Another suggestion has been made to bend the terms of UN SCR 1973. As soon as the first missiles were fired over last weekend the British rapidly pushed for regime change, and even assassination.
But it is now being proposed that a provisional council for Libya be recognised by the UN which could then be armed to kick out Gaddafi.
This really is an astonishing proposal, and proves the true aim of the military actions on Libya and UN SCR 1973, which should now be anulled and replaced by a much better worded resolution, and one that does not violate the UN charter itself.
============================
From http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8401856/Libya-arming-rebellion-would-turn-tide.html
Libya: arming rebellion 'would turn tide'
The Libyan rebel movement could legally be supplied with weapons from abroad in a move that would rapidly bring the conflict to an end, defence experts have said.
By Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent 11:51PM GMT 23 Mar 2011
The United Nations resolution that was made before that governing the no-fly zone prevented Col Muammar Gaddafi's government from obtaining arms but analysts say that it would still be possible to arm a provisional rebel government.
There are growing doubts that the rebels will be able to prevail over Col Gaddafi's forces without outside intervention, and there are worries too that a costly and dangerous stalemate will follow a lack of decisive military action.
Brig Ben Barry, of the International Institute of Strategic Studies, said however that if a provisional council was recognised by the United Nations, it would be able to accept arms, and could quickly overthrow Gaddafi loyalists or persuade the Libyan ruler's inner circle to oust him.
"If this went on for months and months then equipping the rebels would make a difference. The UN arms embargo only proscribes the current Libyan government so if another state recognised a provisional council as the new government it could then agree to requests for assistance including weapons and other military supplies.
"If significant parts of the Libyan military capability were destroyed it could change the minds of those within the regime who might then view Gaddafi as more part of the problem rather than the solution."
Lt Col Richard Williams, the former SAS commander, said that the first thing the rebels needed was a political leader "who can offer to pro-Gaddafi people something that will not terrify them".
Prof Malcolm Chalmers of the Royal United Services Institute, said: "If we get into a stalemate over the coming months then I think arms supply would make a real difference. Rebels will be better organised to provide a sustained and sufficient back bone."
However British defence chiefs admit they are struggling to understand the rebel groups. "We are trying to understand what they want and what they are doing," said a military planner in the Ministry of Defence. "There's no cohesion and there are factions from Benghazi to Misurata and those in Benghazi are not necessarily the right people to talk to. I think stalemate is distinct possibility."
© Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
REARRANGING THE DECKCHAIRS ON THE TITAN-OIK
He tried, didn't he?
Significantly reducing corporation tax to attract businesses, and agreeing a package called Project Merlin (the Merlin referring to the magic of the banks creating non-existent money out of nothing) with the banks to increase lending sounds like a plan to stimulate the private sector.
I actually feel sorry him.
But I don't think he understands the global forces running the show.
He doesn't understand that economies across the globe are being deliberately trashed.
He doesn't understand that nation states are being looted and destroyed before a third world war will be detonated so that the looters can disappear in a thick fog of smoke with the loot, like in a cheezy pantomime. For this is what life is, a cheezy pantomime, but with real blood.
The pantomime villains will disappear with tens if not hundreds of trillions in a haze of fog and smoke from the bombs, but then reappear as saviours proposing that they can save the world from disaster if we gave them control of the world and every single living soul on the planet.
That is the plan.
The Pentagoonz have somehow lost trillions.
The banks will not tell us where trillions in bailouts have gone.
WHY?
Nobody else has any money.
Only a few mega corporations and banks can afford to transfer their operations here, particularly if they have been shipped over to India and/or China to serve the gods of globalisation.
Sure, I think a few corporations could decide that the tax regime will be more attractive, that employment law will be more relaxed so they can fire slaves on the spot simply for farting, and they can take on over educated employees at a fraction of the usual cost due to the new welfare rules, etc.
And the banks may make a few billions, even tens of billions "available" (whatever that means), for SMEs.
But even if this does occur, we will still be getting our money from the same Nazis and Nazi banks who deliberately caused the financial crisis in the first place. They will still rule. They will still be constructing their world government for total enslavement, they will still be poisoning you with fluoride, mercury and microwave communications that interfere with brain function.
And it is they who will laugh in your face as they inject the implantable microchip into your hand for total control.
The Oik is simply rearranging the deckchairs on the Titan-oik, as we sink bow first to the bottom of the ocean called tyrannical world government.
After this serious destabilisation of the financial system caused by this derivatives crisis there is only one solution for the people; destroy it!
The banks and bankers want to preserve it...because it serves them and their plans for world government, destruction and mass depopulation.
The current financial system needs to be destroyed, and replaced with one that serves the people, not the banks. One that constructs infrastructure, provides top class education and life-saving health services.
Through this current system the bankers have been able to finance WW1, WW2, the holocaust, and have engineered all other major events such as the Vietnam War, so that today they almost control the world. The apparatus is nearly there. The IMF is beginning to control not only the economies of the third world, but also some European countries, such as Greece and Ireland, all thanks to the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group. Through the magic of being able to create non-existent money out of nothing they can finance fakes like Soetoro to become President of the USA, and think tanks like PNAC, ICG and Brookings to influence foreign and domestic policy.
The Oik is multi-Bilderberg. I will be suprised if he is not there this year too. He serves the banks, not us, and is betraying us into the hands of genocidalist megalomaniacs.
He and their system must go for the British people to first survive and then thrive to build a nation to be proud of, not ashamed of.
This can only be achieved by a system in which we the British people, HM Queen Liz included, create our own money for the purposes that we want, purposes that serve society as whole, not the genocidal megalomaniac lusts of a few.
Abandon ship!
Leave Captain Oik to sink with the Titan-oik!
Significantly reducing corporation tax to attract businesses, and agreeing a package called Project Merlin (the Merlin referring to the magic of the banks creating non-existent money out of nothing) with the banks to increase lending sounds like a plan to stimulate the private sector.
I actually feel sorry him.
But I don't think he understands the global forces running the show.
He doesn't understand that economies across the globe are being deliberately trashed.
He doesn't understand that nation states are being looted and destroyed before a third world war will be detonated so that the looters can disappear in a thick fog of smoke with the loot, like in a cheezy pantomime. For this is what life is, a cheezy pantomime, but with real blood.
The pantomime villains will disappear with tens if not hundreds of trillions in a haze of fog and smoke from the bombs, but then reappear as saviours proposing that they can save the world from disaster if we gave them control of the world and every single living soul on the planet.
That is the plan.
The Pentagoonz have somehow lost trillions.
The banks will not tell us where trillions in bailouts have gone.
WHY?
Nobody else has any money.
Only a few mega corporations and banks can afford to transfer their operations here, particularly if they have been shipped over to India and/or China to serve the gods of globalisation.
Sure, I think a few corporations could decide that the tax regime will be more attractive, that employment law will be more relaxed so they can fire slaves on the spot simply for farting, and they can take on over educated employees at a fraction of the usual cost due to the new welfare rules, etc.
And the banks may make a few billions, even tens of billions "available" (whatever that means), for SMEs.
But even if this does occur, we will still be getting our money from the same Nazis and Nazi banks who deliberately caused the financial crisis in the first place. They will still rule. They will still be constructing their world government for total enslavement, they will still be poisoning you with fluoride, mercury and microwave communications that interfere with brain function.
And it is they who will laugh in your face as they inject the implantable microchip into your hand for total control.
The Oik is simply rearranging the deckchairs on the Titan-oik, as we sink bow first to the bottom of the ocean called tyrannical world government.
After this serious destabilisation of the financial system caused by this derivatives crisis there is only one solution for the people; destroy it!
The banks and bankers want to preserve it...because it serves them and their plans for world government, destruction and mass depopulation.
The current financial system needs to be destroyed, and replaced with one that serves the people, not the banks. One that constructs infrastructure, provides top class education and life-saving health services.
Through this current system the bankers have been able to finance WW1, WW2, the holocaust, and have engineered all other major events such as the Vietnam War, so that today they almost control the world. The apparatus is nearly there. The IMF is beginning to control not only the economies of the third world, but also some European countries, such as Greece and Ireland, all thanks to the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group. Through the magic of being able to create non-existent money out of nothing they can finance fakes like Soetoro to become President of the USA, and think tanks like PNAC, ICG and Brookings to influence foreign and domestic policy.
The Oik is multi-Bilderberg. I will be suprised if he is not there this year too. He serves the banks, not us, and is betraying us into the hands of genocidalist megalomaniacs.
He and their system must go for the British people to first survive and then thrive to build a nation to be proud of, not ashamed of.
This can only be achieved by a system in which we the British people, HM Queen Liz included, create our own money for the purposes that we want, purposes that serve society as whole, not the genocidal megalomaniac lusts of a few.
Abandon ship!
Leave Captain Oik to sink with the Titan-oik!
IT COULD KICK OFF IN AND OVER GAZA AGAIN
As a No Fly Zone is established by some nations desperate to enforce the will of The United Nations over Libya while not that desperate to enforce the will of The United Nations over Palestine, events in Gaza are again taking a nasty turn, and it could kick off again.
Nutternyahu has recently apologised for killing four Palestinian civilians.
=============================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/23/gaza-rockets-strike-israel
Gaza militants' rockets strike cities deep into Israel
Islamic Jihad claims attacks on Beersheba and Ashdod as Israeli vice-premier calls for new offensive in Gaza Strip
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 23 March 2011 09.40 GMT
Palestinian rockets have struck two cities deep in Israel, wounding one man and prompting a deputy to the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, to call for a new offensive against the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
The attacks, which drew retaliatory air strikes from Israel, marked the biggest escalation of hostilities since Israel launched its assault on Gaza two years ago.
Islamic Jihad, a smaller Gaza faction and occasional Hamas ally, claimed responsibility for the attacks on Beersheba and Ashdod that followed a surge of shelling between Israel and Hamas that killed four Palestinian civilians and five militants on Tuesday.
After the deaths on Tuesday in Gaza, Netanyahu voiced regret for the civilian casualties, which he said resulted from errant Israeli shelling.
The Israeli vice-premier, Silvan Shalom, said the situation recalled the runup to Israel's 2008-2009 Gaza war, in which around 1,400 Palestinians died. Hamas has mostly held its fire from the enclave since.
"We may have to consider a return to that operation," Shalom told Israel Radio. "I say this despite the fact that I know such a thing would, of course, bring the region to a far more combustible situation."
With dissident movements rocking the Arab world, the US-backed Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, has broached reconciliation with Islamist Hamas, which defeated his Fatah faction in a 2006 ballot and seized control of Gaza in a civil war a year later.
Shalom said Hamas might have opened a new front with Israel "to stop any possibility of dialogue among the Palestinians or to come to the intra-Palestinian negotiation in a far stronger position".
Hamas is shunned by the west for rejecting peace with Israel. Under Hamas rule, Gaza has been kept under grinding embargoes by Israel and neighbouring Egypt. Security and economic prospects have improved under Abbas's Palestinian Authority, which has a limited mandate in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Islamic Jihad said it fired Grad rockets, assembly-line weapons more sophisticated than some shorter-range projectiles militants have used in the past, at Beersheba and Ashdod, 20 miles and 25 miles from Gaza respectively.
An Israeli military spokeswoman said a Beersheba man suffered moderate shrapnel wounds and that the second rocket landed outside Ashdod's centre, causing no damage. Authorities closed schools in Beersheba and advised residents to be ready to take shelter at the sound of sirens.
Islamic Jihad said it sought to avenge "the Zionist massacres against our fighters and people" and would continue to fight "until the full liberation of our lands", a reference to Israel, as well as the West Bank and Gaza.
Hamas has described its attacks, which included the firing of more than two dozen mortar shells and rockets at the weekend, as retaliation for Israeli air strikes. Hamas has at times proposed a long-term truce with Israel.
Netanyahu said Israel sought no further flare-up but would continue to respond to Palestinian attacks.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011
Nutternyahu has recently apologised for killing four Palestinian civilians.
=============================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/23/gaza-rockets-strike-israel
Gaza militants' rockets strike cities deep into Israel
Islamic Jihad claims attacks on Beersheba and Ashdod as Israeli vice-premier calls for new offensive in Gaza Strip
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 23 March 2011 09.40 GMT
Palestinian rockets have struck two cities deep in Israel, wounding one man and prompting a deputy to the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, to call for a new offensive against the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
The attacks, which drew retaliatory air strikes from Israel, marked the biggest escalation of hostilities since Israel launched its assault on Gaza two years ago.
Islamic Jihad, a smaller Gaza faction and occasional Hamas ally, claimed responsibility for the attacks on Beersheba and Ashdod that followed a surge of shelling between Israel and Hamas that killed four Palestinian civilians and five militants on Tuesday.
After the deaths on Tuesday in Gaza, Netanyahu voiced regret for the civilian casualties, which he said resulted from errant Israeli shelling.
The Israeli vice-premier, Silvan Shalom, said the situation recalled the runup to Israel's 2008-2009 Gaza war, in which around 1,400 Palestinians died. Hamas has mostly held its fire from the enclave since.
"We may have to consider a return to that operation," Shalom told Israel Radio. "I say this despite the fact that I know such a thing would, of course, bring the region to a far more combustible situation."
With dissident movements rocking the Arab world, the US-backed Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, has broached reconciliation with Islamist Hamas, which defeated his Fatah faction in a 2006 ballot and seized control of Gaza in a civil war a year later.
Shalom said Hamas might have opened a new front with Israel "to stop any possibility of dialogue among the Palestinians or to come to the intra-Palestinian negotiation in a far stronger position".
Hamas is shunned by the west for rejecting peace with Israel. Under Hamas rule, Gaza has been kept under grinding embargoes by Israel and neighbouring Egypt. Security and economic prospects have improved under Abbas's Palestinian Authority, which has a limited mandate in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Islamic Jihad said it fired Grad rockets, assembly-line weapons more sophisticated than some shorter-range projectiles militants have used in the past, at Beersheba and Ashdod, 20 miles and 25 miles from Gaza respectively.
An Israeli military spokeswoman said a Beersheba man suffered moderate shrapnel wounds and that the second rocket landed outside Ashdod's centre, causing no damage. Authorities closed schools in Beersheba and advised residents to be ready to take shelter at the sound of sirens.
Islamic Jihad said it sought to avenge "the Zionist massacres against our fighters and people" and would continue to fight "until the full liberation of our lands", a reference to Israel, as well as the West Bank and Gaza.
Hamas has described its attacks, which included the firing of more than two dozen mortar shells and rockets at the weekend, as retaliation for Israeli air strikes. Hamas has at times proposed a long-term truce with Israel.
Netanyahu said Israel sought no further flare-up but would continue to respond to Palestinian attacks.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011
SIMON
A caller named Simon phoned into the BBC Radio 5 Live phone in this morning. The topic of today's discussion was, what would you do as Chancellor?
Simon was the second caller. He was passionate but controlled, and laid out how the banks create money out of nothing, that the banks do not have the money they claim to have, that only a very small percentage of the money in our system is actually cash and the rest is simply numbers on a computer, and that the banks are taking over everything. Simon's simple solution to this is take back the power to create money and restore it to the government. Simon stated that Abraham Lincoln did this to finance his campaign in the US Civil War, a war that he won because of this. But in winning that war in that way he was assassinated by agents of the City of London, whose attitude has alway been that only they and their minions can create money out of nothing so that they can take over the world.
If the banks can create money out of nothing and completely wreck the economy, they have shown themselves as untrustworthy as NATO and unworthy of such power.
So take back the power to create money, restore it to the government, so the government can create money, debt and interest free, to get the economy that the banks wrecked back to work.
Oh, and clamp down very heavily on all tax avoidance, evasion and whatever else they do.
Two simple actions that can be done today by The Oik.
But don't hold your breath...
Simon was the second caller. He was passionate but controlled, and laid out how the banks create money out of nothing, that the banks do not have the money they claim to have, that only a very small percentage of the money in our system is actually cash and the rest is simply numbers on a computer, and that the banks are taking over everything. Simon's simple solution to this is take back the power to create money and restore it to the government. Simon stated that Abraham Lincoln did this to finance his campaign in the US Civil War, a war that he won because of this. But in winning that war in that way he was assassinated by agents of the City of London, whose attitude has alway been that only they and their minions can create money out of nothing so that they can take over the world.
If the banks can create money out of nothing and completely wreck the economy, they have shown themselves as untrustworthy as NATO and unworthy of such power.
So take back the power to create money, restore it to the government, so the government can create money, debt and interest free, to get the economy that the banks wrecked back to work.
Oh, and clamp down very heavily on all tax avoidance, evasion and whatever else they do.
Two simple actions that can be done today by The Oik.
But don't hold your breath...
SIX OUT OF SEVEN IS NOT BAD
Rhodes Scholar and Knight of the British Empire, General Wesley Clark, wrote in his book Winning Modern Wars that he was told by unnamed sources in the Pentagon that in November 2001, two months after 9/11, plans were already being made for war on Iraq[1]. But Clark was also told that in a five year plan six other countries would be targeted. So in all seven nations were targets of US military aggression. They were
Iraq
Iran
Syria
Lebanon
Sudan
Somalia
and finally...Libya.
Six of these have been significantly affected by either large scale military invasion or destabilisations by assasination and/or revolution, and in one case, Lebanon, both.
Iraq and Iran were named as targets in PNACs Rebuilding America's Defenses, published one year before 9/11 (so plans were already made for these two).
Even on 9/11 the PNACers were blaming Iraq as well as ObL. Iraq was invaded and no WMDs found.
Iran has been the subject of Anglo-American-Israeli plans for years, and the undead George Soros recently stated that Iran would suffer the bloodiest of revolutions, a green revoloution having been crushed in 2009.
The assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005 destabilised Lebanon, and in the Cedar Revolution the Syrians withdrew. In 2006 Israel attacked Lebanon. The STL is to blame Hezbollah, but some reports have implicated Iran.
Syria, along with Iraq and Iran, was named in A Clean Break as targets of Israeli aggression.
Sudan is now being partitioned.
Libya is now under a No Fly Zone with open talk of assassinating Gaddafi, despite such an option not permitted in UN SCR 1973.
There was a small invasion of Somalia by the US military in 2009.
So six out of seven is not bad.
What the name of this operation is I do not know, but whatever it is, the operation itself seems to have been successful.
But what have Russia and China done about this?
[1] The Secrets Clark Kept, http://www.villagevoice.com/2003-09-30/news/the-secrets-clark-kept/
Iraq
Iran
Syria
Lebanon
Sudan
Somalia
and finally...Libya.
Six of these have been significantly affected by either large scale military invasion or destabilisations by assasination and/or revolution, and in one case, Lebanon, both.
Iraq and Iran were named as targets in PNACs Rebuilding America's Defenses, published one year before 9/11 (so plans were already made for these two).
Even on 9/11 the PNACers were blaming Iraq as well as ObL. Iraq was invaded and no WMDs found.
Iran has been the subject of Anglo-American-Israeli plans for years, and the undead George Soros recently stated that Iran would suffer the bloodiest of revolutions, a green revoloution having been crushed in 2009.
The assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005 destabilised Lebanon, and in the Cedar Revolution the Syrians withdrew. In 2006 Israel attacked Lebanon. The STL is to blame Hezbollah, but some reports have implicated Iran.
Syria, along with Iraq and Iran, was named in A Clean Break as targets of Israeli aggression.
Sudan is now being partitioned.
Libya is now under a No Fly Zone with open talk of assassinating Gaddafi, despite such an option not permitted in UN SCR 1973.
There was a small invasion of Somalia by the US military in 2009.
So six out of seven is not bad.
What the name of this operation is I do not know, but whatever it is, the operation itself seems to have been successful.
But what have Russia and China done about this?
[1] The Secrets Clark Kept, http://www.villagevoice.com/2003-09-30/news/the-secrets-clark-kept/
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
ENGELBERT HUMPERDINCK
Englebert Trumperdinck has the name we are, deep down, very envious of.
Take George W Bush.
Take William J Clinton.
Take George HW Bush.
Take Ronald Rainbow Reagan.
Take 'em all, all the way back to 1791.
All powerful men, in their own ridiculous way, wanted a name like Englebert's. Some having betrayed America, while others having also betrayed humanity itself!
But amidst this cesspit of betrayal and corruption stands the proud Englebert Humperdinck.
I now propose, without any recourse to humour or irony, that our dear Englebert was a major major major opponent of the New World Order.
No, don't laugh. Listen to my argument.
Aldous Huxley, gimp of the New World Order, wrote that we, the muggins hard working taxpayers of the world, should love our servitude.
Well, Not me!
Do you?
I will not be servile to anyone, and nor shall I love that servitude if it is imposed upon me.
So I now proudly present to you, Englebert Humperdinck, as he kisses the sweet sweet lips of his new love, freedom!
Please release me, let me go
For I don't love you anymore
To waste our lives would be a sin
Release me and let me love again
I have found a new love, dear
And I will always want her near
Her lips are warm while yours are cold
Release me, my darling, let me go
(Please release me, let me go)
For I don't love you anymore
(To waste my life would be a sin)
So release me and let me love again
Please release me, can't you see
You'd be a fool to cling to me
To live a lie would bring us pain
So release me and let me love again
(Let me love, let me love)
Take George W Bush.
Take William J Clinton.
Take George HW Bush.
Take Ronald Rainbow Reagan.
Take 'em all, all the way back to 1791.
All powerful men, in their own ridiculous way, wanted a name like Englebert's. Some having betrayed America, while others having also betrayed humanity itself!
But amidst this cesspit of betrayal and corruption stands the proud Englebert Humperdinck.
I now propose, without any recourse to humour or irony, that our dear Englebert was a major major major opponent of the New World Order.
No, don't laugh. Listen to my argument.
Aldous Huxley, gimp of the New World Order, wrote that we, the muggins hard working taxpayers of the world, should love our servitude.
Well, Not me!
Do you?
I will not be servile to anyone, and nor shall I love that servitude if it is imposed upon me.
So I now proudly present to you, Englebert Humperdinck, as he kisses the sweet sweet lips of his new love, freedom!
Please release me, let me go
For I don't love you anymore
To waste our lives would be a sin
Release me and let me love again
I have found a new love, dear
And I will always want her near
Her lips are warm while yours are cold
Release me, my darling, let me go
(Please release me, let me go)
For I don't love you anymore
(To waste my life would be a sin)
So release me and let me love again
Please release me, can't you see
You'd be a fool to cling to me
To live a lie would bring us pain
So release me and let me love again
(Let me love, let me love)
TARPLEY ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW
One of few men and women talking some sense on the UN breaking its own charter by meddling in a civil war with bombs, and a civil war that was actually instigated and guided by NATO intelligence circles, including our own MI6 and SAS.
I pray that the corrupt wretches in the House of Commons listen to this.
http://tarpley.net/2011/03/21/tarpley-on-the-alex-jones-show/
The partition of Libya is definitely on the agenda. It is being proposed more frequently in the media since the bombing of Libya started. This is what Webster Tarpley is proposing is the real state of affairs. The partitioning of several rogue states, rogue to the empire that is. These states are targets for destabilisation and partitioning, to make them weak and more controllable by the empire, as they seek to relieve themselves of the yoke of empire and develop into proud nation states. Libya is the most advanced nation in Africa, having used oil money for the benefit of its people. We are now bombing it. Why? If it is subsequently partitioned on an East-West basis, the oil in the East will go to the rebs and their sponsors, the USA and UK, or to be more accurate, BP and Shell, not us, and they could sell to it whoever the like.
Whether this all results in an attack on Iran, or another revolution in Iran as proposed by the undead George Soros, I don't know. But with any major violence in or around the Middle East I always raise the spectre of the Albert Pike three-world-war plan. That modern history has generally followed that plan, with even the saintly FDR provoking and allowing the Japanese to kill nearly 3000 US military personnel at Pearl Harbour, is very concerning. Could it be that all modern history has been manipulated to keep within the scope of that Pike plan? Nearly 150 years of history cannot be completely controlled, but the major events can be, to keep modern history within a certain margin of error that would allow the Pike plan to eventually be realised, with a few minor corrections.
The price of oil jumped as a result of the illegal bombing of Libya. It was falling, mainly due to Japan. This drop in oil price was not proposed by Pastor Williams. The bombing of Libya drove it up again. Hmm.
But who has gambled on the price of oil being much higher than it is now, and is losing because of it?
But to gain more clarity and perhaps support for Tarpley's analysis, there is one thing that we as sovereign citizens can do;
ARREST HENRY KISSINGER!
He knows what is supposed to be happening, as he so publicly implied on Bloomberg 1st February 2011 in an interview about Egypt and Mubarak. Kissinger stated that events in Egypt were "only the first scene of the first act of a drama that is to be played out". He also ended the interview with his belief (or should that be command) that if Egypt went "back to the nationalist orientation of Nasser then things are going to get very tough".
I pray that the corrupt wretches in the House of Commons listen to this.
http://tarpley.net/2011/03/21/tarpley-on-the-alex-jones-show/
The partition of Libya is definitely on the agenda. It is being proposed more frequently in the media since the bombing of Libya started. This is what Webster Tarpley is proposing is the real state of affairs. The partitioning of several rogue states, rogue to the empire that is. These states are targets for destabilisation and partitioning, to make them weak and more controllable by the empire, as they seek to relieve themselves of the yoke of empire and develop into proud nation states. Libya is the most advanced nation in Africa, having used oil money for the benefit of its people. We are now bombing it. Why? If it is subsequently partitioned on an East-West basis, the oil in the East will go to the rebs and their sponsors, the USA and UK, or to be more accurate, BP and Shell, not us, and they could sell to it whoever the like.
Whether this all results in an attack on Iran, or another revolution in Iran as proposed by the undead George Soros, I don't know. But with any major violence in or around the Middle East I always raise the spectre of the Albert Pike three-world-war plan. That modern history has generally followed that plan, with even the saintly FDR provoking and allowing the Japanese to kill nearly 3000 US military personnel at Pearl Harbour, is very concerning. Could it be that all modern history has been manipulated to keep within the scope of that Pike plan? Nearly 150 years of history cannot be completely controlled, but the major events can be, to keep modern history within a certain margin of error that would allow the Pike plan to eventually be realised, with a few minor corrections.
The price of oil jumped as a result of the illegal bombing of Libya. It was falling, mainly due to Japan. This drop in oil price was not proposed by Pastor Williams. The bombing of Libya drove it up again. Hmm.
But who has gambled on the price of oil being much higher than it is now, and is losing because of it?
But to gain more clarity and perhaps support for Tarpley's analysis, there is one thing that we as sovereign citizens can do;
ARREST HENRY KISSINGER!
He knows what is supposed to be happening, as he so publicly implied on Bloomberg 1st February 2011 in an interview about Egypt and Mubarak. Kissinger stated that events in Egypt were "only the first scene of the first act of a drama that is to be played out". He also ended the interview with his belief (or should that be command) that if Egypt went "back to the nationalist orientation of Nasser then things are going to get very tough".
Monday, March 21, 2011
THE COALITION OF THE DEVIL
Gaddafi called the loose coalition that has just been bombing Libya "the coalition of the devil"[1].
The bombing has been led so far by the USA.
The USA is the result of a revolution after we colonised the New World, and we could discuss whether that revolution was engineered or not. I have my own personal doubts about this, and they are laid out in the page on the USA on my website. Washington DC is full of architecture and symbolism relating to the sun and Egypt, and Freemasonry played a significant role in establishing the American republic, holding grand ceremonies and celebrations during the laying of the foundations for Washington DC.
Following the establishment of the republic the American Indians were gradually herded into reservations of ever decreasing size and reduced to the status of a circus freak. Their lands and natural resources were grabbed. A similar process occured when the Jews tookover Palestine, when they herded the Palestinians into the largest refugee camps in the world.
But what has the USA done since they bravely bullied the American Indians into their refugee camps?
The USA created the Federal Reserve, which allowed the international bankers to create money out of nothing, giving them astronomical profits. With these profits they could engineer public opinion and create the Communists and the Nazis. The Federal Reserve financed both world wars. During the world war that the Communists and Nazis fought the USA created the atomic bomb, which they unnecessarily dropped on Japan. After WW2 the USA was the most powerful nation on earth, and has used that power to wage more wars on earth than any other nation. Its military budget is much bigger than the military budgets of all other nations on earth combined. It is a military state. It enforces the wishes of US and Anglo-Dutch corporations. A much respected officer in the US Military, Major General Smedley Butler, wrote that war is a racket.
Yet despite its massive military might, somehow on 11th September 2001, despite many detailed warnings, several passenger aircraft were allegedly hijacked and flown unimpeded around the most protected airspace on earth for a few hours, and then eventually flown into the WTC and unbelievably the most protected building on earth, The Pentagon. The blame for this was quickly placed on two bogeymen, Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, with allegations that Iraq also had WMD and we knew where they were. Well, Osama bin Laden has not been captured, possibly because they do not have the evidence to indict him. We invaded Iraq, and did not find any WMD, but we did hang someone who may or may not have been Saddam Hussein. The USA now has military bases in nearly every nation in the Middle East and Caspian Basin...except in Iran.
The actions of the USA since its creation have been those of a devil. African slaves were captured and transported to American colonies, with the blessings of the church, and used to build America. Since the abolition of slavery the descendents of those slaves have generally formed the lower working classes of American society. Racism is still rife in the Southern States. Without the Federal Reserve there would have been no Communism, Nazism, WW1, WW2, UN, IMF and no 9/11 and subsequent takeover of the Middle East and Caspian Basin.
And what has been directing this global military takeover?
The inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram, the most satanic symbol of the devil, pointing directly into the White House, that has been there since 1791.
[1] A Call from the Colonel: Gaddafi and His Bunker, http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20110320/wl_time/08599206043700
The bombing has been led so far by the USA.
The USA is the result of a revolution after we colonised the New World, and we could discuss whether that revolution was engineered or not. I have my own personal doubts about this, and they are laid out in the page on the USA on my website. Washington DC is full of architecture and symbolism relating to the sun and Egypt, and Freemasonry played a significant role in establishing the American republic, holding grand ceremonies and celebrations during the laying of the foundations for Washington DC.
Following the establishment of the republic the American Indians were gradually herded into reservations of ever decreasing size and reduced to the status of a circus freak. Their lands and natural resources were grabbed. A similar process occured when the Jews tookover Palestine, when they herded the Palestinians into the largest refugee camps in the world.
But what has the USA done since they bravely bullied the American Indians into their refugee camps?
The USA created the Federal Reserve, which allowed the international bankers to create money out of nothing, giving them astronomical profits. With these profits they could engineer public opinion and create the Communists and the Nazis. The Federal Reserve financed both world wars. During the world war that the Communists and Nazis fought the USA created the atomic bomb, which they unnecessarily dropped on Japan. After WW2 the USA was the most powerful nation on earth, and has used that power to wage more wars on earth than any other nation. Its military budget is much bigger than the military budgets of all other nations on earth combined. It is a military state. It enforces the wishes of US and Anglo-Dutch corporations. A much respected officer in the US Military, Major General Smedley Butler, wrote that war is a racket.
Yet despite its massive military might, somehow on 11th September 2001, despite many detailed warnings, several passenger aircraft were allegedly hijacked and flown unimpeded around the most protected airspace on earth for a few hours, and then eventually flown into the WTC and unbelievably the most protected building on earth, The Pentagon. The blame for this was quickly placed on two bogeymen, Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, with allegations that Iraq also had WMD and we knew where they were. Well, Osama bin Laden has not been captured, possibly because they do not have the evidence to indict him. We invaded Iraq, and did not find any WMD, but we did hang someone who may or may not have been Saddam Hussein. The USA now has military bases in nearly every nation in the Middle East and Caspian Basin...except in Iran.
The actions of the USA since its creation have been those of a devil. African slaves were captured and transported to American colonies, with the blessings of the church, and used to build America. Since the abolition of slavery the descendents of those slaves have generally formed the lower working classes of American society. Racism is still rife in the Southern States. Without the Federal Reserve there would have been no Communism, Nazism, WW1, WW2, UN, IMF and no 9/11 and subsequent takeover of the Middle East and Caspian Basin.
And what has been directing this global military takeover?
The inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram, the most satanic symbol of the devil, pointing directly into the White House, that has been there since 1791.
[1] A Call from the Colonel: Gaddafi and His Bunker, http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20110320/wl_time/08599206043700
IT IS NECESSARY, LEGAL AND RIGHT TO BASH THE BANKS
If it is necessary, legal and right to kill Gaddafi, who has used oil profits to build Libya into the most advanced nation in Africa, then it is definitely necessary, legal and right to bash the banks, who have just robbed us all blind, dumped millions of us onto the dole, kicked us out of our houses, and got us to pay for their private gambling debts by killing our aged sick relatives via The Liverpool Care Pathway.
But there is a fairer alternative.
Prosecute the bankers and lock them up with Josef Fritzl where they belong.
Anull all gambling debts of the banks and take them into bankruptcy.
Create our own money and get the nation back to work.
It really is that simple.
Even someone as allegedly intelligent as our great warrior leader, Cameron the Inglorious, can see this?
But there is a fairer alternative.
Prosecute the bankers and lock them up with Josef Fritzl where they belong.
Anull all gambling debts of the banks and take them into bankruptcy.
Create our own money and get the nation back to work.
It really is that simple.
Even someone as allegedly intelligent as our great warrior leader, Cameron the Inglorious, can see this?
WE URGENTLY NEED NO FLY ZONES OVER ALL OUR HOSPITALS
Our beloved aged relatives need protecting from Cameron the Inglorious and his Liverpool Care Pathway (express to heaven).
We urgently need No Fly Zones over all our hospitals to form a humanitarian shield.
We urgently need No Fly Zones over all our hospitals to form a humanitarian shield.
HOW LONG HAVE SAS BEEN IN LIBYA?
It is being proudly reported that the SAS have been in Libya for weeks, and have been preparing for the air strikes we saw reported over the weekend.[1]
It is also being proudly reported that a British bomber aborted its mission after civilians were found to be close to the target.[2]
And it is also being reported that tens of civilians have been killed in these raids.[3]
So this begs the question, just what have the SAS been doing in Libya? If they have been painting targets, then how accurate has that targetting been if civilians are close to the targets, and where did they get their information from? Was the risk of killing these civilians acceptable until it was revealed by the Arab League that civilians had been killed?
Several weeks ago the SAS were reportedly captured in a bungled landing, and sent packing with their tails between their legs. I questioned this fairytale at the time. It is inconceivable that a farmer could capture a unit of SAS and a MI6 officer and hold them hostage until a rebel leader arrived. It is now blatantly clear that several units of SAS and MI6 secretly and illegaly invaded Libya a few weeks ago with the permission of the rebels and a cover story was put out that they were all captured and returned home, or that some of them were returned home with intel and personal communications for the likes of Cameron the Inglorious while the rest remained in Libya to organise, train and assist the rebels who have probably given them the intel on which targets to paint.
So what?
If this has happened then is this legal?
Has the UK interfered in or even fomented a civil war?
Was UN SCR 1973 hastily agreed and betrayed by the UK because the SAS and MI6 were losing and in danger of being captured and their illegal meddling actions revealed?
It is one thing to be the heroes of the Iranian Embassy in 1980.
It is completely another to be organising a revolution and civil war in a foreign country resulting in us using expensive military hardware in a time of severe austerity.
I mean, is it possible that we are now bombing Libya because the SAS (and other NATO intelligence circle special forces) were sent in to create unrest and civil war with the goal of overthrowing Gaddafi but failed?
This is the question the corrupt wretches in the House of Commons should be asking Cameron the Inglorious this afternoon.
And is it "necessary, legal and right", as Cameron the Inglorious recently proposed, for our Defence Secretary Liam Fox to propose that Gaddafi be killed, even though this goes well beyond what the Arab League agreed to in UN SCR 1973?
Indeed, the war talk has become so loud and dominant that Nicky Campbell's discussion on Your Talk on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning is on the question, should we kill Gaddafi?
This goes well beyond the remit of UN SCR 1973, and shows the desperation that the UK now finds itself in. The UK has swiftly changed the aim of UN SCR 1973 from protection of civilians to assasination of Gaddafi and regime change.
All nations in the United Nations Security Council should call an immediate halt to all actions in Libya and demand that the UK, and the USA, explain themselves.
[1] SAS 'Smash' squads on the ground in Libya to mark targets for coalition jets, The Daily Mail, 21/3/2011
[2] BBC Breakfast, 21/3/2011
[3] Arab League Slams Libya Attacks Amid Reports of Growing Civilian Toll, AntiWar, 20/3/2011
It is also being proudly reported that a British bomber aborted its mission after civilians were found to be close to the target.[2]
And it is also being reported that tens of civilians have been killed in these raids.[3]
So this begs the question, just what have the SAS been doing in Libya? If they have been painting targets, then how accurate has that targetting been if civilians are close to the targets, and where did they get their information from? Was the risk of killing these civilians acceptable until it was revealed by the Arab League that civilians had been killed?
Several weeks ago the SAS were reportedly captured in a bungled landing, and sent packing with their tails between their legs. I questioned this fairytale at the time. It is inconceivable that a farmer could capture a unit of SAS and a MI6 officer and hold them hostage until a rebel leader arrived. It is now blatantly clear that several units of SAS and MI6 secretly and illegaly invaded Libya a few weeks ago with the permission of the rebels and a cover story was put out that they were all captured and returned home, or that some of them were returned home with intel and personal communications for the likes of Cameron the Inglorious while the rest remained in Libya to organise, train and assist the rebels who have probably given them the intel on which targets to paint.
So what?
If this has happened then is this legal?
Has the UK interfered in or even fomented a civil war?
Was UN SCR 1973 hastily agreed and betrayed by the UK because the SAS and MI6 were losing and in danger of being captured and their illegal meddling actions revealed?
It is one thing to be the heroes of the Iranian Embassy in 1980.
It is completely another to be organising a revolution and civil war in a foreign country resulting in us using expensive military hardware in a time of severe austerity.
I mean, is it possible that we are now bombing Libya because the SAS (and other NATO intelligence circle special forces) were sent in to create unrest and civil war with the goal of overthrowing Gaddafi but failed?
This is the question the corrupt wretches in the House of Commons should be asking Cameron the Inglorious this afternoon.
And is it "necessary, legal and right", as Cameron the Inglorious recently proposed, for our Defence Secretary Liam Fox to propose that Gaddafi be killed, even though this goes well beyond what the Arab League agreed to in UN SCR 1973?
Indeed, the war talk has become so loud and dominant that Nicky Campbell's discussion on Your Talk on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning is on the question, should we kill Gaddafi?
This goes well beyond the remit of UN SCR 1973, and shows the desperation that the UK now finds itself in. The UK has swiftly changed the aim of UN SCR 1973 from protection of civilians to assasination of Gaddafi and regime change.
All nations in the United Nations Security Council should call an immediate halt to all actions in Libya and demand that the UK, and the USA, explain themselves.
[1] SAS 'Smash' squads on the ground in Libya to mark targets for coalition jets, The Daily Mail, 21/3/2011
[2] BBC Breakfast, 21/3/2011
[3] Arab League Slams Libya Attacks Amid Reports of Growing Civilian Toll, AntiWar, 20/3/2011
Sunday, March 20, 2011
RUSSIA, THE ARAB LEAGUE AND A GLASS OF WARM STALE LIMEADE
So NATO has just served Russia and The Arab League a glass of warm stale limeade, just as I stated they would do.
Russia and The Arab League have now expressed their concerns that the Never A Trustworthy Organisation has far exceeded the terms of UN SCR 1973, and are calling for a ceasefire. The Arab League is holding an emergency meeting to discuss the situation.
I warned that NATO would break any agreement reached in order to pass UN SCR 1973.
This killing of nearly 50 civilians by NATO is less subtle than I imagined. I was expecting special forces to secretly invade, being captured and shown on Libyan TV.
But a Never A Trustworthy Organisation never changes itsinaccurate guided missiles spots.
And let's not kid ourselves. This is NATO. It's the USA, UK and France. Germany abstained.
The only way that Cameron the Inglorious can gain any kind of redemption from this action is to instigate an inquiry into how and why NATO intelligence circles were involved in the uprisings of The Arab Spring, and what Henry Kissinger knew about it all in January.
He should also promise that if Israel so much as farts in the direction of Gaza that we move immediately to implement a no fly zone over Gaza, and this time not kill any civilians.
Russia and The Arab League have now expressed their concerns that the Never A Trustworthy Organisation has far exceeded the terms of UN SCR 1973, and are calling for a ceasefire. The Arab League is holding an emergency meeting to discuss the situation.
I warned that NATO would break any agreement reached in order to pass UN SCR 1973.
This killing of nearly 50 civilians by NATO is less subtle than I imagined. I was expecting special forces to secretly invade, being captured and shown on Libyan TV.
But a Never A Trustworthy Organisation never changes its
And let's not kid ourselves. This is NATO. It's the USA, UK and France. Germany abstained.
The only way that Cameron the Inglorious can gain any kind of redemption from this action is to instigate an inquiry into how and why NATO intelligence circles were involved in the uprisings of The Arab Spring, and what Henry Kissinger knew about it all in January.
He should also promise that if Israel so much as farts in the direction of Gaza that we move immediately to implement a no fly zone over Gaza, and this time not kill any civilians.
TARPLEY ON REGIME CHANGE IN LIBYA
It has become clear that the military action on Libya has nothing to do with humanitarian intervention and everything to do with imperialism.
On BBC Radio 5 Live this morning the No Fly Zone had been magically transformed into a Non Combat Zone, and WilliamFake Hague tried to answer the question of why are we going into Libya and not elsewhere with the weak answer that we cannot do everything!
Cameron the Inglorious has also privately twisted the goal of UN SCR 1973 from humanitarian intervention into ousting Gaddafi to protect British national security.
So I repost this analysis by Webster Tarpley. Of particular interest is a paragraph towards the end in which is quoted the UN Human Development Index of some relevant nations;
Libya 53
Russia 63
Brazil 73
Russia and Brazil did not veto UN SCR 1973.
But what I don't fully understand is why Russia and China would stab Libya in the back. Nobody is going to trust Russia and China now. Why would they? They have basically given a green light to NATO to invade North Africa, haven't they?
======================
From http://tarpley.net/2011/03/19/obamas-bay-of-pigs-in-libya/
Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya: Imperialist Aggression Shreds UN Charter
Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.
TARPLEY.net
March 19, 2011
Washington DC, March 19 – Late today US and British cruise missiles joined with French and other NATO combat aircraft in Operation Odyssey Dawn/Operation Ellamy, a neo-imperialist bombing attack under fake humanitarian cover against the sovereign state of Libya. Acting under UN Security Council resolution 1973, US naval forces in the Mediterranean on Saturday night local time fired 112 cruise missiles at targets which the Pentagon claimed were related to Libya’s air defense system. But Mohammed al-Zawi, the Secretary General of the Libyan Parliament, told a Tripoli press conference that the “barbaric armed attack” and “savage aggression” had hit residential areas and office buildings as well as military targets, filling the hospitals of Tripoli and Misurata with civilian victims. Zawi accused the foreign powers of acting to protect a rebel leadership which contains notorious terrorist elements. The Libyan government repeated its request for the UN to send international observers to report objectively on events in Libya.
The attacking forces are expected to deploy more cruise missiles, Predator drones, and bombers, seeking to destroy the Libyan air defense system as a prelude to the systematic decimation of Libyan ground units. International observers have noted that US intelligence about Libya may be substandard, and that many cruise missiles may indeed have struck non-military targets.
Libya had responded to the UN vote by declaring a cease-fire, but Obama and Cameron brushed that aside. On Saturday, France 24 and al-Jazeera of Qatar, international propaganda networks hyping the attacks, broadcast hysterical reports of Qaddafi’s forces allegedly attacking the rebel stronghold of Bengazi. They showed a picture of a jet fighter being shot down and claimed this proved Qaddafi was defying the UN by keeping up his air strikes. It later turned out that the destroyed plane had belonged to the rebel air force. Such coverage provided justification for the bombing attacks starting a few hours later. The parallels to the Kuwait incubator babies hoax of 1990 were evident. Qaddafi loyalists said Saturday’s fighting was caused by rebel assaults on government lines in the hopes of provoking an air attack, plus local residents defending themselves against the rebels.
At the UN vote, the Indian delegate correctly pointed out that the decision to start the war had been made on the basis of no reliable information whatsoever, since UN Secretary General Ban-ki Moon’s envoy to Libya had never reported to the Security Council. The bombing started shortly after a glittering Paris summit “in support of the Libyan people,” where Sarkozy, Cameron, Hillary Clinton, Stephen Harper of Canada and other imperialist politicians had strutted and postured.
Token contingents from Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia were supposed to take part in the attack, but were nowhere to be seen, while some Arab states were expected to provide financial support. The minimum estimated cost of maintaining a no-fly zone over Libya for one year is estimated in the neighborhood of $15 billion – enough to fund WIC high-protein meals for impoverished US mothers and infants for two years.
From no-fly zone to regime change
The alleged purpose of the bombing was to establish a no-fly zone and to protect a force of CIA-sponsored Libyan rebels composed of the Moslem Brotherhood, elements of the Libyan government and army subverted by the CIA (including such sinister figures as former Justice Minister Mustafa Abdel-Jalil and former Interior Minister Fattah Younis), and monarchist Senussi tribesmen holding the cities of Benghazi and Tobruk. But twin Friday ultimatums by President Obama and British premier Cameron, plus a speech by Harper, made clear that the goal was the ouster of Colonel Muammar Qaddafi and regime change in the North African oil-producing nation, whose proven reserves of crude are the largest on that continent.
Prospects for military success are uncertain, despite the apparent NATO preponderance. No clear military objective has been articulated, and disagreements about the scope of the war are likely. If Qaddafi’s tanks and infantry are engaged in house to house battles with the rebels in cities like Bengazi and Tobruk, it will be hard for NATO to bring its air superiority to bear without massacring large numbers of civilians.
From hope and change to shock and awe
While Obama’s action is being widely compared to the Bush-Cheney 2003 attack on Iraq, parallels to the April 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco are also strong. In that instance, a force of anti-Castro Cubans organized by the CIA was militarily defeated in an attempt to take over Cuba, resulting in calls from Allen Dulles to President Kennedy for air strikes and a ground invasion. Kennedy rejected those calls and fired the Dulles CIA leadership. Obama, faced by the military collapse of a CIA force in Libya, has ordered such bombing, opening a second phase of the present US debacle.
The rebel region of Cerenaica has long been the scene of Moslem brotherhood agitation against Qaddafi, much of it fomented from across the Egyptian border with US assistance. After the failed 1995 assassination attempt against the Libyan leader reported by MI-5 defector David Shayler (for which MI-6 paid £100,000 to an al Qaeda subsidiary), eastern Libya was the scene of a protracted Islamist insurrection. In the wake of events in Tunisia and Egypt, it has become clear that the CIA has stipulated a worldwide alliance against existing Arab governments with the reactionary and oligarchical Muslim brotherhood, which was created by British intelligence in Egypt in the late 1920s. Al Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), another CIA front, is trumpeting full support for the rebels on its website.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy was first to recognize the Benghazi rebels, calling for a no-fly zone and air strikes a week earlier, seconded by British Prime Minister Cameron. Until about 18 hours before the UN vote, top US officials like Secretary of State Clinton and Defense Secretary Gates were stressing the difficulties of a no-fly zone. French Foreign Minister Juppé lamented that it was already too late for a no-fly zone. Then, the US abruptly demanded a no-fly zone plus a blank check for aerial bombing. Diplomatic observers are puzzled by Obama’s turnaround. Was he being blackmailed by the British and the French, the same imperialist coalition that invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal back in 1956? Because of Obama’s decision, the US is now at war with a fourth Moslem nation after Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. In Pakistan, the simmering conflict is threatening to escalate into the open at any time in the wake of the scandal around CIA contractor Ray Davis, accused by the Pakistanis as a terrorist controller.
The Arab League, surprising many analysts, had voted unanimously for a no-fly zone over Libya. The African Union, by contrast, has resolutely opposed foreign intervention. Western diplomats have discounted the AU position, giving rise to suspicions of racism. These are reinforced by reports that the anti-Qaddafi rebels have lynched a number of black Africans, claiming that they were mercenaries hired by Qaddafi.
Interference in Libyan internal affairs violates UN Charter
Diplomatic observers were shocked by the sweeping resolution passed by the Security Council, which allows “all necessary measures” to be used against Libya. The United Nations Charter strictly limits Chapter 7 military actions to threats to international peace and security, which Libya has never represented, but rules out interference in internal affairs of member states. The pretext cited in this case was the protection of defenseless civilians, but it is clear that the rebels constitute an armed military force in their own right. Since no state can be an aggressor on its own territory, the Security Council resolution stands in flagrant violation of the UN Charter. Russia, China, Brazil, Germany, and India abstained. The resolution contains an arms embargo against Libya which the US is already violating by arming the rebels through Egypt.
Among US officials demanding aggression, UN ambassador Susan Rice, Samantha Power of the National Security Council, and Secretary of State Clinton have shown that they are as bellicose as any neocon of the Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz school.
The Libyan Air Force has 13 airbases and some 374 combat capable aircraft, many of them obsolete. Military observers will be watching the performance of Qaddafi’s air defenses, thought to be based largely on older Russian SAMs. But Qaddafi also has mobile and hand-held surface to air missiles. During a 1986 bombing raid on Tripoli aimed at killing Qaddafi, the US lost one F-111 to Libyan fire. The Libyan Defense Ministry has warned that Libya would retaliate against incursions by striking at air and maritime traffic over the central Mediterranean. In 1986, Libya fired two Scud missiles at the US Coast Guard station on the Italian island of Lampedusa, but both missed. Whether Qaddafi has used his immense oil revenues to procure more capable modern anti-ship missiles of Russian design is another question that may be answered soon. A further problem for the aggressors is the March 19 supermoon, which will illuminate the night sky for several days; the preferred time for air attacks is the dark of the new moon.
The propaganda choreography of the current aggression, designed to mask Obama’s warmonger role, requires the right-wing leaders of Britain and France, the Suez 1956 partners, to take the lead. Obama has assumed a low profile, not attending then Paris conference, not making a formal Oval Office address to the American people, and letting the French attack first. Obama is visiting Brazil. This charade is supposed to placate the anti-US hatred of the Arab street. The result is that the inferior Anglo-French military equipment and command structures may contribute to unpleasant reverses for the aggressors, particularly if Sarkozy’s Napoleonic delusions lead him to meddle in military decisions.
The Panavia Tornados to be deployed by London are obsolete; seven (6 UK, 1 Italian) were shot down by Saddam Hussein during the first Gulf War twenty years ago. Eurofighter Typhoons are ultra-modern planes, but they have never been tested in real combat. The troubled French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle flies the Dassault Raffale, also largely untested in combat, plus the accident-plagued 30-year old Super-Étendard. Mirage F1s of various vintages, none recent, are expected. This equipment is vulnerable to attrition by Qaddafi’s countermeasures.
Anglo-American propaganda portrays Qaddafi as a kleptocrat. In reality, Libya is one of the most advanced developing countries, ranking 53 on the UN Human Development Index, making it the most developed society in Africa. Libya ranks ahead of Russia (65), Ukraine (69), Brazil (73), Venezuela (75) and Tunisia (81). The rate of incarceration is 61st in the world, below that of the Czech Republic, and far below that of the United States (1). Longevity has increased by 20 years under Qaddafi’s rule. Qaddafi, while suppressing political challenges, had shared the nation’s oil income better than the rest of OPEC.
US bureaucratic resistance to the imperial overstretch involved in a war with Libya on top of the three existing conflicts may also have been overcome thanks to the activation of pro-British networks in the US government. If so, this would repeat a long-established pattern. In 1990, Margaret Thatcher claimed to have performed an emergency “backbone implant” on George H.W. Bush, convincing him to retake Kuwait from Saddam Hussein. In 1999, Tony Blair pressed for the bombing of Serbia and then for a ground invasion; Clinton wisely declined at least the latter. In September 2001, Blair helped convince Bush the younger to use the 9/11 attack as a pretext for an attack on Afghanistan.
The purpose of this attack, in the context of the CIA’s spring 2011 campaign of putsches, palace coups, color revolutions, and people power insurrections, is to cripple the ability of US client states to seek alternative arrangements through alliances with Russia, China, Iran, and other states. The CIA onslaught takes the form of an attack on the nation state itself. In 2008, Serbia was partitioned. This year, Sudan is being carved in two, while Yemen is increasingly likely to face the same fate. The UN resolution of Libya mentions Bengazi specifically, indicating the clear intent of partitioning and balkanizing this nation along an east-west division. Other countries can expect similar treatment. It is time to end the destructive cycle of color revolutions before one of them turns into a civil war in a country like Belarus, where an internal clash could easily turn into a large-scale confrontation between Russia and NATO.
Copyright © 2011 TARPLEY.net - All Rights Reserved
On BBC Radio 5 Live this morning the No Fly Zone had been magically transformed into a Non Combat Zone, and William
Cameron the Inglorious has also privately twisted the goal of UN SCR 1973 from humanitarian intervention into ousting Gaddafi to protect British national security.
So I repost this analysis by Webster Tarpley. Of particular interest is a paragraph towards the end in which is quoted the UN Human Development Index of some relevant nations;
Libya 53
Russia 63
Brazil 73
Russia and Brazil did not veto UN SCR 1973.
But what I don't fully understand is why Russia and China would stab Libya in the back. Nobody is going to trust Russia and China now. Why would they? They have basically given a green light to NATO to invade North Africa, haven't they?
======================
From http://tarpley.net/2011/03/19/obamas-bay-of-pigs-in-libya/
Obama’s Bay of Pigs in Libya: Imperialist Aggression Shreds UN Charter
Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.
TARPLEY.net
March 19, 2011
Washington DC, March 19 – Late today US and British cruise missiles joined with French and other NATO combat aircraft in Operation Odyssey Dawn/Operation Ellamy, a neo-imperialist bombing attack under fake humanitarian cover against the sovereign state of Libya. Acting under UN Security Council resolution 1973, US naval forces in the Mediterranean on Saturday night local time fired 112 cruise missiles at targets which the Pentagon claimed were related to Libya’s air defense system. But Mohammed al-Zawi, the Secretary General of the Libyan Parliament, told a Tripoli press conference that the “barbaric armed attack” and “savage aggression” had hit residential areas and office buildings as well as military targets, filling the hospitals of Tripoli and Misurata with civilian victims. Zawi accused the foreign powers of acting to protect a rebel leadership which contains notorious terrorist elements. The Libyan government repeated its request for the UN to send international observers to report objectively on events in Libya.
The attacking forces are expected to deploy more cruise missiles, Predator drones, and bombers, seeking to destroy the Libyan air defense system as a prelude to the systematic decimation of Libyan ground units. International observers have noted that US intelligence about Libya may be substandard, and that many cruise missiles may indeed have struck non-military targets.
Libya had responded to the UN vote by declaring a cease-fire, but Obama and Cameron brushed that aside. On Saturday, France 24 and al-Jazeera of Qatar, international propaganda networks hyping the attacks, broadcast hysterical reports of Qaddafi’s forces allegedly attacking the rebel stronghold of Bengazi. They showed a picture of a jet fighter being shot down and claimed this proved Qaddafi was defying the UN by keeping up his air strikes. It later turned out that the destroyed plane had belonged to the rebel air force. Such coverage provided justification for the bombing attacks starting a few hours later. The parallels to the Kuwait incubator babies hoax of 1990 were evident. Qaddafi loyalists said Saturday’s fighting was caused by rebel assaults on government lines in the hopes of provoking an air attack, plus local residents defending themselves against the rebels.
At the UN vote, the Indian delegate correctly pointed out that the decision to start the war had been made on the basis of no reliable information whatsoever, since UN Secretary General Ban-ki Moon’s envoy to Libya had never reported to the Security Council. The bombing started shortly after a glittering Paris summit “in support of the Libyan people,” where Sarkozy, Cameron, Hillary Clinton, Stephen Harper of Canada and other imperialist politicians had strutted and postured.
Token contingents from Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia were supposed to take part in the attack, but were nowhere to be seen, while some Arab states were expected to provide financial support. The minimum estimated cost of maintaining a no-fly zone over Libya for one year is estimated in the neighborhood of $15 billion – enough to fund WIC high-protein meals for impoverished US mothers and infants for two years.
From no-fly zone to regime change
The alleged purpose of the bombing was to establish a no-fly zone and to protect a force of CIA-sponsored Libyan rebels composed of the Moslem Brotherhood, elements of the Libyan government and army subverted by the CIA (including such sinister figures as former Justice Minister Mustafa Abdel-Jalil and former Interior Minister Fattah Younis), and monarchist Senussi tribesmen holding the cities of Benghazi and Tobruk. But twin Friday ultimatums by President Obama and British premier Cameron, plus a speech by Harper, made clear that the goal was the ouster of Colonel Muammar Qaddafi and regime change in the North African oil-producing nation, whose proven reserves of crude are the largest on that continent.
Prospects for military success are uncertain, despite the apparent NATO preponderance. No clear military objective has been articulated, and disagreements about the scope of the war are likely. If Qaddafi’s tanks and infantry are engaged in house to house battles with the rebels in cities like Bengazi and Tobruk, it will be hard for NATO to bring its air superiority to bear without massacring large numbers of civilians.
From hope and change to shock and awe
While Obama’s action is being widely compared to the Bush-Cheney 2003 attack on Iraq, parallels to the April 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco are also strong. In that instance, a force of anti-Castro Cubans organized by the CIA was militarily defeated in an attempt to take over Cuba, resulting in calls from Allen Dulles to President Kennedy for air strikes and a ground invasion. Kennedy rejected those calls and fired the Dulles CIA leadership. Obama, faced by the military collapse of a CIA force in Libya, has ordered such bombing, opening a second phase of the present US debacle.
The rebel region of Cerenaica has long been the scene of Moslem brotherhood agitation against Qaddafi, much of it fomented from across the Egyptian border with US assistance. After the failed 1995 assassination attempt against the Libyan leader reported by MI-5 defector David Shayler (for which MI-6 paid £100,000 to an al Qaeda subsidiary), eastern Libya was the scene of a protracted Islamist insurrection. In the wake of events in Tunisia and Egypt, it has become clear that the CIA has stipulated a worldwide alliance against existing Arab governments with the reactionary and oligarchical Muslim brotherhood, which was created by British intelligence in Egypt in the late 1920s. Al Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), another CIA front, is trumpeting full support for the rebels on its website.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy was first to recognize the Benghazi rebels, calling for a no-fly zone and air strikes a week earlier, seconded by British Prime Minister Cameron. Until about 18 hours before the UN vote, top US officials like Secretary of State Clinton and Defense Secretary Gates were stressing the difficulties of a no-fly zone. French Foreign Minister Juppé lamented that it was already too late for a no-fly zone. Then, the US abruptly demanded a no-fly zone plus a blank check for aerial bombing. Diplomatic observers are puzzled by Obama’s turnaround. Was he being blackmailed by the British and the French, the same imperialist coalition that invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal back in 1956? Because of Obama’s decision, the US is now at war with a fourth Moslem nation after Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. In Pakistan, the simmering conflict is threatening to escalate into the open at any time in the wake of the scandal around CIA contractor Ray Davis, accused by the Pakistanis as a terrorist controller.
The Arab League, surprising many analysts, had voted unanimously for a no-fly zone over Libya. The African Union, by contrast, has resolutely opposed foreign intervention. Western diplomats have discounted the AU position, giving rise to suspicions of racism. These are reinforced by reports that the anti-Qaddafi rebels have lynched a number of black Africans, claiming that they were mercenaries hired by Qaddafi.
Interference in Libyan internal affairs violates UN Charter
Diplomatic observers were shocked by the sweeping resolution passed by the Security Council, which allows “all necessary measures” to be used against Libya. The United Nations Charter strictly limits Chapter 7 military actions to threats to international peace and security, which Libya has never represented, but rules out interference in internal affairs of member states. The pretext cited in this case was the protection of defenseless civilians, but it is clear that the rebels constitute an armed military force in their own right. Since no state can be an aggressor on its own territory, the Security Council resolution stands in flagrant violation of the UN Charter. Russia, China, Brazil, Germany, and India abstained. The resolution contains an arms embargo against Libya which the US is already violating by arming the rebels through Egypt.
Among US officials demanding aggression, UN ambassador Susan Rice, Samantha Power of the National Security Council, and Secretary of State Clinton have shown that they are as bellicose as any neocon of the Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz school.
The Libyan Air Force has 13 airbases and some 374 combat capable aircraft, many of them obsolete. Military observers will be watching the performance of Qaddafi’s air defenses, thought to be based largely on older Russian SAMs. But Qaddafi also has mobile and hand-held surface to air missiles. During a 1986 bombing raid on Tripoli aimed at killing Qaddafi, the US lost one F-111 to Libyan fire. The Libyan Defense Ministry has warned that Libya would retaliate against incursions by striking at air and maritime traffic over the central Mediterranean. In 1986, Libya fired two Scud missiles at the US Coast Guard station on the Italian island of Lampedusa, but both missed. Whether Qaddafi has used his immense oil revenues to procure more capable modern anti-ship missiles of Russian design is another question that may be answered soon. A further problem for the aggressors is the March 19 supermoon, which will illuminate the night sky for several days; the preferred time for air attacks is the dark of the new moon.
The propaganda choreography of the current aggression, designed to mask Obama’s warmonger role, requires the right-wing leaders of Britain and France, the Suez 1956 partners, to take the lead. Obama has assumed a low profile, not attending then Paris conference, not making a formal Oval Office address to the American people, and letting the French attack first. Obama is visiting Brazil. This charade is supposed to placate the anti-US hatred of the Arab street. The result is that the inferior Anglo-French military equipment and command structures may contribute to unpleasant reverses for the aggressors, particularly if Sarkozy’s Napoleonic delusions lead him to meddle in military decisions.
The Panavia Tornados to be deployed by London are obsolete; seven (6 UK, 1 Italian) were shot down by Saddam Hussein during the first Gulf War twenty years ago. Eurofighter Typhoons are ultra-modern planes, but they have never been tested in real combat. The troubled French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle flies the Dassault Raffale, also largely untested in combat, plus the accident-plagued 30-year old Super-Étendard. Mirage F1s of various vintages, none recent, are expected. This equipment is vulnerable to attrition by Qaddafi’s countermeasures.
Anglo-American propaganda portrays Qaddafi as a kleptocrat. In reality, Libya is one of the most advanced developing countries, ranking 53 on the UN Human Development Index, making it the most developed society in Africa. Libya ranks ahead of Russia (65), Ukraine (69), Brazil (73), Venezuela (75) and Tunisia (81). The rate of incarceration is 61st in the world, below that of the Czech Republic, and far below that of the United States (1). Longevity has increased by 20 years under Qaddafi’s rule. Qaddafi, while suppressing political challenges, had shared the nation’s oil income better than the rest of OPEC.
US bureaucratic resistance to the imperial overstretch involved in a war with Libya on top of the three existing conflicts may also have been overcome thanks to the activation of pro-British networks in the US government. If so, this would repeat a long-established pattern. In 1990, Margaret Thatcher claimed to have performed an emergency “backbone implant” on George H.W. Bush, convincing him to retake Kuwait from Saddam Hussein. In 1999, Tony Blair pressed for the bombing of Serbia and then for a ground invasion; Clinton wisely declined at least the latter. In September 2001, Blair helped convince Bush the younger to use the 9/11 attack as a pretext for an attack on Afghanistan.
The purpose of this attack, in the context of the CIA’s spring 2011 campaign of putsches, palace coups, color revolutions, and people power insurrections, is to cripple the ability of US client states to seek alternative arrangements through alliances with Russia, China, Iran, and other states. The CIA onslaught takes the form of an attack on the nation state itself. In 2008, Serbia was partitioned. This year, Sudan is being carved in two, while Yemen is increasingly likely to face the same fate. The UN resolution of Libya mentions Bengazi specifically, indicating the clear intent of partitioning and balkanizing this nation along an east-west division. Other countries can expect similar treatment. It is time to end the destructive cycle of color revolutions before one of them turns into a civil war in a country like Belarus, where an internal clash could easily turn into a large-scale confrontation between Russia and NATO.
Copyright © 2011 TARPLEY.net - All Rights Reserved
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAMERON AND GADDAFI?
Cameron the Inglorious recently accused Gaddafi of being a dictator killing his own people. But what is the difference between Cameron and Gaddafi?
Gaddafi was killing some of his own people, but they had been encouraged, armed and financed by NATO intelligence circles to rebel against him (for what purpose is not fully clear but it is at least oil but may also have something to do with an eventual attack or destabilisation of Iran).
But Cameron is also killing some of his own people, sick old people who have paid their pension and NI contributions, via the Liverpool Care Pathway in order to unnecessarily pay the private gambling debts of Nazi banks who financed his political campaign. Dead sick old people don't need pensions, and dead sick old people don't need expensive treatment.
Gaddafi was killing some of his own people, but they had been encouraged, armed and financed by NATO intelligence circles to rebel against him (for what purpose is not fully clear but it is at least oil but may also have something to do with an eventual attack or destabilisation of Iran).
But Cameron is also killing some of his own people, sick old people who have paid their pension and NI contributions, via the Liverpool Care Pathway in order to unnecessarily pay the private gambling debts of Nazi banks who financed his political campaign. Dead sick old people don't need pensions, and dead sick old people don't need expensive treatment.
Saturday, March 19, 2011
CAMERON THE INGLORIOUS WITTINGLY PROVOKES TERRORISM
Cameron The Inglorious is admitting that by attacking Libya he is risking bringing terrorism to the UK. Therefore, regime change is the only option on the table. This quickly and illegally changes the aim of UN SCR 1973.
So, in his twisted Nazi Eton/Oxford/Bullingdon mind, we should attack Libya and take out Gaddafi because if we attack Libya but Gaddafi stays in power then he might attack us with terror.
SAY WHAT?!
This is the same twisted logic that allows the Nazi gambling banks (who finance the Tory Party) to create non-existent money out of nothing and lend it to us at exorbitant rates of interest.
This is the same twisted logic that has not sent one banker to prison for what they have done to this nation and its people that they, the Tories, are so allegedly proud of.
This is the same twisted logic that permits our superbly trained doctors, trained to sustain life, to transfer sick old people onto the Liverpool Care Pathway, a road to death. I shall repeat again; dead sick old people don't need expensive treatment (even though they will have paid NI all their hard-working life for that exact reason) and dead sick old people don't need pensions (even though they will have paid NI all their hard-working life for that exact reason). So by killing sick old people the regime of Cameron the Inglorious can unnecessarily pay off the private gambling debts of the financiers of the Tory party in the City of London, home of the Rothschilds and therefore the home of violently racist Zionism.
But this is also the same twisted logic that allows Israel to slaughter the Palestinians!
Where were the UN and NATO during Operation Cast Lead?
Take Osama bin Laden. Remember him? That guy in white robes with a beard? Who allegedly did 9/11, a crime the FBI refuse to attribute to him because of lack of evidence? Whatever happened to him?
Anyway, that al-Qaeda thing he allegedly ran cited Israel's treatment of Palestine as their number one grievance. He allegedly attacked the USA on 9/11 and flew some planes into the most protected building on the planet, even after at least an hour's warning, because of it. As a result the UK and USA invaded Iraq (even though Iraq had f*** all to do with 9/11) and now control the fossil fuel-rich Middle East and Caspian Basin...
Except for Iran!
And we all know what the undead George Soros warned, about the time of the Egyptian Revolution, that Iran will suffer the bloodiest of revolutions. Iran almost fell in 2009 in the Green Revolution, another of Soros' colour revolutions.
If the application of 'humanitarian assistance' can be applied to Libyan rebels then why cannot it be applied to Gaza, and Hamas or even Hezbollah? Doing so would eliminate the major source of anger that drives Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism.
I'll tell you why.
Because the singular reason for the creation and existence of Israel is to provoke terror, mass terror, terror that is global. Global terror requires global solutions, doesn't it? That's the mantra, to be repeated ten times a night every night before you climb into your bed.
Without Israel there would be no al-Qaeda.
Without Israel there would have been no 9/11.
Without Israel there would be no global police state.
That's why.
I am not saying that Jews run the world, only that the state of Israel is being used by those who do run the world to provoke tragic reactions, reactions that can then be used for war and the implementation of the global police state.
AND THEY HAVE.
What is the difference between the Palestinians who were terrorisd by Irgun etc and forced into the largest refugee camps in the world and who formed organisations like the PLO and Hamas to fight their corner and the oppressive dictatorial regime in Tel Aviv, and the Libyan rebels?
Answer : the Libyan rebels can get rid of Gaddafi and open up Libyan oil and other resources and markets to their sponsors, like NATO, MI6.
So when Cameron the Inglorious says we must invade Libya and take out Gaddafi or else we will suffer terrorism, what is he in reality saying?
He is
(1) taking the limeade out of Russia
(2) changing the goals of UN SCR 1973 to regime change
(3) risking going to war and not taking Gaddafi out with the unnecessary deaths of ordinary British men, women and children, the same people who are suffering severe austerity, in terror attacks, real or false flag, as a reprisal. In fact, I would say there is a 90% probability that any terror attack in the UK in the near future will be another 7/7; MI5 will know about it, MI5 could have stopped it, but MI5 will allow it, to continue any war on Libya and the removal if not death of Gaddafi, until the plan of Henry Kissinger has been fully implemented (which may well end in Iran).
And if you're wondering who did Pan Am 103? It was not Gaddafi. Look to some greedy corrupt faction within CIA/MI6 dealing in drugs.
ARREST HENRY KISSINGER!
ARREST ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN!
ARREST CAMERON THE INGLORIOUS!
[This blog was brought to you in full compliance with all treaties regarding the fundamental human right to freedom of expression, a right my grandfathers fought in WW2 for, and a right that is being quickly and quietly removed.]
===============================
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8391109/Libya-British-could-face-terrrorist-reprisals.html
The Prime Minister told MPs that Britain’s own national security "interests" will be at risk if the Gaddafi regime survives in Tripoli.
British officials said that the Government’s leading role in international efforts to topple Gaddafi could increase the threat of reprisals from the Libyan leader and his followers.
So, in his twisted Nazi Eton/Oxford/Bullingdon mind, we should attack Libya and take out Gaddafi because if we attack Libya but Gaddafi stays in power then he might attack us with terror.
SAY WHAT?!
This is the same twisted logic that allows the Nazi gambling banks (who finance the Tory Party) to create non-existent money out of nothing and lend it to us at exorbitant rates of interest.
This is the same twisted logic that has not sent one banker to prison for what they have done to this nation and its people that they, the Tories, are so allegedly proud of.
This is the same twisted logic that permits our superbly trained doctors, trained to sustain life, to transfer sick old people onto the Liverpool Care Pathway, a road to death. I shall repeat again; dead sick old people don't need expensive treatment (even though they will have paid NI all their hard-working life for that exact reason) and dead sick old people don't need pensions (even though they will have paid NI all their hard-working life for that exact reason). So by killing sick old people the regime of Cameron the Inglorious can unnecessarily pay off the private gambling debts of the financiers of the Tory party in the City of London, home of the Rothschilds and therefore the home of violently racist Zionism.
But this is also the same twisted logic that allows Israel to slaughter the Palestinians!
Where were the UN and NATO during Operation Cast Lead?
Take Osama bin Laden. Remember him? That guy in white robes with a beard? Who allegedly did 9/11, a crime the FBI refuse to attribute to him because of lack of evidence? Whatever happened to him?
Anyway, that al-Qaeda thing he allegedly ran cited Israel's treatment of Palestine as their number one grievance. He allegedly attacked the USA on 9/11 and flew some planes into the most protected building on the planet, even after at least an hour's warning, because of it. As a result the UK and USA invaded Iraq (even though Iraq had f*** all to do with 9/11) and now control the fossil fuel-rich Middle East and Caspian Basin...
Except for Iran!
And we all know what the undead George Soros warned, about the time of the Egyptian Revolution, that Iran will suffer the bloodiest of revolutions. Iran almost fell in 2009 in the Green Revolution, another of Soros' colour revolutions.
If the application of 'humanitarian assistance' can be applied to Libyan rebels then why cannot it be applied to Gaza, and Hamas or even Hezbollah? Doing so would eliminate the major source of anger that drives Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism.
I'll tell you why.
Because the singular reason for the creation and existence of Israel is to provoke terror, mass terror, terror that is global. Global terror requires global solutions, doesn't it? That's the mantra, to be repeated ten times a night every night before you climb into your bed.
Without Israel there would be no al-Qaeda.
Without Israel there would have been no 9/11.
Without Israel there would be no global police state.
That's why.
I am not saying that Jews run the world, only that the state of Israel is being used by those who do run the world to provoke tragic reactions, reactions that can then be used for war and the implementation of the global police state.
AND THEY HAVE.
What is the difference between the Palestinians who were terrorisd by Irgun etc and forced into the largest refugee camps in the world and who formed organisations like the PLO and Hamas to fight their corner and the oppressive dictatorial regime in Tel Aviv, and the Libyan rebels?
Answer : the Libyan rebels can get rid of Gaddafi and open up Libyan oil and other resources and markets to their sponsors, like NATO, MI6.
So when Cameron the Inglorious says we must invade Libya and take out Gaddafi or else we will suffer terrorism, what is he in reality saying?
He is
(1) taking the limeade out of Russia
(2) changing the goals of UN SCR 1973 to regime change
(3) risking going to war and not taking Gaddafi out with the unnecessary deaths of ordinary British men, women and children, the same people who are suffering severe austerity, in terror attacks, real or false flag, as a reprisal. In fact, I would say there is a 90% probability that any terror attack in the UK in the near future will be another 7/7; MI5 will know about it, MI5 could have stopped it, but MI5 will allow it, to continue any war on Libya and the removal if not death of Gaddafi, until the plan of Henry Kissinger has been fully implemented (which may well end in Iran).
And if you're wondering who did Pan Am 103? It was not Gaddafi. Look to some greedy corrupt faction within CIA/MI6 dealing in drugs.
ARREST HENRY KISSINGER!
ARREST ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN!
ARREST CAMERON THE INGLORIOUS!
[This blog was brought to you in full compliance with all treaties regarding the fundamental human right to freedom of expression, a right my grandfathers fought in WW2 for, and a right that is being quickly and quietly removed.]
===============================
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8391109/Libya-British-could-face-terrrorist-reprisals.html
The Prime Minister told MPs that Britain’s own national security "interests" will be at risk if the Gaddafi regime survives in Tripoli.
British officials said that the Government’s leading role in international efforts to topple Gaddafi could increase the threat of reprisals from the Libyan leader and his followers.
I KNEW IT!
As soon as I saw those images of a fighter plane being shot down over Benghazi this morning I knew there was something seriously wrong.
And there was!
The rebs'shot down their own plane!
Yet the inglorious BBC was reporting that the rebs' had shot down a Gaddafi fighter!
But that doesn't matter, does it? The Nazi MI-controlled BBC only pushes Nazi propaganda like killing disabled people. It would never lie to drag us into war again, like it did over Iraq with its serious lack of journalistic integrity and sucking the cocks of the globalists, would it?
See http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/mar/19/libya-live-blog-ceasefire-nofly#block-54 and read all the way down to 5.40pm.
And there was!
The rebs'shot down their own plane!
Yet the inglorious BBC was reporting that the rebs' had shot down a Gaddafi fighter!
But that doesn't matter, does it? The Nazi MI-controlled BBC only pushes Nazi propaganda like killing disabled people. It would never lie to drag us into war again, like it did over Iraq with its serious lack of journalistic integrity and sucking the cocks of the globalists, would it?
See http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/mar/19/libya-live-blog-ceasefire-nofly#block-54 and read all the way down to 5.40pm.
5.40pm: French media is reporting that Benghazi rebels admit they shot down their own plane today
IF IT LOOKS LIKE REGIME CHANGE AND SOUNDS LIKE REGIME CHANGE AND SMELLS LIKE REGIME CHANGE AND TASTES LIKE REGIME CHANGE
The hastily agreed UN SCR 1973 is wide open to interpretation. The statement that no occupation shall take place looks iron clad, but still allows the possibility for short term operations by foreign special forces, such as assassination, training and logistical support.
And even now, just 24 hours after the resolution was passed, the aim of any action is rapidly morphing from humanitarian intervention into regime change. Cameron demanded that Gaddafi go.
(and yes that is the same Cameron who is killing sick old people via the Liverpool Care Pathway in order to pay for the bailouts of his Nazi friends and financiers in The City)
Craig Murray has written his analysis of UN SCR 1973[2]. Apparently a paragraph which was proposed by the UK which would have excluded the rebels from the arms embargo was dropped. But this exposes the motives of the UK. And you can bet your last SDR that they are at this very minute at least advising the rebels, if not training and arming them, in direct contravention of the resolution.
And now Russia is trying to wriggle out of allowing NATO and its allies to takeover North Africa, warning against a large scale invasion and stating that they were given assurances that no large scale military operation would take place[3], yet no agreement was reached as to how exactly the no fly zone would be implemented. If NATO is Not A Trustworthy Organisation and we see an invasion of Libya, then again Russia will have egg on its face, so much egg that one could start to wonder just who really does run Russia..
[1] Gaddafi told 'Your time is up',http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367764/Gaddafi-told-Your-time-British-jets-prepare-lead-UN-force-Libyan-dictator.html
[2] Military Action Against Libya Is Not Illegal, Not About Democracy and Very Limited, http://craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/03/military-action-against-libya-is-not-illegal-not-about-democracy-and-very-limited/
[3] Russia warns of "full-scale military action" following Security Council vote on Libya, http://rt.com/politics/libya-russia-security-council-un/
And even now, just 24 hours after the resolution was passed, the aim of any action is rapidly morphing from humanitarian intervention into regime change. Cameron demanded that Gaddafi go.
It is almost impossible to envisage a future for Libya that includes him. Gaddafi must go, he has no legitimacy.[1]
(and yes that is the same Cameron who is killing sick old people via the Liverpool Care Pathway in order to pay for the bailouts of his Nazi friends and financiers in The City)
Craig Murray has written his analysis of UN SCR 1973[2]. Apparently a paragraph which was proposed by the UK which would have excluded the rebels from the arms embargo was dropped. But this exposes the motives of the UK. And you can bet your last SDR that they are at this very minute at least advising the rebels, if not training and arming them, in direct contravention of the resolution.
And now Russia is trying to wriggle out of allowing NATO and its allies to takeover North Africa, warning against a large scale invasion and stating that they were given assurances that no large scale military operation would take place[3], yet no agreement was reached as to how exactly the no fly zone would be implemented. If NATO is Not A Trustworthy Organisation and we see an invasion of Libya, then again Russia will have egg on its face, so much egg that one could start to wonder just who really does run Russia..
[1] Gaddafi told 'Your time is up',http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1367764/Gaddafi-told-Your-time-British-jets-prepare-lead-UN-force-Libyan-dictator.html
[2] Military Action Against Libya Is Not Illegal, Not About Democracy and Very Limited, http://craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/03/military-action-against-libya-is-not-illegal-not-about-democracy-and-very-limited/
[3] Russia warns of "full-scale military action" following Security Council vote on Libya, http://rt.com/politics/libya-russia-security-council-un/
Friday, March 18, 2011
TRILLIONS HAVE GONE MISSING
Trillions have gone missing.
On the day before 9/11 Rumsfeld stated a few trillion could not be accounted for. On 9/11, nobody cared. they wanted only revenge.
Trillions have been given to the banks. When asked where it has gone, we were told to f*** off.
How can such fraud go unprosecuted?
With continuous war and terror threats.
On the day before 9/11 Rumsfeld stated a few trillion could not be accounted for. On 9/11, nobody cared. they wanted only revenge.
Trillions have been given to the banks. When asked where it has gone, we were told to f*** off.
How can such fraud go unprosecuted?
With continuous war and terror threats.
THERE IS SOMETHING NOT QUITE RIGHT ABOUT THE CURRENT ACTIONS IN LIBYA
Gadaffi was portrayed as satan, blamed for almost everything.
But then JP Morgan Chase consultant and Bilderberg Boy Blair brought Gaddafi/satan in from the cold. He signed oil exploration deals with Bilderberg Inc., and the alleged Pan Am 103 bomber was released on grounds of compassion as he was allegedly suffering from terminal cancer.
But now he is being driven out of power, in a power play that Kissinger predicted, along with a few other agents, and nothing is being done about them.
However, what is happening in North Africa and the Middle East is driving up the price of oil.
There is something not right about this, but I don't know what at the moment.
But then JP Morgan Chase consultant and Bilderberg Boy Blair brought Gaddafi/satan in from the cold. He signed oil exploration deals with Bilderberg Inc., and the alleged Pan Am 103 bomber was released on grounds of compassion as he was allegedly suffering from terminal cancer.
But now he is being driven out of power, in a power play that Kissinger predicted, along with a few other agents, and nothing is being done about them.
However, what is happening in North Africa and the Middle East is driving up the price of oil.
There is something not right about this, but I don't know what at the moment.
BILDERBERG NATO CHIEF GETS INTO THE SPIRIT OF COMIC RELIEF
Today is Red Nose Day. We joke. We laugh. We donate. The aim is to wipe out poverty and misery and drudgery and slavery and sadness around the world with a few tens of millions of pounds.
Meanwhile, we can somehow immediately bailout the gambling Nazi banks with trillions?!
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the SecGen of NATO, has issued a blog greeting the UN SC Res 1973 to legalise military action on Libya, which is in this spirit of comedy.
This man is literally and legally responsible for the deaths of many innocent men, women and children, not just in Afghanistan but also in Gaza.
He should be arrested immediately, along with Henry Kissinger, and tried for crimes against humanity.
Meanwhile, we can somehow immediately bailout the gambling Nazi banks with trillions?!
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the SecGen of NATO, has issued a blog greeting the UN SC Res 1973 to legalise military action on Libya, which is in this spirit of comedy.
This man is literally and legally responsible for the deaths of many innocent men, women and children, not just in Afghanistan but also in Gaza.
He should be arrested immediately, along with Henry Kissinger, and tried for crimes against humanity.
NATO WILL BETRAY ANY AGREEMENT REACHED AT UNITED NATIONS HQ
Perhaps Russia knows it too.
NATO (Never A Trustworthy Organisation, North Africa Takeover Organisation, NArco Terrorist Organisation) will betray any agreement reached at the United Nations last night so that Russia would not veto the No Fly Zone over Libya.
Russia should know how NATO betrays. NATO uses flight corridors over Russia to support operations in Afghanistan. In return Russia expected NATO to destroy the Afghan opium racket. Guess what?
The betrayal will not be immediate.
The betrayal will not be blatant.
No.
The betrayal will be delayed, subtle, perhaps even gentle, delivered with the casuality of a professional assassin making love to his victim.
Gaddafi recently stated to Russia Today that he would be developing business relations with Russia, China and Germany[1]. Yet all three abstained last night. WHY?
WHAT AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN REACHED IN SECRET?
What agreements will NATO betray?
Has this war been agreed to distract from Fukushima and the poisoning of the world?
[1] Libya’s Gaddafi hunting for enemies and friends alike, http://rt.com/politics/gaddafi-libya-west-un/
NATO (Never A Trustworthy Organisation, North Africa Takeover Organisation, NArco Terrorist Organisation) will betray any agreement reached at the United Nations last night so that Russia would not veto the No Fly Zone over Libya.
Russia should know how NATO betrays. NATO uses flight corridors over Russia to support operations in Afghanistan. In return Russia expected NATO to destroy the Afghan opium racket. Guess what?
The betrayal will not be immediate.
The betrayal will not be blatant.
No.
The betrayal will be delayed, subtle, perhaps even gentle, delivered with the casuality of a professional assassin making love to his victim.
Gaddafi recently stated to Russia Today that he would be developing business relations with Russia, China and Germany[1]. Yet all three abstained last night. WHY?
WHAT AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN REACHED IN SECRET?
What agreements will NATO betray?
Has this war been agreed to distract from Fukushima and the poisoning of the world?
[1] Libya’s Gaddafi hunting for enemies and friends alike, http://rt.com/politics/gaddafi-libya-west-un/
Thursday, March 17, 2011
PUBLIC SECTOR JOB LOSSES MUCH BIGGER THAN EXPECTED
So the economy shrank by 0.6% over winter, after it was forecast to grow.
The decline was blamed on the very cold weather (which was not forecast by the corrupted Meteorological Office).
But perhaps it was due to the reduction in public sector employment, which has also shrank but by a much much larger rate than was forecast.
The COCCs must go.
We must take back the power to create non-existent money out of nothing and get the kingdom back to work, building infrastructure instead of killing sick old people.
============================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/mar/16/public-sector-job-losses
Public sector workers being laid off far faster than officially predicted
More than 100,000 jobs lost in 2010 as Labour accuses Office for Budget Responsibility of getting its forecasts wrong
Heather Stewart and Polly Curtis
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 16 March 2011 20.13 GMT
Public sector workers are being laid off much faster than officials forecast, with more than 100,000 jobs being lost over the past 12 months.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics showed a decline of 111,000 in "general government" workers, 1.9% of the total, during 2010; 66,000 of the jobs were in local government.
In its forecast with the budget last June, George Osborne's Office for Budget Responsibility predicted a decline of 0.1%, equivalent to 5,500 jobs, in general government employment between the financial years of 2009-10 and 2010-11.
In its revised November estimates, the OBR shifted its estimate of the number of government employees in 2010-11 down by a further 40,000; but yesterday's 111,000 figure means job losses are running twice as fast as it expected.
Liam Byrne, shadow work and pensions secretary, said: "If the OBR has underestimated the rise in public sector unemployment, then that makes the outlook for jobs even worse."
On the ONS's wider measure of public sector employment, which includes public sector corporations, the government's austerity drive claimed 132,000 public sector jobs in 2010, with the rate of job losses gathering pace through the year.
Some 45,000 public sector jobs were lost in the final three months of 2010 alone, including 32,000 in schools and colleges, despite the promise to protect education. There was also a surprise rise of 9,000 jobs in "public administration", raising a question about whether the government is finding true efficiencies.
The decline in public sector jobs overall is partly attributed to the government's recruitment freeze, but the pace suggests cuts are already translating into job losses. It is now known that, overall, 170,000 local government workers have got "at risk" notices, which will take some months to translate into redundancies.
The ONS figures show the total of unemployed people increased by 27,000 in the three months to January to reach 2.53m, the highest figure since 1994.
Ministers said the figures show that the private sector is picking up staff and offsetting some of the public sector redundancies, citing a 77,000 rise in jobs from non-state employers in the final three months of 2010.
The figures also show a 45,000 fall in public sector jobs between October and November 2010. In 2010 there was a 132,000 reduction in public sector employment, a decrease of 2.1%. Of those laid off in the last quarter of 2010, 9,000 were in central government, 24,000 in local government, and 12,000 in quangos and other public corporations. Regions with the biggest falls in public sector jobs were: Yorkshire and Humber (22,000); the north-west (19,000); and the south-west (18,000). In Whitehall the largest losses were in the Department for Work and Pensions (1,670), the Home Office (1,190), and Revenue & Customs (640).
Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: "These job losses are a mark of things to come. Where is the protection for frontline services the prime minister promised?"
The Cabinet Office welcomed the figures as showing that efficiencies are being found across the public sector.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011
The decline was blamed on the very cold weather (which was not forecast by the corrupted Meteorological Office).
But perhaps it was due to the reduction in public sector employment, which has also shrank but by a much much larger rate than was forecast.
The COCCs must go.
We must take back the power to create non-existent money out of nothing and get the kingdom back to work, building infrastructure instead of killing sick old people.
============================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/mar/16/public-sector-job-losses
Public sector workers being laid off far faster than officially predicted
More than 100,000 jobs lost in 2010 as Labour accuses Office for Budget Responsibility of getting its forecasts wrong
Heather Stewart and Polly Curtis
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 16 March 2011 20.13 GMT
Public sector workers are being laid off much faster than officials forecast, with more than 100,000 jobs being lost over the past 12 months.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics showed a decline of 111,000 in "general government" workers, 1.9% of the total, during 2010; 66,000 of the jobs were in local government.
In its forecast with the budget last June, George Osborne's Office for Budget Responsibility predicted a decline of 0.1%, equivalent to 5,500 jobs, in general government employment between the financial years of 2009-10 and 2010-11.
In its revised November estimates, the OBR shifted its estimate of the number of government employees in 2010-11 down by a further 40,000; but yesterday's 111,000 figure means job losses are running twice as fast as it expected.
Liam Byrne, shadow work and pensions secretary, said: "If the OBR has underestimated the rise in public sector unemployment, then that makes the outlook for jobs even worse."
On the ONS's wider measure of public sector employment, which includes public sector corporations, the government's austerity drive claimed 132,000 public sector jobs in 2010, with the rate of job losses gathering pace through the year.
Some 45,000 public sector jobs were lost in the final three months of 2010 alone, including 32,000 in schools and colleges, despite the promise to protect education. There was also a surprise rise of 9,000 jobs in "public administration", raising a question about whether the government is finding true efficiencies.
The decline in public sector jobs overall is partly attributed to the government's recruitment freeze, but the pace suggests cuts are already translating into job losses. It is now known that, overall, 170,000 local government workers have got "at risk" notices, which will take some months to translate into redundancies.
The ONS figures show the total of unemployed people increased by 27,000 in the three months to January to reach 2.53m, the highest figure since 1994.
Ministers said the figures show that the private sector is picking up staff and offsetting some of the public sector redundancies, citing a 77,000 rise in jobs from non-state employers in the final three months of 2010.
The figures also show a 45,000 fall in public sector jobs between October and November 2010. In 2010 there was a 132,000 reduction in public sector employment, a decrease of 2.1%. Of those laid off in the last quarter of 2010, 9,000 were in central government, 24,000 in local government, and 12,000 in quangos and other public corporations. Regions with the biggest falls in public sector jobs were: Yorkshire and Humber (22,000); the north-west (19,000); and the south-west (18,000). In Whitehall the largest losses were in the Department for Work and Pensions (1,670), the Home Office (1,190), and Revenue & Customs (640).
Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: "These job losses are a mark of things to come. Where is the protection for frontline services the prime minister promised?"
The Cabinet Office welcomed the figures as showing that efficiencies are being found across the public sector.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
ARISE YE CORRUPT WRETCHES! YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT YOUR BLEATING!
Today's PMQs was as pathetic and tedious and laughable and pathetic and tedious and monotonous and pathetic and evasive and laughable etc as usual.
No matter how much they (pretend to) argue about who would protect the NHS etc more, the banks are still laughing and laughing and laughing and laughing, laughing so much at Project Merlin that despite promising to increase lending in return for paying out huge bonuses to senior employees who say they did not receive any bailouts (which is true if they didn't receive a bailout from the UK but not if they received tens of billions in total, as some highly regarded banks did, from the US Federal Reserve), they have actually restricted lending but have increased the price of borrowing.
[source : FT (print version), Monday 14th March 2011 (sorry, I can't remember the title)]
THEY CREATE NON-EXISTENT MONEY OUT OF NOTHING, FOLKS!
THEY'VE JUST DUMPED TRILLIONS OF THEIR OWN PRIVATE GAMBLING DEBTS ONTO THE MUGGINS BRITISH TAXPAYER, AND STILL RETAIN THE GOD LIKE POWER TO CREATE NON-EXISTENT MONEY OUT OF NOTHING, AND NOT ONE OF THEM GOES TO PRISON!
IN RETURN, THE MUGGINS BRITISH TAXPAYER WILL SUFFER SEVERE AUSTERITY FOR DECADES!
THE BANKS WILL (OR SHOULD) BE THE ONLY ONES LAUGHING ON COMIC RELIEF DAY!
THEY'VE BEEN RELIEVED OF THEIR DEBTS!
WE SUFFER SEVERE AUSTERITY!
Ha, ha, ha, ha!
Who's laughing now?
Baaaah! NHS (who kill sick people via the sick LCP). Baaaah! The deaths of British soldiers (sacrificed on the altar of the New World Order in the name of massively increased heroin profits). Baaaaaaaaaaaaah! Where's my grass?
http://www.twistedtracks.com/sound-effects/animal-sound-effects/sheep-sound-effects/sheep-bleating-herd-2-10.html
[This blog has been brought to you in full compliance with all treaties regarding the fundamental right to freedom of expression.]
Express yourself!
No matter how much they (pretend to) argue about who would protect the NHS etc more, the banks are still laughing and laughing and laughing and laughing, laughing so much at Project Merlin that despite promising to increase lending in return for paying out huge bonuses to senior employees who say they did not receive any bailouts (which is true if they didn't receive a bailout from the UK but not if they received tens of billions in total, as some highly regarded banks did, from the US Federal Reserve), they have actually restricted lending but have increased the price of borrowing.
[source : FT (print version), Monday 14th March 2011 (sorry, I can't remember the title)]
THEY CREATE NON-EXISTENT MONEY OUT OF NOTHING, FOLKS!
THEY'VE JUST DUMPED TRILLIONS OF THEIR OWN PRIVATE GAMBLING DEBTS ONTO THE MUGGINS BRITISH TAXPAYER, AND STILL RETAIN THE GOD LIKE POWER TO CREATE NON-EXISTENT MONEY OUT OF NOTHING, AND NOT ONE OF THEM GOES TO PRISON!
IN RETURN, THE MUGGINS BRITISH TAXPAYER WILL SUFFER SEVERE AUSTERITY FOR DECADES!
THE BANKS WILL (OR SHOULD) BE THE ONLY ONES LAUGHING ON COMIC RELIEF DAY!
THEY'VE BEEN RELIEVED OF THEIR DEBTS!
WE SUFFER SEVERE AUSTERITY!
Ha, ha, ha, ha!
Who's laughing now?
Baaaah! NHS (who kill sick people via the sick LCP). Baaaah! The deaths of British soldiers (sacrificed on the altar of the New World Order in the name of massively increased heroin profits). Baaaaaaaaaaaaah! Where's my grass?
http://www.twistedtracks.com/sound-effects/animal-sound-effects/sheep-sound-effects/sheep-bleating-herd-2-10.html
[This blog has been brought to you in full compliance with all treaties regarding the fundamental right to freedom of expression.]
Express yourself!
ONLY THE BANKS SHOULD BE LAUGHING ON FRIDAY
This Friday is Comic Relief. You know, when we laugh away our troubles and donate yet again to good causes, good causes who always seem to need more and more donations, no matter how much we donate.
But as the austerity begins to kick in to pay for the bailout of the Nazi banks, as people are made unemployed, as house prices fall and families can't remortgage and lose their homes, and more sick old people are euthanised via the LCP, we should not laugh.
Only the banks, bailed out with trillions in loans and guarantees and still entrusted with the power to create non-existent money out of nothing, should be laughing, because their Nazi heritage demands that we suffer severe austerity while they hold wild sex-and-cocaine-and-mock-human-sacrifice parties in their remote 50 bedroom mansions, demanding more war, more misery and more world government.
He who laughs does not know the bad news (or is completely insane).
We do not need comedy. We've been here before. We'll be here again. Unless we take back the power to create non-existent money out of nothing, and lock up a few top bankers and their supporters.
But as the austerity begins to kick in to pay for the bailout of the Nazi banks, as people are made unemployed, as house prices fall and families can't remortgage and lose their homes, and more sick old people are euthanised via the LCP, we should not laugh.
Only the banks, bailed out with trillions in loans and guarantees and still entrusted with the power to create non-existent money out of nothing, should be laughing, because their Nazi heritage demands that we suffer severe austerity while they hold wild sex-and-cocaine-and-mock-human-sacrifice parties in their remote 50 bedroom mansions, demanding more war, more misery and more world government.
He who laughs does not know the bad news (or is completely insane).
We do not need comedy. We've been here before. We'll be here again. Unless we take back the power to create non-existent money out of nothing, and lock up a few top bankers and their supporters.
MASSACRE! SLAUGHTER! EXTERMINATION!
These very emotive words were used by interviewees of Victoria Derbyshire on her radio show on BBC Radio 5 Live. She was speaking to a few people in Bahrain and Libya. They were describing the actions of the Bahraini and Libyan authorities. All pleaded for the world to intervene.
Meanwhile, NATO has just massacred/slaughtered/exterminated some more children, aged 9 and 15[1], and Israel has just massacred/slaughtered/exterminated two more Palestinians[2] in a civil war that has been financed and supported by the USA and the UK for decades.
[1] NATO Strike Kills Two Children in Afghanistan’s Kunar Province
Kids Were Watering Crops During Attack, http://news.antiwar.com/2011/03/15/nato-strike-kills-two-children-in-afghanistans-kunar-province/
[2] Two Palestinians killed in Gaza blitz, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/170224.html
Meanwhile, NATO has just massacred/slaughtered/exterminated some more children, aged 9 and 15[1], and Israel has just massacred/slaughtered/exterminated two more Palestinians[2] in a civil war that has been financed and supported by the USA and the UK for decades.
[1] NATO Strike Kills Two Children in Afghanistan’s Kunar Province
Kids Were Watering Crops During Attack, http://news.antiwar.com/2011/03/15/nato-strike-kills-two-children-in-afghanistans-kunar-province/
[2] Two Palestinians killed in Gaza blitz, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/170224.html
HAVE SOME FUN WITH NATO
What does NATO stand for?
Originally it was North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. But since 9/11, and the unbelievably rapid increase in Afghan heroin production as NATO protects the opium crops, it could be NArco Terrorist Organisation. And as revolutions occur in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya it could be North Africa Takeover Organisation.
But we are now seeing Gaddafi regain control. His son Saif has today stated that it will be all over within 48 hours. So what else could NATO stand for?
Not Able To Overthrow?
Not Always Trustworthy Organisation?
Never A Trustworthy Organisation?
So have some fun with NATO, before they have some fun with you.
Originally it was North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. But since 9/11, and the unbelievably rapid increase in Afghan heroin production as NATO protects the opium crops, it could be NArco Terrorist Organisation. And as revolutions occur in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya it could be North Africa Takeover Organisation.
But we are now seeing Gaddafi regain control. His son Saif has today stated that it will be all over within 48 hours. So what else could NATO stand for?
Not Able To Overthrow?
Not Always Trustworthy Organisation?
Never A Trustworthy Organisation?
So have some fun with NATO, before they have some fun with you.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
THEY DIDN'T WANT HELP. THEY WANTED A REVOLUTION OF THE PEOPLE. BUT NOW THEY WANT GADDAFI ASSASSINATED.
A curious turn of events has occured.
A week or two ago the Libyan 'rebels' did not want any help. They did not want a no fly zone. They allegedly sent the SAS and MI6 away with their tails between their legs. They wanted a revolution of the people.
But now, with the tragedy of Japan now consuming time and space in all media, the 'rebels' are now calling for the assassination of Gaddafi and military strikes on Gaddafi's armed forces.[1]
And these military strikes may occur after the Saudis reached an agreement with Hilary Clinton that such strikes could proceed against Gaddafi if the Saudis could invade Bahrain and put down the revolution there.[2]
In the meantime, NATO is still killing women and children in Afghanistan, and there is still a civil war in Palestine that is the stated prime source of anger within the Arab world.
So what does NATO stand for?
(a) North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
(b) NArco Terrorist Organistaion
(c) North Africa Takeover Organisation
(d) All of the above
[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/14/libyan-rebel-leaders-gaddafi-benghazi
[2] http://craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/03/the-invasion-of-bahrain/
A week or two ago the Libyan 'rebels' did not want any help. They did not want a no fly zone. They allegedly sent the SAS and MI6 away with their tails between their legs. They wanted a revolution of the people.
But now, with the tragedy of Japan now consuming time and space in all media, the 'rebels' are now calling for the assassination of Gaddafi and military strikes on Gaddafi's armed forces.[1]
And these military strikes may occur after the Saudis reached an agreement with Hilary Clinton that such strikes could proceed against Gaddafi if the Saudis could invade Bahrain and put down the revolution there.[2]
In the meantime, NATO is still killing women and children in Afghanistan, and there is still a civil war in Palestine that is the stated prime source of anger within the Arab world.
So what does NATO stand for?
(a) North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
(b) NArco Terrorist Organistaion
(c) North Africa Takeover Organisation
(d) All of the above
[1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/14/libyan-rebel-leaders-gaddafi-benghazi
[2] http://craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/03/the-invasion-of-bahrain/
Sunday, March 13, 2011
WAS ARAB UPRISING DISCUSSED AT BILDERBERG LAST YEAR?
Perhaps the main outcome of Bilderberg last year was the green light for an attack on Iran.
Daniel Estulin[1] said he had the agenda for last year, which was
1. Will the Euro Survive?
2. Development in Europe: Europe's Exit Strategy...On Hold?
3. Do We Have Institutions to Deal With the World Economy?
4. Greece: Lessons and Forward-looking Strategies
5. NATO and Afghanistan: The Practical Agenda for the Alliance
6. Iran and Russia: Economic and Financial Threats to the Alliance
7. The Consequences of War Against Terrorism
8. The Influence of Domestic Issues on American Foreign Policy
9. The Outlook for Japan's Economy
10. The Future of the U.S. Dollar: Alternative Scenarios
There is no explicit or implicit discussion of an Arab uprising.
Jim Tucker made no mention of an Arab uprising in his final report on Bilderberg 2010. He did however state that war on Iran was probably on, and that steps were still being taken to establish a global department of energy, a global world treasury department and a global currency.[2]
So what can we deduce from this?
One possibility is that these uprisings are very genuine and at the time of Bilderberg last year were unforeseen. Pastor Williams made his forecast of the crises in October last year, several months after Bilderberg. So it is possible that an immediate direct attack on Iran was stopped by us, or they changed their mind, and have since come up with a new plan to engineer Arab uprisings which would eventually spill over into Iran, to continue the green revolution of 2009. Indeed, the undead George Soros has publicly stated that Iran will suffer the bloodiest of revolutions.
But there is another point of view (as there always is). One commentator on the Arab uprising is Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya at Global Research[3]. He has written several articles on the The Mediterranean Union, which is an expansion of the EU into North Africa and the Middle East. Nazemroaya states that this expansion is an agreement between two factions, the Franco-German faction, and the Anglo-American faction. Now this sounds like a classic Bilderberg plan, cooperating factions using NATO and trade agreements to open up the markets of North Africa and the Middle East to European and American mega corporate fascists.
Was this discussed at Bilderberg last year? It is neither explicitly or implicitly listed in Estulin's leaked agenda, and Tucker does not mention it either.
So what the hell is goin' on?
Is there a huge plan being implemented that very few people know about, not even Bilderberg?
Or are Estulin's and Tucker's sources not quite telling the whole truth?
Maybe. Maybe not.
But what we have seen in the nearly a year since the last Bilderberg meeting is the agenda as provided to Estulin creep slowly forward in some areas, and be discussed in the mockingbird media in others.
The Euro has been in crisis, but survived, and the crisis was used by Bilderbergers to call for more integration.
The IMF is gradually taking control of more national economies, as it said it would.
NATO stepped up its slaughter of Afghan civilians (while wanting to invade Libya on 'humanitarian' grounds).
Iran and Russia have barely been out of the headlines, and always portrayed as the villains.
One major consequence of the war against terrorism has been the TSA patdown controversy.
Pastor Williams has been told of the coming devaluation of the dollar.
And Japan?
[1] http://bilderbergbook.com/
[2] http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bilderberg_meets_in_spain_225.html
[3] http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=listByAuthor&authorFirst=Mahdi%20Darius&authorName=Nazemroaya
Daniel Estulin[1] said he had the agenda for last year, which was
1. Will the Euro Survive?
2. Development in Europe: Europe's Exit Strategy...On Hold?
3. Do We Have Institutions to Deal With the World Economy?
4. Greece: Lessons and Forward-looking Strategies
5. NATO and Afghanistan: The Practical Agenda for the Alliance
6. Iran and Russia: Economic and Financial Threats to the Alliance
7. The Consequences of War Against Terrorism
8. The Influence of Domestic Issues on American Foreign Policy
9. The Outlook for Japan's Economy
10. The Future of the U.S. Dollar: Alternative Scenarios
There is no explicit or implicit discussion of an Arab uprising.
Jim Tucker made no mention of an Arab uprising in his final report on Bilderberg 2010. He did however state that war on Iran was probably on, and that steps were still being taken to establish a global department of energy, a global world treasury department and a global currency.[2]
So what can we deduce from this?
One possibility is that these uprisings are very genuine and at the time of Bilderberg last year were unforeseen. Pastor Williams made his forecast of the crises in October last year, several months after Bilderberg. So it is possible that an immediate direct attack on Iran was stopped by us, or they changed their mind, and have since come up with a new plan to engineer Arab uprisings which would eventually spill over into Iran, to continue the green revolution of 2009. Indeed, the undead George Soros has publicly stated that Iran will suffer the bloodiest of revolutions.
But there is another point of view (as there always is). One commentator on the Arab uprising is Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya at Global Research[3]. He has written several articles on the The Mediterranean Union, which is an expansion of the EU into North Africa and the Middle East. Nazemroaya states that this expansion is an agreement between two factions, the Franco-German faction, and the Anglo-American faction. Now this sounds like a classic Bilderberg plan, cooperating factions using NATO and trade agreements to open up the markets of North Africa and the Middle East to European and American mega corporate fascists.
Was this discussed at Bilderberg last year? It is neither explicitly or implicitly listed in Estulin's leaked agenda, and Tucker does not mention it either.
So what the hell is goin' on?
Is there a huge plan being implemented that very few people know about, not even Bilderberg?
Or are Estulin's and Tucker's sources not quite telling the whole truth?
Maybe. Maybe not.
But what we have seen in the nearly a year since the last Bilderberg meeting is the agenda as provided to Estulin creep slowly forward in some areas, and be discussed in the mockingbird media in others.
The Euro has been in crisis, but survived, and the crisis was used by Bilderbergers to call for more integration.
The IMF is gradually taking control of more national economies, as it said it would.
NATO stepped up its slaughter of Afghan civilians (while wanting to invade Libya on 'humanitarian' grounds).
Iran and Russia have barely been out of the headlines, and always portrayed as the villains.
One major consequence of the war against terrorism has been the TSA patdown controversy.
Pastor Williams has been told of the coming devaluation of the dollar.
And Japan?
[1] http://bilderbergbook.com/
[2] http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bilderberg_meets_in_spain_225.html
[3] http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=listByAuthor&authorFirst=Mahdi%20Darius&authorName=Nazemroaya
Friday, March 11, 2011
WILL JAPAN EARTHQUAKE BE USED TO DISTRACT FROM ACTIONS IN LIBYA?
Call me a cynic, but with all eyes suddenly on Japan and the tsunami, and Gaddafi apparently regaining control of Libya, could some sort of action in or invasion of Libya by the NWO occur?
Thursday, March 10, 2011
EITHER WORK UNTIL YOU DROP OR BASH THE BANKS
So Lord, repeat Lord, Hutton has recommended that nurses, teachers and firefighters should be shafted and betrayed to pay for the unnecessary bail outs of the Nazi banks.
Hutton said
Hutton is proposing to slash the pensions of employees in the most respected careers. They didn't abuse the God like power to create non-existent money out of nothing and deliberately inflate a credit bubble. They didn't gamble and lose in derivatives. They didn't get multi million pound bonuses. NO! They taught our children. They saved lives. They put out fires.
They will be asked to pay more, work for longer and if they live to retire then they will get less.
But there is another solution, that is so so simple, and as Hutton seeks, is fairer to taxpayers.
That simple solution is to BASH THE BANKS!
Get our money back from the banks. Take them all into bankruptcy. They are all bankrupt. Cancel all derivatives. The current banking system is a complete fraud. Start again. Create our own money. Stop killing old people by the LCP, and instead get people building, nursing, teaching, engineering.
====================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/mar/10/pension-reforms-public-sector-hutton
Pension reforms: Public sector workers to pay more and retire later
Hutton review recommends nurses, teachers and other state employees lose final salary pension scheme and work six years longer
Polly Curtis, Whitehall correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 10 March 2011 08.47 GMT
Six million public sector workers are to lose their generous final salary pension schemes and will have to work for up to six years longer under plans to ease the state's £30bn pensions liability.
A government-commissioned report by Lord Hutton, the former Labour pensions secretary, proposes sweeping changes to state pensions that will mean nurses, doctors, teachers, local government and other public sector workers will have to pay more into their pension pots, retire later and many will receive less when they do.
All state employees in the UK will be affected, creating the first legal basis for simultaneous strike action across the unions, who have universally condemned the report.
The Guardian has revealed details of the first co-ordinated strikes, which are already being planned for June.
Hutton told the BBC's Today programme: "I want the system to be fairer; fairer to scheme members themselves and fairer to taxpayers obviously. I want the reforms to address ... the rising cost of these schemes. I want to make sure we can deliver adequate good quality retirement incomes for public servant and on a sustainable basis.
Hutton said
I want the system to be fairer; fairer to scheme members themselves and fairer to taxpayers obviously.
Hutton is proposing to slash the pensions of employees in the most respected careers. They didn't abuse the God like power to create non-existent money out of nothing and deliberately inflate a credit bubble. They didn't gamble and lose in derivatives. They didn't get multi million pound bonuses. NO! They taught our children. They saved lives. They put out fires.
They will be asked to pay more, work for longer and if they live to retire then they will get less.
But there is another solution, that is so so simple, and as Hutton seeks, is fairer to taxpayers.
That simple solution is to BASH THE BANKS!
Get our money back from the banks. Take them all into bankruptcy. They are all bankrupt. Cancel all derivatives. The current banking system is a complete fraud. Start again. Create our own money. Stop killing old people by the LCP, and instead get people building, nursing, teaching, engineering.
====================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/mar/10/pension-reforms-public-sector-hutton
Pension reforms: Public sector workers to pay more and retire later
Hutton review recommends nurses, teachers and other state employees lose final salary pension scheme and work six years longer
Polly Curtis, Whitehall correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 10 March 2011 08.47 GMT
Six million public sector workers are to lose their generous final salary pension schemes and will have to work for up to six years longer under plans to ease the state's £30bn pensions liability.
A government-commissioned report by Lord Hutton, the former Labour pensions secretary, proposes sweeping changes to state pensions that will mean nurses, doctors, teachers, local government and other public sector workers will have to pay more into their pension pots, retire later and many will receive less when they do.
All state employees in the UK will be affected, creating the first legal basis for simultaneous strike action across the unions, who have universally condemned the report.
The Guardian has revealed details of the first co-ordinated strikes, which are already being planned for June.
Hutton told the BBC's Today programme: "I want the system to be fairer; fairer to scheme members themselves and fairer to taxpayers obviously. I want the reforms to address ... the rising cost of these schemes. I want to make sure we can deliver adequate good quality retirement incomes for public servant and on a sustainable basis.
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
WILL WE SEE CONTROLLED CRISES NOT UNCONTROLLED WAR
Gaddafi was brought in from the cold just a few years ago by the Prophet Tony Blair (may war be upon him). Is it more than coincidence that the US-UK-NATO axis of evil is now after him?
Why would they overthrow Gaddafi if he was their friend, buying weapons, signing oil deals with Bilderberg Inc.?
Has Gaddafi reached a deal with them?
I am beginning to see a possible trick.
It would be easy to drive the oil price up by controlling crises rather than risk uncontrolled war, particularly if you control one of the main instigators, The Muslim Brotherhood.
Imagine you have leaders of oil rich nations as allies.
Imagine engineering, or piggybacking onto, a revolution against those leaders.
With those revolutions controlled the Mockingbird media can exaggerate the crises and drive the price of oil up. And if those revolutions expire but have driven the price of oil up and those allies are still in power, with perhaps even more power as happened with Gulf War 1 when a revolution against Saddam was encouraged by the allies but was then betrayed, then the PTB have gained.
Perhaps this desire of the US-UK-NATO axis of evil to invade etc is designed to merely quell the uprising against Gaddafi with the implication that it is imperialist.
Regarding Tunisia and Egypt, for this proposed trick to occur, for an uprising to occur in Libya alone would look a bit suspicious so there were fake revolutions either side of Libya to disguise the plan.
Mubarak has been a NWO puppet for decades. What happened to him?
The same with Ben Ali?
Out of their countries, with loadsamoney (though perhaps not the quantities they hoped) and with rumours that they are in comas, and with control of their countries still in the hands of NWO puppets.
With apparently 'successful' revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt and a civil war in Libya, the Saudis are encouraged to rise up.
And Saudi Arabia is the key.
The Saudis do not need to be toppled. Only the perception of a civil war in Saudi Arabia is required to drive the price of oil upto $200 per barrel, just as Pastor Williams stated.
If the Saudis are replaced by The Muslim Brotherhood then we can expect a war on Israel, particularly if they come to power in Egypt, Libya etc.
But if these uprisings fizzle out but have driven the oil price up then...
Why would they overthrow Gaddafi if he was their friend, buying weapons, signing oil deals with Bilderberg Inc.?
Has Gaddafi reached a deal with them?
I am beginning to see a possible trick.
It would be easy to drive the oil price up by controlling crises rather than risk uncontrolled war, particularly if you control one of the main instigators, The Muslim Brotherhood.
Imagine you have leaders of oil rich nations as allies.
Imagine engineering, or piggybacking onto, a revolution against those leaders.
With those revolutions controlled the Mockingbird media can exaggerate the crises and drive the price of oil up. And if those revolutions expire but have driven the price of oil up and those allies are still in power, with perhaps even more power as happened with Gulf War 1 when a revolution against Saddam was encouraged by the allies but was then betrayed, then the PTB have gained.
Perhaps this desire of the US-UK-NATO axis of evil to invade etc is designed to merely quell the uprising against Gaddafi with the implication that it is imperialist.
Regarding Tunisia and Egypt, for this proposed trick to occur, for an uprising to occur in Libya alone would look a bit suspicious so there were fake revolutions either side of Libya to disguise the plan.
Mubarak has been a NWO puppet for decades. What happened to him?
The same with Ben Ali?
Out of their countries, with loadsamoney (though perhaps not the quantities they hoped) and with rumours that they are in comas, and with control of their countries still in the hands of NWO puppets.
With apparently 'successful' revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt and a civil war in Libya, the Saudis are encouraged to rise up.
And Saudi Arabia is the key.
The Saudis do not need to be toppled. Only the perception of a civil war in Saudi Arabia is required to drive the price of oil upto $200 per barrel, just as Pastor Williams stated.
If the Saudis are replaced by The Muslim Brotherhood then we can expect a war on Israel, particularly if they come to power in Egypt, Libya etc.
But if these uprisings fizzle out but have driven the oil price up then...
Tuesday, March 08, 2011
DAVID
Starry starry night,
paint this planet green and red,
gaze upon the billions dead,
with eyes that know the darkness in your soul.
Mass graves in the hills.
Bomb the trees and the daffodils.
Fund the Nazis and their T4 kills.
Create The Club of Rome to do the same.
Now I understand what you’ve tried to do to me.
How we’ve suffered from your insanity.
How you’d never see us free.
You would not listen, you did not know how,
perhaps you'll listen now.
Starry starry night,
flaming bombs that brightly blaze,
screaming kids in a terrified daze
reflect in David's eyes of deep blood red.
He feels nothing for the dead,
no mourning for the bombed and maimed.
For his genocide he should be ashamed
and share with Josef Fritzl a prison cell.
For we could not love you, but still your hate was true.
And when no hope was left in sight, on that starry starry night,
you took your life as the detested often do.
But I could have told you, David,
This world was never meant for one so Bilderberg as you.
Starry, starry night,
traitors hung in empty halls,
Bohemian Moloch ignites and falls
Care cremations stopped, reduced to nil.
Like the strangers that you've killed,
the ragged man in ragged clothes,
the bloody cross and the bloody rose,
lie crushed and broken on the virgin snow.
Now I understand what you’ve tried to do to me.
How we’ve suffered from your insanity.
How you’d never see us free.
You would not listen you're not listening still,
perhaps you never will.
paint this planet green and red,
gaze upon the billions dead,
with eyes that know the darkness in your soul.
Mass graves in the hills.
Bomb the trees and the daffodils.
Fund the Nazis and their T4 kills.
Create The Club of Rome to do the same.
Now I understand what you’ve tried to do to me.
How we’ve suffered from your insanity.
How you’d never see us free.
You would not listen, you did not know how,
perhaps you'll listen now.
Starry starry night,
flaming bombs that brightly blaze,
screaming kids in a terrified daze
reflect in David's eyes of deep blood red.
He feels nothing for the dead,
no mourning for the bombed and maimed.
For his genocide he should be ashamed
and share with Josef Fritzl a prison cell.
For we could not love you, but still your hate was true.
And when no hope was left in sight, on that starry starry night,
you took your life as the detested often do.
But I could have told you, David,
This world was never meant for one so Bilderberg as you.
Starry, starry night,
traitors hung in empty halls,
Bohemian Moloch ignites and falls
Care cremations stopped, reduced to nil.
Like the strangers that you've killed,
the ragged man in ragged clothes,
the bloody cross and the bloody rose,
lie crushed and broken on the virgin snow.
Now I understand what you’ve tried to do to me.
How we’ve suffered from your insanity.
How you’d never see us free.
You would not listen you're not listening still,
perhaps you never will.
THE SPECIAL AIR SERVICE TAKES A SHORT HOLIDAY IN LIBYA
The Super Army Soldiers SAS recently took a brief holiday in Libya. A strange time and place for a holiday, you might think.
Libya is in the midst of a civil war.
The US-UK-NATO axis of evil wants Gaddafi gone.
The US-UK-NATO axis of evil wants to invade Libya to bring about that coup.
So were the SAS and the 'junior diplomat', ie MI6 agent, there to discuss 5 star hotels?
Or were they there to blow up an arms dump containing some dodgy weapons that we may have sold to Libya recently?
http://craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/03/this-hague-cock-up-must-be-explained/
Or were they there to discuss organising landing strips for a not-so-secret invasion of Libya?
http://twitter.com/WebsterGTarpley/statuses/44892111593676800
Or are none of these true, and that the SAS and MI6 agent have not returned and are still in Libya, planning the assassination of Gaddafi, possibly with Islamic terrorists as was allegedly attempted in the mid-1990s?
Or is it a combination of the above?
Who knows?
But can you trust anything the government says when they bailout Nazi banks with trillions and impose severe austerity on us, leave the Nazi banks with the power to create non-existent money out of nothing to go gambling with knowing that we the muggins British taxpayer will bail them out again, and then kills our aged and very sick relatives via the Liverpool Care Pathway to save money, because dead old people don't need expensive treament and dead old people don't need pensions.
Have a nice day!
Libya is in the midst of a civil war.
The US-UK-NATO axis of evil wants Gaddafi gone.
The US-UK-NATO axis of evil wants to invade Libya to bring about that coup.
So were the SAS and the 'junior diplomat', ie MI6 agent, there to discuss 5 star hotels?
Or were they there to blow up an arms dump containing some dodgy weapons that we may have sold to Libya recently?
http://craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/03/this-hague-cock-up-must-be-explained/
Or were they there to discuss organising landing strips for a not-so-secret invasion of Libya?
http://twitter.com/WebsterGTarpley/statuses/44892111593676800
Or are none of these true, and that the SAS and MI6 agent have not returned and are still in Libya, planning the assassination of Gaddafi, possibly with Islamic terrorists as was allegedly attempted in the mid-1990s?
Or is it a combination of the above?
Who knows?
But can you trust anything the government says when they bailout Nazi banks with trillions and impose severe austerity on us, leave the Nazi banks with the power to create non-existent money out of nothing to go gambling with knowing that we the muggins British taxpayer will bail them out again, and then kills our aged and very sick relatives via the Liverpool Care Pathway to save money, because dead old people don't need expensive treament and dead old people don't need pensions.
Have a nice day!
Monday, March 07, 2011
I E U B U
The point of posting Wham Bam Thank You Mam is to be yourself.
i e u b u
Perhaps if you express your outrage, fury and anger at the Nazi banks for what they and their corrupt wretches in the Houses of Commons and Lords have done in the last decade, and what they are doing driving us, as if we were their private flock of sheep after they have fleeced us via a credit bubble and related derivatives scam, into the waiting arms of a slaughtering genocidal tyrannical world government, then it might, just might, not happen, to you or your whole family.
The people who have everything are the bankers. As Lord Josiah Stamp correctly stated;
Never ever ever give up on bashing the banks and the bankers.
For they have screwed every single one of us, from here to kingdom come.
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself!
You don't never need help from nobody else
All you got to do now:
Express Yourself!
What ever you do, uh, do it good, uh
What ever you do, do , do, Lord, Lord, do it good
All right...
It's not what you look like, when you're doin' what you're doin'
It's what you're doin' when you're doin' what you look like you're doin'!
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself!
They're doin' it on the moon, yeah, uh
In the jungle too, uh
Everybody on the floor, now, uh
Jumpin' like a kangaroo
So let the horns do the thing they do, yo...ah, uh, ow! Uh-uh uh uh
Some people have everything, and other people don't
But everything don't mean a thing if it ain't the thing you want
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself!
Oh, do it! Oh, do it
Do it to it, go on and do it
Yo, do it, give
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself
Uh! [scatting]
Uh, express yourself, uh express yourself
Uh express yourself
Uh express yourself
Express yourself
Express yourself
Express yourself
i e u b u
Perhaps if you express your outrage, fury and anger at the Nazi banks for what they and their corrupt wretches in the Houses of Commons and Lords have done in the last decade, and what they are doing driving us, as if we were their private flock of sheep after they have fleeced us via a credit bubble and related derivatives scam, into the waiting arms of a slaughtering genocidal tyrannical world government, then it might, just might, not happen, to you or your whole family.
Some people have everything, and other people don't
But everything don't mean a thing if it ain't the thing you want
The people who have everything are the bankers. As Lord Josiah Stamp correctly stated;
Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.
Never ever ever give up on bashing the banks and the bankers.
For they have screwed every single one of us, from here to kingdom come.
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself!
You don't never need help from nobody else
All you got to do now:
Express Yourself!
What ever you do, uh, do it good, uh
What ever you do, do , do, Lord, Lord, do it good
All right...
It's not what you look like, when you're doin' what you're doin'
It's what you're doin' when you're doin' what you look like you're doin'!
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself!
They're doin' it on the moon, yeah, uh
In the jungle too, uh
Everybody on the floor, now, uh
Jumpin' like a kangaroo
So let the horns do the thing they do, yo...ah, uh, ow! Uh-uh uh uh
Some people have everything, and other people don't
But everything don't mean a thing if it ain't the thing you want
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself!
Oh, do it! Oh, do it
Do it to it, go on and do it
Yo, do it, give
Express Yourself!
Express Yourself
Uh! [scatting]
Uh, express yourself, uh express yourself
Uh express yourself
Uh express yourself
Express yourself
Express yourself
Express yourself
WHAM BAM THANK YOU MAM
In times of madness...
Stay in line, now, old boy. There's a good chap.
She was a lady of charm
String of young boys on each arm
She was good to those who took off all their clothes and played guitar
Love comes love goes anyway your mind blows
Wham bam thank you mam
We'll boogie till the rooster crows
He lived alone love for none
He said pain never hurt anyone
Surprise surprise! consumption on the floor
Stretcher out the door and that was it
God forsaken empty shell
forgotten in a bad smell
Wham bam look out Sam
The devil claims his own to moan in hell
Shang-a-lang-a, Shang-a-du-lang, Shang-a-lang-a
Sa-i-di ma-moon, sa-i-di ma-moon, Sa-i-di gris gris
Just hold your breath and close your eyes turn the corner of surprise and there you are
Our lives are run by ego freaks a walking book of rules who seems
To keep you in your pidgeon holes and fuss when your soul steps out of line
Our lives are run by ego freaks a walking book of rules who seems
To keep you in your pidgeon holes and fuss when your soul steps out of line
Stay in line, now, old boy. There's a good chap.
She was a lady of charm
String of young boys on each arm
She was good to those who took off all their clothes and played guitar
Love comes love goes anyway your mind blows
Wham bam thank you mam
We'll boogie till the rooster crows
He lived alone love for none
He said pain never hurt anyone
Surprise surprise! consumption on the floor
Stretcher out the door and that was it
God forsaken empty shell
forgotten in a bad smell
Wham bam look out Sam
The devil claims his own to moan in hell
Shang-a-lang-a, Shang-a-du-lang, Shang-a-lang-a
Sa-i-di ma-moon, sa-i-di ma-moon, Sa-i-di gris gris
Just hold your breath and close your eyes turn the corner of surprise and there you are
Our lives are run by ego freaks a walking book of rules who seems
To keep you in your pidgeon holes and fuss when your soul steps out of line
Sunday, March 06, 2011
BILDERBERG WANTS MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN POWER
When you read an article in The Bilderberg Washington Post by a dude from The Bland Rand Corporation painting the Muslim Brotherhood as moderate and mellow and encouraging Washington to develop releations with "the Brothers", then I think we can guess where this Arab uprising is going.
In Five Myths About the Muslim Brotherhood[1], Lorenzo Vidino, a visiting fellow at the Rand Corporation, argues that "the Brothers" are not the violent extremists they have been portrayed as. The five myths addressed are
1. The Muslim Brotherhood is a global organization
2. The Brotherhood will dominate the new Egypt
3. The Brotherhood seeks to impose a draconian version of sharia law
4. The Muslim Brotherhood has close ties to al-Qaeda
5. Washington can't work with the Brotherhood
The Rand Corporation wants a major world war.
"The Brothers" could provide it.
"The Brothers" want it too. Mohamed Ghanem has called for war on Israel[2]. "The Brothers" would scrap the peace treaty with Israel[3]. This has not been reported in any Western media, has it? No. In the FT[4] and WP, "the Brothers" are portrayed as cute and cuddly Muslims, and any warmongering comments are simply not reported.
[1] Five myths about the Muslim Brotherhood, The WP, 6/3/2011
[2] Muslim Brotherhood Wants War With Israel, http://www.forexcrunch.com/muslim-brotherhood-wants-war-with-israel/
[3] Muslim Brotherhood wants end to Egypt-Israeli peace deal, RIA Novosti, 3/2/2011
[4] Egypt can bring in the Brotherhood, FT, 2/2/2011
In Five Myths About the Muslim Brotherhood[1], Lorenzo Vidino, a visiting fellow at the Rand Corporation, argues that "the Brothers" are not the violent extremists they have been portrayed as. The five myths addressed are
1. The Muslim Brotherhood is a global organization
2. The Brotherhood will dominate the new Egypt
3. The Brotherhood seeks to impose a draconian version of sharia law
4. The Muslim Brotherhood has close ties to al-Qaeda
5. Washington can't work with the Brotherhood
The Rand Corporation wants a major world war.
"The Brothers" could provide it.
"The Brothers" want it too. Mohamed Ghanem has called for war on Israel[2]. "The Brothers" would scrap the peace treaty with Israel[3]. This has not been reported in any Western media, has it? No. In the FT[4] and WP, "the Brothers" are portrayed as cute and cuddly Muslims, and any warmongering comments are simply not reported.
[1] Five myths about the Muslim Brotherhood, The WP, 6/3/2011
[2] Muslim Brotherhood Wants War With Israel, http://www.forexcrunch.com/muslim-brotherhood-wants-war-with-israel/
[3] Muslim Brotherhood wants end to Egypt-Israeli peace deal, RIA Novosti, 3/2/2011
[4] Egypt can bring in the Brotherhood, FT, 2/2/2011
Friday, March 04, 2011
ANOTHER MISINVASION
NATO misinvaded Afghanistan after 9/11.
The Coalition of the Killing misinvaded Iraq after 9/11.
Now we, Great Misinvading Britain, are misinvading Libya.
This truly does support the information that these revolutions are part of a plan. And when Soros openly states that Iran will suffer the bloodiest revolution, then we know for sure what is going down.
The question is, is Gaddafi in on it? We will discover that when, as George Galloway suggested, he swings from the nearest lamppost. But then again, if they can do it with Saddam they can do it with Gaddafi too.
========================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363187/Libya-unrest-UK-spies-SAS-troops-poised-help-Libyan-rebels.html
Fancy your chances against the SAS, Gaddafi? Elite troops and MI6 spies poised to help Libyan rebels
By Tim Shipman
Last updated at 12:39 PM on 5th March 2011
* 600 Black Watch soldiers on 24-hour standby to fly in
* 50 people killed and 300 wounded in clashes at Zawiyah
Britain is to send teams of spies and diplomats into Libya to help oust Colonel Gaddafi, it emerged last night.
MI6 operatives backed by the SAS are to land in the east around the key rebel stronghold of Benghazi 'within days'.
In addition, 600 soldiers of the Black Watch are on 24-hour standby to fly in and avert a humanitarian catastrophe as Libya erupted into a new wave of bloodshed.
...British diplomats and spies have been engaged in intensive efforts to speak to opposition forces, which are led by Mustafa Abdel Jalil, head of the rebel National Libyan Council.
Now ministers have approved a presence on the ground to gather information and boost the chances of the rebels.
The liaison teams will be primarily composed of envoys but will include some intelligence officers.
They will link up with Special Forces already in Libya to provide protection and give informal military advice to the Libyan opposition.
The Coalition of the Killing misinvaded Iraq after 9/11.
Now we, Great Misinvading Britain, are misinvading Libya.
This truly does support the information that these revolutions are part of a plan. And when Soros openly states that Iran will suffer the bloodiest revolution, then we know for sure what is going down.
The question is, is Gaddafi in on it? We will discover that when, as George Galloway suggested, he swings from the nearest lamppost. But then again, if they can do it with Saddam they can do it with Gaddafi too.
========================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363187/Libya-unrest-UK-spies-SAS-troops-poised-help-Libyan-rebels.html
Fancy your chances against the SAS, Gaddafi? Elite troops and MI6 spies poised to help Libyan rebels
By Tim Shipman
Last updated at 12:39 PM on 5th March 2011
* 600 Black Watch soldiers on 24-hour standby to fly in
* 50 people killed and 300 wounded in clashes at Zawiyah
Britain is to send teams of spies and diplomats into Libya to help oust Colonel Gaddafi, it emerged last night.
MI6 operatives backed by the SAS are to land in the east around the key rebel stronghold of Benghazi 'within days'.
In addition, 600 soldiers of the Black Watch are on 24-hour standby to fly in and avert a humanitarian catastrophe as Libya erupted into a new wave of bloodshed.
...British diplomats and spies have been engaged in intensive efforts to speak to opposition forces, which are led by Mustafa Abdel Jalil, head of the rebel National Libyan Council.
Now ministers have approved a presence on the ground to gather information and boost the chances of the rebels.
The liaison teams will be primarily composed of envoys but will include some intelligence officers.
They will link up with Special Forces already in Libya to provide protection and give informal military advice to the Libyan opposition.
BBC USES GEORGE GALLOWAY TO CALL FOR REMOVAL OF GADDAFI
Of all people who could have been used to call for the removal of Gaddafi, I did not expect the BBC, i.e. MI5, to use George Galloway.
Galloway has been very vocal and active against US, UK and Israeli policies in Gaza and the West Bank and in the Arab world in general, and so has been the subject of several media operations to discredit him. Two classic examples are the clip of him apparently praising Saddam Hussein (he was actually praising the Iraqi people as a whole and not Saddam as an individual) and his appearance on Celebrity Big Brother during which he wore a cat suit and pretended to be a cat licking milk from the lap of Rula Lenska (he gave his fee to a Palestinian charity).
So when I heard Galloway was in the BBC studios yesterday morning I thought he was going to denounce the proposed invasion of Libya. He did. But he also appeared to call for the swift execution of Gaddafi too.
Galloway first denounced the proposed invasion of Libya, and the imposition of a no fly zone, referring to the absence of a no fly zone during Operation Cast Lead, and attacked the proposed invasion as aristocratic imperialism.
But Galloway also went on to call Gaddafi a brute, mocked Gaddafi's son as "flashy loadsamoney Saif", and finished by expressing his wish that Gaddafi should be hanged from a lamppost.
And just to make sure the message that Galloway was calling for the swift execution of Gaddafi got through, the end of the interview of Galloway was replayed at the end of Your Call by Nicky Campbell.
Is this a sign of desperation?
Listen to the interview yourself, which starts at about 2 hours 5 minutes into the show.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00yzkls/5_live_Breakfast_04_03_2011/
Galloway has been very vocal and active against US, UK and Israeli policies in Gaza and the West Bank and in the Arab world in general, and so has been the subject of several media operations to discredit him. Two classic examples are the clip of him apparently praising Saddam Hussein (he was actually praising the Iraqi people as a whole and not Saddam as an individual) and his appearance on Celebrity Big Brother during which he wore a cat suit and pretended to be a cat licking milk from the lap of Rula Lenska (he gave his fee to a Palestinian charity).
So when I heard Galloway was in the BBC studios yesterday morning I thought he was going to denounce the proposed invasion of Libya. He did. But he also appeared to call for the swift execution of Gaddafi too.
Galloway first denounced the proposed invasion of Libya, and the imposition of a no fly zone, referring to the absence of a no fly zone during Operation Cast Lead, and attacked the proposed invasion as aristocratic imperialism.
But Galloway also went on to call Gaddafi a brute, mocked Gaddafi's son as "flashy loadsamoney Saif", and finished by expressing his wish that Gaddafi should be hanged from a lamppost.
And just to make sure the message that Galloway was calling for the swift execution of Gaddafi got through, the end of the interview of Galloway was replayed at the end of Your Call by Nicky Campbell.
Is this a sign of desperation?
Listen to the interview yourself, which starts at about 2 hours 5 minutes into the show.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00yzkls/5_live_Breakfast_04_03_2011/
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
A TACTICAL CHANGE AT THE NAZI BBC
Victoria Derbyshire on her radio show on BBC Radio 5 Live interviewed Riven Vincent who has a disabled daughter Celyn. Riven has expressed her regret that she may have to place Celyn into care because she cannot get the help she needs to care for Celyn. Riven was interviewed, then listeners were asked to call in. Sounds OK so far.
But today, the tactics of the BBC changed. A very English lady called Clare phoned in, and she was a pure eugenicist! In a very English aristocratic accent she said that if you cannot prove yourself economically then you should be put down. When asked what she does to economically justify her existence she replied that she writes to help expose her views! Clare was allowed to express her murderous views for several minutes. This provoked horror in the radio studio and in the audience, some of whom later called in or emailed to express their horror that Clare was allowed onto the show to express her eugenics death lust.
One caller was partially blind and she said that when the time was right she was going to Switzerland because she didn't want to be a burden, and she said many people will be doing the same thing.
And that is why I wrote the post about a UK T4 program last week, indicating a creep towards a Nazi style T4 program in Great Britain to get rid of the "useless eaters", or to persuade the weak, the sick and the disabled into killing themselves, to pay for the bailouts of the Nazi banks.
But again, where is the interview of a Nazi banker to explain to the muggins British taxpayer how the system works?!
Where is the investigation into the Nazi bankers and their coordinated policies to bring severe austerity to everywhere, except in their 50 bedroom mansions?!
Inside Job, the documentary that recently won an Oscar in that category, investigated the current financial crisis, and goes after the minnows of Wall Street and not the sharks. George Soros is portrayed as a sacred guru and prophet, so I suspect he is behind it, hence the Oscar. But that only scratched the surface and lingered on some info that was interesting but unnecessary, taking up time that should have been used to expose the whole mass genocide, global war, green and eugenics movements and their origins in Wall Street, and how Wall Street bankers could finance it all; through a system that allows them to create non-existent money out of nothing.
Mervyn King yesterday expressed his surprise that the muggins British taxpayer has not reacted with the anger that he expected. He said we may never fully recover from the crash, and that it is the lower and middle classes who will pay the burden, and not the banker class that caused the crash.
So BBC, investigate the Nazi eugenics heritage of the banker class, who can create non-existent money out of nothing, who have abused that power to deliberately cause a global financial crisis, so that their agenda for war, mass genocide and world government can be implemented.
But today, the tactics of the BBC changed. A very English lady called Clare phoned in, and she was a pure eugenicist! In a very English aristocratic accent she said that if you cannot prove yourself economically then you should be put down. When asked what she does to economically justify her existence she replied that she writes to help expose her views! Clare was allowed to express her murderous views for several minutes. This provoked horror in the radio studio and in the audience, some of whom later called in or emailed to express their horror that Clare was allowed onto the show to express her eugenics death lust.
One caller was partially blind and she said that when the time was right she was going to Switzerland because she didn't want to be a burden, and she said many people will be doing the same thing.
And that is why I wrote the post about a UK T4 program last week, indicating a creep towards a Nazi style T4 program in Great Britain to get rid of the "useless eaters", or to persuade the weak, the sick and the disabled into killing themselves, to pay for the bailouts of the Nazi banks.
But again, where is the interview of a Nazi banker to explain to the muggins British taxpayer how the system works?!
Where is the investigation into the Nazi bankers and their coordinated policies to bring severe austerity to everywhere, except in their 50 bedroom mansions?!
Inside Job, the documentary that recently won an Oscar in that category, investigated the current financial crisis, and goes after the minnows of Wall Street and not the sharks. George Soros is portrayed as a sacred guru and prophet, so I suspect he is behind it, hence the Oscar. But that only scratched the surface and lingered on some info that was interesting but unnecessary, taking up time that should have been used to expose the whole mass genocide, global war, green and eugenics movements and their origins in Wall Street, and how Wall Street bankers could finance it all; through a system that allows them to create non-existent money out of nothing.
Mervyn King yesterday expressed his surprise that the muggins British taxpayer has not reacted with the anger that he expected. He said we may never fully recover from the crash, and that it is the lower and middle classes who will pay the burden, and not the banker class that caused the crash.
So BBC, investigate the Nazi eugenics heritage of the banker class, who can create non-existent money out of nothing, who have abused that power to deliberately cause a global financial crisis, so that their agenda for war, mass genocide and world government can be implemented.
Tuesday, March 01, 2011
HAS MERVYN KING HEARD OF MIND CONTROL?
Speaking to the Treasury Select Committee today, Bilderberger Mervyn King said he was surprised that the anger towards banks has not been greater.
Has King heard of mind control?
Mind control comes in many forms.
There is hard mind control, in the form of electromagnetics, such as microwaves from TV and radio transmission and mobile phones, and chemicals, such as fluoride and mercury.
And there is soft mind control, in the form of propaganda and education (or to be more precise non-education).
Perhaps we are all not as aware of the minute details of the banking system as King, but those of us who are are ****ing furious!
We know the Nazi nature of the banks.
We know they don't want their biggest secrets known, that the money does not exist and they produce money out of thin air.
We know they want human population drastically reduced.
Perhaps King can enlighten us with what was discussed at the Bilderberg meeting he has attended. He has already expressed his disdain for the current banking system, telling an audience in New York last year that the system we have at the moment, the one that has led us to the current financial crisis, is the worst of all systems.
Perhaps King can go on a lecture tour of the UK telling the muggins British taxpayer the minute details of the banking system so that the muggins British taxpayer goes supernova.
-------------------------------
From http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8355475/Anger-at-the-banks-is-justified-Mervyn-King-says.html
Anger at the banks is justified, Mervyn King says
The Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, has expressed "surprise" that the public is not more angry with the bankers who caused the recession.
By Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor 6:14PM GMT 01 Mar 2011
In some of his strongest language yet, Mervyn King today claimed the fall in households' living standards was the fault of the financial services sector and he expressed sympathy that innocent families paying the price.
"The people whose jobs were destroyed were in no way responsible for the excesses of the financial sector and the crisis that followed," he told MPs on the Treasury Select Committee.
In most aspects, he said, the economy had been on a sound footing before the crisis. Previous downturns were often caused by inefficiencies or weak management and were useful opportunities to improve systems. "None of that applied in this crisis," he said. "We had quite a successfully operating economy."
The people who are now suffering "did not get bonuses of the scale people in the financial sector got". The financial crisis may have occurred two years ago but, as austerity measures kick in, "the cost is now being felt", he said.
It remains "a big political problem", he added: "I'm surprised the real anger hasn't been greater than it has."
Has King heard of mind control?
Mind control comes in many forms.
There is hard mind control, in the form of electromagnetics, such as microwaves from TV and radio transmission and mobile phones, and chemicals, such as fluoride and mercury.
And there is soft mind control, in the form of propaganda and education (or to be more precise non-education).
Perhaps we are all not as aware of the minute details of the banking system as King, but those of us who are are ****ing furious!
We know the Nazi nature of the banks.
We know they don't want their biggest secrets known, that the money does not exist and they produce money out of thin air.
We know they want human population drastically reduced.
Perhaps King can enlighten us with what was discussed at the Bilderberg meeting he has attended. He has already expressed his disdain for the current banking system, telling an audience in New York last year that the system we have at the moment, the one that has led us to the current financial crisis, is the worst of all systems.
Perhaps King can go on a lecture tour of the UK telling the muggins British taxpayer the minute details of the banking system so that the muggins British taxpayer goes supernova.
-------------------------------
From http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8355475/Anger-at-the-banks-is-justified-Mervyn-King-says.html
Anger at the banks is justified, Mervyn King says
The Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, has expressed "surprise" that the public is not more angry with the bankers who caused the recession.
By Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor 6:14PM GMT 01 Mar 2011
In some of his strongest language yet, Mervyn King today claimed the fall in households' living standards was the fault of the financial services sector and he expressed sympathy that innocent families paying the price.
"The people whose jobs were destroyed were in no way responsible for the excesses of the financial sector and the crisis that followed," he told MPs on the Treasury Select Committee.
In most aspects, he said, the economy had been on a sound footing before the crisis. Previous downturns were often caused by inefficiencies or weak management and were useful opportunities to improve systems. "None of that applied in this crisis," he said. "We had quite a successfully operating economy."
The people who are now suffering "did not get bonuses of the scale people in the financial sector got". The financial crisis may have occurred two years ago but, as austerity measures kick in, "the cost is now being felt", he said.
It remains "a big political problem", he added: "I'm surprised the real anger hasn't been greater than it has."
ARREST THIS MAN
This man is begging to be arrested. He knows he is an international criminal and conspirator. Put him and us out of our misery. Arrest him. Try him. Then lock him up with Josef Fritzl for a very, very, very long time.
YO! SOETORO! THERE'S A HUMANITARIAN CRISIS AND CIVIL WAR IN THE GAZA STRIP!
Tell your Navy to sail to the coast of Israel to implement a no fly zone over Gaza, and break the economic siege of Gaza to relieve the humanitarian crisis there. Coz if you're wondering where the Islamic terrorist movement gets its inspiration, it's there, duuh. Kill that, and you kill Islamic terrorism. Job done.
It's dead easy.
But you and your crazed masters don't want that, do you? Coz then there's no reason to invade anywhere and implement the global police state apparatus.
It's dead easy.
But you and your crazed masters don't want that, do you? Coz then there's no reason to invade anywhere and implement the global police state apparatus.
ARREST HENRY KISSINGER
Following the revelations from Pastor Lindsey Williams on The Alex Jones Show last week, and following the revelation from Kissinger himself that the events in Egypt a few weeks ago were "only the first scene of the first act of a drama that is to be played out.", and following the ongoing collapse and proposed military intervention in Libya, Henry Kissinger must be arrested immediately on suspicion of treason, of conspiracy of organising mass genocide, and for crimes against humanity, and for any other possible crime he may have committed in US and international law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)