Friday, July 12, 2013

ONCE AGAIN TARPLEY'S POLITICAL ANALYSIS IS THE MOST LIKELY

Last week Dr Webster Tarpley called the Egyptian military's arrest of Morsi a coup to stop Morsi dragging the Egyptian military into a direct conflict with the Syrian Arab Army.

Since then, despite early photographs of the protestors showing them with anti-US placards and banners, many have been suggesting that the coup was controlled by the USA and/or Israel.

Yesterday Tarpley tweeted this about the US Ambassador to Egypt:


Now LPAC have supported Tarpley's thesis indirectly by reporting that Morsi himself was planning a coup of his own against the military.

Armed Forces head al-Sisi had agreed to stand by Morsi in the lead-up to the multi-million-strong June 30 demonstration, provided Morsi de-escalated with all political forces, regardless of their views on his agenda and policies. To Sisi's surprise, Morsi instead threatened his opponents and even the media in his June 26 Nasr City speech. Sisi only learned later that Morsi had drawn up a list of opposition and media figures to arrest (those who had uncovered the tension between the presidency and the army), and actually intended to have them arrested during that very June 26 speech. But Republican Guard head Zaki had declined to execute the order and given the list to Sisi instead.

[source : Morsi, Himself, Was Trying To Mount a Coup, LPAC, http://larouchepac.com/node/27308, 11th July 2013]

So it appears that Morsi was planning a coup against the military. But why would he do that? Was the Egyptian military leadership for or against direct intervention in Syria? Morsi was obviously pushing for direct intervention in Syria.

And did the US Ambassador to Egypt ask or order Morsi to intervene directly in Syria to save the death squads, who are now inflicting collective punishment against the citizens of Aleppo, as described by Partisan Girl, aka Mimi Al Laham to Press TV.


I am concerned that El Baradei has wormed his way into a powerful position, but the evidence is now in and to me Tarpley's thesis is looking the more likely.

No comments: