Friday, February 15, 2008

HOW MUCH MORE EVIDENCE DO YOU NEED?

At the inquest into the deaths of Dodi al Fayed and Princess Diana, the chief of security for al Fayed was grilled about certain allegations, such as Henri Paul had not been drinking.

These are points being raised and placed in the public arena to distract and discredit.

The case against Henri Paul is that his (alleged) blood samples indicated he would have been absolutely legless and out of control, yet CCTV footage shows Paul NOT absolutely legless and out of control. I seriously doubt that Diana and Dodi would have allowed themselves to be chauffuered by Paul if he was even apparently slightly drunk. So why are Paul's blood samples so 'wrong'? Were they tampered with?

There is the case of James Adanson. He was found burned and shot in a car that had been locked from the outside. Adanson had a white Fiat Uno registered under his name on the night of the crash, which when tested was found to be the very same Uno that destabilised Diana's Mercedes that fateful night. Adanson privately boasted that he was in the tunnel when Diana crashed.

There is the testimony of former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson who said that he saw plans for an assassination that were very similar to the events surrounding the death of Diana; a high-speed chase into a tunnel, a bright flash and a destabilising bump from a nearby car to force the target to crash.

And then there is the testimony of Francois Levistre, who testified that he saw a bright flash in the tunnel in his rear view mirror, a high-speed motorcycle with two people stop next to the crashed car, the passenger get off the motorcycle, check the condition of the occupants and then signal to the driver of the motorcycle that the job was done, and then the motorcycle driven off into the Paris night never to be found.

Instead of focusing on these aspects of the testimony which clearly indicate Diana was assassinated, the press concentrate on dead ends and red herrings.

There was an article in The Independent a few days ago about how military intelligence controls the press. Remember that.

No comments: