ON THAT DODGY EGYPTIAN CEASEFIRE PLAN

Why has Israel been so quick to accept that ceasefire plan proposed by Egypt overnight?

The UK media is using this to pin the blame for all deaths on Hamas. Some even use the same headline, which is along the lines of "Israel accepts Egypt ceasefire plan". Hamas claims to have not been consulted. But was Israel? It sounds like it was.

Regarding Israel's quick acceptance:
1. this gives Israel the appearance of peacemaker;
2. if Hamas rejects the offer then Israel can blame all subsequent deaths on Hamas.

But does this also show that Israel has been affected by the international public outrage? Politicians have been either silent on or supportive of Israel's murdering action. But all you need to do to assess public outrage is go onto Twitter and type "Gaza" into the search and read the tweets. I would honestly estimate that about 95% of the tweets were demanding that Israel stop the war on Gaza.

And this is where it now gets tricky for Hamas, because although most tweets were against Israel, very few were in support of Hamas, but there was also a lack of tweets condemning Hamas. This suggests that the world public (that has access to Twitter and is politically active) are against Israel's actions on Gaza but neutral on Hamas, possibly sympathetic to the strength of feeling shown by Hamas but possibly not in favour of their indiscriminate rocketing of Israel (which this war has shown is generally ineffective against Iron Dome).

Hamas has to accept the offer.

But at the same time we must pounce on any Israeli action that breaks the ceasefire.

We know Israel cannot be trusted.

In 2008 there was a ceasefire. The plan was that Hamas would stop firing rockets into Israel, and Israel would lift its already illegal blockade of Gaza. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs website published statistics showing Hamas kept its side of the deal. However, Israel did not lift the blockade. So Hamas smuggled more through tunnels. One day, the day after the 2008 US Presidential election, Israel killed a few Hamas smugglers in a tunnel. Hamas started firing rockets again. And in response Israel executed Operation Cast Lead, killing approximately 1500, and used phosphorous.

That was 2008.

After the ceasefire in late 2012, what happened?

Tthe last time there was a ceasefire, the first three months saw zero rockets but 100+ Israeli attacks. #Gaza #Hamas pic.twitter.com/yOa6uH5dzk

— Ben White (@benabyad) July 15, 2014

Hamas is right. Israel cannot be trusted. But Israel has lost the PR war this time. That is why it has so quickly accepted the ceasefire.

I and most of the world don't want to see any more dead children from Gaza. Only a very sick few in Tel Aviv, Washington DC and London do.

Hamas must accept the ceasefire or face losing the PR war from now on. Surely Hamas can see that their rockets are ineffective against Iron Dome, and that Israel cannot invade Gaza because of the massive outrage their cowardly bombing has provoked so far, or continue that cowardly bombing.

But Israel must also be kept on a very tight leash.

If Obama wants his Nobel peace prize back, now is a great opportunity to bring some kind of peace to the Middle East.

AND BYE BYE JIHADI

William Jihadi Hague has gone.

William Hague to resign as foreign secretary in major cabinet reshuffle http://t.co/fRIbwkU1Nr

— Guardian news (@guardiannews) July 14, 2014

And not a second too soon.

I hope that I had some part in his downfall.

The man, along with a lot in the British Government, is a bloody disgrace.

His support for the neo-Nazis in Ukraine should have led to every living British soldier, past and present, storming Whitehall and lynching Hague from the nearest lamp post.

But he also tried to trick us into war on Syria last year, lying and lying and lying.

And as pointed out during the last week of genocide against Gaza, he is a blatant Zionist, expressing no concern for Palestinians until over 100 of them had been blown to bits.

A bloody disgrace.

Good riddance.

BYE BYE BUTLER-SLOSS

Good riddance.

There is no way that she, with that massive conflict of interest, should have been appointed.

But what else can you expect from The Conservative Party; fascist, Zionist simpletons who only care about money.

THIS IS GAZA

This is Gaza.

The most densely populated area on Earth.

It is not a country.

It is occupied territory.

But the occupiers are not respecting the legal duties of occupiers.

The occupiers whinge when there is retaliation, and indiscriminately kill women and children in a sickening and outrageous ratio of revenge.

The occupiers get $3 billion a year from the USA alone, and can ignore UN resolutions at will knowing that they have the US Congress either bribed or blackmailed.

The occupiers illegally withhold tax receipts, leading to little social infrastructure in the occupied territories.

The occupiers test and use illegal weapons on the occupied territories.

The occupiers have placed an illegal blockade on the occupied territories, driving the occupied to desperation and smuggling.

This is Gaza.

THE NAIVETE OF ED SNOWDEN

Let us assume that Ed Snowden is genuine.

After 9/11 he believed the lies of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld enough to sign up to go to Iraq and kill innocent Iraqis.

After working his way up to quite a powerful position in the IT side of intelligence, he had a Road to Damascus moment and decided that he must tell the world what he knew about NSA surveillance.

He ended up collaborating with Glenn Greenwald, who at the time was writing for The Guardian.

Now, I have written multiple times on this blog of my very strong suspicion of The Guardian, that it is the NATO media flag ship because of its appearance to be an intelligent, truthful, caring newspaper when there is plenty of evidence to suggest otherwise. Perhaps the best example of this is the position that The Guardian took following the horrific incident of 21st August last year, when along with the rest of the NATO media, it immediately and consistently accused Assad of killing hundreds of his own civilians with chemical weapons without considering the rebels as the culprits despite an abundance of evidence that the rebels were indeed the culprits, in addition to the ecstasy that The Guardian showed upon the agreement that Syria would relinquish its chemical weapons while Israel's much more powerful, horrific and destructive arsenal of WMDs of all kinds was never mentioned.

The megaphone of Bilderberg, The Washington Post, has also laid claim to breaking The Snowden Revelations.

Well over a year after The Snowden Revelations broke, Greenwald boasts that he is still sitting on NSA bombshells while he finds time to sign lucrative contracts for himself.

And we can still read new revelations on the front pages of the NATO media while the same NATO media does not report on The Clark Revelations, that the wars in North Africa and The Middle East are a conspiracy using 9/11 as the pretext.

So on hearing the news that the UK is to rush through new spying laws, what is Snowden's reaction? Interviewed by The Guardian, Snowden said:

..."It defies belief."

"I mean the NSA could have written this draft," he said. "They passed it under the same sort of emergency justification. They said we would be at risk. They said companies will no longer cooperate with us. We're losing valuable intelligence that puts the nation at risk."

[source : Edward Snowden condemns Britain's emergency surveillance bill, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/13/edward-snowden-condemns-britain-emergency-surveillance-bill-nsa, 13th July 2014]

So American spying laws have been changed, but what was illegal is now legal and in some cases the spies have more power.

Now it is the same for the UK.

A ZIOCOINCIDENCE

Fact: The only Muslim countries supplying weaponry for the defence of Gaza are Iran and Syria.

— George Galloway (@georgegalloway) July 13, 2014

That Iran and Syria were two of the three nations that Zionist Paul Wolfowitz named to General Wesley Clark in 1991 that had to be 'taken out', and that Iran and Syria were two of the four nations named in A Clean Break in 1996, and that Iran and Syria were named to General Wesley Clark in a plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years shortly after 9/11, and that Roland Dumas, who was asked by British officials in 2009 to arrange to smuggle Jihadis into Syria (I assume for the coming CIA Arab Spring), expressed his belief that the wars since 9/11 have all been for the benefit of Israel, is just a coincidence.

Nothing to worry about.

Get back to digesting your Ziopropaganda.

Oh, the footy's on, innit?

FROM ISRAEL TO GAZA : A NEW TYPE OF LOVE BOMB

In STOP THE WAR ON GAZA I asked this:

What horrors will unfold this war? What horrific weapons will be tested?

Well, it looks like a new weapon is being tested.

Fosse, a department head at a university hospital in Oslo, also says some Palestinian in the besieged enclave have been wounded by a new type of weapon that even doctors with previous experience in war zones do not recognize.

Israel also used depleted-uranium and white phosphorus shells in the besieged region during their previous assaults.

[source : 'Israel drops cancer-inducing bombs on Gazans', PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/07/13/371162/israel-drops-cancerinducing-bombs-on-gaza/, 13th July 2014]

This report is in complete contrast to the "We Heart Gaza" message being pushed by Israeli and NATO media, with the video of an Israeli Air Force officer calling off an air strike because he spotted a young boy. It's a pity that none of the other AIF did so.

STOP THE WAR

In WARS ARE HORRID HORRID THINGS I analysed the official Stop The War history of World War One, entitled The Real History of the First World War, written by Neil Faulkner.

Faulkner was interviewed by Tony Gosling on Friday, and basically repeated his thesis, that the war was going to happen anyway because of competing empires and militaries.

But is this true?

I would urge you all to watch LPAC's brilliant video entitled 1932


And to read La France Conquise which contains an edited version of an article by Webster Tarpley on King Edward VII.

Basically, Faulkner's thesis is not quite right.

Nations like Germany, Russia and the USA were cooperating, not competing as Faulkner states. They were implementing The American System of Economics of national banking and high tariffs to encourage national economic development. In addition land-based trade routes were being developed by these nations beyond the control of the powerful British Navy. Hence, The brutal slave-loving British Empire was being replaced as the most powerful economic force by cooperating nations like Germany and the USA. Faulkner recognises this but does not provide as precise a reason as this. And hence, Great Britain decided to kick over the chess board, engineer World War One to destroy nation states and create a world government under their control.

So as explained multiple times on this blog:
1. Prince Edward, later King Edward VII, engineered the Triple Entente to bring Great Britain out of 'splendid isolation' to surround Germany in war given the correct circumstances;
2. Edward did this while he was Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England;
3. Freemasonry condemned Ferdinand to death;
4. the assassins of Ferdinand were Freemasons, knew that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death but had not yet found willing assassins, and that foreign Freemasons gave the assassins the material and encouragement for the assassination;
5. After the assassination King George V told Kaiser Wilhelm that Great Britain would not fight in any war, thus encouraging mobilisation by Germany and Russia;
6. Edward's protege Sir Edward Grey misrepresented Britain's position to multiple parties, showed little concern for Belgium and did not make Britain's position on Belgium absolutely crystal clear. But as soon as Germany invaded Belgium, Great Britain cited The 1839 Treaty of London which it was not legally bound to enforce unilaterally as the casus belli to declare war on Germany;
7. After the war Kaiser Wilhelm wrote in his memoirs that Freemasonry engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe, which was filled by The League of Nations. The LON was first proposed by Grey. The LoN was the child of Lord Robert Cecil, who proposed Grey's protege Sir James Eric Drummond as the Secretary General. Drummond was private secretary of Balfour when The Balfour Declaration was made to Lord Rothschild.

Now, I recognised the significance of all this and proposed in January, repeat JANUARY!!!, this year that a protest be held outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June.

So come 28th June, who turned up?

JUST ME!!

M
E

O
N

M
Y

O
W
N
!
!

Nobody from Stop The War turned up, not even Neil Faulkner.

And this was the 100th anniversary, the centenary of the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand that kicked off World War One, the war that Faulkner wrote a book about which is the official Stop The War history of World War One.

So please forgive me if I have some concern about and suspicion of Stop The War. If they can't get their history of World War One right, and amend it when much more powerful evidence is provided, then what else are they getting wrong?

Well, here's one classic example.

Last year Stop The War allowed themselves to be bullied by the spoiled petulant vain Jeremy Scahill as he threatened to withdraw from the Stop The War conference unless they dumped Mother Agnes Mariam. Scahill had made Dirty Wars, a film about Obama's drone war, which I thought was OK, but that was about it. So why would I think that? BECAUSE THERE IS A MUCH BIGGER AND MORE IMPORTANT SUBJECT TO MAKE A FILM ABOUT: 9/11 and the subsequent plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years.

So why didn't Scahill make such a film?

BECAUSE HE IS A 9/11 GATEKEEPER!

He believes the official 9/11 fairytale, much like Ed Snowden, but unlike Snowden, Scahill did not believe the lies of Cheney and Rumsfeld enough to sign up to go to Iraq to kill innocent Iraqis.

The evidence that The Brutish Empire and Freemasonry engineered World War One is overwhelming. Equally, the evidence that 9/11 was an inside job is overwhelming.

But why would Scahill launch this very personal but very public dirty war of his own against Mother Agnes Mariam?

We don't know.

Mariam was accused by some of being pro-Assad but without evidence. However, a very good defence of Mariam is available on Global Research. Mariam could have exposed the incident at Ghouta as a false flag, an event that I predicted would happen here on this blog weeks before it happened. But for whatever reason, Stop The War allowed themselves to be bullied by Scahill and wasted a fantastic opportunity to expose Ghouta as a false flag.

So what does the NATO media think of Scahill, this alleged traitor to, and pain in the arse of, the establishment who dares to expose the drone war? THEY ABSOLUTELY ADORE HIM! Much like Owen Jones, who supported Scahill in this very bizarre episode. The Guardian and The Independent wrote fawning articles on Scahill in the week before the Stop The War conference. Yet neither of these have exposed the plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark. And Jones has written in The Independent and writes in The Guardian.

And yes, that's the same The Guardian that:
1. immediately and consistently blamed Assad for Ghouta and other atrocities in Syria, when there was ample evidence that the rebels could have done them and stood to benefit from them enormously;
2. jumped for joy when Syria agreed to relinquish its chemical weapons while not mentioning Israel's much more powerful, horrific and destructive arsenal of WMDs.

In WARS ARE HORRID HORRID THINGS I wrote:

But if the anti war movement continues to push this it-was-going-to-happen-anyway theory regarding WW1 then we could see a few more wars in the future, because the true culprits of organising WW1 are still at large and living it up in Great Queen Street, London.

...I guess what I am saying in this post is that I think there is something rotten in Stop The War.

The failure of World War 1 to form a world government including the USA led to Wall Street and The City of London engineering World War 2, which resulted in the USA not only joining but also hosting The United Nations, and a host of other world governing institutions.

How can an organisation like Stop The War be so wrong on the true origins of World War 1? And when they know the true origins refuse to recognise them?

And how and why would they allow themselves to be bullied by the 9/11 gatekeeper Jeremy Scahill?

ASK YOURSELF WHY

The following have either not been mentioned in the NATO media, or have been but only to be ridiculed:

David Icke
Alex Jones
Paul Joseph Watson
Steve Watson
Tony Gosling
Tony Cartalucci
Michel Chossudovsky

A long, long list of people who have some sort of clue about what is going on: not mentioned in the NATO media, and are only mentioned to be ridiculed, and when that occurs it is only for a day or two at the most.

The following have been on the front pages of the megaphone of Bilderberg The Washington Post, and the NATO media flag ship The Guardian for well over a year, singing like a happy little bird about how we are spied on:

Ed Snowden

The following have been assisting Ed Snowden for well over a year, yet still after all that time they are still, according to their own boasts, sitting on NSA bombshells while finding the time to sign lucrative contracts:

Glenn Greenwald

And have you noticed how there is now no paedophilia-in-Whitehall-scandal?

My, my. That all disappeared a bit quick, didn't it?

Ask yourself why.

Ask yourself, why are you not on the front pages of The Washington Post and The Guardian revealing all that you know?

THE SHAME OF WILLIAM JIHADI HAGUE

It took over 100 dead people from Gaza, many of whom were women and children, before William Jihadi Hague was shamed into issuing this tweet:

Extremely concerned about humanitarian situation and loss of life in Gaza. Speaking to President Abbas today

— William Hague (@WilliamJHague) July 12, 2014

THE BALFOUR DECLARATION

Note the reference to:

...it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,

This document was written at a time when nice Great Britain had no control over Palestine, but nice Great Britain had already promised the land and autonomy to the Palestinians if they joined Great Britain against Germany and its allies, such as the Ottomans who ruled Palestine at the time of WW1. Of course, after WW1 Great Britain stabbed the Palestinians in the back not just once, but twice, by allying with the Saud tribe, who with the assistance of nice Great Britain eventually created Saudi Arabia. Since then the Jews v Palestine conflict has been used to attract anyone anti-Zionist to terrorist causes, most if not all of which have been financed or supported in one way or another by Saudi Arabia. And 9/11 is the classic.

So, I ask: Is Israel honouring The Balfour Declaration?

Are the "civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine" being respected?

If not then why the silence from William Jihadi Hague, as Israel bombs over 100 Palestinians to death...AGAIN?

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour

BONA FIDE SOCIOPATH NETANYAHU BLAMES THE VICTIM

At a press conference today at a compound of the Israeli Defence Ministry, the bona fide sociopath said this:

"We have struck over 1,000 targets in Gaza that belong to Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist organizations," he said, adding that Israel is striking Gaza at a rate twice as fast as during Operation Pillar of Defense. "The military operation in Gaza will continue until quiet is restored to the citizens of Israel," he said.

Netanyahu said that Hamas is to blame for the casualties in the Gaza Strip. "The leaders and operatives of Hamas are hiding behind the citizens of Gaza, and they are responsible for any harm inflicted on them." Unlike Hamas, who fire indiscriminately upon Israeli citizens, Israel strikes military targets only, Netanyahu said, acknowledging that civilians were also being hurt in the process.

[source : Netanyahu: International pressure won't halt Israel's Gaza operation, Haartez, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.604546, 11th July 2014]

As usual, the criminal blames the victim.

If the IDF blow to smithereens a family watching a football match? Blame Hamas.

If the IDF blow to smithereens a house killing an innocent baby? Blame Hamas.

Time after time after time, already destitute, impoverished, thirsty, hungry civilians from an illegal occupation and blockade, suffering from a lack of basic infrastructure because Israel illegally withholds tax receipts, are blown to bits...and Israel blames them.

Not only the world, but also world Jewry, begrudgingly accepted Israel after World War 2. Before the war, most Jews did not want to emigrate to Palestine. Even Jews living in Nazi Germany and with extra enticements did not want to emigrate to Germany. Why? Because they knew the trouble such a mass influx of Jews into Palestine would cause. It took Hitler to change their minds. But even Hitler was created by Wall Street and the City of London. The Warburgs were always in the background assisting Hitler's rise, while the Rockefellers and even Freemasonry are complicit in the rise of Hitler. And not only before but also during WW2 the Nazis and the Zionists collaborated: the Nazis wanted Jews out of Germany, and the the Zionists wanted Jews in Palestine. And after WW2 the tales of Zionist barbarity will never be erased: the 800,000 Palestinians who survived the Zionist terror were herded into the world's largest refugee camps, Gaza and West Bank.

And somehow the reason for this latest war on Gaza has morphed from Hamas kidnapping and killing three Israeli teenagers to destroying terrorists, and we have yet to see any evidence of Hamas involvement in that horrible crime, as pathetic as it may be.

But as we can see from the statistics, out of the so far over 100 dead Palestinians, most have been innocent men, women and children.

But the sociopath has the perfect excuse: blame the victim.

OVER ONE HUNDRED DEAD AND STILL NO CONDEMNATION FROM HAGUE OR FCO

Many media are reporting that the number of Palestinians killed by Israel this week during the engineered conflict is over 100, most of whom are civilians.

That's over 100 sons,daughters, mothers, fathers.

No Israeli has been killed by any rocket fired from Gaza. One elderly woman running to a shelter died from heart attack, and a few wounded, but that's about it.

Over 100 dead Palestinians dug out from rubble, to 1 death of an elderly Israeli woman who died indirectly from a heart attack.

And still no condemnation of Israel from William Hague or The Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

I GOT A BAAAAAD FEELING ON THIS ONE

In Oliver Stone's film Platoon one of the characters Sgt O Neill, after being ordered to a position that is very vulnerable to attack, tells his commanding officer:

Bob, I got a bad feeling on this one, all right? I mean, I got a bad feeling.

O Neill was right : he gets killed.

I've got a baaaaad feeling about this latest war on Gaza. It is beginning to develop into something quite nasty, which when added to all the other conflicts in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, and the way that Nutternyahu has quickly escalated this war for no obvious reason, and the state of the financial markets suggests to me that this is not just another mini war on Gaza. Reports are that rockets were fired at Dimona and soon Ben Gurion Airport will be a target, perhaps today. If one rocket hits Dimona, or one brings down or hits a passenger jet with civilians on board, then...

Obama must resist the Zionists in the USA and not get drawn into defending Israel militarily, in addition to the $3 billion a year that Israel gets from the USA which is used to kill Palestinian children. He must remember that the Zionists through William Kristol's Emergency Committee for Israel have been attacking him through their videos and calling him "the weakness in the White House".

It is not weakness to not defend a bona fide sociopath like Netanyahu.

A TWEET COMPARISON

There has been either silence or pro-Zionist, anti-Hamas comments from Hague and the FCO.

Here is what the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has tweeted so far:

#Lukashevich: #Russia reiterates its conviction that the civilian suffering in #Gaza and the south of #Israel should stop

— MFA Russia (@mfa_russia) July 10, 2014

The Russian position at least recognises the suffering of the civilians of the people of Gaza and expresses a strong feeling that it must stop.

Most of the recent tweets on the Russian MFA twitter are related to Ukraine, which is not surprising as NATO-sponsored neo-Nazis brutally put down an anti-Nazi rebellion in an Israeli-esque operation in preparation for the NATO-isation of Ukraine, with the full support of William Jihadi Hague.

SECRET MEETINGS TO PUSH THROUGH SPYING LAW THAT MPS WILL NOT SCRUTINISE

But who cares?

There maybe some things in the law that at first sight might be OK. After all, the law is supposed to protect us from terrorists and terrapins (joke).

But what if the law is written so that it doesn't do what it says on the tin?

What if, because MPs will not have time to scrutinise the bill, the law allows much, much more than what we are led to believe?

What then, eh?

What protests will there be?

It all sounds very, very dodgy. A fix. A stitch-up.

THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT OF FASCISM

Thou shalt support a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine.

WAS THIS THE LEADER OF HAMAS?

The current war on Gaza is supposed to be about three Israeli teenagers being kidnapped and murdered allegedly by Hamas. Netanyhau immediately and has consistently accused Hamas of that crime, but has yet to provide any evidence, as pathetic as it may be. But a splinter group of ISIS calling itself The Supporters of the Islamic State in Jerusalem claimed responsibility, at the same time swearing loyalty to al Baghdadi. The Israeli media, NATO media, and even RT fail to mention this.

So does Cameron.

So does Hague.

Indeed so do most of the members of the Marsten House, particularly those blackmailed because of their unnatural, abhorrent sexual preference for children.

So, was this the leader of Hamas, killed in revenge for a crime for which no evidence has been offered, except the unproven claims from a bona fide sociopath?

The youngest martyr in Gaza, is sh the leader of a hamas? What has she done to deserve to die? .. بأي ذنب قتلت ؟ pic.twitter.com/zALXvS2pjn

— JIHAD (@Jihadawi) July 10, 2014

WHERE IS PEACE ENVOY TONY BLAIR?

I was going to entitle this, ""WHERE THE FUCK IS THAT LYING BASTARD TONY BLAIR?", but as you can see, I didn't.

But I will say this: SACK BLAIR!!

PALESTINIAN FISH IN AN ISRAELI BARREL

And we know what happens to fish in a barrel, don't we?

Yeah, that's right : THEY GET SHOT!

They get shot. They get blown to bits. Their homes reduced to rubble.

And all the while, Peace Envoy Tony Blair, consultant to The Bank of Satan, JP Morgan, sits with his feet up watching the horror unfold, quaffing yet another glass of the finest Chianti, laughing over the phone with his son, who is an employee of JP Morgan, as yet another dead Palestinian child is dug out from the rubble.

ROLL UP! ROLL UP! THE SNOWDEN CIRCUS IS IN TOWN!

Laws will be introduced in The Marsten House next Monday requiring phone companies to keep records of locations, dates and numbers of any phone call.

So what reason is being put forward?

To keep us 'safe'.

Meanwhile:
1. we created al Qaeda in the first place;
2. we had a Covenant of Security with Islamic terrorists leading to London nicknamed 'Londonistan';
3. we assisted the Jihadis in Libya in 2011, who then moved to Syria where they have been financed with hundreds of millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar;
4. we have been allowing preachers like Michael Adebalajo to encourage British Muslims to go to Syria to fight Jihad against Syria.

And yet it was the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ who blamed Ed Snwoden for 'aiding the enemy'.

And yes, that's the same Ed Snowden whose 'revelations' we knew about in 1999 which are still being published in fake shock horror on the front pages of the establishment media well over a year after they broke, when we can see the panic in the establishment whenever there is the slightest whiff of a scandal involving paedophilia in Whitehall.

Controversial emergency laws will be introduced into the Commons next Monday to reinforce the powers of security services to require phone companies to keep records of their customers' calls.

...There will be no power to look at the content of phone calls, only location, date and the phone numbers.

The government sources say they have been forced to act due to European court of justice ruling in April saying the current laws invaded individual privacy.

The government says if there had been no new powers there would have been no obligation on phone companies to keep phone records if there was a UK court challenge to the retention of data.

Backbench MPs will ask why the new powers are being rushed through the Commons when the European court of justice ruling was passed in April and the Home Office has refused to discuss the implications of the ruling.

[source : Emergency surveillance law to be brought in with cross-party support, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/10/emergency-surveillance-laws-rushed-through-cross-party-support, 10th July 2014]

THE FIRST COMMANDMENT OF FASCISM

Fascism is a religion. Its followers congregate and worship at The Marsten House.

The first commandment of fascism is:

Thou shalt not strike

When Hitler seized power one of the first things he did was smash the unions.

The second commandment of fascism is:

Thou shalt bail out the banks

The third commandment of fascism is:

Thou shalt use the military for corporate looting

Owen Jones wrote a very good article earlier this week, that we should all support the strikers this week. Today an estimated one million civil servants are on strike. They need and deserve our full support. We bailed out the banks yet are seeing very little if any change in their reckless behaviour, or new laws to stop their reckless behaviour. But to pay the private gambling debts of the banks public services are being slashed, threatening lives and livelihoods.

THREE BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR

Three billion dollars a year. That's how much Obama wrote in Haaretz 2 days ago that the USA is giving to Israel for its 'security'.

Yet Israel uses it to kill 7 children per day.

#USA basically has no money to help its own citizens...BUT4 Israel...... pic.twitter.com/CmrmNbAvSv" @georgegalloway #Chicago #NYC #LA #NBA #AFL

— » Imagineer » (@VinceMalumBono) July 9, 2014

ISRAEL HAS KILLED 14 CHILDREN IN TWO DAYS

COME ON HAGUE!

EXPLICITLY CONDEMN THIS!!

.@DCIPalestine confirms a total of 14 children killed in Israeli attacks on #Gaza in past two days. Follow for more details...

— Defence for Children (@DCIPalestine) July 9, 2014

HAGUE AND FCO CANNOT BRING THEMSELVES TO EXPLICITLY CONDEMN GENOCIDAL ISRAEL

Here is the one tweet that I can find on the twitters of Hague and the FCO on the ongoing war on Gaza:

.@WilliamJHague condemns rocket attacks on #Israel & deeply concerned by escalation of violence in #Israel & #Gaza: http://t.co/CPNnza3G0h

— Foreign Office (FCO) (@foreignoffice) July 8, 2014

Note that this tweet:
1. Explicitly condemns "rocket attacks on #Israel";
2. Expresses that Hague is "deeply concerned by escalation of violence in #Israel & #Gaza".

The link referred to in the tweet contains these quotes from Hague:

I am deeply concerned by the recent escalation of violence in Gaza and southern Israel. I condemn the firing of rockets into Israel by Gaza-based militants. The UK calls on Hamas and other militant groups to stop these attacks. The people of Israel have the right to live without constant fear for their security; the people of Gaza also have the right to live in peace.

All sides must do their utmost to act with restraint and avoid the loss of innocent life. I was deeply saddened to hear there have already been civilian injuries.

All sides have a responsibility to respect in full the November 2012 ceasefire, and to address the underlying causes of conflict and instability in Gaza. A dangerous escalation is in no one’s interest, and would be harmful to prospects for the Middle East Peace Process.

In neither the tweet or the quotes does Hague explicitly condemn Israel for bombing civilians in Gaza yet he is prepared to explicitly mention by name Hamas who so far have only fired rockets and not killed anyone. And remember, a splinter of ISIS claimed responsibility for killing those 3 Israeli teenagers. Neither Netanyahu, the NATO media nor even RT have mentioned this. Netanyahu has still not provided any evidence that Hamas was involved in any way in the murder and/or abduction of those 3 Israeli teenagers.

As of 2100 BST the body count in Gaza is over 40 with many civilians dead, including children.

Yet as of 2100 BST there has still not been any explicit condemnation of the Israeli death machine on its relentless bloodlust in an ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

So to summarise:
1. Israel has killed over 40 people, many of whom were civilians and children;
2. Hamas has fired rcokets but not killed anyone from them;
3. yet Hague explicitly condemns Hamas.

WHY WOULD RT REFER TO GAZA AS HAMAS-RULED GAZA?

On the ticker tape at the bottom of the screen this morning on RT I read that Israel had attacked "Hamas-ruled Gaza" overnight.

Why would RT refer to Gaza as "Hamas-ruled Gaza"?

YET MORE EVIDENCE THAT THE SNOWDEN REVELATIONS ARE A PSYOP

An article indirectly linked to by David Icke contains yet more evidence that the The Snowden 'Revelations' are a psyop.

For well over a year we have been told that The Snowden 'Revelations' are damaging national security, yet well over a year after they were first reported we can still find them reported on the front pages of the megaphone of Bilderberg The Washington Post, and/or the NATO media flagship The Guardian, while the man entrusted with reporting those 'revelations' boasts that after well over a year of first breaking the 'revelations' he is still sitting on NSA bombshells while finding the time to sign lucrative contracts!

So what does this article state that is so interesting?

It seems highly unlikely that a British paedophile would be a member of an American paedophile group but not its British equivalent. Thatcher would have been very keen to avoid another high profile scandal involving Establishment paedophiles and national security. It was only two years since senior diplomat Sir Peter Hayman had been outed as a paedophile and PIE member, and only a year since the Elm Guest House paedophile scandal had broken with the headline ‘Security Alert in New Vice Scandal’.

Sir Michael Havers had intervened on both occasions. He defended the decision not to prosecute Sir Peter Hayman, and he “was called in to examine complaints” against several British newspapers by Elm Guest House’s lawyers. The papers never reported on Elm Guest House again after the initial ten days, effectively burying the story and allowing the paedophile network’s activities to continue without being bothered by press coverage.

[source : http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/tag/mi6/, Accessed 9th July 2014]

Allegations of paedophilia in Whiltehall were enough of a threat to national security to lead to Attorney General Sir Michael Havers having a word with the newspapers and the allegations were never heard of again. From the story breaking to the newspapers being told to shut it took just 10 days.

Yet here we are, well over a year after The Snowden 'Revelations' first broke and we can still read more and more 'revelations' on the front pages of the establishment newspapers!

I have other very good arguments as to why The Snowden 'Revelations' are a psyop, but the main ones are:
1. The NATO and Russian media will not report The Clark Revelations;
2. Anyone with any sort of awareness of what is going on only appears in the NATO media to be ridiculed, while Snowden believes the official 9/11 fairytale;
3. The three stooges sobbed that Snowden was aiding the enemy when MI5 allowed Adebalajo to preach Jihad against Syria.

And for the record, Baroness Butler-Sloss cannot run that inquiry because of a massive conflict of interest.

MEET THE MOST BEAUTIFUL PUPPY IN THE WORLD

This is the latest addition to The Truth Serum household.

ONE THING I DON"T UNDERSTAND ABOUT TEACHERS

I have observed quite a few teachers teaching now, as well as listened to their conversations in quite a few staff rooms, and one thing that I do not understand about teachers is this: why are teachers so strict and dominant and authoritarian in the classroom and corridors, saying that they have the best interests of the students at heart, when they will do very little, if anything, to hold to account the politicians, corporations and organisations who have and exercise the power to send those same children to war to kill and possibly to die based on a pack of lies?

And I'll tell you, I have seen some diabolical teaching, even from teachers with >20 years experience.

I have frequently been told that I shouldn't be so 'nice' in the classroom.

Yet I have seen teachers drive really nice teenage girls to tears because they can't remember their 7 times table!!!

No wonder genuinely nice students in a nice school in a nice English town are forced by their 'nice' teachers to write and draw pro-war propaganda to encourage fighting in the Freemasonry-engineered World War 1.

DON'T BAKE A GAY CAKE AND YOU GO TO JAIL.

In yet another example of how homosexuality is being pushed, as Dr Richard Day stated would occur, a bakery which refused to bake a cake showing Bert and Ernie from Sesame Street have been threatened with legal action.

This is insane!

This is very similar to the hoteliers who refused to allow a gay couple to stay.

It's their business/livelihood. If they don't want to take the money from a particular customer then it is up to them. It is precisely analagous to the many economic sanctions placed on Iran or Russia or Cuba.

Don't bake a gay cake and you go to jail.

And two weekends ago, I was on my own outside Freemasons Hall to protest their engineering, including by the bisexual King Edward VII, of WW1 and the consequent WW2, when just down the road, Central London was shut down for a celebration of homosexuality and all things not heterosexual.

"Anything goes", Dr Richard Day stated. Anything goes except not being able to refuse custom from homosexuals while we slap sanctions on countries?

Has the whole world gone nuts? (don't answer that)

A Northern Ireland bakery run by devout Christians could face legal action after they refused to make a gay-themed cake depicting Sesame Street couple Bert and Ernie.

Ashers Baking Company published a statement on its website defending its decision to refuse to bake the cake as the slogan above the puppets was in support support gay marriage.

...In its statement, the company's general manager, Daniel McArthur, said: "The directors and myself looked at it and considered it and thought that this order was at odds with our beliefs.

"It certainly was at odds with what the Bible teaches, and on the following Monday we rang the customer to let him know that we couldn't take his order."

McArthur said the company had offered to fully refund the customer, who wanted to have the campaign slogan from the pressure group 'Queerspace' on the cake.

[source : Bert and Ernie gay marriage cake refused by Northern Ireland bakery, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jul/08/bert-and-ernie-gay-wedding-cake-northern-ireland-ashers-bakery, 8th July 2014]

STOP THE WAR ON GAZA

Last week I said that Netanyahu wanted yet another war on Gaza, and so he does.

A few weeks ago three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and last week their corpses were found near Hebron, which is in The West Bank. Netanyahu immediately and has consistently accused Hamas, but has not yet provided any evidence. Yet Hamas is primarily based in Gaza. And to add to this confusion, a splinter group of ISIS, calling itself The Supporters of the Islamic State in Jerusalem, admitted responsibility and swore allegiance to ISIS. Yet Netanyahu, Israeli media, NATO media, and even Russian media fail to mention this admission, not even to ridicule it. But this is no surprise to me. The same media publish the Snowden revelations in fake shock horror on their front pages while David Icke, Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Lyndon Larouche, Tony Gosling, indeed anyone with any sort of awareness of what is actually going on are generally ignored. The two exceptions have been Alex Jones, who was ridiculed for his interview by Andrew Neil, and David Icke's brief singular semi-ridiculing mention in The Sun. But apart from that: all Snowden, no conspiracy.

Many media are now reporting that Israel is preparing a ground invasion of Gaza. This whole sad, warmongering episode is eerily similar to what occured in Israel in late 2008. During 2008 a ceasefire was agreed between Hamas and Israel; Hamas would stop firing rockets into Israel if Israel lifted its already illegal blockade of Gaza. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs showed that Hamas kept its side of the deal, with rockets falling to zero. However, Israel did not keep its side of the deal. So smuggling of goods into Gaza through tunnels was resumed. And one day Israel killed a few smugglers in a tunnel. The rockets into Israel began. And Israel cited these 'unprovoked' rockets to unleash Operation Cast Lead in which approximately 1500 died and illegal phosphorous was used, and all while Peace Envoy Tony Blair sat with his feet up watching the horror unfold on his TV as he quaffed yet another glass of the finest Chianti. This is what Israel can do and is allowed to do.

What horrors will unfold this war? What horrific weapons will be tested?

Israel has launched what it described as an open-ended and escalating offensive against the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, as air strikes and naval gunfire hit 50 sites overnight.

As part of a new offensive dubbed "Operation Protective Edge", Israeli troops have been mobilised along the Gaza border and a limited number of reserves called up for a possible ground invasion.

..."We are entering into a long operation," a senior IDF source said. "We are only at the start. Patience is required. We are preparing further steps and a gradual expansion of our order of battle."

[source : Israel steps up Gaza offensive and prepares for possible ground invasion, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/08/israel-steps-up-gaza-offensive-possible-ground-invasion, 8th July 2014]

SURPRISE! UN CONFIRMS REBELS HAD SARIN

Early last year there were suggestions by and suspicions of UN inspectors that the rebels had chemical weapons. For example, the incident at Khan al Assal, which NATO media claimed was committed by The Syrian Arab Army. But the NATO media didn't explain why SAA soldiers were killed in the attack, or why everyone, including more SAA soldiers, in the village was later massacred shortly after Syria had agreed to allow UN inspectors to investigate. The Syrian rep to the UN Bashar Jaafari said it: the rebels used Sarin there, and later went into the village to kill all survivors of their first attack so they couldn't tell the UN inspectors about the rebels using Sarin during the first attack.

The most widely suspected use of Sarin by either side was at Ghouta last August, which nearly provoked a war on Syria. Yet this is one aspect of the whole incident that is suspiciously overlooked by the likes of Brown Moses and his coterie. Other aspects that he and his ilk also rarely if ever discuss is that the violence in Syria is a consequence of 9/11, which as revealed by General Wesley Clark was executed to kick off a series of wars in The Middle East and North Africa.

But now even the UN has concluded that the rebels had Sarin.

Two cylinders reportedly seized by Syrian government troops in an area controlled by armed opposition groups contained deadly sarin, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a letter to the U.N. Security Council published on Monday.

..."The Joint Mission confirmed that these contained sarin," said Ban's letter. The letter said the cylinders were "reportedly seized by the armed forces of the Syrian Arab Republic in August 2013 in an area reportedly under the control of armed opposition groups."

...An OPCW report in October mentioned Syrian authorities had found two cylinders, but it was not clear if the cylinders had been handed over to the joint mission at that time.

[source : Two 'abandoned' cylinders seized in Syria contained sarin - U.N., Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/07/us-syria-crisis-chemicalweapons-idUSKBN0FC1U420140707, 7th July 2014]

So these 2 cylinders were found by the SAA in rebel-controlled areas in August, an October OPCW report mentions 2 cylinders being found by the SAA, and now those 2 cylinders are confirmed as containing Sarin.

But at the time of the incident at Ghouta I posted links to reports that
1. the sponsor of the rebels Prince Bandar was about to unleash hell in Syria;
2. the rebels had been arrested with Sarin;
3. the rebels had filmed their experiments with chemical weapons;
4. the rebels had issued threats that they would use chemical weapons to get what they wanted.

All of the above was and still is ignored by the NATO media.

And yes, that's the same NATO media that publishes the Snowden Revelations on their front pages, in yet more fake shock horror, while not publishing the Clark Revelations on their front pages.

WHEN

I'll believe that there is not some kind of psyop behind The Snowden 'Revelations' when:
1. the megaphone of Bilderberg The Washington Post, the NATO media flag ship The Guardian, and Rothschild Russia Today print the bona fide revelations of General Wesley Clark on their front pages for a full week;
2. Glenn Greenwald gets his arse into gear, so to speak, and immediately publishes every single document linked in whatever way to Snowden without any further commercial or journalistic profiteering (and it would help if he returned or donated to charity all the money he has received directly due to The Snowden 'Revelations').

Which do you think is the most likely: the above, or when pigs fly?

ISIS : THE CASE AGAINST GREAT BRITAIN AND OWEN JONES

The threat of ISIS and al Qaeda is being used to terrify us into ceding our privacy and rights. Last year the three stooges, the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, sat in front of a coven of besotted, bewitched MPs and said that Ed Snowden had aided the enemy and that they, the three stooges, needed more power. Since then this splinter of al Qaeda in Syria called ISIS has stormed Iraq and taken control over large areas of Iraq, but it appears that after an initial collapse of the Iraqi Army that was engineered by ISIS sympathisers within its ranks, the Iraqi military is regrouping and retaking what is now under ISIS control. Russian jets should soon help to quickly chase ISIS back into Syria where they will be easily beaten by the Syrian Arab Army.

ISIS is being cited by our politicians in The Marsten House as the reason why we should cede more and more privacy and rights.

But how much responsibility does Great Britain itself bear for the emergence of ISIS?

As stated on this blog many times before, the Jihadis in Syria are there under an agreement reached between Israel, the USA and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon. I argue that this is because by 2007 the plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark after the inside job 9/11 was moribund. And in order for NATO to provide cover for the Jihadis as 'freedom fighters', the US State Dept and its quangos engineered The Arab Spring.

The Arab Spring erupted in Tunisia, then Egypt, and then Libya.

However, I have yet to discover why, but these Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya.

Libya had been named to Clark as a target for war and regime change, and by 2007 had not been attacked. A UN resolution, UN SCR 1973, gave authorisation for a No Fly Zone to stop Colonel Gaddafi from bombing 'protestors'. However, these 'protestors' were actually al Qaeda. And not only that: Gaddafi was giving their names to the CIA and MI6! And not only that, Gaddafi had also been cooperating in the sham Global War on Terror by allowing suspects of terrorism to be renditioned to Libya to be tortured.

British Special Forces were on the ground assisting the Jihadis throughout the middle of 2011, while NATO became The Jihadi Air Force.

So a resolution that was supposed to enforce a No Fly Zone to protect civilians had been twisted into one that gave authorisation to protect and assist al Qaeda and to eventually assassinate Colonel Gaddafi.

After Gaddafi had been murdered in late 2011, the Jihadis and weapons looted from Libya's arsenal were transported to Syria via Lebanon. However, 2 years before this the former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by Great Britain to smuggle Jihadis into Syria.

Last year Lee Rigby was butchered by Michael Adebalajo. But it turns out that Adebalajo was being harassed by MI5 to be a spy for them. He apparently refused, but the harassment apparently flicked a switch inside him and he went on to butcher Rigby. But it also turns out that Adebalajo was no ordinary Jihadi. He was a preacher and had been preaching Jihad against Syrian President Bashar al Assad on the streets of London for weeks,m pleading with Muslims to fight Jihad in Syria. And he was contemplating going there himself.

Now, whether Dumas was asked to create a pipeline for Jihadis from Great Britain, or Libya, or elsewhere into Syria, I am not sure. But Adebalajo was helping to fuel the Jihad in Syria.

Last summer the Syrian Arab Army recaptured al Qusair in Syria, which at the time was an important logistics hub for the Syrian rebels. Within a week of this the rebels began to suffer defeat after defeat at the hands of the Syrian Arab Army. Things became that desperate for the rebels that Prince Bandar bin Sultan was dispatched to Moscow to issue an ultimatum: dump Assad or hell will be unleashed in Syria. Putin refused. A month or so later the incident at Ghouta occured. Hundreds of children were murdered, but not at Ghouta by chemical weapons. They had been kidnapped by rebels from Lattakia by the rebels. The NATO media and our leading politicians demanded war on Syria, to save the rebels. But Ed Miliband denied them their war.

Since then the inevitable defeat of the rebels in Syria led to a branch of them forming ISIS and invading Iraq. But as reported by The Daily Telegraph, this invasion was known of by the Kurds in February, who passed it onto NATO intelligence.

And since the invasion of Iraq by ISIS, we have been bombarded with statements from ISIS Jihadis from Great Britain that they are coming back to Britain to raise the black flag over Downing Street and hold mass executions in Trafalgar Square.

So, far from ISIS being a surprise and independent organisation of Jihadis, Great Britain has been in the background guiding their evolution, from assisting them on the ground in Libya even though Gaddafi had been giving their names to MI6, to smuggling Jihadis into Syria, to allowing criminal Muslim preachers on the streets of London to preach Jihad against Syria, to encouraging Saudi Arabia to finance the Jihadis, to allowing them to invade Iraq, and influencing the Iraqi Army to stand down.

And Owen Jones also has a case to answer.

I have already highlighted the statement made by Jones in The Guardian that the war in Libya was a good war because it removed the tyrant Gaddafi, but for whatever reason the war on Iraq was a bad war. But a lot of the Libyan Jihadis went to Syria, and are I presume now in Iraq as part of ISIS.

And in addition to this, Jones supported Jeremy Scahill in Scahill's vain bullying of Stop The War to oust Mother Agnes Mariam from the guest speaker list at the STW conference last year. Mariam has good evidence that the children claimed to have been killed at Ghouta were in fact kidnapped from Lattakia. By supporting Scahill, Jones has protected the false flag of Ghouta, leading to continued support for the Jihadis in Syria, some of whom are now in Iraq trying to establish a Caliphate which is being used to terrify us.

BIG BROTHER AND THE SNOWDEN REVELATIONS ARE NOT INDEPENDENT

There was a series on Channel 4 that started in 2000 called Big Brother. It was one of the major series on British TV for several years, and made the careers of a few presenters, including Russell Brand. The series consisted of participants in a house with cameras and microphones around the house to record what the participants did and said. The first few series were quite serious, but Big Brother, either leading or following the general degeneracy of nice Great Britain, has become voyeuristic and is becoming pornographic.

I immediately identified BB as a tool to acclimatise us to total surveillance. For how can anyone complain about being under total surveillance by the state when they themselves watch others under total surveillance, particularly when in real life there is the ubiquitous and ever present threat of al Qaeda?

Fast forward to 2013.

President Obama is under immense pressure to bomb Syria. He should not be in The White House. The pro-war, pro-Israel, pro-fascism Mitt Romney should be there, bombing not only Syria but also Iran. Obama is stalling the post-9/11 plan for totaler krieg on seven nations in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark. Obama had been implicated in minor scandal after minor scandal to pressure him. Heads of state personally visited and spoke to Obama, demanding that he at least bomb Syria. The Washington Post wrote twice-weekly editorials demanding that Obama bomb Syria. There were claims that Assad had used chemical weapons.

But Obama refused.

And so in June 2013 a former employee of the NSA somehow got his revelations of the NSA spying on us onto the front pages of not only the NATO media flag ship The Guardian but also the megaphone of Bilderberg, The Washington Post.

For weeks it was Snowden, Snowden, Snowden.

Even after Snowden 'escaped' to Russia, Snowden and his revelations continued to appear on the front pages of the NATO media.

AND THEY STILL DO!!

This is a report in the megaphone of Bilderberg, The Washington Post...TODAY!

Ordinary internet users targeted by NSA spying “far outnumber” the foreigners who are legally monitored, a Washington Post report revealed. The data intercepted includes “startlingly intimate” material which is automatically retained by the NSA.

Analysis of Snowden’s data by the US publication has shown the extent to which the spy agency inadvertently gathers the account data of ordinary Americans and non-Americans. Spy-turned-whistleblower Edward Snowden provided the Post with a cache of leaked data from the US National Security Agency.

[source : NSA gathered 'startlingly intimate' data on ordinary citizens, Snowden data reveals, RT, http://rt.com/usa/170708-nsa-target-ordinary-people/, 6th July 2014]

NB This is RT reporting this. Neither The Washington Post or RT have reported on the revelations of General Wesley Clark.

It's as if they want you to know, to get you used to being under surveillance every millisecond of every minute of every hour of every day, etc.

And they do.

Big Brother and The Snowden 'Revelations' are not independent.

They want you to know you are being spied on, to get you used to it, to accept it, and the threat of ISIS and/or al Qaeda is raised as the raison détre of the spying agencies.

And the general public, so degenerate from celebrating blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses as part of the gay NATO agenda to push 'anything goes' sex and abortion, as stated by high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day, demand total surveillance for protection from the state-engineered threat of ISIS. This inflated threat from ISIS is due to an agreement reached in 2007 that Saudi Arabia would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, a 2009 British plan to smuggle those Jihadis into Syria as revealed to Roland Dumas, and our spying agencies allowing murdering preachers like Michael Adebalajo to preach Jihad against President Assad of Syria to feed the Jihadi pipeline into Syria!!

IT IS ALL SUCH A FARCE!!

We are much, much better than this.

Or are we?

My personal experience is that we are not.

When told what is happening, we the people don't care and/or ostracise those who tell them, and would rather talk about sex, strip clubs in Prague, football, etc.

Hence last Saturday, on the 100th anniversary of the Freemasonic assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand, it was just me, on my own, outside Freemason's Hall, versus Freemasonry, the Police and the system.

FAKE NATO MEDIA SHOCK HORROR ENCOURAGES DEGENERACY

In addition to the fake shock horror over videos and interviews of Jihadis which actually advertises Jihad, the NATO media is encouraging degeneracy. The NATO media is showing video and reports of an Irish teenage girl who was on holiday in Magaluf and was filmed performing 'sex acts' on over 20 men, and that her christian family have forgiven her. There is now a second video of a different young woman performing fellatio on two men on a dance floor.

All this fake shock horror is advertising degeneracy in addition to Jihad.

Meanwhile, a set of videos are easily available on Youtube which show the former Supreme Commander of NATO Forces in Europe, so no ordinary mug off the street, General Wesley Clark stating that he was told shortly after 9/11 that there would be a series of wars on seven nations in five years in The Middle East and North Africa, even though no evidence could be found implicating any of those seven nations in 9/11. Clark also accuses and names several members of a Zionist organisation of a foreign policy coup after 9/11. Wars of one kind or another have subsequently been waged on most of those seven nations, with the potential for war on the others always in the background and growing.

The NATO media is not showing or reporting on this.

Why not?

Because, as with Ed Snowden, you don't get on the front page unless they want you to know.

And for the NATO media, here is Clark. STICK THIS ON YOUR FRONT PAGE!!

DEGENERATION

Does anybody else get the feeling that we are degenerating rather than evolving?

I experienced last weekend the total let down and humiliation of standing alone in front of Freemason's Hall to protest their undeniable engineering of World War 1 and consequently World War 2. Yet just down the road, Central London was shut down for a celebration of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

This was in addition to the sickening and horrific discovery a month earlier that in a nice school in a nice town in nice Great Britain, the genuinely nice students were forced by their nice teachers to write and draw pro-war propaganda to encourage people to fight in the Freemasonic-engineered World War 1.

Scandals to dominate the NATO media this week have been:
1. the video and reports of an Irish teenage girl on a holiday in Magaluf performing 'sex acts' on over 20 men. The area is known to locals as Sodom and Gomorrah because of its degeneracy from mainly British youths. There is now another video of another young woman giving fellatio to 2 men on the dance floor.
2. Stowe School, which charges over £ 30,000 per year boarding fees, has been exposed by a former student as yet another nice boardng school in nice Great Britain but one where the teachers know the students are at it day and night and give them the pill. I wonder what they teach their students about the origins of world wars?

As I have mentioned several times before, my grandfathers invaded France in 1944. They were told that Nazism was the most evil thing to have ever visited this planet. They survived but came back different men. Many didn't survive. We remember those men and women every year on Remembrance Sunday. Yet our politicians in The Marsten House, who will stand with solemn faces at The Cenotaph, support neo-Nazis as they sign over Ukraine to the Bohemian Grove/IMF/ Wall Street cabal for buttons following a violent NATO-sponosred neo-Nazi coup!

In a speech given in 1969, a high level Rockefeller employee Dr Richard Day stated that sex, particularly homosexual sex, would be pushed, along with abortion. Anything goes, Day stated would be the case.

I think what happened to me last Saturday, abandoned on my own outside Freemason's Hall to protest the engineering of WW1 by the bisexual Edward VII, when just down the road thousands celebrated blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses, and the scandals in the papers this week, in addition to the support from our politicians of the Paedo Parliament in The Marsten House for neo Nazis in Ukraine, shows just how far we have degenerated.

WILLIAM HAGUE : JIHADI, ZIONIST AND NAZI

Ever since The Arab Spring kicked off in Syria, William Hague has been demanding that President Bashar al Assad stand down, must go before any talks can begin. And last year he was christened William Jihadi Hague in honour of his new buddies, the international cutthroat Jihadis of Syria, begging that we fall for their trick of murdering Syrian children in order to provoke an overt large scale military intervention by NATO on the side of the international cutthroat Jihadis.

But Hague's latest tweets also reveal his Zionist and Nazi sympathies.

Three Israeli teenagers were kidnapped and murdered, and their corpses were found early this week near Hebron. Netanyahu accused Hamas, and has still to provide any proof, as pathetic as it may be. And he, the NATO media and even (though not surprisingly to me) RT have ignored the claim of responsibility by a splinter group of ISIS.

Hague tweeted:

Killing of the 3 Israeli teenagers an act of terror. My deepest sympathies to the families and to all Israelis as they mourn this sad loss

— William Hague (@WilliamJHague) June 30, 2014

Hague has not tweeted on his personal account anything about the murder of Muhammad Abu Khdeir, but there is a more formal tweet regarding this on the FCO twitter account:

.@WilliamJHague condemns murder of Palestinian teenager; welcomes Israeli commitment to bring perpetrators to justice http://t.co/GqQg5G87ou

— Foreign Office (FCO) (@foreignoffice) July 2, 2014

So, does this indicate where Hague's personal sympathies lie?

But also on Hague's personal twitter is this regarding Ukraine:

Call today with Foreign Minister @PavloKlimkin - assured him of UK's full support in efforts to secure Ukraine's territorial integrity

— William Hague (@WilliamJHague) July 3, 2014

This is supported by a more formal tweet on the FCO twitter:

.@WilliamJHague has restated the UK’s support for #Ukraine in a call to Foreign Minister @pavloklimkin: http://t.co/b2WPXFgOQq

— Foreign Office (FCO) (@foreignoffice) July 3, 2014

What occured in Ukraine in February was a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup which has resulted in anti-putsch protesters being chased into a building and burned alive (much like Muhammad Abu Khdeir), and the Ukraine military and its supporting National Guard, consisting of neo-Nazis, putting down anti-Nazis with fighter jets, artillery and tanks. Ukraine was about to sign a deal with Russia but the neo-Nazis are now signing Ukraine over to the Bohemian Grove/IMF/Wall Street cabal for buttons.

And this is supported by many politicians in The Marsten House, an act which is an insult to all British men and women who fought and died in WW2 fighting the Nazis.

IN ADDITION ON RASPUTIN

Webster Tarpley spent the first 20 minutes or so of his latest appearance on Jeff Rense to discuss World War 1.

Listen at http://tarpley.net/a-rolling-epiphany-of-gop-horrors-brat-mcdaniel-hobby-lobby-wrecking-the-ex-im-bank/

Tarpley refers to an offer that King Edward VII made to the Hofjuden that they could not refuse: invest Edward's assets and he takes the profits but they cover any losses.

Sound familiar? It should, because that is how we have been shafted by the banks in the last 6 years.

But another little factoid that Tarpley mentioned that I would like to add to is on the assassination of Rasputin.

Rasputin was very influential in the Russian Court, but he was not the seducer he was made out to be. These rumours were manufactured by the Anglophile network around Prince Yusupov, who Tarpley states was the homosexual lover of King Edward VII. Yusupov was involved in the assassination of Rasputin, but he was not the only assassin. Yusupov was assisted by MI6 agents Oswald Rayner and John Scales in the assassination. Rasputin had the potential to infuence Nicholas into withdrawing from the war.

This may at first appear to be a reasonable action by MI6 agents, to murder somebody who could take Russia out of the war, leading to the German troops on their Eastern Front switching to their Western Front to fight and kill our fathers and grandfathers in the trenches of Northern France.

But as always, we need to see the bigger picture.

Freemasonry had tried several times to overthrow the Russian monarchy in the first quarter of the 19th century, but failed. As a consequence, despite the Tsar himself being a Freemason he banned Freemasonry in Russia. And as a consequence there was relative stability in Russia. It was not until Tsar Alexander II sent the Russian Navy to New York and San Francisco to assist Abraham Lincoln during the British-engineered US Civil War that there was trouble at'th mill in Russia.

As a consequence of fighting and defeating the British-sponsored Confederacy, Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by a network of British agents based in Canada.

And a nest of British anarchists began attempts on Alexander's life. They failed several times, but eventually succeeded. Alexander III came to the throne and he too was the subject of assassination attempts from the same network, including one by Lenin's brother, who was hanged.

In 1904 there was the Schiff-financed Russo-Japanese war, which Schiff's agent George Kennan was supposed to use in 1905 to raise a rebellion against the Romanovs, but he and Trotsky failed. Trotsky and Lenin were exiled.

But in 1917, after 3 years of slaughter, the Russian people were not ready for a revolution themselves, but were so lethargic and unopposed to somebody else. That somebody else was Lenin, who was used by Germany to spread dissent among the Russian people, and eventually sent into Russia by the Warburgs on a sealed train loaded with Rothschild gold. Meanwhile, Trotsky, who was living in New York, was given an American passport, set sail for Russia accompanied by reps of Wall Street, was detained at Halifax, Nova Scotia but was released under orders of the British Admiralty, to join Lenin. Jacob Schiff later boasted of his financing of the Russian revolution.

From this it is obvious that Rasputin was assassinated to stop him persuading Nicholas II from taking Russia out of the war so that a revolution could finally oust Nicholas of the troublesome Romanovs.

The Triple Entente consisted of Great Britain, France and Russia. In 1917 the USA joined the war, thus sealing Germany's doom. So in 1917 it was time to dump Russia by finally taking out the Russian monarchy that the British/Freemasonry/Jewish cabal had worked for throughout the 19th Century.

THE UNITED STATES OF MASONRY IS A LAND OF IMMIGRANTS

Before the European settlers landed on the east coast of what is now the United States of America, human beings did actually live there. It was not a land without people. Over the next few hundred years those native American Indians were killed and herded, including by the hero of many President Andrew Jackson on his Trail of Tears, into reservations of ever decreasing size.

So whose land is it?

Woody Guthrie-This Land Is Your Land

THE REESE PROJECT

Maybe have a rave outside Freemasons Hall on 4th August?

That was a joke. Nobody would turn up anyway, either don't care, or scared of Freemasonry, or there isn't the PR or street cred in it.

The Colour of Love


And I'm having this next one played at my funeral.

Direct Me

HEY! WHAT'S YOUR NAME?

Since last Friday there has been someone frequently visiting every blog I posted in June last year on my research into Barings and banking in the USA, I think trying to grab my attention.

Hey! What's your name? Who are you?

Baby June - Hey! What's Your Name

BURNING

MK - Burning (MK Extended Remix)

NSA SECRETS ARE NOW AVAILABLE AS AN E BOOK FROM THE WASHINGTON POST

Here is how The Bilderberg Washington Post describes the book entitled NSA Secrets: Government Spying in the Internet Age:

The NSA's extensive surveillance program has riveted America as the public questions the threats to their privacy. As reported by The Washington Post, NSA SECRETS delves into the shadowy world of information gathering, and exposes how data about you is being gathered every day.

From his earliest encrypted exchanges with reporters, Edward Snowden knew he was a man in danger. Sitting on a mountain of incriminating evidence about the NSA surveillance programs, Snowden was prepared to risk his freedom, and his very life, to let the world know about the perceived overreach of the NSA and the massive collection of personal information that was carried out in the name of national security by the U.S. government.

The Washington Post’s complete coverage of the NSA spying scandal, which it helped break, is now collected in one place to give as comprehensive a view of the story as is known. From the first contact with Snowden to the latest revelations in worldwide cellphone tracking, the award-winning reporters at the Post have vigorously reported on the scope of the NSA’s surveillance. Snowden called the internet “a TV that watches you,” and accused the government of "abusing [it] in secret to extend their powers beyond what is necessary and appropriate." Here, the secrets are revealed of those who tried in vain to remain in the shadows.

The Washington Post is the mouthpiece of Bilderberg, and is the newspaper which during the summer of 2013 published editorials twice a week demanding that President Obama bomb Syria. As far as I am aware The WP has not mentioned the claims of General Wesley Clark.

Yet it, along with The Guardian, publish Snowden's claims on their front page for weeks, even after Snowden 'escaped' to Russia.

Why all this?

BECAUSE THEY WANT YOU TO KNOW!!

SIR ERIC DRUMMOND

Sir Eric Drummond, the first President of The League of Nations, was private secretary of Asquith (1912 - 1915), Grey (1915 - 1916) and Balfour (1916 - 1918), as well as Grey's protege. Drummond was proposed by Lord Robert Cecil. Drummond was also British Ambassador to Italy when Mussolini was implementing fascism there. Mussolini had written pro-war propaganda for the British Foreign Office during WW1, and was given a huge loan from J P Morgan.

So at the outbreak of WW1, Drummond was private secretary of the Prime Minister, he was private secretary of Sir Edward Grey when Grey was the first to propose The League of Nations to Colonel House, and he was private secretary of Lord Balfour when Balfour signed The Balfour Declaration. And despite Grey first proposing The League of Nations in 1915, it was Cecil who first wrote a formal plan for The League of Nations, which later became known as The Cecil Plan. Cecil considered The League of Nations to be his child, so to entrust it to Drummond shows just how much Drummond was highly regarded by the Establishment.

So far from being just an ordinary dude, Drummond was an insider. So far I cannot find any memoirs of his, or a collection of his letters, but he'll have a few tales to tell.

George C Marshall and now Sir Eric Drummond. Men who directed the course of history but overlooked.

MORE BBC FAKE SHOCK HORROR ADVERTISES JIHAD

I listened to Nicky Campbell on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning between 0800 and 0830. During that time an interview by Campbell of a Jihadi was repeated. This interview is also reported in The Guardian.

After the repeat of the interview, another BBC reporter spoke to Campbell about the contents of the interview, and said something along the lines of, "Some may say that we should not broadcast such an interview but some times it is necessary so that we can understand their psychology."

A few weeks ago the NATO media was on fire reporting on a video of British and Australian Jihadis in which the Jihadis called for Muslims to join their Jihad in Iraq and Syria.

So I repeat the question that I posed at that time: why are the NATO media showing such videos and playing such interviews in which violent Jihadis call for Muslims to join their Jihad, while they do not report on or play the videos of General Wesley Clark, which are easily available on Youtube, in which Clark states that shortly after 9/11 he was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years?

One possible answer, and the one that I believe in, is that the NATO media needs to broadcast such videos and interviews of Jihadis to at least get their point of view expressed to the Muslim youth who can then decide if they agree or disagree and act accordingly and join the British-manufactured Jihadi pipeline into Syria, but the NATO media cannot glorify such videos and interviews so they express this fake shock horror and revulsion, and they cannot broadcast or refer to the claims of General Wesley Clark because all the wars would stop immediately.

STOP THE WAR HAS BEEN INFILTRATED

STW is an obvious target for MI5 infiltration, and it has been.

And I know who by.

I have already eliminated one website without too much trouble.

Let's see how long it takes before the infiltrator (and their support network) decide to gently abandon their futile task.

EINE KLEINE NACHTMUSIK

THE QUESTION ON EVERYBODY'S LIPS

Walking through town, sat on the train, walking through the city, there was only one question being asked:

how and why did Sir James Eric Drummond become the first President of the League of Nations?

I will now confess: I hated history at school. I truanted. A lot. I hold a PhD in mathematics, but I used to truant history and french, and other subjects too. I truanted history because...it was boring. Not just the way it was taught, what we were taught was much more boring.

But now I can see why history is portrayed as boring...BECAUSE WE ENGINEERED WORLD WARS ONE AND TWO!!!

So I was as surprised as anyone as I heard everyone asking, how and why did Sir James Eric Drummond become the first President of the League of Nations?

Last year it was Baring. This year I have been given the task of researching Drummond.

WE THE PEOPLE

We the people are apparently quite happy with this world.

We the people apparently love our slavery.

We the people apparently love war, particularly world wars.

We the people apparently cannot abide peace.

We the people apparently demand poverty and brutal fascist austerity.

We the people apparently adore being spied on to protect us from state-engineered terrorists.

We the people apparently still trust the politicians and media who lie us into war.

We the people apparently would rather celebrate blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses than research and protest the British Freemasonic engineering of World Wars One and Two to create a world government.

And we the people apparently want that world government.

So, our fathers and grandfathers did not die in vain then.

I KNOW WHY

"We live in a world that is more dangerous and unstable than it was 15 years ago." http://t.co/hoBeexxKB9 Do you agree with #NATO SecGen?

— FutureNATO (@FutureNATO) July 2, 2014

No, I do not agree with Anders. He is a traitor to the human race.

I would like to ask Anders, why is the world more dangerous and unstable than 15 years ago?

I know the answer.

It is because of the inside job 9/11, which was designed to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and The Middle East. However, by 2007 that plan was moribund and behind schedule so it was agreed that Saudi Arabia would unleash cutthroat jihadis onto some nations, but the Jihadis required cover as 'freedom fighters', which was provided by the US State Department's fake Arab Spring, so that NATO could provide assistance.

PROOF AND LOGIC

This year is the centenary of World War One. Centenaries are usually more significant and emotional than other anniversaries, so people are more open to information. Freemasonry engineered World War One. The proof is overwhelming. Yet hardly anyone is pointing this out. As far as I can see, only myself and Webster Tarpley are pointing this out.

But a logical consequence of the NATO and alternative media hiding this is that the culprits get off, and are free to engineer other world wars.

And if they can engineer world wars then then can engineer much smaller crises, perhaps to keep their larger crimes against humanity from being exposed and discussed.

This is why I am focusing and will continue to focus on Freemasonry and World War One.

And due to Sir Edward Grey's failure to persuade the USA to join his League of Nations, World War One also led to World War Two through Anglophile Wall Street creating both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia for a longer, bloodier and more destructive World War Two which the USA was required to fight in from the start. This was achieved through Wall Street agents engineering Pearl Harbor, and after fighting for nearly 4 years instead of the 1 year in WW1, the USA not only joined but hosts the resulting world government, The United Nations.

28th June may have passed. I tried to arrange something that could have woken more people up. But it wasn't to be. It was a glorious opportunity wasted. But it has gone.

So what next?

I don't know yet. But whatever it is it will be peaceful, educational and fun.

This is the proof and logic that I consider much more important than that in mathematics.

THE BBC REPORT ON THE FUNERAL OF THREE KIDNAPPED ISRAELIS

As stated earlier, I heard BBC Radio 5 Live state this morning that the ISJ had claimed responsibility for the kidnap and murder of three Israeli teenagers found dead yesterday near Hebron. Here is what the BBC now reports about this in an article on the funeral of the three teenagers:

The funerals of three teenagers who were abducted and murdered while hitch-hiking in the occupied West Bank have been held in Israel.

Addressing thousands of mourners, PM Benjamin Netanyahu described their killers as "heinous murderers".

Israel has blamed the Palestinian militant group Hamas for the deaths. Hamas has denied any involvement.

...Mr Netanyahu has said Hamas will be made to pay a price for the killings.

After holding a second meeting of his security cabinet in 24 hours, Mr Netanyahu outlined the following objectives:

find the teenagers' killers and kidnappers
weaken Hamas' infrastructure and manpower in the West Bank
operate against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, expanding the operation "if the need arises"

...Overnight, Israel launched more than 30 air strikes on facilities linked to militant groups in the Gaza Strip after 18 rockets had been fired into Israel since Sunday night, the Israeli military reported.

...Israel's Shin Bet security agency had named named two Hamas members from Hebron - Ayoub al-Kawasma and Abu Aisheh - as suspects. The Israeli military raided the homes of both men, setting off explosives.

Palestinian witnesses said Abu Aisheh's home was destroyed.

...More than 400 Palestinians were arrested, while five were killed in fighting with Israeli troops.

Mr Netanyahu has said the incident is a consequence of "the partnership" between Hamas, which rejects Israel's right to exist, and the Fatah movement of Mr Abbas.

The two signed a reconciliation deal in April after years of division and formed a unity government last month.

]source : Israel holds murdered teenagers' funerals, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28112696, 1st July 2014]

The text is accompanied by several emotionally provocative photographs of the funeral and related events.

BUT NO MENTION OF THE ISJ...despite BBC Radio 5 live reporting their admission of responsibility on the ISIS website.

BBC Midnight News had this funeral as their headline. The report was very similar to the above report...including no mention of the ISJ claim!

So does this mean the BBC is Zionist?

Then why did it fail to mention the Nazi swastikas painted on the fence surrounding the Russian embassy in Kiev?

But then again, the Nazis and the Zionists collaborated not just before WW2 in The Haavara Agreement, but also during WW2.

Can you believe that?

Well they did.

So get on with your drudgery and your obsession with sex, or football, or whatever inane interest keeps you occupied...

FUTURE DATES

4th August (Great Britain declared war contrary to King George V's statement))

9th November (Remembrance Sunday)

11th November

IN ADDITION

If you've still not quite worked out why I'm being zapped and you're not because of what you're saying or not saying, I thought of point 13 in addition to the twelve provided in THIS IS WHAT THIS BLOG SAYS:

13. Princess Diana was murdered, but what I suggest is that she was murdered because she was definitely engaged to and pregnant with the child of a Muslim and could have posed huge problems for warmongering in The Middle East post-9/11. September 11th 2001 was THE event of the last 2 to 3 decades. Bigger than the fall of the Berlin Wall. Three thousand died on that day, and the USA has been at war and/or fuelling sectarian war ever since. Plans for this war can be traced to before 1997. Wolfowitz told General Wesley Clark in 1991 that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those former Soviet client regimes: Iraq, Iran and Syria. And A Clean Break wri9tten in 1996 named Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon as targets for Israeli 'engagement', i.e. war. So the plan, as we have seen since 9/11, was for NATO to wage war on Islamic countries. Now, I suggest that because of Diana's massive peaceful global influence, she, married to a Muslim and with a child from that marriage, would have posed a huge obstacle to war in The Middle East. So she had to be eliminated. She was also reportedly about to go public on what the British Royal family were really like.

I WAS THERE WHILE THE REST OF THE WORLD WAS SQUARE

I was there on Saturday at 11am.

Nobody else was.

The evidence implicating Freemasonry and the British Empire in engineering World War One is overwhelming. And the reason, to create a world government under their control, is also convincing.

The event that kicked off all the slaughter in the trenches occured 100 years ago on Saturday. I recognised the significance of last Saturday. I proposed a protest outside Freemasons Hall. I turned up...with leaflets...and even a megaphone.

Nobody else did.

I still went despite ongoing EM harassment that left me cream crackered, unsocial and with no energy.

Nobody else did.

And last summer, while the rest of the world was on their holidays, in Paris, or the Lake District, or Spain, or Malta, or wherever you were doing whatever you were doing, I was trying to stop the slaughter of hundreds of Syrian children by international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria in an attempt to provoke a large scale military intervention on their behalf by NATO.

I think I can hold my head with some dignity.

The rest of the world can't.

Particularly those who were in Trafalgar Square on Saturday...

NETANYAHU WANTS A WAR ON GAZA

The bodies of 3 kidnapped Israeli teenagers were found recently near Hebron. Netanyahu accused Hamas.

But a splinter of ISIS has claimed responsibility.

A Palestinian jihadi group calling itself "Supporters of the Islamic State in Jerusalem" claimed responsibility for the abduction and killing of three Israeli students in Hebron, whose bodies were found on Monday evening in a shallow grave.

The statement was posted on an open access jihadist website supportive of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isis), the Sunni militant group which is waging war in Iraq and has declared a caliphate straddling Iraq and Syria.

[source : 'Islamic State in Jerusalem' Claims Killings of Israeli Hebron Teenagers, IB Times, http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/islamic-state-jerusalem-claims-killings-israeli-hebron-teenagers-1454833, 1st July 2014]

The report contains this tweet:

Jihadi group says Baghdadi is their "master" and warns Israel: "We carry for u in our pouch black days w which we will afflict u w torment"

— Rukmini Callimachi (@rcallimachi) July 1, 2014

This twitter account also says:

Wow: A jihadi grp calling itself “Supporters of the Islamic State in Jerusalem" claims killing 3 students in Hebron. Say they r w Baghdadi

— Rukmini Callimachi (@rcallimachi) July 1, 2014

Yet Netanyahu has always accused Hamas.

Hamas denies responsibility.

But now this unknown ISIL group claims responsibility.

Netanyahu will unleash hell in Gaza...but it won't make much difference to its current state.

And the BBC is his willing accomplice. I heard the BBC report this claim of responsibility of ISJ this morning. This afternoon all reference has been removed, and only reference to Netanyahu accusing Hamas is made.