECIDED IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS

The destiny of the human race will be decided in the next three to six months, if the intelligence given to LPAC and EIR is to be believed. And I do.

The good thing is that many of us are awake to the threat, including The Pentagon rank and file.

The bad thing is that our corrupt unhuman sociopathic leaders look like they are going to go for it and try to start a nuclear WW3 quite soon.

WW3 will not start over the period of one hour or so. It will be a steady escalation, from the initial Israeli strike on Iran, then to Iran's and Hezbollahs' response, then to America's and Israel response, then to the response of Russia, China and possibly Pakistan. Between responses will be round and round of talks and more talks, between allies and between foes, giving us further time to expose the criminals behind it all. Perhaps in the panic the general public will be more open to the suggestion it is all a scam.

Add a false flag operation in there to blame Iran and/or Hezbollah and/or Russia and/or China then those talks could be derailed leading to the level of violence rising to the use of nuclear weapons, eventually worse.

But let us never forget how we came to be in this position.

First and foremost it is Israel. Not the many ordinary Israelis who are beginning to see their predicament and protest. No. It is not them. It is the corrupt and delusional Zionist leadership and their ultimate masters in London, the Rothschilds. Without them the initial Jewish settlements would more than likely have failed. Without them we would not have had the Balfour Declaration and WW1, in which Palestine was stolen from the Palestinians after they were encouraged to rebel against the Ottomans in return for independence, but instead got the betrayal by the British and the Sauds and mass Jewish immigration. Without them we would not have seen the Nazis and their attempts to persuade German Jews to transfer to Palestine, an attempt which failed due to mass Jewish scepticism and led to the Holocaust to persuade global Jewry that Palestine and only Palestine was the only haven for them from a cruel and harsh world. Without them we would not have seen the Zionist terror gangs, having been psychologically traumatised by the Holocaust, terrorising the Palestinians off their farms into the cesspits that are now Gaza and The West Bank. Without them we would not have seen the finance and political support to sustain Israel as it bullied and killed Palestinians. And without them Israel would not have nuclear weapons, and be now threatening Iran over non-existent nuclear weapons.

It is looking more and more like the trigger for WW3 will be due to the Zionist regime in Israel, and that the conflict it will spark will drag in nation after nation, with the world having been divided on the issue of Israel v Palestine for decades.

Such a plan is attributed to the Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike. No hard evidence exists to support this claim, but there is very very very strong circumstantial evidence to support it.

As I said a few months ago. If we fall for this one then we deserve everything that's coming to us.

Two world wars have occured. A third one can too.

We cannot blame Russia and China for defending their interests. But we can blame our corrupt unhuman sociopathic leaders for supporting, defending and propagating state-sponsored terrorism, in New York and Washington DC on 9/11, in London on 7/7, in Iran as the MeK does the bidding of Israel by killing Iranian nuclear scientists. And on. And on. And on.

This drive for WW3 lies in the beating hearts of all of us. It must be stopped. They are our leaders, supposed to be serving us, not ordering us about, ripping us off, treating us like scum, and serving a cabal of warmongering kiddie-fiddling satanists who want a global fascist dictatorship over a vastly reduced human population.

Look deep inside your soul and ask what you can do to stop this mad, insane, criminal drive towards a nuclear WW3.

SMOULDERING BODIES INSIDE CAR BOMBS IMPLY AL QAEDA TERRORISM NOT STATE SPONSORED

Despite the car bombs that exploded in Damascus today being shown to contain smouldering bodies, thus implying the attacks were al Qaeda-type suicide attacks, the media continues to imply that the Syrian government committed the attacks, and continues to use the phrase "terrorist", as if yeah, sure, the "terrorists" did it (tee hee hee, snigger, snigger).

Let's look at what the media are reporting and how they are reporting it.

Twin blasts hit the heart of Damascus today, killing at least 27 people in an attack on security installations that state television blamed on "terrorists" seeking to oust President Bashar al-Assad.

...Gruesome images from the sites showed what appeared to be smoldering bodies in two separate vehicles, a wrecked minivan smeared with blood, and severed limbs collected in sacks.

[source : Two blasts hit Damascus, The Independent, 17/03/2012]

Note the use of "terrorist" despite this report stating that bodies could be seen in the wreckage.

The report said the "terrorist" blasts were caused by car bombs at the aviation intelligence department and a police building at around 7.30am local time.

...Television pictures from the police building showed the smouldering wreckage of a car and what appeared to be a body inside.

[source : Syrian capital hit by two explosions, The Guardian, 17/03/2102]

Note the use of "terrorist" despite this report stating that bodies could be seen in the wreckage.

I seriously doubt that the Syrian security service are that incompetent that they would blow themselves up. We can therefore conclude that the Syrian NATO/Arab League-sponsored al Qaeda death squad rebels killed and wounded over 100 people, and rising, in Damascus today, as they did in Aleppo a month or so ago.

Bravo, Cameron and Hague for supporting these terrorists!

Bravo, al Assad for standing up to the NATO/Arab League-sponsored al Qaeda death squad thugs!