Saturday, October 26, 2013

RIHANNA JOKES ABOUT BEING PRINCESS OF THE ILLUMINATI

You could not fail to have seen or heard about Rihanna's latest photo shoot. She is 99% naked (guess where the covered 1% is), and is playing with snakes.

Snakes are reptiles.

She has tweeted about being Illuminati.

Here is her tweet on her official twitter account:


Rihanna is the Princess of the Illuminati. Their other minions are Lady Gaga and Miley Cyrus. There have been others in the past (Madonna being the most obvious, with that name).

For analysis on Rihanna's Illuminati status see http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/04/proof-rihanna-is-the-princess-of-the-illuminati-2450556.html. The page contains snapshots from Rihanna's videos in which it is clearly stated that she is indeed The Princess of The Illuminati.

In this latest shoot she looks like The Anti-Christ or the Whore of Babylon in The Omen.

Mothers and fathers really do have to wake up very quickly to how not just the music business, but the media in general, is controlled. They only let you see and hear what they want you to see and hear. Which is why I am so suspicious about the Greenwald/Snowden/Guardian circus, particularly with the track record of The Guardian showing its true colours at crucial times (supporting mass genocide at Copenhagen, supporting Rothschild-loving Mikhail Khordokovsky, and supporting the engineered attack on Syria in August this year).

Maybe Snowden and Greenwald are genuine enough, and that whoever really runs The Guardian saw in them an opportunity to damage and control Obama at a time when he was extremely reluctant to save the cutthroat Jihadis through an overt large scale attack on Syria. Within days of Snowden's allegations (which implicated Obama directly) being made public by The Guardian, Obama made a U-turn and declared that a few months earlier Assad had crossed Obama's 'red line' and had used chemical weapons, even though Obama's own intelligence agencies said there was no chain of custody when analysing the samples and that the results could not therefore be trusted.

No comments: