The current lawyer of the hotel maid who says she was sexually assaulted by DSK is Jeffrey Shapiro.
Who is he?
Why did the maid choose him?
Shapiro seems to be a medical negligence/work place injury lawyer, not a criminal rape lawyer. He has had some notable successes, mostly hospital negligence related.
He does not appear to have experience in prosecuting for sexual assault.
http://www.jeffshapirolaw.com/
If this was a set up of DSK would "they" place so much trust in such a lawyer?
------------------------------------
The current lawyer for DSK is Benjamin Brafman. Brafman has successfully defended high profile members of society. Perhaps most notable is his defence of Michael Jackson for child molestation. Many believe that Jackson was on the good side and/or had been seriously abused. The media attacked Jackson a lot. So what can we deduce from Brafman representing DSK, particularly if DSK had begun to steer the IMF towards a friendlier, more loving and caring version of globalisation, as some allege?
Why did DSK choose him?
======================================
From http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110517/ts_afp/imfuscrimefrancelawyerbrafman_20110517213854
New York celebrity lawyer 'perfect fit' for IMF chief
AFP
by Gregor Waschinski – Tue May 17, 5:38 pm ET
WASHINGTON (AFP) – It's the kind of difficult case New York lawyer Benjamin Brafman thrives on. A high-profile client, seemingly long odds at the outset and the world's press eagerly hanging on his every word.
After putting himself through college, Brafman, a former assistant district attorney, has grown into one of New York's toughest and sharpest defense lawyers, earning a reputation for winning surprise acquittals often for celebrity clients.
Now he's back in the limelight as one of the lawyers for IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who is facing seven counts for the alleged sexual assault of a chambermaid in a Manhattan hotel. The IMF chief denies all the charges.
"We believe this is a very, very defensible case," Brafman told the first court hearing Monday, refusing to be knocked back when the judge refused to bail Strauss-Kahn, one of the world's most powerful men.
Brafman, 62, was brought into the case early on Saturday, just hours after the news broke that the head of the International Monetary Fund had been escorted off an Air France plane minutes before take-off from JFK airport.
Strauss-Kahn was arrested, questioned for hours in a special victims unit, charged and then on Monday hauled into court, in a sudden fall from grace as he shared a bench with down-and-outs and petty criminals.
But Brafman has seen it all before. In the late 1990s, he defended the rapper Puff Daddy, Sean Combes, who was charged with gun possession and bribery charges after a shooting in a Manhattan nightclub.
Police found a weapon in the rapper's car, and brought charges. But with Brafman steering his case, the rapper, now known as Diddy, was acquitted.
Brafman also represented the rapper Jay-Z when he was accused of assaulting a record producer at another New York club. Jay-Z pleaded guilty in a deal and was given three years probation.
And later he was one of the lawyers who worked on the defense for pop singer Michael Jackson, who was eventually acquitted on charges of child molestation.
"I'm a take-charge advocate and a well-disciplined trial lawyer," Brafman told the New York Times in an interview a few years ago.
"You need to be able to pull rank and say no to a client. 'Not on my watch, it's not good for you or for the case and we're doing it my way!'"
An orthodox Jew, born to immigrant parents who survived the Holocaust, he grew up in humble circumstances in a Jewish district of New York.
He put himself through night school to get into college, and at one point worked as a stand-up comic to pay his way.
Unlike many of the big names on the legal circuit, he studied law not at one of the big name Ivy League establishments, but at Ohio Northern University.
After taking his first job at a major New York law firm, he moved over to the other side joining the prosecutors office in Manhattan. Turning the page back, Brafman decided to return to private practice and initially made a name for himself defending those from within the mafia mob circles.
Today, according to New York Magazine "he's developed a reputation as the man to have on speed-dial when you're in really big trouble."
And the courtroom is his stage. He is known to put defense witnesses at ease with his disarming, down-to-earth humor, while skewering the prosecution with his sharp cross-examinations.
Brafman is "the single best courtroom attorney I've ever seen," says CNN legal expert Jeffrey Toobin.
And Los Angeles lawyer Mark Geragos told CNN that Brafman was the "perfect lawyer" for the Strauss-Kahn case.
"First of all, because of the high profile nature of the case, he's clearly able to navigate the shoals of the media," Geragos said. He added Brafman had experience defending such cases and would be "perfectly attuned to understanding" the political nature of the case.
Brafman has already given a glimpse of the defense he intends to put forward on Strauss-Kahn's behalf, including shooting down police claims that the IMF boss had fled from the hotel shortly after the alleged sexual assault.
A witness will testify that the veteran French politician was heading to a lunch appointment and not fleeing a crime scene, Brafman told the court Monday.
The New York judge on Monday denied Brafman's plea to grant his client bail, turning down his offer to put up $1 million in cash and surrender the IMF chief's passport.
But undeterred, the feisty lawyer, put everyone on notice that these are just the opening shots in what could prove to be a very long legal fight.
"This battle has just begun," Brafman warned.
Copyright © 2011 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AFP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Agence France Presse.
Copyright © 2011 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
2 comments:
You really don't have a clue, do you? Shapiro is the maid's lawyer. He is not the prosecuting attorney. The State of New York will prosecute, not a private lawyer. Shapiro will undoubtedly represent her in a civil suit for damages, and I hope he cleans DSK's clock.
A+ for banality!
You say the State of New York will prosecute, not a private lawyer, but then go on to say that Shapiro will undoubtedly represent the maid in a civil law suit.
Yes, I do understand the difference, and when I said "prosecute" I was meaning privately. In the UK we have the possibility of a private prosecution, which is the same as a civil law suit. That is what I meant. Shapiro's track record indicates that is what he does ( and does reasonably well too).
So again, A+.
What do you know about The Federal Reserve and how it has been used to create the current world governemnt apparatus and gobal terror network (including the IPCC) through world wars, and how it has been used to rob the USA public of trillions of dollars before engineering another world war while most americans care only about basketball or Justin Bieber?
Post a Comment