Cameron The Inglorious is admitting that by attacking Libya he is risking bringing terrorism to the UK. Therefore, regime change is the only option on the table. This quickly and illegally changes the aim of UN SCR 1973.
So, in his twisted Nazi Eton/Oxford/Bullingdon mind, we should attack Libya and take out Gaddafi because if we attack Libya but Gaddafi stays in power then he might attack us with terror.
SAY WHAT?!
This is the same twisted logic that allows the Nazi gambling banks (who finance the Tory Party) to create non-existent money out of nothing and lend it to us at exorbitant rates of interest.
This is the same twisted logic that has not sent one banker to prison for what they have done to this nation and its people that they, the Tories, are so allegedly proud of.
This is the same twisted logic that permits our superbly trained doctors, trained to sustain life, to transfer sick old people onto the Liverpool Care Pathway, a road to death. I shall repeat again; dead sick old people don't need expensive treatment (even though they will have paid NI all their hard-working life for that exact reason) and dead sick old people don't need pensions (even though they will have paid NI all their hard-working life for that exact reason). So by killing sick old people the regime of Cameron the Inglorious can unnecessarily pay off the private gambling debts of the financiers of the Tory party in the City of London, home of the Rothschilds and therefore the home of violently racist Zionism.
But this is also the same twisted logic that allows Israel to slaughter the Palestinians!
Where were the UN and NATO during Operation Cast Lead?
Take Osama bin Laden. Remember him? That guy in white robes with a beard? Who allegedly did 9/11, a crime the FBI refuse to attribute to him because of lack of evidence? Whatever happened to him?
Anyway, that al-Qaeda thing he allegedly ran cited Israel's treatment of Palestine as their number one grievance. He allegedly attacked the USA on 9/11 and flew some planes into the most protected building on the planet, even after at least an hour's warning, because of it. As a result the UK and USA invaded Iraq (even though Iraq had f*** all to do with 9/11) and now control the fossil fuel-rich Middle East and Caspian Basin...
Except for Iran!
And we all know what the undead George Soros warned, about the time of the Egyptian Revolution, that Iran will suffer the bloodiest of revolutions. Iran almost fell in 2009 in the Green Revolution, another of Soros' colour revolutions.
If the application of 'humanitarian assistance' can be applied to Libyan rebels then why cannot it be applied to Gaza, and Hamas or even Hezbollah? Doing so would eliminate the major source of anger that drives Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism.
I'll tell you why.
Because the singular reason for the creation and existence of Israel is to provoke terror, mass terror, terror that is global. Global terror requires global solutions, doesn't it? That's the mantra, to be repeated ten times a night every night before you climb into your bed.
Without Israel there would be no al-Qaeda.
Without Israel there would have been no 9/11.
Without Israel there would be no global police state.
That's why.
I am not saying that Jews run the world, only that the state of Israel is being used by those who do run the world to provoke tragic reactions, reactions that can then be used for war and the implementation of the global police state.
AND THEY HAVE.
What is the difference between the Palestinians who were terrorisd by Irgun etc and forced into the largest refugee camps in the world and who formed organisations like the PLO and Hamas to fight their corner and the oppressive dictatorial regime in Tel Aviv, and the Libyan rebels?
Answer : the Libyan rebels can get rid of Gaddafi and open up Libyan oil and other resources and markets to their sponsors, like NATO, MI6.
So when Cameron the Inglorious says we must invade Libya and take out Gaddafi or else we will suffer terrorism, what is he in reality saying?
He is
(1) taking the limeade out of Russia
(2) changing the goals of UN SCR 1973 to regime change
(3) risking going to war and not taking Gaddafi out with the unnecessary deaths of ordinary British men, women and children, the same people who are suffering severe austerity, in terror attacks, real or false flag, as a reprisal. In fact, I would say there is a 90% probability that any terror attack in the UK in the near future will be another 7/7; MI5 will know about it, MI5 could have stopped it, but MI5 will allow it, to continue any war on Libya and the removal if not death of Gaddafi, until the plan of Henry Kissinger has been fully implemented (which may well end in Iran).
And if you're wondering who did Pan Am 103? It was not Gaddafi. Look to some greedy corrupt faction within CIA/MI6 dealing in drugs.
ARREST HENRY KISSINGER!
ARREST ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN!
ARREST CAMERON THE INGLORIOUS!
[This blog was brought to you in full compliance with all treaties regarding the fundamental human right to freedom of expression, a right my grandfathers fought in WW2 for, and a right that is being quickly and quietly removed.]
===============================
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8391109/Libya-British-could-face-terrrorist-reprisals.html
The Prime Minister told MPs that Britain’s own national security "interests" will be at risk if the Gaddafi regime survives in Tripoli.
British officials said that the Government’s leading role in international efforts to topple Gaddafi could increase the threat of reprisals from the Libyan leader and his followers.
No comments:
Post a Comment