CFR Gary Hart has apparently exposed part of the whole scam in an open letter posted on a well-respected internet site, The Huffington Post.
In that letter Hart refers to several events which were engineered to drag the USA into war. He even hints, but does not explicitly state, that Pearl Harbour also belongs to this set of events.
Presuming that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.
Having done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to get involved in World War II.
Maybe Hart is breaking ranks and is trying to raise the alarm of yet another engineered event.
Maybe he just lost it.
Let's see what happens to Hart now. He is on the fringe of the circles of power. He is on the advisory board of the Partnership for a Secure America, with such illuminaries as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Richard Holbrooke, as well as the 9/11 gatekeepers Kean and Hamilton, although Kean and Hamilton are now expressing doubts about the official 9/11 myth.
I dunno. Maybe there is a something going on at the PSA? Didn't Brzezinski recently also issue a warning of a false flag attack too?
============================================================
From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hart/unsolicited-advice-to-the_b_65984.html
Unsolicited Advice to the Government of Iran
Posted September 26, 2007 | 03:22 PM (EST)
Read More: Gulf of Tonkin, iran, provoking Iran, Breaking Politics News
Presuming that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.
Having done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to get involved in World War II. For historians of American wars the question is whether we provoke provocations.
Given the unilateral U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, you are obviously thinking the rules have changed. Provocation is no longer required to take America to war. But even in this instance, we were led to believe that the mass murderer of American civilians, Osama bin Laden, was lurking, literally or figuratively, in the vicinity of Baghdad.
Given all this, you would probably be well advised to keep your forces, including clandestine forces, as far away from the Iraqi border as you can. You might even consider bringing in some neighbors to verify that you are not shipping arms next door. Tone down the rhetoric on Zionism. You've established your credentials with those in your world who thrive on that.
If it makes you feel powerful to hurl accusations at the American eagle, have at it. Sticks and stones, etc. But, for the next sixteen months or so, you should not only not take provocative actions, you should not seem to be doing so.
For the vast majority of Americans who seek no wider war, in the Middle East or elsewhere, don't tempt fate. Don't give a certain vice president we know the justification he is seeking to attack your country. That is unless you happen to like having bombs fall on your head.
Friday, September 28, 2007
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
COMPARING BURMA TO AFGHANISTAN
The Dirty List of investors in Burma lists Chevron.
----------------------------
From http://burmacampaign.org.uk/dirty_list/dirty_list_details.html
Chevron
Since its 2005 takeover of Unocal, US oil giant Chevron has been one of the joint venture partners developing the Yadana offshore gas field in Burma, which earns the military regime millions of dollars. Chevron also owns Texaco.
David J. O'Reilly
Chairman and CEO
Chevron
6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd.
San Ramon
CA 94583
USA
Email: comment@chevron.com
-------------------------------
Unocal was the company who wanted to get involved in transporting Caspian Basin energy through Afghanistan, but the Taliban were asking for too much money.
Chevron was part of the Rockefeller Standard Oil cartel. Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney have serious links to Chevron.
--------------------------------
From http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/09/26/big_oil_trumps_freedom.php
Even in Burma, however, Bush’s support for human rights yields to his fondness for the oil and gas industry. Burma has large natural gas reserves, and multinational oil corporations want to cash in. Chevron Corporation is currently the largest U.S. investor in Burma, with a partnership stake in the multi-billion-dollar Yadana gas pipeline project. The Yadana project was originally developed by Unocal, another American oil company, which was acquired by Chevron last year. (Although new investment in Burma is prohibited, the pipeline is grandfathered in under an exception, pushed by Unocal, for preexisting projects.)
The Yadana pipeline has been repeatedly condemned by human rights and environmental advocates as one of the most destructive “development” projects in the world. The Burmese military government is a direct partner in the project, and Burmese soldiers providing security and other services to the pipeline project have conscripted villagers for forced labor on a vast scale, as well as committing murder, rape and torture. These abuses have been widely acknowledged; before Bush took office, the U.S. Department of Labor concluded that “refugee accounts of forced labor” on the project “appear to be credible.”
The Bush administration has close ties to Chevron. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was a member of the Chevron Board of Directors for 10 years before Bush was elected, and even had a Chevron oil tanker named for her until it was quietly renamed after Bush took office. And Halliburton, the oilfield services giant formerly headed by Vice President Dick Cheney, has numerous ties to Chevron, signing several multimillion-dollar contracts during Cheney’s tenure. And yet there is no evidence that the Bush administration has used its connections to convince Chevron to divest its Burmese holdings, despite the evidence of abuses committed on the Yadana project and Bush’s public position on promoting human rights and democracy.
Indeed, even before Chevron acquired Unocal and the Yadana project, Bush’s government actively took steps to thwart accountability for the Yadana project. When refugees who had suffered rape, torture, enslavement, and murder at the hands of soldiers protecting the Yadana pipeline sued Unocal in U.S. court, the Bush administration intervened to try to convince the courts that the lawsuit should not proceed. The administration essentially argued that, even if the case would not actually interfere with U.S. relations with Burma, holding Unocal liable would create a precedent that could conflict with U.S. foreign policy in other parts of the world. (The lawsuit, Doe v. Unocal Corp., was ultimately resolved before the courts considered the administration's position, with Unocal compensating the victims in a historic settlement—see http://www.earthrights.org/legal/unocal/.)
--------------------------------------
And then there's the opium/heroin link. According to the CIA factbook Burma is the world's second largest producer of opium.
Until the coalition of the killing invaded Afghanistan the Taliban had virtually eradicated opium production. But now Afghanistan is the world's largest producer of the stuff.
-------------------------------------
From https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html
[Burma] remains world's second largest producer of illicit opium with an estimated production in 2005 of 380 metric tons, up 13% from 2004 and cultivation in 2005 was 40,000 hectares, a 10% increase from 2004; the decline in opium production in the United Wa State Army's areas of greatest control was more than offset by increases in south and east Shan state; lack of government will to take on major narcotrafficking groups and lack of serious commitment against money laundering continues to hinder the overall antidrug effort; major source of methamphetamine and heroin for regional consumption; currently under Financial Action Task Force countermeasures due to continued failure to address its inadequate money-laundering controls (2005)
--------------------------------------
Certain New World Order families were and probably still are the major dealers in heroin and other narcotics.
So it would appear that the Burmese "evil and wicked Military Junta", as I heard a British government official refer to the Burmese dictatorship, is serving the New World Order well enough; it is co-operating with Chevron to develop the large Burmese natural gas fields, and it is not doing that much to eradicate the opium and heroin production.
Contrast that with what the Taliban did; despite being wooed to the USA they wanted much more money than Unocal would have liked, and they also destroyed the opium industry. In 2001 no evidence was provided that Afghanistan was involved in 9/11, and in 2002 was invaded and the Taliban were overthrown.
----------------------------
From http://burmacampaign.org.uk/dirty_list/dirty_list_details.html
Chevron
Since its 2005 takeover of Unocal, US oil giant Chevron has been one of the joint venture partners developing the Yadana offshore gas field in Burma, which earns the military regime millions of dollars. Chevron also owns Texaco.
David J. O'Reilly
Chairman and CEO
Chevron
6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd.
San Ramon
CA 94583
USA
Email: comment@chevron.com
-------------------------------
Unocal was the company who wanted to get involved in transporting Caspian Basin energy through Afghanistan, but the Taliban were asking for too much money.
Chevron was part of the Rockefeller Standard Oil cartel. Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney have serious links to Chevron.
--------------------------------
From http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/09/26/big_oil_trumps_freedom.php
Even in Burma, however, Bush’s support for human rights yields to his fondness for the oil and gas industry. Burma has large natural gas reserves, and multinational oil corporations want to cash in. Chevron Corporation is currently the largest U.S. investor in Burma, with a partnership stake in the multi-billion-dollar Yadana gas pipeline project. The Yadana project was originally developed by Unocal, another American oil company, which was acquired by Chevron last year. (Although new investment in Burma is prohibited, the pipeline is grandfathered in under an exception, pushed by Unocal, for preexisting projects.)
The Yadana pipeline has been repeatedly condemned by human rights and environmental advocates as one of the most destructive “development” projects in the world. The Burmese military government is a direct partner in the project, and Burmese soldiers providing security and other services to the pipeline project have conscripted villagers for forced labor on a vast scale, as well as committing murder, rape and torture. These abuses have been widely acknowledged; before Bush took office, the U.S. Department of Labor concluded that “refugee accounts of forced labor” on the project “appear to be credible.”
The Bush administration has close ties to Chevron. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was a member of the Chevron Board of Directors for 10 years before Bush was elected, and even had a Chevron oil tanker named for her until it was quietly renamed after Bush took office. And Halliburton, the oilfield services giant formerly headed by Vice President Dick Cheney, has numerous ties to Chevron, signing several multimillion-dollar contracts during Cheney’s tenure. And yet there is no evidence that the Bush administration has used its connections to convince Chevron to divest its Burmese holdings, despite the evidence of abuses committed on the Yadana project and Bush’s public position on promoting human rights and democracy.
Indeed, even before Chevron acquired Unocal and the Yadana project, Bush’s government actively took steps to thwart accountability for the Yadana project. When refugees who had suffered rape, torture, enslavement, and murder at the hands of soldiers protecting the Yadana pipeline sued Unocal in U.S. court, the Bush administration intervened to try to convince the courts that the lawsuit should not proceed. The administration essentially argued that, even if the case would not actually interfere with U.S. relations with Burma, holding Unocal liable would create a precedent that could conflict with U.S. foreign policy in other parts of the world. (The lawsuit, Doe v. Unocal Corp., was ultimately resolved before the courts considered the administration's position, with Unocal compensating the victims in a historic settlement—see http://www.earthrights.org/legal/unocal/.)
--------------------------------------
And then there's the opium/heroin link. According to the CIA factbook Burma is the world's second largest producer of opium.
Until the coalition of the killing invaded Afghanistan the Taliban had virtually eradicated opium production. But now Afghanistan is the world's largest producer of the stuff.
-------------------------------------
From https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html
[Burma] remains world's second largest producer of illicit opium with an estimated production in 2005 of 380 metric tons, up 13% from 2004 and cultivation in 2005 was 40,000 hectares, a 10% increase from 2004; the decline in opium production in the United Wa State Army's areas of greatest control was more than offset by increases in south and east Shan state; lack of government will to take on major narcotrafficking groups and lack of serious commitment against money laundering continues to hinder the overall antidrug effort; major source of methamphetamine and heroin for regional consumption; currently under Financial Action Task Force countermeasures due to continued failure to address its inadequate money-laundering controls (2005)
--------------------------------------
Certain New World Order families were and probably still are the major dealers in heroin and other narcotics.
So it would appear that the Burmese "evil and wicked Military Junta", as I heard a British government official refer to the Burmese dictatorship, is serving the New World Order well enough; it is co-operating with Chevron to develop the large Burmese natural gas fields, and it is not doing that much to eradicate the opium and heroin production.
Contrast that with what the Taliban did; despite being wooed to the USA they wanted much more money than Unocal would have liked, and they also destroyed the opium industry. In 2001 no evidence was provided that Afghanistan was involved in 9/11, and in 2002 was invaded and the Taliban were overthrown.
Sunday, September 23, 2007
IS KISSINGER LYING AGAIN?
Why would Kissinger tell the truth (if he indeed he is)? And why now?
I would like to offer another reason as to why Kissinger, and Greenspan, claim that oil is the reason for invading Iraq, and soon Iran. The real reason for the turmoil in the Middle East is beginning to be realised by a large number of powerful Americans: Pike's WW3, in which possibly billions will die, but it is guaranteed the USA will no longer exist in the form we know today. These patriotic men and women, getting cold feet for more war, need a little encouragement, a little persuading, to carry on the good fight. So why not feed 'em the peak oil/America needs oil line?
The oil grab is a profitable sideline for certain people, and is probably what drives Cheney. But even Cheney does not know what others higher up in the food chain plan and discuss behind closed doors. Perhaps he doesn't care. He sees big $'s dripping in oil.
Major world events do not occur for one reason only. On September 11th 2001 nearly 3000 people died. It was on a scale comparable to Pearl Harbour. That led the USA into 3 1/2 years of bloody war ending with the unnecessary dropping of two atomic bombs on Japan.
Are we to believe that the NWO executed 9/11 simply for oil? I don't.
============================
From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-weissman/greenspan-kissinger-oil_b_64659.html
Alan Greenspan had acknowledged what is blindingly obvious to those who live in the reality-based world: the Iraq War was largely about oil.
Meanwhile, Henry Kissinger says in an op-ed in Sunday's Washington Post that control over oil is the key issue that should determine whether the U.S. undertakes military action against Iran.
These statements would not be remarkable, but for the effort of a broad swath of the U.S. political establishment to deny the central role of oil in U.S. involvement in the Middle East.
I would like to offer another reason as to why Kissinger, and Greenspan, claim that oil is the reason for invading Iraq, and soon Iran. The real reason for the turmoil in the Middle East is beginning to be realised by a large number of powerful Americans: Pike's WW3, in which possibly billions will die, but it is guaranteed the USA will no longer exist in the form we know today. These patriotic men and women, getting cold feet for more war, need a little encouragement, a little persuading, to carry on the good fight. So why not feed 'em the peak oil/America needs oil line?
The oil grab is a profitable sideline for certain people, and is probably what drives Cheney. But even Cheney does not know what others higher up in the food chain plan and discuss behind closed doors. Perhaps he doesn't care. He sees big $'s dripping in oil.
Major world events do not occur for one reason only. On September 11th 2001 nearly 3000 people died. It was on a scale comparable to Pearl Harbour. That led the USA into 3 1/2 years of bloody war ending with the unnecessary dropping of two atomic bombs on Japan.
Are we to believe that the NWO executed 9/11 simply for oil? I don't.
============================
From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-weissman/greenspan-kissinger-oil_b_64659.html
Alan Greenspan had acknowledged what is blindingly obvious to those who live in the reality-based world: the Iraq War was largely about oil.
Meanwhile, Henry Kissinger says in an op-ed in Sunday's Washington Post that control over oil is the key issue that should determine whether the U.S. undertakes military action against Iran.
These statements would not be remarkable, but for the effort of a broad swath of the U.S. political establishment to deny the central role of oil in U.S. involvement in the Middle East.
Friday, September 21, 2007
WAR IS A TERRIBLE THING
To most people, war is a terrible thing.
But to some, it makes their evil hearts sing,
as the cash registers ring, kerching, kerching.
But to most people, war is a terrible thing.
It’s time to make money when blood runs in the street,
and the sheeple continue to fight and bleat,
and follow their orders, turn humans to dead meat,
humans they would otherwise befriend and greet.
Chickenhawk leaders send others to fight
their engineered wars after engineered fright,
and bury the dead at the dead of night,
but more are beginning to see the light.
An engineered war is a terrible thing.
It wreaks of corruption and an unworthy king,
installed by deception and vote rigging,
while the cash registers ring, kerching, kerching.
(All rights reserved 2007)
But to some, it makes their evil hearts sing,
as the cash registers ring, kerching, kerching.
But to most people, war is a terrible thing.
It’s time to make money when blood runs in the street,
and the sheeple continue to fight and bleat,
and follow their orders, turn humans to dead meat,
humans they would otherwise befriend and greet.
Chickenhawk leaders send others to fight
their engineered wars after engineered fright,
and bury the dead at the dead of night,
but more are beginning to see the light.
An engineered war is a terrible thing.
It wreaks of corruption and an unworthy king,
installed by deception and vote rigging,
while the cash registers ring, kerching, kerching.
(All rights reserved 2007)
Thursday, September 20, 2007
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO...?
Shortly after the coalition of the killing invaded Iraq, killing a million innocent civilians and creating the ideal conditions for a civil war to be blamed on the next target for invasion, a story was promoted that Iraq's WMD had been secreted to Syria.
There were allegations that a caravan of vehicles had been photographed transporting the WMD.
Whatever happened to that allegation?
In 1996 "A Clean Break" was published by an Israeli think tank, calling for expansion and inevitable war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon. The authors later obtained influential positions in the Bush administration.
Lebanon was attacked last year, with DU and cluster bombs.
Iraq was invaded by the USA and its gimps.
Now Bush is blaming Syria and Iran for the bomb in Lebanon which killed the anti-Syrian MP Antoine Ghanem.
EVERYTHING in the Middle East is about "A Clean Break".
EVERYTHING about "A Clean Break" is about bringing about Albert Pike's WW3 by creating friction between Islam and Judeo-Christianity.
===============================================
From http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411440048&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
US President George W. Bush condemned the murder of pro-Lebanese government lawmaker, Antoine Ghanem, who was killed in an explosion in Beirut on Wednesday.
Bush hinted that Syria and Iran were responsible for the attack, promising that the US would continue to stand behind Lebanon and support its opposition to Syrian and Iranian efforts to destabilize the country.
The powerful bomb killed Ghanem and six others Wednesday in a Christian neighborhood of Beirut, threatening to derail Parliament's already deeply divided effort to elect Lebanon's next president in voting due to start in days.
There were allegations that a caravan of vehicles had been photographed transporting the WMD.
Whatever happened to that allegation?
In 1996 "A Clean Break" was published by an Israeli think tank, calling for expansion and inevitable war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon. The authors later obtained influential positions in the Bush administration.
Lebanon was attacked last year, with DU and cluster bombs.
Iraq was invaded by the USA and its gimps.
Now Bush is blaming Syria and Iran for the bomb in Lebanon which killed the anti-Syrian MP Antoine Ghanem.
EVERYTHING in the Middle East is about "A Clean Break".
EVERYTHING about "A Clean Break" is about bringing about Albert Pike's WW3 by creating friction between Islam and Judeo-Christianity.
===============================================
From http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411440048&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
US President George W. Bush condemned the murder of pro-Lebanese government lawmaker, Antoine Ghanem, who was killed in an explosion in Beirut on Wednesday.
Bush hinted that Syria and Iran were responsible for the attack, promising that the US would continue to stand behind Lebanon and support its opposition to Syrian and Iranian efforts to destabilize the country.
The powerful bomb killed Ghanem and six others Wednesday in a Christian neighborhood of Beirut, threatening to derail Parliament's already deeply divided effort to elect Lebanon's next president in voting due to start in days.
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
SILENT GUARDIAN
Non-lethal weapons are very sinister. They are being introduced into society as a way of saving lives. But they are also ideal for harrasment and torture, for they leave no trace of use on a victim.
A copper armed with a gun cannot shoot you if he/she doesn't like you, because there will be blood and a bullet hole.
But with a ray gun they can zap you, cause you great pain, and then walk away.
Taser guns were introduced as a non-lethal alternative to guns. They are now being used on people asking awkward questions to senators.
How long will it take before ray guns are used in similar and less threatening circumstances?
================================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=482560&in_page_id=1965
Its makers [Raytheon] claim this infernal machine is the modern face of warfare. It has a nice, friendly sounding name, Silent Guardian.
I am told not to call it a ray-gun, though that is precisely what it is (the term "pain gun" is maybe better, but I suppose they would like that even less).
And, to be fair, the machine is not designed to vaporise, shred, atomise, dismember or otherwise cause permanent harm.
But it is a horrible device nonetheless, and you are forced to wonder what the world has come to when human ingenuity is pressed into service to make a thing like this.
Silent Guardian is making waves in defence circles. Built by the U.S. firm Raytheon, it is part of its "Directed Energy Solutions" programme.
A copper armed with a gun cannot shoot you if he/she doesn't like you, because there will be blood and a bullet hole.
But with a ray gun they can zap you, cause you great pain, and then walk away.
Taser guns were introduced as a non-lethal alternative to guns. They are now being used on people asking awkward questions to senators.
How long will it take before ray guns are used in similar and less threatening circumstances?
================================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=482560&in_page_id=1965
Its makers [Raytheon] claim this infernal machine is the modern face of warfare. It has a nice, friendly sounding name, Silent Guardian.
I am told not to call it a ray-gun, though that is precisely what it is (the term "pain gun" is maybe better, but I suppose they would like that even less).
And, to be fair, the machine is not designed to vaporise, shred, atomise, dismember or otherwise cause permanent harm.
But it is a horrible device nonetheless, and you are forced to wonder what the world has come to when human ingenuity is pressed into service to make a thing like this.
Silent Guardian is making waves in defence circles. Built by the U.S. firm Raytheon, it is part of its "Directed Energy Solutions" programme.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY
The FSA has a webpage on scams and swindles.
========================================================
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/About/What/Supporting/scamms/index.shtml
We are aware of a several bogus communications – claiming to be from various employees of the FSA – which ask the recipient for personal information and/or money.
These communications are often in the form of emails or letters and they sometimes use the name of a current or former FSA employee. They are likely to be linked to organised fraud and we strongly advise that you do not respond to them in any way.
Here are some recent examples:
* Bogus letter from John Tiner
* Email 1
* Email 2
* Letter 1
* Letter 2
For details of many other types of fraud visit our scams and swindles page of information for consumers.
Should you have any doubt about the authenticity of an ‘FSA communication’, please contact the relevant telephone number below:
Authorised firms
From UK: 0845 606 9966 (call rates may vary)
Consumers
From UK: 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary)
Overseas callers
+44 20 7066 1000
===================================================================
Wot? No mention of the British Banking system?
Oh, yeah. The FSA is financed by the British Banking system.
===================================================================
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/About/Who/index.shtml
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) is an independent non-governmental body, given statutory powers by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. We are a company limited by guarantee and financed by the financial services industry. The Treasury appoints the FSA Board, which currently consists of a Chairman, a Chief Executive Officer, three Managing Directors, and 9 non-executive directors (including a lead non-executive member, the Deputy Chairman). This Board sets our overall policy, but day-to-day decisions and management of the staff are the responsibility of the Executive.
===================================================================
Apparently, one of the statutory objectives of the FSA is;
public awareness: promoting public understanding of the financial system
A big, red F for that one.
========================================================
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/About/What/Supporting/scamms/index.shtml
We are aware of a several bogus communications – claiming to be from various employees of the FSA – which ask the recipient for personal information and/or money.
These communications are often in the form of emails or letters and they sometimes use the name of a current or former FSA employee. They are likely to be linked to organised fraud and we strongly advise that you do not respond to them in any way.
Here are some recent examples:
* Bogus letter from John Tiner
* Email 1
* Email 2
* Letter 1
* Letter 2
For details of many other types of fraud visit our scams and swindles page of information for consumers.
Should you have any doubt about the authenticity of an ‘FSA communication’, please contact the relevant telephone number below:
Authorised firms
From UK: 0845 606 9966 (call rates may vary)
Consumers
From UK: 0845 606 1234 (call rates may vary)
Overseas callers
+44 20 7066 1000
===================================================================
Wot? No mention of the British Banking system?
Oh, yeah. The FSA is financed by the British Banking system.
===================================================================
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/About/Who/index.shtml
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) is an independent non-governmental body, given statutory powers by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. We are a company limited by guarantee and financed by the financial services industry. The Treasury appoints the FSA Board, which currently consists of a Chairman, a Chief Executive Officer, three Managing Directors, and 9 non-executive directors (including a lead non-executive member, the Deputy Chairman). This Board sets our overall policy, but day-to-day decisions and management of the staff are the responsibility of the Executive.
===================================================================
Apparently, one of the statutory objectives of the FSA is;
public awareness: promoting public understanding of the financial system
A big, red F for that one.
TODAY IS SADDO-DAY
Saturday.
Grandstand.
World of Sport.
Actors acting at Wrestling.
22 men or women kicking a piece of leather around a field (and swearing and spitting alot too).
An unknown teenage girl balancing and spinning on a beam in a far-off and strange country.
Some men and women running around and around and around an athletics track.
It's all so, so sad.
All that time and energy spent preparing to beat someone else. Not physically beat them (though that is the case in boxing, martial arts etc.), just be in that "I'm going to beat you" frame of mind.
Is sport good or bad?
Sport can keep you physically fit, emotionally happier.
But it can also dominate your life so much you lose any sense of reality, and instead focus on chasing a ball about, or jumping further or higher than anyone else, etc.
Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of men, women and children will be driving up and down the country today to participate in or watch, some form of sport. For what? What is it? Is it the adrenalin rush from either playing or watching? Is adrenalin the most addictive chemical?
I used to be one of them. I loved playing football as a kid. I was good too. But lying in the bath after I used to ask myself, what is it all about? Parents of schoolchildren screaming at their kids to knobble another kid on the opposing team. I mean, what can all that be about? Except creating a destructive, violent and aggressive energy.
Sport could be very good for the human race, to keep it fit and active and relatively sober. But in our current situation, should sport be relegated?
Grandstand.
World of Sport.
Actors acting at Wrestling.
22 men or women kicking a piece of leather around a field (and swearing and spitting alot too).
An unknown teenage girl balancing and spinning on a beam in a far-off and strange country.
Some men and women running around and around and around an athletics track.
It's all so, so sad.
All that time and energy spent preparing to beat someone else. Not physically beat them (though that is the case in boxing, martial arts etc.), just be in that "I'm going to beat you" frame of mind.
Is sport good or bad?
Sport can keep you physically fit, emotionally happier.
But it can also dominate your life so much you lose any sense of reality, and instead focus on chasing a ball about, or jumping further or higher than anyone else, etc.
Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of men, women and children will be driving up and down the country today to participate in or watch, some form of sport. For what? What is it? Is it the adrenalin rush from either playing or watching? Is adrenalin the most addictive chemical?
I used to be one of them. I loved playing football as a kid. I was good too. But lying in the bath after I used to ask myself, what is it all about? Parents of schoolchildren screaming at their kids to knobble another kid on the opposing team. I mean, what can all that be about? Except creating a destructive, violent and aggressive energy.
Sport could be very good for the human race, to keep it fit and active and relatively sober. But in our current situation, should sport be relegated?
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
IT'S ALL SO PREDICTABLE. BRITISH TROOPS NOT COMING HOME AFTER ALL.
They're going to the Iranian border instead!!
Amid all the bugle calls and cries of retreat, several hundred British troops are actually going to the Iranian border to...help start WW3.
I have zero trust, at best, in our top military and politicians, particularly after the debacle earlier this year when some sailors were captured somewhere off the coast of Iran, or was it Iraq? They're all corrupt.
Corrupt leaders feasting off a bankrupt system looking for a way to throw all of us into the shithole they've dug for us, while they stand at the side pissing all over us, and laughing their heads off at how gullible and stupid the human race is.
And if the British-troops-getting-killed-on-the-Iranian-border trick doesn't work there's always the Israelis retaliating against Syria, who retaliated against Israel for Israel violating Syrian airspace and dropping bombs on Syria a week ago.
Amid all the bugle calls and cries of retreat, several hundred British troops are actually going to the Iranian border to...help start WW3.
I have zero trust, at best, in our top military and politicians, particularly after the debacle earlier this year when some sailors were captured somewhere off the coast of Iran, or was it Iraq? They're all corrupt.
Corrupt leaders feasting off a bankrupt system looking for a way to throw all of us into the shithole they've dug for us, while they stand at the side pissing all over us, and laughing their heads off at how gullible and stupid the human race is.
And if the British-troops-getting-killed-on-the-Iranian-border trick doesn't work there's always the Israelis retaliating against Syria, who retaliated against Israel for Israel violating Syrian airspace and dropping bombs on Syria a week ago.
Saturday, September 08, 2007
THEY'RE ALL BANKRUPT!
From http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/09/08/theyre-all-bankrupt.html
September 8, 2007 (LPAC) - At the International Ambrosetti Workshop in Cernobbio, Italy, international bankers and economists discussed how much the international financial system has already disintegrated, and which large bank will announce bankruptcy first, the Italian daily Corriere della Sera reports today.
According to Kenneth Rogoff, former chief economist at the IMF, at least 1.3 trillion dollars have evaporated. At least one large bank will go bust, Rogoff says, adding that Moody's could go bankrupt too: "They make 45% of their profits with ratings on high-risk assets." But nobody knows where the largest holes are. "Not even the banks know that," says Alessandro Mitrovich of the Royal Bank of Scotland. "Even if we sat around a table, we would not get a picture of the situation."
September 8, 2007 (LPAC) - At the International Ambrosetti Workshop in Cernobbio, Italy, international bankers and economists discussed how much the international financial system has already disintegrated, and which large bank will announce bankruptcy first, the Italian daily Corriere della Sera reports today.
According to Kenneth Rogoff, former chief economist at the IMF, at least 1.3 trillion dollars have evaporated. At least one large bank will go bust, Rogoff says, adding that Moody's could go bankrupt too: "They make 45% of their profits with ratings on high-risk assets." But nobody knows where the largest holes are. "Not even the banks know that," says Alessandro Mitrovich of the Royal Bank of Scotland. "Even if we sat around a table, we would not get a picture of the situation."
THE MCCANNS AND 7/7
Just as serious questions about government foreknowledge of 7/7 were being asked in mainstream media, a young girl on holiday in Portugal went missing and became front page news for weeks.
And just as the survivors and relatives of victims of 7/7 receive their predictable denial of an inquiry into 7/7, the mother and father of the missing girl are named as suspects in her disappearance.
Any link?
I watched BBC 6 O Clock news last night. Nearly the first half of it was on the McCanns. The next item lasted 2 minutes on the report on the FMD outbreak at Pirbright.
And just as the survivors and relatives of victims of 7/7 receive their predictable denial of an inquiry into 7/7, the mother and father of the missing girl are named as suspects in her disappearance.
Any link?
I watched BBC 6 O Clock news last night. Nearly the first half of it was on the McCanns. The next item lasted 2 minutes on the report on the FMD outbreak at Pirbright.
Friday, September 07, 2007
WAR
So Israel violates Syrian airspace and drops bombs on Syrian territory and little is said about it.
Russian planes fly in international airspace in exercises announced well in advance and they are "escorted" by NATO planes and the incident is headline news reported as naked Russian aggression.
Who wants war?
Some people do.
Why?
Because the financial system cannot hold together much longer. It wasn't designed to. It was designed to last just long enough to give certain psychos enough power to finance international wars and institutions to centralize control before "the big one", the final war to end all wars for the final power grab.
All this posturing and the provocations are in preparation for it.
Most people don't want war. However, some do.
I am not sure our government is wise enough to see the traps.
Russian planes fly in international airspace in exercises announced well in advance and they are "escorted" by NATO planes and the incident is headline news reported as naked Russian aggression.
Who wants war?
Some people do.
Why?
Because the financial system cannot hold together much longer. It wasn't designed to. It was designed to last just long enough to give certain psychos enough power to finance international wars and institutions to centralize control before "the big one", the final war to end all wars for the final power grab.
All this posturing and the provocations are in preparation for it.
Most people don't want war. However, some do.
I am not sure our government is wise enough to see the traps.
Monday, September 03, 2007
POST-WAR PLANNING WAS "INTELLECTUALLY BANKRUPT"?
NO!
Post-war planning was spot-on, to embroil Iraq in a civil war for at least two purposes;
1. while Iraqis are at each others throats they won't protest against the Anglo-American oil corporations stealing Iraqi oil.
2. the civil war can be blamed on Iran, giving a pretext for war on another member of "the axis of evil".
Post-war planning was spot-on, to embroil Iraq in a civil war for at least two purposes;
1. while Iraqis are at each others throats they won't protest against the Anglo-American oil corporations stealing Iraqi oil.
2. the civil war can be blamed on Iran, giving a pretext for war on another member of "the axis of evil".
Saturday, September 01, 2007
LET IT END HERE? IT SHOULD HAVE ENDED 9 YEARS AGO!
At the memorial for Diana yesterday the Bishop of London said, "Let it end here".
Whether this was a request to cease the exploitation of Diana, or to cease the conspiracy-mongering, I am unsure. Maybe it was both.
On Thursday night, on the eve of the memorial, Newsnight did not run its own dedication to Diana. Instead it questioned why a mainstream newspaper ran so many Diana conspiracy headlines.
But if the Bishop of London's remarks were regarding the conspiracy-mongering, may I remind you the memorial yesterday was for a woman who died TEN YEARS AGO.
Not only that, she was mother to two Princes, and could have been a Queen.
How is it that after ten years there has been no inquest into the death of Diana?
There has been a series of whitewash after whitewash inquiries into her death, the most recent offered by Lord Stevens, whose report was published "coincidentally" on the same day that Blair was questioned by Police. The Stevens Report cannot be believed because he stated no ring had been bought by Fayed in Paris when the purchase is on film and the vendor and Fayed still have the receipts!
I will state again; the Albert Pike Third World War involves driving a massive wedge between Islam and Judeo-Christianity. If Diana was either married or engaged to a Muslim, and possibly have had another child from that relationship then it would have been much more difficult to create that necessary friction.
I am not sure Phillip ordered it.
I am not sure Charles ordered it.
I am not sure she was bred for an ultimate sacrifice in the Pont D'Alma.
But Diana was becoming a loose and powerful cannon, and Diana's romantic relationships with Muslims were threatening the agenda of certain "dark forces" intent on a world war between Islam and the West. In their eyes, in a world in which they believe they can do anything whatsoever, she had to go.
Who has the power to stall an inquest into the death of a much-loved member of the Royal family for TEN YEARS?
Who has the power to control Lord Stevens so that his multi-million report can be rubbished within seconds of reading?
The answer? DARK FORCES.
Whether this was a request to cease the exploitation of Diana, or to cease the conspiracy-mongering, I am unsure. Maybe it was both.
On Thursday night, on the eve of the memorial, Newsnight did not run its own dedication to Diana. Instead it questioned why a mainstream newspaper ran so many Diana conspiracy headlines.
But if the Bishop of London's remarks were regarding the conspiracy-mongering, may I remind you the memorial yesterday was for a woman who died TEN YEARS AGO.
Not only that, she was mother to two Princes, and could have been a Queen.
How is it that after ten years there has been no inquest into the death of Diana?
There has been a series of whitewash after whitewash inquiries into her death, the most recent offered by Lord Stevens, whose report was published "coincidentally" on the same day that Blair was questioned by Police. The Stevens Report cannot be believed because he stated no ring had been bought by Fayed in Paris when the purchase is on film and the vendor and Fayed still have the receipts!
I will state again; the Albert Pike Third World War involves driving a massive wedge between Islam and Judeo-Christianity. If Diana was either married or engaged to a Muslim, and possibly have had another child from that relationship then it would have been much more difficult to create that necessary friction.
I am not sure Phillip ordered it.
I am not sure Charles ordered it.
I am not sure she was bred for an ultimate sacrifice in the Pont D'Alma.
But Diana was becoming a loose and powerful cannon, and Diana's romantic relationships with Muslims were threatening the agenda of certain "dark forces" intent on a world war between Islam and the West. In their eyes, in a world in which they believe they can do anything whatsoever, she had to go.
Who has the power to stall an inquest into the death of a much-loved member of the Royal family for TEN YEARS?
Who has the power to control Lord Stevens so that his multi-million report can be rubbished within seconds of reading?
The answer? DARK FORCES.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE PARATROOPER'S MISSING LEGS
Ben Parkinson lost his two legs when a landmine blew up underneath the Land Rover he was in during a patrol in Helmand.
Yesterday he was awarded just £152,000.
An RAF typist was awarded £484,000 for repetitive strain injury to her thumb (which I assume was not amputated).
Meanwhile, Blair is twiddling his thumbs and deciding which lawyer to appoint in order to get those multi-million pound book deals sealed.
IS THIS WORLD FRICKING MENTAL??
Yes, because it is run by psychopaths who laugh at people like Ben Parkinson while they create billions and billions of pounds OUT OF NOTHING simply in order to prop up their bankrupt and failing financial system that, during last century and the first decade of this century, has brought us massive and intolerable death and destruction.
===========================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=478367&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=
Soldiers, veterans and politicians yesterday described as an 'absolute disgrace' the compensation paid to a paratrooper who lost his legs while serving in Afghanistan.
Lord Guthrie, the former Chief of Defence Staff, said: "As a nation we really should be ashamed of the way we treat people like this."
He was among those reacting with incredulity to the case of Ben Parkinson, highlighted in yesterday's Daily Mail.
The 23-year-old lance bombardier, who requires 24-hour care, has been awarded £152,000 for his devastating injuries - only half the £285,000 maximum award
The payout is less than a third of the £484,000 given last year to an RAF typist suffering from repetitive strain injury to a thumb.
Faced with a huge public backlash, Armed Forces Minister Bob Ainsworth admitted last night that he could not say the payout was 'fair' and said a review of the scheme was under way.
Yesterday he was awarded just £152,000.
An RAF typist was awarded £484,000 for repetitive strain injury to her thumb (which I assume was not amputated).
Meanwhile, Blair is twiddling his thumbs and deciding which lawyer to appoint in order to get those multi-million pound book deals sealed.
IS THIS WORLD FRICKING MENTAL??
Yes, because it is run by psychopaths who laugh at people like Ben Parkinson while they create billions and billions of pounds OUT OF NOTHING simply in order to prop up their bankrupt and failing financial system that, during last century and the first decade of this century, has brought us massive and intolerable death and destruction.
===========================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=478367&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=
Soldiers, veterans and politicians yesterday described as an 'absolute disgrace' the compensation paid to a paratrooper who lost his legs while serving in Afghanistan.
Lord Guthrie, the former Chief of Defence Staff, said: "As a nation we really should be ashamed of the way we treat people like this."
He was among those reacting with incredulity to the case of Ben Parkinson, highlighted in yesterday's Daily Mail.
The 23-year-old lance bombardier, who requires 24-hour care, has been awarded £152,000 for his devastating injuries - only half the £285,000 maximum award
The payout is less than a third of the £484,000 given last year to an RAF typist suffering from repetitive strain injury to a thumb.
Faced with a huge public backlash, Armed Forces Minister Bob Ainsworth admitted last night that he could not say the payout was 'fair' and said a review of the scheme was under way.
Sunday, August 26, 2007
GERRY McCANN SURPISED BY MEDIA COVERAGE OF MADELEINE
This morning I saw on the news a few excerpts from an interview of Gerry McCann, the father of missing Madeleine McCann, at the Media Guardian Edinburgh International Television Festival. The bits I saw showed McCann expressing his amazement at the GLOBAL media coverage of the disappearance of Madeleine. There can only be one explanation for this coverage : the microchip.
While on the subject of the McCanns, the innuendo and rumours coming out of Portugal could be a warning to them to drop their campaign and research into child abduction across the world. If so, by promoting the microchip agenda the NWO fools have created global empathy for a family who are on a quest to find out what happened, not only to their daughter, but to the abducted children of other families.
And if they find the truth about who is really behind that and who protects them, then bodies will swing from trees and lampposts.
Hence the demoralising anonymous accusations in the Portuguese media.
I will once again state my deep suspicion at the timing of the abduction of Madeleine McCann. Dangerous allegations surrounding 7/7 were beginning to surface at the time, and they were gaining momentum, not just in the conspiraloonosphere but also the national media. They had to be stopped.
Hence Madeleine?
I dunno.
But who could be behind all this?
Child abudction.
Terrorism.
Kids shooting kids.
Youths beating a father to death.
And all the other crap that goes on?
And how could it be encouraged?
Below is that inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram immediately north of theBlackWhite House, and a picture of the Federal Reserve building in Washington DC where the greatest financial crimes against humanity are planned and executed. The Federal Reserve financed it all.
While on the subject of the McCanns, the innuendo and rumours coming out of Portugal could be a warning to them to drop their campaign and research into child abduction across the world. If so, by promoting the microchip agenda the NWO fools have created global empathy for a family who are on a quest to find out what happened, not only to their daughter, but to the abducted children of other families.
And if they find the truth about who is really behind that and who protects them, then bodies will swing from trees and lampposts.
Hence the demoralising anonymous accusations in the Portuguese media.
I will once again state my deep suspicion at the timing of the abduction of Madeleine McCann. Dangerous allegations surrounding 7/7 were beginning to surface at the time, and they were gaining momentum, not just in the conspiraloonosphere but also the national media. They had to be stopped.
Hence Madeleine?
I dunno.
But who could be behind all this?
Child abudction.
Terrorism.
Kids shooting kids.
Youths beating a father to death.
And all the other crap that goes on?
And how could it be encouraged?
Below is that inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram immediately north of the
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
WHO FLEXED WHOSE MUSCLES?
It was reported yesterday that two Russian Bears entered British airspace last Friday 17th. The Sun says so.
Yet The Washington Post says the Bears were tailed in international airspace. Two Typhoons were scrambled (?!) when two Bears were headed towards British airspace.
So who flexed their muscles?
For Russia to violate British airspace would be absolute insanity, and would simply serve to portray Russia as the careless aggressor.
So if their mission wasn't to violate British airspace, what was it?
Was it to fly around in international airspace, albeit close to British airspace? And if so, what were the Typhoons doing tailing the bears in international airspace?
It does all seem a little bit like boys with toys.
The Sun quotes one anonymous military expert:
“Putin is playing a dangerous game. If the RAF were to shoot one of these things down it could quickly escalate to an unthinkable level.”
There are some on this side of the North Sea who would love nothing more than a confrontation with Russia, so they could drag the USA into it.
The Sun also quotes an RAF spokesman:
“The plane was on a heading that gave a cause for concern. Our response was in accordance with NATO guidelines.”
If the Bears were deliberately placed on a path that would provoke such a response and NATO guidelines to be followed then someones Russian arse needs kicking.
We don't need silly shit like this.
Yet The Washington Post says the Bears were tailed in international airspace. Two Typhoons were scrambled (?!) when two Bears were headed towards British airspace.
So who flexed their muscles?
For Russia to violate British airspace would be absolute insanity, and would simply serve to portray Russia as the careless aggressor.
So if their mission wasn't to violate British airspace, what was it?
Was it to fly around in international airspace, albeit close to British airspace? And if so, what were the Typhoons doing tailing the bears in international airspace?
It does all seem a little bit like boys with toys.
The Sun quotes one anonymous military expert:
“Putin is playing a dangerous game. If the RAF were to shoot one of these things down it could quickly escalate to an unthinkable level.”
There are some on this side of the North Sea who would love nothing more than a confrontation with Russia, so they could drag the USA into it.
The Sun also quotes an RAF spokesman:
“The plane was on a heading that gave a cause for concern. Our response was in accordance with NATO guidelines.”
If the Bears were deliberately placed on a path that would provoke such a response and NATO guidelines to be followed then someones Russian arse needs kicking.
We don't need silly shit like this.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
SKELLINGTONS IN THE CUPBOARD
I have just listened to a rather strange interview on BBC Radio 5 Live. A woman was being interviewed about her brother. Apparently, this brother and sister were quite close (or she thought they were). He had a drink-and-drug problem from the 1980's and 1990's, and had been to rehab three times but relapsed shortly after treatment stopped.
When he died her house was raided by Customs & Excise who alleged that he was involved in an international drug smuggling ring, acting as a front renting property for the ring. She didn't know about this, and is cheezed off that he didn't tell her, or her husband (the brother's best mate), what he was getting involved in. He died in a right state, emaciated from drink-and-drugs.
While listening to this interview I thought, there are much bigger skeletons, real, boney, fractured, skeletons in the cupboards of other families that could and should be investigated.
When he died her house was raided by Customs & Excise who alleged that he was involved in an international drug smuggling ring, acting as a front renting property for the ring. She didn't know about this, and is cheezed off that he didn't tell her, or her husband (the brother's best mate), what he was getting involved in. He died in a right state, emaciated from drink-and-drugs.
While listening to this interview I thought, there are much bigger skeletons, real, boney, fractured, skeletons in the cupboards of other families that could and should be investigated.
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
CHIEF CONSTABLE FAHY IS NOT QUITE CORRECT. HE SHOULD ALSO LOOK A LITTLE CLOSER TO HOME.
The Chief Constable for Cheshire Constabulary, Peter Fahy, yesterday attacked parents and cheap alcohol for the increase in anti-social behaviour in teenagers. I assume this is in defence of the Police action (or inaction) in the death of Gary Newlove.
The Home Office also agreed with "the substance" of the comments of Fahy.
But in both cases the "just blame parents and alcohol" argument should be amended to account for the blatant criminality manifesting in society, right from the top trickling all the way down to the bottom.
It was the UK who went into Iraq in 2003 against international law.
This criminality trickles down from the top, in which the UK creates and enforces unfair international law or ignores international law altogether, to the bottom, in which the under-priviliged and poverty-stricken see crime as a way to simply survive.
"Behind every great fortune lies a crime" - Honore de Balzac
During the reign of Queen Victoria the British Empire virtually ruled the world. It achieved that through slavery, through invasion and imperialism, and through engineered famines and wars.
The British Empire was built on blatant, bloody crime, and lots of it.
That criminality of the British Empire still exists through the control of the global financial system, based in The City of London and Wall Street/District of Columbia, which is 100% pure fraud, enforced by a Freemason-riddled Law and Justice apparatus.
If those at the top of our society are to remain the top criminals in the world then they need a criminal society underneath them for two reasons:
1. to keep them at the top of our society (an educated and clean living society would see through their lies and crimes and topple them),
2. to believe in or accept the criminal actions of those at the top.
Hence the sad but not unexpected death of Gary Newlove. The lack of respect shown in our youth today, manifesting itself in the sad but not unexpected death of Gary Newlove, is not purely down to alcohol and bad parenting. Those reasons are partially valid, but not the sole reasons.
Go down to your local cinema or DVD/video rental store and look at the films available to watch, particularly the more recent films and re-releases. THEY ARE SICK! They are violent. There is no clever or moral plot or historical education in them. They are simply 100% tortureporn.
Similarly, go down to a pub or club in any town or city centre and they are loaded with drugs, playing banging, moronic music helping to hypnotise the young men and women into fighting or having one-night-stand sex.
Yet go to mainland Europe, and it is like living in a completely different planet (except where there are pissed-up British louts on stag or hen nights). I have walked around Vienna several times on a Friday and Saturday night. It is brilliant. Not only are the streets clean, they are also very safe. There are pubs, clubs, wine bars etc. , but hardly any violence. Why the difference?
Why are the British so different?
Guess who tricked whom into world war during the 20th Century.
Guess who financed the dictators of the 20th Century.
There lies your answer.
It was our leaders and their secret servants who have allowed that dark force to mainfest within them. And so that dark force is encouraged to manifest itself in our youth, so our leaders can continue with their dark agenda and megalomaniac schemes for total world control. With an uneducated youth more concerned about getting pissed/loveless sex/drugs/adrenalin sports, our leaders can get away with murder, mass murder, literally.
That is how Gary Newlove died. It is not just down to bad parenting and cheap, abundant alcohol. The murderers of Gary Newlove are products of centuries of social engineering by the greatest criminals in the world, The British Elite.
The Home Office also agreed with "the substance" of the comments of Fahy.
But in both cases the "just blame parents and alcohol" argument should be amended to account for the blatant criminality manifesting in society, right from the top trickling all the way down to the bottom.
It was the UK who went into Iraq in 2003 against international law.
This criminality trickles down from the top, in which the UK creates and enforces unfair international law or ignores international law altogether, to the bottom, in which the under-priviliged and poverty-stricken see crime as a way to simply survive.
"Behind every great fortune lies a crime" - Honore de Balzac
During the reign of Queen Victoria the British Empire virtually ruled the world. It achieved that through slavery, through invasion and imperialism, and through engineered famines and wars.
The British Empire was built on blatant, bloody crime, and lots of it.
That criminality of the British Empire still exists through the control of the global financial system, based in The City of London and Wall Street/District of Columbia, which is 100% pure fraud, enforced by a Freemason-riddled Law and Justice apparatus.
If those at the top of our society are to remain the top criminals in the world then they need a criminal society underneath them for two reasons:
1. to keep them at the top of our society (an educated and clean living society would see through their lies and crimes and topple them),
2. to believe in or accept the criminal actions of those at the top.
Hence the sad but not unexpected death of Gary Newlove. The lack of respect shown in our youth today, manifesting itself in the sad but not unexpected death of Gary Newlove, is not purely down to alcohol and bad parenting. Those reasons are partially valid, but not the sole reasons.
Go down to your local cinema or DVD/video rental store and look at the films available to watch, particularly the more recent films and re-releases. THEY ARE SICK! They are violent. There is no clever or moral plot or historical education in them. They are simply 100% tortureporn.
Similarly, go down to a pub or club in any town or city centre and they are loaded with drugs, playing banging, moronic music helping to hypnotise the young men and women into fighting or having one-night-stand sex.
Yet go to mainland Europe, and it is like living in a completely different planet (except where there are pissed-up British louts on stag or hen nights). I have walked around Vienna several times on a Friday and Saturday night. It is brilliant. Not only are the streets clean, they are also very safe. There are pubs, clubs, wine bars etc. , but hardly any violence. Why the difference?
Why are the British so different?
Guess who tricked whom into world war during the 20th Century.
Guess who financed the dictators of the 20th Century.
There lies your answer.
It was our leaders and their secret servants who have allowed that dark force to mainfest within them. And so that dark force is encouraged to manifest itself in our youth, so our leaders can continue with their dark agenda and megalomaniac schemes for total world control. With an uneducated youth more concerned about getting pissed/loveless sex/drugs/adrenalin sports, our leaders can get away with murder, mass murder, literally.
That is how Gary Newlove died. It is not just down to bad parenting and cheap, abundant alcohol. The murderers of Gary Newlove are products of centuries of social engineering by the greatest criminals in the world, The British Elite.
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
THE SAD BUT NOT UNEXPECTED DEATH OF GARY NEWLOVE
I didn’t know Gary Newlove personally. But I know people like him. In Warrington. We all do. A loving man with a loving family who wanted to make the world a slightly better place in his own little corner of the world, the street where he lived, and suffered tragically for it.
I know Warrington quite well. I was there when the rave scene kicked off circa 1990. The place was flooded with drugs. It was due to this abundance of drugs in Warrington that I began to become suspicious of the local Police. Later I came to realise just how corrupt the local Police force were and probably still are.
Warrington is halfway between Liverpool and Manchester, and halfway between Stoke/Crewe and Preston, surrounded by the major motorways the M6, M56 and M62. It has its affluent suburbs and its not so affluent suburbs. It is a large North England town with its fair share of pubs and breweries, pub and work football teams, shopping centres and supermarkets, and sadly, its protected gangsters, thugs and criminals.
What I am about to say is true : I have been waiting for a death similar to Gary Newlove’s to happen specifically in Warrington for about five years now. There is something rotten in Warrington that has been allowed to fester for years, a very dark energy. I feel it whenever I am there. Others I know say the exactly the same thing. I strongly suspect Warrington has been used as a laboratory for some sort of social engineering experiment, and with this I am reminded of “A Clockwork Orange”.
There seems to be a worshipping of violence and lawlessness in that area. Tony Wilson, who had the nickname “Mr Manchester”, died last weekend. Many are sad at his death. But I believe he shouldn’t be praised so much, for it was he who helped to create “Gunchester”, a legacy that still haunts Manchester with shootings it seems every week, usually over drugs or the gangs who run the drugs, a scene fuelled by The Hacienda and the musicians who frequently attended there.
Blair should also be in the dock for Gary’s death. Bilderbergers Blair and Thatcher, and Trilateral Major. Blair’s Britain killed Gary Newlove. Blair inherited Major’s Britain, who in turn inherited Thatcher’s Britain. It is their policies (social exclusion, dumbing down of education, cuts in resources and violent films and games, while billions can be created with a click of the fingers for war and to save the bankrupt financial system from collapse) that have led to the attitude that youngsters of today have; abandonment, rejection and a “fuck you” that Lord Rothschild would be proud of.
Gary Newlove was kicked and punched to death outside his own home by a gang of young kids out of their heads on drink and drugs. What sort of Britain are we creating for ourselves when this can happen?
I didn’t know Gary Newlove personally. But I know people like him. We all do. A loving man with a loving family who wanted to make the world a slightly better place in his own little corner of the world, the street where he lived, and suffered tragically for it.
Who’s next?
I know Warrington quite well. I was there when the rave scene kicked off circa 1990. The place was flooded with drugs. It was due to this abundance of drugs in Warrington that I began to become suspicious of the local Police. Later I came to realise just how corrupt the local Police force were and probably still are.
Warrington is halfway between Liverpool and Manchester, and halfway between Stoke/Crewe and Preston, surrounded by the major motorways the M6, M56 and M62. It has its affluent suburbs and its not so affluent suburbs. It is a large North England town with its fair share of pubs and breweries, pub and work football teams, shopping centres and supermarkets, and sadly, its protected gangsters, thugs and criminals.
What I am about to say is true : I have been waiting for a death similar to Gary Newlove’s to happen specifically in Warrington for about five years now. There is something rotten in Warrington that has been allowed to fester for years, a very dark energy. I feel it whenever I am there. Others I know say the exactly the same thing. I strongly suspect Warrington has been used as a laboratory for some sort of social engineering experiment, and with this I am reminded of “A Clockwork Orange”.
There seems to be a worshipping of violence and lawlessness in that area. Tony Wilson, who had the nickname “Mr Manchester”, died last weekend. Many are sad at his death. But I believe he shouldn’t be praised so much, for it was he who helped to create “Gunchester”, a legacy that still haunts Manchester with shootings it seems every week, usually over drugs or the gangs who run the drugs, a scene fuelled by The Hacienda and the musicians who frequently attended there.
Blair should also be in the dock for Gary’s death. Bilderbergers Blair and Thatcher, and Trilateral Major. Blair’s Britain killed Gary Newlove. Blair inherited Major’s Britain, who in turn inherited Thatcher’s Britain. It is their policies (social exclusion, dumbing down of education, cuts in resources and violent films and games, while billions can be created with a click of the fingers for war and to save the bankrupt financial system from collapse) that have led to the attitude that youngsters of today have; abandonment, rejection and a “fuck you” that Lord Rothschild would be proud of.
Gary Newlove was kicked and punched to death outside his own home by a gang of young kids out of their heads on drink and drugs. What sort of Britain are we creating for ourselves when this can happen?
I didn’t know Gary Newlove personally. But I know people like him. We all do. A loving man with a loving family who wanted to make the world a slightly better place in his own little corner of the world, the street where he lived, and suffered tragically for it.
Who’s next?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)