Russell Brand was on BBC QT last night. He seemed to be the most popular member of the panel, with most things he said receiving a laugh and a round of applause. The Zionist Melanie Phillips, on the other hand, was booed and hissed as she ranted about the nation she loves to hate, Iran.
Yesterday Brand was interviewed by Richard Bacon for an hour or so.
And this week the big story was that Brand dumped Perry by text, thus implying Brand was a coward.
In both these encounters with the BBC, Brand's admitted former addiction to drugs was raised. In fact, British government drug policy was a question on QT. During QT only a handful of issues are discussed, so it is suspicious that drug policy was discussed last night. There have been allegations of fixing by QT producers, the most famous being the young Jew Joel Weiner being invited to ask a question of BNP leader Nick Griffin. Weiner had applied to be a QT audience member a year before but was refused but was curiously invited to ask Griffin on QT only the day before Griffin appeared on QT. So it is highly possible that the drug policy question was planted to discredit Brand.
Brand has been an enthusiastic supporter of David Icke and Icke's proposed media adventure The People's Voice. So I think it is plausible that Brand is being discredited to indirectly discredit Icke.
If he is then that shows just how pathetic and empty the BBC and their masters are.
Friday, June 21, 2013
A VERY AMERICAN IRONY
Thomas Willing was the first President of the Bank of North America and the first President of the First Bank of the United States. His mother was Anne Shippen.
In Treason In America by Anton Chaitkin one branch of the very influential Shippen family are shown as traitors. They were known as Loyalists to the British Crown.
Anne had several brothers and sisters but her eldest brother Edward married Sarah Plumley and they had lots of children (like they all seemed to do in that era), one of whom was called Edward. Edward the son married Margaret Francis and they also had lots of children, one of whom was called Margaret. And it is this branch of the Shippens that Chaitkin brings into question.
During the British occupation of Philadelphia this branch of the Shippens, known as Loyalists to the British, had very cordial relationships with the British occupiers, collaborators some might say. The allegedly beautiful Margaret began a relationship with an alleged dashing and handsome British soldier Major John Andre, an aide to General Sir William Howe, so no ordinary soldier. The relationship had barely time to blossom before the British were chased out of Philadelphia by the American revolutionaries. These Shippens then became cautious friends with the Americans. Margaret still kept in touch with Andre but began a relationship with revolutionary war hero General Benedict Arnold who she later married. Margaret then acted as a conduit between Arnold and Andre who were plotting Arnold's surrender of West Point, which Arnold commanded. Arnold escaped. Andre was hung. Margaret somehow managed to convince George Washington and his aide Alexander Hamilton of her innocence.
And not only that, Aaron Burr who shot Hamilton dead and was a traitor along with Andrew Jackson, was raised by the Shippens! As an orphan both he and his sister Sally were brought up by Dr William Shippen...who was the younger brother of Thomas Willing's mother Anne!
So Anne Shippen, the mother of Thomas Willing, the first President of the Bank of North America and the first President of the First Bank of the United States, was also the Grand Aunt of the traitor Margaret Shippen, wife of Benedict Arnold, AND also the Aunt of Aaron Burr!
WHAT A FAMILY!
The Shippens have to be the most influential family in revolutionary America.
Who were they?
But on top of all this, Thomas Willing himself does not have an attractive background. His wealth can be attributed in part to slavetrading. Willing also had private business with the Barings of London. Two of Willing's Granddaughters marry sons of Francis Baring, co-founder of Barings Bank. Barings were made bankers for the USA in Europe, and remained so until Andrew Jackson replaced them with the Rothschilds.
This is all highly suspicious.
In Treason In America by Anton Chaitkin one branch of the very influential Shippen family are shown as traitors. They were known as Loyalists to the British Crown.
Anne had several brothers and sisters but her eldest brother Edward married Sarah Plumley and they had lots of children (like they all seemed to do in that era), one of whom was called Edward. Edward the son married Margaret Francis and they also had lots of children, one of whom was called Margaret. And it is this branch of the Shippens that Chaitkin brings into question.
During the British occupation of Philadelphia this branch of the Shippens, known as Loyalists to the British, had very cordial relationships with the British occupiers, collaborators some might say. The allegedly beautiful Margaret began a relationship with an alleged dashing and handsome British soldier Major John Andre, an aide to General Sir William Howe, so no ordinary soldier. The relationship had barely time to blossom before the British were chased out of Philadelphia by the American revolutionaries. These Shippens then became cautious friends with the Americans. Margaret still kept in touch with Andre but began a relationship with revolutionary war hero General Benedict Arnold who she later married. Margaret then acted as a conduit between Arnold and Andre who were plotting Arnold's surrender of West Point, which Arnold commanded. Arnold escaped. Andre was hung. Margaret somehow managed to convince George Washington and his aide Alexander Hamilton of her innocence.
And not only that, Aaron Burr who shot Hamilton dead and was a traitor along with Andrew Jackson, was raised by the Shippens! As an orphan both he and his sister Sally were brought up by Dr William Shippen...who was the younger brother of Thomas Willing's mother Anne!
So Anne Shippen, the mother of Thomas Willing, the first President of the Bank of North America and the first President of the First Bank of the United States, was also the Grand Aunt of the traitor Margaret Shippen, wife of Benedict Arnold, AND also the Aunt of Aaron Burr!
WHAT A FAMILY!
The Shippens have to be the most influential family in revolutionary America.
Who were they?
But on top of all this, Thomas Willing himself does not have an attractive background. His wealth can be attributed in part to slavetrading. Willing also had private business with the Barings of London. Two of Willing's Granddaughters marry sons of Francis Baring, co-founder of Barings Bank. Barings were made bankers for the USA in Europe, and remained so until Andrew Jackson replaced them with the Rothschilds.
This is all highly suspicious.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
BARINGS AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Willing was a merchant and banker who attended the Continental Congress of 1775 and 1776 but opposed the Declaration of Independence. He was a business partner of Robert Morris. Despite his opposition to independence Willing was appointed the first President of the Bank of North America and the first President of the Bank of the United States (BUS1). In 1774 he appointed Francis Baring as his banker in London. Willing married Anne McCall. Their children included Anne Willing who married William Bingham, a Senator from Pennsylvania. Their children included Ann and Maria. Ann married Alexander Baring. Maria married Henry Baring. Alexander and Henry were brothers and their father was...Francis Baring. So not jut one, but two granddaughters of the President of the Bank of North America and the Bank of the United States marry into the Baring family.
So who was Francis Baring? Francis Baring was a director of the British East India Company. His sister Elizabeth married John Dunning who was a good friend of Lord Shelburne. Francis' son Alexander, who married Ann Bingham, the granddaughter of Thomas Willing, formed Sun Alliance Assurance with Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1824. And the Barings were allegedly involved in running opium and slaves.
Willing appointed Barings the European bankers of The United States.
Biddle and the Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) continued this arrangement.
For a glimpse into just how cosy the relationship was between Biddle and Barings see
"The House of Baring and the Second Bank of the United States, 1826-1836" by R. W. Hidy in The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 68, No. 3 (Jul., 1944), pp. 269-285. Barings could easily have let the USA crash any number of times because Biddle went way over the overdraft the USA had with Barings a few times without agreement, and asked for huge credit when the USA was facing financial trouble. This annoyed Barings but they acquiesced and in the end made a huge profit from doing so.
But Barings' business with BUS2 was without question helping the USA to very quickly develop into a huge economic rival to the British Empire.
So why would the British want to destroy BUS2, as Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin show?
Or was it just the Rothschilds, not the British?
One of the consequences of the destruction was that Jackson made the Rothschilds bankers to the USA, replacing Barings.
So was the destruction of BUS2 just a turf war between Barings and the Rothschilds?
Or was there more to it, as Chaitkin and Kirsch show?
I have suggested that the USA has had a destiny pre-planned millenia ago. On this I agree with David Icke. All the Freemasonic stuff, the parades, ceremonies, regalia, processions, cannot be ignored. Two symbols that cannot be ignored are:
1. the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram to the north of the White House, particularly when America's warmongering and terrorism is taken in to consideration (I mean, how can a God fearing Christian nation turn into Satan's attack dog?)
2. the cornerstone of the Capitol laid by George Washington in a Freemasonic ceremony which had a plaque with text that implied Freemasonry is approximately 6000 years old! We are led to believe it was only formed in 1717.
My gut feeling is that:
1. The Rothschilds had nothing to do with Bank of North America, BUS1 or BUS2 until Jackson made them European bankers to the USA, replacing Barings.
2. Barings involvement in American banking is being covered up by several authors and documentary makers.
3. Barings may have been allowing the USA to develop too quickly for the Satanists running the conspiracy so BUS2 was destroyed and responsibility for American financial dealings with Europe was handed to the Rothschilds
4. but because BUS2 was doing so well and threatening the British Empire BUS2 had to be discredited so it and national banks before it have been portrayed as Rothschild projects from the start, when in fact at that time the Rothschilds were still building their European network and had some but nowhere near as much power as they pretend.
So who was Francis Baring? Francis Baring was a director of the British East India Company. His sister Elizabeth married John Dunning who was a good friend of Lord Shelburne. Francis' son Alexander, who married Ann Bingham, the granddaughter of Thomas Willing, formed Sun Alliance Assurance with Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1824. And the Barings were allegedly involved in running opium and slaves.
Willing appointed Barings the European bankers of The United States.
Biddle and the Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) continued this arrangement.
For a glimpse into just how cosy the relationship was between Biddle and Barings see
"The House of Baring and the Second Bank of the United States, 1826-1836" by R. W. Hidy in The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 68, No. 3 (Jul., 1944), pp. 269-285. Barings could easily have let the USA crash any number of times because Biddle went way over the overdraft the USA had with Barings a few times without agreement, and asked for huge credit when the USA was facing financial trouble. This annoyed Barings but they acquiesced and in the end made a huge profit from doing so.
But Barings' business with BUS2 was without question helping the USA to very quickly develop into a huge economic rival to the British Empire.
So why would the British want to destroy BUS2, as Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin show?
Or was it just the Rothschilds, not the British?
One of the consequences of the destruction was that Jackson made the Rothschilds bankers to the USA, replacing Barings.
So was the destruction of BUS2 just a turf war between Barings and the Rothschilds?
Or was there more to it, as Chaitkin and Kirsch show?
I have suggested that the USA has had a destiny pre-planned millenia ago. On this I agree with David Icke. All the Freemasonic stuff, the parades, ceremonies, regalia, processions, cannot be ignored. Two symbols that cannot be ignored are:
1. the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram to the north of the White House, particularly when America's warmongering and terrorism is taken in to consideration (I mean, how can a God fearing Christian nation turn into Satan's attack dog?)
2. the cornerstone of the Capitol laid by George Washington in a Freemasonic ceremony which had a plaque with text that implied Freemasonry is approximately 6000 years old! We are led to believe it was only formed in 1717.
My gut feeling is that:
1. The Rothschilds had nothing to do with Bank of North America, BUS1 or BUS2 until Jackson made them European bankers to the USA, replacing Barings.
2. Barings involvement in American banking is being covered up by several authors and documentary makers.
3. Barings may have been allowing the USA to develop too quickly for the Satanists running the conspiracy so BUS2 was destroyed and responsibility for American financial dealings with Europe was handed to the Rothschilds
4. but because BUS2 was doing so well and threatening the British Empire BUS2 had to be discredited so it and national banks before it have been portrayed as Rothschild projects from the start, when in fact at that time the Rothschilds were still building their European network and had some but nowhere near as much power as they pretend.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
IF THERE WAS A WINNER AT THE G8
This morning I detected a psyop of some kind, in the NATO media, particularly the BBC, when it was reported that Putin was 'under pressure' to acquiesce over Syria. It now seems he was not. He claims that Russia was not the only nation who is not convinced that Assad used chemical weapons, but AFAIK did not say who.
But I wonder if he reads this blog because he made a very accurate and related comment on the butchering of Drummer Lee Rigby. Here is what Putin said about that horrific attack:
Shortly after the attack on Rigby a youth worker called Abdullah phoned Vanessa Feltz and told her live on air that he had spoken to the attackers trying to persuade them from violence, and Syria was discussed.
From my reading of what was written on the internet I was the only one to make the link to Syria, some too busy spreading a hoax theory, and urged others to spread the link because if it was widely known that the attackers had been preaching Jihad and calling for Muslims to go to Syria and join the Jihad against Assad then the support for the Syrian rebels from the UK and possibly other nations would diminish. But AFAIK nobody did spread that link.
Well here is Putin spreading that link.
And in an interview with Charlie Rose, Obama did NOT look or sound too enthusiastic about escalating the violence in Syria, questioning rushing into another war in the Middle East, the effectiveness of any NFZ and the dangers of arming the rebels because the weapons may end up in the hands of the enemies of America.
From http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57589739/obama-very-easy-to-slip-slide-into-deeper-syrian-involvement/
But I wonder if he reads this blog because he made a very accurate and related comment on the butchering of Drummer Lee Rigby. Here is what Putin said about that horrific attack:
Recently the British people suffered a huge loss. It was a tragedy next to his barracks on the streets of London. A violent assassination, a very brutal killing of a British serviceman.
Clearly the opposition is not composed all of this but many of them are exactly the same as the ones who perpetrated the killing in London.
If we equip these people, if we arm them what is going to control and verify who is going to have these weapons, including in Europe as well.
So we call all our partners, before making this dangerous step, think about it very carefully.
[source : G8 summit - day two: Politics live blog, The guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2013/jun/18/g8-summit-politics-live-blog, 18th June 2013]
Shortly after the attack on Rigby a youth worker called Abdullah phoned Vanessa Feltz and told her live on air that he had spoken to the attackers trying to persuade them from violence, and Syria was discussed.
From my reading of what was written on the internet I was the only one to make the link to Syria, some too busy spreading a hoax theory, and urged others to spread the link because if it was widely known that the attackers had been preaching Jihad and calling for Muslims to go to Syria and join the Jihad against Assad then the support for the Syrian rebels from the UK and possibly other nations would diminish. But AFAIK nobody did spread that link.
Well here is Putin spreading that link.
And in an interview with Charlie Rose, Obama did NOT look or sound too enthusiastic about escalating the violence in Syria, questioning rushing into another war in the Middle East, the effectiveness of any NFZ and the dangers of arming the rebels because the weapons may end up in the hands of the enemies of America.
From http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57589739/obama-very-easy-to-slip-slide-into-deeper-syrian-involvement/
I WONDER IF EUSTACE MULLINS READ THIS IN THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
In "Andrew Jackson as A Treason Project" by Anton Chaitkin, Chaitkin looks into the sordid, treasonous, slaveholding, Indian-murdering history of President Andrew Jackson.
Not only did Jackson make the Rothschilds the US bankers in Europe, he fired two Secretaries to the Treasury who would not remove US Government funds out of the Second Bank of the United States, where it was unquestionably being used to quickly develop the USA into a rival to the British Empire. His third choice, Roger Taney took the funds out and placed it in The Union Bank of Baltimore, which was part owned by...ROGER TANEY!
I wonder if Eustace "the oracle" Mullins read this.
Not only did Jackson make the Rothschilds the US bankers in Europe, he fired two Secretaries to the Treasury who would not remove US Government funds out of the Second Bank of the United States, where it was unquestionably being used to quickly develop the USA into a rival to the British Empire. His third choice, Roger Taney took the funds out and placed it in The Union Bank of Baltimore, which was part owned by...ROGER TANEY!
Taney was from the nastiest element of Maryland’s Anglophile, fox-hunting, slave-plantation aristocracy, and was a leader of the Boston-run Federalist Party. When John Quincy Adams ran for President in 1824, Taney backed Jackson against him, and went from being a Federalist to a Jackson Democrat without missing a step. In Congress in 1834, Adams skewered Taney with this sarcastic proposal: “Resolved that the thanks of the House be given to Roger B. Taney, Secretary of the Treasury, for his pure and disinterested patriotism in transferring the use of the public funds from the Bank of the United States, where they were profitable to the people, to the Union Bank of Baltimore, where they were profitable to himself.” Adams’ speech containing this mock resolution was suppressed by the Jackson forces in Congress, so he privately printed it, and Nicholas Biddle distributed 50,000 copies; a copy is in the Library of Congress rare book collection.
[source : Andrew Jackson as A Treason Project, Anon Chaitkin, EIR, 21st December 2007]
I wonder if Eustace "the oracle" Mullins read this.
DER FUHRER IS POSSESSED
Der Fuhrer, David Cameron, is possessed.
As he attempts to further empower and arm cutthroat Jihadis, who slaughtered black Libyans and have been slaughtering the children of pro-Assad families, Der Fuhrer has completely lost the plot and took the limeade out of the many, many struggling muggins British taxpaying families and tweeted the menu from the dinner he had last night.
Call The Pope for an exorcism!
As he attempts to further empower and arm cutthroat Jihadis, who slaughtered black Libyans and have been slaughtering the children of pro-Assad families, Der Fuhrer has completely lost the plot and took the limeade out of the many, many struggling muggins British taxpaying families and tweeted the menu from the dinner he had last night.
This is the menu for the #G8UK dinner. I’ll chair a discussion on tax, trade, transparency and Syria at 830 tonight pic.twitter.com/GAWDxvEDkI
— David Cameron (@David_Cameron) June 17, 2013
Call The Pope for an exorcism!
FT EDITORIAL DEMANDS ARMING OF REBELS
Since the EU embargo on arms to Syria was allowed to expire, Jihadis Hague and Cameron have consistently said that no decision to arm the rebels has been made and that Parliament would be allowed to vote on arming the rebels.
The Financial Times has stepped up the demands to arm the rebels in an editorial. According to the FT all the violence in Syria is due to Assad.
First, the rebels have been using chemical weapons. A UN investigation found this, the rebels have filmed themselves testing them out and they were caught with kgs of the stuff. What ever evidence that has been provided by the UK, France and Israel is dodgy, with no guaranteed chain of custody.
Second, the 'butchery' is due to the rebels; al Houla, al Duvair, Bayda, Baniyas, tc. The list of massacres and atrocities, of the slaughter of women and children, throats cut and bullets in the head, by the rebels is very, very long.
The Financial Times has stepped up the demands to arm the rebels in an editorial. According to the FT all the violence in Syria is due to Assad.
President Bashar al-Assad’s murderous regime has pressed ahead with its butchery, refusing to engage in any negotiation with struggling opposition militias.
...But events during recent weeks have brought dismay. Far from entering into negotiations, the Assad regime has relentlessly pursued its savagery, taking the strategic stronghold of Qusair and advancing towards Aleppo. Far from stepping back, Mr Assad’s supporters – Hizbollah and Iran – have engaged more heavily on the ground.
...Above all, the west must ask whether it can continue to tolerate Mr Assad’s use of chemical weapons – including sarin gas – against his opponents. The US, Britain and France have provided strong evidence of this use. Any deployment of weapons of mass destruction by the Syrian regime cannot be seen to constitute an acceptable norm of warfare.
[source : Arming the Syrian rebels is justified, FT, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/47a21326-d4ec-11e2-b4d7-00144feab7de.html#axzz2WXb1Z85H, 14th June 2013]
First, the rebels have been using chemical weapons. A UN investigation found this, the rebels have filmed themselves testing them out and they were caught with kgs of the stuff. What ever evidence that has been provided by the UK, France and Israel is dodgy, with no guaranteed chain of custody.
Second, the 'butchery' is due to the rebels; al Houla, al Duvair, Bayda, Baniyas, tc. The list of massacres and atrocities, of the slaughter of women and children, throats cut and bullets in the head, by the rebels is very, very long.
PUTIN MUST REJECT ALL OVERTURES FROM G8 OVER SYRIA BECAUSE HE IS RIGHT AND THEY ARE EVIL AND WRONG
The NATO media is riddled with talk of Vladimir Putin being 'under pressure', to acquiesce, to relent to the demands of the minions Obama, Cameron and Hollande. BBC Radio 5 Live is repeating an interview with Oxfam about refugees from Syria. And the BBC begins its reporting from a camp for Syrian refugees on the Syria-Jordan border today.
Putin is right.
1. Assad has not been using chemical weapons. The rebels have filmed themselves testing them out, preparing to use them in urban areas, were caught with kgs of the stuff, and the UN found that the rebels had used them.
2. Syria is being invaded by a proxy force of cutthroat Jihadis from all over the globe, financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, with logistical support from Turkey and armed by the USA, France and UK.
3. Obama, Cameron and Hollande do not care about Oxfam, because if they did they would not be supporting the rebels, as they did in Libya, and look how that has turned out!
Putin is right.
1. Assad has not been using chemical weapons. The rebels have filmed themselves testing them out, preparing to use them in urban areas, were caught with kgs of the stuff, and the UN found that the rebels had used them.
2. Syria is being invaded by a proxy force of cutthroat Jihadis from all over the globe, financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, with logistical support from Turkey and armed by the USA, France and UK.
3. Obama, Cameron and Hollande do not care about Oxfam, because if they did they would not be supporting the rebels, as they did in Libya, and look how that has turned out!
Monday, June 17, 2013
ROTHSCHILDS, BARINGS, BIDDLE AND THE SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES
Yesterday I questioned Gary Allen's trustworthiness by raising the question of a reference from Epperson's The Unseen Hand, in which Epperson quotes Allen quoting Gustavus Myers who claims that the Rothschilds were long time a power in the Second Bank of the United States.
I forgot that I had already addressed this in ANOTHER FACTOID.
The precise reference is:
The reason, I believe, why the search yesterday could not find this reference to the Rothschilds is because this is just a footnote. But it also does not have any reference to back up the claim.
So some of the confusion from yesterday has been cleared up.
But we still have the claim from Myers that the Rothschilds were powers in the Second Bank of the United States without any source or evidence. Myers mentions Belmont who didn't arrive in the USA until just days before the 1837 Panic began in New York, and by then the BUS2 was on its last legs. Until then the Rothschild agents in the USA were the little known Philips and Joseph, and if the Rothschilds really were that powerful before 1837 I am sure we would have heard alot more of Philips and Joseph.
What I am beginning to piece together is that:
1. the Rothschilds had very little if any power in BUS2
2. what power they may have had, that Myers may refer to, is due to Jackson making them bankers for the USA in Europe around 1834
3. Biddle was without question doing very well in developing the USA as President of the BUS2
4. but Biddle appears to have been very dependent on Barings for lines of credit (which at times were very significant) and at times annoyed Barings but they persisted with him because they eventually did well out of their business with him
5. but Barings were drug runners, according to Dope Inc
So the irony is that the USA may well have relied on the King's drug money for credit for its development.
And why didn't Myers write anything of any significance about the Rothschilds? Astor. Morgan. Vanderbilt. But nothing on Rothschild, but he is prepared to say without reference that "Under the surface, the Rothschilds have long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws."
This is getting very bizarre but very interesting, particularly when the works of Kirsch and Chaitkin are added to the mix.
I forgot that I had already addressed this in ANOTHER FACTOID.
The precise reference is:
Under the surface, the Rothschilds have long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States. August Belmont and Company were their American representatives. In 1873 it was estimated that $375,000,000 of American railroad securities were held abroad, chiefly by foreign bankers. The Final Report of the Industrial Commission in 1902 estimated (see page 404 of that report) the amount of these securities held by foreign banking houses and others abroad at about $3,100,000,000.
[source : History of the great American fortunes, Gustavus Myers, Vol 3, p.183]
The reason, I believe, why the search yesterday could not find this reference to the Rothschilds is because this is just a footnote. But it also does not have any reference to back up the claim.
So some of the confusion from yesterday has been cleared up.
But we still have the claim from Myers that the Rothschilds were powers in the Second Bank of the United States without any source or evidence. Myers mentions Belmont who didn't arrive in the USA until just days before the 1837 Panic began in New York, and by then the BUS2 was on its last legs. Until then the Rothschild agents in the USA were the little known Philips and Joseph, and if the Rothschilds really were that powerful before 1837 I am sure we would have heard alot more of Philips and Joseph.
What I am beginning to piece together is that:
1. the Rothschilds had very little if any power in BUS2
2. what power they may have had, that Myers may refer to, is due to Jackson making them bankers for the USA in Europe around 1834
3. Biddle was without question doing very well in developing the USA as President of the BUS2
4. but Biddle appears to have been very dependent on Barings for lines of credit (which at times were very significant) and at times annoyed Barings but they persisted with him because they eventually did well out of their business with him
5. but Barings were drug runners, according to Dope Inc
So the irony is that the USA may well have relied on the King's drug money for credit for its development.
And why didn't Myers write anything of any significance about the Rothschilds? Astor. Morgan. Vanderbilt. But nothing on Rothschild, but he is prepared to say without reference that "Under the surface, the Rothschilds have long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws."
This is getting very bizarre but very interesting, particularly when the works of Kirsch and Chaitkin are added to the mix.
PUTIN IS NOT THE DEMON
A few years ago many in the mainstream and alternative media were portraying Vladimir Putin as a demon, involved in all sorts of criminality and using secret hand signals to indicate his allegiance to the Prince of Darkness.
It is very, very different today.
Yesterday Putin put Der Fuhrer down at a press conference after a meeting between the two before the G8 begins at Lough Erne today.
Der Fuhrer spoke first and lied to us all; lied to himself, lied to his wife, lied to his children, lied to The Conservative Party, lied to The House of Commons, lied to The House of Lords, lied to the muggins British taxpaying public, and lied to the whole world. The lie he made was this:
First: As I have extensively shown on this blog, the bloodbath in Syria should be directly blamed on Israel and Zionist factions in the USA, France, Saudi Arabia and the UK. Syria is just one of seven nations, all enemies of Israel, that were targeted for war after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
Second: Assad has the support of 70% of Syrians. 20% are neutral. Only 10% support the rebels. That is not me just making this up. NATO found that from data they collected from inside Syria!
Third: AND NO NEW EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PRODUCED! All that has happened is that old evidence, which was at first rejected because the chain of custody could not guaranteed, has been accepted due to a series of scandals which were started because of Obama's obvious reluctance to escalate US involvement in Syria to save the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum at al Qusayr, and soon in Aleppo and Homs from total destruction. AND THE CHAIN OF EVIDENCE STILL CANNOT BE GUARANTEED!
But let's now look at the Putin put down.
Der Fuhrer and Putin were asked what were they going to do with Syria. The question, from the BBC, was:
Der Fuhrer reproduced his incorrect, sickening, pathetic, condescending allegations that all the blood that has been spilled in Syria is Assad's fault, and did not answer the question put to him.
Putin on the other hand did answer the question put to him. AND WHAT AN ANSWER!
The UK is just one of several nations engaged in a proxy war contrary to international law. Russia on the other hand is legally satisfying commercial contracts.
It is a very, very sad day when the Prime Minister of this Disunited Fascist Queendom can stand in front of the DFQ media, regurgitate the totally discredited lies about Syria and get away with it unchallenged.
Yesterday it was Fathers Day.
What did our fathers and grandfathers fight in WW2 for? I thought it was to destroy Nazi Imperialism. But from the overwhelming evidence that I have seen, Nazi Imperialism is alive and well and living it up in London.
It is very, very different today.
Yesterday Putin put Der Fuhrer down at a press conference after a meeting between the two before the G8 begins at Lough Erne today.
Der Fuhrer spoke first and lied to us all; lied to himself, lied to his wife, lied to his children, lied to The Conservative Party, lied to The House of Commons, lied to The House of Lords, lied to the muggins British taxpaying public, and lied to the whole world. The lie he made was this:
I believe that Assad is responsible for tearing his country apart, and that to end Syria’s nightmare he has to go. The new evidence this week of how the regime is gassing its people makes that clearer than ever.
[source : Press conference: the Prime Minister and President Vladimir Putin, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/press-conference-the-prime-minister-and-president-vladimir-putin, 16th June 2013]
First: As I have extensively shown on this blog, the bloodbath in Syria should be directly blamed on Israel and Zionist factions in the USA, France, Saudi Arabia and the UK. Syria is just one of seven nations, all enemies of Israel, that were targeted for war after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
Second: Assad has the support of 70% of Syrians. 20% are neutral. Only 10% support the rebels. That is not me just making this up. NATO found that from data they collected from inside Syria!
Third: AND NO NEW EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PRODUCED! All that has happened is that old evidence, which was at first rejected because the chain of custody could not guaranteed, has been accepted due to a series of scandals which were started because of Obama's obvious reluctance to escalate US involvement in Syria to save the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum at al Qusayr, and soon in Aleppo and Homs from total destruction. AND THE CHAIN OF EVIDENCE STILL CANNOT BE GUARANTEED!
But let's now look at the Putin put down.
Der Fuhrer and Putin were asked what were they going to do with Syria. The question, from the BBC, was:
First of all, to President Putin: the Prime Minister has said in the past that those supporting President Assad have the blood of Syrian children on their hands. Given that Russia is arming one side in this conflict, is it not hypocritical to criticise those who want to arm the other side?
And to the Prime Minister: how would you describe the feeling amongst Tory backbenchers and your Liberal Democrat coalition partners about the idea of arming the rebels? One Tory MP said today that it would be suicidal.
Der Fuhrer reproduced his incorrect, sickening, pathetic, condescending allegations that all the blood that has been spilled in Syria is Assad's fault, and did not answer the question put to him.
Putin on the other hand did answer the question put to him. AND WHAT AN ANSWER!
With regards to the supplies of weapons to the Assad government, and as regards to who has the blood of the children and peaceful citizens of Syria, I believe you will not deny that the blood is on the hands of the both parties, of both of the parties, and there is always a question: who is to be blamed for that, who is to blame? I believe you will not deny the fact that one hardly should back those who kills their enemies and, you know, eats their organs and all that is filmed and shot. Do we want to support these people; do we want to supply arms to these people? So, in this case, it has hardly any relation to the communitarian and cultural values that Europe has been professing for centuries. In Russia, we cannot fancy such things happening.
But if we speak calmly in cold blood, in a business-like fashion, let me draw your attention to the fact that Russia supplies arms to the legitimate government of Syria in full compliance with the norms of international law. We are not breaching anything. Let me emphasise that; we are not breaching any rules and norms, and we call on all our partners to act in same fashion.
The UK is just one of several nations engaged in a proxy war contrary to international law. Russia on the other hand is legally satisfying commercial contracts.
It is a very, very sad day when the Prime Minister of this Disunited Fascist Queendom can stand in front of the DFQ media, regurgitate the totally discredited lies about Syria and get away with it unchallenged.
Yesterday it was Fathers Day.
What did our fathers and grandfathers fight in WW2 for? I thought it was to destroy Nazi Imperialism. But from the overwhelming evidence that I have seen, Nazi Imperialism is alive and well and living it up in London.
Sunday, June 16, 2013
ANOTHER MYSTERIOUS REFERENCE
In The Unseen Hand by Ralph Epperson, Epperson writes
The source for this statement is given as Gary Allen.
The History of the Great American Fortunes is massive. Three volumes. I cannot find a copy of this Allen article online, but The History of the Great American Fortunes is available online and can be quickly scanned for a word.
The three volumes can be accessed by the links provided by the Wikipedia page on Myers at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustavus_Myers
You can scan for any word you like; Myers, Astor, Vanderbilt, railroad. The scan produces the exact location of that word in the volume being scanned.
I typed in Rothschild.
THERE WERE NO ENTRIES FOUND FOR ROTHSCHILD! IN ALL THREE VOLUMES!
If there are no entries found for Rothschild then how can Myers say that the Rothschilds were the powers behind the Second Bank of The United States.
Possibilities to explain this are:
1. Epperson has used the wrong reference.
2. Allen has used the wrong reference.
3. Rothschild is mentioned by Myers but for whatever reason the scan does not find it but does find any other word you enter that is in the volume.
or more sinister,
4. Allen has made this reference up!
This on its own may not mean so much, but if we consider the following:
1. Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin show comprehensively that Andrew Jackson was a dupe of the British and was used, wittingly or unwittingly, to destroy The Second Bank of The United States.
2. Eustace Mullins stated in Secrets of The Federal Reserve that Nicholas Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds but provides no reference.
3. Eustace Mullins twists statements of one his sources, Henry Clews, and omits information that Clews says which would oppose what Mullins tries to suggest.
Mullins also wrote a book called The Biological Jew which develops the idea that Jews are satanist parasites who kidnap young children and sacrifice them in the local synagogue.
It is entirely possible that Epperson or Allen have provided the wrong reference, which would be a case of sloppy research, and in which case can they be trusted on every other reference they provide?
But on the other hand the statement that the Rothschilds were the power behind the Second Bank of The United States could be yet another statement in the operation, I suspect, to portray Jackson as a hero for destroying the bank that under Biddle was quickly developing the USA into a rival of the British Empire so that such a bank is never considered again.
There is something very, very wrong with all this, don't you think?
In his book The History of the Great American Fortunes, author Gustavus Myers had identified the major power behind the Second Bank of the United States as being the Rothschild family.1
[source : The Unseen Hand, Ralph Epperson, Chapter 1, The Rothschild Family]
The source for this statement is given as Gary Allen.
1. Quoted in Gary Allen, "The Bankers, Conspiratorial Origins of the Federal Reserve," American Opinion, (March, 1970), p. 1.
The History of the Great American Fortunes is massive. Three volumes. I cannot find a copy of this Allen article online, but The History of the Great American Fortunes is available online and can be quickly scanned for a word.
The three volumes can be accessed by the links provided by the Wikipedia page on Myers at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustavus_Myers
You can scan for any word you like; Myers, Astor, Vanderbilt, railroad. The scan produces the exact location of that word in the volume being scanned.
I typed in Rothschild.
THERE WERE NO ENTRIES FOUND FOR ROTHSCHILD! IN ALL THREE VOLUMES!
If there are no entries found for Rothschild then how can Myers say that the Rothschilds were the powers behind the Second Bank of The United States.
Possibilities to explain this are:
1. Epperson has used the wrong reference.
2. Allen has used the wrong reference.
3. Rothschild is mentioned by Myers but for whatever reason the scan does not find it but does find any other word you enter that is in the volume.
or more sinister,
4. Allen has made this reference up!
This on its own may not mean so much, but if we consider the following:
1. Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin show comprehensively that Andrew Jackson was a dupe of the British and was used, wittingly or unwittingly, to destroy The Second Bank of The United States.
2. Eustace Mullins stated in Secrets of The Federal Reserve that Nicholas Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds but provides no reference.
3. Eustace Mullins twists statements of one his sources, Henry Clews, and omits information that Clews says which would oppose what Mullins tries to suggest.
Mullins also wrote a book called The Biological Jew which develops the idea that Jews are satanist parasites who kidnap young children and sacrifice them in the local synagogue.
It is entirely possible that Epperson or Allen have provided the wrong reference, which would be a case of sloppy research, and in which case can they be trusted on every other reference they provide?
But on the other hand the statement that the Rothschilds were the power behind the Second Bank of The United States could be yet another statement in the operation, I suspect, to portray Jackson as a hero for destroying the bank that under Biddle was quickly developing the USA into a rival of the British Empire so that such a bank is never considered again.
There is something very, very wrong with all this, don't you think?
RAPID ESCALATION OF WAR IN SYRIA
Franklin Lamb has reported some very serious and grave comments on what is being planned for Syria now that it has been 'found' that Assad used chemical weapons.
But first, Lamb also discusses why Obama has suddenly changed his mind.
This supports what I have been saying.
But what will the USA do now? According to Lamb:
This coming week the nation's darling BBC radio presenter Shelagh Fogarty will be reporting all week from a camp in Jordan for Syrian refugees. Coincidence? I think not. She will be used to develop the R2P argument.
Obama can still pull back from this fast approaching catastrophe. He did not start it. Israel started all this by attacking the USA on 9/11. Obama knows this. We all know this. Even the spider in my bathroom knows this.
Obama could well go down as the most hated President of The United States of America, by dragging the USA into a regional war in The Middle East, a war he could easily avoid, and one for which he should throw his Nobel Peace Prize into the Potomac.
Or he can kick Israel in the bollocks and go public on 9/11, stop all the Zionist warmongering and adopt Dr Webster Tarpley's suggestions for economic development.
But first, Lamb also discusses why Obama has suddenly changed his mind.
Other sources are asserting that Obama actually did not want to invoke direct military aid the rebels fighting to topple the Assad government or even to make use of American military power in Syria for several reasons.
...In addition, Obama has been weakened recently by domestic politics and a number of distractions and potential scandals not least of which is the disclosures regarding the massive NSA privacy invasion.
[source : Why Obama is Declaring War on Syria, Franklin Lamb, Al Manar, http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?fromval=1&cid=41&frid=41&eid=97639, 15th June 2013]
This supports what I have been saying.
But what will the USA do now? According to Lamb:
The Washington Post is reporting that Kerry believes supplying the rebels with weapons might be too little and too late to actually flip the balance on the Syrian ground and this calls “for a military strike to paralyze Al-Assad’s military capacities.” A Pentagon source reported that the USA, France, and Britain are considering a decisive decision to reverse the current Assad momentum and quickly construct one in favor of the rebels” within a time period not exceeding the end of this summer.
...King Abdullah [of the utopian democracy of Saudi Arabia] was reportedly advised by Kerry to be prepared for a rapid expansion of the growing regional conflict.
...“We are going to see a rapid escalation of the conflict”, a staffer on the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee emailed this observer:
...A part of this “humanitarian assistance” the US is going to established in the coming weeks a “limited, humanitarian no-fly zone, that will begin along several miles of the Jordanian and Turkish borders in certain military areas into Syrian territory, and would be set up and presented as a limited bid to train and equip rebel forces and protect refugees. But in reality, as we saw in Libya a Syrian no fly zone would very likely include all of Syria.
...In response to a question from this observer about how he thought event might unfold in this region over the coming months, a very insightful long-term congressional aid replied: “Well Franklin, maybe someone will pull a rabbit out of the hat to stop the push for war. But frankly I doubt it. From where I sit I’d wager that Syria as we have known it may soon be no more. And perhaps some other countries in the region also.”
This coming week the nation's darling BBC radio presenter Shelagh Fogarty will be reporting all week from a camp in Jordan for Syrian refugees. Coincidence? I think not. She will be used to develop the R2P argument.
Obama can still pull back from this fast approaching catastrophe. He did not start it. Israel started all this by attacking the USA on 9/11. Obama knows this. We all know this. Even the spider in my bathroom knows this.
Obama could well go down as the most hated President of The United States of America, by dragging the USA into a regional war in The Middle East, a war he could easily avoid, and one for which he should throw his Nobel Peace Prize into the Potomac.
Or he can kick Israel in the bollocks and go public on 9/11, stop all the Zionist warmongering and adopt Dr Webster Tarpley's suggestions for economic development.
FORMER FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTER CONFIRMS MY THESIS REGARDING SYRIA
In an explosive statement to French Parliament Network LCP the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas has confirmed my thesis regarding Syria.
A brief overview of my thesis is:
1. 9/11 was an Israeli inside job using patsies from Saudi Arabia with Saudi acquiescence and Zionists in the USA in the highest levels of government (VP, SecDef, etc).
2. shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was informed of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. The seven nations named to Clark were generally hostile to Israel and had been targeted in Zionist documents pre-9/11. The nations were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon/Hezbollah, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
3. By 2007 this plan was moribund, with only Iraq and Lebanon suffering war and only Saddam being ousted, so it was agreed between Israel, USA and Saudi Arabia that Jihadis would be unleashed onto those nations not yet ravaged by war.
4. the Jihadis were inserted into Libya, given training and guidance by special forces from UK and Qatar, and given air support from NATO by a deliberate misreading of UN SCR 1973.
5. after killing Gaddafi the Jihadis and weapons were transported to Lebanon and Turkey to invade Syria, and have since been horrifying the world with their cannibalism, medieval justice, and mass slaughter of anyone who is pro-Assad, be they child or aged, be they Shia, Sunni, Christian, Alawite, Orthodox, etc.
I could also extend my thesis that Israel was created for the purpose of detonating WW3:
1. that WW1 handed Palestine to the Zionists for mass immigration of Jews,
2. that despite the rise of Hitler and a Transfer Agreement between the UK, Hitler and the Zionists, European Jews in general did not want to got to Palestine so WW2 and the Holocaust were engineered to convince world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them (with other suggestions for Jewish settlements across the globe refused by the Zionists),
3. that the Zionist-engineered Holocaust has since been used by the Zionists to emotionally blackmail the USA into building Israel and morally supporting Israel as it terrorises its neighbours into war and terrorism against Israel,
4. and that 9/11 was the trigger for WW3 (and with the recent escalation over Syria this thesis cannot be discarded).
But I have made this clear with much more detail in other writings.
Dumas confirms that:
1. around 2009 he was told by top British officials that the UK was preparing to insert rebels into Syria.
2. years before this he was told by a former Israeli PM that Israel would seek to destroy any nation that did not get along with it.
Last year the most explosive item of news that I read was also in Press TV and referred to Obama and Dempsey going public on 9/11.
This statement from Dumas is this year's equivalent.
Obama must go public on 9/11...NOW!
No bombs.
No bullets.
No MANPADs.
No scimitars.
No lies.
In the words of John Lennon, "All I want is the truth. Just gimme some truth now."
A brief overview of my thesis is:
1. 9/11 was an Israeli inside job using patsies from Saudi Arabia with Saudi acquiescence and Zionists in the USA in the highest levels of government (VP, SecDef, etc).
2. shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was informed of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. The seven nations named to Clark were generally hostile to Israel and had been targeted in Zionist documents pre-9/11. The nations were Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon/Hezbollah, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
3. By 2007 this plan was moribund, with only Iraq and Lebanon suffering war and only Saddam being ousted, so it was agreed between Israel, USA and Saudi Arabia that Jihadis would be unleashed onto those nations not yet ravaged by war.
4. the Jihadis were inserted into Libya, given training and guidance by special forces from UK and Qatar, and given air support from NATO by a deliberate misreading of UN SCR 1973.
5. after killing Gaddafi the Jihadis and weapons were transported to Lebanon and Turkey to invade Syria, and have since been horrifying the world with their cannibalism, medieval justice, and mass slaughter of anyone who is pro-Assad, be they child or aged, be they Shia, Sunni, Christian, Alawite, Orthodox, etc.
I could also extend my thesis that Israel was created for the purpose of detonating WW3:
1. that WW1 handed Palestine to the Zionists for mass immigration of Jews,
2. that despite the rise of Hitler and a Transfer Agreement between the UK, Hitler and the Zionists, European Jews in general did not want to got to Palestine so WW2 and the Holocaust were engineered to convince world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them (with other suggestions for Jewish settlements across the globe refused by the Zionists),
3. that the Zionist-engineered Holocaust has since been used by the Zionists to emotionally blackmail the USA into building Israel and morally supporting Israel as it terrorises its neighbours into war and terrorism against Israel,
4. and that 9/11 was the trigger for WW3 (and with the recent escalation over Syria this thesis cannot be discarded).
But I have made this clear with much more detail in other writings.
Dumas confirms that:
1. around 2009 he was told by top British officials that the UK was preparing to insert rebels into Syria.
2. years before this he was told by a former Israeli PM that Israel would seek to destroy any nation that did not get along with it.
“I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria,” said Dumas.
He continued by saying, “This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.”
Responding to a question on the motive behind inciting violence in Syria, Dumas said, "Very simple! With the very simple aim! To overthrow the Syrian government, because in the region, it's important to understand, that the Syrian regime makes anti-Israeli talk,” said Dumas
The former foreign minister added that he had been told by an Israeli prime minister a long time ago that Tel Aviv would seek to “destroy” any country that did not “get along” with it in the region.
[source : UK planned war on Syria before unrest began: French ex-foreign minister, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/06/16/309276/uk-planned-war-on-syria-before-unrest/, 16th June 2013]
Last year the most explosive item of news that I read was also in Press TV and referred to Obama and Dempsey going public on 9/11.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]
This statement from Dumas is this year's equivalent.
Obama must go public on 9/11...NOW!
No bombs.
No bullets.
No MANPADs.
No scimitars.
No lies.
In the words of John Lennon, "All I want is the truth. Just gimme some truth now."
Saturday, June 15, 2013
CONFIRMED : USA IS ISRAEL'S BITCH AND ATTACK DOG
On September 11th 2001 four alleged hijacked passenger planes flew unimpeded around the most protected air space in the world for nearly two hours to eventually fly into the WTC1, WTC2 and even The Pentagon(!!). The fourth was said to have flown into a small hole in the ground, but it was actually shot down. Its target was probably The Capitol or The White House. The US military was mysteriously AWOL on that murdered September day. But when you look at who was running the USA on that day it is no surprise that the attacks occured.
Having formed The Project for a New American Century a few years earlier, a cabal of Zionists had published a document entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses one year earlier in which PNAC called for a "new Pearl Harbor" to convince the American public to go on a global warmongering rampage to assert US hegemony (oh, and take out some of Israel's main enemies, such as Iraq and Iran). A few years before forming PNAC the same cabal of Zionists wrote A Clean Break in which Netanyahu was encouraged to 'engage' Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon/Hezbollah.
The PNAC Zionists running America on 9/11 included:
Dick Cheney
Donald Rumsfeld
Paul Wolfowitz
Richard Perle
Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia. You will observe that Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon were named in A Clean Break.
It took some lying but, after a brief detour into Afghanistan to get the opium production back to record levels, the USA invaded Iraq and took out Saddam (allegedly).
To destabilize Lebanon the former PM Hariri was assassinated. Syria was accused and withdrew from Lebanon during The Cedar Revolution. This left Hezbollah exposed to attack, and in 2006 Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah...but despite the Israeli war machine being the strongest in the region Israel somehow managed to lose. This shows how much Israel needs not only the finance but also the military muscle of the USA.
So by 2007 the plan for war on seven nations in five years was not going so well. So the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of the target nations named to Clark.
In 2011 NATO, but basically the USA, cited R2P to twist UN SCR 1973 into a Get Gaddafi campaign, and gave the Jihadis weapons, training and air support so that the Jihadis eventually 'got' Gaddafi.
The Jihadis have since moved onto Syria and for two years have been chopping the heads off, cutting the throats of, slaughtering and massacring Syrian military and civilians, be they Shia, Sunni, Alawite, Christian, Orthodox. It didn't matter to the cutthroats. They killed anyone who was pro-Assad. The USA has been supporting these Jihadis covertly. The recent 'finding' that Assad had used chemical weapons has allowed the USA to make overt what was covert, and then some.
So in this bloody adventure, the USA has been Israel's attack dog.
It has been estimated that Israel has received over $220 billion in aid from the USA since 1948.
But there is now a move to make it a legal requirement for the USA to give Israel anything that Israel believes it needs for its security. This is an amendment to the NDAA. It has just been passed by The House of Representatives. The amendment reads:
Apparently the POTUS has to report every 90 days to state how the policy is being implemented.
The amendment was passed 315-108.
There is one way to stop this; GO PUBLIC ON 9/11!
Having formed The Project for a New American Century a few years earlier, a cabal of Zionists had published a document entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses one year earlier in which PNAC called for a "new Pearl Harbor" to convince the American public to go on a global warmongering rampage to assert US hegemony (oh, and take out some of Israel's main enemies, such as Iraq and Iran). A few years before forming PNAC the same cabal of Zionists wrote A Clean Break in which Netanyahu was encouraged to 'engage' Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon/Hezbollah.
The PNAC Zionists running America on 9/11 included:
Dick Cheney
Donald Rumsfeld
Paul Wolfowitz
Richard Perle
Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. The seven nations named to Clark were Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia. You will observe that Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon were named in A Clean Break.
It took some lying but, after a brief detour into Afghanistan to get the opium production back to record levels, the USA invaded Iraq and took out Saddam (allegedly).
To destabilize Lebanon the former PM Hariri was assassinated. Syria was accused and withdrew from Lebanon during The Cedar Revolution. This left Hezbollah exposed to attack, and in 2006 Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah...but despite the Israeli war machine being the strongest in the region Israel somehow managed to lose. This shows how much Israel needs not only the finance but also the military muscle of the USA.
So by 2007 the plan for war on seven nations in five years was not going so well. So the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of the target nations named to Clark.
In 2011 NATO, but basically the USA, cited R2P to twist UN SCR 1973 into a Get Gaddafi campaign, and gave the Jihadis weapons, training and air support so that the Jihadis eventually 'got' Gaddafi.
The Jihadis have since moved onto Syria and for two years have been chopping the heads off, cutting the throats of, slaughtering and massacring Syrian military and civilians, be they Shia, Sunni, Alawite, Christian, Orthodox. It didn't matter to the cutthroats. They killed anyone who was pro-Assad. The USA has been supporting these Jihadis covertly. The recent 'finding' that Assad had used chemical weapons has allowed the USA to make overt what was covert, and then some.
So in this bloody adventure, the USA has been Israel's attack dog.
It has been estimated that Israel has received over $220 billion in aid from the USA since 1948.
But there is now a move to make it a legal requirement for the USA to give Israel anything that Israel believes it needs for its security. This is an amendment to the NDAA. It has just been passed by The House of Representatives. The amendment reads:
“It is the policy of the United States to take all necessary steps to ensure that Israel possesses and maintains an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests,”
[source : U.S. House passes bill to ensure Israel can 'remove existential threats', Haaretz, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-house-passes-bill-to-ensure-israel-can-remove-existential-threats-1.529950, 15th June 2013]
Apparently the POTUS has to report every 90 days to state how the policy is being implemented.
That report would identify “all aerial refueling platforms, bunker-buster munitions, and other capabilities and maintenance by Israel of a robust independent capability to remove existential security threats, including nuclear and ballistic missile facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests.”
The amendment was passed 315-108.
There is one way to stop this; GO PUBLIC ON 9/11!
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]
SURPRISE! NO INERNATIONALLY RECOGNISED CHAIN OF EVIDENCE WITH SARIN SAMPLES
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has blasted off both barrels over the claim of Assad's use of chemical weapons and the subsequent decision to escalate US involvement in Syria.
First, over the evidence that Assad used chemical weapons
This supports the claim made to The Cable yesterday that the chain of custody of the Sarin samples that the claims of use are based on is not secure.
Second, any No Fly Zone would be against international law.
So the evidence is shaky, a No Fly Zone would be illegal, and there are concerns from some that supplying the rebs with small arms and ammunition is too little, too late.
First, over the evidence that Assad used chemical weapons
Russia’s foreign minister said Saturday that the evidence put forth by the United States of chemical weapons use in Syria apparently doesn’t meet stringent criteria for reliability.
...In Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the material does not include guarantees that it meets the requirements of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. He said the organization specifies that samples taken from blood, urine and clothing can be considered reliable evidence only if supervised by organization experts from the time they are taken up to delivery to a laboratory.
[source : Russia questions Syrian chemical weapons evidence, Times of Israel, http://www.timesofisrael.com/russia-questions-syrian-chemical-weapons-evidence/, 15th June 2013]
This supports the claim made to The Cable yesterday that the chain of custody of the Sarin samples that the claims of use are based on is not secure.
When the White House first publicly announced in late April its belief that the Assad regime in Syria had used chemical weapons on its own people, it stressed that this was only a strong suspicion -- not a certainty. Yes, they had blood samples that indicated exposure to deadly sarin gas. But they couldn't say for sure who handled those samples in the two weeks it took to get the blood into Western hands. "The physiological examples are compelling but without being able to determine the chain of custody, that's the key to confirming the use," one unnamed U.S. official told the New York Times earlier this week.
That chain of custody still hasn't been nailed down, an American intelligence source tells The Cable.
[source : Source: U.S. Couldn't Nail Down Chemical Weapons Chain of Custody, The Cable, http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/06/14/us_can_t_nail_down_chemical_weapon_chain_of_custody_but_declared_war_on_assad_anywa, 14th June 2013 (registration required)]
Second, any No Fly Zone would be against international law.
The Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, has said that any attempt to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria using US fighter jets and Patriot missiles from Jordan would violate international law.
..."There have been leaks from western media regarding the serious consideration to create a no-fly zone over Syria through the deployment of Patriot anti-aircraft missiles and F-16 jets in Jordan," Lavrov said. "You don't have to be a great expert to understand that this will violate international law."
The US has moved Patriot missiles and fighter jets into Jordan in the past week, officially as part of an annual exercise, but it made clear that the military assets could stay on when the war games were over.
The Wall Street Journal has reported that a US military proposal to arm rebels fighting against Assad would include a limited no-fly zone inside Syria that could be enforced by US and allied planes on Jordanian territory. The US says it has evidence of Syria's use of chemical weapons, but Lavrov said it was not clear that the US evidence would meet international standards of reliability.
He said the evidence must meet the standards of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which specifies that samples taken from blood, urine and clothing can be considered reliable evidence only if supervised by organisation experts from the time they are gathered to when they are delivered to a laboratory.
[source : Syria no-fly zone would violate international law, says Russia, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/15/syria-no-fly-zone-violate-international-law-russia, 15th June 2013]
So the evidence is shaky, a No Fly Zone would be illegal, and there are concerns from some that supplying the rebs with small arms and ammunition is too little, too late.
SURPRISE! BLAIR CALLS FOR NO FLY ZONE OVER SYRIA
Tony Blair, the Butcher of Baghdad, the liar-liar-pants-on-fire who lied, lied, lied to start war on Iraq (and look how well that turned out), has called for a No Fly Zone over Syria. During the Chilcot Inquiry into the war on Iraq he had the balls to use the opportunity of being in the media spotlight to call for war on Iran. In this latest warmongering rant Blair again has a snipe at Iran, also taking aim at Hezbollah.
Hmm.
Iraq.
Syria.
Iran.
Hezbollah.
What document has been written that calls for 'engagement', i.e. war, on these four?
A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
Written for Netanyahu by Zionists such as Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.
The war in Syria has never been a civil war. The war in Syria is a proxy war by the USA, Saudi Arabia, Israel, France and this DFK using cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum to grind Syria down, reduce it to ruins and at the very least oust Assad. The war in Syria is the 'engagement' suggested in A Clean Break, and one stage in the plan for war on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
That plan is at least 5 years behind schedule. Taking the start date of the plan as Operation Shock and Awe then it began to be implemented in 2003. Five years later is 2008. So the plan should have been completed by March 2008. But it is now 2013. And only two governments of the targeted seven have been replaced; Iraq and Libya.
This has to be one of the worst plans ever in the history of mankind, from the scale, execution, cover up and desperation to keep it alive.
I would laugh but the potential consequences of this plan dragging in Russia, China and the USA are too horrific to contemplate.
Hmm.
Iraq.
Syria.
Iran.
Hezbollah.
What document has been written that calls for 'engagement', i.e. war, on these four?
A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.
Written for Netanyahu by Zionists such as Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.
Britain should arm the Syrian rebels and consider imposing a no-fly zone over Syria to prevent "catastrophic consequences", Tony Blair has said.
..."You've got the intervention of Hezbollah, at the instigation of Iran. The other big change is the use of chemical weapons. Once you allow that to happen – and this will be the first time since Saddam used them in the 1980s – you run the risk of it then becoming an acceptable form of warfare, for both sides," he told the Times.
...Blair said the conflict was no longer a civil war. "We should be taking a more interventionist line. You don't have to send in troops, but the international community should think about installing no-fly zones," he said. "You've got to create the circumstances in which Assad is not able to change the balance of power within the struggle by the use of outside forces."
Blair suggested that regime change in Syria was inevitable. "People are no longer going to accept that a minority ruled the country without the say of the majority. It's exactly the arguments we went through over Iraq," he said.
He also reiterated his criticism of Iran, claiming that the transition across the Middle East was being complicated by the policies of the Islamic republic.
"It's not just trying to acquire nuclear weapons, it's trying to export an ideology and an extremism around the region. They continue to meddle in Iraq. It's a hugely destabilising force. I would be 100% more optimistic about the speed with which the region could change if that Iranian regime weren't there."
[source : Tony Blair calls for west to intervene in Syria conflict, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/15/tony-blair-west-intervene-syria, 15th June 2013
The war in Syria has never been a civil war. The war in Syria is a proxy war by the USA, Saudi Arabia, Israel, France and this DFK using cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum to grind Syria down, reduce it to ruins and at the very least oust Assad. The war in Syria is the 'engagement' suggested in A Clean Break, and one stage in the plan for war on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
That plan is at least 5 years behind schedule. Taking the start date of the plan as Operation Shock and Awe then it began to be implemented in 2003. Five years later is 2008. So the plan should have been completed by March 2008. But it is now 2013. And only two governments of the targeted seven have been replaced; Iraq and Libya.
This has to be one of the worst plans ever in the history of mankind, from the scale, execution, cover up and desperation to keep it alive.
I would laugh but the potential consequences of this plan dragging in Russia, China and the USA are too horrific to contemplate.
HAVE GREENWALD AND SNOWDEN BEEN SET UP?
In an interesting article on the NSA PRISM scandal Steve Kinney reveals that
1. there was a plan to discredit Wikileaks
2. that plan involved submitting false documents
3. Glenn Greenwald was mentioned as a target for discrediting
Why would Snowden be under surveillance?
Snowden could have been under surveillance for his postings, possibly for years.
If Snowden was set up then why has the information he has revealed been revealed now?
1. there was a plan to discredit Wikileaks
2. that plan involved submitting false documents
3. Glenn Greenwald was mentioned as a target for discrediting
Intelligence services have been feeding false information to known enemy informants in their own ranks for a long time, and they are very good at it.
Today, the potential whistleblower is one of the most dangerous informants an intelligence service can confront.
Was Edward Snowden spotted before he decided to leak documents, and set up by the NSA?
Substantial evidence supports the possibility that he was. Numerous questions cast doubt on the authenticity of the Power Point slide show describing PRISM, but the UK Guardian has not seen fit to release it to the public. Perhaps Glenn Greenwald should anonymously leak this file: In the words of Snowden himself, “The public needs to decide.”
...“The presentation, which has been seen by The Independent, recommends a multi-pronged assault on WikiLeaks including deliberately submitting false documents to the website to undermine its credibility, pioneering cyber attacks to expose who the leakers to WikiLeaks are and going after sympathetic journalists.
“One of those mentioned is Glenn Greenwald, a pro-WikiLeaks reporter in the US. Writing on Salon.com. Greenwald stated that his initial reaction was “to scoff at its absurdity.” – Jerome Taylor, The Independent[10]
...Was Edward Snowden under surveillance at intelligence contractor Booz Allen in advance of releasing the PRISM document?
[source : NSA Deception Operation? Questions Surround Leaked PRISM Document’s Authenticity
Was Edward Snowden spotted before he decided to leak documents, and set up by the NSA?, Global Research, http://www.globalresearch.ca/nsa-deception-operation-questions-surround-leaked-prism-documents-authenticity/5338673, 12th June 2013]
Why would Snowden be under surveillance?
(Reuters) - While working for U.S. intelligence agencies, Edward Snowden had another secret identity: an online commentator who anonymously railed against citizen surveillance and corporate greed.
Throughout the eight years that Snowden worked for the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency contractors, he posted hundreds of messages on a public Internet forum under a pseudonym.
...He was also a prolific commentator on technology forum Ars Technica, posting approximately 750 messages using the screen name "The True HOOHA" from late 2001 to 2012.
Most of the postings were not political in nature: he dispensed advice about government careers, polygraphs and the 2008 stock market crash. He claimed to own the same gun as James Bond and posted glamour photos of himself. He jokingly compared the video console Xbox Live to NSA surveillance.
[source : While working for spies, Snowden was secretly prolific online, Reuters, http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/06/14/uk-usa-security-snowden-online-idUKBRE95D01Y20130614, 14th June 2013]
Snowden could have been under surveillance for his postings, possibly for years.
If Snowden was set up then why has the information he has revealed been revealed now?
THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY CANNOT BE PROVEN
One intelligence source has told The Cable that the chain of custody of the blood samples used to show use of sarin cannot be proven.
What is being claimed is that, even though the chain of custody cannot be proven, because there are just so many claims of use of sarin and blood samples then there must be some truth to the allegations.
But just how many samples does the USA have? It could be as little as six! From The Cable article I count as little as six samples.
And that is the high level of intelligence that the USA has!
No smoke without fire, they are saying.
So just how easy could it be to pull a hoax? Dead easy. Simply provide a few samples, get the rebs to claim they were attacked, and...BINGO! Congratulations! You have just been hoaxed. And your prize is a free delivery of MANPADs an al Qaeda affiliate in Syria of your choice.
Can we be surprised at this low level of proof?
No. Some of the evidence produced to convince us to go to war on Iraq was comical. Never mind Colin Powell at the UN. Much more comical was the taxi driver who claimed he overheard two Iraqi Generals in the back of his taxi discussing Iraq' WMDs! This sarin allegation against Assad is in the same league as that.
When the White House first publicly announced in late April its belief that the Assad regime in Syria had used chemical weapons on its own people, it stressed that this was only a strong suspicion -- not a certainty. Yes, they had blood samples that indicated exposure to deadly sarin gas. But they couldn't say for sure who handled those samples in the two weeks it took to get the blood into Western hands. "The physiological examples are compelling but without being able to determine the chain of custody, that's the key to confirming the use," one unnamed U.S. official told the New York Times earlier this week.
That chain of custody still hasn't been nailed down, an American intelligence source tells The Cable.
[source : Source: U.S. Couldn't Nail Down Chemical Weapons Chain of Custody, The Cable, http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/06/14/us_can_t_nail_down_chemical_weapon_chain_of_custody_but_declared_war_on_assad_anywa, 14th June 2013 (registration required)]
What is being claimed is that, even though the chain of custody cannot be proven, because there are just so many claims of use of sarin and blood samples then there must be some truth to the allegations.
But just how many samples does the USA have? It could be as little as six! From The Cable article I count as little as six samples.
After an alleged chemical attack on the city of Aleppo in March, the U.S. and United States came into possession of at least three physiological samples that tested positive for indicators of sarin gas. Now, Western intelligence services have at least twice that number of blood, urine, and hair samples coming from a variety of battle zones around the country.
"The big thing that changed is an increase in the number of incidents," the source says. "It's impossible that the opposition is faking the stuff in so many instances in so many locations."
And that is the high level of intelligence that the USA has!
No smoke without fire, they are saying.
So just how easy could it be to pull a hoax? Dead easy. Simply provide a few samples, get the rebs to claim they were attacked, and...BINGO! Congratulations! You have just been hoaxed. And your prize is a free delivery of MANPADs an al Qaeda affiliate in Syria of your choice.
Can we be surprised at this low level of proof?
No. Some of the evidence produced to convince us to go to war on Iraq was comical. Never mind Colin Powell at the UN. Much more comical was the taxi driver who claimed he overheard two Iraqi Generals in the back of his taxi discussing Iraq' WMDs! This sarin allegation against Assad is in the same league as that.
Friday, June 14, 2013
THIS MUCH WE KNOW
We know that 9/11 was an inside job, and that factions in Israel, USA, Saudi Arabia and the UK ran it. Whenever Ahmadenijad declared that 9/11 was an inside job at the UN GA he got standing ovations from the vast majority of reps, with only the likes of the USA, Israel, UK and Canada leaving in protest. We know from the man who revealed NATO Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga that many in Europe and the USA know that 9/11 was an inside job.
We know that General Wesley Clark was told shortly after 9/11 of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Clark called this a foreign policy coup.
We know the nations named to Clark; Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
We know that four of them were named in a 1996 document for Netanyahu called A Clean Break; Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon.
We know that the same cabal of Zionists who wrote A Clean Break formed The Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
We know that PNAC targeted Iraq and Iran.
We know, from Clark that Paul Wolfowitz said in 1991 that the USA "had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes; Iraq, Iran, Syria before the next superpower comes along".
We know that this cabal was in charge of the USA when on 9/11 four alleged hijacked passenger planes flew around the North East sector of US air space unimpeded for nearly 2 hours while the US military was mysteriously and conveniently AWOL, producing the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had dreamed of to begin their warmongering rampage.
We know that Iraq was invaded in 2003 based on a pack of lies about WMD.
We know that Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah in 2006.
We know that by 2007 the plan as revealed to General Clark was moribund so a Plan B was implemented, using cutthroat Jihadis as cannon fodder.
We know that Israel has attacked Sudan several times.
We know that Obama cited R2P and UN SCR 1973 was twisted out of all recognition and used to support the cutthroat Jihadis to eventually kill Gaddafi and destroy Libya.
We know that Bilderberg and Wall Street picked Romney for 2012.
We know that since Obama's re-election Israel, the UK and France and Neocon elements inside the USA have been losing patience with Obama and demanding that Obama arm the Syrian rebels, implement a NFZ and bomb Syria.
We know that Israel, supported by the UK, produced false evidence that the rebels had used chemical weapons.
We know that the rebels have been developing chemical weapons and were arrested with kgs of the stuff.
We know that the rebels have been massacring Syrian military, filming themselves decapitating prisoners, eating their prisoners' hearts, and massacring villages be they Christian, Shia, Alawite or Sunni.
We know that two car bombs exploded in Reyhanli, Turkey just days after Robert "death squad" Ford secretly visited the area and just days before Erdogan travelled to Washington DC.
We know that Israel attacked several HQs of the Syrian Arab Army in coordination with the Syria rebs.
We know that The Washington Post have printed several editorials demanding that Obama bomb Syria and arm the rebels with heavy weapons.
We know that Obama has been feeling the pressure by claiming to be afraid that what happened to MLK will happen to him.
We know that Obama had so far resisted all this pressure, not just domestic from McCain et al but international, from Cameron, Hollande, Hague, Fabius, Erdogan etc.
We know that, just as all this pressure builds up, the rebels face a rapid crushing defeat, and with Hezbollah fighting in Syria as an ally of Assad, Obama was implemented in several scandals, the latest being the very high profile NSA Prism expose, which occured just days after al Qusayr was liberated from the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum.
Within a week of Prism being exposed Obama begins to show signs of cracking, and changes US policy to arming the rebels, but to what extent is yet to be determined.
We know all this.
Obama was stalling the plan for war on seven nations in five years that was kicked off by the inside job 9/11. 9/11 occured in 2001. So it is nearly 12 years since 9/11. And only two nations of the seven named to Clark have seen regime change; Iraq and Libya. Obama could have easily used all the false allegations of massacres and use of chemical weapons in Syria last year. But he didn't. This is one reason why Bilderberg and the Neocons wanted Romney in The White House. Romney would have implemented fascist austerity much quicker but also bombed Syria and Iran by now, being a good friend of Netanyahu.
Obama cited R2P to eventually capitulate to intervene in Libya. I see the beginnings of something similar being planned in NATO media over Syria. Suddenly the numbers of dead are inflated, and then inflated some more. Fake concern for the Syrian people, particularly the children, when NATO, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey have been arming their proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum to attack, attack, attack anyone who supports Assad, be they Shia, Sunni, Alawite, Christian, Orthodox, whatever. Just cut their throats, bring Syria to ruin and remove Assad.
Twelve years since 9/11.
And only Iraq and Libya have fallen.
Oh, how the Neocons, Israel and their masters and allies are getting very, very concerned.
Particularly when Obama is threatening to go public on 9/11, another reason why Obama is not supposed to be in The White House.
This much we know.
We know that General Wesley Clark was told shortly after 9/11 of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Clark called this a foreign policy coup.
We know the nations named to Clark; Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
We know that four of them were named in a 1996 document for Netanyahu called A Clean Break; Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon.
We know that the same cabal of Zionists who wrote A Clean Break formed The Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
We know that PNAC targeted Iraq and Iran.
We know, from Clark that Paul Wolfowitz said in 1991 that the USA "had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes; Iraq, Iran, Syria before the next superpower comes along".
We know that this cabal was in charge of the USA when on 9/11 four alleged hijacked passenger planes flew around the North East sector of US air space unimpeded for nearly 2 hours while the US military was mysteriously and conveniently AWOL, producing the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had dreamed of to begin their warmongering rampage.
We know that Iraq was invaded in 2003 based on a pack of lies about WMD.
We know that Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah in 2006.
We know that by 2007 the plan as revealed to General Clark was moribund so a Plan B was implemented, using cutthroat Jihadis as cannon fodder.
We know that Israel has attacked Sudan several times.
We know that Obama cited R2P and UN SCR 1973 was twisted out of all recognition and used to support the cutthroat Jihadis to eventually kill Gaddafi and destroy Libya.
We know that Bilderberg and Wall Street picked Romney for 2012.
We know that since Obama's re-election Israel, the UK and France and Neocon elements inside the USA have been losing patience with Obama and demanding that Obama arm the Syrian rebels, implement a NFZ and bomb Syria.
We know that Israel, supported by the UK, produced false evidence that the rebels had used chemical weapons.
We know that the rebels have been developing chemical weapons and were arrested with kgs of the stuff.
We know that the rebels have been massacring Syrian military, filming themselves decapitating prisoners, eating their prisoners' hearts, and massacring villages be they Christian, Shia, Alawite or Sunni.
We know that two car bombs exploded in Reyhanli, Turkey just days after Robert "death squad" Ford secretly visited the area and just days before Erdogan travelled to Washington DC.
We know that Israel attacked several HQs of the Syrian Arab Army in coordination with the Syria rebs.
We know that The Washington Post have printed several editorials demanding that Obama bomb Syria and arm the rebels with heavy weapons.
We know that Obama has been feeling the pressure by claiming to be afraid that what happened to MLK will happen to him.
We know that Obama had so far resisted all this pressure, not just domestic from McCain et al but international, from Cameron, Hollande, Hague, Fabius, Erdogan etc.
We know that, just as all this pressure builds up, the rebels face a rapid crushing defeat, and with Hezbollah fighting in Syria as an ally of Assad, Obama was implemented in several scandals, the latest being the very high profile NSA Prism expose, which occured just days after al Qusayr was liberated from the NATO proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum.
Within a week of Prism being exposed Obama begins to show signs of cracking, and changes US policy to arming the rebels, but to what extent is yet to be determined.
We know all this.
Obama was stalling the plan for war on seven nations in five years that was kicked off by the inside job 9/11. 9/11 occured in 2001. So it is nearly 12 years since 9/11. And only two nations of the seven named to Clark have seen regime change; Iraq and Libya. Obama could have easily used all the false allegations of massacres and use of chemical weapons in Syria last year. But he didn't. This is one reason why Bilderberg and the Neocons wanted Romney in The White House. Romney would have implemented fascist austerity much quicker but also bombed Syria and Iran by now, being a good friend of Netanyahu.
Obama cited R2P to eventually capitulate to intervene in Libya. I see the beginnings of something similar being planned in NATO media over Syria. Suddenly the numbers of dead are inflated, and then inflated some more. Fake concern for the Syrian people, particularly the children, when NATO, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey have been arming their proxy cutthroat Jihadi terrorist scum to attack, attack, attack anyone who supports Assad, be they Shia, Sunni, Alawite, Christian, Orthodox, whatever. Just cut their throats, bring Syria to ruin and remove Assad.
Twelve years since 9/11.
And only Iraq and Libya have fallen.
Oh, how the Neocons, Israel and their masters and allies are getting very, very concerned.
Particularly when Obama is threatening to go public on 9/11, another reason why Obama is not supposed to be in The White House.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]
This much we know.
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
NO WAR ON SYRIA!
President Obama will be meeting today to discuss what to do with Syria.
What to do? What to do? What to do?
Here's what to do.
NO WAR ON SYRIA!!!
A war on Syria would be absolutely cataclysmic and catastrophic for the human race.
Russia has clearly made its support for Assad known: brand new MiGs, S-300, Yakhonts, increased Med fleet.
I have made it absolutely clear what I think has happened in the last 150 years or so. It is all about Israel and world government.
WW1 led to the grabbing of Palestine for mass Jewish immigration into Palestine, and the first attempt at world government The League of Nations which failed.
After years of Hitler trying to scare European Jews into populating Palestine (with the agreement of the Zionists) and failing, WW2 led to the engineered Holocaust convincing world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world, and the second attempt at world government The United Nations. The UN has since been assuming more and more control but does not yet have complete control.
Since WW2 Israel has provoked war and terrorism.
On 9/11 the USA was attacked. The attack was used for a foreign policy coup. General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Five of those nations were enemies of Israel: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon and Libya. The other two were Sudan and Somalia. Israel has attacked Sudan. Foreign cutthroat Jihadis have been used to advance this plan after it had stalled in 2007.
I am convinced that Israel was created for WW3 and that WW1 and WW2 were designed to create Israel for this purpose. According to a plan attributed to Albert Pike WW3 is to be between Islam and Zionism with the rest of the world joining in having been divided on the issue for decades. This plan has been implemented by Satanists. The streets of Washington DC contain Satanic symbolism; an inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram directly north of The White House, and Moloch the owl, containing The Capitol, sitting on top of a 13 layer pyramid with the capstone removed. At Bohemian Grove a mock human sacrifice takes place in front of a 40 foot stone owl called Moloch.
A war on Syria by the USA and NATO would drag in Russia and that would be WW3. WW3 would give the UN total control and the Satanists would control the UN.
Does Obama want to be known as the man, the fool, the sucker who fell for this?
Does Obama want to hand the world over to Satanists who would drastically reduce human population? And if so can he guarantee that his family will be spared?
Or does Obama want to be known as the man who stopped this plan, who tamed Israeli aggression and exposed the Israeli role in the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11?
I fully agree with Dr Webster Tarpley. Romney was supposed to win the election last year to
1. implement brutal fascist austerity
2. implement the Israeli-instigated war on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
Listen to Tarpley's latest Unbound Radio Show.
Tell Obama: Hands Off Syria! Say No to British-French-State Dept. War Psychosis!
http://tarpley.net/2013/06/11/tell-obama-hands-off-syria/
But Obama has made it known what he is thinking. Again I agree with Tarpley that Benghazi was an attempt to Carterize Obama. Shortly after this failed attempt by Petraeus et al Obama let it be known that he and others were considering going public on 9/11.
Obama has so far resisted attempts to get the USA embroiled directly in Syria.
Obama has ignored claims from Israel and the DFK that Assad had used chemical weapons and crossed his 'red line'. He was correct to ignore these lies. It was revealed by the UN investigator Carla del Ponte that all the evidence pointed to the rebs using such weapons.
Obama ignored pleas from Erdogan after two car bombs exploded in Reyhanli which Erdogan clumsily blamed on Assad.
Obama forced Israel to expose itself when Israel attacked several HQs of the SAA in coordination with the rebs.
Obama has ignored The Bilderberg Post's numerous calls for a NFZ and air strikes on Syria.
It is just as Obama is ignoring these attempts to drag the USA into a war on Syria, and the rebs were facing defeat at al Qusayr that Obama was implicated in several scandals.
Obama was stalling the Israeli-instigated plan for war on seven nations in five years. Obama has the power to bring down Netanyahu and rid the world of Israeli aggression which is leading the world down a terrible path.
NO WAR ON SYRIA!
Expose Israel's role in 9/11.
What to do? What to do? What to do?
Here's what to do.
NO WAR ON SYRIA!!!
A war on Syria would be absolutely cataclysmic and catastrophic for the human race.
Russia has clearly made its support for Assad known: brand new MiGs, S-300, Yakhonts, increased Med fleet.
I have made it absolutely clear what I think has happened in the last 150 years or so. It is all about Israel and world government.
WW1 led to the grabbing of Palestine for mass Jewish immigration into Palestine, and the first attempt at world government The League of Nations which failed.
After years of Hitler trying to scare European Jews into populating Palestine (with the agreement of the Zionists) and failing, WW2 led to the engineered Holocaust convincing world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world, and the second attempt at world government The United Nations. The UN has since been assuming more and more control but does not yet have complete control.
Since WW2 Israel has provoked war and terrorism.
On 9/11 the USA was attacked. The attack was used for a foreign policy coup. General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Five of those nations were enemies of Israel: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon and Libya. The other two were Sudan and Somalia. Israel has attacked Sudan. Foreign cutthroat Jihadis have been used to advance this plan after it had stalled in 2007.
I am convinced that Israel was created for WW3 and that WW1 and WW2 were designed to create Israel for this purpose. According to a plan attributed to Albert Pike WW3 is to be between Islam and Zionism with the rest of the world joining in having been divided on the issue for decades. This plan has been implemented by Satanists. The streets of Washington DC contain Satanic symbolism; an inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram directly north of The White House, and Moloch the owl, containing The Capitol, sitting on top of a 13 layer pyramid with the capstone removed. At Bohemian Grove a mock human sacrifice takes place in front of a 40 foot stone owl called Moloch.
A war on Syria by the USA and NATO would drag in Russia and that would be WW3. WW3 would give the UN total control and the Satanists would control the UN.
Does Obama want to be known as the man, the fool, the sucker who fell for this?
Does Obama want to hand the world over to Satanists who would drastically reduce human population? And if so can he guarantee that his family will be spared?
Or does Obama want to be known as the man who stopped this plan, who tamed Israeli aggression and exposed the Israeli role in the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11?
I fully agree with Dr Webster Tarpley. Romney was supposed to win the election last year to
1. implement brutal fascist austerity
2. implement the Israeli-instigated war on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
Listen to Tarpley's latest Unbound Radio Show.
Tell Obama: Hands Off Syria! Say No to British-French-State Dept. War Psychosis!
http://tarpley.net/2013/06/11/tell-obama-hands-off-syria/
But Obama has made it known what he is thinking. Again I agree with Tarpley that Benghazi was an attempt to Carterize Obama. Shortly after this failed attempt by Petraeus et al Obama let it be known that he and others were considering going public on 9/11.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]
Obama has so far resisted attempts to get the USA embroiled directly in Syria.
Obama has ignored claims from Israel and the DFK that Assad had used chemical weapons and crossed his 'red line'. He was correct to ignore these lies. It was revealed by the UN investigator Carla del Ponte that all the evidence pointed to the rebs using such weapons.
Obama ignored pleas from Erdogan after two car bombs exploded in Reyhanli which Erdogan clumsily blamed on Assad.
Obama forced Israel to expose itself when Israel attacked several HQs of the SAA in coordination with the rebs.
Obama has ignored The Bilderberg Post's numerous calls for a NFZ and air strikes on Syria.
It is just as Obama is ignoring these attempts to drag the USA into a war on Syria, and the rebs were facing defeat at al Qusayr that Obama was implicated in several scandals.
Obama was stalling the Israeli-instigated plan for war on seven nations in five years. Obama has the power to bring down Netanyahu and rid the world of Israeli aggression which is leading the world down a terrible path.
NO WAR ON SYRIA!
Expose Israel's role in 9/11.
Saturday, June 08, 2013
WHAT HAPPENS IF OBAMA RESIGNS?
Alex Jones (I assume) has begun a petition demanding that President Obama resign.
But what happens if Obama does resign?
According to the 25th Amendment the Vice-President becomes President.
The Vice-President is Joe Biden.
Joe Biden is a bona fide Zionist.
Would Joe Biden bomb Syria, without the need to cite R2P? I believe so.
Would Joe Biden bomb Iran? Absolutely.
Joe Biden would continue the series of wars that was instigated by the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
Ain't no doubt about that.
For whatever reason Obama has been resisting a direct military intervention in Syria. We have seen:
1. Israel attack Damascus in coordination with the al Qaeda rebs
2. Israel, the DFK and France claim they had evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons, which was dismissed by Obama
3. car bombs in Reyhanli, Turkey followed by a face-to-face meeting between Obama and Erdogan
4. editorials from TheBilderberg Washington Post demanding the implementation of a NFZ over, and air strikes on, Syria
5. after Obama's speech at the National Defense University the likes of Bill Kristol, founder of PNAC who ran the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11, shit their pants at its implications.
Obama's resistance has suddenly led to a myriad of scandals, all implementing Obama but none leading directly to The Oval Office.
And now we see this petition.
Yes, Obama is implementing lots of policies that the Anglo-American Establishment want.
But they did the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11 to kick off a series of wars that could be easily manipulated into a WW3 that would lead to the use of terrible weapons, vastly reduced population and more world government.
But Obama is not reading their full script.
I fully agree with Dr Webster Tarpley's take on this and on Bilderberg 2013, as he states in his latest article on Press TV at
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/06/08/307786/uk-france-goading-us-into-striking-syria/
1. Obama has not been for a direct war on Syria.
2. Obama is not implementing brutal austerity fast enough.
3. Romney was supposed to win last year's election to implement points 1. and 2. above
But I must also add this astonishing paragraph from the same media outlet from last year to the mix.
President Richard Nixon resigned after wiretapping a handful of journalists, sparing the nation the ordeal of impeachment. We call on Obama to do the same. His administration vetted the NSA's surveillance of millions of Americans and seriously violated the Fourth Amendment. He confiscated the personal records of reporters, thus violating the First Amendment, and the IRS under his watch harassed political organizations opposed to his policies. Moreover, his administration has lied under oath to Congress. In addition to violating Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution by invading Libya, his administration engaged in torture and conducted a covert drone war. Due to the severity of these crimes, we call for the immediate resignation of Barack Obama.
[source : The White House, https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-demand-president-obama-resign/sTtJndXm, Accessed 8th June 2013]
But what happens if Obama does resign?
According to the 25th Amendment the Vice-President becomes President.
The Vice-President is Joe Biden.
Joe Biden is a bona fide Zionist.
Would Joe Biden bomb Syria, without the need to cite R2P? I believe so.
Would Joe Biden bomb Iran? Absolutely.
Joe Biden would continue the series of wars that was instigated by the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11.
Ain't no doubt about that.
For whatever reason Obama has been resisting a direct military intervention in Syria. We have seen:
1. Israel attack Damascus in coordination with the al Qaeda rebs
2. Israel, the DFK and France claim they had evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons, which was dismissed by Obama
3. car bombs in Reyhanli, Turkey followed by a face-to-face meeting between Obama and Erdogan
4. editorials from The
5. after Obama's speech at the National Defense University the likes of Bill Kristol, founder of PNAC who ran the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11, shit their pants at its implications.
Obama's resistance has suddenly led to a myriad of scandals, all implementing Obama but none leading directly to The Oval Office.
And now we see this petition.
Yes, Obama is implementing lots of policies that the Anglo-American Establishment want.
But they did the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11 to kick off a series of wars that could be easily manipulated into a WW3 that would lead to the use of terrible weapons, vastly reduced population and more world government.
But Obama is not reading their full script.
I fully agree with Dr Webster Tarpley's take on this and on Bilderberg 2013, as he states in his latest article on Press TV at
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/06/08/307786/uk-france-goading-us-into-striking-syria/
1. Obama has not been for a direct war on Syria.
2. Obama is not implementing brutal austerity fast enough.
3. Romney was supposed to win last year's election to implement points 1. and 2. above
But I must also add this astonishing paragraph from the same media outlet from last year to the mix.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]
Friday, June 07, 2013
PRODUCER OF THE MONEY MASTERS SAYS IT HAS FLAWS
I believed in Eustace Mullins and The Money Masters.
I believed, until a few months ago after reading the works of Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin on President Andrew Jackson.
On Mullins, I always had a little niggle in the back of my mind because he would frequently say something but provide no references. So one day I checked out one of his references, by Henry Clews, and Clews does NOT say what Mullins attributes to Clews. In fact, Clews accuses Jackson and his handler Martin van Buren are to blame for the crash of 1837, but Mullins curiously omits this devastating information. I also discovered that Mullins' alleged benefactor, the character Ezra Pound, was looked after by a doctor at the forefront of CIA mind control programs, and that Mullins himself was evasive with references and had access to the Library of Congress that only intelligence agents had.
Now the producer of The Money Masters, Pat Carmack, says that the documentary has flaws, but the general idea of the film is correct.
https://soundcloud.com/riseupradioshow/rise-up-radio-5-3-2013-w-pat
Er, no!
The documentary tries to discredit the First Bank of The United States and the Second Bank of The United States by claiming Andrew Jackson was a hero, when in fact he was an unwitting British agent tasked with the aim of destroying The Second Bank because it was very quickly financing the United States into a huge rival to the British Empire.
Whoever uses Secrets of The Federal Reserve and The Money Masters as sources should now seriously reconsider their history and/or politics.
I believed, until a few months ago after reading the works of Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin on President Andrew Jackson.
On Mullins, I always had a little niggle in the back of my mind because he would frequently say something but provide no references. So one day I checked out one of his references, by Henry Clews, and Clews does NOT say what Mullins attributes to Clews. In fact, Clews accuses Jackson and his handler Martin van Buren are to blame for the crash of 1837, but Mullins curiously omits this devastating information. I also discovered that Mullins' alleged benefactor, the character Ezra Pound, was looked after by a doctor at the forefront of CIA mind control programs, and that Mullins himself was evasive with references and had access to the Library of Congress that only intelligence agents had.
Now the producer of The Money Masters, Pat Carmack, says that the documentary has flaws, but the general idea of the film is correct.
https://soundcloud.com/riseupradioshow/rise-up-radio-5-3-2013-w-pat
Er, no!
The documentary tries to discredit the First Bank of The United States and the Second Bank of The United States by claiming Andrew Jackson was a hero, when in fact he was an unwitting British agent tasked with the aim of destroying The Second Bank because it was very quickly financing the United States into a huge rival to the British Empire.
Whoever uses Secrets of The Federal Reserve and The Money Masters as sources should now seriously reconsider their history and/or politics.
BIG PUSH FOR HUMAN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA IS COMING IN NATO MEDIA
So the day after Obama suggests Rice and Power for NSA and Ambassador to the UN respectively, the UN announces a huge PR campaign to raise over $4 billion for Syrian refugees.
The nation's darling BBC's Shelagh Fogarty is going to Jordan to report from a camp for Syrian refugees for a whole week, so prepare well and buy lots of tissues.
This occurs at the same time that several scandals implicating Obama are causing calls for his impeachment, and the SAA and Hezbollah are preparing to run the Syrian al Qaeda rebs out of Syria.
The nation's darling BBC's Shelagh Fogarty is going to Jordan to report from a camp for Syrian refugees for a whole week, so prepare well and buy lots of tissues.
This occurs at the same time that several scandals implicating Obama are causing calls for his impeachment, and the SAA and Hezbollah are preparing to run the Syrian al Qaeda rebs out of Syria.
FORGET PRISM. THEY ARE HACKING YOUR MIND.
For decades we have known of the 'secret' project monitoring all our emails, Echelon.
So with the development of social media is it any surprise that all our tweets, blogs, etc are being monitored in the same fashion. I would be surprised if the social media technology had not been developed without the nod and from the NSA and CIA and all the other 'secret' alphabet agencies.
So why all the fake outrage at this 'breaking' news?
The questions should be
1. why are all these scandals 'breaking' now, and why are some jumping on the bandwagon?
2. why is nobody focusing on the technology we should all be absolutely livid about, the mind-reading and mind-writing technology?
So with the development of social media is it any surprise that all our tweets, blogs, etc are being monitored in the same fashion. I would be surprised if the social media technology had not been developed without the nod and from the NSA and CIA and all the other 'secret' alphabet agencies.
So why all the fake outrage at this 'breaking' news?
The questions should be
1. why are all these scandals 'breaking' now, and why are some jumping on the bandwagon?
2. why is nobody focusing on the technology we should all be absolutely livid about, the mind-reading and mind-writing technology?
Thursday, June 06, 2013
£1 OR £2 MORE FOR THE PEOPLE'S VOICE
Everyone who has donated so far to #ThePeoplesVoice can donate just £1 or £2 more to hit the £100000 tonight
— Truth Serum (@TruthSerum911) June 6, 2013
UNLEASH THE PEOPLE'S VOICE
Nearly there!.Can we raise 100K by end of today for #ThePeoplesVoicePlease share and donate using following linkindiegogo.com/projects/the-p…
— David Icke (@davidicke) June 6, 2013
HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA IN THE PIPELINE
Yesterday President Obama took one step closer to intervention in Syria by appointing Samantha Power as The United States Ambassador to the United Nations. Power convinced Obama to intervene in Libya, and is married to Cass Sunstein.
Power is replacing Susan Rice who is being made National Security Adviser and also convinced Obama to intervene in Libya.
In case you missed it, at the New Year it was sneakily announced that the number of dead in Syria had been significantly underestimated by nearly 20000! Most of the dead are foreign Jihadis and Syrian military. The vast majority of civilian dead were slaughtered by the foreign Jihadis. So this 'underestimation' makes the crisis in Syria look much worse than it is.
And now the UN has blamed BOTH the rebels and Assad of using chemical weapons, which again makes the crisis look much worse than it is because there is no way that Assad would use chemical weapons thus giving the excuse to bomb Syria.
Perhaps the recent pressure has got to Obama and he is caving into the R2P crowd, which is basically the Blair/British crowd and The Henry Jackson Society.
Power is replacing Susan Rice who is being made National Security Adviser and also convinced Obama to intervene in Libya.
In case you missed it, at the New Year it was sneakily announced that the number of dead in Syria had been significantly underestimated by nearly 20000! Most of the dead are foreign Jihadis and Syrian military. The vast majority of civilian dead were slaughtered by the foreign Jihadis. So this 'underestimation' makes the crisis in Syria look much worse than it is.
And now the UN has blamed BOTH the rebels and Assad of using chemical weapons, which again makes the crisis look much worse than it is because there is no way that Assad would use chemical weapons thus giving the excuse to bomb Syria.
Perhaps the recent pressure has got to Obama and he is caving into the R2P crowd, which is basically the Blair/British crowd and The Henry Jackson Society.
Wednesday, June 05, 2013
UNLEASH THE PEOPLE'S VOICE
Can #thePeoplesVoice raise 90k before the end of today? Share with anybody who wants to see REAL journalism in action indiegogo.com/projects/the-p…
— David Icke (@davidicke) June 5, 2013
I CONCUR WITH TARPLEY'S ANALYSIS OF BILDERBERG 2013
Dr Webster Tarpley has made yet another passionate but also, I believe, highly accurate analysis of the Bilderberg meeting and related events in his latest Unbound Radio Show at
http://tarpley.net/2013/06/04/is-bilderberg-2013-planning-to-oust-obama-and-install-petraeus/
I believe that what we have seen in Syria and Washington DC this last month or two is all related to the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11. On that murdered September day nearly 3000 people died when four alleged hijacked planes were able to fly unimpeded around the most protected airspace in the world for nearly two hours while the US was military virtually AWOL. The government apparatus of the USA on that day was dominated by Zionists. Only President Bush was not a Zionist, but everyone else who held any kind of power was a Zionist. These Zionists had written a document for then PM of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu called A Clean Break which called for Israel to 'engage', i.e. attack, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon. A few years later and this Ziocabal had relocated to the USA and formed The Project for a NewZionist American Century and wrote a document called Rebuilding America's Defenses, which called for America to go on a global warmongering rampage to assert American hegemony, but in particular to target those nations named in A Clean Break. The Zionists recognised that in order for the American people to support such bloodshed a "new Pearl Harbor" was required. Well, while Zionists were in charge of the mysteriously AWOL US military on 11th September 2001 the Zionists got their new Pearl Harbor.
Shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told by a Pentagon planner that, without evidence, the USA was going to attack seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were (not surprisingly) Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, but also Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
After a brief sidetrack in Afghanistan, to get the opium production back to record levels for the Anglo-American Establishment families, attention focused onto the plan for war on seven nations in five years.
The first to go was Iraq in 2003. So many lies and half-truths were told about this invasion that we are still uncovering them.
Then in 2005 the former PM of Lebanon was assassinated. Immediately blame was laid on Syria. A colour revolution was instigated, The Cedar Revolution, which forced Syria to withdraw its forces from Lebanon. This left Hezbollah exposed. In 2006 Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah by sending some unsuspecting IDF troops into an area known to be controlled by Hezbollah. The troops were killed but Israel pretended to believe the troops were alive and went to war on Hezbollah to rescue the troops. This was recently admitted by Ehud Olmert. But despite the overwhelming firepower of the Israeli war machine Israel lost that war.
There were also attempts to provoke Iran into a war, the most blatant being the DFK sending Marines into waters under dispute between Iraq and Iran. Iran captured the Marines and threatened to try them as spies but eventually released them.
So by 2007, four years after the war-on-seven-nations-in-five-years plan began, there had been only two wars, on Iraq and Hezbollah, and Israel had managed spectacularly to lose the war on Hezbollah! The plan was moribund.
So in 2007 a Faustian pact was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of the nations named to Clark.
In 2011 these Jihadis overthrew Colonel Gaddafi in Libya, but they needed overt support from NATO and special forces from the DFK, France and Qatar.
After killing Gaddafi the Jihadis were transported to Turkey and Lebanon to invade Syria and oust President Assad.
But it has not gone so well in Syria for the Jihadis. During two years in Syria their medieval barbarity has been openly displayed for all the horrified world to see; massacres of whole Christian villages, false flag massacres of pro-Assad Sunni families at Houla, forcing children to decapitate unarmed prisoners, and cannibalism. The list of their sickening crimes is endless.
And despite hundreds of millions of dollars from Qatar and Saudi Arabia all that the Jihadis have done is to turn Syria against them such that now they have only support from 10% of Syrians.
AND YET THE WHITEHALL JIHADI HAGUE WANTS TO ARM THEM EVEN MORE!!
Today the news from Syria is that the Syrian Arab Army with help from Hezbollah has dealt a crushing defeat to the al Qaeda rebs at al Qusayr, a major logistics hub for the rebs. In a few weeks the rebs will have run out of supplies in several areas and should be easy to defeat, if they do not decide to flee or surrender.
So in Syria the plan for war on seven nations in five years, the plan that was initiated by the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11, is well and truly moribund, if not dead, dead, dead.
This has just set the stage for what I believe is happening with Obama, Bilderberg and the scandals.
As Tarpley states in his radio show, Bilderberg picked the Mormon Romney last year. Romney received 11 times more from Wall Street than Obama did. Tarpley also praises and mentions Charlie Skelton for providing sources that Romney was Bilderberg's pick. Tarpley also accuses Jim Tucker of making stuff up.
The rebels in Syria have been suffering defeat after defeat. Many have been calling for a No Fly Zone and overt support for the rebels, like in Libya in 2011. TheBilderberg Post has frequently published editorials demanding a NFZ and heavy weapons for the Syrian rebs. But Obama has steadfastly refused, preferring drones and proxies, even if they are cutthroat proxies.
In September last year Ambassador Stevens was murdered at the compound at Benghazi. The media line was that there had been a stand down order, and that only Obama could have issued it and that Obama let the nation down and cannot be trusted with the security of the USA. The inquiry into Benghazi was run by a Mormon, Chaffetz, who tried to pin the blame on Obama and cover up particular facts. Several high ranking members of the US military were sacked. Tarpley sees in all this a Mormon attempt to Carterize Obama just before the election. If Romney was indeed Bilderberg's pick then this would explain the attempt to Carterize Obama.
Netanyahu would also like to see his mate Romney in The Oval Office, for Romney and Netanyahu go back a long, long time. I agree that if Romney had won then by now Syria would have been bombed, Assad ousted, and we would be well on our way to war on Iran.
But another, perhaps more significant, reason why Netanyahu and the dark powers that he works for wanted Obama out and Romney in is this most astonishing paragraph that I read last year:
This was published AFTER Benghazi and BEFORE the election. I have no idea when the author of this paragraph was told this but the timing of this statement is significant.
So we have evidence that Mormon Romney was Bilderberg's pick. Tarpley's analysis of Benghazi as an attempt to Carterize Obama cannot be dismissed, particularly as the Mormon-run inquiry has not grilled Petraeus or Carter Ham.
And I noted that, as the Syrian rebels were facing defeat at al Qusayr and elsewhere, there were repeated editorials in The Washington Post for a No Fly Zone over Syria. Obama refused. Israel and the DFK claimed to have evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons and had crossed Obama's 'red line' so Obama must intervene in Syria directly. Obama refused. Ambassador Robert "death squad" Ford secretly entered Syria to meet with the rebels. Just two days later two car bombs were detonated in Reyhanli in Turkey, just 20 miles from where Ford met the rebels. Erdogan blamed Assad and called for the USA to intervene in Syria directly. Obama refused. The rebels were being defeated in Damascus. Due to Obama's refusal to intervene Israel was forced to expose itself and attack Syria. The claim was that Israel was stopping a weapons transfer, but in reality Israel coordinated the attack with the rebels and the attack was on several HQs of some divisions of the SAA. As all this was going on upto five scandals suddenly materialised, all implicating Obama. But still Obama refused to intervene in Syria directly through a NFZ and heavy weapons.
Obama has survived...for now. The Syrian rebels have suffered a crushing defeat at al Qusayr. There is no No Fly Zone over Syria. The future looks bleak for the Syrian rebels.
And now Petraeus is going to Bilderberg 2013. Also there will be Perle and Slaughter.
On 11th September 2001 someone killed nearly 3000 people in order to start a series of wars for Israel, any one of which could be manipulated into a nuclear WW3 between the USA against Russia and/or China. So far, nearly 12 years later, that WW3 has not occured.
Bilderberg 2013 looks to me to be dominated by bankers and financiers, implying that the financial crisis is top of the agenda. Petraeus just got a plum job with KKR, and his new bosses the Kravis' will be at Bilderberg 2013. Tarpley suggests that Petraeus will be enriched to finance a run for The White House. But Petraeus' presence could also be to discuss Obama and Syria.
http://tarpley.net/2013/06/04/is-bilderberg-2013-planning-to-oust-obama-and-install-petraeus/
I believe that what we have seen in Syria and Washington DC this last month or two is all related to the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11. On that murdered September day nearly 3000 people died when four alleged hijacked planes were able to fly unimpeded around the most protected airspace in the world for nearly two hours while the US was military virtually AWOL. The government apparatus of the USA on that day was dominated by Zionists. Only President Bush was not a Zionist, but everyone else who held any kind of power was a Zionist. These Zionists had written a document for then PM of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu called A Clean Break which called for Israel to 'engage', i.e. attack, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon. A few years later and this Ziocabal had relocated to the USA and formed The Project for a New
Shortly after the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told by a Pentagon planner that, without evidence, the USA was going to attack seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were (not surprisingly) Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, but also Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
After a brief sidetrack in Afghanistan, to get the opium production back to record levels for the Anglo-American Establishment families, attention focused onto the plan for war on seven nations in five years.
The first to go was Iraq in 2003. So many lies and half-truths were told about this invasion that we are still uncovering them.
Then in 2005 the former PM of Lebanon was assassinated. Immediately blame was laid on Syria. A colour revolution was instigated, The Cedar Revolution, which forced Syria to withdraw its forces from Lebanon. This left Hezbollah exposed. In 2006 Israel engineered a war on Hezbollah by sending some unsuspecting IDF troops into an area known to be controlled by Hezbollah. The troops were killed but Israel pretended to believe the troops were alive and went to war on Hezbollah to rescue the troops. This was recently admitted by Ehud Olmert. But despite the overwhelming firepower of the Israeli war machine Israel lost that war.
There were also attempts to provoke Iran into a war, the most blatant being the DFK sending Marines into waters under dispute between Iraq and Iran. Iran captured the Marines and threatened to try them as spies but eventually released them.
So by 2007, four years after the war-on-seven-nations-in-five-years plan began, there had been only two wars, on Iraq and Hezbollah, and Israel had managed spectacularly to lose the war on Hezbollah! The plan was moribund.
So in 2007 a Faustian pact was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of the nations named to Clark.
In 2011 these Jihadis overthrew Colonel Gaddafi in Libya, but they needed overt support from NATO and special forces from the DFK, France and Qatar.
After killing Gaddafi the Jihadis were transported to Turkey and Lebanon to invade Syria and oust President Assad.
But it has not gone so well in Syria for the Jihadis. During two years in Syria their medieval barbarity has been openly displayed for all the horrified world to see; massacres of whole Christian villages, false flag massacres of pro-Assad Sunni families at Houla, forcing children to decapitate unarmed prisoners, and cannibalism. The list of their sickening crimes is endless.
And despite hundreds of millions of dollars from Qatar and Saudi Arabia all that the Jihadis have done is to turn Syria against them such that now they have only support from 10% of Syrians.
AND YET THE WHITEHALL JIHADI HAGUE WANTS TO ARM THEM EVEN MORE!!
Today the news from Syria is that the Syrian Arab Army with help from Hezbollah has dealt a crushing defeat to the al Qaeda rebs at al Qusayr, a major logistics hub for the rebs. In a few weeks the rebs will have run out of supplies in several areas and should be easy to defeat, if they do not decide to flee or surrender.
So in Syria the plan for war on seven nations in five years, the plan that was initiated by the mother of all inside Ziojobs 9/11, is well and truly moribund, if not dead, dead, dead.
This has just set the stage for what I believe is happening with Obama, Bilderberg and the scandals.
As Tarpley states in his radio show, Bilderberg picked the Mormon Romney last year. Romney received 11 times more from Wall Street than Obama did. Tarpley also praises and mentions Charlie Skelton for providing sources that Romney was Bilderberg's pick. Tarpley also accuses Jim Tucker of making stuff up.
The rebels in Syria have been suffering defeat after defeat. Many have been calling for a No Fly Zone and overt support for the rebels, like in Libya in 2011. The
In September last year Ambassador Stevens was murdered at the compound at Benghazi. The media line was that there had been a stand down order, and that only Obama could have issued it and that Obama let the nation down and cannot be trusted with the security of the USA. The inquiry into Benghazi was run by a Mormon, Chaffetz, who tried to pin the blame on Obama and cover up particular facts. Several high ranking members of the US military were sacked. Tarpley sees in all this a Mormon attempt to Carterize Obama just before the election. If Romney was indeed Bilderberg's pick then this would explain the attempt to Carterize Obama.
Netanyahu would also like to see his mate Romney in The Oval Office, for Romney and Netanyahu go back a long, long time. I agree that if Romney had won then by now Syria would have been bombed, Assad ousted, and we would be well on our way to war on Iran.
But another, perhaps more significant, reason why Netanyahu and the dark powers that he works for wanted Obama out and Romney in is this most astonishing paragraph that I read last year:
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21st September 2012]
This was published AFTER Benghazi and BEFORE the election. I have no idea when the author of this paragraph was told this but the timing of this statement is significant.
So we have evidence that Mormon Romney was Bilderberg's pick. Tarpley's analysis of Benghazi as an attempt to Carterize Obama cannot be dismissed, particularly as the Mormon-run inquiry has not grilled Petraeus or Carter Ham.
And I noted that, as the Syrian rebels were facing defeat at al Qusayr and elsewhere, there were repeated editorials in The Washington Post for a No Fly Zone over Syria. Obama refused. Israel and the DFK claimed to have evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons and had crossed Obama's 'red line' so Obama must intervene in Syria directly. Obama refused. Ambassador Robert "death squad" Ford secretly entered Syria to meet with the rebels. Just two days later two car bombs were detonated in Reyhanli in Turkey, just 20 miles from where Ford met the rebels. Erdogan blamed Assad and called for the USA to intervene in Syria directly. Obama refused. The rebels were being defeated in Damascus. Due to Obama's refusal to intervene Israel was forced to expose itself and attack Syria. The claim was that Israel was stopping a weapons transfer, but in reality Israel coordinated the attack with the rebels and the attack was on several HQs of some divisions of the SAA. As all this was going on upto five scandals suddenly materialised, all implicating Obama. But still Obama refused to intervene in Syria directly through a NFZ and heavy weapons.
Obama has survived...for now. The Syrian rebels have suffered a crushing defeat at al Qusayr. There is no No Fly Zone over Syria. The future looks bleak for the Syrian rebels.
And now Petraeus is going to Bilderberg 2013. Also there will be Perle and Slaughter.
On 11th September 2001 someone killed nearly 3000 people in order to start a series of wars for Israel, any one of which could be manipulated into a nuclear WW3 between the USA against Russia and/or China. So far, nearly 12 years later, that WW3 has not occured.
Bilderberg 2013 looks to me to be dominated by bankers and financiers, implying that the financial crisis is top of the agenda. Petraeus just got a plum job with KKR, and his new bosses the Kravis' will be at Bilderberg 2013. Tarpley suggests that Petraeus will be enriched to finance a run for The White House. But Petraeus' presence could also be to discuss Obama and Syria.
AL QUSAYR IS OBAMA'S BAY OF PIGS
In 1961 the CIA, after a year of intense training of thousands of Cuban exiles, attempted an invasion of Cuba with the intent of ousting Fidel Castro. But the invasion force ran into deep trouble upon landing at The Bay of Pigs. The CIA had not told JFK about their doubts about the success of the invasion in order to get JFK to approve the plan. So when the invaders ran into trouble the CIA expected JFK to send in the US military. But he didn't. The invaders were easily destroyed.
The following year Nikita Kruschev provoked the Cuban Missile Crisis and won the concession that the USA would not attempt an invasion of Cuba again.
There is strong evidence that an extreme right wing faction within the USA assassinated JFK for this series of events.
Fast forward to 2013.
An extreme right wing faction in the USA wants President Bashar al Assad ousted, having executed the mother of all inside jobs 9/11. They use foreign Jihadis as a proxy force, much like the CIA used Cuban exiles. But the Jihadis have run into deep trouble in al Qusayr, much like the Cuban exiles did at The Bay of Pigs. President Obama did not implement a No Fly Zone or send in the troops to save the Jihadis, despite several false flag events such as the two car bombs at Reyhanli, Turkey and claims from Israel and the UK that Assad had used chemical weapons. Kennedy also did not implement a No Fly Zone or send in the troops to save the invasion force.
There is a parallel.
There are arguments that JFK was assassinated not just for his policy on Cuba. Some suggest issuing debt free bonds circumventing The Federal Reserve sealed his fate. Some suggest his anti-Israel policy also sealed his fate.
And it is the latter suggestion which should raise concerns.
Al Qusayr was a major logistics hub for the Syrianal Hague-Qaeda rebs. Today it is controlled by the Syrian Arab Army. This victory for the SAA is a huge blow not just to the rebs, but also to the extreme right wing Ziofactions in the USA, France, DFK, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, but in particular to Israel itself.
The following year Nikita Kruschev provoked the Cuban Missile Crisis and won the concession that the USA would not attempt an invasion of Cuba again.
There is strong evidence that an extreme right wing faction within the USA assassinated JFK for this series of events.
Fast forward to 2013.
An extreme right wing faction in the USA wants President Bashar al Assad ousted, having executed the mother of all inside jobs 9/11. They use foreign Jihadis as a proxy force, much like the CIA used Cuban exiles. But the Jihadis have run into deep trouble in al Qusayr, much like the Cuban exiles did at The Bay of Pigs. President Obama did not implement a No Fly Zone or send in the troops to save the Jihadis, despite several false flag events such as the two car bombs at Reyhanli, Turkey and claims from Israel and the UK that Assad had used chemical weapons. Kennedy also did not implement a No Fly Zone or send in the troops to save the invasion force.
There is a parallel.
There are arguments that JFK was assassinated not just for his policy on Cuba. Some suggest issuing debt free bonds circumventing The Federal Reserve sealed his fate. Some suggest his anti-Israel policy also sealed his fate.
And it is the latter suggestion which should raise concerns.
Al Qusayr was a major logistics hub for the Syrian
Syrian pro-government forces have taken full control of the strategic town of Qusair, state TV and the rebels say.
The town, near the Lebanese border, has been the centre of fighting for more than two weeks between rebels and Syrian troops backed by fighters from the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.
Syrian state TV said a large number of rebels had died and many had surrendered.
[source : Syrian army retakes key town of Qusair from rebels, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22778310, 5th June 2013]
Tuesday, June 04, 2013
AMERICA WAS NOT BUILT WITH AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS
I heard Mike Adams say on the Alex Jones Show yesterday that people are waking up and realising that Austrian economics was the solution.
But America was not built with Austrian economics!
America was built with the First Bank of the United States and Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) using the American system of economics. The British destroyed the BUS2 through Andrew Jackson and then tried to cover up the success of those banks and make Jackson a hero through Eustace Mullins. It was Jackson who made the Rothschilds bankers to the USA.
Austrian economics is a David Rockefeller project.
How the Money Power created Libertarianism and Austrian Economics
http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/how-the-money-power-created-libertarianism-and-austrian-economics/
But America was not built with Austrian economics!
America was built with the First Bank of the United States and Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) using the American system of economics. The British destroyed the BUS2 through Andrew Jackson and then tried to cover up the success of those banks and make Jackson a hero through Eustace Mullins. It was Jackson who made the Rothschilds bankers to the USA.
Austrian economics is a David Rockefeller project.
How the Money Power created Libertarianism and Austrian Economics
http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/how-the-money-power-created-libertarianism-and-austrian-economics/
THE SUN CALLS DAVID ICKE AN ODDBALL BUT IT COULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MUCH WORSE
The Sun has had a dig at David Icke, calling him an oddball, as it reports on Icke's attempt to create a new media channel.
I believe that the Woolwich Hoax was pushed to sabotage this attempt of Icke. Yesterday The Daily Mail called the original hoax video, which was created by students at London Metropolitan University, 'sickening'. But this video was then taken up by some conspiracy websites and embellished with doctored photographs and deliberate misinterpretations, so that it was being suggested that the whole barbaric event was actually a film location and everyone involved, from Rigby to the Police, were actors.
I think that someone was hoping that several media outlets would be able to label Icke as more than just an oddball by associating him with the 'sickening' Woolwich Hoax theory, lights, camera and action and all, such that names like 'sicko' could have been applied.
But it wasn't to be.
FORGET ITV, David Icke is trying to set up ICKE TV – a channel devoted to conspiracy theories.
The oddball — who once said the country is run by LIZARDS — wants to raise £100,000 to launch a free global internet, TV and radio station, broadcasting opinions “the mainstream media won’t touch”.
The station would feature shows from around the globe and phone-ins for fellow conspiracy theorists.
Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/4953819/-David-Icke-is-trying-to-start-conspiracy-theory-TV-channel.html#ixzz2VFRJisyu
[source : Yickes! Crazy Dave telly plan, The Sun, http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/4953819/-David-Icke-is-trying-to-start-conspiracy-theory-TV-channel.html, 4th June 2013]
I believe that the Woolwich Hoax was pushed to sabotage this attempt of Icke. Yesterday The Daily Mail called the original hoax video, which was created by students at London Metropolitan University, 'sickening'. But this video was then taken up by some conspiracy websites and embellished with doctored photographs and deliberate misinterpretations, so that it was being suggested that the whole barbaric event was actually a film location and everyone involved, from Rigby to the Police, were actors.
I think that someone was hoping that several media outlets would be able to label Icke as more than just an oddball by associating him with the 'sickening' Woolwich Hoax theory, lights, camera and action and all, such that names like 'sicko' could have been applied.
But it wasn't to be.
Monday, June 03, 2013
WE CAN NOW SEE THE TRUE REASON WHY THE WOOLWICH HOAX THEORY WAS PUSHED BY PARTICULAR WEBSITES
The Daily Mail has published an article on the original Woolwich hoax video. It was made by a Muslim student group at London Metropolitan University just hours after Drummer Lee Rigby was horrifically butchered.
And look at the aspects of 'the hoax' that it addresses:
fake blood,
women not looking traumatised,
no blood on the butchers hands,
fake blood,
Masonic coppers.
This was then taken up by some websites who blatantly doctored some photographs to imply that there was no blood on the footpath when video filmed at the time of the killing showed the butcher actually walking through it! Then those websites were pushed by others who are trusted by some but not by me.
The Daily Mail's reaction says it all. If David Icke had pushed this hoax just before he announced his effort to start a news channel then that news channel would have been seriously ridiculed and have no credibility before it even started. People would have been so sickened that they may not donate to get the project off the ground in the first place.
WAKE UP!
And look at the aspects of 'the hoax' that it addresses:
fake blood,
women not looking traumatised,
no blood on the butchers hands,
fake blood,
Masonic coppers.
An Islamic Society at one of Britain's largest universities has promoted a video claiming the execution of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich was a hoax cooked up by the state, it was revealed today.
Hours after the death of the soldier, 25, a Muslim student group at London Metropolitan University (LMU) circulated a YouTube film arguing the crime was manufactured using 'fake blood'.
The six minute video called 'Woolwich false flag b*******. Masses are in a state-sponsored trance', has been viewed by 300,000 people, and says that Scotland Yard detectives investigating the murder were Freemasons who were in on an anti-Muslim conspiracy.
The film even claims that traumatised witnesses were in on a hoax, taunting those who tried to comfort Drummer Rigby as he lay dying by saying: 'These women look very traumatised lol (laugh out loud).'
...The video shows news coverage on the day of Lee Rigby's death, including his alleged killers covered in blood and holding weapons.
Over the pictures are subtitles, arguing his death was a conspiracy, including one asking: 'Where is the blood on his hands that is seen on most of the other videos?'.
As a reporter describes the scene in Woolwich the film says: 'Now add some fake blood and a fake media whore (reporter) talking s***, stating the obvious just in case you don’t get it and we got the made up news lol.'
It later says: 'I need proof and not fabricated ‘bs’ (b*******).'
It then cuts to a police officer telling the public to 'move back'.
The subtitles then say: 'Yes listen to the masonic copper, move back before you film anything incriminating against their false flag charade.'
...A witness then describes what he saw, and the subtitles say: 'Makes sense to you? Sounds staged to me!!!... are you buying this?'.
The film's maker then goes on to pinpoint areas where fake blood was smeared by conspirators.
[source : 'These women seem very traumatised LOL': Sickening video circulated by university extremists claims Lee Rigby murder was a hoax, The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2335224/Street-killing-soldier-Lee-Rigby-faked-claim-members-controversial-London-universitys-Islamic-society.html, 3rd June 2013]
This was then taken up by some websites who blatantly doctored some photographs to imply that there was no blood on the footpath when video filmed at the time of the killing showed the butcher actually walking through it! Then those websites were pushed by others who are trusted by some but not by me.
The Daily Mail's reaction says it all. If David Icke had pushed this hoax just before he announced his effort to start a news channel then that news channel would have been seriously ridiculed and have no credibility before it even started. People would have been so sickened that they may not donate to get the project off the ground in the first place.
WAKE UP!
DFK
DFK stands for Disunited Fascist Kingdom.
But from the news this morning DFK now stands for Disunited Fucked-up Kingdom.
The news leading to this is
1. Nick "squeaky clean" Ross saying he would watch child porn
2. a former lover of Mark Bridger saying she wants to shag him senseless despite him being locked up for the murder of April Jones
3. a Cambridge Law exam used a very sick scenario of sexual abuse at an initiation
4. Michael Douglas saying that oral sex gave him cancer
It is on days like this that I wonder why I believe the human race can be saved from descending into hell.
But from the news this morning DFK now stands for Disunited Fucked-up Kingdom.
The news leading to this is
1. Nick "squeaky clean" Ross saying he would watch child porn
2. a former lover of Mark Bridger saying she wants to shag him senseless despite him being locked up for the murder of April Jones
3. a Cambridge Law exam used a very sick scenario of sexual abuse at an initiation
4. Michael Douglas saying that oral sex gave him cancer
It is on days like this that I wonder why I believe the human race can be saved from descending into hell.
I JUST CAUGHT YOUTUBE EDITING MY VIDEO ON ISRAEL AND 911
I was watching my video on Israel and 9/11 Part One on YouTube this morning, not looking at the playtime, when the video stopped at about 3 minutes when it should run for nearly 12 minutes. It is about that time into the video that I start to talk about Hitler, the Warburgs and their influence on IG Farben, the Rothschilds and how they could have saved the Jews with a ransom offer from Hitler, and the Transfer Agreement between the Zionists, the Nazis and the British. So I logged into my account and that Part One was still showing a playtime of 11 minutes 47 seconds. So I logged out and watched the video again and the playtime was 11 minutes 47 seconds.
So why was the Part One cut to 3 minutes?!
Who made that decision?
And why was I not informed?
So why was the Part One cut to 3 minutes?!
Who made that decision?
And why was I not informed?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)