THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON THE VAPOUR TRAIL OF A BUK MISSILE

Below are just some of the videos filmed by several people close to the crash site of MH17, some very, very close indeed. In these videos we:
1. do not see any vapour trail of a BUK missile;
2. do not hear anyone pointing out that they see a vapour trail of a BUK missile.







The vapour trail of a BUK missile can be seen for a number minutes after launch, depending on atmospheric conditions.

At the moment there are just two photographs, taken by the same person, showing a plume of smoke which some say is the vapour trail of a BUK missile. That photographer just happened to have close contacts with the Ukraine Security Service.

So let's recap the evidence for a missile strike on MH17.

The evidence for is two photographs of a plume of smoke which some say is the vapour trail of a BUK missile, but
(a) the photographer had close links to the Ukraine Security Service;
(b) the photographer was 8Km from the alleged launch site;
(c) nobody else took a photograph of this plume smoke even though there are several towns and villages within just a few miles of the alleged launch site, and there were even members of the Ukraine military just a mile or two from the alleged launch site who were fighting in the Battle of Saur-Mogila, none of whom photographed the plume;
(d) a Reuters report on residents in a village seeing the smoke was discredited when one of the interviewees said that Reuters made it all up.

The evidence against consists of:
1. at least 7 eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw fighter jets close to MH17;
2. several videos (see above) filmed almost immediately after MH17 fell out of the sky which show no vapour trail or people pointing out or shouting that they see a vapour trail.

In addition there are the contradictory 'proofs' from Der Spiegel and Correctiv who state that, based on anonymous eyewitnesses (as opposed to those who state on camera for RT and BBC that they saw fighter jets), a BUK was launched from a field 3Km north of Shnizhne (and if so why did nobody photograph the vapour trail?), and the Ukraine Security Service who within hours of MH17 crashing released a tape of alleged phone intercepts which they said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks based at Chernukino shot down MH17 with a BUK. However, the US State department cannot believe those tapes because according to data collected from their 'sensors' a missile was launched from the Shnizhne area, but instead of releasing the raw data they instead released a simple image of an arc and a straight line intercepting over East Ukraine, an image that a schoolboy could create in a few minutes.

And yes, that is the same US State Department that ran the Arab Spring, and told us that Iraq had WMDs and was involved in 9/11, and that Osama bin Laden had done 9/11 and was hiding out in Afghanistan dragging his kidney dialysis machine behind him as he was allowed to escape from Tora Bora, etc. Their list of lies goes on and on and on...

And we now know that in the Belling Cat team pushing the BUK missile theory:
1. Aric Toler is paid by George Soros;
2. Eliot Higgins is up to something with The Atlantic Council which is run by the Neocon-CIA warmongers.

So the thought for t'day is: why did only one person 8Km away photograph a plume of smoke, but nobody filmed that plume on videos that were obviously filmed just after MH17 came down, and why on those videos is nobody pointing out a plume of smoke, while there are at least 7 eyewitnesses who state on camera that they saw fighter jets?