WHILE SOETORO URGES ARAB DICTATORS RESTRAIN THEMSELVES HE KILLS 65 INNOCENT CIVILIANS

And it is not just Obama, it's Cameron, Merkel, the whole lot of corrupt NATO traitors to their nations and to the human race.

An investigation into an attack by NATO in the Kunar Province of Afghanistan last week has confirmed that 65 innocent civilians were killed, 50 of them women and children.

And NATO blame these murders on the victims!!

And we wonder why people like Khan and Tanweer and other angry young men want to go to Pakistan to train to join the Jihad?

And we scratch our heads asking why would MI5 not want Khan and Tanweer identified?

It's bleedin' obvious, innit.

=========================
From http://news.antiwar.com/2011/02/25/afghan-probe-confirms-nato-killed-65-in-kunar-offensive/


Afghan Probe Confirms: NATO Killed 65 in Kunar Offensive
NATO Blames Villagers for 'Pro-Taliban' Propaganda
by Jason Ditz, February 25, 2011
Email This | Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum

Following up quickly on the reports of the massive civilian death toll in last week’s Kunar Province offensive, the Afghan government confirmed today that its probe found 65 civilians were killed by NATO troops during the offensive, with 50 of them either women or children.

The report appears to have been largely in keeping with the provincial government’s reports, which said they were told 64 civilians had been killed in the remote portions of the border province.

NATO denied the killings at the time and insisted again today that their own investigation showed no civilians at all were killed or wounded. The claim follows an embarrassing week of soundbites, in which top US commanders first suggested that local parents were burning their children and blaming NATO, and later claimed that the local parents just burn their children all the time for the heck of it.

Now NATO’s official excuse has changed yet again, and they say that all of the villagers in that region are “pro-Taliban” and made up the reports of all the civilian deaths as “propaganda” against the occupation forces. This will likely not be welcomed any better than the other claims, and will also harm claims that NATO is making progress is convincing locals to support their decade-long occupation.

Copyright © Antiwar.com 2011