Saturday, March 02, 2013

THE INSIDE JOB 9/11 WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT

I'll bet that on the evening of 11th September 2001 particular sections of our planet were chinking their glasses of brandy together and saying, "Cheers! We got away with it!". They immediately began to move their pawns in the media and politics to drum up support for a bloody warmongering rampage. War and regime change in seven nations in five years was the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark; Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Iran, "those old soviet client regimes" as Paul Wolfowitz suggested to Clark as far back as 1991.

But by 2007 the plan was moribund. Of those seven nations only Iraq had been invaded, in 2003. In 2006 Israel sent some poor unsuspecting IDF fools into land controlled by Hezbollah. The fools were kidnapped and/or killed. Israel knew they would probably be killed and so went to war on Lebanon.

So an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash a terrible plague of criminal cutthroat Jihadi locusts onto some of the nations targeted for war and regime change. In 2011 special forces of some NATO members and Qatar trained, advised, armed and guided these Jihadis in Libya while NATO bombed a clear and unobstructed path all the way into Tripoli for them. Gaddafi had fled but was killed later.

After Libya the Jihadis were sent to Syria, where the heroes of 2012 the Syrian military are kicking their al Qaeda butts, so much so that the UK and USA and even Europe are getting very very frustrated and have now decided to openly ally themselves with al Qaeda in Syria by sending everything they can.

However, Iraq has decided to join in now.

Iraq was the first name on the list. In 2003 we invaded Iraq based on the pretext of Iraq being behind 9/11 and having WMD. The Sun ran manipulated photos of Saddam Hussein flying a passenger jet into the WTC. Donald Rumsfeld on the telly said the WMD were North, South, East and West of Baghdad and around Tikrit.

But it was all bull.

And now 10 years after invading Iraq and trying to replace the government there Iraq has decided to bomb the Syrian al Qaeda rebs!

YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!

We invade Iraq based on a steaming pile of bullshit, killing approximately 1 million civilians. And for what? So that the new government can bomb the Syrian al Qaeda rebs that we injected into Syria in order to replace Assad, and are now overtly backing with God knows what!

You do not need a PhD from The University of the Bleedin' Obvious to see that the inside job 9/11 was not worth it. All that it has done is expose to the world that there really is a monstrous warmongering evil elite who will do anything, say anything and kill anyone to get control of the world.

And to show just how desperate the warmongers are, they have even got Ben Affleck(!!) to direct a historically inaccurate and anti-Iran film that is being bashed by nearly all the Ambassadors to Iran of key nations at the time because of its inaccuracies!!

YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB (AND WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT).

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB (AND WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT).

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB (AND WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT).

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB (AND WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT).

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB (AND WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT).

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB (AND WAS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT).

The Iraqi army has reportedly shelled Free Syrian Army positions inside Syria near the border with Iraq. Unconfirmed reports suggest that Iraq was helping Syrian government forces regain control of a border checkpoint seized by the insurgency.

Syrian troops have recaptured the Al-Ya'robiya checkpoint on the border with Iraq on Friday night. According to witness reports on Twitter, Iraq's armed forces moved in to help with the operation and shelled the border post, which was held by the rebels.

An Al-Arabiya correspondent also confirmed that targets inside Syria had been shelled while Iraqi snipers took positions near the crossing. Massive reinforcements have also been deployed in Baghdad near the Syrian border, the correspondent said.

[source : Iraqi army helped Syrian government retake border checkpoint - reports, RT, http://rt.com/news/syria-iraq-border-checkpoint-706/, 2nd March 2013]

Thursday, February 28, 2013

RESTORE THE BANK FOR THE PEOPLE OF A REPUBLIC

We in this Disunited Fascist Kingdom desperately need a new banking system.

For years we have been tricked into ignoring the banks in the United States that quickly made the USA a threat to the British Empire; The First and Second Banks of the United States.

Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin destroyed the myth of the traitor Andrew Jackson, who destroyed The Second Bank of The United States as a plot to wreck the economy of the USA for the British Empire.

Kirsch has now presented draft legislation for a bank modelled on the The First and Second Banks of the United States. This is free and available at http://larouchepac.com/restorethebank

Kirsch also spoke a few weeks ago describing this draft legislation. The video of this is available to watch at http://larouchepac.com/node/25457

This is exactly what we need in this DFK...now.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

LITVINENKO EVIDENCE WITHHELD BY BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND HOW THIS LINKS TO SYRIA

The British Government has been accused of withholding evidence from the inquest into the radioactive Russian traitor Alexander Litvinenko, whose wife Marina believes this is being done to protect trade between Great Britain and Russia.

On September 11th 2001 four passenger planes were allegedly hijacked and flown around the North East sector of American airspace for nearly two hours before flying into the the WTC 1 and 2 and even the flipping Pentagon without any shot being fired. Shortly after this General Wesley Clark was told in two different meetings how the USA would engage in war and regime change in seven nations in five years. The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. Most of these had previously been named in two Zionist warmongering documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, the latter explicitly stating that a "new Pearl Harbor" would be required to transform the opinion of the American public to go on such a bloody rampage.

So Iraq was invaded in 2003 based the pretext that Iraq had been involved in 9/11 and had WMD. Neither was true.

There was a small war contrived by Israel on Lebanon in 2006.

But by 2007 this plan revealed to Clark was moribund. So an agreement was reached between Israel, Saudi Arabia and the USA to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto several of the nations named to Clark. Libya was the first to suffer this plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts. Since killing Gaddafi, an ally in the war on terror having given the names of suspected al Qaeda to CIA and MI6, these Jihadis have been busy in North Africa and Syria.

And so to Syria.

Last year there was enormous pressure placed on Russia to support an invasion and/or military intervention in Syria. Russia has refused. Russia waited and investigated the massacres that the NATO media screamed had been committed by Assad, and found such allegations false or inconclusive. So any kind of evidence that could put further pressure on Russia to acquiesce in the destruction of Syria and the replacement of Assad would be very useful.

So to recap:
1. a cabal of kiddie-fiddling warmongering megalomaniacs did the inside job 9/11 to get at nations like Iraq, Syria and Iran. Their plan stalled so they have unleashed an uncontrollable plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts onto a number of nations, one of them currently Syria.
2. Russia has rejected military intervention in Syria, despite enormous pressure following several false flag massacres blamed by NATO media on Assad and his supporters.

So if the British government had evidence that Russia was indeed behind the death of the radioactive Russian traitor Litvinenko would that evidence not be released to put even more pressure on Russia to relent and allow military intervention in Syria?

What we have seen in this controversial death from the British government is lots and lots of finger pointing but very little hard evidence. And when prompted to provide such evidence the British government hides behind Public interest immunity (PII).

For years it was just rumour and idle speculation that Litvinenko was actually working for MI6. It has only recently been confirmed that this was in fact the case. Litvinenko even had his own handler "Martin" and his private mobile number.

So I think the question is, at the moment which is more important: some small trade agreements between Great Britain and Russia, or kicking Assad out of Syria to eventually get Iran?

And remember, they did the inside job 9/11 to get these nations!

I believe the latter. Only yesterday it was announced that the USA has broadened the definition of non-lethal aid to include virtually everything except rifles and heavy artillery, so that now the al Qaeda rebs will receive armour-plated vests and armoured personnel carriers from the USA and the guns, artillery and ammo from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This shows just how much ousting Assad means to them.









Monday, February 25, 2013

THEY DID THE INSIDE JOB 9/11 TO GET IRAN

They did 9/11 to get Iran.

Iran is named in A Clean Break, Rebuilding America's Defenses and was named to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.

They will not let Iran stand up to them.

Hence my scepticism in the historically inaccurate and anti-Iran film Argo winning Best Picture.

Assad is still in power, with growing support from the Syrian people, but Syria is broken and weak.

BEST PICTURE

The historically inaccurate and anti-Iran film Argo has won Best Picture at this year's Oscars.

This does not bode well.

The director Ben Affleck was not nominated for Best Director. So what is it about the film that deserves Best Picture award if the direction was not worthy of nomination?

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

THIS IS WHAT DID IT FOR ME ME ME

Shostakovich Symphonies 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10.

But this...

Maybe just for this lifetime...

STARLIGHT - NUMERO UNO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tPQD2DUo20

TIGER FEET

Oh dear!

Yet another...

The Sugar Hill Gang - Rappers Delight ( Ben Liebrand Mix )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np6Txx8otig&feature=related

COME ALIVE

Another Legends classic!

But instead of making love in London we should march on and storm our Paedo Parliament and make a citizen's arrest of a few paedos...

Orchestra JB - Come Alive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYQZcFIylNE&feature=related

Monday, February 18, 2013

ISRAEL DESPERATE TO BLAME HEZBOLLAH FOR BURGAS

The Bulgarian Foreign Minister is to present evidence to the EU this week that Hezbollah executed the bombing of a bus in Burgas, Bulgaria last July.

The evidence is flimsy at best.

The real identities of the suspects are still unknown, and no names have been provided. So how can Bulgaria blame Hezbollah? Because forged licences were printed on a printer somehow traced to Lebanon, and apparently there was a small increase in phone calls between Bulgaria and Lebanon in the days before the bombing.

And that is about it!

This kind of 'evidence' could be very easily fabricated.

And is it not highly suspicious that within hours of the bombing Benjamin Netanyahu had convicted Iran and Hezbollah and suggested that we must bomb Iran because the bombers were on their way to London to bomb the Olympic Games?

So why would Hezbollah bomb Jews in Bulgaria? Now that is a tough question. Hezbollah would have nothing to gain by bombing a few Jews in Bulgaria. Some 'experts' have suggested that Iran through Hezbollah retaliated to the blatant assassinations by Israel of Iranian nuclear scientists. But Bulgaria is one of a handful of nations who have formally recognised Palestine as a state. And by bombing in Bulgaria, inside the EU, this would give Israel the perfect opportunity to demand sanctions against Hezbollah, maybe a freeze on Hezbollah's assets in Europe.

Here is what Haaretz is reporting.
DNA samples of his [the suspected suicide bomber on the bus] were sent to several Western intelligence agencies but none of them could find a match to anyone in their records. The only clue that connected him to the terrorists who survived and fled was a SIM card and a forged Canadian driver’s license that were found in a small town on the Bulgarian-Romanian border. The items, which belonged to a cell member who got away, had DNA traces that were very similar to the DNA of the suicide terrorist. The forged driver’s licenses that all three of them carried yielded the most significant smoking gun, since with the help of foreign intelligence sources the Bulgarians managed to locate the printer that had produced the forged documents − and it wasn’t in Canada or in the United States, but in Lebanon.

...The investigation found that there was an increase in the number of calls between Burgas and Lebanon in the days that preceded the attack, among them several suspicious calls that were apparently between the cell members and Hezbollah officials.

[source : Bulgaria to reveal how it traced Hezbollah to deadly attack on Israeli tourists in Burgas, Haaretz, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/bulgaria-to-reveal-how-it-traced-hezbollah-to-deadly-attack-on-israeli-tourists-in-burgas-1.504124, Haaretz]

So here it appears as though the bomber's DNA is not recognised, and somehow the printer used for the creation of forged driver's licences was traced to Lebanon!

This excerpt from a report in The Washington Post just about sums the situation up.
Three men are suspected in the attack, including the bomber.

The latter’s identity has not been established. The names of the two other suspects, believed to still be alive, have not been made public.

The European Union, of which Bulgaria is a member, which regards Hezbollah as a legitimate political organization and has resisted calls to blacklist the group or declare it a terrorist organization.

[source : Hezbollah says no comment on Bulgarian report blaming it for killing Israelis in July, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/hezbollah-refuses-to-comment-on-bulgarian-report-on-july-bombing-that-killed-5-israelis/2013/02/16/6c958248-784f-11e2-b102-948929030e64_story.html, 16th February 2013]

So here is the WP basically saying the identities of the suspects are unknown, or if they are known then for some strange reason they are not being released, thus giving the suspects chance to escape! And the EU currently considers Hezbollah a legitimate political organisation.

So that is it. That is the strongest evidence that Bulgaria has to convict Hezbollah. Forged licences printed by a printer in Lebanon, dodgy unknown DNA and a few phone calls between Bulgaria and Lebanon.

WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT!

And what is more suspicious about how the Bulgarian Foreign Minister concluded that Hezbollah was behind the Burgas bombing is his relationship with the USA. Mladenov's Wikipedia page lists that he went to Kings College London to gain a MA in War Studies, and later ran Soros' Open Society in Bulgaria. He then joined The World Bank. He has since developed deep links between the USA and Bulgaria. He stinks of an insider; pro-European integration, pro-USA.

But would Israel bomb a bus in Bulgaria to blame Hezbollah to frame Hezbollah, to get it blacklisted so that its assets in Europe were taken?

I can name two very high profile events from which Israel benefited but is the prime suspect.

The first is the inside job 9/11. Francesco Cossiga stated in 2007 that most of the world's intelligence agencies know that Israel with the USA itself did 9/11. Jews died on 9/11.

The second is the assassination of Rafik Hariri in Beirut in February 2005.

Both of these apparently unconnected events are actually joined at the hip. This is because 9/11 was executed to implement a plan laid out in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, two documents written by the same cabal of Zionutters. General Wesley Clark was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 that there would be war and regime change in seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. The war in Lebanon occured in 2006. It was a war contrived by Israel, as admitted by Olmert. But before this war The Special Tribunal for Lebanon first accused Syria of the assassination of Hariri, which led to The Cedar Revolution and the withdrawal by Syria from Lebanon. The evidence against Syria was later found to be a load of bollocks. So the STL blamed Hezbollah and said that it would present the evidence. Over TWO YEARS LATER and that evidence has not been presented. However Hezbollah has presented evidence that it claims implicates Israel. That evidence consists of hacked communications from Israeli drones flying illegally over Beirut tracking Hariri's movements.

Every event in the Middle East and North Africa on and since 11th September 2001 is due to Israeli aggression. Israel was created by Zionists, themselves traumatised by the Holocaust, terrorising nearly a million Palestinians off their farms and lands. Terror is in the DNA of Zionism.

I am deeply deeply sceptical that Hezbollah was behind Burgas. Hezbollah had everything to lose, while Israel had everything to gain...and has form.

And the 'evidence' is very poor at best and could be easily fabricated.





Sunday, February 17, 2013

SURPRISES AND COINCIDENCES

Argo has been the 'surprise' winner of film awards this season. The film is based in Iran around the time of the Iranian Revolution of 1979, and is directed by Ben Affleck. The film has been made and released at a very curious time. Iran has been the ultimate target of Israeli aggression for decades. Israel, with the assistance of the USA and Saudi Arabia, did 9/11 to implement a plan that had been proposed in two documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, and revealed to General Wesley Clark when he was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 that the USA would wage war and regime change on seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were:
Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006)
Libya (2011)
Syria (ongoing through NATO proxy terrorist scum supplied by Saudi Arabia)
Sudan
Somalia
Iran

Clark was told this in late 2001. It is now early 2013, and of those seven nations only two have had their governments changed, Iraq and Libya. Lebanon was dragged into a small war in 2006. But by 2007 this plan was moribund, so as revealed by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection the true Axis-of-Evil, the USA, Saudi Arabia and Israel, had reached an agreement that Saudi Arabia would unleash vicious cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya and Syria. In 2011 NATO twisted UN SCR 1973 out of all recognition and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed a clear and unobstructed path for these Jihadis all the way into Tripoli to illegally kill Gaddafi, having first trained and advised them in the battlefield through special forces of Qatar, UK and France. Those same Jihadis were then transported to Turkey to attack Syria in a proxy covert war.

The heroes of 2012, the Syrian military, have so far been successful in stopping these cutthroat Jihadis from toppling Assad. However, Syria is weakened and may well be unable to assist Iran should a war on Iran begin.

But it looks like the 'people' who dreamed up this plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years and kicked it all off via the inside job 9/11 are going to see it through. War on Iran is the plan. So it is no surprise that a film portraying Iran as a huge threat to the USA has been made and released at this time.

But can you remember what other film Ben Affleck is associated with that I think helped to prepare America to go to war after 9/11? Affleck was one of the stars of Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor. There had already been one film, Tora! Tora! Tora!, made about the Japanese attack on the US port in Hawaii in 1941, an attack that could have been stopped. Pearl Harbor claimed to be historically accurate, but it wasn't, and I found some curious coincidences with numbers and symbolism in that film. I believe that Pearl Harbor was made to remind the USA of a surprise attack and what could be done about it, to prepare the American public for that transformation of society as proposed in Rebuilding America's Defenses which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" was needed to convince the American public to wage simultaneous wars across the globe.

Is it just 'coincidence' that Affleck has directed this anti-Iran film at a time when the Establishment through the Zionist entity is desperate to start war on Iran?

And just how accurate is Argo? Apparently not very. One of the characters in the film, the Canadian Ambassador to Iran at the time of the revolution, has criticised the accuracy of the film.
Former Canadian Ambassador to Iran Ken Taylor has heavily criticized the anti-Iran American film Argo, saying that the screenwriter has “no idea what he's talking about."

“The amusing side is the script writer (Chris Terrio) in Hollywood had no idea what he's talking about,” Taylor said during an audience with Ryerson University students in Toronto on Thursday, CBC reports.

...Political analysts say Argo unmasks the elaborate US scheme to employ every medium in its propaganda apparatus to incite Iranophobia across the globe.

Observers have further lashed out at the director of Argo for portraying a stereotyped and caricatured view of the Iranian society and noted that Affleck has consciously sought to ridicule the very customs and traditions of Iran.

In mid-January, Iran announced plans to mount a big cinematic project on the 1979 US embassy incident to give a true image of the historical event distorted in Argo.

[source : ‘Argo’ writer has no idea what he's talking about: Ex-Canada envoy, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/17/289403/excanada-envoy-argo-got-it-all-wrong/, 17th February 2013]

So we have Affleck, who starred in the historically inaccurate but very emotional Pearl Harbor with lots of symbolism, now directing a historically inaccurate anti-Iran film when war on Iran is the ultimate plan, and that film is the 'surprise' winner of award after award after award.

Surprise?

Coincidence?

NOT BLOODY LIKELY!


Saturday, February 16, 2013

A ONE LEGGED SEX MACHINE?

THIS IS ONE REASON WHY I LOVE PLANET EARTH!

Some have their geographical reasons. But sometimes you just can't do anything but shake your head and laugh your head off!
CROSS-DRESSING comic Eddie Izzard is related to a one-legged ‘sex machine’ who has fathered 93 kids – and has two more on the way!

Eddie made the discovery while researching his family’s DNA for a new BBC documentary.

He met his “ancestral cousin” – 64-year-old Daad Murad Al-Baluchi – in the United Arab Emirates while filming Meet The Izzards.

Eddie also found that his mother’s ancestors were Namibian bush people while his father’s family can be traced back to the Saxons.

Meet The Izzards on BBC1 next Wednesday and Thursday at 9pm.

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/4797662/Eddie-Izzard-is-related-to-a-one-legged-sex-machine-reveals-BBC-doco.html#ixzz2L5RzfNDU

CHECK

Before reposting or linking to an article or blog please read what that publication or blog has suggested about you beforehand.

I am aware of one very well known writer who has recently been linking to blogs but from a blogger blogspot that has previously attacked him several times.

Once checked, ask why that spot began siding with that author and note the time that it occured.

I CRIED

How spooky is this?

A Year 7 (i.e. first year, 11 year old) sang this solo beautifully in assembly last week. This is on the same day that a very important deja vu occured; not only the same day but time of day.



Tuesday, February 12, 2013

ANOTHER FACTOID

Gary Allen writes in None Dare Call It Conspiracy
But, even though America did not have a central bank after President Jackson abolished it in 1836, the European financiers and their American agents managed to obtain a great deal of control over our monetary system. Gustavus Myers, in his History of The Great American Fortunes, reveals:

"Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States [abolished by Andrew Jackson]."

No specific reference is given.

The problem here is that History of The Great American Fortunes by Gustav Myers is a THREE volume work!

And after some research this citation by Allen does not give any specific reference in History of The Great American Fortunes. However this is what Myers writes in Vol 3:
The two things worked well together. By means of financial laws, corruptly passed, the bankers, both international and national, compelled the people of the United States, through their Government, to present them with the funds with which to buy up railroads and other forms of property.5

This reference Number 5 contains the Allen quote:
5 Under the surface, the Rothschilds have long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States. August Belmont and Company were their American representatives. In 1873 it was estimated that $375,000,000 of American railroad securities were held abroad, chiefly by foreign bankers. The Final Report of the Industrial Commission in 1902 estimated (see page 404 of that report) the amount of these securities held by foreign banking houses and others abroad at about $3,100,000,000.

But Mullins in World Order p35 says that in the Panic of 1837 the Rothschilds let their agents W.L. & M.S. Joseph go under while they backed Belmont.
In 1931, W. Averell Harriman, son of E.H. Harriman, merged his banking house, W.A. Harriman & Co. with Brown Bros, to form the present firm of Brown Bros. Harriman. In 1933, Brown Bros. Harriman backed the expansion of CBS, in which they have maintained a large position. The Brown Bros, firm occupied offices on the comer of Wall Street and Hanover which had been occupied by J.L. & J.S. Joseph Co., the American representatives of the Rothschilds. Josephs went broke in the Panic of 1837, having been cut loose by the Rothschilds, who were now operating through August Belmont and George Peabody & Co.

And on p4 Mullins states:
For more than a century, a widespread belief has been deliberately fostered in the United States that the Rothschilds were of little significance in the American financial scene. With this cover, they have been able to manipulate political and financial developments in this country to their own advantage. In 1837, the Rothschilds let their American representative, W.L. & M.S. Joseph, go bankrupt in the Crash, while they threw their cash reserves behind a newcomer, August Belmont, and their secret representative, George Peabody of London. Bermingham notes in "Our Crowd", "In the Panic of 1837, Belmont was able to perform a service which he would repeat in subsequent panics, thanks to the hugeness of the Rothschild reservoir of capital, to start out in America operating his own Federal Reserve System."

After 1837, August Belmont (Schonberg) was publily advertised in the financial press as the American representative of the Rothschilds. When Belmont participated in a financial operation, everyone knew that the Rothschilds were involved. When Belmont took no part, and the transaction was handled by J.P. Morgan & Co., and or by Kuhn, Loeb Co., everyone "knew" that
the Rothschilds were not involved.

My question is : why does Mullins begin this alleged long time control over banking in the United States at 1837, AFTER the traitor Andrew Jackson had destroyed the Second Bank of the United States and the US economy?

Surely if W.L. & M.S. Joseph were so powerful we would be familiar with this name as we are with Belmont, Morgan, Loeb, etc.

This is not definite proof but supports the thesis that the Rothschilds had NOTHING to do with with The First or The Second Bank of The United States. There is a definite plot to portray these banks as having been under Rothschild control so that we do not look at them, study them and see how they financed the creation of the USA in it early years.






Sunday, February 10, 2013

THE SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS

The Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) was destroyed by the traitor Andrew Jackson and his anglophile handlers. Jackson hated paper money after losing most of his fortune in a bank crash. This was used by anglophiles to destroy the BUS2 which was financing the creation of a USA that was rapidly becoming a developed industrial nation and a threat to the British Empire.

Now, a lot of disinformation has been put out to portray Jackson as a hero for destroying the BUS2. Some claim, without evidence, that Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. These same people claim that Jackson hated the Rothschilds. But these same people do not address why Jackson made the Rothschilds the bankers to the USA!

The BUS2 and The Bank of England were privately-owned central banks. They issued the national currency which was created out of thin air based on a small quantity of specie. This is fact. The US government held only 20% of the stock of the BUS2. The rest, as Jackson pointed out, was held by investors, many of them European. The likes of Astor, Girard and Brown Brothers held stock in BUS2. So why would these kind of investors who held stock in the bank want to destroy it? Surely if their only motive was profit they would keep their investment in The BUS2? Apparently not. These particular investors pulled their investment before Jackson destroyed the bank. I would suggest that these particular investors did not like what Biddle was doing with the bank and the USA itself.

As yet nobody has explained the presence of the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram in the 1791 street plan of Washington DC that is directly North of The White House. I have recently read that John Quincy Adams, anti-Mason and pro-BUS2, accused Thomas Jefferson of being a member of The Illuminati. As I understand it only three men had control over the design of Washington DC; L'Enfant, Washington and Jefferson. Jefferson, like Jackson, did not trust paper money and banks being able to create money out of thin air. This power to create money out of thin air can be used for good or bad. Jefferson believed that only bad could come from this power, particularly if this power was given to privately owned banks. Hence Jefferson's famous banking quotes. But what Biddle, with support from Adams, did was to use this power to create money out of thin air for good. Under Biddle the USA was transformed within years.

I strongly believe that the USA had a destiny long before 1776, dating back 6000 years or so. The Freemasonic celebrations and ceremonies etc that occured during the founding of Washington DC prove this, as do the alignments of some streets and objects with the sun. The USA is the most powerful military nation on Earth, with bases in nearly every country on Earth. When you consider the White House pentagram and Moloch on the pyramid in the street plan of Washington DC I believe that it is highly probable that this was the destiny of America, to be the world's dominant nation, terrorising, invading, murdering, defrauding, etc. But the American revolutionaries of 1776 went a bit too...revolutionary, and took their freedom and the development of a free and prosperous USA very, very seriously indeed. The revolutionaries saw the power of creating money out of thin air as a force for good, not just evil like The Bank of England used it.

But for the USA to have this destiny it had to develop into that nation. I suggest that the BUS2 was creating an America that was overtaking The British Empire and was not under the control of the satanists who controlled England at the time. The USA had to develop into a world superpower but only at the correct rate. If the BUS2 had survived and built a free and prosperous America which was full of lovers of freedom, liberty and justice then it would have no doubt launched a devastating war on Great Britain and given that evil empire a jolly good thrashing.

This is probably not that revolutionary a suggestion, that the British Empire saw the USA as a threat. But history has been explained so far by two suggestions; the first is that the revolution of 1776 was genuine and had no other motive; the second is that the revolution was not genuine but was a giant hoax which was followed by the creation of a series of privately-owned banks.

This third suggestion combines my belief that the USA had a 6000 year old destiny, that the revolution was provoked to achieve that destiny, but things got a little out of hand and the revolutionaries took their revolution just a bit too seriously such that the USA could have reached its destiny not under the control of the satanists.

Anyway. What else does this mean other than the USA being a satanic force?




MAKING EVEN MORE SENSE OF EUSTACE MULLINS AND EZRA POUND

Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins is considered to be one of the classics in conspiracy theory literature, describing how international bankers took control of America. I believed in it for years, but always had this little niggle in the back of my mind that something was not right about it. Its general flow, its narrative had something to it; it sounded, felt, seemed right...but then again not quite.

In the last month or so I have been driven to find out what that little niggle in the back of my mind was. And I believe I have found the problem.

To start, Mullins says that Ezra Pound paid him to write about The Federal Reserve. At the time Pound was locked up in a psychiatric hospital waiting to be tried for treason after ranting against FDR and Jews from fascist Italy during WW2. Pound was a strong supporter of Martin van Buren and Andrew Jackson. The recent works of Anton Chaitkin and Michael Kirsch destroy the image of van Buren and Jackson as heroes waging war on the international bankers.

So what were Pound's sources? Here is a small list of Ezra Pound's sources. This is beginning to make more sense. Pound's view of van Buren and thus Jackson is due to van Buren himself! To be more specific van Buren's autobiography.

Ezra Pound

In the 1930s, when Martin Van Buren was mostly forgotten as a national figure, an unlikely champion of the eighth president emerged: the poet Ezra Pound. Embittered by the awesome destruction of World War I, Pound settled in Italy in the 1930s and embraced fascism and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Jewish financiers. Against the backdrop of Europe in tumult he produced one of his most famous works, The Cantos, his epic-length poem divided into 120 sections. Pound cites hundreds of figures in his unwieldy polemic on society, culture and government. He had special admiration for the Jeffersonians he saw as enemies of the Bank of the United States, particularly Andrew Jackson and Van Buren. In Cantos XXXVII (1934), Pound opens, “‘Thou shalt not,’ said Martin Van Buren, ‘jail ‘em for debt.’ ” He quotes parts from Van Buren’s Autobiography in the poem: “From the real committee of Bank’s directors the government’s directors have been excluded … Bank president controlling government’s funds to the betrayal of the nation … government funds obstructing the government … and has sequestered the said funds of the government … acting in illegal secret, pouring oil on the press, giving nominal loans on inexistent security … on precedent that Mr. Hamilton has never hesitated to jeopard the general for advance of particular interests.”

The Cantos is not the only time Pound praised Van Buren. In a letter to the poet Harriet Monroe, Pound called him a “a national hero,” whose story was one of the “few clean and decent pages” in American history. Pound’s history is faulty. He saw Van Buren as a resolute foe of banks when he was merely critical of their excesses—a liberal but hardly radical view in his time. Van Buren was clear in his positions and his letters that he was no enemy of state banks. To be fair to Pound, he did not have the scholarship we have today to work with. He noted that his sources for Van Buren included Edward M. Shephard’s 1888 biography, George Bancroft’s Martin Van Buren to the End of His Public Career (1889) and, of course, the Autobiography. All of these books are highly flawed and unreliable when it comes to Van Buren’s position on the banks and the Democratic Party. Pound’s admiration for Van Buren shows that the current right-wing love affair with Van Buren has its antecedents.

[source : Ezra Pound, American Talleyrand, From http://americantalleyrand.com/?p=246, accessed 10th February 2013]

Yesterday I hinted that maybe while in hospital something happened to Pound. Well get this. His doctor was apparently working for what would become the MK Ultra program! This devastating information comes from a Beatrice Mott who claims to have been a friend of Mullins towards the end of his life.

Here is Mott describing Pound's time in hospital.
And here is where the story goes sour. Pound was a feared political prisoner incarcerated because of what he said in Italy about America’s involvement with the international bankers and warmongering. Pound was watched twenty four hours a day and was under the supervision of Dr. Winfred Overholser, the superintendent of the hospital.

Overholser was employed by the Office of Strategic Services (the CIA’s forerunner) to test drugs for the personality-profiling program, what would be called MK-ULTRA. (See John Marks’ The Search for “the Manchurian Candidate”: The CIA and Mind-Control.) Personality profiling was St. Elizabeth’s bread and butter: The asylum was a natural ally to the agency.

Overholser was also a distinguished professor in the Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Department of George Washington University. This department provided students as test patients for the Frankfurt Schools’ personality profiling work, which the CIA was very interested in. Prophets of Deceit, first written by Leo Löwenthal and Norbert Guterman in 1948, reads like a clumsy smear against Pound.

[source : This Difficult Individual Eustace Mullins — and the Remarkable Ezra Pound, The Occidental Observer, http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Mott-Mullins.html, 20th March 2010]

Mott also hints that perhaps Mullins' research and referencing skills could have been better, giving examples of when she asked Mullins for specific references to back up statements in the book Mullins would evade giving the reference, and would often simply reply that it is all in The Library of Congress. However, Mott also hints that maybe there was more to Mullins.
It does seem odd that a nationalist student [Mullins] would be allowed to continue the work of the dangerously brilliant Pound right under Winny’s nose. The story gets even stranger, as Mr. Mullins describes his stay in Washington during this time. He was housed at the Library of Congress — apparently he lived in one of the disused rooms in the Jefferson building and became good friends with Elizabeth Bishop.

Bishop was the Library of Congress’ “Consultant in Poetry” — quite a plum position. She was also identified by Frances Stonor Saunders as working with Nicolas Nabokov in Rio de Janeiro. Nabokov was paid by the CIA to handle South American-focused anti-Stalinist writers. (See The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters.) If what Saunders says is true, then it puts Eustace in strange company at that time of his life.

According to the CIA’s in-house historians, the Library was also a central focus for intelligence gathering after the war, so it is doubly unlikely that just anybody would be allowed to poke around there after hours.

Whatever the motivation for letting Mullins in to see Pound was, the result has been that confusion, misinformation and unverifiable literature have clouded Pound’s message about the financial industry’s role in war. Fortunately Pound did plenty of his own writing.

Pound's war time radio rants were compiled by Leonard Doob and published as Ezra Pound Speaking. Pound is very close to the truth, except for his love of van Buren and Jackson. It would make sense for the NWO to get at Pound, incarcerate him for years in a hospital that was linked to the CIA with a doctor linked to the CIA and then allow an unknown 'writer' to befriend him to write lots of anti-Semitic books that are poorly referenced. I mean, do we have any proof that Pound paid Mullins? Any receipts? If Pound did not pay Mullins then how did Mullins finance himself while allegedly spending day after day after day reading virtually everything in The Library of Congress?

As with all disinformation, there is a lot of true fact but this is obscured by bad untrue information. The Second Bank of The United States was a good bank. It was rapidly creating a United States that threatened the British Empire. So according to the British it had to be destroyed. Van Buren and Jackson did this as agents of The British Empire. And Van Buren would not declare this in his autobiography, now would he? Van Buren would portray himself and his allies as heroes. Such a bank as The Second Bank of The United States must be made to appear bad so that nobody would ever dare suggest creating such a bank again. Hence Secrets of The Federal Reserve? Because that is the source that is cited by many as providing the definitive history of banking in the USA. Documentaries have been based on the work of Mullins. Books too. However, Mullins stated that Henry Clews stated several facts about The Bank of England and the Rothschilds. But when you read Clews' book Clews does not make those statements. If anything Clews blames Jackson for screwing up the economy!

This is making much more sense of Eustace Mullins and Ezra Pound and the little unsourced factoids in Mullins' books. The one little unsourced factoid that I have as yet been unable to source has been the claim that Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. I am prepared to believe that for whatever reason Mullins made that one up!

For who would challenge an author, the oracle, who allegedly spent years reading nearly everything in The Library of Congress?




Saturday, February 09, 2013

PLAIN ENGLISH

A soldier of love.

OPEN YOUR MIND

This is an appeal to everyone, but particularly to those who still believe in Saint Andrew Jackson.

Read the publications of Anton Chaitkin and Michale Kirsch from 2006 onwards on this. I know that this contradicts Eustace Mullins and therefore everything that he wrote. I am becoming more and more suspicious of Mullins and particularly Pound. They kept Pound isolated in a tiny cell for weeks, and that is the minimum of what we know what they did. What else did they to him all that time he was isolated? And that he couldn't remember?

But I need to be absolutely 100% sure of history before I stand up in a court of law and refer to and call witnesses on the history of privately-owned banking.

U.S.U.R.A. - Open Your Mind (Classic Mix)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEgiNag27WI&feature=related

THE CITIZEN'S ARREST

Is this an arcane idea from ancient antiquity? Perhaps a myth? A legend? A hope?

NO!

According to God Wikipedia the Citizen's Arrest is still operational and legal.

So if you have reasonable grounds for the arrest of a paedophile then you are perfectly within the law to arrest that person and drag him or her to the nearest police station where he or she will hopefully be detained, charged, prosecuted and given a custodial sentence for a very, very, very long time (and a strand of their DNA taken for analysis to see if this detestable behaviour really does 'run in the family' so to speak).

THINKING ABOUT YOUR LOVE

When I'm sleeping
I've got you in my dreams
Your love is creeping
Deep into my veins

...Girl I'm thinking about your love
Never knew it could be so good
Thinking of your tender touch
Never knew I could care so much

Skipworth & Turner - Thinkin' About Your Love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZbmriIciIc

ONE SMALL STEP FOR CYPRUS. ONE GIANT LEAP FOR PALESTINE.

It is being reported that little Cyprus has stood up to the bullying murdering Zionist entity and has allowed the creation of an embassy for Palestine, giving the embassy full diplomatic status. This is yet another breakthrough after the UN GA voted to upgrade the status of Palestine.

Step by step a State of Palestine is being created. Slowly but surely. The world has had enough.

Readers please note the list of countries who have already done this. Bulgaria is named. Burgas is in Bulgaria and was the in the news this week after Bulgaria finally relented to Israeli pressure of various forms and said that Hezbollah may have committed the bombing. I seriously doubt this. Why would Hezbollah bomb a bus in Bulgaria which has recognised the State of Palestine and also play right into the hands of the Zionist entity so that Israel and the USA could demand that the EU place sanctions on Hezbollah and take all Hezbollah's money in European accounts?

Israel was born through terror. It survives through terror.

Anyway. Bravo, little Cyprus!

Cyprus has given the “state of Palestine” an embassy, even though it still says that a “Palestinian state” needs to be established through negotiations with Israel.

AFP reported Cyprus said on Friday it has upgraded its relations with the Palestinian Authority to full diplomatic mission status, one of just eight European Union countries to do so.

The decision was announced by the Cypriot Foreign Minister Erato Kozakou-Marcoullis during an official visit by the Palestinian Authority’s Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki.

"I informed my Palestinian counterpart of the decision of the government to upgrade the status of the Palestinian diplomatic representation in Cyprus from that of a Diplomatic Mission to that of an Embassy of the State of Palestine,” Marcoullis told reporters, according to AFP.

She said that this "important decision" was in line with the recognition of a Palestinian state in 1988 by Cyprus, and follows seven other EU members that have recognized a Palestinian State -- Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia.

A Cyprus Representation Office opened in Ramallah in 2009.

Malki said the decision sent a "very important message," adding, "We hope this courageous step taken by Cyprus will be taken by others in the European Union."

The PA’s ambassador to Nicosia, Walid Al-Hassan, told AFP, "Now we have diplomatic representation in Cyprus like any other country in the world. This applies to our legal situation and the immunity which accompanies diplomatic status.”

On November 29, Cyprus also voted in favor of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s bid for upgraded UN General Assembly status.

"All official correspondence will now be done in the name of the State of Palestine. Cyprus is the first European state to upgrade Palestinian status since the UN vote," Hassan told AFP.

Marcoullis said Cyprus expressed "full support" for resolving aspirations for Palestinian statehood and sovereignty and those of Israel for security, through a comprehensive negotiated peace based on a two-state solution.

Nicosia backs an enhanced EU role in efforts for renewed and substantial peace efforts in 2013.

In the months that have passed since the UN vote, Abbas has taken several steps to officially name the areas he controls "the State of Palestine".

He first ordered all of the PA's institutions to stop using the term "Palestinian National Authority" on official documents and replace it with the term 'the State of Palestine'.

Abbas then issued new guidelines ordering the PA government to re-issue passports, identity cards, registration documents, vehicle licenses, driver's licenses, stamps and postmarks.

Abbas's new guidelines dictate that a new emblem which reads "the State of Palestine" be placed on all re-issued documents.

The PA’s Minister of Communication said last month that the first stamp to carry the name “State of Palestine” will be issued for the benefit of PA diplomatic offices abroad.

(Arutz Sheva’s North American Desk is keeping you updated until the start of Shabbat in New York. The time posted automatically on all Arutz Sheva articles, however, is Israeli time.)

[source : Cyprus Gives 'Palestine' Full Diplomatic Status, INN, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/165036#.URYXvPIXYSE, 8th February]

Friday, February 08, 2013

GOT TO GIVE IT UP

Got to give it up - Marvin Gaye
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp7Q1OAzITM


And here is a fantastic use of this. The choreography is brilliant but could be performed just a little bit better...

HAVE YOU HEARD THE ONE ABOUT PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS CREATNG MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR?

It's a joke.

It's a huge joke.

One huge gigantic ginormous fucking joke...ON YOU!!

Wednesday, February 06, 2013

LOST IT

YOU ARE UNDER MY POWER.
IT IS THE POWER OF LOVE.

Four To The Floor - Lost It
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-tNjjm8Npg&feature=related

BULGARIA POINTS FINGER FOR BURGAS AT HEZBOLLAH

The Burgas bombing of July 2012 in which several Israelis were killed has played directly into the hands of the Zionist entity. As such we must be highly suspicious of this.

Within hours of the bombing Israel had named the ringleader and had released a drawn image of his face, stating that he was on his way to London to bomb the Olympics. And get this. Israel also claimed that we should therefore bomb Iran!

Since then the Israeli media has jumped on the slightest mention of the bombing to blame Hezbollah. Bulgaria has so far refused to do this, but has this week finally relented and said that passports found near the bus implicate Hezbollah. And this comes after the most bizarre incident in Bulgaria in which a man with a pistol walked onto a stage at a political conference and pointed a gun at the speaker. Perhaps the two are related? Perhaps not.

But back to these passports. Bulgaria has allegedly had these passports for months and has so far refused to state that Hezbollah was involved, but only now says that those passports found near the bus implicate Hezbollah. Have we heard of something similar before? Yes we have. Shortly after 9/11 passports were 'found' in pristine condition that implicated the alleged hijackers. Similar forms of ID were 'found' in the tube tunnels of London after 7/7.

The Bilderberg Post is now citing this allegation by Bulgaria to call for Europe to take action against Hezbollah, something that Europe has so far been reluctant to do.
The United States, which long ago designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, has been pressing European leaders to do the same so that the group’s funds in European banks and other financial assets can be targeted. Several governments, led by France, have resisted; they worry that sanctions could further destabilize Lebanon or subject European peacekeepers in the south of that country to reprisals. Bulgaria’s findings should end the debate. Inaction would mean accepting that Europe can be a free-fire zone for Iran and its proxies.

[source : European Union must respond to Hezbollah’s attack in Bulgaria, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/european-union-must-respond-to-hezbollahs-attack-in-bulgaria/2013/02/05/2b21ddf6-6fd1-11e2-ac36-3d8d9dcaa2e2_story.html?hpid=z3, 6th February 2013]

This WP editorial also cites the now totally discredited plot by Iran to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to the USA inside the USA(!!) as evidence that Hezbollah and Iran are getting away with murder and must be controlled (preferably bombed to smithereens).

Meanwhile Lebanon has expressed its doubt in the allegations by saying that Bulgaria should 're-evaluate' the findings, offering to assist in the investigation in whatever way it can.
Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati has called on the Bulgarian government to re-evaluate the results of a probe which accuses the Hezbollah resistance movement of involvement in a bomb attack on a bus carrying Israeli tourists in Bulgaria last year.

"Lebanon trusts that the Bulgarian authorities will undertake a serious evaluation of the results of the investigation and affirms that it is ready to cooperate with Bulgaria to shed light on the circumstances" of the bombing in the eastern city of Burgas, AFP quoted Mikati as saying in on Tuesday.

[source : Lebanon to Bulgaria: re-evaluate results of bus bombing probe, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/06/287487/lebanon-asks-bulgaria-to-review-bomb-probe/, 6th February 2013]

Hezbollah denies the allegation.

Have we seen attempts by Israel to blame Hezbollah for murder before? YES! The most famous is the assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon created to investigate the assassination at first blamed Syria. The Cedar Revolution occured in Lebanon and Syria withdrew. But the charges were trumped up. So now Hezbollah is blamed. The STL said two years ago that it would release the evidence. As far as I know that evidence has not been released. But what the assassination did was satisfy the Israeli document A Clean Break, by challenging Syria and Iran in Lebanon. And what Hezbollah did was release video of interceptions from Israeli drones flying illegally over Beirut and following Hariri's car.

In fact, virtually everything that has occured since the inside job 9/11 has satisfied the warlust of the Zionist entity, which implicates Israel as the perp of 9/11. Indeed this was expressed by Francesco Cossiga in late 2007 when he said that all the intel agencies of the world know that Israel and the USA did 9/11. He should have added Saudi Arabia too. These three components of the true Axis-of-Evil have since unleashed al Qaeda and its affiliates onto Libya and now Syria, as part of a drive to inject some life into a rapidly dying plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11. That plan was for war and regime change in seven nations in five years. They are woefully behind in that plan. And falling further behind by the day as the heroes of 2012 the Syrian military kick al Qaeda butt. Hence the provocation by Israel attacking a Syrian research facility shortly after Iran said that an attack on Syria is an attack on Iran.

The solution to this warmongering madness is to remove Benjamin Netanyahu, force him to resign, or impeach him (or whatever the Israeli version is). He is a madman, controlled by lunatics in London determined to unleash hell on Earth by dragging the USA into a horrible WW3 with Russia and/or China.

Monday, February 04, 2013

WE NEED A REVOLUTION IN BANKING NOT ELECTRIFIED RINGFENCING

Ringfencing and 'electrification' is not Glass-Steagall.

The bankers will soon get around the current laws with their financial shenanigans.

The bankers are wrecking the world.

We don't need them. They need us and our gullibility.

We need a revolution in banking.

NO TO PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS IN THE UK GAMBLING AND CREATING MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR.

YES TO A STATE OWNED BANK CREATING CREDIT FOR THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS.

Sunday, February 03, 2013

WE NEED AND CAN HAVE A BANK LIKE THE SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

The more I read the more I believe we need and can have a bank exactly like the Second Bank of The United States (BUS2) that was destroyed by the traitor President Andrew Jackson. The bank should operate exactly like BUS2, with publicly elected officials for a fixed term, with banks similar to US state banks in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England, perhaps even sub-banks in counties and/or cities and/or regions who would have more detailed local knowledge, but one central bank to regulate and control the pound (or whatever the currency is called) with tariffs on imports, sound control of specie, and financing of national and perhaps international programs that would be mutually beneficial. The bank should finance national public works that would help to generate wealth and allow small and family business to grow and flourish. We can be nearly 100% self reliant. We have an abundance of fresh water and superb farm land. We have the best coal in the world and 200 years of it. Our education system and transport infrastructure need improving. And we definitely need to overhaul the Nazi NHS that is now killing both old and young alike. But with the proper credit system we could advance these rapidly. For now that bank could be called The Bank of The United Kingdom, but once the monarchy has been abolished this could change to The Bank of the Republic of Britain.

We, the muggins British taxpayer, have put up with this current corrupt and self-serving banking system for far too long. This system has given too much undeserved power to a criminal cabal who have engineered world wars and genocide and intend reducing human population down to around one billion, and whether it was planned 150 years ago (as Albert Pike planned and I believe he, or someone else, did) or it has been engineered only recently, the situation in the Middle East is looking more and more like the trigger for WW3 that I thought it would be after the inside job 9/11.

However, there is one aspect of BUS2 that I am suspicious of, and that is that the BUS2 was a privately owned central bank. Yes, it was used differently than say The Bank of England has been. But the US government held only 20% of the stock of BUS2. 20%! The names associated with BUS2 were Girard and Astor who had questionable allegiances. Perhaps these were needed for their specie. This may need to be addressed with this new bank, with private stockholders (but vetted) at first, but whose stock could be bought after. I would prefer the new bank to be initially 100% owned by the people in the form of a republican government owning 100% of the stock, but realise this may take time to achieve and that perhaps stock could be bought by other well intentioned investors, but only initially.

This is my suggestion as to how to save this Disunited Fascist Kingdom. We can be united against the EU, neither fascist nor communist just free, and make a peaceful transition from a Kingdom to a Republic.

But we want, need and can have a fairer banking system, one that serves the people not a kleptocracy. There was definitely a plot by Great Britain to destroy the Second Bank of The United States and there has definitely been a subsequent plot to cover that plot up by portraying Andrew Jackson as a hero battling the Rothschilds. But if he hated the Rothschilds so much why did he make them bankers to the US?! Even Mullins states this happened but did not question why Jackson would do this.

And when you read what the BUS2 did and how it worked you will understand why. Within just a few years it had enabled the USA to become a huge threat to the British empire. And its operation was not that complex. But it helped the ordinary man in the street who just wanted to get on and contribute to create wealth for himself, his family and his new young nation.

We can be a Great Britain again, but without the slave-trading, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling, fascist kleptocracy that has ruled us since the 16th Century.



IS THIS LOVE?

Whitesnake - Is This Love?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loM99T_XEyk


I should have known better
Than to let you go alone,
It's times like these
I can't make it on my own
Wasted days, and sleepless nights
And I can't wait to see you again

I find I spend my time
Waiting on your call,
How can I tell you, baby
My back's against the wall
I need you by my side
To tell me it's alright,
'Cos I don't think I can take anymore

Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for
Is this love or am I dreaming,
This must be love,
'Cos it's really got a hold on me,
A hold on me...

I can't stop the feeling
I've been this way before
But, with you I've found the key
To open any door
I can feel my love for you
Growing stronger day by day,
An' I can't wait to see you again
So I can hold you in my arms

Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for
Is this love or am I dreaming,
This must be love,
'Cos it's really got a hold on me,
A hold on me...

Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for...
Is this love or am I dreaming,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for...

Friday, February 01, 2013

BUT WILLIAM THE ROOT CAUSE IS YOU

In response to the blatantly illegal bombing of a Syrian research facility by Israel, Foreign Minister William Hague has refused to condemn the action.
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said that rather than condemning the actions of Israel, attention should be focussed on addressing ''the root causes'' of the crisis in Syria.

[source : William Hague: I'm not condemning Israel over 'attack' on Syria, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21285348, 31st January 2013]

But William the root cause is you!

You, NATO, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

You are using extremist Jihadis to attack a sovereign nation state that is an enemy of the Zionist entity...AND YOU ARE LOSING!

The heroes of 2012, the Syrian military, are repelling the Jihadis. Every day it it reported that that 10 or 20 or 30 or more Jihadis are now dead Jihadis. Every day it is reported that the Syrian people hate the NATO proxy terrorist scum. Every day it is reported that the Jihadis are on the run. Every day it is reported that the NATO proxy terrorist scum are destroying peaceful towns and villages, looting and massacring.

The Syrian people are rallying around their President.

The world is awake to your criminal cabal.

Shut up and get our boys out of Syria...NOW!



Thursday, January 31, 2013

A SLIGHT SUSPICION

I read about this woman Louise van der Velde last week, maybe weekend. She was in the paper saying how great her love life was having four lovers, describing each one; an electrician, a businessman, a fitness instructor and someone else (I can't remember). Her husband died a few years ago. She has said she was happily married. She has written in The Sun about how great sex was with her husband when they used Viagra, but also said that this destroyed that intimacy that keeps lovers together.

But she now says that marriage is a prison, outdated and a joke.

For whatever reason she was invited onto This Morning to discuss marriage with the resident Agony Aunt. She apparently lost the viewing public vote. But what concerns me about this is that:
1. This Morning did not invite anyone on to the show to discuss why we are supporting al Qaeda in Syria but bombing them to death in Mali and Algeria.
2. But they did invite someone on to call marriage a joke, outdated and a prison.
3. The Illuminati want to destroy marriage and the family.
4. Of all the colours to wear this woman wore the Illuminati colours red and black.

Here she is describing her experience using Viagra with her husband.
Louise van der Velde, 33, is a relationship therapist and tantric sex expert.

I was scared as I handed the chemist a prescription for Viagra. As a woman picking up sex pills, I got a very strange look.

My hubby, who was a doctor, wanted to experiment, so he broke the law by writing a prescription on an old pad.

We checked into a hotel and had mind-blowing sex. We didn’t get out of bed for two days and nights.

We would each take a pill and, about 20 minutes later, I would feel hot and tingly all over, but especially around my pelvis.

Then we’d make love for two or three hours non-stop. I’d have at least eight orgasms, and Steve would come three or four times.

We’d sleep for a few hours, take another pill and start again. It was addictive. We’d soon used up our eight tablets – and we wanted more.

So I went out with another prescription and got arrested. The pharmacist had called the police.

It was embarrassing. We were in the papers and my husband was fined for falsely obtaining Viagra.

My experience made me realise Viagra could actually be a hazard.

All that rampant sex meant missing out on the first stage of love-making, the kissing and stroking that builds intimacy and keeps a couple together.

I began looking for ways to experience incredible sex without pills. I discovered tantric sex, which led to a new, successful career.

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/real_life/20626/Viagra-took-over-our-sex-lives.html#ixzz2JZrpT3aX

But here she is describing her fantastic marriage to a husband Stephen, who was found dead at the bottom a cliff, and is thought to have thrown himself off for an unstated reason.
Therapist Louise Van der Velde was left devastated when her doctor husband Stephen McEwen, 34, ended his life, leaving her alone to bring up children, Jordan, now 15, and Chloe, ten.

Here, Louise, 37, from Camberley, Surrey, tells her story:

“Stephen and I had a real connection. He swept me up in a whirlwind romance and six months later, in January 1998, we got married.

We made the decision to start our married life abroad and moved out to Spain.

Stephen built a reputation as a GP while I worked as a therapist at our private practice.

We had a wonderful life with Jordan. Five years later, daughter, Chloe, followed. Stephen was a devoted dad. He would carry her everywhere.

Stephen and the kids used to love dressing up as wizards.

But when Chloe was about six months, the stresses of normal life began to take their toll.

Stephen was highly respected but he required a lot of support from me and talked about the pressures he felt in his job.

But Stephen was never one to admit he had a problem.

I knew he’d dabbled in prescription drugs as a student in his 20s, as many young doctors do, but he began taking more and more tablets.

I confronted him but he always played it down, insisting he was fine.

Eventually though, things came to a head. It got to the stage that Stephen wouldn’t come home after work on a Friday night, finally turning up on a Monday or Tuesday.

Desperate for some kind of release, he was having these complete blowouts away from everyone and everything.

It became obvious his issues were more serious than I’d realised and although he continued to bottle up his problems, Stephen agreed to fly back to England to get help.

The plan was for him to get better then re-join me and the kids in Spain.

Not long afterwards, in March 2004, I had some work in London. Jordan and Chloe stayed with a nanny in Spain while I flew there for a couple of days.

It was a high point for me. I was looking forward to spending some quality time with Stephen, who was up in Durham.

I was so happy that he was getting better. Then the phone rang. It was 11am on March 3, 2004 and it was my secretary in Spain. She told me that she’d just taken a call explaining that Stephen had been found at the bottom of some cliffs in Durham. He was dead.

He was just 34 years old.

I can’t put into words how I felt in that moment.

Utter disbelief gave way to hysteria. I was inconsolable.

I was on autopilot as I travelled back to Spain to break the news to the children.

I had no idea what to say, how could I explain their dad had killed himself?

Chloe was only little but Jordan, who was eight at the time, was beside himself. He was distraught that he hadn’t had a chance to say goodbye. Why had Stephen done it, and why hadn’t I seen how awful he was feeling?

Given my work as a therapist, I felt I somehow should have seen what was happening, and my grief was mixed with guilt.

Then all the practical considerations kicked in.

Suddenly I was effectively a single mother, not only dealing with all the trauma that Stephen’s death had brought, but also struggling to cope with all the practical and logistical challenges.

I felt frustrated, that the whole situation was unfair.

Stephen had left me with everything to deal with on my own, and to some extent I felt he’d taken the easy road out.

I thought we had the fairytale, that we’d be together always and for ever. I’m just grateful that my work has given me the tools to cope, and to help my children deal with their emotions too.

For those suffering as a result of a partner’s sudden death — I’ve been there.

It’s tragic and awful and you can’t see a way out.

But know that, in time, you will grow from the experience.

To those feeling that suicide is their only option I’d urge them to talk to somebody and confide your issues.

The fear of something is always going to be worse than the reality. Nothing is ever that bad. There is always a way through it.”

Louise has written a series of books called The Transformation on grief and loss. Learn about them, and more, at louisevandervelde.co.uk

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4100689/Agony-of-two-families-suffering-like-Gary-Speeds.html#ixzz2JZwWAo3i

Something is not right with all this. She writes that her marriage was fantastic, but then her husband allegedly commits suicide, then she starts seeing four men...AT THE SAME TIME..AND WRITES ABOUT IT IN THE PAPERS!

Is she genuine? Is she unwittingly being used to push an agenda?

I am not stating that this woman MUST be Illuminati, but we do have to ask how she, with this curious and bizarre background and history, first saying she was very much in love and happily married but now describing marriage as a joke, was able to appear first in national newspapers, then on national TV, wearing the Illuminati colours red and black, to call marriage a joke and outdated when the Illuminati want to destroy marriage.

And to repeat, she lost.

But they'll be back.

They'll be back, destroying marriage, then pushing paedophilia, then pushing murder.

MAKING SOME SENSE

Eustace Mullins was financed by Ezra Pound to write about the Federal Reserve system. Pound detested WW1 and blamed international finance, i.e. the Jews, and subsequently apparently at least sympathised with if not supported Hitler and Mussolini and attacked Communism. We now know much more about these two fascist murderers than Pound did at the time. Mussolini was a British agent writing propaganda for the British during WW1, and was given hundreds of millions of dollars by Wall Street. As for Hitler, he was supported by the British elite in eugenics and was financed by the Rockefellers to research racial hygiene, he was given a lot of technology and patents that enabled the Wehrmacht to wage a long war, and was allowed to build the Wehrmacht way beyond what was permitted by the Treaty of Versailles (in order to wage WW2 against FDR-supplied Russia).

In 1944 Pound published America, Roosevelt and the Causes of the Present War in which Pound states
(4) The fourth period covers the twelve years of Jackson (eight) and Van Buren (four), but the decade of 1830-40 has disappeared from the school-books. The public knows, and schoolchildren get taught, that Jackson killed a few Redskins, chewed tobacco, and beat the English at New Orleans, after the peace of Ghent, but before news of its signing had arrived. This military victory of the Hero of New Orleans was nevertheless of service to America, for no one will be so ingenuous as to suppose that London would have observed the treaty had the British forces won the battle.

But the real war was the war between the bank and the people, waged and won for the people by
Jackson and Van Buren.

This is the fact that explains the silence of “history” and the small respect paid to Van Buren
throughout the whole period of American decadence, which dates from Lincoln’s assassination.

Pound was infamous for his radio broadcasts from Italy during WW2 for which he was arrested when the USA invaded Italy. These were later compiled and edited by Leonard W. Doob and entitled Ezra Pound Speaking. Pound accuses FDR of joining a war for the gold standard and for being influenced by the Jews and calls for America's youth not to be sacrificed for this. He saw Hitler and Mussolini as standing up to gold and the Jews. Here is Pound in his broadcast 26th February 1942 in which he quite clearly states that anything that FDR says that has any sanity is copied from Hitler and Mussolini.
It is to be supposed that you are all running round hot and bothered, like headless chickens, no man understanding another. And the pathological brainstorm in the White House after years of robbing the country dipping into the Treasury, years of frothing at the mouth about Mussolini and Hitler, in mid January comes out with a discourse and EVERY single item in it that has a trace of sanity is IMITATED from Mussolini or Hitler.

Pound does seem to rant a bit in his broadcasts, but there are nuggets of truth in there. Take this nugget from 2nd March 1942 about a reason for WW2:
Do you stand, those of you who are above goose gangster level, for the obliteration of all occidental civilization? If NOT, why join the Anglo Jewish clique which has been and still is out professedly and openly for the obliteration of Europe? Western Civilization, all of it that you have still got.

The truth in this nugget is that "the Anglo Jewish clique" did indeed set out to destroy Europe; they created both Hitler and Stalin, who at first were allies invading Poland together, but then Hitler's obvious and manipulated hatred of Communism came forth and he invaded Soviet Russia in Operation Barbarossa. Stalin, supplied by FDR, repelled the Nazis all the way back to Berlin. Central and Eastern Europe was destroyed, and France was partially destroyed. The point is that after WW1 neither a European government nor a world government had been accepted. But after WW2 we got the EU and the UN. This is the aim. Pound continually states that the gold standard is the aim and to get all the gold in Fort Knox. Oh yes. All the gold in Fort Knox? Is there any now? But what about a world government dictatorship?

Another nugget of Pound's from 26th February 1942:
Nevertheless I am convinced of at least one thing. The present war should NOT be allowed to degenerate into a 30 years or even ten years beano for Knudson and the other sustainers of speed-ups and sweating, chain table.

Work ’em up in six years, was the old Jamaica slave owners system. Do the young men, and only young men can stand it, last SIX years at the Knudson band assembly systems? Jews paid by Schiff in New York got hold of Russia and turned the whole land into a sweat shop. Watch your step, brother, it CAN happen to you.

Here Pound predicts the war would last 6 years. WW2 lasted SIX years. And yes, Jacob Schiff did finance The first Russian Revolution. He bragged about it. Lenin was sent into Russia by the Warburgs on a sealed train and completed the revolution in October.

There is now absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the Rothschilds and their ilk, such as the Warburgs and the Schiffs, have played a huge part in steering modern history. This makes sense because they are allowed to create money out of thin air while the rest of us work our arses off just to put a crust of stale bread on the table. But they are merely Hofjuden.

But thanks to Michael Kirsch we now also know much more about Jackson and van Buren and the manipulation and lies that surrounded the destruction of The Second Bank of The United States. We now also know much more about Mussolini and Hitler. Pound supported these with varying degrees of strength.

We must not fall into this trap. Pound is correct to point the finger at "the Anglo Jewish clique". It is real. It exists. It has a set of goals consisting of a world government dictatorship over a technologically controlled and vastly reduced human population. But we must not twist history to fit into a view of history that fits our prejudices.

Why would Mullins write that Clews stated the 1837 panic was engineered by the Bank of England and the Rothschilds when Clews did not state this? Perhaps Pound's prejudices influenced Mullins to write this. If anything Clews blamed Jackson and van Buren. And Mullins even states that Jackson made the Rothschilds the bankers to the USA. Why would Jackson, the alleged Rothschild-hater, do this? The only explanation is that Jackson was a traitor.

BYE BYE BIBI. BIBI GOODBYE.

This lyric from the Bay City Rollers cover came to me this morning when I read more details of the illegal Israeli bombing of Syria.

Several claims have been made about what was attacked, ranging from a convoy of weapons bound for Hezbollah to a military research installation. It doesn't matter. As with everything Israeli it was illegal.

But this latest dangerous attack is a consequence of Benjamin Netanyahu's imminent demise as a politician. Jeffrey Steinberg writes in EIR that the recent election has caused a shock in Israeli politics.
Going into the Jan. 22 Knesset elections in Israel, nearly every pundit and pollster in Israel and the United States was forecasting an overwhelming electoral victory for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing and ultra-Orthodox bloc of parties.

But when the dust settled, Netanyahu had suffered a humiliating defeat which raises serious questions about Israel's direction in the near future.

...Al-Monitor Israeli correspondent Ben Caspit called the vote a "resounding vote of no-confidence," and a "devastating political blow" to Netanyahu. While President Shimon Peres is still expected to ask Netanyahu to attempt to form a new government over the next 30 days, it is unclear what kind of coalition Bibi will be able to cobble together, not to mention whether he will be able to govern, even if he does succeed.

[source : Bibi Netanyahu's Humiliating Defeat, EIR, http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2013/4005bibi_defeat.html, 1st February 2013]

The result may have been a shock to most, but not to me. Indeed I said that Netanyahu was politically finished shortly after his latest bloody adventure in Gaza late last year. The Israeli people are more concerned about creating a fair and just society with a sound economy and peace. Netanyahu cannot deliver any of this because Netanyahu is a fascist warmonger. And this latest attack on Syria is his latest folly to prove this.

Since the Israeli election the Holocaust has been milked much more than usual. A cartoon of Netanyahu published in The Times was criticised for actually depicting the truth. Now an attack on Syria. But why now? May it have something to do with the nomination of alleged anti-Israeli Chuck Hagel?

Israel's abuse of Gaza and The West Bank is isolating Israel more each day.

The UN GA effectively gave Palestine statehood.

The Israeli people want peace and a sound economy.

And Israel's involvement in and planning for 9/11 and the subsequent wars is becoming more evident by the day, with President Obama threatening to go public, documentary evidence in the form of A Clean Break, Rebuilding America's Defenses and General Wesley Clark's revelations, and it indisputable that the wars have targeted Israel's enemies such as Iraq, Libya, Syria and soon Iran.

The Israeli people have had enough.

The Israeli military and intelligence apparatus has had enough.

The world has had enough.

It is time for Netanyahu to resign before he drags the whole world into a hell which was planned 150 years ago and from which we will not recover.





Wednesday, January 30, 2013

A FLAW

It has been blindly accepted by some that the Rothschilds caused the panic of 1837 in the USA because Andrew Jackson killed their bank The Second Bank of The United States run by their agent Nicholas Biddle. The source for this appears to be Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins. One of the sources that Mullins uses for this claim is Twenty Eight Years in Wall Street by Henry Clews. Here is what Mullins says about the 1837 panic.
John Pierpont Morgan was born in 1837, during the first money panic in the United States. Significantly, it had been caused by the House of Rothschild, with whom Morgan was later to become associated.

...Henry Clews, the famous banker, in his book, Twenty-eight Years in Wall Street, states that the Panic of 1837 was engineered because the charter of the Second Bank of the United States had run out in 1836. Not only did President Jackson promptly withdraw government funds
from the Second Bank of the United States, but he deposited these funds, $10 million, in state banks. The immediate result, Clews tells us, is that the country began to enjoy great prosperity. This sudden flow of cash caused an immediate expansion of the national economy, and the government paid off the entire national debt, leaving a surplus of $50 million in the Treasury.
The European financiers had the answer to this situation. Clews further states, "The Panic of 1837 was aggravated by the Bank of England when it in one day threw out all the paper connected with the United States."

The Bank of England, of course, was synonymous with the name of Baron Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Why did the Bank of England in one day "throw out" all paper connected with the United States, that is, refuse to accept or discount any securities, bonds or other financial paper based in the United States? The purpose of this action was to create an immediate financial panic in the United States, cause a complete contraction of credit, halt further issues of stocks and bonds, and ruin those seeking to turn United States securities into cash.

But does Clews actually say this?

I believe not.

Clews writes a whole chapter on the 1837 panic, Chapter XIX Old Time Panics. Clews explicitly states the following:
1. The Second Bank of The United States under Biddle was doing a good job of regulating a stable currency
2. Jackson withdrew government deposits from the Second Bank of the United States and placed these funds in state banks (were these banks run and/or owned by Jackson's friends?)
3. Jackson sold off government land, i.e. privatisation.
4. This combination fuelled a credit bubble and speculation in land which was bought by investors using notes issued by the state banks in which Jackson had deposited the funds removed from the Second Bank of the United States.
5. Jackson was able to clear the government debt from these land sales (but had Biddle done most of the hard work before?)
6. Jackson then issued the Specie Circular which demanded “that all collectors of the public revenue to receive nothing but silver and gold as payment”.

What Clews says is damning of Jackson
The crisis came in 1837, and was hastened by the "Specie Circular," which was the last official act of President Jackson, and which pricked the bubble of inflation.

Apparently public opposition to this circular
was so strong and universal, that a bill went through both houses of Congress partially repealing it."Old Hickory" did not yield to Congress, however, and though he did not veto the bill, he delayed signing it until after Congress adjourned, thus preventing it from becoming a law.

And far from praising Jackson, Clews even appears to criticise Jackson and his VP Martin van Buren. After describing the aftermath of the crisis, with investors losing everything and failures in New York amounting to $100,000,000 Clews mocks
Such were the good old times of financiering when General Jackson and his successor, Martin Van Buren, sat in the Executive chair.

Regarding the influence of The Bank of England on the panic, Clews appears to suggest that the damage had already been done by Jackson when the Bank of England reacted in self defence.
The panic of 1837 was further aggravated by the action of the Bank of England which, in one day, threw out all the paper connected with the United States. The banks on this side refused to discount paper, and as a retaliatory measure in self-defense the business men and speculators withdrew their deposits from the banks.

In other words Mullins is taking liberties in describing the 1837 panic. Clews does not explicitly state that the Bank of England and the Rothschilds engineered the panic because Jackson killed their bank, as is suggested by Mullins in the quote at the top. On the contrary, Clews has a negative view of Jackson's handling of government finance, and blames Jackson's land privatisation, unrestrained credit expansion and Jackson's Specie Circular for the panic, which forced the Bank of England to react. Indeed this would actually suggest that Jackson was a British agent!

And this brings me back to the most excellent report How Andrew Jackson Destroyed the United States by Michael Kirsch in which it is clearly shown that Jackson, despite having fought the British in New Orleans, came under the influence of a nest of Anglophiles around Martin van Buren and was given the task of destroying The Second Bank of The United States because it was financing growth very well. This Jackson did very well.

If you have not done so already you should read Clews' book, Chapter XIX.

This brings into question not only Mullins, but everyone who has used this book as a source. There are several claims that are made that can now be brought into question. For example, was Biddle really an agent of James Rothschild? What is the evidence?

And doesn't this have a familiar ring to it; banks create a credit bubble based on land and property which is then pricked to cause a panic? 1837? Or 2007?

And one last thing. Apparently Jackson placed US government funds in the NM Rothschild bank in London! The source is The Pressure of 1836: The International Origins of the panic in 1837 by Jessica Lepler.

Thursday, January 24, 2013

A VERY GOOD WAY OF STORING INFORMATION

This is how one researcher described DNA.
"All we're doing is adapting what nature has hit upon—a very good way of storing information,"

[source : Storing Digital Data in DNA, Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324539304578259883507543150.html, 24th January 2013]

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

THE SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES WILL SHOW THE WAY

There is a large schism within the anti-New World Order movement, and I think it can be exemplified The Second Bank of the United States.

One side worships President Andrew Jackson for destroying the bank. Evidence backing this side is Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins in which it is claimed that Nicholas Biddle was a Rothschild agent, as was Alexander Hamilton. Another source is The Creature from Jekyll Island by G Edward Griffin. Another is The Money Masters.

The other side detests Jackson, claiming that he was an agent of the British with the order to destroy the bank because it was financing the rapid growth of the United States of America and threatening the British Empire. The finest evidence to support this is How Andrew Jackson Destroyed the United States by Michael Kirsch available at LPAC.

Claim and counter-claim is made; The Rothschilds controlled the bank but the hero Jackson destroyed it and in retaliation the Rothschilds caused panics and sent over some agents versus Jackson was a tool of the Anglophile pro-slavery South tasked with destroying the bank that was financing industry and fuelling rapid growth.

This is what it is all about.

Who is telling the truth?

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

THE BBC HATES YOU

Two reports in the UK media reveal the attitude the BBC has to the human race.

In The Daily Mail David Bellamy gives the reason why he has been shunned by the BBC; he doesn't believe in man made global warming.
‘From that moment, I really wasn’t welcome at the BBC. They froze me out, because I don’t believe in global warming. My career dried up. I was thrown out of my own conservation groups and I got spat at in London.

[source : The BBC froze me out because I don't believe in global warming: Outspoken as ever, David Bellamy reveals why you don't see him on TV any more, The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2266188/The-BBC-froze-I-dont-believe-global-warming-Outspoken-David-Bellamy-reveals-dont-TV-more.html, 22nd January 2013

And in The Daily Telegraph David...sorry Sir David Attenborough rants about his hatred of the human race, calling us "a plague"!
"We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now," he told the Radio Times.

[source : Humans are plague on Earth – Attenborough, The Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/9815862/Humans-are-plague-on-Earth-Attenborough.html, 22nd January 2013]

So are you "a plague"?

Attenborough was promoted by the BBC and continues to work with them, yet Bellamy was silenced.

There has been no global warming in the last 20 years. See Lord Mockton's report at http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/two_decades_no_warming.pdf.

How much does Attenborough know about international finance and bankers? Or engineered weather systems? Or The Cult of Death behind the United Nations?

Sweet FA!

If he does know then he is in league with them.




I AIN'T DYIN' WITHOUT TRYIN'

I have received some inspiration as to how to make things happen, and I am not dying without trying.

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

BRAIN INVADERS

Nice one, Jesse and team!

I have had this technology deployed on me since 2000, from sounds of shotguns and aggressive dogs barking and growling going off in my head just as I was about to fall asleep, amongst other types of EM harassment, which has started to occur almost every night again after a period when it was used only on Sunday nights and before that on the nights before I had a job interview.

I shall definitely be checking out Robert Duncan and his book Mind Hackers.

From http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18PtOXrzDVE


Friday, January 04, 2013

BRZEZINSKI : NO WAR ON IRAN

Writing in The Bilderberg Washington Post Zbigniew Brzezinski calls for diplomacy in US policy on Iran, and not a war which Brzezinksi warns could ignite the whole region and benefit Russia.

Recent Israeli media reports have cited a former member of President Obama’s National Security Council staff predicting a U.S. attack by about midyear.

...Although the president has skillfully avoided a specific commitment to military action by a certain date, the absence of a negotiated agreement with Iran regarding its compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty will inevitably intensify some foreign and extremist domestic clamor for U.S. military action, alone or in coordination with Israel.

...Iran, in retaliating, could make life more difficult for U.S. forces in western Afghanistan by activating a new guerrilla front. Tehran could also precipitate explosive violence in Iraq, which in turn could set the entire region on fire, with conflicts spreading through Syria to Lebanon and even Jordan.

...To make matters worse, the most immediate beneficiary of ill-considered recourse to war would be Vladimir Putin’s Russia, which would be able to charge Europe almost at will for its oil while gaining a free hand to threaten Georgia and Azerbaijan.

[source : Iran should be key topic at hearings, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/zbigniew-brzezinski-iran-should-be-key-topic-at-senate-hearings/2013/01/03/5dbc3324-5519-11e2-8b9e-dd8773594efc_story.html, 4th January 2012]

But isn't it Brzezinski who is the dude advising the Old and Decrepit World Order that they had better get their arses into gear because we the people are waking up and waking up very very fast...and getting very pissed off at the stuff that they have done and plan to do to us?

This is rather confusing advice, for it would appear that the foot is being taken off the pedal in the rush to war in the Middle East. But isn't that why they did 9/11? Such a war would be a quicker way to get a world government established. That is how the United Nations was eventually accepted, after years of bloody ridiculous unnecessary world war. WW1 nearly did the trick, but the USA voted out of it so WW2 was engineered and...BINGO! The trauma and chaos of a world war can work wonders with the human psyche. Since the UN was accepted it has gradually assumed more and more global control, with continental governments such as the EU also assuming more and more power.

But they are not there just yet.

Perhaps they think they are so close that they can tiptoe quietly over the line while the fluoride heads are glued to their TVs watching the Superbowl?

Why risk a world war that could shake the rest of humanity from its slumber?

But just a few days ago the same WP Editorial lamented Obama's policy on Syria. With Syria gone Iran would be virtually alone in the region. But then also possibly more compliant.

But isn't it interesting that Brzezinski mentions Syria only once, and then warning that it could ignite if Iran is bombed, as if Syria is currently a haven of peace and tranquility?

But for once Brzezinski has actually said something that is absolutely correct : NO WAR ON IRAN





Thursday, January 03, 2013

HAS USA DUMPED FSA?

From https://twitter.com/SANA_English/status/286881258213089280