I can see clearly now Copenhagen's gone
I can see all obstacles in my way
Gone are the darkest clouds that had me blind
It's gonna be a bright {bright} bright sunshiny 2010
======================
After years of terror and lies, involving government offices and research centres and even friends of the blatant racist and genocidalist Prince Philip, all they could come up with was 2.5 pages of words.
Not legally binding, ineffective words.
It is very very revealing that after all the hot air about AGW, the power brokers found it most important to create this Copenhagen Climate Fund, that is expected to be handled by The World Bank which is run by...oh look, A FUCKING BILDERBERGER, CFR, PNAC warmonger Robert Zoellick!
No to setting targets to keep temperature increase below 1 degree celsius by slashing CO2 emissions.
Yes to handing hundreds of billions of dollars to a CFR PNAC warmongering Bilderberger who will then decide how it is dished out (if at all if we are to believe rumours about the WB). Getting money out of Washington-based organisations is bloody difficult, unless you're the bloody military-industrial complex, or a Bilderberg bank.
That this proposition to 'entrust' The World Bank with a hundred billion dollars annually is being 'enforced' against the wishes of the poor underdeveloped nations who are alleged to be affected most by AGW says alot; that the developed nations do not give a rats fart about those nations.
It's all about world government.
The developed nations know AGW is bollocks. All they wanted was some sort of framework for Bilderberg world government...and they nearly got it.
They still might, if they get down on their knees and grovel.
And I'll tell you another thing that says volumes. Russia has laid its cards on the table and apparently not agreed to this push to world government.
2 comments:
well said. I couldn't have put it better myself.
You might want to cast your eye over another major issue - namely in our courts, catalysed by the powerful teacher called 'bitter experience'...
Dear Freedom-fighter
Please take note of this pathetic letter sent from a "case worker" today at HMCS - it is all over my bringing to their attention that the BASICS of Law are not even being upheld by the judges who are allowing FALSE AND FRAUDULENT POSSESSION CLAIMS through their nets, awarded the status of a "case number" ! why should any of us respect these mindless, conniving, manipulators, who for the most part, don't even appear to have the backing of even a basic education that enables them to comprehend plain English, let alone to string a proper sentence together ! The standard of "service" within HMCS is down the toilet, and none of them want you or I to do a thing to change it ! Her Majesty needs to urgently overhaul her namesake Court service, and commence a Royal Enquiry in to the despicable practices within her Court service, which do NOT serve her subjects !
They have their mechanisms at the ready to ring-fence themselves from Reality and the Real World that the rest of us have to cope with, and rely on hiding behind 'asleep at the wheel' judges who are considered "above the Law". Their entourage of clerks are all rendered and trained to be 'deaf dumb and blind' to cries for help from those that use their dis-services, and are dissallowed to pass even an opinion, let alone any comment that may get construed as "giving legal advice" ! what a mess it is. We no longer have human beings to deal with or our valid queries, no longer can we have the luxury of engaging with sentient people who have hearts, feelings and emotions, but rather the dumbed-down version of the politically correct bullshit that is the product of Gordon brown-nose and his merry men/hangers on who 100% back and support the banksters fleecing the People of Britain today.
They all argue, like parrots, that they have "no executive power in the judicial process". No one is allowed to "comment" on Judges nor their conduct, no matter WHAT they do ! How bad is that ? They say "The Judiciary are independent. Judges are free to make their decisions" (and mistakes). We say "The Judiciary are owned by the Banksters, and are laundering billions of dirty money through our Courts. Judges are free to engage in corrupt practices such as accepting 'financial bribes by the bagful' and are untouchable ! METHINKS THE JUDICIAL PROCESS SUCKS
Note their euphemistic expression, which is wholly misleading: "Judges must be free to make their decisions based on the evidence before them and the current law."
This is something they misleadingly call 'JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE" !!!! What it REALLY should be called is "Unconstitutional judicial immunity" - what a cop out. By that token, mugging and thieving must be "POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE" ! Now is THAT why our MP's have made free with the Public purse ? They think they are all above common-sense practices and do not know the distinction between 'right and wrong'. Their speciality is to send everyone 'round the houses' like hamsters on a wheel, going through their mindless "complaints procedures" which all lead to the same place: a hiding to nowhere. Why should we give credence to Her Majesty's Court service, if they can't get their stupid act together at even the most basic level ? comments, anyone ?
liz
here is the letter that inadvertently was omitted from the previous posting:
Dear Mrs XXX
Thank you for your emails of 1 and 17 December. I also note that yesterday you had telephone conversations with Dinesh Bhatt and Noel Phillips concerning proceedings at Bournemouth County Court.
In your email to Noel Phillips you ask five questions about your case. These matters are for the judiciary to decide upon when dealing with the case. It may help if I explain that Her MajestyБ─≥s Courts Service (HMCS) provides the administrative support to the judiciary and have no executive power in the judicial process. Court staff are not legally trained and must remain strictly neutral at all times. They cannot therefore examine documents and give any opinion on their validity. It is the responsibility of the parties to ensure that they file the correct documents in the correct format. If there is a dispute as to the validity of any documents, it for the judiciary to decide.
Mr Sweeney has already explained to you that neither Ministers nor Administrators can comment on judicial decisions. This is not out of lack of concern but because for them to do so would breach the principle that the judiciary are independent. Judges must be free to make their decisions based on the evidence before them and the current law. Where a person is dissatisfied with a decision, the test of its integrity lies in an appeal to a higher level of judge. I suggest that you seek independent legal advice as to your options.
Mr Bhatt explained yesterday that this office has no jurisdiction to investigate complaint against personal conduct of Mr Sweeney; if you wish to pursue this matter further then you should write to the office of David Gentry whose details you have.
With regards to your request to see the court files you will need to pursue this with the relevant court.
Turning to your concerns about the maladministration by the court staff you will need to put these matters in writing to the Area Director's Office as explained by Mr Sweeney.
Yours sincerely,
Russell Meek
Russell Meek
Case Worker
Customer Service Unit
Post a Comment