There's this Twitter hashtag going around, probably from the CIA, similar to French Fries rebranded Freedom Fries before the USA invaded Iraq and killed half a million Iraqis.
#PutinAtWar.
#PutinAtWar.
It has the ominous threat behind it. Putin is at war...and he's gonna' getcha'!
But who has been at war recently?
Yes, Putin has been at war...with Islamic terrorists in the Caucasus who want a Caliphate like Islamic State. And yes, there was a brief war with Georgia, but that was provoked by Wall Street agent Shaakashvili after he ordered the shelling of civilians of South Ossetia as they slept in their beds at night.
So what of NATO and the USA?
Well, where do we begin?
Afghanistan. Iraq. Libya. Proxy war in Syria. One million deaths in total.
And before that - smashed up Yugoslavia through naked aggression and proxy wars.
And before that - attempted coup in Venezuela, just the latest interference in Latin America.
And before that - Goddam Vietnam.
#PutinAtWar refers to Putin's latest egotistical warmongering adventure in Ukraine.
But do you know what NATO just did and are doing in Ukraine? They used bona fide neo-Nazis to oust a legitimately elected government and installed their puppets: Yats, recipient of NATO funds and hand-picked by the USA to be PM; Natalie Jaresko, former senior officer at the US Embassy in Kiev, and also former manager of USAID (CIA) funds, funds that she somehow managed to 'lose', but who is now Minister of Finance eagerly flogging Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto.
And the likes of Luke Harding and Jeroen Akkermans write nothing about this, instead worshipping and beatifying the neo-Nazis!!
So if Putin is at war it is not because he is a bloodthirsty warmonger on a quest for global domination. That is NATO's quest. It will be because NATO wants to plonk first strike nuclear missiles in Ukraine aimed at Moscow...and put those nuclear missiles in the hands of neo-Nazis.
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
INITIAL REACTION BELLING CAT'S LATEST MH17 REPORT
My initial reaction is : Yes. So what?
Russia transported BUKs down to the border. So what?
But the report does not establish when the BUKs got into or out of Ukraine, if they were in Ukraine at all.
Yet on page 44 is a frame from a video showing the infamous BUK with missing missile which clearly shows the time "around 05.00 hrs".
So you tell me why a BUK seen in Luhansk at 2am, according to Naida, on its way to Severniy would be in a west suburb of Luhansk at 5am? Did the cabin driver fancy a bacon butty from his favourite truckstop to the west of Luhansk while transporting the alleged BUK that shot down MH17? COMPLETE NONSENSE!! You'd want to get the hell out of Dodge asap, not hang around. Which implies that Naida is lying.
Remember, the source of both of all these allegations is the SBU.
We have no idea who says they saw "a Buk missile launcher...around midnight on 17 July (the night between 16 and 17 July) in “Сєверний“(Syeverniy) in Ukraine" (quote from above). For all we know that could be someone anonymously phoning the MH17 JIT!!!
But can you remember what else the SBU said?
The SBU released a sick tape cobbled together from other tapes which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino.
Yes. Good work in detecting that track through the field. But there is no evidence provided that a BUK went through that field. Other military transport may have. But that killer evidence is still elusive. At the moment is all circumstantial.
But do you know what else is circumstantial?
Earlier this week Higgins posted a video in which an eyewitness clearly says, and shows with his hands, that something (BUK missile? plane?) attacked MH17 from its rear. And that is in addition to the other 8 eyewitnesses who have gone on camera, faces clear for all to see to be identified, who say that they saw a fighter jet when MH17 was shot down.
But who interviewed this guy who says MH17 was attacked from behind? Paris Match, the same Paris Match that Belling Cat's earlier report referred to, the source of the Paris Match photo of a BUK on a trailer apparently travelling east from Donetsk.
BTW, I highlighted the contradiction in Naida's statements months ago, possibly before Christmas last year.
Russia transported BUKs down to the border. So what?
But the report does not establish when the BUKs got into or out of Ukraine, if they were in Ukraine at all.
According to a video published to YouTube64 by the Joint Investigation Team,65 a Buk missile launcher was seen around midnight on 17 July (the night between 16 and 17 July) in “Сєверний“(Syeverniy) in Ukraine as well as in the early morning (around 5:00 AM) of 18 July driving through Lugansk in the direction of the border. An article published 19 July66 on a Ukrainian news site (mainly consisting of an interview with the head of Ukraine’s security service, Vitaly Naida), indicated that the missile launcher was seen on 18 July around 2:00 AM in Lugansk oblast traveling in the direction of “Северный - Верхняя Ореховка Российской Федерации“(Severniy – Verkhnyaya Orekhovka Rossiyskoy Federatsii), where, according to the article, two trucks hauling Buk missile launchers crossed the border, one of which had four missiles and the other three.61
The article went on to say that around 4:00 AM the same day, three more trucks crossed the border at that location, one hauling an empty trailer, one hauling a missile launcher with four missiles, and one hauling a military vehicle, which might have been a control unit (note: the vehicle was likely covered, so it could not be identified).
[Page 43/44]
Yet on page 44 is a frame from a video showing the infamous BUK with missing missile which clearly shows the time "around 05.00 hrs".
So you tell me why a BUK seen in Luhansk at 2am, according to Naida, on its way to Severniy would be in a west suburb of Luhansk at 5am? Did the cabin driver fancy a bacon butty from his favourite truckstop to the west of Luhansk while transporting the alleged BUK that shot down MH17? COMPLETE NONSENSE!! You'd want to get the hell out of Dodge asap, not hang around. Which implies that Naida is lying.
Remember, the source of both of all these allegations is the SBU.
We have no idea who says they saw "a Buk missile launcher...around midnight on 17 July (the night between 16 and 17 July) in “Сєверний“(Syeverniy) in Ukraine" (quote from above). For all we know that could be someone anonymously phoning the MH17 JIT!!!
But can you remember what else the SBU said?
The SBU released a sick tape cobbled together from other tapes which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that MH17 was shot down by Cossacks from Chernukino.
Yes. Good work in detecting that track through the field. But there is no evidence provided that a BUK went through that field. Other military transport may have. But that killer evidence is still elusive. At the moment is all circumstantial.
But do you know what else is circumstantial?
Earlier this week Higgins posted a video in which an eyewitness clearly says, and shows with his hands, that something (BUK missile? plane?) attacked MH17 from its rear. And that is in addition to the other 8 eyewitnesses who have gone on camera, faces clear for all to see to be identified, who say that they saw a fighter jet when MH17 was shot down.
But who interviewed this guy who says MH17 was attacked from behind? Paris Match, the same Paris Match that Belling Cat's earlier report referred to, the source of the Paris Match photo of a BUK on a trailer apparently travelling east from Donetsk.
BTW, I highlighted the contradiction in Naida's statements months ago, possibly before Christmas last year.
EVIDENCE OSAMA BIN LADEN DIED IN LATE 2001
Osama bin Laden did not claim responsibility for 9/11. Colin Powell stated that the USA would produce an extensive dossier on bin Laden's guilt for 9/11. Surprise!! The USA never did produce that dossier, or anything like a dossier.
But the USA did steam into Afghanistan and within a few years the opium harvests, which the Taliban had eradicated, were back to record levels, and those opium harvests just keep getting bigger and bigger...
You see, our ruling families have been running the opium trade for centuries. It's all there in Dope Inc by EIR.
So if bin Laden really was behind 9/11 then why go to all that trouble and deny responsibility?
And if the USA had any evidence at all that bin Laden was guilty then why has it not been released?
Perhaps because bin Laden didn't do 9/11?
Perhaps it was all a hoax so that:
1. the massive profits from Afghan opium could be restored;
2. the USA and its allies could go on a warmongering rampage as PNAC had proposed in 2000 in Rebuilding America's Defenses?
That plan revealed to General Wesley Clark is the manifestation of part 2. above.
And perhaps bin Laden didn't do 9/11 because he was not fit and healthy enough?
Osama bin Laden suffered from Marfan Syndrome and required frequent kidney dialysis. Now, you tell me how Osama bin Laden, requiring all that significant medical care and treatment, and being global public enemy number 1 after 9/11, could survive anywhere, let alone in the remote mountains of Afghanistan?
Hersh now says that Pakistan held him since 2006. That would still leave ObL with 4 years to survive in the remote mountains of Afghanistan, dragging a kidney dialysis machine behind as he somehow managed to evade capture or death at the hands of a powerful global coalition hunting him down for 9/11.
The answer lies in this: Osama Bin Laden’s Obituary Notice. December 26, 2001
Even if Hersh's latest report is true:
1. why was ObL's alleged corpse allegedly buried at sea?
2. and so quickly?
3. and without any photos?
Bin Laden died in December 2001. He was on his death bed in July 2001. But our ruling families needed the myth of bin Laden to send NATO in to kick The Taliban out and restore their massive opium profits.
And after that was achieved it was on with the warmongering as revealed to General Wesley Clark: Iraq in 2003; Lebanon in 2006; Libya in 2011; and Syria since 2011.
But the USA did steam into Afghanistan and within a few years the opium harvests, which the Taliban had eradicated, were back to record levels, and those opium harvests just keep getting bigger and bigger...
You see, our ruling families have been running the opium trade for centuries. It's all there in Dope Inc by EIR.
So if bin Laden really was behind 9/11 then why go to all that trouble and deny responsibility?
And if the USA had any evidence at all that bin Laden was guilty then why has it not been released?
Perhaps because bin Laden didn't do 9/11?
Perhaps it was all a hoax so that:
1. the massive profits from Afghan opium could be restored;
2. the USA and its allies could go on a warmongering rampage as PNAC had proposed in 2000 in Rebuilding America's Defenses?
That plan revealed to General Wesley Clark is the manifestation of part 2. above.
And perhaps bin Laden didn't do 9/11 because he was not fit and healthy enough?
Osama bin Laden suffered from Marfan Syndrome and required frequent kidney dialysis. Now, you tell me how Osama bin Laden, requiring all that significant medical care and treatment, and being global public enemy number 1 after 9/11, could survive anywhere, let alone in the remote mountains of Afghanistan?
Hersh now says that Pakistan held him since 2006. That would still leave ObL with 4 years to survive in the remote mountains of Afghanistan, dragging a kidney dialysis machine behind as he somehow managed to evade capture or death at the hands of a powerful global coalition hunting him down for 9/11.
The answer lies in this: Osama Bin Laden’s Obituary Notice. December 26, 2001
Even if Hersh's latest report is true:
1. why was ObL's alleged corpse allegedly buried at sea?
2. and so quickly?
3. and without any photos?
Bin Laden died in December 2001. He was on his death bed in July 2001. But our ruling families needed the myth of bin Laden to send NATO in to kick The Taliban out and restore their massive opium profits.
And after that was achieved it was on with the warmongering as revealed to General Wesley Clark: Iraq in 2003; Lebanon in 2006; Libya in 2011; and Syria since 2011.
I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN
Higgins has tweeted that he met with CIJA...and actually praises them!
But he knows, and his disciples should too, from reading this blog that:
1. the series of wars that have been executed in North Africa and the Middle East since 9/11 are all a massive conspiracy for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;
2. but by 2007 that plan was moribund so:
(a) the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
(b) to provide cover for those Jihadis as 'freedom fighters', the US State Dept ran The Arab Spring.
3. those Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya in 2011, when NATO became the air force of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb;
4. after slaughtering black Libyans and assassinating Gaddafi, those Jihadis were then smuggled into Syria, where they have eventually morphed into Islamic State.
Now, who are by far the biggest criminals in all this?
Assad, who is protecting his country, with virtually the full support of the Syrian people, from the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia have unleashed onto Syria?
Or the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia for unleashing the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria in the first place?
Obviously the latter: the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
You know what they do in Saudi Arabia, don't you? Yep. They chop your head off...with a sword...like on their flag...and as held by Prince Charles when he gets down and jiggy with the Saudis.
I repeat: the CIJA is looking to prosecute the rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist and letting the rapist get away without charge.
I should have known Higgins would praise the CIJA, with all his increasing connections to NATO/CIA/Soros.
In 2010 there wasn't a civil war in Syria. But by late 2011 there was.
This blog explains clearly why that happened.
Good to see CIJA's work written about in the Guardian, I met them a couple of weeks ago and their doing a really amazing job.
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) May 13, 2015But he knows, and his disciples should too, from reading this blog that:
1. the series of wars that have been executed in North Africa and the Middle East since 9/11 are all a massive conspiracy for war and regime change in seven countries in five years;
2. but by 2007 that plan was moribund so:
(a) the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran;
(b) to provide cover for those Jihadis as 'freedom fighters', the US State Dept ran The Arab Spring.
3. those Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya in 2011, when NATO became the air force of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb;
4. after slaughtering black Libyans and assassinating Gaddafi, those Jihadis were then smuggled into Syria, where they have eventually morphed into Islamic State.
Now, who are by far the biggest criminals in all this?
Assad, who is protecting his country, with virtually the full support of the Syrian people, from the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia have unleashed onto Syria?
Or the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia for unleashing the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria in the first place?
Obviously the latter: the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
You know what they do in Saudi Arabia, don't you? Yep. They chop your head off...with a sword...like on their flag...and as held by Prince Charles when he gets down and jiggy with the Saudis.
I repeat: the CIJA is looking to prosecute the rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist and letting the rapist get away without charge.
I should have known Higgins would praise the CIJA, with all his increasing connections to NATO/CIA/Soros.
In 2010 there wasn't a civil war in Syria. But by late 2011 there was.
This blog explains clearly why that happened.
SEEKING JUSTICE IN SYRIA
That article in The Guardian about an organisation seeking justice in Syria allegedly smuggling out hundreds of thousands of documents allegedly incriminating the Syrian government in war crimes again proves just how biased The Guardian really is.
The article refers to a Committee for International Justice and Accountability, which is reportedly run by William Wiley, a 'former' Major of the Canadian, i.e. NATO, Army.
What they appear to be doing is prosecuting a rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist while allowing the rapist to get away with rape.
If you want to know a bit more about the CIJA, read this: Atrocity Accountability in Syria: What Criminal Investigations Have Uncovered .
Apparently there is a US Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice. His name is Stephen J. Rapp.
Can you believe that? The USA actually has an Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice.
WHAT A SICK JOKE!!
And yet there Rapp was, sat with senior members of the CIJA, Wiley included, discussing how to prosecute Assad for protecting his country from the international cutthroat Jihadis that have been unleashed onto Syria by Saudi Arabia, Israel and the USA as per The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh!!
I repeat: WHAT A SICK JOKE!!
The article refers to a Committee for International Justice and Accountability, which is reportedly run by William Wiley, a 'former' Major of the Canadian, i.e. NATO, Army.
What they appear to be doing is prosecuting a rape victim for scratching the eyes of the rapist while allowing the rapist to get away with rape.
If you want to know a bit more about the CIJA, read this: Atrocity Accountability in Syria: What Criminal Investigations Have Uncovered .
Apparently there is a US Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice. His name is Stephen J. Rapp.
Can you believe that? The USA actually has an Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice.
WHAT A SICK JOKE!!
And yet there Rapp was, sat with senior members of the CIJA, Wiley included, discussing how to prosecute Assad for protecting his country from the international cutthroat Jihadis that have been unleashed onto Syria by Saudi Arabia, Israel and the USA as per The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh!!
I repeat: WHAT A SICK JOKE!!
MY COMPUTER IS RIDICULOULSY SLOW THIS MORNING
It took nearly 25 minutes before I could get a working window up. I even had to reboot, and it is still slow.
I was expecting it to be slow/interfered with due to my open letter Prince William last night. Something usually happens after posting something controversial, usually my firewall does not start automatically and can take 5 minutes before it starts.
But this is the kind of everyday low level harassment I suffer.
Did I tell you I found a large shard of glass on the path the other morning?
I was expecting it to be slow/interfered with due to my open letter Prince William last night. Something usually happens after posting something controversial, usually my firewall does not start automatically and can take 5 minutes before it starts.
But this is the kind of everyday low level harassment I suffer.
Did I tell you I found a large shard of glass on the path the other morning?
IS ISRAEL USING HERSH TO GET AT OBAMA?
The target of the latest article from Seymour Hersh seems to be Obama, to discredit Obama not Hersh.
Now, who would want to damage Obama?
The Zionists.
Why now?
Why is this doubt about the official narrative being revealed now when a blogger claims she revealed it all in August 2011?
Now, who would want to damage Obama?
The Zionists.
Why now?
Why is this doubt about the official narrative being revealed now when a blogger claims she revealed it all in August 2011?
Tuesday, May 12, 2015
THE GUARDIAN IN GET-ASSAD SHOCK HORROR
I am absolutely shocked, SHOCKED!, that The Guardian is running with a headline about alleged documents allegedly smuggled out of Syria over a 3 year period which could be sent to The Commission for International Justice and Accountability to use against Assad in any trial at The Hague or elsewhere.
The documents may or may not be true. We cannot trust The Guardian. Actually, that's not quite true. I would use The Guardian as toilet paper, but only in an emergency.
But has The Guardian exposed this in which General Wesley Clark reveals the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years?
Or this, in which Seymour Hersh in 2007 foretold the unleashing of cutthroat Jihadis by Saudi Arabia onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran?
The Redirection by Seymour Hersh?
Er, nope.
The documents may or may not be true. We cannot trust The Guardian. Actually, that's not quite true. I would use The Guardian as toilet paper, but only in an emergency.
But has The Guardian exposed this in which General Wesley Clark reveals the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years?
Or this, in which Seymour Hersh in 2007 foretold the unleashing of cutthroat Jihadis by Saudi Arabia onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran?
The Redirection by Seymour Hersh?
Er, nope.
OPEN LETTER TO HRH WILLIAM, DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE
Dear William
Please accept my apologies if I address you incorrectly. I am just a common man and the likes of me are not taught such Royal protocol at state school.
First, congratulations on the birth of your second child. I am glad that you have named her after your mother, but am disturbed that the names of your father and your grandmother take precedence. I sincerely hope that your daughter Diana grows up with your mother's love of life.
But second, how does it feel to have the blood of the engineers of World War 1, King Edward VII and King George V, running through your veins?
Did you know that it was King George V who told Germany that Great Britain would not fight in any war, thus tricking Germany into invading Belgium, while at the same time telling Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into any subsequent war?
Yes, the likes of me might not know Royal protocol, but we know who engineered WW1. I'm sure your mother would not have approved, if she knew. Or perhaps she did? But we will never know now.
Again, I wish you, Kate and your children well, and hope that you keep your eyes open for those "dark forces" your grandmother mentioned to Paul.
Please accept my apologies if I address you incorrectly. I am just a common man and the likes of me are not taught such Royal protocol at state school.
First, congratulations on the birth of your second child. I am glad that you have named her after your mother, but am disturbed that the names of your father and your grandmother take precedence. I sincerely hope that your daughter Diana grows up with your mother's love of life.
But second, how does it feel to have the blood of the engineers of World War 1, King Edward VII and King George V, running through your veins?
Did you know that it was King George V who told Germany that Great Britain would not fight in any war, thus tricking Germany into invading Belgium, while at the same time telling Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into any subsequent war?
Yes, the likes of me might not know Royal protocol, but we know who engineered WW1. I'm sure your mother would not have approved, if she knew. Or perhaps she did? But we will never know now.
Again, I wish you, Kate and your children well, and hope that you keep your eyes open for those "dark forces" your grandmother mentioned to Paul.
EVIDENCE THAT WILLIAM HAGUE AND PHIL HAMMOND HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH A ROGUE FACTION IN MI6
I have sent numerous letters to numerous MPs and Ministers, and all have replied...except two. Those two are William Hague and Phil Hammond. After you have read this blog you will understand why they didn't reply.
On 23rd March 2014 I sent a letter to William Hague about Ukraine and Syria. I posted that letter here in A LETTER TO WILLIAM HAGUE , and did not receive a reply.
And on 24th August 2014 I sent a similar letter to Phil Hammond which I posted here in MY LETTER TO THE EXTREMELY NAIVE FOREIGN SECRETARY PHIL HAMMOND , to which I also did not receive a reply.
In those letters I explicitly mention the following:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh (though not by name in the letter to Hague);
2. Roland Dumas and his claims of being asked by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria;
3. The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years.
So it is well over a year since I told Hague about these...if he didn't know already. So did he pass this information onto MI6 to see if it was true? Well, the fact that he did not reply says a lot.
Similarly for Hammond.
The information I sent to both is of a very, very serious nature, indicating an international conspiracy of astronomical magnitude to destroy the lives of millions of innocent civilians through war and regime change.
If you were Foreign Secretary and you were unaware of this information, would you pass this information onto MI6 or another group or investigator to see if it was true?
On 28th March this year I sent the following Freedom of Information request to the FCO.
On 1st April I received a reply containing this request for clarification:
On 2nd April I replied with this clarification:
And eventually on 23rd April I recieved two emails. The first contained this from the Middle East & North Africa Department of the FCO:
The second email from the North America Department of the FCO contained this:
So The North America Department is apparently unaware of The Redirection and the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark.
And The Middle East & North Africa Department are unaware of them and also of the claims of Dumas.
So we can deduce that either the FCO is lying, or that a rogue faction within MI6 approached Dumas.
And if a rogue faction within MI6 did approach Dumas without the permission of the Foreign Secretary then surely after I had written to both Hague and Hammond they should have investigated it, and if it had been investigated then it should have been an official investigation and records and findings made and kept.
But it looks like nothing happened. Life went as normal: international cutthroat Jihadis slit the throats of Syrian children and eventually morphed into Islamic State, who are now being used as the reason for the British government to intrude into every communication we make...just in case we are terrorists.
So apparently the FCO was unaware of:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh, but it is now;
2. Roland Dumas and his claims of being asked by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria;, but it is now;
3. The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, but it is now.
So did Hague and Hammond pass on the information? Even though I sent details of these and more to both Foreign Secretaries William Hague and Phil Hammond?
That is the next question to answer.
If they didn't then they are protecting a rogue faction in MI6 because it looks like everything that has gone on Syria has been "off the books".
And the fact that neither of them replied to my letters, when every other letter I have sent to an MP or Minister or Government department has been replied to, speaks volumes and volumes of potential guilt in war crimes.
On 23rd March 2014 I sent a letter to William Hague about Ukraine and Syria. I posted that letter here in A LETTER TO WILLIAM HAGUE , and did not receive a reply.
And on 24th August 2014 I sent a similar letter to Phil Hammond which I posted here in MY LETTER TO THE EXTREMELY NAIVE FOREIGN SECRETARY PHIL HAMMOND , to which I also did not receive a reply.
In those letters I explicitly mention the following:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh (though not by name in the letter to Hague);
2. Roland Dumas and his claims of being asked by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria;
3. The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years.
So it is well over a year since I told Hague about these...if he didn't know already. So did he pass this information onto MI6 to see if it was true? Well, the fact that he did not reply says a lot.
Similarly for Hammond.
The information I sent to both is of a very, very serious nature, indicating an international conspiracy of astronomical magnitude to destroy the lives of millions of innocent civilians through war and regime change.
If you were Foreign Secretary and you were unaware of this information, would you pass this information onto MI6 or another group or investigator to see if it was true?
On 28th March this year I sent the following Freedom of Information request to the FCO.
To whom it may concern:
On 24th August last year I sent a letter to the Foreign Secretary asking for an inquiry into the following and more. Unfortunately the Foreign Secretary has not replied. So I am now writing to make an open government request for all the information to which I am entitled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Please send me:
1. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that was reported by Seymour Hersh in New Yorker magazine on 5th March 2007 in which Saudi Arabia would unleash Islamic extremists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
2. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the allegations of former French foreign minister Roland Dumas who in 2013 said that in 2009 he was approached by British officials who asked him to help them to plan the smuggling of Islamic extremists into Syria. Did officials from Great Britain approach Mr Dumas? And for this purpose? Who were they? And on whose authority?
Do not restrict the information you provide to just these questions.
I would like the above information to be provided to me as electronic copies.
If this request is too wide or unclear, I would be grateful if you could contact me as I understand that under the Act, you are required to advise and assist requesters. If any of this information is already in the public domain, please can you direct me to it, with page references and URLs if necessary.
If the release of any of this information is prohibited on the grounds of breach of confidence, I ask that you supply me with copies of the confidentiality agreement and remind you that information should not be treated as confidential if such an agreement has not been signed.
I understand that you are required to respond to my request within the 20 working days after you receive this letter. I would be grateful if you could confirm in writing that you have received this request.
I look forward to hearing from you.
On 1st April I received a reply containing this request for clarification:
Thank you for your email of 28 March to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act.
The first part of your request was for “Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that was reported by Seymour Hersh in New Yorker magazine on 5th March 2007 in which Saudi Arabia would unleash Islamic extremists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.”
I am writing to ask you to consider clarifying the scope of this part of your request. As currently drafted this would go over the statutory limit set under the FOI act and we would be unable to proceed with it.
Would it be possible for you to refine this part of your request? E.g. could you specify a particular timeframe and could you be more specific about the information that you are interested in?
We will then accept your revised request and establish whether we hold any information relating to it before considering the appropriate course of action.
On 2nd April I replied with this clarification:
OK.
My initial request was for information on two events. I believe the two are linked.
Regarding your request of me refine my initial request, I would like to know:
1. was the FCO or any proxy agent of the FCO, e.g. MI6, involved in the discussions leading up to the decision taken that was reported by Seymour Hersh in his report of 5th March 2007? If so, who was it and on whose authority?
2. is the FCO aware of the publication of Hersh's report? If so when and how?
3. if the FCO is aware of the plan reported in Hersh's report then has the FCO decided to go along with it? And if so why has it not reported its existence to the British public?
That should do for now.
Can you tell me what you mean by this is in your initial reply:
As currently drafted this would go over the statutory limit set under the FOI act and we would be unable to proceed with it.
What do you mean by statutory limit?
And eventually on 23rd April I recieved two emails. The first contained this from the Middle East & North Africa Department of the FCO:
Thank you for your email of 28 March asking for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. You asked:
1. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the agreement reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that was reported by Seymour Hersh in New Yorker magazine on 5th March 2007 in which Saudi Arabia would unleash Islamic extremists onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
You clarified Q1 on 2 April to:
1. was the FCO or any proxy agent of the FCO, e.g. MI6, involved in the discussions leading up to the decision taken that was reported by Seymour Hersh in his report of 5th March 2007? If so, who was it and on whose authority?
2. is the FCO aware of the publication of Hersh's report? If so when and how?
3. if the FCO is aware of the plan reported in Hersh's report then has the FCO decided to go along with it? And if so why has it not reported its existence to the British public?
The North America Department are replying to this part of your request separately.
2. Any and all information that the FCO has or is aware of regarding or related to the allegations of former French foreign minister Roland Dumas who in 2013 said that in 2009 he was approached by British officials who asked him to help them to plan the smuggling of Islamic extremists into Syria. Did officials from Great Britain approach Mr Dumas? And for this purpose? Who were they? And on whose authority? Do not restrict the information you provide to just these questions.
I am writing to advise you that following a search of our paper and electronic records, I have established that we do not hold any information that is relevant to your request.
The second email from the North America Department of the FCO contained this:
Thank you for your e-mail of 2 April regarding the article by Mr Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker magazine on 5 March 2007. It has been passed on to the North America Department for a response.
As you would expect, the FCO has a regular dialogue with the US authorities on a broad range of foreign policy issues, and has done so for many years. The UK and US work closely together on a number of areas such as climate change, the economy and tackling terrorism. Both countries place great emphasis on the special relationship we hold, but that does not mean we automatically look to align our goals with each other. However, our partnership does have clear common agenda in ensuring our security, delivering economic growth and stability at home and across the world, and promoting our shared values.
Much of the information contained in Mr Hersh’s article relates to the US government’s foreign policy approach. As the formulation of US policy is a matter for the US authorities you may wish to contact the US Government for their views on the suggestions made in Mr Hersh’s article.
As you will be aware, there are daily media articles discussing the US government’s perceived foreign policy approach. Whilst North America Department is aware of some of these articles, it is not possible to monitor all of the media articles that discuss US foreign policy. I can confirm however that the information covered within this article would have had no impact on how the UK government formulated its own foreign policy agenda. If you require information about the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s foreign policy approach please visit - https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-office/about
Kind Regards
North America Department
So The North America Department is apparently unaware of The Redirection and the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark.
And The Middle East & North Africa Department are unaware of them and also of the claims of Dumas.
So we can deduce that either the FCO is lying, or that a rogue faction within MI6 approached Dumas.
And if a rogue faction within MI6 did approach Dumas without the permission of the Foreign Secretary then surely after I had written to both Hague and Hammond they should have investigated it, and if it had been investigated then it should have been an official investigation and records and findings made and kept.
But it looks like nothing happened. Life went as normal: international cutthroat Jihadis slit the throats of Syrian children and eventually morphed into Islamic State, who are now being used as the reason for the British government to intrude into every communication we make...just in case we are terrorists.
So apparently the FCO was unaware of:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh, but it is now;
2. Roland Dumas and his claims of being asked by British officials to smuggle Jihadis into Syria;, but it is now;
3. The plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, but it is now.
So did Hague and Hammond pass on the information? Even though I sent details of these and more to both Foreign Secretaries William Hague and Phil Hammond?
That is the next question to answer.
If they didn't then they are protecting a rogue faction in MI6 because it looks like everything that has gone on Syria has been "off the books".
And the fact that neither of them replied to my letters, when every other letter I have sent to an MP or Minister or Government department has been replied to, speaks volumes and volumes of potential guilt in war crimes.
THE SHAGGING AND FIGHTING SONG
Here is the first verse of a song I just wrote:
I think some teachers will appreciate these lyrics (just don't teach them at form time. OK?)
We'll shag, shag, shag,
Then have a war, war, war.
If this is being human
I want more, more, more.
At weekends watch grown men kick balls
And score, score, score.
Peace is so annoying.
Let’s shag then fight a war!
I think some teachers will appreciate these lyrics (just don't teach them at form time. OK?)
HAS SEYMOUR HERSH BEEN HOAXED TO DESTROY HIS CREDIBILITY?
In 2007 Seymour Hersh exposed the bloody wave of barbarism that Saudi Arabia was about to unleash onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran through the use of the nastiest, most medieval international cutthroat Jihadis who have eventually morphed into Islamic State. That barbarism actually began in 2011 in Libya, but in late 2011, after the assassination of Colonel Gaddafi, that barbarism began in Syria, and has spread to Lebanon but not yet Iran.
A few days ago Hersh reported that the official narrative of the death of Osama bin Laden was not true. Hersh is correct in that, but not in the way he says. Now Hersh is being accused of plagiarism in his report. Apparently in August 2011 a blogger wrote what Hersh claims happened.
What you have to ask about the alleged death of bin Laden is, why was his corpse allegedly dumped at sea so quickly and no photos of his corpse have been released?
The fact is that bin Laden was dying in late 2001 and died then. But the myth of bin Laden was required for NATO to kick out The Taliban and restore record opium harvests in Afghanistan. Once that was done it was on with the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
A few days ago Hersh reported that the official narrative of the death of Osama bin Laden was not true. Hersh is correct in that, but not in the way he says. Now Hersh is being accused of plagiarism in his report. Apparently in August 2011 a blogger wrote what Hersh claims happened.
What you have to ask about the alleged death of bin Laden is, why was his corpse allegedly dumped at sea so quickly and no photos of his corpse have been released?
The fact is that bin Laden was dying in late 2001 and died then. But the myth of bin Laden was required for NATO to kick out The Taliban and restore record opium harvests in Afghanistan. Once that was done it was on with the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark for war and regime change in Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
GET READY FOR A WAR IN UKRAINE
The supporters of Boris Nemtsov, Wall Street's ex-Special Agent in Charge of sedition in Russia, have today released a report into Russian involvement in Ukraine, and also on MH17. I can't read, write or speak Russian but from the photos in the report the work on MH17 is just lifted from Belling Cat.
The supporters of Nemtsov who published this report have a cheek. They ask that they be given donations from Russians only, thus giving the appearance that they are Russians working Russians. Nothing could be further from the truth. Nemtsov became such a well-known critic of Putin precisely because he and his supporters have been receiving donations and aid and support from the USA!!
Digest this lot about Nemtsov and his ilk:
So, far from being Russian and supported by Russians, Nemtsov, Navalny and all that lot of traitors are essentially agents for Wall Street. And once you start to associate with Mikhail Khordokovsky then you are in the presence of an agent of Lord Jacob Rothschild. Khordokovsky, Rothschild and Henry Kissinger founded the Open Russia Foundation at a Rothschild property, Somerset House, in 2001.
But at the end of this month The Atlantic Council will hold a conference to expose Russia's military presence in Ukraine.
But while whinging and crying that Russia is interfering in Ukraine, the USA is sending 800 troops to Ukraine, in addition to the nearly 300 in total provided by the UK and Canada, to train the Ukraine military that is infiltrated/infested with neo-Nazis, while also sending military hardware, including drones, to the Nazi-infested UAF!! More lethal aid will no doubt be sent soon.
This to me is beginning to look like an operation to first get Russian military presence out of Ukraine through reports such as that published today, through promoting the work of Belling Cat (while ignoring eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw MH17 hit/attacked by something that came from its behind), and through conferences such as that to be held by The Atlantic Council later this month. Once Russia has withdrew then the Kiev Nazis will unleash hell in East Ukraine
Something similar happened in Syria in 2005. Rafik Hariri was assassinated in February 2005. Syria was immediately blamed. A colour revolution, The Cedar Revolution, began in protest at Syria's presence in Lebanon. Syria subsequently withdrew its troops from Lebanon. The following year Israel attacked Lebanon. Lebanon was named in A Clean Break. Lebanon was named in The Redirection.
Similarly, in 2008 NATO stated that Ukraine would at some point become a member. The violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine last year has led to Ukraine taking steps to join NATO.
The supporters of Nemtsov who published this report have a cheek. They ask that they be given donations from Russians only, thus giving the appearance that they are Russians working Russians. Nothing could be further from the truth. Nemtsov became such a well-known critic of Putin precisely because he and his supporters have been receiving donations and aid and support from the USA!!
Digest this lot about Nemtsov and his ilk:
It’s also instructive to look at the leading opposition figures who seem to have stepped forward in Russia in recent days. The current opposition “poster boy” favorite of Russian youth and especially western media is Russian blogger Alexei Navalny whose blog is titled LiveJournal. Navalny has featured prominently as a quasi-martyr of the protest movement after spending 15 days in Putin’s jail for partaking in a banned protest. At a large protest rally on Christmas Day December 25 in Moscow, Navalny, perhaps intoxicated by seeing too many romantic Sergei Eisenstein films of the 1917 Russian Revolution, told the crowd, “I see enough people here to take the Kremlin and the White House (Russia’s Presidential home-w.e.) right now…”[13]
Western establishment media is infatuated with Navalny. England’s BBC described Navalny as “arguably the only major opposition figure to emerge in Russia in the past five years,” and US Time magazine called him “Russia’s Erin Brockovich,” a curious reference to the Hollywood film starring Julie Roberts as a researcher and legal activist. However, more relevant is the fact that Navalny went to the elite American East Coast Yale University, also home to the Bush family, where he was a “Yale World Fellow.” [14]
The charismatic Navalny however is also or has been on the payroll of Washington’s regime-destabilizing National Endowment for Democracy (NED). According to a posting on Navalny’s own blog, LiveJournal, he was supported in 2007-2008 by the NED. [15] [16]
Along with Navalny, key actors in the anti-Putin protest movement are centered around Solidarnost which was created in December 2008 by Boris Nemtsov, Vladimir Ryzhkov and others. Nemtsov is hardly one to protest corruption. According to Business Week Russia of September 23, 2007, Nemtsov introduced Russian banker Boris Brevnov to Gretchen Wilson, a US citizen and an employee of the International Finance Corporation, a financing arm of the World Bank. Wilson and Brevnov married. With the help of Nemtsov Wilson managed to privatize Balakhna Pulp and Paper mill at the giveaway price of just $7 million. The enterprise was sucked dry and then sold to the Wall Street-Swiss investment bank, CS First Boston bank. The annual turnover of the mill was reportedly $250 million. [17]
CS First Boston bank also paid for Nemtsov’s trips to the very expensive Davos World Economic Forum. When Nemtsov became a member of the cabinet, his protégé Brevnov was appointed the chairman of the Unified Energy System of Russia JSC. Two years later in 2009 Boris Nemtsov, today’s “Mr anti-corruption,” used his influence reportedly to get Brevnov off the hook for charges of embezzling billions from assets of Unified Energy System. [18]
Nemtsov also took money from jailed Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky in 1999 when the latter was using his billions to try to buy the Russian parliament or Duma. In 2004 Nemtsov met with exiled billionaire oligarch Boris Berezovsky in a secret gathering with other exiled Russian tycoons. When Nemtsov was detailed by Russian authorities for allegations of foreign funding of his new political party, “For Russia without Lawlessness and Corruption,” US Senators John McCain and Joe Liberman and Mike Hammer of the Obama National Security Council came to support of Nemtsov. [19]
Nemtsov’s close crony, Vladimir Ryzhkov of Solidarnost is also closely tied to the Swiss Davos circles, even founding a Siberian Davos. According to Russian press accounts from April 2005, Ryzhkov formed a Committee 2008 in 2003 to “draw” funds of the imprisoned Khodorkovsky along with soliciting funds from fugitive oligarchs such as Boris Berezovsky and western foundations such as the Soros Foundation. The stated aim of the effort was to rally “democratic” forces against Putin. On May 23, 2011 Ryzhkov, Nemtzov and several others filed to register a new Party of Peoples’ Freedom to ostensibly field a presidential candidate against Putin in 2012.[20]
Another prominent face in the recent anti-Putin rallies is former world chess champion turned right-wing politician, Garry Kasparov, another founder of Solidarnost. Kasparov was identified several years ago as being a board member of a Washington neo-conservative military think-tank. In April 2007, Kasparov admitted he was a board member of the National Security Advisory Council of Center for Security Policy, a “non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security.” Inside Russia Kasparov is more infamous for his earlier financial ties to Leonid Nevzlin, former Yukos vice-president and partner of Michael Khodorokvsky. Nevzlin fled to Israel on being charged in Russia on charges of murder and hiring contract killers to eliminate “objectionable people” while Yukos vice-president. [21]
In 2009 Kasparov and Boris Nemtsov met with no less than Barack Obama to discuss Russia’s opposition to Putin at the US President’s personal invitation at Washington’s Ritz Carlton Hotel. Nemtsov had called for Obama to meet with opposition forces in Russia: “If the White House agrees to Putin’s suggestion to speak only with pro-Putin organizations… this will mean that Putin has won, but not only that: Putin will become be assured that Obama is weak,” he said. During the same 2009 US trip Nemtsov was invited to speak at the New York Council on Foreign Relations, perhaps the most influential US foreign policy think-tank. Significantly, not only has the US State Department and US-backed political NGOs such as NED poured millions into building an anti-Putin coalition inside Russia. The President personally has intervened into the process.[22]
[source : William Engdahl, Regime Change in the Russian Federation? Why Washington Wants ‘Finito’ with Vladimir Putin, Global Research, http://www.globalresearch.ca/regime-change-in-the-russian-federation-why-washington-wants-finito-with-vladimir-putin/28571, 10th January 2012]
So, far from being Russian and supported by Russians, Nemtsov, Navalny and all that lot of traitors are essentially agents for Wall Street. And once you start to associate with Mikhail Khordokovsky then you are in the presence of an agent of Lord Jacob Rothschild. Khordokovsky, Rothschild and Henry Kissinger founded the Open Russia Foundation at a Rothschild property, Somerset House, in 2001.
But at the end of this month The Atlantic Council will hold a conference to expose Russia's military presence in Ukraine.
But while whinging and crying that Russia is interfering in Ukraine, the USA is sending 800 troops to Ukraine, in addition to the nearly 300 in total provided by the UK and Canada, to train the Ukraine military that is infiltrated/infested with neo-Nazis, while also sending military hardware, including drones, to the Nazi-infested UAF!! More lethal aid will no doubt be sent soon.
This to me is beginning to look like an operation to first get Russian military presence out of Ukraine through reports such as that published today, through promoting the work of Belling Cat (while ignoring eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw MH17 hit/attacked by something that came from its behind), and through conferences such as that to be held by The Atlantic Council later this month. Once Russia has withdrew then the Kiev Nazis will unleash hell in East Ukraine
Something similar happened in Syria in 2005. Rafik Hariri was assassinated in February 2005. Syria was immediately blamed. A colour revolution, The Cedar Revolution, began in protest at Syria's presence in Lebanon. Syria subsequently withdrew its troops from Lebanon. The following year Israel attacked Lebanon. Lebanon was named in A Clean Break. Lebanon was named in The Redirection.
Similarly, in 2008 NATO stated that Ukraine would at some point become a member. The violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine last year has led to Ukraine taking steps to join NATO.
HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT : NATO IMPERIALISM
Higgins has at last revealed what his clandestine relationship with the warmongering CIA-Neocon Atlantic Council is: he has been helping them to expose Russian military involvement in Ukraine.
Ignore the fact that over the decades NATO has expanded from a small group of just 5 nations centred in Northern Europe to now have 28 members and span from Turkey to the west coast of the USA.
Ignore the fact that in 2008 NATO said that Ukraine will become a member.
Ignore the fact that in 2014 violent neo-Nazis executed a coup that has led to a civil war and 6000 deaths, most of whom have been citizens of East Ukraine opposing their Nazism.
Ignore the fact that we went to war to destroy Nazism, and that Russia paid the highest price of all in 27 million deaths at the Wall Street-supported, bloodsoaked hands of the Nazis.
Ignore the fact that Victoria Nuland admitted that the USA has spent over $5 billion in fomenting a revolution in Ukraine.
Ignore the fact that that same Victoria Nuland hand-picked Yatsenyuk as the new Prime Minister of Ukraine in a phone conversation with Geoffrey Pyatt in which Pyatt all but admitted that the coup was being run by the USA when he stated, "I think we're in play".
Ignore the fact that that same Victoria Nuland is the wife of the co-founder of The Project for a New American Century, Robert Kagan, which since 2000 has brought us the wars in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon and Syria.
Ignore the fact that Yatsenyuk runs a foundation, Open Ukraine Foundation, which receives funds from NATO.
Ignore the fact that the new Minister of Finance for Ukraine is an American who was a senior official at the US Embassy in Kiev and was also a manager of funds for USAID (CIA) who 'lost' those funds, and whose first act was to flog Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto.
Ignore the fact that troops from the USA, UK and Canada are or will soon be in Ukraine to train Ukraine Armed Forces troops who are Nazis or Nazi sympathisers.
And ignore the fact that last weekend Russia and the UK celebrated 70 years after defeating the Nazis.
Ignore all this blatant NATO imperialism using Nazis to bring NATO to the front door of Russia in Ukraine.
I have already looked at the current management of The Atlantic Council: warmongers, CIA, Bilderberg, bankers.
But who founded The Atlantic Council?
According to the official history of The Atlantic Council, the following men were instrumental in the creation of The Atlantic Council:
Dean Acheson - Marshall Plan, created NATO;
Theodore Achilles - Bay of Pigs, created NATO, true globalist (Bilderberg, CFR), first wife divorced him on the grounds of cruelty;
Christian Herter - Freemason, married into Rockefeller's Standard Oil cabal, US rep at Versailles, founder of CFR, Marshall Plan, co-founder of Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) (home of the Neocon Wolfowitz cabal), true globalist;
William Clayton - Marshall Plan, sponsor of William L. Clayton Professorship on International Economics at SAIS.
The Atlantic Council has since grown to be run by the military-industrial-banking complex with two things in mind: Anglo-American/NATO imperialism and war.
Isn't it ironic that one of the founders of The Atlantic Council, Christian Herter, sat on the Board of Trustees of The World Peace Foundation!!
And finally, to remind us all of how NATO has expanded and expanded and expanded, and wishes to expand until it has consumed the whole globe, here are 2 images showing that expansion:
We all wonder what Higgins would do if NATO used violent neo-Nazis, who his father and grandfather fought in WW2, to kick out his next door neighbours in order to place first strike nuclear missiles on his ex-next door neighbours' front lawn aimed at his living room.
What I've been working on - Hiding in Plain Sight: Putin's War in Ukraine and Boris Nemtsov's Putin. War http://t.co/lBqPVIJZAK #PutinAtWar
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) May 12, 2015Ignore the fact that over the decades NATO has expanded from a small group of just 5 nations centred in Northern Europe to now have 28 members and span from Turkey to the west coast of the USA.
Ignore the fact that in 2008 NATO said that Ukraine will become a member.
Ignore the fact that in 2014 violent neo-Nazis executed a coup that has led to a civil war and 6000 deaths, most of whom have been citizens of East Ukraine opposing their Nazism.
Ignore the fact that we went to war to destroy Nazism, and that Russia paid the highest price of all in 27 million deaths at the Wall Street-supported, bloodsoaked hands of the Nazis.
Ignore the fact that Victoria Nuland admitted that the USA has spent over $5 billion in fomenting a revolution in Ukraine.
Ignore the fact that that same Victoria Nuland hand-picked Yatsenyuk as the new Prime Minister of Ukraine in a phone conversation with Geoffrey Pyatt in which Pyatt all but admitted that the coup was being run by the USA when he stated, "I think we're in play".
Ignore the fact that that same Victoria Nuland is the wife of the co-founder of The Project for a New American Century, Robert Kagan, which since 2000 has brought us the wars in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon and Syria.
Ignore the fact that Yatsenyuk runs a foundation, Open Ukraine Foundation, which receives funds from NATO.
Ignore the fact that the new Minister of Finance for Ukraine is an American who was a senior official at the US Embassy in Kiev and was also a manager of funds for USAID (CIA) who 'lost' those funds, and whose first act was to flog Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto.
Ignore the fact that troops from the USA, UK and Canada are or will soon be in Ukraine to train Ukraine Armed Forces troops who are Nazis or Nazi sympathisers.
And ignore the fact that last weekend Russia and the UK celebrated 70 years after defeating the Nazis.
Ignore all this blatant NATO imperialism using Nazis to bring NATO to the front door of Russia in Ukraine.
I have already looked at the current management of The Atlantic Council: warmongers, CIA, Bilderberg, bankers.
But who founded The Atlantic Council?
According to the official history of The Atlantic Council, the following men were instrumental in the creation of The Atlantic Council:
Dean Acheson - Marshall Plan, created NATO;
Theodore Achilles - Bay of Pigs, created NATO, true globalist (Bilderberg, CFR), first wife divorced him on the grounds of cruelty;
Christian Herter - Freemason, married into Rockefeller's Standard Oil cabal, US rep at Versailles, founder of CFR, Marshall Plan, co-founder of Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) (home of the Neocon Wolfowitz cabal), true globalist;
William Clayton - Marshall Plan, sponsor of William L. Clayton Professorship on International Economics at SAIS.
The Atlantic Council has since grown to be run by the military-industrial-banking complex with two things in mind: Anglo-American/NATO imperialism and war.
Isn't it ironic that one of the founders of The Atlantic Council, Christian Herter, sat on the Board of Trustees of The World Peace Foundation!!
And finally, to remind us all of how NATO has expanded and expanded and expanded, and wishes to expand until it has consumed the whole globe, here are 2 images showing that expansion:
We all wonder what Higgins would do if NATO used violent neo-Nazis, who his father and grandfather fought in WW2, to kick out his next door neighbours in order to place first strike nuclear missiles on his ex-next door neighbours' front lawn aimed at his living room.
Monday, May 11, 2015
THE ROTTEN FASCIST TURD IN THE PUNCH BOWL OF LIFE
Who am I talking about?
David Icke? No, I'm not Alex Jones.
I am talking about Iain Duncan-Smith, who has been rewarded for his loyal fascism with the power to commit more fascist crime in the name of putting the Great back into Great Britain, as pigeon-murderer Cameron proposed. IDS will remain as Work and Pensions Secretary.
IDS lives rent free in a multi-bedroomed mansion with tennis courts and a swimming pool, you know, all the essentials in life, courtesy of his marriage. Nothing to do with his business acumen. IDS married money.
Pigeon-murderer Cameron has it all wrong.
To put the Great back into Great Britain we need to kick out the Venice in Great Britain: THE CITY OF LONDON!!
If Venice wishes to remain here we should tax it to hell.
But if Venice wishes to leave then I'll happily be the driver of the coach to the nearest port or airport for them to leave this Disunited Fascist Queendom as soon as possible. And good riddance too!!
So next time you meet IDS, hold your nose to contain the stench, the rotten stench of fascism.
David Icke? No, I'm not Alex Jones.
I am talking about Iain Duncan-Smith, who has been rewarded for his loyal fascism with the power to commit more fascist crime in the name of putting the Great back into Great Britain, as pigeon-murderer Cameron proposed. IDS will remain as Work and Pensions Secretary.
IDS lives rent free in a multi-bedroomed mansion with tennis courts and a swimming pool, you know, all the essentials in life, courtesy of his marriage. Nothing to do with his business acumen. IDS married money.
Pigeon-murderer Cameron has it all wrong.
To put the Great back into Great Britain we need to kick out the Venice in Great Britain: THE CITY OF LONDON!!
If Venice wishes to remain here we should tax it to hell.
But if Venice wishes to leave then I'll happily be the driver of the coach to the nearest port or airport for them to leave this Disunited Fascist Queendom as soon as possible. And good riddance too!!
So next time you meet IDS, hold your nose to contain the stench, the rotten stench of fascism.
SUPERSTAR
And the third in the sad song trilogy is this from The Carpenters; Superstar. Nearly every Sunday. And during the week.
CARPENTERS - SUPERSTAR
CARPENTERS - SUPERSTAR
IF YOU GO AWAY
Another sad song, this time from Cocaine Campbell. Nearly every Sunday I heard this and sometimes during the week too.
Glen Campbell - If You Go Away
Glen Campbell - If You Go Away
IF YOU COULD READ MY MIND
I grew up with this sad song. My mum and dad loved Jack Jones who did a cover of this, and every Sunday while they prepared the roast dinner they'd have a Jack Jones, or Glen "Cocaine" Campbell or The Carpenters LP on the record player.
Gordon Lightfoot - If You Could Read My Mind
Gordon Lightfoot - If You Could Read My Mind
SEYMOUR HERSH IS HALF RIGHT ABOUT BIN LADEN
Seymour Hersh is the reporter who in 2007 published The Redirection which foretold the unleashing by Saudi Arabia of the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria and Lebanon, but also Iran.
Hersh is now reporting that that the death of Osama bin Laden as reported in May 2011 is not true.
Hersh is correct in that, but not in what he says happened.
In 2001 Osama bin Laden was literally on his death bed. He suffered from Marfan Syndrome, which is a degenerative disease requiring significant medical treatment if the sufferer is to survive. In addition bin Laden required frequent kidney dialysis.
So how did bin Laden survive in the mountains of Afghanistan for a decade if he required all that frequent, regular and significant medical treatment? He didn't. He died around Christmas time of 2001.
Shortly after 9/11 bin Laden stated that he was not responsible for 9/11. If he was responsible then why would he go to all that trouble and then deny that he was responsible? And Colin Powell stated that the USA would provide a comprehensive dossier on bin Laden's guilt. That dossier was never compiled or published.
It was around November 2001 that odd-looking bin Laden's began to show up on videos. But the difference was that the real bin Laden was tall and thin, while his impostors in these videos were not.
In April 2011 a scandal began to emerge over Obama's long form birth certificate. He could not produce one, suggesting that he was not a citizen of the USA and thus could not become President. To divert attention from this scandal Obama played his trump card and had Osama bin Laden 'killed'. Obama overnight went from being in big, big trouble to being the untouchable All American Hero for getting bin Laden. But bin Laden was already dead for nearly 10 years. This is why his 'corpse' was allegedly dumped so quickly at sea without a single photograph of his dead face or corpse released.
This has been kept from the public because the real reason why we went into Afghanistan was not for bin Laden but for opium.
Our ruling families have been running the opium trade for centuries. But by 2001 The Taliban had destroyed the opium industry in Afghanistan. The solution was to go into Afghanistan under the pretext of hunting down bin Laden and restore the opium industry. The result is that although The Taliban had rapidly destroyed the industry, NATO restored opium to record levels within a few years. And the record opium harvests keep coming and coming...
If you want to know how much the establishment cherish the profits from the opium trade then read Dope Inc by EIR. We are talking hundreds of billions of dollars.
Hersh is now reporting that that the death of Osama bin Laden as reported in May 2011 is not true.
Hersh is correct in that, but not in what he says happened.
In 2001 Osama bin Laden was literally on his death bed. He suffered from Marfan Syndrome, which is a degenerative disease requiring significant medical treatment if the sufferer is to survive. In addition bin Laden required frequent kidney dialysis.
So how did bin Laden survive in the mountains of Afghanistan for a decade if he required all that frequent, regular and significant medical treatment? He didn't. He died around Christmas time of 2001.
Shortly after 9/11 bin Laden stated that he was not responsible for 9/11. If he was responsible then why would he go to all that trouble and then deny that he was responsible? And Colin Powell stated that the USA would provide a comprehensive dossier on bin Laden's guilt. That dossier was never compiled or published.
It was around November 2001 that odd-looking bin Laden's began to show up on videos. But the difference was that the real bin Laden was tall and thin, while his impostors in these videos were not.
In April 2011 a scandal began to emerge over Obama's long form birth certificate. He could not produce one, suggesting that he was not a citizen of the USA and thus could not become President. To divert attention from this scandal Obama played his trump card and had Osama bin Laden 'killed'. Obama overnight went from being in big, big trouble to being the untouchable All American Hero for getting bin Laden. But bin Laden was already dead for nearly 10 years. This is why his 'corpse' was allegedly dumped so quickly at sea without a single photograph of his dead face or corpse released.
This has been kept from the public because the real reason why we went into Afghanistan was not for bin Laden but for opium.
Our ruling families have been running the opium trade for centuries. But by 2001 The Taliban had destroyed the opium industry in Afghanistan. The solution was to go into Afghanistan under the pretext of hunting down bin Laden and restore the opium industry. The result is that although The Taliban had rapidly destroyed the industry, NATO restored opium to record levels within a few years. And the record opium harvests keep coming and coming...
If you want to know how much the establishment cherish the profits from the opium trade then read Dope Inc by EIR. We are talking hundreds of billions of dollars.
Sunday, May 10, 2015
HIGGINS TWEETS EVIDENCE THAT MH17 SHOT DOWN BY A POINT BUT WITNESS SAYS IT CAME FROM BEHIND MH17
In his excitement he may have missed the bit that it came from behind.
But also what is this "point"?
Is it a missile, or is it just that what ever it was, possibly a fighter jet, was that far away that it was viewed as a point, a dot?
Anyway, the witness shows with his hands how the missile/plane hit MH17: it came from behind/from the side, not head on, which would have happened if the missile had been fired from his proposed location of 5 Km south of Shnizhne.
Here is the tweet. Watch the guy talk about the "point" climb into the sky. But please take note of how the missile/plane hit MH17. IT CAME FROM BEHIND!!! And behind means much more likely to be Ukraine Armed Forces.
Here is how the witness describes how the point/missile/plane hit MH17 translated into French (taken from the video).
Here is the google translation of that French.
Note that the witness never says "missile", and that after describing MH17 by "l'avion" the witness uses the word "l'autre" to describe whatever it was he saw. "L'autre" means "the other". The other plane? The other object?
But whatever "l'autre" was, IT CAME FROM BEHIND MH17!!
I take this verbal description and the way in which the guy uses his hands to completely destroy the thesis that MH17 was hit by a missile head on, i.e. from Shnizhne.
NO WONDER SOCIAL MEDIA EXPERT NEVER KNEW ABOUT THIS!! They've been trying to keep it quiet because it destroys everything NATO has been saying!!
This totally contradicts the US State Dept image below (which I have always mocked).
But also what is this "point"?
Is it a missile, or is it just that what ever it was, possibly a fighter jet, was that far away that it was viewed as a point, a dot?
Anyway, the witness shows with his hands how the missile/plane hit MH17: it came from behind/from the side, not head on, which would have happened if the missile had been fired from his proposed location of 5 Km south of Shnizhne.
Here is the tweet. Watch the guy talk about the "point" climb into the sky. But please take note of how the missile/plane hit MH17. IT CAME FROM BEHIND!!! And behind means much more likely to be Ukraine Armed Forces.
Missed this video before, but this Paris Match video interviews a witness of the #MH17 shoot down 1/3 https://t.co/Jt3BlDlK15
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) May 10, 2015Here is how the witness describes how the point/missile/plane hit MH17 translated into French (taken from the video).
ensuite j'ai vu au loin comme un point dans le ciel. Je l'ai vu grimper dans le nuage et bang. C'est rentre dans le nuage on le voyait plus. Et apres on a entendu l'explosion. L'avion venait de ce cote, et allait vers la bas en Malaise. Il volait dans la direction de Rostov. L'autre il etait derriere et il est alle comme ca. Souvenouz vous qu'il faisait nuageux ce jour la. Moi j'ai juste vu le truc qui grimpait vers le nuage.
Here is the google translation of that French.
Then I saw in the distance as a point in the sky. I saw him climb into the cloud and bang. It is returned in the cloud could be seen the most. And after we heard the explosion. The aircraft had on that side, and going downwards in Malaysia. It flew in the direction of Rostov. The other was behind it and it has gone as ca. Souvenouz sure it was cloudy that day. I just saw the thing that climbed to the cloud.
Note that the witness never says "missile", and that after describing MH17 by "l'avion" the witness uses the word "l'autre" to describe whatever it was he saw. "L'autre" means "the other". The other plane? The other object?
But whatever "l'autre" was, IT CAME FROM BEHIND MH17!!
I take this verbal description and the way in which the guy uses his hands to completely destroy the thesis that MH17 was hit by a missile head on, i.e. from Shnizhne.
NO WONDER SOCIAL MEDIA EXPERT NEVER KNEW ABOUT THIS!! They've been trying to keep it quiet because it destroys everything NATO has been saying!!
This totally contradicts the US State Dept image below (which I have always mocked).
A VERY NAZI IRONY
So the great and the good are out in force in London today to celebrate 70 years after defeating the Nazis in WW2.
Meanwhile, NATO has been running and supporting a violent neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine, and has sent troops to train the Ukraine Armed Forces which contain Nazis.
Meanwhile, NATO has been running and supporting a violent neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine, and has sent troops to train the Ukraine Armed Forces which contain Nazis.
POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC COMMON SENSE
Stuart Hooper gives his post-general election result speech at 12:20 in the video below.
It's just political and economic common sense: get the bastards who caused the crisis in the first place to pay by taxing them and using the Bank of England to create credit for the nation not to bail out the banks.
But for whatever reason the likes of Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat or UKIP never address this. Under them the banks get off and the poor pay. Only The Green Party suggested this.
So congrats to Stuart for having a go. Two hundred and five votes is just the start of a very long journey. The people will come to understand this solution in the end. Five years is a very, very long time in politics. Stuart has inspired me into considering running on a similar manifesto in the next GE.
It's just political and economic common sense: get the bastards who caused the crisis in the first place to pay by taxing them and using the Bank of England to create credit for the nation not to bail out the banks.
But for whatever reason the likes of Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrat or UKIP never address this. Under them the banks get off and the poor pay. Only The Green Party suggested this.
So congrats to Stuart for having a go. Two hundred and five votes is just the start of a very long journey. The people will come to understand this solution in the end. Five years is a very, very long time in politics. Stuart has inspired me into considering running on a similar manifesto in the next GE.
DEATHS IN WORLD WAR 2
According to Wikipedia, here are the nations who paid for WW2 in the number of deaths they suffered:
1. Russia (25 to 30 million)
2. China (15 to 20 million)
3. Germany (7 to 9 million)
American propaganda leaves many with the notion that the USA saved the world from fascism. So how many Americans died in WW2? According to Wikipedia, just 420,000.
But the major fact that many WW2 histories omit is that it was Wall Street and The City of London who financed and engineered the creation of the Nazis in the first place!!
Why?
Because they wanted another world war because WW1 did not produce the world government that they wanted.
The one book to smash the myth that the Nazis and their Wehrmacht just appeared out of nowhere is Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C Sutton. But Sutton also wrote a devastating trilogy on Soviet economic development which shows how Wall Street financed the creation of the USSR, a fact that Stalin recognised himself.
In other words both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were created for a second world war by an Anglophile Wall Street. The result? THE UNITED NATIONS!!
The League of Nations failed.
The United Nations survived and is growing stronger and stronger.
And not only the UN, but also other world governing institutions, which have also grown in power and influence. One is the IMF which a few years ago stated that it will soon manage the economies of every nation on earth. Many heads of the IMF attend Bilderberg.
But back to the main point of this blog.
Russia did not start the war. Russia was invaded by Nazi Germany and paid the highest price with possibly 30 million deaths, eventually driving the Nazis all the way from the walls of Moscow and Leningrad back to Berlin. Meanwhile Americans were based in the UK seducing the wives and girlfriends of British servicemen fighting in Europe and North Africa after Wall Street had financed the creation of the Nazis!!
So let's put WW2 into perspective: many more civilians of Leningrad died during the Nazi siege of that city than Americans died during WW2.
1. Russia (25 to 30 million)
2. China (15 to 20 million)
3. Germany (7 to 9 million)
American propaganda leaves many with the notion that the USA saved the world from fascism. So how many Americans died in WW2? According to Wikipedia, just 420,000.
But the major fact that many WW2 histories omit is that it was Wall Street and The City of London who financed and engineered the creation of the Nazis in the first place!!
Why?
Because they wanted another world war because WW1 did not produce the world government that they wanted.
The one book to smash the myth that the Nazis and their Wehrmacht just appeared out of nowhere is Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C Sutton. But Sutton also wrote a devastating trilogy on Soviet economic development which shows how Wall Street financed the creation of the USSR, a fact that Stalin recognised himself.
In other words both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were created for a second world war by an Anglophile Wall Street. The result? THE UNITED NATIONS!!
The League of Nations failed.
The United Nations survived and is growing stronger and stronger.
And not only the UN, but also other world governing institutions, which have also grown in power and influence. One is the IMF which a few years ago stated that it will soon manage the economies of every nation on earth. Many heads of the IMF attend Bilderberg.
But back to the main point of this blog.
Russia did not start the war. Russia was invaded by Nazi Germany and paid the highest price with possibly 30 million deaths, eventually driving the Nazis all the way from the walls of Moscow and Leningrad back to Berlin. Meanwhile Americans were based in the UK seducing the wives and girlfriends of British servicemen fighting in Europe and North Africa after Wall Street had financed the creation of the Nazis!!
So let's put WW2 into perspective: many more civilians of Leningrad died during the Nazi siege of that city than Americans died during WW2.
Saturday, May 09, 2015
CHOOSE THE LYRICS
The chorus of Over There by George Cohan is:
But we know what war is. War is a racket.
So here are more apt lyrics, but I can't decide which ones are best. Can you help me?
Options are:
1. replace "Rothschild" in line 3 with "British" or with "That the";
2. replace "they've stole" in line 8 with "they've grabbed" or with "they own".
Over there, over there,
Send the word, send the word over there
That the Yanks are coming, the Yanks are coming
The drums rum-tumming everywhere.
So prepare, say a prayer,
Send the word, send the word to beware -
We'll be over, we're coming over,
And we won't come back till it's over, over there.
But we know what war is. War is a racket.
So here are more apt lyrics, but I can't decide which ones are best. Can you help me?
Over there, over there,
Send the word, send the word over there.
Rothschild banks are coming, their banks are coming
Creating money from thin air.
So prepare, say a prayer,
Send the word, send the word to beware -
They'll be over, they're coming over,
And they won't come back till they've stole what's over there.
Options are:
1. replace "Rothschild" in line 3 with "British" or with "That the";
2. replace "they've stole" in line 8 with "they've grabbed" or with "they own".
Friday, May 08, 2015
AUSTERITY! AUSTERITY! WHERE FOR ART THOU, AUSTERITY?
So the muggins British taxpayer loves austerity. We know that now. Head over heels in love with austerity, we are.
But there is a much easier and quicker way.
And that is to:
1. impose a financial trading tax on The City of London;
2. bring the power to create money under public control.
The benefit wouldn't be seen tomorrow, or the next day or the day after that.
But it would quickly alleviate the suffering of those who, through no fault of their own, have been paying for the excesses of The City of London, and would give us the power to create money for infrastructure and housing that the Tories will not provide.
The mad thing is we still borrow from the banks and institutions who caused this austerity in the first place when we could grab this power to create money from their undeserving hands and use it for our benefit not theirs.
But there is a much easier and quicker way.
And that is to:
1. impose a financial trading tax on The City of London;
2. bring the power to create money under public control.
The benefit wouldn't be seen tomorrow, or the next day or the day after that.
But it would quickly alleviate the suffering of those who, through no fault of their own, have been paying for the excesses of The City of London, and would give us the power to create money for infrastructure and housing that the Tories will not provide.
The mad thing is we still borrow from the banks and institutions who caused this austerity in the first place when we could grab this power to create money from their undeserving hands and use it for our benefit not theirs.
THE PIGEON MURDERER ACTUALLY GETS A MAJORITY
He's actually got a majority!
Here's to a bleaker future (except if you are rich and/or work in the City of London).
This is the power of the Murdoch press. Scotland was always going to SNP, but it looks like Lib Dem voters voted Tory and not Labour. Why? Scared about a Labour-SNP coalition courtesy of the Murdoch press.
Here's to a bleaker future (except if you are rich and/or work in the City of London).
This is the power of the Murdoch press. Scotland was always going to SNP, but it looks like Lib Dem voters voted Tory and not Labour. Why? Scared about a Labour-SNP coalition courtesy of the Murdoch press.
ELECTION RESULTS SUPPORT THE NEED FOR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Even though I do not support UKIP, the fact that they won millions of votes, won many 2nd and 3rd places and over 10% of the total vote, yet only have 1 MP is totally unfair.
PR would also abolish the Boundary Commission and the potential for influencing outcomes through redesigning the boundaries of constituencies.
It is high time for a fairer voting system.
PR would also abolish the Boundary Commission and the potential for influencing outcomes through redesigning the boundaries of constituencies.
It is high time for a fairer voting system.
BILDERBERG RUPERT MURDOCH WON THE ELECTION FOR THE TORIES
Oh fucking hell!!
I knew the Tories would become the majority but not to this degree.
But how did I know this would sort of happen?
Rupert Murdoch:
1. pushed/endorsed Nigel Farage and UKIP, which split the Labour vote;
2. got his media to scare the shit out of the British electorate with fears of a Labour-SNP coalition.
Murdoch also owns Storyful.
Miliband is probably a nice chap with his heart nearly in the right place, but he was never PM material. He didn't look right, or sound right, and his policies were not right either. On the other hand, Cameron has royal blood, his ancestors ran the banking system running opium, and his wife is more establishment than him.
Labour have only themselves to blame for choosing the wrong leader years ago.
But for that decision we will generally all suffer, except for the establishment, but the poor, weak and vulnerable will suffer the most.
More food banks (unless the Tories outlaw them).
More homelessness (unless the Tories outlaw that either).
More zero hours contracts (the Tories will never outlaw them).
More wars (the Tories will never outlaw them).
This is a dark day for a Disunited Fascist Queendom that over the next 5 years will become more Disunited (unequal) and more fascist.
The answer is simple:
1. tax the City of London;
2. bring money creation under public control.
I knew the Tories would become the majority but not to this degree.
But how did I know this would sort of happen?
Rupert Murdoch:
1. pushed/endorsed Nigel Farage and UKIP, which split the Labour vote;
2. got his media to scare the shit out of the British electorate with fears of a Labour-SNP coalition.
Murdoch also owns Storyful.
Miliband is probably a nice chap with his heart nearly in the right place, but he was never PM material. He didn't look right, or sound right, and his policies were not right either. On the other hand, Cameron has royal blood, his ancestors ran the banking system running opium, and his wife is more establishment than him.
Labour have only themselves to blame for choosing the wrong leader years ago.
But for that decision we will generally all suffer, except for the establishment, but the poor, weak and vulnerable will suffer the most.
More food banks (unless the Tories outlaw them).
More homelessness (unless the Tories outlaw that either).
More zero hours contracts (the Tories will never outlaw them).
More wars (the Tories will never outlaw them).
This is a dark day for a Disunited Fascist Queendom that over the next 5 years will become more Disunited (unequal) and more fascist.
The answer is simple:
1. tax the City of London;
2. bring money creation under public control.
Thursday, May 07, 2015
TODAY IS ALSO THE CENTENNIAL OF THE SINKING OF THE LUSITANIA
The Lusitania was sunk by a devilish German U-boat.
That's what we are told. That's all we need to know.
The Germans sunk The Lusitania.
But there is much more to this sinking.
Here is what I wrote about The Lusitania in those reports I've been ranting about, which will soon be available on a website.
Since I wrote that in 2013 another damning piece of evidence has come to light: besides telling Kaiser Wilhelm II that Great Britain would not join in any war, King George, at the same time, was also ordering Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into the war.
So besides tricking Germany into invading Belgium, thus giving Sir Edward Grey the perfect opportunity to cite the 1839 Treaty of London which Great Britain did not need to enforce, King George V, the current Queen's Grandfather, also engineered the sinking of The Lusitania to get the USA into the war!!
That's what we are told. That's all we need to know.
The Germans sunk The Lusitania.
But there is much more to this sinking.
Here is what I wrote about The Lusitania in those reports I've been ranting about, which will soon be available on a website.
The start of World War 1 did not go so well for Great Britain. Germany was surprisingly strong, resilient and resourceful, and Great Britain was struggling to raise finance due to fears that it would not win the war. There were even fears that Great Britain would have to seek peace with Germany on German terms. So for Great Britain it was very important that America should join the war on its side as soon as possible. This is when the Zionists began to demand Palestine as payment for them using their influence on American politics to bring America into the war on the side of Great Britain, resulting in The Balfour Declaration.
The Lusitania was registered as an armed auxilliary cruiser but was actually used as a passenger liner. Perhaps as evidence of the anticipation of war, in May 1913 The Lusitania was fitted with deck guns, and passenger accommodation was removed to make space for cargo. Rothschild agent JP Morgan was the sole agent for the British Government for war materials. Morgan was illegally shipping war materials and ammunition in the cargo holds of passenger ships such as The Lusitania, which was actually owned by his shipping rival Cunard and was thus expendable. The Germans were aware that The Lusitania was being used to carry war material, and protested this to the American government without reply. Before The Lusitania set sail from New York on 1st May 1915 the German Embassy in America tried to place adverts in fifty American newspapers warning any potential American passengers on The Lusitania not to sail on her, but the US State Department threatened the papers with court action if the ads were run. As a consequence only one paper published the warning.
On the night of 7th May 1915 First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill knew of the large presence of German U-boats off the coast of Southern Ireland, which was on the route The Lusitania was taking. The Lusitania was supposed to rendezvous with the destroyer Juno who would then escort her through the waters known to be infested with German U-boats, but Juno was recalled, apparently because she was thought unfit for the job. No other escort was sent. Several ships had been sunk in the area during the 24 hours before The Lusitania was hit. So why was The Lusitania ordered to sail at only 75% power, unescorted and in U-boat infested waters?
Churchill left the Admiralty that day to go to France for a holiday. Was Churchill unaware of the German warnings? The Lusitania was attacked and sunk. The British and American media went berserk, condemning Germany for sinking a ship carrying passengers. However, the British and American public were not made aware of its use for illegally supplying arms, thus deliberately risking the lives of any passengers on board. A cover-up followed chaired by Lord Mersey, who later referred to the whole episode as “damned dirty business”. The US Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan wrote a note to President Woodrow Wilson indicating his suspicion of the sinking of The Lusitania
and the way in which the sinking was being used by elements within the British and American governments to go to war. Bryan wrote:
Germany has a right to prevent contraband going to the allies and a ship carrying contraband should not rely upon passengers to protect her from attack - it would be like putting women and children in front of an army.
The passengers on board The Lusitania were being used as a human shield. And if the Germans should sink it then the outrage could be used to drag America into the war. Bryan resigned over this sinking, having become totally disenchanted with the administration of President Woodrow Wilson, who we shall briefly analyse later.
To support the thesis that The Lusitania was allowed to be sunk to provoke outrage in the American public, during the day The Lusitania was attacked a series of conversations took place between King George V, British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey and Colonel Edward Mandel House, who was chief adviser of Woodrow Wilson and who shall be looked at shortly, during which House was asked by Grey, “what will Americans do if the Germans sink an ocean liner with Americans on board?”. House replied that America would be outraged and probably join the war. King George asked House, “Suppose they should sink The Lusitania with Americans on board...?”. This is the same King George who on 29th July 1914 led Kaiser Wilhelm II to believe that Great Britain would not become involved in any war on the continent.
Although this sordid episode did not immediately convince the American public that they should join the war, the sinking of The Lusitania gave the war party in America a great deal of support and momentum, and turned public opinion in their favour.
Since I wrote that in 2013 another damning piece of evidence has come to light: besides telling Kaiser Wilhelm II that Great Britain would not join in any war, King George, at the same time, was also ordering Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into the war.
So besides tricking Germany into invading Belgium, thus giving Sir Edward Grey the perfect opportunity to cite the 1839 Treaty of London which Great Britain did not need to enforce, King George V, the current Queen's Grandfather, also engineered the sinking of The Lusitania to get the USA into the war!!
SURPRISE! VICIOUS ISRAELI NAZI IS AWARDED POSITION OF JUSTICE MINISTER IN MURDERER NETANYAHU'S GOVERNMENT
What gender do you think the new Israeli Justice Minister is, who is quoted as saying:
And this:
And this:
And is described thus:
Well, unless she has exercised her new civil right of transgenderism and was originally a man but is now a woman, Ayelet Shaked is female.
Yes. A woman. But possessed by the same, if not more, evil spirit that possesses Benjamin Netanyahu.
The quest of Israel is one of lebensraum: to drive the Palestinians into the sea.
Lebensraum? Now where have I heard that word before...
They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.
And this:
Enough with the oblique references. This is a war. Words have meanings. This is a war. It is not a war against terror, and not a war against extremists, and not even a war against the Palestinian Authority. These too are forms of avoiding reality. This is a war between two people. Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people.
And this:
...They have to die and their houses should be demolished so that they cannot bear anymore terrorists...
And is described thus:
The demand to give Ayelet Shaked the Justice portfolio is like giving the Fire and Rescue Services to a pyromaniac.
Well, unless she has exercised her new civil right of transgenderism and was originally a man but is now a woman, Ayelet Shaked is female.
Yes. A woman. But possessed by the same, if not more, evil spirit that possesses Benjamin Netanyahu.
The quest of Israel is one of lebensraum: to drive the Palestinians into the sea.
Lebensraum? Now where have I heard that word before...
Israeli MP Accused of Inciting Palestinian Genocide Named Justice Minister > http://t.co/iTqK2gnenI #hatecrime pic.twitter.com/pOi2ww6sdH
— free falling upwards (@philipgeany) May 7, 2015THE UNIVERSE IS PLAYING A JOKE ON US TODAY
One of the political parties with candidates today is the United Kingdom Independence Party. They are known as UKIP, or U-KIP, or You-Kip, or You-Sleep.
Most of the voting population is still asleep as they sleepwalk to the voting booth and vote for Labour, LibDem or Conservative in England. In Scotland they will vote for SNP, in Wales for Plaid Cymru and in Northern Ireland for the DUP and Sinn Fein.
In other words, very little change.
We have just suffered 5 terrible years of a ConDem coalition that:
1. bombed the shit out of Libya and has supported unleashing cutthroat Jihadis in Syria and is using the threat of those Jihadis as a reason to spy on us;
2. supported the slaughter of 520 children in Gaza, leading to more joining Jihadi organisations;
3. imposed zero-hours contracts, massive welfare cuts and the Bedroom Tax to bail out fascist bankers.
Sadly, I think we will get the same again: 5 more diabolical years of a ConDem coalition.
Why?
Murdoch's press has scared the shit out of just enough voters over a possible Labour-SNP coalition that would threaten the unity of the United Kingdom.
But even if Labour did get a majority, what would we get? Well, his speech at Chatham House last week was terrifying: more war; more world government. Yes, zero-hours contracts could be made illegal but it is not guaranteed. But 'experts' say that whoever forms a government would have to impose satanic cuts in welfare in order to help us, the muggins British taxpayer, bail out the fascist bankers.
The main fact that has led to all the austerity that the politicians are falling over themselves in order to impose it on us in order to save the banks is that the banks have the power to create money. Earlier this year there was a 'debate' about the power to create money. It was the first debate on the subject for 170 years, lasted less than an hour and only about 20 MPs attended, one of whom was Zac Goldsmith, a Rothschild by marriage.
The only party looking to take this power to create money back into public hands is The Green Party.
But who did the revolutionary Russell Brand endorse? Ed 'I am a Zionist' Miliband who wants more war and more world government.
So in a way, what ever party anyone votes for they are voting for You-Sleep.
Most of the voting population is still asleep as they sleepwalk to the voting booth and vote for Labour, LibDem or Conservative in England. In Scotland they will vote for SNP, in Wales for Plaid Cymru and in Northern Ireland for the DUP and Sinn Fein.
In other words, very little change.
We have just suffered 5 terrible years of a ConDem coalition that:
1. bombed the shit out of Libya and has supported unleashing cutthroat Jihadis in Syria and is using the threat of those Jihadis as a reason to spy on us;
2. supported the slaughter of 520 children in Gaza, leading to more joining Jihadi organisations;
3. imposed zero-hours contracts, massive welfare cuts and the Bedroom Tax to bail out fascist bankers.
Sadly, I think we will get the same again: 5 more diabolical years of a ConDem coalition.
Why?
Murdoch's press has scared the shit out of just enough voters over a possible Labour-SNP coalition that would threaten the unity of the United Kingdom.
But even if Labour did get a majority, what would we get? Well, his speech at Chatham House last week was terrifying: more war; more world government. Yes, zero-hours contracts could be made illegal but it is not guaranteed. But 'experts' say that whoever forms a government would have to impose satanic cuts in welfare in order to help us, the muggins British taxpayer, bail out the fascist bankers.
The main fact that has led to all the austerity that the politicians are falling over themselves in order to impose it on us in order to save the banks is that the banks have the power to create money. Earlier this year there was a 'debate' about the power to create money. It was the first debate on the subject for 170 years, lasted less than an hour and only about 20 MPs attended, one of whom was Zac Goldsmith, a Rothschild by marriage.
The only party looking to take this power to create money back into public hands is The Green Party.
But who did the revolutionary Russell Brand endorse? Ed 'I am a Zionist' Miliband who wants more war and more world government.
So in a way, what ever party anyone votes for they are voting for You-Sleep.
THE WND DEAL OF THE DAY
Pam Geller was the driving force behind the 'contest' that led to 2 Islamic terrorists being shot at an exhibition centre in Garland, Texas as they were about to attack attendees to the contest. The 'contest' was who could draw the 'best' cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad. Similar previous events have provoked Islamic violence: in 2005 Jyllands-Posten published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad which led to massive riots in Denmark; Charlie Hebdo published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad which led to an attack on their office and a kidnapping in a supermarket in Paris and 2 police officers dead (and a subsequent Unity March in Paris that was awkwardly hijacked by Benjamin Netanyahu who was not invited to the march in the first place!!).
The significant thing about the Jyllands-Posten debacle is that the PM of Denmark at the time was Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who would become Secretary General of NATO.
Pam Geller writes for World Net Daily (WND).
WND's deal of the day is Geller's Stop the Islamization of America.
WND is a rabidly pro-Israel news/information website which encourages readers to visit the wonderful and free (but only if you are Jewish) land of Israel (murderers of over 520 children in Gaza last year who were murdered by an out-of-control IDF who had orders to kill anything that moved).
Geller does not write about the Covenant of Security that MI5 had/have with the Islamic extremists.
Nor does she write about A Clean Break.
Conclusions?
The significant thing about the Jyllands-Posten debacle is that the PM of Denmark at the time was Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who would become Secretary General of NATO.
Pam Geller writes for World Net Daily (WND).
WND's deal of the day is Geller's Stop the Islamization of America.
WND is a rabidly pro-Israel news/information website which encourages readers to visit the wonderful and free (but only if you are Jewish) land of Israel (murderers of over 520 children in Gaza last year who were murdered by an out-of-control IDF who had orders to kill anything that moved).
Geller does not write about the Covenant of Security that MI5 had/have with the Islamic extremists.
Nor does she write about A Clean Break.
Conclusions?
Wednesday, May 06, 2015
WHEN THE ELECTION IS OVER I SHALL PUBLISH EVIDENCE THAT HAGUE AND HAMMOND MAY HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH A ROGUE FACTION OF MI6
It is not worth posting this information in great detail while everyone is focused on the election results and their implications.
But I have evidence that William Hague and Phil Hammond have been working with a rogue faction of MI6 regarding Syria.
I recently asked the FCO through a FoI request for all information on:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh and the subsequent unleashing of the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria;
2. the claims of Roland Dumas who was asked by British officials to smuggle those very same Jihadis into Syria.
Apparently the FCO knows nothing about either of these.
Which is funny, because I told both Hague and Hammond about all this a long time ago!!!
I posted my letters to them on this blog.
Surely they would have passed my information onto MI6?
Unless MI6 refused to act on it?
But I have evidence that William Hague and Phil Hammond have been working with a rogue faction of MI6 regarding Syria.
I recently asked the FCO through a FoI request for all information on:
1. The Redirection reported by Seymour Hersh and the subsequent unleashing of the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria;
2. the claims of Roland Dumas who was asked by British officials to smuggle those very same Jihadis into Syria.
Apparently the FCO knows nothing about either of these.
Which is funny, because I told both Hague and Hammond about all this a long time ago!!!
I posted my letters to them on this blog.
Surely they would have passed my information onto MI6?
Unless MI6 refused to act on it?
A QUESTION FOR STUART J HOOPER
Stuart Hooper is fighting to represent the constituency of Basildon and East Thurrock, and has received the backing of the Tax Wall Street Party in the USA.
But to become a sitting MP you have to swear allegiance to the Crown, or some similar bullshit.
So, Stuart, are you prepared to swear allegiance to the Crown, or like members of Sinn Fein refuse to do so?
But to become a sitting MP you have to swear allegiance to the Crown, or some similar bullshit.
So, Stuart, are you prepared to swear allegiance to the Crown, or like members of Sinn Fein refuse to do so?
LATEST MH17 REPORT SAYS IT ALL
A 'leaked' report to be submitted to the MH17 JIT has been published by Novaya Gazeta. This is strange because Novaya Gazeta is pushed in NATO-land as anti-Kremlin because NATO blames the Kremlin for killing a number of Novaya Gazeta journalists because they were allegedly telling 'the truth' about corruption in Russia.
But this is a very interesting development. This does not rule out the involvement of a fighter jet. Remember, eight eyewitnesses have gone on camera, with their faces clear to see, to state that they saw a fighter jet close to MH17 when it was shot down. Contrast that with the alleged 'eyewitnesses' of Correctiv and Der Spiegel who said they saw a missile being fired, but did not give their name or allow their faces to be photographed, and similarly for the Das Erste report a week or two ago. And then there is Pytor Fedotov who was interviewed by Reuters. Reuters reported that Fedotov told them that he saw a missile fired from territory controlled by the Kiev Nazis but off camera told them that he actually saw a missile fired from separatist controlled territory but did not want to say so because he feared for his life. RT challenged this and Fedotov told RT that he never said anything off camera about missiles. RT has asked that Reuters show them the tape of their interview of Fedotov. Reuters has so far declined. This is significant because Eliot Higgins recently had a secret meeting with The Atlantic Council which has the head of Reuters on the board (see below).
As for the Kiev Nazis saying their air force was not active on 17th July 2014, if we are to believe the many tapes they have released of alleged intercepted phone calls between separatists, the separatists claim to have shot down a Kiev Nazi fighter jet on 17th July 2014. Unless that is yet another bogus tape, along with the tape they claimed proved 100% beyond doubt that separatists at Chernukino shot down MH17.
And as for different theories, each side has several different versions:
1. from the NATO-Kiev Nazi side we have that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile by
(a) Cossacks at Chernukino (Kiev Nazis);
(b) separatists from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne (Belling Cat, RTL and US State Dept);
(c) separatists from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne (Correctiv, Der Spiegel);
(d) separatists from an as yet unidentified field (Das Erste).
2. from the anti-NATO-Kiev Nazi side we have that MH17 was shot down by
(a) a fighter jet;
(b) a Ukraine Armed Forces BUK at Zaroshchenske.
But who can we trust?
The eight eyewitnesses who said they saw a fighter jet could be lying, but in their favour is that they went on camera with their faces clearly visible for the whole world to see, and the BBC pulled a report which contained 3 of those witnesses stating their claim on camera.
The eyewitnesses of Correctiv/Der Spiegel could be lying, and against them is that they would not allow their faces to be filmed.
The Kiev Nazis have lied because of that tape they released blaming Cossacks at Chernukino.
Correctiv and Der Spiegel could be lying because their witnesses and report contradicts Belling Cat/RTL/US State Dept.
Belling Cat/RTL/US State Dept could be lying because they contradict Correctiv and Der Spiegel, and the US State Dept will not release their data only a schoolboy image of a few coloured lines.
Das Erste could be lying because their witnesses could not be identified and nor could the field they suggest was the launch site.
Russia has lied because of their claim about the car advert at their 21st July press conference.
But what has happened is that Belling Cat, with their reports accusing Russia, that somehow the NSA, CIA, NATO military intelligence etc. could not produce, have been used to attack Russia.
And over the last few months it has come out that Belling Cat are involved in projects, or have had clandestine meetings, with the following shady organisations:
1. Google (NSA/CIA);
2. USAID (CIA);
3. Open Society (Soros);
4. Atlantic Council (CIA/Necon/Bilderberg/warmongers).
On the other hand, I have not. I have tried to remain neutral and not jump to conclusions, questioning everything because I am aware of the geopolitical situation and what the forces behind NATO are like (and a clue is that there is a massive kiddie-fiddling/murder scandal in the UK but not in Russia).
And in addition the whole 'official' investigation has been corrupt from the start.
1. The Netherlands is running the investigation. The Netherlands was one of the five founding members of NATO. NATO wants Ukraine as a member, and after the recent violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine, Ukraine is taking steps towards joining NATO. In other words, the investigating country is not neutral and has a massive motive in promoting one particular outcome, that Russia did it;
2. there was a secret agreement that would keep particular findings secret if one of the conspiring countries vetoed that information;
3. some Dutch families have called the investigation "completely botched" and asked that the investigation be handed over to a neutral international investigation team, a request that the Dutch PM denied;
4. some members of the MH17 JIT have complained that the Dutch intelligence services are obstructing their investigation and influencing the outcome of the investigation.
And now there is evidence that one of the investigating countries, Ukraine, could have shot down MH17 with a BUK. This does not rule out a fighter jet either being involved or at least present, possibly to be used to trick separatists into thinking MH17 was a military plane through spoofing radar, or pretending to be escorting MH17 and thus tricking separatists into thinking MH17 was a military plane that way.
Whether you believe this latest evidence or not, it is yet just another theory that needs to be questioned.
Where are the vapour trails?
Did anyone nearby see or hear the launch?
Where were Ukraine's BUKs on 17th July 2014?
What Belling Cat either refuse to see or cannot see is that there has just been a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine. The neo-Nazis have stated that they provoked the violence in Kiev by shooting both protestors and police from The Conservatory. The neo-Nazis then burned alive 50 anti-Kiev Nazi protestors in Odessa. NATO wants Ukraine as a member, and under their man Yats, Ukraine is taking steps to join NATO. And what could be more obvious than a former senior member of the US Embassy in Kiev, and a former manager of USAID (CIA) funds, becoming minister of finance whose first act was to sell Ukraine to Monsanto!!!
Why is NATO doing this?
Because NATO wants to plonk first strike nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow.
But d'ya know what? Perhaps Russia deserves it?
I mean, Russia invaded Iraq killing approaching a million over a period of 2 decades, bombed Libya and has unleashed the most barbaric international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria.
Yeah!
Russia definitely wants war!!
But this is a very interesting development. This does not rule out the involvement of a fighter jet. Remember, eight eyewitnesses have gone on camera, with their faces clear to see, to state that they saw a fighter jet close to MH17 when it was shot down. Contrast that with the alleged 'eyewitnesses' of Correctiv and Der Spiegel who said they saw a missile being fired, but did not give their name or allow their faces to be photographed, and similarly for the Das Erste report a week or two ago. And then there is Pytor Fedotov who was interviewed by Reuters. Reuters reported that Fedotov told them that he saw a missile fired from territory controlled by the Kiev Nazis but off camera told them that he actually saw a missile fired from separatist controlled territory but did not want to say so because he feared for his life. RT challenged this and Fedotov told RT that he never said anything off camera about missiles. RT has asked that Reuters show them the tape of their interview of Fedotov. Reuters has so far declined. This is significant because Eliot Higgins recently had a secret meeting with The Atlantic Council which has the head of Reuters on the board (see below).
As for the Kiev Nazis saying their air force was not active on 17th July 2014, if we are to believe the many tapes they have released of alleged intercepted phone calls between separatists, the separatists claim to have shot down a Kiev Nazi fighter jet on 17th July 2014. Unless that is yet another bogus tape, along with the tape they claimed proved 100% beyond doubt that separatists at Chernukino shot down MH17.
And as for different theories, each side has several different versions:
1. from the NATO-Kiev Nazi side we have that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile by
(a) Cossacks at Chernukino (Kiev Nazis);
(b) separatists from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne (Belling Cat, RTL and US State Dept);
(c) separatists from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne (Correctiv, Der Spiegel);
(d) separatists from an as yet unidentified field (Das Erste).
2. from the anti-NATO-Kiev Nazi side we have that MH17 was shot down by
(a) a fighter jet;
(b) a Ukraine Armed Forces BUK at Zaroshchenske.
But who can we trust?
The eight eyewitnesses who said they saw a fighter jet could be lying, but in their favour is that they went on camera with their faces clearly visible for the whole world to see, and the BBC pulled a report which contained 3 of those witnesses stating their claim on camera.
The eyewitnesses of Correctiv/Der Spiegel could be lying, and against them is that they would not allow their faces to be filmed.
The Kiev Nazis have lied because of that tape they released blaming Cossacks at Chernukino.
Correctiv and Der Spiegel could be lying because their witnesses and report contradicts Belling Cat/RTL/US State Dept.
Belling Cat/RTL/US State Dept could be lying because they contradict Correctiv and Der Spiegel, and the US State Dept will not release their data only a schoolboy image of a few coloured lines.
Das Erste could be lying because their witnesses could not be identified and nor could the field they suggest was the launch site.
Russia has lied because of their claim about the car advert at their 21st July press conference.
But what has happened is that Belling Cat, with their reports accusing Russia, that somehow the NSA, CIA, NATO military intelligence etc. could not produce, have been used to attack Russia.
And over the last few months it has come out that Belling Cat are involved in projects, or have had clandestine meetings, with the following shady organisations:
1. Google (NSA/CIA);
2. USAID (CIA);
3. Open Society (Soros);
4. Atlantic Council (CIA/Necon/Bilderberg/warmongers).
On the other hand, I have not. I have tried to remain neutral and not jump to conclusions, questioning everything because I am aware of the geopolitical situation and what the forces behind NATO are like (and a clue is that there is a massive kiddie-fiddling/murder scandal in the UK but not in Russia).
And in addition the whole 'official' investigation has been corrupt from the start.
1. The Netherlands is running the investigation. The Netherlands was one of the five founding members of NATO. NATO wants Ukraine as a member, and after the recent violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine, Ukraine is taking steps towards joining NATO. In other words, the investigating country is not neutral and has a massive motive in promoting one particular outcome, that Russia did it;
2. there was a secret agreement that would keep particular findings secret if one of the conspiring countries vetoed that information;
3. some Dutch families have called the investigation "completely botched" and asked that the investigation be handed over to a neutral international investigation team, a request that the Dutch PM denied;
4. some members of the MH17 JIT have complained that the Dutch intelligence services are obstructing their investigation and influencing the outcome of the investigation.
And now there is evidence that one of the investigating countries, Ukraine, could have shot down MH17 with a BUK. This does not rule out a fighter jet either being involved or at least present, possibly to be used to trick separatists into thinking MH17 was a military plane through spoofing radar, or pretending to be escorting MH17 and thus tricking separatists into thinking MH17 was a military plane that way.
Whether you believe this latest evidence or not, it is yet just another theory that needs to be questioned.
Where are the vapour trails?
Did anyone nearby see or hear the launch?
Where were Ukraine's BUKs on 17th July 2014?
What Belling Cat either refuse to see or cannot see is that there has just been a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine. The neo-Nazis have stated that they provoked the violence in Kiev by shooting both protestors and police from The Conservatory. The neo-Nazis then burned alive 50 anti-Kiev Nazi protestors in Odessa. NATO wants Ukraine as a member, and under their man Yats, Ukraine is taking steps to join NATO. And what could be more obvious than a former senior member of the US Embassy in Kiev, and a former manager of USAID (CIA) funds, becoming minister of finance whose first act was to sell Ukraine to Monsanto!!!
Why is NATO doing this?
Because NATO wants to plonk first strike nuclear missiles aimed at Moscow.
But d'ya know what? Perhaps Russia deserves it?
I mean, Russia invaded Iraq killing approaching a million over a period of 2 decades, bombed Libya and has unleashed the most barbaric international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria.
Yeah!
Russia definitely wants war!!
Tuesday, May 05, 2015
LATEST OCCRP REPORT SAYS IT ALL
Everyone's favourite CIA-Soros-linked agent, E Higgins Esq, has retweeted this:
At the bottom of the report you can find this statement:
Google is CIA/NSA.
USAID (sponsor of OCCRP) is CIA.
Open Society Foundation is Soros.
In addition, Higgins still has not revealed what happened at the warmongering CIA-Neocon Atlantic Council love-in a few months ago.
'Nuff sed (damn, I wish Id not truanted engerlisH lessons)
Higgins and Belling Cat are climbing into bed with some really, really and easily identified nasty pieces of work.
OCCRP's Annual Report 2014 - now out! - http://t.co/6xuPxS0MvZ
— OCCRP (@OCCRP) May 5, 2015At the bottom of the report you can find this statement:
OCCRP partnered with Google Ideas to host nearly 100 journalists, researchers, programmers and more for its first all-day "Investigathon" in London in July 2014, followed by another in New York in November. The Investigathons have continued thanks to Bellingcat and the Open Society Foundations
Our heartfelt appreciation goes out to all the donors, supporters and partners who make our work possible. We couldn't do it without you!
Google is CIA/NSA.
USAID (sponsor of OCCRP) is CIA.
Open Society Foundation is Soros.
In addition, Higgins still has not revealed what happened at the warmongering CIA-Neocon Atlantic Council love-in a few months ago.
'Nuff sed (damn, I wish Id not truanted engerlisH lessons)
Higgins and Belling Cat are climbing into bed with some really, really and easily identified nasty pieces of work.
BUY ONE WAR GET ONE FREE
That's how our politicians whore themselves to the war machine: Cameron, Miliband, Clegg. Even Farage would fall for this economics of the market place. There is something wrong when Labour claims to be the party of business and the Tories claim to be the party of the NHS.
In the end, NHS, education, welfare, etc are just crumbs from the table when the power to create money and engineer wars rests in the hands of the Establishment.
In the end, NHS, education, welfare, etc are just crumbs from the table when the power to create money and engineer wars rests in the hands of the Establishment.
DID I DO SOMETHING WRONG?
Last year, in January, I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall in Great Queen Street, London on 28th June. I turned up. I waited, and walked around for hours, having had a total of 7 hours sleep in the 3 nights previous due to being zapped. You should try being zapped. It does wonders for you.
So did I do something wrong by:
1. proposing the protest in the first place?
2. actually turning up while nobody else did, so I was left standing alone, pissing into the wind, completely fucking knackered?
CHEERS!!
So did I do something wrong by:
1. proposing the protest in the first place?
2. actually turning up while nobody else did, so I was left standing alone, pissing into the wind, completely fucking knackered?
CHEERS!!
THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT SAID IT WOULDN'T RAIN TODAY WHERE I LIVE
But it did rain.
So don't vote for the British Government.
THEY LIE!!
So don't vote for the British Government.
THEY LIE!!
THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON EDUCATION
Education. Education. Education.
Parents send their children to school for an 'education'.
But that 'education' is simply to raise good citizens for the system to manipulate.
When I was growing up I was top of the year throughout junior school, and also in the first year of secondary school. But then in my 2nd year of secondary school, probably due to puberty, I started to rebel a bit. That rebellion grew so much so that in my final year of secondary school I was regularly truanting nearly half the subjects I was being taught, which were english, computer studies, history, french, but the teachers didn't seem to care. At the time I just thought they (subjects and teachers) were boring and irrelevant. I was interested in maths, physics and english literature (I wrote poetry about a girl I was in love with at the time).
So what has happened since then?
I have gone onto to gain a PhD in maths/computer science/physics as well as several Masters degrees, and am now researching a fascinating topic that brings all these together.
But what of the other subjects I used to truant?
Well, is or isn't it weird that two are combined in this blog: english and history.
And it is the history bit that is the most curious. I thought history was boring. We were taught stuff like the castles of North Wales, the Cultural Revolution of Mao Tse Tung, and Richard III and the Princes in the Tower. To a working class boy/young man, with girls and football and weekend cider on his mind, the possible murder of two young royal boys centuries ago, or the growth of communism in a country half the way around the world are not going to be inspiring.
But looking back now, what would have really inspired me to study history at school, and possibly to have studied it and gained a PhD in history rather than in maths, would have been if we had been taught the true causes of world war, or basically everything I write about here.
So the thought for t'day is this: are children so difficult to educate because they know deep inside that what we are teaching them is absolute bollocks?
Parents send their children to school for an 'education'.
But that 'education' is simply to raise good citizens for the system to manipulate.
When I was growing up I was top of the year throughout junior school, and also in the first year of secondary school. But then in my 2nd year of secondary school, probably due to puberty, I started to rebel a bit. That rebellion grew so much so that in my final year of secondary school I was regularly truanting nearly half the subjects I was being taught, which were english, computer studies, history, french, but the teachers didn't seem to care. At the time I just thought they (subjects and teachers) were boring and irrelevant. I was interested in maths, physics and english literature (I wrote poetry about a girl I was in love with at the time).
So what has happened since then?
I have gone onto to gain a PhD in maths/computer science/physics as well as several Masters degrees, and am now researching a fascinating topic that brings all these together.
But what of the other subjects I used to truant?
Well, is or isn't it weird that two are combined in this blog: english and history.
And it is the history bit that is the most curious. I thought history was boring. We were taught stuff like the castles of North Wales, the Cultural Revolution of Mao Tse Tung, and Richard III and the Princes in the Tower. To a working class boy/young man, with girls and football and weekend cider on his mind, the possible murder of two young royal boys centuries ago, or the growth of communism in a country half the way around the world are not going to be inspiring.
But looking back now, what would have really inspired me to study history at school, and possibly to have studied it and gained a PhD in history rather than in maths, would have been if we had been taught the true causes of world war, or basically everything I write about here.
So the thought for t'day is this: are children so difficult to educate because they know deep inside that what we are teaching them is absolute bollocks?
THEY WERE BURIED OVER THERE
Oh What a Lovely War does a good job in not directly blaming Germany, and in particular Kaiser Wilhelm II, for World War One, but is, like Stop The War Coalition, a bit of a gatekeeper, which is why we are still having all these horrid, horrid wars that Stop The Coalition protest about.
You should all by now know that the British monarchy and their mafia, Freemasonry, engineered and executed WW1 to create a world government as the ultimate British Empire.
But by 1916 Great Britain was in trouble, and despite its huge resource base, natural and human, was losing the war and was struggling to raise finance. Most men in the USA did not want to fight in WW1, but after several years of propaganda following the outrageous decision to allow The Lusitania to be sunk by a German U-boat, in April 1917 the USA decided to join the war.
George Cohan wrote a propaganda song, Over There, which as most war propaganda does, called on men to make their families proud of fighting for the red, white and blue.
Oh What a Lovely War changes the lyrics of the chorus slightly. The last line in the original chorus is
In Oh What a Lovely War the last line of the chorus is
From Oh What a Lovely War - Over There
But that song also foretold Anglo-American-Zionist-NATO imperialism.
You should all by now know that the British monarchy and their mafia, Freemasonry, engineered and executed WW1 to create a world government as the ultimate British Empire.
But by 1916 Great Britain was in trouble, and despite its huge resource base, natural and human, was losing the war and was struggling to raise finance. Most men in the USA did not want to fight in WW1, but after several years of propaganda following the outrageous decision to allow The Lusitania to be sunk by a German U-boat, in April 1917 the USA decided to join the war.
George Cohan wrote a propaganda song, Over There, which as most war propaganda does, called on men to make their families proud of fighting for the red, white and blue.
Oh What a Lovely War changes the lyrics of the chorus slightly. The last line in the original chorus is
And we won't come back till it's over, over there.
In Oh What a Lovely War the last line of the chorus is
And we won't come back. We'll be buried over there.
From Oh What a Lovely War - Over There
But that song also foretold Anglo-American-Zionist-NATO imperialism.
HIGGINS ON DEBKAFILE ON GHOUTA
Eliot Higgins has tweeted this:
Debka File is a Mossad operation.
So what did they say about Ghouta in August 2013?
In ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE ASSET DEBKAFILE CLAIMS TO KNOW WHO FIRED THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS I commented on a Debkafile report which stated that:
Debka File is the Globalresearch of conflict analysis.
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) May 5, 2015Debka File is a Mossad operation.
So what did they say about Ghouta in August 2013?
In ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE ASSET DEBKAFILE CLAIMS TO KNOW WHO FIRED THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS I commented on a Debkafile report which stated that:
The Israeli intelligence asset Debkafile is reporting that they have the facts about the alleged chemical weapons attack on Wednesday. They say:
1. shells loaded with poison gas were fired by the 155th Brigade of the Syrian Arab Army’s 4th Division which is headed by President Bashar Asad’s younger brother General Maher Assad.
2. the shells were fired from the Mount Kalmun army base south of Damascus
3. these shells can only be loaded and fired with the permission of Maher and his brother President Bashar.
4. the attack was coordinated with Hezbollah and Iran, with four rockets fired into Israel (even though the two events were nearly 48 hours apart!)
Monday, May 04, 2015
CHARLOTTE ELIZABETH DIANA
What does the choice and sequence of names of the latest undeserving parasite tell us?
We all know Diana was murdered. It took theSaxe-Coburg-Gothas Windsors one full week before lowering their flags to half-mast. They claimed it was protocol. But she was the mother of the Queen's grandchildren!! Contrast that with their high-on-amphetamines speed in lowering flags to half-mast when the king of head-chopping, terrorist-financing Saudi Arabia died a few months ago. Christ, the flag was down before he was even cold!!
And there was something not quite right about the speed with which Kate appeared in full glow just hours after giving birth.
That Diana is the 3rd name suggests to me that Wills and Kate have placed their allegiance with Charles and Liz, despite Diana writing a letter held by Paul Burrell in which she prophesised that Charles would kill her through a car crash.
The full text of the letter is:
We all know Diana was murdered. It took the
And there was something not quite right about the speed with which Kate appeared in full glow just hours after giving birth.
That Diana is the 3rd name suggests to me that Wills and Kate have placed their allegiance with Charles and Liz, despite Diana writing a letter held by Paul Burrell in which she prophesised that Charles would kill her through a car crash.
The full text of the letter is:
I am sitting here at my desk today in October, longing for someone to hug me & encourage me to keep strong & hold my head high — this particular phase in my life is the most dangerous — my husband is planning "an accident" in my car. brake failure & serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing but a decoy, so we are all being used by the man in every sense of the word.
I have been battered, bruised and abused mentally by a system for 15 years now, but I feel no resentment, I carry no hatred. I am weary of the battles, but I will never surrender. I am strong inside and maybe that is a problem for my enemies.
Thank you Charles, for putting me through such hell and for giving me the opportunity to learn from the cruel things you have done to me. I have gone forward fast and have cried more than anyone will ever know. The anguish nearly killed me, but my inner strength has never let me down, and my guides have taken such good care of me up there. Aren't I fortunate to have had their wings to protect me.
LOOK OUT FOR THE UKRAINE AIR FORCE INSIGNIA
The plane in this is a Ukraine Air Force fighter not MH17. You can see the blue and yellow insignia.
Be wary of the source.
Be wary of the source.
Russian trolls are desperate now. Latest claim on #MH17 is debunked in 12 seconds. http://t.co/3RWih15NoL pic.twitter.com/MHxUvUsCGW
— Marcel van den Berg☁ (@marcelvandenber) May 3, 2015DID YOU HONESTLY THINK IT WAS THE END?
I tried being a porn star for the weekend, but it didn't work out, so I'm thinking that maybe TTS is in my DNA?
Anyway, there's no way I would pack TTS in for a bunch of arrogant, ignorant, reptilian, nymphomaniac teachers!
I just hope that over the weekend (while I was NOT, repeat NOT, trying to be a porn star - that was a joke) that they had a good think about how they treat people trying to help them, how they approach that weirdo in the corner of the classroom, and henceforth what they are going to do to save their families from what is coming: a global fascist dictatorship over a vastly reduced and dumbed down, both nutritionally and educationally, population policed by autonomous killer robots.
I have decided to soon release for free updated versions of those reports I sent to 'that' teacher. I haven't decided how yet.
But I am doing that simply because, due to the arrogant and disrespectful manner in which I requested that she and her mates destroy those reports, a request that was ignored, I cannot trust her, her friends and her family. Everyone else I sent those reports to I can trust because they have not ostracised me. She did and still does ostracise me. And after what I said in THE END she will forever. Two years of silence says a fucking lot, doesn't it? But I'm not having anyone make any personal gain from what I sent her in good faith.
But do you know what?
FUCK THE WARMONGERING, KIDDIE-FIDDLING NEW WORLD ORDER!!
Anyway, there's no way I would pack TTS in for a bunch of arrogant, ignorant, reptilian, nymphomaniac teachers!
I just hope that over the weekend (while I was NOT, repeat NOT, trying to be a porn star - that was a joke) that they had a good think about how they treat people trying to help them, how they approach that weirdo in the corner of the classroom, and henceforth what they are going to do to save their families from what is coming: a global fascist dictatorship over a vastly reduced and dumbed down, both nutritionally and educationally, population policed by autonomous killer robots.
I have decided to soon release for free updated versions of those reports I sent to 'that' teacher. I haven't decided how yet.
But I am doing that simply because, due to the arrogant and disrespectful manner in which I requested that she and her mates destroy those reports, a request that was ignored, I cannot trust her, her friends and her family. Everyone else I sent those reports to I can trust because they have not ostracised me. She did and still does ostracise me. And after what I said in THE END she will forever. Two years of silence says a fucking lot, doesn't it? But I'm not having anyone make any personal gain from what I sent her in good faith.
But do you know what?
FUCK THE WARMONGERING, KIDDIE-FIDDLING NEW WORLD ORDER!!
Friday, May 01, 2015
THE END
This is the last post on The Truth Serum.
Why?
Ask a teacher.
Five years ago I was expecting to be involved in a court case, but it didn't happen for reasons unknown to me (but I have my suspicions), and it still hasn't.
But just over 2 years ago I met someone who I thought (a) had the perfect experience to help me in that case, and (b) would want to help me.
Did you ever stop to think that the two were related?
But knowing the vast difference in knowledge between us of how this world really works, I began to tell her gradually over a period of a few months. I honestly thought we were friends. Not best friends obviously, or Christmas card list friends, but friends. But then she unexpectedly and disappointingly ostracised me. I tried contacting over the summer of 2013. But still nothing. I sent her some more detailed reports in August 2013. And still nothing. After a few months, after giving her time to digest the reports, in January 2014 I told her I wrote TTS and asked, fully expecting her to agree, if she wanted to help. After all, she had 3 kids of her own. But still nothing.
Throughout 2014, despite lots of emails asking her to look deep inside to realise how she could help: nothing.
And when Islamic State sawed the heads of those Syrian military officers I became enraged, so because the Mr Nice Guy approach hadn't worked, I decided to change tactics, to shake her out of her apathy. But still nothing.
And now it is May 2015, 2 years since I last heard from her: and still - nothing. Not even a "thanks".
But the thing is this: she is not alone. She has family, and friends, and work colleagues. So why haven't they been able to persuade her to offer to help? She may well have passed those reports on to them. Have they tried to persuade her?
Because of her reluctance to reply at all, I assumed she didn't want to help, so I asked that those reports be returned and destroyed, because she had shown that she could not be trusted and I didn't want all that work in her untrustworthy hands that she could use for her own benefit. I didn't receive one return, thus showing a complete lack of respect towards me and reinforcing my lack of trust in, and everything else I had told her about my suspicion of, human relationships.
And 2 months ago I asked her to give me one good reason why should I walk around with a massive target on my back while they do nothing except enjoy their lives.
Have I heard anything back? Nope.
So I am obviously not good enough for the likes of her, her family and friends.
So d'you know what?
FUCK 'EM!!
I don't think I could trust her legal advice anyway now. Not after all this.
So if you lot want a safer world for your children and grandchildren then you can do it yourselves. I've gone through all sorts of shit over the last 2 decades, including gang-stalking and EM harassment. And for what? So I can also be treated like a piece of shit by the very people I'm trying to help?
FUCK THAT!!
And I still demand that those reports be destroyed.
Maybe this will shake you ungrateful, apathetic, nymphomaniac lot from your middle class dreamy dream, to get off your obsequious arses and actually do something to save the families you produced from shagging and not rely on others who you treat like shit to do it for you.
All I have been trying to do is to help you lot, but all I got was to be treated like a leper covered in shit.
FUCK THAT SHIT!!
Why?
Ask a teacher.
Five years ago I was expecting to be involved in a court case, but it didn't happen for reasons unknown to me (but I have my suspicions), and it still hasn't.
But just over 2 years ago I met someone who I thought (a) had the perfect experience to help me in that case, and (b) would want to help me.
Did you ever stop to think that the two were related?
But knowing the vast difference in knowledge between us of how this world really works, I began to tell her gradually over a period of a few months. I honestly thought we were friends. Not best friends obviously, or Christmas card list friends, but friends. But then she unexpectedly and disappointingly ostracised me. I tried contacting over the summer of 2013. But still nothing. I sent her some more detailed reports in August 2013. And still nothing. After a few months, after giving her time to digest the reports, in January 2014 I told her I wrote TTS and asked, fully expecting her to agree, if she wanted to help. After all, she had 3 kids of her own. But still nothing.
Throughout 2014, despite lots of emails asking her to look deep inside to realise how she could help: nothing.
And when Islamic State sawed the heads of those Syrian military officers I became enraged, so because the Mr Nice Guy approach hadn't worked, I decided to change tactics, to shake her out of her apathy. But still nothing.
And now it is May 2015, 2 years since I last heard from her: and still - nothing. Not even a "thanks".
But the thing is this: she is not alone. She has family, and friends, and work colleagues. So why haven't they been able to persuade her to offer to help? She may well have passed those reports on to them. Have they tried to persuade her?
Because of her reluctance to reply at all, I assumed she didn't want to help, so I asked that those reports be returned and destroyed, because she had shown that she could not be trusted and I didn't want all that work in her untrustworthy hands that she could use for her own benefit. I didn't receive one return, thus showing a complete lack of respect towards me and reinforcing my lack of trust in, and everything else I had told her about my suspicion of, human relationships.
And 2 months ago I asked her to give me one good reason why should I walk around with a massive target on my back while they do nothing except enjoy their lives.
Have I heard anything back? Nope.
So I am obviously not good enough for the likes of her, her family and friends.
So d'you know what?
FUCK 'EM!!
I don't think I could trust her legal advice anyway now. Not after all this.
So if you lot want a safer world for your children and grandchildren then you can do it yourselves. I've gone through all sorts of shit over the last 2 decades, including gang-stalking and EM harassment. And for what? So I can also be treated like a piece of shit by the very people I'm trying to help?
FUCK THAT!!
And I still demand that those reports be destroyed.
Maybe this will shake you ungrateful, apathetic, nymphomaniac lot from your middle class dreamy dream, to get off your obsequious arses and actually do something to save the families you produced from shagging and not rely on others who you treat like shit to do it for you.
All I have been trying to do is to help you lot, but all I got was to be treated like a leper covered in shit.
FUCK THAT SHIT!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)